rbk lect 4 elect props of metals

Upload: r-balakrishnan

Post on 04-Apr-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    1/61

    DRUDES MODEL THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY

    WIEDMANN-FRANZ LAW

    1

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    2/61

    Resistivity of materials

    10 18 10 16 10 14 10 12 10 10 10 8 10 6 10 4 10 2 10 0 10 -2 10 -4 10 -6

    1 ohm - cm

    Insulators

    Organic insulators

    Quartz Ceramics

    Mica Glass

    Semi conductors Metals

    Bi

    Fe

    Ag

    Cu2O

    TiO2

    Pbs

    SeSi

    Ge

    2

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    3/61

    Mean free path - The average distance that electrons can

    move without being scattered by other atoms.Temperature Effect - When the temperature of a metalincreases, thermal energy causes the atoms to vibrateEffect of Atomic Level Defects - Imperfections in crystal

    structures scatter electrons, reducing the mobility andconductivity of the metalMatthiessens rule - The resistivity of a metallic material isgiven by the addition of a base resistivity that accounts for

    the effect of temperature ( T ), and a temperatureindependent term that reflects the effect of atomic leveldefects, including impurities forming solid solutions ( d ).Effect of Processing and Strengthening

    Conductivity of Metals and Alloys

    3

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    4/61

    The total scattering rate for a slightly imperfect crystal at finitetemperature;

    So the total resistivity ,

    This is known as Mattheisens rule and illustrated in followingfigure for sodium specimen of different purity.

    0

    1 1 1

    ( ) ph T

    Due to phonon Due to imperfections

    02 2 20

    ( )( )

    e e e I

    ph

    m m mT

    ne ne T ne

    Ideal resistivity Residual resistivity

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    5/61

    5

    Electrical resistivity with composition (impurity additions) for various copper alloys.

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    6/61

    Current: (Amps)dqdt

    i

    q t id

    i R

    V

    R L A

    Macroscopic Microscopic2Current Density: (A/m )

    d dA

    J i

    d i A J

    where resistivityconductivity

    E E J

    where carrier densitydrift velocityd

    d nv

    n e J v

    2where scattering timem

    ne

    Classical Theory of Conduction Review

    Drift velocity v d is net motion of electrons (0.1 to 10 -7 m/s).

    Scattering time is time between electron-lattice collisions. 6

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    7/61

    Drudes classical theory (1900)

    Drude developed this theory of conductivity of metalsby considering metals as a classical gas of electrons,governed by Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics

    Electrons wandered through a sea of immobile positivecharges

    Drude introduced conduction electron density n=N/V,V=volume of metal, N = Avogadros No.

    Applied kinetic theory of gas to conduction electronseven though the electron densities are ~1000 timesgreater

    Electron gas is free and independent, meaning noelectron-electron or electron-ion interactions occur

    If Electric field is applied, electron moves in straightline between collisions (no electron-electron collisions).Collision time constant. Velocity changesinstantaneously.

    7

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    8/61

    Drude theory: electrical conductivity

    Drudes theory gives a reasonable picture for thephenomenon of resistance. Drudes theory gives qualitatively Ohms law (linear

    relation between electric field and current density).

    It also gives reasonable quantitative values, at least atroom temperature. Drudes theory gives an explanation of why metals do

    not transmit light and rather reflect it.

    8

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    9/61

    Drudes classical theory (1900)

    Drude treated the (free) electrons as a

    classical ideal gas but the electronsshould collide with the stationary ions,not with each other.

    9

    average rms speed

    so at room temp.

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    10/61

    Drude theory: electrical conductivity

    10

    we apply an electric field. The equation of motion is

    integration gives

    and if is the average time between collisions then the

    average drift speed is

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    11/61

    Drude theory: electrical conductivity

    11

    we get

    number of electrons passing in unit time

    and with

    current density

    current of negatively charged electrons

    Ohms law

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    12/61

    Drude theory: electrical conductivity

    12

    Ohms law

    and theresistivity

    and we can define the conductivity

    and the mobility

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    13/61

    vm

    lne

    v

    l

    2

    mkT

    v 2

    4

    In the Drude model, the conductivity should beproportional to T -1/2 . But for most conductors theconductivity is nearly proportional to T -1except at very lowtemperatures, where it no longer follows a simplerelation.

    Drude theory: electrical conductivity

    13

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    14/61

    2

    1( )

    E

    d

    F ma E me e J ne v ne a nne

    Metal: Resistance increases with Temperature.

    Why? Temp t, n same (same # conductionelectrons) r

    Semiconductor: Resistance decreases withTemperature.

