provincial examination results - new brunswick · 2018-09-01 · 37 provincial exam enrolment rates...

PPrroovviinncciiaall EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss FFrraannccoopphhoonnee SScchhooooll DDiissttrriiccttss

Department of Education Francophone Assessment and Evaluation Branch

DDeecceemmbbeerr 22000099

To obtain additional copies of this report or to send your comments, please us the following coordinates:

Francophone Assessment and Evaluation Branch Department of Education of New Brunswick

P.O. Box 6000 Fredericton, N.B.

E3B 5H1

Tel.: 506-453-2157 Fax: 506-462-2201

E-mail: [email protected]

Internet : http://www.gnb.ca/0000/francophone-f.asp#1

December 2009 _____________________________________________________________

Une version française de ce document est également disponible.

A similar report on Anglophone school districts is also available in English or in French. Un document analogue présentant les résultats des districts scolaires anglophones est disponible, en anglais ou en français.

Contact/Téléphonez aux Communications 506-444-4714

Fax/Télécopie: 506-457-4810

E-mail: [email protected] Internet : http://www.gnb.ca/0000/francophone-f.asp#1

PPrroovviinncciiaall EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss

FFrraannccoopphhoonnee SScchhooooll DDiissttrriiccttss DDeecceemmbbeerr 22000099

ISBN: 978-1-55471-258-8

Francophone School Districts

PPrréésseennttaattiioonn

i

IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn

he Department of Education is pleased to present this provincial statistical report to give school staff,

parents, and taxpayers a general idea of how students in New Brunswick’s Francophone school districts did on the provincial examinations administered in the 2008-2009 school year. A similar document is produced for the Anglophone school districts. It should be noted, however, that results for the Francophone and Anglophone sectors cannot be compared given differences in the respective programs and evaluation tools. This document has four chapters. The first is an overview of the learning evaluation program. The second chapter provides details on the learning evaluation program at the elementary level. It contains the results of the examinations in Grade 2 Literacy, Grade 5 Sciences et technologie, Grades 5 and 8 Mathématiques, and Grade 8 Français.

The third chapter provides details on the learning evaluation program at the high school level. It contains the results of the examinations in Grade 11 Mathématiques and Grade 11 Français, as well as the Grade 10 ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment. The fourth chapter contains a brief description of pan-Canadian and international assessments in addition to results showing how New Brunswick matches up against the other Canadian provinces and the OECD member countries on these assessments. Any comments likely to make this report more informative and complete should be sent to the following address. Department of Education Francophone Assessment and Evaluation Branch P.O. Box 6000 Fredericton, N.B. E3B 5H1

T

Table of Contents

iii

TTaabbllee ooff CCoonntteennttss IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn......................................................................................................................... i

CChhaapptteerr 11 PPrroovviinncciiaall EEvvaalluuaattiioonn PPrrooggrraamm aatt tthhee EElleemmeennttaarryy aanndd HHiigghh SScchhooooll LLeevveellss

Why is there a provincial evaluation program in New Brunswick schools?............ 1

What subjects were tested? ................................................................................... 1

How are the exams prepared? ............................................................................... 1

How are the exams administered? ......................................................................... 2

How is exam marking coordinated? ....................................................................... 2

How are the exams marked? ................................................................................. 2

Are there any precautions to bear in mind when interpreting the results? .............. 2

Is the quality of marking checked? ......................................................................... 3

How are the exams followed up? ........................................................................... 3

CChhaapptteerr 22 PPrroovviinncciiaall EElleemmeennttaarryy SScchhooooll EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss

Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary School Level...................... 5

What is the purpose of these exams? ......................................................... 5

What is tested? ........................................................................................... 5 Charts

1 to 6 Grade 2 provincial literacy exam, percentage of students having achieved level 3 or 4 ................................................................................. 7

Description of performance levels for the Grade 2 provincial literacy exam .......................................................................................................... 7

7 to 12 Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Sciences et technologies exam, by school, including the districts and province .......................................................... 13

What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index of Grade 5 Science et technologies for the province? ................................................................. 13

13 to 18 Provincial exam, Grade 5 Mathématiques, percentage of students at the acceptable level or higher by school, including the districts and province ................................................................................................... 19

Table of Contents

iv

What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index of Grade 5 Mathématiques for the province? ...................................................................................... 19

19 to 24 Provincial exam, Grade 8 Mathématiques, percentage of students at the acceptable level or higher by school, including the districts and province ......................................................................... 25

What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index of Grade 8 Mathématiques for the province? ...................................................................................... 25

25 to 30 Provincial exam, Grade 8 Français, percentage of students at the acceptable level or higher by school, including the districts and province ............................................................................... 31

What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index of Grade 8 Français for the province? ............................................................................................ 31

31 to 36 Elementary school exam results by sex, including the districts and province ............................................................................................. 37

CChhaapptteerr 33 PPrroovviinncciiaall HHiigghh SScchhooooll EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss

Provincial Evaluation Program at the High School Level ............................... 41

What is the purpose of these exams? ....................................................... 41

What is the passing grade? ...................................................................... 41 Charts

37 Provincial exam enrolment rates by course and sex ................................. 42

38 to 41 Do the provincial exam results differ according to sex? ............................ 43

42 to 53 Difference between provincial exam average and school mark average .................................................................................................... 45

Is there an appreciable difference between exam marks and school marks? .......................................................................................... 46

What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index for the province? .................. 46

54 to 57 Performance indices for Français and Mathématiques, by school, including the districts and province .......................................................... 53

What is the performance index? ............................................................... 54

58 Percentage of students having achieved intermediate level or higher on the Grade 10 ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment, by school, including the districts and province .......................................................... 58

Second language oral proficiency scale ................................................... 58

59 to 102 Percentage of students having achieved a provincial exam result of 55% or more (acceptable level) or 70% or more (competent level), by subject and school, including the districts and province, since 2006 .................... 61

Tables by subject, level, and school at the high school level .................... 85

Grade 11 Français (regular level) ......................................................... 86

Table of Contents

v

Grade 11 Français (modified level) ...................................................... 87

Grade 11 Mathématiques (regular level) .............................................. 88

Grade 11 Mathématiques (modified level) ........................................... 89

Grade 10 ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment (all levels) ....................... 90

CChhaapptteerr 44

RReessuullttss ooff PPaann--CCaannaaddiiaann aanndd IInntteerrnnaattiioonnaall AAsssseessssmmeennttss

Pan-Canadian (PCAP/SAIP) and International (PISA) Assessment Programs ............................................................................................................ 91

What are SAIP and PCAP? ...................................................................... 91

Why did CMEC develop SAIP and PCAP? ............................................... 91

Why did CMEC replace SAIP with PCAP? ............................................... 92

What is PISA?........................................................................................... 92

Who participates in PISA? ........................................................................ 92

How are students selected? (PISA) .......................................................... 93

How is the information used? (PISA) ........................................................ 93 Charts

103-109 Average scores and confidence intervals, by province and country, for each PCAP 2007 domain ......................................................................... 94

110-118 Average scores and confidence intervals by province and country for each PISA domain ................................................................................. 104

CCoonncclluussiioonn ....................................................................................................................... 117

Chapitre 1 ‐ le programme provincial d'évaluation au primaire et au secondaire

Chapter 1

Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels

Why is there a provincial evaluation program in New Brunswick schools?

For a number of years now, New Brunswickhas been looking more closely at theeducation system and its performance. Areschools preparing students to becomecommitted, productive, and responsiblecitizens? Will students be ready to meet thechallenges of the 21st century? These are

What subjects were tested?

All the results presented in this document arefrom the ten provincial examinationsadministered from kindergarten to Grade 12 inthe 2008-2009 school year. The subjectstested were Grade 2 Literacy, Grade 5Sciences et technologies and Mathématiques,Grade 8 Français and Mathématiques, Grade10 ESL, and Grade 11 Mathématiques

1

Chapter 1

Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels

Why is there a provincial evaluation program in New Brunswick schools?

For a number of years now, New Brunswickhas been looking more closely at theeducation system and its performance. Areschools preparing students to becomecommitted, productive, and responsiblecitizens? Will students be ready to meet thechallenges of the 21st century? These arequestions being asked by parents, othereducation stakeholders, and New Brunswicktaxpayers as a whole.

To answer these questions, a provincialevaluation program was set up to assessstudents’ skills in literacy, mathematics, andscience and technology at key stages in theeducation system.

The provincial evaluations are also used toassess studies for the purpose of awardingthe high school diploma .

What subjects were tested?

All the results presented in this document arefrom the ten provincial examinationsadministered from kindergarten to Grade 12 inthe 2008-2009 school year. The subjectstested were Grade 2 Literacy, Grade 5Sciences et technologies and Mathématiques,Grade 8 Français and Mathématiques, Grade10 ESL, and Grade 11 Mathématiques(regular and modified levels) and Français(regular and modified levels) .

How are the exams prepared?

The provincial examinations are developedtogether with teaching staff. Supervision isprovided by provincial evaluation consultantsin association with the provincial and districtcurriculum officers concerned. The theoreticalfoundations and nature of the exams aredefined in the assessment framework for eachsubject .

Le programme provincial d'évaluation au primaire et au secondaire ‐ chapitre 1

How are the exams administered?

The rules and procedures to be followed inorder to ensure uniform administration of theexams are set out in an administration guide,which is updated and distributed to theschools for each exam session. TheFrancophone Assessment and EvaluationBranch is responsible for coordinating andadministering the exams .

How is exam marking coordinated?

For each subject tested, head markers aretrained beforehand to oversee the use of themarking grids and ensure uniform scoringprovince-wide. Marking is coordinated byprovincial evaluation consultants incooperation with provincial curriculum officers.

Are there any precautions to bear in mind when interpreting the results?

When comparing averages for a given subject,we must take into account the measurementerror associated with each score before wecan claim there is a difference between twoaverages. Using the standard error, a range(confidence interval) is established, withinwhich the true value of the average is locatedin 95% of cases. The 95% confidence intervalused in this report is calculated by adding twostandard errors on each side of the average.The difference between the averages of twoschools is said to be significant if theirconfidence intervals do not overlap .

In reviewing the provincial examination resultsat the high school level, it should be noted thatstudents enrolled in regular-level courses write

2

How are the exams marked?

Once the exams have been administered, thehigh school students’ booklets are sent tothree marking centres located in Shediac,Edmundston, and Bathurst. The elementaryschool students’ booklets are sent to a singlemarking centre at either the Moncton orEdmundston campus of the Université deMoncton. The constructed-response questionsare marked by teaching staff under thecoordination of the head markers (teachers ordistrict supervisors), who are trained by theprovincial evaluation consultants. Theselected-response questions are markedelectronically .

gstudents enrolled in regular-level courses writeone set of exams, while those enrolled inmodified-level courses write another.Interestingly, in schools having a largepercentage of students enrolled at the regularlevel, the results are often better than, or atleast comparable with, those of other schoolsfor both the regular- and modified-levelexams. This makes it very important toconsider the percentage of students enrolledat each level.

We must bear in mind as well that provincialexam marks and school marks are only two ofmany factors indicating a school’s overallsituation. Socioeconomic conditions,demographics, what is expected of students,and parental involvement also influencestudent performance. This report does nottake the latter factors into account.

Chapitre 1 ‐ le programme provincial d'évaluation au primaire et au secondaire

Is the quality of marking checked?

The 2008-2009 exam results were subject tothe implementation of an inter-rater reliability(IRR) measurement process to determine thequality of marking of theitems that require human involvement(markers), that is: Open-ended questions; Essay-type questions Problem solving; Marking criteria for writing exams; and Oral proficiency assessments.

A sampling of booklets is selected at random(systematic method) from the exam bookletsat the marking centres. A second markingsheet is inserted in the booklets selected andthe booklet is placed in the pile with theothers. When a marker gets a booklet with asecond marking sheet in it, he or she mustmark it on the sheet, not in the booklet. Themarker then gives the booklet to anothermarker, who marks it normally, i.e. in thet d t' b kl t

The inter-rater reliability index makes itpossible to answer the question, "Howaccurate is the marking if it is submitted to twodifferent markers (or marked twice)?" Theinter-rater reliability indices are thereforedisplayed with the exam averages for eachlevel in the report.

How are the exams followed up?

At the high school level, a statistical reportbreaking down the results by skill and contentis published after each exam session. Itcontains a description of the school resultsand the provincial average for each subject..

This statistical report is available in PDFformat at the following Web address:

http://www.gnb.ca/education/francophone-e.asp#1

The school districts, together with the school

3

marker, who marks it normally, i.e. in thestudent's booklet .

In English, a sample of records is given to amarker, and after listening to the interviewagain, a proficiency level is determined.

The school districts, together with the schooladministrators and teaching staff, areresponsible for interpreting the results anddeveloping an education plan. The statisticsare reviewed at the provincial level to aid indecision making regarding curricula.

Le programme provincial d'évaluation au primaire et au secondaire ‐ chapitre 1

4

Chapitre 2 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire

Chapter 2

Provincial Elementary School Examination Results

Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary School Level

What is the purpose of these exams?

The provincial evaluation program at theelementary school level has a very specificobjective: to use the information obtained fromthe exams to determine whether or not

What is tested?

The exams are developed on the basis of alist of topics drawn up by school districtpersonnel and Department consultants. Thetopics are derived from the provincial curriculaand identify the elements essential for further

5

Chapter 2

Provincial Elementary School Examination Results

Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary School Level


The provincial evaluation program at theelementary school level has a very specificobjective: to use the information obtained fromthe exams to determine whether or notstudents have mastered the skills and abilitiesassociated with the curricula being evaluated.

Using the results, teaching staff and schooladministrators can develop and applyappropriate action strategies for correctingweaknesses noted among students, and canguide students in a review of what they havelearned.

The results are also analyzed by the schoolsand school districts and the Department ofEducation.

What is tested?

The exams are developed on the basis of alist of topics drawn up by school districtpersonnel and Department consultants. Thetopics are derived from the provincial curriculaand identify the elements essential for furtherdevelopment of skills in Grade 5 Sciences ettechnologies, in Grades 5 and 8Mathématiques, and in Grade 8 Français .

