quality assurance system policy

72
1

Upload: others

Post on 01-Jan-2022

16 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

1

Page 2: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

2

QUALITY ASSURANCE

SYSTEM POLICY

UNIVERSITAS ISLAM INDONESIA

2016

Page 3: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

3

OFFICIAL REGULATIONS OF WAQF FOUNDATION BOARD OF MANAGEMENT

OF ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA

NUMBER: 04.a YEAR 2011

ON

QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM

ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA

BISMILLAHIRRAHMANIRRAHIM

THE BOARD OF MANAGEMENT OF WAQF FOUNDATION OF ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY

OF INDONESIA

CONSIDERING: a. that in order to bring about the Quality Assurance System Policy

(SMP) in the working environment of Islamic University of Indonesia, it

is deemed necessary to determine the Quality Assurance System Policy

(SPM) of Islamic University of Indonesia in accordance to the Official

Regulations of Waqf Foundation Board of Management UII.

IN VIEW OF: 1. Law Number 16 Year 2001 on the Waqf Foundation as amended by

Law Number 28 Year 2004 on Amendment of Law Number 16 year

2001 on The Foundation.

2. Articles of Association of The Waqf Foundation of Islamic

University of Indonesia as an adjustment with Law Number 16 Year

2001 on The Foundation jo. Law Number 28 Year 2004.

3. Decision of The Supervisory Board of UII Waqf Foundation Number

I/TAP/PBN/2009 on the Long Term Based Strategic Guidelines 2008-

2013 of UII Waqf Foundation.

4.UII Statute Year 2009.

CONSIDERING: 1. Rector’s Directive Number: 892/rek/10/BEH/III/2016 dated on

March 22nd 2016.

2. General Meeting of Board of Management’s Decision of UII Waqf

Foundation dated April 26th 2016.

DECIDING:

Stipulating: OFFICIAL REGULATIONS OF WAQF BOARD OF

MANAGEMENT OF ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA ON

QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY (SPM) OF ISLAMIC

UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA.

Jl. CIK DI TIRO NO. 1 YOGYAKARTA 55223 TELP& FAX (0274) 589604

Page 4: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

4

Paragraph 1

Quality Assurance System Policy (SPM) of Islamic University of Indonesia is a policy to comply

with and to be implemented by each organization unit of the entire activities within the scope of

quality assurance in the environment of Islamic University of Indonesia.

Paragraph 2

The Document of Quality Assurance System Policy (SPM) of Islamic University of Indonesia

as intended in Paragraph 1 is fully attached as an integral part of this Official Regulations.

Paragraph 3

This Official regulation shall come into force on the date of promulgation.

Promulgated in: Yogyakarta

Date of promulgation: May 2nd 2016

________________________________

Board of Management of UII Waqf Foundation

Chairman,

Signed and sealed

Dr. Ir. Luthfi Hasan, MS.

Page 5: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

5

TABLE OF CONTENT

Official Regulation of PYBW Number 04.a Year 2016

The SPM Policy of UII ................................................................................... i

Table of Content .......................................................................................... iii

Attachment .................................................................................................. v

List of Tables ................................................................................................ vii

List of Figures ................................................................................................ ix

List of Acronyms ........................................................................................... xi

CHAPTER I QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY OF UII ............... 1

1.1. Background of SPM ............................................................... 2

1.1.1. Philosophical Background .......................................... 2

1.1.2. Juridical Basis ................................................................ 4

1.1.3 Operational Basis .......................................................... 6

1.2. Scope of SPM……. ................................................................ 7

1.2.1. Scope of SPM Divisions .............................................. 7

1.2.2. Scope of Quality Assurance of UII Business Processes . 7

CHAPTER II QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM OF UII ................................. 13

2.1 Quality Assurance System Model ............................................ 13

2.2. SPM Goals and Objectives ..................................................... 17

2.3. SPM Management and Organization ...................................... 18

2.3.1 BPM Vision, Mission, and Objectives ............................. 19

2.3.2 BPM Role and Function ................................................ 20

Page 6: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

6

CHAPTER III QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM DOCUMENTS ....................... 21

3.1. Hierarchy of SPM Documents ......................................... 21

3.2. SPM Documents .............................................................. 23

3.2.1. Quality Statement ............................................ 24

3.2.2. Quality Policy ................................................... 24

3.2.3. SPM Policy ....................................................... 23

3.2.4. SPM Manuals .................................................... 24

3.2.5. SPM Standards ............................................... 26

3.2.5.1. Quality Objectives ............................ 35

3.2.5.2.3 Quality Plan .................................... 36

3.2.6. Roles and Authorities ................................................... 37

3.2.7 Key Performance Indicator ........................................... 38

3.2.8. Quality Objective of the Unit ....................................... 30

3.2.9. Strategic Plan ............................................................... 36

3.2.10. Annual Planning and Budgeting ........................ 40

3.2.11. Working Procedures .................................................... 41

3.2.12. Working Instructions .................................................. 41

3.2.13. List of Documented Information ............................... 41

CHAPTER IV SPM IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY ...................................... 43

4.1. Commitment of UII Board of Management in SPM

Implementation ………………………………………………….. 43

4.2. Strategy of SPM Implementation ............................................. 44

4.2.1. SPM Planning ................................................................ 45

4.2.2 Operational Supports ................................................... 46

Page 7: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

7

CHAPTER V SPM MONITORING AND DEVELOPMENT ........................... 49

5.1 SPM Monitoring, Evaluation, and Measurement ..................... 49

5.2 AMI, RTM, and SPM Development ........................................ 51

Page 8: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

8

LIST OF ATTACHMENT

Attachment 1 BPM Position in UII Organization Structure ............................ 59

Attachment 2 Summary of The Drafting Mechanism of SPM UII… ............... 61

Attachment 3a Coherence between Vision, Mission, Academic Quality Policy,

and SPMI Standard ............................................................... 64

Attachment 3b Coherence between Vision, Mission, Non Academic Quality

Policy, and SPMI Standard .................................................. 66

Attachment 4 Coherence between Business Processes and Organization

Standard and Unit .............................................................. 68

Attachment 5 RKAT Table Format ............................................................. 70

Page 9: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

9

LIST OF TABLES

Number Title Page

1. UII Standard Codes ..................................................................... 27

2. Minimum Scope of Management and Organization Standard… ......... 28

3. Minimum Scope of Academic Standard ............................................. .. 28

4. Minimum Scope of Research Standard .............................................. 29

5. Minimum Scope of Community Service Standard ........................... .. 29

6. Minimum Scope of Yield of Service Standard................................... .. 30

7. Minimum Scope of Output Standard ................................................. 30

8. Minimum Scope of Facility Standard… ............................................... 31

9. Minimum Scope of Governance Standard ......................................... .. 32

10. Minimum Scope of Outcome and Cooperation Standard ................. 33

11. Minimum Scope of Dakwah Islamiyah Standard ............................. .. 33

12. The Main Divisions Responsible for Content Standard of UII ........... .. 34

13. University Quality Objectives ............................................................ 35

14. Quality Standard Document Format .................................................. .. 37

15. Strategic Plan of UII Table Format .................................................... 39

16. List of Documented Information Table Format ............................... .. 42

Page 10: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

10

LIST OF FIGURES

Number Title Page

1. Model of Quality Assurance System of UII ......................................... 16

2. PDCA SPM Cycle of UII … ................................................................. 17

3. Organization Structure of Quality Assurance Agency ........................ 18

4. Document Hierarchy of Quality Assurance System ........................... .. 22

5. SPM Implementation Strategy ......................................................... .. 45

Page 11: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

11

ACRONYMS

AME External Quality Audit

AMI Internal Quality Audit

AQAIWW Association of Quality Assurance Agencies of the Islamic World

AUN Asian University Network

BEH Ethical and Legal Body

BP Planning Agency

BPA Academic Development Agency

BPM Quality Assurance Agency

BSI Information System Agency

DA Directorate of Academic Affairs

DH Directorate of Social Relations

DKA Directorate of Finance & Budgeting

DOSDM Directorate of Organization & Human Resources

DP Directorate of Library

DPBMKM Directorate of Student Talent and Interest Development & Student

Welfare

DPKA Directorate of Marketing, Cooperation, & Outcome

DPPAI Directorate of Training & Development of Islamic Religion

DPPM Directorate of Research & Community Service

DSP Directorate of Facilities & Infrastructure

DIT List of Documented Information

IK Working Instructions

IKK Key Performance Index

ISESCO Islamic Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization

ISO International Standardization Organization

IWA International Workshop Agreement

KPI Key Performance Indicator

PK Working Procedure

PM Quality Procedure

PP Regulations

Page 12: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

12

PPEP Planning, Implementation, Evaluation, Controlling, and

Development

Prodi Study Program

PR Regulation of Rector

PSM Quality Controller System

PT Higher Educations

PU University Regulations

QA Quality Assurance

Renstra Strategic Plan

RIP Development Master Plan

RKAT Annual Planning & Budgeting

RTM Management Review

RTM-SF Management Review of Faculty Senate

RTM-SPMF Management Review of Faculty Quality Assurance System

RTM-SPMU Management Review of University Quality Assurance System

RTM-SU Management Review of University Senate

RTM-UF Management Review of Faculty Unit

RTM-UU Management Review of University Unit

SMU Quality Objective of Units

SN National Standard

SPM Quality Assurance System

STPMP Task Force of Quality Control Study Program

TW Roles & Authorities

UII Islamic University of Indonesia

WCU World Class University

Page 13: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

13

CHAPTER I

QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY OF UII

Islamic University of Indonesia (UII) is an Islamic based higher education

institution which holds high the Islamic principles of Al Qur’an, Assunnah, and the

prevailing Indonesian Law. Its main duties are well described in the Catur Dharma

(The Four Main Duties) of higher education institution constituted of education

and teaching, research, community service, and Dakwah Islamiyah (Islamic

proselytizing).

To successfully bring about those four main duties, UII is entitled with the

following functions.

a. Organize, foster, and develop higher education

b. Organize, foster, and develop research in order to maintain, preserve, and

develop science, technology, culture, literature, and art

c. Organize, foster, and develop community service in order to improve the

human life at large and Indonesian social welfare in particular

d. Organize, foster, and develop Islamic proselytizing

e. Organize leadership training and coaching for lecturers and academic staffs

f. Organize both academic and administrative services

Those four Main Tasks known as Catur Dharma are directed towards the

quality of World Class University (WCU) by way of publishing its implementation

to notify both the internal and external relevant parties of UII. To assure the

quality of Catur Dharma implementation, as well as making it comply with the

principles of accountability, transparency, non-profit taking, quality, effectiveness,

efficiency, autonomy, fairness, and utility, it is necessary that UII apply quality

based organization management system.

Successful management and organization of UII main tasks lies on collective

works. In other words, successful management of Catur Dharma will only be

achieved through important role of each personnel, namely management,

lecturers, and academic staffs.

The involvement of all members of UII organizations in giving innovative

suggestions, being consistent with the process, being trustful in carrying out the

tasks, and being committed to performing at their best are key factors to satisfy all

the requirements and expectations of UII stakeholders. The internal stakeholders

of UII constitute of the students, lecturers, academic staffs, and The Waqf

Foundation, whilst the external stakeholders of UII constitute of students’ parents,

Outcome, Outcome endorsers, the government, and general public.

