rbs - summary/media/files/r/rbs-ir/credit... · 2016-05-09 · rbs currently employs around 6,000...

8
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ISSUER COMMENT 29 April 2016 RATINGS The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc LT senior unsecured Ba1 Subordinate Ba2 Junior subordinate Ba3 (hyb) Additional Tier 1 B1 (hyb) Short term Non-prime Outlook Positive Source: Moody's Investors Service. Contacts Daniel Forssen 44-20-7772-1553 Associate Analyst [email protected] Andrea Usai 4420-7772-1058 Senior Vice President [email protected] Laurie Mayers 44-20-7772-5582 Associate Managing Director [email protected] Robert Young 212-553-4122 MD-Financial Institutions [email protected] Alessandro Roccati 44-20-7772-1603 Senior Vice President [email protected] THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND GROUP PLC Q1 2016 Results: Lower Litigation and Conduct Charges Offset Weaker Revenues And Higher Credit Costs SUMMARY All figures in this report relate to Q1 2016 and comparisons are made to Q1 2015, unless otherwise indicated. » In Q1 2016, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (RBS, LT senior unsecured Ba1 Positive) reported a net loss of £968 million from a loss of £459 million a year earlier. The loss reduces to £31 million when excluding the £1.2 billion payment to retire the Dividend Access Share (DAS) and the effect of fair value movements on own debt. A widened loss in non-core operations and lower revenues were offset by lower litigation and restructuring charges. These quarterly financials are in line with our expectations and have no rating implications. As we have highlighted in recent research, we reflect RBS’s material progress towards restructuring in the positive ratings outlook. However, we expect the group’s profitability to remain depressed in the coming quarters as restructuring and additional conduct and litigation costs are incurred. 1 » Results by business line were mixed. Operating profit in the UK Personal & Business Banking (UK PBB) was 2.5x higher increasing to £509 million, owing to lower litigation and conduct costs, offsetting a 2% drop in revenues. Commercial Banking (CB) revenues rose 8% on the back of higher asset volumes and internal business transfers, resulting in an operating profit of £401 million, up 7%. The ongoing significant downsizing of the Corporate & Institutional Banking (CIB) division, which if completed as planned will be credit positive for bondholders, led to a sizeable 36% yearly drop in total revenues. The quarterly loss for CIB narrowed to £20 million from £279 million, owing to lower litigation and restructuring costs. » RBS has made further progress towards its restructuring in Q1. RBS further reduced its Capital Resolution legacy asset portfolios by 6% to £50.2 billion (funded assets) in the quarter. The additional disposals of low-quality assets and the overall reduction in exposure to certain cyclical sectors such as oil and gas (residual exposure £5.2 billion), mining and metals (£1.5 billion) and shipping (£7.1 billion) in the quarter, further reduced the group’s overall asset risk. The non-performing loan ratio declined to 3.6% at end-March 2016 from 3.9% at end-2015. 2 However, management announced a heightened risk of missing the end-2017 deadline for the separation of Williams and Glyn (W&G, unrated), which could lead to financial fines and/or other punitive actions for RBS, higher costs and could underscore the complexity of the overall restructuring.

Upload: others

Post on 16-Mar-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: RBS - SUMMARY/media/Files/R/RBS-IR/credit... · 2016-05-09 · RBS currently employs around 6,000 full time staff on the W&G project, with an estimated annual cost of around £630

FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

ISSUER COMMENT29 April 2016

RATINGS

The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plcLT senior unsecured Ba1

Subordinate Ba2

Junior subordinate Ba3 (hyb)

Additional Tier 1 B1 (hyb)

Short term Non-prime

Outlook Positive

Source: Moody's Investors Service.

Contacts

Daniel Forssen 44-20-7772-1553Associate [email protected]

Andrea Usai 4420-7772-1058Senior Vice [email protected]

Laurie Mayers 44-20-7772-5582Associate [email protected]

Robert Young [email protected]

Alessandro Roccati 44-20-7772-1603Senior Vice [email protected]

THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND GROUPPLCQ1 2016 Results: Lower Litigation and Conduct ChargesOffset Weaker Revenues And Higher Credit Costs

SUMMARYAll figures in this report relate to Q1 2016 and comparisons are made to Q1 2015, unlessotherwise indicated.

