rco introduction

7/30/2019 RCO Introduction

1/24

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

RISK REDUCTION OR

RISK CONTROL OPTION

WORKSHOP

Tanjung Puteri Golf Resort, Pasir Gudang

20 June 2012


2/24

Objective of workshop

Amending & correcting data entries previously

done;

Identify risk reducing measures or risk control

options for each of the hazards identified in

the HAZID Workshop;

Presentation of findings.


3/24

0930-1000 1000-1045 1045-

1100

1100-

1145

1145-1230 1230

-

1400

1400-

1530

1530-

1600

1600-1645 1645-

1730

Introduction

to risk

reducing and

Risk Control

Options

Base Case

Risk control

options

Coffee

break

Base

Case

Risk

control

options

Base Case -

Risk control

options

Presentation

by

participants

Lunch Alternative

Case Risk

control

options

Tea

break

Presentation

of Risk

control

options

Alternative

Case by

Participants

Way

forward &

comments

for MTRA

& Future

work

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION (HAZID)

RISK REDUCTION WORKSHOP

TANJUNG PUTERI GOLF RESORT, PASIR GUDANG, JOHOR

20 JUNE 2012


4/24

Workshop

Two sessions Base Case & Alternative Case

4 Groups per session

Each Group = 4 presenters

Each Presenter will present findings for one ofthe following

Collisions

Contacts Groundings & Personal Injury

Others


5/24

1ST HAZID WORKSHOP

IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS

General outcomes


6/24

Summary of submission made during the HAZID Workshop

For Scenario 1 The Base Design of the Jetty

95 items received

For Scenario 2 The Alternative Design of the Jetty

52 items received


7/24

No. Types Numbers

1. Collision 322. Contact 30

3. Grounding 7

4. Personal Injury 3

5. - (unlisted) 3

6. Injury 2

7. Piracy 2

8. Loss of Revenue 2

9. Approach 1

10. Design 111. Fire/Explosion 1

Base Design - Type of hazardsNo. Types No

12. Impact 113. Leans 1

14. Near Miss 1

15. Oil Pollution 1

16. Operations 1

17. Sabotage 118. Tsunami 1

19. Uncontrolled ignition 1

20. Underground obstacle 1

21. Weather 1

22. Wild cargo 1Total 95


8/24

No. Types Numbers

1. Collision 19

2. Contact 11

3. Grounding 6

4. Personal Injury 6

5. Explosion 3

6. Impact 2

7. Shipping Routes 2

8. Anchorage 1

9. Drifting 1

10. Environmentors .. 1

11. Striking 1

Total

52

Alternative Design Types of Hazard


9/24

Area No. Description of Areas

1 Jetty No.1 including Inner Basin

1A Jetty No 1A including Inner Basin

2 Jetty No.2 including Inner Basin

3 Waters between the jetties and the edge ofport limits including anchorage

4 Waters outside port limits including the

Traffic Separation Scheme (TSS)

Classification of Area of incidents


10/24

No. Areas Numbers

1. 1 19

2. 2 10

3. 3 14

4. 4 9

5. - 5

6. 1 & 2 6

7. 1 Jetty Basin 4

8. 1,2 5

9. 1,2 & 3 4

10. 1,2,3 & 4 4

Area of Accidents

Base Design

No. Areas Numbers11. 2 & 3 1

12. 2,3 & 4 1

13. 3 & 4 5

14. 3 Anchorage area 1

15. 3 Pilot Boarding

Ground

1

16. A1 3

17. Jetty Structure 2

18. Outside dredge

pocket

1

19. Port entrance 1

Total 95


11/24

No. Areas Numbers1. 1 2

4. 1A 33

2. 2 3

3. 3 4

5. 4 4

6. 1A/2 3

7. 1A 3 4 1

8. 1A/3 1

9. 1A/4 1

10. 2, 3 1

Total

53

Area of Accidents

Alternative Design


12/24

Amending and correcting

HAZID entries


13/24

Marine Traffic Risk Assessment

(MTRA)

Collision

Contact (which can include a sub-category ofBerthing Contact)

Grounding Loss of Hull Integrity

Fire/Explosion

Equipment Failure (Often a cause of otheraccident categories)

Personal Injury.


14/24

4 24 Design 1 & 2

All

Vessels

Crash into

trestle -

Lost control of tug

& helm

Damage to

trestle C3 0 2 1 2 2 3 3 3

1 16 Wild Cargo1, 2,

3 & 4

Crude

LNGWild Cargo

Unstable

crude /

Hydrocarbons

resulting in

venting,

flaring

Unstable

Hydrocarbons

Venting,

flaring

Gas clouds,

VCE's,

Damage to

others &

casualties.

0 0 2 2 2 3 3 3

3 9Near

Misses3

All

vessels

Approaches

to jetties

Other vessels

navigating

when tankers

areapproaching

berth

Mariners simply

ignorant of the

colreg & unaware of

the grave

consequences

May result in

minor contact

May result in

major

collision

0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 2 2

4 11Oil

Pollution

1, 2

& 3

All

vessels

Spill into port

limits

Spill encroach

into jetty

areas & port

approaches

2 or more vessels

involved in collision

@ OPL or

Precautionary area.

Short term

disruption

due to oil spill

clean-up

Disruption for

a longer

period

0 3 3 3 2 0 4 8 6 2

1 23 Operations1, 2,

3 & 4

All

VesselsOperations -

Training, Procedure

not in place,

Competency of

operators

DamageDamage &

Casualties0 1 1 1 3 3 3 3

HAZID SUBMISSION possible amendments and corrections


15/24

Risk Control Options or

Mitigating measures


16/24

Category Description DefinitionOperational

Interpretation

F1 Frequent An event occurring once aweek to once an operatingyear.

