radiolysis studies of kappa carrageenan for bio base

178
Radiolysis studies of kappa carrageenan for biobased materials development (生体由来材料開発のためのカッパ・カラギーナンの 放射線分解に関する研究) by Lucille V. Abad(ルシル ベレス アバド) Department of Nuclear Engineering and Management Graduate School of Engineering The University of Tokyo

Upload: duongngoc

Post on 23-Dec-2016

227 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Radiolysis studies of kappa carrageenan

for biobased materials development

(生体由来材料開発のためのカッパ・カラギーナンの

放射線分解に関する研究)

by

Lucille V. Abad(ルシル ベレス アバド)

Department of Nuclear Engineering and Management

Graduate School of Engineering

The University of Tokyo

What t

D

the heart

Dedicated

This one

Tabong,I’ve g

t has once

to Mama

e is for you

breakfast wgot this one

e known, i

a and Tab

Ma.

will no longee ready for y

it shall ne

bong

er be readyyou.

ver forge

but …

et.

This work was done under the sponsorship of the

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

RONPAKU (PhD Dissertation) Program

in cooperation with the

Department of Science and Technology

Philippines

Through the support of the following institutes:

Philippine Nuclear Research Institute

Nuclear Research Engineering Laboratory

Department of Nuclear Engineering and Management

The Univeristy of Tokyo

Takasaki Advanced Radiation Research Institute

Japan Atomic Energy Agency

Neutron Science Laboratory

Institute for Solid State Physics

The University of Tokyo

“Something that has always puzzled me all my life is why, when I am in

special need of help, the good deed is usually done by somebody on whom I

have no claim.”

William Feather

To my Advisers…

Dr. Hisaaki Kudo and Dr. Alumanda M. De la Rosa

Thank you for guiding me all the way and making sure that I finish this successfully.

To my Japanese Supervisors…

Prof. Mitsuhiro Shibayama, Dr. Masao Tamada, and Prof. Yosuke Katsumura

Thank you for giving me the rare opportunity to work with you in your laboratory.

To my Panelists

Prof. Yosuke Katsumura, Prof. Takayuki Terai, Prof. Mitsuhiro Shibayama, Dr. Hisaaki Kudo, and Dr. Masao Tamada

To my Japanese Mentors

Saiki-san and Nagasawa-san

Thanks for all the technical discussions, the planning and implementation of my experimental design, and most of all for teaching me the Japanese ways of doing things.

To my Japanese friends and acquaintances…

Lin-san, Muroya-san, Ira, Satoshi-san, Fu-san, Hiroki-san, Hasegawa-san, Tokoro-san, Asahi-san, Okamoto-san, Makuuchi-san, Yoshii-san, Kume-san, Takigami-san,

Amada-san, Imura-san, my gaijin tomodachis, and Japanese gakuseis…

A million thanks for putting up with all my “ “

お願いします

To my PNRI family…

Alum, Boss Elvies, Lorna, Chat, Biboy, Jay, Andrew, Ryan, Adel, Angie, Simon, Rina, Aileen, Sol, Sony, Mon, Jo Mike, Fe “Ima”, Yen-yen, Maricel, Boss Gin, my “ka-

bonding”, and the rest of the clan.

Thanks for all your support –technical or non-technical, for the spices of light moments that you provide!

To my OJT students and chemists…

Jaimee, Yam, Eco, Ron-ron, Julienne, Day, Arlyn

Thank you for your eagerness to learn and patience to repeatedly do accurately the analyses.

To my friends in Japan…

Agnes & Gigi with their two “chikitings”, Anabel, Adelfa, Michelle, Mida, Teks, Ely & Kuya Roger, Joji & Jun, Cora, Ascen, Mila, Goie, Kimie-san & Seigi-san and TA Japan

Thanks for the happy days in Japan over a glass of “biru” with matching spaghetti and “magic sing”.

To my Teresian Family…

Eufro, Bebing, Queenie, Amyting, Baleleng, Julie (+), Ester, Melds, Roli, Cena, Thelma, Remy, Mimi, Marj, Margie, Sally, Chuchi, Novie and all my special friends.

Thanks for your encouragement and raining heaven with your prayers.

To the best of my Kin… Teddy & Yvonne, Gemma & Raul, Danny & Pining, Justine and Joe, their siblings…

Thanks for your gestures of countless love and support.

And above all…

Thank you God for whispering in my ear – Yes You Can!

ABSTRACT

Kappa (-) carrageenan oligomers are known to have several biological

activities such as anti-HIV, anti-herpes, antitumor and antioxidant properties. Recent

progress in the development of radiation modified -carrageenan has resulted in new

applications such as plant growth promoter, radiation dose indicator and hydrogels for

wound dressing. This study would investigate on the changes in chemical structure,

gelation and conformational transition behavior and molecular size of -carrageenan

at doses from 0 to 200 kGy and would be correlated to these functions for the

development of bio-based materials.

Pulse radiolysis studies on -carrageenan was carried out to determine what

transient species directly affects the degradation rate of -carrageenan in aqueous

solution. The results reveal that there is no seeming reaction of the hydrated electron

with -carrageenan. OH• reacts with -carrageenan at a fast rate of approximately 1.2

x 109 M-1s-1. This value was influenced by conformational change from helix to coil

by the addition of the metal ion Na+, reduction of molecular weight by hydrolysis

reaction and reduction of reactive sites by sonolysis or irradiation.

Most applications from the radiation degradation of polysaccharides started

with the use of the “hit and miss” process where polysaccharides were irradiated at a

certain dose range and finding out which dose is suitable for a specific function.

Measurement of the radiation degradation yield (Gd) at different conditions can give

an approximation of the Mw at an absorbed dose. This will allow the production of

oligomers with a specified Mw. With the use of the Gd both in solid and in aqueous

solution, one can also make a rough calculation whether it is more economical to

irradiate -carrageen in solid or in aqueous solution. Results of this experiment reveal

ii

that the radiation degradation yields (Gd) of -carrageenan in solid and in aqueous

(1%) were as follows: 2.5, 1.7 and 1.2 x 10-7 mol J-1 for solid in atmosphere, solid in

vacuum and at 1% aqueous solution, respectively. The presence of N2O gas in

aqueous -carrageenan solution increased its Gd whereas a decrease in Gd was

observed in the presence of N2 gas. The Gd of -carrageenan was also affected by the

conformational change from helix to coil in the presence of Na+ ion.

This study would also investigate on the chemical structure of the radiolytic

products of -carrageenan at doses from 0 to 200 kGy at different irradiation

conditions. The results would determine the extent of destruction of its basic structure

[(13)-4 sulfate--D galactose (14)-3, 6 anhydro-"-D-galactose)] with absorbed

dose. The new functional groupings produced by radiation will be determined. The

findings would be related to some possible uses of the -carrageenan oligomers e.g.

plant growth promoter, anti-viral, anti-tumor, antioxidants, stimuli responsive gels,

hydrogels and as radiation dose indicators. Chemical and spectral analyses were

carried out using UV-Vis spectroscopy, FT-IR spetroscopy, NMR spectroscopy,

reducing sugar analysis, free sulfate and carboxylic acid analysis. The chemical and

spectral analyses of the radiolytic products indicated increasing reducing sugars,

carbonyl, carboxylic acids, and sulfates with increasing doses which reach a

maximum level at a certain dose depending on the irradiation condition. Values were

very much lower in solid irradiation (in vacuum and in air) as compared to aqueous

irradiation. NMR data also revealed an intact structure of the oligomer irradiated at

100 kGy in the specific fraction that contains an Mw = (3-10) kDa.

In addition to changes in chemical structure with absorbed dose, it would also

be important to determine the changes in dynamic behavior and structure form of -

iii

carrageenan with absorbed dose. This would indicate changes in gelation behavior

and conformational transition temperatures of -carrageenan or the destruction of its

polymer chain. The results would be important in determining the appropriate

molecular size needed for its biological activities. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and

small angle neutron scattering (SANS) were carried out for this purpose. DLS

experiments reveal that at a dose of up to 50 kGy, sol-gelation transition was still

observed. Beyond 50 kGy, no gelation took place, instead appearance of fast

relaxation mode in characteristic decay time function was observed at doses of (75–

150) kGy. Optimum peak intensity was found at 100 kGy (Mol wt .5 – 10 kDa)

which coincides with the optimum plant growth promoter effect in -carrageenan. At

a dose beyond 150 kGy, the conformational transition temperature from coil to helix

was no longer observed. In addition, SANS experiment indicated a unique structure

form at 100 kGy wherein a power law behavior with a fractal dimension -1.84 was

observed.

The correlation of all the results gave us a wide spectrum of the possible uses

of -carrageenan for bio-based material development.

iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pages

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION……………………………………………... 1

Biological Activity of Carrageenan………………………………………... 5

Carrageenan-based radiation dose indicator……………………………….. 8

Polyvinyl pyrrolidone – - Carrageenan……………………………………. 10

Hydrogels for Burn / Wound Dressing

Objectives……………………………………………………………….…. 11

CHAPTER 2: RATE CONSTANTS OF REACTIONS

OF -CARRAGEENAN WITH HYDRATED

ELECTRON AND HYDROXYL RADICAL…………………. 18

2.1. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………..... 18

2.2. MATERIALS AND METHODS………………..………………….... 19

2.2.1. Materials…………………………………………………….….. 19

2.2.2. Sample Preparation…………………………………………..…. 20

2.2.3. Laser Photolysis of -carrageenan………………………..……. 20

2.2.4. Pulse Radiolysis of -carrageenan…………………………..…. 20

2.2.5. Irradiation of -carrageenan………………………………..…... 22

2.2.6. Sonication of -carrageenan………………………………..…... 22

2.2.7. Molecular weight Determination of -carrageenan…………..… 22

2.2.8. UV-Vis Analysis……………………………………………...… 23

2.2.9 Viscosity Measurement……………………………………...….. 23

2.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION…………………………….……….. 23

2.3.1 Reaction of hydrated electrons with -carrageenan…………….. 23

2.3.2. Rate constant of hydroxyl radicals reactions

with -carrageenan……………………………………………. 25

2.3.3. pH Dependence…………………………………………………. 27

2.3.4. Pulse radiolysis studies of sonicated and irradiated

-carrageenan…………………………………………………... 29

v

Pages

2.3.5. The effect of sodium ion on the rate constant

of reaction of OH radical with - carrageenan…………………. 33

2.4. CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………. 37

CHAPTER 3: RADIATION DEGRADATION

YIELD OF -CARRAGEENAN…………………………….. 41

3.1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………… 41

3.2 METHODOLOGY……………………………………………………… 45

3.2.1. Sample Preparation……………………………………………….. 45

3.2.2 Gamma Irradiation of -carrageenan……………………………… 46

3.2.3. GPC Analyses of -carrageenan………………………………… 46

3.2.4. UV Vis Spectroscopy……………………………………………... 46

3.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION………………………………………... 46

3.3.1. Radiation Degradation Yield of -Carrageenan………………….. 46

3.3.2. The Effect of N2 and N2O gas on the

Radiation Degradation Yield of -Carrageenan………………… 51

3.3.3. The Effect of Na+ on the Gd of -carrageenan…………………… 54

3.4. CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………. 56

CHAPTER 4: CHEMICAL AND SPECTRAL CHARACTERIZATION

OF THE RADIOLYTIC PRODUCTS OF

-CARRAGEENAN …………………………………………… 61

4.1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………… 61

4.2. METHODOLOGY……………………………………………………... 64

4.2.1. Gamma Irradiation of -carrageenan……………………………... 64

4.2.2. UV Vis Spectroscopy……………………………………………... 64

4.2.3. FT-IR Spectroscopy……………………………………………… 64

4.2.4. Chemical Analyses………………………………………………... 64

4.2.5. Fractionation of Irradiated -carrageenan………………………... 65

4.2.6. NMR of Irradiated -carrageenan………………………………… 65

4.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION………………………………………... 66

4.3.1. UV-Vis Spectrum………………………………………………….66

vi

Pages

4.3.2. FT-IR Spectrum…………………………………………………... 69

4.3.3. Reducing Sugars………………………………………………….. 71

4.3.4. Acidity……………………………………………………………..73

4.3.5. Fractionation of Irradiated -carrageenan………………………... 77

4.3.6. NMR of Fractionated Irradiated -carrageenan …………………. 80

4.3.6.1. NMR of carrabiose standards……………………………… 81

4.3.6.2. NMR of oligomers from irradiated -carrageenan……….. 87

4.4. CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………. 95

4.4.1. For 1% Aqueous Solution Irradiation …………………………… 95

4.4.2. For Solid Irradiation …………………………………………. 96

CHAPTER 5: STRUCTURAL AND DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF

IRRADIATED - CARRAGEENAN…………………………. 103

5.1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………… 103

5.2. METHODOLOGY……………………………………………………... 104

5.2.1. Dynamic Light Scattering………………………………………… 104

5.2.2. Small Angle Neutron Scattering………………………………….. 105

5.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION……………………………………….. 107

5.3.1. Dynamic Light Scattering Studies of Irradiated -Carrageenan….. 107

5.3.1.1. Molecular weight dependence and characteristic

relaxation time dependence of -carrageenan

with absorbed dose………………………………………. 108

5.3.1.2. Coil-helical transition of irradiated -carrageenan……….. 110

5.3.1.3. Gelation temperatures of -carrageenan as a

function of dose…………………………………………… 116

5.3.1.4. Fast relaxation mode peaks corresponding to

optimum biological activity of -carrageenan………………119

5.3.2. Small-angle Neutron Scattering Study on Irradiated

-Carrageenan……………………………………………………. 121

5.3.2.1. Physical Properties of irradiated -carrageenan gels……… 121

5.3.2.2. SANS profile of -carrageenan gels………………………. 123

5.4. CONCLUSION………………………..……………………………….. 127

vii

Pages

CHAPTER 6: RADIOLYSIS REACTIONS OF -CARRAGEENAN……….. 132

6.1. INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………132

6.2. METHODOLOGY……………………………………………………... 133

6.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION……………………………………….. 133

6.3.1. Electron Spin Resonance of -carrageenan………………….. 133

6.3.2. Proposed Mechanism for the Radiolysis Reaction

of -carrageenan…………………………………………….. 137

CHAPTER 7: SUMMARY AND CONLUSIONS……………………………... 148

viii

LIST OF FIGURES

Pages

Figure 1.1. Idealized structure of -, - and -carrageenan……………………... 2

Figure 1.2. Plant growth promnotion effect of -carrageenan in rice…………... 7

Figure 1.3. Different formulations of -carrageenan-based

radiation dose indicator………………………………………………………. 9

Figure 1.4. PVP- -carrageenan hydrogel for wound/burn dressing…………….. 11

Figure 1.5. Over-all view of the different chapters………………………...……. 14

Figure 2.1. The schematic diagram of experimental apparatus of a pulse

radiolysis or laser photolysis combined with photo-spectroscopic method….. 21

Figure 2.2. Decay profiles of the absorbance at 720 nm after

pulse radiolysis of -carrageenan at varying concentrations………………... 24

Figure 2.3. Determination of the rate constant reaction of ·OH with

-carrageenan by competition method………………………………………. 26

Figure 2.4. Determination of the rate constant reaction of ·OH with

-carrageenan by competition method at varying pH (laser photolysis

method)………………………………….…………………………………... 28

Figure 2.5. Determination of the rate constant reaction of ·OH with

-carrageenan by competition method after neutralization at pH =2

(laser photolysis method)……………………………………………...…….. 28

Figure 2.6. Determination of the rate constant reaction of OH radical

with sonicated -carrageenan…………………………………………..…… 30

Figure 2.7. Determination of the rate constant reaction of OH radical

with irradiated -carrageenan…………………………………..…………… 30

Figure 2.8. UV-Vis spectra of sonicated -carrageenan………………………... 33

Figure 2.9. The effect of Na+ on the rate constant of OH· reaction

with -carrageenan………………………………………..…………………. 34

Figure 2.10. Two models of conformational transition in -carrageenan………. 36

Figure 3.1. Main mechanism for acid hydrolysis of -carrageenan……………... 44

Figure 3.2. GPC Chromatogram of a) irradiated solid

-carrageenan and b) irradiated aqueous -carrageenan……………………. 47

ix

Pages

Figure 3.3. Molecular Weight of -carrageenan in air, in vacuum and

in aqueous solution at various doses……………………………………….... 48

Figure 3.4. Reciprocals of Mw of solid -carrageenan in air and in vacuum

at varying doses…………………………………………………….………... 49

Figure 3.5. Reciprocal of Mw of 1% aqueous -carrageenan at varying doses… 50

Figure 3.6. Reciprocal of Mw of 1% aqueous -carrageenan at varying doses

purged with different gases……………………………………………..…... 52

Figure 3.7. UV absorbance at 260nm of -carrageenan (0.25%) irradiated at

different conditions…………………………………………………………. 53

Figure 3.8. The Effect of Na+ on the reciprocals of Mw of -carrageenan……... 55

Figure 4.1. Structure of Neocarrabiose Standards………………………………. 66

Figure 4.2. UV-Vis spectra of -carrageenan irradiated as

a) solid in atmosphere b) solid in vacuum and c) 1% aqueous

solution at varying doses…………………………………………………….. 67

Figure 4.3. UV absorbance (260nm) of irradiated -carrageenan

at different conditions……………………………………………………… 68

Figure 4.4. FT-IR spectra of -carrageenan irradiated in air, in vacuum

and in 1% aqueous solution at different doses……………………..……….. 70

Figure 4.5. Percent reducing sugar of -carrageenan irradiated at increasing

doses………………………..………………………………………………... 72

Figure 4.6. Percent Acidity of -carrageenan as a function of dose at

different conditions………………………………………………………….. 74

Figure 4.7. Fractional yield of irradiated -carrageenan………………………. 79

Figure 4.8. Proton NMR of neocarrabiose standards…………………………... 83

Figure 4.9. 13C NMR of neocarrabiose standards……………………………... 84

Figure 4.10. 1H NMR of irradiated -carrageenan oligomers…….……………....91

Figure 4.11. 13C NMR of irradiated -carrageenan oligomers…………………. 92

Figure 4.12. 1H and 13C NMR of -carrageenan polymer……………………... 93

Figure 4.13. Summary of chemical and spectral analyses of

-carrageenan irradiated in 1% aqueosus solution at varying doses………….97

x

Pages

Figure 4.14. Summary of chemical and spectral analyses of

solid -carrageenan irradiated in vacuum at varying doses………….………. 98

Figure 4.15. Summary of chemical and spectral analyses of

solid -carrageenan irradiated in air at varying doses……………………….. 98

Figure 5.1. The DLS Set-up………………………………………………..…….. 104

Figure 5.2. Schematic Diagram of the SANS-U Set-up………………..……….. 106

Figure 5.3. (a) Intensity correlation function and (b) decay time

distribution of 0.5% irradiated -carrageenan (in 0.05M KCl) at 80oC…….. 109

Figure 5.4. Relationship of the molecular weight of -carrageenan

(0.5% in 0.05M KCl) and 1/ (T=80oC and a scattering angle of 90o)

with absorbed dose………………..………………………………………..… 110

Figure 5.5. Decay time distribution function of 0.5% irradiated

-carrageenan (in 0.05M KCl) at varying temperatures at doses

of (a) 0 kGy (b) 150 kGy (c) 300 kGy……………………………………… 111

Figure 5.6. Conformational transition temperature as a function

of absorbed dose……………..……………………………………………… 112

Figure 5.7. Effect of gamma radiation on the structure of -carrageenan………. 115

Figure 5.8. Conformational transition models of -carragenan…………………. 117

Figure 5.9. ICF 0.5% irradiated -carrageenan (in 0.05M KCl) at varying

temperatures at doses of (a) 0 kGy (b) 100 kGy and (c) 200 kGy……...……. 118

Figure 5.10. Decay time distribution function of 0.5% irradiated

-carrageenan (in 0.05M KCl) at varying temperatures at doses

of (a) 0 kGy (b) 50 kGy (c) 75 kGy (d) 100 kGy (e) 150 kGy

and (f) 200 kGy………………………………………………………………. 120

Figure 5.11. -carrageenan gels in 0.05M KCl at 20oC………………………….. 122

Figure 5.12. Gelation temperatures of 5% -carrageenan………………………. 123

Figure 5.13. SANS intensity curves of -carrageenan

(in 0.0M KCl at 20oC) at varying doses……………………………………... 124

Figure 5.14. Power law behavior of -carrageenan

(5% in 0.05M KCl at 20oC) irradiated at 100 kGy………………………….. 126

Figure 5.15. Distribution of -carrageenan polymer chains

with dose…………………………………………………………………... 126

xi

Pages

Figure 5.16. Changes in gelation and conformational transition

behavior of irradiated -carrageenan at varying doses………………………..129

Figure 6.1. ESR of -carrageenan irradiated at varying doses in air…………......134

Figure 6.2. ESR of -carrageenan at varying temperatures

irradiated in vacuum…………………………………………………………. 136

Figure 6.3. ESR of -carrageenan irradiated in vacuum and in air

at 5 and 50 kGy…………………………………………………………….. 136

Figure 7.1. Effective dose range of irradiated - carrageenan

for bio-based materials development…………………………………………153

Figure 7.2. Over-all view of the current research and some future works………..154

xii

LIST OF TABLES

Pages

Table 1.1. Summary of the biological functions of -carrageenan oligomer….…8

Table 2.1. Rate constant of reaction of hydrated electron and

OH radicals with different types of natural polymer………………………... 25

Table 2.2. Rate constant of reaction of OH radicals with

-carrageenan at different conditions…………………………………….…..36

Table. 3.1 Radiation degradation yield of different polysaccharides

irradiated in solid and aqueous solution……………………………………. 51

Table 4.1a. Acidic composition of gamma irradiated solid

-carrageenan (in air) with absorbed dose………………………………….. 76

Table 4.1b. Acidic composition of gamma irradiated solid

-carrageenan (in vacuum) with absorbed dose…………………………….. 76

Table 4.1c. Acidic composition of gamma irradiated -carrageenan

(1% aqueous solution) with absorbed dose…………………………………. 76

Table 4.2. Molecular weight of the fractionated samples of

irradiated -carrageenan…………………………………………………….. 78

Table 4.3. UV-Vis ( = 260nm) of fractionated irradiated

-carrageenan (0.025%)……………………………………………………… 78

Table 4.4. Chemical shifts of the 1H NMR of neocarrabiose standards………… 85

Table 4.5. Chemical Shifts of the 13C NMR of neocarrabiose standards………. 86

Table 4.6. Chemical Shifts of the proton NMR of irradiated

-carrageenan oligomers……………………………………………………... 94

Table 4.7. Chemical shifts of the C-13 NMR of irradiated

-carrageenan oligomers……………………………………………………... 94

Table 5.1. Molecular weight (Mw), conformational transition

temperature (CTT) and gelation temperature (GT) of

-carrageenan at varying doses…………………………………...…………. 119

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

The Eucheuma seaweed, which produces carrageenan, is a red algae grown in

culture farms located mostly in Eastern Visayas and Mindanao part of the Philippines.

The Philippines remains the world's top producer of seaweed, according to SIAP

(Seaweed Industry Association of the Philippines) president Benson U. Dakay, with

an estimated production of 92,700 metric tons per year (MTPY) (46 % of the world

Eucheuma seaweed production) in 2007 [1]. A total yield of 34,500 MTPY of

processed carrageenan has been produced also in the same year. This accounts for

41% of the world processed carrageenan production. These data easily make the

Eucheuma seaweed and the Philippine processed carrageenan as priority export

products of the country. The Philippines should maintain this competitive advantage

through R & D that will diversify the applications of carrageenan and open new

markets for carrageenan.

Carrageenans are hydrophilic polymers that comprise the main structural

polysaccharides of numerous species of seaweed e.g., Eucheuma, Chondrus, Gigartina,

Fucellaria [2]. They are composed of D-galactose units linked alternately with $(1,3)-

D-galactose-4-sulfated and "(1-4)-3,6-anhydro-D-galactose. Due to their half-ester

sulfate moieties, they are strongly anionic polymers. These sulfated galactans are

classified according to the presence of the 3,6 anhydrogalactose on the 4-linked

residue, and in the number and position of the sulfate group. Carrageenans that can

create gels have a 3,6-anhydrogalactose unit. The most well known of them are kappa

()-carrageenans (A-G4S) and iota ()-carrageenans (A2S-G4S). -Carrageenan is

sulfated only in position C4 in the galactose unit, while -carrageenan has an

2

additional sulfate unit in position C2 of the 3,6-anhydrogalactose unit. Both the

number and the position of sulfate [3] and the 3,6-anhydrogalactose [4], have a

dramatic effect on the tertiary structure and the possible interactions of the different

types of carrageenans. -carrageenan forms gels that are hard, strong and brittle,

whereas -carrageenan forms soft and weak gels [5]. Lambda ()-carrageenan differs

from - and -carrageenan by having a disulfated-D-galactose residue and no 4-sulfate

in the -D-galactose residue. Instead of 4-sulfate ester groups, -carrageenan contains

variable amounts of 2-sulfate ester groups (G2,6S-G2S). Lambda carrageenan does

not gel at all. The repeating units -, -, and -carrageenans are shown in Figure 1.1.

Figure 1.1. Idealized structure of -, - and -carrageenan

O

O

CH2OH

HO

O

-O3SO

OCH2OSO3

-

-O3SO

OSO3-

OCH2OH

-O3SO

OH

O

H2CO

O

iota-carrageenan

OH

OCH2OH

-O3SO

OH

O

H2CO

O

kappa-carrageenan

O

O

O

O

CH2OH

HO

O

-O3SO

OCH2OSO3

-

-O3SO

O

O

CH2OH

HO

O

-O3SO

OCH2OSO3

-

-O3SO

OSO3-

OCH2OH

-O3SO

OH

O

H2CO

O

iota-carrageenan

OH

OCH2OH

-O3SO

OH

O

H2CO

O

kappa-carrageenan

O

O

lambda-carrageenan

3

Some 70% of all carrageenan products are utilized by the food industry. Of the

remaining commercially used products, the major applications are in the cosmetics

and personal care industries [6]. From the structural point of view, the carrageenans

have vast potential for non-food applications such as matrices for controlled drug

delivery systems, immobilized enzyme systems, and for wound dressing.

Radiation technology has emerged as an environment-friendly, commercially

viable technology with broad applications that can essentially contribute to achieve

the goal of sustainable development [7]. This technology is based on the use of

ionizing radiation to modify physical, chemical and biological properties of materials

for different industrial applications particularly in health care, agricultural, and

environmental applications. Material modification would include polymerization,

polymer crosslinking and degradation. Gamma ray emitters like cobalt-60 became

popular radiation sources for medical and industrial applications. In recent times, the

use of electron accelerators as a radiation source is widely increasing. In a radiation

process, a product or material is intentionally irradiated to preserve, modify or

improve its characteristics. Radiation processing is a very convenient tool for

imparting desirable effects in polymeric materials and it has been an area of enormous

interest in the last few decades. Primarily, radiation processing concerns molecular

weight increase by radiation-induced cross-linking and grafting, or molecular weight

decrease by degradation caused by scission or both. Commercial success has been

achieved in radiation processing of synthetic polymers, which is now a multi billion

dollar industry. While the radiation effects on synthetic polymers have been well

studied, the radiation effects on natural polymers such as polysaccharides remain

rather obscure and hence few applications are at hand. Radiation technology may also

be utilized for the conversion of these abundant natural resources into useful value-

4

added products. In recent years, natural polymers are being looked at with interest

because of their unique characteristics like inherent biocompatibility, biodegradability

and easy availability. Among the most abundant natural polymers, cellulose, chitin,

carrageenan, and alginates have been found to be the most promising candidates for

radiation processing [8]. Many new areas of use of radiation modified natural

polymers are being explored by researchers, such as pharmaceuticals, nanotechnology,

biomaterials, biofuels and biochemicals [9].

The irradiation of natural polymeric materials with ionizing radiation (gamma

rays, X-rays, or accelerated electrons) leads to the formation of very reactive

intermediates and free radicals. These intermediates can follow several reaction paths

that result in disproportion, hydrogen abstraction, arrangements and/or the formation

of new bonds. The degree of these transformations depends on the structure of the

polymer and the conditions of treatment before, during and after irradiation. Thorough

control of all of these factors facilitates the modification of polymers by radiation

processing. Radiation modification of natural polymers covers cross-linking (in the

presence of water soluble synthetic polymers), grafting, curing (for natural oils) and

degradation. With the end in view of developing non-food applications of

carrageenans, several works have been done on the radiation modification of

carrageenan to produce lower molecular weight fragments or crosslinked hydrogels.

Its applications cover the following: a) radiation processed carrageenan oligomers as

plant growth promoter; b) -carrageenan / polyethylene oxide (PEO) hydrogels as

radiochemical dosimeters; and c) Polyvinyl pyrolidone (PVP)-carrageenan hydrogels

as wound/burn dressing.

5

Biological Activity of Carrageenan

Carrageenans are known to have valuable biological functions. Due to the

superior gelling and high viscosity properties of the native carragenans, their

utilization for biological applications is in most cases in the form of their oligomers.

Oligo--carrageenans induce secretion of laminarinase from Rubus cells and

protoplast [10]. Degraded λ-carrageenan is reported to have tumor inhibiting activities

[11, 12]. Oligomers from carrageenans suggest promising antiherpetic and anti-HIV

(human immunodeficiency virus) activities [13 - 16]. Oligomers of carrageenan can

easily be prepared through depolymerisation either by chemical or enzymatic

hydrolysis.

Recently, degradation by radiation processing of polysaccahrides has gained

much attention due to its technological effectiveness in producing low molecular

weight oligomers. Radiation degraded polysaccharides such as chitin, chitosan,

carrageenan, alginates can induce various kinds of bioactivities such as growth

promotion of plants, suppression of heavy metal stress on plants and anti

microbiological activities [17]. Irradiated alginate shows a strong effect on the

growth-promotion of rice and peanut. Degraded alginate (MW ca. 7000) in 4%

alginate solution irradiated at 100 kGy or from powder irradiated at 500 kGy has a

remarkable effect on growth promotion of rice [18]. Oligochitosan with Mw of 2,000

inhibited the growth of fungi and that with Mw 800 enhances the growth of the same

typical fungi [19]. Depolymerized chitosan with an Mw of 47,000 shows growth

promoting effect in spring rape seeds [20]. Anti-bacterial activity of irradiated

chitosan has been tested against Escherichia coli B/r [21]. Irradiated pectin induces

Phytoalexin elicitor activity to prevent infection of plants by several fungi [22-27].

Irradiated chitosan has anti-fungal activity when used as coats for mango [28].

6

Irradiated lignocllulosic materials suppresses the heavy metal and salt stress on barley

plants [28]. Oligoalginate prepared by irradiation with an Mw of approximately

14,000 is found to be effective for in vitro propagation of flower plants [29].

Oligogalacturonide fragments are found to have root-inhibiting and flower-

stimulating effects [30- 31].