» In Q1 2016, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (RBS, LT senior unsecuredBa1 Positive) reported a net loss of £968 million from a loss of £459 million ayear earlier. The loss reduces to £31 million when excluding the £1.2 billion paymentto retire the Dividend Access Share (DAS) and the effect of fair value movements onown debt. A widened loss in non-core operations and lower revenues were offset bylower litigation and restructuring charges. These quarterly financials are in line with ourexpectations and have no rating implications. As we have highlighted in recent research,we reflect RBS’s material progress towards restructuring in the positive ratings outlook.However, we expect the group’s profitability to remain depressed in the coming quartersas restructuring and additional conduct and litigation costs are incurred.1

» Results by business line were mixed. Operating profit in the UK Personal & BusinessBanking (UK PBB) was 2.5x higher increasing to £509 million, owing to lower litigationand conduct costs, offsetting a 2% drop in revenues. Commercial Banking (CB) revenuesrose 8% on the back of higher asset volumes and internal business transfers, resultingin an operating profit of £401 million, up 7%. The ongoing significant downsizing ofthe Corporate & Institutional Banking (CIB) division, which if completed as planned willbe credit positive for bondholders, led to a sizeable 36% yearly drop in total revenues.The quarterly loss for CIB narrowed to £20 million from £279 million, owing to lowerlitigation and restructuring costs.

» RBS has made further progress towards its restructuring in Q1. RBS furtherreduced its Capital Resolution legacy asset portfolios by 6% to £50.2 billion (fundedassets) in the quarter. The additional disposals of low-quality assets and the overallreduction in exposure to certain cyclical sectors such as oil and gas (residual exposure£5.2 billion), mining and metals (£1.5 billion) and shipping (£7.1 billion) in the quarter,further reduced the group’s overall asset risk. The non-performing loan ratio declined to3.6% at end-March 2016 from 3.9% at end-2015.2 However, management announceda heightened risk of missing the end-2017 deadline for the separation of Williams andGlyn (W&G, unrated), which could lead to financial fines and/or other punitive actionsfor RBS, higher costs and could underscore the complexity of the overall restructuring.

Page 2: RBS - SUMMARY/media/Files/R/RBS-IR/credit... · 2016-05-09 · RBS currently employs around 6,000 full time staff on the W&G project, with an estimated annual cost of around £630

MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page onwww.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history.

2 29 April 2016 THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND GROUP PLC: Q1 2016 Results: Lower Litigation and Conduct Charges Offset Weaker Revenues And Higher CreditCosts

» Regulatory capitalisation was down in the quarter but remains good versus that of peers. The retirement of the DASand the recent payment to reduce the pension deficit, prompted a 90 basis point decrease in the fully-loaded Basel III CommonEquity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio in the quarter, to 14.6%. Whilst the current capital ratio is higher than RBS’s target of more than 13% forend-2016, we expect it to decline as a result of future charges from pending high-profile litigations.

In Q1, RBS accounted for £238 million in restructuring costs, £31 million in additional litigation provisions, bringing the total litigationand conduct reserves to £6.1 billion. Following the £500 million charge in the previous quarter, RBS made no further provisions forPayment Protection Insurance (PPI) in Q1. RBS estimates that the current PPI reserve stock (£911 million at end-March 2016) is sufficientto cover future claims. However, we continue to believe that conduct charges, the pattern of which is unpredictable, could materialiseagain in the coming quarters. We also expect further large top-ups of litigation reserves, as RBS approaches the settlement of high-profile pending litigations.

RBS’s quarterly (reported) divisional performance was mixed in Q1, as shown in Exhibit 1.

Exhibit 1

Results By Business Line Was Mixed in Q1RBS: Quarterly operating profits by business line

Source: RBS’s Q1 2016 Results and Excel data supplement. Results for Private Banking are included in ‘Other’.

Results by main divisions were as follows:

The UK Personal & Business Banking (UK PBB) division, one of the group’s key credit strengths, reported an operating profit of £509million relative to a profit of £201 million. The absence of litigation and conduct charges drove this increase, which more than offset a2% decline in total income and a 3% rise in underlying operating expenses. The gross loan portfolio was up around 1.5% in the quarterto £123.4 billion, mainly as a result of higher mortgage lending.

Ulster Bank (Ulster Bank Ireland Limited, LT deposits Baa3 stable, BCA b2) generated an operating profit of £78 million – from a profitof £83 million a year earlier – due to lower loan impairment releases and a 7% rise in operating expenses which were only partly offsetby a non-recurring gain (EUR28 million) on asset disposals. The business still exhibited a relatively high cost-to-income ratio (70% inQ1 – including part of the one-off gain), partly as a result of the low-yielding tracker mortgage book (EUR11.6 billion), which remainsa drag on its overall performance.