    Why? Temp t, n (free -up carriers to conduct) r

    Temperature dependence of resistivity.

    14

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    15/61

    Failure of Drude s theory: According to Drudes model :

    1. Conductivity is proportional to the number density of

    valence electrons (n)and to the mobility( ); mobility variesinversely with the mean free path which is taken to beindependent of the size of the ions. However, it is foundthat mobility does not vary substantially among different

    metals.2. It could not explain the observation of positive Hallcoefficients in many metals

    3. As more became known about metals at lowtemperatures, it was obvious that the conductivityincreased sharply, This could not be explained by simpleelectron-ion scattering.

    4. This theory fails to explain ferromagnetism,superconductivity, photoelectric effect, Compton effect and

    blackbody radiation. 15

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    16/61

    Failure of Drude s theory contd..:

    6.It is a macroscopic theory.7.Dual nature is not explained.8.Atomic fine spectra could not be accounted.

    16

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    17/61

    Failures of the Drude model: heat capacity

    Experimentally, one finds a value of about at roomtemperature, independent of the number of valenceelectrons (rule of Dulong and Petit), as if the electrons do

    not contribute at all.17

    consider the classical energy for one mole of solid in a heatbath: each degree of freedom contributes with

    energy heat capacity

    monovalent

    divalent

    trivalent

    el. transl. ions vib.

    17

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    18/61

    18

    Failures of the Drude model: electrical conductivity of analloy

    The resistivity of an alloy should be between those of itscomponents, or at least similar to them.

    It can be much higher than that of either component.

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    19/61

    19

    Conduction electron Density n

    calculate as

    #valenceelectronsper atom

    density atomicmass

    #atomspervolume

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    20/61

    20

    Electrical conductivity of materials

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    21/61

    Thermal conductivity, K

    metals non metalsK K

    13 V F

    K C v l V C

    Due to the heat tranport by the conduction electrons

    Electrons coming from a hotter region of the metalcarry more thermal energy than those from a cooler region,resulting in a net flow of heat. The thermal conductivity

    where is the specific heat per unitvolume

    21

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    22/61

    Wiedemann-Franz law

    Wiedemann and Franz found in 1853 that the ratio of thermal and electrical conductivity for ALL METALSis constant at a given temperature (for roomtemperature and above).

    Later it was found by L. Lorenz that this constant is

    proportional to the temperature.

    22

    constant

    22

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    23/61

    Wiedemann-Franz law

    2

    e

    nem

    2 2

    3 B

    e

    nk T K m

    228 22.45 10

    3K k

    x W K T e

    B

    8 22.23 10K

    L x W K T

    The ratio of the electrical and thermal conductivities is

    independent of the electron gas parameters;

    Lorentznumber

    For copper at 0 C

    23

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    24/61

    Comparison of the Lorenz number to experimental data

    24

    L = 2.45 10 -8 Watt K -2

    at 273 K

    metal 10-8 Watt K -

    2

    Ag 2.31 Au 2.35

    Cd 2.42Cu 2.23Mo 2.61Pb 2.47Pt 2.51Sn 2.52W 3.04Zn 2.31

    f h d l

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    25/61

    Assumptions of the FREE ELECTRON Model1. Metals have high electrical conductivity and no apparent activationenergy, so at least some of their electrons are free and not bound toatoms

    4. :Therefore model the behavior of the freeelectrons with U = 0 inside the volume of themetal and a finite potential step at the

    surface. Assume each atom has n 0 freeelectrons, where n 0 = chemical valence. Assume that resistance comes fromelectrons interacting with lattice throughoccasional collisions

    2. Coulomb potential energy of positive ions U 1/r is screened bybound electrons and is weaker at large distances from nucleus

    3. Electrons would have lowest U (highest K) near nuclei, so they spendless time near nuclei and more time far from nuclei where U is notchanging rapidly

    25

    F i E d D i f S

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    26/61

    Fermi Energy and Density of States

    Solutions have

    1. Wave functions:

    2. Energies:

    Time-independentSchrdinger Equation:

    E U m

    22

    2

    With U = 0: E m

    2

    2

    2 22 2mE 22 k

    )( t r k i Ae Traveling waves (plane waves)

    mk

    E 2

    22

    Parabolic energy bands

    E

    kx26

    0

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    27/61

    Electron Density per unit Energy

    The density of states dN/dE is often written g(E) The number of electrons per unit energy, N(E) also

    depends upon the probability that a given state isoccupied, F(E). It is,

    N(E) = g(E)F(E)

    27

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    28/61

    We know that the number of allowed k values inside aspherical shell of k-space of radius k of

    2

    2( ) ,2

    Vk g k dk dk

    where g(k) is the density of statesper unit magnitude of k.