At the end of Grade 2, reading comprehensionis evaluated at the provincial level. This examconsists of a reading comprehension test andan oral reading test.

Résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire ‐ chapitre 2

6


Grade 2 provincial literacy exam, percentage of students having achieved level 3 or 4

Description of performance levels for the Grade 2 provincial literacy exam

Level 1 – The student has significant difficulty in reading.

Level 2 – The student will be able to:read and understand straightforward, illustrated texts geared to his/her level; read variousfamiliar words, e.g., cat, dog, happy, give; break down words into their constituent sounds,e.g., teach-er, pa-per; read various words made up of complex sounds, e.g., neighbour,bread; explain how he/she tackles new words when reading; read while making mistakesthat do not change the meaning of a text; retell what he/she has read and give additionaldetails when asked questions; identify the main characters and events.

Level 3* – The student will be able to:read and understand illustrated texts geared to his/her level; read a range of familiar words,e.g., eyes, red, morning, reading; read words made up of complex sounds, e.g., friend, said,would; explain how he/she tackles new words when reading; find the meaning of a wordbased on the context; read fluently and observe punctuation marks; retell what he/she hasread and describe most of the events of the story; describe the characters the central

7

based on the context; read fluently and observe punctuation marks; retell what he/she hasread and describe most of the events of the story; describe the characters, the centralproblem, and how the problem is solved; find answers to questions using clues contained inthe text.

Level 4 – The student will be able to:read and understand texts geared to his/her level, with or without picture support; explainthe various techniques he/she uses to read words; find the meaning of a word based on thecontext; read fluently and observe punctuation marks so as to read expressively; retell whathe/she has read and describe the main events of the story; describe the characters, thecentral problem, and how the problem is solved; find answers to questions using clues givenin the text or by drawing on personal experiences or even by making generalizationsextending beyond the content of the text.

* By the end of Grade 2, students are expected to have attained Level 3.


Chart 1

District 01 n= 592

District 03 n= 436

District 05 n= 346

District 09 n= 415

District 11 n= 396

Province n= 2185

Chart 2

Number of students

who wrote the exam

District 01

Grade 2

Literacy

74 7277

7466

7371 7479

74

62

72

0

20

40

60

80

100

District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province

Percentages

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 2

Reading comprehension Oral reading

target

68

78

60

76

Des Bâtisseurs

Samuel‐de‐Champlain


Des Bâtisseurs n= 93

Arc‐en‐ciel n= 29

Saint‐Henri n= 73

Sainte‐Bernadette n= 22

Amirault n= 138

Abbey‐Landry n= 37

Sainte‐Thérèse n= 53

Champlain n= 96

District 01 n= 592

Province n= 2185

n= 51Samuel‐de‐

Champlain

Number of students who

wrote the exam

8

73

74

74

81

70

77

55

75

76

68

72

71

69

68

81

75

73

73

72

60

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Champlain

Sainte‐Thérèse

Abbey‐Landry

Amirault

Sainte‐Bernadette

Saint‐Henri

Arc‐en‐ciel

Des Bâtisseurs

Percentages

Oral reading Reading comprehension

target


Chart 3

Ernest‐Lang n= 9

Sainte‐Anne n= 11

Saint‐Joseph n= 21

Carrefour de la

Jeunesse

Grade 2

Literacy


wrote the exam

n= 42

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerollen= 13

Centre d'appren‐

tissage du Haut‐

Madawaska

n= 31

District 03

Régionale

Saint‐Basilen= 23

63

65

78

77

76

87

46

82

78

58

74

79

49

76

88

81

87

62

91

67

52

81

Grande‐Rivière

Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur

Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph

Régionale Saint‐Basile

Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle

Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang

Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska

Carrefour de la Jeunesse


Saint‐Jacques n= 56

Notre‐Dame n= 50

Grande‐Rivière n= 19

Mgr‐Lang n= 22

Marie‐Immaculée n= 15

Echo Jeunesse n= 30

Mgr‐Martin n= 37

District 03 n= 436

Province n= 2185

n= 37

n= 20

9

Élémentaire

Sacré‐Coeur

Régional de

Saint‐André

73

72

89

70

73

77

45

63

72

74

81

63

93

86

53

79

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Mgr‐Martin

Echo Jeunesse

Marie‐Immaculée

Mgr‐Lang

Régional de Saint‐André

Grande‐Rivière

Percentages


target


Chart 4

Cité‐de‐l'Amitié n= 63

Le Tournesol n= 50

Séjour‐Jeunesse n= 4

François‐Xavier‐

Daiglen= 13

La Découverte‐de‐

Saint‐Sauveur

District 05

Grade 2

Literacy


wrote the exam

La Croisée‐de‐

Robertvillen= 31

Académien= 14

n= 8

École Carrefour‐

Étudiantn= 36

100

76

79

74

81

69

83

100

73

92

78

64

88

65

77

92

63

79

Mgr‐Melanson

Apollo‐XI

Le Rendez‐vous‐des‐Jeunes *

Académie Assomption

Séjour‐Jeunesse *

Le Tournesol

La Croisée‐de‐Robertville

François‐Xavier‐Daigle

École Carrefour‐Étudiant

La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐Sauveur

Cité‐de‐l'Amitié


Apollo‐XI n= 37

Mgr‐Melanson n= 13

Versant‐Nord n= 15

Le Coin‐des‐Amis n= 13

Arthur‐Pinet n= 3

District 05 n= 346

Province n= 2185

10

Assomptionn= 14

Le Rendez‐vous‐

des‐Jeunesn= 2

Académie

Notre‐Damen= 23

Domaine‐des‐

Copainsn= 21

73

77

67

69

87

87

100

72

79

57

77

87

93

92

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05

Domaine‐des‐Copains

Arthur‐Pinet *

Le Coin‐des‐Amis

Académie Notre‐Dame

Versant‐Nord

Mgr‐Melanson

Percentages


target

* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but areincluded in the results for the district and province.


Chart 5

La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 9

Centre la fontaine n= 24

René‐Chouinard n= 9

L'Amitié n= 21

La Source n= 35

La Ruche n= 58

La Passerelle n= 21

L'Envolée n= 47

L'Étincelle n= 19

La‐Rivière n= 11

Grade 2

Literacy

District 09


wrote the exam

La Relève‐de‐

Saint‐Isidoren= 22

73

89

83

77

52

72

86

48

67

71

67

82

79

81

77

62

91

74

43

67

75

67

La‐Rivière

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée

La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore

La Passerelle

La Ruche

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine

La Villa‐des‐Amis

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Litereacy Assessment at Grade 2

Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 26

Le Maillon n= 12

Ola‐léger n= 14

Province n= 2185

District 09 n= 415

11

L'Escale‐des‐

Jeunesn= 16

Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandren= 29

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 42

73

74

50

69

83

76

81

76

73

72

74

43

69

75

67

77

86

82

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09

Ola‐léger

L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes

Le Maillon

Marguerite‐Bourgeoys

Terre‐des‐Jeunes

Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre

La‐Rivière

Percentages


target


Chart 6

Le Soleil‐Levant n= 31

W‐F‐Boisvert n= 18

Grande‐Digue n= 28

Donat‐Robichaud n= 41


wrote the exam

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 19

La Marée‐

Montante

Grade 2

Literacy

District 11

n= 49

Régionale‐de‐

Baie‐Sainte‐Annen= 20

Père‐Edgar‐

T.‐LeBlancn= 27

82

65

70

59

86

40

56

84

59

79

70

45

75

59

61

79

55

61

39

51

89

Mont‐Carmel

Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois

Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc

Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue

Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne

W‐F‐Boisvert

Le Soleil‐Levant

La Marée‐Montante

Carrefour‐Beausoleil


Mont‐Carmel n= 11

Camille‐Vautour n= 20

Saint‐Paul n= 6

Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 8

Notre‐Dame n= 12

District 11 n= 396

Province n= 2185

12

Blanche‐

Bourgeoisn= 21

Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 25

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 60

73

66

52

62

83

75

83

65

82

72

62

48

76

67

63

50

70

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11

Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud

Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame

Calixte‐F.‐Savoie

Saint‐Paul

Camille‐Vautour

Percentages


target


Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Sciences ettechnologies exam, by school, including the districts and province

What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index of Grade 5 Scienceset technologies for the province?

The IRR was calculated at 96.7% for a sampling of 133 booklets for the provincial Grade 5Sciences et technologies exam.

13


Chart 7

District 01 n= 511

District 03 n= 478

District 05 n= 386

District 09 n= 478

District 11 n= 409

Province n= 2262

Chart 8


wrote the exam

Grade 5

Sciences et

technologies

District 01

72

6066 66 63 65

0

20

40

60

80

100


Pourcentages

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et

technologies Exam by District, Including the Province

target

77

71

Des Bâtisseurs

Samuel‐de‐Champlain


technologies Exam



Anna‐Malenfant n= 164

Saint‐Henri n= 81



Champlain n= 75

District 01 n= 511

Province n= 2262

Samuel‐de‐

Champlainn= 45

14


wrote the exam

65

72

65

64

83

69

80

29

77

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Champlain

Abbey‐Landry

Sainte‐Bernadette

Saint‐Henri

Anna‐Malenfant

Arc‐en‐ciel

Des Bâtisseurs

Percentages

target


Chart 9

Ernest‐Lang n= 11

Sainte‐Anne n= 18

Centre d'apprentis‐

sage du Haut‐

Madawaska

n= 28

Grade 5

Sciences et

technologies


wrote the exam

District 03

Carrefour de la

Jeunessen= 52

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerollen= 16

Régionale n= 22 48

51

48

86

56

61

45

86

79

Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph



Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang

Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐…



technologies Exam



Notre‐Dame n= 54


Mgr‐Lang n= 20


Echo Jeunesse n= 37

Mgr‐Martin n= 44

District 03 n= 60

Province n= 65

Régional de

Saint‐Andrén= 19

15

Saint‐Basilen= 22

Élémentaire

Sacré‐Coeurn= 37

65

60

86

59

45

30

21

52

62

48

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Mgr‐Martin

Echo Jeunesse

Marie‐Immaculée

Mgr‐Lang


Grande‐Rivière


Notre‐Dame

Percentages

target


Chart 10


Daigle


wrote the exam

Cité‐de‐l'Amitié N= 63


Saint‐SauveurN= 7

Le Domaine‐

ÉtudiantN= 50

École Carrefour‐

ÉtudiantN= 36

Grade 5

Sciences et

technologies

N= 23

District 05

67

71

79

43

47

60

100

62

Le Rendez‐vous‐des‐…


Séjour‐Jeunesse




Le Domaine‐Étudiant

La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐…


Percentage of students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et

technologies Exam

Apollo‐XI N= 41

Versant‐Nord N= 22

Le Coin‐des‐Amis N= 11

Arthur‐Pinet * N= 2

N= 386

Province N= 2262

Le Rendez‐vous‐des‐

Jeunes *N= 1

Mgr‐Melanson N= 16

Académie Notre‐

DameN= 35

N= 7

16

La Croisée‐de‐

RobertvilleN= 39

Séjour‐Jeunesse

Académie

AssomptionN= 12

District 05

Domaine‐des‐

CopainsN= 21

65

66

81

36

80

59

56

80

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet *



Versant‐Nord

Mgr‐Melanson

Apollo‐XI

Le Rendez‐vous‐des‐…

Percentages

target



Chart 11




L'Amitié n= 23

La Source n= 36

La Ruche n= 60

La Passerelle n= 28

L'Envolée n= 45

É

La Relève‐de‐

Saint‐Isidoren= 25


wrote the exam

District 09

Grade 5

Sciences et

technologies

64

78

76

54

57

89

70

32

45

65

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée


La Passerelle

La Ruche

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine



technologies Exam

L'Étincelle n= 22

La‐Rivière n= 10


Ola‐léger n= 17

Léandre‐LeGresley n= 13

District 09 n= 478

Province n= 2262

Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandren= 33

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 55

17

L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes n= 10

65

66

85

88

70

75

75

42

50

64

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09

Léandre‐LeGresley

Ola‐léger





La‐Rivière

L'Étincelle

Percentages

target


Chart 12





Grade 5

Sciences et

technologies

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 15

District 11


wrote the exam

La Marée‐

Montanten= 38

Régionale‐de‐Baie‐

Sainte‐Annen= 17

87

36

65

41

71

58

52

53

73



Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue


W‐F‐Boisvert

Le Soleil‐Levant




technologies Exam

Mont‐Carmel n= 6

Saint‐Paul * n= 1


Notre‐Dame n= 17

District n= 409

Province n= 2262

18

Père‐Edgar‐T.‐

LeBlancn= 28

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 60


Blanche‐Bourgeois n= 23

Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 38

65

63

58

78

59

75

64

100

87

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul *

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel

Mgr François Bourgeois

Percentages

target



Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Mathématiques exam,by school, including the districts and province

What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index of Grade 5Mathématiques for the province?

The IRR was calculated at 98.5% for a sampling of 127 booklets for the provincial Grade 5Mathématiques exam.