RBS’s Commercial Banking (CB) division, another key business for RBS, which has a strong market share in the UK, reported an operatingprofit of £401 million, up 7% on the year. Total income was up 8% to £853 million, reflecting higher asset volumes as well as the impactof business transfers. CB's gross loan book increased by £5.5 billion during the quarter to £97.5 billion. We note that growth in the CBbook was 4.3%, much higher than the market at 2.4%.

Page 3: RBS - SUMMARY/media/Files/R/RBS-IR/credit... · 2016-05-09 · RBS currently employs around 6,000 full time staff on the W&G project, with an estimated annual cost of around £630

MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

3 29 April 2016 THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND GROUP PLC: Q1 2016 Results: Lower Litigation and Conduct Charges Offset Weaker Revenues And Higher CreditCosts

The Corporate & Institutional Banking (CIB) division reported an operating loss of £20 million, compared with a loss of £279 million.Lower litigation and restructuring costs offset a 36% decline in revenues as a result of the ongoing restructuring and reduced marketactivity. At product level, declines in Rates (-49%) and Financing (-68%) overshadowed an improved Currency performance (+60%). RBScontinues to downsize its capital markets business, which is credit positive for RBS’s bondholders because these activities carry earningsvolatility and tail risk. Despite this reduction, however, the group remains fully committed to certain product lines – FX, Rates, DCM,Structured Finance and Loans – that it deems important to support its corporate client base.

Progress on the ongoing restructuring continued in Q1 but Williams & Glyn separation could be delayedRBS made further progress on its restructuring initiatives in the first quarter of 2016. Funded assets in RBS’s non-core unit CapitalResolution declined by £3.2 billion to £50.2 billion; the corresponding reduction in RWAs was 3% to £47.6 billion. The disposal of poor-quality assets has contributed to a large decline in the group’s overall non-performing ratio to 3.6% at end-March 2016, from 3.9% atend- 2015 and 6.8% at end-2014. In addition, adjusted operating expenses were down 7%, which management believes it is on track toachieve the targeted £800 million cost reduction in 2016. Management has also reiterated its targeted reduction in Capital Resolution’sRWAs to £30 billion by end-2016, which we consider achievable. However, we note that the pace of quarterly reduction slowed downcompared to recent periods, which we believe was due to challenging market conditions.

However, RBS has said that the end-2017 deadline agreed with the European Commission (EC) for the divestment of Williams & Glyn(W&G, unrated) could be missed. This could ultimately have an adverse impact on the business and increase the costs associated withthe W&G separation. RBS currently employs around 6,000 full time staff on the W&G project, with an estimated annual cost of around£630 million per year. Total costs incurred to December 2015 amounted to £1.2 billion.

Capital ratios reduced in the quarter but remain well positioned compared to peersRBS’s capital position is currently one of the strongest among domestic and global peers, with a CET1 ratio of 14.6% at end-March2016 (Exhibit 2). While we consider the group's overall restructuring plans to be realistic, we continue to believe that RBS's capital ratioscould experience some volatility in the coming quarters while the plan is executed, and other expenses, such as litigation, restructuringcosts and other regulatory fines, continue to be incurred. This is despite the recent large improvement in the group’s regulatory capitalbase resulting from the ongoing deleveraging.

RBS’s CET1 ratio fell by 90 basis points in the quarter to 14.6%, which was driven by the payment related to the DAS retirement, therecent payment to reduce its pension deficit and a slight rise in risk-weighted assets due to new lending.

Exhibit 2CET1 ratios for Global Investment Banks, as at end-March 2016

(*): figures as at Q4 2015. (**) as per Swiss capital regime.Source: Banks’ investor presentations.

RBS targets a CET1 ratio of more than 13% by 2016, after the settlement of large pending litigations and the remaining budgetedrestructuring costs (above £1 billion), of which £800 million more will likely be accounted for in 2016. We consider these targets as

Page 4: RBS - SUMMARY/media/Files/R/RBS-IR/credit... · 2016-05-09 · RBS currently employs around 6,000 full time staff on the W&G project, with an estimated annual cost of around £630

MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

4 29 April 2016 THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND GROUP PLC: Q1 2016 Results: Lower Litigation and Conduct Charges Offset Weaker Revenues And Higher CreditCosts

achievable and recognise the proven track record of the group’s restructuring, which we expect to continue as planned in the absenceof major headwinds.

The retirement of the Dividend Access Share and increased leverage exposures resulted in a fall in RBS’s leverage ratio of 30 basis points inthe quarter to 5.3%. This is well above the current 3% minimum level that the UK Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) currently requires.

