proposing an interpolated pipeline adc
TRANSCRIPT
Akira Matsuzawa
Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan
Proposing
An Interpolated Pipeline ADC
Matsuzawa& Okada Lab.
38GHz long range mm-wave system
Background
Role of long range mm-wave
Optical fiber
Optical fiber
Connect with mm-wave
Current
Future
Base stationsfor WiFi and WiMAX
Not flexible
Very flexible
38GHz long range mm-wave system
realized 1Gbps long range mm-wave systems
Current system: 80Mbps!!
System configuration
RJ-
45
Gig
abit
Eth
erne
tTr
ansc
eive
r
Bas
eban
d S
oC LPF
LPF
PA
LNA
BPF
TX A
NT
Eth
erne
t Cab
le
Sur
ge P
rote
ctor
RJ-
45
LPF
BPF
BPF
RX
ANT
PoE
Inte
rface
RJ-
45
Sur
ge P
rote
ctor
PoE
Inte
rface
Compatible with Gbit EthernetHole system is integrated with planar antenna
Mixed signal BB SoC
Base band SoC
ADC & DAC 90nm CMOS40M Transistors
A mixed signal SoC has been developed to realize64QAM (1Gbps) with BW of 260MHz.
Co-developed with JRC
Developed ADC
10b, 320 MSps, 40mW ADC
Developed new 10b ADC to address 64 QAM.
M. Miyahara, A. Matsuzawa, VLSI-CS, 2011.
Interpolated pipeline schemeNo need of high gain OP amps
Suitable for low gain and low VDD scaled CMOS
BER vs. SNR
C/N vs 64QAM_BER on B-B pair
1.E-14
1.E-13
1.E-121.E-11
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-061.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
20 25 30 35 40 45C/N [dB]
BER
Measurement
ENOB=6.0 (600Mbps version)
ENOB=6.25
ENOB=6.5 (1Gbps version 2009)
ENOB=6.75
ENOB=7.0
ENOB=7.4
ENOB=8.5 (ADC design target)
ENOB=7.15 (1Gbps version 2010)
2008
2009
2010
C/N vs 64QAM_BER on B-B pair
1.E-14
1.E-13
1.E-121.E-11
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-061.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
20 25 30 35 40 45C/N [dB]
BER
Measurement
ENOB=6.0 (600Mbps version)
ENOB=6.25
ENOB=6.5 (1Gbps version 2009)
ENOB=6.75
ENOB=7.0
ENOB=7.4
ENOB=8.5 (ADC design target)
ENOB=7.15 (1Gbps version 2010)
2008
2009
2010
BER for 64QAM has been reduced to the idealENOB of ADC is increased
9
Tokyo Tech. Model Network
W8
I6
I1
S3 H100
M1
#2
#1
#3
#4
#5
#6#7
#8
#9
#10
Tokyo Tech. O-Okayama Campus
Ten mm-wave base stations in our campus
Expand the area to NEC (4km)
4km1km
NEC
Tokyo Tech
Challenge for 4km mm-wave communication
11
Outline
• Introduction• Interpolation Techniques• Circuit Implementation• Measurement Results• Conclusions
Conventional Pipelined ADC
12
Conventional pipelined ADC requires accurate MDAC
Pipelined ADC Conversion
13
FSino1 2
12 VVVinVResidue
Output CODE 1
FS2o3o 2
12 VVV
1
000001010011100101110111
2oV 3oV
FSV
0
FS21V
FS41V
FS43V MDAC1
MDAC2
MDAC3
Input
x2 x2
o1o2 2VV
0
1oV
Threshold
1 0
x2.1
Conventional MDAC• High DC gain OpAmp
– Difficult to realize in scaled technology• Closed-loop MDAC leads to lower speed
14
106)dB(0 NG
SNFGBW
N: Number of bitsFs: Sampling freq.
