Pros and Cons of Hybrid Cloud Architecture Approaches

Hybrid cloud architecture basically provides a conducive storage infrastructure for

both on-premise (where it enables the users to store unstructured data from internet or

devices) and off-premise (cloud) purposes that enables a flawless integration with the

public cloud for cloud bursting, long-term data archiving and disaster retrieval in the

most cost-effective and highly ascendible manner.

When considering how to acquire a hybrid cloud architecture, there are basically two

approaches, building-it-yourself or get a prepackaged one. Based on the resources and

time available criteria, an organization can choose either of the two approaches. Each

approach has its pros and cons as analyzed below.

Option 1: Build-it-yourself Hybrid Cloud Architecture

This approach requires an IT planner to select the object storage software

autonomously from the hardware. In this case, the hardware is usually off-the-shelf,

this includes commodity servers that can at times be remainders of a server

consolidation effort. Therefore, this approach compels the user to buy the storage

device off-the-shelf.

● Advantages

The main pro of this approach is that it is very cost-effective compared to the

prepackaged hybrid cloud architecture. Servers in the data center can be reused by

members of the cloud storage infrastructure. It is, therefore, the best option for

organizations that face tight budget constraints.

Another pro is that this approach is very flexible. The IT planner sets out the

architecture in such a manner that most of the vendor hardware can be used in both

the present time and future. This makes it a long-term asset to the organization.

● Disadvantages

The major drawback of this approach is the time it consumes. The process of

identifying and feasibility testing of all the servers and storage to be used in the cloud

infrastructure consumes a lot of time. In this case, the more complex the cloud

infrastructure is the more time it consumes. This approach would, therefore, not be

very attractive to organizations that have no much time on their side to undertake the

process of building the cloud architecture.

Option 2: Prepackaged Hybrid Cloud Architecture

This approach is very similar to the build-it-yourself approach but on its case, the

vendor needs to install cloud storage software to the commodity hardware after the

integration work. When the vendor server is usually a server vendor, however, the

cloud architecture will customarily use its name-brand equipment.

● Advantages

The main pro of this approach is usually the time value. This system can be ordered

and start writing data on it within a very short period of time. It is, therefore, more

preferable to organizations that are constrained by time.

● Disadvantages

Vendors charge for their services, that is, pre-configuration of the system and,

therefore, making this approach more expensive compared to the make-it-yourself

approach. This makes the prepackaged hybrid cloud architecture less suitable to

organizations that have a tight budget constraint, but it still suits organizations that are

competing against time.

It is evident that the choice between building a hybrid cloud architecture for yourself

and purchasing prepackaged hybrid cloud architecture is informed by consideration of

time saved and cost saved which results to a trade-off between time and cost. The

decision on which a data center uses will hence be highly influenced by, the IT's

deployed, skills and time.

As a result, I’d introduce another brand in the market which brings a whole different

meaning in the world of telecommuting—EZTalks, leading video conferencing

software that makes it possible for you to connect with people all the time regardless

of where you are. It is efficient but easy to use in your day to day operations. With

EZTalks, you’re definitely assured of more savings, increased independence as well

as improvement of competitiveness all around the world.

Article Source: Pros and Cons of Hybrid Cloud Architecture Approaches