reaction engineering and catalysis

Upload: murdanetap957

Post on 28-Feb-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/25/2019 Reaction Engineering and Catalysis

    1/3

    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

    Reaction engineering and catalysisEditorial

    overviewTheodore T

    TsotsisCurrent Opinion in Chemical Engineering 2012,

    1:269271

    For a complete overview see the Issue

    Available online 20th July 2012

    2211-3398/$ see front matter, # 2012 Elsevier Ltd.

    All rights reserved.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.07.001

    Theodore T Tsotsis

    Robert E. Vivian Professor of EnergyResources, Mork Family Department ofChemical Engineering and Materials Science,

    University

    of

    Southern

    California,

    UniversityPark, Los Angles, CA 90089-1211, USAe-mail: [email protected]

    Theodore T. Tsotsis is the Robert E. VivianProfessor of Energy Resources at theUniversity of Southern California. His currentresearch interests are in the areas of reactionengineering, reactor design, membrane andadsorbent preparation/characterization, andthe modelling of transport and reaction incomplex porous media.

    Reaction

    and

    Reactor

    Engineering

    are

    among

    the

    oldest

    disciplines

    in

    the

    field of Chemical

    Engineering

    and

    have

    played

    a pivotal

    role

    in

    the

    de-

    velopment of

    manufacturing,

    and

    the

    chemical

    and

    petrochemical

    indus-

    tries. Despite

    their

    maturity,

    however,

    they

    continue

    to

    be

    the

    arena

    of

    many

    lively and intensive R&D activities. This themed issue of Current Opinionin Chemical

    Engineering

    contains

    ten

    short

    review

    articles

    that

    provide

    only

    a small sampling of the so many new and exciting things which are currently

    taking place

    in

    this

    all

    important

    area

    of

    Chemical

    Engineering.

    This

    write-up attempts

    to

    provide

    a

    short

    overview

    of

    the

    diverse

    mix

    of

    interesting

    topics which

    are

    covered

    by

    these

    review

    papers.

    Adesinas paper focuses on CO2(dry as it is better known) reforming of light

    hydrocarbons (C1C4)

    for

    syngas

    production,

    which

    has

    attracted

    consider-

    able recent

    attention

    because

    of

    concerns

    about

    global

    warming,

    and

    the

    obvious benefit

    of

    being

    able

    to

    utilize

    CO2. The process also has the added

    flexibility of

    producing

    syngas

    with

    a H2:CO ratio more amenable to further

    downstream use

    in

    FischerTropsch and methanol syntheses. Unfortu-

    nately, catalyst

    coking

    is

    a

    problem

    with

    dry

    reforming,

    and

    thus

    substantial

    recent research activities are focusing on efforts to overcome this problem.As detailed

    in

    the

    paper,

    they

    include

    the

    development

    of

    carbon-tolerant

    catalysts, adding

    an

    oxidant

    to

    the

    reforming

    mixture,

    the

    distributed

    feeding of

    reactants,

    and

    unsteady-state

    reactor

    operation.

    Adesina

    briefly

    reviews such

    past

    efforts.

    He

    then

    proceeds

    to

    describe

    efforts

    by

    his

    group

    in which

    CO2is used as co-feed of a forced periodically operated reformer in

    order to

    minimize

    coking

    even

    at

    the

    low

    steam

    to

    carbon

    ratio

    of 1. His

    studies have also revealed that a basic oxide supported Ni-containingcatalyst promoted

    with

    alkaline-earth

    or

    rare-earth

    metals

    performs

    as

    well

    or better than expensive noble metals.

    Nature-inspired chemical engineering (NICE), which studies the funda-

    mental mechanisms

    determining

    a

    desired

    property

    or

    function

    in

    nature,

    particularly in

    biology,

    and

    attempts

    to

    apply

    the

    same

    mechanism/prin-ciples in

    the

    context

    of

    chemical

    engineering

    is

    the

    focus

    of

    Coppens

    paper.