Vin
Vout
Dout
C
mC
G0
MDAC Implementationm bit
U1-
VO
UT
/ mV
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
800
Time/mSecs 200uSecs/div
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
VO
UT
/ mV
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
800
OpAmp gain and conversion error
)(106 dBNG
370 372 374 376 378 380
VO
UT
/ mV
-280
-270
-260
-250
-240
-230
)(
23
LSB
N
G
G
N
LSB23
)(
10bit ADC
Gain>70dB
Large error occurs
40dB gain
Recent Works• Digital compensation technique [1, 2]
– Capacitor mismatch, gain error and opamp nonlinearity can be corrected
• Simple analog circuit design– Foreground compensation
• PVT variation degrade the performance– Long compensation time
• Increase of test cost
16
[1] B. Murmann and B. E. Boser, Dec., 2003.[2] A. Verma and B. Razavi, Nov., 2009.
Proposed ADC
17
• Target : 10bit, Fs> 300 MS/s• Interpolation and pipelined operation
– Moderate relative gain • G/G < 5% for 10bit• Open-loop amplifiers can be used• No need of linearity compensation
– Insensitive to settling time• High speed• Low power
Interpolation Architecture
Vin
Vout
CMP
Voa
Vob
1a
1b
Inter-polator CMP
Voa
Vob
18
Interpolation Architecture
Vin
Vout
CMP
Vob
Voa : Vob = 1 : 1Voa
1a
1b
Inter-polator CMP
Voa
Vob
1a
1b
CMP
19Interpolator example [3,4]
R
R
[3]A. Matsuzawa, et al. Feb. 1990.[4]C. Mangelthdolf, et al. , Feb. 1993.
Interpolation Architecture
Vin
Vout
CMP
Vob
Voa : Vob = 2 : 2Voa : Vob = 3 : 1
Voa : Vob = 1 : 3
Conversion error is not occurred by changing gain
Voa
1a
1b
Inter-polator CMP
Voa
Vob
20
1a
1b
CMP
Interpolator example
3R
1R
Interpolated Pipeline ADC Structure
21Pi
pelin
e St
age
Pipe
line
Stag
e
Interpolation technique is used for 2-4th stage.Each stage has an 1-bit redundancy.
1st stage 2nd stage 3rd stage 4th stage
Interpolation methods
22Resistive
(Series) [3,4]Capacitive
(Series)Capacitive(Weighted)
• Static current• Good linearity• Imbalance settling
• No static current• Cp causes
nonlinearity
• No static current• Good linearity• Heavy load
Vin
Cp
Cp
1a
1b
Cp
Cu
Cu
Cua1 Cub1
CuaN CubN
2a
2b
2a
2b
2a
2b
1a
1b
1a 1b
Ex. 3bit1:8
2:6
3:5
8:1
Total:36Cu
Proposed Weight Controlled Capacitor Array
23
1a
1b
1a
1b
2a
2b
2a
2b
Voa
Vob
Vxa
Vxb
Sub-ADC controls the capacitor weight.Load capacitance is reduced from 36Cu to 16Cu (3bit).
Total:16Cu
16Cu
16Cu
Weight Controlled Capacitor Array
24
rbinbrainax VVG
nmnVVG
nmmV
off_bbob
off_aaoa
off_brbinbob
off_arainaoa
''
VGVVGV
VVVGVVVVGV
Ga, Gb: Gain of A1a and A1bVoa, Vob : Output voltage Voff_a, Voff_b: Offset voltageVra, Vrb: Reference voltagem, n : Capacitor weight
Offset voltage can be cancelled in interpolation phase
Interpolated Output
Vin
Vx
Vob
Voa
Vxa
Vxb
Voa
Vob CMP2
VxaVxb
1bit redundancy
mC nC mC nC
Vxa
Vob Voa
31 71
25
Sub-ADC StructureGate-width-weighted interpolation comparators with capacitive offset calibration is used.
