proposed changes to the title i, part d, federal data collection as of june 28, 2012
DESCRIPTION
Proposed Changes to the Title I, Part D, Federal Data Collection As of June 28, 2012. Questions & Contact Information for Assistance. Question & Answer There will be an opportunity to ask questions at the end of each section of the presentation. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Proposed Changes to the Title I, Part D, Federal Data Collection
As of June 28, 2012
2Questions & Contact Information for Assistance
Question & Answer There will be an opportunity to ask questions at the end of each
section of the presentation. All phones will be muted throughout the Webinar.
• To unmute your phone, press *7 on your phone.
• To re-mute your phone, press *6 on your phone.
Assistance For assistance during the Webinar, please contact NDTAC at
3
Agenda
Introductory Remarks John McLaughlin, Federal Program Manager, Title I, Part D,
Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk Program
Part 1: Review Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR) for SY 2011–12 Liann Seiter, Research Associate, NDTAC
Q&A for SY 2011–12
Part 2: Review Proposed Changes to CSPR for SY 2012–13 Liann Seiter, Research Associate, NDTAC
Q&A for SY 2012–13
Introductory Remarks
John McLaughlinFederal Program Manager, Title I, Part D
The SY 2011–12 Title I, Part D, Collection
6
Summary of Changes for SY 2011–12
Refers to school year ending June 2012
Reporting in winter 2013
Much of the CSPR remains the same
Minor changes made (removed or condensed items) Total average length of stay (item removed) Multipurpose facility count (item removed) Number of programs with academic offerings (table removed) Students obtaining postsecondary outcomes
(items condensed) Students enrolling in vocational training (items condensed)
72.4.1.1 and 2.4.2.1: Programs and Facilities
State Program/Facility Type Programs/Facilities Average length of stay
(in days)
Neglected programs
Juvenile detention
Juvenile corrections
Adult corrections/At-risk
Other
Total NO LONGER REQUIRED
(1) Total average length of stay cell removed
(2) Information on multipurpose facilities removed
82.4.1.1.1 and 2.4.2.1.1: Programs and Facilities Reporting Data
State Program/Facility Type # Reporting Data
Neglected Programs
Juvenile Detention
Juvenile Corrections
Adult corrections/At-Risk
Other
Total (Auto calculated)
9
2.4.1.2 and 2.4.2.2: Students Served
# of Students Served
Neglected Programs
Juvenile Detention
Juvenile Corrections
Adult Corrections/
At-RiskOther
Programs
Total Unduplicated Students Served
Long-Term Students Served
102.4.1.2 and 2.4.2.2: Students Served by Race and Ethnicity and Sex
Race/EthnicityNeglected Programs
Juvenile Detention
Juvenile Corrections
Adult Corrections/
At-Risk Other
Programs
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
White
Two or more races
Total (Auto calc) (Auto calc) (Auto calc) (Auto calc) (Auto calc)
Sex
Male
Female
Total (Auto calc) (Auto calc) (Auto calc) (Auto calc) (Auto calc)
112.4.1.2 and 2.4.2.2: Students Served by Age
AgeNeglected Programs
Juvenile Detention
Juvenile Corrections
Adult Corrections/
At-Risk Other
Programs
3 through 5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Total (Auto calc) (Auto calc) (Auto calc) (Auto calc) (Auto calc)
122.4.1.3 and 2.4.2.3: Program/Facility Academic Offerings
# Programs ThatNeglected Programs
Juvenile Detention Facilities
Juvenile Corrections
Facilities
Adult Corrections Facilities/ At
Risk Facilities
Other Programs
Awarded high school course credit(s)
Awarded high school diploma(s)
Awarded GED(s)
132.4.1.4.1 and 2.4.2.4.1: Academic Outcomes While in Facility
# of Students Who
Neglected Programs
Juvenile Detentio
n
Juvenile Correctio
ns
Adult Corrections/
At-RiskOther
Programs
1. Earned high school course credits
2. Enrolled in a GED program
142.4.1.4.2 and 2.4.2.4.2: Academic Outcomes While in Facility or 30 Days After Exit
Consolidate items related to postsecondary education into a single item
152.4.1.5 and 2.4.2.5: Vocational Outcomes
# of Students WhoNeglected Programs
Juvenile Detention
Juvenile Corrections
Adult Corrections/
At-RiskOther
ProgramsEnrolled in job training courses/programsObtained employment
(1) Remove tables 2.4.1.5.1 (S1) and 2.4.2.5.1 (S2), with item on “enrolled in elective job training”