Being oriented towards the WCU and by considering the requirements,

demand, and expectation of every stakeholder, as well as the legislative regulations

as stipulated by the Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education of

the Republic of Indonesia, it is deemed necessary that UII determine its Internal

Quality Assurance System Policy.

Page 14: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

14

This SPM policy is aimed at establishing, implementing, and developing SPM

sustainably, consistently, effectively, efficiently as an integrated activity inside the

working environment of UII.

1.1. SPM Basis

SPM UII is conducted based on philosophical, juridical, and operational

bases.

1.1.1. Philosophical Basis

Quality Assurance System of Higher Education (SPM PT) is an integral part

of higher education system of a higher education institution. Therefore, its

philosophical basis underpinning the arrangement, implementation, and

development of SPM UII must ideally be based on the Moral philosophy of UII.

The philosophical basis of SPM UII is comprised of vision, mission, values,

and meaning. Vision is best defined as one foresight on the organization, or to be

precise it is the dream to realize within certain range of time. Meanwhile, mission

is referred to as the objective and reason for the existence of UII as an organization.

The values that UII must hold high must represent what should and should not be

done by the member of UII organization in implementing its mission in order to

reach its vision. Lastly, meaning refers to the benefit and core meaning of UII for

all university members.

The vision, mission, values, and meaning as the philosophical basis of SPM

UII is illustrated as follows.

a. Vision

The university envisions a dream of “realizing Islamic University of

Indonesia as a blessing for the whole universe with a commitment towards

perfection (innovation), risalah Islamiyah (Islamic principles) in education,

research, community service, and proselytizing, at the level of qualified

universities in some advanced countries”.

b. Mission

The university bears a mission of “Enforcing the divine revelation and

sunnah of the prophet as the source of the eternal truth that showers the

whole universe with mercy through the development and dissemination of

Islamic based science, technology, culture, literature and art, in order to

form Muslim scholars and management of piety, noble, knowledgeable and

charitable who have excellence in Islam, science, leadership, expertise,

independence, and professionalism.

Page 15: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

15

c. Values

The Document of Behavior Manuals contains what should and should not

be done by the members of UII. These Values are abbreviated as V-I-P which

may be explained as follows.

(1) Value (rahmatan lil’alamin/the blessing for the whole universe)

It should bring goodness for the whole universe, human, all

creatures, and natural balance and environmental harmony. The

values may be incorporated as follows.

(i) Islamic Integrity (taqwa): Islam, Ihsan, Iman, Amal Shaleh

(good deed), genuineness and responsibility

(ii) Moral behavior: democratic thinking, being consistent, being

thankful, being humble, being simple, and accepting for what

it comes

(iii) Kindness: cooperation, kind heartedness, generosity,

tolerance, and integration

(iv) Professionalism: honesty, fairness, and commitment

(v) Loyalty: obedience, compliance, and the feeling to belong

(2) Innovation

Being innovative is attributed to the ability to envision the future

through a never ending endeavor to learn, implement, and

disseminate the values as well as a continual correction on self

betterment. Innovation may embrace the followings.

(i) Intellectual: being knowledgeable and charitable based on

Islamic principles

(ii) Excellence: Quality, high standard, and orientation towards

achievement

(iii) Visionary: creative, open minded, progressive, futuristic, and

problem solving

(iv) Continuous Correction: sustainable, proactive, and continuous

correction

(3.) Perfection (Risalah Islamiyah)

Perfection refers to the ability to be totally devoted in thinking,

behaving, and taking measurement completely based on Islamic

Principles. The value of perfection may embrace the following.

(i) Leadership: exemplary, mercy, accommodative, firmness, and

responsibility

(ii) Responsibility: being responsive with an orientation towards

perfection, punctuality, and being on target

(iii) Independence: being independent and determined

(iv) Teamwork: team solidarity

(v) Discipline: appreciating time and being committed to

agreement

(vi) Intellectual struggle

Page 16: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

16

d. Meaning

The essential meaning for UII citizens lies on the struggle to build Islamic

civilization for the happiness of the world and hereafter.

1.1.2. Juridical Framework

The juridical framework of legal basis of SPM UII is underpinned by the

applicable legislatives and regulations as stipulated by the government and official

regulations of UII as follows.

i. Law of Indonesian Republic Number 20 Year 2003 on National

Education System

ii. Law of Indonesian Republic Number 12 Year 2012 on Higher

Education

iii. Government Regulation (PP) of The Republic of Indonesia (RI)

Number 19 Year 92005 on National Education Standard

iv. PP RI Number 04 year 2014 on Higher Education Administration

and University Management

v. Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture (Permendikbud)

of the Republic of Indonesia Number 50 Year 2014 on Quality

Assurance System of Higher Education

vi. Permendikbud RI Number 87 Year 2014 on Accreditation of Study

Program and Higher Education

vii. Regulation of The Minister of Research, Technology, and Higher

Education (Permenristekdikti) RI Number 44 Year 2015 on The

National Standard of Higher Education

viii. Decision of the Supervisory Board of The Waqf Foundation of

Islamic University of Indonesia No. VI/TAP/PBN/VII/2009 on the

Legalization of the Statute of Islamic University of Indonesia year

2009.

ix. Regulation of The Executive Management of The Waqf Foundation

of Islamic University of Indonesia, No. 04 Year 2006 on Roles and

Responsibilities and Rights and Duties of UII Rector and Vice of

Rector

x. Regulation of The Board of Management of The Waqf Foundation

UII No. 02 Year 2008 on the Code of Conduct of Lecturers of Islamic

University of Indonesia

xi. Regulation of The Board of Management of The Waqf Foundation

No. 03 year 2013 on Drafting Guidelines of Annual Planning and

Budgeting (RKAT) within the scope of Islamic University of

Indonesia

xii. Decision of Executive Management of The Waqf Foundation of UII

No. 02/KPTSP/PH/2006 on Roles and Responsibilities and Rights

and Duties of the Dean and Vice Dean within the working

environment of UII

Page 17: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

17

xiii. University Regulation No. 13/PU/Rek/VI/2006 on Roles and

Responsibility of and Rights and Duties of Head and Secretary of

Department/Study Program in the working environment of UII

xiv. University Regulation No 04/PU/Rek/IX/2012 on The Code of

Conduct of Academic staffs of Islamic University of Indonesia

xv. University Regulation No. 460/SK/-REK/REK/X/2001 on Student

Discipline of Islamic University of Indonesia

xvi. Regulation of Rector No. 12/PR/Rek/V/2010 on the Status,

Requirements, Tenure, Roles and Responsibilities, and Rights and

Duties of the Directors and Heads in the working environment of

Islamic University of Indonesia

1.1.3. Operational Basis

The Operational Basis of SPM UII underpins its implementation. It is a set

of university objectives with some underlying basis which is sourced from both

internal and external parties of UII.

As is stipulated in the statute of UII, the university SPM has some objectives

as operational bases as elucidated below.

a. Training Muslim Scholars and management of the nation which are

highly qualified, socially beneficial, acknowledging Islamic teachings and

being able to put them into force, and highly competitive.

b. Developing and disseminating Islamic based science, technology,

culture, literature and art.

c. Taking part in social and national development of The Republic of

Indonesia for justice and prosperity with a blessing from Allah swt.

d. Learning, developing, and disseminating Islamic teachings to make

University citizens and the society at large understand, fully

comprehend, and apply them in daily life.

Some other fundamental bases of the operational basis of SPM UII embrace

the followings.

i. The National Policy of Internal Quality Assurance System based on

Law No. 12 Year 2012 on Higher Education and Permendikbud No

50 Year 2014 on SPM Dikti

ii. Islamic Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (ISESCO).

Guide for Assessment & Quality Enhancement for Universities in the

Islamic World

iii. AUN-QA, 2015, Guide to AUN Actual Quality Assessment at

Programme Level

iv. IWA 2, Quality Management System-Guidelines for the application

of ISO 9001:2000 in education

v. ISO 9001:2015, Quality Management System-Requirements

Page 18: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

18

1.2. Scope of SPM

The scope of SPM UII is sustainably decided, applied, and improved for all

business processes held in the working environment of UII.

1.2.1. Scope of SPM Divisions

The scope of SPM UII divisions covers the academic and non academic. The

academic divisions of SPM UII constitutes of education and teachings including

Output, researches, community service, and Islamic proselytizing. Meanwhile, the

non academic divisions or the academic supporting divisions of SPM UII is

comprised of organization management and human resources, services, facilities,

governance, and Outcome based on Islamic principles and is oriented to satisfy

the whole stakeholders of UII.

The scope of the unit organizing the academic divisions of SPM UII

embraces the diploma program, undergraduate program, profession program,

post graduate program, and doctoral program. On the other hand, the scope of

units organizing non academic divisions of SPM constitutes of Office of University

Rector, bodies, directorates, faculties, laboratories, center for studies, and

divisions.

The scope of SPM UII activities constitutes of Standard Determination,

Standard Implementation, Evaluation of Standard Implementation, Control on

Standard Implementation, and Standard Development. Substantially, both

academic and non academic divisions of SPM management are directed to fulfill

or even exceed the standard requirements of a higher education institution

administration, and to fulfill the requirements, needs and expectation of all

stakeholders of UII.

1.2.2. The Scope of Quality Assurance of UII Business Processes

In principal, it is expected that SPM UII cover the business processes which

consist of activities and well structured and integrated units of works to achieve

the university objectives. The management process as the controller of operational

system, academic operational processes as the core business process, and

supportive academic processes are within the control of SPM UII.

The overall guideline of the activities in the business process of UII as the

scope of SPM is as illustrated as follows.

(1) Organization Management Process

The management process of UII is to assure the quality of the university in

administering the four main tasks of Catur Dharma. The development

processes and activities, establishment, merging, and dismissal of an

organization are determined based on the roles and functions of each

organization as complemented with benchmarking of performance

Page 19: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

19

successes of each unit of organization in the working environment of UII.

All activities including that of competence requirement and qualifications

of the trustee in each organization is an integral part of quality assurance of

organization management processes.

(2) Strategic Planning of Management Processes

All sets of activities and interactions of business processes in each unit of

organization in the working environment of UII is to be planned carefully

and to be oriented with WCU objective. The quality assurance of strategic

management is implemented through drafting The Development Master

Plan, drafting the Strategic Plan, drafting The Annual Planning and

Budgeting, and the development plan and university reputation both in the

nationwide and worldwide.

(3) Input Management Processes

The main input of higher education service administration of UII is the

students. Some processes and activities of input management to control are

the standard qualification of students’ qualification (prospective students),

the standard method of admission test, admission test question standard for

prospective students, Output standard of admission, registration processes,

and standard of rights and duties of the new students. In addition, input

management also covers promotion, both in terms of promotion materials,

promotion media, promotion executor, promotion method, and

promotion targets.

