purification of cucumber pale fruit viroid*
TRANSCRIPT
日植 病 報 50: 331-338 (1984)
Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Japan 50: 331-338 (1984)
Purification of Cucumber Pale Fruit Viroid*
Ichiro UYEDA**, Teruo SANO** and Eishiro SHIKATA**
上 田一 郎 **・佐野 輝 男 **・四 方 英 四郎 **:Cucumber pale fruit viroidの 純 化*
Abstract
Cucumber pale fruit viroid was purified from infected cucumber leaves and stems.
Nucleic acids were extracted from the frozen tissue by phenol-CHCl3-SDS, and precipitated
with ethanol. Polysaccharides were removed by ethylene glycol monomethyl ether treatment
and phenolic substrances by cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide. After 2M LiCl soluble
fraction was treated with DNase, low molecular weight RNAs were obtained. The viroid
was further purified by CF-11 cellulose chromatography and 15% polyacrylamide gel electro-
phoresis. Yield of the purified viroid was about 3-6ƒÊg/200g of tissue. Five percent
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the purified viroid in the presence of urea revealed
two bands both associated with infectivity. (Received December 16, 1983)
Key Words: cucumber pale fruit viroid, gel electrophoresis, purification.
Introduction
Sasaki and Shikata have shown that hop stunt disease is caused by a viroid15-19) and
Takahashi confirmed its viroidal etiology21). They15,17) also reported that hop stunt viroid
(HSV) is mechanically transmissible to several herbaceous plants including cucumber
and tomato. Descriptions of symptoms on cucumber and host range of cucumber pale
fruit viroid (CPFV) found in Europe22) were very similar to HSV. Sano et al.14) conducted
simultaneous comparison of HSV and CPFV, and showed that they were indistinguishable
by host range and symptomatology.
For further comparative studies of the two viroids by their physicochemical proper-
ties, it is essential to extract and purify them in a reasonably large quantity. In our
preliminary attempts, purification of CPFV and HSV by extraction methods of Morris
and Smith6) was unsuitable when a large amount of the infected tissue was handled,
because remained impurties prevented a sample to dissolve in a small volume of a buff-
er before 5% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Furthermore, 5% PAGE did
not separate the two viroids from 7S RNA of the host origin.
Although Sanger at al.13) and Muhlbach and Sanger7) reported studiess using purified
CPFV, detailed procedures have not yet been described. In this paper, we describe
*This research was supported in part by Research Grant No.56480037 and No.56360004 from the
Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan.
*Plant quarantine permission number 54-Yokoshoku-1259 and 55-Yokoshoku-1035 .
**Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060, Japan北 海 道 大 学 農 学 部
332 日本植物病理学会報 第50巻 第3号 昭和59年7月
successful purification of CPFV by modification of the methods of Raymer and Diener11),
and Singh and Sanger20), and by the use of 15% PAGE.
Materials and Methods
Viroids. Cucumber pale fruit viroid was maintained and propagated on cucumber
plants (Cucumis sativus L. cv. Suyo) as previously described14).
Test sample were mechanically inoculated to 4 cucumber plants and infectivity was
quantitatively assayed according to Raymer and Diener11).
Purification of the low molecular weight RNAs. The methods of Raymer and
Diener11), and Singh and Sanger20) were combined and modified as follows.
Two hundreds g of frozen tissues were blended in 300ml of 1M K2HPO4, 4g of
sodium dodesyl sulfate (SDS), 0.4g of bentonite and 40ml of water-saturated phenol
for 5min at room temperature. After centrifugation at 6,500rpm for 20min, aqueous
supernatant was collected. Water-saturated phenol (200ml) and 200ml of CHCl3 were
added and stirred with a magnetic stirrer for 30min at room temperature. Aqueous
supernatant after centrifugation at 6,500rpm for 20min was collected and 2.5 volume
of 95% ethanol containing 0.2M sodium acetate were added. After storage at -30C
overnight, nucleic acids were recovered as a skin at the interface between the lower
phosphate rich aqueous phase and upper ethanol phase after the low speed centrifuga-
tion. Nucleic acids were dissolved in 100ml of distilled water, precipitated again by
2.5 volumes of 95% ethanol, and dissolved in 50ml TES buffer (0.1M Tris, 0.001M
ethylenediaminetetraacetate disodium salt (EDTA), 0.1M NaCl, pH7.5). Fifty ml
each of ethylene glycol monomethyl ether and 2.5M K2HPO4, pH8.3 was then added,
blended at 15,000rpm for 3min, and centrifuged at 3,000rpm for 20min. The up-
per aqueous phase is carefully recovered without disturbing the interphase and diluted
up to 625ml with distilled water to make 0.2M K2HPO4. While stirring with a mag-
netic stirrer, 10ml of 2% cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) was slowly added.
