quality and safety in private healthcare

25
1 Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare Andrew Vallance- Owen Group Medical Director

Upload: ajaxe

Post on 22-Jan-2016

40 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare. Andrew Vallance-Owen Group Medical Director. Quality – The Target. Appropriate, cost-effective care and treatment whose outcomes will benefit the patient. Quality – The Target. The right treatment At the right time Managed by the right person - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

1

Quality and Safety inPrivate Healthcare

Andrew Vallance-OwenGroup Medical Director

Page 2: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

2

Quality – The Target

Appropriate, cost-effective care and treatment

whose outcomes will benefit the patient

Page 3: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

3

Quality – The Target

• The right treatment

• At the right time

• Managed by the right person

• In the right place

Where ‘appropriate’ means:

Page 4: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

4

The Cochrane Principle

“Best clinical practice often represents best financial value in healthcare”

Cochrane AL (1999) Effectiveness and Efficiency.

Random Reflections on Health Services. March. 3rd Edition. Royal Society of Medicine Press, London. ISBN 1-85315-394-X

Page 5: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

5

Professor Jack Wennberg and Professor Elliott Fisher Dartmouth Medical School

• Compared with the lowest use areas, people in the highest use areas get ten times as many prostate operations, six times as many back operations, seven times as many coronary angioplasties and ten times as many hospital days if they have heart failure

• What predicts the rate is the number of specialists per capita. The more doctors, the more consultations

• High use did not mean better quality of care and outcomes. In fact, for many measures, quality and outcomes were best in the low-use areas

Page 6: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

6

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence(NICE)

• An independent organisation responsible for providing national guidance on the promotion of good health and the prevention and treatment of good health

• Guidance is developed using the expertise of the NHS and the wider healthcare community, including NHS staff, healthcare professionals, patients and carers, industry and the academic world.

Page 7: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

7

NICE Produces Guidance in Three Areas

• Health technologies - including new and existing medicines, treatments and procedures

• Clinical practice - appropriate treatment and care of people with specific diseases and conditions

• Public health - guidance on the promotion of health and the prevention of ill health

Page 8: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

8

Implementation of NICE Guidance

“Once NICE publishes clinical guidance, health professionals and the organisations that employ them are expected to take it fully into account when deciding what treatments to give to people.”

“To develop NICE interventional procedures guidance, NICE reviews evidence and collects and analyses information. By providing guidance on how safe procedures are and how well they work, NICE makes it possible for new treatments and tests to be introduced into the NHS in a responsible way.”

A Guide to NICE 2006

Page 9: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

9

Speciality networks

Driving the Quality agenda forward

Page 10: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

10

BUPA’s Role

• BUPA seeks to be at the forefront of developments in quality based contracting

• We have a responsibility to set and monitor standards. This is in the members’ interests

• We have built the credibility to challenge

Page 11: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

11

Approved Cancer Hospitals

• BUPA spends $35m AUD per year on the diagnosis and treatment of breast and bowel cancer

• BUPA was the first UK insurer to develop a national network of quality assured hospitals for breast and bowel cancer

• Currently over 130 BUPA Approved Breast and 120 BUPA Approved Bowel Cancer Hospitals

10/05

Page 12: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

12

Why is BUPA’s accreditation process for cancer units important?

A study in the British Journal of Cancer states that “Local recurrence rates were 57% lower and the risk of death from breast cancer was 20% lower for women treated in specialist units…the surgical management in specialised breast units is more often adequate, local and regional recurrence rates are lower, and survival is correspondingly better.”

Of those who applied to be an approved cancer hospital just 64% have been able to meet the standards we seek

Page 13: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

13

Case Management

• Nurses micro manage treatment & work with providers to ensure delivery of appropriate, cost effective care

• 32 experienced nurses and 29 expert advisors

• Manage complex care – diseases and cases– critical care– cancer care– rehabilitation– back pain– medical cases & psychiatry

• BUPA Initiatives do change clinical practice– Wisdom Teeth Extraction– Hysterectomy

Page 14: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

14

Supported Decisions - BUPA Healthline

24 hour health Information Service made up of :

• A team of specialist nurses, available 24/7

• Supported by research based health information

• Confidential service• Triage via a comprehensive symptom assessment• Information on specific health topics & Travel advice• Self help groups & Fact sheets• Home Treatments• Advice on medications

Page 15: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

15

Patient Satisfaction Survey

• Monthly survey to approx 5,000 randomly selected members who have had an inpatient or day case episode of care asking them for feedback about their hospital stay.