(4) Academic Design Processes

The academic quality assurance is the core part of higher education

administration; therefore UII always assures the quality of the academic

design processes. The quality of academic design processes such as

preparation of graduate competency standards, content development and

curriculum structure, strategy development, and learning methods,

competency development of lecturers, development of teaching materials,

development of quality standards and academic reputation, as well as

development of assessment methods of learning are all assured to ensure

the best result. Such activities such as the study on the establishment of

prospective study program, the merging and its dismissal, the determination

of competitive standard of excellence of a study program, study program

specification, and study program reputation development are all parts

academic design to control.

(5) College Preparation Processes

The quality assurance of college preparation processes is to be held

comprehensively by covering the promotion of active student registration

requirement, promoting the drafting of Semester Academic Planning (RAS),

the process of Key-In RAS implementation, lab work preparation, Working

practice preparation (internship), Community Service Preparation (KKN),

Page 20: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

20

and Final Assignment (TA) preparation. All activities ranging from

deactivating the learning process after college leave and the process for

college leave itself are all standardized parts.

(6) Learning Implementation Processes

The comprehensive quality assurance of all processes of learning is targeted

towards all activities of learning activities management at class, monitoring

lecturer’s and students’ attendance in the lecture, monitoring the

implementation of lab work and working Practice, monitoring all activities

of student’s counseling and monitoring the processes of student’s final

assignments.

(7) Learning Evaluation Processes

The Quality Assurance of all learning evaluation processes ranges from test

management processes, question validation activities, grade management,

standardization of assessment method, Seminar activities and Working

Practice Assessment, responses on Lab works, Community Service

Assessment, and the management of student’s final assignment assessment.

All requirements for resignation activities, student sanction standards in the

form of passing out, and drop out become part of control over the result

of learning evaluation.

(8) Students’ Coaching Processes

In order to produce highly qualified outputs there should be a synergy

between the academic process and non academic processes of improving

student soft skills through talent development and interests, personality,

and student skills. In addition, there should also be some preparations of

student scientific work competition, sports, arts and cultural development,

and mentoring student organization activities.

(9) Dakwah Islamiyah (Islamic Proselytizing) Processes

Founded on Islamic principles, UII is to assure the implementation quality

of Islamic values in all academic and non academic processes including

service process. Such activities to control ranges from quality correction and

religious guidance of lecturers and education personnel, students' religious

coaching program, Basic Value Orientation program (ONDI), Basic Islamic

Leadership Training (LKID) program, Advanced Islamic Leadership Training

(LKIl) program, religious mentoring program and Islamic Boarding Schools

for students so as to ensure the implementation process. The quality

assurance on the management of Islamic proselytizing activities is carried

out through the determination of material standards, media, targets,

implementation, methods, and funding sources of Islamic proselytizing.

(10) Research Processes

The quality assurance of research processes covers all Sectors such as

reputation standard determination, processes, content, result, media,

Page 21: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

21

facilities, and research management, qualification of research

implementation, and funding transparency and research funding. In

addition, research on the development of learning method and

development of the quality of learning materials are also well covered here.

(11) Community Service Processes

The quality assurance on the processes of community service covers

quality assurance of the whole processes, content, result, media, facilities,

implementer, management, funding transparency and community service

funding, and the assessment on the reputation of the community service.

(12) Human Resources Management

The quality assurance of Human Resource management and the

development of organizational culture range from the process of human

resources recruitment including its classification, training on prospective

lecturers and academic staffs, and development and strengthening of

Human Resources Competence. In addition, it also covers promotion,

mutation, demotion, and dismissal. Some activities such as the Planning and

Implementation of Study, compensation system, human resources’ welfare

and sanctions are also controlled.

(13) Governance Processes of Work Ethics

Islamic work ethics underpinned by the principle of considering works as

part of religious service characterizes the working environment of UII.

Therefore, all parts of UII working environments are required to pray

before work, at work, and after work. They are also required to keep the

office clean and well organized, be smiley and friendly, greet everyone, and

uphold Islamic fraternity. The UII citizens are also required to be responsible

in their duties, discipline, obedient, and to perform their best. Doing these

will assure blessings from Allah for all citizens of UII in particular and for

the society at large.

(14) Governance Processes of Source of Fund and Financing

To assure the accountability and transparency, it is necessary that UII

determine good financing standards related to education financing, research

financing, community service financing, financing for lecturers and

education personnel, and all financing to support academic and non-

academic implementation. It is necessary that the university disseminate the

transparency of funding and funding sources to each of UII stakeholders.

(15) Management Process of Facilities and Infrastructure

The quality of facilities and infrastructure for both academic and non

academic facilities is to assure them based on the standard need and

requirement of each stakeholder. The quality assurance also covers

procurement system, inventory, utilization, circulation, mutation,

maintenance, and elimination of the infrastructure. Such infrastructures may

Page 22: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

22

cover consumables, moving goods, library materials, and laboratory

equipment.

(16) Yield of Service Processes

All higher education institution must be fully equipped with highly qualified

processes and yield of service. To assure the service processes in the

university, both in terms of academic services, general services, facility

utilization, financing transparency, and management information system

are all directed to satisfy the whole stakeholders of UII. Some Sectors such

as superiority, assured result, physical appearance, attention and empathy,

and responses towards complaints are to be controlled well to assure the

quality of services.

(17) The Process of Assuring Outcome's Satisfaction

The Outcome management ranges from debriefing Outcome candidates,

Outcome distribution services, work information services, Outcome

tracking, data control of Outcome, and Outcome empowerment.

(18) Cooperation Processes

The process of developing, establishing, implementing and terminating

Cooperation should also be planned, monitored, evaluated and controlled

with an orientation to stakeholder satisfaction. Therefore, feed backs from

external stakeholders are essential to determine what should be changed

and improved to meet stakeholder’s requirements.

(19) The Process of Assuring Ethical and Law Enforcement

Quality assurance of legal guidance ranges from planning, creating,

promoting, monitoring, reviewing ethical and law enforcement activities to

all regulations and policies and risk control over legal disputes processes.

(20) Service Process and Information Technology Governance

Information technology support is absolutely necessary in the course of a

series of processes and activities at UII. Thus, it is pivotal that the university

assures the quality of the provision of information technology services as

the elaboration of university policy, management of development and

maintenance of information technology, as well as cost-benefit analysis to

the implementation activities of information technology program, and

effectiveness in improving university performance.

Page 23: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

23

CHAPTER II

QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM

ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA

2.1. Quality Assurance System Model of UII

Within the scope of quality assurance of UII, quality is best defined as the

best standard, as this complies well with the objectives of UII as having additional

values, being efficient, and satisfying customers. The higher education quality of

UII is based on the level of compliance between Quality Assurance Standard

determined by UII and that determined nationally by the government, as well as

that determined at the international level.

Therefore, in principal, SPM UII is systemic activities to improve the quality

of education on a planned and sustainable basis. The quality of higher education

is a multidimensional concept that must accommodate all business processes and

activities in UII, whether related to input, process, or output. UII is committed to

making quality as a culture, which is demonstrated by attitudes, habits,

organizational behavior, work ethics, yield of service, interaction with colleagues,

management, and communities with a commitment to the best outcomes.

Therefore, the ranges of SPM UII activities consisting of determining,

implementing, evaluating, controlling, and upgrading, is essentially one

continuous cycle of Plan, Do, Check, and Act (PDCA) cycles. These activities are

to ensure that the resulting education services meet the established quality

standards and satisfy the expectations of all stakeholders.

The Quality Assurance System of UII is basically a combination between

Quality Assurance and Quality Management. Its development is underpinned by

the basic principle of The National Higher Education Quality Assurance System

and the International Higher Education Quality Assurance System. It is also

synergized with the Quality Management System issued by the International

Organization for Standardization (ISO). The development of SPM UII is to

generate competent students to satisfy every stakeholder.

The Quality Assurance System principles in the working environment of UII

are as described below.

a. Leadership

The management and board of management of UII is entitled to

determine the strategic objectives to achieve, both in terms of academic

and non academic Sectors. UII management must be able to translate,

communicate, and ensure that all members of the organization unit in

UII working environment, including those from bodies, directorates,

faculties, study programs, laboratories, and study center understand

well the university objectives. UII Management should be committed to

make the quality as a culture so as to create and maintain conducive

internal environment for all citizens of UII. They are also entitled to

Page 24: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

24

totally devote themselves and set themselves as an example in achieving

the university objectives. Being committed not only means providing

support, but also trying to understand, giving the best, doing the best,

and producing the best in every activity.

b. Stakeholder Focus

Every thought and measurement taken by UII management must be

oriented towards the fulfillment of academic quality standard and non

academic quality standard as decided and required by the stakeholders

and as part of university strategic objectives. UII management are to

take heed on the fulfillment and provision of the need of every

stakeholder, be it the students, the lecturers, academic staffs, Outcome,

Outcome endorser, government, or the society at large. Therefore, UII

management should always be ahead of time in deciding both the

current need and the prospective need of the stakeholder in the

upcoming future.

c. Contribution and Synergy of UII Citizens

The wide array of the scope of business process quality assurance and

UII activities requires UII citizens to highly synergize and work hand in

hand. Regardless their main duties, functions, and position, each citizen

of UII is entitled to realize about such responsibility to contribute and

take part in achieving the university objectives and satisfy the need of

the stakeholders. According to his/her competence, a lecturer is

demanded to be a social mover of Islamic proselytizing. Meanwhile, as

the operational executor, each academic staff should be reliable,

friendly, polite, end emphatic in service provision, as well assuring the

quality of the service. A good synergy and solidity between each

member of organization unit in UII will ease the attempts towards the

fulfillment of university objectives.

d. Processes and System Approach

Qualified process will lead to the development of quality management

system. Thus, it is expected that the process of every single of activity in

UII be clear from the beginning to its ending. Each of organization unit

in UII should realize that they are part of an integrated process which

requires their understanding of all duties born by each unit and the

working objective of each unit. The business processes and activities of

each organization unit in UII will only reach the best outcome if they

are oriented towards optimum result by making the best use of the

resources efficiently and effectively. Each organization unit in UII is to

be apt at managing the processes and activities through good planning,

implementation assurance, and control of quality management system

to achieve the Unite Quality Objectives and the university objectives at

large.

Page 25: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

25

e. Sustainable Development

The quality assurance in UII is taken through PDCA approach, so that

each activity, quality objective, and quality standard of the university is

to be oriented towards the sustainable development. Each organization

unit must actively respond both the internal and external changes which

may affect the outcome of service and unit performance.

f. Fact-Based Decision Making

Every decision or policy to inform to the relevant party of UII

organization unit should be based on fact, data analysis, and

information. Thus, data and information management within SPM UII

should be supported by reliable information technology.

g. Partnership Management

Partnership management and Cooperation in the implementation of

SPM UII is to be based on Islamic principles by putting forth the mutual

synergy to perform their best and mutual benefit to work hand in hand

with both the internal and external stakeholders of the university.

The Model of Quality Assurance System to implement in UII is as

illustrated in Figure 1 below. Meanwhile, the PDCA cycle of SPM is as

what depicted by Figure 2.

