public law in indian legal system
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 Public Law in Indian Legal System
1/15
ELEMENTS OF JURISPRUDENCE
1 | P a g e
PROJECT REPORT ON:
PUBLIC LAW IN INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEMSubmitted to: Submitted by:
Abhik majumdar Sourav chandan padhi
BBA.LLB(H) Roll no 51
1st
Semester
-
7/28/2019 Public Law in Indian Legal System
2/15
ELEMENTS OF JURISPRUDENCE
2 | P a g e
CONTENTS
1- Introduction 3
2-Methodology 4
3-Development of Indian Legal system 5
4-Provisions of Constitution of India 7
(like fundamental rights)
5-Change in trends of Judicial decision 10
after Maneka Gandhis case
6- Conclusion 13
7-Bibliography 14
-
7/28/2019 Public Law in Indian Legal System
3/15
ELEMENTS OF JURISPRUDENCE
3 | P a g e
Table of Cases
1 Cocks v Thanet District council2 case of Golaknath AIR 1967 SC 16433 Basheshar Nath v Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi and Rajasthan and Another.1959 AIR(SC)
149
4 Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, A.I.R. 1978 S.C. 597.5 Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation A.I.R. 1986 S.C. 180.6 Rudal Shah v. Stateof BiharA.I.R. 1983 S.C. 1086.7 Bhim Singh v. State of Jammu and Kashmir, 1985 (4) SCC 6778 M.C.Mehta v. Union of India A.I.R. 1987 S.C. 1086.9 Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Union Territory of DelhiA.I.R. 1981 S.C. 746.10 Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P., 1994 Cr. L. J. 1981
-
7/28/2019 Public Law in Indian Legal System
4/15
ELEMENTS OF JURISPRUDENCE
4 | P a g e
Introduction
Public Law It is the law which deals with the relation between the state and the
person.According to Lord Bacon that it is a true and received division of law into ius publicum
and ius pri-vatum,the one being sinews of property ,and the other of government.
Private Law- It is the law which deals with the relation between person and person, where the
state has no intervention.
According to kelsen the traditional distinction between public and private law is that
private law deals with co-ordination and the relation between equals , where as public law is
the realm of political domination.In French Legal system private law and public law are
subjected to different rules and jurisdiction. But where as in Indian Legal system there is no
distinction between private and public law. However in recent years a distinction of a different
kind has emerged in our system .It is based not on differences between courts or rules of law
but rather on the different procedure to be used where the purpose of the case is to enforce
the public duties of state agency rather than to enforce the private rights of a citizen1.
The distinction has never been clearly marked. Until and unless the state itself
develops,public law is mere embryo . Even in the days of feudalism there is much confusion;for
no clear line can be drawn between private and public capacities of the king.In the days of
laissez-faire such a criterian wouldnot give too great a scope to public law; but today , with the
entry of the state into business world, we find that the sphere of private law is diminishing . In a
community where the ideal of state socialism was realized, public law would cover all the
instruments of production . The test of public and private interest is not sufficiently precise-thewhole doctrine of public policy depends on a concept of public interest , yet much of it
undoubtedly belongs to private law.
The divisions of public law are constitutional law and administrative law . Constitutional
law deals with the distribution of legal power and of the functions of the organs of the state.
Administrative law deals with rules which determine the organisation, powers, and duties of
administrative authorities.
1Distinction can be illustrated in the case of Cocks v Thanet District council
-
7/28/2019 Public Law in Indian Legal System
5/15
ELEMENTS OF JURISPRUDENCE
5 | P a g e
Methodology
Objective -:
The main objective of my research is to study Public law in Indian legal system by viewing
historical development of Constitution law and administrative law in India.
For this purpose I have taken help from many sources.The method followed by me for
the research is completely doctrinal.I have taken help of both primary and secondary
resources.Some of primary sources include Indian constitution law.I have also referred to some
secondary sources as in articles and books.i have also collected my research materials from
many websites.
Since Public law is vast topic therefore I would deal with Indian judiciary and its judicial
activism for the development of Indian legal system.Then How the Constitution of India
prevents Public law being exploitated in India .Lastly I would like to illustrate How Indian legal
system or judiciary has been active in protecting the fundamental rights of the citizen of India.
Scope of Research -:
The research is basically looking at constitution law and not looking to other aspects of Public
law like the Administrative law or the Criminal law.
Research Question -:
How public Law has developed in Indian legal system, with special reference to constitutional
law ?
-
7/28/2019 Public Law in Indian Legal System
6/15
ELEMENTS OF JURISPRUDENCE
6 | P a g e
Chapter -1 Development of Indian Legal system through judicial
activism
RQ-How Indian Legal system developed through judicial activism?