Upon irradiation, carrageenans can also be depolymerized to form shorter

fragments with some biological activities. When solutions of the irradiated -

carrageenan and -carrageenan are mixed with the growth medium for rice seedlings

under hydroponics conditions, stimulation of growth is observed [32-33]. As shown in

Figure 1.2, the maximum % weight gain of rice seedlings is obtained with -

carrageenan irradiated at 100 kGy. Unirradiated -carrageenan and -carrageenan also

stimulates the growth of rice to some extent. This suggests that the radiation product

should be within a certain range of Mw for it to exhibit the growth promoting effect

on plants. Thus, carrageenans exhibit various levels of growth promoting effects. -

carrageenan at 100 kGy and with a Mw of 24,000 shows the highest effect. -

carrageenan, on the other hand, exhibits less growth promoting properties than -

carrageenan. Growth promoting activity of -carrageenan on vegetables like bok-choi

and mustard has also been tested. -carrageenan is applied through hydroponics for

cultivation of bok-choi while foliar spraying for mustard. Growth promoting effects

are observed for both cultivation conditions. The effect of irradiated -carrageenan on

the growth of chrysanthemum in tissue culture has previously been studied. The

optimum growth promoting effect of irradiated -carrageenan is observed to be at 200

kGy . Based on the Gd of -carrageenan, the corresponding Mw of -carrageenan

irradiated at 200 kGy is 2000. The biological activity of oligosaccharides derived

7

from irradiated -carrageenan at different doses in potato tissue culture bioassay has

also been tested. Unirradiated carrageenan inhibits the growth of potato in tissue

culture while carrageenan irradiated at 30 kGy (Mw = 10,000) shows the highest

growth promoting effect. Compared to the control, the fresh biomass and shoot height

increases by 35% and 15%, respectively, when supplemented with oligosaccharide

with an Mw of 10,000 [34].

While much progress has been done in studies related to the application of

carrageenans as plant growth promoter, very few fundamental researches on the

radiation chemistry of carrageenan and radiolytic products formed have been made.

Studies on the effect of radiation on carrageenan and the characterization (chemical

structure and molecular size) of the radiolytic products will provide a better insight on

the preparation of these biomaterials as plant growth promoter. Furthermore, the

degradation response of carrageenan to the absorbed dose at different radiation

conditions will optimize conditions for the preparation of such materials which is an

important factor if economics have to be considered.

Figure 1.2. Plant growth promotion effect of -carrageenan in rice

8

Table 1.1 presents some known biological functions of -carrageenan

oligomer and its effective Mw or molecular size. Some general comments on its

chemical structure and size in relation to biological activity are also given.

Table 1.1. Summary of the biological functions of -carrageenan oligomer.

Biological Activity

Effective size or Mw

Some Comments

Anti-Herpes Antiviral activity of sulfated polysaccharides increases with the molecular weight or the degree of sulfation. The molecular weights and the sulfate contents of all the carrageenan samples are in the range adequate for antiviral activity.

Anti-HIV 51 – 54 kDa Anti-HIV activity of carrageenans depends on the type of sugar chain, the degree of sulfation, and the molecular weight. The most active preparations has a sulfate content of 3.4-3.8 mole/mole of disaccharide.

Anti-tumor 1.2 kDa -carrageenan is most effective among the carrageenans

Plant growth promoter

< 10 kDa Optimum at an absorbed dose of 100 kGy

Plant elicitor DP= 2-7 (optimum at DP=3)

Elicit laminirase activity in Rubus cells and protoplasts.

Carrageenan-based radiation dose indicator

Industrial radiation processing such as food irradiation and medical products

sterilization need visual radiation indicators to determine whether the products have

been irradiated or not. The radiation dose indicator is an important tool in quality

assurance program of radiation processing. A Go-no-Go radiation indicator is

available commercially for medical products sterilization in the range of 25 kGy.

However, there is no similar indicator for food irradiation in the range of 1 – 10 kGy.

The carrageenan-based Go-no-Go radiation dose indicator has been developed for

both medical products sterilization and food irradiation [33].

9

It consists of phenol red, an acid-sensitive dye mixed homogeneously with a

polymer base such as carrageenan or the carrageenan-based hydrogels (KC/MPEO

(medium molecular weight polyethylene oxide) hydrogel). The indicator is being

developed based on the observation that carrageenan releases the sulfate group during

irradiation thereby changing the pH around the carrageenan environment. A decrease

in pH of -carrageenan from pH 6.7 to pH 3.4 with dose (5 to 30 kGy) is observed.

This change in pH will elicit a reaction from the acid-sensitive dye resulting in a

change in color as the specific pH is reached. The radiation indicator being developed

is in gel or film form which can be affixed to the product packaging (Figure 1.3).

This product developed is simply based from the practical observation that

carrageenan would decrease its pH with dose. A study on the acidic components

produced from the irradiation of -carrageenan and the mechanism involved in their

formation would give additional information to further develop this application.

Figure 1.3. Different formulations (a-d) of -carrageenan-based radiation dose indicator

 

10

Polyvinyl pyrrolidone – -Carrageenan Hydrogels for Burn / Wound Dressing

Various water soluble polymers like polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP), polyvinyl

alcohol (PVA) and polyethylebe oxide (PEO) have been used successfully as a basic

material for the manufacturing of hydrogel wound dressing. They show usually good

biocompatibility. A combination with natural polymers such as agar improves the

physical-mechanical properties such as tensile strength, swelling and gel fraction. A

method of preparing these hydrogels was first patented in 1989 (US Patent No.

4,871,490) [35]. The method consists of a combination of poly(vinyl pyrrolidone),

poly(ethyleneglycol) and agar crosslinked and sterilized simultaneously by radiation.

Parallel to the sterilization is the formation of a permanent three-dimensional network.

There are already some commercialized hydrogel wound dressings under the trade

names Vigilon, Ivalon, Aqua gel and Kik gel, Cli-gel, Burn caring, P-Chitosan, Hiezel,

etc. which are using the same technique. Hydrogel made up of a blend of PVP and -

carrageenan is now also a fully developed technology. This has passed clinical trials

as wound dressing for diabetic ulcers and burn dressings and has a patent under the

Philippine Patent Office (No. 1-2000-02471) and is now ready for commercialization

(Figure 1.4) [36].

Hydrogels made up of water soluble and natural polymers are now quite an

established technology. They are known to exhibit properties different from the

original polymers. It is a known fact that carrageenans like other natural polymers are

degraded with radiation and PVP are crosslinked at concentration higher than the

critical value [37]. The combination of both gives a semi-interpenetrating network

where carrageenan degraded oligomer is physically entangled in the three dimensional

network [38]. Literatures on the theroretical aspect of the radiation crosslinking of

11

PVP hydrogels are quite extensive but very few are available on the radiation

degradation of carrageenan oligomers.

Figure 1.4. PVP- -carrageenan hydrogel for wound/burn dressing

Objectives:

From the introduction, several works have already been done to exploit the use

of carrageenan for agricultural, biomedical and industrial application. While the

application of radiation processed carrageenan oligomers has been thoroughly studied,

knowledge on the radiation-induced changes both in aqueous and in solid media and

the kinetics of radiation induced reactions in aqueous carrageenan are quite few. This

information would be quite essential in understanding the processes involved and the

radiolytic products formed (chemical structure, functional groups and molecular size)

that may be useful in the development of carrageenan-containing biomaterials for

functional material development. Furthermore, the factors (absorbed dose, in solid or

aqueous state, in air or in vacuum) affecting the radiation degradation of -

12

carrageenan for modification to useful low molecular weight oligomers would

optimize the radiation processing conditions for specific applications. The degradation

yield obtained at different conditions would determine how much dose would be

needed to attain an oligomer with specific Mw. Choices can then be made whether it

is more practical or economical to irradiate in solid or in aqueous solution. It is

expected that the yield of degradation of -carrageenan irradiated in vacuum would be

lower than irradiation in air. It may offer some advantages though in terms of keeping

the chemical structure of the oligomer intact in the absence of O2. Oxygen promotes

the formation of oxidizing species such as peroxy radicals.

This study will focus only on -carrageenan. It specifically aims to do the

following:

To study the kinetics of the reactions of the intermediate products of water

radiolysis with -carrageenan.

To determine the radiation yields of scission (Gd) of -carrageenan irradiated in

solid and aqueous state and some factors affecting the Gd.

To characterize the chemical structure of the radiolytic products formed with

absorbed dose.

To determine structure and dynamic behavior of -carrageenan as a function of

absorbed dose.

To propose mechanism for the radiolysis reaction of -carrageenan in solid and in

aqueous solutions.

Chapter two would study the rate constants for the reactions of carrageenans with

hydrated electron and hydroxyl radical as investigated by electron beam pulse

13

radiolysis and excimer flash laser photolysis. The influence of changes in pH on the

rate constant of hydroxyl radical with carrageenan is also studied. The rate constants

of irradiated and sonicated -carrageenan (at decreasing molecular weights) will also

be examined. The study will determine the effect of conformational changes (addition

of ions e.g. Na+ ) on the rate constant reaction of OH with -carrageenan.

Chapter three will study on the radiation yields of scission of -carrageenan -

irradiated in solid state and aqueous state at different conditions (solid in air and in

vacuum, aqueous in the presence of N2O or N2). The effect of conformational changes

(presence of Na+) on the Gd will also be investigated.

Chapter four will determine the radiolytic products formed at different doses.

The chemical structure of irradiated -carrageenan as analyzed by spectroscopic

methods and some chemical analyses will be discussed.

Chapter five will study the structure and dynamic behavior of irradiated -

carrageenan by dynamic light scattering and small angle neutron scattering. Changes

on the conformational transition temperature and gelation behavior with absorbed

dose will be discussed.

Chapter six will propose some possible mechanism for the radiolysis reaction

of -carrageenan.

Results will then be correlated to the possible applications of -carrageenan

for bio-based material development. A summary of all the chapters is illustrated in

Figure 1.5.

14

Figure 1.5. Over-all view of the different chapters.

Rate constants (k) of transient species ( OH and eaq )with -carrageenan

-.

H2O eaq, OH, H, H2, H+, OH-- . .

H. OH.eaq-

H. H.

H.

H.

H.

eaq-

eaq-

eaq-

eaq-

OH.

OH.

OH.

OH.

Chapter 2

200 kGy

-CarrageenanOligomers

-Carrageenan(solid in air. solid in vacuum,

1% aqueous)

Chapter 6: Radiolysis Reaction Mechanism

Possible uses:

• Plant growth promoter• Plant elicitor• Anti-HIV• Anti-herpes• Anti-tumor• Anti-oxidant• Hydrogels• Radiation dose indicator

Radiation degradation yield (Gd) of -carrageenan at different conditions

Chapter 3

etc.

O

O

OH

O

O

OH

(KC)nO

O

OH

O

O

OH

-O3 SO

CH2OH

O

OH

O

O

H2C

O

O

O

O

OH

-O3SO-O3SO

CH2OHCH2OH

O

O

OO

O

O

OH

CH2OHCH2OH

O

O

O

O

OH

-O3SO-O3SO-O3SO-O3SO

CH2OHCH2OHCH2OHCH2OH

O

O

OOOO

O

O

OH

CH2OHCH2OHCH2OHCH2OH

O

O

O

O

O

OH

-O3SO-O3SO

CH2OHCH2OH

O

O

H2CH2C

O

O

O

OHOO

O

O

O

O

O

OH

-O3SO-O3SO-O3SO-O3SO

CH2OHCH2OHCH2OHCH2OH

O

O

H2CH2CH2CH2C

O

O

O

OHOO

-O3SO

O

O

O

O

OH

-O3SO

CH2OHCH2OH

O

O

OO

O

O

OH

CH2OHCH2OH

OO

-O3SO

O

O

O

O

OH

-O3SO

CH2OHCH2OHCH2OHCH2OH

O

O

OOOO

O

O

OH

CH2OHCH2OHCH2OHCH2OH

OOOO

O

O O

-O3SO-O3SO

CH2OHCH2OH

O

O

OO

O

OHOH

CHCH2OH

OOO

O O

-O3SO-O3SO-O3SO-O3SO

CH2OHCH2OHCH2OHCH2OH

O

O

OOOO

O

OHOHOHOH

CHCH2OHCHCH2OH

OOOO

CH2 OHO

O

OH

O

O

O

OH

CH2 OHO

O

OH

O

O

O

OH

(KC)n-xCH2 OH

O

O

OH

O

O

O

OH

CH2 OHO

O

OH

H2CH2CH2CH2CO

O

O

OH

-O3 SO

i ii→

Changes in chemical structure of irradiated -carrageenan

Chapter 4

Structure and dynamic behavior of irradiated -carrageenan (changes in gel size, conformational transition temperature and gelation behavior )

Chapter 5

Experimental

Data

15

REFERENCES:

1. B. Dakay, “Developing Partnership between the Philippines and Indonesia in the Seaweed Industry”, 1st Indonesia Seaweed Forum, South Sulawesi, Indonesia, 27-30 October 2008.

2. G. Therkelsen, 1993. Industrial Gums, Polysaccharides and their Derivatives. R.L. Whistler and BeMiller, eds. Academic Press, San Diego.

3. M. Roberts, B. Quemener, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 10 (1999) 169. In A.

Antonopoulo, B. Herbreteau, M. Lafosse, W. Helbert, J. Chromatogr. A, 1023 (2004) 231.

4. J. Le Questel, S. Cros, W. Mackie, S. Pérez, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 17 (1999) 161.

In: A. Antonopoulo, B. Herbreteau, M. Lafosse W. Helbert, J. Chromatogr. A. 1023 (2004) 231.

5. F. Van de Velde, H. Peppelman, H. Rollema, R. Tromp, Carbohydr. Res. 331

(2001) 271.

6. R. Tye, Carbohydr. Polym. 10(1998) 259.

7. IAEA-TECDOC-1386, Emerging Applications of Radiation Processing, January 2004.

8. IAEA- TECDOC-1422, Radiation Processing of Polysaccharides, November 2004.

9. M. Haji-Saeid, M. Sampa, N. Ramamoorthy, O. Güven, A. Chmielewski, Nucl.

Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. B. 265 (2007) 51.

10. P. Patier, P. Potin, C. Rochas, B. Kloareg, J. Yvin, Y. Lienard, Plant Sci. 110 (1995) 27.

11. G. Zhou, Y. Sun, H. Xin, Z. Zhang, Z. Xu, Pharm. Res. 50 (2004). 47.

12. G. Zhou, H. Xin, W. Sheng, S. Yueping, Z. Li, Z. Xu. Pharm. Res. 51 (2005)153.

13. M. Carlucci, C. Pujol, M. Ciancia, M. Noseda, M. Matulewicz, E. Damonte, A.

Cerezo, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 20 (1997) 97.

14. T. Yamada, A. Ogamo, T. Saito, J. Watanabe, H. Uchiyama, Y. Nakagawa, Carbohydr. Polym. 32 (1997) 51.

15. T. Yamada, A. Ogamo, T. Saito, H. Uchiyama, Y. Nakagawa, Carbohydr. Polym.,

41 (2000) 115.

16. P. Cáceres, M. Carlucci, E. Damonte, B. Matsuhiro, E. Zúñiga, Phytochem., 53 (2000) 81.

16

17. T. Kume, In: Processing of Agro Waste by using Radiation Technology, IAEA, RCA National Executive Management Seminars (NEMS), Islamabad, (2000) 17.

18. N. Hien, N. Nagasawa, L. Tham, F. Yoshii, V. Dang, H. Mitomo, K. Makuuchi,

T. Kume, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 59 (2000) 97.

19. L. Hai, T. Diep, N. Nagasawa, F. Yoshii, T. Kume, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. B. 208 (2003) 466.

20. A. Chmielewski, W. Migdal, J. Swietoslawski, U. Jakubaszek, T. Tarnowski,

Radiat. Phys.Chem. 76 (2007) 1840.

21. S. Matsuhashi, T. Kume, J. Sci. Food Agric. 73 (1997) 237.

22. G. Darvill, P. Albersheim, Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35 (1984) 243.

23. A. Ryan, Biochemistry 27 (1988) 8879.

24. W. Schnabel, Polymer Degradation: Principles and Practical Applications, Hanser Verlag, 1981.

25. Y. Shigemasa, K. Saito, H. Sashiwa, H. Saimoto, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 16

(1994) 43.

26. E. Muraki, F. Yaku, H. Kojima, Carbohydr. Res. 239 (1993) 227.

27. A. Andrady, A. Torikai, T. Kobatake, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 62 (1996) 1465.

28. T. Kume, N. Nagasawa, F. Yoshii Radiat. Phys. Chem. 63 (2002) 625.

29. L. Luan, N. Hien, N. Nagasawa T. Kume, F. Yoshii, M. Nakanishi, Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 38 (2003) 283.

30. D. Bellincampi, G. Salvi, G. Lorenzo, F. Cervone, V. Marfà, S. Eberhard, A.

Darvill, P. Albersheim, Plant J. 4 (1993) 207.

31. V. Marfa`, D.J. Gollin, S. Eberhard, D. Mohnen, A. Darvill, P. Albersheim P, Plant J. 1 (1991) 217.

32. L. Relleve, L. Abad, C. Aranilla, A. Aliganga, A. de la Rosa, F. Yoshii, T. Kume,

N. Nagasawa, “ Biological Activities of Radiation-Degraded Carrageenan” Proceedings of the Symposium on Radiation Technology in Emerging Industrial Applications, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, 6-10, November 2000.

33. A. de la Rosa, L. Abad, L. Relleve, C. Aranilla, “ Radiation-Modified

Carrageenan For Agricultural And Health Care Applications”. IAEA Report, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Project Coordination Meeting on Radiation Processing of Chitin/Chitosan, Bangkok, Thailand, 18-20 March 2002

17

34. L. Relleve, N. Nagasawa, L.Q. Luan, T. Yagi, C. Aranilla, L. Abad, T. Kume, F. Yoshii, A. dela Rosa, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 87 (2005) 403.

35. J. Rosiak, A. Rucihska-Rybus and W. Pekala (1989). US Patent no. 4,871,490.

36. L. Abad, A. de la Rosa (2008). Philippine Patent no. 1-2000-02471.

37. J. Rosiak, J. Olejniczak, W. Pecala, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 36 (1990) 747.

38. L. Abad, L. Relleve, C. Aranilla, A. de la Rosa, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 68 (2003)

901.

18

CHAPTER 2

RATE CONSTANTS OF REACTIONS OF -CARRAGEENAN

WITH HYDRATED ELECTRON AND HYDROXYL RADICAL

2.1. INTRODUCTION

In dilute aqueous polymeric solutions, the energy of radiation is absorbed

mainly by water. Direct effect of radiation on the polymer itself is quite minimal. This

leads to the formation of OH-radicals, solvated electrons and H-atoms as reactive

intermediates (equation 2.1). Radiation chemical yield of these transients is similar for

gamma and electron beam irradiation, i.e. G(eaq) = G(OH) = 2.8 x 10-7 mol J-1, G(H) =

0.6 x 10-7 mol J-1 and it is constant in the wide range of pH [1]. The hydrated electron,

eaq, is the simplest reducing specie which may react with some transient species of the

water molecule, with surrounding water molecules or with the polymer itself.

Hydrated electrons react with N2O almost quantitatively giving the corresponding

amount of .OH with the rate constant k = 9.8 x 109 M-1 s-1 as shown in equation 2.2.

[2, 3]. The .OH is a reactive oxidizing species, which can abstract hydrogen within the

polymer. The H radicals react with polymers at a rate constant one order lower than

the OH radicals whose value is often times negligible [1].

Pulse radiolysis is well known as an excellent method for direct observations

of short-lived transient species and their reactions. A method of nanoseconds /

(2.1)

(2.2)eaq + N2O + H2O .OH + N2 + OHeaq + N2O + H2O .OH + N2 + OH

H2O eaq, OH, H, H2, H+, OH-- . .

19

picoseconds electron beam pulse radiolysis or flash laser photolysis combined with

absorption spectroscopy has been used for the investigation of these radiation-induced

intermediates. The electron beam pulse radiolysis technique involves the use of high-

energy electrons (from a linear electron accelerator) that are delivered to a sample at

times < 1 s [4]. Laser photolysis technique involves a technique where sample is

firstly excited by a strong pulse of light from a laser of < 1 s pulse width. This first

strong pulse of both techniques starts a chemical reaction. Typically the absorption of

light by the sample is recorded within short time intervals to monitor relaxation or

reaction processes initiated by the pulse by photo spectroscopic method such as UV-

spectroscopy. Using both methods, this chapter will investigate the rate constants (k)

of the reaction of -carrageenan and its oligomers with the primary water radicals

using both techniques. It will also investigate the effect of conformational changes in

-carrageenan on its k.

2.2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.2.1. Materials

Refined -carrageenan was obtained from Shemberg Corporation, Philippines.

This was further purified. -carrageenan was dissolved in distilled water and

precipitated with isopropyl alcohol. The precipitated carrageenan was dissolved in a

buffer solution containing 0.1N NaCl and 0.005M ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

(EDTA). The sample was dialyzed (Mol. wt. cut-off = 12,000-14,000) against a

NaH2PO4/ Na2HPO4 buffer solution for 72 hrs. The dialyzed solution was then

reprecipitated with isopropyl alcohol and freeze dried [5, 6].

20

2.2.2. Sample Preparation

The purified samples of refined -carrageenan were dissolved in Millipore

water to make a 50 mM concentration (based on Mw of repeating unit). This was

stirred overnight to insure complete dissolution. The -carrageenan samples were then

diluted to the desired concentrations for both the Laser Photolysis and Electron-beam

radiolysis experiments. The pH of the solutions were adjusted either by the addition of

HClO4 or NaOH. Perclorate anion does not react with the .OH. In order to investigate

the reaction of OH radical with the polymer, the solution was first saturated with N2O

to convert the eaq, into .OH (equation 2.2). On the other hand, the solution was

saturated with Ar when reaction of eaq with the polymer was being studied. This

eliminates the dissolved atmospheric oxygen from scavenging the hydrated electrons.

For analysis using the laser photolysis, polymer solutions were added with 5mM H2O2

to generate .OH.

2. 2.3. Laser Photolysis of -carrageenan

A 248 nm (KrF) excimer laser was used with the maximum energy of 330 mJ

per 20 ns pulse. The analyzing light was perpendicular with the laser beam, and the

optical length was 15 mm. Fresh sample solutions were placed in the optical cell by

batch.

2.2.4. Pulse Radiolysis of -carrageenan

Pulse radiolysis experiments were performed using an electron beam (10ns) of

35 MeV delivered from a linear accelearator. The preparation and analysis of the

samples were the same as that in laser photolysis, except that the optical path length

21

was 18mm. Figure 2.1 shows the schematic diagram for the laser photolysis and pulse

radiolysis set-up with all the essential parts. In this figure, LINAC is a linear

accelerator. The pulsed lamp is a Xe lamp which provides high-intensity probe light

from UV to near IR region. This probe light is being optimized by the presence of

lenses which passes through the monochromator for proper selection of wavelength.

The pulse generator produces a series of control signals to LINAC, Excimer, pulse Xe

lamp and oscilloscope et al. The photodiode detects the change in intensity of the

probing light where the signals are being amplified by the amplifier. The digital

oscilloscope then collects and records these data which is transmitted to the computer

for storage and processing purposes. Control for the pulse generator, oscilloscope and

monochromator is done through a GPIB interface using a homemade software based

NI LabVIEW (National InstrumentsTM).

Figure 2.1. The schematic diagram of experimental apparatus of a pulse radiolysis or laser photolysis combined with photo-spectroscopic method.

Lenses Cell

Beam

LINAC orExcimer

Mono-chromator Photodiode

Pulse duration: 10 or 50 nsDose per pulse: 20 or 50Gy

PulseGenerator

Computer

Oscilloscope

Amplifier

Lamp

22

2.2.5. Irradiation of -carrageenan

Irradiation of the purified -carrageenan was carried out using the Co-60

facility of the Takasaki Advanced Radiation Research Institute, Japan Atomic Energy

Agency in atmospheric condition, at a dose rate of 10 kGy/h with absorbed doses

ranging from 1 to 100 kGy.

2.2.6. Sonication of -carrageenan

Sonochemical degradation of -carrageenan was performed using the Cole

Parmer 4710 Series, Ultrasonic Homogenizer, with a frequency of 80 kHz. Solutions

with concentration of 5%, 2.5 % and 1% were sonicated for 30mins.

2.2.7. Molecular weight Determination of -carrageenan

The molecular weight of -carrageenan was determined by Gel Permeation

Chromatography. GPC analyses were performed on a Tosoh chromatograph equipped

with DP-8020 pump, CO-8020 column oven, RI-8020 refractive index detector and

four TSK gel PWXL columns in series (G6000 PWXL, G4000 PWXL, G3000 PWXL

and G2500 PWXL. Elution was carried out using 0.1M NaNO3 (to suppress

electrostatic effects [7, 8] as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. The

temperatures of the column and detector were both maintained at 40oC. A calibration

curve was constructed using polyethylene oxide as standards. All molecular masses

reported in this work are based on PEO standards and are not absolute.

23

2.2.8. UV-Vis Analysis

UV-visible spectroscopy of carrageenan solutions was performed using a Shimadzu

spectrophotometer UV-265 FW (wavelength range = 200 - 600 nm) at ambient

temperature and at 0.025% (w/v) concentration.

2.2.9. Viscosity Measurement

Viscosity measurement of carrageenan solutions (1%) was done using a

Tokimec Viscometer TV-20L with a THM-11 spindle at 25oC and a rotor speed of 6

rpm.

2.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

2.3.1. Reaction of Hydrated Electrons with -Carrageenan

The rate constant of the reaction of hydrated electron with -carrageenan can

be estimated by measuring the rate of disappearance of eaq- at 720 nm. The first order

rate constants for the reaction of eaq- with -carrageenan can be obtained from the

linear plot of log (absorbance) against time after pulse. From the slope of the straight

line of the plot of the first order rate constant with polymer concentration, the second-

order rate constant can then be estimated.

The plot of absorbance with time at different concentrations of -carrageenan

is shown in Figure 2.2. The figure indicates no seeming reaction of the eaq- with -

carrageenan. The rate of decay decreased with increasing polymer concentration. This

trend of decreasing rate constants may simply be a result of the slow diffusion of eaq-

into the polymer due to increasing viscosity. Even at very low concentrations of

24

-carrageenan where viscosity approximates that of water (0.2-0.5 mM), this

decreasing trend of rate constants is still observed. Thus it can be deduced that the

reaction with hydrated electron with -carrageenan is negligible. The reactivity of eaq-

towards the carbohydrates is generally low (typically < 107 M-1 s-1) [9]. Investigations

done on the reaction rates of hydrated electron with carboxymethyl cellulose (with

different degrees of substitution), carboxymethyl chitin, carboxymethyl chitosan,

chondrotin sulfate and keratin sulfate are shown in Table 2.1.

water

10mM

water

10mM

Figure 2.2. Decay profiles of the absorbance at 720 nm after pulse radiolysis of -carrageenan at varying concentrations.

25

Table 2.1. Rate constant of reaction of hydrated electron and OH radicals with different types of natural polymer.

Type of Natural Polymer k (M-1 s-1) of hydrated

electron with polymer k (M-1 s-1) of OH radicals

with polymer Carboxymethyl cellulose (4.0 - 5.0) x 106 [10]

6.53 x 106 [10] 1.8 x 107 [11]

(9.5 - 10.2) x 108 [9,16]

Hyaluronic acid < 5.0 x 106 [12] (7 – 9) x 108 [18] Carboxymethyl chitin 6.1 x 107 [13] 9.9 x 108 [15] Carboxymethyl chitosan 3.7 x 107 [13] 12.9 x 108 [15] Chondrotin sulfate (1.1 – 4.2) x 107 [14] Keratin sulfate 3.3 x 107 [14] Dextran 1 x 108 [17]

2.3.2. Rate Constant of Hydroxyl Radicals Reactions with -

Carrageenan

The OH• radical has no absorption in the visible and near-UV regions. Thus,

the rate constant of the reaction of OH• with -carrageenan was determined by the

competition kinetics using KSCN as competitor scavenger. SCN- can be oxidized by

the OH• radical to form (SCN)2•- which has a strong absorption band at 472 nm

(equation 2.3). The rate constant of OH• reactions with -carrageenan can be

measured using equation 2.4.

OHC SCN SCN

OH SCN 2C (2.3)

1 .

. (2.4)

where A0 and A are the transient absorbance of (SCN)2•- in the absence and presence

of -carrageenan respectively. KOH• + KSCN! is known to be 1.1 x 1010 M-1s-1[15] . Kkc

can then be obtained from the slope of the plot of .

against

26

A/A0 – 1 where either the KSCN or -carrageenan concentration can be fixed. In the

current procedure, KSCN concentration was fixed at 2mM. Figure 2.3 shows the plot

of the curves using laser photolysis and e-beam radiolysis. The values of Kkc obtained

for both methodologies were quite high and were in close agreement with each other,

1.14 x 109 for pulse radiolysis and 1.21 x 109 M-1 s-1 for laser photolysis. This value is

quite close to the reported values for CM-cellulose, CM-chitosan and CM-chitin

shown in Table 2.1. The rate constants for the reaction of OH• with dextran and

hyaluronic acid are lower.

0.0 4.0e-10 8.0e-10 1.2e-9 1.6e-9 2.0e-90.0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2.0

Pulse radiolysisPhotolysis

A0/

A -

1

[KC] / KOH + SCN- [SCN-]

K = 1.14 x109

K = 1.21 x109

Figure 2.3. Determination of the rate constant reaction of ·OH with -carrageenan by competition method.

27

2.3.3. pH Dependence

The rate constant of reaction of the OH radical with a charged polymer can be

pH or ionic strength dependent. This phenomenon can be influenced by the changes in

conformational structure of the polymer due to these variations. CM-cellulose has

higher rate constant at a basic pH and in the presence of a salt (NaCl). This is due to

its extended conformation in these prevailing conditions. As the pH is increased,

ionization, through its repulsive interactions, causes extension of macromolecule

chains. Ions of NaCl reduce the mutual interaction of charges on macromolecules,

thus the stiffness of chains reduces, resulting in coiling [17] . Similar results are also

observed in CM-chitin and CM-chitosan where both exhibit pH dependence. The rate

constant is lowest at pH = 4.4, near the isoelectric point of CM-chitin [16]. On the

other hand, CM-chitosan exhibits maximum k at a pH range of 2.0 – 7.3 [16]. At this

pH range, both polymers tend to have the coiled conformation. -carrageenan is also a

negatively charged polymer with sulfate groups attached to it. The rates of reaction of

OH• with -carrageenan may also exhibit pH dependence. Figure 2.4 shows the

influence of pH (2 - 10) on the k reaction of OH• with -carrageenan. At pH higher

than 10, OH• dissociates into O• as shown in equation 2.5. The pKa of OH• is 11.5.

OH OH•

O• H2O (2.5)

Rate constant was faster at an acidic pH = 2. When the acidic solution of -

carrageenan was neutralized back to pH 7.7, the rate constant did not revert back to

the original value of 1.21 x 109 M-1 s-1 (Figure 2.5). This indicates that the increase in

rate constant at pH =2 was not due to any conformational change in the -carrageenan

but to some structural changes. At an acidic pH, it is possible that hydrolysis reaction

28

Figure 2.4. Determination of the rate constant reaction of ·OH with -carrageenan by competition method at varying pH (laser photolysis method)

Figure 2.5. Determination of the rate constant reaction of ·OH with -carrageenan by

competition method after neutralization at pH =2 (laser photolysis method)

0 4.0e‐10 8.0e‐10 1.2e‐9 1.6e‐9 2.0e‐90.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

A0

/A -

1

[KC] / KOH + SCN- [SCN-]

pH 7.7 (control) pH 2 pH 4 pH 6 pH 10 

4.0e-10 6.0e-10 8.0e-10 1.0e-9 1.2e-9

0.0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2.0

pH 7.7pH2 pH 2 after neutralization

A0

/A -

1

[KC] / KOH + SCN- [SCN-]

29

may have occurred resulting in the fragmentation of -carrageenan [20]. Thus, OH•

can diffuse faster into the polymer resulting in a higher rate constant. Measurement of

the viscosity of - carrageenan at pH 2 and at neutral pH indicated values of 61 and

85 mPa·s, respectively. These results would indicate further that at pH 2, hydrolysis

reaction took place which resulted in the formation of lower molecular fragments that

consequently decreased the viscosity of -carrageenan. In cellulose, glycosidic

linkages are stable to alkali but are readily hydrolyzed by dilute acid solutions [21].