    28

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    29/61

    The number of allowed statesper unit energy range?

    Each k state represents two possible electron states, one forspin up, the other is spin down.

    ( ) 2 ( )g E dE g k dk ( ) 2 ( )

    dk g E g k

    dE 2 2

    2k

    E m

    2dE k dk m

    2

    2 mE k

    ( )g E 2 ( )g k dk

    dE

    3/ 2 1/ 22 3 (2 )2

    ( )V

    m E g E

    29

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    30/61

    Ground state of the free electron gas

    Electrons are fermions (s= 1/2) and obey Pauliexclusion principle; each state can accommodateonly one electron.

    The lowest-energy state of N free electrons istherefore obtained by filling the N states of lowest energy.

    30

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    31/61

    Thus all states are filled up to an energy E F, known as Fermienergy , obtained by integrating density of states between 0 andEF, should equal N. Hence

    Remember

    Solve for E F (Fermi energy);

    2/ 32 232F

    N E

    m V

    3/ 2 1/ 22 3 (2 )2

    ( )V

    m E g E

    3/ 2 1/ 2 3/ 22 3 2 3

    0 0

    ( ) (2 ) (2 )2 3

    F F E E

    F

    V V N g E dE m E dE mE

    31

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    32/61

    The occupied states are inside the Fermi sphere in k-space shown below;

    radius is Fermi wave number k F.

    2 2

    2F

    F e

    k E m

    kz

    ky

    kx

    Fermi surfaceE=EF

    kF

    2 / 32 23

    2F

    N E

    m V

    From these two equation k Fcan be found as ,

    1/ 323

    F N k

    V

    The surface of the Fermi sphere represent the boundary betweenoccupied and unoccupied k states at absolute zero for the freeelectron gas. 32

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    33/61

    Typical values may be obtained by using monovalent potassiummetal as an example; for potassium the atomic density andhence the valance electron density N/V is 1.402x10 28 m -3 sothat

    Fermi (degeneracy) Temperature T F by

    193.40 10 2.12F E J eV 10.746F k A

    F B F E k T

    42.46 10F F B

    E T K

    k

    33

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    34/61

    It is only at a temperature of this order that the particles in aclassical gas can attain (gain) kinetic energies as high as E F .

    Only at temperatures above T F will the free electron gasbehave like a classical gas.

    Fermi momentum

    These are the momentum and the velocity values of the

    electrons at the states on the Fermi surface of the Fermisphere.

    So, Fermi Sphere plays important role on the behaviour of metals.

    F F P k

    F e F P m V

    6 10.86 10F F e

    PV ms

    m

    34

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    35/61

    The Fermi Parameters

    35

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    36/61

    2/ 32 2

    3 2.122F

    N E eV m V

    1/ 3213 0.746F

    N k A

    V

    6 10.86 10F F e

    PV ms

    m

    42.46 10F F B

    E T K

    k

    Typical values of monovalent potassium metal;

    36

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    37/61

    The free electron gas at finite temperature

    At a temperature T the probability of occupation of anelectron state of energy E is given by the Fermi distributionfunction

    Fermi distribution function determines the probability of

    finding an electron at the energy E.

    ( ) /

    11 F BFD E E k T f e

    37

    Reality of the Fermi Energy

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    38/61

    Reality of the Fermi Energy

    The valence bandwidth is in reasonableagreement with the FEG prediction of E F = 11.7

    eV

    There are several spectroscopic techniques that allow the measurementof the distribution of valence electron states in a metal. The simplest issoft x-ray spectroscopy, in which the highest-lying core level in a sample

    is ionized. Only higher-lying valence electrons can fall down to occupythe core level, and the spectrum of emitted x-rays can be measured:

    EF 13 eV

    38

    Utility of the Density of States

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    39/61

    Utility of the Density of States

    We can simplify by using the relation:

    With N(E) we can immediatelycalculate the average energy per

    electron in the 3-D FEG system:

    Why the factor 3/5? A look at thedensity of states curve should give theanswer:

    F

    F

    E

    E

    dE E N

    dE E E N

    electrons

    energytotal E

    0

    0

    )(

    )(

    #

    2 / 1)( CE E N

    F E

    E

    E

    E

    E

    E

    E

    dE E C

    dE E C

    E F

    F

    F

    F

    53

    32

    52

    0

    2 / 3

    0

    2 / 5

    0

    2 / 1

    0

    2 / 3

    N(E)

