rating of city services for policy direction

143
1 Rating of City Services for Policy Direction RESULTS City of Tacoma City Council Goal Setting Session June 19, 2012

Upload: others

Post on 12-Sep-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

1

Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

RESULTS

City of Tacoma City Council Goal Setting Session June 19, 2012

Page 2: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

2 City of Tacoma

Today’s Session

• Budget Policy Review and Budget Goal Setting Session

• Budget Baseline and 5-Year Forecast

• Health Care and Retirement Overview

• Review and discuss the Rating results

• Align results identified from Rating to ensure consensus in City Council policy goals and service delivery priorities for budget development

• Discuss major service areas and potential program, project and process changes

Page 3: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

3

Budget Baseline and 5 Year Forecast

Jeff Litchfield June 19, 2012

Page 4: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

4 City of Tacoma

Total General Fund Revenues

$150

$170

$190

$210

$230

$250

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Mill

ion

s

Actuals Forecast

Page 5: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

5 City of Tacoma

Total General Fund Expenditures

$150

$170

$190

$210

$230

$250

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Mill

ion

s

Actuals Forecast

Page 6: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

6 City of Tacoma

Components of General Fund Revenue (in millions)

$-

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Property Tax Utility (GET) Tax Sales Tax Business Taxes All Other Revenues

Actuals Forecast

Page 7: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

7 City of Tacoma

Components of General Fund Expenditures (in millions)

$-

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Salaries & Benefits M&O Fixed Costs Transfers Other/Non Dept

Actuals Forecast

Page 8: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

8 City of Tacoma

Forecast Overview

$150

$170

$190

$210

$230

$250

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Mill

ion

s

Revenue Expenditures

$42M Gap

$33M Gap

$39M Gap

Actuals Forecast

$30M Gap

Page 9: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

9 City of Tacoma

Revenue vs Expenditures for 2013-14

Page 10: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

10

Budget Baseline and Forecast

Jeff Litchfield June 19, 2012

Page 11: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

11

General Fund and Major Departments

Tanya Robacker June 19, 2012

Page 12: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

12 City of Tacoma

Budget Overview

• General Fund –Current 2011-2012 Budget

• Major Departments Budget Components in General Fund: – Police

– Fire

– Public Works

• Public Works Overview

• Public Works Street Fund & Street Maintenance

Page 13: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

13 City of Tacoma

General Fund Current Budget 2011-2012

Police, 142,945,519

37%

Fire, 93,809,812

24%

Non Departmental 49,567,650

13%

Public Works, 25,830,641

7%

Library, 24,536,000

6% Human Rights & Human Services,

13,503,305 3%

Community & Economic

Development, 12,098,723

3%

Other, 21,993,925

6%

General Fund Current Budget 2011-2012 Total $391,609,026

Other Includes Legal, Finance, Municipal Court, Human Resources, City Manager, City Council, Hearings Examiner, and Government relations

Page 14: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

14 City of Tacoma

General Fund: Police Department

Labor Benefits, 22,692,918

16%

Labor Overtime, 2,367,458

2%

Labor Regular, 64,646,744

45%

M&O, 6,533,947

5%

Fixed Costs, 13,085,343

9%

Assessments, 3,443,195

2%

LESA, 15,950,984

11%

Jail/Property Rm, 14,224,931

10% Contribution to Traffic,

3,472,719 3%

Total Current 2011-2012 Budget: $142,945,519

Page 15: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

15 City of Tacoma

General Fund: Fire Department

Labor Regular, $59,109,013

63% Labor Benefits,

$23,462,722 25%

Labor Overtime, $1,532,500

2%

M&O, $3,689,064

4%

Fixed Costs, $3,784,241

4%

Assessments, $2,232,272

2%

Total Current 2011-2012 Budget: $93,809,812

Page 16: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

16 City of Tacoma

General Fund: Public Works

Assessments, $(3,002,024)

-10.4% Labor Benefits,

$2,325,414 8.1%

Labor Overtime, $120,000

0.4%

Labor Regular, $5,174,085

17.9%

Fixed Costs, $1,428,492

5%

M&O, $1,185,399

4.1%

Transfer to Street, $18,599,276

64.5%

Totals Before Assessments in General Fund (and After): $28,832,665 / $25,830,641 Totals Excluding Street Transfer: $10,233,389 / $7,231,365

Page 17: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

17 City of Tacoma

Public Works: Major Components

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

140.0%

50.6%

29.3%

22.7%

14.0%

11.6%

1.2%

2011-2012 General Fund Budget Components – Excluding Street Transfer

Labor Overtime

M&O

Fixed Costs

Labor Benefits

Assessments

Labor Regular

Page 18: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

18 City of Tacoma

Public Works General Government Funds

Parking Capital Fund

$1.4M

ROW Street $235k

BLUS Fund $6.4M

Police Facility Fund $242k

Paths & Trails

$2.6M

Muni Facility Fund

$15.3M

Traffic Fund $278k

Asphalt Plant

$3.1M

Equipt. Rental Fund

$22.1M

Street Fund $180.7M

General Fund $25.8M

Total 2011-2012 General Government Budget : $258,159,747 (Excludes Enterprise Funds)

Page 19: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

19 City of Tacoma

Public Works Street Fund

Street Construction $2.6M

Street Engineering $14.8M

Street Maintenance $17.3M

Street SRF $146M

General Fund Supported

Non - General Fund Supported

Page 20: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

20 City of Tacoma

Public Works Street Maintenance Major Components

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

48%

26%

20%

4%

2%

2011-2012 Budget Components – $17.3M Street Maintenance Only

Labor Overtime

M&O

Fixed Costs

Labor Benefits

Labor Regular

Page 21: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

21

General Fund and Major Departments

Tanya Robacker June 19, 2012

Page 22: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

22

Employee Health Care Overview

Joy St. Germain June 2012

Page 23: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

23 City of Tacoma

Employees Enrolled in Medical Plans

Employees/Subscribers Enrolled in Medical

City of Tacoma 38% are Tacoma Public Utilities Employees 62% are General Government Of the 62%, about half are General Fund

