rcocmbd

Upload: ezhil-vendhan-palanisamy

Post on 14-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 rcocmbd

    1/27

    RELIABILITY-CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM) :RELIABILITY-

    CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM) RCM IS A SYSTEMATIC CONSIDERATION

    OF SYSTEM FUNCTIONS, THE WAY FUNCTIONS CAN FAIL, & A PRIORITY-BASED CONSIDERATION OF SAFETY AND ECONOMICS THAT IDENTIFIES

    APPLICABLE & EFFECTIVE PM TASKS.

    RELIABILITY-CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM) :RELIABILITY-

    CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM) RELIABILITY-CENTERED MAINTENANCE(RCM) IS THE PROCESS OF DETERMINING THE MOST EFFECTIVE

    MAINTENANCEAPPROACH. RCM WAS FIRST APPLIED ON A LARGE SCALE

    TO DEVELOP THE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM OF THE BOEING 747. KNOWN

    AS MSG-3 IN THE AEROSPACE INDUSTRY.

    RELIABILITY-CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM): RELIABILITY-

    CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM) RCM IS A TECHNIQUE FOR DEVELOPINGA PM PROGRAM. IT IS BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE INHERENT

    RELIABILITY OF THE EQUIPMENT IS A FUNCTION OF THE DESIGN AND THEBUILD IN QUALITY. AN EFFECTIVE PM PROGRAM WILL ENSURE THAT THE

    INHERENT RELIABILITY IS REALISED.

    MAIN OBJECTIVE OF RCM: MAIN OBJECTIVE OF RCM TO REDUCE THE

    MAINTENANCE COST, BY FOCUSING ON THE MOST IMPORTANT

    FUNCTIONS OF THE SYSTEMS, AND AVOIDING OR REMOVINGMAINTENANCE ACTIONS THAT ARE NOT STRICTLY NECESSARY.

    RCM HISTORY :RCM HISTORY ORIGINATED IN THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY IN

    THE 1960S. BY THE LATE 1950S, THECOST OF MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES

    IN THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY HAD BECOME HIGH ENOUGH TO WARRANT ASPECIALINVESTIGATION INTO THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THOSE ACTIVITIES.

    ACCORDINGLY, IN 1960, A TASK FORCE WAS FORMED.

    RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE HISTORY :RELIABILITY

    CENTERED MAINTENANCE HISTORY CONSISTING OF REPRESENTATIVES

    OF BOTH THE AIRLINES AND THE FEDERAL AVAITION ADMINISTRATION(FAA-US) TO INVESTIGATE THE CAPABILITIES OFPREVENTIVE

    MAINTENANCE. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THIS TASK FORCE

    SUBSEQUENTLY LED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SERIES OF GUIDELINESFOR AIRLINES AND AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURERS TO USE, WHEN

    ESTABLISHING MAINTENANCESCHEDULES FOR THEIR AIRCRAFT.

  • 7/27/2019 rcocmbd

    2/27

    RCM PHILOSOPHY EMPLOYS THESE TECHNIQUES :RCM PHILOSOPHY

    EMPLOYS THESE TECHNIQUES PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE (PM)

    PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE (PDM) REAL-TIME MONITORING (RTM1) RUN-TO-FAILURE (RTF - ALSO CALLED REACTIVE MAINTENANCE) PROACTIVE

    MAINTENANCE

    THE GOAL OF THE RCM PHILOSOPHY :THE GOAL OF THE RCM

    PHILOSOPHY TO PROVIDE THE STATED FUNCTION OF THE FACILITY, WITHTHE REQUIRED RELIABILITY ANDAVAILABILITY AT THE LOWEST COST.

    RCM REQUIRES THAT MAINTENANCE DECISIONS BE BASED ON

    MAINTENANCEREQUIREMENTS SUPPORTED BY SOUND TECHNICAL AND

    ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION.

    PRIMARY RCM PRINCIPLES :PRIMARY RCM PRINCIPLES RCM IS

    FUNCTION ORIENTED IT SEEKS TO PRESERVE SYSTEM OR EQUIPMENTFUNCTION, NOT JUSTOPERABILITY FOR OPERABILITY'S SAKE.

    REDUNDANCY OF FUNCTION, THROUGH MULTIPLE EQUIPMENT,IMPROVESFUNCTIONAL RELIABILITY, BUT INCREASES LIFE CYCLE COST IN TERMS

    OF PROCUREMENT ANDOPERATING COSTS.