• Key themes below:– 85% of members rated the overall service provided

by the hospital as excellent or very good;– 94% of members said that the overall service met

or exceeded their expectations;– 74% of members rated the overall level of comfort

as excellent or very good;– 84% of members rated the hospital as very clean;– 80% of members rated the nursing staff as excellent

or very good for each of the five questions relating to them (e.g. attitude/efficiency)

Page 16: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

16

Compare Practice with

standards

Compare Practice with

standards

Clinical improvement cycle

Set Standards

Set Standards

Measure OutcomesMeasure

Outcomes

Improve StandardsImprove

Standards

Peer Review

Peer Review

Improve PracticeImprove Practice

Page 17: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

17

BHL in-patient mortality (QIP indicator 3.1); deaths as % of in-patient discharges, 2005

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

AL BR BU CB CD CL ED GP HP HT HW LA LC LD MN NC NW PK PT RD RG SB TW WA WL WR

Hospital

Rat

e (%

)

UK Ind. Mean +2 SD

UK Ind. Mean

BHL Mean

Rate %

Page 18: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

18

BUPA Hospitals rates for clinical indicators(Most indicators <0.5% of discharges)

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Hospital

% o

f to

tal d

isc

ha

rge

s

% Surgical Deaths

% Transfers

% Re-ops

Page 19: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

19

BUPA Hospitals rates for clinical indicators(What about the other 99.5% of patients?)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Hospital

% o

f to

tal d

isch

arg

es

% Surgical Deaths

% Transfers

% Re-ops

Page 20: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

20

Functional Outcome Measurement

• Thoroughly validated and reviewed

• Suitable for most surgical, medical and psychiatric treatment

• Measures physical and psychological health status

• Risk-adjusts

• Reliable process for collecting data

• Does not impose extra work on clinicians

Why SF-36?

Page 21: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

21

The SF-36 Survey Process

• The baseline questionnaire is completed by the patient at admission

• A follow-up questionnaire is sent to the patient at twelve weeks after the treatment

• The participation of the patient is entirely voluntary

• Patients cannot be identified by their doctors

Page 22: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

22

Change in SF-36 Physical Summary Score after 12 weeksBUPA Hospitals top-20 therapeutic procedures

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Phako

emuls

ificati

on of le

ns

TURP

Excisi

on o

f lesio

n of sk

in or s

ubcu

taneo

us tis

sue

Septo

plast

y of n

ose

Surgica

l rem

oval

of im

pacte

d tee

th

Ligatio

n/strip

ping

of lo

ng/sh

ort v

ein

Thera

peuti

c OGD

Hyste

recto

my a

nd re

mov

al of u

terin

e adn

exae

Carpal/

cubit

al tunn

el re

lease

Sub-a

crom

ial d

ecompre

ssion

Primar

y rep

air o

f ingu

inal

hernia

Cathete

risatio

n of ri

ght a

nd le

ft sid

e of

hear

t

Epidur

al in

jection

(lum

bar)

Thera

end

o ops

cavit

y of k

nee

Tonsil

lecto

my -

adult

Thera

end

o ops

semilu

nar ca

rtilage

knee

Lapa

rosc

opic

chole

cyste

ctom

y

Total

pros

thet

ic re

place

men

t of k

nee jo

int

Autog

raft

bypas

s cor

onary

arte

ry(ie

s)

Total

pros

thet

ic re

place

men

t of h

ip jo

int

Me

an

ch

an

ge

in P

hy

sic

al S

um

ma

ry S

co

re

(an

d 9

5%

co

nfi

de

nc

e in

terv

al)

Page 23: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

23

Change in SF-36 Mental Summary Score after 12 weeksBUPA Hospitals top-20 therapeutic procedures

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Thera

end

o ops

cavit

y of k

nee

Total

pros

thet

ic re

place

men

t of k

nee jo

int

Carpal/

cubit

al tunn

el re

lease

Thera

end

o ops

semilu

nar ca

rtilage

knee

Primar

y rep

air o

f ingu

inal

hernia

Phako

emuls

ificati

on of le

ns

Surgica

l rem

oval

of im

pacte

d tee

th

Excisi

on o

f lesio

n of sk

in or s

ubcu

taneo

us tis

sue

Ligatio

n/strip

ping

of lo

ng/sh

ort v

ein

Sub-a

crom

ial d

ecompre

ssion

Septo

plast

y of n

ose

TURP

Epidur

al in

jection

(lum

bar)

Cathete

risatio

n of ri

ght a

nd le

ft sid

e of

hear

t

Total

pros

thet

ic re

place

men

t of h

ip jo

int

Thera

peuti

c OGD

Lapa

rosc

opic

chole

cyste

ctom

y

Tonsil

lecto

my -

adult

Autog

raft

bypas

s cor

onary

arte

ry(ie

s)

Hyste

recto

my a

nd re

mov

al of u

terin

e adn

exae

Me

an

ch

an

ge

in M

en

tal S

um

ma

ry S

co

re

(an

d 9

5%

co

nfi

de

nc

e in

terv

al)

Page 24: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

24

Professor Sir Cyril ChantlerChairman, Great Ormond Street Hospital

“Medicine used to be simple, ineffective and safenow it’s complex, effective, and potentially dangerous”

Page 25: Quality and Safety in Private Healthcare

25

BUPA

Vision

“Caring for the lives in our hands”

Mission

“To help our customers liver longer, healthier and more productive lives”