2.3.4. Pulse radiolysis studies of sonicated and irradiated -

carrageenan

The molecular weight of the sonicated -carrageenan solutions was analyzed

by GPC. Mw was determined to be as follows: 376,000; 267,000; and 202,000. The

rate constant of OH• reaction with -carrageenan of these samples was measured by e-

beam pulse radiolysis. A decrease in molecular weight of -carrageenan would

signify a decrease in viscosity, which expectedly would increase the diffusion rate of

OH radicals and consequently increase the rate constant. The results, however,

indicated a reverse trend than what was expected. Figure 2.6 shows that the rate

constants decreased from k = 9.9 x 108 (unsonicated -carrageenan) to k = 9.4 x 108,

8.3 x 108 and 6.8 x 108 M-1s-1 with decreasing molecular weights. Similarly, the rate

constants of irradiated carrageenan at 25, 50 and 100 kGy (computed Mw = 188,000;

105,000; and 59,000 respectively) decreased (from k = 1.1 x 109 to an average of k =

8.2 x 108 M-1s-1) but did not vary with increasing doses (Figure 2.7). Two factors may

affect the reaction rate of a polymer. First, a reduction of viscosity or molecular size

leads to higher diffusion of OH• in the polymer resulting in increased rate constant.

Second, rate constant is directly proportional to the number of reactive

30

0.0 2.0e-10 4.0e-10 6.0e-10 8.0e-10 1.0e-9 1.2e-9 1.4e-9 1.6e-9 1.8e-9

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

0kGy25kGy50kGy100kGy

A0/

A -

1

[KC] / [KOH.] [SCN- ][KC] / [KOH.] [SCN- ]

Figure 2.6. Determination of the rate constant reaction of OH radical with

sonicated -carrageenan

Figure 2.7. Determination of the rate constant reaction of OH radical with irradiated -carrageenan

0.0 2.0e-10 4.0e-10 6.0e-10 8.0e-10 1.0e-9 1.2e-9 1.4e-9 1.6e-9

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

Mw = 436,915 (Non -sonicated)

Mw = 376,139

Mw = 267,467

Mw = 202,244

[KC] / [KOH.] [SCN- ]

0.0 2.0e-10 4.0e-10 6.0e-10 8.0e-10 1.0e-9 1.2e-9 1.4e-9 1.6e-9

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

Mw = 437 kDa (Non-sonicated)

Mw = 376 kDa

Mw = 267 kDa

Mw = 202 kDa

[KC] / [KOH.] [SCN- ]

A0

/ A

-1

31

sites for the OH• interaction. Based on the results, the latter factor predominates in the

sonication or irradiation of -carrageenan. Cleavage of glycosidic linkage in -

carrageenan is the most likely effect in the sonication or irradiation of -carrageenan

as evidenced by a rapid decrease in molecular weight by either these two processes.

But cleavage of glycosidic linkage alone by hydrolysis reaction would have increased

the rate constant of OH• reaction similar to the one observed in -carrageenan at pH

= 2. Experiments on chitosan indicate that the rate constant of OH• reaction with

chitosan is increased with decreasing chain length [22]. Most likely, sonication or

irradiation of -carrageenan could have generated products that have reduced the

reactive sites for OH• reaction with -carrageenan. Thus, decreasing rate constant of

OH• interaction with decreasing molecular weight was observed both in sonicated and

irradiated -carrageenan. The degradation mechanism of macromolecules by

ultrasound is frequently attributed to cavitation (mechanical) effects and partially to

the stress concentration on the segment of macromolecules [23]. At lower

frequencies, 20–50 kHz range (the ‘low’ frequency domain reaches to 100 kHz), these

effects are observed [24]. When ultrasound of a frequency >500 kHz is applied, an

additional factor (radical reactions similar to radiolysis effect) may become more

pronounced [25]. Since the frequency used for the sonication of -carrageenan was

only 80 kHz, it was expected that cleavage of glycosidic linkage could be caused only

by vibrational effect. However, UV-Vis spectra of sonicated -carrageenan solutions,

revealed otherwise as seen in Figure 2.8. The figure shows slightly increasing UV

absorbance at 260nm. Similar experiments done previously on sonicated chitosan

(360kHz) show two absorption bands (at 265 and at 297 nm), absent in the starting

material, in the UV–Vis spectroscopy. These are some transformations of chitosan-

derived radicals that lead to the formation of carbonyl groups [22]. Ultrasound-

32

induced degradation of chitosan in Ar-saturated solutions, both caused by OH• or

vibrational effects, is accompanied by side reactions. One source of such processes is

a terminal radical formed as a result of glycosidic bond breakage. In the case of OH•-

mediated process, there are also non-terminal radicals located along the chain, which

may not be capable of causing chain breakage, but may undergo other reactions [25,

26]. The effect of sonochemical degradation of -carrageenan may follow the same

scheme as that of chitosan. Since the frequency is not so high, the formed carbonyl

may simply be a terminal radical formed as a result of glycosidic bond breakage.

Thus, only a slight increase in carbonyl bonds (UV-Vis spectra in Figure 2.8) was

observed with increasing doses. As a consequence, diminishing reactive site for OH

radical interaction was also observed as indicated by decreasing rate constant k with

sonication time (decreasing molecular weight). In the case of the reaction of ionizing

radiation with -carrageenan, reactions of OH• and other radicals can produce

carbonyl groups in several sites not only in the terminal groups. Reactions can be

more severe than the sonication process especially under air condition where some

peroxy radicals are generated. Oxidation reactions may take place with the formation

of carbonyl groups/carboxyl groups and which can eventually lead to fragmentation

patterns that may result in ring opening of the galacto-pyranose ring. This phenomena

may then lead to a drastic reduction of reactive sites for OH• interaction at all levels of

absorbed doses (decreasing molecular weight). Thus, the k for OH• reaction with -

carrageenan levels off. Two events - decrease in viscosity (increase in k) and decrease

in reactive sites (decrease in k) with increasing radiation may have occurred

simultaneously producing an over-all effect of a consistently uniform rate constant for

all doses.

33

2.3.5. The Effect of Sodium Ion on the Rate Constant of Reaction of

OH Radical with - Carrageenan

It is known that OH radicals react with synthetic polyelectrolytes at rate

constants dependent on the conformation of a macromolecule. When macromolecules

are charged, they attain a linear conformation with a rate constant that is significantly

higher than when they are in their neutral coiled conformation [27,28]. Extended

chains fill up volume of the solution more uniformly than shrunk chains, which

occupy only limited space leaving large voids of water devoid of the solute. The

reaction rate constant of OH• with macromolecules is dependent on the diffusion

distance [17]. This effect can be observed for natural polymers and their derivatives.

This phenomena is illustrated in the cellulose derivatives (CM-cellulose, CM-

Figure 2.8. UV-Vis spectra of sonicated -carrageenan

Mw = 436,195 (non-sonicated)Mw = 376,139Mw = 267,467Mw = 202,244

Ab

so

rba

nc

eMw = 436 kDa (non-sonicated)Mw = 376 kDaMw = 267 kDaMw = 202 kDa

260nm

200 300 400 500 600-0.02

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

Wavelength (nm)

34

0 1x10-12 2x10-12 3x10-12 4x10-12 5x10-12

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5Kappa Carrageenan

Kappa Carrageenan added with 0.08M NaClO4

[KC] / [KOH.] [SCN- ] / M-1s-1

A0/

A -

1 /

a.u

.

0 1x10-12 2x10-12 3x10-12 4x10-12 5x10-12

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5Kappa Carrageenan

Kappa Carrageenan added with 0.08M NaClO4

[KC] / [KOH.] [SCN- ] / M-1s-1

A0/

A -

1 /

a.u

.

8.8 x 108 M-1s-1

4.5 x 108 M-1s-1

- Carrageenan-Carrageenan with NaClO4

0 1x10-12 2x10-12 3x10-12 4x10-12 5x10-12

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5Kappa Carrageenan

Kappa Carrageenan added with 0.08M NaClO4

[KC] / [KOH.] [SCN- ] / M-1s-1

A0/

A -

1 /

a.u

.

0 1x10-12 2x10-12 3x10-12 4x10-12 5x10-12

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5Kappa Carrageenan

Kappa Carrageenan added with 0.08M NaClO4

[KC] / [KOH.] [SCN- ] / M-1s-1

A0/

A -

1 /

a.u

.

8.8 x 108 M-1s-1

4.5 x 108 M-1s-1

0 1x10-12 2x10-12 3x10-12 4x10-12 5x10-12

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5Kappa Carrageenan

Kappa Carrageenan added with 0.08M NaClO4

[KC] / [KOH.] [SCN- ] / M-1s-1

A0/

A -

1 /

a.u

.

0 1x10-12 2x10-12 3x10-12 4x10-12 5x10-12

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5Kappa Carrageenan

Kappa Carrageenan added with 0.08M NaClO4

[KC] / [KOH.] [SCN- ] / M-1s-1

A0/

A -

1 /

a.u

.

8.8 x 108 M-1s-1

4.5 x 108 M-1s-1

- Carrageenan-Carrageenan with NaClO4

chitosan, and CM-chitin) as discussed earlier under Chapter 2.3.3. It is also a known

fact that carrageenans undergo thermoreversible ion-induced conformational

transition from a disordered (coil) to an ordered (helix) form. The ability of some

cations to promote helical formation follows this order: Li+, Na+, NR4+ <<NH4

+ <K+,

Cs+ <Rb+. These transitions are both temperature and concentration dependent [30].

At temperatures below its transition temperature, -carrageenan assumes a helical

conformation. Transition temperatures differ with the type of carrageenan, 22oC and

57oC (in 0.2M NaCl) for - and - respectively [31]. The effect of Na+ (NaClO4) on

the rate constant of reaction of OH• with -carrageenan was investigated. The effect

of conformational change on the radiolysis of carrageenan is shown in Figure 2.9. The

rate constant of OH• reaction with - carrageenan with and without the addition of

0.08M NaClO4 was investigated by electron pulse radiolysis. Results show a dramatic

decrease of rate constant from 8.8 x 108 M-1s-1 to 4.5 x 108 M-1s-1.

Figure 2.9. The effect of Na+ on the rate constant of OH• reaction with -carrageenan

35

-carrageenan indicated high increase in viscosities in the presence of 0.08M NaClO4

by almost three folds (from 77 cP to 182 cP), an indication of a conformational

change from coil to helix taking place. This result indicates that the rate constant of

OH• reaction with -carrageenan is highly influenced by its conformational state

whether it is in the coil or helical form. The rate constant of OH• reaction with -

carrageenan is higher in the coiled conformation than in the helical conformation.

Coil to helix transition in -carrageenan involves an association between polymer

strands forming a more rigid structure. These transitions from coil to helix have been

observed by many researchers [32-35]. Several investigators favour a coaxial double

helix as the fundamental ordered conformation. Upon reducing the temperature or

increasing the salt concentration, double helical stretches will be formed in a

thermoreversible process [36-40]. It has been reported that the ratio of the molecular

weights of the helix to coil is approximately two [40]. Other groups of researcher

present evidence of a single helix as the fundamental ordered state of carrageenans

prior to association and gel formation [7, 30, 41-46]. These two schools of thought for

the conformational transition of -carrageenan are illustrated in Figure 2.10 [47].

Whether it is a single or double helix, the structure as seen from the figure becomes

more rigid in the helical conformation. The single or double stranded helical

conformation would have some polymers protected inside the strand, preventing

exposure to the solvent, thus decreasing possible interaction with OH radical. As a

consequence, k is decreased.

36

Figure 2.10. Two models of conformational transition in -carrageenan

A summary of the rate constant of reaction of OH• with -carrageenan at

different conditions are shown in Table 2.2.

Table 2.2. Rate constant of reaction of OH radicals with -carrageenan at different conditions.

Experimental Conditions k (M-1 s-1) of OH radicals with -

carrageenan Neutral pH ( 7.7) 1.2 x 109 pH 2 1.9 x 109 25 kGy irradiation (Mw = 188 kDa) 7.5 x 108 50 kGy irradiation (Mw = 105 kDa) 7.4 x 108 100 kGy irradiation (Mw = 59 kDa) 7.7 x 108

Sonicated (5% aqueous) Mw = 376 kDa 9.4 x 108

Sonicated (2.5% aqueous) Mw = 267 kDa 8.3 x 108

Sonicated (1% aqueous) Mw = 202 kDa 6.8 x 108

With NaClO4 8.5 x 108

Double Helix

Coil

Single Helix

37

2.4. CONCLUSION

Pulse radiolysis experiments indicate no seeming reaction of the hydrated

electron with -carrageenan. The rate constant for the reaction of OH• with -

carrageenan was approximately 1.2 x 109 M-1s-1. It was faster at an acidic pH of 2

which is probably due to fragmentation from the hydrolysis of -carrageenan.

The rate constant of OH• interaction with sonicated -carrageenan decreased

with decreasing molecular weight. On the other hand, the OH• interaction with

irradiated -carrageenan decreased but did not vary significantly with decreasing

molecular weight. Metal ion (Na+) induced conformational transition into helical form

decreased the rate constant of OH• reaction with -carrageenan.

The radiation depolymerization (decrease in Mw) of aqueous solution of -

carrageenan is caused primarily by the indirect effect of OH•. Obviously, greater

depolymerization is expected in aqueous solution than in solid due to this OH•. Like

most other natural polymers, decrease in molecular weight at higher doses is lower

and reaches a point where it forms a plateau. This phenomenon can thus be explained

by the fact that more carbonyl groups are formed with increasing dose which

decreases reactive sites and consequently lowers rate constant of OH• with -

carrageenan.

Most commercially available -carrageenans are of the Na+ or K+ form. It is

then expected that in solution these would assume a helical conformation which

would decrease k of OH• with -carrageenan. Theoretically speaking,

deploymerization of aqueous commercial carrageenans would be lower than its

purified form. However, for practical reasons, it is more convenient to irradiate in its

commercial form without further purification for bio-based material development.

38

REFERENCES:

1. R. Wach, H. Kudoh, M. Zhai, N. Nagasawa, Y. Muroya, F. Yoshii, Y. Katsumura, Polymer 45 (2004) 8165.

2. C. von Sonntag, E. Bothe, P. Ulanski, J. Deeble, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 46 (1995) 527.

3. C. von Sonntag and HP. Schuchmann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 30 (1991)

1229.

4. C. von Sonntag, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 65 (1994) 19.

5. F. van de Velde, A. Antipova, H. Rollema, T. Burova, N. Grinberg, L. Pereira, P. Gilsenan, R. Tromp, B. Rudolphe, V. Grinberg, Carbohydr. Res. 340 (2005) 1113.

6. J. Aguilan, 2005. Structural Analysis of kappa and iota carrageenan from

Philippine Seaweeds, PhD Dissertation, Ateneo de Manila University Graduate School, Philippines.

7. D. Slootmaekers, J. van Dijk, F. Varkevisser, C. van Treslong, H. Reynaers,

Biophy. Chem. 41 (1991) 51.

8. S. Singh, S. Jacobsson, Carbohvdr. Polym. 23 (1994) 89.

9. R. Wach, H. Kudoh, M. Zhai, Y. Muroya, Y. Katsumura, Journal of Polymer Science: Part A: Polym. Chem. 43 (2005) 505.

10. G. Phillips, D. Wedlock, I. Micic, B. Milosorljevic. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 15

(1980) 187.

11. E. Balazs, J. Davies, G. Phillips, D. Scheufele. J. Chem. Soc. (C). 1968;1420.

12. P. Myint, D. Deeble, P. Baumont, S. Balke, G. Phillips, Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 925 (1987) 194.

13. M. Zhai, H. Kudoh, G. Wu, R. Wach, Y. Muroya,Y. Katsumura, N. Nagasawa,

L. Zhao, F. Yoshii, Biomac. 5 (2004) 453.

14. J. Moore, G. Phillips, Carbohy. Res. 12 (1970) 253.

15. G. Buxton, C. Greenstock, W. Helman, A. Ross, J. Phys Chem Ref Data 17 (1988) 513.

39

16. R. Wach, H. Kudoh, M. Zhai, N. Nagasawa, Y. Muroya, F. Yoshii, Y. Katsumura, Polymer 45 (2004) 8165.

17. M. Zhai, H. Kudoh, G. Wu, R. Wach, Y. Muroya, Y. Katsumura, N. Nagasawa,

L. Zhao, F. Yoshii, Biomac. 5 (2004) 458.

18. G. Buxton, C. Greenstock, W. Helman, A. Ross, J. Phys. Chem, Ref Data, 17 (1988) 513.

19. D. Deeble, E. Bothe, H. Schuchman, B. Parson, G. Phillips, C. von Sonntag,

Naturforsch Teil C 45 (1990) 1031–43.

20. Y. Jiang, X. Guo, X. Tian, Carbohyd. Polym. 61 (2005) 399.

21. A. Chapiro. Radiation Chemistry of Polymeric Systems: High Polymers Vol. 15. New York, Interscience Publishers (1962) p. 533.

22. R. Czechowska-Biskup, B. Rokita, S. Lotfy, P. Ulanski, J. Rosiak, Carbohyd.

Polym. 60 (2005) 175.

23. T. Mason, J. Lorimer, (1988). Sonochemistry: theory, applications and uses of ultrasound in chemistry, Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood pp. 99–138: In C. Lii, C. Chen, A. Yeh, V. Laic, Food Hydrocolloids 13 (1999) 477.

24. N. Kardos, J. Luche, Carbohyd. Res. 332 (2001) 115.

25. G. Portenlänger, H. Heusinger, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 4 (1997) 127: In C.

Lii, C. Chen, A. Yeh, V. Laic, Food Hydrocolloids 13 (1999) 477.

26. P. Ulanski, C. Von Sonntag, Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2 (2000) 2022.

27. C. von Sonntag, C. (1987). The chemical basis of radiation biology. London:

Taylor and Francis.

28. P. Ulanski, J. Rosiak, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. Lett. 186 (1994) 315.

29. P. Ulanski, E. Bothe, C. von Sonntag, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 56 (1999) 467.

30. M. Ciancia, M. Milas, M. Rinaudo, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 20 (1997) 35.

31. Y. Yuguchi, T. Thuy, H. Urakawa, K. Kajiwara, Food Hydrocolloids. 16 (2002) 515.

32. F. van de Velde, A. Antipova, H. Rollema, B. Tatiana, N. Grinberg, L. Pereira, P.

Gilsenan, R. Tromp, B. Rudolphe, V. Grinberg, Carbohyd. Res. 340 (2005) 1113.

33. T. Hjerde, O. Smidsrød, B. Christenesen, Carbohydr. Res. 288 (1996) 175.

40

34. M. Ciszkowska, J. Osteryoung, J. Am. Chem. Soc. (Commun) 121 (1999) 1617.

35. S. Cara, C. Tamerler, H. Bermek, O. Pekcan, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 31 (2003)

177.

36. M. Ciszkowska, I. Kotlyar, Anal. Chem.71 (1999) 5013.

37. D. Reid, T. Bryce, A. Clark, D. Rees, Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 57 (1974) 230.

38. T. Hjerde, O. Smidsrod, B. Christensen, Biopolymers, 49 (1999) 71.

39. R. Jones, E. Staples, A. Penman, Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans., II (1973) 1608.

40. B. Wittgren, J. Borgström, L. Piculell, K. Wahlund, Biopolymers. 45 (1998) 85.

41. C. Viebke, J. Borgström, L. Piculell, Carbohyd. Polym. 27 (1995) 145.

42. S. Bailey, Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 17 (1955) 194.

43. Smidsrød, in 27th Int. Congress of Pure and Appl.Chem., Varmavuori A. Ed.,

Pergamon, Oxford (1980) p 315-327.

44. O. Smidsrød, I. Andresen, H. Grasdalen, B. Larsen, T. Painter, Carbohydr. Res., 80 (1980) c11.

45. D. Slootmaekers, M. Mandel, H. Reynaers, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 13 (1991) 17.

46. K. Ueda, M. Itoh, Y. Matsuzaki, H. Ochiai, A. Imamura, Macromolecules 31

(1998) 675.

47. H. Reynaers, Fibres Text. East Eur. 11(2003) 88.

41

CHAPTER 3

RADIATION DEGRADATION YIELD OF -CARRAGEENAN

3.1. INTRODUCTION

The irradiation of polymeric materials with ionizing radiation (gamma rays, X

rays, accelerated electrons, ion beams) leads to the formation of very reactive

intermediates. These chemically active species as free radicals or radical ions react

with other radicals or molecules to form stable products. It can follow several reaction

paths, which result in rearrangements and/or formation of new bonds [1-7]. These

reactive intermediates are formed either from direct action of radiation on the polymer

chains or from indirect effect, i.e. reaction of the intermediates generated in water

with polymer molecules in aqueous solutions [8]. The ultimate effects of these

reactions can be the formation of oxidized products, grafts, scission of main chains

(degradation) or cross-linking. The degree of these transformations depends on the

structure of the polymer and the conditions of treatment before, during and after

irradiation [9]. The yields of radiation –induced reactions are expressed as G-values,

where G is the number of molecules changed (formed or destroyed) per 100 eV of

energy.

The most important reactions occurring during radiolysis of polymers are

those that lead to permanent changes in their molecular weight. The reactions leading

to either increases or decreases in molecular weight are referred to as cross-linking

and chain scission, respectively. Radicals would also be expected to

dimerize/polymerize: abstraction of a hydrogen atom from a polymer radical followed

by addition of this polymer radical to another polymer radical that would yield a

42

molecule of increased molecular weight. Carbon-carbon scission following loss of a

hydrogen atom from a polymer radical could account for the formation of fragments

as in the case of most polysaccharides. This results in the decrease of molecular

weight. In general, cross-linking and scission processes can occur simultaneously in

any irradiated material; however, it is often observed that one tends to dominate over

the other, and thus polymers can be broadly placed into the categories cross-linking or

degrading. Over the years a solid understanding of the relationship between polymer

structure and the relative yields of cross-linking and chain scission has been acquired

[10].

In the early 1950s, Charlesby and co-workers were considering theoretical

approaches to the description of the changes in molecular weight of polymers during

irradiation. As early as 1954 they reported that the molecular weight of PMMA,

measured by solution viscometry, was inversely proportional to the absorbed dose

[11,12]. This has then been the basis for the theoretical expression of the theory of

degradation. Since that time a number of refinements to these initial observation and

theoretical expression have been made [13-17]. In summary, the number- and weight-

average molecular weights change is described below:

(3.1)

(3.2)

where Gd (mol/J) expresses the degradation susceptibility of the polymer during

radiation, where Mn / Mw is the number / weight-average molecular weight at

absorption dose; Mn0 / Mw0 is the initial number / weight- average molecular weight;

D is the absorbed dose in kGy.

In polysaccharides, glycosidic linkages between constituent units may be

broken by ionizing radiation, resulting in the shortening of polysaccharide chains.

43

Irradiation of polysaccharides in solid state leads to chain scissions, and may cause

some side reactions, such as oxidation. Radiation-chemical yield of scission would

thus also depend on the presence of oxygen [18, 19]. If scission is the only mode of

action of radiation in the polysaccharides, the radiation–chemical yield of degradation

(scission) G(s) can be determined using equation 3.1 or 3.2. Using this formula, a plot

of 1/Mn – 1/Mn0 vs. dose gives a linear curve. The slope of the line can be computed

as the Gd or G(s).

Polysaccharides can be degraded at a higher rate constant by irradiation in

aqueous solution. The scission reactions are due mainly to the indirect effect of water

radiolysis, i.e. generation of hydroxyl radicals, which in turn attack polysaccharide

molecules by H abstraction, thus forming radicals at carbon atoms. Some of them

rearrange resulting in the scission of the glycosidic bond [19-27]. The radiation–

chemical yield of degradation earlier mentioned is a measurement of scission events

in one kg polymer, thus in aqueous polymeric solutions, the fractional weight of the

polymer has to be considered in the measurement of Gd.. Radiation–chemical yield

(Gd.) for aqueous solution is computed as follows:

(3.3)

where c is the fractional weight of carrageenan solution [19].

Carrageenans are a class of polysaccharides that are known to easily degrade

either by enzymatic or chemical hydrolysis reactions resulting in the breakage of the

glycosidic linkage as illustrated in the scheme in Figure 3.1 [28]. Chemical methods

such as acid hydrolysis [29-32], enzymatic hydrolysis [33-35], reductive hydrolysis

[35-38], methanolysis [39] and active oxygen species fragmentation [40-41] have

been employed for the depolymerization of -carrageenan. Among the methods, acid

44

a) Cleavage of the glycosidic linkage

b) Reaction mechanism for the cleavage of the glycosidic linkage Figure 3.1. Main mechanism for acid hydrolysis of -carrageenan (adopted from

Fengel and Wegener). [28]

or enzymatic hydrolysis has commonly been used for -carrageenan degradation. The

hydrolysis products of -carrageenan indicate the presence of oligomers of

neocarrabiose, neocarratetraose and neocarrahexaose with neocarrabiose as the most

abundant [33, 35, 42, 43]. Recently, degradation by radiation processing of

polysaccharides has gained much attention due to its technological effectiveness in

producing low molecular weight oligomers. In comparison to enzymatic hydrolysis,

radiation degradation has an edge over this method since the degree of polymerization

(DP) of the oligomers formed are lower. Some enzyme resistant fractions are formed

in enzymatic hydrolysis [44]. Acid hydrolysis can also be quite effective in generating

+ H2O+ H2O

O+

HH

O3-SO

O

OH

CH2OH

O

H

O

O

OH

H+

O

HH

O3-SO

O

OH

CH2OH

OO

O

OH

O

HH

O3-SO

O

OH

CH2OH

O+

O

O

OH

H

O

HH

O3-SO

O

OH

CH2OH

O

H

O

OH

O

OH

C+

O

O

OH

OHO

C+

HH

O3-SO

O

OH

CH2OH

H

O

HH

O3-SO

O

OH

CH2OH

OH

O

O

OH

OH

+ H+

45

low DP oligomers but this method would need further purification step to remove all

the mineral acids. Several studies have already been done to determine the kinetics /

rate constant of reactions by acid hydrolysis for the reduction of molecular weight of

-carrageenan [45-47]. While both common methods of degrading -carrageenan

have extensively been studied, this chapter will study the degradation yield of -

carrageenan with the use of gamma irradiation at different experimental conditions.

3.2. METHODOLOGY

3.2.1. Sample Preparation

For Solid Irradiation:

Purified solid -carrageenan were placed in small polyethylene bags and sealed.

Another set of solid -carrageenan were placed in glass tubes. These tubes were

connected to a vacuum line aided with methanol ice and liquid nitrogen traps. The

tubes were then evacuated while initially tapping and heating with a blower the

portion of tubes containing the polymer to facilitate the escape of gases. Once fully

evacuated, the tubes were then sealed directly from the vacuum line.

For Aqueous Irradiation:

Purified -carrageenan was dissolved in water at 1% concentration (w/v) and was

divided into three different sets while placing them in separates tubes (5 tubes per

set). The different sets of tubes were then treated in the following manner:

a) Tubes were sealed with parafilm.

b) Tubes were purged with N2O gas for 30 mins. and heat sealed while still

purging the gas at the mouth of the tubes.

46

c) Tubes were purged with N2 gas for 30 mins. and heat sealed while still

purging the gas at the mouth of the tubes.

3.2.2. Gamma Irradiation of -carrageenan

Solid and aqueous -carrageenan samples were gamma irradiated according to

the procedure discussed in Chapter 2.2.5 at absorbed doses ranging from 1 to 200 kGy

at a dose rate of 1 or 10 kGy/h (for doses above 5 kGy).

3.2.3. GPC Analyses of -carrageenan

GPC analyses of -carrageenan has already been described under Chapter

2.2.7.

3.2.4. UV Vis Spectroscopy

UV Vis Spectroscopy of -carrageenan is described under Chapter 2.2.8.

3.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.3.1. Radiation Degradation Yield of -Carrageenan

Figures 3.2a and 3.2b show the GPC profile of -carrageenan irradiated in

solid and at 1% aqueous solution (at atmospheric conditions). Carrageenan degraded

easily upon irradiation without adding any chemical additives at ambient temperature

as shown by the large increase in elution time with dose especially for aqueous -

carrageenan. Figure 3.3 shows the plot of the molecular weights with increasing dose

at different conditions. Expectedly, the molecular weight decreased drastically in

aqueous solution as compared to solid due to the indirect effect of the free radicals

from radiolysis of H2O. In solid irradiation, the molecular weight tapered off at

47

Figure 3.2. GPC chromatogram of a) irradiated solid -carrageenan and

b) irradiated aqueous (1%) -carrageenan.

Elution Time (mins)

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

0 kGy10 kGy20 kGy50 kGy100 kGy200 Gy

a)

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

0kGy 10kGy20kGy50kGy100kGy200kGy

Radiolytic product

Elution Time (mins.)

0kGy 10kGy20kGy50kGy100kGy200kGy

0kGy 10kGy20kGy50kGy100kGy200kGy

b)0

10

20

50

100

200 kGy

48

Figure 3.3. Mw of -carrageenan in air, in vacuum and in aqueous solution at

various doses.

100 kGy for both air and vacuum. On the other hand, in aqueous, no further decrease

in Mw (3,000) was observed beyond 50 kGy. Instead, a marked increase in radiolytic

product (Elution time = 73.7 mins.) appeared with increasing dose as shown in the

GPC profile in Figure 3.2b. Approximately, the computed minimum DP obtained

from the gamma irradiation of aqueous -carrageenan at these high doses is 7. The

decrease in molecular weight of -carrageenan irradiated in vacuum was slightly

lower than that in air as shown in Fig. 3.4. This result is expected as irradiation in the

presence of oxygen (in air) can result in the formation of some peroxy radicals as

shown in the following equation [48]:

R. + O2 ROO. (3.4)

This could indirectly increase the yield of scission products [49]. On the other hand,

decrease in molecular weight with dose was obviously higher in 1% aqueous solution

Dose (kGy)

0 50 100 150 200 250

Molecular Weight 

0

1e+5

2e+5

3e+5

4e+5

5e+5

Solid  ‐ carrageenan in atmosphere

Soild  ‐carrageenan in vacuumAqueous  ‐carrageenan (1%)

49

Figure 3.4. Reciprocals of Mw of solid -carrageenan in air and in vacuum at varying doses.

as shown by the sharp drop in Mw (at <10 kGy). This is due to the indirect effect of

water radiolysis products. Computing the Gd (equation 3.3) of 1% -

carrageenan solution at high doses (above 10 kGy) did not give the typical linear

relationship of 1/Mn – 1/Mn0 vs. absorbed dose, thus Gd was obtained by measuring

the molecular weights at doses of as low as 1 to 10 kGy. Figure 3.5 shows the graph

of the relationship of 1/Mn – 1/Mn0 vs. absorbed dose in 1% aqueous solution. Gd of

- carrageenan (equations 3.1 to 3.3) at different conditions were computed as

follows: 2.5, 1.7 and 1.2 x 10-7 mol J-1 for solid in atmosphere, solid in vacuum and at

1% aqueous solution, respectively. The Gd for -carrageenan in aqueous solution (1.2)

was almost half the value of the Gd in solid irradiation. Considering that the scission

events contributed by the direct effect of radiation on -carrageenan accounts only 1%

0 50 100 150 200 2500

1

2

3

4

5

6

In AirIn Vauum

Dose (kGy)

(Mw

‐1–Mw0‐1)* 106

50

Figure 3.5. Reciprocal of Mw of 1% aqueous -carrageenan at varying doses.

of the total scission events, this value would be almost a hundred times in order of

magnitude (around 1.2 x 10-5 mol J-1) if the indirect effect due to water radiolysis was

included. Thus, for - carrageenan whose known optimum biological activity is at

100 kGy, an absorbed dose of approximately 2 kGy would be sufficient to obtain the

desired molecular weight at 1% wt aqueous solution. Similar studies using Na+ type

carrageenan indicate lower radiation yield of 1.3 x 10-7 mol J-1 for solid in atmosphere

[50]. Values of Gd for chitosan, alginate and galactomannans both in aqueous and

solid form vary as reported by the different authors shown in Table 3.1 [51-55]. The

variations may be due to different starting materials e.g. differences in Mw, purity,

conformational state, degree of deacetylation, etc. In general, it can be seen from this

table that Gd of purified -carrageenan both in solid and aqueous form is higher than

other polysaccharides. This implies that pure -carrageenan is more susceptible to

radiation degradation than these other polysaccharides.