An impartial judiciary is a sine-qua-non for the smooth functioning of a political system
.It is the third organ of the government and is charged with deliverance of justice to the
aggrieved party.The judiciary does not have alternative in the present society.In modern
democratic political system is known as open, unbiased ,consistent ,stable & Predictable. The
judiciary operates in accordance with direction of rule of law i.e.equality of all citizens before
the law and a person being innocent unless committed by a court of law .such judicial system
believes in the fairness and openness of proceedings . Some times,to protect the interests of
the people , but there is seldom a deliberate attempt on the part of the state abrogate the
usual process and procedure of justice . In India ,also , the judiciary is taken largely , as
independent ,impartial, fair and real protector of the rights and liberties of the citizens.
In India , we have a unified structure of the judiciary despite the fact that our
Constitution is quasi-federal .Under our Constitution , we have a single integrated system of
courts for the union as well as , the states which administer both union and state laws.At the
apex,we have the Supreme court ,below the supreme court we have high courts of the different
states , under each high courts there is a hierarchy of other courts.Which are called sub-
ordinate courts, these are the courts which are sub-ordinate to high court.2
Judicial Activism
Judicial activism thus means thejudiciarys pronouncement in matters of general social
interest or welfare even though these may not be considered in its jurisdiction. According to
the traditional understanding of law ,for this the judiciary also may not necessarily follow the
established or prescribed procedure of litigation.Since the Constitution doesnot lay down any
principle guideline for constitutional interpretation to be followed by the courts, it provided a
vast scope for the judiciary to exercise judicial discretion . The judiciarys frequent
pronouncements on the parliaments power on the grounds of infringement of individuals
rights not taking into account the social interests and directive are called as judicial activism .In
the case of Golaknath3
of 1967 of supreme court declared that parliament has no power toamend the Constitution.This was a negative sense of the term. Another critism of judicial
system in India was its costliness and time consuming .The normal judicial process in India is so
costly that the poor just cannot enter the courts.It is so cumbersome also that it takes years to
2Indira Gandhi National Open University,Roleof jjudiciary,available at
http://www.egyankosh.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/31670/1/Unit10.pdf3
AIR 1967 SC 1643
http://www.egyankosh.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/31670/1/Unit10.pdfhttp://www.egyankosh.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/31670/1/Unit10.pdfhttp://www.egyankosh.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/31670/1/Unit10.pdf -
7/28/2019 Public Law in Indian Legal System
7/15
ELEMENTS OF JURISPRUDENCE
7 | P a g e
get justice.Both the Doctrine of superiority of fundamental rights over directive principles and
costly judicial system favours only the rich and deprives the poor from being taken care.So
there was pressure for reforms in the legal system. There was increasing pressure from social
action groups on behalf of the underprivileged and deprived section of society for the fulfilment
of their aspiration. The significant outcomes of these development were the system of publicInterest Litigation (PIL) Lok adalats & Legal Aid.
Public Interest Litigation (PIL)
There emerged a new substitute in judiciary orientation . The supreme court ,in early
1980s , started reforming its own procedural & jurisdictional rules.The purpose was that the
cases of the poor , who lacked both resources and awarenwss , could be brought to the courts
for redreesal.Public interest litigation means that where the poor who ,on account of their
poverty , social disability or lack of awareness , cannot approach the courts incase of the denial
of their rights, any member of the public or a social action group can approach the court onbehalf of them .Whatever the court fee may be it is relaxed.Any member of public can file a PIL
where there is public injury and breach of public duty. In 1990s the courts have gone a step
further .They themselves have started taking certain issues on the basis of newspaper reports
on their own. Then court itself initiates case pronounces a decision and directs the appropriate
authorities to act accordingly.4
Lok Adalat
The other area of development in judiciary system was the introduction of the
institution of Lok adalats . In bringing about this reform judiciary ,the executive and legislaturehave acted more in cooperation .The purpose of lok adalts is to make the process of dispute
settlement simple and cheap .The Lok adalat system ,is a method of settlement of disputes
which are not of very serious in nature are settled by mutual agreements between parties .The
help of arbitrators who have the necessary knowledge and competence to understand and
settle the disputes is made available.The arbitrators attempt to settle the disputes an the basis
of facts and document .Disputes like divorce , fixation and payment of maintenance, care of
children etc are settled by lok adalats. Lok adalats cannot pronounce judgement on criminal
cases.The settlements of disputes out of court, emphasis an reconciliation, avoidance of lawyer
and court fee.