Ratings ConsiderationsWe rate RBS's long-term debt rating Ba1 and the supported long-term deposit and senior unsecured ratings of its main operating entity,The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, A3. The ratings outlook is positive, reflecting the substantial progress the firm has made in its restructuringplan and our expectation that its credit fundamentals will continue to improve over the next 12-18 months.

Page 5: RBS - SUMMARY/media/Files/R/RBS-IR/credit... · 2016-05-09 · RBS currently employs around 6,000 full time staff on the W&G project, with an estimated annual cost of around £630

MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

5 29 April 2016 THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND GROUP PLC: Q1 2016 Results: Lower Litigation and Conduct Charges Offset Weaker Revenues And Higher CreditCosts

Moody's Related ResearchCredit Opinions:

» The Royal Bank of Scotland Group

» Ulster Bank

» Ulster Bank Ireland

Special Reports:

» Dividend Access Share Retirement Weakens RBS’s Capitalisation But Is Evidence of Further Progress On Restructuring

» Q4 2015 Results: Significant Charges Drive A Large Quarterly Loss But Restructuring Continues to Progress

» RBS Announces Various Large Charges, a Credit Negative

» Large Charges Highlight Ongoing Restructuring Challenges

» Substantial Restructuring Progress Underpins Our Positive Outlook

» RBS’s Plan to Shrink CIB Will Make the Group Less Risky, but Is Costly and Complex

» RBS Sells Its Residual Stake in Citizens, a Credit Positive for Both Banks

Company Profiles:

» The Royal Bank of Scotland Group

» Ulster Bank

» Ulster Bank Ireland

To access any of these reports, click on the entry above. Note that these references are current as of the date of publication of thisreport and that more recent reports may be available. All research may not be available to all clients.

Page 6: RBS - SUMMARY/media/Files/R/RBS-IR/credit... · 2016-05-09 · RBS currently employs around 6,000 full time staff on the W&G project, with an estimated annual cost of around £630

MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

6 29 April 2016 THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND GROUP PLC: Q1 2016 Results: Lower Litigation and Conduct Charges Offset Weaker Revenues And Higher CreditCosts

Endnotes1 Please see our Issuer In-depth report ‘The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc: Substantial Restructuring Progress Underpins Our Positive Outlook',

published on 11 January 2016.

2 RBS’s internal definition or Risk Element In Lending.

Page 7: RBS - SUMMARY/media/Files/R/RBS-IR/credit... · 2016-05-09 · RBS currently employs around 6,000 full time staff on the W&G project, with an estimated annual cost of around £630

MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

7 29 April 2016 THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND GROUP PLC: Q1 2016 Results: Lower Litigation and Conduct Charges Offset Weaker Revenues And Higher CreditCosts

© 2016 Moody's Corporation, Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Moody's Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ("MIS") ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDITRISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'SPUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKESECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANYESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKETVALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICALFACT. MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHEDBY MOODY'S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDITRATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDITRATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGSAND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY ANDEVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FORRETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACTYOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW,AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTEDOR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANYPERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as wellas other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information ituses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However,MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody's Publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for anyindirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use anysuch information, even if MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses ordamages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of aparticular credit rating assigned by MOODY'S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatorylosses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for theavoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents,representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCHRATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody's Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (includingcorporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating,agreed to pay to Moody's Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintainpolicies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO andrated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually atwww.moodys.com under the heading "Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's InvestorsService Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody's Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intendedto be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, yourepresent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly orindirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY'S credit rating is an opinion asto the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be recklessand inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY'S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or otherprofessional adviser.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody'sOverseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody's SF Japan K.K. ("MSFJ") is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a NationallyRecognized Statistical Rating Organization ("NRSRO"). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by anentity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registeredwith the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferredstock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it feesranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.

REPORT NUMBER 1023580

Page 8: RBS - SUMMARY/media/Files/R/RBS-IR/credit... · 2016-05-09 · RBS currently employs around 6,000 full time staff on the W&G project, with an estimated annual cost of around £630

MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

8 29 April 2016 THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND GROUP PLC: Q1 2016 Results: Lower Litigation and Conduct Charges Offset Weaker Revenues And Higher CreditCosts

Contacts

Daniel Forssen 44-20-7772-1553Associate [email protected]

Andrea Usai 4420-7772-1058Senior Vice [email protected]

CLIENT SERVICES

Americas 1-212-553-1653

Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077

Japan 81-3-5408-4100

EMEA 44-20-7772-5454