3638

City of Tacoma Retirees 673

Law Enforcement Support Agency (LESA) 162

Total Enrolled 4473

Page 24: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

24 City of Tacoma

Funding Sources: Health care/ Benefits

• General Fund and other Fund contributions to Health Care Trust Fund

• Employee premium contributions to Health Care Trust Fund

• Retiree premium contributions to Health Care Trust Fund

• Employee/ retiree direct co-pay for services or prescriptions

Page 25: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

25 City of Tacoma

Scope Employee Benefits

• Health Insurance: Regence or Group Health

• Vision

• Dental

• Flex Spending

• Life Insurance

• Employee Assistance program

Page 26: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

26 City of Tacoma

Historical Costs Health care, Dental, Vision & Life

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Yearly Totals of Historical Costs (in millions)

Page 27: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

27 City of Tacoma

Cost Trend Factors

• Medical Price Inflation-the increase in the cost of medical services, treatment and supplies

• Technological Changes-costs of new medical equipment, procedures, therapies and intensity of care provided

• Drugs-the number and duration of prescriptions, more expensive drugs, and price increases

Page 28: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

28 City of Tacoma

Cost Trend Factors, Continued

• Mandated benefits-requirements to cover and/or add new services not previously covered

• Litigation/Risk Management-increases to costs due to legal costs from class action lawsuits

• Utilization-the frequency of claims incurred by a medical plan

Page 29: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

29 City of Tacoma

Utilization – Trend Factors

• Aging population

• Increased availability – mandated benefits, richer plan offerings

• Trend of low office visit and out of pocket costs compared to medical inflation

• Restraints on access to care are being dropped or loosened

• Increased awareness for preventative services

• Technology Changes / Advancements

Page 30: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

30

Employee Health Care Overview

Joy St. Germain June 2012

Page 31: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

31

Monica Butler June 2012

Retirement Overview

Page 32: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

32 City of Tacoma

Scope of Retirement Benefits

Scope of Benefits by Retirement System

Tacoma Employee Retirement System- Non Uniformed General Fund Employees

Retirement Benefit

LEOFF II- Active Police and Fire Retirement Benefit

Police and Fire Pension- Retired Police and Fire

Supplemental Retirement and Healthcare for Life

Page 33: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

33 City of Tacoma

General Fund Employee Retirement Plans

Employee Membership in Retirement Plans

Tacoma Employee Retirement System- Non Uniformed General Fund Employees

509

LEOFF II- Active Police and Fire 714

Police and Fire Pension- Retired Police and Fire 621

Page 34: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

34 City of Tacoma

Retirement System Funding Sources

TERS and LEOFF II

• Employee Contributions

• City Contribution

• Investment Returns

Police and Fire Pension

• Primarily General Fund

Page 35: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

35 City of Tacoma

2012 GF Contribution by System

Retirement System General Fund Contribution

Employee Contributions

Tacoma Employee Retirement System- Non Uniformed General Fund Employees

$4 Million $3.4 Million

LEOFF II- Active Police and Fire $3.5 Million $5.7 Million

Police and Fire Pension

$10.2 Million

Not Applicable

Total General Fund Contribution $17.7 Million

Page 36: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

36 City of Tacoma

Retirement Cost Trend Factors

LEOFF II and TERS

• Investment Returns

• Headcount

• Employee Wages

Police and Fire Pension

• Health care costs

• Active Employee Wages

Page 37: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

37

Monica Butler June 2012

Retirement Overview

Page 38: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

38

Rating Results

Mary Morrison June 19, 2012

Page 39: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

39 City of Tacoma

Today’s Session

• Budget Policy Review and Budget Goal Setting Session

• Review and discuss the Rating results

• Align results identified from Rating to ensure consensus in City Council policy goals and service delivery priorities for budget development

• Discuss major service areas and potential program, project and process changes

Page 40: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

40 City of Tacoma

Rating Results - Background

• Mayor and City Council

provided with Rating of City

Services for Policy Direction as

part of the 2013-14 Budget

Development Process at the

June 5 Study Session

Page 41: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

41 City of Tacoma

Rating Results

Rating of City Services consisted of two steps

• Step 1 – Create your Budget – Indicate relative importance placed on 8 major

service categories

• Step 2 – Rate City Services – Indicate preferred level of financial resource

allocation for 39 specific existing City services

Page 42: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

42 City of Tacoma

Rating Results Process

• City Council members individually completed Rating of City Services

• All City Council members created budgets that equaled $8.50

• All City Council members rated 39 service questions and 2 questions related to General Fund reserves and Council Contingency

• City Manager’s Office staff compiled individual results for analysis and discussion

Page 43: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

43

Step 1: Create Your Budget Results

Page 44: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

44 City of Tacoma

Step 1: “Create Your Budget”

• Eight major City service/budget categories within the City’s General Fund Budget

• Exercise required budget to be reduced from $10.00 to $8.50 (or 15% reduction)

• Calculated average change in each budget category to determine overall “City Budget”

