publishing scientific research & how to write high-impact research papers
TRANSCRIPT
copy 2016
Publishing Scientific Research amp How to Write High-Impact Research Papers
Dr John Uhlrich
Editor
copy 2016
Todayrsquos Talk
wwwurl-to-be-addedcom
copy 2016
1) About Wiley-VCH
2) The psychology of editors and reviewers and demystifying the publication process
3) Writing for scientific success
4) Q amp A
Todayrsquos Talk
copy 2016
bull PhD students
bull Post-Docs or beyond
bull Who has already published something
bull Have you had the opportunity to act as a peer reviewer for a submitted research manuscript
bull Who can imagine a career in publishing
Who are you
copy 2016
Who am I
bull Chemical Engineering PhD University of Wisconsin USAbull Interface Chemistry of Hybrid Photovoltaic
MaterialsDevices
bull Postdoc 2009-2011 Fritz Haber Institute BerlinDepartment of Chemical Physics (HJ Freund)bull Surface Science for Model Catalysis
bull 2011ndash 2012ndash Editor Advanced Materials Advanced Functional
Materials
bull 2012-presentndash Editor Energy Technology
copy 2016
Who am I
bull Chemical Engineering PhD University of Wisconsin USAbull Interface Chemistry of Hybrid Photovoltaic
MaterialsDevices
bull Postdoc 2009-2011 Fritz Haber Institute BerlinDepartment of Chemical Physics (HJ Freund)bull Surface Science for Model Catalysis
bull 2011ndash 2012ndash Editor Advanced Materials Advanced Functional
Materials
bull 2012-presentndash Editor Energy Technology
copy 2016
John Wiley amp Sons
South Korea
Founded in 1807 in New York City by John Wiley
To this day family-owned in the 6th generation
Approx 5000 staff worldwide
Wiley Online Library has 130 million users
1500 journals 1200 society partners
Company headquarters are in Hoboken (New Jersey)
Wiley-VCH (Germany) has been part of Wiley since 1996
copy 2016
copy 2016
Weinheim office
where John livesKarlsruhe
Bad Herrenalb
copy 2016
bull Wiley-VCH Wiley-Blackwell Ernst amp Sohn GIT
bull Weinheim Berlin Zuumlrich (CH)
bull 530 employees (450 70 14)
ndash With a PhD 20 - University degree 30
ndash ~ 70 female - 30 male
ndash Average age ~ 42 years
ndash Average time with Wiley-VCH ~ 10 years
ndash Foreign employees 40 from 24 different nations
bull Primarily chemists followed by materials scientists physicists biologists mathematicians
Wiley in Germany
copy 2016
Wiley-VCH Journal Genealogy
copy 2016
1500 journals books
And More
copy 2016
bull Honestly assess the importanceimpact and scope of your work
bull Journal Impact Factor is not everything
bull What are the implications of your research
bull How important will others find your researchndash In your fieldndash In related fields
bull Publication fees Open access
bull Speed of publicationbull What is the scope of your
candidate journalbull Who reads your candidate
journal
Selecting the Journal
copy 2016
Number of source items published in 2014 and 2013
_________________________________
Impact Factor2015 =
Number of citations in 2015 to articles published in 2014 and 2013
Example
Journal of hellip publishes 75 articles in 2013 and
83 articles in 2014
In 2015 it receives a total of 344 citations to
these articles in all the other published journals
The journalrsquos Impact Factor for 2015 is
344 (75 + 83) = 218
2016
2013
2012
2011
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Cited
window
Citing
window
2015
2014
2015
Impact Factor (IF)
The 2015 Impact Factor first appears in 2016
copy 2016
ldquooriginally appeared in a postscript of my previous Editorial and then it was just to note that I did not wish to write about it because it has become a plague rdquo
copy 2016
1) Statistically (= scientifically) poor methods
2) Arbitrary 2-year window citation practices depend upon the field and on the
specific work
3) Overinterpretation and misuse of the Impact Factor values
4) Incentives for poor research practice amp unethical behavior (on the parts of both
publishers and authors)
Problems with IF-based Assessment
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Todayrsquos Talk
wwwurl-to-be-addedcom
copy 2016
1) About Wiley-VCH
2) The psychology of editors and reviewers and demystifying the publication process
3) Writing for scientific success
4) Q amp A
Todayrsquos Talk
copy 2016
bull PhD students
bull Post-Docs or beyond
bull Who has already published something
bull Have you had the opportunity to act as a peer reviewer for a submitted research manuscript
bull Who can imagine a career in publishing
Who are you
copy 2016
Who am I
bull Chemical Engineering PhD University of Wisconsin USAbull Interface Chemistry of Hybrid Photovoltaic
MaterialsDevices
bull Postdoc 2009-2011 Fritz Haber Institute BerlinDepartment of Chemical Physics (HJ Freund)bull Surface Science for Model Catalysis
bull 2011ndash 2012ndash Editor Advanced Materials Advanced Functional
Materials
bull 2012-presentndash Editor Energy Technology
copy 2016
Who am I
bull Chemical Engineering PhD University of Wisconsin USAbull Interface Chemistry of Hybrid Photovoltaic
MaterialsDevices
bull Postdoc 2009-2011 Fritz Haber Institute BerlinDepartment of Chemical Physics (HJ Freund)bull Surface Science for Model Catalysis
bull 2011ndash 2012ndash Editor Advanced Materials Advanced Functional
Materials
bull 2012-presentndash Editor Energy Technology
copy 2016
John Wiley amp Sons
South Korea
Founded in 1807 in New York City by John Wiley
To this day family-owned in the 6th generation
Approx 5000 staff worldwide
Wiley Online Library has 130 million users
1500 journals 1200 society partners
Company headquarters are in Hoboken (New Jersey)
Wiley-VCH (Germany) has been part of Wiley since 1996
copy 2016
copy 2016
Weinheim office
where John livesKarlsruhe
Bad Herrenalb
copy 2016
bull Wiley-VCH Wiley-Blackwell Ernst amp Sohn GIT
bull Weinheim Berlin Zuumlrich (CH)
bull 530 employees (450 70 14)
ndash With a PhD 20 - University degree 30
ndash ~ 70 female - 30 male
ndash Average age ~ 42 years
ndash Average time with Wiley-VCH ~ 10 years
ndash Foreign employees 40 from 24 different nations
bull Primarily chemists followed by materials scientists physicists biologists mathematicians
Wiley in Germany
copy 2016
Wiley-VCH Journal Genealogy
copy 2016
1500 journals books
And More
copy 2016
bull Honestly assess the importanceimpact and scope of your work
bull Journal Impact Factor is not everything
bull What are the implications of your research
bull How important will others find your researchndash In your fieldndash In related fields
bull Publication fees Open access
bull Speed of publicationbull What is the scope of your
candidate journalbull Who reads your candidate