    He notes

    that

    application

    of

    biological

    mechanisms

    in

    reaction

    engineering

    requires substantial

    adaptations,

    because

    the

    relevant

    time

    scales

    and

    available building

    elements

    are

    different.

    For

    example,

    in

    reaction

    engin-

    eering one

    is

    able

    to

    manipulate

    parameters

    such

    as

    temperature

    and

    pressure, which

    are

    much

    less

    tunable

    in

    biological

    systems.

    Coppens

    likens

    NICE to

    an

    abstract

    portrait

    which

    preserves

    essential

    aspects

    of

    the

    subject, without

    being

    its

    literal

    representation,

    emphasizing

    key

    features

    that serve

    a

    desired

    objective.

    According

    to

    him,

    NICE

    aims

    to

    innovate

    guidedby nature but without mimicking it. Coppens uses three examples toillustrate

    how

    biological

    mechanisms

    can

    be

    adapted

    to

    guide

    innovative

    www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 2012, 1:269271

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/22113398/1/3http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.07.001mailto:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.03.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.03.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.03.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.03.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.03.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.03.001mailto:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.07.001http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/22113398/1/3
  • 7/25/2019 Reaction Engineering and Catalysis

    2/3

    solutions

    to

    technical

    challenges

    in

    Reaction

    and

    ReactorEngineering.

    They

    include:

    first,

    the

    use

    of

    optimized,

    hierarchical

    networks to bridge scales, and to minimize

    transport limitations,

    and

    to

    realize efficient,

    scalable

    solutions; second, careful balancing offorces at one or more

    scales

    to

    achieve

    superior

    reactor

    performance,

    a

    keyexample being

    enzyme

    nano-confinement;

    third,

    emer-

    gence of complex

    functions

    from

    simple

    components,

    using

    dynamics

    as

    an

    organizing

    mechanism. Coppens

    believes that

    NICE

    complements

    the

    ongoing

    revolution

    in bio-inspired

    chemistry

    and

    materials

    synthesis,

    which

    already finds

    applications

    in

    enzyme-mimics

    and

    anti-

    body-mimics

    for

    catalysis,

    and

    in

    artificial

    photosynthesis.

    Direct

    solid

    fuel

    use

    for

    electricity

    production

    using

    chemical looping

    combustion

    (CLC)

    is

    discussed

    in

    the

    paper

    by

    Fan

    and

    coworkers.

    According

    to

    the

    authors,

    this novel

    approach

    shows

    the

    potential

    to

    have

    higher

    energy efficiency than competing technologies in a car-

    bon-constrained scenario, whereby CO2 must be separ-

    ated and sequestered. The paper first focuses on the

    selection

    of

    oxygen

    carriers

    via

    thermodynamic

    analysis,with iron-based

    materials

    being

    considered

    as

    a particu-

    larly promising

    candidate.

    Then

    various

    CLC

    reactor

    configurations

    are

    compared,

    based

    on

    the

    modes

    of

    reducer design and operation, and are shown to signifi-

    cantly

    impact

    the

    overall

    system

    performance.

    The

    authors conclude,

    based

    on a

    review

    of

    recent

    experimen-

    tal studies

    by

    their

    group and

    others,

    that

    direct

    solid

    fuel

    CLC is

    a

    promising

    technology,

    and

    they

    identify

    optimal

    reducer design

    (to

    provide

    effective

    gassolid contact),

    and favorable

    thermodynamics

    of

    the

    oxygen

    carrier

    as

    the important challenges for the commercial scale appli-cation of

    the

    process.

    With

    renewed

    focus

    on

    the

    use

    of

    energy

    sources

    other

    than crude,

    such

    as

    coal

    and

    biomass,

    there

    has

    been

    in

    recent years

    quite

    a bit

    of

    new

    interest

    in

    the

    FischerTropsch

    Synthesis

    (FTS)

    reaction.

    The

    paper

    by

    Glasser,

    Hildebrandt and coworkers reviews recent reaction andreactor engineering

    advances

    in

    this

    area.

