purple line extension contract revised

8/12/2019 Purple Line Extension contract revised

1/20

Los Angeles C o u n t y One a t ew ay Plaza z i 3 .Metropolitan Transportat ion A u t h o r i t y Los Angeles, CA g o o i 2 - z 9 5 z me

M e t r o

2ND REVISEDCONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE

JULY 7, 2014

SUBJECT: WESTSIDE PURPLE I NE EXTENSION PROJECT, ECTION

ACTION: AWARD DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT AND S TA B L I S H LIFE OFPROJECT BUDGET

RECOMMENDATION

A . A u t h o r i z e the Chief Executive O f f i c e r(CEO) o award a 1 0 7 mon th i r m f i x e dp r i c e c o n t r a c t sub iec t to the resolution of a n y timely protests, underRequest -f o r - Proposal No. C 1 0 4 5 i t h Skanska, r a y l o r and Shea , a J o i n tVenture (STS) , the responsive an d r e s p o n s i b l e prop oser determined t o p r o v i d eMetro w i t h the Best Value o r the i n a l design an d c o n s t r u c t i o n o f the WestsidePurple Line Extension P r o j e c t S e c t i o n 1 f o r a i r m f i x e d p r i c e o f 1,636,418,585.

B. A u t h o r i z e the Chief Executive O f f i c e r t o execu te u t u r e i n d i v i d u a l c o n t r a c t

m o d i f i c a t i o n s t o Contract N o . C 1 0 4 5 up o an a m o u n t not o e x c e e d 1,000,000f o r e a c h i n d i v i d u a l c o n t r a c t m o d i f i c a t i o n w i t h i n the Board appr oved p o l i c y o f 10%f o r c o n t r a c t m o d i f i c a t i o n a u t h o r i t y .

C. E s t a b l i s h a L i f e o f P r o j e c t (LOP) udget of 2 ,773 ,879 ,593 o r the Wests idePurple Line Extension P r o j e c t S e c t i o n 1 an d No. 6 5 5 1 8 , ncluding a c o s ti n c r e a s e of 288.170,284 r e l a t i v e to the L o n q Range ransportat ion Plan.

D . A u t h o r i z e the CEO o e x e r c i s e Option 1 , o r the c rossove r v e n t i l a t i o n system i nthe a m o u n t of 3,150,000 w i t h i n s i x m o n th s f Contract Award .

ISSUE

On Sep t em ber 27, 2012 , the Board a u t h o r i z e d s t a f f t o use ad es ig n - b u i l d process ocomple te the i n a l design an d c o n s t r u c t i o n o f the Wests ide Purple L i n e ExtensionP r o j e c t Section 1 and t o s o l i c i t a o n t r a c t f o r the 3.92 m i l e dual t r a c k h e a v y i l systemw i t h t h r e e n e w t a t i o n s . T h e Board a u t h o r i z e d the procuremen t unde r P u b l i c ContractCode e c t i o n 20209.5 t s e q . which a l l o w s f o r the n e g o t i a t i o n an d award of a esign-


2/20

b u i l d c o n t r a c t t o a e s p o n s i b l e p r o p o s e r w h o s e p r o p o s a l i s d e t e r mi n e d t o be the b e s tvalue o Metro .

T h e S o u r c e e l e c t i o n Plan an d R e q u e s t o r Pr o p o s a l RFP) ontained the weightedvalue ass igned t o each c r i t e r i o n . I n accordance i t h P u b l i c Contract Code PCC)

2 0 2 0 9 .5 2 0 2 0 9 . 1 4 and the R FP, B e s t Value s e x p r e s s l y d e f i n e d as a valued e t e r mi n e d by b j e c t i v e c r i t e r i a and may n c l u d e , b u t i s not i m i t e d t o , p r i c e , f e a t u r e s ,f u n c t i o n s , l i f - c y c l e c o s t s , a n d o t h e r c r i t e r i a d e e m e d a p p r o p r i a t e by Metro ; and the Be s t Value Proposa l as the m o s t ad v an tag eo u s Proposa l o M e t r o w h e n evaluated i naccordance i t h the E v a l u a t i o nC r i t e r i a d e f i n e d i n the R F P.

T h e r e c o m m e n d e d a c t i o n i s t o award the c o n t r a c t t o the h i g h e s t r anked and m o s tad v an tag eo u s p r o p o s e r b ased o n a Be s t Value p r o c u r e m e n t process . Th er e c o m m e n d e d c o n t r a c t o r had the o v e r a l l h i g h e s t r a n k i n g , i n c l u d i n gthe h i g h e s t t e c h n i c a lsc o r e b ased o n the r i t e r i a i n the R FP.

T h e o l i c i t a t i o n p r o c e s s has e e r y comp { e t e d . h i s r e p o r t p r o v i d e sa r e c o m m e n d a t i o nf o r award o f he c o n t r a c t w i t h i n the Federal r a n s i t A d m i n i s t r a t i o n(FTA) p p r o v e d F u l lFund i ng G r an t A g r e e m e n t FFGA) n d a pp r ove d loan by he T r a n s p o r t a t i o nI n f r a s t r u c t u r e Finance an d n n o v a t i o nAct TIFIA) oan O f f i c e .

DISCUSSION

T h e We s t s i d e P u rp le Line Extens ion P r o j e c t , Section 1 t h e P r o j e c t ) s the i r s t o f t h r e es e c t i o n s t o be d e s i g n e d an d c o n s t r u c t e d as a r t of he L o s A n g e l e s C o u n t yM e t r o p o l i t a nT r a n s p o r t a t i o n A u t h o r i t y LACMTA) e a s u r e R r o g r a m . The p r o g r a mwas p p r o v e d by L o s A n g e l e s C o u n t y o t e r s i n N o v e m b e r 2 0 0 8 and p r o v i d e sa a l f -c e n t ales a x t o finance n e w r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o j e c t s . I n A p r i l 2012, he h r e e s e c t i o n s ofthe P r o j e c t w e r e n v i r o n m e n t a l l y c l e a r e da n d a dop t e d by LACMTA o ard o f D i r e c t o r s .

Section 1 w i l le x t e n d the e x i s t i n g Pu r p l e L i n e by 3 . 92 i l e s b e g i n n i n g a t theW i l s h i r e / W e s t e r nS t a t i o n . F r o m t h i s s t a t i o n , the w i n t u n n e l a l ignment i l l t r a v e l w e s t e r l yw i t h i n the e x i s t i n g W i l s h i r e Bouleva rd r i g h t- o f- way. U nde rg r oun d s t a t i o n s w i l l be o c a t e da t the n t e r s e c t i o n s o f i l s h i r e /La Brea, i l s h i r e / F a i r f a x , a n d W i l s h i r e/La Cie n e ga . l lt h r e e of he t a t i o n b o x e s i l l be o c a t e d w i t h i n the W i l s h i r e Bouleva rd r i g h t- o f-way i t hs t a t i o n p o r t a l s ex tend ing t o o f f- s t r e e t entrances.

T h e r o j e c t w i l la l s o i n c l u d e t r a i n c o n t r o l an d s i g n a l s , communicat ions , r a c t i o n p o w e rsupply and i s t r i b u t i o n , and a r e c o l l e c t i o n s y s t e m s h a t w i l lc o n n e c t and operate i t h thee x i s t i n g s y s t e m . The r o j e c t sc he d u l e e q u i r e s comple t ion i n O c tob e r 2024.

P r o p o s e r s w e r e a s k e d t o p r i c e an o p t i o n t o i n c l u d e an n t e r n a l exhaus t p l e n u m a t thecrossover, n c l u d i n gr e v i s i o n s t o describe the e m e r g e n c y and ma in t e n a nc e scenariost h a t are o be a dd r e s se d by the c rossover e n t i l a t i o n s y s t e m . T h e p t i o n a b o v e s not

We st s i d e Pu r p l e L i n e E x t e n s i o n , S e c t i o n1 Aw a r d D / B o n t r a c t &Establish LOP u d g e t


3/20

b e in g e x e r c i s e d a t aw ard . T h e n e e d f o r e x e r c i s i n g the o p t i o n w i l l b e d e t e r mi n e d up t os i x m o n t h s a f t e r c o n t r a c t aw ard .

DETERMINATION OF SAFETY IMPACT

This Board a c t i o n compl ie s w i t h e s t a b l i sh e d s a f e t y standards.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

F u n d s are i n c l u d e d i n the proposed FY15 u d g e t o r the r e c o m m e n d e d c o n t r a c t a w a r da n d adoption of the LOP u d g e t un d e r P r o j e c t 865518 We s t s ide Purple L i n eExtens ion P r o j e c t , Secti on 1, i n Cost Ce n t e r 8510 C o n s t r u c t i o n P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t ) ,a n d A cco u n t N u m b e r 3 1 0 1 A c q u i s i t i o n B u i l d i n g a n d S t r u c t u r e ) .