    PRIMARY RCM PRINCIPLES :PRIMARY RCM PRINCIPLES RCM IS SYSTEM

    FOCUSED IT IS MORE CONCERNED WITH MAINTAINING SYSTEM FUNCTION

    THANINDIVIDUAL COMPONENT FUNCTION. RCM IS DRIVEN BY SAFETYAND ECONOMICS SAFETY MUST BE ENSURED AT ANY COST; THEREAFTER,

    COST-EFFECTIVENESS BECOMES THE CRITERION.

    PRIMARY RCM PRINCIPLES :PRIMARY RCM PRINCIPLES RCM IS

    RELIABILITY CENTERED IT TREATS FAILURE STATISTICS IN ANACTUARIAL MANNER. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OPERATING AGE AND

    THE FAILURES EXPERIENCED IS IMPORTANT. RCM IS NOT OVERLY

    CONCERNED WITH SIMPLE FAILURE RATE IT SEEKS TO KNOW THE

    CONDITIONAL PROBABILITY OF FAILURE AT SPECIFIC AGES (THEPROBABILITY THAT FAILURE WILL OCCUR IN EACH GIVEN OPERATING

    AGE BRACKET).

    PRIMARY RCM PRINCIPLES :PRIMARY RCM PRINCIPLES RCM

    ACKNOWLEDGES DESIGN LIMITATIONS ITS OBJECTIVE IS TO MAINTAINTHE INHERENT RELIABILITY OF THE EQUIPMENT DESIGN, RECOGNIZING

    THAT CHANGES IN INHERENT RELIABILITY ARE THE PROVINCE OF DESIGN

    RATHER THAN MAINTENANCE. RCM RECOGNIZES THAT MAINTENANCE

    FEEDBACK CAN IMPROVE ON THE ORIGINAL DESIGN. RCM RECOGNIZES

  • 7/27/2019 rcocmbd

    3/27

    THAT A DIFFERENCE OFTEN EXISTS BETWEEN THE PERCEIVED DESIGN

    LIFE AND THE INTRINSIC OR ACTUAL DESIGN LIFE, AND ADDRESSES THIS

    THROUGH THE AGE EXPLORATION (AE) PROCESS.

    PRIMARY RCM PRINCIPLES :PRIMARY RCM PRINCIPLES RCM DEFINESFAILURE AS ANY UNSATISFACTORY CONDITION THEREFORE, FAILURE

    MAY BE EITHER A LOSS OF FUNCTION (OPERATION CEASES) OR A LOSS OF

    ACCEPTABLE QUALITY (OPERATION CONTINUES).

    PRIMARY RCM PRINCIPLES :PRIMARY RCM PRINCIPLES RCM USES A

    LOGIC TREE TO SCREEN MAINTENANCE TASKS THIS PROVIDES ACONSISTENT APPROACH TO THE MAINTENANCE OF ALL KINDS OF

    EQUIPMENT.

    RCM LOGIC TREE :RCM LOGIC TREE

    PRIMARY RCM PRINCIPLES :PRIMARY RCM PRINCIPLES RCM TASKS

    MUST BE APPLICABLE THE TASKS MUST ADDRESS THE FAILURE MODEAND CONSIDER THE FAILURE MODE CHARACTERISTICS. RCM TASKS MUST

    BE EFFECTIVE THE TASKS MUST REDUCE THE PROBABILITY OF FAILURE

    AND BE COST EFFECTIVE.

    THREE TYPES OF MAINTENANCE TASKS :THREE TYPES OF

    MAINTENANCE TASKS TIME-DIRECTED (PM) SCHEDULED WHENAPPROPRIATE. CONDITION-DIRECTED (PDM AND REAL-TIME MONITORING)

    PERFORMED WHEN CONDITIONS INDICATE THEY ARE NEEDED. FAILURE

    FINDING (ONE OF SEVERAL ASPECTS OF PROACTIVE MAINTENANCE)AFTER IT HAS FAILED, INVESTIGATE THE CAUSES OF FAILURES.

    EQUIPMENT IS RUN-TO-FAILURE. THIS IS ACCEPTABLE FOR SOME

    SITUATIONS AND SOME TYPES OF EQUIPMENT.