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

1% Aqueous -carrageenan(M

w‐1–Mw0‐1)* 106

Dose (kGy)

51

Table. 3.1 Radiation degradation yield of different polysaccharides irradiated in solid and aqueous (1%) solution.

Gd (x 10-7 moles/joule)

Solid on air 4% aqueous 1% aqueous-carrageenan 1.3 [50]

2.5 0.3 [50] 1.2

chitosan 6.0 [51]1.8 [52]

0.9 [52]

3.53 [54]

galactomannans 0.9-1.1 [53] alginate 1.9 [27] 0.7 [27]

0.1 [54] 0.6 [27] 0.8 [54]

3.3.2. The Effect of N2 and N2O gas on the Radiation Degradation

Yield of -Carrageenan

The Gd of 1% aqueous solution of -carrageenan irradiated in N2O, N2 and in

air was determined to find out effects of these gases on the degradation of -

carrageenan. From equation 2.2 of chapter 2, N2O reacts with solvated electrons to

produce more OH radicals. It was discussed previously that OH• radicals react at a

very fast rate with -carrageenan (k . 1.2 x 109 M-1 s-1). The effect of air on the

degradation yield of solid -carrageenan has also been discussed. Thus, it would be

interesting to know to what extent is the Gd of -carrageenan affected by the presence

of N2O and by purging N2 gas to remove air in the solution. Figure 3.6 shows the plot

of 1/Mn – 1/Mn0 against absorbed dose in the presence of these gases. From the

graph, it is quite obvious that in the presence of N2O, Gd was increased substantially.

Expectedly, the Gd of -carrageenan in the presence of N2 was lowest when compared

to N2O and in air. There was only a slight difference in the slope of the curves

between N2 and air. The computed Gd values were as follows: 1.7, 1.3 and 1.1 x 10-7

mol J-1 for N2O, air and N2 respectively. Studies on alginate do not show any

52

Figure 3.6. Reciprocal of Mw of 1% aqueous -carrageenan at varying doses

purged with different gases.

difference in the Gd of 1% solution in air and in N2 (Gd = 0.55 x 10-7 mol J-1) [27]. In

some cases, it has been reported that the radiation-chemical yield of scission has been

reduced in oxygen containing polymeric solution. The radiation-chemical yields of

chain scission for a 0.01 M chitosan are Gd = 3.4 × 10-7 mol J-1 in N2O-saturated and

G = 2.1 × 10-7 mol J-1 in N2O–O2-saturated solutions [19]. Similar trends have been

observed in pectic substances [23]. Interestingly, the starting molecular weight of -

carrageenan for this set of experiments is quite low (Mw = 32 kDa) as compared to

previous experiments in Section 2.3.1. (Mw = 450 kDa). Yet, results of the Gd for 1%

-carrageenan in air for both types of -carrageenan did not vary significantly (1.2

and 1.3 x 10-7 mol J-1). The Gd remained constant for large or small polymer chains of

-carrageenan.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

in Airin N2

in N2

O

(Mw

‐1–Mw0‐1)* 106

Dose (kGy)

53

Figure 3.7 shows the UV absorbance at 260nm for aqueous -carrageenan in

the presence of N2O, N2 and in air with increasing doses. As previously discussed in

Chapter 2.3.4, this 260nm peak is attributed to the formation of carbonyl bond in the

pyranose ring. A slight increase in intensity of this peak was seen with increasing

doses. The UV absorbance trend follows the same order as that of their Gd values

where N2O > Air > N2. Thus, the greater is the radiation degradation yield, the greater

are the number of carbonyl groups formed. Free carbonyl groups are formed in two

ways, first, by radiolytically induced hydrolytical cleavage of glycosidic bonds, and

second, as the result of oxidation of carbohydrate radicals generated inside the galacto

pyranose ring [23].

Figure 3.7. UV absorbance at 260nm of -carrageenan (0.25%) irradiated at

different conditions.

Dose (kGy)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

N2O

Air

N2

UV Absorbance (= 260nm)

54

3.3.3. The Effect of Na+ on the Gd of -carrageenan

It has been discussed in Chapter 2.3.5 that the presence of cations such as Na+

in -carrageenan promotes the formation of helical structures. The helical

conformation of - carrageenan also mentioned in the same chapter is currently still a

subject of debate. Some authors propose monomolecular helices (single strand) [55-

57] while other experimental results suggest double-stranded bimolecular structure

(double helix) of the carrageenan [58-62]. The subject on weight-average molecular

weight in the helical conformation has also been studied. Some authors show an

approximate doubling of the weight-average molecular weight for both - and -

carrageenan helices [63]. Ultrasonically degraded and - carrageenans also indicate

a higher weight-average molecular weight in the helix state [64].

The conformational or physical state of polysaccharides may have a strong

influence on the stability towards degradation [65]. Crystalline cellulose shows strong

resistance towards acid hydrolysis as compared to amorphous cellulose [66]. The

formation of multiple-stranded ordered structures stabilized by non-covalent inter-

chain bonds may increase the stability as they can tolerate cleavages of glycosidic

linkages without any pronounced changes in the physical structure [65].

In the initial stage of radiolysis reaction, Chapter 2.3.5 has demonstrated that

the presence of Na+ lowers the rate constant of reaction of OH• with -carrageenan. It

would be interesting to know if the yield of degradation would also be affected by

conformational transitions with higher structure rigidity e.g. helical conformation.

Figure 3.8 shows the effect of the addition of Na+ on the relationship of 1/Mn – 1/Mn0

with absorbed dose. The Gd had substantially been decreased by the presence of Na+

from a value of 1.2 to 0.7 x 10-7 mol J-1. This result clearly suggests that

conformational change from coil to helix in the presence of metal ions (Na+) affects

55

Figure 3.8. The effect of Na+ on the reciprocals of Mw of -carrageenan.

the degradation yield of -carrageenan. Since the transition to helical state of -

carrageenan forms rigidity of structure that promotes closer interaction of polymer

chains, there is the possibility of crosslinking simultaneously taking place with

degradation. Thus, Gd became lower in the helical state. It is also possible that these

results may be due to the higher stability in glycosidic linkage brought about by non-

covalent inter-chain bonds as explained in the previous paragraph. In a similar study,

the influence of the conformational state of - and - on the rate of acid hydrolysis has

been investigated. Results indicate an increase by a factor of 200 and 10 for - and -

carrageenan respectively when passing above the conformational transition

temperature [67].

Dose (kGy)

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.00

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

- Carrageenan

-Carrageenan with NaClO4

(1/M

n –

1/M

n0

) x 1

06

56

3.4. CONCLUSION

The radiation degradation yields of -carrageenan in solid and in aqueous

(1%) form at different conditions were found to be as follows: 2.5, 1.7 and 1.2 x 10-7

mol J-1 for solid in atmosphere, solid in vacuum and at 1% aqueous solution,

respectively. These values are higher than other known polysaccharides which make

-carrageenan more susceptible to radiation degradation attack. The Gd of solution

saturated with N2O solution was expectedly much higher with a value of 1.7 x 10-7

mol J-1. On the other hand, a lower Gd of 1.1 x 10-7 mol J-1 was obtained from -

carrageenan solution saturated with N2. The Gd in aqueous form was affected by the

conformational state of -carrageenan. The helical conformation gave a lower Gd (0.7

x 10-7 mol J-1) than the coiled conformation (Gd = 1.2 x 10-7 mol J-1).

Gd in solid which show higher value than in aqueous solution would indicate

higher efficiency. Note that the Gd in aqueous solution (1.2 x 10-7 mol J-1) constitutes

only 1% of the total depolymerization effect. If the radiation effect due to the indirect

action of transient OH• (in Chapter 2), then the degradation yield would be almost 100

times higher than its actual Gd value.

Information on the Gd will give the economic benefits of choosing the proper

condition for irradiating -carrageenan – whether in solid or in aqueous solution, solid

in air or in vacuum, aqueous in N2O, in N2 or in air. Ultimately, the users will have to

determine what would be best fitting for them considering their available resources

and for what specific purpose they want to depolymerize -carrageenan. For some

whose available energy Co-60 source is quite low, irradiation by aqueous solution

might be more beneficial where a dose of only 2 kGy (1% aqueous) is needed to

produce an equivalent of 100 kGy dose in solid irradiation. Where larger volumes of

57

-carrageenan are needed, solid irradiation may be more practical. Concentration of

aqueous -carrageenan can still be adjusted to higher concentration to maximize

benefits of aqueous irradiation. While the data obtained from this chapter gives us

outright the necessary absorbed dose at different conditions to obtain a specific

molecular weight -carrageenan, this would not be a sufficient basis for determining

the optimum dose needed for bio-based material development. Molecular weight/size

coupled with the chemical structure, functional groups formed, gelation and

conformational change behavior with absorbed dose need to be determined to harness

the full benefits of -carrageenan oligomer produced by radation processing.

REFERENCES:

1. A. Charlesby, Atomic Radiation and Polym. Vol. 1, Permagon Press, Oxford, 1960.

2. A. Chapiro, ed. Radiation Chemistry of Polymeric Systems, Vol. XV, Interscience, New York, 1962.

3. F. Williams, Radiat. Chem. Macromol. 1 (1972) 7.

4. J. H.O’Donnell and D. F. Sangster, Principles of Radiation Chemistry, Edward

Arnold, London, 1970.

5. J.W. T. Spinks and R. J.Woods, An Introduction to Radiation Chemistry, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1990.

6. C. D. Jonah, B. S. Madhava Rao, Radiation chemistry: present status and future

trends, Elsevier, 2001.

7. C. von Sontagg, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 65 (1994) 19.

8. A. O. Allen, J. Phys. Chem. 52 (1948), 479.

9. IAEA-TECDOC-1420, Advances in radiation chemistry of polymers, Proceedings of a technical meeting held in Notre Dame, Indiana, USA, 13–17 September 2003

10. D. J. T. Hill, and A. K. Whittaker, "Radiation Chemistry of Polymers",

Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology, 2004, on-line edition.

58

11. A. Charlesby, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 224 (1954) 120.

12. P. Alexander, A. Charlesby, M. Ross, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 223 (1954) 392.

13. M. Inokuchi, M. Dole, J. Chem. Phys. 38 (1963) 3006.

14. O. Saito, H. Y. Kang, M. Dole, J. Chem. Phys. 46 (1967) 3607.

15. H. Y. Kang, O. Saito, M. Dole, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Symp. 25 (1968) 123.

16. O. Saito, Radiat. Chem. Macromol. 1 (1972) 223.

17. M. Tsuda, S. Oikawa, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed. 17 (1979) 3759.

18. W. Dziedziela, D. Kotynska, J.Radiat. Phys. Chem. 23 (1984) 723.

19. P. Ulanski C. Von Sonntag, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 (2000) 2022.

20. P. Ulanski, J. Rosiak, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 39, (1992) 53.

21. I. Idimecheva, R. Kisel, O. Shadyro, K. Kazem, H. Murase, T. Kagiya. J. Radiat.

Res. 46 (2005) 319.

22. G. O. Phillips and G. J. Moody, Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 6 (1959) 78.

23. H. Zegota, Food Hydrocolloids 13 (1999) 51.

24. T. Bucknall, H. Edwards, K. Kemsley, J. Moore, G. Phillips, Carbohydr. Res. 62 (1978) 49.

25. L. Huang, M. Zhai, J. Peng, J.Li, G.Wei, Carbohydr. Polym. 67 (2007) 305.

26. P. Baugh, J. Goodall, G. Phillips, C. Von Sonntag, M. Dizdaroglu, Carbohydr.

Res. 49 (1976) 315

27. N. Nagasawa, H. Mitomo, F. Yoshii, T. Kume, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 69 (2000) 279.

28. Fengel, D., Wegener, G. 1984. Wood: Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions.

Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

29. Y. Jiang, X. Guo, Carbohydr. Polym. 61 (2005) 441.

30. T. Hjerde, O. Smidsrød, B. Christensen, Carbohyd. Res. 288 (1996) 175.

31. A. Karlsson, S. Singh, Carbohydr. Polym. 38 (1999) 7.

32. G. Yu, H. Guan, A. Ioanoviciu, S. Sikkander, C. Thanawiroon, J. Tobacman, T. Toida, R. Linhardt, Carbohydr. Res. 337 (2002) 433.

59

33. S. Knutsen, H. Grasdalen Carbohydr. Polym. 19 (1992) 199.

34. S. Knutsen, M. Sletmoen, T. Kristensen, T. Barbeyron, B. Kloareg, P. Potin,

Carbohydr. Res. 331 (2001) 101.

35. M. Guibet, N. Kervarec, S. Génicot, Y. Chevolota, W. Helbert, Carbohydr. Res. 341 (2006) 1859.

36. R. Falshaw, R. Furneaux, H. Wong, Carbohydr. Res. 338 (2003) 1403.

37. T. Stevenson, R. Furneaux, Carbohydr. Res. 210 (1991) 277.

38. A. Usov, Food Hydrocolloids. 12 (1998) 301.

39. S. Knutsen, H. Grasdalen, Carbohydr. Res. 229 (1992) 233.

40. T. Yamada, A. Ogamo, T. Saito, H. Uchiyama, Y. Nakagawa, Carbohydr. Polym.

41 (2000) 115.

41. T. Yamada, A. Ogamo, T. Saito, J. Watanabe, H. Uchiyama, Y. Nakagawa, Carbohydr. Polym.. 32 (1997) 51.

42. C. Rochas, M. Rinaudo, M. Vincendon, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 5 (1983) 111.

43. G. Yu, H. Guan, A. Ioanoviciu, S. Sikkander, C. Thanawiroon, J. Tobacman, T.

Toida, R. Linhardt, Carbohydr. Res. 337 (2002) 433.

44. C. Rochas, A. Heyraud, Polym. Bull.5 (1981) 81.

45. T. Hjerde, O. Smidsrød, B. Stokke, E. Christensen, Carbohydr. Res. 288 (1996) 175.

46. T. Hjerde, T. Kristiansen, B. Stokke, O. Smidsrød, B. Christensen, Carbohydr.

Polvmers 24 (1994) 265.

47. S. Singh, S. Jacobsson, Carbohydr. Polym. 23 (1994) 89.

48. C. von Sonntag, H-P. Schuchmann, Angeuz. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 30 (1991) 1229-1253.

49. C. von Sonntag, E. Bothe, P. Ulanski, and D. J. Deeble, Radiat. Phys. Chem.

46(1995) 527.

50. L. Relleve, N. Nagasawa, L. Luan, T. Yagi, C. Aranilla, L. Abad, T. Kume, F. Yoshii, A. De la Rosa, Polym Degrad Stab. 87 (2005) 403.

51. R. Czechowska-Biskup, B. Rokita, B., P. Ulanski, J. Rosiak, J. Nucl. Instr. and

Meth. in Phys. Res. B. 236 (2005) 383.

60

52. L. Hai, TB. Diep, N. Nagasawa, F. Yoshii, T. Kume, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. B., 208 (2003) 466.

53. M. Sen, B. Yolacan, O. Guven, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. B., 265

(2007) 429.

54. J. Wasikiewicza, F. Yoshii, N. Nagasawa, R. Wach, H. Mitomo, Radiat. Phy. Chem., 73 (2005) 287.

55. S. Paoletti, O. Smidsrød, H. Grasdalen, Biopolymers. 23 (1984) 177l.

56. C. Rochas, S. Landry, Carbohydr. Polym. 7 (1987) 435.

57. M. Bosco, A. Segre, S. Miertus, A. Cesàro, S. Paoletti, Carbohydr. Res. 340

(2005) 943.

58. S. Nilsson, L. Piculell,. Macromolecules. 24 (1991) 3804.

59. V. Grinberg, N. Grinberg, A. Usov, N. Shusharina, A. Khokhlov, K. de Kruif, Biomacromolecules. 2 (2001) 864.

60. Y. Yuguchi, T. Thuy, H. Urakawa, K. Kajiwara, Food Hydrocolloids. 16 (2002)

515.

61. S. Janaswamy, R. Chandrasekaran, Carbohydr. Polym. 60 (2005) 499.

62. M. Mangione, D. Giacomazzaa, D. Bulonea, V. Martoranaa, P. San Biagioa, Biophys. Chem. 104 (2003) 95.

63. C. Viebke, J. Borgström L. Piculell, Carbohydr. Polym. 27 (1995) 145.

64. V. Meunier, T. Nicolai, D. Durand, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 28 (2001) 157.

65. T. Hjerde, T. Kristiansen, B. Stokke, O. Smidsrød, B. Christensen, Carbohvdr.

Polym. 24 (1994) 265.

66. A. Sharples, Trans. Faraday Soc. 53 (1957) 1003.

67. T. Hjerde, O. Smidsrød, B. Christensen, Carbohydr. Res. 288 (1996) 175.

61

CHAPTER 4

CHEMICAL AND SPECTRAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE

RADIOLYTIC PRODUCTS OF -CARRAGEENAN

4.1. INTRODUCTION

The radiation chemistry of carbohydrates involves the abstraction of hydrogen

atoms from positions which are -to a hydroxyl group. In the case of aqueous

solutions, abstraction is achieved through the hydroxyl radicals (from radiolysis of

water). Hydrated electrons react more slowly, if at all. Hydrogen atoms react more

slowly than hydroxyl group but would be expected to abstract similarly. The

formation of the carbohydrate radicals (e.g. glucose radicals) may be represented as

follows : [1-3]

(4.1)

(4.2)

(4.3)

In the absence of oxygen, the gluconic acid and glucosone (2-oxo-D-

arabinoaldohexose) can be formed by abstraction of hydrogen atoms from the radicals

O

OH

HH

H

OH

OH

H OH

H

CH2OH

O

C

OH

HH

H

OH

OH

H OH

CH2OH

O

OH

HH

OH

OH

H OH

H

CH2OH

.

O

OH

HH

H

OH

OH

H OH

H

CHOH.

O

C

OH

HH

H

OH

OH

H OH

CH2OH

OH

COOHHH

H

OH

OH

H OH

CH2OH

O

OH

HH

OH

OH

H

H

CH2OH

O

O

C

OH

HH

H

OH

OH

H OH

CH2OH

(-H + H2O)

(-H)

62

R-H R.(C1 – C6) + H.

R-H + H. R.(C1 – C6) + H2

R.(C1, C4) F1 + F2 (scission)

F. R(C=O)

.

formed in equations 4.2 and 4.3. The formation of glucuronic acid on irradiation in

the presence of oxygen may be due to the reaction of oxygen with the radicals formed

by reaction 4.3 yielding an unstable aldehyde which becomes oxidized to glucuronic

acid. The absence of glucosone may be accounted for by the addition of oxygen to the

radical formed in 4.2, followed by a chain of reactions including C-C scission, giving

rise to the formation of arabinose and formaldehyde.

The chemical changes occurring in polysaccharides are similar to those with

simple carbohydrates. Reducing groups (carbonyl) and acid groups appear and

carbon-carbon scission occurs. Radiation degradation of several natural

polysaccharides e.g. cellulose [4], chitosan [5-8], carboxymethyl chitosan [9],

alginates [10-11], galactomanans [12], xyloglucan [13], cycloamylose [14] and

pectins [15] have already been studied. Degradation schemes have been proposed for

the cleavage of the glycosidic linkage leading to the degradation of the polymeric

chain e.g. chitosan, pectin, dextrans, etc. with C(1) 6 C(4) linkages. These schemes

can be summarized as follows:

Solid Irradiation:

(4.4)

(4.5)

(4.6)

(4.7)

63

H2O .OH + H. + eaq

N2O + eaq + H+ .OH + N2

.OH(H.) + RH R.(C1 – C6) + H2O(H2)

F1 + F2 (hydrolysis)R.(C1, C4, C5)

F3 + F4 (scission)

F1(F3) R(C=O) or R(COOH)

2R. (F.) 2R (F) (disproportionation)

.

-

.

. .

-

R.(C1 – C6) + O2 ROO. R(C=O)

Aqueous Irradiation:

(4.8)

(4.9)

(4.10)

(4.11)

(4.12)

(4.13)

Aqueous or Solid Irradiation:

(4.14)

From these schemes, the radiolytic products yield not only the formation of low

molecular weight oligomers but also some carbonyl bonds (carboxyl and aldo-keto

groups) and some functional groupings that are cleaved off e.g. NH3 in chitosan.

Depolymerization of carrageenan is easily achieved by chemical means as

already discussed in Chapter 3.1. These hydrolysis reactions are accompanied by

increase in reducing sugars [16-17] and release of sulfate [18-20]. Some other

methods make use of ultrasonic [21-22] and microwave degradation [23].

Mechanochemistry and radical reactions similar to the radiation chemistry of

carbohydrates are expected to contribute to chain scission using the ultrasonic

degradation processes [24-25]. While the scission reactions of the chemical

degradation process have already been carefully studied, this chapter will study the

64

chemistry of the radiolytic products of -carrageenan processed by gamma radiation

as well as the possible mechanisms involved.

4.2. METHODOLOGY

4.2.1. Gamma Irradiation of -carrageenan

Solid and aqueous -carrageenan samples were gamma irradiated (Chapter

2.2.5) with absorbed doses ranging from 1 to 200 kGy at a dose rate of 1 or 10 kGy/h

(for doses above 5 kGy).

4.2.2. UV Vis Spectroscopy

UV Vis Spectroscopy of -carrageenan is already described under Chapter

2.2.8.

4.2.3. FT-IR Spectroscopy

FT-IR spectra of samples in KBr pellets (1mg / 100mg KBr) were measured

using an FT-IR Nicolet Magna 550 at ambient temperature in the region of 4000-

400cm-1.

4.2.4. Chemical Analyses

The reducing group of the carrageenans was determined using the Nelson-

Somogyi method of analysis with galactose as the standard [26].

The total acidity of the carrageenans was determined by acid–base titration

method. Carrageenan solutions were titrated against standardized NaOH using a

phenolphthalein indicator to determine end point. The acidity was reported as %

H2SO4 in carrageenan.

65

Samples of -carrageenan were washed three times in ethanol (95% purity) to

remove the free sulfates. The samples were then freeze dried. Percent carboxylic acid

was determined by acid-base titration with standardized NaOH of these washed

samples. The % free sulfates was then computed as follows:

% Free Sulfates = % Total acidity– % Acidity due to COOH

The percent cleaved sulfate was computed as follows:

% Desulfation = % free sulfates / 20.98 x 100

where the value 20.98 is the theoretical percent sulfate (as HSO3-) present in -

carrageenan per mole of the repeating unit.

4.2.5. Fractionation of Irradiated -carrageenan

Irradiated -carrageenan samples (solid-100 kGy in air, solid - 100 kGy in

vacuum and 1% aqueous - 2 kGy) were fractionated using an Amicon Pressure

Filtration set up pressurized with N2O gas (not exceeding 1.5 kgf/cm2) using

Millipore filters with molecular weight cut offs of >30 kDa, 10-30 kDa, and 3-10

kDa.

4.2.6. NMR of Irradiated -Carrageenan

Fractionated samples with molecular weight cut off of 3–10 kDa were

dissolved in D2O at concentrations of 30-40 mg/ml. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

(NMR) analyses were carried out using a Bruker 300 Ultra Shield equipment with

300MHz frequency at room temperature (25oC). The 1H spectra were recorded using 8

scans. 13C spectra were obtained using 2400 scans with 3-(Trimethylsilyl)-1-

propanesulfonic acid (DDS) as internal standard. Neocarrabiose-4-O-Sulphate (DP=1,

66

mol.wt = 449) and Neocarrahexaose-4 1,3,5-tri-O-suphate (DP=3, mol. wt = 1265)

were also analyzed as reference materials (Figure 4.1).

Figure 4.1. Structure of Neocarrabiose Standards

4.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.3.1. UV-Vis Spectrum

It is already known that radiation degradation of polysaccharides leads to

some chemical changes such as the formation of carbonyl, carboxyl or double bonds

[6, 10, 15]. These changes are seen in the UV spectra as a new absorbance peak at

around 265 and 297nm for chitosan. Likewise, it has also been reported that UV

spectra of all types of irradiated carrageenan show absorbance peak at around 260nm.

Its intensity increases with increasing dose [27]. Figures 4.2a, b, and c show a new

absorbance peak at 260nm for -carrageenan irradiated in solid (in air and in vacuum)

and at 1% aqueous solution. The peak intensities increased with increasing doses.

Absorbance of aqueous carrageenan solutions was very much higher than in solid in

O

OH

O3SO

OOH

OH

O

OH

OOH

Na

O

OH

O3SO

O

OH

O

OH

OO

OH

O3SO

O

OH

O

OH

OOO

OH

O3SO

OOH

OH

O

OH

OO OH

Na Na Na

Neocarrabiose‐4‐O‐Sulphate 

Neocarrahexaose‐4 1,3,5‐tri‐O‐suphate 

67

Wavelength (nm)

Absorban

ce

200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340

‐0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0kGy

10kGy

20kGy

50kGy

100kGy

200kGy

a)

Wavelength (nm)

Absorbance

200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340

‐0.02

0.00

0.02

0.04

006

0.08

0.10

0kGy10kGy20kGy50kGy100kGy200kGy

b)

Wavelength (nm)

Absorban

ce

200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340

‐0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

0kGy

10kGy

20kGy

50kGy

100kGy

200kGy

c)

Figure 4.2. UV-Vis spectra of - carrageenan irradiated as a) solid in atmosphereb) solid in vacuum and c) 1% aqueous solution at varying doses

68

air and in vacuum. This is expected due to the indirect effect of radical species from

the radiolysis of water. Increase in intensity became prominent starting at a dose of 20

kGy for solid irradiation in air and in vacuum and at 50 kGy for aqueous -

carrageenan. Plotting increase in absorbance at 260 nm with absorbed dose gave a

linear curve for solid -carrageenan irradiated in air and in vacuum (Figure 4.3). The

slope of the curve was slightly higher in air than in vacuum (see inset). The reaction

of peroxy radicals from O2 could have generated more carbonyl groups [28-29, 4].

For aqueous -carrageenan, a decrease in the slope of the curve beyond 100 kGy was

observed. Irradiating aqueous -carrageenan at a dose of as high as 100 kGy may

have resulted in the decomposition of carbonyl/carboxyl peaks to probably CO2, thus,

the decrease in the slope beyond 100 kGy.

Figure 4.3. UV absorbance (260 nm) of irradiated -carrageenan at different conditions

0 50 100 150 2000.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

A‐A

o(260nm)

Absorbed Dose (kGy)

0 50 100 150 2000.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

1% aqueous in air

Solid in air

Solid in vacuum

69

4.3.2. FT-IR Spectrum

Several references are available for the FT-IR of -carrageenan [30-35]. FT-IR

spectra in Figure 4.4 show the finger print functional groupings of the unirradiated -

carrageenan [36] and some changes with irradiation. Similar spectrum has been

obtained with low molecular weight -carrageenan processed by acid hydrolysis [37–

38]. The spectra of irradiated - carrageenan in solid form in air indicated that the

functional groupings were entirely kept intact even at a high dose of 200 kGy. The

only change observed was the appearance of a new absorption peak at 1728 cm-1

corresponding to the carbonyl grouping and decrease in the intensity of polymer

bound water peak at 200 kGy. For vacuum irradiation, no changes were alsoobserved

up to a dose of 100 kGy. However, distortion of peak corresponding to the

galactopyranose ring / glycosidic linkage became evident at 200 kGy. Loss of peaks

corresponding to covalent sulfate, 3,6 anhydro bridge and D-galactose-4-sulfate were

also observed. There was a decrease in the intensity of polymer bound water peak.

The change in the polymer bound water may signify that water radiolysis may have

also occurred in the system. It could not be discounted that changes in vacuum at 200

kGy may also be caused by post-irradiation effects after exposure of the sample in air.

In 1% aqueous solution -carrageenan, increasing carbonyl peaks was observed with

increasing doses. The FT-IR data showing the appearance of carbonyl peaks which

increased with absorbed dose further supports data obtained in the UV-Vis spectra

which also indicated the same trend of increasing carbonyl peaks. At 2 kGy, the finger

print functional groups of 1% aqueous -carrageenan solution were still intact.

Changes in the functional groupings were observed starting at a dose of 10 kGy. The

spectra of aqueous -carrageenan started to become distorted at this dose with a

70

Figure 4.4. FT-IR spectra of -carrageenan irradiated in air, in vacuum and in

1% aqueous solution at different doses.

Absorption (cm-1)

1640-1645

1370-1375

1210-1260

1010-1080

928-933

840-850

Functional Groups

polymer bound water

methylene group

covalent sulfate

glycosidic linkage

3,6 anhydro-D-galactose

D-galactose-4-sulfate

0kGy

200kGy

2 kGy

10 kGy

100 kGy

200kGy

100kGy

100kGy

600800100012001400160018002000

Wavenumber (cm‐1)

Relative Absorban

ceSolid Powder in air 1% aq. soln. Solid Powder in vacuum

Carbonyl

Polymer Bound

Water

MethyleneGroup

CO, COH

Covalent

Sulfate

Galactose

Pyeanose

ring

Glycosidic

linkage

3,6 anhydro

bridge

D‐galactose

4‐sulfate

71

decrease in polymer bound water and shifting of the 964 – 1200cm-1 peaks

(galactopyranose ring, glycosidic linkage) toward a higher wavelength. More

distortions were seen at 100 kGy with an increase in intensity and the more

pronounced shifting of the 964 – 1200 cm-1 peaks toward higher wavelength, loss of

peaks corresponding to covalent sulfate, 3,6 anhydro bridge and D-galactose-4-

sulfate. These same changes were also observed in solid -carrageenan irradiated in

vacuum at 200 kGy.

4.3.3. Reducing Sugars

Depolymerization of polysaachrides by conventional methods is accompanied

by the production of reducing sugars [16-17]. Similarly, radiation induced

depolymerization of carrageenan produces reducing sugars. Thus, the number of

reducing sugars indirectly determines the number of cleaved glycosidic linkages.

Figure 4.5 presents the dose dependence of the concentration of reducing end groups

for -carrageenan at different irradiation conditions. The yields of the radiolytically

formed reducing groups, i.e. aldehyde groups or hemiacetal ends, increased with

increasing doses for solid -carrageenan irradiated in air. The amount of reducing

sugars in -carrageenan irradiated in air was slightly lower than in vacuum at doses of

less than 100 kGy. Expectedly, since the Gd in air is higher than in vacuum, the

number of reducing sugars in air should be slightly higher than in vacuum. However,

results revealed otherwise. It is assumed that some of the formed aldehydic groups

have been oxidized to carboxylic groups. The other possibility is that ketal groups

(non reducing) instead of the aldehydes were formed. Solid -carrageenan irradiated

in vacuum shows also a slight increase in reducing sugar but which started to plateau

at a dose of as low as 10 kGy. The amount of reducing sugar decreased at 200 kGy.