And CTA-nucleic acids comlexes were precipitated by a low speed centrifugation after
incubation at 6C for 30min. The precipitate was washed twice with 95% ethanol to
remove CTA cations and stored in 70% ethanol at -30C overnight. After a low speed
centrifugation, the precipitate was disolved in TES buffer and an equal volume of 4M
LiCl solution was added. The solution was stood at 0C for 4hr and centrifuged at
3,000rpm for 30min. To the supernatant, which contained 2M LiCl soluble low
molecular weight RNAs and DNA, added 2.5 volumes of 95% ethanol and the nucleic
acid was precipitated by the low speed centrifugation. The precipitate was dissolved
in 10ml of DNase I (Worthington Biochemical) solution (25ƒÊg/ml)1), incubated at 37
C for 30min. The DNA digestion was stopped by phenol-CHCl3 treatment and the
RNAs were precipitated by ethanol. About 10mg of the low molecular weight RNAs
were recovered from 200g of tissue.
Column chromatography. DEAE cellulose (DE-32: Whatman) column chromato-
graphy was carried out at 6C. The column size was 10•~70mm and flow rate was
50ml/hr. The low molecular weight RNAs were fractionated by stepwise elution using
0.02M Tris-HCl, pH7.6, containing 0.3, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7M NaCl.
Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Japan 50 (3). July, 1984 333
Sephadex G-100 gel filtration was carried out in a 16•~900mm column at 6C.
The flow rate was 10ml/hr. The low molecular weight RNAs were eluted in 0.05M
KCl containing 1% methanol.
CF-11 cellulose column chromatography was carried out at room temperature (25C)
according to the procedure of Franklin2). The low molecular weight RNAs were frac-
tionated by stepwise elution using 35% and 15% ethanol followed by ethanol free buffer.
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under
nondenaturing condition was performed in 15% (acrylamide: bis=30:0.8) gel with 0.04
M Tris-0.02M sodium acetate-0.001M EDTA, pH7.2, buffer3) using 15cm•~19cm•~
1.5mm slab gel apparatus, at 15mA constant for 20hr at 6C. During electrophoresis,
the buffer was recirculated with a peristaltic pump.
Five percent PAGE under denaturing condition was performed in 7M urea, 0.075
M Tris, 0.045M boric acid, and 0.001M EDTA4). Ethanol-precipitated RNA sample
was suspended in 0.01M EDTA, pH7.0, 16% sucrose, 20% dimethyl sulfoxide, heated
at 50C for 10min, and electrophored, at 5mA constant for about 7hr at 40-45C.
After electrophorsis, gels were stained with 0.02% toluidine blue O and destained in
distilled water. The viroid band was cut out and homogenized in 0.5M ammonium ace-
tate, 0.01M magnesium acetate, and 0.1% SDS4). After stirring with a magnetic stirrer
overnight at room temperature, gel slurry was pelleted by a low speed centrifugation
and supernatant was collected. The viroid was precipitated with ethanol and dissolved
in 0.02M Tris-HCl containing 0.3M NaCl, pH7.6. The viroid was then applied onto a
DEAE-cellulose column equilibrated with 0.02M Tris-HCl containing 0.3M NaCl, pH
7.6, washed with the same buffer and eluted with 0.02M Tris-HCl containing 0.6M
NaCl.
