q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

21
Q1 2014 FINANCIAL RESULTS May 2014

Upload: goldenstarresources

Post on 13-Jan-2015

568 views

Category:

Investor Relations


3 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

Q1 2014

FINANCIAL RESULTSMay 2014

Page 2: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

Legal and Other Matters

SAFE HARBOR: Some statements contained in this presentation are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of1995 and applicable Canadian securities laws. Investors are cautioned that forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and involve risks and uncertainties that couldcause actual results to differ materially. Such statements include comments regarding: our production expectations for 2014 and 2015 including our production guidance;the impact of cost cutting initiatives; grade, recovery rates and timelines for production from our tailings reclaim facility and the impact of such production on theCompany’s performance; the timing for the completion of push backs trends on cash and all-in sustaining costs; predictions regarding cash costs per ounce; haulage costs;improved access to ore in 2014; duration of mining at Father Brown pit; strip ratios after push backs; average planned head grades for refractory ore; sustaining capitalbudgeted for 2014; ability to generate cash; timing for moving equipment from Bogoso to Wassa; the life of mine at Bogoso; pumping capacity at the Bogoso tailings facility;timing of Mineral Resource estimates at Wassa; timing of drilling and recovery of assays; timing for completion of a feasibility study at Wassa underground; timing of WassaPreliminary Economic Assessment, timing of Wassa underground to commercial production; plans to pursue a low cost production strategy focused on non-refractory oresources; updated mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates at Wassa; capital expenditures; and our 2014 and 2015 outlook and objectives for the remainder of 2014and 2015 and our medium term objectives. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include timing of and unexpected events at the Bogoso oxide andsulfide processing plants and/or at the Wassa processing plant; variations in ore grade, tonnes mined, crushed or milled; variations in relative amounts of refractory, non-refractory and transition ores; delay or failure to receive board or government approvals and permits; the availability and cost of electrical power; timing and availability ofexternal financing on acceptable terms; technical, permitting, mining or processing issues; changes in U.S. and Canadian securities markets; and fluctuations in gold price andinput costs and general economic conditions. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting the Company will be those anticipated by management. Pleaserefer to the discussion of these and other factors in our Annual Report for 2013. The forecasts contained in this presentation constitute management's current estimates, asof the date of this presentation, with respect to the matters covered thereby. We expect that these estimates will change as new information is received and that actualresults will vary from these estimates, possibly by material amounts. While we may elect to update these estimates at any time, we do not undertake to update any estimateat any particular time or in response to any particular event. Investors and others should not assume that any forecasts in this presentation represent management'sestimate as of any date other than the date of this presentation.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES: In this presentation, we use the terms "cash operating cost per ounce“ and “all-in sustaining cost per ounce”. These measuresshould be considered as Non-GAAP Financial Measures as defined in applicable securities laws and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures ofperformance prepared in accordance with GAAP. We use cash operating cost per ounce as a key operating indicator. We monitor these measures monthly, comparingeach month's values to prior period's values to detect trends that may indicate increases or decreases in operating efficiencies. This measure is also compared againstbudget to alert management to trends that may cause actual results to deviate from planned operational results. We provide this measure to our investors to allow them toalso monitor operational efficiencies of our mines. We calculate these measures for both individual operating units and on a consolidated basis. There are materiallimitations associated with the use of such non-GAAP financial measures. These measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations asdetermined under IFRS. Changes in numerous factors including, but not limited to, mining rates, milling rates, gold grade, gold recovery, and the costs of labor, consumablesand mine site general and administrative activities can cause these measures to increase or decrease. We believe that these measures are the same or similar to themeasures of other gold mining companies, but may not be comparable to similarly titled measures in every instance.