The i f e of Pro jec t b u d g e t r e c o m m e n d a t i o n i n c l u d e s a os t i n c r e a se of$288,170,284 over s t i m a t e s used o r p l a n n i n g and programming purposes. Thec o s t i n c r e a se c a n b e s u p p o r t e d b y M e a s u r e R 35 ransit Capital f u n d i n g f r o mt h e l i n e i t e m f o r t h i s aro iec t i n t h e M e a s u r e R x p e n d i t u r e P l a n , a s d i s c u s s e d i nA t t a c h m e n t C, he M e a s u r e R C o s t Management r o c e s s a n d Pol icy Analysis .Appr ova l of th e c o s t i n c r e a s e w i l l r e d u c e f u n d s a v a i l a b l e for a We s t s i d e /CentralA r e a Sub - R e g i o n a l M e a s u r e R e p l a c e m e n t p r o i e c t s ) f r o m $ 7 8 8 m i l l i o n t o $500m i l l i o n . No ther sub - r e g i o n s or M e a s u r e R rojects a r e i m p a c t e d .

S i n c e t h i s i s a u l t i -year P r o j e c t , the Executive D i r e c t o r of Engineer ing a n dC o n s t r u c t i o n a n d the P r o j e c t M a n a g e r i l l b e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r budge t ing costs o r f u t u r ey e a r s , i n c l u d i n g a n y o p t i o n s e x e r c i s e d .

Impac t t o B u d g e t

T h e sources of fu n d s o r the P r o j e c t a re c a p i t a l f u n d s i d e n t i f i e d i n the proposed LOPB u d g e t a s s h o w n i n A t t a c hme n t B . The r e c o m m e n d e d LOP u d g e t o r P r o j e c t No .865518 w a s a s s u m e d i n the L o n g R a n g e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Pl a n f o r the We s t s id e PurpleLine Extens ion P r o j e c t , Sec t ion 1 a n d d o e s not have a n imp a c t o o p e r a t i o n s fund ingsources . The M e a s u r e R os t M a n a g e m e n t P ro cess a n d P o l i c y A n a l y s i s , AttachmentC, describe s the process a v a i l a b l e t o c l o s e the u d g e t g a p .

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

T h e Board may hoose not t o m o v e forward w i t h the c o n t r a c t a w a r d a n d approval o f theLOP. This i s n o t r e c o m m e n d e d a s h i s i s a n adopted p r o j e c t w i t h the Long R a n g eT r a n s p o r t a t i o n Pl a n a n d not a w a r d in g t h i s c o n t r a c t a t t h i s t i me i l l delay the schedulea n d w i l l increase the cost o f the P r o j e c t . f the Board d o e s not approve the a w a r d orreques ts a r e - s o l i c i t a t i o n o f the c o n t r a c t the o l l o w i n g c o n s e q u e n c e s may c c u r :

We st s i d e Purp le L i n e E x t e n s i o n , e c t i o n 1 Aw a r d D B C o n t r a c t &Establish LOP u d g e t


4/20

x te n s iv e sc he du l e d e l a y s w i t h n o a s s u r a n c e of b e t t e r p r i c i n g w i t h o u t s i g n i f i c a n tde - s c o p i n g o f t h e P r o j e c t ;

o u a r a n t e e t h a t t h e c u r r e n t propose r s or a n y others) l l p r o v i d e b e t t e rproposals i n r e s p o n s e t o a u t u r e s o l i c i t a t i o n w i t h t h e v a r i a b l e ma r k e t c o n d i t i o n s t h a t

h a v e b e e n p r e v a l e n t t h e s e l a s t coup le o f y e a r s ; o t e n t i a l l o s s of f u n d s u n d e r t h e FFGA; n d o t e n t i a l l o s s of f u n d s u n d e r t h e TI FI A L o a n A g r e e m e n t .

NEXT STEPS

Me t r o l l i s s u e a N o t i c e o f Aw a r d , e x e c u t e a c o n t r a c t w i t h t h e r e c o m m e n d e d c o n t r a c t o ra n d o n c e bonds , insurance , a n d p r o j e c t l a b o r a g r e e m e n t r e q u i r e me n t s a r e m e t , s s u e an o t i c e t o proceed .

Me t r o s t a f f h a s i n i t i a t e d discuss ions w i t h t h e FTA e g a r d i n g h o w t o a d d r e s s t h e 1 45c o n t r a c t a m o u n t n t h e contex t of t h e o v e r a l l We s t s i d e Purp le L i n e E x t e n s i o n S e c t i o n 1FFGA budge t . To he e x t e n t r e q u i r e d by t h e T I F I A l o a n d o c u m e n t s , Me t r o s t a f f w l lh a v e s i m i l a r d iscuss ions w i t h t h e T I F I A o f f i c e r e g a r d i n g t h e We s t s i d e Purp le L i n eExtens ion , e c t i o n 1 T I F I A l o a n . T h e s e d iscuss ions d o not i m p a c t t h e p roposed a c t i o no f t h e B o ard t o a p p r o v e c o n t r a c t a w a r d a n d ad o p t the LOP B u d g e t per ther e c o m m e n d e d Board a c t i o n s .

ATTACHMENTS

A . P r o c u r e m e n t SummaryB. F u n d i n g /Expendi tu re Pl a nC. M e a s u r e R o s t M a n a g e m e n tP r o c e s s a n d P o l i c y A n a l y s i s

P r e p a r e d b y : D e n n i s M o r i E x e c u t iv e O f f i c e r - P r o j e c t D i r e c t o r( 2 1 3 ) 92 2 -7221

Rick Wilson , D i r e c t o r of P r o j e c t C o n t r o l s( 2 1 3 ) 922 -3 6 2 7

Da v i d Yale , Execu t ive O f f i c e r Coun tyw id e P la n n in gD e v e l o p m e n t 2 1 3 ) 922 - 2469

B ru ce Warrens fo rd , D i r e c t o r of Contract A d m i n i s t r a t i o n( 2 1 3 ) 922 - 7338

We s t s i d e Purp le L ine Extension , e c t i o n 1 Aw a r dD / B Contrac t Es tab l i s h LOP u d g e t


5/20

eph i e Wigg inExecutive D i r e c t o r Vendor Co n t r a c t M a n a g e m e n t

~

Bryan P e n i n g t o n E x c u t i v e D i r e c t o rE n g i n e e r i g Co n s t r u c t i o n

Arthu . L a hyChi E x e u t i v e i

Westside Purple L i n e Extension , e c t i o n 1 Aw a r d D / B Contrac t Es tab l i s h OP u d g e t


6/20

ATTACHMENT A

PROCUREMENT SUMMARY

WESTSIDE PURPLE INE EXTENSION PROJECT,SECTION DESIGN -BUILD

CONTRACT NO. 1045

1 . C ont ra c t Number : C10452 . R e c o m m e n d e d Vendor: S k a n s k a , r a f o r a n d S h e a STS a o i n t Ven tu re3 . Type f P r o c u r e me n t (check one): IFB FP RFP A E

No n-Com e t i t i v e ~ ~ rder4. P r o c u r e me n t Dates:

A. I s s u e d : J u n e 10, 01 3B. A d v e r t i s e d/ P u b l i c i z e d : J u n e 20 , 0 1 3 13 u b l i c a t i o n sC. Pre- r o os a l / P r e - B i d Conference: J u l 24, 01 3D. r o o sa ls / B i d s Due: J a n u a 30, 01 4E . P r e - Q u a l i f i c a t i o n Com l e t e d : Ma 29 , 01 4F. o n f l i c t o f n t e r e s t F o r m Submitted t o E t h i c s : Februa 3 , 01 4

G. r o t e s t P e r i o d End Date: u l 2 2 , 01 45. S o l i c i t a t i o n s Picked up/ D o w n l o a d e d :

1 09Bids/Pr opo sal s Received:

3

6 . C ont ra c t d m i n i s t r a t o r :Bruce Warrensfo rd

Telephone N u m b e r :2 1 3 9 2 2- 7 3 3 8

7. P r o j e c t M a n a g e r :Denn is M ori

Telephone N u m b e r :2 1 3 9 2 2- 7 2 3 8

A . P r o c u r e m e n t B a c k g r o u n d

This Board A c t i o n i s f o r ad es ig n - b u i l d , Best Val ue proc urement issued i n supporto f a o n t r a c t f o r the m a n a g e m e n t , o o r d i n a t i o n , p r o f e s s i o n a l s e r v i c e s ,l a b o r ,equipment , a t e r i a l s a n d l l o t h e r s e r v i c e s necessary o p e r f o r mthe i n a l designa n d c o n s t r u c t i o no f the Wests ide Purple Line Extens ion P r o j e c t , S e c t i o n 1 , ( P r o j e c t ) .

