reaching for the stars: developmental math redesign
DESCRIPTION
Reaching for the Stars: Developmental Math Redesign. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Reaching for the Stars: Developmental Math Redesign The presenters will review the history, review process, and pilot experiences of the Greenville Technical College Developmental Mathematics department’s approach to multi-course curriculum redesign. Data from pilot approaches with comparisons to other software programs will be shared. The presenters will also explain how Greenville Tech used student success data in their search for a suitable software program and textbook.
Reaching for the Stars:
Developmental Math Redesign
Susan Johnson & Bill Parker
3
The Redesign Journey
1. Before Redesign2. Planning 3. Pilots and Results4. Moving forward
4
Before RedesignConcerns with:
Success rates consistently low Textbook(s) Lack of success in curriculum math
classesLearning Software
Thus began our 5-year Journey of Redesign…
5
PlanningRevise course curricula:
Active/Engaged LearningExtend Time on TaskIntegrate TechnologyPromote Critical Thinking Incorporate outcomes assessment
Beg./Int. Alg. 2009-2012
Pre-Algebra 2010-2013
Fast Track 2011-2013
Basic Math 2012-2013
Online 2012-2013
The Progression of TeamsFall 2013Grant ended
7
PilotsCourse
Learning Outcome
sTextbooks
Learning Software
Assessments
tied to course outcomes
Common Syllabus
8
Can the choice of math software make a significant difference in success rate of students?
Learning Software Piloted
1st Team: Beg./Int. Algebra
Focused on Software Selection
9
Pilots Sections Faculty
Pilot A(Fall only)
5 sections 2 faculty
Pilot B 8 sections 2 faculty
Pilot C 10 Beg. Alg. sections6 Int. Alg. sections
3 faculty
Total 29 sections 7 faculty
Beg./Int. Algebra2010 Fall & 2011 Spring
10
Pilot vs. Non-Pilot successNon-Pilot Pilot B Pilot C
Beg. Alg. 56.3% 60.8% 70.6%
(Inc Withdrawals) 45.4% 43.6% 48.5%
Int. Alg. 57.3% 71.4%
(Inc Withdrawals) 44.9% 50.6%
11
Instructor history of student success
InstructorPast
success rate average
(2005 FALL-2010 SUMMER)
Pilot success rate
average (2010 FALL)
Change in success
rate
Total Pilot B Instructors: 59.6% 60.8% +1.2%
Total Pilot C Instructors: 47.0% 71.0% +24.0%
12
Mastery based
Simple and easy to navigate
Rigorous and concept-focused
Easily adaptable
Great customer support
Pilot C
Learning Software Selection
Success Rates of Students in Beginning Algebra
FA 2010
FA 2011
FA 2012
Beginning AlgebraWithdrawals included
43.07 44.01 47.98
Beginning AlgebraWithdrawal notincluded
56.30 56.31 61.20
Students that finish the course are more successful than before.
Success Rates of Students in Intermediate Algebra
FA 2005
FA 2010
FA 2011
FA 2012
All 45.20 42.16 47.80without Beg. Alg. history
44.86 66.43 53.47 55.28
with Beg. Alg. history
36.52 49.12 43.92 49.77
Cohort 61.65 61.88
15
Stage is set for remaining teams…
16
2nd Team: Pre-AlgebraApproach Focus – Introducing & Using a Common Calculator (TI30XS-Multiview)
Pilot A – Intensive Pilot B – Strategic
Plus: Enhancing Rigor and Foundation Integrating activities and applied
problems
17
Pre-AlgebraData & Findings
Approach Supplemental Materials Smartboard Lessons Activities Rigor
Increased success in Beginning Algebra!
Success Rates of Students in Pre-Algebra
The success rates, especially for those students who persist to the end of the term, are increasing.
FA 2010
FA 2011
FA 2012
Pre-AlgebraWithdrawals included
65.68 62.43 64.90
Pre-AlgebraWithdrawal notincluded
74.41 74.21 78.71
19
3rd Team: Math Fast Track
Actions taken:Alignment and flow of Course
Outlines & Learning Resources Curriculum MappingData comparing Fast Track vs. Full
Term sections
Issue: There was a significant gap in success rates between Beginning and Intermediate Algebra; but the largest gap occurred between Basic Math and Pre-Algebra.
