publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Publishing for impact
Wouter Gerritsma, Wageningen UR Library
Elements for a publication strategy
![Page 2: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Social science publications at Wageningen UR
![Page 3: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Full screen image with title
Klik op het pictogram als u een afbeelding wilt toevoegen
![Page 5: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
How are we able to compare numbers?
Scientist Z. Math has a publication from 2001 with 17 citations
Scientist M. Biology has a publication from 2007 with 32 citations
![Page 6: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Baselines for Mathematics
![Page 7: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Baselines for Molecular Biology
![Page 8: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
A quantitative example
Bouma, J, Bulte, EH, & DP van Soest (2008) Trust, Trustworthiness and Cooperation: Social Capital and Community Resource Management. J. Env. Ec. & Mngmt 56(2)155-166.
●Cited 12 times
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management from journals menu in ESI:
●Economics & Business
Baseline data for Economics & Business (from ESI)
●Article from 2008: Average: 3.62 Citations; Top 10%: 9 citations; Top 1% 27 citations
RI = 12 / 3.62 = 3.31
![Page 9: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Baseline data to normalize citation data?
Citations data source Baselines
Web of Science ESI or InCites
Scopus SciVal Strata
Google Scholar none
Propriatary A&I database none
![Page 10: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
H-index
Balance between productivity and citedness
To rule out the effect of one or two highly cited papers
Applicable to authors, journals, research groups, compounds, subjects etc…
But there are some serious doubts about robustness
Waltman, L. & N. J. van Eck (2011). The inconsistency of the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63(2):406-415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21678
![Page 11: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
In practice
![Page 12: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
After excellent research, where should you publish?
![Page 13: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Where to publish?
A valued journal?
●Quality
●Editorial board
●Acceptance rate
●Time to publication
●Journal circulation
●Visibility
![Page 14: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
50% of articles generate 90% of all cites
Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314(7079): 497-502. http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/314/7079/497
![Page 15: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Look at the IF in a different way
![Page 16: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Journal quality and impact global universities
![Page 17: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Highlighting Dutch Universities
![Page 18: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
But where is Tilburg?
![Page 19: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Journal quality and article impact 2003-2009, for Wageningen UR
Journal Quartile Pubs RI T10(%T10) T1(%T1)
Q 1 7170 2.26 2444(34%) 505(7%)
Q 2 2919 1.26 578 (20%) 61 (2%)
Q 3 1303 0.93 143 (11%) 10 (1%)
Q 4 587 0.66 30 (5%) 6 (1%)
Aggregate 11917 1.79 3195(27%) 582(5%)
Source: Wageningen Yield, Feb. 2012
![Page 20: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Document type and article impact 2003-2009, for Wageningen UR
Document type Pubs RI T10(%T10) T1(%T1)
Article 11212 1.62 2777(25%) 437( 4%)
Review 705 4.45 418 (59%) 145(21%)
Aggregate 11917 1.79 3195(27%) 582(5%)
Source: Wageningen Yield, Feb. 2012
![Page 21: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
The impact factor Matthew effect
The journal in which papers are published have a strong influence on their citation rates, as duplicate papers published in high-impact journals obtain, on average, twice as many citations as their identical counterparts published in journals with lower impact factors..
Larivière, V. and Y. Gingras (2010). The impact factor's Matthew Effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(2): 424-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21232
![Page 22: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Final word on journal quality
It is better to publish one paper in a quality journal than multiple papers in lesser journals. [...]. Try to publish in journals that have high impact factors; chances are your paper will have high impact, too, if accepted.
Bourne, P. E. (2005). Ten Simple Rules for Getting Published. PLoS Computational Biology 1(5): e57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010057
![Page 23: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Networking
![Page 24: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
International cooperation
No Cooperation International CooperationUniversity % output Impact % output ImpactEUR 16 1.13 40 2.00RUG 23 1.07 39 1.43RUN 20 0.94 39 1.46TUD 33 1.24 43 1.52TUE 29 1.50 41 1.52UL 20 0.90 46 1.38UM 16 0.90 42 1.48UT 33 1.33 37 1.36UU 21 1.54 39 1.61UvA 20 1.15 43 1.64UvT 25 1.15 42 1.21VUA 18 1.15 43 1.68
WUR 21 1.12 49 1.27 Aggregate 25 1.15 44 1.53
NOWT (2008). Wetenschaps- en Technologie- Indicatoren 2008. Maastricht, Nederlands Observatorium van Wetenschap en Technologie (NOWT).
![Page 25: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Cooperation is effective
WTI2 report 2011
![Page 26: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Cooperation...