    E

    EF39

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    40/61

    3D Cubic Infinite Potential Well

    1-D Well

    3-D Cubic Well (with sides length L)

    22

    22

    2/1

    2

    sin2)(

    nmL

    E

    nLxLx

    n

    n

    20232221222

    321

    2 / 3

    2

    sinsinsin2

    )(

    321

    321

    n E nnnmL

    E

    n L z

    n L y

    n L x

    L x

    nnn

    nnn

    40

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    41/61

    3D Infinite Potential Well : Degeneracy

    Consider three differentwave functions(quantum states) for aparticle in the 3-D Well:

    i, j, and k are integers

    Although the states aredifferent, the energy ofthese states are the same,i.e. these are degenerate

    iL

    z jL

    yk

    L

    x

    Lx

    kLzi

    L y

    jLx

    Lx

    kL

    z jL

    yi

    L

    x

    Lx

    kji

    jik

    ijk

    sinsinsin2

    )(

    sinsinsin2

    )(

    sinsinsin2

    )(

    2/3

    2/3

    2/3

    2

    22

    0

    2220

    2220

    2220

    2

    mLE

    i jkE

    ki jE

    k jiEE

    41

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    42/61

    Electrons in 3D Infinite Potential Well

    Each electron is described by the wavefunction of a

    particle in the infinite well, i.e. the electron state isdefined by three quantum number n1 , n2 , n3; however, in addition, we have to include the spinquantum number , ms

    The electron states are thus determined by four quantumnumbers: n1 , n2 , n3 , ms The energy, of course, still depends only on n1 , n2 , n3!

    It is convenient to use the following notations:

    for ms = , we shall call it the spin up ( ) for ms = - , we shall call it the spin down ( )

    Example: ),,,()21,,,( 321321 nnnmnnn s42

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    43/61

    Electrons in 3D Infinite Potential Well:Paulis Principle

    What is the ground state configuration ofmany electrons in the 3D infinite potentialwell?

    Electrons cannot be in the lowest energystate, since this would violate the PauliExclusion Principle. consider case of solid with 34 electrons

    43

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    44/61

    34 Electrons in 3D Infinite Well

    (n1, n1, n1) The lowest energy for this system is 3 E0 , which corresponds

    to n1 = n2 = n3 = 1 Thus only 2 (two) electrons can have this energy: one with

    spin and one with spin

    Next energy level (6 E0), for which one of ns is 2 (112) Thus total of 6 (six) electrons can have this energy

    Next energy level (9 E0) (122) can also accommodate6 electrons

    What are the combinations of n s for this energy level?

    44

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    45/61

    Electrons in 3D Infinite Well

    Can demonstrate with

    diagram Energy is plotted in terms

    of E0

    Each arrow represents anelectron with up ordown spin

    Numbers in parenthesisshow the set of ns for agiven energy level

    0

    1

    2

    3

    45

    6

    7

    8

    9

    1011

    12

    13

    14

    15

    1617

    18

    (3,2,2)

    (3,2,1)

    (3,1,1)

    (2,2,2)

    (2,2,1)

    (2,1,1)

    (1,1,1)

    E n e r g y

    ( i n u n i

    t s o

    f E

    0 )

    222

    0

    2

    3

    2

    2

    2

    10 2 ,

    321 mLEwithnnnEE

    nnn

    45

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    46/61

    Electrons in 3D Infinite Well

    In this configuration, What is the probability at

    T =0 that a level withenergy 14 E0 or less will beoccupied?

    It is 1! What is the probability

    that the level with energyabove 14 E

    0will be

    occupied? It is 0!

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    (3,2,2)

    (3,2,1)

    (3,1,1)

    (2,2,2)

    (2,2,1)

    (2,1,1)

    (1,1,1)

    E n e r g y

    ( i n u n

    i t s o

    f E

    0 )

    46

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    47/61

    Fermi Energy

    Generally: The highest filled energy iscalled the Fermi Energy

    It is often denoted as E F In our case: EF = 14E0 An electron with E = 14E0 is

    said to be at the Fermi level

    0

    1

    2

    34

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    (3,2,2)

    (3,2,1)

    (3,1,1)

    (2,2,2)

    (2,2,1)

    (2,1,1)

    (1,1,1)

    E n e r g y

    ( i n u n

    i t s o

    f E

    0 )

    47

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    48/61

    Velocity Distribution

    Find the velocity distribution the probability perunit velocity of finding a state with velocity v

    222 / 3

    22 / 3

    2 / 1

    2 / 12

    2 / 1

    2 / 12

    2)(

    )(2))(2()(

    ,22

    1E

    andforsexpressionneedSo

    )(,21

    vvm

    C vg

    dvvgdvv

    m

    C mvdvv

    m

    C dE CE dE E g

    mvdvdE vm

    E mv

    dE E

    dE CE dE E gmv E

    48

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    49/61

    The free electron gas at finite temperature

    At a temperature T the probability of occupation of an electron state of energy E is given by the Fermidistribution function

    Fermi distribution function determines the probability

    of finding an electron at the energy E.

