qaqc evaluation

Upload: sbtharan

Post on 05-Apr-2018

240 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    1/22

    Quality Assurance/QualityControl Plan Evaluation

    February 16, 2005

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    2/22

    A time of change A/E Oversight Guidelines.

    This defining of roles and

    responsibilities paints a clearerpicture of the responsibilitiesand relationships within CFLand consultants.

    With these guidelines in place

    it is now time to review theother components of the

    processes that contribute to thedelivery of projects.

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    3/22

    Why Do You Plan for Quality? If you dont know where

    youre going, any road will

    take you there

    Louis Carroll

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    4/22

    Responsibility for QualityRecognition of A/E industry capabilities

    Acceptance that quality is the A/Es responsibilityBoth parties

    CFLHDs roles is QA

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    5/22

    Follow Through on Quality The best written quality

    plan is no better than theworst, if it is not followed

    through. Take the time to provide

    the appropriate level ofquality control.

    Reduced levels of QC maybe justified, but they mustbe communicated andagreed to.

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    6/22

    Reasons for EvaluationCFLHD accepted the existing QA/QC plans on the

    merits of each firm.

    Now that the existing QA/QC plans have been inpractice for a while, CFLHD will be evaluatingthem to develop a basis for providing QA/QC

    program improvement recommendations;modification of scopes of work to addressdeficiencies; and to identify weakness areas formonitoring.

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    7/22

    How Evaluation was DevelopedKey elements of a comprehensive highway

    QA/QC plan were identified

    The evaluation criteria was selected by researching

    quality practices of State DOTs and consultants.

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    8/22

    Goals of EvaluationProvide CFLHD with a clear understanding of the

    QA/QC processes and procedures that are in place

    to control the quality of the work.

    Identify improvement opportunities.

    And;

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    9/22

    Goals of Evaluation Verify that the mechanisms

    that control quality are in

    place so the product meetsthe expectations of the

    team.

    Client Agencies;

    CFLHD; and

    A/E

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    10/22

    Evaluation Criteria The current organizational QA/QC plans will be evaluated,

    using 25 evaluation criteria, for the inclusion of the

    elements necessary to promote the thorough review andchecking of all documents.

    Implementation of QA/QC is not intended to lead to

    unnecessarily complex and expensive systems but only to

    formalize and record the good management practices that

    have usually been practiced in the past.

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    11/22

    SUMMARY OF EVALUATION CRITERIA RESULTSWEAKNESS

    AREAS

    THE CONSULTANTS QA/QC PLAN:

    1Provides for quality checking and reviewing processes through all phases of product

    development.

    2 Provides for involvement of the project manager in the control of quality.

    3 Provides for adequate continuous QC during design and production.

    4 Provides for the development of a Project Quality Plan.

    5 Provides for the various review types used to control the work.

    6 Provides for internal Quality Assurance monitoring.

    7Provides addressing, incorporation and verification of review comments and the use

    of a comment and response tracking form.

    8Provides for proper subconsultant quality control (including verification of

    document quality).

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    12/22

    SUMMARY OF EVALUATION CRITERIA RESULTSWEAKNESS

    AREAS

    9 Provides for the retention and filing of QA/QC check copies and records.

    10Requires the use of a tracking and responsibility stamp or sign-off.

    11Requires the use of an adequate checking and back-checking system, including how

    to utilize the checking system.

    12Provides for the QC checking of manual calculations.

    13Provides for the QC checking of computer-generated calculations.

    14Provides for the QC checking of drawings.

    15Provides for the QC checking of specifications.

    16Provides for the QC checking of quantities and cost estimate.

    17Provides for the QC checking of environmental commitments and permitting

    requirements (including incorporation of commitments and requirements).

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    13/22

    SUMMARY OF EVALUATION CRITERIA RESULTSWEAKNESS

    AREAS

    18Provides for the QC checking of studies and reports.

    19Provides for the QC checking of construction stakeout reports.

    20Provides for a document and report format review.

    21Bridge quality assurance/quality control minimum requirements

    22Provides for the use and submittal of development and review checklists and QC

    control documents

    23Provides a certification that QC checking has been performed in accordance withQA/QC plan.

    24Provides for sealing and signing of documents (i.e. plans, specifications, reports,

    studies, etc.).

    25Provides for a final closeout and evaluation.

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    14/22

    Involvement of Project Management

    in QA/QC Project managers have to

    be active participants in the

    quality of deliverables. Verification that scope and

    design are in agreement.

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    15/22

    Development of a Project Quality PlanScope of each review.

    Allocation of resources and areas of responsibility.

    Analysis of risks and design decisions.First step in assuring that best practices and sound

    engineering judgment is used.

    Quality assurance of subconsultants.Reference quality procedures to be used.

    Modification of PQP.

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    16/22

    Subconsultant Quality Assurance and

    Quality Control Subconsultants have acceptable QA/QC plans.

    QA activity to ensure that work is balanced between

    project constraints, good engineering judgment, andit reflects the appropriate level of risk.

    Subconsultant are tasked to provide activities for

    back checking the technical recommendationsagainst the project deliverables to assure that thetechnical recommendations reflect the evolution ofthe project.

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    17/22

    Quality Assurance Certificate of

    ComplianceA certificate of compliance is to be submitted for

    ALL deliverables.

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    18/22

    Use of Checklists and QA/QC Control

    DocumentsUse documents at the appropriate stages of

    development.

    Submit the completed checklists with each of the

    deliverables.

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    19/22

    Sealing and Signing of DocumentsEngineering drawing

    Cross-Sections

    Specifications

    Engineering reports and formal technicalmemorandums

    Construction staking reportsAll other technical recommendations or

    deliverables

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    20/22

    Final Closeout and EvaluationDocument problems encountered

    Areas for improvement

    Mistakes and lessons learned

    Outstanding features

    Corrective action plan

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    21/22

    Next Step in the ProcessAn audit report for each of the current QA/QC

    plans will be developed.

    The reports will be distributed.

    Meeting to discuss the results will be scheduled, as

    necessary, to address findings.

  • 8/2/2019 QAQC Evaluation

    22/22

    Questions