20
Pre-Algebra
Beginning Algebra
Intermediate Algebra
Basic Math
Pre-Algebra
Beginning Algebra
Intermediate Algebra
22
4th Team: Basic Math Pilot: Comparison of teaching methods Results: Solving percent problems using
equations vs proportions. Fractions Lab time vital to success.
23
5th Team: Beg. Algebra Online Same curriculum but tailored to online environment Changes: Student-Teacher interaction Accountability Availability Accessibility Clearer expectations and layout
24
Course Kits
OutlinesLesson PlansActivitiesSmart Lessons
25
Table of Contents Beg. Algebra Course Outline with Lesson Plan/Activity Links General Daily Lesson Plan with Activity/Teaching Ideas Unit 1: Solving Linear Equations Overview - Teaching Insights & Strategies 1a. Course Introduction & Basic Math Review 1b. Simplifying Algebraic Expressions 1c. Solving Linear Equations in One Variable 1d. Solving Absolute Value Equations 1e. Applications of Linear Equations Unit 2: Linear Inequalities; Graphing Linear Equations in Two Variables Overview - Teaching Insights & Strategies 2a. Solving Linear Inequalities 2b. Cartesian Coordinate System 2c. Graphing Linear Equations in Two Variables 2d. Graphing: Slope-Intercept Form 2e. Graphing: Point-Slope Form 2f. Applications of Two Variable Equations
26
Unit 3: Systems of Linear Equations; Exponents Overview - Teaching Insights & Strategies 3a. Systems of Linear Equations: Solve by Graphing & Substitution 3b. Systems of Linear Equations: Solve by Addition 3c. Applications of Linear Systems 3d. Exponents Unit 4: Polynomials; Factoring Overview - Teaching Insights & Strategies 4a. Introduction to Polynomials & Operations 4b. Operations on Polynomials – Multiplying 4c. Operations on Polynomials - Division 4d. Greatest Common Factor, Factor by Grouping 4e. Factoring Trinomials Review Sessions
27
Lesson 3b-1: Solving System of Equations by Substitution
Initial Session by: W. Parker
Course/Unit Focus: MAT 101/Systems of Linear Equations
Primary Course Outcome(s): 4. Solve systems of equations and interpret solutions;
Developmental Studies Lesson Plan Learning Objectives: By the end of the session, learners will:
•Use the substitution method to find the solution of the system of equations. • Identify the solution of the system• Interpret the significance of the solution
Materials: TextDuration: 40 minutes
28
Time Description/Activity5min. Review objectives. Introduce topic and uses in
mathematics. 5min Review and demonstrate solving a system of equations by
graphing10min Demonstrate solving systems of equations by
substitution. Review how a solution is checked and interpreted.
15min Activity: Small group-solving practice problems. Students work cooperatively to solve 3 problems from worksheet.
5min Review solutions by substitution and interpretation of solutions. Student volunteer will explain solution from the group. Additional problems from worksheet and certification for Hawkes 10.2 assigned for homework.
29
Master Course Shellsin Blackboard (GTC’s LMS)
Key Elements • Home Page Banner & Entry Instructions• Navigation Menu – similar across courses to help Developmental
students see/access course materials.
• Course Information – links to section-specific information, Department/Division Policies, etc.
• Syllabus & Outline – common syllabus (for all course sections) and base course outline.
• Section-specific information –pre-designated locations available for faculty to upload Course & Instructor Information, Course Outlines, etc. specifically designed for their section.
• Course Content – shared base content including: Ppts, Readings, Online Quizzes/Tests
• Online Learning Software/Resources – links to software, tutoring, library, websites, links to instructional videos, etc.
• Initial Announcement & Start-up Assignment –“To do” /assignment list acquaints students with Blackboard features
• Grade Center – contains specialized categories & “My Average” with common weighted calculations (matched to course syllabus).
• Instructor Resources – links to Course Kits (repositories of materials in Bb).
Guiding Principles:
• A Starting Point – for faculty to build on, retaining common syllabi, content and assessment.
• All Inclusive – all basic/ common elements for a course.
• Simple & Intuitive – easy to navigate and see.
• Organization & Logic –Elements clustered in a logical and sequential order.