A w o- s t e p n e g o t i a t e d p r oc u r e me n t process was t i l i z e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t hC a l i f o r n i aP u b l i c C o n t r a c t C o d e 0209.5 20209 .14 a n d M e t r o sA c q u i s i t i o nP o l i c yf o r a Firm Fixed P r i c e c o n t r a c t .

I n step o n e , Reques t o r Q u a l i f i c a t i o n(RFQ) a s issued t h a t r e q u i r e d i n t e r e s t e dr e sponden t s o submi t S ta tement s o f u a l i f i c a t i o n s( S O Q ) , hich wer e evaluatedbased o n c r i t e r i a set o r t h i n the RFQ. n step t wo , a Reques t o r Pr o p o s a l s w a sissued t o the pre - q u a l i f i e d r e sponden t s o submit sepa ra te e c h n i c a la n d p r i c ep r o p o s a l s .

Westside Purp le L i n e E x t e n s i o n , S e c t i o n1 Aw a r dD/B Co n t r a c t &Establish LOP udget


7/20

Procurement Process Step One

C a l i f o r n i a P u b l i c Contract Code e c t i o n 2 0 2 0 9 .5 e t seq . e q u i r e s Metro t o p r e -q u a l i f y des ign - b u i l d e n t i t i e s u s i n g a standardized q u e s t i o n n a i r e deve loped b y th eState of a l i f o r n i a Depar tment of n d u s t r i a l R e l a t i o n s (DIR) . Metro h a s th e

d i s c r e t i o n t o a d d supplementa l questions t o the q u e s t i o n n a i r e , wh i c h Metro d i d t om a t c h the experience a n d past performance of respondents o the l e v e l ofcomplexity o f t h i s p r o j e c t .

T h e RFQ was ssued on D e c e m b e r 7 , 2 0 1 2 . Four SOQs ere r e c e i v e d on February7 , 2013. A l l f o u r SOQs e c e i v e d f r o m respondents m e t the m i n i m u m p r e -q u a l i f i c a t i o n requirements a n d w e r e i n v i t e d t o submi t p r o p o s a l s .

Procurement Process Step Two

T h e RFP was ssued o n Ju n e 10, 2013 , e q u e s t i n g fo rmal t e c h n i c a l a n d p r i c eproposals n

a c c o r da nc ew i t h

therequirements d e f i n e d i n the

R F P.~ 0

p r e -proposal

conference was e l d o n J u l y 2 4 , 2013 , n the B o ard Room i t h r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s ofapproximately 268 i r m s i n a t tendance ; n u m e r o u s o b s i t e v i s i t s h e l d f o r the primec o n t r a c t o r s a n d t h e i r des igna ted s u b c o n t r a c t o r s ; a n d 3 6 7 questions w e r e r e c e i v e da n d a n s w e r e d .

F i v e a m e n d m e n t s wer e issued d u r i n g the s o l i c i t a t i o n phase o f t h i s R F P ; a m e n d m e n tNo . issued o n J u l y 2 4 , 2 0 1 3 n c l u d e d v a r i o u s r e v i s i o n s a n d c l a r i f i c a t i o n s t oc o n t r a c t d o cu m en t s , e c h n i c a l p r o j e c t d e f i n i t i o n d o cu m en t s , a n d r e f e r e n c ed o cu m en t s . Amendment No. ssued Sep temb er 18, 2 0 1 3 e v i s e d c o n t r a c td o c u m e n t s , e c h n i c a l requirements a n d r e f e r e n c e d o cu m en t s . A m e n d m e n t No. 3issued October 17 , 2 0 1 3 o c l a r i f y c o n t r a c t requirements, implement DBE a ceconsc ious goal requirements , e v i s e t e c h n i c a l p r o j e c t d e f i n i t i o n d o c u m e n t s a n dr e v i s e r e f e r e n c e d o c u m e n t s . Amendment No. 4 ssued N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 1 3 oex tend the proposal d u e d a t e , c o r r e c t i o n s t o the p r i c e proposal fo rm, e v i s e t e c h n i c a lp r o j e c t d e f i n i t i o n d o c u m e n t s a n d r e v i s e reference d o cu m en t s . A m e n d m e n t No. 5issued D e c e m b e r 16, 2 0 1 3 o ex tend the proposal d u e a t e , c l a r i f y e v a l u a t i o nc r i t e r i a , r e v i s e proposal s u b m i t t a l requirements a n d p r i c e proposal form.

A o t a l o f t h r e e proposals wer e r e c e i v e d o n Ja nua r y 30 , 2 0 1 4 n response t o th eRFP equirements , rom D r a g a d o s / s t a l d i /South land (DAS) J o i n t Venture a kaD r a g a d o s USA, n c . ( D U S A ) , Southland C o n t r a c t i n g , I n c . , a n d A s t a l d i C o n s t r u c t i o nC o r p o r a t i o n ;S k a n s k a , r a y l o r a n d S h e a (STS) o i n t Venture a k a S k a n s k a USAC i v i l We s t a l i f o r n i a D i s t r i c t I n c . , T r a y l o r B r o s . , I n c . , a n d J . F . S h e a C o n s t r u c t i o n ,I n c . ; a n d We s t s ide T r a n s i t Partners WTP I m p r e g i l o S . p . A . , S a m s u n g E CAmer ica . n c . , a n d S a l i n i USA. n c . ) . Although the s o l i c i t a t i o n process allowedProposers t o submi t l t e r n a t e p r o p o s a l s , n o n e wer e submitted.

Amendment No. 6 nd Reques t o r Best a n d F i n a l O f f e r s(BAFO) ssued May , 2 0 1 3e s t a b l i s h e d BAFO u b m i t t a l requirements, l a r i f i e d t e c h n i c a l p r o j e c t d e f i n i t i o nd o c u m e n t s a n d i n c l u d e d Option 1 . T h e BAFOs ere r e c e i v e d o n May 0, 2 0 1 4 .

Westside Purple L i n e E x t e n s i o n , S e c t i o n 1 Aw a r dD / B C o n t r a c t Es tab l i s h LOP u d g e t


8/20

B. Ev a l u a t i o n o f P r o p o s a l s /Bids

A roposa l E v a l u a t i o n Team PET) o n s i s t i n g of e p r e s e n t a t i v e s f rom MetroEngineer ing a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n , Metro Operations, a n d the C i t y of Lo s Ange les ,B u r e a u of Engineer ing D ep ar tm en t f P u b l i c Wo r k s , w a s c o n v e n e d a n d conduc ted a

t h o r o u g h a n d c o m p r e h e n s i v e e v a l u a t i o n o f the proposals r e c e i v e d .T h e proposals w ere eva lua ted b ased o n the o l l o w i n g e v a l u a t i o n c r i t e r i a a n dw e i g h t s :

r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t 25

Technical A p p ro ach 35

r i c e 40

T h e e c h n i c a l a n d p r o j e c t m a n a g e m e n t v a l u a t i o n c r i t e r i a w a s ass igned a c o m b i n e dh i g h e r percen tage t h a n p r i c e i n c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f the u n n e l i n g complexi ty a n d g assyc o n d i t i o n s of h e P r o j e c t s i t e . A l l p r o j e c t requ i rements wer e cons idered w h e n

deve lop ing t h e weights a b o v e o e s t a b l i s h t h a t the best va lue s e l e c t i o n wouldp r oduc e the Proposer m o s t capable o f address ing the u n i q u e e c h n i c a l cha l lengesassociated w i t h t h i s p r o j e c t .

T h e w e i g h t i n g ass igned f o r the o l l o w i n g m i n i m u m a c t o r s c o l l e c t i v e l y represented a tl e a s t 50 f the t o t a l weight given t o l l c r i t e r i a f a c t o r s : p r i c e , t e c h n i c a l e x p e r t i s e ,l i f e c y c l e costs ove r 15 years or m o r e , k i l l e d l a b o r f o r c e a v a i l a b i l i t y, a n d acceptables a f e t y r e c o r d , a s p r e s c r i b e d b y a l i f o r n i a P u b l i c Contract C o d e 0209 .8 d ) .

Mor e ove r, h e best value s e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a , t h e i r weights a n d r e l a t i v e importancewer e p r o v i d e d t o l l Proposers a s p a r t o f the RFP o c u m e n t .