Figure 1. UII Quality Assurance System Model

As is observable from Figure 1 and Figure 2, the system is held in accordance

to the vision, mission, statute, customer’s demand, and some necessities and

expectations of the stakeholder. Thus, UII management is entitled to determine

the SPM and provide the resources to ensure the smooth activity flow. To measure

Page 26: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

26

the compliance between the SPM and effective implementation of activities, the

university carries out monitoring, measurement, evaluation, and analysis as

audited by the Internal Quality Audit (AMI). The result of which is to be discussed

to the Management Review (RTM) and to be improved and developed further.

Such requirement, demand and expectation of the stakeholder cover the National

Standard (SN) Dikti, National Accreditation Body (BAN), Independent

Accreditation Institution (LAM), several guidelines, and international quality

assurance (International QA). On the other hand, the related documents of SPM

includes quality statement, SPM policy, SPM standard, SPM manuals, Strategic

Plan, RKAT, Roles and Authorities (TW), Working Procedures, Working

Instruction, and List of Documented Information (DIT).

Figure 2. The Cycle of PDCA SPM UII

2.2. SPM Goals and Objectives

The primary objective of quality assurance for all processes and activities in

UII is to ensure that the Quality Objectives and Quality Standard of UII as blessing

for the whole universe with quality of perfection, excellence, and risalah Islamiyah

in the Sector of education, research, community service, and Islamic proselytizing

to be at the level of qualified university of the advanced countries as stated

by the university vision and mission be met. SPM UII is also directed towards the

fulfillment of requirements, demand, and expectation of all stakeholder of UII.

The implementation of SPM UII is directed towards the following

objectives.

a. To fulfill and or exceed the National Standard of Higher Education

b. To sustainably develop academic quality

c. To support the academic and non academic activities effectively and

efficiently

Page 27: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

27

d. To ensure the smooth flow of all processes and activities of each

organization unit in the working environment of UII in accordance to

the standard and the principle of sustainable development

e. To provide evidence that UII is responsible on the fulfillment of

expectation to satisfy the stakeholders

2.3. Management and Organization of SPM

The Quality Assurance Agency (BPM) is an organization unit of quality

assurance to be responsible with SPM UII. The position of BPM UII in the university

is directly below the coordination of the Rector, as is stipulated in the Official

Regulation of Board of Management of The Waqf Foundation (PYBW) Number

13 Year 2013 on the Amendment of Official Regulation of UII Waqf Foundation

Number 01 Year 2011 on the UII Organizations.

The internal organization structure of BPM is as can be seen in Figure 3

below, whilst the position of BPM within the Organization Structure of UII overall

is as depicted by attachment 1.

Figure 3. Organization Structure of Quality Assurance Agency

BPM consists of four divisions to perform its function namely Quality System

Controller PSM), Internal Quality Audit (AMI), Statistics and Information System

Page 28: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

28

(SSI), and Training and Cooperation (PKS). BPM has some representatives in the

faculty level to assist the duties in faculty level through Faculty Quality System

Controller (PSMF) and at the level of study program through Study Program

Quality System Task Force (STPMP).

The management of SPM UII is conducted based on the following two

approaches.

(i) Management trough special unit at the university level (BPM), faculty

level (PSMF), and study program level (STPMP).

(ii) Management attached to the management function of the diploma

program, undergraduate program, profession program, post graduate

program, and doctoral program.

2.3.1 Vision, Mission, and Objectives of BPM

The core vision of BPM is to “Become a reliable quality assurance

organization in implementing the quality management system to ensure and assure

the fulfillment of quality standard and satisfaction of all service users to realize the

university objective as the blessing for the whole universe of excellence and

international quality”.

BPM also comes up with the following missions.

a. To establish and develop quality assurance system model which meets

both the national and international standard

b. To establish and develop and quality standard (quality objective and

quality plan), academic and non academic procedures of quality

assurance system in UII

c. To ensure the implementation of quality assurance system throughout

the working environment of UII

d. To assure the customers’ and stakeholders’ satisfaction

e. To provide services and trainings of quality assurance system for both

internal and external parties

f. To build a quality culture for human resources and organization in the

working environment of UII

g. To consistently improve the implementation and development of

quality assurance system of UII

h. To positively contribute to the additional value of the university

2.3.2. BPM Function and Role

BPM is entitled with the following functions and roles to assure the

implementation of SPM in the working environment of UII.

a. To plan the SPM model to implement

b. To prepare and draft the equipment of quality assurance system

document

c. To guide and assure the implementation of SPM in every unit of UII

Page 29: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

29

d. To monitor each unit for the implementation of SPM

e. To hold trainings, workshops, consultation, tutorials, and assistance, of

SPM within the internal and external scope

f. To measure the level of stakeholder’s satisfaction

g. To conduct Internal Quality Audit

h. To held Management Review

i. To periodically report the activities related to SPM implementation to

the Rector

j. To cooperate with other institutions within the Sector of SPM

Page 30: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

30

CHAPTER III

QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM DOCUMENT

Quality Assurance System Document is a set of documents to manage the

Quality Assurance System of UII. These SPM documents are drafted to take into

account the content clarity, objectives, responsibility, period, drafting mechanism,

and document distribution. The references to be used to determine the document

components shall be standardized from the guidelines, regulations, applicable

legislative laws both from the internal and external parties of UII.

The SPM document of UII shall cover Development Master Plan (RIP),

Quality Statement, SPM Policy, SPM Manuals, SPM Standard, Quality Objectives,

Quality Plan, SPM Form, Strategic Plan (Renstra), Annual Planning and Budgeting,

Roles and Authorities (TW), Key Performance Indicator, Quality Objectives of Unit

(SMU), Working Procedure, Working Instruction, and List of Documented

Information (DIT). The SPM document is drafted based on hierarchy requirement

and document draft references.

3.1 Document Hierarchy of SPM

The document hierarchy of SPM UII is a documentation structure to

implement in the working environment of UII. It consists of six levels as depicted

by Figure 4 with the following order of level.

Level 1 Basic Philosophical Document

Level 2 Basic Quality System Document

Level 3 System Operational Document

Level 4 Unit Operational Document

Level 5 Implementation Document

Level 6 Supporting Document

Page 31: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

31

Figure 4. Document Hierarchy of Quality Assurance System

Level 1 : Basic Philosophical Document

The basic philosophical document is the basis for drafting, implementation, and

SPM development in UII. The basic philosophical document consists of vision,

mission, and statute of UII.

Level 2 : Basic Quality System Document

This is the document to be the basis and policy guideline in the implementation of

quality assurance system in UII. This document is sourced from UII internal

references, that are Quality Statement, RIP, SPM Policy, SPM Standard, University

Regulations, and Regulation of Rector. Meanwhile, the bases of external references

are Government Regulations, and Regulation of The Waqf Foundation.

Level 3 : System Operational Document

This document is to be the basis of technical operation in the implementation,

controlling, and development of quality assurance system at UII. It consists of

Renstra, RKAT, SPM Manuals, Quality Plan, TW, IKK, and SMU.

Level 4 : Unit Operational Document

Unit operational document is the basis of technical operation in the

implementation, controlling, and development of quality assurance system at the

level of organization unit of UII. Such document is constituted of Working

Procedure and Working Instruction.

Vision-Mission

Statute

Quality Statement, SPM Policy,

SPM Standard, RIP, PU,& PR

----------------------------------

Government Regulations, The

Foundation Regulations

Renstra, RKAT,

SPM Manuals, Quality Plan,

TW, IKK, SMU

PK and IK

Form, Label, Coding Recording of SPM Implementation

Internal and external reference of document, Ad Hoc, Temporary Document

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

LEVEL 5

LEVEL 6

Page 32: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

32

Level 5 : Implementation Document

This document consists of 2 types namely practical document of system controller

which is constituted of form, label, coding, and empirical document of the

implementation of quality assurance system in the form of records. In principal,

other implementation forms or documents may be attached to each document of

SPM.

Level 6 : Supporting Document

The supporting document is the references from internal and external parties to

support the implementation of quality assurance system. Such document may

cover Ad Hoc or Temporary Document (a document with a time limit).

3.2 SPM Document

The summary of document’s name, the person in charge, drafting time, drafting

mechanism, and document distribution is as exemplified in attachment 2.

3.2.1 Quality Statement

One of the primary principles of Islamic values to uphold by UII citizen is

that mankind is in loss if they do not do righteous deeds. The livelihood that we

may never receive today we may receive tomorrow, but the time passing today

may never return tomorrow. This value is in line with the content of Al Ashr sura

verse 1-3 which is the basis of the quality statement of UII. The surah is as written

below.

Meaning:

By time, Indeed, mankind is in loss. Except for those who

have believed and done righteous deeds and advised each

other to truth and advised each other to patience.

On the basis of the foregoing description, UII decided the following quality

statement.

“Today is better than yesterday, and the next day is better than today.”

Page 33: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

33

3.2.2 Quality Policy

This document consists of a statement on the basic policy of UII

management which is comprised of some academic Sector such as education

and teaching, research, community service, and Islamic Proselytizing (Catur

Darma), and the competence to achieve by the graduates. It also covers non

academic Sectors such as organization management of UII, services, facilities,

human resources, financing, and Cooperation.

The Academic Quality Policy of UII is as determined below.

“Islamic University of Indonesia is a university which possesses education

excellence, research, community service, and Islamic proselytizing to

generate the graduates which are highly competitive and well acquiring

their knowledge and Islamic principles at the level of qualified universities

of the advanced countries.”

The Non Academic Quality Policy of UII is as determined below.

“Islamic University of Indonesia is a university with human resources,

governance, service, and facility excellence which is based on Islamic

principles with an orientation to satisfy stakeholder’s interest.”

Quality policy document is the responsibility of the Rector as prepared

by the Planning Agency with a support of Academic Development Agency and

Quality Assurance Agency in the early period of Rector’s service by embracing

related units. The discussion and legalization of Quality Policy document

should pass the mechanism of Management Review of University Quality

Assurance System (RTM-SPMU) and to be legalized by the University Senate.

The legalized Quality Policy document shall be distributed to all units in the

working milieu of UII.

3.2.3 SPM Policy

Principally, SPM UII policy is a document to describe the objectives

and strategies of SPM, the basic principles of SPM, SPM management, SPM

person in charge, and SPM standard document applicable in UII. The

manuscript of SPM UII policy also contains the background, scope,

organization, outline of the document, interaction between each document,

and monitoring and development of SPM.

The SPM policy document is drafted by BPM which collaborated with

related units. After which the draft is discussed and approved by university

senate through Management Review of University Senate (RTM-SU). Upon

the university senate approval and legalization, the document of SPM UII is

distributed to all organization units in the working milieu of UII.

3.2.4 SPM Manual

SPM Manual is a documented procedure which elaborates and

elucidates the steps and mechanism of business process implementation and

system processes in UII. The SPM Manual is to assure the implementation

and control of all processes and systems in UII. The SPM manual format

Page 34: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

34

consists of objective, scope, definition, reference, distribution, manual’s

content, and attachment. The manual itself contains order of activities,

implementation schedule, and the person in charge for activities.

The SPM manual is to be prepared by BPM which work hand in

hand with related units. The SPM Manual is to be discussed and legalized

through the mechanism of Management Review of University Senate

(RTM-SU). The SPM manual is to be drafted by the Head of Quality System

Controller Division (KPBSM), auditd by the Head of Quality Assurance

Agency (KBPN), and to be legalized by the Rector.