Teams increasingly dominate solo authors in the production of knowledge. Research is increasingly done in teams across nearly all fields.
Teams typically produce more frequently cited research than individuals do, and this advantage has been increasing over time.
Teams now also produce the exceptionally high-impact research, even where that distinction was once the domain of solo authors.
Wuchty, S., B. F. Jones, et al. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827): 1036-1039. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
![Page 27: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Networking is important
Start early, make use of Social Networking tools
●Social networks for scientists
●SSRN, Academics.edu, Researchgate
![Page 28: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
On social networking
![Page 29: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
On using social media
McKenzie and Özler (2011) The impact of economics blogs
![Page 30: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Consider the Wikipedia
For better or worse, people are guided to Wikipedia when searching the Web for biomedical information. So there is an increasing need for the scientific community to engage with Wikipedia to ensure that the information it contains is accurate and current.
Logan, D.W., M. Sandal, P.P. Gardner, M. Manske & A. Bateman (2010). Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia. PLoS Comput Biol, 6(9): e1000941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000941
![Page 31: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Self citations and more
![Page 32: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Self citations
The model [...] implies that external citations are enhanced by self-citations, so that we have the “chain reaction:” Larger size leads to more self-citations, which lead to more external citations.
11/28
van Raan, A. F. J. (2008). Self-citation as an impact-reinforcing mechanism in the science system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(10): 1631-1643.
![Page 33: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
More on references
Articles that cite more references are in turn cited more themselves
Webster, G. D., P. K. Jonason, et al. (2009). Hot Topics and Popular Papers in Evolutionary Psychology: Analyses of Title Words and Citation Counts in Evolution and Human Behavior, 1979 – 2008. Evolutionary Psychology 7(3): 348-362. http://www.epjournal.net/filestore/ep07348362.pdf
To be the best, cite the bestBorrowed from: Corbyn, Z. (2010). "To be the best, cite the best." Nature News, 13 October 2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/news.2010.539 Reporting on the publication of Bornmann, L., F. de Moya Anegón, et al. (2010). Do Scientific Advancements Lean on the Shoulders of Giants? A Bibliometric Investigation of the Ortega Hypothesis. PLoS ONE 5(10): e13327 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013327.
![Page 34: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
More articles per research project?
Publishing more articles results in higher citation counts if the articles provide sufficient substantive content to other researchers.
●Beware of the ethical standards
●Bornmann looked at total citations, not to relative impact
Bornmann, L. & H.-D. Daniel (2007). Multiple publication on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(8): 1100-1107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20531
![Page 35: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Journal selection and referencing with multidisciplinary research
Higher citations are linked to the citation-intensive disciplines.
● But Larivière et al. looked at absolute citations rather that relative to the field
Articles citing citation-intensive disciplines are more likely to be cited by those disciplines and, hence, obtain higher citation scores than would articles citing non-citation-intensive disciplines.
Larivière, V. & Y. Gingras (2010). On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1): 126-131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21226
![Page 36: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Consider Open Access publishing
Be aware of your copyrights when publishing
Golden Road
●PloS Journals, BMC, etc.
Green Road
●Self archived copies (final author’s version)
●TU Repository, RePec, SSRN etc.
Open Choice
●Hybrid system, author pays and library pays
●Sage model (only 10% of standard fees)
![Page 37: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Is there a citation advantage for OA?
Evidence is mounting
●There is certainly no dis-advantange
●Van Raan has started to self archive his preprints
●Publishers allow self archiving of the final peer reviewed authors version
●Open Citation Project
OA is important for developing countriesEvans, J.A., Reimer, J., 2009. Open access and global participation in science. Science. 323, 1025. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1154562
![Page 38: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Publish your data!
Henneken et al. (2011) "articles with links to data result in higher citation rates than articles without such links"
http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.3618
Piwowar et al. (2007) "Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000308
Also relevant in the view of the latest developments
(KNAW)
Library assists in curating datasets
![Page 39: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
What is in a name?
![Page 40: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Who is the author of this thesis?
![Page 41: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
On the inside
![Page 42: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
On her own publication list
![Page 43: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Final word of warning!
Publishing strategies are meant to improve the impact of good quality research. Using these techniques to upgrade CVs or boosting research performance ratings of research groups is a dangerous tactic.
Tijssen, R.J.W. (2003). Scoreboards of research excellence. Research Evaluation, 12(2): 91-104; p.16 is especially relevant for Tilburg University
![Page 44: Publishing for impact elements for a publication strategy](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022013100/548d062ab47959190d8b6494/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Thank you!
On the Web:@wowterwowter.netwww.slideshare.net/wowter
http://tinyurl.com/7r67fmm