reaction plane reconstruction1 reaction plane reconstruction in extzdc michael kapishin...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Reaction plane reconstruction 1
Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC
Michael Kapishin [email protected]
Presented by A.Litvinenko
![Page 2: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Reaction plane reconstruction 2
Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC
Topics discussed in the report
Dependence from:
beam energy ZDC cell size
ZDC length
magnetic field
![Page 3: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Position of extZDC within MPD set-up
Reaction plane reconstruction 3
extZDC
![Page 4: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Reaction plane reconstruction 4
Methods of reaction plane reconstruction
1-st Fourier harmonics → directed flow:
))φ-cos(φ2v +(12π
N
φd
dNRn
tot ∑=
∑∑
i,xi
i,yi
Rpw
pwarctanφ =
Ew ii =
iii p/Ew =
![Page 5: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Reaction plane reconstruction 5
Methods of reaction plane reconstruction
Method 1:
2222 +=
+==
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
iinuclR
xy
xφcos;
xy
yφsin;
φcosEΔ
φsinEΔarctanφ
∑∑
Method 2:
2π2
2ππ2
δ1+δ1δπ++δ
=)φ()φ(
)φ()φ()φ(φφ
RnuclR
RRnuclR
nuclR
R
→ combine measurements for η<0 and η>0 to improve precision, study as a function of impact parameter b
;
∑∑
ii
iinuclR
xEΔ
yEΔarctanφ =
![Page 6: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Extended ZDC detector
Reaction plane reconstruction 6
Simulation of extended ZDC within mpdroot:
• L = 120 (60, 40) cm
• 5 < R < 61 cm (inscribed circle), z0=270 cm, 1<θ<12.5o (2.2<η<4.8)
• dcell = 5x5,10x10 cm
• wi=Σ Evis in active layers of 1 module → use methods 1 and 2 for RP reconstruction
• No π vs p/ion identification
• Geant 4 , QGSP_BIC physics model
dcell = 5x5 cm, 420 cells in each side of MPD
dcell = 10x10 cm, 121 cells in each side of MPD
![Page 7: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Resolution δφRP vs b
Reaction plane reconstruction 7
δφRPo = φZDC-φRP
Extended ZDC, QGSM 9 AGeV AuAu, Geant4 QGSP_BIC modeldcell = 5x5cm, L=120cm2.2 < η < 4.8, method 1, w=Evis
No PID (π vs p/ion)
b = 0 – 16 fm in 8 bins, 2 fm / bin
![Page 8: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
cos δφRP vs b
Reaction plane reconstruction 8
b = 0 – 16 fm in 8 bins, 2 fm / bin
cos(δφRP) = cos(φZDC-φRP)
Extended ZDC, QGSM 9 AGeV AuAu, Geant4 QGSP_BIC modeldcell = 5x5cm, L=120cm2.2 < η < 4.8, method 1, w=Evis
No PID (π vs p/ion)
![Page 9: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Resolution δφRP vs b
Reaction plane reconstruction 9
• methods 1 and 2 give consistent results for RP resolution in azimuthal angle φ
• RP resolution for the case if only ZDC from one side of MPD set-up is used vs full ZDC set-up (lower plot)
![Page 10: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Resolution δφRP and <cos δφRP> vs b
Reaction plane reconstruction 10
Effects of ZDC cell size and length, beam energy and interaction model
![Page 11: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Effect of magnetic field: <φZDC-φRP> vs b
Reaction plane reconstruction 11
→ Systematic effect of magnetic field increases from ~1o at 9 AGeV to ~3o at 3 AGeV, QGSM and UrQMD model give consistent results
QGSM UrQMD
![Page 12: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Effect of magnetic field: <φZDC-φRP> vs b
reaction plane reconstruction 12
• Systematic effect of magnetic field increases from ~1o at 9 AGeV to ~3o at 3 AGeV• Magnetic field systematics is small compared to RP resolution• QGSM and UrQMD models give consistent results → systematics could be corrected based on model predictions
![Page 13: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