3.2.5 SPM Standard

SPM Standard is derived from vision, mission, and both the academic

and non academic quality policy which is comprised of all business process

standards in each organization unit of UII. SPM UII Standard assures the

quality of Catur Dharma implementation and the whole supporting

processes for the implementation of the Catur Dharma.

UII Standard is drafted to exceed the national standard of higher

education and is accrued with the international standard of higher

education. Therefore, in the long term it is expected that UII standard will

solidly stand against all changes both in the nationwide and worldwide

sphere. On the basis of the requirements, demand, and expectation of many

related parties, the university sets up the following ten primary standards.

(i) Management and Organization Standard

(ii) Academic Standard

(iii) Research Standard

(iv) Community Service Standard

(v) Yield of Service Standard

(vi) Graduation Standard

(vii) Facility Standard

(viii) Governance Standard

(ix) Outcome and Cooperation Standard

(x) Islamic Proselytizing Standard

The primary standard of UII is abbreviated as MERCY OF GOD which is a

shortened version of each capital letter of those ten standards in English as

elaborated in table 1 below.

Page 35: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

35

Table 1. Standard Code of UII

Standard Code

Management and Organization M Management and Organization

Education E Education

Research R Research

Community Services C Community Services

Yield of Services Y Yield of Services

Output O Output

Facilities F Facilities

Governance G Governance

Outcome and Cooperation O Outcome and Cooperation

Da’wah Islamiyah D Da’wah Islamiyah

The details of each standard comprised of term definition, standard

determination rationale, statement of standard content, standard achievement

strategy, standard achievement indicator, related units or parties in standard

achievement, and references or relation between one standard to another are to

prepare by university management with other related agencies or directorates.

Overall, the relation between vision, mission, quality standard and UII standard is

as elaborated in attachment 3a and attachment 3b.

The scope of each standard is developed and determined based on the

whole business processes in UII which contains the minimum scope as elaborated

in table 2 to table 11.

Page 36: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

36

Table 2. The Minimum Scope of Management and Organization Standard

(Management and Organization)

Code The Minimum Scope of Management Standard

M1 UII Standard Identity

M2 Organization Standard

M3 Reputation Management Standard

M4 Organization Management Standard

M5 Islamic Value of Management Standard

M6 Strategic Planning of Management Standard

M7 SPM Policy Standard

Table 3. The Minimum Scope of Education Standard

Code The Minimum Scope of Education Standard

E1 Standard of Education Reputation

E2 Islamic Value Standard of Education Sector

E3 Standard of Graduate Competence

E4 Standard of Study Program Specification

E5 Standard of Content and Learning Structure

E6 Standard of Strategy and Learning Process

E7 Standard of Student Character Development

E8 Standard of Learning Assessment

E9 Standard of Lecturers and Lecturer Development

E10 Standard of Management and Learning Quality Assurance

Page 37: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

37

Table 4. The Minimum Scope of Research Standard

Code The Minimum Scope of Research Standard

R1 Standard of Research Sector Reputation

R2 Islamic Value Standard of Research Sector

R3 Outcome Standard or Research Result

R4 Standard of Research Content

R5 Standard of Research Process

R6 Standard of Research Assessment

R7 Standard of Researcher

R8 Standard of Research Management

Table 5. The Minimum Scope of Community Services Standard

Code The minimum scope of community services

C1 The Minimum Scope of Community Services Standard

C2 Reputation Standard of Community Services Sector

C3 Islamic Value Standard of Community Services

C4 Standard of Community Services Outcomes

C5 Standard of Community Services Contents

C6 Standard of Community Services Processes

C7 Standard of Community Services Assessment

C8 Standard of Community Services Implementer

C9 Standard of Community Services Management

Page 38: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

38

Table 6. The Minimum Scope of Yield of Services Standard

Code The Minimum Standard of Yield of Services

Y1 Reputation Standard of Services Sector

Y2 Islamic Value Standard of Services Sector

Y3 Standard of Academic Services

Y4 Standard of Laboratory Services

Y5 Standard of Library Services

Y6 Standard of Student Activity Services

Y7 Standard of General Services

Y8 Standard of Financial Services

Y9 Standard of Graduation Ceremony Services

Y10 Yield of Services Standard for Student’s Parents

Y11 Yield of Services Standard for Outcome

Table 7. The Minimum Scope of Output Standard

Code The Minimum Scope of Output Standard

O1 Standard of Output Reputation

O2 Islamic Value Standard of Output

O3 Academic Standard of Output

O4 Standard of Length of Study

O5 Standard of Output Ethics

O6 Standard of Diploma Supplement

Page 39: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

39

Table 8. The Minimum Scope of Facility Standard

Code The Minimum Scope of Facility Standard

F1 Reputation Standard of Academic Sector

F2 Islamic Value Standard of Facility Sector

F3 Standard of Learning Facility and Infrastructure

F4 Facility Standard of Academic Laboratory

F5 Facility Standard of Library

F6 Standard of Research Infrastructure and Facility

F7 Standard of Community Service Infrastructure and Facility

F8 Facility Standard of Information Technology

F9 Facility Standard for Management

F10 Facility Standard for Lecturers

F11 Facility Standard for Academic Staffs

F12 Facility Standard for Administrative Staffs

F13 Facility Standard for Students’ Activities

F14 Standard of Public Facilities

Page 40: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

40

Table 9. The Minimum Scope of Governance Standard

Code The Minimum Scope of Governance Standard

G1 Reputation Standard of Governance Sector

G2 Islamic Value Standard of Governance Sector

G3 Governance Standard of Information Technology

G4 Governance Standard of Learning Financing

G5 Governance Standard of Research Funding and Financing

G6 Governance Standard of Community Service Financing

G7 Governance Standard of Facilities and Infrastructure

G8 Financing Standard of Academic Supplement

G9 Standard of Salary and Incentives

G10 Standard of Social Aid and Welfare

G11 Recruitment Standard of Lecturers and Academic Staffs

G12 Standard of Academic Method and Development of Academic

Method

G13 Ethical Standard of Lecturers and Academic Staffs

G14 Ethical Standard of Students

G15 Standard of Employee Discipline

G16 Standard of Working Hours, Overtime Hours, and Leave

G17 Assessment Standard of Working Achievement

G18 Standard of Mutation, Promotion, and Demotion

G19 Standard of Working Contract and Termination

G20 Standard of Risk Management

Page 41: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

41

Table 10. The Minimum Scope of Outcome and Cooperation

Code The Minimum Scope of Outcome and Cooperation

O1 Standard of Contribution and Reputation of Outcome

O2 Islamic Value Standard of Outcome

O3 Standard of Outcome Tracking

O4 Standard of Cooperation

O5 Standard of Feed Back Filter of Internal Stakeholders

O6 Standard of Feed Back Filter of External Stakeholders

O7 Standard of Stakeholders’ Satisfaction

Table 11. The Minimum Scope of Da’wah Islamiyah (Islamic Proselytizing)

Standard

Code The Minimum Scope of Islamic Proselytizing

D1 Reputation Standard of Islamic Proselytizing Sector

D2 Competence Standard of Islamic Proselytizing

D3 Material Standard of Islamic Proselytizing

D4 Media Standard of Islamic Proselytizing

D5 Target Standard of Islamic Proselytizing

D6 Implementer Standard of Islamic Proselytizing

D7 Method Standard of Islamic Proselytizing

D8 Financing Standard of Islamic Proselytizing

Meanwhile, the primary sector to be responsible with comprehensive standard

drafting out of those ten primary standards leads to the following 99 scopes as

Page 42: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

42

elaborated in table 12. The unit related to standard drafting and business processes

of each standard is as elaborated in attachment 4.

Table 12. The Primary Sector Responsible for Standard Content of UII

Standard The Responsible Party for Content

Standard

M Management and

Organization

Vice Rector for Administration,

Finance, & Human Resources Affairs

E Education Vice Rector for Academic Affairs

R Research Vice Rector for Academic Affairs

C Community Services Vice Rector for Academic Affairs

Y Yield of Services Vice Rector for Administration,

Finance, & Human Resources Affairs

O Output Vice Rector for Academic Affairs

F Facilities Vice Rector for Administration,

Finance, & Human Resources Affairs

G Governance Vice Rector for Administration,

Finance, & Human Resources Affairs

O Outcomes and Cooperation Vice Rector for Cooperation, Students,

Religion, & Outcomes Affairs

D Da’wah Islamiyah (Islamic

Proselytizing)

Vice Rector for Cooperation, Students,

Religion, & Outcomes Affairs

3.2.1.5.1. Quality Objectives

The quality objectives of UII is the objectives derived from each primary

standard “MERCY OF GOD”, as part of reputation standard/ the quality standard

as the target to achieve by the university, faculty, and study program. The

parameter of quality objectives for the university derived from MERCY OF GOD

are as elaborated in table 13 below.

Page 43: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

43

Table 13. University Quality Objectives

Standard No. Description

M Management and

Organization 1.

University and Study Program Achievement

in The World Rank

E Education 2. Average Islamic Competence Grade of

Outputs

R Research 3.

Percentage of Lecturers’ Scientific

Publication in Reputable International

Journal or patented journal

C Community

Service 4.

Percentage of Lecturers receiving grants of

community services from external parties

Y Yield of Services 5. Stakeholder’s Level of Satisfaction towards

services

O Output 6. Percentage of outputs with standard length

of study

F Facilities 7. Stakeholder’s level of satisfaction towards

facilities

G Governance 8. Lecturer’s Performance Appraisal

O Outcome and

Cooperation 9.

Percentage of employed Outputs within

three months

D Da’wah Islamiyah 10.

Percentage of employees taking part in

Islamic Proselytizing at the national or

international level

Page 44: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

44

University Quality Objectives Document becomes the responsibility of the

Rector as prepared by The Planning Agency with assistance of Academic

Development Agency and Quality Assurance Agency in the early period of rector’s

service by embracing the related units. The discussion and legalization of University

Quality Objectives document should pass the mechanism of Management Review

of University Unit (RTM-UU). The document format of University Quality

Objectives is to be prepared by the Planning Agency, auditd by the BPM and

legalized by the Rector.

Faculty Quality Objectives Document is to be prepared by The Dean in the

early period of his/her service by embracing the related units. The discussion and

legalization of Faculty Quality Objectives document should pass the mechanism of

Management Review of Faculty Unit (RTM-UF) or Faculty Working Meeting and

to be approved by the Faculty Senate Meeting and legalized by the Rector. The

Faculty Quality Objectives Document is to be prepared by the Dean, auditd by the

Head of BPM and legalized by the Rector.

Study Program Quality Objectives Document is to be prepared by The

Head of The Study Program in the early period of his/her service. The discussion

and legalization of Study Program Quality Objectives document should pass the

mechanism of Board of Lecturer’s Meeting, Management Review of Faculty Unit

(RTM-UF) or Faculty Working Meeting to be approved by the Faculty Senate

Meeting and legalized by the Rector. The document of Study Program Quality

Objectives is to be prepared by the study program, approved by the Dean, auditd

by the head of BPM and legalized by the Rector.