72

Figure 4.5. Percent reducing sugar of -carrageenan irradiated at increasing

doses.

Free carbonyl groups in glucose yields carrageenan macromolecule which are formed

in two ways, first, by radiolytically induced cleavage of glycosidic bonds, and second,

as the result of oxidation of carbohydrate radicals generated inside the carrageenan

residue. These radiolytically formed free carbonyl groups can be generated via the

different schemes as illustrated in the last part of this chapter. Radiolysis reaction in

glucose yields glucosone (a ketone) in the absence of oxygen (eq. 4.3). Results on the

reduction of the amount of reducing sugar at 200 kGy coincided with the FT-IR

results of vacuumed -carrageenan irradiated at 200 kGy where the absorbance peak

corresponding to galactose pyranose ring and glycosidic linkage has been destroyed at

this dose. Aqueous -carrageenan, obviously, yielded more reducing end groups as

more radiolytically formed reducing group are expected from the indirect effect of

Dose (kGy)

0 50 100 150 200 250

Pe

rce

nt

Re

du

cin

g S

ug

ar

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14 Solid iin air

Solid in vacuum

1% aq. soln.

73

OH radicals promoting scission and hydrolysis reactions. Radiation effects on the

polysaccharide pectin solutions also yield reducing groups which increase rapidly

with increasing doses. The presence of oxygen during irradiation of pectin solutions

influences to some extent the concentration of these groups [15]. Gamma irradiation

of aqueous solutions of D-glucose in oxygen yields the reducing sugars erythrose,

glyoxal, formaldehyde, arabinose and xylose [2]. Maximum amount of reducing sugar

in aqueous solution was obtained at 50 kGy. This result coincided with the weight

average molecular weight obtained at 50 kGy (Chapter 3.3.1). No further decrease in

Mw was observed beyond a dose of 20 kGy which would indicate no further cleavage

in glycosdic linkage and therefore no further increase in reducing groups. Beyond 50

kGy, these reducing groups may have been oxidized further to carboxylic groups or

other decomposition products which resulted in the decrease of reducing sugar

beyond this dose.

4.3.4. Acidity

Sulfated galactans like carrageenans are known to release their sulfates after

depolymerization [18-20] rendering them acidic. Acid hydrolysis of -carrageenan

and chondroitin sulfate has been observed to undergo significant desulfation [39].

Figure 4.6 shows a slight increase in acidity (as H2SO4) with solid carrageenans

irradiated in vacuum and in air. Increase in acidity of the vacuumed samples was

almost zero. Irradiation in aqueous solution, on the other hand, showed a sharp

increase in acidity up to 50 kGy and starts to plateau beyond this dose. A high percent

acidity of around 16% percent (as H2SO4) was observed at a dose of 200 kGy. Since

the source of acidity of irradiated carrageenans does not originate only from the

cleaved sulfates but also from the carboxylic groups formed (from oxidation of

74

carbonyl groups), it would be interesting to know how much of the acidity is

contributed by these groups. In aqueous irradiation, carboxylic groups can be

generated through the scheme illustrated in equation 4.2 as in the case of glucose

radicals. Irradiation of aqueous solutions of glucose in the presence of oxygen yields

glucoronic and gluconic acid [2]. In solid irradiation, carboxylic groups can also be

formed through the attack of OH radical or H radical (from the radiolysis of the

polymer bound water) on C=O or ROO radical (in the presence of oxygen). Table 4.1

shows the amount of carboxyl and free sulfate (as bisulfate) groups of -carrageenan

irradiated at increasing doses. The amount of carboxyl groups steadily increased with

dose for -carrageenan irradiated both in air and in vacuum. The values are however

smaller for the vacuumed samples. Carboxylic group from the irradiation of

Figure 4.6. Percent Acidity of -carrageenan as a function of dose at different

conditions.

0 50 100 150 2000

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16In Air

In Vacuum

In 1% Aqueous Solution

Dose (kGy)

% A

cid

ity

(as

H2S

O4)

75

vacuumed -carrageenan may be a result of OHC radical attack (from polymer bound

water) with C=O. In air, ROOC radical attack may be an additional source for the

formation of carboxylic group. Irradiation in air indicated that the free sulfates are the

major contributor of the acidity of irradiated solid -carrageenan. No changes in the

amount of free sulfate were observed beyond 50 kGy. Percent desulfation leveled off

at around 9%. In vacuumed samples, the major contributor for the acidity of irradiated

solid -carrageenan was the carboxyl groups (starting at 50 kGy) with values higher

than the free sulfate groups. The free sulfate values were quite negligible, almost less

than 1% desulfation. In aqueous irradiation, percent acidity was contributed both by

the free sulfate and carboxyl groups which continuously increased with increasing

dose. No further release in sulfate was observed beyond 100 kGy. Percent desulfation

at this dose was quite high which reached a value of around 40%. A similar study

using 5% sodium type -carrageenan shows desulfation to cease beyond an absorbed

dose of 10 kGy. A maximum of 10% desulfation is observed [27].

Chemical analyses from the results of reducing sugar, total acidity and UV

absorbance at 260nm for the carbonyl groups indicated increasing values for solid -

carrageenan (irradiated in air and in vacuum) with dose. FT-IR structural analysis also

indicated that all functional groupings present in -carrageenan remained intact up to

a dose of 100 kGy for -carrageenan. Thus, it can be stated that solid irradiation does

not significantly change the structure of -irradiation up to a dose of 100 kGy. On the

other hand, irradiation of -carrageenan in aqueous solution (1%) lead to the

destruction of the structure starting at a dose of 10 kGy which became more obvious

at 50 kGy as indicated by changes in the FT-IR finger print regions, decrease in

reducing sugar, desulfation effect and increase in carboxylic groups.

76

Table 4.1a. Acidic composition of gamma irradiated solid -carrageenan (in air)

with absorbed dose.

Table 4.1b. Acidic composition of gamma irradiated solid -carrageenan (in vacuum) with absorbed dose.

Table 4.1c. Acidic composition of gamma irradiated -carrageenan (1% aqueous solution) with absorbed dose.

Absorbed

Dose (kGy)

% Acidity (as

H2SO4) %COOH

Free Sulfates

(as % HSO3-)

% Desulfation

10 0.52 0.00 0.48 2.29

20 0.97 0.04 0.85 0.19

50 2.07 0.08 1.81 8.63

100 2.49 0.17 2.11 10.06

200 3.15 1.01 1.88 8.96

Absorbed

Dose (kGy)

% Acidity (as

H2SO4) %COOH

Free Sulfates

% HSO3-

% Desulfation

10 0.07 0.02 0.05 0.24

20 0.14 0.06 0.07 0.33

50 0.17 0.15 0.01 0.05

100 0.21 0.19 0.01 0.05

200 0.33 0.27 0.04 0.19

Absorbed

Dose (kGy)

% Acidity (as

H2SO4) %COOH

Free Sulfates

% HSO3-

% Desulfation

2 0.46 0.01 0.41 1.95

10 1.96 0.40 1.39 6.62

20 5.52 3.35 1.72 8.20

50 8.94 4.44 3.77 17.97

100 11.78 4.67 8.23 39.22

200 15.59 5.67 8.64 41.18

77

4.3.5. Fractionation of Irradiated -carrageenan

From the introduction, the effective Mw of oligosaacharides as plant growth

promoter is < 10 kDa. The optimum biological activity of -carrageenan is attained at

100 kGy (in solid) as discussed also in the introduction. Previous result in Chapter

3.3.1 has demonstrated that the Mw obtained at 100 kGy can likewise be attained by

irradiating 1% aqueous -carrageenan solution at around 2 kGy. Chapter 5.3.1.4 will

discuss on some DLS experiments demonstrating the presence of new fast mode

peaks in the ICF at 100 kGy with an Mw ca. 5,000 - 10,000 which is believed to be

related to the biological activity in plants. Thus, solid and aqueous -carrageenans

were irradiated at these doses and were fractionated for structural elucidation. Several

literatures are available for the separation of the different oligomers of -carrageenan

[40-45]. Most of these procedures utilize some appropriate columns that make the

process very tedious and give very small yield. Fractionation was done with the use of

Millipore filters with appropriate molecular weight cut-offs. This procedure, however,

gives a wide range of molecular weight distribution of the fraction. Table 4.2 shows

the weight average molecular weight obtained by GPC of the different fractions of -

carrageenan irradiated in solid state in air and in vacumm at 100 kGy and 1% aqueous

solution at 2 kGy. Fractionation of solid -carrageenan irradiated in air (100 kGy) and

1% aqueous -carrageenan (2 kGy) was well achieved as seen from the Mw of the

different fractions. Fractionation of the irradiated vacuumed sample (100 kGy), on the

other hand, was not well achieved. The fractionated -carrageenan containing < 3 kDa

had an additional radiolytic product peak with an Mw of around 900. This fraction

also contained higher carbonyl and/or double bonds as indicated by the UV-Vis

absorbance at 260nm in Table 4.3. Thus, only the fraction of oligomers with an Mw of

78

Table 4.2. Molecular weight of the fractionated samples of irradiated -carrageenan

Table 4.3. UV-Vis ( = 260nm) of fractionated irradiated -carrageenan

(0.025%)

3- 10 kDa was considered to probably contain the biological active components for

plant growth promoter. From the results in Figure 4.7, the fraction containing an Mw

of 3- 10 kDa constitutes only 11% and 25% for air and aqueous solution respectively.

This implies that the active component for the biological activity of -carrageenan

comprises only a small fraction of the irradiated -carrageenan per unit weight.

Higher amount of the biological active component can be obtained in irradiated 1%

Mol. Wt. Cut-off (kDa)

Mw Peak 1 Mw Peak 2

100 kGy in Air < 3,000 9,000 910

3,000-10,000 15,000 -

10,000-30,000 26,000 -

> 30,000 38,000 -

2 kGy

1% Aqueous

<3,000 7,000 930

3,000-10,000 13,000 -

10,000-30,000 32,000 -

> 30,000 30,000 -

100 kGy in Vacuum

< 3,000 10,000 890

3,000-10,000 29,000 -

10,000-30,000 26,000 -

> 30,000 - -

Mol. Wt. Cut-off Fraction

Solid (100 kGy) 1% Aqueous (2 kGy)

Vacuum (100 kGy) 0.1%

> 30,000 - - -

10,000-30,000 0.005 0.006 0.047

3,000-10,000 0.004 0.028 0.051

<3,000 0.025 0.023 0.118

79

aqueous -carrageenan. This fraction, however, had higher radiolytic products

containing carbonyl and/or double bonds as shown in the table. Currently, the

mechanism for the plant growth promotion of these oligomers is not yet known. It is

not also known whether slight changes on the structure of the oligomers would

influence its biological activity. Thus, it is not also certain whether oligomers

containing carbonyl or double bonds can produce the same effect as those with an

intact oligomeric structure. The only thing that is certain is that oligomers containing

around Mw = 5-10 kDa promotes plant growth effect.

In order to compensate for the small fraction of biologically active component

in irradiated -carrageenan, the amount of oligomers added to plants can be increased.

Other possibility is to increase the absorbed dose of 1% -carrageenan to a dose not

exceeding 10 kGy. FT-IR results in Chapter 4.3.2 have already indicated structural

changes in the finger print region of -carrageenan beyond 10 kGy. Studies on the

actual role of the structure of oligomers on the growth in plants need further studies in

order to establish the maximum dose limit for irradiating -carrageenan both in solid

and in aqueous solution to obtain optimum effects.

Figure 4.7. Fractional yield of irradiated -carrageenan.

0.28

0.18

0.56

0.11

0.250.29

0.5 0.48

0.150.11 0.09

0

100kGy solidIn air

2kGy1% aq. soln.

100kGy solidIn vacuum

Mol.wt cut ‐off

<3kDa 3‐10kDa 10‐30kDa >30kDa

Wt. fraction / Total w

t.

80

4.3.6. NMR of Fractionated Irradiated -carrageenan

The biological activity as plant growth promoter of -carrageenan oligomers

processed by radiation is already quite established. However, the structure function

relationship in terms of its biological activitiy is still uncertain because of the lack of

analytical methods for the determination of the fine structure of carrageenans at the

polysaccharide level. Thus, proper analytical techniques are needed in order to

characterize such complex mixtures. At present, NMR spectroscopy (both 1H and 13C)

is one of the standard tools for the determination of the chemical structure of

carrageenan samples. NMR spectroscopy gives valuable information about

polysaccharide structures especially if the polysaccharide molecules are built of

identical or related oligomeric blocks such as the case of carrageenans. It is quite

helpful in the primary structure elucidation. Several data are now available for the

NMR analysis of -carrageenan samples using both 1H and 13C NMR spectra [37-38,

41-42, 46-62]. In most cases, due to the low natural abundance of the 13C isotope and

its high viscosity, samples for 13C NMR are prepared at relatively high concentrations

(5–10% w/w in D2O) and at elevated temperature (80-90oC). High viscosity results in

line broadening. In the current experiment, analyses were performed at room

temperature since the samples analyzed were oligomeric units with relatively low

viscosities. Broad peaks are obtained with the native polymer. Thus, in order to obtain

better NMR resolution, -carrageenan is hydrolyzed further into its oligomeric units.

Interpretation of NMR spectra may be made by comparing it with available model

compounds such as neocarrabiose [57]. Standard neocarrabioses are the basic

repeating units of carrageenan having varying degrees of polymerization e.g.

neocarrabiose (DP-1), tetracarrabiose (DP-2), hexacarrabiose (DP-3), etc. 13C NMR

81

of -carragenan would give useful information on the type of Carbons present. It

would determine whether new bonded Carbon atoms are formed aside from the

original galacto pyranose ring e.g. new fragmentation patterns, formation of carbonyl

or carboxyl groups. 1H NMR would give information on the removal of sulfate

groups, formation of reducing ends, glycosidic bond cleavage, destruction of anhydro

ring, or other bond formations. For nomenclature purposes, the following

abbreviations are made throughout the discussion:

G4S – galactopyranose 4-sulfate unit A – anhydro galactose unit

nr – non reducing unit r – reducing unit

4.3.6.1. NMR of carrabiose standards

The 1H-NMR spectra of two oligosaccharides of neocarrabiose 4-sulphate

(neocarrabiose-4-O-sulphate (A-G4S) and neocarrahexaose-4 1,3,5-tri-O-suphate [(A-

G4S)3] are shown in Figure 4.8 The spectra of both neocarrabiose indicated well

resolved peaks which resembled those already presented in literatures. The main

difference between G4S and (A-G4S)3 is that non reducing and reducing groups are

present in (A-G4S)3 whereas the disaccharide G4S contains only a reducing end.

Thus, 1H-NMR of Ar of the disaccharide differs from that of the higher

oligosaccharides in the sense that it has the characteristics of both a unit next to a

reducing end (Ar) and a unit occupying the non-reducing end (Anr). The spectra of

(A-G4S)3 looked more complicated showing more peaks. The most upfield resonance

was found in G-2 (-3.5 ppm) whereas the most downfield was found in G4S-1

(-5.2ppm). Unresolved low-intensity signals were found at chemical shifts ()

between 3.8 and 4.2. 1H-NMR of the different neocarrabiose has already been

extensively studied [55, 57-58]. In the current experiment, was assigned to the

82

different protons in neocarrabiose by comparing the peaks obtained from the spectra

with those in literatures. The chemical shift data are given in Table 4.4. The chemical

shifts were similar but slightly lower than those found in literatures as shown in the

table. The spectra showed some overlapping peaks in (A-G4S)3 especially for the

anomeric types and hydrogen attached to the same carbon. For practical purposes,

the same were assigned to these protons.

13C NMR spectra of A-G4S and (A-G4S)3 are shown in Figure 4.9. A-G4S

show a total of 20 different Carbons. (A-G4S)3 on the other hand had a total of 32

Carbons with the additional carbons due to the presence of non-reducing groups. The

same peaks were also found in literatures [57]. The chemical shift data are found in

Table 4.5. The observed values were quite close to those given in literature. The

assigned indicated 12 different carbons for the galactose unit of A-G4S (each carbon

in the ring containing and units) and eight different carbons for the

anhydrogalactose unit. (A-G4S)3 had 16 different carbons for the galactose unit and

14 carbons for the anhydrogalactose unit. The most upfield resonance was found in

G-6 (-61.9ppm and 61.9 for A-G4S and (A-G4S)3 respectively). The most downfield

resonance on the other hand was found in found in A-1 (-95ppm) and Gnr-1

(-102.9ppm) for A-G4S and (A-G4S)3 respectively.

83

neocarrabiose‐4‐O‐sulphate 

neocarrahexaose‐4 1,3,5‐tri‐O‐suphate 

Figure 4.8. Proton NMR of neocarrabiose standards

84

neocarrahexaose‐4 1,3,5‐tri‐O‐suphate 

neocarrabiose‐4‐O‐sulphate 

Figure 4.9. 13C NMR of neocarrabiose standards

85

Table 4.4. Chemical shifts of the 1H NMR of neocarrabiose standards.

A-G4S A-G4S Ref [57]

(A-G4S)3 (A-G4S)3 Ref [57]

ArH-1 5.003 5.102 5.026 5.120 ArH-1 4.984 5.084 5.008 5.103 AnrH-1 4.989 5.084 AH-1 4.989 5.103 ArH-2 4.005 4.106 4.044 4.142 ArH-2 4.005 4.106 4.044 4.142 AnrH-2 4.017 4.102 AH-2 4.044 4.138 ArH-3 4.255 4.357 4.443 4.535 ArH-3 4.255 4.357 4.443 4.535 AnrH-3 4.255 4.352 AH-3 4.443 4.529 ArH-4 4.374 4.478 4.511 4.607 ArH-4 4.374 4.478 4.511 4.607 AnrH-4 4.385 4.479 AH-4 4.511 4.607 ArH-5 4.308 4.408 4.567 4.650 ArH-5 4.308 4.408 4.567 4.650 AnrH-5 4.317 4.409 AH-5 4.567 4.650 ArH-6a 3.920 4.020 3.985 4.061 ArH-6a 3.920 4.020 3.985 4.061 AnrH-6a 3.942 4.020 AH-6a 3.985 4.061 ArH-6b 4.129 4.218 4.148 4.234 ArH-6b 4.095 4.202 4.126 4.224 AnrH-6b 4.117 4.203 AH-6b 4.126 4.224 G4S-H-1 5.217 5.320 5.224 5.320 G4S-H-1 4.536 4.650 4.553 4.654 G4Snr-H-1 4.572 4.658 G4S-H-1 4.572 4.660 G4SrH-2 3.814 3.919 3.823 3.917 G4SrH-2 3.489 3.594 3.501 3.593 G4Snr-H-2 3.501 3.596 G4S-H-2 3.501 3.599 G4Sr-H-3 4.068 4.165 4.090 4.165 G4Sr-H-3 3.869 3.967 3.900 3.983 G4Snr-H-3 3.920 4.003 G4S-H-3 3.920 4.013 G4Sr-H-4 4.832 4.895 4.827 4.901 G4Sr-H-4 4.793 4.835 4.802 4.835 G4Snr-H-4 4.802 4.855

86

Cont’d

Table 4.5. Chemical Shifts of the 13C NMR of neocarrabiose standards

A-G4S A-G4S Ref [57]

(A-G4S)3 (A-G4S)3 Ref [57]

G4S-H-4 4.802 4.855 G4Sr-H-5 4.054 4.190 4.090 4.186 G4Sr-H-5 3.678 3.774 3.689 3.774 G4Snr-H-5 3.689 3.817 G4S-H-5 3.689 3.817 G4Sr-H-6a 3.718 3.793 3.757 3.790 G4Sr-H-6a 3.678 3.78 3.689 3.783 G4Snr-H-6a 3.689 3.800 G4S-H-6a 3.689 3.800 G4Sr-H-6b 3.624 3.731 3.639 3.731 G4Sr-H-6b 3.678 3.783 3.689 3.783 G4Snr-H-6b 3.689 3.800 G4S-H-6b 3.689 3.800 G4S-H-1 5.217 5.320 5.224 5.320

A-G4S (A-G4S)3 (A-G4S)2 Ref [57]

Anr C-1 95.08 95.00 Anr C-2 69.82 69.89 Anr C-3 81.31 81.28 Anr C-4 70.48 70.44 Anr C-5 77.84 77.79 Anr C-6 69.48 69.45 Ar-C1 95.06 95.08 95.00 Ar-C2 69.94 69.95 69.96 Ar-C1 94.99 95.00 94.94 Ar-C2 70.05 70.03 70.10 Ar-C3 81.31 79.61 79.56 Ar-C4 78.82 78.85 78.83 Ar-C5 77.83 77.07 77.02 Ar-C6 69.47 69.82 69.78 G4S C-1 92.80 92.87 92.77 G4S C-2 67.69 67.67 67.60 G4S C-3 75.71 75.53 75.58 G4S C-4 75.39 75.19 75.28 G4S C-5 70.50 70.48 70.49 G4S C-6 61.98 61.88 61.95 G4S C-1 96.99 96.99 96.94 G4S C-2 71.04 70.48 70.97

87

Cont’d

4.3.6.2. NMR of oligomers from irradiated -carrageenan

1H-NMR and 13C spectra of the fractionated oligomers from irradiated -

carrageenan are shown in Figures 4.10 and 4.11. Similar spectra are observed in the

native -carrageenan polymer (Figure 4.12). The 1H-NMR indicated a simple spectra

with 12 different protons for the different types of irradiated -carrageenan oligomers

(-carragenan irradiated in solid in air, solid in vacuum and at 1% aqueous solution).

This may correspond to the protons of the 12 different carbons of the dimer unit of -

carrageenan. The peaks in the spectra were rather broad which probably contains

some overlapping unresolved peaks. This clearly indicates that the oligomers obtained

were still large enough for the details of the proton to be seen by NMR like those

obtained from the neocarrabiose standards. The spectra of these oligomers resemble

more the spectra of a -carrageenan polymer (shown in Figure 4.12) rather than that

of the neocarrabiose oligosaccharides. Based from the obtained MW from GPC

experiments, these oligomers would have approximately a DP of 39, 36 and 75 for -

carrageenan irradiated in solid in air, at 1% aqueous solution, and solid in vacuum

Cont A-G4S (A-G4S)3 (A-G4S)2 Ref [57]

G4S C-3 78.82 78.71 78.65 G4S C-5 75.00 74.21 74.97 G4S C-6 61.87 61.88 61.84 G4Snr C-1 102.91 102.84 G4Snr C-2 69.53 69.78 G4Snr C-3 78.61 78.52 G4Snr C-4 74.13 74.15 G4Snr C-5 75.01 75.15 G4Snr C-6 61.68 61.64

88

respectively. From the 1H-NMR spectra, the degree of polymerization can also be

estimated based on the ratio between integrated areas of the resonances from all H-1

protons of 3,6-anhydrogalactose divided by the average area of the H-3 and H-5 of the

non-reducing end 3,6 anhydrogalactose and multiplying by 2 [57]. However, since the

peaks for the non-reducing ends were not resolved, this method could not be done.

The proton NMR chemical shift data are shown in Table 4.6. did not vary

significantly with the three different fractions of oligomers. Their values were quite

close to each other for the same type of proton. The given denotes only the protons

attached to specific carbon and does not distinguish the different types whether it is

-, -, reducing or non reducing protons. The only well resolved peaks seen in the

spectra were those protons attached to A-6 with chemical shifts ranging from 3.98 to

4.13 ppm for A-6a, A-6b and A-6a nr. The values were quite close to reference

values taken from a polymer [60] and a low molecular weight (LMW) -carragenan

from an acid hydrolyzed sample [37] as seen in the table. Other reference values for

the polymeric and oligomeric -carrageenan are also available [52, 55]. From the 1H-

NMR spectra, the G-4 proton could not be seen in -carrageenan irradiated in vacuum

and in air. This proton was seen only as a slight bump in aqueous -carrageenan at =

4.829 ppm. For the neocarrabiose standard, G-4 proton does not exist as a singlet but

consists of two separate peaks, 4.802 ppm and 4.827 ppm for G4S-4 and G4S-

respectively. One possibility for the disappearance of the G-4 peak is the removal of

the 4-sulphate groups at C-4. Proton NMR of -carrageenan, a desulfated -

carragenan with OH attached to G-6, does not show any peak at .4.8 ppm. The

chemical shift data of -carrageenan resembles that of -carrageenan except for the

G-4 which appears upfield at 4.14 / 4.36 ppm [61-62]. Removal of the 4-sulphate

89

group also shifts slightly upfield the resonances of R-GH-1 and R-GH-1nr [57]. A

closer look at the 1H-NMR spectra of all the irradiated -carrageenan oligomers

would reveal a slight bump at .5.19, indicative of the presence of the reducing end

R-GH-1. This appears a little bit upfield from the neocarrabiose standards ( = 5.224

ppm). Resonances from end residues of carrageenan molecules of a higher molecular

weight are decreased in intensities as they have lesser reducing end groups. Other

unidentified small peaks ( .4.9) were also seen in the spectra of -carrageenan

oligomers irradiated in solid in air and at .3.2 for all types of irradiated -

carrageenan oligomers. Possibly these are protons coming from a different type of

Carbon other than those from the intact dimer A-G4S of -carrageenan. These

probably could be some of the radiolytic products present in small quantities in the

sample.

13C NMR spectra of radiation processed -carrageenan oligomers (irradiated

in solid and in air and as aqueous solution) are shown in Figure 4.11. The spectra

indicated only 11 different types of carbons. In comparison with the 13C NMR profile

of standard neocarrabiose where the non-reducing, reducing ends, and types for

the same carbon atom indicate distinctly different peaks, the 13C NMR spectra of

radiation processed -carrageenan oligomers showed only one peak for each Carbon

atom in the galactopyranose ring dimer. The data are seen in Table 4.7. Chemical

shift values of the three different types of -carrageenan oligomers were almost the

same for the different types of carbon atoms. The values were quite close to reference

values from the polymer and oligomer (DP4) [38]. Other references give also similar

results [49, 54-57, 59]. The reference values indicate that A-2 and A-6 have almost

the same chemical shifts. Thus, carbons from A-2 and A-6 of irradiated -carragenan

90

oligomers were assigned with the same (70.01). This would account for the 12

different carbons present in the galacto pyranose ring. Other reference values are also

quite close. No evidence of carbon atom from carbonyl bonds ( > 160 ppm) was

seen. FT-IR results of solid -carrageenan at 100 kGy (in air and in vacuum) and 1%

aqueous -carrageenan at 2 kGy indicated the presence of carbonyl bonds (Chapter

4.3.2). Carbonyl carbons do not have hydrogen attached to them so they often appear

less intense than other carbons in the molecule. It is also possible that the carbonyl

groups present in this fraction are quite minimal which could not easily be detected by

13C NMR. Most likely, a large fraction of the -carrageenan oligomer containing the

carbonyl groups may have been present in the separated fraction with the molecular

weight cut-off of less than 3,000 Da.

Based on 13C and 1H NMR spectra, the -carrageenan oligomers obtained

from the polymer irradiated in solid in air and in vacuum and at 1% aqueous solution

indicated still an intact repeating unit of the dimer with no changes in the chemical

structure of the galacto-pyranose ring. This result could present further explanation on

the optimum plant growth promoter effect found at 100 kGy for solid irradiation.

91

Figure 4.10. 1H NMR of irradiated -carrageenan oligomers.

solid ‐carrageenanirradiated in vacuum

G4S‐1A‐5

A‐4

G4S‐2

G4S‐3

G4S‐5 & 6

A‐1 A‐2A‐3A‐6a

A‐6a*A‐6b

D2O

aqueous (1%) ‐carrageenanirradiated in airG4S‐4

H2O

G4S‐1

solid ‐carrageenanirradiated in air

? ?

92

Figure 4.11. 13C NMR of irradiated -carrageenan oligomer.

solid ‐carrageenanirradiated in vacuum

solid ‐carrageenanirradiated in air

aqueous (1%) ‐carrageenanirradiated in air 

G4S‐1

A‐1

A‐3

A‐4

G4S‐3

A‐5

G4S‐4

A‐2 & A‐6

G4S‐5

?( 71.45)

G4S‐2

G4S‐6

Internal Standard (DDS)

G4S‐1

A‐1

A‐3

A‐4

G4S‐3

A‐5

G4S‐4

A‐2 & A‐6

G4S‐5

G4S‐2

G4S‐6

G4S‐1

A‐1

A‐3

A‐4

G4S‐3

A‐5

G4S‐4

A‐2 & A‐6

G4S‐5

G4S‐2

G4S‐6

93

Figure 4.12. 1H [60] and 13C NMR [47] of -carrageenan polymer (Top and Bottom).

G4S‐1

A‐1

A‐3

A‐4

G4S‐3

A‐5

G4S‐5

A‐6

A‐2

G4S‐1

G4S‐6

1H NMR

13C NMR

12

3

4 56 1

234

5

6

O

OH

O3SO

OO

OH

O

OH

O

94

Table 4.6. Chemical Shifts of the proton NMR of irradiated -carrageenan oligomers

Table 4.7. Chemical shifts of the C-13 NMR of irradiated -carrageenan oligomers

Solid Vacuum Aqueous Reference (Polymer)

[38]

Reference (DP4) [38]

G-1 102.87 102.89 102.88 102.5 102.2 G-2 69.81 69.82 69.81 69.9 69.6 G-3 78.51 78.51 78.50 78.8 78.7 G-4 74.12 74.13 74.11 74.0 73.8 G-5 75.18 75.18 75.17 74.8 74.5 G-6 61.68 61.68 61.67 61.3 61.0 A-1 95.08 95.09 95.08 95.1 94.9 A-2 70.01 70.01 70.01 69.7 69.8 A-3 79.60 79.61 79.60 78.3 78.9 A-4 78.87 78.86 78.85 79.1 78.0 A-5 77.08 77.05 77.06 76.8 76.5 A-6 70.01 70.01 70.01 69.4 69.6

Solid Vacuum Aqueous Reference Polymer

[60]

Reference LMW [37]

G-1 4.57 4.58 4.57 4.75 4.60 G-2 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.74 3.55 G-3 3.90 3.91 3.90 4.10 3.97 G-4 4.83 4.95 4.81 G-5 3.71 3.72 3.71 3.93 3.76 G-6 3.71 3.72 3.71 3.93 3.76 A-1 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.24 5.06 A-2 4.04 4.04 4.05 4.12 4.10 A-3 4.43 4.44 4.44 4.30 4.48 A-4 4.51 4.51 4.51 4.75 4.60 A-5 4.56 4.56 4.56 4.65 4.56 A-6a 3.98 3.98 3.98 4.15 4.01 A-6b 4.13 4.13 4.13 4.25 4.18 A-6a nr 3.94 3.94 3.94

95

4.4. CONCLUSION

Chemical structure of irradiated -carrageenan at different doses (1% aqueous

and solid in air and in vacuum) was investigated using several methods (UV-Vis / FT-

IR / NMR spectroscopy / reducing sugar analysis / sulfate and carboxylic acid

analysis). The implications of all these chemical analyses in relation to bio-based

material development can be described as follows:

4.4.1. For 1% Aqueous Solution Irradiation

Figure 4.13 summarizes the radiolytic products of 1% aqueous -carrageenan

with dose. Values of reducing sugar, carbonyl groups, free sulfates and carboxylic

groups are relatively high especially at doses over 50 kGy. It is at these doses where

there is either a reduction or a plateau of radiolytic products formed. FT-IR at 100

kGy further suggests destruction of peaks corresponding to covalent sulfate, 3,6

anhydro bridge, D-galactose-4-sulfate, polymer bound water and the galacto-pyranose

ring. Note that Chapter 3 discussed that at dose beyond 50 kGy, there is no longer a

decrease in Mw but increase in radiolytic product peak (Mw . 1,000) is observed

instead. Thus, the region beyond 50 kGy can be considered the decomposition region

and therefore will not be useful for any application

On the other hand, doses between 10 to 50 kGy suggest a continuous build-up

of radiolytic products. FT-IR indicates that at a starting dose of 10 kGy, destruction of

peaks corresponding to galacto-pyranose ring and polymer bound water takes place.