• Extended ZDC detector (2.2<η<4.8) provides RP measurement at medium b (4<b<10 fm) with resolution of δφRP~22-35o in AuAu collisions at energies 5-9 AGeV, RP resolution deteriorates to δφRP~45-65o at 3 AGeV
• Sensitivity of extended ZDC to RP azimuthal angle in central (b<3 fm) and peripheral collisions (b>12 fm) is much weaker
• QGSM and UrQMD models give consistent results for RP resolution of extended ZDC, model dependence increases at low beam energies
• ZDC cell size and length is not critical: dcell=10x10cm, L=60cm are sufficient for RP measurement. ZDC length is more crucial for energy flow measurement
• Magnetic field systematics to φRP is ~1o at 9 AGeV which increases to ~3o at 3 AGeV. Reduced magnetic field at the lowest energy would decrease systematics
Summary
13
![Page 14: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Backup
Reaction plane reconstruction 14
![Page 15: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Reaction plane peconstruction 15
![Page 16: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Reaction plane peconstruction 16
![Page 17: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
LAQGSM generator: all nucleons in 1000 events
directed to rectangle 10x10cm for 3 regions of impact parameter
b <= 10.84 (60%)
19707 nucleons
10.84<b<=12.5 (60-80%)
47826 nucleons
b>12.5 (after 80%)
60431 nucleons
![Page 18: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
LAQGSM generator: all nucleons in 1000 events
directed to new ZDC for 3 regions of impact parameter
b <= 10.84 (60%)
71041 nucleons
10.84<b<=12.5 (60-80%)
22848 nucleons
b>12.5 (after 80%)4787 nucleons
![Page 19: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Elliptic Flow vs. Beam Energy25% most central mid-rapidity
six decades
In-planeelliptic flow
squeeze-out
bounce-off
A. Wetzler
![Page 20: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
“old” and extended ZDC
cell 10 x 10 (cm x cm)
![Page 21: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
PHENIXReaction Plane Resolution
O30ΔΨ 0.4)ΔΨ2cos( == ⇒
O40ΔΨ 0.2)ΔΨ2cos( == ⇒
![Page 22: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Reaction plane resolution vs. numbers of particle and value of the flow
![Page 23: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
PHENIXReaction Plane Detector
L=38 cm 2.8< η< 0.8
O18ΔΨ 0.8)ΔΨ2cos( == ⇒
![Page 24: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
GeV .SNN 98=
![Page 25: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
GeV .SNN 98=
![Page 26: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Fast evaluations: the movement of spectators at NICA/MPD
bpXY
Z
T 1 B
QB0.3Ap
- Ap
zQB0.3cos
QB0.3Ap
)z(y
ApzQB0.3
sinQB0.3Ap
)z(x
T
z
T
z
T
ApzQB0.3
cos12QB0.3Ap
yx )z,B(z
T22
Ap
zQBz
p
pzB
Ap
zQB
zz
T
z
0.3
2
1 ; ),( 0.2
0.3
The conclusion:Magnetic field of MPD will not change the polar angles for spectators at ZDC position it will only slightly changes the azimutal angles
06
zT p/p
![Page 27: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
![Page 28: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
LAQGSM generator: all nucleons in 1000 events
directed to new ZDC for 3 regions of impact parameter
b <= 10.84 (60%)
71041 nucleons
10.84<b<=12.5 (60-80%)
22848 nucleons
b>12.5 (after 80%)4787 nucleons
![Page 29: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
G4 physics model: QGSP_BIC vs QGSP_BERT
Reaction plane peconstruction 29
Gean4 physics models:
QGSP_BERT uses Geant4 Bertini cascade for primary protons, neutrons, pions and Kaons below ~10GeV. In comparison to experimental data we find improved agreement to data compared to QGSP which uses the low energy parameterised (LEP) model for all particles at these energies. The Bertini model produces more secondary neutrons and protons than the LEP model, yielding a better agreement to experimental data.
