quality of open education and moocs

17
www.efquel.or g Quality of Open Education and MOOCs Prof. Dr. phil. habil. Ulf-Daniel Ehlers Vicepresident Baden-Wurttemberg Cooperative State University President European Foundation for Quality in E-Learning

Upload: ulf-daniel-ehlers

Post on 06-May-2015

373 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Presentation for the 25th World Conference of the ICDE in Beijing, China.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Quality of Open Education and MOOCs

www.efquel.org

Quality of Open Education and MOOCsProf. Dr. phil. habil. Ulf-Daniel EhlersVicepresident Baden-Wurttemberg Cooperative State UniversityPresident European Foundation for Quality in E-Learning

Page 2: Quality of Open Education and MOOCs
Page 3: Quality of Open Education and MOOCs

What we wish for...

• OER and Open Education offer unprecedented opportunities to improve quality, access and equity in education and training.

• Individuals can learn anything, anywhere, at any time for free.

Page 4: Quality of Open Education and MOOCs

And what we have...

• OER usage take up too slow• Teachers often skeptical, Learners

insecure about recognition, ‚closed‘ institutions lack open business models

• Three Grand Challenges for the Open Education Movement– Business Models– Recognition– Quality of open curricula

Page 5: Quality of Open Education and MOOCs

Will MOOCs Boost Open Education?

MOOCs are the third digital revolution1. E-Learning hype around new millenium

Changed learning environments2. OER peak from 2007

Giving away knowledge for free3. MOOC peak from 2010

Access to education for free

Page 6: Quality of Open Education and MOOCs

The Quality Challenge

• Start from digital and technological innovation,

• move on to educational (r)evolution and change, and

• lead to a quest for quality and innovation strategies.

Page 7: Quality of Open Education and MOOCs
Page 8: Quality of Open Education and MOOCs

MOOCs and Quality...?!

• Should we care about the MOOC drop outs?

• Do MOOCs challenge the current HE model?

• How will it be looking when learning and certification will be disaggregated?

• What is it that makes a model with high drop out, little success rates and heterogenious target groups popular?

Page 9: Quality of Open Education and MOOCs

The MOOC Quality Project

12 weeks, 12 experts, 12 posts, 15.000 Readers, >150 comments m

ooc.e

fqu

el.o

rg

Page 10: Quality of Open Education and MOOCs

1. Massive Target Audience? • Change from „no target audience“-

thinking to having one in mind, even if it is wide. Take into acount new participation profiles.

MOOC

Lurkers

Passive participants

Active participants

Drop-ins

HILL, P. (2013) “The Four Student Archetypes Emerging in MOOCs” [Online] e-Literate blog post 02/03/13 [accessed 19/04/13]. Available:

http://mfeldstein.com/the-four-student-archetypes-emerging-in-moocs/

Page 11: Quality of Open Education and MOOCs

www.efquel.org

2. Mixing Groups?

• Be aware that inviting the world means to bring in the worlds opinion (existing groups might be disturbed)

• Mixing campus and MOOC Students might be challenging: drive in/by learners vs. highly motivated learners who want a masters degree.

http://www.teleskop-service.de/Veranstaltungen/ITT2007/Blick_in_die_Berge.jpg

Page 12: Quality of Open Education and MOOCs

3. Learning Across Contexts

• Be aware that the quality paradigm “fitness for purpose” is not working for MOOCs because MOOCs mean learning across contexts and purposes.

• Quality measures become individualized, quality methods like self- & peer-assessment and –reflection are suitable.http://www.teleskop-service.de/Veranstaltungen/ITT2007/Blick_in_die_Berge.jpg

Page 13: Quality of Open Education and MOOCs

www.efquel.org

4. Support Self-Organization• Be open about your requirements of

self-organization, provide scaffolding for those who lack that self-organization.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Fugle%2C_%C3%B8rns%C3%B8_073.jpg

Page 14: Quality of Open Education and MOOCs

5. Declare What‘s in it!

1. the degree of openness, 2. the scale of participation

(massification), 3. the amount of use of multimedia, 4. the amount of communication, 5. the extent to which collaboration

is included, 6. the type of learner pathway (from

learner centered to teacher-centered and highly structured),

1. the level of quality assurance,

2. the extent to which reflection is encouraged,

3. the level of assessment, 4. how informal or formal it

is, 5. autonomy, 6. and diversity.

Be precise about the content and purpose of the MOOC (self-declaration) and keep promises! (Use a MOOC description model)

(Conole 2013)

Page 15: Quality of Open Education and MOOCs

6. Peer-to-Peer Pedagogy• Use peer-to-peer pedagogy: peer-

learning, peer-review, peer-assessment, collaborative learning, multiple learning pathways and exploratory learning

• Understand that teaching is not a prerequsite of learning.

http://www.naset.org/uploads/pics/choice.gif

Page 16: Quality of Open Education and MOOCs

www.efquel.org

7. MOOCs Support Choice Based Learning

• Get away from – the notion that „ending a MOOC early“ means

dropping out – looking at MOOCs like (structured, paced,

timebound) courses

• Be aware that MOOC learning is an opt-in/out learning model

• MOOCs follow voluntary sequencing and are based on choices. The choices they offer make their attractiveness.

http://www.naset.org/uploads/pics/choice.gif

Page 17: Quality of Open Education and MOOCs

www.efquel.org

WWW.EFQUEL.ORG

EFQUEL office in BrusselsRue des deux Eglises 35B – 1000 BRUSSELSBELGIUMTel : + 32 2 639 30 32Fax : + 32 2 644 35 83Email : [email protected]

Released under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 Belgium License

You are free:• to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the

work• to Remix — to adapt the work

Under the following conditions:Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one.