– Offset voltage < 2 mV ()
26
1a
1b2nd
1st stageSense
2nd stageLatch
Wa
VINNbVINNaVINPbVINPa
Wb Wa Wb
CLKDD
OUTP
OUTN
[1] V. Giannini, ISSCC 2008[5] Y. Asada, A-SSCC 2009
Requirements for An Amplifier
• Absolute Gain error ⇒ No error• Offset voltage ⇒ DNL error
– Offset voltage < 1LSB• Offset voltage can be negrected by
output offset cancel technique.
• Gain mismatch ⇒ DNL error• Linearity ⇒ DNL and INL error
27
Amplifier : Schematic
28
1st stage amplifier require good linearity=>CMOS input with source degenerations
Gain mismatch < 2.1%(3)
Amplifiers : Simulation results
29
1st stage a3/a1 < 1.3 2nd stage a3/a1 < 6.2
3in3in1out aa VVV
Gain matching requirement
30
8.8
9.0
9.2
9.4
9.6
9.8
10.0
0 2 4 6 8 10
ENO
B [b
it]
∆G/G (%)
G-G
G+G
Gain mismatch of 1st stage amplifiers < 2.1%(3s)
Linearity Requirement
31
8.68.89.09.29.49.69.8
10.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
ENO
B [b
it]
a3/a1
3in3in1out aa VVV
1st stage a3/a1 < 1.3, 2nd stage a3/a1 < 6.2
Chip photo
32
• 90 nm 10M1P CMOS technology • Chip area of 0.46mm2
Timing generator & Clock lines
4thstage
5th
Logic
3rdstage
2ndstage
1ststage
1120 m
415 m
DNL, INL
33
-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.51.01.52.0
0 256 512 768 1024
DN
L [L
SB]
OUTPUT CODE
-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.04.0
0 256 512 768 1024
INL
[LSB
]
OUTPUT CODE
DNL +0.9/-0.6
INL +1 .4 / -1 .8
This periodical error is due to bad layout, not essential issue.
Sampling Frequency vs. SNDR
34
Input Frequency = 1 MHz
Input Frequency vs. SNDR
35
Sampling Frequency = 320 MS/s
Performance summary
36
This Work [2] [6] [7]Resolution (bit) 10 10 10 10Fsample (MS/s) 320 500 205 320VDD (V) 1.2 1.2 1.0 -Power (mW) 40 55 61 42ENOBpeak (bit) 8.5 8.5 8.7 8.7FoMFs/ FoMERBW (pJ/c.-s) 0.35 / 0.77 0.31 0.65 0.36/0.44Technology (nm) 90 90 90 90Active Area (mm2) 0.46 0.5 1 0.21Amplifier type Open Closed Closed ClosedLinearity Compensation No Yes No Yes
[2] A. Verma and B. Razavi, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 44, Nov., 2009.[6] S. Lee, Y. Jeon, K. Kim, J. Kwon, J. Kim, J. Moon, and W. Lee,” ISSCC, 2007.[7] H. Chen, W. Shen, W. Cheng, and H. Chen, A-SSCC, 2010.
Conclusions
37
• An interpolated pipelined ADC using open-loop amplifier has been proposed.– Interpolation architecture
• G/G < 5% for 10bit• Using simple open-loop amplifiers enables high
speed operation• No need of a linearity compensation
– Weight Controlled Capacitor Array• Load capacitance is reduced from 36Cu to 16Cu
• Offset voltage of the amplifier can be cancelled– 10bit, 320MS/s, 40 mW ADC has been realized
Future Prospect
• Issue: Need twice larger circuits– Same capacitance as for the conventional pipeline
ADC can be used by modifying circuits.– Area and power can be reduced, since lower
bandwidth is acceptable.
• Still need the pipelined ADC?– SAR ADC: lowest FoM, but low fs and low resolution.– SAR-Pipeline: higher resolution, but lower fs due to
multi step conversions. – Interleaving: effective for low resolution ADC, but need
totally large capacitance.