Page 45: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

45 City of Tacoma

Step 1: Create Your Budget Results MAJOR CITY SERVICE/BUDGET

CATEGORIES -For the General Fund/ General

Fund Subsidized Funds-

A. CURRENT

BUDGET

ALLOCATION

B. AVERAGE

CITY COUNCIL

BUDGET

C. AVERAGE

BUDGET

CHANGE

D. PERCENT

CHANGE

1. Police Protection $3.74

2. Fire Protection 2.75

3. Streets, Sidewalks, and Bike

Lanes 1.20

4. Community and Economic

Development .79

5. Library Services .72

6. Human Rights & Human Services

(HRHS) and Health Contributions .52

7. Parks and Grounds Maintenance .17

8. Code Enforcement and

Community Based Services .11

TOTAL $10.00 $8.50

Page 46: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

46 City of Tacoma

Step 1: Create Your Budget Results MAJOR CITY SERVICE/BUDGET

CATEGORIES -For the General Fund/ General

Fund Subsidized Funds-

A. CURRENT

BUDGET

ALLOCATION

B. AVERAGE

CITY COUNCIL

BUDGET

C. AVERAGE

BUDGET

CHANGE

D. PERCENT

CHANGE

1. Police Protection $3.74 $3.39 ($.35) (9.4%)

2. Fire Protection 2.75 2.41 (.34) (12.4%)

3. Streets, Sidewalks, and Bike

Lanes 1.20 .96 (.24) (19.9%)

4. Community and Economic

Development .79 .58 (.21) (26.0%)

5. Library Services .72 .57 (.15) (20.5%)

6. Human Rights & Human Services

(HRHS) and Health Contributions .52 .41 (.11) (21.8%)

7. Parks and Grounds Maintenance .17 .09 (.08) (44.4%)

8. Code Enforcement and

Community Based Services .11 .09 (.02) (19.2%)

TOTAL $10.00 $8.50 $1.50 15%

Page 47: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

47 City of Tacoma

Step 1: Create Your Budget

$-

$0.50

$1.00

$1.50

$2.00

$2.50

$3.00

$3.50

$4.00

Police Protection

Fire Protection Streets, Sidewalks and

Bike Lanes

Community and Economic

Development

City of Tacoma Budget

Rating Result Average

15% Reduction

Page 48: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

48 City of Tacoma

Step 1: Create Your Budget

$-

$0.10

$0.20

$0.30

$0.40

$0.50

$0.60

$0.70

$0.80

Library Services HRHS Parks & Grounds Maintenance

Code Enforcement/CBS

City of Tacoma Budget

Rating Result Average

15% Reduction

Page 49: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

49 City of Tacoma

Step 1: Create Your Budget Results MAJOR CITY SERVICE/BUDGET

CATEGORIES -For the General Fund/ General

Fund Subsidized Funds-

A. CURRENT

BUDGET

ALLOCATION

B. AVERAGE

CITY COUNCIL

BUDGET

C. MIN D. MAX

1. Police Protection $3.74 $3.39 $3.18 $3.54

2. Fire Protection 2.75 2.41 2.20 2.58

3. Streets, Sidewalks, and Bike

Lanes 1.20 .96 .62 1.20

4. Community and Economic

Development .79 .58 .49 .67

5. Library Services .72 .57 .40 .65

6. Human Rights & Human Services

(HRHS) and Health Contributions .52 .41 .30 .47

7. Parks and Grounds Maintenance .17 .09 .03 .14

8. Code Enforcement and

Community Based Services .11 .09 .06 .11

TOTAL $10.00 $8.50

Page 50: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

50 City of Tacoma

Step 1: Create Your Budget Results MAJOR CITY SERVICE/BUDGET

CATEGORIES -For the General Fund/ General

Fund Subsidized Funds-

A. CURRENT

BUDGET

ALLOCATION

B. AVERAGE

CITY COUNCIL

BUDGET

C. AVERAGE

BUDGET

CHANGE

D. PERCENT

CHANGE

1. Police Protection $3.74 $3.39 ($.35) (9.4%)

2. Fire Protection 2.75 2.41 (.34) (12.4%)

3. Streets, Sidewalks, and Bike

Lanes 1.20 .96 (.24) (19.9%)

4. Community and Economic

Development .79 .58 (.21) (26.0%)

5. Library Services .72 .57 (.15) (20.5%)

6. Human Rights & Human Services

(HRHS) and Health Contributions .52 .41 (.11) (21.8%)

7. Parks and Grounds Maintenance .17 .09 (.08) (44.4%)

8. Code Enforcement and

Community Based Services .11 .09 (.02) (19.2%)

TOTAL $10.00 $8.50 $1.50 15%

Page 51: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

51 City of Tacoma

Step 1: Create Your Budget Results MAJOR CITY SERVICE/BUDGET

CATEGORIES -For the General Fund/ General

Fund Subsidized Funds-

A. CURRENT

BUDGET

ALLOCATION

B. AVERAGE

CITY COUNCIL

BUDGET

C. AVERAGE

BUDGET

CHANGE

D. PERCENT

CHANGE

1. Police Protection $3.74 $3.39 ($.35) (9.4%)

2. Fire Protection 2.75 2.41 (.34) (12.4%)

3. Streets, Sidewalks, and Bike

Lanes 1.20 .96 (.24) (19.9%)

4. Community and Economic

Development .79 .58 (.21) (26.0%)

5. Library Services .72 .57 (.15) (20.5%)

6. Human Rights & Human Services

(HRHS) and Health Contributions .52 .41 (.11) (21.8%)

7. Parks and Grounds Maintenance .17 .09 (.08) (44.4%)

8. Code Enforcement and

Community Based Services .11 .09 (.02) (19.2%)

TOTAL $10.00 $8.50 $1.50 15%

Page 52: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

52 City of Tacoma

Step 1: Create Your Budget Results MAJOR CITY SERVICE/BUDGET

CATEGORIES -For the General Fund/ General

Fund Subsidized Funds-

A. CURRENT

BUDGET

ALLOCATION

B. AVERAGE

CITY COUNCIL

BUDGET

C. AVERAGE

BUDGET

CHANGE

D. PERCENT

CHANGE

1. Police Protection $3.74 $3.39 ($.35) (9.4%)

2. Fire Protection 2.75 2.41 (.34) (12.4%)

3. Streets, Sidewalks, and Bike

Lanes 1.20 .96 (.24) (19.9%)