The quality objective document in the faculty unit and study program is to

be accrue with university quality objectives and completed by the stages of

achievement at least for one service period. The proposal of faculty objectives

should be completed with its measurement method.

3.2.5.2. Quality Plan

To guide the achievement of quality standard at large, and the quality

objectives and its aspects in the reputation standard to be precise, it is necessary

that the university draft and elaborate quality plan as part or supplement of quality

standard. The elements in the quality plan is drafted by taking into account the

internal demand of UII and the external and stakeholder’s requirements of UII.

The quality standard document as a guideline for SPM implementation can

be drafted as what is elaborated in table 14 which at least contain the following

elements/

(i) Standard Scope

(ii) Parameter

(iii) Parameter Target of Achievement

(iv) Examining Period

(v) The Responsible Party for Measurement

(vi) The Implementer of Measurement

Page 45: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

45

(vii) Form (if required)

(viii) References (if any)

Table 14. Quality Standard Document Format

Scope No Parameter Target Period Responsible

Party Implementer Form Reference

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)

3.2.6 Roles and Authorities

Roles and Authorities document elaborates the scope of authority and the

structural position duties in organization unit of UII. It also explains the application

of Quality Assurance System of the organization. TW document aims to shed light

on the structure of a position in the organization, its qualification, required

competence, direct management and subordinates, tenure, and the description of

tasks and authorities. TW document of University leader and faculty heads is

imposed on the Waqf Foundation, whilst the TW document of Head of Agencies,

Directors, Head and Secretary of the Study Program, Head of Directorate Division,

and Head of Faculty Division becomes the responsibility of the university.

Furthermore, the TW document of Head of Study Program Laboratory and Study

Program Center of Study are imposed on the study program. TW document may

take the form of Official Regulation of The Waqf Foundation, University

Regulation, and or Dean’s Regulation.

3.2.7 Key Performance Indicator

Key Performance Indicator (KPI) is a set of quantitative measurements used

to measure and compare performances in achieving the strategic and operational

objectives of the university. KPI is harnessed to assist the university to determine

and measure its development towards its objective achievement and its work

performance. KPI is designed for each lecturer, academic staffs, and entire board

of management in the working milieu of UII.

KPI is imposed on the university management as drafted by the Directorate

of Organization and Human Resources with assistance of related units. KPI is set

Page 46: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

46

to target the objective with an orientation towards the outcome. It comes up with

a threshold to distinguish between the target value and actual value and the clear

cut time span to achieve the target.

3.2.8 Unit Quality Objectives

The Unit Quality Objectives Document (SMU) elaborates the primary

targets of a unit which is derived from the scope and roles and authorities attached

to each unit. The SMU document is to be drafted by the unit management since

the early period of their service.

3.2.9 Strategic Plan

The Strategic Plan document (Renstra) is oriented towards the outcome to

achieve within a certain time frame in relation to the main tasks of the

University/Faculty/Study Program in UII. The Strategic Plan (Renstra) in UII consists

of University Renstra, Faculty Renstra, and Study Program Renstra. The University

Renstra is an elaboration from the strategic guideline drafted by the Board of

Management of The Waqf Foundation (PYBW) and is legalized by the Supervisor

of The Waqf Foundation to accrue with the Vision, Mission, Objectives,

Development Master Plan of UII, and the applicable Legislatives and

Government’s Law on the management of Higher Education.

The Strategic Plan of UII is comprised of the strategic objectives, targets,

strategies, programs, Key Performance Indicator, and year of implementation as is

written in the following table 15.

Table 15. UII Strategic Plan Table Format

Strategic Plan

Objectives Strategy Program Key

Performance Indicator

Year of Implementation

1 2 3 4

The Strategic Plan (Renstra) document of the university is proposed and to

be drafted by the Rector as is prepared by the Planning Agency (BP), approved by

the University Head of Senate, and legalized by the Chairman of Board

Management of The Waqf Foundation. The Renstra document is to be drafted in

the early period of the Rector’s service by involving the related units. The

discussion and legalization of University Renstra document should go through the

mechanism of Management Review of University Senate (RTM-SU) and or

University Working Meeting. It is then approved by the University Senate Meeting

and to be legalized by the The Waqf Foundation.

Page 47: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

47

Faculty Strategic Plan is derived from University Renstra with the same

minimum scope which covers the strategic objectives, targets, program, key

performance indicator, and year of implementation as elaborated by table 16.

Faculty Renstra document is drafted and prepared by the Dean in the early period

of his service by involving related units. The discussion on Faculty Renstra should

go through the mechanism of Management Review of Faculty Senate (RTM-SF)

and or Faculty Working Meeting and to be approved by the Faculty Working

Meeting and legalized by the Rector. The legality format of Faculty Renstra

document is to be drafted by the Dean, auditd by the Head of Planning Agency,

and legalized by the Rector.

The Study Program Strategic Plan (Renstra) is derived from Faculty Renstra

which contains the strategic objectives, strategy, targets, programs, key

performance indicator, and year of implementation as elaborated in table 15. The

study program Renstra is to be drafted and prepared by the Head of Study

Program in the early period of his service. The discussion of Study Program Renstra

should go through the mechanism of Study Program Board of Lecturer’s Meeting

and the Management Review of Faculty Senate (RTM-SF) and or Faculty Working

Meeting and to be approved in the Faculty Senate Meeting to be legalized by the

Rector. The legality format of Study Program document is to be drafted by the

Head of Study Program, approved by the Dean, auditd by the Head of Planning

Agency and legalized by the Rector.

3.2.10 Annual Planning and Budgeting

The Annual Planning and Budgeting (RKAT) is a set of activities and budget

required to finance the activities which is drafted in one Budget Year starting from

January to December.

The working unit to be in charge of the drafting, implementation, and

control of RKAT consists of university responsibility unit (consists of Rector, Vice

Rector I, Vice Rector II, and Vice Rector III), Faculty Responsibility unit, and Study

Program responsibility unit. RKAT consolidation drafted by all responsibility units

should be presented in the form of university RKAT.

University RKAT is to be drafted on schedule, in an integrated manner, and

sustainably be in line with the whole working units in the working milieu of UII.

The drafting and legalization mechanism of RKAT is as elaborated in The Official

Regulation of Board of Management of The Waqf Foundation Number 03 Year

2013 on the Guideline for Annual Planning and Budgeting Draft within the Scope

of Islamic University of Indonesia.

The RKAT table format is as elaborated in attachment 5 with the following

overall outline.

a. Strategic Objective, which a formulation of the condition to achieve

within a certain time frame as elaborated in Renstra legalized by the

university senate.

b. Target, which is a condition to achieve in the Renstra

Page 48: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

48

c. Strategy, which is a formulation on the University, Faculty, Study

Program policy in one period of service as elaborate in the Renstra.

d. Working Program, which is formulated based on the strategy drafted in

the Renstra as legalized by the related senate.

e. Activities, which is elaborated in accordance to its characteristics, types,

indicator of activity’s achievement which highlights the success of each

activity, and to be completed with activity implementation.

f. Year and moth of activity implementation

g. Budget

3.2.11 Working Procedure

The working procedure document (PK) consists of method and order of working

implementation of a certain activity in each organization unit in the working milieu

of UII. This document is used as a guideline in the implementation of Quality

Assurance System. The Working Procedure Document contains the working scope,

working order, person in charge, completion time frame, and target to achieve.

The Working Procedure at the university level is to be drafted and made

by the related person in charge, auditd by the direct leader, and legalized by the

Head of BPM. The faculty level Working Procedure is to be drafted and made by

the related unit heads, auditd by the Dean/Vice Dean and legalized by the Head

of BPM.

3.2.12 Working Instruction

The Working Instruction contains the order of activities in detailed

rundown for each stage of work/activities which may contain errors, danger, and

deviation. This Working Instruction only elaborates one function of each activity

as mentioned in the Quality Procedure or Working Procedure.

This Working Instruction contains the scope of activities, distribution,

references, and order of activities. The university level Working Instruction is to

be drafted by the related person in charge of the activity, auditd by the direct

leader and legalized by the Head of BPM. The Working Instruction at the faculty

level is to be drafted by the related head of unit, auditd by the Dean/Vice Dean

and legalized by the Head of BPM.

3.2.13 List of Documented Information

The documented information is the whole documents to be used in the

management of Quality Assurance System of UII which consists of planning

document, implementation document, monitoring document, measurement and

evaluation, some supplement forms, and development document.

Documented information may be drafted in soft copy and or hard copy

which should be stored and well kept in accordance to the applicable standard.

Page 49: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

49

For ease of control, the information documented in SPM shall be elaborated in a

Documented Information Draft (DIT) which is arranged systematically and

managed by each working unit in the working milieu of UII. Such management

consists of identification, storing, maintenance, withdrawal, storage time, and

document annihilation.

The DIT format to be presented in hardcopy as listed in table 16 at least by

containing the following contents:

(i) Name of Document

(ii) Code of Document

(iii) Person in Charge

(iv) Storage Time Span

(v) Storage Location, and

(vi) Storage Method

Table 16. Table Format of Documented Information List

Name of Document

Code of Document

Person in Charge

Storage Time Span

Storage Location

Storage Method

DIT format is presented in a soft copy as arranged in some folders in

accordance to the documented information. The folder naming or file naming shall

be arranged in a way that eases searching and control.

The type of information to be documented at least contains the UII

standard of MERCY OF GOD and proof of achievement measurement of the

implementation of MERCY OF GOD by containing some other information in

accordance to the need of each unit.

Page 50: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

50

CHAPTER IV

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

OF QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM

The success of Quality Assurance System of UII lies on the commitment of each of

UII citizens in understanding, and implementing SPM consistently in accordance to

his/her role and authorities. Excellent thoughts, creative and innovative ideas of

all UII citizens shall be synergized with implementation consistency of SPM to

achieve the best outcome, which becomes the primary requirement of SPM

implementation.

4.1. Management Commitment of UII in The Implementation of SPM

Commitment is best defined as willingness, coherence, and self confidence

to conduct activities by UII managements as a role model and pioneer to be an

exemplary for the whole citizen of UII.

The management in each organization unit of UII shall come up with

awareness that the core essence of leadership is a mandate and responsibility to be

accountable towards Allah Swt. Within the context of UII working environment,

leadership shall be interpreted as sacrifice and mandate to perform at its best. It is

also to be interpreted as an authority to serve and protect the related parties by

doing fair justice. UII leadership should be an exemplary and pioneer to act

inspired by the spirit of genuineness and justice values.

UII management shall build a shidiq (trustworthy) characteristic to uphold

truth and sincerity in action, talks, and implementation of duties. Fathonah

(intelligence) is a characteristic which shall enable UII management to be tactful,

apt, and reliable to face any problems. Amanah is a characteristic of UII

management which put forth responsibility as a leader on top of everything. The

UII management also shall bear a characteristic of Tabligh, that is an ability to

frankly convey and responsibly convey what they had done.

The management of each organization unit of UII shall understand the

working scope under their responsibility, the related parties in each unit, the

benchmark of success and quality assurance standard in his working unit. This

commitment shall be indicated from their willingness to understand, be involved,

implement, evaluate, improve, and follow up all processes and activities of the

unit he is in charge of.