T h e PET e t x t e n s i v e l y i n the m o n t h s of Februa ry 2014 hrough J u n e 2014, othoroughly revi ew a n d eva lua te the o r i g i n a l a n d r e v i s e d w r i t t e n proposals u b m i t t e d .T h e PET sk ed o r w r i t t e n c l a r i f i c a t i o n t o ques t ions p o sed o f e a c h t e a m , i t h w r i t t e nr e sponse s be ing submit ted b y proposers o assess e a c h t e a m ' s e c h n i c a la pp r oa c he s , a n d p r e v i o u s experience.

A f t e r the PET cored the o r i g i n a l w r i t t e n p r o p o s a l s , reviewed answer s o c l a r i f i c a t i o nr e q u e s t s , t h e y h a d i n t e r v i e w s w i t h k ey personne l a n d h e l d o n e - on - o n e d i s c u s s i o n sw i t h e a c h proposer p r i o r t o i ssuance of the reques t o r Best a n d F i n a l O f f e r s . A l lt h r e e proposers submitted t h e i r Best a n d F i n a l O f f e r s o n May 0 , 014. A f t e r th eBAFOs e r e r e c e i v e d the PET omp le t e d t s review a n d e v a l u a t i o n of the r e v i s e dproposals o n J u n e 16, 014.

Qualif icat ions Summary f s t r e ng th s a n d w e a k n e s s e s for l l th ree proposers :

S k an sk a , T r a y l o r a n d S h e a STS) , a o i n t Ve n t u r e , P a r s o n s o r p o r a t i o n a s ea ddes igne r a n d C o m s t o c k a s s y s t e m s subcontractor

Westside Purple L i n e Extension , e c t i o n 1 Aw a r d D/B C o n t r a c t Establ ish LOP u d g e t


9/20

STS ummary o f t r e n g t h s :

ighes t a t e d t e c h n i c a l and p r o j e c t m a n a g e m e n t resources stand pre pared t oprosecute work immediately

roposes a r l y comple t ion schedule saving 300 alendar days

DBE oal of 20.25% o r Design and 17 for o n s t r u c t i o n

STS nd l l key personnel demonstrate t h e r e a t e s t dep th o f com bi ned r e l e v a n texper ience working toge the r o n major a p i t a l p r o j e c t s such as:

e t ro G old Line Eastside Extension L i g h t R a i l T r a n s i t (LRT)- C i t y o f LA o r t h East n t e r c e p t o r S e w e r u n n e l

E x p o s i t i o n LRT PhaseF o o t h i l l Extension LRT

STS nd proposed s u b c o n t r a c t o r s h a v e an e s t a b l i s h e d , recognized workingr e l a t i o n s h i p

Side -by - s i d e schedule n a l y s i s o f h e Regional Conne c to r and Wests ide PurpleL i n e demonstrate s sequenci ng t h a t d o e s not r e a t e o v e r l a p p i n g c o n f l i c t s . Thereare no major scheduling or personnel o n f l i c t s b e t w e e n Shea 's u n n e l i n g work o nt h e Cren shaw and t h e Wests ide P r o j e c t s

STS as very g o o d exper ience n executing m i t i g a t i o n measures h a t addresst h i r d p a r t y and communi ty c o n c e r ns

STS roposes o su p p lem en t r o j e c t Man ag er i t h Value Ad d ed ersonnelwho trengthen t h e i r team's p r o j e c t m a n a g e m e n t o m m i tm en t , e c h n i c a l c a p a c i t yand c a p a b i l i t i e s

STS ummary f weaknesses:

ro p o sed P r o j e c t Man ag er l s o s e l e c t e d f o r t h e Regional Conn e c to r as h eP r o j e c t M a n a g e r

ighes t r i c e o f f e r

Westside T r a n s i t Partners WTP I m p r e g i l o S. . A . , Samsung E &C merica. n c . , andS a l i n i USA. n c . ) .

WTP ummary f t r e n g t h s :

S e c o n d lowes t r i c e o f f e r

Westside Purple L i n e E x t e n s i o n , S e c t i o n 1 Award D/B C o n t r a c t &Establish LOP u d g e t


10/20

WTP nd key personne l demons t ra te general com bi ned exper ience o n a v a r i e t yo f i m i l a r major a p i t a l p r o j e c t s

WTP s u t i l i z i n gARUP n d M a s s E l e c t r i c Co. an d o t h e r key s u b c o n t r a c t o r s w i t hexper ience i n the LA rea an d Metro

WTP u m m a r y f w e a k n e s s e s :

WTP r o j e c t M a n a g e r h a s l i m i t e d t r a n s i t experience. T h e r e l a t i o n s h i p o f th eP r o j e c t M a n a g e r o the D ep u ty P r o j e c t M a n a g e r and t eam d i d not demons t ra te as t r o n g working h i s t o r y

WTP's C o n s t r u c t i o n A p p r o a c h as presented i n t h e i r d e t a i l e d schedu le d o e s no tp r o v i d e a e a l i s t i c schedule o r the h r e e c u t- an d -cover t a t i o n s i t e s

C o n s t r u c t i o n A p p r o a c h a s presented i n t h e i r D e t a i l e d Schedu le s u b m i t t a l

e x p o s e s Metro o a h i g h p r o b a b i l i t y o f cos t an d schedule r i s k

D r a g a d o s Astaldi South land DAS) o i n t Venture ak a D r a g a d o s U S A , n c . (DUSA) ,A s t a l d i C o n s t r u c t i o n C o r p o r a t i o n a n d Sou th land C o n t r a c t i n g I n c .

DAS u m m a r y o f t r e n g t h s :

L o w e s t r i c e o f f e r

DAS nd key personne l demons t ra te general com bi ned exper ience o n a v a r i e t yo f i m i l a r ma j o r a p i t a l p r o j e c t s

P r o p o s e s a r l y comple t ion schedule sav ing 180 calendar days

DAS u m m a r y o f w e a k n e s s e s :

DAS r o j e c t M a n a g e r d o e s not h a v e r e q u i s i t e r i l t r a n s i t exper ience and l i m i t e dp r o j e c t m a n a g e m e n t experience.

DAS epu ty P r o j e c t M a n a g e r h a s e c e n t p r o j e c t m a n a g e m e n t exper ience o n am u l t i- l a n e m o t o r w a y h ig h w ay u n n e l p r o j e c t but a ~ - r ~ e d o e s n o t h a v e r e q u i s i t ema j o r exper ience o n i l t r a n s i t o r o t h e r r e l e v a n t ma jo r o n s t r u c t i o n p r o j e c t s .

r o p o s a l l l u s t r a t e s a w e a k unders tanding of the o v e r a l l P r o j e c t as demons t ra tedby the o r g a n i z a t i o n a l d i s c o n t i n u i t y between the P r o j e c t Manager, Des ignM a n a g e r and key personnel, who e r e not a m i l i a r w i t h the d e t a i l s o f th econtents o f t h e i r Reques t o r Proposa l (RFP).

l l Added Value personne l who e r e n the o r i g i n a l proposa l w ere r e m o v e da f t e r the BAFO.

Westside Purple L i n e E x t e n s i o n Section 1 Aw a r d D / B C o n t r a c t&Establish LOP udget 10


11/20

DAS' e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e i r C o n s t r u c t i o n Approach was not supported by atho rough d e t a i l e d schedule .

o n s t r u c t i o n Approach a s presented i n t h e i r D e t a i l e d S c h e d u l e exposes Metro o

a h i g h p r o b a b i l i t y o f cost a n d s c h e d u l e r i s k .

Based o n a thorough a n d i n t e g r a t e d assessment f the p r o p o s a l s , a s performed an dd e t e r mi n e d by the Proposal E v a l u a t i o n Te a m , a n d i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h the RFP p e c i f i e de v a l u a t i o n f a c t o r s a n d su b a c t o r s , the STS roposal o f f e r s the Best Va l u e a n d i s them os t a d v a n t a g e o u s o Metro. T h e i n a l scores a n d r a n k i n g f o r a l l proposers i ssum m ar i zed i n the f o l l o w i n g t a b l e :

FIRM FactorWe i g h t

F i n a lWe i g h t e d

S c o r e

R a n k

1 . ~kanska, r a y l o r a n d S h e a , a J o i n tVe n t u r e STS

'

P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t 13 a c t o r s ) 25 19.83

Technical A p p ro ach (3 a c t o r s ) 35 2 7 .4 2

P r i c e 3 a c t o r s ) 40 30.98

Total 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 7 8 . 2 3

2. Wests ide T r a n s i t Partners WTP I m p r e g i l o S .p .A S a m s u n g E &C merica ,I n c . , a n d S a l i n i USA, n c .

