quality and tqm
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Opermgt 345Introduction To Production and Operations ManagementIntroduction to Quality and TQMChapter 7Shannon Spring 2001What is Quality?®® ®The concept of quality is subjective and difficult to define Certain aspects of quality can be identified Ultimately, the judgement of quality rests with the customerDimensions Of Product Quality®Performance®basic operating characteristics “extra†items added to basic features probability product will operate over time®TRANSCRIPT

Opermgt 345Introduction To Production and Operations
Management
Opermgt 345Introduction To Production and Operations
Management
Introduction to Quality and TQM
Chapter 7
Shannon Spring 2001

What is Quality?
The concept of quality is subjective and difficult to define
Certain aspects of quality can be identified Ultimately, the judgement of quality rests with the
customer

Dimensions Of Product QualityDimensions Of Product Quality
Performance basic operating characteristicsbasic operating characteristics
Features ““extra” items added to basic featuresextra” items added to basic features
Reliability probability product will operate over timeprobability product will operate over time

Dimensions Of Product QualityDimensions Of Product Quality
Conformance meeting pre-established standardsmeeting pre-established standards
Durability life span before replacement life span before replacement
Serviceability ease of getting repairs, speed & competence of repairsease of getting repairs, speed & competence of repairs

Dimensions Of Product QualityDimensions Of Product Quality
Aesthetics look, feel, sound, smell or tastelook, feel, sound, smell or taste
Safety freedom from injury or harmfreedom from injury or harm
Other perceptions subjective perceptions based on brand name, advertising, etcsubjective perceptions based on brand name, advertising, etc

Is TQM Dead?Is TQM Dead?

Process Improvement and Quality Management
There are many definitions:
A journey to excellence in which everyone in the organization is focused on continuous process improvement directed toward increased customer satisfaction.
Journey Everyone Continuous Process Improvement Increased Customer Satisfaction

The TQM Unifying Principles
Customer-First Orientation Top Management Leadership Continuous Process Improvement Respect for Employees Reduction in Process and Product Variation On-going Education and Training Statistical Thinking and Emphasis on Data Emphasis on Prevention Rather Than Detection Customer-Supplier Partnerships

Leadership for TQM
Leaders Must:
Become Aware
Become Committed
Truly Understand
Champion the Process

Is there a Recipe for TQM?Is there a Recipe for TQM?
TQM has evolved over many years, and incorporates the thinking of many people
There is no single recipe or standard, just guiding principles

Quality Philosophers
Walter Shewhart W. Edwards Deming Joseph Juran Philip Crosby Armand Feigenbaum Kaoru Ishikawa Genichi Taguchi

Deming’s 14 Points
1. Create constancy of purpose
2. Adopt philosophy of prevention
3. Cease mass inspection
4. Select a few suppliers based on quality
5. Constantly improve system and workers
6. Institute worker training

7. Instill leadership among supervisors
8. Eliminate fear among employees
9. Eliminate barriers between departments
10. Eliminate slogans
11. Remove numerical quotas
12. Enhance worker pride
13. Institute vigorous training & education programs
14. Implement these 13 points
Deming’s 14 Points (continued)

Traditional United States Perspective
Top Mgmt
Middle Mgmt
Supervisors
Operations
Source: Kaizen, by Masaaki Imai, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1986
Time Spent
Innovation
Maintenance

Japanese Kaizen ModelJapanese Kaizen Model
Source: Kaizen, by Masaaki Imai, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1986
Top Mgmt
Middle Mgmt
Supervisors
Operations
Time Spent
Kaizen
Innovation
Maintenance

The Quality Gap Concept
Quality Dimensions
TangiblesReliability
ResponsivenessCompetence
CourtesyCredibility
SecurityAccess
CommunicationUnderstandingthe Customer
Word ofMouth
Personal Needs
PastExperience
ExternalCommunications
Expected Quality
Expected Quality
PerceivedQuality
PerceivedQuality
The QualityGap

Your Quality ExperiencesYour Quality Experiences
Examples of Poor Quality
Examples of High Quality

Quality Implementation Strategies
Six-Sigma Program
Cost of Quality
Benchmarking
Malcolm Baldrige Assessment
Many Others …...