INFORMATION: The information contained in this presentation has been obtained by Golden Star from its own records and from other sources deemed reliable,however no representation or warranty is made as to its accuracy or completeness. The technical information relating to Golden Star’s material properties disclosed hereinis based upon technical reports prepared and filed pursuant to National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) and other publicly available information regarding the Company,including the following: (i) “NI 43-101 Technical Report on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Golden Star Resources Ltd, Wassa Gold Mine, Ghana EffectiveDate December 31, 2012”, prepared by SRK Consulting (UK) Limited; (ii) “NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment, Mechanized Mining of the West Reef Resource,Prestea Underground Mine, Prestea, Ghana”, dated May 3, 2013 and prepared under the supervision of Martin P. Raffield and S. Mitchel Wasel; and (iii) Golden Star’s AnnualReport for 2013. Additional information is included in Golden Star’s Annual Information From for the year ended December 31, 2013 which is filed on SEDAR. MineralReserves were prepared under the supervision of Dr. Martin Raffield, Senior Vice President Technical Services for the Company. Dr. Raffield is a "Qualified Person" asdefined by Canada's National Instrument 43-101. The Qualified Person reviewing and validating the estimation of the Mineral Resources is S. Mitchel Wasel, Golden StarResources Vice President of Exploration.

CURRENCY: All monetary amounts refer to United States dollars unless otherwise indicated.

Golden Star Resources Q1 2014 Financial Results Presentation 2

Page 3: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

Management Participants

Daniel OwireduExecutive Vice President Operations

Sam CoetzerPresident and Chief Executive Officer

André van NiekerkExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Martin RaffieldSenior Vice President, Technical Services

Golden Star Resources Q1 2014 Financial Results Presentation 3

Page 4: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

Q1 2014 Operational Overview

• Gold produced and sold during the first quarter of 65,812 ounces, (Q4

2013: 75,430 ounces) in line with expectations

• Production guidance for full year of 295,000 – 320,000 ounces maintained

• Drilling at Wassa continues to yield significant results, PEA of underground

mining at Wassa on track for Q3 2014

• Mining in Wassa Main pit established, better than expected productivity

with lower cost per tonne

• At Bogoso strip ratio continues to decline as betterment stripping

substantially complete

• Higher grades and improved recovery at Bogoso expected for the

remainder of the year

• Refractory processing plant achieves record throughput, supports

increased supply of ore going forward

4Golden Star Resources Q1 2014 Financial Results Presentation

Page 5: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

Q1 2014 Financial Overview

• Revenues for the first quarter of 2014 decreased to $85.0 M (Q4 2013:

$96.0 M) with fewer ounces sold

• Cost of sales excluding depreciation and amortization decreased to $84.3

M (Q4 2013: $88.5 M)

• Mine operating expenses decreased to $82.9 M (Q4 2013: $84.8 M)

• Consolidated cash operating costs per ounce of $1,206 (Q4 2013: $1,091

per ounce)

• Cash cost guidance for the year of $950 – 1,000 per ounce maintained

• Adjusted net loss attributable to shareholders for the quarter of $12.2 M

(Q4 2013 adjusted net loss of $6.5 M) before non-cash impairments

• Consolidated cash balance at quarter end of $57.8 M

• $10 M undrawn on Ecobank loan facility

Golden Star Resources Q1 2014 Financial Results Presentation 5

Page 6: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

Production Performance

$59.5 $56.5$44.9

$58.7

$39.5

$40.1

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

$140

Q3 2013 Q4 2013 Q1 2014

Wassa Bogoso

45 4435

44

31

31

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Q3 2013 Q4 2013 Q1 2014

Wassa Bogoso

Revenue ($ million) Production (k oz.)

• Average realized gold price of $1,292 per ounce (Q4 2013: $1,273)

Golden Star Resources Q1 2014 Financial Results Presentation 6

Page 7: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

• Sequential reductions in cost of

sales

• Lower mining contractor

expenses and haulage costs

• An increase in metal inventory

and lower royalty expense

Cost of Sales

$91.3

$88.5

$84.3

$75

$80

$85

$90

$95

$100

Q3 2013 Q4 2013 Q1 2014

Cost of Sales Excluding Depreciation and

Amortization ($ million)

Golden Star Resources Q1 2014 Financial Results Presentation 7

Page 8: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

Cash Operating Costs per Ounce1

$1,091 $1,206

$950 - 1,000

Q4 2013 Q1 2014 FY 2014E

AISC:

$1,373

(1) See note on slide 2 regarding non-GAAP financial measures

AISC:

$1,523

AISC:

$1,150 -1,200

• Cash operating costs per ounce higher in Q1 2014

• Transition into new Main pit at Wassa

• Reduction of feed from Father Brown

• Lower grade and recoveries Bogoso

Golden Star Resources Q1 2014 Financial Results Presentation 8

Page 9: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

Wassa Cash Costs

Cash operating cost per oz1

$805

$881

$955

$-

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

Q3 2013 Q4 2013 Q1 2014

• Increased costs per ounce as per

plan

• Mine operating expenses reduced

to $34.1 M (Q4 2013: $39.2 M) as

mining productivity increases with

new mobile fleet from Bogoso

• Operational efficiencies achieved

at end of first quarter

• Full year cash operating costs

expected to be $900 – $950/oz

(1) See note on slide 2 regarding non-GAAP financial measures

Golden Star Resources Q1 2014 Financial Results Presentation 9

Page 10: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

Bogoso Cash Costs

Cash operating cost per oz1

$1,118

$1,391

$1,489

$-

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

Q3 2013 Q4 2013 Q1 2014

• Mine operating expenses increased

to $48.9 M (Q4 2013: $45.6 M),

push backs now substantially

complete

• Costs per ounce expected to

decrease going forward

• Labour rationalization

• Equipment retired

(1) See note on slide 2 regarding non-GAAP financial measures

Golden Star Resources Q1 2014 Financial Results Presentation 10

Page 11: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

Balance Sheet

• Cash on hand at period end of $57.8 M

• Ecobank loan facility of $10.0 M remaining

• Equipment financing of $23.1 M available

• Further capital expenditure for 2014 of $38.0 M budgeted

• Operations expected to generate positive cash flow over remainder of

year

• Working capital expected to improve as accounts payable reduce over

remainder of year

Golden Star Resources Q1 2014 Financial Results Presentation 11

Page 12: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

Wassa Main Grade Thickness Contour (g\t)*m

Wassa Growth – Dec 2011

Golden Star Resources Q1 2014 Financial Results Presentation 12

• Two year LOM in 2011

Page 13: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

Wassa Main Grade Thickness Contour (g\t)*m

Wassa Growth – Dec 2013

• Mineral Reserve and Resource update for year end 2013

• Wassa Mineral Reserve increased 34% to 2.0 Moz; 22% higher average grade of 1.75 g/t Au

• Wassa Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources increased 29% to 3.3 Moz; 25% higher

average grade of 2.0 g/t Au

$1,300 Pit Shell

Golden Star Resources Q1 2014 Financial Results Presentation 13

Page 14: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

Wassa Main Grade Thickness Contour (g\t)*m

Wassa Growth – March 2014

$1,300 Pit Shell

• New drilling campaign commenced November 2013 - infill and step out

• Significant grades and widths intercepted on step out holes, confirming ore body is open down

plunge

• In-fill drilling shows wide zones of significant grades between existing high grade drill intercepts

Golden Star Resources Q1 2014 Financial Results Presentation 14

Page 15: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

Wassa –Way Forward

• Current drill program completed and

assays to be received mid 2014

• PEA of underground mine at Wassa to

be published Q3 2014

• Revised Mineral Resource estimate Q3

2014

• Feasibility Study (based on revised

Resource estimates) to commence Q3

2014

• 18 months to commercial production

thereafter

• Financing options being considered,

internal financing possible

Golden Star Resources Q1 2014 Financial Results Presentation 15

Page 16: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

Investment Case

Golden Star is focusing its operations on low cost non-refractory ounces

Costs are reducing through active management and will reduce further as a

result of strategy

Management team continue to demonstrate their capabilities and will deliver

on guidance

The Company is adequately funded for current operations

Significant optionality exists to increase production from other ore sources

if the gold price rises

Established infrastructure with three operating plants and all permitting

requirements fulfilled

Development of Wassa Underground is central to this strategy

Golden Star Resources Q1 2014 Financial Results Presentation 16

Page 17: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

APPENDICES

Page 18: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

(1) Includes US$47.3M of 5% Convertible Debentures at fair value

(2) As accessed on April 23, 2014 from Bloomberg

(3) As a group, beneficially owned, or controlled or directed, directly or indirectly as at December 31, 2013