journal
Selecting the Journal
copy 2016
Number of source items published in 2014 and 2013
_________________________________
Impact Factor2015 =
Number of citations in 2015 to articles published in 2014 and 2013
Example
Journal of hellip publishes 75 articles in 2013 and
83 articles in 2014
In 2015 it receives a total of 344 citations to
these articles in all the other published journals
The journalrsquos Impact Factor for 2015 is
344 (75 + 83) = 218
2016
2013
2012
2011
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Cited
window
Citing
window
2015
2014
2015
Impact Factor (IF)
The 2015 Impact Factor first appears in 2016
copy 2016
ldquooriginally appeared in a postscript of my previous Editorial and then it was just to note that I did not wish to write about it because it has become a plague rdquo
copy 2016
1) Statistically (= scientifically) poor methods
2) Arbitrary 2-year window citation practices depend upon the field and on the
specific work
3) Overinterpretation and misuse of the Impact Factor values
4) Incentives for poor research practice amp unethical behavior (on the parts of both
publishers and authors)
Problems with IF-based Assessment
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
1) About Wiley-VCH
2) The psychology of editors and reviewers and demystifying the publication process
3) Writing for scientific success
4) Q amp A
Todayrsquos Talk
copy 2016
bull PhD students
bull Post-Docs or beyond
bull Who has already published something
bull Have you had the opportunity to act as a peer reviewer for a submitted research manuscript
bull Who can imagine a career in publishing
Who are you
copy 2016
Who am I
bull Chemical Engineering PhD University of Wisconsin USAbull Interface Chemistry of Hybrid Photovoltaic
MaterialsDevices
bull Postdoc 2009-2011 Fritz Haber Institute BerlinDepartment of Chemical Physics (HJ Freund)bull Surface Science for Model Catalysis
bull 2011ndash 2012ndash Editor Advanced Materials Advanced Functional
Materials
bull 2012-presentndash Editor Energy Technology
copy 2016
Who am I
bull Chemical Engineering PhD University of Wisconsin USAbull Interface Chemistry of Hybrid Photovoltaic
MaterialsDevices
bull Postdoc 2009-2011 Fritz Haber Institute BerlinDepartment of Chemical Physics (HJ Freund)bull Surface Science for Model Catalysis
bull 2011ndash 2012ndash Editor Advanced Materials Advanced Functional
Materials
bull 2012-presentndash Editor Energy Technology
copy 2016
John Wiley amp Sons
South Korea
Founded in 1807 in New York City by John Wiley
To this day family-owned in the 6th generation
Approx 5000 staff worldwide
Wiley Online Library has 130 million users
1500 journals 1200 society partners
Company headquarters are in Hoboken (New Jersey)
Wiley-VCH (Germany) has been part of Wiley since 1996
copy 2016
copy 2016
Weinheim office
where John livesKarlsruhe
Bad Herrenalb
copy 2016
bull Wiley-VCH Wiley-Blackwell Ernst amp Sohn GIT
bull Weinheim Berlin Zuumlrich (CH)
bull 530 employees (450 70 14)
ndash With a PhD 20 - University degree 30
ndash ~ 70 female - 30 male
ndash Average age ~ 42 years
ndash Average time with Wiley-VCH ~ 10 years
ndash Foreign employees 40 from 24 different nations
bull Primarily chemists followed by materials scientists physicists biologists mathematicians
Wiley in Germany
copy 2016
Wiley-VCH Journal Genealogy
copy 2016
1500 journals books
And More
copy 2016
bull Honestly assess the importanceimpact and scope of your work
bull Journal Impact Factor is not everything
bull What are the implications of your research
bull How important will others find your researchndash In your fieldndash In related fields
bull Publication fees Open access
bull Speed of publicationbull What is the scope of your
candidate journalbull Who reads your candidate
journal
Selecting the Journal
copy 2016
Number of source items published in 2014 and 2013
_________________________________
Impact Factor2015 =
Number of citations in 2015 to articles published in 2014 and 2013
Example
Journal of hellip publishes 75 articles in 2013 and
83 articles in 2014
In 2015 it receives a total of 344 citations to
these articles in all the other published journals
The journalrsquos Impact Factor for 2015 is
344 (75 + 83) = 218
2016
2013
2012
2011
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Cited
window
Citing
window
2015
2014
2015
Impact Factor (IF)
The 2015 Impact Factor first appears in 2016
copy 2016
ldquooriginally appeared in a postscript of my previous Editorial and then it was just to note that I did not wish to write about it because it has become a plague rdquo
copy 2016
1) Statistically (= scientifically) poor methods
2) Arbitrary 2-year window citation practices depend upon the field and on the
specific work
3) Overinterpretation and misuse of the Impact Factor values
4) Incentives for poor research practice amp unethical behavior (on the parts of both
publishers and authors)
Problems with IF-based Assessment
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
bull PhD students
bull Post-Docs or beyond
bull Who has already published something
bull Have you had the opportunity to act as a peer reviewer for a submitted research manuscript
bull Who can imagine a career in publishing
Who are you
copy 2016
Who am I
bull Chemical Engineering PhD University of Wisconsin USAbull Interface Chemistry of Hybrid Photovoltaic
MaterialsDevices
bull Postdoc 2009-2011 Fritz Haber Institute BerlinDepartment of Chemical Physics (HJ Freund)bull Surface Science for Model Catalysis
bull 2011ndash 2012ndash Editor Advanced Materials Advanced Functional
Materials
bull 2012-presentndash Editor Energy Technology
copy 2016
Who am I
bull Chemical Engineering PhD University of Wisconsin USAbull Interface Chemistry of Hybrid Photovoltaic
MaterialsDevices
bull Postdoc 2009-2011 Fritz Haber Institute BerlinDepartment of Chemical Physics (HJ Freund)bull Surface Science for Model Catalysis
bull 2011ndash 2012ndash Editor Advanced Materials Advanced Functional
Materials
bull 2012-presentndash Editor Energy Technology
copy 2016
John Wiley amp Sons
South Korea
Founded in 1807 in New York City by John Wiley
To this day family-owned in the 6th generation
Approx 5000 staff worldwide
Wiley Online Library has 130 million users
1500 journals 1200 society partners
Company headquarters are in Hoboken (New Jersey)
Wiley-VCH (Germany) has been part of Wiley since 1996
copy 2016
copy 2016
Weinheim office
where John livesKarlsruhe
Bad Herrenalb
copy 2016
bull Wiley-VCH Wiley-Blackwell Ernst amp Sohn GIT
bull Weinheim Berlin Zuumlrich (CH)
bull 530 employees (450 70 14)