4. Community and Economic

Development .79 .58 (.21) (26.0%)

5. Library Services .72 .57 (.15) (20.5%)

6. Human Rights & Human Services

(HRHS) and Health Contributions .52 .41 (.11) (21.8%)

7. Parks and Grounds Maintenance .17 .09 (.08) (44.4%)

8. Code Enforcement and

Community Based Services .11 .09 (.02) (19.2%)

TOTAL $10.00 $8.50 $1.50 15%

Page 53: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

53 City of Tacoma

Step 1: Create Your Budget Results MAJOR CITY SERVICE/BUDGET

CATEGORIES -For the General Fund/ General

Fund Subsidized Funds-

A. CURRENT

BUDGET

ALLOCATION

B. AVERAGE

CITY COUNCIL

BUDGET

C. AVERAGE

BUDGET

CHANGE

D. PERCENT

CHANGE

1. Police Protection $3.74 $3.39 ($.35) (9.4%)

2. Fire Protection 2.75 2.41 (.34) (12.4%)

3. Streets, Sidewalks, and Bike

Lanes 1.20 .96 (.24) (19.9%)

4. Community and Economic

Development .79 .58 (.21) (26.0%)

5. Library Services .72 .57 (.15) (20.5%)

6. Human Rights & Human Services

(HRHS) and Health Contributions .52 .41 (.11) (21.8%)

7. Parks and Grounds Maintenance .17 .09 (.08) (44.4%)

8. Code Enforcement and

Community Based Services .11 .09 (.02) (19.2%)

TOTAL $10.00 $8.50 $1.50 15%

Page 54: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

54 City of Tacoma

Step 1: Create Your Budget Results MAJOR CITY SERVICE/BUDGET

CATEGORIES -For the General Fund/ General

Fund Subsidized Funds-

A. CURRENT

BUDGET

ALLOCATION

B. AVERAGE

CITY COUNCIL

BUDGET

C. AVERAGE

BUDGET

CHANGE

D. PERCENT

CHANGE

1. Police Protection $3.74 $3.39 ($.35) (9.4%)

2. Fire Protection 2.75 2.41 (.34) (12.4%)

3. Streets, Sidewalks, and Bike

Lanes 1.20 .96 (.24) (19.9%)

4. Community and Economic

Development .79 .58 (.21) (26.0%)

5. Library Services .72 .57 (.15) (20.5%)

6. Human Rights & Human Services

(HRHS) and Health Contributions .52 .41 (.11) (21.8%)

7. Parks and Grounds Maintenance .17 .09 (.08) (44.4%)

8. Code Enforcement and

Community Based Services .11 .09 (.02) (19.2%)

TOTAL $10.00 $8.50 $1.50 15%

Page 55: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

55 City of Tacoma

Step 1: Create Your Budget Results Less than 15% Reduction Range

Funding level reductions between 5% and 15%

– 9.4% Police Protection

– 12.4% Fire Protection

Page 56: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

56 City of Tacoma

Step 1: Create Your Budget Results: 16%-25% Reduction Range

Funding level reductions ranging from 16%-25%

– 19.2 % Code Enforcement and Community Based Services

– 19.9% Streets, Sidewalks and Bike Lanes

– 20.5% Library Services

– 21.8% Human Rights and Human Services and Health Contributions

Page 57: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

57 City of Tacoma

Step 1: Create Your Budget Results: Greater than 25% Reduction Range

Funding level reductions greater than 25%

– 26% Community and Economic Development

– 44.4% Parks and Grounds Maintenance

Page 58: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

58

Step 2: Rate City Services Results

Page 59: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

59 City of Tacoma

Step 2: Calculating Rating Results

39 services/programs evaluated using a four-point rating scale:

1. Eliminate total program resources

2. Reduce some level of resources to fund higher priority services and programs

3. Maintain current level of funding

4. Increase through additional available funds or budget reallocations

Page 60: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

60 City of Tacoma

Step 2: Rating Results Average Rating

RATING SCALE # of Service Areas

1- Eliminate resources 0

2- Reduce some level of resources 22

3- Maintain current resource level 17

4- Increase level of resources 0

TOTAL 39

Page 61: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

61 City of Tacoma

Increase if Funds are Available

• Based on Rating results, there was no willingness to increase resources for any program or services

Page 62: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

62 City of Tacoma

Eliminate Total Program Resources

• Based on Rating results, there is no willingness to eliminate programs and services

Page 63: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

63 City of Tacoma

Maintain Resource Level

Based on Rating results, there is willingness to maintain current funding levels for 17 programs and services

– Police Protection: Patrol Officers responding to emergency and non-emergency calls for service

– Police Protection: Sector-based Community Policing

– Police Protection: Patrol Officers assigned to gang enforcement and covert operations

– Fire Protection: Fire suppression

– Fire Protection: 9-1-1 call receiving and dispatching

Page 64: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

64 City of Tacoma

Maintain Resource Level

Based on Rating results, there is willingness to maintain current funding levels for 17 programs and services

– Street, Sidewalks, and Bike Lanes: Street maintenance

– Human Rights and Human Services: Homeless services and housing first programs

– Public Library computers and internet access

– CED: Business and neighborhood support

– Nuisance abatement and vehicle removal

– Community Based Services

Page 65: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

65 City of Tacoma

Maintain Resource Level

Included in the maintain resource level are the six programs or services for which 4 was the only possible rating. There was not a willingness to increase resources for the following:

– Library • Access to digital media lab, cultural programs, and jobs and career

center

– CED • International business strategies • Public infrastructure for catalytic economic development • Tourism and hospitality initiatives

– Code Enforcement and Community Based Services • Proactive graffiti abatement • Proactive code enforcement