Results
Detection of the viroids by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
In early experiments, the low molecular weight RNAs were directly eletrophoresed
on PAGE. As previously described, HSV- and CPFV- specific RNA were not detected
on 5% PAGE, because the migration rate of both HSV and CPFV was identical to that
of 7S RNA of host origin. Since it was known that electrophoretic mobility of viroids
in gels changes differently from host RNAs at different concentrations of acrylamide,
the low molecular weight RNAs extracted from CPFV-infected cucumber were electro-
phoresed on 5%, 7.5%, 15%, and 20% polyacrylamide gel in Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer.
These experiments revealeed that CPFV was clearly separated from host RNAs by 15%
20% PAGE. The result of 15% PAGE is shown in Fig. 1. An arrow indicates and
CPFV-specific RNA band that was not detected in extracts of healthy cucumber plants.
The gel was sectiond into 7 slices as indicated in Fig. 1 and assayed on cucumber plants.
Infectivity was mostly associated with the CPFV-specific RNA band.
The concentrated low molecular weight RNA preparation was usually colored and vis-
cous due to contaminated impurities and the bands were frequenly disturbed by them
and we sometimes failed to detect the viroid band after staining with toluidine blue O.
We therefore examined chromatographic procedures for further purification of CPFV.
334 日本植物病理学 会報 第50巻 第3号 昭和59年7月
Fig. 1. Fifteen percent PAGE of the low
molecular weight RNAs of healthy
(A) and CPFV-infected (B) plants
under non-denaturing condition and
its infectivity assay. An arrow in-
dicates the band specific to CPFV-
infected plant. Each well received
about 300ƒÊg of the RNA.
Fig. 4. Sephadex G-100 gel filtration of RNAs from CPFV-infected plant. The low molecular weight RNAs were
purified by DEAE cellulose chromatography and about 5mg of the RNAs were loaded onto the Sephadex column. Five ml/fraction was collected and absorba-nce at 260nm was monitored.
Fig. 2. DEAE cellulose chromatography of nucleic acids from CPFV-infected plant. About 17mg of the nucleic acids prior to DNase treat-ment were loaded onto the column and 5ml/fraction was collected. Absorbance at 260nm of fractions were monitored after 10 folds dilution.
Fig. 3. Fifteen percent PAGE analysis of the selected fractions of DEAE cel-lulose chromatography. One ml portion of the fractions 1 (A), 2 (B), 6 (C), 7 (D), 11 (E), 12 (F), and 16 (G) in Fig. 2 were treated with DN-ase, precipitated with ethanol and electropho-resed under non-dena-turing condition. An arrow indicates CPFV.
DEAE cellulose chromatography
Figs. 2 and 3 show the elution pattern of nucleic acid preparation prior to DNase
treatment and 15% PAGE analysis of the eluted fractions, respectively. The first peak
eluting with 0.3M NaCl contained mostly DNA and the colored impurities and degra-
Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Japan 50 (3). July, 1984 335
Fig. 5. Fifteen percent PAGE analy -sis of the selected fractions of Sephadex G-100 chromato-
graphy. The RNAs in 1ml portion of the fractions 13 (A), 15 (B), 18 (C), 20 (D), and 24 (E) in Fig. 4 were precipitated with ethanol and electropho-resed under non-denaturing condition. An arrow indicates CPFV.
Fig. 7. Fifteen percent PAGE analy-sis of the fractions eluted with 35% (A), 15% (B), and 0% (C) ethanol of CF-11 cellulose chromatography.
Fig. 6. CF-11 cellulose chromatography of the low mo-
lecular weight RNAs from CPFV-infected plant.
About 10mg of the RNAs were loaded. Each
peak was assayed for infectivity on cucumber.
Fig. 8. Five percent PAGE under 7M urea-denaturing condition and infectivity assay of purified CPFV. Arrows indicate circular (C) and linear (L) molecules of CPFV.
ded nucleic acids. The second peak eluting with 0.5M NaCl contained almost all part
of the low molecular weight RNAs including the viroid. Thus most of the impurties
were excluded but a large portion of the host RNAs still remained in the eluted viroid
preparation.Sephadex C100 chromatography
Fig. 4 and 5 show the elution pattern and 15% PAGE analysis of the eluted fractions,
respectivery. The peak in exclusion volume contained viroid RNA, some cellular RNA
species of similar sizes to the viroid and highly viscous impurities that remained at
the top of the gel. Such impurities frequently disturbed the electrophoretic migration
of RNAs and made further purification of the viroid difficult.