The commitment of UII management for some sectors will function as

follow.

(i) To unite the objectives and target of UII;

(ii) To create and keep up the conducive internal environment to realize

the objectives of the university;

Page 51: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

51

(iii) To be totally devoted towards the system implementation of quality

assurance of the university;

(iv) To focus on the fulfillment and struggle to exceed student’s expectation

as competent graduate candidates;

(v) To determine the policy of SPM UII and SPM standard including that of

efficient quality target;

(vi) To involve the whole citizen of UII in SPM implementation, and

(vii) To build good communication with UII internals as a system.

4.2. Strategy in SPM Implementation

The primary role and function of UII management in the SPM includes planning,

organizing, operational, evaluation, implementation and control, and

development as elaborated by Figure 5 below.

Figure 5. Strategy for SPM Implementation

The overall role and function of UII management to apply as part of SPM

implementation strategy is as explained as follows.

4.2.1. SPM Planning

The policy and SPM standard as part of SPM planning as determined by UII

management shall accommodate the tendency, willingness, needs, and

expectation of all related parties in the future which shall be in line with the

university objectives.

UII Leadership

Operational Support

Performance Evaluation

Development

Policy Planning & SPM

Standard

Page 52: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

52

UII management is to plan and determine an effective and efficient

organization structure to support the main task implementation of Catur Dharma.

Therefore, UII management is to clearly detail the reason for an existence of an

organization unit, its role and function, and its working area. The qualification and

competence of the person in charge of an organization unit is to be clearly

formulated so as to realize the objectives of each organization unit in supporting

the realization of university objectives. The qualification and Human Resources

Competence in each organization unit must take into account the requirements,

needs, and expectation of related parties in UII.

In addition, the type of service to administer in the university shall be

planned properly, including the scheme of between one service and another, and

between one working unit with another. The type of service is planned and

determined to sustainably apply and maintain the SPM implication so as to

improve its effectiveness. UII management is to plan the facility specification

assuring that the activities and system in a certain unit run properly. Financial

management, facilities and structure, human resources, information system, and

working system are to be carefully planned by the management to assure its

implementation.

The implementation strategy planning of SPM UII requires precise clarity on

which organization unit is in charge of certain business processes and activities

within the working milieu of UII. The business process mapping and activities in

accordance to the standard and related organization unit of each business process

and activity is as elaborated in attachment 4.

4.2.2. Operational Support

The operational support of UII management towards the realization of

university objectives is as elaborated in the following management capacity.

(i) To create activities as an integrated process within a certain system by

involving the available resources to easily be monitored and controlled

so as to lead to continual correction

(ii) To assure the academic process to meet the requirements, certification,

and accreditation

(iii) To administer RTM to assure that the implementation of quality

assurance system be well kept and well developed sustainably by taking

improving and preventive measurement

(iv) To assure the effectiveness of correction and prevention

The full support of UII management in the operational implementation of

SPM encompasses the following aspects.

Page 53: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

53

a. Provision of Lecturers and Academic Staffs

UII management is to assure the availability of human resources for lecturers

and academic staffs in accordance to their qualification and competence as

determined for the implementation of the main business processes and or

supplementing processes. The Human Resources Management

incorporating recruitment system, management, and development of

effective Human Resources shall be consistently improved. The

development of Human Resources Competence of the university shall be

facilitated through relevant training which shall be consistently evaluated.

UII management is to ensure that each of UII citizens take heed on their

own role and function in the SPM and that they understand the importance

of their works and responsibilities to keep up the achievement of university

objectives. The entire available Human Resources, be it lecturers or

academic staffs, shall work hand in hand in synergy to optimize the SPM

implementation. The working implementation shall be in line with the

duty, role, authority, function, expertise, and competence of each resource

to achieve the best outcome.

b. Provision of Resources

UII management is to provide the resources as the determined standard and

ensure that the existence of those resources are aptly used, aptly qualified,

apt in quantity, aptly functioned, aptly targeted, and aptly utilized upon

need. The management of UII shall provide the infrastructure that is the

land, building, classroom, management room, administration, laboratory,

and et cetera to primarily support an academic process. In addition, the

management should also grant access to tools, equipments, media, books,

learning sources, and consumables to achieve the academic objectives. The

provision of comprehensive, reliable, and trusted information system

support shall be integrated with the existing business processes and

activities. The provision of services and management system shall assure

that SPM UII be implemented appropriately in accordance to the

determined standard.

c. Provision of Source of Fund

The provision of source of fund shall assure the implementation of the

entire business processes and activities in UII. UII management is also

entitled to ensure that the existing fund is well managed to meet and satisfy

all the need of organization unit, the financing of all academic processes

and non academic processes shall be arranged in a way that prioritize the

blessing and benefit principle and to also take into account the standard of

Page 54: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

54

fairness of financing. The financial management of all processes and

activities in the whole organization unit of the university shall be carried

out transparently, accountably, and responsibly.

The operational support of UII management shall be directed towards the

production of conducive working environment and shall take heed on the

assurance that the whole citizen of UII be able to work effectively and efficiently

to achieve the objectives of the university. The UII management shall become an

exemplary through his hard work, smart work, and team work with the entire

academic citizen and non academic citizen of the scope of SPM UII

implementation. UII management is also entitled to ensure that the provision of

all sources will assure the effective implementation of SPM UII.

Page 55: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

55

CHAPTER V

MONITORING AND SPM DEVELOPMENT

The management of Quality Assurance System shall be completed with the

determination of sets of control of implementation and SPM development

sustainably based on the following objectives.

(i) To show and assure the conformity between output of education with

the determined Quality Objectives and Quality Standard to satisfy the

stakeholder

(ii) To ensure that the Quality Assurance System of UII be implemented in

appropriately in accordance to the determined requirements

(iii) To improve the effectiveness of Quality Assurance System of UII

sustainably in controlling the whole processes and activities in the

working environment of UII so as to achieve more efficient level of

university management.

The monitoring, examining, assessing, management, evaluation, and

analysis are sets of activities to generate some facts to develop the SPM. The

sets of controlling and sustainable development are part of implementation

cycle of UII Quality Assurance System, as is elaborated in figure 2., and figure

5.

5.1. Monitoring, Evaluation, and SPM Measurement

The Quality Objectives in particular and UII SPM Standard in general are

the primary objectives of each activity carried out by the unit management

within the framework of SPM implementation. To achieve those objectives, it

is necessary that all activities be written in the working program. The

effectiveness of output shall be controlled through monitoring, measurement,

and evaluation which will be determined by the external unit.

a. Monitoring and Evaluation

Monitoring and evaluation (monev) are set of activities to evaluate the

executed performance by the university citizens. It primarily aims to assure that

SPM implementation is conducted appropriately, to check its conformity with

SPM standard, and to evaluate the effectiveness of SPM implementation.

Monitoring and evaluation (monev) are sets of instruments which enable to

identify and measure the output of determined programs/objectives/system.

Monitoring is a way to supervise and audit the development of the ongoing

program implementation. Evaluation is a systematic and objective activity to

Page 56: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

56

know the resulted output of a program/objective/system to see their relevance,

coherence, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability of the

program/objective/system.

UII management is entitled to determine what to monitor and evaluate,

which monev method to use, when to implement monev, who to implement

monev, and what it will be used for. Monev comes up with some types

including monev of Quality Assurance System implementation, monev of the

achievement of Quality Objectives and Quality Standard, monev of the

implementation of Strategic Plan and Annual Planning and Budgeting (RKAT).

UII management is to determine monev procedure and perform it based on the

applicable requirement an procedure.

b. Measurement

Measurement is a set of activities to asses and audit the process and

output of the implementation of Quality Assurance System in UII. UII

management is to determine what to measure, which measurement method to

use, when to implement the measurement, and who will conduct the

measurement based on the procedure. UII management is entitled to determine

the measurement procedure of Quality Assurance System Implementation,

measurement of the achievement of Quality Objectives and Strategic Plan or

Quality Standard, and the measurement of stakeholder satisfaction. UII

management is to conduct the measurement based on the applicable

requirements as written in the measurement procedures.

5.2. AMI, RTM, and SPM Development

The output of set of activities of monitoring, evaluation, and measurement

on the implementation of SPM UII will be audited by external parties through

Internal Quality Audit (AMI). The result of AMI will be discussed in a forum of

RTM SPMU of Audit result.

a. Internal Quality Audit

Internal Quality Audit of UII is a set of systematic and independent

auditing activities by an auditor to determine whether the program, quality

objectives, quality standard, and quality assurance system are conformed to the

determined plan and are implemented effectively. Quality audit consists of

Internal Quality Audit (AMI) and External Quality Audit (AME).

UII management is to determine what to do to conduct quality audit,

which quality audit method to use, when to implement the quality audit, and

who will conduct the quality audit as written in the procedure. UII management

is to determine the AMI procedure of SPM Implementation, the achievement

Page 57: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

57

of Quality Objectives and Quality Standard, and the Strategic Plan. UII

management is to form Auditor Team to conduct AMI in accordance to the

applicable requirement in the procedure.

b. Management Review Meeting

The Management Review Meeting is the highest forum in the decision

making process of evaluation or discussion or formal explanation on SPM UII.

RTM materials may take the form of evaluation of AMI, legalization of SPM

tools (SPM Policy, Quality Objectives, SPM Standard, and SPM Manuals),

Renstra, and RKAT which is conducted by the board of management (not Ad

Hoc management) or of special nature (senate) both in the university level and

faculty level within a scheduled time span.

RTM comes with some different types including University Senate

Management Review (RTM-SU), Faculty Senate Management Review (RTM-

SF), Management Review of University Quality Assurance System (RTM-

SPMU), Management Review of University Unit (RTM-UU) and Management

Review of Faculty Unit (RTM-UF).

UII management is entitled to determine the RTM procedure which contain

the participants, guests, materials, main topic, quorum, heads, note taker, and

RTM decision.

RTM Forum aims to determine the analysis and formulation of correction,

correction, and prevention as measurement to develop sustainable correction.

The strategic output of RTM which affects the implementation processes of SPM

UII shall be written in the form of Rector’s Decision Letter or Dean’s Decision

Letter of RTM result in accordance to the type of RTM at university or faculty

level.

c. SPM Development

UII management is to identify the inconformity between SPM

implementation and its output based on the quality audit (both internal and

external) or based on the stakeholder’s request. Afterwards, the management is

to analyze factors behind the inconformity and handle it through correction

and corrective action.

UII management is entitled to verify the effectiveness of corrective action

and correction as continuous improvement. Those activities are to be written

in the procedure of inconformity control and corrective action. On the basis of

AMI results and the analysis and discussion of RTM forum, UII management is

to determine the follow ups towards the development of SPM.

Page 58: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

58

In principle, SPM development may take the form of SPM document

development, implementation development, or development towards the

strategy of SPM achievement. The next SPM development plan shall be

communicated with the whole parties involved and related parties in the

SPM development.

The whole activities ranging from planning, implementation,

monitoring, evaluation, measurement, AMI, RTM, and SPM development of

UII are carried out to achieve the university objectives and meet all the

requirements, demand, and expectation of all related parties in UII.