ndash With a PhD 20 - University degree 30
ndash ~ 70 female - 30 male
ndash Average age ~ 42 years
ndash Average time with Wiley-VCH ~ 10 years
ndash Foreign employees 40 from 24 different nations
bull Primarily chemists followed by materials scientists physicists biologists mathematicians
Wiley in Germany
copy 2016
Wiley-VCH Journal Genealogy
copy 2016
1500 journals books
And More
copy 2016
bull Honestly assess the importanceimpact and scope of your work
bull Journal Impact Factor is not everything
bull What are the implications of your research
bull How important will others find your researchndash In your fieldndash In related fields
bull Publication fees Open access
bull Speed of publicationbull What is the scope of your
candidate journalbull Who reads your candidate
journal
Selecting the Journal
copy 2016
Number of source items published in 2014 and 2013
_________________________________
Impact Factor2015 =
Number of citations in 2015 to articles published in 2014 and 2013
Example
Journal of hellip publishes 75 articles in 2013 and
83 articles in 2014
In 2015 it receives a total of 344 citations to
these articles in all the other published journals
The journalrsquos Impact Factor for 2015 is
344 (75 + 83) = 218
2016
2013
2012
2011
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Cited
window
Citing
window
2015
2014
2015
Impact Factor (IF)
The 2015 Impact Factor first appears in 2016
copy 2016
ldquooriginally appeared in a postscript of my previous Editorial and then it was just to note that I did not wish to write about it because it has become a plague rdquo
copy 2016
1) Statistically (= scientifically) poor methods
2) Arbitrary 2-year window citation practices depend upon the field and on the
specific work
3) Overinterpretation and misuse of the Impact Factor values
4) Incentives for poor research practice amp unethical behavior (on the parts of both
publishers and authors)
Problems with IF-based Assessment
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Who am I
bull Chemical Engineering PhD University of Wisconsin USAbull Interface Chemistry of Hybrid Photovoltaic
MaterialsDevices
bull Postdoc 2009-2011 Fritz Haber Institute BerlinDepartment of Chemical Physics (HJ Freund)bull Surface Science for Model Catalysis
bull 2011ndash 2012ndash Editor Advanced Materials Advanced Functional
Materials
bull 2012-presentndash Editor Energy Technology
copy 2016
Who am I
bull Chemical Engineering PhD University of Wisconsin USAbull Interface Chemistry of Hybrid Photovoltaic
MaterialsDevices
bull Postdoc 2009-2011 Fritz Haber Institute BerlinDepartment of Chemical Physics (HJ Freund)bull Surface Science for Model Catalysis
bull 2011ndash 2012ndash Editor Advanced Materials Advanced Functional
Materials
bull 2012-presentndash Editor Energy Technology
copy 2016
John Wiley amp Sons
South Korea
Founded in 1807 in New York City by John Wiley
To this day family-owned in the 6th generation
Approx 5000 staff worldwide
Wiley Online Library has 130 million users
1500 journals 1200 society partners
Company headquarters are in Hoboken (New Jersey)
Wiley-VCH (Germany) has been part of Wiley since 1996
copy 2016
copy 2016
Weinheim office
where John livesKarlsruhe
Bad Herrenalb
copy 2016
bull Wiley-VCH Wiley-Blackwell Ernst amp Sohn GIT
bull Weinheim Berlin Zuumlrich (CH)
bull 530 employees (450 70 14)
ndash With a PhD 20 - University degree 30
ndash ~ 70 female - 30 male
ndash Average age ~ 42 years
ndash Average time with Wiley-VCH ~ 10 years
ndash Foreign employees 40 from 24 different nations
bull Primarily chemists followed by materials scientists physicists biologists mathematicians
Wiley in Germany
copy 2016
Wiley-VCH Journal Genealogy
copy 2016
1500 journals books
And More
copy 2016
bull Honestly assess the importanceimpact and scope of your work
bull Journal Impact Factor is not everything
bull What are the implications of your research
bull How important will others find your researchndash In your fieldndash In related fields
bull Publication fees Open access
bull Speed of publicationbull What is the scope of your
candidate journalbull Who reads your candidate
journal
Selecting the Journal
copy 2016
Number of source items published in 2014 and 2013
_________________________________
Impact Factor2015 =
Number of citations in 2015 to articles published in 2014 and 2013
Example
Journal of hellip publishes 75 articles in 2013 and
83 articles in 2014
In 2015 it receives a total of 344 citations to
these articles in all the other published journals
The journalrsquos Impact Factor for 2015 is
344 (75 + 83) = 218
2016
2013
2012
2011
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Cited
window
Citing
window
2015
2014
2015
Impact Factor (IF)
The 2015 Impact Factor first appears in 2016
copy 2016
ldquooriginally appeared in a postscript of my previous Editorial and then it was just to note that I did not wish to write about it because it has become a plague rdquo
copy 2016
1) Statistically (= scientifically) poor methods
2) Arbitrary 2-year window citation practices depend upon the field and on the
specific work
3) Overinterpretation and misuse of the Impact Factor values
4) Incentives for poor research practice amp unethical behavior (on the parts of both
publishers and authors)
Problems with IF-based Assessment
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Who am I
bull Chemical Engineering PhD University of Wisconsin USAbull Interface Chemistry of Hybrid Photovoltaic
MaterialsDevices
bull Postdoc 2009-2011 Fritz Haber Institute BerlinDepartment of Chemical Physics (HJ Freund)bull Surface Science for Model Catalysis
bull 2011ndash 2012ndash Editor Advanced Materials Advanced Functional
Materials
bull 2012-presentndash Editor Energy Technology
copy 2016
John Wiley amp Sons
South Korea
Founded in 1807 in New York City by John Wiley
To this day family-owned in the 6th generation
Approx 5000 staff worldwide
Wiley Online Library has 130 million users
1500 journals 1200 society partners
Company headquarters are in Hoboken (New Jersey)
Wiley-VCH (Germany) has been part of Wiley since 1996
copy 2016
copy 2016
Weinheim office
where John livesKarlsruhe
Bad Herrenalb
copy 2016
bull Wiley-VCH Wiley-Blackwell Ernst amp Sohn GIT
bull Weinheim Berlin Zuumlrich (CH)
bull 530 employees (450 70 14)
ndash With a PhD 20 - University degree 30
ndash ~ 70 female - 30 male
ndash Average age ~ 42 years
ndash Average time with Wiley-VCH ~ 10 years
ndash Foreign employees 40 from 24 different nations
bull Primarily chemists followed by materials scientists physicists biologists mathematicians
Wiley in Germany
copy 2016