(2) Consolidate the job training items into a single item in tables 2.4.1.5.2 and 2.4.2.5.2 (elective and external distinctions are no longer made)
162.4.1.6 and 2.4.2.6: Academic Performance in Reading/Mathematics
Performance Data (Based on most recent pre/post-test data)
Neglected Programs
Juvenile Detention
Juvenile Corrections
Adult Corrections/
At-Risk Other
Programs
1. Long-term students who tested below grade level upon entry
2. Long-term students who have complete pre- and post-test results (data)
Performance Data (Based on most recent pre/post-test data)
Neglected Programs
Juvenile Detention
Juvenile Corrections
Adult Corrections/
At-Risk Other Programs
3. Negative grade level change from the pre- to post-test exams
4. No change in grade level from the pre- to post-test exams
5. Improvement of up to 1/2 grade level from the pre- to post-test exams
6. Improvement from 1/2 up to one full grade level from the pre- to post-test exams
7. Improvement of more than one full grade level from the pre- to post-test exams
Of the students reported in row 2 above, indicate the number who showed:
17
Questions Related to SY 2011–12
Proposed Changes to the SY 2012–13 Collection for
Title I, Part D
19
Summary of Proposed Changes for SY 2012–13
Refers to school year July 2012–June 2013 Reporting in winter 2014 Changes primarily expand information on student need
and clarify transition information IDEA and LEP status of students (new to Title I, Part D)
Items on transition services (revised since 60-day comment period)
Academic and Vocational Outcomes merged into a single CSPR table and collected via EDFacts (individual items unchanged)
Disaggregation of outcome/transition data (same items) Expansion of transition period to 90 days
Pre-posttest items and requirements altered Merging of improvement categories Removal of At-Risk from Subpart 2 tables (revised since 60-day
comment period)
20
2.4.1.2 and 2.4.2.2: Students Served
# of Students Served
Neglected Programs
Juvenile Detention
Juvenile Corrections
Adult Corrections/
At-RiskOther
Programs
Total unduplicated students served
Long-term students served
# of Students Served
Neglected Programs
Juvenile Detention
Juvenile Corrections
Adult Corrections/
At-RiskOther
Programs
Students with disabilities (IDEA)
LEP students
Student Subgroups (NEW)
212.4.1.3.1 and 2.4.2.3.1: Transition Services
Neglected Programs
Juvenile Detention
Juvenile Corrections
Adult Corrections/
At-RiskOther
ProgramsAre facilities in your State able to collect data on student outcomes after exit? (Explain)Number of students receiving transition services that address further schooling and/or employment.
Table language was revised after the initial 60-day comment period.
222.4.1.3.2 and 2.4.2.3.2: Academic and Vocational Outcomes
# of Students WhoNeglected Programs
Juvenile Detention
Juvenile Corrections
Adult Corrections/
At-RiskOther
Programs
Infacility
90days after exit
Infacility
90days
after exitIn
facility
90days
after exitIn
facility90 days after exit
Infacility
90days after exit
Enrolled in their local district schoolEarned high school course credits Enrolled in a GED program Earned a GEDObtained a high school diploma Accepted and/or enrolled into post-secondary education
Enrolled in job training courses/programs
Obtained employment
(1) All outcomes merged into one table for EDFacts reporting(2) Disaggregation of “in-facility” outcomes and “transition”(3) Reporting of transition outcomes allowed up to 90 days after exit
232.4.1.6 and 2.4.2.6: Academic Performance in Reading/Mathematics
Performance Data (based on most recent testing data)
Neglected Programs
Juvenile Detention
Juvenile Corrections
Adult Corrections/ Other
Programs
1. Long-term students who tested below grade level upon entry
2. Long-term students who have complete pre- and post-test results (data)
Of the students reported in row 2 above, indicate the number who showed:
No longer required
for At-Risk programs
No longer required
for At-Risk programs
24
Contact Information
NDTAC Data Team Liann Seiter: [email protected], 202–403–5827 Dory Seidel: [email protected], 202–403–5627 Stephanie Lampron: [email protected], 202–403–6822 State Liaisons:
http://www.neglected-delinquent.org/nd/direct_assistance.asp
ED John McLaughlin, [email protected] Joel McFarland, [email protected]
25
Questions related to SY 2012–13