19


Chart 13

District 01 n= 510

District 03 n= 480

District 05 n= 390

District 09 n= 477

District 11 n= 410

Province n= 2267

Chart 14


wrote the exam

District 01

Grade 5

Mathématiques

6963 65 61 60

64

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam

by District, Including the Province

target

81Samuel‐de‐Champlain




Anna‐Malenfant n= 165

Saint‐Henri n= 81



Champlain n= 75

District 01 n= 510

Province n= 2267

20


wrote the exam

Samuel‐de‐

Champlainn= 42

64

69

59

56

94

60

81

43

63

81

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Champlain

Abbey‐Landry

Sainte‐Bernadette

Saint‐Henri

Anna‐Malenfant

Arc‐en‐ciel

Des Bâtisseurs

Champlain

Percentagestarget


Chart 15

Ernest‐Lang n= 10

Sainte‐Anne n= 19


Carrefour de la

Jeunessen= 51

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerollen= 17

n= 22

Centre d'apprentis‐

sage du Haut‐

Madawaska

n= 29

Régionale Saint‐

Basile

Grade 5

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

District 03

50

50

52

52

64

35

53

70

83

78

Élé t i S é C

Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph



Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang

Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska




Notre‐Dame n= 54


Mgr‐Lang n= 19


Echo Jeunesse n= 38

Mgr‐Martin n= 44

District 03 n= 480

Province n= 2267

21

Élémentaire Sacré‐

Coeurn= 38

Régional de Saint‐

Andrén= 20

64

63

86

79

60

68

25

63

50

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Mgr‐Martin

Echo Jeunesse

Marie‐Immaculée

Mgr‐Lang


Grande‐Rivière


Percentages

target


Chart 16

n= 63

n= 7


wrote the exam



Saint‐Sauveurn= 7

Le Domaine‐

Étudiantn= 50

La Croisée‐de‐

Robertville

École Carrefour‐

Étudiantn= 38


Daiglen= 24

n= 39

Séjour‐Jeunesse

Grade 5

Mathématiques

District 05

31

100

77

33

53

58

100

56

Le Rendez‐vous‐des‐Jeunes *


Séjour‐Jeunesse





La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐Sauveur



Apollo‐XI n= 41


Le Coin‐des‐Amis n= 11

Arthur‐Pinet * n= 2

District 05 n= 390

Province n= 2267

Académie Notre‐

Damen= 35

n= 1

Mgr‐Melanson n= 16

22

n= 21

Le Rendez‐vous‐des‐

Jeunes *

Domaine‐des‐

Copains

Académie

Assomptionn= 13

64

65

95

45

66

77

63

88

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet *



Versant‐Nord

Mgr‐Melanson

Apollo‐XI

e Rende vous des Jeunes

Percentages

target

* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are

included in the results for the district and province.


Chart 17




L'Amitié n= 23

La Source n= 36

La Ruche n= 60

La Passerelle n= 27

L'Envolée n= 44

L'Étincelle n= 24

La‐Rivière n= 10

La Relève‐de‐Saint‐

Isidore

Grade 5

Mathématiques

District 09


wrote the exam

n= 25

50

82

60

48

57

86

39

58

56

76

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée


La Passerelle

La Ruche

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine



Ola‐léger n= 17


District 09 n= 477

Province n= 2267

23

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 57

Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandren= 33



64

61

46

76

67

60

84

48

0

50

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09


Ola‐léger





La‐Rivière

L'Étincelle

Percentages

target


Chart 18





wrote the exam

n= 27

n= 17

Grande‐Digue

Père‐Edgar‐T.‐n= 28

Grade 5

Mathématiques

District 11

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 15

La Marée‐

Montanten= 38


Sainte‐Anne

78

18

63

59

47

39

68

71

87

l



Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue


W‐F‐Boisvert

Le Soleil‐Levant



Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématique Exam

Mont‐Carmel n= 6


Saint‐Paul * n= 1


Notre‐Dame n= 17

District 11 n= 410

Province n= 2267

24


LeBlancn= 28

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 59

Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 38

64

60

37

75

59

63

64

100

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul *

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel

Percentages

target



Percentage of students having achieved acceptable levelor higher on the provincial Grade 8 Mathématiques exam by school, including the districts and province

What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index of Grade 8Mathématiques for the province?

The IRR was calculated at 96.4% for a sampling of 122 booklets for the provincial Grade 8Mathématiques exam.

25


Chart 19

District 01 n= 591

District 03 n= 462

District 05 n= 421

District 09 n= 495

District 11 n= 462

Province n= 2431

Chart 20


wrote the exam

District 01

Grade 8

Mathématiques

6560

5649

57 58

0

20

40

60

80

100


Pourcentages


by District, Including the Province

target



Sainte‐Anne n= 97


Le Mascaret n= 201


District 01 n= 591

Province n= 2431

26


wrote the exam

n= 39

Carrefour de

l'Acadien= 195

Samuel‐de‐

Champlain

58

65

59

59

63

56

74

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Abbey‐Landry

Le Mascaret

Carrefour de l'Acadie

Arc‐en‐ciel

Sainte‐Anne

Champlain

Percentages

target


Chart 21

Ernest‐Lang n= 10

Sainte‐Anne n= 15

n= 34

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerollen= 15

Centre

d'apprentissage du

Haut‐Madawaska

n= 36

Régionale Saint‐

Basile

District 03


wrote the exam

Carrefour de la

Jeunessen= 46

Grade 8

Mathématiques

31

46

62

60

20

70

72

83

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph

Régionale Saint‐…

Mgr‐Mathieu‐…

Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang

Centre d'appren…

Carrefour de la …




Notre‐Dame n= 48

Thomas‐Albert n= 102


A.‐J.‐Savoie n= 43

Marie‐Gaétane n= 34

District 03 n= 462

Province n= 2431

27

58

60

68

60

58

57

69

31

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Marie‐Gaétane

A.‐J.‐Savoie

Grande‐Rivière

Thomas‐Albert

Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Percentages

target


Chart 22

Place‐des‐Jeunes n= 92


Roland‐Pépin n= 47


District 05


wrote the exam

La Croisée‐de‐

Robertvillen= 28

Grade 8

Mathématiques


Daiglen= 17

Le Domaine‐

Étudiantn= 82

École Carrefour‐

Étudiantn= 47

51

75

46

53

55

74

35

Roland‐Pépin

Séjour‐Jeunesse





Place‐des‐Jeunes


Arthur‐Pinet n= 18

District 05 n= 421

Province n= 2431

Domaine‐des‐

Copainsn= 17

Académie Notre‐

Damen= 24

28

58

56

76

28

71

76

51

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet


Versant‐Nord

Roland‐Pépin

Percentages

target


Chart 23




L'Amitié n= 16

La Source n= 40

Le Tremplin n= 62

La Passerelle n= 25

L'Envolée n= 61

L'Étincelle n= 19

La‐Rivière * n= 5


Isidoren= 27

Grade 8

Mathématiques

District 09


wrote the exam

63

57

33

60

63

23

56

40

50

28

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée


La Passerelle

Le Tremplin

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine




Ola‐léger n= 12


District 09 n= 495

Province n= 2431

Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandren= 38

29

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 58


58

49

84

33

69

38

55

37

63

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09


Ola‐léger





La‐Rivière *

L'Étincelle

Percentages

target



Chart 24




La Marée‐

Montanten= 24

Secondaire

Assomptionn= 31

Grade 8

Mathématiques

District 11


wrote the exam

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 23


Sainte‐Annen= 20


34

77

67

70

30

48

71

29

91



Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue


Secondaire Assomption

Le Soleil‐Levant




Mont‐Carmel n= 16


Saint‐Paul n= 6


Notre‐Dame n= 13

District 11 n= 462

Province n= 2431

30

LeBlancn= 44

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 70


Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 37

58

57

46

66

62

33

100

57

69

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel

Bourgeois

Percentages

target


Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 8 Français exam by school, including the districts and province

What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index of Grade 8 Françaisfor the province?

The IRR was calculated at 95.4% (reading portion) and 58.9% (writing portion) for a sampling of130 booklets for the provincial Grade 8 Français exam.

31


Chart 25

District 01 n= 579

District 03 n= 442

District 05 n= 408

District 09 n= 480

District 11 n= 454

Province n= 2363

Chart 26

Grade 8

Français


wrote the exam

District 01

6762

7064

5664

0

20

40

60

80

100


Pourcentages

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français exam by

District, Including the Province

target


Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam

Sainte‐Anne n= 95


Le Mascaret n= 198


District 01 n= 579

Province n= 2363

32


wrote the exam

Samuel‐de‐

Champlainn= 38

Carrefour de

l'Acadien= 192

64

67

53

61

76

61

65

76

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Abbey‐Landry

Le Mascaret

Carrefour de l'Acadie

Arc‐en‐ciel

Sainte‐Anne

Champlain

Percentages

target


Chart 27

Ernest‐Lang n= 10

Sainte‐Anne n= 15

n= 33Régionale Saint‐

Basile


wrote the exam

Carrefour de la

Jeunessen= 46

Centre

d'apprentissage du

Haut‐Madawaska

n= 33

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerollen= 14

Grade 8

Français

District 03

58

64

88

64

47

90

58

70

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph

Régionale Saint‐…

Mgr‐Mathieu‐…

Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang

Centre d'appren…

Carrefour de la …




Notre‐Dame n= 47

Thomas‐Albert n= 96


A.‐J.‐Savoie n= 43

Marie‐Gaétane n= 30

District 03 n= 442

Province n= 2363

33

64

62

53

60

48

52

70

58

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Marie‐Gaétane

A.‐J.‐Savoie

Grande‐Rivière

Thomas‐Albert

Notre‐Dame

SaintJacques

Percentages

target


Chart 28

Place‐des‐Jeunes n= 91


Roland‐Pépin n= 45


n= 77

École Carrefour‐

Étudiantn= 44


Daigle

La Croisée‐de‐

Robertvillen= 27

n= 17

Grade 8

Français

District 05


wrote the exam

Le Domaine‐

Étudiant

71

75

74

94

61

86

52

Roland‐Pépin

Séjour‐Jeunesse





Place‐des‐Jeunes


Arthur‐Pinet n= 18

District 05 n= 408

Province n= 2363

Académie Notre‐

Damen= 23

Domaine‐des‐

Copainsn= 17

34

64

70

76

67

78

73

71

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet


Versant‐Nord

Roland‐Pépin

Percentages

target


Chart 29




L'Amitié n= 16

La Source n= 39

Le Tremplin n= 57

La Passerelle n= 25

L'Envolée n= 59

L'Étincelle n= 19

La‐Rivière * n= 5

Grade 8

Français

District 09


Isidoren= 27


wrote the exam

68

68

63

56

89

67

44

52

41

59

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée


La Passerelle

Le Tremplin

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine




Ola‐léger n= 13

District 09 n= 480

Province n= 2363


Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandren= 36

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 56


35

64

64

53

77

62

66

59

58

68

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09


Ola‐léger





La‐Rivière *

L'Étincelle

Percentages

target



Chart 30




District 11


wrote the exam

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 23

La Marée‐

Montanten= 24

Secondaire

Assomptionn= 31


Sainte‐Annen= 20


Grade 8

Français

52

66

56

50

65

61

53

38

83



Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue



Le Soleil‐Levant




Mont‐Carmel n= 16


Saint‐Paul * n= 5


Notre‐Dame n= 13

District 11 n= 454

Province n= 2363

Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 38

36


LeBlancn= 44

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 63

64

56

45

72

77

42

39

56

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul *

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel

g

Percentages

target


Elementary school exam results by sex, including the districts and province

37


Reading comprehension

Chart 31

District Boys Girls

01 307 285

03 213 223

05 178 168

09 209 206

11 187 209

Province 1094 1091


wrote the exam

Grade 2

Grade 2

Literacy

68 7074

65 6268

8075

81 83

7078

0

20

40

60

80

100


Pourcentages

Percentage of Students Having achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Silent Reading Test by Sex and by District,

Including the Province

Boys Girls

target

Oral reading

Chart 32

District Boys Girls

01 306 285

03 212 223

05 179 166

09 209 206

11 187 209

Province 1093 1089

38

Grade 2

Literacy


wrote the exam

67 6873

67

53

66

7680

86 83

7078

0

20

40

60

80

100


Pourcentages

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Oral Reading Test by Sex and by District,

Including the Province

Boys Girls

target


Chart 33

District Boys Girls

01 266 255

03 253 236

05 189 213

09 258 229

11 210 203

Province 1176 1136


wrote the exam

Grade 5

Sciences et

technologie

72

5966 65 62 65

71

6166 67 63 66

0

20

40

60

80

100


Pourcentages

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 5 Science & technologies Exam

by Sex and by District, Including the Province

Boys Girls

target

Chart 34

District Boys Girls

01 263 247

03 249 231

05 183 207

09 253 224

11 209 201

Province 1157 1110


wrote the exam

Grade 5

Mathématiques

39

69

5963 61 63 63

69 66 6662

5664

0

20

40

60

80

100


Pourcentages

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam by Sex

and by District, Including the Province

Boys Girls

target


Chart 35

District Boys Girls

01 290 301

03 246 216

05 237 184

09 238 257

11 269 193

Province 1280 1151

Grade 8i

Grade 8

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

6459 57

45

55 56

6561

54 5261 59

0

20

40

60

80

100


Pourcentages

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam by Sex

and by District, Including the Province

Boys Girls

target

Français

Chart 36

District Boys Girls

01 284 295

03 230 212

05 228 180

09 228 252

11 260 194

Province 1230 1133

40


wrote the exam

5851

58

48 4552

75 73

8679

7277

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 8 Français Exam by Sex and by

District, Including the Province

Boys Girls

target

Chapitre 3 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire

Chapter 3

Provincial High School Examination Results

Provincial Evaluation Program at the High School Level


The provincial high school examinations areintended to provide provincial certification ofstudies done in Grade 11 Français andGrade 11 Mathématiques. Students enrolledin regular courses write one set of exams and

Grade 10 students’ ESL oral proficiency isreported using a five-level scale. The studentsreceive a certificate attesting to their level ofESL proficiency. Oral proficiency results donot affect Grade 10 ESL course marks.

The results reported in this chapter indicatethe situation for the entire 2008-20091 schoolyear by combining the results for both

41

Chapter 3

Provincial High School Examination Results

Provincial Evaluation Program at the High School Level


The provincial high school examinations areintended to provide provincial certification ofstudies done in Grade 11 Français andGrade 11 Mathématiques. Students enrolledin regular courses write one set of exams, andthose enrolled in modified courses writeanother.

The provincial exams also assess ESL OralProficiency in Grade 10.

What is the passing grade?

The final passing grade is 55% for Françaisand Mathématiques. The final grade consistsof 60% of the school mark and 40% of theprovincial exam mark.

Grade 10 students’ ESL oral proficiency isreported using a five-level scale. The studentsreceive a certificate attesting to their level ofESL proficiency. Oral proficiency results donot affect Grade 10 ESL course marks.

