quantifying aerosol direct radiative effect with misr observations yang chen, qinbin li, ralph kahn...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
219 views
TRANSCRIPT
Quantifying aerosol direct Quantifying aerosol direct radiative effect with MISR radiative effect with MISR
observationsobservations
Yang Chen, Qinbin Li, Ralph KahnJet Propulsion Laboratory
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA
California Institute of Technology, June 05, 2007
OverviewOverview Aerosol direct radiative effect (Scattering, Absorption)
• Aerosol forcing (anthropogenic)• Aerosol radiative effect (natural + anthropogenic)
Method to estimate global aerosol direct radiative effect• Model-based, radiative transfer calculation• Satellite-based• -0.1~-0.9 W/m2 for annual mean global aerosol direct forcing
(IPCC,2007).
Previous satellite based studies• CERES (Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System) TOA fluxes ! Coarse resolution (~10x10 km2)
• MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) Aerosols ! Has difficulty in retrieving aerosol properties over bright land
This study• Use MISR (Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer) to quantify global
aerosol shortwave direct radiative effect (SWDRE), on both land and oceans.
Introduction to MISR (Multi-angle Introduction to MISR (Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer)Imaging SpectroRadiometer)
On board satellite TERRA
9 view angles at earth surface:
• ±70.5º. ±60.0º, ±45.6º, ±26.1º, nadir
Four spectral bands at each angle:
• 446 nm (Blue) • 558 nm (Green)• 672 nm (Red)• 866 nm (NIR)
Global Mode:• 275 m sampling resolution for
nadir camera and red band of other cameras
• 1.1 km for the other channels• 400-km swath• Global coverage: 9 days at
equator, 2 days at poles
Continuous data retrieval since Feb 2000.
MISR products used
MISR products and imagesMISR products and images
Nadir view Cloud mask
AOD TOA albedo
1°x 1° grid
MISR images
TOA albedo TOA albedo (2.2x2.2 km2)
AOD AOD (17.6x17.6 km2)
Cloud mask Cloud mask (1.1x1.1 km2)
BHRPAR BHRPAR (1.1x1.1 km2)
Global distribution of MISR AOD, Global distribution of MISR AOD, albedo, and BHRPAR (July, 2002)albedo, and BHRPAR (July, 2002)
26 BHRPAR bins:
0~0.1: each 0.01 interval
0.1~0.4: each 0.02 interval
Above 0.4: 1 level
List of selected regionsList of selected regions
Regions over land Regions over ocean
Each region has 10°x5° area
TOA albedo~AOD correlation over TOA albedo~AOD correlation over ocean regionsocean regions
The slopes indicate the ability of aerosols to affect TOA radiative flux.
Alternative method: do global regression for each solar zenith angle.
TOA albedo~AOD correlation TOA albedo~AOD correlation over remote ocean regionsover remote ocean regions
Global regression over ocean for each SZA
List of selected regionsList of selected regions
Regions over land Regions over ocean
Each region has 10°x5° area
Aerosol direct radiative effectAerosol direct radiative effect
(a) Clear-sky and (b) all-sky aerosol direct radiative effect (W/m2) for July 2002.
Aerosol direct radiative effectAerosol direct radiative effect
Aerosol DRE (Clear sky) (W/m2)
Aerosol DRE (All sky) (W/m2)
Global -4.70 -1.49
Over ocean -4.54 -1.95
Over land -4.88 -1.18
Source Aerosol DRE (W/m2) Spatial coverage Temporal coverage Satellite data source
Zhang and Christopher, 2005
-6.4 ± 2.6 Cloud-free oceans 09/2000-08/2001 CERES, MODIS
Christopher and Zhang, 2002
-6 Cloud-free oceans 09/2000 CERES, MODIS
Loeb and Kato, 2002
-4.6 ± 1 Cloud-free tropical oceans
01/1998-08/1998, 03/2000
CERES, TRMM VIRS
Loeb and Manalo-Smith, 2005
-5.5, -3.8 Cloud-free oceans 03/2000-12/2003 CERES, MODIS
-2.0, -1.6 All-sky oceans
From this study (July, 2002):
From previous satellite-based studies:
Correlation between aerosol Correlation between aerosol SWDRE and 0.56 SWDRE and 0.56 m AODm AOD
Correlation between aerosol SWDRE and AOD (a) Over ocean (b) Over land
UncertaintiesUncertainties Satellite retrieval of aerosol, TOA albedo and
surface properties.
Cloud contamination.
Diurnal variability.
TOA albedo narrow-to-broadband conversion.
Surface heterogeneity.
Use SVM classifier to calculate Use SVM classifier to calculate smoke aerosol effect - methodsmoke aerosol effect - method
SVM: Support Vector Machine
SVM classifiers• Clouds• Aerosols
Smoke Dust Other
• Ice/Snow• Water• Land
freeaerosolsmokeTOAaerosolssmoke IF __
Clouds
Land
Water
Smoke
Dust
Use SVM classifier to calculate Use SVM classifier to calculate smoke aerosol effect - resultsmoke aerosol effect - result
(a) Clear-sky aerosol SWDRE from smoke aerosols (W/m2)
(b) MODIS wild fire occurrence from Fire Information for Resource Management System (NASA/U of Maryland, 2002)
Use SVM classifier to calculate Use SVM classifier to calculate smoke aerosol effect - uncertaintysmoke aerosol effect - uncertainty
Threshold for differentiating ‘Aerosols’ and ‘Surface’ pixels is arbitrary, which may cause the underestimation of total number of ‘smoky’ pixels.
Since many ‘Surface’ pixels actually have some aerosol loading, the albedo for ‘Surface’ pixels is highly overestimated.
The SVM scene classification is still in provisional quality, and the aerosol sub-classification validation has not yet been completed.
Due to the above reasons, we chose not to use SVM scene classifiers in the global aerosol SWDRE estimation.
Conclusions and future workConclusions and future work Conclusions
• By using MISR datasets, first satellite-based attempt to estimate global aerosol direct radiative effect over both ocean and land has been made.
• Aerosols and TOA albedo show different correlations in absorptive aerosol dominated region and non-absorptive aerosol dominated region.
• Over land, the slope of AOD ~ TOA albedo decreases as BHRPAR increases, indicating the aerosol scattering and absorbing effect on TOA albedo is smaller over brighter surfaces.
Future work• Extend the approach to include seasonal and inter-
annual variability.