    PRIMARY RCM PRINCIPLES :PRIMARY RCM PRINCIPLES RCM IS A LIVING

    SYSTEM IT GATHERS DATA FROM THE RESULTS ACHIEVED AND FEEDSTHIS DATA BACK TO IMPROVE DESIGN AND FUTURE MAINTENANCE. THIS

    FEEDBACK IS AN IMPORTANT PART OF THE PROACTIVE MAINTENANCE

    ELEMENT OF THE RCM PROGRAM.

    RCM ANALYSIS CONSIDERS THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS :RCM

    ANALYSIS CONSIDERS THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WHAT DOES THE

  • 7/27/2019 rcocmbd

    4/27

    SYSTEM OR EQUIPMENT DO? WHAT IS ITS FUNCTION? WHAT FUNCTIONAL

    FAILURES ARE LIKELY TO OCCUR? WHAT ARE THE LIKELY

    CONSEQUENCES OF THESE FUNCTIONAL FAILURES? WHAT CAN BE DONETO REDUCE THE PROBABILITY OF THE FAILURE? IDENTIFY THE ONSET OF

    FAILURE, OR REDUCE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE FAILURE?

    RCM IS APPLICABLE TO :RCM IS APPLICABLE TO WHERE LARGE,

    COMPLEX EQUIPMENT IS USED WHERE EQUIPMENT FAILURES POSESIGNIFICANT ECONOMIC, SAFETY, OR ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS. AERO /

    ASTRO INDUSTRIES NAVY UTILITY COMPANIES OFFSHORE INDUSTRY

    MANUFACTURING PROCESS

    BENEFITS OF RCM :BENEFITS OF RCM

    INSTITUTING AN RCM PROGRAM DEPEND ON :INSTITUTING AN RCM

    PROGRAM DEPEND ON NATURE OF THE BUSINESS RISKS POSED BYEQUIPMENT FAILURE STATE OF THE EXISTING MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

    TO DEVELOP AN RCM PROGRAM :TO DEVELOP AN RCM PROGRAM WHAT

    ASSETS ARE OWNED & OPERATED BY THE COMPANY? TO WHICH OF THESE

    SHOULD RCM BE APPLIED? WHAT ARE THE FUNCTIONS & PERFORMANCE

    EXPECTATIONS OF EACH SELECTED ASSET? IN WHAT WAYS CAN IT FAILTO PERFORM THESE FUNCTIONS?

    TO DEVELOP AN RCM PROGRAM :TO DEVELOP AN RCM PROGRAM WHAT

    CAUSES IT TO FAIL? WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES OF EACH FAILURE?

    WHAT SHOULD BE DONE TO PREVENT EACH FAILURE? WHAT STEPSSHOULD BE TAKEN IF PREVENTIVE MEASURES CANT BE FOUND?

    PURPOSE OF THE RCM REVIEW PROCESS :PURPOSE OF THE RCM REVIEWPROCESS TO DEFINE THE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR A PHYSICAL

    ASSET THAT ARE NECESSARY TO MEET THE BUSINESS OBJECTIVES. THE

    LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE REFLECTS WHAT IS REQUIRED OR WANTEDFROM THE ASSET.

    MAJOR STEPS IN THE RCM REVIEW PROCESS :MAJOR STEPS IN THE RCM

    REVIEW PROCESS STEP 1 SELECT PLANT AREAS THAT MATTER STEP 2

    DETERMINE KEY FUNCTIONS & PRODUCTIVITY GOALS STEP 3 DETERMINE

    PLAUSIBLE FUNCTIONAL FAILURES STEP 4 DETERMINE LIKELY FAILURE

  • 7/27/2019 rcocmbd

    5/27

    MODES & THEIR EFFECTS

    MAJOR STEPS IN THE RCM REVIEW PROCESS :MAJOR STEPS IN THE RCM

    REVIEW PROCESS STEP 5 SELECT FEASIBLE & EFFECTIVE MAINTENANCE

    TACTICS STEP 6 IMPLEMENT SELECTED TACTICS STEP 7 OPTIMIZE TACTICS& PROGRAMS

    STEP 1 - SELECT PLANT AREAS THAT MATTER :STEP 1 - SELECT PLANT

    AREAS THAT MATTER ESTABLISH A STRUCTURED, COMPREHENSIVE LIST

    OF ALL PHYSICAL ASSETS OWNED OR USED THAT REQUIRE SOME FORM

    OF MAINTENANCE OR ENGINEERING ATTENTION. PLANT REGISTER, PLANTINVENTORY, OR EQUIPMENT FAMILY TREE IDENTIFY & PRIORITIZE THE

    PHYSICAL RESOURCES.

