proposed strategy for the fair science program boris sharkov scientific managing director fair...

Proposed strategy for the FAIR science program

Boris SharkovScientific managing director FAIR

13.10.2015

SwedenFrance IndiaFinland Germany Poland Spain Romania Russia Slovenia UK

2

UNILAC

SIS18 SIS100/300p-Linac

HESR

CR &RESR

NESR

Cryring

Rare-IsotopeProduction Target

Anti-ProtonProduction Target

100 m

Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research – new international research laboratory under construction to explore the nature and evolution of matter in the Universe

• Beam Intensities: • intensities of primary beams: x 100 – x 1000

• intensities of secondary beams: x 10.000

• Beam Energies:• energies: x 30

• Unprecedented Variety of Ions: • antiprotons

• protons to Uranium, radioactive beams

• Beam Quality:• cooled antiprotons

• intense cooled RIBs

• Pulse Structure:• extremely short pulses (70 ns) to slow extraction (quasi CW)

• Parallel Operation:• (Finally) operation of up to four experiments simultaneously

Acc Performance for FAIR Experiments

4

UNILAC


HESR

CR &RESR

NESR

Cryring



100 m

Accelerator Facility

Primary Beams

• 1012/s; 1.5 GeV/u; 238U28+

• 1010/s 238U73+ up to 35 GeV/u• 3x1013/s 30 GeV protons

Secondary Beams

Storage and Cooler Rings

• radioactive beams• 1011 antiprotons 1.5 - 15 GeV/c,

stored and cooledTechnical

Challenges• cooled beams, rapid cycling superconducting magnets

• range of radioactive beams up to 1.5 - 2 GeV/u; up to factor 10 000 higher in intensity than presently • antiprotons 3 - 30 GeV

Physics at FAIR

5

Dense Bulk Plasmas (Ion-beam bunch compression& petawatt-laser)

Materials Science & Radiation Biology (Ion & antiproton beams) Accelerator Physics

UNILAC


HESR

CR &RESR

NESR

Cryring



100 m

QCD-Phase Diagram(HI beams 2 to 45 GeV/u)

Hadron Physics (Stored and cooled14 GeV/c anti-protons)

Nuclear Structure & Astrophysics(Rare-isotope beams)

Fundamental Symmetries& Ultra-High EM Fields(Antiprotons & highly stripped ions)

GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH 6

CBM nuclear matter at high densities

NUSTAR neutron-rich nuclei

APPAions in extreme electro-magnetic

fields

PANDA hadron physics with antiprotons

4 Research Pillars

Staging (2005 - 2009)

Baseline Technical Report 2005

Boris Sharkov, Karlheinz Langanke 7

Staging (2005 - 2009)


Start Version Phase A 2007(SIS100)

Phase B(SIS300)


Staging (2005 - 2009)


Start Version Phase A 2007(SIS100)

Phase B(SIS300)

Modularised Start Version 2009

Module 0 Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Module 4 Module 5

SIS100 Exp. halls CBM & APPA

Super-FRS NuSTAR

Antiproton FacilityPANDA & options

NuSTAR

LEB, NESR, FLAIRNuSTAR & APPA

RESRPANDA, NuSTAR &

APPA

“Based on recent cost estimates (2009) and the funding commitments of the FAIR Member States MSV of the Projects comprises modules 0 – 3.”


10

Modularised Start Version (MSV) Downscaling with the MSV

APPA

CBM/HADES

NUSTAR

PANDA

ModulesM0: SIS100M1: APPAM1: CBM/HADESM2: NUSTARM3: PANDA, NuSTAR, APPA

M0

M1

M2M3

M3

Cost about 1.6 billion by 2018(1 billion 2005 Euros)

Baseline 2010 (just before founding of FAIR)

Charge for the White Book: „The Modularized Startversion“

• Financial ceiling of 1027 M€• State of planning as of October 2009

• None of the four scientific pillars to be omitted completely

• The full version must be still possible

• Scientific program must be competitive and world class


The MSV should enable realization of outstanding forefront research program to all 4 scientific pillars of FAIR

After several evaluations by external reviewers and

the FAIR Scientific Council (report to the Council 20 January 2013)

• MSV: Significant reduction of the initial performance of all experiments

(can be recovered later)

• Modules 0 – 3 confirmed

GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHWorkshop, MEPHI, O. Kester01.10.2015

Heavy ion accelerator chain

SIS18

NuSTAR

Collector Ring

Super-FRSCBM

CBM

SIS 100

12


Anti proton accelerator chain

SIS18

p-Linac

p-bar targetCollector Ring

HESR

APPA

SIS 100

PANDA

13


GSI accelerators intense upgrade programUNILAC and SIS18 upgrade for high intensity and high brilliance

FAIR accelerator challenges

SC-magnets production and testing

Beam instrumentation and controls

rf-systems and timing

Beam transport and collimation,

Stochastic beam cooling

Beam physics (talk of Oliver Boine-Frankenheim)

14

Summary

• Steering company

• International Convention

• International Partners

FAIR GmbH

SwedenFrance IndiaFinland Germany Poland UK Romania Russia Slovenia

Wiesbaden, 2010

16

17 17

FAIR Members‘ Contributions (2005 Kosten)

FAIR Countries Total declared Contribution (k€)

China1.600

Finland5.000

France27.000

Germany 705.000

Great Britain5.000

India36.000

Poland23.740

Romania11.870

Russia 178.050

Slovenia12.000

Spain11.870

Sweden10.000

Total1.027.130

Not shareholders

Costs of the MSV


Total costs (M€) 2005 prices Escalated prices*

Experiments

Accelerators

Acc. coordination personnel Personnel FAIR GmbH Running costsCivil Construction original estimate

78,0

385,0

110,9

38,0

15,4

495,0

83,6

412,5

113,1

43,1

19,8

676,3

Subtotal 1.122,3 1.348,4

less site costs 1.027,3 1.220,9

Civil Construction cost increase 227,9 320,1

LEB building 6,5 9,6

Total incl. site costs 1.356,8 1.678,1

Civil construction cost overrun of 320 million € not covered.