Six-Sigma ProgramSix-Sigma Program
Pioneered By Motorola and GE
GE Slide Show: http:/www.cimplicityhmi.com/croton/ppt/sigma/sld001.htm







Quality Function Deployment House of QualityText Book Publishing Example
Highlights important material
Examples illustrate theory
En
han
ces
Stu
den
t ab
ilit
y to
lear
n
Real-world applications
Mee
ts in
stru
ctio
nal
nee
ds
Clear Presentation
Appropriate Level
Good Topical Coverage
Cost
Exercises
Free from Errors
Covers subject matter
Up-to-Date
Sufficient Quantity
Range of difficulty
Low cost
Easy to read
No content omissions
No typographical errors
Step 1 ~ Voice of Customer “WHATS”

Quality Function Deployment House of Quality
Mee
ts in
stru
ctio
nal
nee
ds
En
han
ces
Stu
den
t ab
ilit
y to
lear
n
Clear Presentation
Appropriate Level
Good Topical Coverage
Cost
Exercises
Free from Errors
Covers subject matter
Up-to-Date
Real-world applications
Sufficient Quantity
Range of difficulty
Low cost
Easy to read
Highlights important material
Examples illustrate theory
No content omissions
No typographical errors
Step 2 ~ Technical Requirements “HOWS”
Res
earc
h li
tera
ture
cov
erag
e
Pop
ula
r li
tera
ture
cov
erag
e
Am
oun
t of
mat
hem
atic
s
# of
nu
mer
ical
exe
rcis
es
# of
dis
cuss
ion
exe
rcis
es
Use
of
figu
res
and
tab
les
Col
or
Su
bse
ctio
ns
“Box
ed”
Exa
mp
les
Cor
rect
nes
s of
gra
mm
ar
Siz
e
Very strong relationship
Strong relationship
Weak relationship

Mee
ts in
stru
ctio
nal
nee
ds
En
han
ces
Stu
den
t ab
ilit
y to
lear
n
Clear Presentation
Appropriate Level
Good Topical Coverage
Cost
Exercises
Free from Errors
Covers subject matter
Up-to-Date
Real-world applications
Sufficient Quantity
Range of difficulty
Low cost
Easy to read
Highlights important material
Examples illustrate theory
No content omissions
No typographical errors
Res
earc
h lit
erat
ure
cove
rage
Pop
ular
lite
ratu
re c
over
age
Am
oun
t of
mat
hem
atic
s
# of
nu
mer
ical
exe
rcis
es
# of
dis
cuss
ion
exe
rcis
es
Use
of
figu
res
and
tab
les
Col
or
Su
bse
ctio
ns
“Box
ed”
Exa
mp
les
Cor
rect
nes
s of
gra
mm
ar
Siz
e
Quality Function Deployment House of Quality
Step 3 ~ Relationship Matrix
Very strong relationship
Strong relationship
Weak relationship

Quality Function Deployment House of Quality
Mee
ts in
stru
ctio
nal
nee
ds
En
han
ces
Stu
den
t ab
ilit
y to
lear
n
Clear Presentation
Appropriate Level
Good Topical Coverage
Cost
Exercises
Free from Errors
Covers subject matter
Up-to-Date
Real-world applications
Sufficient Quantity
Range of difficulty
Low cost
Easy to read
Highlights important material
Examples illustrate theory
No content omissions
No typographical errors
Step 4 ~ Competitive Evaluation
Selling points
A B
B A
B A
A BA BA B
ImportanceCompetitive evaluation
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
A B
A B
B AA B
B A
*
*
Very strong relationship
Strong relationship
Weak relationship
Res
earc
h lit
erat
ure
cove
rage
Pop
ular
lite
ratu
re c
over
age
Am
oun
t of
mat
hem
atic
s
# of
nu
mer
ical
exe
rcis
es
# of
dis
cuss
ion
exe
rcis
es
Use
of
figu
res
and
tab
les
Col
or
Su
bse
ctio
ns
“Box
ed”
Exa
mp
les
Cor
rect
nes
s of
gra
mm
ar
Siz
e

Quality Function Deployment House of Quality
Mee
ts in
stru
ctio
nal
nee
ds
En
han
ces
Stu
den
t ab
ilit
y to
lear
n
Clear Presentation
Appropriate Level
Good Topical Coverage
Cost
Exercises
Free from Errors
Covers subject matter
Up-to-Date
Real-world applications
Sufficient Quantity
Range of difficulty
Low cost
Easy to read
Highlights important material
Examples illustrate theory
No content omissions
No typographical errors
Res
earc
h li
tera
ture
cov
erag
e
Pop
ula
r li
tera
ture
cov
erag
e
Am
oun
t of
mat
hem
atic
s
# of
nu
mer
ical
exe
rcis
es
# of
dis
cuss
ion
exe
rcis
es
Use
of
figu
res
and
tab
les
Col
or
Su
bse
ctio
ns
“Box
ed”
Exa
mp
les
Cor
rect
nes
s of
gra
mm
ar
Siz
e
importanceCompetitive evaluation
Selling points
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
A B
B A
A B
Competitive evaluation
Targets
Deployment
AB
3 4 3 4 5 3 3 2 4 5 4 5 2 3 3 4 3 4 4 2 5 4 4 5 2 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 3 * * * * * *
B A
A BA BA B
A B
B A
A B
B A
Step 5 ~ Completed House of Quality
*
*
Very strong relationship
Strong relationship
Weak relationship