    STEP 1 - SELECT PLANT AREAS THAT MATTER :STEP 1 - SELECT PLANT

    AREAS THAT MATTER ASSESS THE IMPACT OF THE PHYSICAL RESOURCESON THE KEY BUSINESS PERFORMANCE AREA. AVAILABILITY PROCESS

    CAPABILITY QUALITY COSTS SAFETY/ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS

    STEP 1 - SELECT PLANT AREAS THAT MATTER :STEP 1 - SELECT PLANT

    AREAS THAT MATTER ESTABLISH THE BOUNDARIES BETWEEN

    EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS. DEFINES THE SCOPE OF THE REVIEW & ORGANIZESIT INTO MANAGEABLE PIECES.

    STEP 2 DETERMINE KEY FUNCTIONS & PRODUCTIVITY GOALS :STEP 2

    DETERMINE KEY FUNCTIONS & PRODUCTIVITY GOALS THE PURPOSE OF

    THE MAINTENANCE TACTIC IS TO MAKE SURE THE EQUIPMENT ISWORKING PROPERLY & PRODUCING ON SCHEDULE.

    STEP 2 DETERMINE KEY FUNCTIONS & PRODUCTIVITY GOALS :STEP 2 DETERMINE KEY FUNCTIONS & PRODUCTIVITY GOALS CATEGORIES OF

    PHYSICAL ASSETS IN TERMS OF FUNCTION PRIMARY WHY THE

    EQUIPMENT EXISTS AT ALL. SECONDARY LESS OBVIOUS PRIMARYFUNCTION BUT THE CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE MAY BE NO LESS

    SEVERE. PROTECTIVE

    STEP 2 DETERMINE KEY FUNCTIONS & PRODUCTIVITY GOALS :STEP 2

    DETERMINE KEY FUNCTIONS & PRODUCTIVITY GOALS MAINTENANCE

    PERFORMANCE MAY BE DEFINED IN TERMS OF BUILT-IN WHAT IT CAN

  • 7/27/2019 rcocmbd

    6/27

    DO REQUIRED WHAT WE WANT IT TO DO ACTUAL WHAT IT IS DOING

    STEP 3 DETERMINE PLAUSIBLE FUNCTIONAL FAILURES :STEP 3

    DETERMINE PLAUSIBLE FUNCTIONAL FAILURES FUNCTIONAL FAILURES

    TOTAL LOSS OF FUNCTION PARTIAL LOSS OF FUNCTION MULTIPLE LEVELSOF PERFORMANCE EXPECTED FROM AN INDIVIDUAL FUNCTION.

    STEP 4 DETERMINE LIKELY FAILURE MODES AND THEIR EFFECTS

    :STEP 4 DETERMINE LIKELY FAILURE MODES AND THEIR EFFECTS

    LIKELY FAILURE MODES THOSE THAT OCCURRED ON THE SAME OR

    SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. THOSE ALREADY THE SUBJECT OF PREVENTIVEMAINTENANCE TASKS. THOSE THAT HAVE NOT HAPPENED BUT ARE

    CONSIDERED POSSIBLE BECAUSE OF EXPERIENCE OR

    VENDOR/MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS.

    STEP 4 DETERMINE LIKELY FAILURE MODES AND THEIR EFFECTS

    :STEP 4 DETERMINE LIKELY FAILURE MODES AND THEIR EFFECTS WHEN

    A FAILURE MODE OCCURS, OBTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. THE

    EVIDENCE OF THE FAILURE TO THE OPERATING CREW UNDER NORMALCONDITIONS. THE HAZARDS THE FAILURE MAY POSE TO WORKER SAFETY,

    PUBLIC SAFETY, PROCESS STABILITY, OR THE ENVIRONMENT. THE EFFECT

    ON PRODUCTION OUTPUT AND MAINTENANCE.