2


Technical A p p ro ach (3 a c t o r s ) 35 23.04

P r i c e 3 a c t o r s ) 40 35.97

Total 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 7 4 . 64

3. Dr agados / s t a l d i /Sou th l a nd (DAS)a J o i n t Ve n t u r e

3


Technical A p p ro ach (3 a c t o r s ) 35 19.83

P r i c e 3 a c t o r s ) 40 35.01

Total 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 69 .37

* The v a l u a t i o n f a c t o r s f o r t h e P r i c e c a te gory i n c l u d e d o v e r a l l proposed p r i c e , d a i l y de la y co mp en sa t io nr a t e s a n d i f e cycle c o s t s .

C. Cost /Pr ice Analysis

T h e r e c o m m e n d e d p r i c e has b e e n d e t e r mi n e d t o be a i r a n d reasonable based upona d e q u a t e p r i c e c o m p e t i t i o n , d i s c u s s i o n s , a u l l t e c h n i c a l a n a l y s i s , a n d a

Westside Pu r p l e L i n e Extension, e c t i o n 1 Aw a r dD/B C o n t r a c t &Establish LOP u d g e t 1 1


12/20

compara t ive p r i c e a n a l y s i s , i n c l u d i n g M e t r o s I n d e pe n d e n t C o s t Est imate ( ICE) . Ther e c o m m e n d e d Proposer ' s p r i c e i s l e s s than 1 % h i g h e r than the I C E . Ther e c o m m e n d e d a w a r d i s f o r the h i g h e s t r a n k e d propose r b ased o n the Be s t Va l u ep r o c u r e m e n t process.

B i d d e r / P r o p o s e r Name T o t a l E v a l u a t e d P r i c i n Aw a r d Pr i c eO r i g i n a l Be s t a n d F i n a l Be s t a n d

Proposa l O f f e r A m o u n t F i n a l O f f e rA m o u n t (BAFO)

1 . S k a n s k a , r a y l o r a n dSh ea , a J o i n t Ve n t u r e $1 ,672 ,150 ,915 $ 1,6 50 ,9 41 ,0 00 $ 1,6 36 ,4 18 ,5 85STS

2 . We s t s ide T r a n s i tPartners TP( I m p r e g i l o S .p .A $1 ,641 ,022 ,256 $ 1,5 96 ,5 00 ,0 00 $ 1,5 71 ,7 75 ,9 00

S a m s u n g E C m e r i c a ,I n c . , a n d S a l i n i USA,I n c .

3 . D r a g a d o s / s t a l d i /Southland (DAS) $ 1,4 76 ,4 46 ,8 76 $ 1,4 59 ,8 86 ,0 68 $ 1 , 4 4 3 , 8 7 8 , 0 6 4a J o i n t Ve n t u r e

D . B a c k g r o u n d on Recommended o n t r a c t o r

The r e c o m m e n d e d i r m , S k a n s k a , r a y l o r a n d S h e a , a J o i n t Ve n t u r e (STS) a s

f o r m e d f o r the We s t s i d e P u rp le L i n e Extens ion P r o j e c t , S e c t i o n 1 w i t h o f f i c e s i nd o w n t o w n Lo s Ange les . S k a n s k a i s a 1 2 5-y e a r o l d c o m p a n y a n d o n e o f the l a r g e s tc o n s t r u c t i o n o r g a n i z a t i o n s i n the w o r l d . S k a n s k a has 39 f f i c e s throughout the U . S . ,w i t h i t s Southern C a l i f o r n i a O f f i c e l o c a t e d i n R i v e r s i d e , CA, S k a n s k a has o v e r1 2 , 0 0 0 u l l- t i m e c o n s t r u c t i o n i n d u s t r y p r o f e s s i o n a l s i n the U . S . a n d h a s c o m p l e t e d1 5 design - b u i l d r i l a n d t r a n s i t p r o j e c t s t o t a l i n g m o r e than $ 4 . 2 i l l i o n n a t i o n w i d e .These i n c l u d e the A i r T r a i n JFK LRT n New o r k , the Wor ld Trad e Ce n te rT r a n s p o r t a t i o n H u b i n New ork , the - 2 1 0 G o l d L i n e B r i d g e , a n d the E x p o P h a se 2p r o j e c t . S k a n s k a i s a l s o the c o n t r a c t o r o n the BART e r ryessa Design - B u i l d T r a n s i tE x t e n s i o n . The T r a y l o r Bros . Southern C a l i f o r n i a o f f i c e i s l o c a t e d i n L o n g B each ,CA n d t has a t r a c k r e c o r d t h a t f e a t u r e s ove r 1 1 0 u n n e l i n g p r o j e c t s w i t h m o r e than

90 i l e s o f bored t u n n e l s , a s w e l l a s a50

-year p r e se nc ei n

southernC a l i f o r n i a .

T r a y l o r s exper ience w i t h Me t r o i n c l u d e s the M e t r o G o l d L i n e E a s t s i d e Extension,w i t h o v e r 4 . 5 m i l l i o n safe w o r k hours a n d z e r o g r o und l o s s , a n d the Me t r o R e d L i n eS e g m e n t o l l y wo o d t u n n e l s . T h e i r t u n n e l i n g w o r k a l s o i n c l u d e s the U n i v e r s i t yL i n k( 0 2 2 0 ) n S e a t t l e , a n d the Q u e e n s B o red Tu n ne l s E a s t S ide A c c e s s p r o j e c t i nNew ork , which was a m e d the 2 0 1 2 r o j e c t of the Ye a r by the I n t e r n a t i o n a lTunne l A s s o c i a t i o n . S h e a headquar te rs a re l o c a t e d i n Walnu t , CA nd hasc omple t e d $ 2 1 . 6 i l l i o n i n C a l i f o r n i a p r o j e c t s since the 1 9 2 0 s a s a 1 3 1 -year o l ddesign - b u i l d e r a n d genera l c o n t r a c t o r . F r o m s u b w a y s t o p i p e l i n e s a n d d a m s , S h e a

Westside Purp le L i n e E x t e n s i o n , S e c t i o n 1 Aw a r d D/B C o n t r a c t &Establish LOP u d g e t 1 2


13/20

has c a r ve d m i l e s o f t u n n e l o u t f s i m i l a r g r o u n d c o n d i t i o n s . T h e i r m s t e c h n o l o g i c a le x p e r t i s e has r e a t l y e n h a n c e d the e f f i c i e n c y o f t u n n e l i n g , a n d t s p e c i a l i z e s i nu n d erg ro u n d w or k . S h e a p a r t n e r e d w i t h Sk an sk a o n t h e Se c o n d Av e n u e S u b w a ya n d the N o . 7 i n e S u b w a y p r o j e c t s i n New o r k . S h e a l s o l e d t h e j o i n t v e n t u r et e a m o n the Me t r o R e d L i n e S u b w a y S e g m e n t 2) r o j e c t f o r Me t r o n 1995 , w hic h

i n c l u d e d gassy o n d i t i o n s s i m i l a r t o t h e Wests id e S u b w a y. S h e a b r i n g s s u c c e s s f u le xpe r i e nc e w i t h a m u l t i t u d e o f g e o l o g i c a lc o n d i t i o n s i n l a r g e s u b w a y a n d t r a n s i tp r o j e c t s . Par sons C o r p o r a t i o nw i l l be t h e l e a d des igner a n d C o m s t o c k i sr e s p o n s i b l ef o r t h e systems n t e g r a t i o n . Parsons , based i n P a s a d e n a , C A , s ag l o b a l l e a d e r i n t h e e n g i n e e r i n ga n d c o n s t r u c t i o n o f major r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o j e c t s i n

c o m p l e x , urban e nvi ronments . They h av e co m p le ted t r a n s i t d e s i g n- b u i l d p r o j e c t s f o rM e t r o ,Bay Ar ea Rapid T r a n s i t(BART), DART, he D e n v e r R e g i o n a lT r a n s p o r t a t i o nD i s t r i c t a n d M i n n e a p o l i sMe t r o T r a n s i t .

