quality of assessment

18
Quality of Assessment

Upload: richardnelson

Post on 21-May-2015

133 views

Category:

Education


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Measuring the quality

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Quality of assessment

Quality of Assessment

Page 2: Quality of assessment

Issues

• 1. How can the need for learners to pass assessment distort the curriculum content and teaching & learning?

• 2. How far do we assess only what we can grade - especially ‘numerically’?

• 3. Does assessment act as a gate-keeping mechanism to exclude rather than include?

• 4. Why are there tensions between ‘unseen exams/tests’ and coursework?

Page 3: Quality of assessment

Previously we discussed Assessment methods

• Initial/ diagnostic

• Formative

• Summative

Page 4: Quality of assessment

Mastery and Developmental

Mastery Objectives• Essential skills and knowledge which underpin course

studied• Assessed on pass/fail basisDevelopmental Objectives• Apply skills and knowledge in structured way to subject

and wider curriculum- e.g. transferable skills• Evaluation, analysis, interpretation, synthesis• Assessed on formative or graded basis

• http://pandora.cii.wwu.edu/cii/resources/outcomes/objectives.asp

Page 6: Quality of assessment

Bloom

Page 7: Quality of assessment

Read Dunn’s Paper

• identify which of the outcome types are ‘mastery’ and which are ‘developmental’

• Suggest appropriate assessment methods in each section which are relevant to your subject specialism

Page 8: Quality of assessment

Judging assessment quality

VACSR

Page 9: Quality of assessment

Reliability

Getting the assessment right

• Consistent- the same result each timeMethods to ensure reliability: (what do you think?)• Marking scheme• Answer guideCertain types of assessments tend to be more reliable:

(?)• Oral questions with answer guide• Multiple choice• Closed questions• Assignments with suggested evidence --- TASK 2

Page 10: Quality of assessment

Validity

Validity is all about getting the right assessment. If an assessment is valid it is measuring what it is supposed to be measuring.

For example, within the psychomotor domain (physical/manual skills) you would want them to demonstrate the skill rather than write about it.

Page 11: Quality of assessment

Validity and Reliability

• Validity is concerned with getting the right assessment and reliability is concerned with getting the assessment right.

Reece, I. & Walker, S. (2000) Teaching, Training and Learning. Business Education Publishers, Sunderland (p. 420)

Page 12: Quality of assessment

Sufficiency

This is to do with the amount of work the students have to do for you to determine whether they can do something or know something to a particular level.

Page 13: Quality of assessment

Authenticity

“Is it real?” On a horticultural course is performing a gardening task

indoors in a pot is authentic?

PlagiarismAlso we need to ask, is the work their own.We can assess whether work is authentic as you get a feel

for the level that your learners are at.

So the work (as far as is possible) needs to be in an Authentic setting as well as authentic to the person that has produced it.

• Task 5

Page 14: Quality of assessment

Currency

• Is it up to date?

Page 15: Quality of assessment

…in class…

Page 16: Quality of assessment

Today’s Targets

• Review previous session’s content

• Evaluate assessment types using key terminology

• Distinguish mastery from developmental objectives and assessment methods

• Define and exemplify key assessment quality terms

Page 17: Quality of assessment

Group TaskIdentify one formative assessment and one summative assessment used by one member of the group. For each one make judgements about it according to reliability, validity, authenticity, sufficiency and fairness

VASK Doc

Page 18: Quality of assessment

Review

• Look at your notes and the activities

• Text

• - one thing that is clear and useful

• - one thing that’s a bit muddy still