The results reported in this chapter indicatethe situation for the entire 2008-20091 schoolyear by combining the results for bothsemesters, except in the case of Grade 11Français, which is a full-year course .

__________________1 January and June results are combined on the premise that the exams given in the two semesters are equivalent. The experts who help develop and correct the provincial examinations ensure that the exams given in the two semesters are as parallel as possible.

Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ chapitre 3

Chart 37

Provincial exam enrolment rates by course and sex

Chart 37 clearly shows that boys have atendency to enrol in modified courses. We alsosee that female enrolment rates areconsistently higher in all regular courses.

The gap is especially pronounced in themodified Grade 11 Français course, with boysaccounting for 64% of enrolments and girls for36%. The difference in enrolment rates showsgirls predominant in the following regularcourses: Grade 11 Français (by 12percentage points) and Grade 11Mathématiques (by 8 percentage points) .

64%

44%

36%

56%

M thé ti

Français 11 (mod.)

Français 11 (rég.)

Provincial exam enrolment rates by course and sex

42

55%

46%

45%

54%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Mathématiques 11 (mod.)

Mathématiques 11 (rég.)

Percentages

Boys Girls


Chart 38

Regular level

% of N.B. students enrolled in

regular courses

Grade 11 Mathématiques: 82%

Grade 11 Français: 89%

58

6364 64

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

F i 11 M hé i 11

Ave

rag

e

Provincial Exam Averages by Subject and Sex -Regular Level

Do the provincial exam results differ according to sex?The provincial results (Charts 38 and 39) show that in the regular courses, girls outperformed boys in Français. Male and female performance was the significantlyequal in Mathématiques. In the modified courses, girls and boys obtained comparable results in Français, whereas the boys outperformed the girls in Mathématiques.

More detailed statistics on the departmentalexam for the regular Grade 11 Françaiscourse were compiled, but do not appear inthis report. They show that girls have beensignificantly outperforming boys for a longtime, with a pass rate of 74%, compared with55% for boys. This poor performance on thepart of boys is a source of concern because itcould considerably affect their performance inother subjects .

Chart 39

Modified level

Grade 11 Mathématiques: 18%

43

% of N.B. students enrolled in

modified courses

Grade 11 Français : 11 % 55

6058

54

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

Français 11 Mathématiques 11

Ave

rag

e

Provincial Exam Averages by Subject and Sex -Modified Level

Boys Girls

40Français 11 Mathématiques 11

Boys Girls

The provincial average (boys and girls combined) is 61% in Grade 11 Français and 63% in Grade 11 Mathématiques.

The provincial average (boys and girls combined) is 56% in Grade 11 Français and

N.B.: Differences in averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.


Chart 40

District Boys Girls

01 288 256

03 247 235

05 207 197

09 275 277

11 179 199

Province 1196 1164

Grade 10 English Second Language


were interviewed

96

36

68

37

94

65

97

43

76

32

92

66

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100


Per

cen

tag

es

Percentage of Students at Intermediate Level or Higher on ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment, by Sex

and District, Including the Province

Boys Girls

Chart 41

44

1 17

26

31

27

70 1

6

26

32

27

8

0

10

20

30

40

Exempted Unratable Novice Basic Intermediate Advanced Superior

Per

cen

tag

es

Percentage of Students at Each ESL Oral Proficiency Level , by Sex, for the Province

Boys Girls

Boys Girls


Difference between provincial exam average and school mark average

45


Is there an appreciable difference between exam marks and schoolmarks?

Charts 42 to 53 show that there is often an appreciable difference between provincial exammarks and school marks. This difference is especially pronounced for the regular courses,with school marks being as much as 22 percentage points higher. For a district overall, thegap generally hovers around 7 percentage points. In the modified courses, the differencebetween provincial exam marks and school marks is smaller, hovering around 9 percentagepoints, although it may be as high as 20 percentage points, depending on the course andthe district.

What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index for the province?

The IRR indices were calculated for the exams from samplings (n) :

IRR n

Grade 10 English Second Language: 75.0% 244 Grade 11 Français (regular), reading: 94.6% 124 Grade 11 Français (regular), writing: 39.5% 115 Grade 11 Français (modified), reading: 94.3% 30 Grade 11 Français (modified), writing: 28.2% 26

46

Grade 11 Français (modified), writing: 28.2% 26 Grade 11 Mathématiques, (regular) : 97.6% 25 (June 2009) Grade 11 Mathématiques, (modified): 99.2% 10 (June 2009)


Chart 42

Regular level

District 01 n= 402

District 03 n= 415

District 05 n= 348

District 09 n= 425

District 11 n= 343

Province n= 1933

Grade 11

Français


wrote the exam

Français 10331 and 10332 averages by district -school marks and provincial exam marks

The Français curricula are based on a communicative approach,which explains why the Français examination consists of twotests, a reading test and a writing test, each worth 50%. Themark for the writing test includes a “language” component (70%)and a “discourse and communication” component (30%).

7075 73 71 70 72

63 61 62 61 58 61

0

20

40

60

80

100


Per

cen

tag

eFrançais 11 Averages, by District, Regular

Level

Chart 43

Modified level

District 01 n= 50

District 03 n= 40

District 05 n= 52

District 09 n= 54

District 11 n= 37

Province n= 233


wrote the exam

47

N.B.: Differences in averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.


School mark Provincial exam

62 62 63 60 60 6155 57 58 57

53 56

0

20

40

60

80

100


Per

cen

tag

e

Français 11 Averages, by District, Modified Level



Chart 44

Regular level

Grade 11

Français

Province‐wide difference

between provincial exam

average and school mark

average: ‐10.8 percentage

points.

-14,8

-14,8

-14,8

-14,4

-13,8

-13,6

-13,2

-11,6

-10,8

-10,6

-10,0

-9,9

-9,8

-9,8

-9,3

-9,2

-7,4

-6,6

-6,2

-6,0

-4,2

Clément-Cormier

Carrefour Beausoleil

Sainte-Anne

Louis-Mailloux

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard

Cité-des-Jeunes


Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne

Province

Marie-Gaétane

Roland-Pépin

Secondaire Népisiguit

Grande-Rivière

A.-J.-Savoie

Centre La fontaine

W.-A.-Losier

Louis-J.-Robichaud

Marie-Esther

Mathieu-Martin

L'Odyssée

Samuel-de-Champlain

Difference, by School, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average

in Français 10331

Chart 45

Regular level

48

-20,0

-17,5

-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5

Thomas-Albert

Aux quatre vents

Percentage points

-10,8

-14,3

-11,5

-11,0

-9,9

-7,2

-15 -10 -5 0 5 10

Province

District 03

District 11

District 05

District 09

District 01

Percentage points

Difference, by District, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average

in Français 10331


Chart 46

Modified level

Grade 11

Français





points.

-13,2

-10,2

-9,7

-9,1

-8,9

-7,8

-6,1

-5,4

-5,1

-3,4

-3,1

1,2

6,5

Sainte-Anne *

Centre La fontaine *

Secondaire Assomption *

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard *

Samuel-de-Champlain *

Grande-Rivière *

A.-J.-Savoie *

Marie-Gaétane **

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne **

Carrefour Beausoleil **

Aux quatre vents

Thomas-Albert

Mathieu-Martin

Louis-Mailloux

Clément-Cormier

L'Odyssée

Cité-des-Jeunes

Province

Louis-J.-Robichaud


W.-A.-Losier

Roland-Pépin

Marie-Esther


in Français 10332

Chart 47

Modified level

49

-15 -10 -5 0 5 10

Sainte Anne

Percentage points

-5,4

-8,5

-6,8

-5,2

-4,8

-2,4

-15 -10 -5 0 5 10

Province

District 01

District 11

District 03

District 05

District 09

Percentage points

Difference, by District, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average

in Français 10332

* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province .** These schools had no students who wrote the modified-level exam.


Chart 48

Regular level

District 01 n= 430

District 03 n= 426

District 05 n= 372

District 09 n= 374

District 11 n= 354

Province n= 1956

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

77 75 75 72 75 7569

60 61 58

6863

0

20

40

60

80

100


Per

cen

tag

eMathématiques 11 Averages,

by District, Regular Level

Mathématiques 30311 and 30312 averages by district -school marks and provincial exam marks

In Mathématiques, more than 80% of students write their exam in January, at the end of the first semester of Grade 11. Generally speaking, students display a satisfactory understanding of mathematical concepts and their decontextualized application. The main challenges lie with the problem-solving component, but students are increasingly demonstrating effective solving strategies

Province n= 1956

Chart 49

Modified level

District 01 n= 56

District 03 n= 79

District 05 n= 96

District 09 n= 136

District 11 n= 50

Province n= 417

50


wrote the exam


6761

68 65 65 6559 59 56 55

61 57

0

20

40

60

80

100


Po

urc

enta

ge

Mathématiques 11 Averages, by District, Modified Level


N.B. Differences in averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.


Chart 50

Regular level

Grade 11

Mathématiques





points.

-22,2

-19,3

-18,6

-17,5

-17,1

-15,7

-14,7

-14,5

-14,5

-13,3

-13,2

-12,0

-11,7

-11,5

-10,5

-9,3

-9,0

-8,2

-7,5

-6,2

-4,2

-3,7

-3,4

Marie-Gaétane

Marie-Esther

Centre La fontaine


Aux quatre vents

A.-J.-Savoie

Thomas-Albert

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard

Cité-des-Jeunes

L'Odyssée

W.-A.-Losier

Province

Louis-Mailloux



Samuel-de-Champlain

Grande-Rivière

Sainte-Anne

Clément-Cormier

Roland-Pépin


Louis-J.-Robichaud

Mathieu-Martin


in Mathématiques 30311

Chart 51

Regular level

51

-22,2

-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5

Marie-Gaétane

Percentage points

-12,0

-15,2

-15,1

-14,4

-7,8

-7,6

-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5

Province

District 03

District 09

District 05

District 01

District 11

Percentage points

Différence, by District, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average



Chart 52

Modified level

Grade 11

Mathématiques





points.

-19,9

-16,4

-14,7

-14,6

-11,2

-11,0

-9,9

-9,1

-8,4

-6,0

-3,6

-1,8

0,3

2,5

Marie-Gaétane *

A.-J.-Savoie *

Centre La fontaine *

Grande-Rivière *

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne *

Secondaire Assomption *

Sainte-Anne *

Samuel-de-Champlain *

Louis-Mailloux

Marie-Esther


Roland-Pépin

Mathieu-Martin

Louis-J.-Robichaud

Aux quatre vents

Province

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard

W.-A.-Losier

Thomas-Albert

Cité-des-Jeunes

L'Odyssée

Clément-Cormier



Chart 53

Modified level

52

-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5

Carrefour Beausoleil **

Percentage points

-9,1

-13,5

-11,3

-8,3

-5,8

-2,4

-15 -10 -5 0 5 10

Province

District 05

District 09

District 01

District 11

District 03

Percentage points

Différence, by District, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average


* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.** These schools had no students who wrote the modified-level exam .


Performance indices for Français and Mathématiques, by school, including the districts and province

53


What is the performance index?

The performance index gives the percentage of students in regular and modified courseswho earned a passing mark on the regular-level examinations. Since one objective of theeducation system is to prepare students for post-secondary studies, it is important that theybe able to pass the regular-level exams. This is an excellent indicator of their level ofpreparedness for post-secondary education.

Sample performance index calculation

Say that 75% of all students at school X are enrolled in the regular Mathématiques course.

Now say that 64% of the students who wrote the regular-level Mathématiques exam passed it .

The performance index is then calculated as follows:

(75 64)/100 = 48

Consequently, it can be said that 48% of all students at school X passed the regular-level Mathématiques exam. The performance index for school X is 48 for the Mathématiques

54

q p qcourse.


Chart 54

Grade 11

Français

62

66

48

60

66

44

30

72

69

63

79

67

58

64


Roland-Pépin

Aux-Quatre-Vents

District 03

Cité-des-Jeunes

Thomas-Albert

Grande-Rivière

A.-J.-Savoie

Marie-Gaétane

District 01

Samuel-de-Champlain

Sainte-Anne

L'Odyssée

Mathieu-Martin

Performance Index by School for Grade 11 Français

55

59

51

89

48

32

55

64

39

57

56

56

65

52

61

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Mgr-M.-F.-Richard



Louis-J.-Robichaud

Clément-Cormier

District 09

Centre La fontaine

W.-Arthur-Losier

Marie-Esther

Louis-Mailloux

District 05

Percentage points

target


Chart 55

Grade 11

Mathématiques

47

51

48

48

45

45

43

71

48

68

66

78

59

71

Secondaire Népisiguit *

Roland-Pépin

Aux-Quatre-Vents

District 03

Cite-des-Jeunes

Thomas-Albert

Grande-Rivière

A.-J.-Savoie

Marie-Gaétane

District 01

Samuel-de-Champlain

Sainte-Anne

L'Odyssée

Mathieu-Martin

Performance Index by School for Grade 11 Mathématiques

56

53

65

90

51

73

71

73

60

40

44

39

33

50

49

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Mgr-M.-F.-Richard



Louis-J.-Robichaud

Clément-Cormier

District 09

Centre La fontaine

W.-Arthur-Losier

Marie-Esther

Louis-Mailloux

District 05

Percentage points

target


Chart 56

Grade 11

Français

30

40

50

60

70

80

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Perform

ance index

District and Provincial Performance Indices for Français 11 since 2006

District 01 District 03 District 05

District 09 District 11 Province

Chart 57

57

Grade 11

Mathématiques

30

40

50

60

70

80

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Titre

District and Provincial Performance Indices for Mathématiques 11 since 2006

District 01 District 03 District 05

District 09 District 11 Province


Percentage of students having achieved intermediate level or higher on the Grade 10 ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment, by school, including the districts and province

Second language oral proficiency scale

Novice Able to satisfy immediate needs using rehearsed phrases. No real autonomy of expression, flexibility, or spontaneity. Can ask questions or make statements with reasonable accuracy but only with memorized phrases. Vocabulary is very limited.

