rating form
DESCRIPTION
ResearchTRANSCRIPT
UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH ORAL DEFENSE (RATING FORM)
NAME OF RESEARCHER/S:_________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
DEGREE SOUGHT: Bachelor of Science in Nursing_ _______________________
ADVISER: _________________________________________________
THESIS TITLE: __________________________________________________________________________________________________
1. THE RESEARCH REPORT
Criteria Weight
Student 1
Student 2
Student 3
Student 4
1.1. Chapter 1 (15%)Rationale and Background of Study clear and adequate.
5
Framework/Paradigm of the Study comprehensive and clear
4
Statement of the Problem clear, concise, and specific.
3
Scope and Delimitations clear and appropriate 1Significance of the Study well established 1Definition of Terms clear and operational 1
TOTAL 151.2. Chapter 2 (5%)Review of Related Literature clear, adequate, and critical
2
Discussion of Concepts relevant and coherent 2Presentation systematic and well organized 1
TOTAL 51.3. Chapter 3 (30%)Research Method clearly stated and appropriate 5Research Design clear with appropriate sampling method, valid, and reliable research instruments and
15
1
appropriate research settingProcedures are scientific and statistical treatments appropriate
10
TOTAL 301.4. Chapter 4 (10%)Data adequate, valid, and reliable 2Data presentation clear and logical (e.g. tables, graphs, charts)
2
Data Analysis and Interpretation accurate 3Textual Discussion clear and concise 3
TOTAL 101.5. Chapter 5 (5%)Summary of Problem, Procedure, and Findings concise and comprehensive.
2
Conclusions logical and based on the findings of the study
2
Recommendations based on Findings and Conclusions, feasible, practical and attainable
1
TOTAL 51.6. Form and Style (20%)Style/Format conforms to the LNU-URS 5Report well-written, sentence structure lucid and grammar correct
3
Report objective, scientific and technically correct 5Referencing, bibliographic entries correct and complete
4
Organization of report logical and coherent 3
TOTAL 202. THE ORAL DEFENSE
Criteria Weight
Student 1
Student 2
Student 3
Student 4
2.1. Mastery of the content of the research (8%)Ability to answer clearly, objectively, adequately and honestly questions raised by the panel members
5
Ability to keep discussion on the main issues 3
TOTAL 82.2. Confidence in presentation and defense of research (4%)Minimal reliance on adviser for answers to questions
4
2
raised by the panel2.3. Presentation of research (3%)Clarity and comprehensiveness 2Effective use of visual aides 1
TOTAL 3OVERALL TOTAL 100
RESEARCH 2 ADVISER’S RATING FORM
A. PANELS’ RATING (70%)
Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4
Panel Member 1Panel Member 2Panel Member 3Panel Member 4
TOTAL70%
B. ADVISER’S RATING (30%)
Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4
Participation (60)Time of Submission (20)Errors in Manuscript (20)
TOTAL (100)30%
C. OVERALL GRADE FOR RESEARCH 2
Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4
Grade from Panel Members (70%)Grade from Adviser (30%)
TOTAL (100%)
3