4National Institute of Open Schooling, Judicial Activism,available at http://nos.org/317courseE/L-
16%20JUDICIAL%20ACTIVISM.pdf
http://nos.org/317courseE/L-16%20JUDICIAL%20ACTIVISM.pdfhttp://nos.org/317courseE/L-16%20JUDICIAL%20ACTIVISM.pdfhttp://nos.org/317courseE/L-16%20JUDICIAL%20ACTIVISM.pdfhttp://nos.org/317courseE/L-16%20JUDICIAL%20ACTIVISM.pdfhttp://nos.org/317courseE/L-16%20JUDICIAL%20ACTIVISM.pdf -
7/28/2019 Public Law in Indian Legal System
8/15
ELEMENTS OF JURISPRUDENCE
8 | P a g e
Legal aid movement
As a step towards making the legal system serve the poor and deprived,the judiciary
has also taken active interest in providing legal aid to the needy.Directive principle (Art 39A )
directs the state to provide for equal justice and legal aid .The Supreme court has given a
positive and broad interpretation .
1) Spread of legal awareness through programme of legal literacy2) Organisation of the poor and the exploited with a view to building up pressure for
enactment and implementation of egalitarian laws
3) Providing legal services to the poor and deprived people4) Fighting court battles either through social action litigation or through tradition forms to
obtain justice for the deprived .
5
5National Institute of Open Schooling, Judicial Activism,available at http://nos.org/317courseE/L-
16%20JUDICIAL%20ACTIVISM.pdf
http://nos.org/317courseE/L-16%20JUDICIAL%20ACTIVISM.pdfhttp://nos.org/317courseE/L-16%20JUDICIAL%20ACTIVISM.pdfhttp://nos.org/317courseE/L-16%20JUDICIAL%20ACTIVISM.pdfhttp://nos.org/317courseE/L-16%20JUDICIAL%20ACTIVISM.pdfhttp://nos.org/317courseE/L-16%20JUDICIAL%20ACTIVISM.pdf -
7/28/2019 Public Law in Indian Legal System
9/15
ELEMENTS OF JURISPRUDENCE
9 | P a g e
Chapter-2 Fundamental Rights are Integral Part of Indian Constitution
RQ-How fundamental rights affected the relation between state and citizen ?
"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an
instrument for the people to restrain the government -- lest it come to dominate our lives and
interests."
Patrick Henry
The primary function of constitutional law is to ascertain the political centre of gravity of
any given state. It announces in what portion of the whole is to be found the internal
sovereignty, supremepotestas, Staatsgewalt.In other words ,it defines the form of
government.The function of state goes farbeyond mere presentation of internal order andexternal independence .It is expected to promote social and economic ends of every kind , and
these are conveniently classed as executive function.It is also necessary to alter from time to
time the existing law and this is a distinct function of the legislative.Since it is the source of law
,its act can never be illegal.
The definition of sovereign power in a state necessarily leads to the consideration of its
constituent parts. The distinction between legislative ,executive and judiciary
functions.Constitution law deals with the functioning of different organs of the constitution
very minutely.It prescribes the order of succession to the throne; or in a Republic ,the mode of
electing a president.It provides for the continuity of executive power .It regulates the
composition of the council of state ,and of the upper and lower houses of the assembly.It
describe about the process of election to lower and upper house and the tenure of
representatives. It also mentions about the powers and privileges of the assembly as a
whole,and the machinery of law-making.6
Historical perspectives of constitution of India
The constitution of India, the precursor of the new Indian renaissance,become effective
on January 26th
1950.Before the advent of the constitution ,India was governed by the
government of India act 1935.India was part of the British Empire ;sovereignty of the British
crown prevailed over the country and it was in the exercise of this sovereignty that the british
Parliament had enacted the Act 1935. The only two major features of the Act were that the act
6T.E .HOLLAND,ELEMENTS OF JURISPRUDENCE 370(13th ed.2007)
-
7/28/2019 Public Law in Indian Legal System
10/15
ELEMENTS OF JURISPRUDENCE
10 | P a g e
conferred only a very limited right of self government on the Indians. The executive authority
of province was vested in the governor appointed by the crown.
The Constitution of India being written constitutes the fundamental law of the land .
This has several significant implications.It is under this fundamental law that all laws are made
and executed ,all government authorities act and the validity of their functioning adjudged. A
legislative cannot make a law and a govt agency cannot act ,contrary to the constitution.the
Constitution thus conditions the whole governmental process in the country .The judiciary is
obligated to see that the provisions of constitution are not violated by any governmental
organ.This function of the judiciary entitles it to be called as guardian of the constitution ,it can
declare any act of the state invalid if its contradicts the constitution.