    STEP 5 SELECT FEASIBLE AND EFFECTIVE MAINTENANCE TACTICS

    :STEP 5 SELECT FEASIBLE AND EFFECTIVE MAINTENANCE TACTICSPREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE TACTICS MUST BE TECHNICALLY

    FEASIBLE DEAL EFFECTIVELY WITH THE TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTIC

    OF THE FAILURE. COST-EFFECTIVE REDUCING OR AVOIDING PITFALLS INLINE WITH COSTS AND OPERATING CONSTRAINTS.

    STEP 6 IMPLEMENT SELECTED TACTICS :STEP 6 IMPLEMENTSELECTED TACTICS ACTIONS NEEDED TO PUT THE MAINTENANCE

    TACTICS INTO EFFECT. TWEAKING MAINTENANCE SCHEDULES.

    DEVELOPING OR REVISING TASKS INSTRUCTIONS. SPECIFYING SPAREPARTS AND ADJUSTING INVENTORY LEVELS. ACQUIRING DIAGNOSTIC OR

    TEST EQUIPMENT. REVISING OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

    PROCEDURES. SPECIFYING THE NEED FOR REPAIR OR RESTORATIONPROCEDURES. CONDUCTING TRAINING IN THE NEW PROCEDURES.

    STEP 7 OPTIMIZE TACTICS AND PROGRAM :STEP 7 OPTIMIZE TACTICS

  • 7/27/2019 rcocmbd

    7/27

    AND PROGRAM THE OBJECTIVE OF THIS ONGOING ACTIVITIES ARE TO

    REDUCE EQUIPMENT FAILURE, IMPROVE MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS,

    THE USE OF RESOURCES, IDENTIFY THE NEED TO EXPAND THE REVIEW,AND REACT TO THE CHANGING INDUSTRY OR ECONOMIC CONDITIONS.

    STEP 7 OPTIMIZE TACTICS AND PROGRAM :STEP 7 OPTIMIZE TACTICS

    AND PROGRAM COMPLIMENTARY ACTIVITIES PERIODIC RE-ASSESSMENT

    AND REVISION OF THE RCM REVIEW RESULTS. CONTINUOUS PROCESS OFMONITORING, FEEDBACK, AND ADAPTATION. ANALYZES AND ASSESSES

    THE DATA PRODUCED BY PRODUCTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES

    FOR FAILURE RATES, CAUSES, AND TRENDS. VARIANCES BETWEEN

    ACTUAL AND TARGET PERFORMANCE.

    RCM KEY SUCCESS FACTORS :RCM KEY SUCCESS FACTORS CLEAR

    PROJECT GOALS MANAGEMENT SUPPORT & A COMMITMENT TOINTRODUCE A CONTROLLED MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT. UNION

    INVOLVEMENT GOOD UNDERSTANDING OF RCM PHILOSOPHY BY PLANTSTAFF.

    Slide 42:RCM KEY SUCCESS FACTORS PILOT RCM APPLICATIONS TO

    DEMONSTRATE SUCCESS & BUILD SUPPORT. SUFFICIENT RESOURCES FOR

    BOTH THE REVIEW AND SUBSEQUENT IMPLEMENTATION OF

    RECOMMENDATIONS. CLEAR DOCUMENTATION OF RESULTS TOFACILITATE ACCEPTANCE OF RECOMMENDATIONS. INTEGRATION WITH

    CONDITION-BASED MAINTENANCE CAPABILITY.

    RCM IMPLEMENTATION PHASES :RCM IMPLEMENTATION PHASES

    RELIABILITY-CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM) :RELIABILITY-

    CENTERED MAINTENANCE IS THE PROCESS OF DETERMINING THE MOST

    EFFECTIVE MAINTENANCEAPPROACH. AS THE AIRLINE INDUSTRYSHOWED 40 YEARS AGO, RCM CAN NOT ONLY IMPROVE THE RELIABILITY

    OF A SYSTEM, IT CAN SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THE REQUIRED

    MAINTENANCE. RELIABILITY-CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM)

    RELIABILITY-CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM) :RELIABILITY-CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM) IN TODAY'S COMPETITIVE WORLD

    ECONOMY, THAT TRANSLATES INTO A LOT OF MONEY SAVED, BOTH

    FROM REDUCED FAILURES AND REDUCED WORK. A PROPERLY

    IMPLEMENTED RCM PROGRAM WILL CONTINUE SAVING MONEY YEAR

  • 7/27/2019 rcocmbd

    8/27

    AFTER YEAR.

