questionnaire on well-being at work 2011 university of helsinki
DESCRIPTION
Questionnaire on well-being at work 2011 University of Helsinki. Questionnaire on well-being at work Background - Gender:. Questionnaire on well-being at work Background - Age:. Questionnaire on well-being at work Background - Employment:. Questionnaire on well-being at work - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Questionnaire on well-being at work 2011 University of Helsinki
Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Gender:
Female Male0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
67%
33%
Al l (Mean: 1.33, Deviation: 1.105) (Responses: 3880)
Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Age:
-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
15%
29%24% 23%
9%
Al l (Mean: 2.837, Deviation: 1.564) (Responses: 3957)
Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Employment:
Fixed-term
Unti l further notice
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
41%
59%
Al l (Mean: 1.588, Deviation: 1.115) (Responses: 3947)
Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Duration of employment at the university:
less than 2 years
2-5 years
6-9 years
10-13 years
more than 14 years
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
19%
26%
14%
12%
29%
Al l (Mean: 3.071, Deviation: 1.817) (Responses: 3961)
Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Position:
Teaching or research staff
Other
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
48%
52%
Al l (Mean: 1.524, Deviation: 1.118) (Responses: 3992)
Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Do you work in a supervisory position?
Yes No0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
19%
82%
Al l (Mean: 1.815, Deviation: 1.073) (Responses: 3863)
Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Faculty
Faculty of Theology
Faculty of Law
Faculty of Medic ine
Faculty of Arts
Faculty of Sc ience
Faculty of Pharmacy
Faculty of Biological and Env ironmental Sc iences
Faculty of Behav ioural Sc iences
Faculty of Soc ial Sc iences
Swedish School of Soc ial Sc ience
Faculty of Agriculture and Fores try
Faculty of Veterinary Medic ine
Independent ins titutes
Central adminis tration
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2%
2%
10%
6%
11%
2%
6%
8%
5%
1%
6%
5%
27%
9%
All (Mean: 8.899, Dev iation: 4.219) (Responses : 4032)
Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Faculty of Medicine
Facul ty of Medicine
Insti tute of Biomedicine
Insti tute of Dentistry
Hjel t Insti tute
Insti tute of Cl inical Medicine
Haartman Insti tute
Uni t of Research programmes
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
18%
18%
8%
14%
13%
14%
15%
Al l (Mean: 3.86, Deviation: 2.334) (Responses: 421)
Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Faculty of Arts
Facul ty of Arts
Department of Phi losophy, H istory, Cul ture and Art Studies
Department of World Cul tures
Department of Modern Languages
Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
22%
24%
11%
24%
20%
Al l (Mean: 2.959, Deviation: 1.771) (Responses: 246)
Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Faculty of Science
Facul ty of Science
Department of Physics
Department of Geosciences and Geography
Department of Chemistry
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
Department of Computer Science
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
10%
31%
14%
25%
6%
14%
Al l (Mean: 3.302, Deviation: 1.843) (Responses: 437)
Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences
Facul ty of B iological and Envi ronmental Sciences
Ki lpisjärvi Biological Station
Lammi Biological Station
Tvärminne Zoological Station
Department of Biosciences
Department of Envi ronmental Sciences
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
17%
4%
5%
5%
48%
22%
Al l (Mean: 4.289, Deviation: 2.004) (Responses: 256)
Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Faculty of Behavioural Sciences
Facul ty of Behavioural Sciences
Insti tute of Behavioural Sciences
Department of Teacher Education
Helsinki Teacher Training School
Vi ikki Teacher Training School
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
14%
33%
29%
6%
18%
Al l (Mean: 2.802, Deviation: 1.62) (Responses: 318)
Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Faculty of Social Sciences
Facul ty of Social Sciences
Department of Economic and Pol i tical Studies
Department of Social Studies
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
20%
36%
44%
Al l (Mean: 2.232, Deviation: 1.26) (Responses: 181)
Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry
Facul ty of Agricul ture and Forestry
Department of Food and Environmental Sciences
Department of Agricul tural Sciences
Department of Forest Sciences
Department of Forest Sciences - Station (Hyytiälä or Värriö)
Department of Economics and Management
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
14%
33%
24%
15%
3%
11%
Al l (Mean: 2.925, Deviation: 1.763) (Responses: 255)
Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
Facul ty of Veterinary Medicine
Veterinary Teaching Hospi tal
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
73%
27%
Al l (Mean: 1.269, Deviation: 1.094) (Responses: 216)
Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Independent institutes
In dep en de n t i n sti tu tes
Ope n Un ive rs i ty
He ls i nk i In sti tu te o f Phys i cs
He l s in k i Un i ve rs i ty L ib ra ry
IPR Un ive rs i ty Cen te r
Lan gu ag e Cen tre
Fi nn i sh Mu seu m o f N a tu ra l H i s to ry
Ru ra l i a In sti tu te
Cen te r fo r In fo rma ti on Tech no l og y
He l s in k i C o l l e g iu m fo r Ad vance d Stud ie s
0% 20% 40% 60 % 80 % 10 0%
3%
2%
4%
7%
2%
0%
12 %
2%
0%
14%
6%
9%
7%
2%
3%
3%
10%
10%
2%
3%
Al l (Mea n : 11 .2 28 , D evia ti o n : 5 .28 5 ) (Resp on ses: 10 96 )
Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Central Administration
Central Adminis tration
Human Resources and Legal Affairs
Education
Financ ial Affairs
Research
Communications and Community Relations
Univ ers ity Museum
Univers ity Management
Planning and Community Relations
Adminis trative Serv ices
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12%
20%
22%
20%
5%
8%
2%
1%
3%
8%
All (Mean: 3.905, Dev iation: 2.698) (Responses : 348)
Your job
1 . My j ob d escr i p ti o n i s c l ea r an d I und e rstand my g oa l s
2 . My j ob i s su i tab l y ch a l l en g i ng
3 . I have e no ug h t ime to ca rry ou t my du ti e s du r i n g work i ng ho u rs
4 . I am ab l e to con cen tra te o n my j o b w i tho u t un du e d i s tu rba nce s
5 . I ha ve e no ug h i n f l ue nce o ve r my o wn j ob an d du ti e s
6 . Ch an ges a t wo rk d o n o t l e ssen my a b i l i ty to co pe a t w o rk
7 . I ha ve the a pp ro p r i a te too l s
8 . The d i n i ng an d o the r soc ia l a rea s a re a deq ua te
9 . Th e ra ti o b e twe en te ach ing a nd rese a rch wo rk i s sa ti s facto ry
1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5
4 .158
4 .02 8
3 .185
3 .1 48
3 .606
3 .222
3 .824
3 .67 5
3 .438
Al l
Managing
10 . The un i ve rs i ty 's s tra tegy i s c l ea r a nd compre he nsib le
11 . The un i ve rs i ty acts op en l y w he n ma king a nd p re pa r i ng d ec i s i o ns
12 . Emp lo yees a re ab le to i n f l u ence the un i ve rs i ty 's d ec i s i on s
13 . The s tra teg y s te e rs the a cti v i t i es and p r imary tasks o f ou r un i t
14 . Me n an d wome n h ave eq ua l opp o r tun i ti es fo r ad va nce me n t i n o u r un i t
15 . Ou r mee ti n g p ra cti ce s a re w e l l su i te d fo r ach iev i ng the un i t 's goa l s
1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5
3 .066
2 .721
2 .4 72
3 .07
3 .741
3 .063
Al l
Supervisory work
16 . My sup erv i so r ma kes su re th a t ou r g oa l s a nd ta sks a re c l ear
17 . My su pe rv i sor reg u la r l y carr i es ou t pe rfo rma nce eva l ua ti on s w i th me
18 . I ge t en o ug h co nstructi ve fe ed ba ck fro m my sup erv i so r
19 . My supe rv i so r trusts me
20 . I d a re to d i sag ree w i th my supe rv i so r
21 . My su pe rvi so r i s i mpa rti a l a nd fa i r
22 . My su pe rv i so r take s the d i ffe re nce s be tw een p eo p le i n to con si de ra ti o n ( fo r i nsta nce reg ard i n g ski l l s , e xp e r i e nce o r a b i l i t i e s)
23 . I te l l my sup e rv i so r abo u t my i d ea s to d e ve lo p our u n i t o r my wo rk
24 . My su pe rvi so r en cou ra ge s me to ma ke su gg esti o ns, take respo nsib i l i ty an d d eve lop my w o rk
1 1 .5 2 2.5 3 3 .5 4 4.5 5
3.271
3 .663