STS's P r o j e c t M a n a g e r, M i k e A p a r i c i o ,has 27 ears o f e x p e r i e n c e n t h e heavy i v i lc o n s t r u c t i o n i n d u s t r y , i n c l u d i n g 20 ears man ag in g t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a n d heavy i v i l

c o n s t r u c t i o n p r o j e c t s a n d o r g a n i z a t i o n s . He as i g n i f i c a n t l a r g e- s c a l e d e s i g n- b u i l de x p e r i e n c e ,i n c l u d i n g t h e m a n a g e m e n t f m o r e than 1 .5 i l l i o n i n d e s i g n- b u i l dp r o j e c t s s i n c e 1997 . He as a n e x c e l l e n t r e c o r d f o r s u c c e s s f u l l y man ag in gc o n t r a c t o r , d e s i g n e r , s u b c o n t r a c t o ra n d o w n e r n t e r e s t s , s p e c i f i c a l l y o n Los Ange l e sdes ign - b u i l d t r a n s i t c o n t r a c t s . M r. p a r i c i o s b ack g ro u n d i n c l u d e s p r o j e c t m a n a g e rf o r the Me t r o G o l d L i n e E a s t s i d e E x t e n s i o nP r o j e c t , a n d m a n a g e m e n t o l e s f o r E x p o2, a n d the P a s a d e n a Me t r o G o l d L i n e p r o j e c t s . J im Kl em z , i t h Parsons , s t h eD es ig n M a n a g e r/ P r i n c i p a l E n g i n e e r ,l i c e n s e d a n d r e g i s t e r e d i n t h e S t a t e o fC a l i f o r n i a , w i t h 36 years o f i v i l e n g i n e e r i n ge xpe r i e nc e o n l a r g e d e s i g n- b u i l dp r o j e c t s . Mr. Kl em z ' xpe r i e n c e i n c l u d e s b e i n g D es ig n - B u i l d S p o n s o r o n the F o o t h i l lP h a s e 2A n d the -25 T -REX r o j e c t . H i s e x t e n s i v e c o n s t r u c t i o n s u p e r v i s i o n

e xpe r i e nc e i n c l u d e s c o n t r a c t m a n a g e m e n t a n d a d m i n i s t r a t i o n ,s c h e d u l i n g ,q u a l i t yc o n t r o l , a n d d e s i g n a c t i v i t i e s r e l a t e d t o c o n s t r u c t i o n . R i c h a r dWe l d o n , i t h Skanska,i s the C o n s t r u c t i o n M a n a g e r, i t h e x p e r i e nc e man ag in g s a f e t y , q u a l i t y , e n g i n e e r i n ga n d c o n s t r u c t i o n i s s u e s . His e x p e r i e n c e i n c l u d e s the E a s t s i d e E x t e n s i o na n d h i sm o s t u r r e n t as s i gnm en t a s the C o n s t r u c t i o n M a n a g e r o n E x p o 2.

E. 1 ) mal l B u s i n e s s P a r t i c i p a t i o n - D e s i g n

T h e i v e r s i t y a n d E c o n o m i c p p o r t u n i t y D e p a r t m e n t (DEOD) s t a b l i s h e d a R a c eConsc i ous Disadvan taged Business E n t e r p r i s e(RC DBE) o a l o f 20 o r Design .STS e t h e g o a l a n d m a d e a 2 0 . 2 5 % DBE o m m i t m e n t .

SMALL SMALLBUSINESS

20 .00%BUSINESS

20 .25%GOAL COMMITMENT

DBE u b c o n t r a c t o r s E t h n i c i t Committed1 . B A, n c . A f r i c a n A m e r. 2 . 9 6 %2. V & A , n c . H i s a n i c 6 . 2 1

We st s i d e Purp le L ine E x t e n s i o n ,Sec t ion 1 Aw a r dD/B C o n t r a c t&Establish LOP u d g e t 1 3


14/20

3 . C2PM As i a n P ac . 2 . 5 04 . TOGO As i a n P ac . 2 .955. IEG I n n o v a t i v e Engineer ing

Gro uAs i a n P ac . 3 . 5 3

6 . Mia L e h r e r H is an ic 0 . 7 2

7. MGE Asian P a c . 0 . 7 08 . M a r t i n i r i l l i n His a n i c 0 . 5 79. C a l i f o r n i a T e s t i n a n d I n s e c t i o n H is anic 0.1 1

Tota l Commitment 20.25

E. 2) m a l l B u s i n e s s P a r t i c i p a t i o n - Const ruc t ion

T h e D i v e r s i t y a n d E c o n o m i c O p p o r t u n i t y D e p a r t m e n t (DEOD) s t a b l i s h e d a RC DBEgoa l of 1 7 . 0 0 o r C o n s t r u c t i o n . STS made 17 .00 DBE o m m i t m e n t . T o berespons ive t o DBE equi rements , STS was e q u i r e d t o i d e n t i f y a l l k n o w n DBEsubcontractors a t t ime o f p r o p o s a l . STS i s t e d o n e DBE i r m a s noted below. I na d d i t i o n , STS was e q u i r e d t o su b mi t a DBE o n t r a c t i n g Plan i d e n t i f y i n gc o n s t r u c t i o n o p p o r t u n i t i e s t o m e e t t s DBE o m m i t m e n t . STS u s t update t sC o n t r a c t i n g Pl a n monthly, a s c o n t r a c t work i s b i d a n d a w a r d e d t o DBE i r m s . DEODrev iewed a n d a pp r ove d t h e C o n t r a c t i n g Pl a n submitted by RCC.

SMALL SMALLBUSINESS BUSINESS

GOAL17D.00

COMMITMENT17D.00

DBE u b co n t rac to r sCons t r uc t i on

E t h n i c i t y Committed

1 . T h e S o l i s Gro u His an ic 0 . 0 5

Tota l Commitment 17 .00

F . A l l S u b co n t rac to r s Included with Recommended Cont rac to r ' s P r o p o s a l

Subcon t r a ct or Se r v i ce s Pr ov i de d

1 . A l d e a S e r v i c e s , LLC Risk Management

2. B A , n c . U t i l i t yEngineer ing

3 . C2PM A d m i n P r o j e c t C o n t r o l s

4 . C a l i f o r n i a T e s t i n g &Inspec t ion T e s t i n g Laboratory

We st s i d e Purple L i n e Extension , e c t i o n 1 Aw a r dD/B Contrac t &Establish LOP u d g e t 1 4


15/20

5 . CH2M i l l E n g i n e e r s , n c . G e o t e c h n i c a l De s i g n ,Tu n n e l D e s i g n , t r .E n i n e e r i n

6 . Comet l e c t r i c E l e c t r i c a l

7 . G r o u p D e l t a C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c . G e o te c h n ic a l E n g in e e r in g

8 . I E G I n n o v a t i v e E n g in e e r in g G r o u p ) E l e c t r i c a l E n g

9 . KDC, n c . d b a D y n a e l e c t r i c E l e c t r i c a l

10 K r o n e r En v i r o n me n t a l S e rv i c e s En v i r o n me n t a l

11. L . K . C o m s t o c k N a t i o n a l T r a n s i t S y s t e m s

12 . M a r t i n i D r i l l i n g C o r p S o i l B o r in g S a m p l i n g

13 . MGE S t r u c t u r a l E n g

14 . M i a Le h r e rL a n d s c a e r c h

15 . P a r s o n s T r a n s p o r t a t i o n L e a d D e s i g n

16 . Psomas D e s i g n a n d C o n s t r u c t i o nS u r v e

17 . T h e S o l i s G r o u p J o b s C o o r d i n a t i o n

18 . TOGO D u ctb an k En g r. A r c h .

19 . U n i v e r s i t y M e c h a n i c a l Me c h a n i c a l / P l u mb i n g

2 0. V A, n c . G e n e r a l , i v i l a n d T r a f f i cE n i n e e r i n

We st s i d e Purp le L ine E x t e n s i o n , e c t i o n 1 Aw a r dD / B C o n t r a c t Es tab l i s h LOP u d g e t


16/20

ATTACHMENT B

WESTSIDE PURPLE INE EXTENSION PROJECT, ECTION

Funding /Expenditure P lan(Do l la r s i n M i l l i o n s )

~ fC a p i t a l Projec t 8 6 5 5 1 8 P r i o r FY14 FY15 FY16 FY7T FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 F Y2 2 F Y2 3 F Y2 4 FY25 FY26 ToW IT o t a l

U s e s f Funds

C o n s t r u c t i o n 2 . 4 1 2 . 0 1 4 9 . 5 2 6 3 . 1 2 3 0 . 0 4 0 6 . 6 2512 1 1 4 . 6 1 3 6 . 0 1 1 0 . 4 6 0 . 1 1 . 5 - - 7 , 7 3 7 . 4 6 2 . 6

R i g h t- o f-Way 0 . 9 3 . 8 1 4 8 . 6 2 2 . 3 - - - - - - - - - - 1 7 5 . 6 6.3

Ve h iG e s - - 3 . 9 1 0 . 7 1 1 . 1 3 1 . 9 4 8 . 6 4 9 . 8 42 - - - - - 1602 5.8

P r o f e s s i o n a l Services 5 6 . 2 3 0 . 0 4 8 . 4 4 5 . 9 3 4 . 3 3 3 . 7 3 2 . 5 2 8 . 1 3 0 . 8 3 7 . 9 3 1 . 8 9 1 - - 4 1 2 . 7 1 4 . 9

P r o j e c t Contingency - - 3 2 . 3 3 3 . 6 3 4 . 6 3 5 . 7 3 6 . 7 2 1 . 4 2 2 . 0 2 2 . 8 8 . 5 1 . 0 - - 2 4 8 . 6 9.0