The Cost of Quality: Sources of Costs
Prevention Preventing Defects from Happening
Appraisal Evaluating Materials and Performance
Internal Failures Defects that are Discovered In-House
External Failures Defects Discovered by the Customer
Liability Customer Complaints Warranty Costs and Field Re-Work Damaged Image
Scrap (waste) Re-work Time spent analyzing failures Tests and re-tests Operations downtime Internal Customer Complaints
Incoming materials Inspection In-process Inspection Final End-item Inspection Maintenance of test Equipment Training Calibration
Quality Planning Training Verification of Design Plant and Equipment
Maintenance Qualifying Suppliers

The Cost of QualityDistribution of the Costs
(25.0%)(65.0%)
(10.0%)
Prevention
Evaluation
failures
Internal and External
Reduce Quality Costs by Increasing Prevention Efforts

“Quality is Free”
For the average company, the cost of quality is about 25% of total sales
The cost of prevention is a fraction of the cost of fixing mistakes after they are made
Investments in prevention can drastically reduce the total cost of quality

20
Benchmarking
1. Identify those processes needing improvement.
2. Identify a firm that is the world leader in performing the process (Library & WWW).
3. Contact the managers of that company and make a personal visit to interview managers and workers.
4. Analyze data

The Process Model

Sources of Problems in a Process
Inadequate Knowledge of How the Process Actually Works
Inadequate Knowledge of How the Process Should Work
Errors in Executing the Process FunctionsExisting Practices that Fail to Take Preventive
MeasuresExistence of Non-value Adding Steps in the ProcessVariation in Inputs and Outputs

The Problem Solving Process
IssueSurfaces
OrganizeTeam
Definethe Problem
TheTools ofQuality
Identify &AnalyzeCauses
IdentifySolutions &
Options
Test Solutions
Track &Evaluate

The Deming Wheel(or P-D-C-A Cycle)
1. PlanIdentify problemDevelop plan for
improvement
2. DoImplement plan
on test basis
3. Study / CheckIs the plan working
4. ActInstitutionalize improvement
Continue cycle

A Process Improvement Model- CA-PDCA
Chance ForCustomer
Satisfaction
Chance ForCustomer
SatisfactionFormTeam
FormTeam
CheckSituation
CheckSituation
ProcessAnalysis
ProcessAnalysis
CreateActionPlans
CreateActionPlans
ImplementPlans
ImplementPlans
VerifyResults
VerifyResults
Make Routine
Make Routine
Continuous Improvement
CHECK ANALYZE PLAN DO
CHECK
ACT

Employees & Quality Improvement
Quality circles Employee suggestions Process improvement teams Self-managed work teams

The Quality Circle Process
Organization 8-10 members
Same area ModeratorPresentation
Implementation Monitoring
Solution Problem results Problem analysis
Cause & effect Data collection &
analysis
Problem ID List alternatives
Consensus Brainstorming
Training Group processes Data collection
Problem analysis

The Quality Tools
Basic Tools:BrainstormingFlowchartingCause and Effect
DiagramsPareto ChartsHistogramsData Checks SheetsProcess Control ChartsScatter Diagrams
The New Tools:Affinity DiagramsInterrelationship DigarphsTree DiagramsPrioritization MatricesMatrix DiagramProcess Decision Program
ChartsActivity Network Diagram

A Flowchart

12
Pareto Analysis
80% of the problems may be attributed to 20% of thecauses.
80% of the problems may be attributed to 20% of thecauses.
Assy.Instruct.
Fre
quen
cy
Design Purch.Training
Other

Cause-and -Effect (Fishbone) Diagram
QualityProblem
MachinesMeasurement Human
ProcessEnvironment Materials
Faulty testing equipment
Incorrect specifications
Improper methods
Poor supervision
Lack of concentration
Inadequate training
Out of adjustment
Tooling problems
Old/worn
Defective from vendor
Not to specifications
Material-handling problems
Deficienciesin product design
Ineffective qualitymanagement
Poor process design
Inaccuratetemperature control
Dust and Dirt

13
Run Chart
0.440.460.48
0.50.520.540.560.58
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Time (Hours)
Dia
met
er

14
Histogram
Fre
quen
cy
Data Ranges

15
Scatter Diagram
02468
1012
0 10 20 30
Hours of Training
Def
ects

16
Checksheet
Billing Errors
Wrong Account
Wrong Amount
A/R Errors
Wrong Account
Wrong Amount
Monday

18
Control Charts
970
980
990
1000
1010
1020
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
LCL
UCL

24
ISO 9000
Series of standards agreed upon by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
Adopted in 1987
More than 100 countries
A prerequisite for global competition?
ISO 9000 directs you to "document what you do and then do as you documented."
Web Site: http://www.iso.ch/welcome.html