Wiley-VCH Journal Genealogy
copy 2016
1500 journals books
And More
copy 2016
bull Honestly assess the importanceimpact and scope of your work
bull Journal Impact Factor is not everything
bull What are the implications of your research
bull How important will others find your researchndash In your fieldndash In related fields
bull Publication fees Open access
bull Speed of publicationbull What is the scope of your
candidate journalbull Who reads your candidate
journal
Selecting the Journal
copy 2016
Number of source items published in 2014 and 2013
_________________________________
Impact Factor2015 =
Number of citations in 2015 to articles published in 2014 and 2013
Example
Journal of hellip publishes 75 articles in 2013 and
83 articles in 2014
In 2015 it receives a total of 344 citations to
these articles in all the other published journals
The journalrsquos Impact Factor for 2015 is
344 (75 + 83) = 218
2016
2013
2012
2011
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Cited
window
Citing
window
2015
2014
2015
Impact Factor (IF)
The 2015 Impact Factor first appears in 2016
copy 2016
ldquooriginally appeared in a postscript of my previous Editorial and then it was just to note that I did not wish to write about it because it has become a plague rdquo
copy 2016
1) Statistically (= scientifically) poor methods
2) Arbitrary 2-year window citation practices depend upon the field and on the
specific work
3) Overinterpretation and misuse of the Impact Factor values
4) Incentives for poor research practice amp unethical behavior (on the parts of both
publishers and authors)
Problems with IF-based Assessment
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
John Wiley amp Sons
South Korea
Founded in 1807 in New York City by John Wiley
To this day family-owned in the 6th generation
Approx 5000 staff worldwide
Wiley Online Library has 130 million users
1500 journals 1200 society partners
Company headquarters are in Hoboken (New Jersey)
Wiley-VCH (Germany) has been part of Wiley since 1996
copy 2016
copy 2016
Weinheim office
where John livesKarlsruhe
Bad Herrenalb
copy 2016
bull Wiley-VCH Wiley-Blackwell Ernst amp Sohn GIT
bull Weinheim Berlin Zuumlrich (CH)
bull 530 employees (450 70 14)
ndash With a PhD 20 - University degree 30
ndash ~ 70 female - 30 male
ndash Average age ~ 42 years
ndash Average time with Wiley-VCH ~ 10 years
ndash Foreign employees 40 from 24 different nations
bull Primarily chemists followed by materials scientists physicists biologists mathematicians
Wiley in Germany
copy 2016
Wiley-VCH Journal Genealogy
copy 2016
1500 journals books
And More
copy 2016
bull Honestly assess the importanceimpact and scope of your work
bull Journal Impact Factor is not everything
bull What are the implications of your research
bull How important will others find your researchndash In your fieldndash In related fields
bull Publication fees Open access
bull Speed of publicationbull What is the scope of your
candidate journalbull Who reads your candidate
journal
Selecting the Journal
copy 2016
Number of source items published in 2014 and 2013
_________________________________
Impact Factor2015 =
Number of citations in 2015 to articles published in 2014 and 2013
Example
Journal of hellip publishes 75 articles in 2013 and
83 articles in 2014
In 2015 it receives a total of 344 citations to
these articles in all the other published journals
The journalrsquos Impact Factor for 2015 is
344 (75 + 83) = 218
2016
2013
2012
2011
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Cited
window
Citing
window
2015
2014
2015
Impact Factor (IF)
The 2015 Impact Factor first appears in 2016
copy 2016
ldquooriginally appeared in a postscript of my previous Editorial and then it was just to note that I did not wish to write about it because it has become a plague rdquo
copy 2016
1) Statistically (= scientifically) poor methods
2) Arbitrary 2-year window citation practices depend upon the field and on the
specific work
3) Overinterpretation and misuse of the Impact Factor values
4) Incentives for poor research practice amp unethical behavior (on the parts of both
publishers and authors)
Problems with IF-based Assessment
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
copy 2016
Weinheim office
where John livesKarlsruhe
Bad Herrenalb
copy 2016
bull Wiley-VCH Wiley-Blackwell Ernst amp Sohn GIT
bull Weinheim Berlin Zuumlrich (CH)
bull 530 employees (450 70 14)
ndash With a PhD 20 - University degree 30
ndash ~ 70 female - 30 male
ndash Average age ~ 42 years
ndash Average time with Wiley-VCH ~ 10 years
ndash Foreign employees 40 from 24 different nations
bull Primarily chemists followed by materials scientists physicists biologists mathematicians
Wiley in Germany
copy 2016
Wiley-VCH Journal Genealogy
copy 2016
1500 journals books
And More
copy 2016
bull Honestly assess the importanceimpact and scope of your work
bull Journal Impact Factor is not everything
bull What are the implications of your research
bull How important will others find your researchndash In your fieldndash In related fields
bull Publication fees Open access
bull Speed of publicationbull What is the scope of your
candidate journalbull Who reads your candidate
journal
Selecting the Journal
copy 2016
Number of source items published in 2014 and 2013
_________________________________
Impact Factor2015 =
Number of citations in 2015 to articles published in 2014 and 2013
Example
Journal of hellip publishes 75 articles in 2013 and
83 articles in 2014
In 2015 it receives a total of 344 citations to
these articles in all the other published journals
The journalrsquos Impact Factor for 2015 is
344 (75 + 83) = 218
2016
2013
2012
2011
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Cited
window
Citing
window
2015
2014
2015
Impact Factor (IF)
The 2015 Impact Factor first appears in 2016
copy 2016
ldquooriginally appeared in a postscript of my previous Editorial and then it was just to note that I did not wish to write about it because it has become a plague rdquo
copy 2016
1) Statistically (= scientifically) poor methods
2) Arbitrary 2-year window citation practices depend upon the field and on the
specific work
3) Overinterpretation and misuse of the Impact Factor values
4) Incentives for poor research practice amp unethical behavior (on the parts of both
publishers and authors)
Problems with IF-based Assessment
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Weinheim office
where John livesKarlsruhe
Bad Herrenalb
copy 2016
bull Wiley-VCH Wiley-Blackwell Ernst amp Sohn GIT
bull Weinheim Berlin Zuumlrich (CH)
bull 530 employees (450 70 14)