Page 59: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

59

ATTACHMENT

Page 60: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

60

Attachment 1. The Position of BPM within University Organization Structure

RECTOR

Planning Agency (BP)

Ethical & Legal Body (BEH )

Information System Agency

) ( BSI

Academic Development Agency (BPA)

Vice Rector 1 Vice Rector 2 Vice Rector 3

o Directorate of Academic Affairs (DA )

o Directorate of Library Affairs (DP)

o Directorate of Research & Community Service (DPPM)

Quality Assurance Agency (BPM)

o Directorate of Promotion, Cooperation &Alumni Affairs (DPKA)

o Directorate of Talent and Interest Coaching & Student's Welfare

) DPBMKM (

o Directorate of Coaching & Development of Islamic Religion (DPPAI)

o Directorate of Organization & Humand Resources ) DOSDM (

o Directorate of Financial & Budget Affairs (DKA)

o Directorate of Facilities & Infrastructure (DSP)

o Directorate of Public Relation (DH)

Faculty of Industrial Tecnology

( FTI )

Faculty of Mathematics & Natural Science

( FMIPA )

Medical Faculty ) FK (

Faculty of Islamic

Religion ( FIAI )

Faculty of Law ( FH )

Faculty of Economics

FE ( )

Faculty of Psychology & Social Culture

) ( FPSB

Faculty of Civil

Engineering & Planning

( FTSP )

Page 61: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

61

Promulgated in: Yogyakarta

Date of promulgation: May 2nd 2016

________________________________

Board of Management of UII Waqf Foundation

Chairman,

Signed and sealed

Dr. Ir. Luthfi Hasan, MS.

Page 62: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

62

Attachment 2.

Summary of The Drafting Mechanisms of UII’s Quality Assurance System

No Name of the

Quality Document

Person in

Charge

Drafting

Period

Drafting Mechanism Approval/

Legalization

Document

Distribution

1.

Quality Statement Rector Early Period

of Service

Drafted by the Rector, assisted by the

Vice Rector RTM-SU

The entire unit

in the working

environment

of UII

2.

Quality Policy Rector Early Period

of Service

Drafted by the Rector, assisted by the

Vice of Rector RTM-SU

The entire unit

in the working

environment

of UII

3.

SPM Policy Rector Early Period

of Service

Coordinated by Rector, drafted by the

Quality Assurance Agency assisted by

Planning Agency, Academic

Development Agency, and related units

RTM-SU

The entire unit

in the working

environment

of UII

4.

University

Standard Rector

Early Period

of Service

Coordinated by Vice Rector, drafted by

Quality Assurance Agency, assisted by

Planning Agency, Academic

Development Agency, and related units

RTM-SPMU

The entire unit

in the working

environment

of UII

5.

Quality Objectives Rector Early period

of service

Coordinated by Rector, drafted by

Planning Agency assisted by Academic

Development Agency and Quality

Assurance Agency

RTM-SPMU

The entire unit

in the working

environment

of UII

Page 63: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

63

No Name of the

Quality Document

Person in

Charge

Drafting

Period

Drafting Mechanism Approval/

Legalization

Document

Distribution

6. Quality Plan

All Vices of

Rector

Early period

of service

Coordinated and drafted by Vice Rector

and assisted by related units RTM-SPMU Related Units

7. Roles &

Authorities (TW)

All Vices of

Rector

Early period

of service

Coordinated by Vice Rector for Human

Resources, assisted by Director of

DOSDM and the related units RTM-SPMU Related Units

8. Key Performance

Indicator (KPI)

All Vices of

Rector

Early period

of service

Coordinated and drafted by Vice

Rector, and assisted by the related units RTM-SPMU Related Units

9. Unit Quality

Objectives (SMU)

Unit

Management

Early Period

of service

Coordinated by the management of

related unit

RTM-UU

RTM-UF Related Unit

10.

Strategic Plan

Rector,

Dean, Head

of Study

Programs

Early Period

of Service

Coordinated and drafted by the

Management and assisted by the related

units

RTM-SU

RTM-SF Related Unit

11. Annual Planning

and Budgeting

(RKAT)

Unit

Management Annually

Coordinated and drafted by the

Management, and assisted by the

related unit

RTM-SU

RTM-SF Related Unit

12. Working

Procedure (PK)

Head of

Division

Throughout

the year

Coordinated and drafted by the Head

of Division

RTM-UU

RTM-UF Related Unit

13. Working

Instruction (IK)

Head of

Division

Throughout

the year

Coordinated and drafted by the Head

of Division

RTM-UU

RTM-UF Related Unit

Page 64: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

64

No Name of the

Quality Document

Person in

Charge

Drafting

Period

Drafting Mechanism Approval/

Legalization

Document

Distribution

14. List of

Documented

Information (DIT)

Head of

division

Throughout

the year

Coordinated and drafted by the Head

of Division

RTM-UU

RTM-UF Related Unit

Promulgated in: Yogyakarta

Date of promulgation: May 2nd 2016

________________________________

Board of Management of UII Waqf Foundation

Chairman,

Signed and sealed

Dr. Ir. Luthfi Hasan, MS.

Page 65: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

65

Attachment 3a.

Coherence between Vision, Mission, Academic Quality Policy, and SPMI Standard

Vision Mission Academic Quality Policy SPMI Standard

Code Area

Rahmatan lil alamin

(Mercy for the whole

universe)

To enforce:

Divine Revelation & Sunnah of

The Prophet

Islamic Value Mastery

and Application for all

outputs

E Education

C Community Service

Mercy for the whole universe O Output

Commitment towards

excellence and risalah

Islamiyah in the area of:

- Education

- Research

- Community

Service

- Dakwah (Islamic

Proselytizing)

Being an Islamic minded in the

development and dissemination

of:

- Science

- Technology

- Culture

- Literature, and

- Art

UII comes up with

excellence in the area of:

- Education

- Research

- Community

Service

- Dakwah (Islamic

Proselytizing)

E Education

R Research

C Community Service

Becoming a Muslim scholar who

is:

- Pious

- Has a noble character

O Output

D Dakwah Islamiyah

Page 66: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

66

Vision Mission Academic Quality Policy SPMI Standard

Code Area

- Knowledgeably

charitable

- Charitably knowledgeable

-

Achieving the

education level of

qualified

universities of the

advanced

countries

Becoming a Muslim & national

leader with excellence in:

- Islamic values -

Science

- Leadership

- Expertise

- Independence

- Professionalism

The Output should:

- Become highly

competitive

- Master a scientific

expertise and

apply his/her

knowledge &

Islamic values

M Management

E Education

R Research

C Community Service

O Output & Cooperation

D Dakwah Islamiyah

Promulgated in: Yogyakarta

Date of promulgation: May 2nd 2016

________________________________

Board of Management of UII Waqf Foundation

Chairman,

Signed and sealed

Dr. Ir. Luthfi Hasan, MS.

Page 67: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

67

Attachment 3b.

Coherence between Vision, Mission, Non Academic Quality Policy, and SPMI Standard

Vision Mission Academic Quality

Policy

SPMI Standard

Code Area

Rahmatan lil alamin

(Mercy for the whole

universe)

To enforce:

Divine Revelation & Sunnah of

The Prophet Islamic Value Basis for

resources, governance,

services, and facilities

M Management and Organization

Y Yield of Service

F Facilities

Mercy for the whole universe

G Governance

O Output & Cooperation

D Dakwah Islamiyah

Commitment towards

excellence and risalah

Islamiyah in the area of:

- Education

- Research

- Community

Service

- Dakwah (Islamic

Proselytizing)

Being an Islamic minded in the

development and dissemination of:

- Science

- Technology

- Culture

- Literature, and

- Art

UII comes up with

excellence in the area

of:

- Education

- Research

- Community

Service

- Dakwah (Islamic

Proselytizing)

M Management

Y Yield of Service

F

Facilities

Becoming a Muslim scholar who is: G Governance

Page 68: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

68

Vision Mission Academic Quality

Policy

SPMI Standard

Code Area

- Pious

- Has a noble character

- Knowledgeably charitable

- Charitably knowledgeable

O Output &

Cooperation

-

Achieving the

education level of

qualified

universities of the

advanced

countries

Becoming a Muslim & national

leader with excellence in:

- Islamic values

- Science

- Leadership

- Expertise

- Independence

- Professionalism

UII should posses

excellence in:

- Resources

- Governance

- Services

- Facilities

The stakeholder’s

satisfaction

M Management

Y Yield of Service

F Research

G Community Service

O

Output &

Cooperation

Promulgated in: Yogyakarta

Date of promulgation: May 2nd 2016

________________________________

Board of Management of UII Waqf Foundation

Chairman,

Signed and sealed Dr. Ir.

Luthfi Hasan, MS.

Page 69: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

69

Attachment 4.

Coherence between Business Process and Standard and Organization Unit

Business Process Standard Related Organization Unit

Code Area Agency/Directorate Faculty Study Program

o Process of Organization

Management

o Process of Strategic Planning

Management o Process of Input Management

M Management and

Organization

• BP, BPM, BEH

• DOSDM

• DPKA

All Faculties All Study programs

o Process of Academic Design o Process of Lecture

Preparation o Process of Learning

Implementation o Process of Learning Evaluation

o Process of Student’s Management

E Education • BPA

• DA

• DPBMKM

All Faculties All Study Programs

o Research Process R Research DPPM All Faculties All Study Programs

o Process of Community Service C Community Service DPPM All Faculties All Study Programs

o Process of Yield of Services Y Yield of Services • All agencies

• All Directorates

All Faculties All Study Programs

o Process of Learning Evaluation o Process of

Students’ Management

O Output • BPA

• DA

• DPBMKM

All Faculties All Study Programs

o Process of facilities and infrastructure

management

F Facilities • BP, BSI

• DP

All Faculties All Study Programs

Page 70: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

70

Business Process Standard Related Organization Unit

Code Area Agency/Directorate Faculty Study Program

• DSP, DOSDM

DPBMKM

o Process of Human Resources Governance

o Process of Work Ethics Governance

o Process of Governance of Source of

Fund and Financing

o Process of Services and Information

Technology Governance

o Process of Assurance of Ethics and

Law Enforcement

G Governance BP, BSI, BEH

DKA, DOSDM

All Faculties All Study Programs

o Process of output’s satisfaction assurance

o Process of Cooperation

O Output &

Cooperation

• BP, BPM

• DH

• DPKA

All Faculties All Study Programs

o Process of Dakwah Islamiyah D Dakwah Islamiyah DPPAI All Faculties All Study Programs

Promulgated in: Yogyakarta

Date of promulgation: May 2nd 2016

________________________________

Board of Management of UII Waqf Foundation

Chairman,

Signed and sealed Dr. Ir.

Luthfi Hasan, MS.

Page 71: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

71

Attachment 5.

RKAT Format Table

Promulgated in: Yogyakarta

Date of promulgation: May 2nd 2016

________________________________

Board of Management of UII Waqf Foundation

Chairman,

Signed and sealed

Dr. Ir. Luthfi Hasan, MS.

Page 72: QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

72