Subto tal a p i t a l Projec t 5 9 . 5 4 5 . 8 3 8 2 . 7 3 7 5 . 6 3 1 0 . 0 5 0 7 . 9 3 6 9 . 0 2 1 3 . 9 7 9 3 . 0 7 6 5 . 1 1 0 0 . 4 1 1 . 6 - - 2 , 7 3 4 . 5 98.6

Environmental /Panning 3 8 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 - - - - - - - - - - 3 9 . 4 1 . 4

Tota l Projec t C o s t 9 8 . 0 4 6 . 3 3 8 3 . 1 3 7 5 . 6 3 1 0 . 0 5 0 7 . 9 3 6 9 . 0 2 1 3 . 9 1 9 3 . 01 6 5 . 1 1 0 0 . 4 1 1 . 6 - - 2 , 7 7 3 . 9 1 0 0 . 0

S o u r c e s f F u n d s*

Federal 5309 New t a r t s - 6 5 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 7 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 01 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 8 5 . 0 1 , 2 5 0 . 0 4 5 . 1

Federal T I F I ALo a nProc e e ds Repaid i t h - - - - - 3 4 0 . 7 3057 1 8 4 . 9 2 4 . 7 - - - - - 8 5 6 . 0 3 0 . 9

M e a s u re R 5/

M e a s u re R 5 3 1 . 3 ( 1 8 . n 2572 2 6 7 . 9 2 0 2 . 5 64 2 ( 3 9. 5) ( 7 1. 0 ) 4 3 . 7 6 8 . 4 ( 2 9 . ~ ( 9 7 . 3 ) ( 1 00 .0 ) (8 5. 0) 4 9 4 . 0 1 7 . 8

Le a s e R e v e n u e s - - 1 9 . 0 - - - - - 1 8 . 7 - - - 3 7 . 7 1 . 4

R e p a y m e n t r o m S t a t e of5 7 . 8 - 6 . 9 6 . 1 - - 1 . 5 - 2 4 . 6 ( 2 7 . 0 ) 5 . 1 ( 7 3 . 7 ) ( 2 2 . 0 ) - 3 9 . 9 1 . 4

C a p r o j e c t Lo an s

LTF General Rev en u es 1 . 8 7 . 8 0 1

TDA 4 . 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 1 0 . 1

S TI P Regional Improvement 2 _ - 2 . 6 0 . 1Prog ra m

C i t y of L o s Angeles- -

~ ~ 3 - 5 . 0 2 5 . 0 2 2 . 0 2 2 . 0 7 5 . 3 2.7C o n t r i b u t i o n

Federal e c t i o n 53390 . 4 0 . 4 0.0

A l t e r n a t i v e s A n a l y s i s

F e d e r a l CMAQ - - - 1 . 6 7 . 5 3 . 0 - - - - - - 7 2 . 7 0.4

Tota l Projec t Funding 9 8 . 0 4 6 . 3 3 8 3 . 1 3 7 5 . 6 3 1 0 . 0 5 0 7 . 9 3 6 9 . 0 2 1 3 . 9 1 9 3 . 0 7 6 5 . 7 7 0 0 . 4 1 1 . 6 - - 2 , 7 7 3 . 9 1 0 0 . 0 /

'Timing o f funding sou rces s s u b j e c t t o change .

We st s i d e P u r p l e Line Ex tens ion , ec t i on 1-Award / B Cont rac t & E s t ab l i s h LOP udge t 16


17/20

ATTACHMENT C

WEST~SIDE PURPLE INE EXTENSION PROJECT,SECTION

Measure R ost Management rocess and Policy Analysis

Introduction

The Measure R ost Management Process and P o l i c y(the P o l i c y was dopted by theMetro Boar d of i r e c t o r s i n March 2011. The n t e n t of the P o l i c y i s t o i n f o r m the MetroBoard o f D i r e c t o r s r e g a r d i n g p o t e n t i a l cost i ncreases o Measure R-funded p r o j e c t s andthe s t r a t e g i e s a v a i l a b l e t o c l o s e any unding gaps. The Westside Purple L i n e Extension(Westside Su b wa y Extension) e c t i o n 1 P r o j e c t warrants such an a n a l y s i s due o a$288 i l l i o n cost increase described i n the r e p o r t accompanying t h i s a n a l y s i s ,However, he Measure R unds a r g e t e d t o a l l t h r e e Westside Su b wa y e c t i o n s t o date

amounts o $3,285. m i l l i o n(out f a o t a l I V i e a s u r e R ommitment f $4,074 m i l l i o n .The remaining $788.2 i l l i o n i s a v a i l a b l e t o address cost increases on t h i s p r o j e c t , asdescribed i n the Other Cost Reductions n the Same ubregion e c t i o n o f t h i sa n a l y s i s . _ We re recommending t h i s s o l u t i o n t o the cost increase i s s u e .

Measure R os t Management ol icy Summary

The adopted i n a l Measure R n i f i e d Cost Management Process and P o l i c y s t i p u l a t e sthe o l l o w i n g :

I f increases i n cost estimates occur, the LACMTA oard of i r e c t o r s must approve ap l a n of c t i o n t o address the issue p r i o r t o t a k i n g any c t i o n necessary o p e r m i tthep r o j e c t t o m o v e o the next m i l e s t o n e .Increases i n cost estimates i l l b e measuredagainst the 2 0 0 9 Long Range r a n s p o r t a t i o n Plan as d j u s t e d by subsequent c t i o n son cost estimates taken by the LACMTA oard of i r e c t o r s . S h o r t f a l l s w i l lf i r s t b eaddressed a t the p r o j e c t l e v e l p r i o r t o e v a l u a t i o n f o r any d d i t i o n a l resources u s i n gthese methods n t h i s o r d e r :

1 ) Value engineering an d / o r scope r e d u c t i o n s ;2 New o c a l agency unding resources;3 ) Shorter segmentation;

4 Other cost r e d u c t i o n sw i t h i n the same r a n s i t c o r r i d o r or highway o r r i d o r ;5 Other cost r e d u c t i o n sw i t h i n the same ub - r e g i o n ; and i n a l l y ,6 Countywide r a n s i t cost r e d u c t i o n sand / o r o t h e r funds i l l b e sought s i n g p r e -

e s t a b l i s h e d p r i o r i t i e s .

We o l l o w e dthe i x steps p r e s c r i b e d b y the p o l i c y t o address the funding g ap anddeveloped the o l l o w i n gp l a n of c t i o n :

Westside Purple L i n e Extension, e c t i o n 1 Award D/B Contract &Establish LOP udget 17


18/20

Value Engineer inq a n d /o r Scope Reduc t i ons

During the development f the P r e l i m i n a r y Engineering f o r the Reques t o r Proposa l RFP) o cu m en t s , t a f f con ducted Value Engineering VE) o r k s h o p s t i l i z i n ga VEPanel o f t r a n s i t i n d u s t r y p r o f e s s i o n a l s w i t h p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n c l u d i n g the FTA's P r o j e c t

M a n a g e m e n t Oversight Consultant PMOC). T h e VE tems b e l i e v e d t o h av e th ep o t e n t i a l o f y i e l d i n g the l a r g e s t cost savings wer e i n c o r p o r a t e d i n t o the AdvancedP r e l i m i n a r y Engineering PE) esigns in 2012 . T h e s e items i n c l u d e d the r e d u c t i o n o funderground s t a t i o n fo o t p r i n t s i z e s and s t a t i o n depths. S t a t i o n r o o m l a y o u t s and o t h e ra r c h i t e c t u r a l elements w ere standardized t o reduce design, o n s t r u c t i o n , o p e r a t i o n sand maintenance c o s t s . T h e cross -over v e n t i l a t i o n extended plenum design which i snot r e q u i r e d a s p a r t o f the normal v e n t i l a t i o n design, w a s n c l u d e d a s a n o p t i o n t osupp lement e n t i l a t i o n d u r i n g p e r i o d i c t r a c k maintenance work. T h e P r o j e c t Team l s oanalyzed c o n s t r u c t a b i l i t y issues and v a r i o u s c o n s t r u c t i o n sequencing scenarios oreduce r i s k s and the o v e r a l l d u r a t i o n s f o r t u n n e l i n g and cu t - an d -cover undergroundc o n s t r u c t i o n .