ndash With a PhD 20 - University degree 30
ndash ~ 70 female - 30 male
ndash Average age ~ 42 years
ndash Average time with Wiley-VCH ~ 10 years
ndash Foreign employees 40 from 24 different nations
bull Primarily chemists followed by materials scientists physicists biologists mathematicians
Wiley in Germany
copy 2016
Wiley-VCH Journal Genealogy
copy 2016
1500 journals books
And More
copy 2016
bull Honestly assess the importanceimpact and scope of your work
bull Journal Impact Factor is not everything
bull What are the implications of your research
bull How important will others find your researchndash In your fieldndash In related fields
bull Publication fees Open access
bull Speed of publicationbull What is the scope of your
candidate journalbull Who reads your candidate
journal
Selecting the Journal
copy 2016
Number of source items published in 2014 and 2013
_________________________________
Impact Factor2015 =
Number of citations in 2015 to articles published in 2014 and 2013
Example
Journal of hellip publishes 75 articles in 2013 and
83 articles in 2014
In 2015 it receives a total of 344 citations to
these articles in all the other published journals
The journalrsquos Impact Factor for 2015 is
344 (75 + 83) = 218
2016
2013
2012
2011
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Cited
window
Citing
window
2015
2014
2015
Impact Factor (IF)
The 2015 Impact Factor first appears in 2016
copy 2016
ldquooriginally appeared in a postscript of my previous Editorial and then it was just to note that I did not wish to write about it because it has become a plague rdquo
copy 2016
1) Statistically (= scientifically) poor methods
2) Arbitrary 2-year window citation practices depend upon the field and on the
specific work
3) Overinterpretation and misuse of the Impact Factor values
4) Incentives for poor research practice amp unethical behavior (on the parts of both
publishers and authors)
Problems with IF-based Assessment
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
bull Wiley-VCH Wiley-Blackwell Ernst amp Sohn GIT
bull Weinheim Berlin Zuumlrich (CH)
bull 530 employees (450 70 14)
ndash With a PhD 20 - University degree 30
ndash ~ 70 female - 30 male
ndash Average age ~ 42 years
ndash Average time with Wiley-VCH ~ 10 years
ndash Foreign employees 40 from 24 different nations
bull Primarily chemists followed by materials scientists physicists biologists mathematicians
Wiley in Germany
copy 2016
Wiley-VCH Journal Genealogy
copy 2016
1500 journals books
And More
copy 2016
bull Honestly assess the importanceimpact and scope of your work
bull Journal Impact Factor is not everything
bull What are the implications of your research
bull How important will others find your researchndash In your fieldndash In related fields
bull Publication fees Open access
bull Speed of publicationbull What is the scope of your
candidate journalbull Who reads your candidate
journal
Selecting the Journal
copy 2016
Number of source items published in 2014 and 2013
_________________________________
Impact Factor2015 =
Number of citations in 2015 to articles published in 2014 and 2013
Example
Journal of hellip publishes 75 articles in 2013 and
83 articles in 2014
In 2015 it receives a total of 344 citations to
these articles in all the other published journals
The journalrsquos Impact Factor for 2015 is
344 (75 + 83) = 218
2016
2013
2012
2011
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Cited
window
Citing
window
2015
2014
2015
Impact Factor (IF)
The 2015 Impact Factor first appears in 2016
copy 2016
ldquooriginally appeared in a postscript of my previous Editorial and then it was just to note that I did not wish to write about it because it has become a plague rdquo
copy 2016
1) Statistically (= scientifically) poor methods
2) Arbitrary 2-year window citation practices depend upon the field and on the
specific work
3) Overinterpretation and misuse of the Impact Factor values
4) Incentives for poor research practice amp unethical behavior (on the parts of both
publishers and authors)
Problems with IF-based Assessment
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Wiley-VCH Journal Genealogy
copy 2016
1500 journals books
And More
copy 2016
bull Honestly assess the importanceimpact and scope of your work
bull Journal Impact Factor is not everything
bull What are the implications of your research
bull How important will others find your researchndash In your fieldndash In related fields
bull Publication fees Open access
bull Speed of publicationbull What is the scope of your
candidate journalbull Who reads your candidate
journal
Selecting the Journal
copy 2016
Number of source items published in 2014 and 2013
_________________________________
Impact Factor2015 =
Number of citations in 2015 to articles published in 2014 and 2013
Example
Journal of hellip publishes 75 articles in 2013 and
83 articles in 2014
In 2015 it receives a total of 344 citations to
these articles in all the other published journals
The journalrsquos Impact Factor for 2015 is
344 (75 + 83) = 218
2016
2013
2012
2011
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Cited
window
Citing
window
2015
2014
2015
Impact Factor (IF)
The 2015 Impact Factor first appears in 2016
copy 2016
ldquooriginally appeared in a postscript of my previous Editorial and then it was just to note that I did not wish to write about it because it has become a plague rdquo
copy 2016
1) Statistically (= scientifically) poor methods
2) Arbitrary 2-year window citation practices depend upon the field and on the
specific work
3) Overinterpretation and misuse of the Impact Factor values
4) Incentives for poor research practice amp unethical behavior (on the parts of both
publishers and authors)
Problems with IF-based Assessment
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
1500 journals books
And More
copy 2016
bull Honestly assess the importanceimpact and scope of your work
bull Journal Impact Factor is not everything
bull What are the implications of your research
bull How important will others find your researchndash In your fieldndash In related fields
bull Publication fees Open access
bull Speed of publicationbull What is the scope of your
candidate journalbull Who reads your candidate
journal
Selecting the Journal
copy 2016
Number of source items published in 2014 and 2013
_________________________________
Impact Factor2015 =
Number of citations in 2015 to articles published in 2014 and 2013
Example
Journal of hellip publishes 75 articles in 2013 and
83 articles in 2014
In 2015 it receives a total of 344 citations to
these articles in all the other published journals
