quality profile sligo-3a.pdf · profile type of institution: iot +353 (0) 1 905 8100 key quality...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: QUALITY PROFILE Sligo-3a.pdf · PROFILE Type of Institution: IoT +353 (0) 1 905 8100 KEY QUALITY REVIEW COMMENDATIONS Te Review Tea oens te strent an ept of te Institution’s enaeent](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071214/6042115cdef696787e46bb2f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
QUALITY PROFILE
Type of Institution: IoT
+353 (0) 1 905 8100
KEY QUALITY REVIEW COMMENDATIONS
The Review Team commends the strength and depth of the Institution’s engagement with its external stakeholders. Reviewers saw and heard clear
IT Sligo holds a national leadership role in online delivery, which plays into its success in widening participation, serving the needs of its professional/
Staff at all levels of the Institution are passionately committed to giving students a good experience; and to the Institution’s mission and values. There
IT Sligo has effective mechanisms to support quality enhancement. For example, the needs of specific learners are routinely identified and
IT Sligo is highly regarded by employers and its graduates are perceived as ‘job-ready’ by employers.
QQI
Institutional Review 2018Next Review Date: 2024
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
NFQ
Review Handbook
Terms of Reference
Review Team
Annual Quality Reports
Follow-Up Report
Full Report
1
KEY QUALITY REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS
The Review Team recommends that the Institute continues and completes steps already being taken to: • Evaluate, streamline and thoroughly
The Institute should improve its processes for planning, managing and evaluating change. Notwithstanding the difficulties that have been created
The Institute should evaluate its current HR policy and culture. Quality depends on all categories of staff in the Institution doing what they are
The Institute should keep under review the difficult balance between dynamic responsiveness and strategic direction. There is a recognition that
The Institute should keep under review the new organisational structure.The Review Team welcomed the examples provided where individuals have
4
3
2
1
5
INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SLIGO