    Slide 46:TO REMAIN COMPETITIVE MOST COMPANIES CAN NO LONGER

    AFFORD TO REMAIN ON THE SIDELINES DOING THINGS LIKE THEY'VE

    ALWAYS DONE. LET RCM MOVE THE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM INTO THE21ST CENTURY. RELIABILITY-CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM)

  • 7/27/2019 rcocmbd

    9/27

    Introduction to Reliability-centered Maintenance

    This is an excerpt of the first chapter of the book "Reliability-centred Maintenance" by

    John Moubray. You may order this book through this website by clickinghere.

    1.1 The Changing World of Maintenance

    Over the past twenty years, maintenance has changed, perhaps more so than any other

    management discipline. The changes are due to a huge increase in the number and variety

    of physical assets (plant, equipment and buildings) which must be maintained throughout

    the world, much more complex designs, new maintenance techniques and changing viewson maintenance organization and responsibilities.

    Maintenance is also responding to changing expectations. These include a rapidly

    growing awareness of the extent to which equipment failure affects safety and theenvironment, a growing awareness of the connection between maintenance and product

    quality, and increasing pressure to achieve high plant availability and to contain costs.

    The changes are testing attitudes and skills in all branches of industry to the limit.

    Maintenance people are having to adopt completely new ways of thinking and acting, asengineers and as managers. At the same time the limitations of maintenance systems are

    becoming increasingly apparent, no matter how much they are computerized.

    In the face of this avalanche of change, managers everywhere are looking for a new

    approach to maintenance. They want to avoid the false starts and dead ends which always

    accompany major upheavals. Instead they seek a strategic framework which synthesizesthe new developments into a coherent pattern, so that they can evaluate them sensibly and

    apply those likely to be of most value to them and their companies.

    This book describes a philosophy which provides just such a frame-work. It is calledReliability-centered Maintenance, orRCM.

    If it is applied correctly, RCM transforms the relationships between the undertakings

    which use it, their existing physical assets and the people who operate and maintain those

    assets. It also enables new assets to be put into effective service with great speed,confidence and precision.

    This chapter provides a brief introduction to RCM, starting with a look at how

    maintenance has evolved over the past fifty years.

    1.2 Reliability-centered Maintenance

    mailto:[email protected]://www.plant-maintenance.com/books/0831130784.shtmlhttp://www.plant-maintenance.com/books/0831130784.shtmlhttp://www.plant-maintenance.com/books/0831130784.shtmlmailto:[email protected]://www.plant-maintenance.com/books/0831130784.shtml
  • 7/27/2019 rcocmbd

    10/27

    Since the 1930's, the evolution of maintenance can be traced through three generations.

    RCM is rapidly becoming a cornerstone of the Third Generation, but this generation can

    only be viewed in perspective in the light of the First and Second Generations.

    The First Generation

    The First Generation covers the period up to World War II. In those days industry was

    not very highly mechanized, so downtime did not matter much. This meant that the

    prevention of equipment failure was not a very high priority in the minds of mostmanagers. At the same time, most equipment was simple and much of it was over-

    designed. This made it reliable and easy to repair. As a result, there was no need for

    systematic maintenance of any sort beyond simple cleaning, servicing and lubricationroutines. The need for skills was also lower than it is today.

    The Second Generation

    Things changed dramatically during World War II. Wartime pressures increased thedemand for goods of all kinds while the supply of industrial manpower dropped sharply.

    This led to increased mechanization. By the 1950's machines of all types were morenumerous and more complex. Industry was beginning to depend on them.

    As this dependence grew, downtime came into sharper focus. This led to the idea that

    equipment failures could and should be prevented, which led in turn to the concept of

    preventive maintenance. In the 1960's, this consisted mainly of equipment overhauls doneat fixed intervals.

    The cost of maintenance also started to rise sharply relative to other operating costs. This

    led to the growth of maintenance planning and control systems. These have helpedgreatly to bring maintenance under control, and are now an established part of thepractice of maintenance.

    Finally, the amount of capital tied up in fixed assets together with a sharp increase in the

    cost of that capital led people to start seeking ways in which they could maximize the lifeof the assets.

    The Third Generation

    Since the mid-seventies, the process of change in industry has gathered even greater

    momentum. The changes can be classified under the headings of new expectations, newresearch and new techniques.