The journalrsquos Impact Factor for 2015 is
344 (75 + 83) = 218
2016
2013
2012
2011
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Cited
window
Citing
window
2015
2014
2015
Impact Factor (IF)
The 2015 Impact Factor first appears in 2016
copy 2016
ldquooriginally appeared in a postscript of my previous Editorial and then it was just to note that I did not wish to write about it because it has become a plague rdquo
copy 2016
1) Statistically (= scientifically) poor methods
2) Arbitrary 2-year window citation practices depend upon the field and on the
specific work
3) Overinterpretation and misuse of the Impact Factor values
4) Incentives for poor research practice amp unethical behavior (on the parts of both
publishers and authors)
Problems with IF-based Assessment
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
bull Honestly assess the importanceimpact and scope of your work
bull Journal Impact Factor is not everything
bull What are the implications of your research
bull How important will others find your researchndash In your fieldndash In related fields
bull Publication fees Open access
bull Speed of publicationbull What is the scope of your
candidate journalbull Who reads your candidate
journal
Selecting the Journal
copy 2016
Number of source items published in 2014 and 2013
_________________________________
Impact Factor2015 =
Number of citations in 2015 to articles published in 2014 and 2013
Example
Journal of hellip publishes 75 articles in 2013 and
83 articles in 2014
In 2015 it receives a total of 344 citations to
these articles in all the other published journals
The journalrsquos Impact Factor for 2015 is
344 (75 + 83) = 218
2016
2013
2012
2011
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Cited
window
Citing
window
2015
2014
2015
Impact Factor (IF)
The 2015 Impact Factor first appears in 2016
copy 2016
ldquooriginally appeared in a postscript of my previous Editorial and then it was just to note that I did not wish to write about it because it has become a plague rdquo
copy 2016
1) Statistically (= scientifically) poor methods
2) Arbitrary 2-year window citation practices depend upon the field and on the
specific work
3) Overinterpretation and misuse of the Impact Factor values
4) Incentives for poor research practice amp unethical behavior (on the parts of both
publishers and authors)
Problems with IF-based Assessment
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Number of source items published in 2014 and 2013
_________________________________
Impact Factor2015 =
Number of citations in 2015 to articles published in 2014 and 2013
Example
Journal of hellip publishes 75 articles in 2013 and
83 articles in 2014
In 2015 it receives a total of 344 citations to
these articles in all the other published journals
The journalrsquos Impact Factor for 2015 is
344 (75 + 83) = 218
2016
2013
2012
2011
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Cited
window
Citing
window
2015
2014
2015
Impact Factor (IF)
The 2015 Impact Factor first appears in 2016
copy 2016
ldquooriginally appeared in a postscript of my previous Editorial and then it was just to note that I did not wish to write about it because it has become a plague rdquo
copy 2016
1) Statistically (= scientifically) poor methods
2) Arbitrary 2-year window citation practices depend upon the field and on the
specific work
3) Overinterpretation and misuse of the Impact Factor values
4) Incentives for poor research practice amp unethical behavior (on the parts of both
publishers and authors)
Problems with IF-based Assessment
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
ldquooriginally appeared in a postscript of my previous Editorial and then it was just to note that I did not wish to write about it because it has become a plague rdquo
copy 2016
1) Statistically (= scientifically) poor methods
2) Arbitrary 2-year window citation practices depend upon the field and on the
specific work
3) Overinterpretation and misuse of the Impact Factor values
4) Incentives for poor research practice amp unethical behavior (on the parts of both
publishers and authors)
Problems with IF-based Assessment
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
1) Statistically (= scientifically) poor methods
2) Arbitrary 2-year window citation practices depend upon the field and on the
specific work
3) Overinterpretation and misuse of the Impact Factor values
4) Incentives for poor research practice amp unethical behavior (on the parts of both
publishers and authors)
Problems with IF-based Assessment
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
What are the alternatives
httpexchangeswileycomblog20140814four-ways-of-measuring-influence
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
bullCovering the technical aspects of applied energy research
ndashGenerationndashConversionndashStoragendashDistribution
bullCompanion journal of other related Wiley titles (Advanced Energy Materials ChemSusChem etc)
bullListed in important databases (ISI Web of Knowledge)
bullFirst full Impact Factor (2015) 2557
bullOnline publication (no color fees)
Launched in 2013
Deputy EditorDr John Uhlrich
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
Special Issues
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Printed Energy Technologies
Energy Storage MaterialsBatteries
Shale Gas Technology
Fraunhofer ISE (Solar Energy Systems)
Energy Science amp Engineering Conference
On the waybull Chemical Looping Technologiesbull Pyrolysis for Energy Technologiesbull Li-Ion Batteriesbull CO2 Utilizationbull KIT Energy
Research
Special Issues
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
ldquoIf your research does not generate papers it might just as well not have been done lsquoInteresting and unpublishedlsquo is equivalent to non-existantldquo
ldquoRealize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses to draw conclusions from these tests and to teach these conclusions to others Your objective is not to lsquocollect datalsquoldquo
George Whitesides ldquoWhitesideslsquo Group Writing a Paperldquo Essay in Advanced Materials 2004 16 1375
Why publish at all
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Dont underestimate how hard it is or
how long it takes to write a good paper
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
bull Paper fits within the journal scope
bull Novelty and quality
bull Concise and well-written papers
bull Of high interest to the readership of the journal
What Editors Want
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Cover Letter The Worst Type