    As

    they

    note,

    despite the fact that FTS has been studied for over 80

    years an

    adequate

    description

    of

    its

    kinetics

    still

    seems

    to

    be lacking. The authors report, for example, a number of

    recent experimental

    results

    by

    their

    group

    and

    others

    that

    are not

    explained

    by

    any

    of

    the

    existing

    kinetic

    models.Their paper

    reviews

    some

    of

    these

    recent

    findings

    with

    thegoal

    of

    shedding

    light

    on

    phenomena

    occurring

    during

    the FTS

    reaction

    that

    determine

    the

    overall

    rate

    and

    selectivity, and

    in

    particular

    the

    olefin

    to

    paraffin

    ratios

    of

    the lower

    MW

    hydrocarbon

    products.

    Their

    paper

    notes

    that the

    volatile

    liquid-phase

    being

    present

    during

    FTS

    may have

    a great

    effect

    on

    the

    observed

    kinetics,

    and

    proposes that

    the

    FTS

    reactor

    maybe

    be

    best

    modeled

    as

    a reactive

    distillation

    system,

    whereby

    the

    interaction

    between phenomena such as vapor liquid equilibrium,partial reaction

    equilibrium

    and

    kinetics

    can

    lead

    to

    complex

    behavior

    and,

    thus,

    explain

    the

    conflictingreports

    among

    various

    researchers

    studying

    the

    system.

    The topic

    ofNOxreduction in lean-burn vehicle engines

    is discussed in the paper by Harold. Its particular focus is

    the so-called

    lean

    NOx trap

    (LNT),

    which

    is

    an

    adsorptivecatalytic

    reactor

    in

    which

    NOx is stored (in the form of

    nitrates)

    in

    the

    presence

    of

    excess

    O2, and is subsequently

    reduced

    during

    a

    brief

    regeneration.

    As

    Harold

    notes,

    this

    is a

    transient

    multi-functional

    reactor

    that

    is

    called

    upon

    to carry

    out

    NO

    oxidation,

    NOxstorage, and reduction, all

    within a

    12 min cycle, attaining in the process NOxconversions

    exceeding

    95%.

    The

    paper

    reviews

    studies

    by Harolds

    group

    on

    the

    coupling,

    under

    transient

    con-

    ditions, between

    reaction

    and

    transport,

    and

    describes

    the

    current

    insight

    linking

    catalyst

    composition

    and

    structure

    to conversion

    and

    selectivity.

    The

    current

    technical

    hur-

    dles facing

    the

    emerging

    lean

    NOx reduction technol-

    ogies are also nicely described.

    One of the primary challenges in the conversion of

    biomass

    to

    renewable

    fuels

    and

    chemicals

    is

    removingthe oxygen-containing

    functional

    groups.

    The

    paper

    by

    Kruger, Nicolakis

    and

    Vlachos

    discusses

    catalytic

    dehy-

    dration as

    an

    effective

    way

    to

    deoxygenate

    biomass

    that

    avoids the environmental challenges facing the current

    approaches using

    inorganic

    acids.

    The

    paper

    reviews the

    use of

    microporous

    and

    mesoporous

    catalysts

    for

    this

    reaction, and

    tries

    to

    correlate

    their

    characteristics

    such

    as degree

    and

    type

    of

    acidity,

    mesoporosity,

    and

    hydro-

    phobicity

    to

    their

    performance.

    Review

    of

    recent

    studies

    indicates that

    heterogeneous

    catalysts

    show

    good

    promise, but the lack of fundamental understandingmay be

    limiting

    their

    commercial

    use;

    potential

    technical

    barriers

    that

    need

    to

    be

    overcome

    are

    discussed.

    Ethylene

    oxide

    is

    one

    of

    the

    most

    important

    intermedi-

    ates in

    the

    chemical

    industry,

    being

    used

    to

    produce

    a

    variety of

    chemicals,

    including

    various

    glycols,

    glycol

    ethers and polyols, ethoxylates, ethanolamines, amongothers. Direct

    catalytic

    epoxidation

    of

    ethylene

    by

    air

    or

    oxygen is currently the dominant production technology

    having today

    largely

    replaced

    the

    earlier,

    more

    complex

    routes. Salmi and coworkers note in their paper that no

    general agreement

    exists

    presently

    concerning

    its

    reac-

    tionmechanism

    and

    kinetics.