• Continuity of Design – across program, department, division & college.
Over the last three-four years Developmental Studies and Curriculum Math (102) have collaborated on the redesign of courses (Math, English & Reading). Teams of faculty worked through the Unlock Your Future Initiative (UYF, Title III funding) identifying common elements and resources for use in classes. One of our achievements is the creation of Blackboard Master Course Shells. The purpose was to bring efficiency and uniformity to course communication and to have one easy place for students (and faculty) to find all they need for learning and success in a class.
Over the past two years we have developed and deployed Master Course Shells for 8 courses (and over 650
sections), learning along the way. We believe that we have come up with a pattern that can be adopted by others that will help to clarify curricula, underscore course commonalities, increase comparability and enhance the integrity of the curricula. This “starting point” of a course shell can make the teaching/learning experience easier for instructors (particularly Part-time/Adjuncts) and students alike.
Homepage Banner & Entry Instructions
Instructor Resources
Best Practices in Creating Master Course Shells Commonality, Consistency ,Continuity & Simplicity
• •
Introduction Course Information
Key Elements• Home Page Banner & Entry Instructions - for Faculty &
Students• Navigation Menu – with similar elements across courses to
help Developmental students easily see and access course materials.
• Course Information – links to Syllabus, section-specific information, Department/Division Policies, Important Dates, Student Information Sheet, etc.
• Syllabus & Outline – common syllabus (for all course sections) and base course outline.
• Section-specific information –pre-designated locations available for faculty to upload Course & Instructor Information, Course Outlines, etc. specifically designed for their section.
• Course Content – shared base content including: PowerPoints, Readings, Online Quizzes & Tests (varies from course to course, instructors add to this).
• Online Learning Software/Resources – links to software, Smart Thinking tutoring, library, websites, links to instructional videos, etc.
• Initial Announcement & Start-up Assignment –“To do” list acquaints students with Blackboard features; First assignment directs students to complete/submit the Student Information Sheet.
• Grade Center – contains specialized categories & “My Average” column with common weighted column calculations (matched to course syllabus).
• Instructor Resources – for adding to and enhancing course content (links to course-specific repositories of materials in the Blackboard Content
Collection).
Navigation Menu
Grade Center Setup
Guiding Principles for Creating Master ShellsMaster Course Shells should have the following
characteristics:
• A Starting Point – for faculty to build on, and make each course section ‘their own’ while retaining commonality in syllabi, content and assessment.
• All Inclusive – a one stop shop that has all basic and common elements for a course.
• Simple & Intuitive – so students and instructors can easily find what they need.
• Organization & Logic – Cluster elements in a logical and sequential order.
• Continuity of Design – across program, department, division & college.
We have established some common structures in Blackboard Navigation designed to provide:
• A simple and clear environment for developmental studies students to enter into Blackboard;
• A common structure across developmental studies courses to provide continuity of experience;
• A structure similar to the recommended/standard GTC Blackboard course menu - to support student’s transition to curriculum courses.
All menus have the following four areas: Course Information, Course Content, Communications and Grades/Info (plus Instructor Resources)
Online Learning Software maintain parallel gradebooks that either require faculty to input grades periodically (MAT - Hawkes & RDG-Aplia);
Or integrate seamlessly with Blackboard, depositing grades into the Grade Center (ENG - Writing Class)
as students complete pre/post-tests. Diagnostic tests, practice exercises, quizzes and tests online.
Common quizzes and tests posted to Blackboard automatically record grades into the Grade Center.
The “My Average” weighted total is set up to automatically calculate grades in the Grade Center to align with the common weighted grading scheme reflected in the syllabus (note: also drops/replaces grades as commonly agreed/designed).
For Instructors:
For Students:
Instructor Resources provide direct links to all teaching resources needed for each course. These include:
• Blackboard Content Collections; • Course Kits;• Activities & Handouts; • Quizzes/Tests …and more…
all of which are easily accessible from within each Blackboard course.
Cour
se In
foCo
urse
Con
tent
Com
mun
icat
ions
Gra
des/
Info
31
Questions? Suggestions?
Comments?Susan JohnsonDevelopmental Studies Math
Program [email protected]
William ParkerDevelopmental Studies MAT
032 Lead [email protected]