Once a week to

once in 12 months

F2 LikelyAn event occurring once a year

to once every 10 operating

years.Once a year to once

every 10 years

F3 PossibleAn event occurring once

every 10 operating years to

once in 100 operating years.Once in every 10

years to once in

100 years

F4 UnlikelyAn event occurring less

than once in 100 operating

years.Once in less than

100 years

F5 RareConsidered to occur less than

once in more than 100

operating years (e.g. it may

have occurred at a portelsewhere in the world).

Once in more than

100 years

Frequency Matrix used in Port Risk Assessment


17/24

Scale People Property Environment Port Stakeholders

C0

Insignificant

Possible veryminor injury (e.g.

Bruise)

Insignificant(RM0 -100,000)

Insignificant

Negligible environmental impact. Tier 1may be declared but criteria not

necessary met. (RM0 100,000)

Insignificant

(RM0 100,000)

C1Minor

Single slight

injury

Minor

(RM100K1M)

Minor

Tier 1 to Tier 2 criteria reached. (Small

operational spill) (RM100K 1M)

Minor

Bad local publicity or short-term loss of

revenue, etc.(RM100K 1M)

C2

Moderate

Multiple minoror single major

injury

Moderate(RM1M-10M)

Moderate

Tier 2 Spill criteria reached, capable ofbeing limited to immediate area within

port limits. (RM1M-10M)

Moderate

Bad widespread publicity, temporarynavigation closure or prolonged

restriction of navigation. (RM1M-10M)

C3Major

Multiple major

injuries or single

fatality.

Major

(RM10M 100M)

Major

Lower Tier 3 criteria reached, with

pollution outside port limits expected.

Chemical spillage or small gas release.

Potential loss of environmental amenity.(RM10M 100M)

Major

National Publicity. Port faces temporary

closure of a navigation channel affecting

movements to a port or ports for several

days. Ensuing loss of trade. (RM10M

100M)

C4Catastrophic

Multiple

fatalities

Catastrophic

(RM100M+)

Catastrophic

Tier 3 criteria oil spill reached with

support from international clean up

funds. Widespread beach contamination

or serious chemical/gas release.

Significant threat to environmentalamenity. (RM100M+)

Catastrophic

International media publicity. Port

closes, navigation seriously disrupted for

an extended period. Serious and long

term loss of trade.

(RM100M+)

Consequence Matrix


18/24

CONSEQ

UENCE

C4 5 6 7 8 10

C3 4 5 6 7 9

C2

3

3

4

6

8

C1 1 2 2 3 6

C0 0 0 0 0 0

FREQUENCY F5 F4 F3 F2 F1

Risk Matrix


19/24

A suggested definition of the numbers

in the matrix is as follows:

Risk Matrix Description

0 & 1 Negligible Risk

2 & 3 Low risk

4 & 5 The extent of the As Low As Reasonably

Practicable area (ALARP)

6 Heightened Risk

7 & 8 Significant Risk

9 & 10 High Risk.


20/24

No.

HazardNo.

Category

Area

VesselType

HazardTitle

HazardDetail

Possiblecauses

Mostlikelyconsequence

WorstLikelyConsequence

Hazard Assessment

Most Likely Worst Credible

People

Property

Environment

Stakeholder'sBusiness

Frequency

People

Property

Environment


Frequency

Remarks

1 1

Collision

PortEntrance

Bulk

Carrier

Incoming

vessels

blocked byvessels

anchored or

sailing out at

the port

entrance

Large vessel

in conflictwith

anchored

vesel at

entrance

Uncontrolled anchoringof vessels; Fast sailing

vessels sailing by at port

entrance

Danger to

vesels; Lost

contaiment

and

pollution;

personal

injury

Major hull

damage; port

closure; lost ofcargo; impair to

environment

and

surrounding

area.

8 9 9 9 7 8 8 9

Example of HAZID & The Mitigation measures needed to lower the risks to ALARP level

N

o.

Hazard Assessment

Description of Risk Control Options

Most Likely Worst Credible

People

Properety

Environ

me

nt

Stakeho

lde

r'sBusin

ess

People

Properety

Environ

me

nt

Stakeho

lde

r'sBusin

ess

1

8 9 9 9 7 8 8 9


21/24

Example of Mitigation


22/24

Hazard List with Risk Matrix Scoring and Mitigation Index

RankedNo.

HazardNo.

Category

Area

VesselType

HazardTitle

HazardDetail

Possiblecause

s

Mostlikelyconsequence

WorstLikelyConsequence

Pre Mitigation Risk

Index

Remarks

ProposedMitigationmeasures.

ReductionofR

iskindex

Post Mitigation

Risk indexMost

Likely WorstCredible

Most

LikelyWorst

Credible

People

Properety

Environment


People

Properety

Environment


People

Properety

Environment


People

Properety

Environment


Mitigationrem

arks

16

8Collision

B

TankerandContainer

ship

Collisionatapproachch

annel

Tankercollidedbycontainershipdueto

enginefailure.

Engine

failure

whileat

channe

l. Bad

weathe

r

conditi

ons.

Call for

tugassistanc

e. Minor

damage

to the

two

vessels.

Likely

explosion.Serious

damage

to

vessels.

Pollutions

.

1 4 5 6 2 8 9 10

noremarks.

Improved VTS

system. tugs to

secure and

towimmobilised

vessel away.

Tugs of higher

bollard pull.

Met & Hydro

info live.

vetting of

ships.

reduceby3index

0 1 2 3 0 5 6 7

Consider

escort

for

critical

ships

while on

passage

in

channel.

Example of a Risk item being reduced through mitigation


23/24

?


24/24

Terima Kasih

rco introduction

Documents