Fundamental rights
The Indian Constitution guarantees to the people certain basic human rights and
freedoms,such as inter alia,equal protection of laws, freedom of speech and expression ,
freedom of worship and religion, freedom of assembly and association, freedom to move freely
and to reside and settle anywhere in India ,freedom to follow any occupation ,trade or
business,freedom of person .A person can claim Fundamental rights against the state subject to
the state imposing some permissible restrictions in the interest of social control.These
restriction are also mentioned in the Constitution. These rights ,in substance , constitute
inhibitions on the legislative and executive organs of the state . Any law or the action of
executive can infringe the fundamental rights,the Constitution demarcates an area of individual
freedom and liberty where the state cannot interfere.The Constitution provides a machinery in
Arts 32 and 226 for the reinforcement of rights.7
They give emphasis to fundamental unity of the country by guaranteeing the access and
use of the same facilities, irrespective of caste, colour, creed and religion to all citizens.Ours is a
nascent democracy and situated as we are, socially, economically, educationally and politically,
it is the sacred duty of the Supreme Court to safeguard the fundamental rights which have been
for the first time enacted in Part III of our Constitution. The limits on those rights have been
enacted in the Constitution itself, e.g., in Arts. 19, 33 and 34. But unless and until we find the
limitations on such fundamental rights enacted in the very provisions of the Constitution, there
is no justification whatever for importing any notions from the United States of America or theauthority of cases decided by the Supreme Court there in order to whittle down the plenitude
of the fundamental rights enshrined in Part III of our Constitution.8
7M.P.JAIN,INDIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 15 (5th ed 2009)
8Basheshar Nath v Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi and Rajasthan and Another.1959 AIR(SC) 149
-
7/28/2019 Public Law in Indian Legal System
11/15
ELEMENTS OF JURISPRUDENCE
11 | P a g e
The different Fundamental Rights the Constitution provides the Indian citizen are
1)Right to freedom
2)Right to equality
3)Right to freedom of religion
4)Right to freedom from exploitation
5)Cultural and educational rights
6)Right to Constitutional remedies
These Fundamental rights have been conceived in a liberal spirit and seek to draw a
reasonable balance between individual freedom and social control.These rights are similar to
those of Englands Bills of Rights,The United nations Bill of Rights and Frances declaration of
the rights of men.
Chapter -3 Case laws
RQ- How the trend of judicial decision have been changing after the Maneka Gandhi case?
By playing a vital role in the task of protecting fundamental rights, the Supreme Court
has made a positive contribution in this fertile field. The turning point came in 1978 in Maneka
Gandhis case9
when the Supreme Court held that any state action affecting life and liberty of
a person has to be right, just, fair and reasonable and not arbitrary fanciful and oppressive.
Thereafter, there appeared era of progressive judicial activism for protection of human rights.
In the postManekaperiod courts activism blossomed and flourished. A new trend was set in
Maneka Gandhis case. The Supreme Court, in its anxiety to protect human rights, has at times
undertaken the roles of both organs of the government, the legislature and the executive. The
Constitution does not confer such omnipotent power on the Judiciary.
In Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation10
, one Journalist of Bombay claimed relief
against demolition of hutments of pavement dwellers by the Municipal Corporation of Bombay.
His letter to the Supreme Court was treated as writ petition and the court granted interim relief
to pavement dwellers.
9Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, A.I.R. 1978 S.C. 597.
10Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation A.I.R. 1986 S.C. 180.
-
7/28/2019 Public Law in Indian Legal System
12/15
ELEMENTS OF JURISPRUDENCE
12 | P a g e
There is no express provision in the Constitution of India for grant of compensation for
violation of a fundamental right to life and personal liberty. But the judiciary has evolved a right
to compensation in cases of illegal deprivation of personal liberty. Rudal Shah v. Stateof Bihar11
is an instance of breakthrough in Human Rights Jurisprudence. The Court granted monetarycompensation of Rs.35,000 against the Bihar Government for keeping a person in illegal
detention for 14 years even after his acquittal. The Court departed from the traditional
approach, ignored the technicalities while granting compensation.
In another case12
, a member of the Legislative Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir was
arrested by the police mala fide and he was not produced before the Magistrate within the
required time. Holding that his fundamental rights under Article 21 and 22 (1) were violated,the Court observed that when there is mala fide arrest, the invasion of constitutional or legal
right is not washed away by his being set free and in appropriate cases the Court has
jurisdiction to compensate the victim by awarding suitable monetary compensation. The Court
awarded Rs.50,000 as monetary compensation by way of exemplary costs to the petitioner to
compensate him.