Basic Able to create with the language by combining and recombining learned elements. Can satisfy minimum courtesy requirements and maintain very simple face-to-face interaction with native speakers accustomed to dealing with second language learners. Almost every utterance contains fractured syntax and grammatical errors. Vocabulary is adequate to express most elementary needs.

Intermediate* Able to initiate and maintain routine conversations and satisfy predictable requirements in

58

Able to initiate and maintain routine conversations and satisfy predictable requirements in school/work settings. Able to provide autobiographical information in some detail and give explanations with some degree of accuracy, but language is awkward . Able to state facts and narrate, describe, report on and speak of current, past, and future activities. Can give directions from one place to another; can give accurate instructions in a field of personal expertise . Has a speaking vocabulary to converse simply, with some paraphrasing. Accent, though often quite faulty, is intelligible. Uses high-frequency language structures accurately, but does not have a thorough or confident control of grammar . In certain situations, diction would probably distract a native speaker.

* Intermediate is the level expected of students at the end of Grade 10.


AdvancedAble to speak the language with sufficient structural accuracy and vocabulary to participate effectively in most formal and in all informal conversations, on practical, social, and academic or work-related topics . Control of grammar is good and speech is fluent. Can describe in detail and narrate accurately. Can discuss abstract topics and ideas as well as events. Can support opinions and hypothesize. Accent may be obvious but never interferes with understanding. Sporadic errors still occur, but they would not distract a native speaker or interfere with communication.

SuperiorAble to use the language fluently and accurately on all levels normally pertinent to personal situation (academic, social, work-related).Can understand and participate in any conversation with a high degree of fluency and precision of vocabulary.Accent is good, but the speaker would not necessarily be taken for a native speaker.

59


69

Chart 58

Sainte‐Anne n=98

L'Odyssée n=182

Mathieu‐Martin n=227

District 01 n=544

Cité‐des‐Jeunes n=273

Thomas‐Albert n=109

Grande‐Rivière n=17

A.‐J.‐Savoie n=49

Marie‐Gaétane n=34

District 03 n=482

n=37

Number of students

interviewed:

Samuel‐de‐

Champlain

Grade 10

English Second

Language

78

65

73

40

12

16

76

72

32

97

98

98

93

95

Aux quatre vents

Roland-Pépin


District 03

Marie-Gaétane

A.-J.-Savoie

Grande-Rivière

Thomas-Albert

Cité-des-Jeunes

District 01

Mathieu-Martin

L'Odyssée

Sainte-Anne

Samuel-de-Champlain

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Intermediate Level or Higher on ESL Oral

Proficiency Assessment, at Grade 10, by School

Secondaire Népisigu n=227

Aux quatre vents n=81

District 05 n=404

Centre La Fontaine n=41

W.‐A.‐Losier n=199

Marie‐Esther n=163

Louis‐Mailloux n=149

District 09 n=552

Carrefour Beausoleil n=13

Mgr‐M.‐F.‐Richard n=58

Rég. de Baie‐Sainte‐An=13

Clément‐Cormier n=125

District 11 n=378

Province n=2360

60

Roland‐Pépin

Secondaire

Assomption

n=96

n=19

n=150Louis‐J.‐Robichaud

66

93

92

97

92

95

88

85

34

33

26

32

88

72

78

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11

Clément-Cormier

Louis-J.-Robichaud



Mgr-M.-F.-Richard


District 09

Louis-Mailloux

Marie-Esther

W.-A.-Losier

Centre La Fontaine

District 05

Aux quatre vents

Percentage

target

Chapitre 3 ‐ Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire

Percentage of students having achieved a provincial exam result of 55% or more (acceptable level) or 70% (competent level) by subject and school, including the districts and province, since 2006

61

Percentage of students having achieved a provincial exam result of 55% or more (acceptable level) or 70% (competent level) by subject and school, including the districts and province, since 2006

Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ Chapitre 3

Regular level

Chart 59

2006 2007 2008

Schoool 164 173 173

District 398 404 451

Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 188

District 414

Province 1961


wrote the exam

Grade 11

Français

District 01 École Mathieu‐Martin

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages

Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006

School (55 % +) District 01 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)


Regular level

Chart 60

2006 2007 2008

School 147 183 186


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 189

District 430

Province 1956

62

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages

Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since

2006




Regular level

Chart 61

2006 2007 2008

School 144 151 147


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 137

District 414

Province 1961

District 01 École L'Odyssée

Grade 11

Français


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 62

2006 2007 2008

School 121 137 160


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 137

District 430

Province 1956

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

63

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 63

2006 2007 2008

School 57 59 97


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 58

District 414

Province 1961


wrote the exam

District 01 École Sainte‐Anne

Grade 11

Français

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006



Regular level

Chart 64

2006 2007 2008

School 57 60 87


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 68

District 430

Province 1956

Grade 11

Mathématiques

64


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 65

2006 2007 2008

School 33 21 34


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 31

District 414

Province 1961

District 01 École Samuel‐de‐Champlain

Grade 11

Français


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 66

2006 2007 2008

School 35 23 31


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 36

District 430

Province 1956


wrote the exam

Grade 11

Mathématiques

65

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 67

2006 2007 2008

School 19 28 41


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 30

District 418

Province 1961

District 03 École Marie‐Gaétane

Grade 11

Français


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 68

2006 2007 2008

School 21 22 38


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 37

District 426

Province 1956

66


wrote the exam

Grade 11

Mathématiques

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 69

2006 2007 2008

School 51 51 43


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 49

District 418

Province 1961

District 03 Polyvalente A.‐J.‐Savoie

Grade 11

Français


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 70

2006 2007 2008

School 42 45 52


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 53

District 426

Province 1956

67

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 71

2006 2007 2008

School 14 26 24


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 17

District 418

Province 1961

District 03 École Grande‐Rivière


wrote the exam

Grade 11

Français

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 72

2006 2007 2008

School 13 31 24


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 16

District 426

Province 1956

68

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 73

2006 2007 2008

School 74 98 106


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 98

District 418

Province 1961

Polyvalente Thomas‐AlbertDistrict 03


wrote the exam

Grade 11

Français

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 74

2006 2007 2008

School 63 99 93


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 95

District 426

Province 1956


wrote the exam

69

Grade 11

Mathématiques

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 75

2006 2007 2008

School 252 230 241


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 224

District 418

Province 1961


wrote the exam

District 03 Cité‐des‐Jeunes A.‐M.‐Sormany

Grade 11

Français

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 76

2006 2007 2008

School 233 220 246


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 225

District 426

Province 1956

70

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 77

2006 2007 2008

School 89 66 72


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 49

District 348

Province 1961

District 05 École Aux quatre vents


wrote the exam

Grade 11

Françcais

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 78

2006 2007 2008

School 108 78 74


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 55

District 372

Province 1956

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

71

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 79

2006 2007 2008

School 91 72 93


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 85

District 348

Province 1961


wrote the exam

District 05 Polyvalente Roland‐Pépin

Grade 11

Français

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 80

2006 2007 2008

School 76 83 109


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 99

District 372

Province 1956

Mathématiques

11e année


wrote the exam

72

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 81

2006 2007 2008

School 234 237 183


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 214

District 348

Province 1961

District 05 École Secondaire Népisiguit *

Grade 11

Français


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 82

2006 2007 2008

School 239 234 35


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 218

District 372

Province 1956

* The exam was optional in January 2008 because of an exceptional situation.


wrote the exam

73

Grade 11

Mathématiques

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 83

2006 2007 2008

School 126 124 110


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 120

District 435

Province 1961

District 09 Polyvalente Louis‐Mailloux

Grade 11

Français


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 84

2006 2007 2008

School 109 111 117


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 108

District 374

Province 1956

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

74

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 85

2006 2007 2008

School 101 122 120


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 114

District 435

Province 1961

District 09 École Marie‐Esther

Grade 11

Français


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 86

2006 2007 2008

School 75 102 111


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 110

District 374

Province 1956

75

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 87

2006 2007 2008

School 171 179 196


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 165

District 435

Province 1961

District 09 Polyvalente W.‐Arthur‐Losier

Grade 11

Français


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 88

2006 2007 2008

School 152 158 149


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 116

District 374

Province 1956


wrote the exam

76

Grade 11

Mathématiques

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 89

2006 2007 2008

School 41 43 34


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 36

District 435

Province 1961

District 09 Centre scolaire‐communautaire La Fontaine

Grade 11

Français


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 90

2006 2007 2008

School 53 44 31


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 40

District 374

Province 1956

77

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 91

2006 2007 2008

School 124 115 96


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 105

District 346

Province 1961


wrote the exame

District 11 École Clément‐Cormier

Grade 11

Français

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 92

2006 2007 2008

School 138 117 99


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 112

District 354

Province 1956

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

78

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 93

2006 2007 2008

School 120 137 120


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 134

District 346

Province 1961

Grade 11

Français

District 11 École Louis‐J.‐Robichaud


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 94

2006 2007 2008

School 138 141 127


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 134

District 354

Province 1956

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

79

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 95

2006 2007 2008

School 13 9 12


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 9

District 346

Province 1961

District 11 École Régionale de Baie‐Sainte‐Anne

Grade 11

Français


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 96

2006 2007 2008

School 15 11 10


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 9

District 354

Province 1956

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

80

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 97

2006 2007 2008

School 17 21 23


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 23

District 346

Province 1961

Grade 11

Français

District 11 École Secondaire Assomption


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 98

2006 2007 2008

School 29 24 26


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 28

District 354

Province 1956

81

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 99

2006 2007 2008

School 65 57 51


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 65

District 346

Province 1961

Grade 11

Français

District 11 École Mgr‐M.‐F.‐Richard


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 100

2006 2007 2008

School 92 65 57


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 61

District 354

Province 1956

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

82

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




Regular level

Chart 101

2006 2007 2008

School 11 8 10


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 10

District 346

Province 1961

District 11 École Carrefour Beausoleil

Grade 11

Français


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 102

2006 2007 2008

School 13 11 12


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 10

District 354

Province 1956

83

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages


2006




84


Tables by subject, level, and school at the high school level

85


Schools

Mathieu-Martin 20 178 87 70 65 76 68 94 64 14 173 82 71 70 87 70 94 70

L'Odyssée 6 136 89 66 60 67 64 86 58 7 147 90 65 65 81 65 88 72

Sainte-Anne 3 57 93 78 63 72 72 97 67 0 97 93 75 67 75 72 98 70

Samuel-de-Champlain 1 31 94 71 66 84 69 94 79 0 34 100 73 70 94 72 97 94

District 01 30 402 89 70 63 73 67 92 63 21 451 88 70 68 83 69 93 72

Marie-Gaétane 2 30 100 75 64 73 70 100 69 1 41 100 78 65 67 73 98 67

A.-J.-Savoie 0 49 92 75 65 78 71 94 72 0 43 78 71 71 88 71 93 69

Grande-Rivière 0 17 85 64 54 35 60 77 30 1 24 96 71 68 79 70 91 76

Thomas-Albert 3 97 88 75 55 50 67 94 44 2 106 87 74 64 70 70 97 61

Cité-des-Jeunes 11 222 92 76 62 73 71 97 66 7 241 89 75 69 83 73 94 74

District 03 16 415 91 75 61 67 69 96 60 11 455 89 75 68 79 72 95 70

Aux quatre vents 0 49 79 78 60 61 71 98 48 1 72 80 74 65 81 70 96 64

Roland-Pépin 4 85 88 75 64 75 71 94 66 1 93 82 73 70 91 72 98 73

Secondaire Népisiguit 8 214 89 71 62 71 67 91 62 11 183 73 75 69 84 72 96 61

District 05 12 348 87 73 62 70 69 93 61 12 348 77 74 68 85 72 97 64

Louis-Mailloux 4 117 87 74 60 62 68 98 52 7 110 80 73 62 66 69 92 52

Marie-Esther 6 110 87 70 64 76 68 94 65 4 120 83 71 68 86 70 95 70

W.-A.-Losier 8 162 91 69 60 65 65 84 56 8 196 89 73 62 71 69 91 63

Centre La Fontaine 0 36 92 69 60 61 66 86 56 1 34 83 69 61 62 66 86 51

District 09 18 425 89 71 61 67 67 90 57 20 460 85 72 64 73 69 92 61

Clément-Cormier 8 105 87 70 55 45 64 81 39 3 96 91 71 62 69 67 93 63

Louis-J.-Robichaud 2 134 89 69 62 72 66 92 64 8 120 87 68 65 81 67 89 70

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne 0 9 100 74 62 67 69 100 55 0 12 86 67 62 83 65 92 71

Secondaire Assomption 0 22 88 67 54 36 61 77 32 0 23 88 67 65 78 66 87 69

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 3 64 97 71 57 58 65 94 48 2 51 81 69 61 73 66 90 58