3.2 74
4 .076
4 .015
3.656
3.637
3 .8 77
3.693
Al l
Work community and co-operation
25 . Ou r u n i t i s a d yn a mic commun i ty o f e xpe rts
2 6 . Ou r u n i t has a p o si t i ve a tti tude tow ards deve l opmen t
2 7 . Th e co mmun ica ti o ns p ra cti ce s i n ou r un i t p ro mote e ff i c i en t commun i ca ti on
28 . No neg a ti ve comp e ti t i on b e twe en i nd i v i d ua l s takes p lace i n o u r un i t
29 . Ou r u n i t has a co n structi ve a tti tu d e towa rds hu ma n e rro rs
30 . We h a ve d eve l o ped e ffe cti ve p ro cesses to take u p d i f f i cu l t i ssue s fo r d i scuss io n
3 1 . We sup por t and enco u ra g e ea ch o the r
32 . I t i s e asy fo r me to ask my co l l e ague s fo r h e lp
33 . R umours a nd g oss ip do n o t i n te r fe re w i th w ork
34 . I h ave n o t b een a ta rge t o f w o rkp l a ce b u l l y i n g o r ha ra ssmen t a t w o rk ove r the p ast yea r
1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5
3 .567
3 .62
3 .112
3 .2
3 .51 3
2 .635
3 .55 8
4 .09 5
3 .53
4 .3 3 4
Al l
Competence
3 5 . Job i n trod u cti on s a re ha nd l ed w e l l i n o u r u n i t
36 . Exp e r i en ce an d kno wl e dg e (ski l l s , ne tworks, co n tac ts , f i nd i n g fi n an c ing ) a re sha red sys temati ca l l y be fo re pe op le l ea ve th e u n i t
37 . My sk i l l s ma tch the d e ma nd s o f my jo b
38 . I am a b l e to e ffi c i en tl y ma ke u se o f my sk i l l s i n my wo rk
39 . I ha ve su ff i c i e n t op p or tun i t ie s to d e ve l o p my comp e te n ce
40 . I kno w wh a t sk i l l s w i l l b e requ i re d o f me d u r in g the n ex t fe w yea rs
41 . Kn ow -how i s sha red su ff i c i en tl y b e tw ee n expe r ts
1 1 .5 2 2.5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5
2 .99 6
2 .6 9 3
3 .93 1
3 .947
3 .66 5
3.5 8 8
3 .2 6
Al l
Motivation
42 . My co n tr i bu ti o n i s imp or tan t fo r the success o f my un i t
43 . I h ave ca ree r ad va nce men t o ppo r tu n i t i es a t th e u n i ve rs i ty
44 . I ga in i n cen ti ve fro m th e reward s an d pe rso na l re cog n i t i on I ge t from my un i t
45 . I am ab le to wo rk i nd e pen de n tl y an d free l y
46 . My tasks a re i n te re sti n g a nd cha l l e ng in g
47 . My w ork a l l ows me to be i n ven ti ve /crea ti ve
48 . I ge t a su ffi c i e n t amou n t o f con stru cti ve feedb ack a t wo rk
49 . I g e t supp or t i n comme rc i a l i z i n g a nd d eve lo p i ng a bu si ness ba se d on my f i n d ing s ( i f th i s s ta teme n t do es n o t ap p l y to you , se le ct "n o o p i n io n ")
50 . I g e t supp or t i n fi nd i ng p ro je ct f i n anc i ng ( i f th i s s ta temen t doe s n o t ap p l y to you , se le ct "no o p in io n ")
1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5
3 .981
2 .672
2 .66
4 .23 6
4 .075
4 .091
3 .163
2 .579
3 .1 99
Al l
Health and life situation
51 . I fe e l I h ave a go o d me n ta l wo rk ca p a ci ty
52 . I fee l I h ave a go o d p hysi ca l w o rk ca p ac i ty
53 . Re ti re me n t p lan s a re d i scusse d o p en l y i n my u n i t
54 . My u n i t i s p rep a re d to a ccommod a te peo p l e w i th re duce d wo rk cap ac i ty ( i n te rms o f w o rk ing h ou rs o r ta sks)
55 . My u n i t ta ke s th e ne ce ssa ry mea su re s i n te rms o f fo l l o w i ng u p on si ck l ea ve s
5 6 . The occu pa ti on a l he a l th -ca re se rv i ce s sup p or t the w e l l -be in g o f th e p e rso nne l
57 . Th e co -op e ra ti o n b e tw e en HR , sup e rv i so rs a nd OHS works smoo th ly
1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3.5 4 4 .5 5
3 .8 15
3 .9 9
2.9 73
3 .5 19
3 .06
3 .619
3 .1 15
Al l
The university's image
58. The qual i ty of research in our uni t
59. The qual i ty of teaching in our uni t
60. Our uni t's success in acqui ring external financing
61. The universi ty's image as an employer
62. The universi ty's attractiveness to students
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
4.036
3.982
3.857
3.343
4.068
Al l
Means of the divisions
Your job
Manag in
g
Supe r vis
o r y w
or k
Wor k
com
mun it y
and c
o - oper a
t ion
Compe te
nc e
Mot iv
a t ion
Hea lth a
nd lif e
si tu
a t ion
The un iv
e r si ty
' s im
age
MEANS
1
1 .5
2
2 .5
3
3 .5
4
4 .5
5
3 .6
3
3 .73 .5 3 .4 3 .4 3 .4
3 .9
3 .5
All