New Local A g e n c v F u n d i n g R e s o u r c e s

P e r Note G n the Measur e R xpenditure Plan, o c a l agencies are expected t oc o n t r i b u t e an a m o u n t equal o t h r e e percent o f o t a l costs o r t r a n s i t p r o j e c t s . Metro andthe C i t y o f L o s Angeles agreed t o a 3 o n t r i b u t i o n a m o u n t n A p r i l o f 2014 . T h a tag r eem en t t a t e s the o l l o w i n g w i t h respect o cost increases and b e t t e r m e n t s :

T h e p a r t i e s understand the C i t y s Westside Subway xtension Section T S h a r ew i l lno t increase e v e n i f the f i n a l LACMTA adopted i f e- o f - p r o j e c t budget o r th eWestside Subway xtension Section 1 p r o j e c t exceeds $2,509,100,000.

an d

A n y r o j e c t betterments o r e a c h P r o j e c t s h a l l b e paid b y the C i t y separate a n dapart f r o m t h i s A g r e e m e n t a n d h a l l b e d e f i n e d i n a n d paid pursuant o th eMaster Cooperat ive A g reem en t , dated January 21, 2 0 0 3 MCA ' ) .

Pursuant o the ag r eem en t ab o v e , we r e n o t assuming a n y d d i t i o n a l c o m m i t m e n tf r o m the C i t y o f L o s Angeles o r the p r o j e c t a s these are n o t betterments a s e f i n e d inthe MCA.

S i m i l a r l y , the $ 1 .2 5 i l l i o nNew t a r t s F u l l Funding Grant A g r e e m e n t executed betweenthe FTA n d Metro o n May 1 , 2 0 1 4 t a t e s t h a t l l cost increases are o be borne by thep r o j e c t sponsor, not the Federal r a n s i t A d m i n i s t r a t i o n . Pursuant o t h a t agreement , weare assu m in g t h a t n o a d d i t i o n a l New t a r t s funds can be made v a i l a b l e t o cover thecost n c r e a s e .

Westside Purple L i n e Extension, e c t i o n 1 Aw a r d D / B Contract &Establish LOP Budget 18


19/20

Sh or t e r Segm en t a t i on

While s h o r t e r segmenta t ion i s p o s s i b l e f o r the Wests id e Subway Extension, wer e c o m m e n d a g a i n s t t h i s s tep f o r s e v e r a l reasons . Section 1 w a s extended t oW i l s h i r e/La Cienega due t o e n g i n e e r i n g c o n s t r a i n t s a t the n i t i l S e c t i o n 1 terminus a t

W i l s h i r e/ F a i r f a x . Shortening S e c t i o n 1 would l i k e l y r e s u l t i n f u r t h e r cost increases t o th ep r o j e c t and r e q u i r e d e f e r r a l of o t h e r p r o j e c t s . T h e o n l y S e c t i o n which c o u l d beshor tened i s S e c t i o n 3 . This would r e q u i r e e l i m i n a t i n gthe Veteran A f f a i r s S t a t i o n andmoving the terminus t o We s t w o o d . I n a d d i t i o n t o h i g h e r r e a l e s t a t e p r i c e s i n We s t w o o d ,e l i m i n a t i n g the Veteran A f f a i r s s t a t i o n would r e q u i r e L CMT o prepare asupp lemen ta l Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report E I S/ E I R )due t o s i g n i f i c a n t p r o j e c t changes . s r e s u l t , t h e r e may be s i g n i f i c a n t p r o j e c t delaysand increased costs t o the p r o j e c t . We o n o t r e c o m m e n d s h o r t e r segmentation.

O t h e r C o s t Reduc t i ons within t h e Same ransit Corridor

T h e We s t s ide Subway Extension c o r r i d o r h ad i n c l u d e d the W i l s h i r e Bus Rapid T r a n s i tp r o j e c t . This p r o j e c t was i f u r c a t e d i n t o two p a r t s , o n e s a l i m i t e d p e a k hour o n l yv e r s i o n of BRT h a t i s already funded w i t h f e d e r a l g r a n t s and the o t h e r w a s a m o r erobust BRT i t h dedicated lanes and r i d e improvements . This seco n d W i l s h i r e BRTp r o j e c t w a s already e l i m i n a t e df rom the LRTP o deal w i t h p r i o r cost n c r e a s e s .

O t h e r C o s t Reduc t i ons within the Same ubregion

s f March 1 3 , 2 0 1 4 , he L o n g R a n g e Plan F i n a n c i a l Forecast update prepared i n

support o f the Shor t R a n g e r a n s p o r t a t i o n Plan (also o n theJ u l y 2 0 1 4 a g e n d a o r

a p p r o v a l ) , the Measur e R unds t a r g e t e d t o l l t h r e e We s t s ide Subway e c t i o n samo u n ted t o $ 3 , 2 8 5 . 8 m i l l i o n(out of a o t a l Measur e R o mmi tmen t f $ 4 ,0 7 4 m i l l i o n ) .T h e remaining $ 7 8 8 . 2 m i l l i o n i s described i n the s u p p o r t i n gF i n a n c i a l Forecast o r theShor t R a n g e Plan a s a Subregional payback o r We s t s id e Purple L i n e Extension h a tw a s scheduled t o occur n the t h i r d decade of the L o n g R a n g e Plan ( F Y 2 0 3 0 an dbeyond).

We e l i e v e we an pay o r the We s t s ide Subway Section 1 cost n c r e a s e o f $ 2 8 8 m i l l i o nd i r e c t l y f r om Measur e R r , f necessary, n c u r a d d i t i o n a l bond debt o cover the costi n c r e a s e . Su ch a d d i t i o n a l indebtedness s r e s t r i c t e d by the Measur e R ontingencyP o l i c yadopted by the Board i n May 011 ( and a m e n d e d i n A p r i l 2012) . Our review ofthe s t a t u s of Measur e R orrowing t o date i n c l u d i n g l l planned borrowing) n d i c a t e st h a t the a d d i t i o n a l borrowing t o m a k e these funds a v a i l a b l e f o r the Wests ide SubwaySection 1 p r o j e c t i s e n t i r e l y w i t h i n the p o l i c y cap e s t a b l i s h e d by the Metro Board o fD i r e c t o r s .

Countywide Transit C o s t Reduc t i ons a n d /or O t h e r Funds

This cost increase d o e s not r e q u i r e any countywide cost r e d u c t i o n sor o t h e r funds.

Westside Purple Line E x t e n s i o n , S e c t i o n1 Aw a r d D/B C o n t r a c t &Establish LOP udget 1 9


20/20

20

09 RTP Transit

orrido

rs

"`~^

^~/' ~

South Los ngeles

ounty

`

'

~

S

an ernando alley

San ernando alley Ees[

~''`

North/Beath Repidways`R

~.,

~

'

w

~~

HSR*

l

~~

~

+.

San

ernando alley

a

; ~

,

.

.

y

North

/South Canoga xtension

w:

q~oyo erdugo

(unde

r

onstruction)

W

'

~ ~

~

~

'

`

~`~

Regional Connactw`R

g

CENTER

R ~,

'

^

,

a

Central:

~o~a

i

n

e

Foanin

Sepulveda ass

orrida'a

~Ml

shlre BRT

'Q$ AO

185 ^

'

Raii

ransd

xtensionR

(under c

'

~

_

_

_

,

_

_

Las

ir

enes

Malibu

9

Westside ities,

e~.MaHrE

~

r;'

S

,.

~~

-

.

.

.

.

.

M

~

.

.

,

._.___....

_

.

.

.

Wealside

^uWxey

xtension

1

-

~ne~~Ni.. Qnr_ v

~3.senmants)

R~

''

$

81EE~/

-

Ezpositlon Phase

sunder

bnstructim~

Green ine

EX1@IISI0f1 CO L

~

North

High Speed ail

Los ngeles

Union

tation

o Palmdale'

CflUnty

LS ':

i

`

~

g

H

,mmm

',~Oatewa~r i

r

t

i

e

I

n

l

a

n

d

co

r

r

i

d

o

r

Crenshaw/LAX

Eastsfde

ransit

A

~.~~

Transit

orrldor'~

~

;

Corridor Phase "R

~'`

12

lternatives}

w

i

~'~Lrmy~rrw ,

:~

aoy.

r

~~'~~

PiORWALKm`'`

m

'.

m

~~ .,

$$bSouth

a

~`

HSR

a

West a

nta Ma

Pnaheim o

.A.`

&anch

aridar'~

Green

ine

O

SaUth

ay xtension

R

R '11V

IV

1

L B

S

Fate

LiM:ti'SILFP..2D36_6.15..t~oad

e

~

a

~

t

i

s

f

_M~as~reR+MRnsllrinsnGomd

+

a

s

s

.

3

0_rE

:Jflrft4.~17t2~ru:o

Ualn Six5f

0i2.

15'171

NO

R

e~surn

unAed roj

ects

xProject alignments o

e

etarnincd

U

.~ Vary mn115sor

ts

N0O r V C ~ O N 7a Nr 0 fl. 0 y

purple line extension contract revised

Documents