Carrefour Beausoleil 1 9 100 80 65 89 74 100 89 0 10 91 84 77 100 81 100 91

District 11 14 343 90 70 58 59 65 89 51 13 312 87 69 64 76 67 91 66

Province 90 1933 89 72 61 67 68 92 59 77 2026 85 72 66 79 70 94 67

* Passing grade: 55 %

86

School Mark

Prov. Exam Mark

Français grade 11 (Regular Level)2008-2009

Français grade 11 (Regular Level)2007-2008

School Mark

Prov. Exam Mark

% Pass Exam

Final Mark*

% Pass Final Mark

Perfor-mance Index

No. of Absentees

% of Students in This Level

% Pass Exam

No. of Attendees

No. ofAbsentees

No. ofAttendees


Final Mark*

% Pass Final Mark

Perfor-mance Index


SchoolsMathieu-Martin 7 27 13 63 54 41 59 85 7 37 18 60 53 43 58 85

L'Odyssée 4 17 11 63 56 59 60 95 3 16 10 55 59 81 56 78

Sainte-Anne ** 0 4 - - - - - - 0 7 7 59 46 29 54 86

Samuel-de-Champlain ** 0 2 - - - - - - 0 0 - - - - - -

District 01 11 50 11 63 55 46 60 89 10 60 12 58 54 52 57 83

Marie-Gaétane ** 0 0 - - - - - - 0 0 - - - - - -

A.-J.-Savoie ** 0 4 - - - - - - 0 12 22 53 58 50 55 67

Grande-Rivière ** 0 3 - - - - - - 0 1 - - - - - -

Thomas-Albert 0 13 12 63 53 39 59 100 0 16 13 62 55 50 59 88

Cité-des-Jeunes 0 20 8 64 58 65 62 95 1 29 11 61 58 62 60 86

District 03 0 40 9 62 57 58 60 95 1 58 11 60 57 57 59 83

Aux quatre vents 0 13 21 68 55 46 63 92 0 18 20 63 55 44 60 83

Roland-Pépin 0 12 12 61 62 83 62 100 3 21 18 65 61 71 63 96

Secondaire Népisiguit 2 27 11 62 58 59 60 93 5 66 27 64 56 55 61 94

District 05 2 52 13 63 58 62 61 94 8 105 23 64 57 56 61 93

Louis-Mailloux 6 18 13 68 60 72 65 100 4 27 20 64 56 52 61 93

Marie-Esther 2 16 13 53 59 63 55 69 3 24 17 55 62 75 58 78

W.-A.-Losier 5 17 9 56 54 47 54 65 3 23 11 58 54 44 56 74

Centre La Fontaine ** 0 3 - - - - - - 0 7 17 63 58 71 61 100

District 09 13 54 11 60 57 59 58 79 10 81 15 59 57 58 59 83

Clément-Cormier 1 16 13 59 50 31 56 75 0 9 9 58 49 33 54 67

Louis-J.-Robichaud 1 16 11 60 55 56 58 88 1 18 13 59 55 39 57 89

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne ** 2 0 - - ‐ - - - 0 2 - - - - - -

Secondaire Assomption ** 0 3 - - - - - - 0 3 - - - - - -

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard ** 11 2 - - - - - - 1 12 19 56 58 58 57 77

Carrefour Beausoleil ** 0 0 - - - - - - 0 1 - - - - - -

District 11 15 37 10 60 53 49 58 86 2 45 13 58 56 51 57 83

Province 41 233 11 61 56 55 59 88 31 349 15 61 56 55 59 86

* Passing grade: 55 %

No. Of Attendees

Français Grade 11 (Modified Level)2007-2008

Français grade 11 (Modified Level)2008-2009

87

** The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.

% Pass Final Mark

Prov. Exam Mark

% Pass Exam


Prov. Exam Mark

% Pass Exam

Final Mark*

% Pass Final Mark

Final Mark*

School Mark

No. of Absentees

No. of Attendees


Schoot Mark

No. of Absentees


Schools

Mathieu-Martin 5 189 83 75 72 86 74 97 71 1 186 87 74 71 86 73 98 74

L'Odyssée 3 137 93 77 63 64 72 93 59 2 160 93 76 65 66 71 93 60

Sainte-Anne 1 68 97 80 72 81 77 99 78 1 87 94 78 70 84 75 99 78

Samuel-de-Champlain 0 36 88 80 71 75 78 94 66 1 31 91 72 71 87 72 87 79

District 01 9 430 88 77 69 77 74 96 68 4 464 91 75 69 78 73 96 70

Marie-Gaétane 0 37 88 78 56 54 69 92 48 0 38 83 77 59 63 69 76 52

A.-J.-Savoie 0 53 96 78 62 74 72 96 71 2 52 84 75 54 39 66 77 32

Grande-Rivière 1 16 80 68 59 56 65 94 43 0 24 77 73 60 71 68 88 55

Thomas-Albert 0 95 82 75 61 56 69 95 45 1 93 80 75 59 53 68 96 42

Cité-des-Jeunes 6 225 83 75 60 54 69 88 45 3 246 84 74 64 67 70 91 55

District 03 7 426 84 75 60 57 69 91 48 6 453 83 75 61 61 69 89 50

Aux quatre vents 1 55 71 81 63 69 75 98 48 5 74 89 77 62 65 71 88 58

Roland-Pépin 4 99 80 68 62 64 66 77 51 3 109 82 69 66 70 68 82 57

Secondaire Népisiguit ** 5 218 82 78 60 60 72 94 47 167 35 63 78 49 40 77 97

District 05 10 372 79 76 61 62 71 90 49 175 218 80 75 62 63 73 91 51

Louis-Mailloux 7 108 81 73 62 64 70 92 50 4 117 77 73 57 50 66 88 37

Marie-Esther 2 110 74 74 55 46 68 87 33 6 111 66 73 57 50 66 88 32

W.-A.-Losier 4 116 63 71 57 63 66 83 39 4 149 69 72 61 53 67 91 36

Centre La Fontaine 0 40 89 75 57 50 70 85 44 1 31 86 74 54 42 67 72 36

District 09 13 374 73 73 58 57 68 87 40 15 408 71 73 58 50 67 88 35

Clément-Cormier 3 112 89 73 65 68 70 89 60 4 99 90 70 70 77 70 88 68

Louis-J.-Robichaud 4 134 88 78 74 84 76 96 73 2 127 86 75 72 83 74 98 71

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne 1 9 90 75 65 78 72 89 71 0 10 67 79 70 80 76 100 53

Secondaire Assomption 0 28 93 74 63 79 71 100 73 0 26 87 69 50 39 62 63 33

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 0 61 80 75 61 66 70 84 51 1 57 84 73 60 58 68 88 49

Carrefour Beausoleil 0 10 100 80 75 90 78 100 90 0 12 100 77 78 92 77 92 85

District 11 8 354 88 75 68 75 73 92 65 7 331 86 73 68 73 71 91 63

Province 47 1956 82 75 63 66 71 91 53 207 1874 82 74 64 65 71 91 53

* Passing grade: 55 % ** The exam was optional in January 2008 because of an exceptional situation.

No. of Absentees

% of Students

in this Level

School Mark

Prov. Exam Mark

% Pass Final Mark

Perfor-mance Index

No. of Attendees

88

Final Mark*

No. of Absentees

No. of Attendees


School Mark

Prov. Exam Mark

% Pass Exam

Mathématiques grade 11 (Regular Level)2008-2009

Mathématiques grade 11 (Regular Level)2007-2008

% Pass Final Mark

Perfor-mance Index

% Pass Exam

Final Mark*


SchoolsMathieu-Martin 2 38 17 70 59 66 67 87 2 27 13 68 58 63 64 82

L'Odyssée 0 11 7 60 61 82 60 73 3 12 7 57 61 75 58 75

Sainte-Anne ** 1 2 - - - - - - 0 6 6 55 54 67 55 67

Samuel-de-Champlain ** 0 5 - - - - - - 0 3 - - - - - -

District 01 3 56 12 68 59 68 65 86 5 48 9 62 58 67 60 77

Marie-Gaétane ** 0 5 - - - - - - 0 8 17 65 54 38 60 100

A.-J.-Savoie ** 0 2 - - - - - - 0 10 16 60 51 40 57 80

Grande-Rivière ** 1 4 - - - - - - 0 7 23 55 55 43 55 71

Thomas-Albert 3 21 18 59 55 48 58 81 0 23 20 61 60 78 61 91

Cité-des-Jeunes 0 47 17 62 60 64 61 81 2 48 16 68 64 79 66 90

District 03 4 79 16 61 59 61 60 82 2 96 17 64 60 69 63 89

Aux quatre vents 1 23 29 72 63 74 69 96 0 9 11 58 58 56 58 56

Roland-Pépin 0 25 20 66 51 44 62 68 0 24 18 68 58 54 64 83

Secondaire Népisiguit 7 48 18 69 55 54 65 83 58 21 38 68 49 43 66 92

District 05 8 96 21 69 56 56 65 82 58 54 20 67 55 50 65 87

Louis-Mailloux 6 25 19 72 52 28 65 89 5 35 23 70 52 40 64 92

Marie-Esther 5 38 26 70 54 40 65 92 4 57 34 60 49 37 56 61

W.-A.-Losier 4 68 37 63 57 57 61 83 4 66 31 65 55 49 61 87

Centre La Fontaine ** 0 5 - - - - - - 0 5 - - - - - -

District 09 15 136 27 66 55 47 63 86 13 163 29 65 52 44 60 79

Clément-Cormier 1 14 11 68 71 93 69 100 1 11 10 63 60 64 62 91

Louis-J.-Robichaud 2 18 12 67 58 56 64 95 0 21 14 62 64 71 63 86

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne ** 0 1 - - - - - - 0 5 - - - - - -

Secondaire Assomption ** 0 2 - - - - - - 0 4 - - - - - -

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 2 15 20 62 53 47 59 87 0 11 16 57 49 27 54 64

Carrefour Beausoleil ** 0 0 - - - - - 1 0 - - - - - -

District 11 5 50 12 66 61 66 64 94 2 52 14 63 60 62 62 81

Province 35 417 18 66 57 57 63 86 80 413 18 65 56 55 62 83* Passing grade: 55 %

% Pass Final Mark

% Pass Exam

No. of Attendees

Mathématiques Grade 11 (Modified Level)2007-2008

Mathématiques grade 11 (Modified Level)2008-2009

89

School Mark

Prov. Exam Mark

% Pass Final Mark

No. of Absentees


% Pass Exam

No. of Absentees

No. of Attendees


School Mark

Prov. Exam Mark

Final Mark*

Final Mark*


Schools

Mathieu-Martin 8 227 0,4 0,0 0,0 1,8 35,7 48,5 13,7 3 247 0,8 0,0 0,0 4,5 25,5 57,5 11,7

L'Odyssée 2 182 0,0 0,5 1,6 0,0 15,9 55,5 26,4 4 166 0,0 0,0 1,2 4,2 24,1 54,2 16,3

Sainte-Anne 6 98 0,0 0,0 0,0 7,1 10,2 45,9 36,7 2 76 0,0 0,0 0,0 6,6 19,7 31,6 42,1

Samuel-de-Champlain 0 37 5,4 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,7 43,2 48,6 0 38 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,6 10,5 44,7 42,1

District 01 16 544 0,6 0,2 0,6 2,0 22,2 50,0 24,4 9 527 0,4 0,0 0,4 4,6 23,1 51,8 19,7

Marie-Gaétane 1 34 0,0 0,0 20,6 67,6 8,8 2,9 0,0 0 33 0,0 0,0 21,2 66,7 12,1 0,0 0,0

A.-J.-Savoie 1 49 4,1 0,0 26,5 53,1 16,3 0,0 0,0 0 62 0,0 0,0 29,0 61,3 8,1 1,6 0,0

Grande-Rivière 0 17 0,0 0,0 0,0 23,5 47,1 29,4 0,0 0 24 0,0 0,0 4,2 33,3 41,7 20,8 0,0

Thomas-Albert 10 109 0,0 0,0 0,0 27,5 49,5 19,3 3,7 6 132 0,0 0,0 2,3 22,0 39,4 33,3 3,0

Cité-des-Jeunes 4 273 0,0 1,1 13,6 53,1 22,0 10,3 0,0 5 305 0,3 1,6 14,1 46,9 23,3 11,8 2,0

District 03 16 482 0,4 0,6 11,8 47,3 27,6 11,4 0,8 11 556 0,2 0,9 12,9 43,2 25,5 15,5 1,8

Aux quatre vents 1 81 0,0 0,0 7,4 14,8 39,5 30,9 7,4 1 63 0,0 0,0 6,3 17,5 39,7 31,7 4,8

Roland-Pépin 5 96 0,0 1,0 6,3 28,1 46,9 15,6 2,1 1 127 3,9 0,0 3,9 28,3 43,3 18,9 1,6

Secondaire Népisiguit 10 227 0,0 0,9 4,0 22,0 41,9 27,3 4,0 5 281 0,7 1,8 5,0 23,1 35,9 24,2 9,3

District 05 16 404 0,0 0,7 5,2 22,0 42,6 25,2 4,2 7 471 1,5 1,1 4,9 23,8 38,4 23,8 6,6

Louis-Mailloux 3 149 0,7 0,7 17,4 48,3 26,8 6,0 0,0 11 171 0,0 1,2 22,8 52,6 16,4 7,0 0,0

Marie-Esther 10 163 1,2 3,1 16,6 53,4 15,3 9,8 0,6 5 150 0,0 9,3 28,0 42,0 15,3 4,7 0,7

W.-A.-Losier 7 199 1,0 3,0 10,6 53,8 26,1 5,5 0,0 7 208 8,7 1,0 15,4 52,9 15,4 6,3 0,5

Centre La Fontaine 0 41 0,0 0,0 0,0 12,2 43,9 34,1 9,8 0 47 6,4 0,0 0,0 17,0 46,8 14,9 14,9

District 09 20 552 0,9 2,2 13,4 49,1 24,5 9,1 0,9 23 576 3,6 3,1 19,6 47,0 18,2 6,8 1,6

Clément-Cormier 3 125 0,0 0,0 0,8 7,2 51,2 40,0 0,8 1 145 0,0 0,0 0,0 1,4 63,4 34,5 0,7

Louis-J.-Robichaud 5 150 0,0 0,0 1,3 2,0 48,7 41,3 6,7 3 179 0,6 0,0 1,1 7,3 51,4 34,6 5,0

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne 0 13 7,7 0,0 0,0 0,0 46,2 46,2 0,0 1 11 0,0 0,0 0,0 9,1 0,0 81,8 9,1

Secondaire Assomption 1 19 5,3 0,0 0,0 0,0 47,4 42,1 5,3 0 31 0,0 0,0 0,0 3,2 19,4 71,0 6,5

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 1 58 3,4 0,0 0,0 8,6 48,3 39,7 0,0 1 93 0,0 1,1 2,2 9,7 37,6 39,8 9,7

Carrefour Beausoleil 0 13 0,0 0,0 0,0 15,4 23,1 46,2 15,4 0 12 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 16,7 25,0 58,3

District 11 10 378 1,1 0,0 0,8 5,0 48,4 41,0 3,7 6 471 0,2 0,2 0,8 5,5 48,2 38,9 6,2

Province 78 2360 0,6 0,8 6,7 26,2 31,5 26,9 7,3 56 2601 1,2 1,1 8,2 25,9 29,9 26,6 7,0

No. of Attendees

ESL Oral Proficiency AssessmentGrade 10 (All Levels) 2007-2008

UnratableExempted SuperiorAdvancedInter-

mediaryExempted Unratable

90

BasicNoviceNo. of

AbsenteesAdvanced SuperiorNovice BasicInter-

mediaryNo. of

AttendeesNo. of

Absentees

ESL Oral Proficiency AssessmentGrade 10 (All Levels) 2008-2009

Chapitre 4 ‐ résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale

Chapter 4

Results of Pan-Canadian and International AssessmentsPan-Canadian (PCAP/SAIP) and International

(PISA) Assessment Programs

What are SAIP and PCAP?1

The School Achievement Indicators Program(SAIP) was a cyclical program of pan-Canadian assessments of studentachievement in mathematics, reading andwriting, and science that was conducted bythe Council of Ministers of Education Canada

Why did CMEC develop SAIP and PCAP?

