Rating with FidelityNorth Carolina Educator Evaluation System

Welcome and Introductions

Savon WillardPD Consultant

Jan KingPD Lead, Region 8

Dr. Rachel McBroomPD Lead, Region 4

Robert SoxPD ConsultantKim

Simmons,NCEES Consultant

http://ncees.ncdpi.wikispaces.net

Outcomes

• When to assign ratings• Definition of the ratings• When to use “not demonstrated” and “not looked

for”• Discussion of the role of teacher and student

behavior and potential artifacts• Consider scenarios to move toward inter-rater

reliability• Where to find additional resources

This webinar considers the following aspects of the evaluation process:

When are ratings assigned?

STEP 1:Training and Orientation

STEP 2:Self-Assessment, Goal Setting and Pre-Conference

STEP 3:Observation Cycle(Administrative and

Peer)

STEP 4: Summary

Evaluation and Goal Setting

STEP 1:Training and Orientation

STEP 2:Self-Assessment, Goal Setting and Pre-Conference

STEP 3:Observation Cycle(Administrative and

Peer)

STEP 4: Summary

Evaluation and Goal Setting

**Reminder**Summary Ratings Forms, along with all

other parts of the process, must be entered into the online tool on or before

June 30, 2012as the form will lock down at that time and

no additions or edits can be made.

Defining the Ratings

Image Credits: http://ellie-sparks.livejournal.com/3021.html; http://www.shoveitinyourface.com/2011/02/chocolate-and-golden-vanilla-triple.htm;lhttp://find-how.com/Cake-recipe.html

When to Use “Not Demonstrated”

vs.“Not Looked For”

• Teacher did not demonstrate basic competence on or adequate growth toward achieving standard(s) of performance.

Not Demonstrated

Not Looked For

Image from Microsoft Gallery

AnalyzingTeacher and Student

Behavior and Potential Artifacts

Behaviors

21st Century Skills

Artifacts

Image from MicroSoft Online Image Gallery

Using Scenariosto Move Toward

Inter-Rater Reliability

Agenda for Scenarios:• Read through the scenario

• Google Form– rate without rubric

• Read through again, using the rubric

• Google Form– rate with rubric

• Google Form for discussion

http://ncees.ncdpi.wikispaces.net

Standard I – without rubric

Standard I – with rubric

Standard I Rating Rationale

Standard V – without rubric

Standard V – with rubric

Standard V Rating Rationale

Additional Resourcesfor Educator Evaluation

NCEES Resources• NCEES wiki - http://ncees.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/

• NCDPI/Educator Recruitment & Development website – http://www.ncpublicschools.org/profdev/training/

• Upcoming webinars

• Online Modules at https://center.ncsu.edu/nc - N.C. Professional Teaching Standards - School Executive Standards (coming later this spring)

Regional PD Leads http://www.ncpublicschools.org/profdev/directory/

Image from Microsoft Gallery

Please providewebinar feedback:

http://bit.ly/FISURVEY   

Thank you forjoining the webinar!

Digital tools used during the course of this meeting have been helpful to some educators across the state.  However, due to the rapidly changing digital environment, NCDPI does not represent nor endorse that these tools are the exclusive digital tools for the purposes outlined during the meeting.