Major Shareholders2

Heartland Advisors Inc. 12.11%

Sentry Select Capital Corp. 11.53%

Van Eck Associates Corp. 8.0%

Directors and Executive Officers3 2.8%

DE Shaw & Co 1.8%

Acadian Asset Management 1.2%

Share Price (Last close) (US$) (as of May 05, 2014) 62 cents

Shares Outstanding 259.4 M

Market Capitalization (US$) 160.8 M

Cash and Equivalents (US$) (March 31 2014) 57.8 M

Total Debt (US$) (March 31,2014)1 112.8 M

EnterpriseValue (US$) 215.8 M

Daily Average Volume TSX: 140K

NYSE MKT: 2.6M

Strong Sponsorship, Good Liquidity

Golden Star Resources Q1 2014 Financial Results Presentation 18

Page 19: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

2014 Guidance

Combined Operations in 2014

Production (oz) 295,000 – 320,000

Cash operating cost ($/oz.)1 950 – 1,000

Capital expenditure (millions)

Sustaining:

Development:

Total:

$21

$29(2)

$50

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2014E

Wassa Bogoso

165 – 180k oz

130 – 140k oz

295 – 320k oz

(1) Power and fuel prices used in the guidance are US$0.18 per kilowatt hour and US$1.30 per liter, respectively.

(2) The development capital expenditure forecast for Bogoso for 2014 is inclusive of approximately US$12 million of development expenditures incurred at the Prestea Underground Mine.

Production

Golden Star Resources Q1 2014 Financial Results Presentation 19

Page 20: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

Wassa Main Drill Hole Plan View

BSDD292A

4.1m @

17.6g/t

BSDD290B 18.5m

@ 6.8g/t

BSDD224

17.6m @

3.9g/tBSDD225

18.4m @

4.6g/t

BSDD241

5.9m @

12.1g/t

BSDD246

19.0m @

10.2g/t

BSDD220

29.0m @

7.5g/t

BSDD285

27.9m @

5.0g/t

BSDD246

12.9m @

10.7g/t

BSDD2274

2.9m @

3.8g/t

BSDD218

32.4m @

3.5g/t

BSDD262

47.1 m @

7.2g/t

BSDD212

75.6m @

1.7g/t

BSDD264

16.9 @

5.5g/t

BSDD260

62.8m @

4.1g/t

BSDD256

52.9m @

4.3g/t

BSDD226

32.6m @

7.5g/t

STDD033

24.0m@

4.3g/t

BSDD219

4.8m @

27.4g/t

BSDD233

11.2m @

20.0g/t

BSDD239B

22.2m @

4.1g/t

BSDD210

17.2m @

5.2g/tBSDD209

10.2m @

12.1g/t

242DD068

31.7m @

7.3g/t

BSDD293

17.5m @

4.9g/t

BSDD295M 20.3m

@

3.5g/t

BSDD296

19.9m @

15.3g/t

BSDD298A

58.6m @

4.0g/t

BSDD299

38.2m @ 3.5g/t

242DD080

11.7m @

2.4g/t

Page 21: Q1 2014 financial results may 2014 final

Wassa Main Drill Hole Plan View

BSDD301

19.2m

@11.35g/t

BSDD302

3.39m @

5.99g/t

BSDD305M

12.1m @ 6.53g/t

BSDD305D2

48.02m @

3.70g/t

BSDD305D1

17.11m @

2.35g/t

BSDD307

10.96m @

4.0g/t

BSDD308M

23.09m @

9.66g/t BSDD308D1

13.60m @

5.99g/t

BSDD295M

20.3m @ 3.5g/t

BSDD306

29.93m @

17.36g/t

BSDD309

5.36m @

2.28g/t

BSDD310

19.07m @

5.61g/t

BSDD311

5.74m @

2.40g/t

242DD080

11.7m @

2.4g/t