Canadians have long been interested in howwell their education systems are meeting theneeds of students and society. To provideinformation on this issue, the provinces andterritories through CMEC developed SAIP

91

Chapter 4

Results of Pan-Canadian and International AssessmentsPan-Canadian (PCAP/SAIP) and International

(PISA) Assessment Programs

What are SAIP and PCAP?1

The School Achievement Indicators Program(SAIP) was a cyclical program of pan-Canadian assessments of studentachievement in mathematics, reading andwriting, and science that was conducted bythe Council of Ministers of Education, Canada(CMEC) between 1993 and 2004. The Pan-Canadian Assessment Program (PCAP) hassince then replaced SAIP. The first PCAPassessment took place in the spring of 2007.PCAP will continue to assess performance inthe same three core subjects as SAIP but willhave room for other subjects to be added asthe need arises.

_______________1 CMEC (2006). The Pan-Canadian AssessmentProgram (PCAP) and the School AchievementIndicators Program (SAIP). Taken on December 11,2006 from http://www.cmec.ca/pcap/indexe.stm .

Why did CMEC develop SAIP and PCAP?

Canadians have long been interested in howwell their education systems are meeting theneeds of students and society. To provideinformation on this issue, the provinces andterritories, through CMEC, developed SAIPand then PCAP to assess the performance ofstudents in mathematics, reading, andscience. Three cycles of pan-Canadianassessments have been conducted since1993. The information revealed in eachassessment, together with the reviewmechanisms of individual jurisdictions, hasgiven ministers of education a basis forexamining their curriculum and other aspectsof their school system.

Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4

Why did CMEC replace SAIP with PCAP?

At its 83rd meeting (held on April 2, 2003, inLondon, Ontario), CMEC approved thedevelopment of PCAP to replace SAIP. Theneed for a new pan-Canadian program thatwould reflect changes made in jurisdictionalcurricula within the past decade had becomeapparent in Canadian provinces andterritories. PCAP also recognizes theincreased jurisdictional emphasis now placedon international assessments. It assessesperformance in reading, science, andmathematics, and will have room for othersubjects as the need arises. PCAP assesses13-year-old students and enables provincesand territories to improve their ownassessments and validate their results againstnational and international results.

What is PISA?2

The Program for International Student

The assessment covers three domains:reading, mathematics, and science. Althougheach assessment has questions from all threedomains, the focus shifts with eachassessment. In 2000 the focus was onreading, in 2003 on mathematics, and in 2006on science. In 2003, an assessment ofproblem-solving skills was also conducted.

In Canada, the first PISA assessment tookplace in April and May 2000 at the same timeas the Youth in Transition Survey (YITS) foryouth aged 15. The second assessment wasconducted in 2003.

Who participates in PISA?

Although the samples in most countries arebetween 4,000 and 10,000 students, inCanada, over 22,000 students are tested,which allows results to be produced at theprovincial level.

The survey includes a two-hour written test tomeasure students’ knowledge in reading

92

The Program for International StudentAssessment (PISA) is an internationalassessment of the skills and knowledge of 15-year-olds. The study is being directed by theOrganization for Economic Co-operation andDevelopment (OECD) and involves over 69countries. As the study will be repeated inother years, it will continue to produce resultsthat can be compared internationally .

_______________2CMEC (2006). The Program for International StudentAssessment (PISA). Taken on December 11, 2006 fromhttp://www.cmec.ca/pisa/indexe.stm .

The survey includes a two-hour written test tomeasure students’ knowledge in reading,mathematics, and science, as well as variousquestionnaires to gather general informationabout the students and their schools.


How are students selected? (PISA)

About 1,000 schools across Canada arerandomly selected to participate in PISA andYITS. In these schools, a random selection ismade of 15-year-old students to determinewho will participate.

How is the information used? (PISA)

Because PISA is an international studyinvolving over 69 countries, it provides aunique examination of the levels ofachievement of 15-year-olds around theworld. It gives a clear indication of thepreparedness of these students as theycontinue in their studies and enter the workforce. It is able to address questions such as :

How well are young adults prepared tomeet the challenges of the future?

Results from PISA are invaluable toeducators, social policy analysts, and humanrights advocacy groups. These researchersand analysts have access to importantinformation that can be used in developingprograms to deal with both short-term andlong-term problems or barriers that youngadults may face in their pursuit of highereducation or in gaining work experience.Information from the survey helps to evaluatethe effectiveness of existing programs andpractices, to determine the most appropriateage at which to introduce new programs, andto better target programs to those most inneed .

Young adults themselves are able to see howtheir own experiences compare with those ofother young adults.

93

meet the challenges of the future?

Are they able to analyze, reasonand communicate their ideaseffectively?

Are some kinds of school policiesand practices more effective thanothers?


Average scores and confidence intervals, by province and country, for each PCAP 2007 domain

Reading as primary domain

Curricula across Canada identify comprehension, interpretation, and response andreflection as major organizing aspects of reading literacy. In this assessment, threesubdomains of the integrated process of reading are assessed: comprehension,interpretation, and response to the text (which includes response and reflection).

Comprehension

Students understand the explicit and implicit information provided by the text. In particular,they understand the vocabulary, parts, elements, and events of the text.

Interpretation

Students make meaning by analyzing and synthesizing the parts/elements/events todevelop a broader perspective and/or meaning for the text. They may identify thetheme/thesis and support that with references to details, events, symbols, patterns, and/ortext features.

Response to text

94

p

In responding, the readers engage with the text in a number of possible ways :

making personal connections between aspects of the text and their own real/vicariousprior experiences, knowledge, values and/or point of view;

responding emotionally to central ideas or aspects of the text; taking an evaluative stance about the quality or value of the text,

possibly in relation to other texts or social or cultural factors.

The curricula across Canada in reading generally distinguish between personal and criticalresponses.

Performance descriptors for scores at each level of the general scale

Level 1 scores (379 and below)The student demonstrates a partial understanding of some fiction and non-fiction texts. Thestudent understands directly stated information, relying on familiar vocabulary, concretedetails, and explicit statements. In interpreting texts, the student provides a simplified orgeneral perspective, often relying on directly stated conclusions or connecting someaspects of the text to one another. The student demonstrates understanding of how somecontent and text features are used to accomplish particular purposes. In respondingpersonally a.d critically to texts, the student’s responses are often vague or general


Level 2 scores (380 to 575)The student comprehends, interprets, and responds to a variety of texts in a clear andreasonable manner. The student understands both directly stated information andinformation implied by the text. The student connects general statements and supportingdetails, draws conclusions about the broader meaning and intent of the text, and interpretsspecific parts of the text based on inferences and figurative language. The studentdemonstrates knowledge of how texts are structured and organized to accomplish a varietyof purposes. The student’s personal and critical responses are supported with references tothe text and other sources.

Level 3 scores (576 and above)The student comprehends, interprets, and responds to a variety of texts in a thoughtful andelaborated manner. The student understands directly stated information and informationimplied by the text, including implications arising from subtle aspects of style and tone. Thestudent demonstrates insightful interpretation of the text by synthesizing several elementsor by making a thoughtful analysis of one or more significant elements, often relying onsubtle relationships among elements and ideas. The student demonstrates knowledge andinsight of how writers structure texts and use other elements of style to accomplish a varietyof purposes. The student provides extended personal and critical responses, sometimesincluding social and cultural implications or literary evaluation.

Mathematics assessment

The mathematics component in PCAP 2007 is aligned with the jurisdictions’ own curriculaas well as the standards of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). The

95

p g jas well as the standards of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Theoverriding principle of the assessment is that the application of mathematics is an integratedact in which the skills and concepts of various content areas are inherently linked.

Organization of the domain

For the purposes of PCAP, the domain of mathematics was divided into four subdomainsand three processes. The four subdomains are :

numbers and operations (percentages, equivalent representations, rates, ratio and proportionality);

geometry and measurement (properties of 2-D figures and 3-D shapes,relative position, transformations and measurement);

patterns and relationships (patterns and algebraic expressions, linear relations and equations);


data management and probability (data collection and analysis, experimental andtheoretical probability. The three processes are:

problem solving; communication and representation; reasoning connections.

The subdomains are traditional groupings of skills and knowledge, while the processes areused in the application of all subdomains. The PCAP 2007 mathematics componentincluded test items drawing from the specifications of all four subdomains and related to thecompetencies (processes) of problem solving, communication/representations, andreasoning/connections. In addition, an attempt was made to ensure that the contexts of thevarious scenarios were drawn from situations that were relevant, appropriate, and sensiblefor Canadian 13-year-olds.

The scope of this assessment was limited to those concepts and skills encountered andused by most 13-year-olds in their courses of study in Canada. However, it was not acomprehensive assessment of all the concepts and skills that a particular system expects13-year-olds to master.

Science assessment

The PCAP science assessment is founded on a definition of scientific literacy thatadvocates that students’ evolving competencies in using science-related attitudes, skills,and knowledge as well as an understanding of the nature of science enable them to conductinquiries, solve problems, and make evidence-based decisions about science-relatedissues Embedded in this definition of scientific literacy is the supposition that students have

96

issues. Embedded in this definition of scientific literacy is the supposition that students haveknowledge of the life sciences, physical sciences (chemistry and physics), and earth andspace sciences, as well as an understanding of the nature of science as a humanendeavour.

Like the mathematics assessment, the science assessment comprises items associatedwith the competencies and subdomains that provide opportunities for students todemonstrate their use of science-related attitudes, skills, and knowledge. Thecompetencies and the combination of the five interrelated subdomains as defined bycurricula across Canada, as well as the statements in the CMEC's Common Framework ofScience Learning Outcomes , provided the foundation for the development of test items.

Reporting scales for the minor domains

As was the case for reading, one mean scale score for each of the minor domains has beenused for reporting the achievement results. The pan-Canadian mean score was set at 500with a standard deviation of 100.


Chart 103

PCAP (2007)Reading

476

477

478

479

486

486

491

492

503

505

524

532

Manitoba (A)

Nova Scotia (F)

Ontario (F)

Quebec (A)

British Columbia (A)

Yukon (A)

Alberta (A)

Canada (A)

Ontario (A)

Alberta (F)

Canada (F)

Quebec (F)

Pan- Canadian Results in Reading by Language

Ranking of jurisdictions on PCAP (2007) ReadingAssessment

97

N.B. Averages are statistically signigicant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.

436

458

459

464

466

471

471

473

476

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Manitoba (F)

New Brunswick (F)

Prince Edward Island (A)

Newfoundland and …

New Brunswick (A)

Nova Scotia (A)

Saskatchewan (A)

British Columbia (F)

Manitoba (A)

Scores


Chart 104

PCAP (2007)Reading

19

17

17

17

16

16

15

14

14

13

12

11

11

10

9

62

72

67

65

72

70

72

77

58

71

70

73

55

67

54

19

11

16

18

12

14

13

9

28

16

18

16

34

23

37

O t i (F)

New Brunswick (A)

Nova Scotia (F)

Yukon (A)

Nova Scotia (A)

Quebec (A)

Manitoba (A)

Saskatchewan (A)

Alberta (F)


Canada (A)

Alberta (A)

Canada (F)

Ontario (A)

Quebec (F)

Distribution (%) of Performance Levels in Reading by Language

Percentage of Students by Performance Level on PCAP(2007)

98

31

24

22

19

19

19

17

58

62

55

70

69

62

72

11

14

23

11

12

19

11

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Manitoba (F)

New Brunswick (F)



Newfoundland and Labrador (A)

Ontario (F)

New Brunswick (A)

Level 1 (%) Level 2 (%) Level 3 (%)


Chart 105

PCAP (2007)Reading

480

480

482

483

483

489

492

493

499

503

524

531

Saskatchewan (A)

Nova Scotia (F)

Nova Scotia (A)

Manitoba (A)

Quebec (A)


Canada (A)

Alberta (A)

Ontario (A)

Alberta (F)

Canada (F)

Quebec (F)

Pan-Canadian Results in Reading by Subdomain and Language — Comprehension

Ranking in reading (comprehension) on PCAP (2007)Reading

99

445

466

472

473

475

477

479

479

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Manitoba (F)


New Brunswick (F)


New Brunswick (A)

Ontario (F)

Yukon (A)


( )

Scores

N.B. Averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.