Page 66: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

66 City of Tacoma

Reduce Resource Levels

• Based on Rating results, there is willingness to reduce resource levels for the following Police Protection areas:

– Patrol Officers to address traffic enforcement

– Commissioned and civilian staff supporting department-wide personnel

Page 67: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

67 City of Tacoma

Reduce Resource Levels

• Based on Rating results, there is willingness to reduce resource levels for the following Fire Protection areas:

– Fire prevention, investigation, code inspection and enforcement

– Specialized response services (hazardous materials, technical rescue and marine)

– Emergency management and disaster planning services

Page 68: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

68 City of Tacoma

Reduce Resource Levels

Based on Rating results, there is willingness to reduce resource levels for the following Streets, Sidewalks and Bike Lanes areas:

– Bike lanes and striping

– New sidewalk and sidewalk repair

Page 69: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

69 City of Tacoma

Reduce Resource Levels

Based on Rating results, there is willingness to reduce resource levels for the following Parks and Grounds Maintenance areas:

– City-owned park landscape and grounds maintenance

– Funding support for Metro Parks park maintenance

– Funding support for Metro Parks adult recreation and enrichment

– Funding support for Metro Parks youth recreation and enrichment

Page 70: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

70 City of Tacoma

Reduce Resource Levels

Based on Rating results, there is willingness to reduce resource levels for the following Human Rights and Human Services and Health Contributions areas:

– Enforcement of employment, public accommodation, crime free housing and fair housing discrimination laws

– Senior services

– Social services and delegate agency funding

– Health education programs

– Programs to protect residents and visitors from infectious diseases, environmental hazards and food borne illness, and clinical services

Page 71: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

71 City of Tacoma

Reduce Resource Levels

Based on Rating results, there is willingness to reduce resource levels for the following Library Services areas:

– Books and materials (such as video, music, digital books and magazines)

– Library facility maintenance

– Days and hours of operation at Main and branch libraries

Page 72: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

72 City of Tacoma

Reduce Resource Levels

Based on Rating results, there is willingness to reduce resource levels for the following Community and Economic Development areas:

– Long-range planning

– Funding for arts and cultural programs

– Education and workforce development agency funding and programs

Page 73: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

73 City of Tacoma

Create Your Budget Results and Council Strategic Priorities

1. Create and implement an economic development strategy

2. Improve the City’s transportation infrastructure and communicate progress

3. Plan for development, including transportation, along the medical mile on Martin Luther King, Jr. Way

4. Establish a results-oriented administration 5. Develop and maintain healthy neighborhoods and

families, including maintaining and expanding CBS 6. Build city-wide support for youth success

Page 74: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

74 City of Tacoma

Create Your Budget Results and Council Strategic Priorities

7. Create a customer services culture of “YES” 8. Strengthen regional cooperation with military,

education and social service partners 9. Support and challenge the library system to meet

the changing needs of the community 10. Continue to implement the Climate Action Plan; and

evaluate recommendations from other task forces 11. Evaluate city services for fit with the City’s mission,

vision and long-term financial sustainability 12. Increase tourism and maximize the use of publicly

owned facilities

Page 75: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

75 City of Tacoma

General Fund Reserves

Based on the Rating results:

– A minimum and maximum range set between 5% and 11% would reflect City Council’s preferences for General Fund Reserves

Page 76: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

76 City of Tacoma

Council Contingency

• Based on the Rating results:

– There was willingness to set the minimum Council Contingency at 0.25% (Approximately $500,000)

– There was willingness to set the maximum Council Contingency at 0.50% (Approximately $1 Million)

Page 77: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

77 City of Tacoma

Today’s Session

• Budget Policy Review and Budget Goal Setting Session

• Review and discuss the Rating results

• Align results identified from Rating to ensure consensus in City Council policy goals and service delivery priorities for budget development

• Discuss major service areas and potential program, project and process changes

Page 78: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

78

Rating Results

Mary Morrison June 19, 2012

Page 79: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

79

Services and Programs

Tacoma Police Department

Chief Donald Ramsdell June 19, 2012

Page 80: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

80 City of Tacoma

Mission Statement

To create a safe and secure environment in which to live, work, and visit by working together with the community, enforcing the law in a fair and impartial manner, preserving the peace and order in our neighborhoods, and safeguarding our Constitutional guarantees.

City of Tacoma

Page 81: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

81 City of Tacoma

TPD Budget History

City of Tacoma

* 2007/08 Actual was $136.4 ** 2009/10 Actual was $146.2

Tacoma Police Department Budget History (all $ in millions)

2007-08 Adopted*

2009-10 Adopted**

2011-12 Adopted

2011-12 Current

TPD Budget $125.0 $145.0 $142.7 $142.9

$ Change from prior biennium

$20.0 ($2.3) $0.2

% Change from prior biennium

16.0% (1.6%) 0.1%

Page 82: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

82 City of Tacoma

Personnel History

City of Tacoma

*FTE reflected above are not cost-distributed and show in home fund, not where funding is from

433 433 446 446 443 443 409

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Pre-Phase1

Reductions

2012 Post-Phase 1

Reductions

Police Department Change in FTEs over time (all funds except Utilities)

Page 83: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

83 City of Tacoma

TPD Program Summary

• Operations – Patrol – Community Policing – Special Teams – Homeland Security – Special Event

• Investigations Bureau – Criminal/Special Investigations – Forensics – Technical Services – Investigative Task Force