This region may no longer be useful for applications related to the biological activity

of -carrageenan due to the destruction of its chemical structure. However, the acidic

components, reducing sugars and carbonyl groups can still be useful for other

96

applications e.g. radiation dose indicators or as antioxidants. Carbonyl groups in

aldehydic (reducing sugars) and ketone forms are considered antioxidants.

There is a narrow window (< 10 kGy) for the -carrageenan oligomer

containing an intact chemical structure. It is only in this region that applications

related to the biological function of -carrageenan can be considered.

4.4.2. For Solid Irradiation

The radiolytic products of -carrageenan irradiated in vacuum and in air are

shown in Figures 4.14 and 4.15. Unlike the values of 1% aqueous -carrageenan, the

formation of carbonyl groups, free sulfates and carboxylic groups are very minimal

both irradiated solid in air and in vacuum. These are good indicators of a well

preserved chemical structure. For vacuum irradiation, at a high dose of 200 kGy, FT-

IR spectra show that there is already a destruction of the chemical structure of -

carrageenan. However, a 200 kGy dose is rather too large for its biological activity

function considering that the optimum dose for plant growth promotion effect is

known only at 100 kGy. From these results on chemical structure, -carrageenan

irradiated both in vacuum and in air are expected to have good biological activity up

to a dose of 100 kGy. This dose extends further to 200 kGy for solid -carrageenan

irradiated in air. The expected benefits would be higher in vacuumed -carrageenan

due to its very low radiolytic product formation. The carbonyl, carboxylic and free

sulfates groups are lower than in air. In the use of -carrageenan oligomers as anti-

HIV, the main factors that influence the anti-HIV activity of carrageenans are the type

of sugar chain, the degree of sulfation, and the molecular weight [63]. The sulfated

oligosaccharide with the special structure of (13)-4 sulfate--D galactose (14)-3,

6 anhydro-"-D-galactose have antitumor and immunostimulating activity [64]. Thus,

97

any changes to the chemical components and structure of -carrageenan would

decrease the antitumor activity.

Furthermore, the integrity of the chemical structure of -carrageenan

irradiated in 1% aqueous solution at 2 kGy and solid (in vacuum and air) at 100 kGy

has been proven by NMR. While irradiated -carrageenan may have some changes in

functional groupings (from the chemical and spectral analyses), these groups may

only be present as a small fraction of the entire molecular weight distribution. Most

probably this is present in the fraction with an Mw < 3kDa as indicated by its

carbonyl peak at 260nm of the UV-Vis spectra.

Figure 4.13. Summary of chemical and spectral analyses of -carrageenan irradiated in 1% aqueosus solution at varying doses

* destruction of galacto-pyranosering

* decrease in polymer bound water

Decomposition 

* Loss of peaks - covalent sulfate - 3,6 anhydro bridge - D-galactose-4-sulfate

* decrease in polymer bound water* destruction of galacto-pyranose ring

50 100 150 200

Intact chemical structure

Carbonyl group

00.0

15.0

% R

ed

uc

ing

Su

gar

0.0

0.5

A-A

o(2

60

nm

)

0.0

10.0

%  F

reeSulfate (as HSO

3‐ )

0.0

10.0

%  C

OO

H

Free Sulfate

Carboxylic group

Reducing group

98

Figure 4.14. Summary of chemical and spectral analyses of solid -carrageenan

irradiated in vacuum at varying doses.

Figure 4.15. Summary of chemical and spectral analyses of solid -carrageenan

irradiated in air at varying doses.

0.0

15.0

% R

ed

uc

ing

Su

gar

0.0

0.5

A-A

o(2

60

nm

)

0.0

10.0

%  F

reeSulfate (as HSO

3‐ )

0.0

10.0

%  C

OO

H

0 50 100 150 200

Absorbed Dose (kGy)

Carbonyl group

Reducing Sugar

Carboxylic AcidFree Sulfate

* Loss of peaks - covalent sulfate - 3,6 anhydro bridge - D-galactose-4-sulfate

* decrease in polymer bound water* destruction of galacto-pyranose ring

Intact chemical structure

Decomposition

0 50 100 150 200

Absorbed Dose (kGy)

Carbonyl Group

Reducing Sugar

Free Sulfate

Carboxylic Acid

Intact chemical structure

0.0

15.0

% R

ed

uc

ing

Su

gar

0.0

0.5

A-A

o(2

60

nm

)

0.0

10.0

%  F

reeSulfate (as HSO

3‐ )

0.0

10.0

%  C

OO

H

99

REFERENCES:

1. A. Swallow. Radiation Chemistry: An Introduction. New York. Wiley. 1973. pp. 231-234.

2. G. Phillips, G. Moody, Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Is. 6 (1959) 78. 3. I. Idimecheva, R. Kisel, O. Shadyro, K. Kazem, H. Murase, T. Kagiya. J. Radiat.

Res. 46 (2005) 319. 4. W. Dziędziela, D. Kotyńska, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 23 (1984) 723. 5. L. Hai, T. Diep, N. Nagasawa, F. Yoshii, K. Tamikazu, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in

Phys. Res. B. 208 (2003) 466. 6. P. Ulanski, J. Rosiak, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 39, (1992) 53. 7. U. Gryczka, D. Dondi, A. Chmielewski, W. Migdal, A. Buttafava, A. Faucitano,

Radiat. Phys. Chem. 78 (2009) 543. 8. P. Ulanski C. Von Sonntag, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 (2000) 2022. 9. L. Huang, M. Zhai, J. Peng, J. Li, G. Wei, Carbohydr. Polym. 67 (2007) 305. 10. N. Nagasawa, H. Mitomo, F. Yoshii, T. Kume, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 69 (2000)

279. 11. J. Scott, M. Tigwell, Carbohydr. Res. 47 (1976) 105. 12. M. Şen, B. Yolaçan, O. Güven, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. B. 265

(2007) 429. 13. M. Vodeničarová, G. Dřímalová, Z. Hromádková, A. Malovíková, A.

Ebringerová Ultrason. Sonochem. 13 (2006) 157. 14. P. Baugh, J. Goodall, G. Phillips, C. von Sonntag, M. Dizdaroglu, Carbohydr.

Res. 49 (1976) 315. 15. H. Zegota, Food Hydrocolloids 13 (1999) 51. 16. T. Hjerde, O. Smidsrød, B. Christenesen, Carbohydr Res. 288 (1996) 175. 17. C. Rigouin, C. Ladrat, C. Sinquin, S. Colliec-Jouault, M. Dion, Carbohy. Polym.

76 (2009) 279. 18. A. Karlsson, S. Singh, Carbohydr. Polym. 38 (1999) 7. 19. D. Navarro, M. Flores, C. Stortz, Carbohydr. Polym. 69 (2007) 742.

100

20. I. Miller, J. Blunt, Carbohydr. Res. 309 (1998) 39. 21. C. Lii, C. Chen, A. Yeh, V. Lai, Food Hydrocolloids 13 (1999) 477. 22. V. Meunier, T. Nicolai, D. Durand, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 28 (2001) 157. 23. G. Zhou, W. Yao, C. Wang, Carbohydr. Polym. 64 (2006) 73. 24. R. Czechowska-Biskup, B. Rokita, P. Ulanski, J. Rosiak, Nucl. Instr. and Meth.

in Phys. Res. B. 236 (2005) 383. 25. R. Czechowska-Biskup, B. Rokita, S. Lotfy, P. Ulanski, J. Rosiak, Carbohyd.

Polym. 60 (2005) 175. 26. J. Hodge, B. Hofreiter, B.T. (1962) In Whistler, R.L. & Wolfrom, M.L.(Eds.)

Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry (Vol. 1, pp 380-394). Academic Press: New York.

27. L. Relleve, N. Nagasawa, L. Luan, T. Yagi, C. Aranilla, L. Abad, T. Kume, F.

Yoshii, A. De la Rosa, Polym Degrad Stab. 87 (2005) 403. 28. M. Akhlaq, S. Baghdadi, C. von Sonntag, Carbohydr. Res.164 (1987) 71. 29. C. von Sonntag, E. Bothe, P. Ulanski, J. Deeble, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 46 (1995)

527. 30. N. Anderson, T. Dolan, A. Penman, D. Rees, G. Mueller, D. Stancioff. N.

Stanley, J. Chem. Soc. C (1968) 602. 31. S. Peats, The infrared spectra of carrageenans extracted from various algae. In:

Proc. of the Xth Interrnational Seaweed Symposium (1981), Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 495-501.

32. E. Lacerna, R. Veroy, A. Luistro, G. Cajipe, Extracts from some red and brown

seaweeds of the Philippines. In: Proc. of the Xth Interrnational Seaweed Symposium (1981), Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 4441-448.

33. B. Matsuhiro, Hydrobiologia 326-327 (1996) 481. 34. G. Santos, Aqua. Bot. 36 (1989) 55. 35. I. Fournet, E. Ar Gall, E. Deslandes, J. Huvenne, B. Sombret, J. Floćh, Bot.

Mar. 40 (1997) 45. 36. J. Prado-Fernández, J.A. Rodríguez-Vázquez, E. Tojo, J.M. Andrade, Anal.

Chim. Acta. 480 (2003) 23.Y. Jiang, X. Guo, X. Tian, Carbohydr. Polym. 61 (2005) 399.

101

37. Y. Jiang, X. Guo, X. Tian, Carbohydr. Polym. 61 (2005) 399. 38. C. Rochas, M. Rinaudo, M. Vincendon, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 5 (1983) 111. 39. N. Volpi, A. Mucci, L. Shenetii, Carbohydr. Res. 315 (1999) 345. 40. T. Malfait, F. van Cauwelaert, J. Chromatogr. A, 504 (1990) 369. 41. A. Kolender, M. Matulewicz, Carbohydr. Res. 337 (2002) 57. 42. S. Knutsen, M. Sletmoen, T. Kristensen, T. Barbeyron, B. Kloareg, P. Potin,

Carbohydr. Res. 331 (2001) 101. 43. N. Caram-Lelham, R. Cleland, L. Sundelöf, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 16 (1994)

71. 44. N. Caram-Lelham, L. Sundelöf, T. Andersson, Carbohydr. Res. 273 (1995) 71. 45. A. Antonopoulos, B. Herbreteau, M. Lafosse, W. Helbert, J. Chromatogr. A

1023 (2004) 231. 46. Y. Jiang, X. Guo, Carbohydr. Polym. 61 (2005) 441. 47. F. Velde, H. Peppelman, H. Rollema, R. Tromp, Carbohydr. Res. 331 (2001)

271. 48. A. Usov, Food Hydrocolloid. 12 (1998) 301. 49. A. Usov, S. Yarotsky, S. A. Shaskov, Biopolymers. 19 (1980) 977. 50. C. Stortz, B. Bacon, R. Cherniak, A. Cerezo, Carbohydr. Res. 261 (1994) 317. 51. E. Murano, R. Toffanin, E. Cecere, R. Rizzo, S. Knutsen, Mar. Chem. 58 (1997)

319. 52. E. Tojo, J. Prado, Carbohydr. Polym. 53 (2003) 325. 53. F. Van de Velde, A. Antipova, H. Rollema, B. Tatiana, N. Grinberg, L. Pereira,

P. Gilsenan, R. Tromp, B. Rudolphe, V. Grinberg, Carbohyd. Res. 340 (2005) 1113.

54. F. van de Velde, L. Pereira, H. Rollema, Carbohydr. Res. 339 (2004) 2309. 55. F. van de Velde, S. Knutsen, A. Usov, H. Rollemay, A. Cerezo, Trends Food.

Sci. Tech. 13 (2002) 73.

102

56. M. Ciancia, M. Matulewicz, P. Finch, A. Cerezo, Carbohydrate Research, 238 (1993) 241.

57. S. Knutsen, H. Grasdalen, Carbohydr. Res., 229 (1992) 233. 58. S. Knutsen, H. Grasdalen, Carbohydr. Polym. 19 (1992) 199. 59. T. Turquois, S. Acquistapace, F. Arce Vera, D Welti. Carhohydr. Polym. 31

(1996) 269. 60. V. Campo, D. Kawano, D. da Silva Jr., I. Carvalho, Carbohydr. Polym. 77

(2009) 167. 61. A. Kolender, M. Matulewicz, Carbohydr. Res. 339 (2004) 1619. 62. R. Falshaw, R. Furneaux, H. Wong, Carbohydr. Res. 338 (2003) 1403.

63. T. Yamada, A. Ogamo, T. Saito, J. Watanabe, H. Uchiyama, Y. Nakagawa,

Carbohydr. Polym. 32 (1997) 51.

64. H. Yuan, J. Song, X. Li, N. Li, J. Dai, Cancer Letters, 243 (2006) 228.

103

CHAPTER 5

STRUCTURAL AND DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF IRRADIATED

-CARRAGEENAN

5.1. INTRODUCTION

Most of the available data on the analysis of the radiolytic products of natural

polysaccharides are those related to their chemical structure. The dynamic behavior

and structural heterogeneity of irradiated polysaccharides have not been studied. The

various structural elements of a macromolecule e.g. -carrageenan, such as

polydispersity, overall molecular dimensions, hydrodynamic behavior and internal

mobility would have an influence in its properties in solution. The reduction in

molecular size and changes in chemical structure of -carrageenan as an effect of

radiolytic degradation may have an influence on these structural elements.

It is well known that -carrageenan easily undergoes association in the

presence of ions (Chapter 2.3.5) and changes in temperature. Thermoreversible

conformational changes from coil to helix to gel are expected with this association.

With radiation, the conformational characteristic and gelation behavior of -

carrageenan may be altered. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) can be a convenient tool

to observe such changes. Likewise, the different diffusion modes of the oligomers

produced from radiation may also be observed.

The availability of structural heterogeneity makes it possible to perform

experimental procedures based on scattering of the incident radiation. The small-angle

neutron scattering technique (SANS) is a convenient and efficient tool for the

determination of structural characteristics in a scale from one up to hundreds of

104

nanometers. This is due to a variety of capabilities of deuteration labelling increasing

contrast. Using this method, the structure change of -carrageenan with absorbed dose

can be observed.

5.2. METHODOLOGY

5.2.1. Dynamic Light Scattering

Irradiated carrageenan was dissolved in 0.05MKCl to make a 0.5%

solution. These were preheated at 80oC in a water bath for more than three hours prior

to DLS measurements. The solvents were filtered with a 0.20 m filter. DLS studies

were performed using a static/dynamic compact goniometer (SLS/DLS-5000), ALV,

Langen, Germany. A He-Ne laser with a power of 22 mW emitting a polarized light at

= 632.8 nm was used as the incident beam. The DLS set-up is shown in Figure 5.1.

Samples were cooled at a controlled rate of 0.4oC/min from 80oC to 20oC. DLS

measurements were taken at an interval of 60 sec. at a 90 angle.

Figure 5.1. The DLS Set-up

105

The laser (He-Ne) passes through a collimator lens and then hits the cell with

the solution. The light is scattered and detected by a photomultiplier that transform a

variation of intensity into a variation of voltage. After the photomultiplier, the signal

is immediately preamplified and then sent to the computer for data processing. A

time-dependent fluctuations in the scattered intensity will be observed.

5.2.2. Small Angle Neutron Scattering

Non-irradiated and irradiated -carrageenan samples were dissolved in D2O

and in 0.05M KCl/D2O solutions at elevated temperatures at a fixed concentration of

5% by weight. The samples were then placed in drum cells with a sample thickness of

0.21 mm. SANS experiments were carried out with the small-angle neutron scattering

instrument, SANS-U, at the Institute for Solid State Physics, The University of Tokyo,

located at the Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai, Japan. A flux of cold neutrons

with a wavelength of 0.7 nm was irradiated to the sample and the scattered intensity

profile was collected with an area detector of 128 x 128 pixels. The sample to detector

distances of 2.00 m and 8.00 m were used which covered the accessible q range of

0.06 to 1.5 nm-1, where q is the scattering vector. The sample drum cells with quartz

windows were placed in a brass chamber and the chamber was thermo-regulated with

a circulating water bath. SANS experiments were initially done at 20oC and the

temperature was raised to 60oC. The obtained intensities were corrected for the

detector inhomogeneities, cell scattering, fast neutrons, transmission, and incoherent

scatterings, and then were scaled to the absolute intensity with an intensity calibration

standard sample (Lupolen). Figure 5.2. shows the schematic diagram of the SANS

set-up.

106

This instrument is composed of (a) a mechanical neutron velocity selector

(NVS), (b) a pre-sample flight path, (c) a multi purpose sample stage, (d) an

evacuated post-sample flight path, (e) an area detector, (f) a point detector for

transmission measurements, (g) a beam stop made of B4C, and (h) a data acquisition

system. The incident neutron beam from the cold source (white beam flux » 2 × 108

cm−2s−1 with the peak wavelength of 0.4 nm) is monochromatized by a NVS with

helical slits. Cold neutron beam from the reactor is guided to the NVS. Just behind

the NVS is located the pre-sample flight path, which consists of (j) pinhole tubes

coated with B4C inside and (k) alternate neutron guide tubes coated with Ni inside.

By replacing the pinholes and the guide tubes in or out of the beam, users can change

the effective source-to-sample distance (= collimation length, CL) to 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, or

16 m in order to vary the divergence and flux of the incident beam at the sample

position. The sample to-detector distance (SDD) can be continuously varied from 1

to 16 m, which covers the Q-range from 0.03 to 2.7 nm-1. Normally, a symmetric

optical arrangement, i.e., CL = SDD, is recommended to optimize the flux and

divergence of the beam. The collimator apertures are 20 mmø each and the sample

aperture can be chosen from 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10 to 16 mmø. The most-commonly used

Figure 5.2. Schematic Diagram of the SANS-U Set-up

107

neutron wavelength is 0.7 nm. The two dimensional detector is a multi-wired

position sensitive proportional counter (PSPC, model 2660N, ORDELA, USA). The

optical system of the SANS-U is controlled by LabVIEW-RT running on an

integrated PXI (PCI eXtensions for Instrumentation) system [1].

5.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

5.3.1. Dynamic Light Scattering Studies of Irradiated -

Carrageenan

It is known that dynamics of polymer solution can be investigated by

considering the intensity correlation function (ICF) as a function of decay time [2-

5].

gT(2)() gT

(2)(,q) I(0;q)I(;q)

T

I(0;q)T

2 g(1)(;q)21 (5.1)

where I(;q) is a scattered intensity at time with respect to =0 and the scattering

vector q and <…>T denotes time average, g(1)() is the scattering field time-correlation

function given by Laplace transform of the characteristic decay time distribution

function, G(), i.e.

g(1)( ) G()exp( )d0

(5.2)

Here, G() is the characteristic decay time distribution function (CDF) and is the

characteristic decay time.

108

5.3.1.1. Molecular weight dependence and characteristic relaxation time

dependence of -carrageenan with absorbed dose

Figures 5.3a and b show the ICFs and the CDFs respectively for -

carrageenan. The ICFs of 0.5% irradiated -carrageenan solutions in the presence of

0.05M KCl were obtained at varying doses. The shoulder of the ICF shifted to the

region of the smaller relaxation times with increasing dose. This indicates that smaller

fragments of -carrageenan produced by gamma irradiation tend to move faster than

non-irradiated -carrageenan. This trend becomes more obvious using the decay time

distribution of the inverse Laplace transformation of ICF (Figure 5.3b). G() revealed

the presence of two peaks. The fast mode peaks were in the range of 0.1 to 10 ms.

Non-irradiated -carrageenan showed sharper peaks in the range of 4 to10 ms. With

irradiation, peaks shifted towards faster relaxation time and started to broaden. At 300

kGy, the peak became very broad ranging from 0.1 to 4ms. Polydispersity of the

molecular size distribution may have resulted in the broadening of peaks. Molecular

weight distribution is expected to become larger with increasing dose in as much as

cleavage of the molecules by gamma irradiation is a random process. A large broad

peak was observed with non-irradiated -carrageenan in the range of 70 to 800ms.

This peak was also present in irradiated -carrageenan but became smaller at higher

doses, which disappeared completely at 300 kGy. These broad slower signals are due

to the diffusion of some aggregates. Irradiation decreases the molecular weight of

carrageenan, decreasing the aggregating particle sizes. In a similar study reported by

Pinder, et.al. [6], diffusive mode together with a slower non-diffusive mode ascribed

to aggregates were also observed with the carbohydrate dextran.

109

Figure 5.3. (a) Intensity correlation function and (b) decay time distribution of 0.5% irradiated -carrageenan (in 0.05M KCl) at 80oC.

Figure 5.4 shows the relationship between the molecular weight of irradiated -

carrageenan and the characteristic decay time obtained from CDF. The molecular

weight estimated with GPC is a steep decreasing exponential function with dose,

where Mw = 1.06 x 105 + 1.10 x 106e-0.077x [g/mol], x is the absorbed dose in kGy. It

can be seen that gamma ray irradiation leads to depolymerization of -carrageenan

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

G(

)

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

-1 / ms

0kGy 50kGy 100kGy 200kGy 300kGy

(a)

(b)

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

g(2) -

1

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

/ ms

0kGy 50kGy 100kGy 200kGy 300kgy

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

G(

)

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

-1 / ms

0kGy 50kGy 100kGy 200kGy 300kGy

(a)

(b)

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

g(2) -

1

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

/ ms

0kGy 50kGy 100kGy 200kGy 300kgy

110

quite effectively. A similar dose dependence was found in that of -1 where -1 = 0.83

+ 5.7e-0.061x [ms] taken from an empirical fitting. This clearly indicates that -1 can

also be used as a measure of molecular weight index.

Figure 5.4. Relationship of the molecular weight of -carrageenan (0.5% in 0.05M KCl) and 1/ (T=80oC and a scattering angle of 90o) with absorbed dose.

5.3.1.2. Coil-helical transition of irradiated -carrageenan

The characteristic decay time distribution function was also determined for

irradiated and non-irradiated -carrageenan at decreasing temperatures. The CDFs are

shown in Figures 5.5 a-c. The figures illustrate a typical shifting of peaks towards

slower relaxation modes with decreasing temperatures. This is expected as the

solution increases in viscosity with decreasing temperature. At high temperatures (i.e.,

76 °C and above), sharp peaks were observed in the CDFs. These peaks started to

broaden as temperatures were lowered. Peak broadening started at around 74oC

(Figure 5.5a) for non-irradiated -carrageenan. This transition may be due to

conformational changes from coil to helix. Coil-helix transition has already been

1.4

1.2

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

200150100500

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

Mo

lec

ula

rwe

igh

t(g

/mo

l) x

10

6

-1

/ m

s

Absorbed Dose (kGy)

111

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

G

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

-1/ ms

75.3oC

69.9oC

62.6oC

56.6oC

51.5oC

47.7oC

Sharp peak

Sharp peaks

(a)

(b)

(c)

0.14

0.12

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

G

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

-1ms

76.2oC

74.0oC

71.0oC

65.1oC

58.8oC

55.4oC

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

-1

/ ms

76.6oC

70.4oC

64.7oC

56.8oC

52.2oC

47.7oCG

x

10-3

Figure 5.5. Decay time distribution function of 0.5% irradiated -carrageenan (in 0.05M KCl) at varying temperatures at doses of (a) 0 kGy (b) 150 kGy (c) 300 kGy.

112

discussed in Chapters 2.3.5 and 3.3.3. Helical structure can be promoted by adding an

appropriate electrolyte to a sufficient ionic strength and/or by lowering the

temperature. he ordered conformation with added K+ could develop either into a

double helix or a dimer, stabilized by electrostatic attractive forces involving the -

carrageenan ion and by hydrogen bonding [7]. The conformational transition

temperature (CTT, observed as the transition from sharp peak to broad peak or when

the width of the base of peak becomes twice as that at š 75o C in Figure 5.5)

decreased with increasing doses as shown in Figure 5.6. A sharp decrease in CTT was

observed from 25 kGy to 50 kGy which leveled off beyond this dose at a temperature

of around 55oC to 51oC. These temperatures are quite close to CTT values reported by

Chronakis, et al., which is between 55oC to 58oC for concentrations of 0.35% - 1.6%

KC in 0.2M NaI [8]. The leveling off of CTT is consistent with the leveling off of

changes in molecular weight with dose as shown in Figure 5.4 whereby decrease in

molecular weight started to be suppressed also at 50 kGy. As the size of carrageenan

Figure 5.6. Conformational transition temperature as a function of absorbed dose.

80

70

60

50

40200150100500

Co

nfo

rma

tion

al T

ran

sitio

n

Tem

pe

ratu

re (

oC

)

Absorbed Dose (kGy)

113

molecules are shortened with irradiation, the molecules are easier to disentangle from

its helical state forming the coil conformation such that lower CTT are observed with

increasing doses. Studies done by Meunier, et.al. [9] also show a peak broadening and

a shift to lower temperatures of the coil-helix transition with decreasing molar mass

obtained from sonication of -carrageenan

No changes in conformation were observed at a dose of 175 kGy and above

(Figure 5.5c). High absorbed doses may not only result in the cleavage of the polymer

but may also destroy the galacto-pyranose rings of -carrageenan leading to ring

opening. As a consequence, a longer polymer chain with some pendant molecules is

formed which increases the possibility of entanglement of -carrageenan. In addition,

the presence of these straight chain polymers with pendant molecules and some intact

galacto-pyranose rings produces a heterogeneous system. Thus, a broad peak was seen

in the CDF of irradiated -carrageenan at doses of 200 kGy and above. Mechanisms

for the radiation induced ring opening of the pyranose ring in some polysaccharides

have been proposed as shown in equations 5.3 to 5.5. Though -carrageenan was

irradiated in solid state, the presence of polymer bound water may have induced also

some hydrolytic reaction similar to these schemes and consequently resulted in

randomized ring openings. Figure 5.7 would illustrate the radiolytic reactions of -

carrageenan.

114

In Chitosan [10]

5.3

In pectin [11]

5.4

115

In cycloamylose D-glucose [12]

5.5

Figure 5.7. Effect of gamma radiation on the structure of -carrageenan.

(KC)

-O3SO

CH2OH

O

O

OH

H2C

O

O

O

OH

-O3SO

CH2OH

O

O

OH

H2C

O

O

O

OH

-O3SO

CH2OH

O

O

OH

H2C

O

O

O

OH

-O3SO

CH2OH

O

O

OH

H2C

O

O

O

OH

(KC)

n n-xi→iietc.

OH

OH

-O3SO

O

CH2

OH

O

H

O

OH

3SO

O

CH2OH

O

H

-O

O

OH

3SO

OO

CH 2OH

OH

O

KCn

-O

O

OH

3SO

O

CH 2OH

H

OH

-O

116

5.3.1.3. Gelation temperatures of -carrageenan as a function of dose

There is controversy regarding the gelling mechanism of -carrageenan.

According to the first model of Rees and coworkers [13], the junctions are double

helices which when they are cation-mediated forms aggregates of double helices

(Figure 5.8a, domain model) [14]. Another model suggests a cation-specific, nested,

single-helix (Figure 5.8b) [15, 16]. The various levels of aggregation of -carrageenan

helices leading to gelation using the different models have been studied by several

authors [8, 17-25]. The double helices (double helix model) described are aggregated

to higher order assemblies to create a three dimensional network known as the double

helix domain. The single helical model suggests that helical regions along the polymer

chain associate into larger stretches upon increasing salt concentration and / or

polymer and / or decreasing temperature. Figures 5.9a-c show the ICFs of irradiated

-carrageenan at lower temperatures. A power law behavior was observed below 39oC

with non-irradiated -carrageenan. This indicates that the system is undergoing

gelation. It is known that the sol-gel transition point can be observed at the

temperature where power law behavior in ICF appears [3-5, 26-27]. Taking the double

helix model during gelation, -carrageenan-water system starts to decompose into two

phases with different network concentrations. This creates concentration fluctuations.

The double helix aggregate forms a separate phase by excluding water from their

domains. As a result the contrast between -carrageenan and water phases can scatter

light and dramatically reduce its intensity [18]. The gelation temperatures decreased

with increasing dose from 39oC to 36oC down to 28oC for 0 kGy, 25 kGy and 50 kGy

respectively (not illustrated). This phenomenon seems to be reasonable because the

probability of aggregation becomes less by lowering the molecular weight. At 100

kGy and above, no gelation occurred. Figures 5.9b-c show ICFs which do not have

117

Figure 5.8. Conformational transition models of -carragenan.

a) Double helix domain

b) Single helix model

118

Figure 5.9. ICF 0.5% irradiated -carrageenan (in 0.05M KCl) at varying

temperatures at doses of (a) 0 kGy (b) 100 kGy and (c) 200 kGy.

(b)

Gelation

(a)

(c)

5

67

10-1

2

3

4

5

67

100

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

/ ms

43.9oC

39.7oC

36.5oC

32.1oC

24.5oC

21.1oC

6

810-1

2

4

6

8100

g(2) (

) -1

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

/ ms

40.2oC

37.5oC

34.1oC

29.5oC

26.0oC

25.7oC

g(2) (

) -1

6

810-1

2

4

6

8100

g(2) (

) -1

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

/ ms

46.6oC

43.1oC

40.3oC

39.0oC

38.8oC

38.7oC

119

any phase transition at 100 kGy and above. The molecular sizes at these doses are not

big enough to form gels. Table 5.1 summarizes the conformational transition

temperatures and gelation temperatures with dose.

Table 5.1. Molecular weight (Mw), conformational transition temperature

(CTT) and gelation temperature (GT) of -carrageenan at varying doses.

5.3.1.4. Fast relaxation mode peaks corresponding to optimum biological activity

of -carrageenan

Figures 5.10a-f show the CDFs at higher doses of -carrageenan. Figures

5.10a-b indicate broadening of peaks which are also clear manifestations of a sol-gel

transition. At doses of 75 kGy and above (Figures 5.10c-e), instead of a gelation, a

new fast mode peak appeared at around 10-1 ms below the CTT temperatures. It was

largest at 100 kGy which decreased beyond this dose. These peaks started to disappear

at 175 kGy and above (Figure 5.10f). This result can well be related to the optimum

growth promoting effect in plants for -carrageenan (100 kGy). The appearance of the

fast mode peaks corresponds to the lower molecular size oligomers formed from

irradiated carrageenan which may be responsible for the enhancement of the

biological effect. The molecular weight of these oligomers is estimated to be 5.0 x 103

to 10.0 x 103 from the peak position of the “new peak” in Figure 5.10d by assuming a

phenomenological linear-relationship between the molecular weight and -1 (Figure

Dose (kGy)

-carrageenanMw CTT

(oC) GT (oC)

0 1.2106 74 39 50 1.3105 56 28

100 1.1105 55 none 200 6.6104 none none

120

Figure 5.10. Decay time distribution function of 0.5% irradiated -carrageenan (in

0.05M KCl) at varying temperatures at doses of (a) 0 kGy (b) 50 kGy (c) 75 kGy (d) 100 kGy (e) 150 kGy and (f) 200 kGy.

