r&d bottom up for redd+
DESCRIPTION
by Deborah Barry, CIFORTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: R&D Bottom Up for REDD+](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082915/54756e59b4af9f980a8b5a68/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
R& D Research & Development Bottom Up for REDD +
CO2 Capture and Storage @ community landscape
level
Where you work means Who you work with
Where: Forests
Agro-forests landscapes Agricultural
Who: in each of these organizations land use systems
![Page 2: R&D Bottom Up for REDD+](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082915/54756e59b4af9f980a8b5a68/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Oaxaca, Mexico SAO - Oaxacan Environmental Services
Where- type of landscape & vegetation
16 community forests +
22 shade coffee producing units
Who – organizations
SAO
2 UnionsForestEjidos
Indigenous Muncipality
3 ejidos
Federation Coffee
producing cooperatives
![Page 3: R&D Bottom Up for REDD+](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082915/54756e59b4af9f980a8b5a68/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
“Translation” to local understanding
1- What is CO2? - Translate abstract to the concrete. (5 pools) - Providing a service not a good
- Why should they be interested, who is buying?
2 - What does capture & storage mean?
3- Translate into: (most important)- Changes in cultural/management practices (collective/indiv)
- Changes in forest use (consumptive) What you have to stop doing/taking? (firewood) What new things you have to do?(fire
prevention)
![Page 4: R&D Bottom Up for REDD+](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082915/54756e59b4af9f980a8b5a68/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Trade off analysis - Self evaluation
• They calculate the costs of these changes:
- subsistence sphere
- existing market relations (goods)
- social infrastructure sphere
• $$$$ They weigh costs vs. payments (trade offs)
• They decide if its worth it????
![Page 5: R&D Bottom Up for REDD+](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082915/54756e59b4af9f980a8b5a68/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Management = rights & responsibilities
Translate Upload
Participatory Community/local management across landscapes or territory (learn and enforce)
LUCUC - technical measurement instrument for CO2 storage
* Recalculate the costs to the community
![Page 6: R&D Bottom Up for REDD+](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082915/54756e59b4af9f980a8b5a68/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Benefits Distribution = legitimacy
• They (who) decide what they want to do with the funds, how and where: (legitimacy is the guarantee for longevity)
- Collective funds: social spending
- In-kind development assistance (CBF)
Social infrastructure
- Household level dividends
- Transparency - (communication)
![Page 7: R&D Bottom Up for REDD+](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082915/54756e59b4af9f980a8b5a68/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Negotiation
• Whoever negotiates must represent the interests and proposals of the membership
• And have the technical capacity to engage with ‘buyers.’
• Communication on changes w/ membership
![Page 8: R&D Bottom Up for REDD+](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082915/54756e59b4af9f980a8b5a68/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Monitoring and Verification
• $$$$ Up to now, communities still have a marginal gain from price paid.
• Clincher – Who monitors ???
and where does the funding come from???
* Renegotiations- communities can
![Page 9: R&D Bottom Up for REDD+](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082915/54756e59b4af9f980a8b5a68/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Costs of R & D Bottom Up
Bottom up for buy-in …… Long term guarantee for CO2 storage
Costs: to organizations • Field work and consensus building mtgs• Producing people’s time (compensation)• Travel, shelter and food for meetings• Training on technical issues • Transformation & translation of key documents• Communications (radio, brochures, manuals)