In M.C.Mehta v. Union of India13
, the Supreme Court held that the power of the Court
under Article 32(1) is not only injunctive in nature, that is, preventing the infringement of a
fundamental right, but it is also remedial in scope. The power of the Court to grant such
remedial relief may include the power to award compensation in appropriate cases. The
appropriate cases are those cases where the infringement of fundamental right is gross and
patent. It is considered unjust to ask the victim to go to the civil court for claiming
compensation as it may take many years for the victim to get relief in a civil court.
11
. Rudal Shah v. Stateof BiharA.I.R. 1983 S.C. 1086.12
Bhim Singh v. State of Jammu and Kashmir, 1985 (4) SCC 67713
M.C.Mehta v. Union of IndiaA.I.R. 1987 S.C. 1086.
-
7/28/2019 Public Law in Indian Legal System
13/15
ELEMENTS OF JURISPRUDENCE
13 | P a g e
The Supreme Court, while elaborating the scope of the right guaranteed under
Article 21 observed in Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi14
that
right to life cannot be restricted to mere animal existence. It means something more than
just physical survival. Right to life includes the right to live with human dignity and all that
goes along with it, namely, the bare necessities of life such as adequate nutrition, clothing
and shelter and facilities for reading, writing and expressing oneself in diverse forms, freely
moving about and mixing and co-mingling with fellow human beings. The Supreme Court
ruled that the detenu should be treated with more humanity and dignity than the
undertrial or a convict. He should be allowed greater freedom than allowed to an undertrial
or a convict as he stands on the higher rung of the ladder.
In the opinion of the Supreme Court no arrest can be made because it is lawful for
the police officer to do so. The existence of the power to arrest is one thing. The justification
for the exercise of it is quite another. No arrest can be made in a routine manner on a mere
allegation of commission of an offence made against a person. There must be some
reasonable justification in the opinion of the officer effecting the arrest that such arrest is
necessary and justified. Except in heinous offences, an arrest must be avoided.15
14 Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Union Territory of DelhiA.I.R. 1981 S.C. 746.
15Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P., 1994 Cr. L. J. 1981
-
7/28/2019 Public Law in Indian Legal System
14/15
ELEMENTS OF JURISPRUDENCE
14 | P a g e
Conclusion
India incorporated a number of basic Human rights as guaranteed fundamental rights,these
rights are adopted by the partIII of our constitution.These rights go much beyond American Bills ofrights and Frances declaration of rights of men.These were drawn from the universal Human rights
declared by united nation,1948. The fundamental rights are very much required for the
development and welfare of citizen of India.If fundamental rights are infringed then they can be
challenged in the court and various writs are issued according to the infringement.As we saw the
role of judiciary in protection of Human rights is commendable.However ,in the quest for socio-
economic justice the judiciary has been overstepping the limits of judicial function and trespassing
the areas of executive and legislative.Its the need hour to have balance between Judicial activism
and judicial self-possession.Though Indian Constitution is rigid ,but has dynamism ,expansion and
flexibility .It does not impose any rule on the citizen of India ,it can be amended as per the time
demands .Hence public law in Indian legal system is an important aspect for development of the
nation .
-
7/28/2019 Public Law in Indian Legal System
15/15
ELEMENTS OF JURISPRUDENCE
15 | P a g e
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS
M.P.JAIN,INDIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (5th ed 2009)
T.E .HOLLAND,ELEMENTS OF JURISPRUDENCE 370(13th ed.2007)
WEBSITES
1) National Institute of Open Schooling, Judicial Activism,available at http://nos.org/317courseE/L-16%20JUDICIAL%20ACTIVISM.pdf
2) Indira Gandhi National Open University,Roleof jjudiciary,available athttp://www.egyankosh.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/31670/1/Unit10.pdf
3) http://www.library.du.ac.in4) http://www.archive.org5) http://ssrn.org
http://nos.org/317courseE/L-16%20JUDICIAL%20ACTIVISM.pdfhttp://nos.org/317courseE/L-16%20JUDICIAL%20ACTIVISM.pdfhttp://nos.org/317courseE/L-16%20JUDICIAL%20ACTIVISM.pdfhttp://www.egyankosh.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/31670/1/Unit10.pdfhttp://www.egyankosh.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/31670/1/Unit10.pdfhttp://ssrn.org/http://ssrn.org/http://ssrn.org/http://www.egyankosh.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/31670/1/Unit10.pdfhttp://nos.org/317courseE/L-16%20JUDICIAL%20ACTIVISM.pdfhttp://nos.org/317courseE/L-16%20JUDICIAL%20ACTIVISM.pdf