rapid transit and surrey's needs - part 3: assessing the impacts

Upload: daryl-dela-cruz

Post on 03-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Rapid Transit and Surrey's needs - Part 3: Assessing the impacts

    1/14

    Assessingthe impacts

    Conclusions gathered Modal shift rates on all proposed Surrey Rapid Transit

    clearly inferior to Vancouver achievements

    Surrey-wide achievements after 20 years of rapid trancompletely inferior to what Vancouver has achieved ayears

    Auto use to remain dominant in the City of Surrey whVancouver has already met goals and other cities withrapid transit will follow.

    Vehicles entering/within Surrey will increase with popjobs, and the city will require millions of dollars to addissue as a tradeoff for not enough investment in rapi

    Comparing the plannedimpact of the Surrey

    Rapid Transit alternativesvs. what rapid transit hasdone in Vancouver

    Scroll down for more inf

  • 7/29/2019 Rapid Transit and Surrey's needs - Part 3: Assessing the impacts

    2/14

    Modal shift inVancouver1996-2006

    During this period, the MillenniumLine SkyTrain line as well as the 99and 98 B-Lines were introduced.As well, Mark II train service wasinitiated on the Expo Line toimprove service and ride quality.

    Source: Vancouver Transportation Plan Updatehttp://www.tac-atc.ca/english/annualconference/tac2012/docs/session18/krueger.pdf

    http://www.tac-atc.ca/english/annualconference/tac2012/docs/session18/krueger.pdfhttp://www.tac-atc.ca/english/annualconference/tac2012/docs/session18/krueger.pdf
  • 7/29/2019 Rapid Transit and Surrey's needs - Part 3: Assessing the impacts

    3/14

    Modal shift inVancouver1996-2006During this period, the 99 B-Line, 98B-Line and Millennium LineSkyTrain line were introduced. As

    well, Mark II train service wasinitiated on the Expo Line toimprove service.

    Source: Vancouver Transportation Plan Updatehttp://www.tac-atc.ca/english/annualconference/tac2012/docs/session18/krueger.pdf

    http://www.tac-atc.ca/english/annualconference/tac2012/docs/session18/krueger.pdfhttp://www.tac-atc.ca/english/annualconference/tac2012/docs/session18/krueger.pdf
  • 7/29/2019 Rapid Transit and Surrey's needs - Part 3: Assessing the impacts

    4/14

    Surrey rapidtransit modalshift expectation2021-2041

    0.00%

    2.00%

    4.00%

    6.00%

    8.00%

    10.00%

    12.00%

    14.00%

    16.00%

    BRT

    network

    LRT to

    Langley +

    BRT

    Full LRT

    network

    RRT to

    Langley +

    BRT

    Study area mode share

    (to/from/within)

    2021 (opening year) to 2041

    Mode share in 2021 (opening day) Mode share in 2041

    3.18 3.28

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    BRT network LRT to

    Langley +BRT

    Study area m

    2021 (opening y

    Additional mode sha

    26.72%27.80%

    20%

    22%

    24%

    26%

    28%

    30%

    BRT

    network

    LRT to

    Langley +

    BRT

    Study area m

    2021 (opening y

    Mode-share

    Source: Final Analysis PDF page 342-344

  • 7/29/2019 Rapid Transit and Surrey's needs - Part 3: Assessing the impacts

    5/14

    Comparison 1Surrey 2021-2041 vsVancouver 1996-2006

    3.01

    3.183.28

    3.21 3.17

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    Vancouver

    1996-2006

    Surrey 2021-

    2041, BRT1

    Surrey 2021-

    2041, LRT5a

    Surrey 2021-

    2041, LRT1

    Surrey 2021-

    2041, RRT1

    Expected modal shift to transit

    Additional transit mode-share captured in %

    Vancattracomshiftcomexpeappr

    afterany r

    Sources: Final Analysis PDF page 342-344,

    Vancouver Transportation Plan Update

    TDM adjustments are not included in this comparison as such measures had not been implemented

    of Vancouver. See report: Assessing the potential for road and parking charges to reduce demand focommuting in the Greater Vancouver region, page 9 - http://research.rem.sfu.ca/theses/Washbroo

    http://research.rem.sfu.ca/theses/WashbrookKevin_2002_MRM298.pdfhttp://research.rem.sfu.ca/theses/WashbrookKevin_2002_MRM298.pdf
  • 7/29/2019 Rapid Transit and Surrey's needs - Part 3: Assessing the impacts

    6/14

    Comparison 2Surrey 2021-2041 vsVancouver 1996-2006

    0.3

    0.159 0.164 0.1605 0.1585

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    0.35

    Vancouver1996-2006

    Surrey 2021-2041, BRT1

    Surrey 2021-2041, LRT5a

    Surrey 2021-2041, LRT1

    Surrey 2021-2041, RRT1

    Average yearly modal shift to transit

    Average yearly additional transit mode-share captured in %

    PreviotransitcapturtwiceannuatransitSurreyoption

    Sources: Final Analysis PDF page 342-344,

    Vancouver Transportation Plan Update

    TDM adjustments are not included in this comparison as such measures had not been implemented

    of Vancouver. See report: Assessing the potential for road and parking charges to reduce demand focommuting in the Greater Vancouver region, page 9 - http://research.rem.sfu.ca/theses/Washbroo

    http://research.rem.sfu.ca/theses/WashbrookKevin_2002_MRM298.pdfhttp://research.rem.sfu.ca/theses/WashbrookKevin_2002_MRM298.pdf
  • 7/29/2019 Rapid Transit and Surrey's needs - Part 3: Assessing the impacts

