public law 280 (l25)

18
Public Law 280 (L25) Dr. Anton Treuer Bemidji State University

Upload: takara

Post on 15-Jan-2016

108 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Public Law 280 (L25). Dr. Anton Treuer Bemidji State University. Merriam Report Review. Exposed problems with boarding schools: malnutrition of students, harsh physical punishments, deaths Exposed poverty: Indians making 1/7 of the average American household income - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Public Law 280 (L25)

Public Law 280 (L25)

Dr. Anton TreuerBemidji State University

Page 2: Public Law 280 (L25)

Merriam Report Review

• Exposed problems with boarding schools: malnutrition of students, harsh physical punishments, deaths

• Exposed poverty: Indians making 1/7 of the average American household income

• Failure of allotment and assimilation programs to improve life for Indians or assimilate them into mainstream

Page 3: Public Law 280 (L25)

John Collier & Indian New Deal Review

• BIA becomes advisory not supervisory• Work program, public health, education

funding• Indian Reorganization Act: end allotment,

enable creation of modern tribal government

Page 4: Public Law 280 (L25)

Unraveling the Indian New Deal

• Indian resistance– 77 tribes voted not to accept IRA– 17 accepted it against their will– More than 50,000 Indians not recognized as such

by federal government– Over 100,000 Indians in OK not affected by IRA

Page 5: Public Law 280 (L25)

Unraveling the Indian New Deal• Nonnative resistance to IRA & Collier– Collier seen as a radical, segregationist, communist– BIA moved temporarily to Chicago, 1941 to distance

BIA from legislators and President– Several attempts to repeal IRA– Reservations are negative: relics of a racist past,

obstacle to assimilation– Desire for unity, consensus during WWII (in spite of

Japanese internment camps & anti-immigration)– Navajo Code Talkers unnoticed– Collier resigns, 1945

Page 6: Public Law 280 (L25)

Policy Shift

• Previous policies focused on changing Indians, but also isolating them from whites: reservations, boarding schools, allotment, even citizenship

• Now policy-makers advocated assimilation by integration: relocating Indians away from home communities and terminating tribal sovereignty

Page 7: Public Law 280 (L25)

Indian Claims Commission

• Clean up past messes• Cloud titles turned clean• Quantify solutions to complex problems• Tribes have to establish competing claims to

prove who got cheated• No apologies, no reparations

Page 8: Public Law 280 (L25)

Relocation

• Entice Indians to move to urban areas: Minneapolis, Milwaukee, Chicago

• One-way bus fare and first month’s rent supplied by government

• Once relocated, Indian families found little economic opportunity

• Put first significant numbers of Indian on welfare – entitlement mentality

• Cost the government more than it saved

Page 9: Public Law 280 (L25)

Relocations Advertisements

Page 10: Public Law 280 (L25)

Relocation Families

Page 11: Public Law 280 (L25)

Effects of Relocation

• Urbanization is permanent: most tribes have half their population living off-reservation, 37% of Indians in MN in the 7 country metro

• Red Lake and many other reservations establish urban offices to outreach constituents

• Poverty, gangs, drop out rates all higher for urban Indians than their reservation counterparts

Page 12: Public Law 280 (L25)

Termination

• Prelude: full lecture on subject later• Disband tribal governments, making Indians

American with tribal heritage but without tribal government, land, or assistance

• Menominee terminated

Page 13: Public Law 280 (L25)

Indian Health Service

• Treaty-stipulated obligation to many tribes• Reorganized under U.S. Public Health

Program, 1954• Quality of care• Privacy• Sterilization: 25,000 tubal ligations by 1975

without consent

Page 14: Public Law 280 (L25)

Public Law 280, 1953

• Federal congressional act: “Only Congress shall…”

• Test case, affecting MN, WI, CA, NEB, OR• Other states added later

Page 15: Public Law 280 (L25)

Public Law 280

Jurisdiction Before PL 280• Federal government has

plenary power (Kagama decision)

• Federal government has jurisdiction over Major Crimes (Major Crimes Act, 1885)

• State has no authority over tribes

• Tribes maintain civil and criminal jurisdiction over all but major crimes

Jurisdiction After PL 280• Federal government has

plenary power (Kagama decision)

• State government has jurisdiction over crime

• Tribes maintain civil jurisdiction

• Only affects tribes in named states

• Treaty rights not affected

Page 16: Public Law 280 (L25)

Red Lake Exempted

Giniwgwaneyaash• Scrutinized legislative

agenda and intervened• Angry testimony in

Washington• Bill amended to exclude

Red Lake before it came to a vote

Roger Jourdain

Page 17: Public Law 280 (L25)

Eroding PL 280

• Many tribes seek exemption from PL 280• Boise Forte (Nett Lake, Vermilion, Deer Creek)

exempted in 1975• All tribes in MN except Fond du Lac have tribal

courts and police• Double jeopardy – separate sovereigns

Page 18: Public Law 280 (L25)

New Assimilation Approach

• Reservation period, up to 1933: allotment, boarding schools – keep them separate and assimilate them before integration

• Indian New Deal period, 1933-1945: expanding tribal sovereignty and autonomy

• Post-IRA period, 1945-1970: relocation, termination, PL 280 - assimilate by integration