    They

    describe

    using

    micro-reactors as

    a

    tool

    for

    the

    rapid

    and

    precise

    investigations

    of

    epoxidation

    kinetics.

    Their

    paper

    reviews

    and

    screens

    rival kinetic

    models,

    and

    proposes

    a more

    general kinetic

    model for

    ethylene

    oxide

    formation

    consistent

    with

    their

    experimental

    data

    on

    silver

    catalysts.

    Fuel cells

    find

    today

    application

    in

    many

    diverse

    areas.

    Sundmacher

    and

    coworkers

    in

    their

    paper

    indicate

    that

    despite significant

    progress

    that

    has

    been

    made

    in

    the

    last

    two decades, substantial further improvements in per-formance and

    reduction

    in

    costs

    are

    potentially

    possible.

    270 Reaction engineering and catalysis

    Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 2012, 1:269271 www.sciencedirect.com

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.05.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.05.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.05.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.05.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.05.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.05.001
  • 7/25/2019 Reaction Engineering and Catalysis

    3/3

    They

    identify,

    in

    particular,

    four

    areas

    in

    fuel

    cell

    researchwhere chemical

    reaction

    engineers

    can

    make

    significant

    contributions. They include: first, understanding their

    nonlinear

    dynamic

    electrochemical

    behavior,

    second,

    improving mass and heat integration, third, being

    able to

    use

    renewable

    biomass

    as

    a

    primary

    energy

    source,and fourth,

    using

    enzymes

    for

    catalyzing

    the

    electrode

    reactions.

    The focus

    of

    the

    paper

    by

    Subramanian

    is

    on

    non-

    traditional solvents

    and

    on

    how

    they

    may

    be

    exploited

    to develop

    sustainable

    chemical

    processes.

    The

    empha-

    sis, in

    particular,

    is

    on

    gas-expanded

    liquids

    (GXL)

    gener-

    ated by

    mixing

    liquid

    solvents

    and

    compressed

    near-

    critical gases,

    such

    as

    CO2 and light olefins. Subrama-

    nians group

    and

    others

    have

    shown,

    in

    lab-scale

    studies,

    that the

    enhanced

    solubility

    and

    transport

    properties

    of

    GXL compared

    to

    conventional

    liquid

    solvents

    allow

    them to carry out reactions at mild conditions, with

    increased selectivity, and also provide for the facile

    separation

    of

    catalyst

    and

    products.

    Examples

    are

    pro-vided of

    using

    GXL

    for

    industrially

    important

    hydrofor-

    mylations and epoxidations. According to Subramanian,

    GXL show

    particularly

    good

    promise

    for

    application

    in

    the biorefining industry.

    Liu, Sahimi

    and

    Tsotsis

    summarize

    in

    their

    paper

    recent

    efforts by

    their

    team

    in

    producing

    hydrogen

    from

    coal

    and

    biomass using

    membrane-based

    reactive

    separations.

    They report

    on

    the

    development

    of

    a

    technology,

    they

    term the

    one-box process, to

    produce

    pure

    hydrogen

    from coal-derived

    and

    biomass-derived

    syngas

    in

    the

    presence

    of

    its

    common

    impurities

    via

    the

    water

    gas

    shift

    reaction, and

    by

    using

    commercial-scale

    carbon

    molecular

    sieve membranes

    and

    impurity-tolerant

    commercial

    cat-

    alysts. They

    also

    discuss,

    in

    addition,

    the

    use

    of

    com-

    mercial-size

    Pd

    and

    Pd-alloy

    membranes

    during

    production

    of

    ultra-pure

    hydrogen

    from

    coal

    and

    biomass.

    Details about the recent field-testing of the technology

    are also provided.

    Editorial

    overview Tsotsis 271

    www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 2012, 1:269271

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.005http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.005http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.06.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.02.005