Boundary Conditions for the Future Strategy


1. MSV is the minimal configuration that allows all scientific pillars to operate

2. the shareholders did not commit to cover additional civil construction cost

Both conditions can only be changedby explicit FAIR Council or shareholder decision

Council Decision from the 13th Council session on 7 November 2014Decision XIII.7.1:The Council takes note of the Report by the FAIR Management on a delay of the schedule and an increase of costs of civil construction and possible de-scoping measures.

The Council acknowledges and confirms its responsibility to finish the project according to the Modularized Start Version as described in the

Convention.

FAIR Modularised Start Version

APPA

CBM

NUSTAR

PANDA

ExperimentsM0: SIS100M1: CBM,APPAM2: NUSTARM3: PANDA, APPA, NUSTAR

M0

M1

M2M3

M3

Science with the MSV


Observations and Recommendations by SC

1. The Scientific Councils (SCs) reconfirm their earlier assessment that all four FAIR pillars - despite the delay of the project - carry compelling scientific cases with unique discovery potential.

2. Therefore , the SCs consider the FAIR MSV to offer the best science to cost ratio for the FAIR project.

3. The SCs carefully took into account the recommendations by the International Review Committee chaired by Rolf Heuer. The SCs consider the ordering of the experiments as the result of a resource- loaded rather than a purely scientific evaluation.

Observations and Recommendations II

4. In case it is needed to consider scenarios with a - so far unknown - cost cap, the SCs consider the 11 @ 22 scenario as a viable option, provided that a strategy is developed to realize an antiproton program by 2025.

5. The 11 @ 22 proposal requires an immediate start of the project. Nevertheless, on a six months time-scale, corresponding resource loaded plans should be presented for the 11 @ 22 scenario with a staged antiproton program.

6. The SCs urge the management to investigate all potentials for cost savings. These discussions should involve representatives from civil construction, accelerators and experiments.

Observations and Recommendations III

7. The SCs congratulate the FAIR collaborations for the continuous progress achieved towards the realization of the experiments.

8. The SCs consider the planned intermediate research program of high importance and quality which also keeps the scientific communities alive.

9. The SCs welcome the steps taken by the Management towards setting up an adequate project organization.

High Level Schedule of the MSV


8


Decision XVII.6.1

(1) The Council confirms the stepwise approach to the realization of the FAIR project outlined in the Convention, Article 5 (6), starting with the Modularized Start Version (MSV), according to Article 5 (2) of the Convention.

(2) The Council states that the target completion date for the Modularized StartVersion should be not later than 2025.

(3) The Council asks the FAIR Management to provide for approval by the Council a suitable document summarizing the reasons for the delay in realization of FAIR and the respective cost increases as well as a reasoned proposal of the MSV construction time scale and financing schedule, in a manner which is communicable to decision makers in all partner countries.

(4) Taking into account the prolonged time schedule for the realization of the FAIR Modularized Start Version and the concomitant cost increases, a staged approach is agreed upon for speeding up the start of experiments.

(5) The Council asks the Management to prepare for a detailed review of the progress and financial status of the FAIR project not later than 2019.


(6) The Council defines the value of 1,262 M€ (2005 prices) as cost cap for the FAIR Modularized Start Version, not including the exceptional additional site-related costs of 95 M€ (2005 prices), already borne by Germany.

(7) In order to enable the Management to expedite contracting of design works, civil construction, and accelerator and detector component construction for all four FAIR experimental areas in the framework of the MSV, the Council asks the Shareholders and the Associated Partner to assure the necessary additional funding as soon as possible (cf. Table 1). Commitments to cover additional 158 M€ (2005 prices) have to be made at the latest by the end of the first half of 2016; commitments to cover another 90 M€ (2005 prices) will have to be made by 2019. This additional funding will be required from 2019 onwards for the completion of the MSV, and is to be provided in principle as cash contribution.

(8) The Council asks the Management to continuously look for any cost savingmeasures.(9) The Council asks the Management to continue its effort to attract additionalShareholders to the project who will be able to bring in additional intellectual andfinancial resources for the project.


(10) The Council takes note that with this approach, a re-definition of the already planned in-kind contributions will not be necessary.

(11) The Council understands the necessity that all parties involved do their utmost to continue to provide all experimental groups of the MSV experiments with adequate funding for R&D and detector construction to avoid negative consequences for the experiments due to the delays and the construction staging.

GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH 34

CBM nuclear matter at high densities

NUSTAR neutron-rich nuclei

APPAions in extreme electro-magnetic

fields

PANDA hadron physics with antiprotons

4 Research Pillars


Thanks for your attention

35

Boris Sharkov 36

Plasma Physics @ FAIR/ GSI

Quo vadis ?

What to do ?

proposed strategy for the fair science program boris sharkov scientific managing director fair...

Documents

version phase

radioactive beams beam

intensities of primary

intensities of secondary

module 5sis100exp

baseline technical report

cooler rings radioactive

ion research