prospective validation of the wireless vital signs monitor system

29
U.S. Army Institute of Surgical U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research Research Fort Sam Houston, TX Fort Sam Houston, TX

Upload: alvaro

Post on 14-Jan-2016

38 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System. José Salinas, PhD 1 John B. Holcomb, MD 2 1 U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, TX 2 University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX. Disclaimer. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

U.S. Army Institute of Surgical ResearchU.S. Army Institute of Surgical ResearchFort Sam Houston, TXFort Sam Houston, TX

Page 2: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

DisclaimerDisclaimer

• The opinions and assertions contained herein The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the author and are not are the private views of the author and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.Department of Defense.

• This study was conducted under a protocol This study was conducted under a protocol reviewed and approved by the UTHSC reviewed and approved by the UTHSC Institutional Review Board, and in accordance Institutional Review Board, and in accordance with the approved protocol.with the approved protocol.

Page 3: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

3

Mass Casualty IncidentsMass Casualty Incidents

Lack of situational information can make triage and

treatment of trauma patients problematic for civilian trauma centers.

Two killed, five injured in Wharton Co. wreck

Blast at Texas oil refinery kills 14 and injured more than 100 others.

Photo by Elmer Cavender/Special To The Advocate

Image: Brett Coomer/Houston Chronicle/Polaris

Page 4: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

ProblemProblem

• Current vital signs monitors in the Current vital signs monitors in the critical care environment suffer from critical care environment suffer from many drawbacksmany drawbacks– ““Dumb” – do not provide actionable Dumb” – do not provide actionable

informationinformation– Big/BulkyBig/Bulky– Do not talk to other systemsDo not talk to other systems– Have many wires Have many wires – Don’t have access to other patient Don’t have access to other patient

information and/or scene datainformation and/or scene data

Page 5: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

5

Military RelevanceMilitary Relevance

• Prevention of circulatory shock in the battlefield Prevention of circulatory shock in the battlefield requires early recognition and interventions.requires early recognition and interventions.

• Treatment of the combat casualty traditionally Treatment of the combat casualty traditionally has relied on “snap shot” physiologic data has relied on “snap shot” physiologic data points to drive interventions and treatment points to drive interventions and treatment strategies.strategies.

• An intuitive battlefield monitoring device; An intuitive battlefield monitoring device; “smart device” that is capable of supplying the “smart device” that is capable of supplying the medic with constant physiologic observations medic with constant physiologic observations and data would enhance the medic’s ability to and data would enhance the medic’s ability to assess and treat battlefield injuries.assess and treat battlefield injuries.

• Lack of situational information can make triage Lack of situational information can make triage and treatment of trauma patients problematic and treatment of trauma patients problematic for military trauma centers.for military trauma centers.

Page 6: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

6

Civilian Relevance

• Treatment of the trauma patient may be based on incomplete pre-hospital physiologic data.

• The lack of real-time observable physiologic data and patient progression makes it difficult to accurately predict life saving interventions.

Page 7: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

Typical ScenarioTypical Scenario

Page 8: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

Critical Areas for Preventable Critical Areas for Preventable DeathsDeaths

Advanced TriageIntelligent DiagnosisDecision SupportWirelessClosed LoopData ManagementMedical Device Interfacing Standards

Page 9: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

Problem: Data FlowProblem: Data FlowPatient Information Flow

Stops or is SeverelyReduced Between

Sections

Patient Information Flow Stops or is SeverelyReduced Between

Sections

Page 10: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

En Route

Critical Care Tech GapCritical Care Tech Gap

En Route

STANDARD OF CARE

Level IIb:Forward Surgical Team

Level III: Combat Support Hospital

Level IV-V:LandsuhlWalter ReedBAMC

Level I: Point of Injury

En Route

TECH GAP

Casualty Movement

Med

ical

Cap

abili

ty

Page 11: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

Athena Wireless Vital Signs Athena Wireless Vital Signs MonitorMonitor

Page 12: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

WVSM CapabilitesWVSM Capabilites

• 500 g weight500 g weight• Wireless: 802.11, BluetoothWireless: 802.11, Bluetooth• Waveforms: Waveforms:

– ECGECG– PlethPleth– CO2 (via wireless dongle to Oridion)CO2 (via wireless dongle to Oridion)

• Numerics: Numerics: – HRHR– SpO2SpO2– NIBP (SBP, DBP, MAP)NIBP (SBP, DBP, MAP)– EtCO2 (via wireless dongle to Oridion)EtCO2 (via wireless dongle to Oridion)

Page 13: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

Receiving StationReceiving Station

• Current Numeric Vital Signs & Current Numeric Vital Signs & WaveformsWaveforms

• Full trends & projectionsFull trends & projections– Prehospital, EDPrehospital, ED

• Physical ExamPhysical Exam

• ScoresScores

• LSI predictionLSI prediction

• Non linear indices of patient statusNon linear indices of patient status

Page 14: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

TRENDSTRENDS

PROJECTIONPROJECTION

PROBABILITY OF PROBABILITY OF NEEDING AN LSINEEDING AN LSI

NON LINEARNON LINEARINDICESINDICES

Page 15: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System
Page 16: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

WVSM ProjectWVSM Project

• Clinical EfficacyClinical Efficacy– Determine the clinical efficacy of using the Athena Wireless Determine the clinical efficacy of using the Athena Wireless