City of Tacoma

Page 84: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

84 City of Tacoma

TPD Program Summary

• Police Chief & Administrative – Internal Affairs

– Support Services

– Public Information & Community Relations

• Jail, Dispatch & Contracted – Pierce County Jail & Juvenile Court

– LESA

– Property Room

– Humane Society & Animal Emergency Hospital

City of Tacoma

Page 85: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

85 City of Tacoma

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

19

85

19

86

19

87

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

Cu

rren

t

# of TP

D Em

plo

yees C

rim

e In

dex

Crime Index TPD Sworn

Source: WASPC Historical Crime Data and Crime in Washington Data

City of Tacoma

Page 86: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

86 City of Tacoma

TPD As Primary Unit January 1-May 31

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Cal

ls f

or

Serv

ice

Self-Initiated Non Self Initiated

Source: Computer Aided Dispatch

City of Tacoma

Page 87: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

87 City of Tacoma

Part One Violent Crime

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

2002 2003 2004** 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Homicide, Forcible Rape, Robbery, and Aggravated Assault

** In 2004, LESA began to include male victims in the Rape statistics. This was not done in previous years.

Percent Change: 2002 to 2011:

-31.1%

City of Tacoma

Page 88: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

88 City of Tacoma

Part One Property Crime

0

4,000

8,000

12,000

16,000

20,000

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Burglary, Larceny/Theft, MVTR and Arson

Percent Change:

2002 to 2011:

-33.0%

Source: WASPC Historical Crime Data and Crime in Washington Data

City of Tacoma

Page 89: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

89 City of Tacoma

TPD Performance

Selected Offences Jan – Apr 2011

Jan – Apr 2012

% Change

Violent Crime 505 545 7.9%

Property Crime 3464 3954 14.1%

Quality of Life 3137 3245 3.4%

Selected Offences Total 7106 7744 9.0%

Calls with TPD as Primary Unit Jan – Apr 2011

Jan – Apr 2012

% Change

Non-Self Initiated Calls with TPD as Primary Unit 20166 20912 3.7%

Self Initiated Call with TPD as Primary Unit 18714 15125 -19.2%

Page 90: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

90 City of Tacoma

Current Challenges

Operations- (Patrol, Community Policing, Special Teams, Homeland Security, Special Events ) Reduction in Primary Call Responders

Potential increase in average response time

Increase in overtime due to backfilling shifts

Less opportunity for self initiated field activities

Increased workload

Staffing impacts in Traffic Division

Investigations Bureau- (Criminal/Special Investigations, Forensics, Tech Services, Investigative task Force) Staffing for covert operations and sex crimes

Equipment/Software enhancements to improve investigative efforts

Alignment of Special Investigations with Tacoma Crime Control System

City of Tacoma

Page 91: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

91 City of Tacoma

Current Challenges

Jail, Dispatched & Contracted- (Pierce County Jail & Juvenile Court, LESA, Property Room, Human Society & Animal Emergency Hospital) Increase Booking, confinement and court escort fees

Storage space for evidence

Records Management and IT Support (software/equipment enhancements needed)

Chief & Administrative & Support- (Internal Affairs, PIO, Tech Support Rapid change of Technology

Equipment improvements

Training, accreditation, facilities

City of Tacoma

Page 92: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

92 City of Tacoma

2012 Efficiencies

SECTOR Pilot Program Statewide Electronic Collision & Ticket Online Records)

Tacoma Crime Control System (TCCS) Hot Spot policing, car prowls etc.)

Implementation of Reality Based & Online training programs

Reorganization & reduction of Support Services Division

City of Tacoma

Page 93: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

93 City of Tacoma

2013-2014 Biennium Initiatives for consideration

Technological enhancements for all service areas

Equipment improvements

Cross functional training to increase skill sets

Transition from LESA to South Sound 911

Implementation of Data-Driven Strategies

Assigned gang Unit & School Resource Officers to Community Policing Division

Expand TCCS department-wide

City of Tacoma

Page 94: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

94

Services and Programs

Tacoma Police Department

Chief Donald Ramsdell June 19, 2012

Page 95: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

95

Services and Programs

Tacoma Fire Department

Chief Jim Duggan June 19, 2012

Page 96: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

96 City of Tacoma

Mission Statement

Protecting People, Property and the Environment

City of Tacoma

Page 97: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

97 City of Tacoma

TFD Accreditations

City of Tacoma

Page 98: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

98 City of Tacoma

TFD Budget History

City of Tacoma

Tacoma Fire Department Budget History (all $ in millions)

2007-08 Adopted*

2009-10 Adopted**

2011-12 Adopted

2011-12 Current

TFD Budget $84.4 $96.8 $101.5 $93.8

$ Change from prior biennium

$12.5 $4.6 ($7.7)

% Change from prior biennium

14.8% 4.8% (7.6)%

* 2007/08 Actual was $89.0 ** 2009/10 Actual was $92.2

Page 99: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

99 City of Tacoma

TFD Budget History

City of Tacoma

*FTE reflected above are not cost-distributed and show in home fund, not where funding is from

442.3 442.3 443.3 443.3 446.3 446.3 420.7

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Pre-Phase 1

Reductions

2012 Post- Phase 1

Reductions

Fire Department Change in FTEs over time (all funds except Utilities)

Page 100: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

100 City of Tacoma

Fire Department Programs

Operations- Fire Suppression & EMS

Fire Prevention

Special Operations

Emergency Management

9-1-1 Emergency Communications

City of Tacoma

Page 101: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

101 City of Tacoma

TFD Service Areas

City of Tacoma

Contracted Service Areas

Waterways

Freeways

Automatic Aid

City of Tacoma

Page 102: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

102 City of Tacoma City of Tacoma

TFD Performance

Dispatched Incident (Initial Dispatch Type)

