proposed new wording for academic regulations and procedures 1. current wording under “major...

7
Proposed New Wording for Academic Regulations and Procedures 1. Current wording under “Major Field Requirements”: “A grade of C- or better is necessary for required courses in the major department; these courses cannot be taken on a S/Cr/NC basis. For required courses outside the major department, grades of S, C- or better are necessary.” Proposed new wording: “ For a course to count toward the major, a grade of C- or better must be earned; these courses cannot be taken on a S/Cr/NC basis.” 2. Current wording under “Satisfactory/Credit/No Credit (S/Cr/NC or “scrunch”) Option”: “Note that required courses in the student's major department cannot be taken on a S/Cr/NC basis.” Proposed new wording: “ Note that for a course to count toward the major, it cannot be taken on a S/Cr/NC basis.”

Upload: sheila-mitchell

Post on 03-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Proposed New Wording for Academic Regulations and Procedures  1. Current wording under “Major Field Requirements”:  “A grade of C- or better is necessary

Proposed New Wording for Academic Regulations and Procedures

1. Current wording under “Major Field Requirements”: “A grade of C- or better is necessary for required courses in the major

department; these courses cannot be taken on a S/Cr/NC basis. For required courses outside the major department, grades of S, C- or better are necessary.”

Proposed new wording: “ For a course to count toward the major, a grade of C- or

better must be earned; these courses cannot be taken on a S/Cr/NC basis.”

  2. Current wording under “Satisfactory/Credit/No Credit (S/Cr/NC or

“scrunch”) Option”: “Note that required courses in the student's major department cannot

be taken on a S/Cr/NC basis.” Proposed new wording: “ Note that for a course to count toward the major, it cannot be

taken on a S/Cr/NC basis.”

Page 2: Proposed New Wording for Academic Regulations and Procedures  1. Current wording under “Major Field Requirements”:  “A grade of C- or better is necessary

Latin Honors Proposal

Page 3: Proposed New Wording for Academic Regulations and Procedures  1. Current wording under “Major Field Requirements”:  “A grade of C- or better is necessary

 

Current Language in Academic Regulations and Procedures:

Carleton recognizes outstanding academic performance by noting at commencement those students with a grade point average of 3.25 or better (cum laude), 3.50 or better (magna cum laude), and 3.90 or better (summa cum laude). 

  

Proposed Language:

Carleton recognizes outstanding academic performance by awarding the Latin honors of cum laude, magna cum laude, and summa cum laude to students with qualifying cumulative grade point averages. These honors are noted on diplomas and final transcripts of those students. For students in the graduating class of 2014 and earlier, Latin honors are awarded to students with a grade point average of 3.25 (cum laude), 3.50 or better (magna cum laude), and in 3.90 or better (summa cum laude).

Beginning with the class of 2015, Latin honors will be awarded to students with a grade point average in the top 2% of their graduating class (summa cum laude), those in the remaining top 15% (magna cum laude), and those in the remaining top 30% (cum laude).  

Page 4: Proposed New Wording for Academic Regulations and Procedures  1. Current wording under “Major Field Requirements”:  “A grade of C- or better is necessary

Percent of Class with Latin Honors

Page 5: Proposed New Wording for Academic Regulations and Procedures  1. Current wording under “Major Field Requirements”:  “A grade of C- or better is necessary

Latin Honors 1999-2010

Class YearSumma Laude %

Magna Laude %

Cum Laude %

Total Honors %

2010 27 5.48% 244 49.49% 115 23.33% 386 78.30%

2009 22 4.35% 230 45.45% 127 25.10% 379 74.90%

2008 24 5.18% 215 46.44% 121 26.13% 360 77.75%

2007 23 4.97% 178 38.44% 128 27.65% 329 71.06%

2006 13 2.77% 187 39.79% 128 27.23% 328 69.79%

2005 14 2.82% 222 44.67% 116 23.34% 352 70.82%

2004 14 3.07% 178 39.04% 121 26.54% 313 68.64%

2003 10 2.23% 163 36.38% 119 26.56% 292 65.18%

2002 6 1.21% 181 36.57% 136 27.47% 323 65.25%

2001 9 2.05% 143 32.57% 140 31.89% 292 66.51%

2000 12 2.84% 143 33.81% 109 25.77% 264 62.41%

1999 9 2.07% 144 33.10% 125 28.74% 278 63.91%

Page 6: Proposed New Wording for Academic Regulations and Procedures  1. Current wording under “Major Field Requirements”:  “A grade of C- or better is necessary

Latin Honors Policy Summary

Institution Summa Magna Cum Comments

Carleton 3.9 3.5 3.25  

AmherstHonors awarded on basis of GPA in top 25%, department recommendation based on thesis,and/or  review by committee

Smith Completion of distribution requirements for LH; GPA set by subcommittee

Macalester 3.9 3.8 3.65  

Grinnell Departments recommend for honors; minimum 3.5 GPA in major and 3.4 overall required

HaverfordMagna or summa awarded on recommendation of committee for outstanding work overall; summa rarely awarded

WilliamsTop 2% of graduating 

class rest of top 15% rest of top 35%  

Wellesley 3.9 3.75 3.6  

Lawrence 3.9 3.7 3.4  

Middlebury 3.8 3.6 3.4  

Bates 3.91 3.8 3.7Establish GPA cutoffs based on 3-yr. average of 2, 8, and 15%iles

Davidson 4.0 3.75 3.5  

Bowdoin 2% 8% 20%  

Page 7: Proposed New Wording for Academic Regulations and Procedures  1. Current wording under “Major Field Requirements”:  “A grade of C- or better is necessary

For Class of 2010

Latin Honor Current Proposed

Summa 3.90 3.94

Magna 3.50 3.79

Cum 3.25 3.66