336 日本植物病理学 会報 第50巻 第3号 昭和59年7月
CF11 cellulose chromatography
Fig. 6 and 7 show the elution pattern and 15% PAGE analysis of the eluted fraction,
respectively. The first peak eluted with 35% ethanol contained a large portion of
tRNA, degraded nucleic acids and impurities (Fig. 7). The second peak eluted with
15% ethanol contained viroid RNA, small amount of tRNA, 5S RNA, and some minor
species of cellular RNAs. The third peak eluted with the buffer alone scarcely
contained nucleic acids. The bioassay showed that almost all of viroid RNA was
eluted with 15% ethanol (Fig. 6).
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the purified viroid under denaturing
condition
After 15% PAGE and elution of the viroid from the gel, purity of the viroid prepa-
ration was assayed by 5% PAGE under denaturing condition. Two major bands (tolui-
dine blue O stain) were consistently detected after electrophoresis. The bioassay indi-
cated that both bands were highly associated with infectivities (Fig. 8).
It was assumed that the slower migrating and faster migrating bands were circular
and linear molecules of the same viroid, respectively, as has been reported for other
viroids5,9,10,13). However, in some preparation, several minor bands whose migration was
identical to RNAs of healthy tissue were detected indicating a trace of contamination
of cellular RNAs.
Discussion
Sanger and his co-workers7,13) purified CPFV from tomato cv. Rentina. However,
purification from the tomato plants had two disadvantages. First, the infected tomato
cv. Rentina did not produce distinct symptoms under greenhouse conditions. This
makes an additional procedure to assure that inoculated tomato plants are indeed
infected. Cucumber plant is an obvious choice of starting materials, because CPFV
produces distinct symptoms on this host. Second, low molecular weight RNAs prepar-
ations from tomato contained much more colored substances than from cucumber.
Although Sanger's attempts had been unsuccessful12), we were able to purify CPFV
from cucumber as shown in this paper.
It was found that CF-11 cellulose chromatography was the most effective for purifi-
cation among chromatographic procedures, because it could separate not only the impu-
rities but also a large portion of tRNA from the viroid. DEAE cellulose chromatography
could remove the impurities, particularly highly colored materials, but a large portion
of host RNAs eluted together with the viroid. Sephadex G-100 chromatography separa-
ted the viroid almost completely from both tRNA and 5S RNA but unable to remove
the viscous impurities which sometimes made further purification of the viroid by
PAGE impossible. Alternatively, two cycles of 15% PAGE effectively purify CPFV.
Ohno et al.8) also obtained satisfactory results using two cycles of 10% PAGE for
purfication of HSV. The combination of CF-11 cellulose chromatography and 15%
PAGE, or two cycles of 15% PAGE yielded 3-6ƒÊg/200g of tissue of purified CPFV.
The use of 15% PAGE was found to be effective to separate the viroid from the
cellular RNAs of the similar size. Hop stunt viroid migrated almost identically to CPFV
Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Japan 50 (3). July, 1984 337
in 15% PAGE, and was purified by the method described here. Yoshikawa and Takaha-
shi23) used 7.5% PAGE for the purification of HSV in which HSV migrated between 7S
and 9S cellular RNAs. However, the RNAs banded sharper in 15% PAGE than in 7.5%
PAGE and were more effectively separated from each other. The migration pattern of
HSV in 10% PAGE8) was similar to that in our 15% PAGE. But we prefered 15%
PAGE because of the same reasons for 7.5% PAGE. Twenty percent PAGE also
effectively separated CPFV and HSV. However, it was difficult to make gels due to a
substantial shrinkage occured during gel formation in our electrophoresis apparatus.