Jan – Apr 2011

Jan – Apr 2012

% Change

Automatic Alarm 748 675 -9.8%

Fire 345 341 -1.2%

Hazardous Condition 63 157 149.2%

Hazmat 1 0 -100.0%

Investigate Only 1,048 1,357 29.5%

No Dispatch 22 15 -31.8%

No Initial Type 14 16 14.3%

Request for EMS 9,842 10,637 8.1%

School Box Alarm Test 24 14 -41.7%

Search and/or Rescue 57 56 -1.8%

Staging/Standby 84 78 -7.1%

Total 12,248 13,346 9.0%

Page 103: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

103 City of Tacoma

TFD Program Summary

Operations

Fire suppression

EMS

Fire Prevention & Life Safety

Inspections & Public Education

Plan review

Permitting & code enforcement

Fire investigations

City of Tacoma

Page 104: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

104 City of Tacoma

TFD Program Summary

Special Operations

Hazardous materials

Marine firefighting & rescue

Technical rescue

Emergency management

911 Emergency Communications Program

Disaster response

City of Tacoma

Page 105: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

105 City of Tacoma

Current Challenges

Staffing levels

Increased use of 911 Communications

Cell phones

Response time goals

Freeway incidents

Staff reliance on grant funding

Fire company level inspections

Training & equipment improvements

City of Tacoma

Page 106: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

106 City of Tacoma

Current Efficiencies

Oxygen SCBA Repair Hose Repair

City of Tacoma

Page 107: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

107 City of Tacoma

Current Efficiencies

Firefighter staffing levels

Peak-hour response vehicle

Damage assessment routes Fire engines, ladder & medic companies

Streamlined Training

Rapid response boat

Hazardous materials equipment enhancement

City of Tacoma

Page 108: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

108 City of Tacoma

Efficiency Consideration

FD Cares Automatic Fire Alarms

Prevention De-centralized

Training

INNOVATION

City of Tacoma

Page 109: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

109 City of Tacoma

2013-2014 Biennium Initiatives for consideration

FD CARES, EMS Prevention Technological improvements Decentralize training Reduce non-emergency responses Public Notification System in Port of Tacoma Next Generation 911 CERT Program & UWT COOP for City departments Recovery exercises

City of Tacoma

Page 110: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

110

Services and Programs

Tacoma Fire Department

Chief Jim Duggan June 19, 2012

Page 111: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

111

Services and Programs

Human Rights & Human Services

Linda Villegas Bremer June 19, 2012

Page 112: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

112 City of Tacoma

HRHS Mission

• The City of Tacoma Human Rights and Human Service Department coordinates public and private resources, facilitating and delivering community-wide solutions. We protect the rights and improve the safety and well being of all residents.

Page 113: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

113 City of Tacoma

HRHS Budget History

HRHS General Fund Budget History (all $ in millions)

2007-08 Adopted*

2009-10 Adopted**

2011-12 Adopted

2011-12 Current

HRHS Budget $11.2 $13.1 $14.7 $13.5

$ Change from prior biennium

$ 1.9 $ 1.6 ($ 1.2)

% Change from prior biennium

16.6% 12.1% (7.9%)

*2007/08 Actual was $10.6 **2009/10 Actual was $12.6

Page 114: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

114 City of Tacoma

Change in HRHS FTE* over Time (All Funds)

28.8 28.8

33.7 33.7

35.4 35.4

30.2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Pre-Phase 1

Reductions

2012 Post-Phase 1

Reductions *FTE reflected above are employees that work in HRHS, though funding may come from other departments or funds

Page 115: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

115 City of Tacoma

HRHS Program/ Service Summary

• HRHS Administration

• Human Rights and Enforcement

• Homeless Housing First Services

• Senior Citizen Services

• Child Care Aware

• Funding to External Agencies

Page 116: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

116 City of Tacoma

2011-12 Program Changes

Efficiencies

• Combined Landlord/Tenant & Crime Free Housing functions

Reductions

• Reduced hours, transportation and special events

• Reduced funding to competitive and non-competitive allocations

Page 117: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

117 City of Tacoma

2013-14 Challenges

Human Rights and Enforcement • Increased demand; regional and national collaboration • New EEOC Guidelines Homeless Housing First • Implementation of Homeless Management Information

System • Increased demand for services Senior Citizen Services • Increasing senior population, both over and under 60 yrs Increased demand for families needing elder care Funding to External Agencies • Increased community need and decreased funding resources

Page 118: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

118 City of Tacoma

Program Changes Under Consideration 2013-14 Biennium

Senior Citizen Services • Potential Partnership with Metro Parks

Tacoma Funding to External Agencies • Implementation of Recommendations

included in Human Services Strategic Plan Update

• Funding Process for Mental Health Sales Tax

Page 119: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

119

Potential Changes to External Agencies Funding Processes

Page 120: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

120 City of Tacoma

Human Services Strategic Plan: Current Status

• Human Services Strategic Plan will be discussed at June 28th PSHSE Committee

• Draft Revisions Include: – Lower maximum City support to 50% of budget (from

65%) – Make allocations to funding categories; prioritization – No future funding guarantee if not successful in

application process – Eliminate Human Services Contingency Fund – Transition non-competitive human services allocations

to competitive

Page 121: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

121 City of Tacoma

HRHS Community Services 14%

CDBG Human Services (Grant) 2%

CDBG and HOME (Grant) 15%

ESG Human Services (Grant) 1%

Curfew 1%

HRHS Non-Competitive GF Council Initiatives

16%

HRHS Domestic Violence 4%

GF Non-Departmental 17%

GF Other Community 29%

Office of Sustainability* 1%

2011-12 Community Funding

*$50,000 is competitive

2011-12 Community Funding: Competitive vs. Non-Competitive

Community Funding: $30,149,963 Competitive; BLUE SHADES- General Fund in Dark Blue, Federal in Light Blue: $10,011,267 (33%) Non-Competitive; TAN SHADES: $20,138,696 (67%)