    7/14

    Comparison 3Surrey 2021-2041 vsVancouver 1996-2006

    1.73%

    1.34%1.39% 1.36%

    1.29%

    0.00%

    0.20%

    0.40%

    0.60%

    0.80%

    1.00%

    1.20%

    1.40%

    1.60%

    1.80%

    2.00%

    Vancouver

    1996-2006

    Surrey 2021-

    2041, BRT1

    Surrey 2021-

    2041, LRT5a

    Surrey 2021-

    2041, LRT1

    Surrey 2021-

    2041, RRT1

    Average yearly modal shift

    Average yearly transit mode share growth

    Surreyannuawith atransitVancoseen p

    Canad

    Sources: Final Analysis PDF page 342-344,

    Vancouver Transportation Plan Update

    TDM adjustments are not included in this comparison as such measures had not been implemented

    of Vancouver. See report: Assessing the potential for road and parking charges to reduce demand focommuting in the Greater Vancouver region, page 9 - http://research.rem.sfu.ca/theses/Washbroo

    http://research.rem.sfu.ca/theses/WashbrookKevin_2002_MRM298.pdfhttp://research.rem.sfu.ca/theses/WashbrookKevin_2002_MRM298.pdf
  • 7/29/2019 Rapid Transit and Surrey's needs - Part 3: Assessing the impacts

    8/14

    Sub-area transitmode-shares inSurrey andLangley

    0.00%

    5.00%

    10.00%

    15.00%

    20.00%

    25.00%

    30.00%

    Transit mode-shares for study sub-are

    with BRT network with LRT to Langley + BRT with full LRT network with

    Source: Final Analysis PDF page 87

  • 7/29/2019 Rapid Transit and Surrey's needs - Part 3: Assessing the impacts

    9/14

    Modal shift inDowntownVancouver

    1996-2006

    Vancouver has sreduced amountentering downtoin 15 years, desppopulation and j

    Opened in this pMillennium LineSkyTrain, 99 and

    Line up until intrCanada Line

    Source: Vancouver Transportation Plan Updatehttp://www.tac-atc.ca/english/annualconference/tac2012/docs/session18/krueger.pdf

    http://www.tac-atc.ca/english/annualconference/tac2012/docs/session18/krueger.pdfhttp://www.tac-atc.ca/english/annualconference/tac2012/docs/session18/krueger.pdf
  • 7/29/2019 Rapid Transit and Surrey's needs - Part 3: Assessing the impacts

    10/14

    Modal shift inDowntownVancouver

    1996-2006

    Source: Vancouver Transportation Plan Updatehttp://www.tac-atc.ca/english/annualconference/tac2012/docs/session18/krueger.pdf

    http://www.tac-atc.ca/english/annualconference/tac2012/docs/session18/krueger.pdfhttp://www.tac-atc.ca/english/annualconference/tac2012/docs/session18/krueger.pdf
  • 7/29/2019 Rapid Transit and Surrey's needs - Part 3: Assessing the impacts

    11/14

    Comparison 4Downtown Surrey 2041 vsDowntown Vancouver 2006Both cases are measurements 20years after rapid transit

    41.28%

    26.60% 26.60% 26.50% 26.90%

    0.00%

    5.00%

    10.00%

    15.00%

    20.00%

    25.00%

    30.00%

    35.00%

    40.00%

    45.00%

    Downtown

    Vancouver

    2006

    Downtown

    Surrey 2041

    with BRT1

    Downtown

    Surrey 2041

    with LRT5a

    Downtown

    Surrey 2041

    with LRT1

    Downtown

    Surrey 2041

    with RRT1

    Measurement of transit mode-share

    Transit mode share* (see note)

    Downtoto have mtransit mDowntow

    * Downtown Surrey estimates consider trips leaving City Centre (i.e. onthe Expo Line towards Burnaby and Downtown Vancouver, or reversecommutes), whereas Downtown Vancouver numbers do not. Downtown

    Vancouver numbers average to/within trip mode share.

  • 7/29/2019 Rapid Transit and Surrey's needs - Part 3: Assessing the impacts

    12/14

    Most pedestrianfriendly city inCanada

    These argood trareductio

    Vancouvpedestrin Canad

    Of all ne

    downtowpedestrineighboVancouv

  • 7/29/2019 Rapid Transit and Surrey's needs - Part 3: Assessing the impacts

    13/14

    Comparison 5Proposed Surrey bus networkvs. 2006 Vancouver network(bus networks after 20 years ofrapid transit)

    All rapid transit alternatives to be complemented with BAU trSource: Final Analysis PDF page 242-245

  • 7/29/2019 Rapid Transit and Surrey's needs - Part 3: Assessing the impacts

    14/14

    Comparison 5Proposed Surrey bus networkvs. 2006 Vancouver network(bus networks after 20 years ofrapid transit)

    Surrey 2041 bus nbe far more estabVancouvers 2006routes to maintaservice within 15Surrey/SOF after transit.

    Busy Vancouver bof frequent transi2006 (i.e. 20 yearsincluded: 17, 25, 4

    Vancouver bus ronot existbefore 2

    Many Vancouver years after rapid tprovide service wpeak hour (26, 27,

    Mode share goalsVancouver for intin 2006 are not myears of rapid tranmore established Source: Final Analysis PDF page 242-245,

    TransLink 2008 press releaseCPTDB Wiki on CMBC bus routes

    Full tables on final analysis PDF page 242-245