5.6). Note that the molecular weight of the original -carrageenan is 1.9 x 106

according to the GPC data. Though the large molecular size -carrageenan (broad

slow relaxation mode peaks) has also a biological effect but due to its size, this cannot

easily diffuse into the plant system as much as these low molecular size oligomer

fragments. The quantity of these oligomers becomes maximum at 100 kGy. At higher

doses, the chemical structure of the galacto-pyranose ring is destroyed, as mentioned

in earlier discussion, such that biological effect decreases. The relationship between

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.00

G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1/ ms

40.2oC

37.5oC

34.1oC

29.5oC

26.0oC

25.7oC

New Peak

(d)

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1/ ms

43.9oC

39.7oC

36.5oC

32.1oC

24.5oC

21.1oC

(f)

80x10-3

60

40

20

0G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1/ ms

43.5oC

39.6oC

36.2oC

32.0oC

25.6oC

22.6oC

(e)

New Peak

80x10-3

60

40

20

0

G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1/ ms

47.7oC

43.8oC

39.4oC

35.3oC

28.1oC

Gelation

(b)

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1ms

43.5oC

39.6oC

36.2oC

32.0oC

25.6oC

22.6oC

(c)

New Peak

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1/ ms

46.6oC

43.1oC

40.3oC

39.0oC

38.8oC

38.7oC

(a)

Gelation

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.00

G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1/ ms

40.2oC

37.5oC

34.1oC

29.5oC

26.0oC

25.7oC

New Peak

(d)

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.00

G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1/ ms

40.2oC

37.5oC

34.1oC

29.5oC

26.0oC

25.7oC

New Peak

(d)

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1/ ms

43.9oC

39.7oC

36.5oC

32.1oC

24.5oC

21.1oC

(f)

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1/ ms

43.9oC

39.7oC

36.5oC

32.1oC

24.5oC

21.1oC

(f)

80x10-3

60

40

20

0G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1/ ms

43.5oC

39.6oC

36.2oC

32.0oC

25.6oC

22.6oC

(e)

New Peak

80x10-3

60

40

20

0G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1/ ms

43.5oC

39.6oC

36.2oC

32.0oC

25.6oC

22.6oC

(e)

New Peak

80x10-3

60

40

20

0

G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1/ ms

47.7oC

43.8oC

39.4oC

35.3oC

28.1oC

Gelation

(b)

80x10-3

60

40

20

0

G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1/ ms

47.7oC

43.8oC

39.4oC

35.3oC

28.1oC

Gelation

(b)

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1ms

43.5oC

39.6oC

36.2oC

32.0oC

25.6oC

22.6oC

(c)

New Peak

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1ms

43.5oC

39.6oC

36.2oC

32.0oC

25.6oC

22.6oC

(c)

New Peak

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1/ ms

46.6oC

43.1oC

40.3oC

39.0oC

38.8oC

38.7oC

(a)

Gelation

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1/ ms

46.6oC

43.1oC

40.3oC

39.0oC

38.8oC

38.7oC

(a)

Gelation

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1/ ms

46.6oC

43.1oC

40.3oC

39.0oC

38.8oC

38.7oC

(a)

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00

G

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

-1/ ms

46.6oC

43.1oC

40.3oC

39.0oC

38.8oC

38.7oC

(a)

GelationGelation

121

the biological effect of the oligomers formed by irradiation and the appearance of fast

mode peaks in CDF has to be further substantiated by additional studies.

5.3.2. Small-angle Neutron Scattering Study on Irradiated -

Carrageenan

Small angle neutron scattering (SANS) is a laboratory technique

(complementary to light scattering techniques) that proves to be a powerful tool for

studies of structure-property relationships in polymeric systems. During a SANS

experiment, a beam of neutrons is directed at a sample and the neutrons are elastically

scattered by a sample and the resulting scattering pattern is analyzed to provide

information about their size, shape, conformational changes and molecular

associations.

Very few studies have been done on the small angle neutron scattering

(SANS) of carrageenan [28–30]. The structure change of -carrageenan gel with K+ in

the gel to sol transition has been investigated by SANS. The SANS intensity

decreases as it approaches the gel-to-sol transition. Its scattering profile fits with the

Guinier approximation formula [28]. Studies were made to investigate the structural

changes of -carrageenan with dose by SANS.

5.3.2.1. Physical Properties of irradiated -carrageenan gels

The gelation of -carrageenan has already been discussed extensively in the

previous section. Non-irradiated -carrageenan gels formed from a 5% concentration

in 0.05M KCl were hard and brittle. Irradiated -carrageenan gels on the other hand

were soft and paste-like as the absorbed dose was increased. Figure 5.11 shows the -

carrageenan gels at varying doses. The picture indicates a clear homogenous non-

122

Figure 5.11. -carrageenan gels in 0.05M KCl at 20oC.

irradiated -carrageenan gel. Turbidity increased with increasing dose up to a dose of

100 kGy. Beyond this dose, very clear gels were obtained. Radiation randomly

cleaves off the glycosidic linkages of -carrageenan resulting in a very heterogeneous

system. Further cutting of the glycosidic linkages would result in a more homogenous

molecular size distribution as it reaches the minimum molecular size possibly

attainable. DLS measurements discussed in earlier section indicated a flattening of

molecular weight beyond a dose of 100 kGy. The sol-gel transitions of 5% -

carrageenan are shown in Figure 5.12. Addition of K+ ions increased the gelation

temperatures. Due to its high concentration, gelation temperature (47oC – 50oC) did

not vary so much up to a dose of 150 kGy. A drastic decrease in gelation temperature

of 29oC was observed only at 200 kGy. A similar trend was observed in -

carrageenan without KCl for the same concentration. Gelation temperature started to

decrease at 150 kGy (33oC). At 200 kGy, no gelation was observed. DLS studies

0 kGy 50 kGy 100 kGy 150 kGy 200 kGy0 kGy 50 kGy 100 kGy 150 kGy 200 kGy

123

discussed earlier also showed a decrease in gelation temperatures for irradiated -

carrageenan up to a dose of 50 kGy.

Figure 5.12. Gelation temperatures of 5% -carrageenan

5.3.2.2. SANS profile of -carrageenan gels

Figure 5.13 shows double logarithmic plots of the scattered intensity

functions, I(q), observed for 5% -carrageenan in 0.05M KCl/D2O solutions

irradiated at various doses. The figure shows that I(q) increased with increasing

decrease in I(q) was observed. This increase and decrease in I(q) agrees with the

visual observations of the gel where maximum turbidity was observed at 100 kGy

(Figure 5.11). This may be closely associated to the increasing heterogeneity of the

polymer system with dose brought about by random cleavage of the polymer chains.

Minimum intensity was found in non-irradiated -carrageenan gels. Except for the

55

50

45

40

35

30

25

Gel

atio

nTe

mpe

ratu

re (

o C)

200150100500Dose (kGy)

With 0.05M KClNo KCl

124

Figure 5.13. SANS intensity curves of 6-carrageenan (in 0.0M KCl at 20oC) at

varying doses. I(q)s are shifted vertically with a step of one at increasing doses to avoid overlap. Solid lines are curve fittings with equation 5.6 except for 150 kGy which was done using L-SL fitting (eq. 5.7). The inset shows the actual observed I(q)s for all doses.

cases of 100 and 150 kGy, the scattering functions approximate a close fitting to an

Ornstein-Zernike (OZ) type function as shown in the solid curves:

I(q) I(0)

1 2q2 (5.6)

0.1

1

10

6 7 8 9

0.012 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

0.1

= 85 Å

= 195 Å

= 61 Å

=109 Å

10-3

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

105

I(q)

/ c

m-1

6 7 8 90.01

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90.1

q /C-1

200 kGy 150 kGy 100 kGy 50 kGy 0 kGy

125

where I(q) is the scattering intensity, I(0) is the 0-q intensity and is the correlation

lengths indicating the extent of correlated concentration fluctuations. The solid lines

in Figure 5.13 are the fit of the experimental data with this equation. Initially, for 0

kGy was 85Å which increased to 195Å at 50 kGy. Further irradiation at 200 kGy

decreased to 109 Å. No correlation length was evaluated from the carrageenan at

100 kGy since it had a power law behavior.

While the fitting curves were essentially Lorentzian, i.e., an OZ function,

certain deviations to this function were observed especially with -carrageenan

irradiated at 100 and 150 kGy. The double logarithmic plot indicated a power law

behavior exclusively at a dose of 100 kGy. Figure 5.14 shows a very close power law

fitting of -carrageenan at 100 kGy. The scattering exponent was -1.84. Non–

irradiated -carrageenan and -carrageenan irradiated at other doses did not exhibit

any power law behavior. Introduction of the squared-Lorentzian function was also

necessary for 150 kGy to give a successful fitting curve that closely reproduced the

observed I(q)s (equation 5.7).

(5.7)

where is the other correlation length describing the extent of spatial

inhomogeneities [31].

This phenomenological behavior can well be explained by looking at their

collective fluctuations as illustrated in Figure 5.15. The concentration at 0 kGy is high

enough to form a polymer solution that fills the entire space with polymer chains

overlapping each other (C >> C*), where C* is the chain overlap concentration. Since

-carrageenan is a natural polymer, concentration fluctuations are strongly suppressed

222221

)0(

1

)0()(

q

I

q

IqI SLL

126

Figure 5.14. Power law behavior of 6-carrageenan (5% in 0.05M KCl at 20oC)

irradiated at 100 kGy

Figure 5.15. Distribution of -carrageenan polymer chains with dose.

such that the free energy density remains at a minimum. This is attained by

cooperative arrangement of cross-linking and/or helix formation between chains.

Gamma-irradiation randomly cleaves the -carrageenan chains which leads to the

-2

-1

0

1

2

log

[I(q

) / c

m-1

]

-2.0 -1.6 -1.2 -0.8

log [q / C-1]

Slope = -1.84

100 kGy

 

0 kGy

100 kGy

200 kGy

0 kGy

0 kGy

100 kGy

100 kGy

200 kGy

200 kGy

127

formation of segments that are not able to pair with other segments to form cross-links

and/or helices. As a result, concentration fluctuations increase. This is the case of

-carrageenan irradiated at 100 kGy. Interestingly enough, the scattering intensity

function exhibits a power law behavior exclusively at this dose. Unscreening of

entangled and cross-linked polymer chains may take place exposing heterogeneous

chains of polymers of varying cluster sizes. This may be why a power law was

observed. Decreasing of the molecular weight takes place further as in the case of -

carrageenan irradiated at 200 kGy. The system then moves towards uniformity as a

result of cleavage to low molecular sizes achieved by high doses. The scattering

function no longer exhibits a power law behavior at this dose.

5.4. CONCLUSION

Dynamic light scattering results have provided valuable information on the

molecular size, changes in conformational transition temperatures and gelation

behavior of -carrageenan with absorbed dose. While the previous chapter on the

chemical structure analysis of irradiated -carrageenan (in air) has demonstrated a lot

of possibilities for use of this material as a biologically active oligosaccharide at a

wide dose range (0-200kGy), this chapter narrows down the effective dose range to

attain optimum biological activity. Figure 5.16 shows the changes in dynamic

behavior of -carrageenan with dose. Gelation is observed between 0 to 50 kGy. This

implies that at these doses, molecular size is large enough to form aggregation of

molecular chains. At doses beyond 150 kGy, conformational transitions from coil to

helix with the lowering of temperature are no longer observed. This conformational

transition is typical of -carrageenan. The absence of this at doses beyond 150 kGy

implies that the molecular structure of -carrageenan has been damaged by

128

Figure 5.16. Changes in gelation and conformational transition behavior of irradiated -carrageenan at varying doses.

irradiation. Thus, the range between 75 to 150 kGy can be considered as the effective

range for optimum biological activity. It is as this range wherein the molecular size is

small enough not to form any aggregation but still retaining its molecular structure.

DLS experiment also indicates that at this range, a new fast mode in the characteristic

decay time distribution function appears. This fast mode is found to be maximum at

100 kGy with an estimated Mw of 5-10 kDa. This dose very well coincides with the

optimum plant growth promoter effect in -carrageenan and from literatures that

specify that oligomers with an Mw of < 10 kDa are needed as plant growth promoters.

The optimum plant growth promoter effect for other polysaccharides such as chitosan

and alginates is also found at 100 kGy. Thus, for plant growth promoter, what is

needed is a basic chemical structure of an oligosaccharide. DLS confirms that a size

of an Mw <10 kDa with intact molecular structure is appropriate for plant growth

promoter. Other biological functions such as plant elicitor, anti-viral and anti-tumor

0 50 100 150 200

Absorbed Dose (kGy)

Carbonyl Group

Reducing Sugar

Free Sulfate

Carboxylic Acid

Destruction of  gelation and 

conformational transition behavior

Gelation

Still a PolymerMw > 100 kDa

An Oligomer

No gelation but presence of 

new fast mode peak with an Mw .5–10 kDa

0.0

15.0

% R

ed

uc

ing

Su

gar

0.0

0.5

A-A

o(2

60

nm

)

0.0

10.0

%  F

reeSulfate (as HSO

3‐ )

0.0

10.0

%  C

OO

H

129

activities may need specific chemical structures e.g. amide group in chitosan, sulfates

in carrageenan with the appropriate molecular size of the oligomer.

SANS experiments demonstrates the following: -carrageenan is subjected to

degradation by gamma irradiation. The structure factor of non-irradiated -

carrageenan aqueous solutions is similar to those for polymer solutions in semi-dilute

regime, i.e., an Ornstein-Zernike form. A power-law behavior appears in I(q) which

interestingly was observed at 100 kGy irradiated -carrageenan. Again, this coincides

with the optimum biological activity in -carrageenan. While the SANS data obtained

is quite limited, its interpretation in relation to the optimum biological function of

irradiated -carrageenan also remains to be very limited. This initial result opens new

possibilities for further studies in order to find the real significance of the power-law

behavior exclusively at 100 kGy.

REFERENCES:

1. S. Okabe, M. Nagao, T. Karino, S. Watanabe, M. Shibayama, J. Appl. Cryst. 38 (2005) 1035.

2. M. Shibayama, T. Norisuye, Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 75 (2002) 64. 3. J. Martin, J. Wilcoxon, J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 373. 4. S. Ren, W. Shi, W. Zhang, C. Sorensen, Phys. Rev. A. 45 (1992) 2416. 5. B. Nystrom, J. Roots, A. Carlsson, B. Lindman, Polymer. 33 (1992) 2875. 6. D. Pinder, W. Nash, Y. Hemar, H. Singh, Food Hydocolloids. 17 (2003) 463. 7. M. Nickerson, A. Paulson, F. Hallet, Carbohydr. Polym. 58 (2004) 25. 8. I. Chronakis, J. Doublier, L. Picullel, Int. Biol. Macromol. 28 (2000) 1.

9. V. Meunier, T. Nicolai, D. Durand, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 28 (2001) 157.

10. P. Ulanski C. Von Sonntag, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 (2000) 2022.

130

11. H. Zegota, Food Hydrocolloids 13 (1999) 51. 12. P. Baugh, J. Goodall, G. Phillips, C. von Sonntag, M. Dizdaroglu, Carbohydr.

Res. 49 (1976) 315. 13. A. McKinnon, D. Rees, F. Williamson, J. Chem. Soc. D (1969) 701. 14. D. Rees, Pure & Appl. Chem. 53 (1981) 1. 15. O. Smidsrød, H. Grasdalen, Carbohydr. Polym. 2 (1982) 270. 16. O. Smidsrød, I. Andresen, H. Grasdalen, B. Larsen, T. Painter, Carbohydr. Res.,

80 (1980) c11. 17. Y. Yuguchi, T. Thuy, H. Urakawa, K. Kajiwara, Food Hydrocolloids. 16 (2002)

515. 18. S. Kara, C. Tamerler, H. Bermek, O. Pekcan, Int J Biol Macromol 31 (2003)

177. 19. M. Mangione, D. Giacomazzaa, D. Bulonea, V. Martoranaa, P. San Biagioa,

Biophys. Chem. 104 (2003) 95. 20. A. Michel, M. Mestdagh, M. Axelos, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 21 (1997) 195. 21. Y. Chen, M. Liao, D. Dunstan, Carbohydr. Polym. 50 (2002) 109. 22. M. Nickerson, A. Paulson, Carbohydr. Polym. 61 (2005) 231. 23. P. MacArtain, J. Jacquier, K. Dawson, Carbohydr. Polym. 53 (2003) 395. 24. L. Piculell, J. Borgström, I. Chronakis, P. Quist, C. Viebke, Int. J. Biol.

Macromol. 21 (1997) 141. 25. M. Núñez-Santiago, A. Tecante, Carbohydr. Polym. 69 (2007) 763. 26. T. Norisuye, M. Shibayama, S. Nomura, Polymer. 39 (1998) 2769. 27. J. Martin, J. Wilcoxon, J. Odinek, Phys Rev A. 43 (1991) 858. 28. M. Sugiyama, C. Yuasa, K. Hara, N. Hiramatus, A. Nakamura, Y. Hayakawa,

Y. Maeda, Physica B 999 (1998) 241. 29. G. Evmenenko, E. Theunissen, K. Mortensen, H. Reynaers, Polymer 42 (2001)

2907.

131

30. N. Mischenko, B. Denef, K. Mortensen, H. Reynaers, Physica B 283 (1997) 234.

31. M. Shibayama, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 199 (1998) 1.

132

CHAPTER 6

RADIOLYSIS REACTIONS OF -CARRAGEENAN

6.1. INTRODUCTION

Electron spin resonance is quite a useful tool in determining the transientt free

radicals generated in irradiated chemical systems. Irradiation induced chemical

reactions in simple, neutral sugars such as glucose, and other carbohydrates have been

carefully studied using this method [1-6]. Low-molecular weight products formed

from the disproportionation reactions of the six primary glucose radicals, and the

radicals that are generated from these primary radicals by a number of elimination and

rearrangement reactions have been identified [7-9]. This method has also been used to

identify mechanism for chain scission and crosslinking of polysaccharides 10-13].

Among the polysaccharides, the radicals of cellulose have been well studied. Random

cleavage of glycoside bonds in the main chain, initialized by radicals placed on

macromolecules is considered as the leading reaction. After initial ionization, most of

kicked out electrons thermalize and eventually recombine with their parent ions.

Consequently, excited fragments of the polymer are formed. They decompose with

cleavage of chemical links, i.e., carbon-hydrogen. This leads to the formation of

radicals on polymer chains and hydrogen atoms [10, 14]. Several mechanisms of the

processes have been proposed. The process is similar for most polysaccharides. The

localization of the energy initiates degradation and dehydrogenation reactions. ESR

spectra of irradiated cellulose differ depending on the source of material origin, its

chemical treatment history, kind and conditions of irradiation [15-17].

133

6.2. METHODOLOGY

Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) experiments were performed on -

Carrageenan using a JEOL (JM-FE3) X-band spectrometer with 9.07-9.22 GHz

frequency. Powdered samples of carrageenan were irradiated in air at room

temperature at different doses (5, 50, 160 and 280 kGy) using the gamma irradiation

facility of the Takasaki Advanced Radiation Research Institute of JAEA. These were

placed in a 5mm diameter quartz tubes immediately prior to ESR analysis. Another set

of -carrageenan samples were placed in quartz tubes and sealed under 10-3 Pa

vacuum and irradiated at liquid nitrogen temperature. The temperature was then

slowly increased by submerging the tubes in dry ice, in ice and at room temperature.

The tips of the quartz tubes were then broken to allow air to come in. ESR analyses

were done at every step of the procedure.

6.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

6.3.1. Electron Spin Resonance of -carrageenan

The ESR spectrum recorded at room temperature (around 25oC) for solid -

carrageenan irradiated at 5 kGy to 280 kGy at room temperature in air is presented in

Figure 6.1. The free radicals formed (trapped hydroxyl radicals, hydrogen radicals, -

carrageenan macroradicals, etc.) indicated poorly resolved ESR spectra as shown in

the figure. A single broad peak was observed for all doses. A study on the ESR of

cellulose also shows a single broad peak which contains more than 20 possible

radicals [10]. ESR spectra of polycrystalline ice of citrus pectin show a poorly

resolved composite ESR spectrum [18]. ESR investigation on the irradiated

derivatives of cellulose such as carboxymethyl cellulose [10], methylcellulose and

134

Figure 6.1. ESR of -carrageenan irradiated at varying doses in air.

hydroxyethylcellulose [11] in dry state and in aqueous solution shows some signals

typical of degradation reaction of cellulose and additional signals on side chains of

derivatives. Though the ESR profile of -carrageenan indicated no change in shape

with dose, its intensity varied with dose. Intensity increased at 50 kGy which

decreased beyond this dose. ESR measurements of irradiated dextrin demonstrate that

radical concentration increases with doses [13]. The decrease in intensity of ESR

signals of irradiated -carrageenan beyond 50 kGy may be related to the decrease in

crystallinity of -carrageenan with dose. Fast decay of free radicals is expected as the

degree of crystallinity is lowered with irradiation. Irradiation of polysaccharides such

as cellulose results in the decrease of chain rigidity and the degree of crystallinity of

the material [19]. Carbohydrate radicals are stabilized in a polycrystalline matrix [18].

2 mT

5kGy 50kGy 160kGy 280kGy

135

ESR of -carrageenan irradiated in vacuum at 50 kGy at increasing

temperatures is shown in Figure 6.2. A single broad peak was also observed. Similar

results were also observed in -carrageenan irradiated at a lower dose of 5 kGy (not

shown). There were no essential changes of signals from liquid nitrogen temperature

to ice temperature. Increase in intensity and change in shape were observed at room

temperature (RT) and when irradiated -carrageenan was exposed to air. The ESR

signal became more intense and sharper. Peak signals start to decrease slightly after

30 mins. of annealing at room temperature. Previous study on dextrin reports that the

spin density is not deeply affected by time due to the presence of carbonyl groups

which are long lived free radicals [13]. Comparing the ESR profile of solid -

carrageenan irradiated in air (at RT) and in vacuum (in liquid nitrogen), a broader

peak was observed in the latter (Figure 6.3). This is expected due to the fast decay of

some free radicals at RT.

136

Figure 6.2. ESR of -carrageenan at varying temperatures irradiated in vacuum

Figure 6.3. ESR of -carrageenan irradiated in vacuum and in air at 5 and

50 kGy

2 mT

Liq N2

Dry Ice Ice RT air RT air after 30 mins.

mT

315 320 325 330 335 340 345-600

-400

-200

0

200

400

600

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

5kGy vacuum, liquid N 2

50kGy vacuum, liquid N2

5kGy in air50kGy in air

Re

lati

ve in

ten

sit

y i

n a

ir

Re

lati

ve

inte

ns

ity

in

va

cu

um

, Liq

uid

N2

137

6.3.2. Proposed Mechanism for the Radiolysis Reaction of -carrageenan

The current ESR results did not allow the identification of transient species or

macroradicals formed from the radiolysis of -carrageenan. This could have provided

the possible mechanisms for the radiolysis reaction. However, several schemes for the

radiation degradation of polysaccharides have already been proposed by several

authors e.g. chitosan [19, 20], cellulose [14], pectin [18], glucose [22, 4],

cycloamylose [23]. Based on the results of both spectral and chemical analyses of the

radiolytic products of irradiated carrageenan, similar schemes could be applied / and

or adopted to -carrageenan.

It is known that radiolytic effect of carbohydrates results in the abstraction of

carbon-bonded hydrogens which are the precursors of product formation. These are

caused either by the direct effect of ionizing radiation on carbohydrates or by the

indirect attack of the free radicals (OH and H radicals) generated from the water

radiolysis reaction in aqueous solutions as shown in equations 6.1 to 6.3. It can be

expected that abstraction of hydrogen from -carrageenan would yield 12 different

radicals as shown in scheme 1 (eqs. 6.4 to 6.9)

The main reaction in the radiolysis of polysaccharides is the O-glycoside bond

rupture [24]. Thus, of the 12 different radicals, only those macroradicals that are

directly located at the glycosidic bond or can be transferred by rearrangement into a

position adjacent to this bond undergo transformation to form scission products. For

-carrageenan with an (1,3) and (1-4) linkages, C(1) and C(3) of the D-galactose-4-

sulfate unit and C(1) and C(4) of the 3,6-anhydro-D-galactose unit participate in this

reaction. The degradation mechanism for irradiated -carragenan in solid state can be

outlined as proposed in scheme 2 (eqs. 6.10 to 6.13).

138

In aqueous solution, the reaction of .H atoms with many carbohydrates is

slower than that of hydroxyl radicals. Attack by .OH free radicals causes scission of

the glycosidic bond induced either by hydrolysis or by fragmentation. Scission of the

l-4 and 1-3 glycosidic bonds is caused by rearrangement of radicals localized on

C(1), C(4), C(3) and C(5) carbon atoms. The selectivity of .OH radical attack towards

carbohydrates is low and they react almost randomly with a slight preference for C(1)

carbon atom in pyranose ring of glucose. Schemes 3a and 3b (eqs. 6.14 to 6.24)

presents the proposed radiolytic cleavage of the glycosidic linkages of -carrageenan

in aqueous solution. The formed free aldehydic groups constitute the reducing sugars.

By analogy with previous work on cycloamyloses, it can be assumed that the

locations of radiation-induced keto groups in the -carrageenan residues coincide with

the sites of initial attack, i.e., the primary-radical sites. These keto groups arise in

irradiated -carrageenan by reaction steps involving (a) disproportionation and,

possibly, hydrogen-abstraction reactions of primary and secondary radicals; (b)

radical rearrangement; (c) eliminations of water, HOR, and carbon monoxide; and (d)

hydrolysis of the acetal bond if the radical site is at a neighbouring carbon atom.

In the presence of oxygen (in air) the hydrated electrons and .H atoms react

rapidly with O2 giving HO2. and O2

. radicals. These peroxy radicals can also abstract

the carbon-bonded hydrogens in the carbohydrates forming an ROO. radical (equation

6.25). In carbohydrates, the α-hydroxyalkyl peroxyl radicals readily undergo HO2. and

O2. elimination. In -carrageenan system, this would be the peroxyl radicals at C(2)

and C(6) in the D-galactose-4-sulfate unit and C(1) in the 3,6-anhydro-D-galactose

139

unit [e.g. Scheme 4 reaction 6.26 to 6.27]. Peroxyl radicals at the carbons attached to

the glycosidic linkages may contribute also to chain scission.

Other radiolytic reactions in -carrageenan involve the cleavage of the sulfate

group (HSO4- or HSO3

-) as shown in Scheme 5 equations 6.28 to 6.30. At high doses,

FT-IR results in Chapter 4.3.2 indicated loss of the anhydro galactose functional

group. Although, knowledge of the underlying reactions is still too limited to come up

with a convincing detailed mechanistic scheme for the loss of the anhydro galactose

group, the radical reactions leading to chemical modifications identified following

initial attack at C(5) or radical attack at C(6) followed by a rearrangement, C(5) 6

C(6), in cycloamyloses could be a possible mechanism for the loss of such group as

shown in scheme 6 equations 6.31 to 6.33. Direct free radical attack on C(6) may also

lead to the cleavage of anhydro galactose group (eqs. 6.34-6.36). The other possibility

is a rearrangement of C(3) radical in the anhydrogalactose ring giving rise to a keto

group in equation 6.37. Carbonyl groups can also be oxidized further to form

carboxylic groups (reaction 6.38). This accounts for the observed increase in

carboxylic groups with dose (Chapter 4.3.4).

(6.1)

(6.2)

(6.3)

140

OO3SO

O

OH

CH2OH

OO

O

OH

OO3SO

O

OH

CH2OH

OO

O

OH

.

OO3SO

O

OH

CH2OH

OO

O

OH

.

OO3SO

O

OH

CH2OH

OO

O

OH

.

OO3SO

O

OH

CH2OH

OO

O

OH

.

OO3SO

O

OH

CH2OH

OO

O

OH

‐ .

‐.

OO3SO

O

OH

CHOH

OO

O

OH

.OH-H2O

.

.

.

.

.

.

.H

(6.4)

(6.5)

(6.6)

(6.7)

(6.8)

(6.9)

Scheme 1. Abstraction of hydrogen from -carrageenan

141

(6.10)

(6.11)

(6.12)

(6.13)

Scheme 2. Cleavage of the glycosidic linkage in solid -carrageenan

OO3SO

O

OH

CH2OH

OO

O

OH

.

‐ OO3SO

O

OH

CH2OH

O

O

OH

+O .

‐ OO3SO

O

OH

CH2OH

O

O

OH

+OO3SO

O

OH

CH2OH

OO

O

OH

. O.

O

O

OH

O

.

OO3SO

OH

CH2OH

O

O

OH

. +

‐ OO3SO

OH

CH2OH

O

O

OH

O

.

‐ OO3SO

OH

CH2OH

O

O

OH

O

‐ OO3SO

OH

CH2OH

.+

C‐1 (G4S)

C‐4 (A)

C‐3 (G4S)

C‐1 (A)

142

OO3SO

O

OH

CH2OH

OO

O

OH

.

.OO3SO

O

OH

CH2OH

OH

O

O

OH

OH

+

‐ OO3SO

O

OH

CH2OH

O

O

OH

+O .

H2OC‐1 (G4S)

+

‐ OO3SO

O

CH2OH

OH

OH

.O

O

OH

OH

C‐4 (A)

OO3SO

O

OH

CH2OH

OO

O

OH

.

+

O

O

OH

O

‐ OO3SO

O

OH

CH2OH

.

H2O

‐ . OO3SO

O

OH

CH2OH

OO

O

OH

+

OH

CO

OH

CH2OH

O

H

SO‐O3

.O

O

OH

OH

CO

OH

CH2OH

OH

H

OSO‐O3

+.

O

O

OH

OH

+CO

OH

CH2OH

O

H

SO‐O3 O.

O

O

OH

OH

H2O

C‐5 (G4S)

(6.14)

(6.15)

(6.16)

(6.17)

(6.18)

(6.19)

(6.20)

Scheme 3a. Cleavage of the 1-4 glycosidic linkage in aqueous -carrageenan

143

O

O

OH

O

.

OO3SO

OH

CH2OH

O

O

OH

. +

O

O

OH

OH.

‐ OO3SO

OH

CH2OH

OH

+H2O

‐ OO3SO

OH

CH2OH

C‐3 (G4S)

O

O

OH

O

.

‐ OO3SO

OH

CH2OH

H2O

O

O

OH

OH

.‐ OO3SO

OH

CH2OH

OH

+

O

O

OH

O

‐ OO3SO

OH

CH2OH

.+

C‐1 (A)

(6.21)

(6.22)

(6.23)

(6.24)

Scheme 3b. Cleavage of the 1-3 glycosidic linkage in aqueous -carrageenan

(6.25)

(6.26)

(6.27)

Scheme 4. Reaction of O2 with -carrageenan

+C CHOH O2 C CHOH

O2

.

OO3SO

O

OH

CH2OH

OO

O

OH

‐ OO3SO

O

H

OO

O

OHOO-O.

CH2OH

‐ OO3SO

O

CHOH

OO

O

OHO

O2

HO2

144

(6.28)

(6.29)

(6.30)

Scheme 5. Cleavgae of the sulfate group in -carrageenan

(6.31)

(6.32)

(6.33)

Scheme 6. Cleavage of the anhydrogalactose unit in -carrageenan

O

O

OH

CH2OH

OO

O

OH

OO3SO

O

OH

CH2OH

OO

O

OH

-HSO4+

O

O

OH

CH2OH

OO

O

OH

.H.

H.