QGSP_BIC uses Geant4 Binary cascade for primary protons and neutrons with energies below ~10GeV, thus replacing the use of the LEP model for protons and neutrons In comparison to the LEP model, Binary cascade better describes production of secondary particles produced in interactions of protons and neutrons with nuclei. QGSP_BIC also uses the binary light ion cascade to model inelastic interaction of ions up to few GeV/nucleon with matter.
QGSP_BIC is selected → more reasonable description of interactions of light ions (A=2,3,4) with medium, see also next slides
Shower radius in ZDC: hadrons, light ions (A=2,3,4), em particles
![Page 30: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
G4 physics model: QGSP_BIC vs QGSP_BERT
Reaction plane peconstruction 30
Evis (0.1zdc) / Evis (full zdc) Evis (zdc) / Egen
hadrons, light ions (A=2,3,4), em particles
![Page 31: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
G4 physics model: QGSP_BIC vs QGSP_BERT
Reaction plane peconstruction 31
Evis (zdc) vs Egen Evis (zdc) / Egen vs Egen
hadrons, light ions (A=2,3,4), em particles
Non-linear response because of shower leakage
![Page 32: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Reaction plane peconstruction 32
Extended ZDC: Evis vs impact parameter b
b = 0 – 16 fm in 8 bins, 2 fm / bin
b measurement using Evis (ZDC):
QGSM model: Evis has peak at b=8-10 fm, → double solution in b measurement based on Evis
UrQMD model: monotonic dependence of Evis on b
QGSM, 9 AGeV
![Page 33: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Reaction plane peconstruction 33
Extended ZDC: Fvis(R<25cm) vs b
b = 0 – 16 fm in 8 bins, 2 fm / bin
b measurement using Fvis=Evis(R<25cm)/Evis(full zdc):
QGSM model: Fvis is monotonic except at highest b>12fm→ large fluctuations of Fvis
→ double solution for b measurement based on Fvis
UrQMD model: monotonic dependence of Fvis on b
QGSM, 9 AGeV
![Page 34: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Reaction plane peconstruction 34
QGSM vs UrQMD: particle and energy flow
extZDC
QGSM and UrQMD generate very different particle and energy flow spectra in pseudo-rapidity range of extZDC
![Page 35: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Reaction plane reconstruction 35
ExtZDC: <Evis> and <Fvis> (R<25cm) vs b
QGSM vs UrQMD:
• model dependence is big for Evis at large b (b>10fm)
• effect is smaller for Fvis(ZDC, R<25cm), but is not negligible
• QGSM and UrQMD predictions for particle and energy flow in ZDC pseudo-rapidity range are very different→ energy flow measurement in extended ZDC will distinguish between models
What can one get from TPC data?
Effect of beam energy and AuAu interaction model
![Page 36: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Reaction plane peconstruction 36
Multiplicity and Σ p (π,K,p in TPC) vs b
• Σ p of charged tracks in TPC (|η|<1.2) is a measure of impact parameter b or centrality of nucleus-nucleus interaction. It is less model dependent (QGSM vs UrQMD) in comparison with multiplicity of TPC tracks (lower plot) • Model dependence of b measurement with Σ p of charged particles in TPC decreases at low beam energies
![Page 37: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
![Page 38: Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin kapishin@mail.desy.de Presented by A.Litvinenko](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec05503460f94bcafcc/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Reaction plane peconstruction 38
Relation between b and centrality
Impact parameter b: 0 - 3 fm 3 – 6 fm 6 – 9 fm 9 – 12 fm
Fraction of σincltot : 0 - 5% 5 – 15% 15 – 30% 30 – 60%
Total multiplicity of charged tracks is a measure of impact parameter b (and centrality of nucleus-nucleus interaction)