    ( ) / 11 F BFD E E k T f

    e

    49

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    50/61

    Fermi-Dirac Distribution Function

    We introduce the probability distribution function, F (E ),

    which describes the probability that a state with energyE

    isoccupied For electrons this function is the

    F

    F

    EEEE

    E f for ,1 for ,0

    )(

    50

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    51/61

    Fermi-Dirac Distribution Function

    At T > 0 K

    11

    )( /)( T kEE BFeE f

    51

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    52/61

    EF EEF

    0.5

    f FD(E,T)

    E

    ( ) /

    11 F BFD E E k T

    f e

    Fermi Function at T=0and at a finite temperature

    f FD=? At 0K

    i. EEF

    ( ) / 1 11 F BFD E E k T f

    e

    ( ) / 1 0

    1 F BFD E E k T f

    e

    52

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    53/61

    T>0

    T=0

    n(E,T)

    E

    g(E)

    EF

    n(E,T) number of freeelectrons per unit energyrange is just the areaunder n(E,T) graph.

    ( , ) ( ) ( , )FDn E T g E f E T

    Number of electrons per unit energy range according to thefree electron model?

    The shaded area shows the change in distribution betweenabsolute zero and a finite temperature.

    53

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    54/61

    Fermi-Dirac distribution function is a symmetricfunction; at finite temperatures, the same

    number of levels below E F is emptied and samenumber of levels above E F are filled by electrons.

    T>0

    T=0

    n(E,T)

    E

    g(E)

    EF

    54

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    55/61

    Fermi-Dirac distribution function at varioustemperatures

    Incg temp

    55

    F El t M d l

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    56/61

    Free Electron Models Classical Model:

    Metal is an array of positiveions with electrons that arefree to roam through theionic array Electrons are treated as an ideal

    neutral gas, and their totalenergy depends on thetemperature and applied field

    In the absence of an electricalfield, electrons move withrandomly distributed thermalvelocities

    When an electric field isapplied, electrons acquire a netdrift velocity in the directionopposite to the field

    Quantum MechanicalModel:

    Electrons are in a potentialwell with infinite barriers:They do not leave metal, but free to roam inside

    Electron energy levels arediscrete (quantized) andwell defined, so averageenergy of electron is notequal to (3/2) kBT

    Electrons occupy energylevels according to Paulisexclusion principle

    Electrons acquire additionalenergy when electric field isapplied

    56

    f l h

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    57/61

    Consequences for Metal Theories

    At T = 0 K

    N is the electron density, i.e. the number of electrons perunit volume of metal

    Calculations show that

    Thermal energy at room temperature:

    k BT ~ 0.025 eV k BT

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    58/61

    Consequences for Metal Theories

    Only electrons occupying levels close to the FermiEnergy will participate in the conduction, sinceonly these electrons can be excited into the higherenergy states by the electric field

    From QM point of view, energy supplied by theelectric field excites electrons into higher lyingenergy levels

    58

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    59/61

    Heat capacity of the free electron gas

    From the diagram of n(E,T) the change in the distribution of electrons can be resembled into triangles of height 1/2g(E F)and a base of 2k BT so 1/2g(E F)kBT electrons increased theirenergy by k BT.

    T>0

    T=0

    n(E,T)

    E

    g(E)

    EF

    The difference in thermal energyfrom the value at T=0K

    21( ) (0) ( )( )2 F B

    E T E g E k T

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    60/61

    Differentiating with respect to T gives the heat capacity atconstant volume,

    2( )v F B E C g E k T T

    2( )

    33 3

    ( )2 2

    F F

    F F B F

    N E g E

    N N g E

    E k T

    2 23( )2v F B B B F

    N C g E k T k T k T

    32v B F

    T C Nk T

    Heat capacity of Free electron gas

  • 7/31/2019 Rbk Lect 4 Elect Props of Metals

    61/61

    Total heat capacity at low temperatures

    where and are constants and they can be found

    drawing C v/T as a function of T 2

    3

    C T T

    ElectronicHeat capacity

    Lattice HeatCapacity