PCAP (2007)Reading

Chart 106

477

482

482

483

486

489

491

492

503

509

525

532

Quebec (A)

Ontario (F)

Nova Scotia (F)



Yukon (A)

Alberta (A)

Canada (A)

Ontario (A)

Alberta (F)

Canada (F)

Quebec (F)

Pan-Canadian Results in Reading by Subdomain and Language — Interpretation

Ranking in Reading (interpretation) on PCAP 2007

100

444

457

459

463

467

469

469

475

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Manitoba (F)


New Brunswick (F)

New Brunswick (A)

Nova Scotia (A)

Saskatchewan (A)

Newfoundland and Labrador …

Manitoba (A)

( )

Scores



Chart 107

PCAP (2007)Reading

476

480

482

484

489

493

494

495

499

506

516

522

Manitoba (A)

Nova Scotia (F)

Quebec (A)

Ontario (F)


Alberta (A)

Yukon (A)

Canada (A)

Alberta (F)

Ontario (A)

Canada (F)

Quebec (F)

Pan-Canadian Results in Reading by Subdomain and Language — Response to Text

Ranking in Reading (response to text) on PCAP (2007)

101

445

458

462

467

469

470

470

471

476

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Manitoba (F)

Princ Edward Island (A)

New Brunswick (F)

New Brunswick (A)


Nova Scotia (A)


Saskatchewan (A)

Manitoba (A)

Scores



PCAP (2007)Mathématiques

Chart 108

471

474

478

478

479

484

496

500

508

510

512

518

Ontario (F)

Manitoba (F)

Newfoundland and Labrador …

Alberta (F)

Manitoba (A)


Canada (A)

Alberta (A)

Ontario (A)

Quebec (A)

Canada (F)

Quebec (F)

Pan-Canadian Results in Mathematicsby Language

Ranking of Jurisdictions in Mathematics on PCAP (2007)

102

448

449

457

460

461

462

464

467

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Yukon (A)


Nova Scotia (A)

New Brunswick (F)

Saskatchewan (A)

New Brunswick (A)

Nova Scotia (F)


Scores



PCAP (2007)Science

Chart 109

479

480

485

485

488

496

499

503

512

514

516

524

Nova Scotia (A)

Saskatchewan (A)

Ontario (F)



Canada (A)

Ontario (A)

Nova Scotia (F)

Canada (F)

Alberta (F)

Quebec (F)

Alberta (A)

Pan-Canadian Results in Scienceby Language

Ranking of Jurisdictions in Science on PCAP 2007

103

458

460

464

467

468

470

475

477

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Yukon (A)

New Brunswick (F)


Quebec (A)

New Brunswick (A)

Manitoba (F)


Manitoba (A)

Scores



Average scores and confidence intervals, by province and country, for each PISA domain

104


PISA 2000Reading

Chart 110

The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100.

507

507

516

517

517

521

522

523

525

527

528

529

529

529

533

534

536

538

546

550

BelgiumAustria

SwedenNewfoundland and Lab.

Prince Edward IslandNova Scotia

JapanUnited Kingdom

KoreaIreland

AustraliaNew Zealand

SaskatchewanManitoba

OntarioCANADA

QuebecBritish Columbia

FinlandAlberta

Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: READING

Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2000 reading assessment

N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.

105

396

422

441

458

462

470

474

479

480

483

484

487

492

493

494

497

500

501

504

505

505

507

507

375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

BrazilMexico

LuxembourgLatvia

Russian FederationPortugalGreecePoland

HungaryLichtenstein

GemanyItaly

Czech RepublicSpain

SwitzerlandDenmark

OECD AverageNew BrunswickUnited States

FranceNorwayIceland

Belgium

Scores


PISA 2000Mathematics

Chart 111


514

514

514

515

517

520

524

525

529

529

533

533

533

534

536

537

547

547

550

557

LichtensteinIceland

DenmarkAustriaFrance

BelgiumOntario

SaskatchewanUnited Kingdom

SwitzerlandCANADAManitobaAustralia

British ColumbiaFinland

New ZealandKorea

AlbertaQuebec

Japan

Average scores and confidence intervals by province and country: MATHEMATICS


Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2000 mathematics assignment

106

334

387

446

447

454

457

463

470

476

478

488

490

493

498

499

500

503

506

509

510

512

513

514

300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

BrazilMexico

LuxembourgGreece

PortugalItaly

LatviaPolandSpain

Russian FederationHungary

GermanyUnited States

Czech RepublicNorway

OECD AverageIreland

New BrunswickNewfoundland and Lab.

SwedenPrince Edward Island

Nova ScotiaLichtenstein

Scores


PISA 2000Science

Chart 112


508

511

512

513

516

516

519

522

522

527

528

528

529

532

533

538

541

546

550

552

Prince Edward IslandCzech Republic

SwedenIreland

Nova ScotiaNewfoundland and Lab.

AustriaSaskatchewan

OntarioManitobaAustralia

New ZealandCANADA

United KingdomBritish Columbia

FinlandQuebecAlbertaJapanKorea

Average scores and confidence intervals by province and country: SCIENCE


Average scores and confidence intervals by province andcountry for the PISA 2000 science assessment

107

375

422

443

459

460

460

461

476

478

481

483

487

491

496

496

496

496

497

499

500

500

500

508

350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

BrazilMexico

LuxembourgPortugal

LatviaRussian Federation

GreeceLichtenstein

ItalyDenmark

PolandGermany

SpainSwitzerland

BelgiumIceland

HungaryNew Brunswick

United StatesOECD Average

NorwayFrance

Prince Edward Island

Scores


PISA 2003Reading

Chart 113

498499500500503507510512513513514515520521522525525525528530534535543543

JapanSwitzerland

OECD AverageNorway

New BrunswickBelgium

Hong Kong-ChinaSaskatchewan

NetherlandsNova Scotia

SwedenIreland

ManitobaNewfoundland and Lab.

New ZealandLichtenstein

AustraliaQuebec

CANADAOntario

KoreaBritish Columbia

AlbertaFinland

Average scores and confidence intervals by province and country: READING


Average scores and confidence intervals by province andcountry for the PISA 2003 reading assessment

108

375

382400403

412420

434441442

469472476478479481482489491491491492492495495496497498498

350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

TunisiaIndonesia

MexicoBrazil

Serbia and MontenegroThailandUruguay

TurkeyRussian Federation

SlovakiaGreece

ItalyPortugal

LuxembourgSpain

HungaryCzech Republic

LatviaAustria

GermanyIceland

DenmarkPrince Edward Island

United StatesFrancePoland

Macao-ChinaJapan

Scores



Chart 114


512514515515516516517523524527527528529530532534536537538538542544549550

New BrunswickDenmark

IcelandNova Scotia

Czech RepublicSaskatchewan

Newfoundland and Lab.New Zealand

AustraliaSwitzerland

Macao-ChinaManitobaBelgiumOntario

CANADAJapan

LichtensteinQuebec

NetherlandsBritish Columbia

KoreaFinlandAlberta

Hong Kong-China

Average Scores and Confidence Intervals for Provinces and Countries: MATHEMATICS

Average scores and confidence intervals by province andcountry for the PISA 2003 mathematics assessment

N.B. . Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.

109

356

359360

385417422423

437445

466466468

483483485490490493495498500500503503506509511512

325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

BrazilTunisia

IndonesiaMexico

ThailandUruguay

TurkeySerbia and Montenegro

GreeceItaly

PortugalRussian Federation

United StatesLatviaSpain

HungaryPoland

LuxembourgNorway

SlovakiaOECD Average

Prince Edward IslandIreland

GermanyAustria

SwedenFrance

New Brunswick

Scores


PISA 2003Science

Chart 115

505505506506509511512513514515519520521523524525525525527

538539539

548548

IrelandNova Scotia

SaskatchewanSwedenBelgiumFrance

ManitobaSwitzerland

Newfoundland and Lab.Ontario

CANADAQuebec

New ZealandCzech Republic

NetherlandsMacao-China

AustraliaLichtenstein

British ColumbiaCorée

AlbertaHong Kong-China

JapanFinland

Average Scores and Confidence Intervals for Provinces and Countries: SCIENCE



110

385

390395

405429434436438

468475481483484486487489489489491491494495495498498502503505

350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

TunisiaBrazil

IndonesiaMexico

ThailandTurkey

Serbia and MontenegroUruguayPortugal

DenmarkGreece

LuxembourgNorway

ItalySpain

Prince Edward IslandLatvia

Russian FederationAustria

United StatesOECD Average

IcelandSlovakia

New BrunswickPoland

GermanyHungary

Ireland

Scores


PISA 2006Reading

Chart 116

507

508

510

513

514

516

517

521

522

527

528

534

535

536

547

556

Netherlands

Poland

Lichtenstein

Australia


Manitoba

Ireland

New Zealand

Quebec

Canada

British Columbia

Ontario

Alberta

China-Hong Kong

Finland

Korea

Average Scores and Confidence Intervals for Provinces and Countries: READING



111

488

490

491

492

494

494

495

495

496

497

497

498

499

501

501

505

507

507

507

275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

France

Austria

OECD Average

China-Macao

Slovenia

Denmark

United Kingdom

Germany

Chinese Taipei


New Brunswick

Japan

Switzerland

Estonia

Belgium

Nova Scotia

Sweden

Saskatchewan

Netherlands

Scores


Chart 116 (continued)

PISA 2006Reading

442

447

460

461

466

469

470

472

477

479

479

482

483

484

484

R i F d i

Chile

Turkey

Greece

Spain

Slovakia

Italy

Lithuania

Portugal

Croatia

Luxemburg

Latvia

Hungary

Czech Republic

Norway

Iceland

Average Scores and Confidence Intervals for Provinces and Countries: READING (continued)



112

285

312

353

374

380

385

392

393

393

396

401

401

402

410

413

417

439

440

275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

Kyrgyzstan

Qatar

Azerbaijan

Argentina

Tunisia

Colombia

Montenegro

Indonesia

Brazil

Romania

Serbia

Jordan

Bulgaria

Mexico

Uruguay

Thailand

Israel

Russian Federation

Scores



Chart 117

521

522

523

523

525

525

526

527

530

530

531

540

547

547

548

549

Manitoba

New Zealand

Japan

British Columbia

Lichtenstein

China-Macao

Ontario

Canada

Switzerland

Alberta

Netherlands

Quebec

Korea

China-Hong Kong

Finland

Chinese Taipei

Average Scores and Confidence Intervals for Provinces and Countries: MATHEMATICS



113

496

498

501

501

502

504

504

505

506

506

506

507

507

510

513

515

520

520

521

275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

France

OECD Average


Ireland

Sweden

Slovenia

Germany

Austria

Nova Scotia

New Brunswick

Iceland

Saskatchewan


Czech Republic

Denmark

Estonia

Australia

Belgium

Manitoba

Scores




459

462

466

467

474

476

476

480

486

486

490

490

491

492

495

495

Greece

Italy

Portugal

Croatia

United States

Russian Federation

Azerbaijan

Spain

Lithuania

Latvia

Norway

Luxemburg

Hongrie

Slovakia

United Kingdom

Poland

Average Scores and Confidence Intervals for Provinces and Countries: MATHEMATICS (continued)


Average scores and confidence intevals by province andcountry for the PISA 2006 mathematics assessment

114

311

318

365

370

370

381

384

391

399

406

411

413

415

417

424

427

435

442

459

275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

Kyrgyzistan

Qatar

Tunisia

Colombia

Brazil

Argentina

Jordan

Indonesia

Montenegro

Mexico

Chile

Bulgaria

Romania

Thailand

Turkey

Uruguay

Serbia

Israel

Greece

Scores


The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100

Chart 118

PISA 2006Science

522

522

523

525

526

527

530

531

531

531

532

534

537

539

542

550

563

Lichtenstein

Korea

Manitoba

Netherlands

Newfoundland and Labrador

Australia

New Zealand

Quebec

Japan

Estonia

Chinese Taipei

Canada

Ontario

British Columbia

China - Hong Kong

Alberta

Finland

Average Scores and Confidence Intervals for Provinces and Countries: SCIENCE

N.B.Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.


115

495

496

498

500

503

504

506

508

509

510

511

511

512

513

515

516

517

519

520

522

300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

France

Denmark

Poland

OECD Average

Sweden

Hungary

New Brunswick

Ireland


Belgium

China-Macao

Austria

Switzerland

Czech Republic

United Kingdom

Germany

Saskatchewan

Slovenia

Nova Scotia

Lichtenstein

Scores


PISA 2006Science


The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100

438

454

473

474

475

479

486

487

488

488

488

489

490

491

493

Chile

Israel

Greece

Portugal

Italy

Russian Federation

Luxemburg

Norway

Spain

Slovakia

Lithuania

United States

Latvia

Iceland

Croatia

Average Scores and Confidence Intervals for Provinces and Countries : SCIENCE (continued)

N.B. N.B.Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.


116

322

349

382

386

388

390

391

393

410

412

418

421

422

424

428

434

436

300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

Kyrgyzstan

Qatar

Azerbaijan

Tunisia

Colombia

Brazil

Argentina

Indonesia

Mexico

Montenegro

Romania

Thailand

Jordan

Turkey

Uruguay

Bulgaria

Serbia

Scores

Conclusion

Conclusion

This marks the fifteenth year of publication of New Brunswick’s provincial examination results by school and district. The Department of Education releases these results to meet the requirements of accountability and transparency.

The production of this report is the outcome of a lengthy process of preparation and then compilation of the data gathered from the provincial examinations administered in the 2008-2009 school year. The Department chose the most relevant data so as to produce a report accessible to everyone.

These results show all education partners and decision makers how New Brunswick students are doing in the subjects that make up the compulsory portion of the curriculum .

We would appreciate receiving your comments by mail or e-mail once you have d thi t ith b il il Pl d th t th dd

117

Conclusion

This marks the fifteenth year of publication of New Brunswick’s provincial examination results by school and district. The Department of Education releases these results to meet the requirements of accountability and transparency.

The production of this report is the outcome of a lengthy process of preparation and then compilation of the data gathered from the provincial examinations administered in the 2008-2009 school year. The Department chose the most relevant data so as to produce a report accessible to everyone.

These results show all education partners and decision makers how New Brunswick students are doing in the subjects that make up the compulsory portion of the curriculum .

We would appreciate receiving your comments by mail or e-mail once you have read this report, either by mail or e-mail. Please send them to the addresses indicated at the beginning . The Department will examine your questionnaire responses and comments with great care.

Note, too, that school principals and district superintendents, as well as appropriate departmental staff, are available to answer any further questions you may have.

provincial examination results - new brunswick · 2018-09-01 · 37 provincial exam enrolment rates...

Documents