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Yours Sincerely
A Author
We would like to submit our paper
ldquoFantastic Synthesis of Really Interesting
Compoundsrdquo to your journal We hope you will
find it acceptable for publication
Cover Letter Not Much Better
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Dear Editor
Compound X is a potent anticancer agent and was
synthesised in 99 yieldhellip
Reactions catalyzed by A are ten times faster
than those catalyzed by B becausehellip
Our method for protein isolation gives 50
higher yields than previous ones becausehellip
My suggestions for referees are
Cover Letter Attention Editor
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
bull Why is this topic important
bull Why are these results significant
bull What is the key result (breakthrough)
bull Why is it an advance on previous work
bull Why are you submitting to this journal
bull Why will this journalrsquos readers read it
bull Provide reviewer suggestions
Together with the conclusions section of your paper the cover letter is one of the first things the editor will see so make it count
Tip Keep the letter as concise as possible ndash the longer it is the easier it becomes to overlook something important
Maximizing Success Writing the Cover Letter
Solar Cell ExampleWe have fabricated a solar cell with high efficiency and stability using earth-abundant materials by using a simple synthetic method nontoxic precursors using a scaleable fabrication procedure with a unique combination materials that increase our fundamental understanding of photovoltaic devices
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Is the novelty high enough
Difference to prior work
Important to the whole readership
Important to researchers in this field
After the initial check for scope and length is done the manuscript is examined more closely
the most important
hurdle
bdquoPublishing space islimited ndash choose a journal whose readership will be keen to see your resultsldquo
What Editors Look For (Manuscript Suitability)
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Conclusions section of manuscript
While reading new manuscripts editors will especially look at
Cover letter ldquoIf Ilsquom interested my readers will be tooˮ
Keywords
Literature references
Visual information
Abstract
Where will the Editor look
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Manuscript rejected on reports
Manuscript submitted
Peer review editors examine
amp make initial decision
Manuscript sent out
for peer review
Editor makes decision
based on reports
Manuscript is accepted as
is or with minor revisions
Manuscript transferred
to the publication workflow
Manuscript rejected on reports
but reinvited if
major revisions promising
Manuscript rejected on topic
Revisions requested
if possible in short time
Manuscript rejected on format
but reinvited (eg shorten)
Peer Review Editorial Workflow
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
bull Present data honestly and accurately not fabricate or falsify data
bull Reference and cite properly not plagiarize or ignore related work
bull Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication
bull Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press
bull Submit to only one journal at a time
bull Disclose conflicts of interest
Author Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
bull Ensure efficient fair and timely manuscript processing
bull Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
bull Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting
bull Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript
bull Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research
bull Ensure fair selection of referees including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author
bull Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct
bull Deal fairly with author appeals
Editor Responsibilities
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
bull Constructive criticism
bull Identify strengths amp
weaknesses
bull Be specific
bull Check references amp
supporting infoActual referee report received by EurJOC
To EurJOC
Subject Referee report
Save a tree donrsquot
Writing a Referee Report
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
bull Treat it as a discussion of your paper from one of the top experts in your field
bull Donrsquot take it personally ndash it is not an attack on you
bull Be thorough and a little self-critical remember that the referee is trying to help you improve your work and its presentation
bull Remember that everyone is human Take every criticism as an opportunity for improvement this is a ldquotrial runldquo for how your work may be perceived after publication
How to Read a Referee Report
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
Credit Nick Kim (wwwnearingzeronet)
Stay Calm
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Article published online on EarlyView amp news spread
Issue printed (for those journals that still do) ampdispatched to print customers
Electronic files received
Article edited and typeset
Proofs checked (by author)
Corrections made amp checked
Article ready for publication
Issue assembly
Issue published online
Post-Acceptance Workflow
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
httpexchangeswileycomblog2013092310-easy-ways-to-make-sure-your-article-gets-read
Search-engine optimization
Your institutional library and press office
Departmental webpage
Personal webpage
Videos amp blogs
Social media
Promoting Your Published Work
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
1 Have something to say
2 Say it
3 Stop as soon as you have said it
4 Give the paper a proper title
Source John S Billings An Address on our Medical LiteratureBr Med J (1881) 2262-268
The Four Basic Rules
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Titles and abstracts are searchable separately from the
main paper in databases and online
Therefore to increase your paperrsquos ldquodiscoverabilityrdquo
give it a specific and concise title
include many appropriate keywords
ldquosearch-engine optimizationrdquo
Title amp Abstract
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
What effect
Which metal(s)
What type of coupling reaction(s)
Which aryl alcohols
Specific
Concise
Contains many keywords
Effect of Metal Catalyst on the
Outcome of Coupling Reactions
with Aryl Alcohols
Ruthenium Trichloride
The Most Effective Catalyst for
C-H Activation with 24-
Disubstituted Aryl Alcohols
Targeting Your Title
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Results
Introduction
Methods
Abstract
