pyc 2020 final powerpoint

15
Adam Nowak Fatimah Muhammad Sandybel Quintana Lindsey Shobe

Upload: nowakaj

Post on 24-May-2015

331 views

Category:

Education


6 download

DESCRIPTION

Final presentation project for my PYC 2020, Psychology Research Methods, class.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

Adam Nowak

Fatimah Muhammad

Sandybel Quintana

Lindsey Shobe

Page 2: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

• A common activity of everyday life is identifying and understanding written words whether it is in books, billboards, signs, clothing, or even card games.

• In a Stroop experiment, participants are asked to identify the color of a word.

• The words themselves are colors, e.g. red, purple, brown, and grey. However, the words are written in a different color, other than what the word itself says.

• The purpose is to study if there is a deviation between reaction times when the word and color match, a congruent condition, and when the word and color do not match, an incongruent condition.

Page 3: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

HYPOTHESES

PrimaryThe backwards incongruent condition would be the slowest reaction time.

SecondaryThe congruent condition would be the fastest reaction time.

Page 4: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

METHOD

Participants• Age: Young adults 18-25

• 19 participants (10 females)

Materials • Dell/75 Htz desktop

• 17inch LCD color monitor

• SPSS

• Keyboard strokes: r, g, y, b

Page 5: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

STIMULI

Backwards Congruent

Backwards Incongruent

Page 6: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

Sideways Congruent

Sideways Incongruent

Page 7: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

Congruent

Incongruent

Page 8: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

PROCEDURE

• Practice Trial Run

• Single- letter stimuli

• Real Trial

• 12 trials per condition

• All trials separated with a cue +++

• Conditions were counterbalanced

• Correct response: r, g, y, or b

Page 9: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

RESULTS

• A one-way repeated measure ANOVA was calculated comparing the reaction times and a significant effect was found:

[F(1,18)=259.12]

• Significant Results

Page 10: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint
Page 11: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

DISCUSSIONInternal Validity Issues• Stimuli were not completely randomized

• More room for carryover effect

• Three participants participated in similar research

Correlation to Research• Effects of dyslexia on Stroop performance

• Physiological inhibitors (parietal and frontal lobe lesions)

Page 12: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

PHYSIOLOGICAL REASONING

• Frontal lobe and the parietal lobe lesions interfere with reaction times

Page 13: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

NEXT STEPS• Screen for dyslexia

• Is language a distracter?

• Is the Stroop effect still present with a single-letter incongruency

Page 14: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

REFERENCES• Pujol, J., Vendrell, P., Deus, J., Junque, C., Bello, J., Mati-Vilata, J., Capdevila, A. (2001).

The effect of medial frontal and posterior parietal demyelinating lesions on Stroop interference. NeuroImage, 13, 68-75. Doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0662.

Page 15: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

QUESTIONS?