OO3SO

O

OH

CH2OH

OO

O

OH

. H. O

O

OH

CH2OH

OO

O

OH

O -HSO3+

O

O

OH

.

O

OO3SO

OH

CH2OH

OHOH

O

O

OO3SO

OH

CH2OH

OH

.CH2

OHOH

O

O

OO3SO

OH

CH2OH

OH

CH3

OHOH

O

CH3

C

O

H

3SOO O

OH

CH2OH

OH

+

H2O

H.

145

C

O

H (R)R C

O

OHR

(6.34)

(6.35)

(6.36)

(6.37)

Scheme 6. (cont’d) Cleavage of the anhydrogalactose unit in -carrageenan

Scheme 7. Oxidation of carbonyl groups to carboxylic acid

O

O

OH

‐.

O

OO3SO

OH

CH2OH

O

OH

‐.

O

OO3SO

OH

CH2OH

CHOH

OHOH

O

OO3SO

OH

CH2OH

OH.

CHO

OHOH

CHO

C

O

H

OO3SO

OH

CH2OH

OH

+

H2O

H.

O

O

OH

. O

OO3SO

OH

CH2OH

O

OH

‐.

O

OO3SO

OH

CH2OH

CH2

(6.38)

146

REFERENCES:

1. I. Shkrob, M. Depew, J. Wan, Chem. Phys. Lett. 202 (1993) 133. 2. M. Kuwabara, Z. Zhang, O. Inanami, G. Yoshii, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 24 (217)

1984. 3. M. Kuwabara, Z. Zhang, G. Yoshii, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 21 (1983) 451. 4. R. Muzzarelli, F. Tanfani, G. Scarpini, M. Muzzarelli, Biochem. Bio. Ph. Res.

Co. 89 (1979) 706. 5. T. Matsuyama, H. Menhofer, H. Heusinger, Int. J. Radiat. Appl. Instrum. Part C.

Radiat. Phys. Chem. 32 (1988) 735. 6. S. Çakir, F. Köksal, R. Tapramaz, O. Çakir, Int. J. Radiat. Appl. Instrum. Part C.

Radiat. Phys. Chem. 38 (1991) 17. 7. S. Kawakishi, Y. Kito, M. Namiki, Carbohydr. Res. 39 (1975) 263. 8. C. von Sonntag, Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 37 (1980) 7. 9. C. von Sonntag, H. Schuchmann, Radiation Chemistry. Present Status and

Future Trends, C. D. Jonah, B. S. M. Rao (Eds), Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2001, Chapter Carbohydrates, p. 481.

10. R. Wach, H. Mitomo, N. Nagasawa, F. Yoshii, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 68 (2003)

771. 11. R. Wach, H. Mitomo, F. Yoshii, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Ch. 261 (2004) 113. 12. A. Alberti, S. Bertini, G. Gastaldi, N. Iannaccone, D. Macciantelli, G. Torri, E.

Vismara Eur. Polym. J. 41 (2005) 1787. 13. S. Lotfy, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 44 (2009) 57. 14. Y. Nakamura, Y. Ogiwara, G. Phillips, Polym. Photochem. 6 (1985) 135. 15. A. Mohanty, B. Singh, Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 27 (1988) 435–466. 16. A. Rukhlya, E. Petrayaev, O. Shadyro, J. Appl. Chem. USSR, 56 Part 2 (1983)

911. 17. Y. Ogiwara, H. H. Kubota, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 18 (1974) 2057.

18. H. Zegota, Food Hydrocolloids 13 (1999) 51.

147

19. C. Delides, C. Panagiotalidis, O. Legapanagiotalidis, Textile Res. J. 51 (1981)

31.

20. P. Ulanski, J. Rosiak, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 39, (1992) 53.

21. P. Ulanski C. Von Sonntag, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 (2000) 2022.

22. G. Phillips, G. Moody, Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Is. 6 (1959) 78.

23. P. Baugh, J. Goodall, G. Phillips, C. von Sonntag, M. Dizdaroglu, Carbohydr. Res. 49 (1976) 315.

24. I. Idimecheva, R. Kisel, O. Shadyro, K. Kazem, H. Murase, T. Kagiya. J. Radiat.

Res. 46 (2005) 319.

148

CHAPTER 7

SUMMARY AND CONLUSIONS

Kappa carrageenan is easily degraded by radiation with a higher degradation

yield than most other known natural polysaccharides (Gd = 2.5 for solid in air, 1.7 in

vacuum and 1.2 x 10-7 mol J-1 in 1% aqueous irradiation). Irradiation of -carrageenan

in solid or aqueous solution, yields higher Gd in the presence of O2. Radiation in

aqueous solution is initialized by reaction with OH• radical at a rate constant k = 1.2 x

109 M-1s-1. Both Gd and kkc are affected by conformational changes from coil to helix

especially in the presence of ions such as Na+. Irradiation of -carrageenan reduces its

viscosity due to degrease in DP but yields radiolytic products that can decrease the

reactive sites for OH• radical interaction and consequently decreases kkc for irradiated

-carrageenan. On the other hand, hydrolysis of -carrageenan by chemical means,

yields lower molecular weight polymer/oligomer fragments that increases its kkc.

The chemical analyses of the radiolytic products indicate increasing reducing

sugars, carbonyl, carboxylic acids, and sulfates with increasing doses which reach a

maximum level at a certain dose depending on the irradiation condition. Values are

very much lower in solid irradiation (in vacuum and in air) as compared to aqueous

irradiation. NMR spectra of -carrageenan irradiated at 100 kGy indicate that the

fraction with an Mw (3-10) kGy has an intact oligomer structure (13)-4 sulfate--D

galactose (14)-3, 6 anhydro-"-D-galactose.

The dynamic behavior of -carrageenan indicates that absorbed dose of up to

50 kGy still undergoes sol-gelation transition. Above 50 kGy, no gelation takes place,

149

instead appearance of fast relaxation mode in CDF is observed at doses of 75–150

kGy. Optimum peak intensity was found at 100 kGy (Mol wt .5 – 10 kDa) which

coincides with the optimum plant growth promoter effect in -carrageenan. At a dose

beyond 150 kGy, the conformational transition temperature from coil to helix is no

longer observed. In addition, SANS experiment indicates a unique structure form at

100 kGy wherein a power law behavior with a fractal dimension -1.84 is observed.

The significance of all data obtained can be summarized in Figure 7.1. The

figure shows the spectrum of possible applications of irradiated -carrageenan based

on the functional groupings and molecular size of the radiolytic products. The color

intensity from light to dark denotes increasing effectivity.

Optimum biological activity can be obtained at a dose between 75 to 150 kGy

which is maximum at 100 kGy in solid. In 1% aqueous solution, a dose of less than 10

kGy and minimum at 2 kGy would be appropriate for the biological activity. For plant

growth promoter, it requires only an intact oligomeric backbone with a glycosidic

linkage (common to all polysaccharides) with an Mw of 5-10 kDa. This can be

obtained by irradiating -carrageenan at 100 kGy either in air or in vacuum or at 2

kGy in 1% aqueous solution. Applications related to the other biological functions of

-carrageenan, e.g. plant elicitor, anti viral (anti-herpes and anti-HIV), and anti-tumor

require more specificity. It has to have an intact -carrageenan oligomer structure

with an intact functional sulfate group ((13)-4 sulfate--D galactose (14)-3, 6

anhydro-"-D-galactose.). Thus, irradiating it in solid and in vacuum may be more

appropriate for this purpose considering that the chemical changes in -carrageenan at

this condition are so minimal.

150

The gelation property of -carrageenan can be utilized for the making of

hydrogels in general. -carrageenan can be irradiated up to a dose of 50 kGy without

destroying its gelation properties. Synthetic water soluble polymers when combined

with natural polymers can substantially improve the physico-mechanical properties of

the hydrogel (swelling and tensile strength).

Stimuli responsive hydrogels undergo abrupt volume change in response to

changes in environmental parameters such as pH, ions, temperature. These hydrogels

normally undergo conformational chain transitions which directly affects the

swelling-deswelling behavior of the hydrogel. In the case of -carrageenan, this

conformational transition from helix to coil is influenced by changes in temperature or

presence of metal ions. Thus, irradiated -carrageenan can also be useful as stimuli

responsive gels when combined or grafted to some synthetic water soluble polymers.

The effective dose range for this purpose is less than 175 kGy. At doses below 50

kGy the conformational transition temperature of -carrageenan is rather high

(>70oC) which drops to 50oC at doses between 50 to 175 kGy. Stimuli responsive gels

are commonly used as matrix for the slow release of drugs or as industrial censors. -

carrageenan may be grafted unto water soluble polymers to make hydrogels of this

type.

The presence of reducing sugars in irradiated -carrageenan gives possibilities

for its utilization as antioxidant. The reducing sugars are easily oxidized to carboxylic

acid. In solid irradiation, the number of reducing sugar increases with dose for even as

high as 200 kGy. On the other hand, for 1% aqueous solution, reducing sugar reaches

a maximum high level at 50 kGy. This can be useful as polysaccharide-based edible

coatings for food protection and preservation in fruits and vegetables. Irradiation of -

151

carrageenan with amino groups at this effective dose range may produce a powerful

antioxidant (Maillard reaction products) which involves the formation of brown

pigments by condensation between carbonyl groups of reducing sugars, aldehydes or

ketones and amine groups of amino acids.

The amount of free sulfates released from -carrageenan with irradiation can

be utilized for purposes of developing radiation dose indicators. This application has

already been described in the introduction. In solid irradiation, free sulfates levels off

at 50 kGy while at 1% aqueous solution, this levels off at 100 kGy with higher acidity

obtained in aqueous solution.

To conclude, Figure 7.2 gives an over-all view of the importance of this study

and some future researches that still need to be done. All the data obtained from this

research are new and valuable information on absorbed dose and conditions for the

development of noble materials from radiation processed natural polymer (-

carrageenan) has been obtained. This fundamental study would serve as a theoretical

basis and would prove to be most useful especially in the formulation and

development of new products from radiation modified -carrageenan for various

applications. This data should further be supplemented with actual results from

applied researches of developed materials. Furthermore, while this research is limited

to -carrageenan, investigation should be extended to other types of carrageenan (

and ). In fact, -carrageenan oligomer is known to be more effective as an anti-viral

and anti-tumor agent. This technique may also be applied to other natural polymers.

The proposed radiolytic reaction mechanism should also be confirmed by doing a

more detailed ESR study. Further elucidation of the radiolytic products by ESR and

other known techniques could be interesting.

152

Lastly, this is the first research which has employed the use of techniques such

as dynamic light scattering and small angle neutron scattering in understanding the

radiation chemistry of polysaccharides. It is hoped that more works along this area

would be done to understand better the effect of radiation on the structure and

dynamic behavior of polysaccharides.

153

Figure 7.1. Effective dose range of irradiated - carrageenan for bio-based materials development

Absorbed Dose (kGy)

PossibleUses Conditions

Biological Activity: Plant Growth Promoter Plant Elicitor Anti‐ viral e.g. anti‐HIV,anti‐herpetic Tumor inhibition

Solid

1% aqueous

Hydrogels Solid

Stimuli Responsive Gels Solid

Anti‐oxidantSolid

1% aqueous

Radiation Dose IndicatorSolid

1% aqueous

0 50 100 150 200

154

200 kGy

-CarrageenanOligomers

-Carrageenan(solid in air. solid in vacuum,

1% aqueous)

H2O eaq, OH, H, H2, H+, OH-- . .

H. OH.eaq-

H. H.

H.

H.

H.

eaq-

eaq-

eaq-

eaq-

OH.

OH.

OH.

OH.

Chapter 2

Radiation degradation yield Gd = 2.5 for solid in air, 1.7 in vacuum and 1.2 x 10‐7 mol J‐1 in 1% aqueous solution

Chapter 3

etc.

O

O

OH

O

O

OH

(KC)nO

O

OH

O

O

OH

-O3 SO

CH2OH

O

OH

O

O

H2C

O

O

O

O

OH

-O3SO-O3SO

CH2OHCH2OH

O

O

OO

O

O

OH

CH2OHCH2OH

O

O

O

O

OH

-O3SO-O3SO-O3SO-O3SO

CH2OHCH2OHCH2OHCH2OH

O

O

OOOO

O

O

OH

CH2OHCH2OHCH2OHCH2OH

O

O

O

O

O

OH

-O3SO-O3SO

CH2OHCH2OH

O

O

H2CH2C

O

O

O

OHOO

O

O

O

O

O

OH

-O3SO-O3SO-O3SO-O3SO

CH2OHCH2OHCH2OHCH2OH

O

O

H2CH2CH2CH2C

O

O

O

OHOO

-O3SO

O

O

O

O

OH

-O3SO

CH2OHCH2OH

O

O

OO

O

O

OH

CH2OHCH2OH

OO

-O3SO

O

O

O

O

OH

-O3SO

CH2OHCH2OHCH2OHCH2OH

O

O

OOOO

O

O

OH

CH2OHCH2OHCH2OHCH2OH

OOOO

O

O O

-O3SO-O3SO

CH2OHCH2OH

O

O

OO

O

OHOH

CHCH2OH

OOO

O O

-O3SO-O3SO-O3SO-O3SO

CH2OHCH2OHCH2OHCH2OH

O

O

OOOO

O

OHOHOHOH

CHCH2OHCHCH2OH

OOOO

CH2OHO

O

OH

O

O

O

OH

CH2OHO

O

OH

O

O

O

OH

(KC)n-xCH2OH

O

O

OH

O

O

O

OH

CH2OHO

O

OH

H2CH2CH2CH2CO

O

O

OH

-O3 SO

i ii→

•  Increasing reducing sugar             •  Increasing carboxylic acids•  Release of free sulfates                  •  Increasing carbonyl groups•  Intact chemical structure of ‐carrageenanoligomer

Chapter 4

•  Appearance of fast relaxation mode at 75–150 kGy (Mw = 5 ‐ 10kDa)•  Decreasing conformational transition temperatures (coil to helix)•  Disappearance of gelation behavior

Chapter 5

Chapter 6: Proposed Radiolysis Reaction Mechanism

Possible uses:• Plant growth promoter• Plant elicitor• Anti‐HIV• Anti‐herpes• Anti‐tumor• Anti‐oxidant• Hydrogels• Stimuli responsive   gels• Radiation dose indicator

Experimental

Data

Rate constant of OH• reactionwitk ‐carrageenan = 1.2 x 109 M‐1s‐1

New!

Current research

Future research

Actual application

and - Carrageenanand other natural polymers

ESR experiments for verification andradiolytic products strutural elucidation

-Carrageenan-basedmaterials development

Figure 7.2. Over-all view of the current research and some future works

155

Publications related to the dissertation 1. L.V. Abad, H. Kudo, S. Saiki, N. Nagasawa, M. Tamada, Y. Katsumura, C.T.

Aranilla, L.S. Relleve and A.M. De La Rosa, 2009. Radiation degradation studies of carrageenans. Carbohyd. Polym. 78, 100-106.

2. L.V. Abad , S. Okabe, M. Shibayama, H. Kudo, S. Saiki, C. Aranilla, L. Relleve, and A.M. De la Rosa, 2008. Comparative studies on the conformational change and aggregation behavior of irradiated carrageenans and agar by dynamic light scattering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 42, 55-61.

3. L.V. Abad, S. Saiki, H. Kudo, Y. Muroya, Y. Katsumura and A.M. De la Rosa, 2007. Rate constants of reactions of κ-carrageenan with hydrated electron and hydroxyl radical. Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, B. 265, 410-413.

4. L.V. Abad, S. Okabe, S. Koizume, M. Shibayama, 2006. Small-angle neutron

scattering on irradiated kappa carrageenan. Physica B. 381, 103-108.

5. L.V. Abad, I. Nasimova, C. Aranilla, M. Shibayama, 2004. Light scattering studies of irradiated - and -carrageenan. Rad. Phys. Chem. 23, 29-37.

6. L.V. Abad, I. Nasimova, L. Relleve, A.M. Dela Rosa, M. Shibayama, 2004.

Dynamic light scattering studies of irradiated kappa carrageenan. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 34, 81-88.

Poster and Paper Presentations to Conferences, Symposiums and Meetings Related to the Dissertation

1. L. V. Abad, L.S. Relleve, C. T. Aranilla and A. M. de la Rosa “Radiation

Processed Materials from Carrageenan for Agricultural Applications” 1st

Regional Cooperative Meeting (RCM) on “Development of radiation-processed products of natural polymers for application in agriculture, health care, industry and environment”, 21-25 April 2008, Vienna, Austria,.

2. L. V. Abad, H. Kudo, S. Saiki, N. Nagasawa, M. Tamada, H. Fu, Y. Muroya,

M. Lin, Y. Katsumura, and A. M. deLaRosa “Gamma-rays irradiation and electron-beam pulse radiolysis study on kappa-carrageenans”, The 2nd Asia Pacific Symposium on Radiation Chemistry, 29 August -1 September 2008, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan

3. L.V. Abad, S. Saiki, H. Kudo, Y. Muroya, Y. Katsumura and A.M. De la Rosa

“Pulse Radiolysis of -Carrageenan, 7th International Symposium on Ionizing Radiation and Polymers, 23-28 September 2006, Antalya, Turkey.

4. L.V. Abad, S. Saiki, H. Kudo, Y. Muroya, Y. Katsumura and A.M. De la Rosa

“Pulse Radiolysis of -carrageenan” 49th Annual Meeting of Japanese Society of Radiation Chemistry, 12-14 October 2006, Takasaki, Gunma, Japan.

156

5. L. Abad, I. Nasimova, S. Koizumi, M. Shibayama “Structure and Dynamics of Irradiated Kappa Carrageenan”, 53rd SPSJ Annual Meeting, 25-27 May 2004, Kobe International Conference Center, Kobe-shi, Japan

6. L. Abad, I. Nasimova and M. Shibayama “Dynamic Light Scattering of

Irradiated Kappa Carrageenan”, 第 15 回高分子ゲル研究討論会, 14-15 January 2004, University of Tokyo, Japan.

7. L. V. Abad, L. S. Relleve, C. T. Aranilla, and A. M. Dela Rosa, “Properties of

Radiation Synthesized Water Soluble Polymer-Carrageenan Hydrogels and their Applications”, 5th Gel Symposium, Polymer Gels: Fundamentals and Nano-Fabrications, 18 November 2003, Kashiwa Campus, University of Tokyo, Japan.

Other Publications

1. L. Relleve, N. Nagasawa, L.Q. Luan, T. Yagi, C. Aranilla, L. Abad, T. Kume, F. Yoshii, A. dela Rosa, 2005. Degradation of carrageenan by radiation. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 87, 403-410.

2. L.V. Abad, L.S. Relleve, C.T. Aranilla, A.M. Dela Rosa, I. Nasimova, S. Okabe, and M. Shibayama, Structure and Dynamics of Irradiated Kappa Carrageenan, Proceedings of the 20th Philippine Chemistry Congress, 12 March 2005, Baguio City, Philippines.

3. L.V. Abad, L.S. Relleve, C.T. Aranilla, and A.M. Dela Rosa, 2003. Properties

of radiation synthesized PVP-kappa carrageenan hydrogel blends. Rad. Phys. Chem. 68, 901-908.

4. L.V. Abad, L.S. Relleve, C.T. Aranilla, A.K. Aliganga, C.M. San Diego, and

A.M. dela Rosa, 2002. Natural antioxidants for radiation vulcanization of natural rubber latex. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 76, 275-279.

5. Relleve, Lorna S., L. V. Abad, C.T. Aranilla, A. Aliganga, A.M. Dela Rosa, F.

Yoshii, T. Kume and N. Nagasawa, “ Biological Activities of Radiation-Degraded Carrageenan” Proceedings of the Symposium on Radiation Technology in Emerging Industrial Applications, 6-10 November 2000, Beijing, People’s Republic of China.

6. Abad, Lucille V., L.S. Relleve, C.T. Aranilla, A. Aliganga, C.M. San Diego

and A.M. Dela Rosa, “Natural Antioxidants for Radiation Vulcanized Natural Rubber Latex”, Proceedings of the Symposium on Radiation Technology in Emerging Industrial Applications, 6-10 November 2000, Beijing, People’s Republic of China,.

7. L. V. Abad, C. San Diego, C.T. Aranilla, L.S. Relleve and A. M. dela Rosa,

“Natural Antioxidants for RVNRL Part II”, IAEA Regional Cooperative Meeting Report on the Improvement of the Physical Properties of RVNRL, 18-

157

22 October 1999, Takasaki Radiation Chemistry Establishment, Takasaki, Japan.

8. A. M. dela Rosa, L.S. Relleve, C.T. Aranilla, L.V. Abad and C. San Diego,

“Preparation of New Hydrogels from Carrageenan via Radiation Crosslinking” Proceedings of the 15th Philippine Chemistry Congress, 26-29 May 1999, Waterfront Cebu City Hotel, Cebu City, Philippines.

9. L.V. Abad, A. M. dela Rosa, I. Janik, and J.M. Rosiak, “Sol/Gel Analysis of

Crosslinked Polymers”, Proceedings of the 15th Philippine Chemistry, 26-29 May 1999, Waterfront Cebu City Hotel, Cebu City, Philippines.

10. L.V. Abad, C.M. San Diego, L.P. Relleve, C.O. Aranilla, and A.M. Dela Rosa,

“Natural Antioxidants for RVNRL”, IAEA Regional Cooperative Meeting Report on the Improvement of the Physical Properties of RVNRL, 7-11 September 1998, Bangkok, Thailand.

11. A.M. dela Rosa, L.V. Abad, L.P. Relleve, C.O. Aranilla and C.L. Pascual,

“Radiation Response of Philippine Natural Rubber Latex”, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Radiation Technology in Conservation of the Environment, 8-12 September 1997, Zakopane, Poland.

12. L.V. Abad, A.M. dela Rosa, K. Makuuchi, and F. Yoshii, "The Role of Proteins

on the Thermal Oxidative Aging of Radiation Vulcanized Natural Rubber Latex", Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on RVNRL, 15-17 July 1996, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

13. A.M. dela Rosa, L.V. Abad, L.P. Relleve, C.O. Aranilla and C.L. Pascual,

"Radiation Vulcanization of Philippine Natural Rubber Latex", Proceedings of the 12th Philippine Chemistry Congress, 23-25 May 1996, Sarabia Manor Hotel, Iloilo City, Philippines.

14. A.M. dela Rosa, L.P. Relleve, Aranilla C.O., Pascual C.L. and L.V. Abad,

"Polymerization of Coconut Oil and Lauryl Alcohol with Methylmethacrylate by Gamma Radiation", Proceedings of the12th Philippine Chemistry Congress, 23-25 May 1996, Sarabia Manor Hotel, Iloilo City, Philippines.

15. L.V. Abad, "The Effect of Proteins on the Aging Properties of Radiation

Vulcanized Natural Rubber Latex", Thesis presented to the University of Santo Tomas (UST), 18 March 1993, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.

16. A.M dela Rosa, L.V. Abad, and R.B. Banzon Michel, "Radiation Enhanced

Biomass Conversion of Agricultural Cellulosic Wastes", Proceedings of the 6th Philippine Chemistry Congress, 25 May 1990, University of San Carlos, Cebu City, Philippines.

17. R.B. Banzon, L.V. Abad and A. M. dela Rosa, 1988. Genotoxic Studies in

Irradiated Mangoes Using Short Term Mutagenicity Assays. Phil. Journal Food Science and Technology. 12, 1.

158

18. L.V. Abad, R.B. Banzon, A.M. Dela Rosa,"Composition of the Enzymatic and Acid Hydrolyzates of Gamma Irradiated Rice Straw", Proceedings of the 2nd ASEAN Science and Technology Week, 1989, Vol 2, 124-134.

19. A.M. Dela Rosa, and L.V. Abad, 1986. "Structural Analysis of Gamma

Irradiated Cellulose and Agricultural Cellulosic Wastes", PAEC (C) IB 86005. 20. A.M. Dela Rosa, R.B. Banzon, L.V. Abad, Z.F. Simbul Nuguid, and A.DM.

Bulos, 1985. Effect of Gamma Irradiation on the Saccharification of Cellulose. The Nucleus. 23, 1-10.

21. A.M. Dela Rosa, A.DM. Bulos, R.B. Banzon, Z.F. Simbul Nuguid, and L.V.

Abad, 1983. Radiation Pretreatment of Agricultural Cellulosic Wastes for Energy Production. PAEC (C) IB 83006.

Other Lectures and Presentations

1. L.V. Abad, “Achievements on the IAEA Regional Cooperative Agreement (RCA) RAS 8/106 Project in the Philippines”, IAEA/RCA Project Final Technical Review Meeting for RAS/8/106 on “Radiation Processing Applications for Health and the Environment” and First Technical Planning and Coordination for RAS 8/109 “Supporting Radiation Processing of Polymeric Materials for Agricultural Applications and Environmental Remediation”, 16 - 20 March 2009, Daejeon, Korea.

2. L.V. Abad, “IAEA/RCA Activities on Radiation Processing of Natural Polymers” and “IAEA/RCA RAS 8/106 Activities”, FNCA 2008 Workshop on Application of Electron Accelerator-Radiation Processing of Natural Polymer, 26 – 31 October 2008, Shanghai, China.

3. L. Abad, L. Relleve, C. Aranilla, A. dela Rosa, “RAS 8/106 Country Report”,

IAEA/RCA Mid-Term Progress Meeting of RAS/8/106 on “Radiation Processing Applications for Health and the Environment”, 7 - 12 April 2008, Manila, Philippines.

4. L.V. Abad, “IAEA/RCA Activities on Radiation Processing”, Forum for

Nuclear Cooperation in Asia (FNCA) 2007 Workshop on Application of Electron Accelerator-Radiation Processing of Natural Polymer, 22 – 26 October 2007, Kimdo Hotel, 133 Nguyen Hue Ave., Dist. 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

5. L. V. Abad, “Introduction to Radiation Chemistry of Water and Polymers”;

“Radiation processing applications of polysaccharides”; and “Natural Polymer Modification and Characterization”, IAEA Regional Training Course (RTC) on Radiation Processing for Basic and Medium Level Personnel, 6 -10 August 2007, Malaysian Nuclear Agency (Nuclear Malaysia), Bangi. Malaysia.

159

6. L.V. Abad, “Radiation Processing of Natural Polymers”, IAEA/RCA Regional Training Course RAS/8/106 on Promotion of Radiation Technology Utilization 9 - 13 July 2007, The Linden Suites, Manila, Philippines.

7. L. Abad, L. Relleve, C. Aranilla, C. Bisnar, and A. dela Rosa, Radiation

Processing of Natural Polymers RAS 8/098, IAEA/RCA Project Planning Meeting of RAS/8/106, 23-27 April 2007, Thailand, Bangkok.

8. L.V. Abad, Radiation Processing of Carrageenan, IAEA/RCA Regional

Meeting On “Health Care Stimuli Responsive Radiation Processed Materials”, 26-30 June 2006, Hotel Sheraton, Dhaka, Bangladesh,

9. L.V. Abad, “Radiation Processing of Carrageenan using Electron Beam” and

“Prospects of Electron Beam Treatment of Flue Gases in the Philippines”, FNCA 2004 Workshop on Application of Electron Accelerator, 7 September 2004, Beijing, China.

10. Alumanda M. Dela Rosa, Lucille V. Abad, Lorna S. Relleve, Charito T.

Aranilla, and Cristina L. Pascual, “Radiation-Modified Carrageenan for Agricultural and Health Care Applications”, IAEA Project Coordination Meeting on Radiation Processing of Chitin/Chitosan, 19 March 2002, Bangkok, Thailand.

11. L.V. Abad, “Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications”, February 2002, Poveda

Learning Centre, Quezon City, Philippines.

12. L.V. Abad, “New Applications of Radiation Modified Carrageenan”, 3rd Annual De La Salle University Science and Technology Conference (Physics Session), 9 March 2001, De la Salle University, Manila, Philippines.

13. L.V. Abad, “Radiation Processing of Natural Polymers and Its Applications”, 28th Atomic Energy Week, 13 December 2000, Philippine Nuclear Research Institute, Quezon City, Philippines.

14. L.V. Abad, C.M. San Diego, L.P. Relleve, C.O. Aranilla, and A.M. Dela Rosa,

“Natural Antioxidants for RVNRL”, Regional Cooperative Meeting on the Improvement of the Physical Properties of RVNRL, 7-11 September 1998, Bangkok, Thailand.

15. L.V. Abad, Lecture-Forum on Gas Chromatography and High-Performance

Liquid Chromatograph, 30 August 1996, Far Easten University, Manila, Philippines.

16. L.V. Abad, K. Makuuchi, F. Yoshii and A.M. dela Rosa, "The Role of Proteins

on the Thermal Oxidative Aging of Radiation Vulcanized Natural Rubber Latex", Diliman Community Celebration of the National Science and Technology Week, 22 July 1993, Philippine Nuclear Research Institute, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines.

160

17. L.V. Abad, K. Makuuchi and F. Yoshii, "The Effect of Proteins on the Ageing Properties of RVNRL, Final report presented to the staff of the Takasaki Radiation Chemistry Research Establishment, 17 March 1992, TRCRE, Gunma ken, Japan.

18. L.V. Abad, R.B. Banzon and A.M. Dela Rosa, "Composition of the Enzymatic

and Acid Hydrolyzates of Gamma Irradiated Rice Straw", First ASEAN Talent Search for Young Scientists", 18 January 1989, Philippine International Convention Center, Manila.

Other Professional Activities

1. Philippine Patent “PVP-carrageenan hydrogel for burn/wound dressing” (№ 1-2000-02471), Philippine Patent Office

2. Philippines’ National Project Coordinator (NPC), IAEA RAS 8/109 “Radiation

Processing of Polymeric Materials for Agricultural Applications and Environmental Remediation (RCA)”, 2009-2011.

3. IAEA Expert to the FNCA 2008 Workshop on Application of Electron

Accelerator-Radiation Processing of Natural Polymer, 26 – 31 October 2008, Shanghai, China.

4. IAEA Expert to the FNCA 2007 Workshop on Application of Electron

Accelerator-Radiation Processing of Natural Polymer, 22 – 26 October 2007, Kimdo Hotel, 133 Nguyen Hue Ave., Dist. 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

5. Project Leader, Radiation Processed Materials from Carrageenan for

Agricultural Applications, IAEA CRP Project on “Development of Radiation-Processed Products of Natural Polymers for Application in Agriculture, Healthcare, Industry and Environment”, 2007 to present.

6. Philippines’ NPC and Project Lead Country Coordinator, IAEA RAS 8/106

“Radiation Processing Applications for Health and Environment (RCA)”, 2007-2008.

7. Course Director, IAEA/RCA Regional Training Course RAS/8/106 on

Promotion of Radiation Technology Utilization, 9 - 13 July 2007, The Linden Suites, Manila, Philippines

8. IAEA Expert Lecturer to the IAEA Regional Training Course (RTC) on

Radiation Processing for Basic and Medium Level Personnel, 6 -10 August 2007, Malaysian Nuclear Agency (Nuclear Malaysia), Bangi. Malaysia.

9. Project Leader, Philippine DOST, TECHNICOM Project “Semi-

Commercialization of PVP-Carrageenan Hydrogels for Burn/Wound Dressing and Bed Sores (Phase II) : Production and Market Acceptability”, 2007-2008.

161

10. Philippines’ NPC and Project Lead Country Coordinator, IAEA RAS 8/098 “Radiation Technology for Development of Advanced Materials and for Protection of Health and the Environment”, 2005-2006.

11. Philippine Project Coordinator , IAEA CRP on the Improvement of Physical

Properties of Radiation Vulcanized Natural Rubber Latex, 1997-1999.