And Discussion
The IMRAD structure began to be used for scientific papers in the 1940s Common in life sciences journals
Consult Guide to Authors for style of journal you are writing for
IMRAD
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Conclusion
Introduction
ResultsAnd
Discussion
Abstract
Experimental Section
Energy Technology
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
bull Provides the background to the study
bull Describes why the work was carried
out and what the aim of the study
was
bull Details the results from other
relevant studies
bull Explains what is still unknown
bull Enables a non-expert to understand
the rationale
General
Specific
Manuscript Progression
The Introduction
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
bull Highlight and review important findings
But be selective
Present the experiments performed in a logical and clear
manner
Clearly indicate significant data
bull Illustrate with clear graphical material
bull Provide explanations for the findings ndash supportedby references
bull Conclusions must be supported by the data
bull Detail any limitations of the study
Results and Discussion
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
bull VERY important
bull Summarize succintly most important findings (but not just a summary)
bull Describe implications of the study
bull Provide recommendations for the future
Conclusions
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Tips
Be precise about the
reagents used (name
suppliers vectors
provide references)
If a new method provide
all detail
If standard provide
citation only
bull Should provide sufficient information to enable the reader to evaluate (and repeat) the results
bull Check Guide for Authors AND common practices of community
bull Establishes credibility for the results
bull To save space non-essential but important parts can be submitted as supportinginformation
Experimental Section
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
bullThe references must comply to house style of the journal
bullEnsure that they are cited in numerical order and that every reference is cited (with each reference appearing in the bibliography only once)
bullThe work cited should be fair and balanced
bullNot only your own references
bullUp to date
bullEnsure that credit is given to the original discoveries
References
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
bull ThisItndash Not This is a fast reaction This leads us to concludendash Instead This reaction is fast This observation leads us to conclude
bull Avoid being overly wordyndash ldquoThis leads us to point out the fact that our previous conclusion was
incorrectldquo
bull Active Voicendash Not It was observed that the solution turned redndash Instead The solution turned red or We observed that the solution turned red
bull Could wouldndash Not ldquoThe sample could be observed to degrade over timeldquo ndash Instead ldquoThe sample degraded over timeldquo
bull ldquoapproximatelyldquo (as well as ldquoaroundldquo and ~)bull ldquonovelldquo
ndash Should be avoided (especially in titles)
bull Holy Grail
Tips (and Pet Peeveshellip)
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
Holy Grailshellip
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
ldquoDuring prescreening I look for an up-to-date and relevant bibliography and a clear comparison of the results with those of previous studiesmdashit is difficult to assess the significance of the findings if they are not presented in an appropriate context I routinely read the literature cited and conduct my own literature search to check if important papers have been omitted that may detract from the novelty of the work
I also appreciate honest reporting While your work may represent an advance there will certainly be shortcomings and room for improvement This should be discussed but is too often neglected
A final piece of advice is that as a reader and reviewer of our journals you should self-assess your manuscript and submit accordingly to the most appropriate journal rather than the one with the highest Impact Factor This will ensure swifter publication of your workrdquo
Dr Adam Brotchie
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
ldquoCompared to Advanced Materials Advanced Functional Materials adopts the same criteria in terms of scientific novelty and importance If the manuscript has been previously rejected by Advanced Materials only a superficial change in the format (Communication to Full Paper) may still result in a direct rejection
Paper evaluation is not a gambling game and it is inappropriate to ignore the previous comments with the belief that a new group of editorsreviewers might generate a new resultrdquo
Dr Yan Li
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
ldquoThink of the reader Compare your results to the work of others wherever possible (a good tablefigure helps the reader a lot) And use the most widely accepted units If not possible give reasons why Mention and discuss differences (because thatrsquos what scientific publishing is about after allhellip )rdquo
Dr Till Graberg
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
57
ldquoNovelty and state-of-the-art of the presented results must be ensured Incremental results or simple extensions of published work are not desired neither are specialized topics The title abstract and conclusions as well as the figures should be appealing and motivating and concisely explain the key findings The writing should be easy-to-read and the English should be goodrdquo
Dr Ingeborg Stass
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
wwwChemistryViewsorg
Getting Help Resources
Have a friendcolleague read your manuscript read your work again after setting it aside fora couple of days have a native speaker proofread for language if available
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
httpwileyeditingservicescomen
Getting Help Editing Services
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
1) Unpublished work is lost and properly communicating science
takes effort
2) A simple writing style is best
3) Optimize your content for internet use
4) Peer review isnrsquot perfect but it is the best we have
5) Competition is hard so make your work stand out
6) Take an active role in promoting your work
Conclusions
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal
copy 2016
EnergyTechnol
Questions
bull Contact mendash John Uhlrich
jjuhlrichwileycom
Energy Technology
wwwentechnolde
energy-technologywileycom
Submissions
wwweditorialmanagercomente
httpswwwfacebookcomEnergyTechnologyJournal