Vital Signs monitor system in a pre-hospital and emergency Vital Signs monitor system in a pre-hospital and emergency room settingroom setting

• Clinical EffectivenessClinical Effectiveness– Determine if the use of this system leads to the use of earlier Determine if the use of this system leads to the use of earlier

life saving interventions in the emergency departmentlife saving interventions in the emergency department

• UsabilityUsability– Determine if this device has better usability characteristics Determine if this device has better usability characteristics

compared to bench mounted vital sign monitors currently compared to bench mounted vital sign monitors currently used in the pre-hospital setting by medical helicopter service used in the pre-hospital setting by medical helicopter service personnelpersonnel

Jose Salinas, PhD

Page 17: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

Study DesignStudy Design

• Multi-Center Prospective StudyMulti-Center Prospective Study– UTHealth-Houston/CeTIRUTHealth-Houston/CeTIR

• Memorial Hermann Hospital-TMCMemorial Hermann Hospital-TMC

– U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research ***U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research ***• Brooke Army Medical CenterBrooke Army Medical Center

– University of Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio University of Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio ******

• University HospitalUniversity Hospital

• Limited to Air Medical ProvidersLimited to Air Medical Providers– Memorial Hermann Life FlightMemorial Hermann Life Flight– San Antonio AirLifeSan Antonio AirLife

• 18 Month Enrollment Period18 Month Enrollment Period*** Planned

Page 18: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

20

Study Population

Inclusion Criteria

• > 18 years of age • Trauma Patient• Transported by Memorial

Hermann Life Flight or San Antonio AirLIFE

• Code 2 or Code 3 trauma patients with blunt or penetrating trauma

Exclusion Criteria

• < 18 years of age• Women who present to the ED

who are obviously pregnant• Transported from nursing

home• Actively psychotic • Prisoner (Currently

incarcerated at a correctional facility)

• Not transported by Memorial Hermann Life Flight or San Antonio AirLIFE

Page 19: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

Project Setup/TrainingProject Setup/Training

• TrainingTraining– UTHealthUTHealth

• CeTIR CeTIR • Department of Surgery – TraumaDepartment of Surgery – Trauma• Department of Emergency MedicineDepartment of Emergency Medicine

– 80 – Faculty, Residents, Medical Students, Research 80 – Faculty, Residents, Medical Students, Research Coordinators & Research AssociatesCoordinators & Research Associates

– Memorial Hermann HospitalMemorial Hermann Hospital• Memorial Hermann Life FlightMemorial Hermann Life Flight• Emergency DepartmentEmergency Department

– 110 – Flight Nurses, Flight Paramedics, ED Nurses & 110 – Flight Nurses, Flight Paramedics, ED Nurses & Techs.Techs.

Page 20: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

Project ExecutionProject Execution

• Equipment DeployedEquipment Deployed

• Simulated WVSM Trial RunsSimulated WVSM Trial Runs– Internal TestingInternal Testing– External TestingExternal Testing

• MHLFMHLF• Full Integration Testing – CeTIR, MHLF & Full Integration Testing – CeTIR, MHLF &

MH-EDMH-ED

• 11stst Subject Enrollment – June 27, Subject Enrollment – June 27, 20112011

Page 21: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

WVSM Study Kit EquipmentWVSM Study Kit Equipment

Page 22: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

24

Pre-Hospital Study ProcessPre-Hospital Study Process

• On scene patient screening & enrollment

• Apply LP-12 monitoring system to patient & WVSM/Oridion monitoring devices to potential study subjects

Page 23: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

25

Pre-Hospital Study ProcessPre-Hospital Study Process

• Enter Life Saving Interventions on tablet PC:– Intubation– Blood Administration– Chest Tube – Pericardiocentesis– CPR – Chest Decompression

Photo by Ryche Guerrero/JEMS July 2010

Page 24: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

26

WVSM Patient Arriving Memorial Hermann Hospital

WVSM in RangePatient Assigned to Trauma Bay

Page 25: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

27

Trauma Bay WVSM DisplayTrauma Bay WVSM Display

Page 26: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

28

Trauma Center Study ProcessTrauma Center Study Process

• CeTIR research associate responds to the ED for in-bound Code 2 or Code 3 trauma patients.

• Screen and enroll WVSM subject and/or control subject.

– Prospective “real time” data collection.

• Data collection stops when the subject discharge and/or transfer out of the ED

Page 27: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

Institutional PartnersInstitutional Partners

Page 28: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

Support PartnersSupport Partners

• Athena GTXAthena GTX

• Oridion CapnographyOridion Capnography

• NoninNonin

• State of Texas Emerging State of Texas Emerging Technology FundTechnology Fund

• U.S. Army Combat Casualty Care U.S. Army Combat Casualty Care Research ProgramResearch Program

Page 29: Prospective validation of the Wireless Vital Signs Monitor System

31

AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements

• NTI– Sharon Smith– Monica Phillips

• ISR– Roger Killmer

• UTHSC-Houston (CeTIR)– Charles E. Wade– Jeanette Podbielski– Hari Radhakrishnan– Timothy Welch– Denise Hinds

• Athena GTX, Inc– Mark Darrah– Kevin Stitcher– Joel Meyer