Our purified viroid preparations still contain a trace of cellular RNAs as revealed
by 5% PAGE under denaturing condition. Further purification by 5% PAGE under de-
naturing condition will be necessary when viroids were used in the direct sequencing
or hybridization experiments where the highest purity is required.
Literature cited
1. Erikson, R.L. (1969). In Fundamental Techniques in Virology. Academic Press, New York and London. pp. 451-463.
2. Franklin, R.M. (1966). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 55: 1504-1511.3. Loening, U.E. (1967). Biochem. J. 102: 251-257.4. Maniatis, T. and Efstradiadis, A. (1980). Methods in Enzymol. 65: 299-305.5. McClements, W.L. and Kaesberg, P. (1977). Virology 76: 477-484.6. Morris, T.J. and Smith, E.M. (1977). Phytopathology 67: 145-150.7. Muhlbach, H-P and Sanger, H-L (1977). J. gen. Virol. 35: 377-386.8. Ohno, T., Akiya, J., Higuchi, M., Okada, Y., Yoshikawa, N., Takahashi, T. and Hashimoto, J.
(1982). Virology 118: 54-63.9. Owens, R.A., Erbe, E., Hadidi, A., Steere, R.L. and Diener, T.O. (1977). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 74: 3859-3863.10. Palukaitis, P. and Symons, R.H. (1980). J. gen. Virol. 46: 477-489.11. Raymer, W.B. and Diener, T.O. (1969). Virology 37: 343-350.12. Sanger, L.H. (Personal communication).13. Sanger, L.H., Klotz, G., Riesner, D., Gross, H.J. and Kleinshmidt, A.K. (1976). Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 73: 3852-3856.14. Sano T., Sasaki, M. and Shikata, E. (1981). Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Japan 47: 599-605.15. Sasaki, M. and Shikata, E. (1977). Proc. Japan Acad. 53B: 103-108.16. Sasaki, M. and Shikata, E. (1977). Ibid. 53B: 109-112.17. Sasaki, M. and Shikata, E. (1978). Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Japan 44: 465-477.18. Sasaki, M. and Shikata, E. (1978). Ibid. 44: 570-577.19. Sasaki, M. and Shikata, E. (1980). Rev. Pl. Protect. Res. 13: 97-113.20. Singh, A. and Sanger, H.L. (1976). Phytopath. Z. 87: 143-160.21. Takahashi, T. (1981). Ibid. 100: 193-202.22. Van Dorst, H.J.M. and Peters, D. (1974). Neth. J. Pl. Path. 80: 85-96.23. Yoshikawa, N. and Takahashi, T. (1982). Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Japan 48: 182-191.
338 日本植物病 理学 会報 第50巻 第3号 昭和59年7月
和 文 摘 要
Cucumber pale fruit viroidの 純 化
上 田 一 郎 ・佐 野 輝 男 ・四 方 英 四 郎
Cucumber pale fruit viroidを 罹病 キ ュ ウ リ茎 葉 よ り純 化 した 。 核 酸 は フ ェ ノー ル ・ク ロ ロホ ル ム ・SDS
法 で 抽 出 し,エ タ ノー ルで 沈 澱 させ た。 多 糖 類 は,エ チ レング リ コール モ ノ メ チル エ ー テ ル処 理,ま た フ ェ ノール 物 質 は,セ チ ル トリメチ ル ア ンモニ ウ ムブ ロ ミ ド処 理 で 除 去 した。 更 に2M LiCl可 溶分 画 をDNase I
で処 理 して,低 分 子RNA分 画 を 得 た。 ウ イ ロ イ ドは そ の分 画 よ りCF-11セ ル ロー ス ク ロマ トグ ラフ ィ ー
と15%ポ リア ク リル ア ミ ドス ラブゲ ル電 気 泳 動 を 用 い て純 化 した。 ウ イ ロイ ドの収 量 は,3~9μg/200g茎
葉 で あ った。 尿 素 を 含 む,5%ポ リア ク リル ア ミ ドス ラブゲ ル電 気 泳 動 で,純 化 ウ イ ロイ ドは2本 の バ ン ドに
分 か れ,両 者 に感 染 性 が あ っ た。