Page 122: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

122 City of Tacoma

2011-12 Community Funding: Competitive vs. Non-Competitive

Obligated* $4,009,389

20%

Contract $6,685,911

33%

Agreement $9,443,396

47%

*Obligated Allocations

TPCHD, Health Pool

PC Dept of Assigned Council, Indigent Legal Services

Puget Sound Clean Air Agency

Non-Competitive Allocation Types ($20,138,696 )

Page 123: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

123 City of Tacoma

Community and Economic Development

45% $13,395,697

Increase Employability and Self Sufficiency for

Adults* 3%

$1,001,316

Meet Basic Needs* 27%

$8,225,778

Prepare Children and Youth for Success*

16% $4,629,363

Government 9%

$2,897,809 Human Services Clients** Children & Youth: 14,561 Employability/ Self-Sufficiency: 3,206 Basic Needs: 381,225 TOTAL: 398,992 * Yellow denotes Human Services = $13,856,457 **Duplicated annual count

2011-12 Funding Allocation by Category ($30,149,963)

Page 124: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

124

Services and Programs

Human Rights & Human Services

Linda Villegas Bremer June 19, 2012

Page 125: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

125

Services and Programs

Community & Economic Development Department

Martha Anderson June 19, 2012

Page 126: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

126 City of Tacoma

CEDD Mission

• Stimulate Tacoma’s economic activity and strengthen Tacoma’s position as a thriving urban, cultural and economic center

Page 127: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

127 City of Tacoma

CEDD Budget History

CEDD General Fund Budget History (all $ in millions)

2007-08 Adopted*

2009-10 Adopted**

2011-12 Adopted

2011-12 Current

CEDD Budget $11.2 $12.0 $13.2 $12.1

$ Change from prior biennium

$ 0.9 $ 1.2 ($ 1.1)

% Change from prior biennium

7.8% 9.7% (8.3%)

*2007/08 Actual was $11.1 **2009/10 Actual was $10.5

Page 128: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

128 City of Tacoma

Change in CEDD FTE* over Time (All Funds)

39 39 42 42

91.8 91.8 83.9

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011** 2012 Pre-Phase 1

Reductions

2012 Post-Phase 1

Reductions

**The Permit Center was transferred to CEDD during 2010, but reflected in 2011-12 adopted budget

*FTE reflected above are employees that work in CEDD, though funding may come from other departments or funds

Page 129: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

129 City of Tacoma

Service & Program Areas

• CEDD Administration and Arts

• Comprehensive Planning

• Economic Development Services

Page 130: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

130 City of Tacoma

2011-12 Program Changes

Reductions • Reduced administrative staff by 2.6 FTE • Reduced Permit Center Staffing • Reduced Art Maintenance Fund by 75% • Re-allocation of staff to special funds • Reduced Contract Services

Page 131: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

131 City of Tacoma

2013-2014 Challenges

Administration and Arts

• Maintenance obligations for art collection

Comprehensive Planning

• Increased demand services

• Limited flexibility in special funds

Economic Development Services

• Global Economic Uncertainty • Intense commercial office space competition

Page 132: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

132 City of Tacoma

Program Changes Under Consideration 2013-14 Biennium

Administration and Arts

• Conduct diagnostics on Bridge of Glass

• Review funding to external agencies

Comprehensive Planning

• Process and Code Improvements

Economic Development Services

• Market and improve disposition

processes for high-impact, high-value

City-owned property

• Implement Economic Development Strategy

Page 133: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

133

Economic Development Strategy Framework

Page 134: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

134 City of Tacoma

Economic Development Strategy Development: Current Status

• 2011 Community/ Stakeholder Outreach Completed

• Framework will be discussed at June 26th Economic Development Committee

• Draft Framework includes: – 6 Strategies – High-level objective

statements

Page 135: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

135 City of Tacoma

Review of ED Strategy Elements

• Downtown and Business District Vitality: Land and Infrastructure

– Prioritize Infrastructure Improvements Associated with Catalytic Economic Development and Redevelopment Projects

– Identify High Impact/High Value City-Owned Property and Steps to Meet City Objectives

Page 136: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

136 City of Tacoma

Review of ED Strategy Elements, Continued

• Business Services

– Increase Utilization of Small Business Support Services to Build Capacity

– Target Business Expansion, Retention and Attraction

Page 137: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

137 City of Tacoma

Review of ED Strategy Elements, Continued

• Professional and Business Friendly Government: Business Climate Improvements

– Create a Competitive Business Environment

• Waterfront Development

– Target Infrastructure and Other Capital Investments to Enhance Quality and Use of Waterfront Resources

Page 138: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

138 City of Tacoma

Review of ED Strategy Elements, Continued

• Workforce Development

– Strengthen the Quality and Competitiveness of Tacoma’s Workforce

• Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Initiatives

– Position Tacoma as a Destination City

Page 139: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

139

Services and Programs

Community & Economic Development Department

Martha Anderson June 19, 2012

Page 140: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

140

Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

RESULTS

City of Tacoma City Council Goal Setting Session June 19, 2012

Page 141: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

141 City of Tacoma

Next Steps

June 25 • Community Budget Input Meetings

– Overview of the Budget Process • General Fund • Special Funds • Revenues • Expenditures/Services

– In Council Districts beginning June 25

• Citizen Services Questionnaire and Ranking • Available June 25 through August 31

• BudgetInputBox • BIB available June 25 through November 2012

Page 142: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

142 City of Tacoma

Conclusions

• Rating exercise was helpful – Looking forward to community input

• Difficult to achieve balanced budget through cuts only, will require growing the economy and increasing revenue

• Look at decisions in context – For long-term sustainability – For impact on other services, and on other service providers – General Fund is also impacted by other funds in General

Government

• Confirmed Strategic Priorities as consistent with rating results

• Reduced level of funding for Council Contingency

Page 143: Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

143

Rating of City Services for Policy Direction

RESULTS

City of Tacoma City Council Goal Setting Session June 19, 2012