reasonable officer response (r.o.r.) canadian association for civilian oversight of law enforcement...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski Professionalism](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062417/55180a185503468c438b456a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Reasonable Officer Response(R.O.R.)
Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight ofCanadian Association for Civilian Oversight ofLaw Enforcement (CACOLE)Law Enforcement (CACOLE)Deputy Chief Norm LipinskiDeputy Chief Norm Lipinski
Professionalism in Policing
![Page 2: Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski Professionalism](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062417/55180a185503468c438b456a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Use of Force by the Police as seen through the
lens of…
![Page 3: Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski Professionalism](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062417/55180a185503468c438b456a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
FORCE CONTINUUM - FORCE CONTINUUM - BEGINNINGSBEGINNINGS
![Page 4: Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski Professionalism](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062417/55180a185503468c438b456a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Part IPart IThe TestThe Test
Given the totality of the circumstances, the Given the totality of the circumstances, the following factors will be considered by the court:following factors will be considered by the court:
a)a) Was the officer lawfully placed?Was the officer lawfully placed?
b)b) Did the officer subjectively believe that the Did the officer subjectively believe that the amount of force used was reasonable?amount of force used was reasonable?
c)c) Would an objective reasonable person (standing Would an objective reasonable person (standing in the officers’ shoes) believe that the level of in the officers’ shoes) believe that the level of force used was reasonable?force used was reasonable?
![Page 5: Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski Professionalism](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062417/55180a185503468c438b456a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Part IPart IEnvironmental Factors:Environmental Factors:
Location (confined space, Location (confined space, isolation)isolation)
CoverCover
WeatherWeather
LightingLighting
FootingFooting
Other exigent circumstancesOther exigent circumstances
![Page 6: Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski Professionalism](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062417/55180a185503468c438b456a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Part IPart ISubject Factors:Subject Factors:
Age, size, gender Age, size, gender Number of subjectsNumber of subjectsTraining, experience, fitnessTraining, experience, fitnessExhaustion, injuriesExhaustion, injuriesGoal orientedGoal orientedNature and severity of crimeNature and severity of crimeHistoryHistoryMental stateMental stateAlcohol, drugsAlcohol, drugsVerbal, non-verbal threat cuesVerbal, non-verbal threat cuesWeapons, proximity to weaponsWeapons, proximity to weaponsFleeing, risk of escapeFleeing, risk of escapeImmediate / imminent threat to police/public/themselvesImmediate / imminent threat to police/public/themselvesAudience/peersAudience/peers
![Page 7: Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski Professionalism](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062417/55180a185503468c438b456a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Part IPart IOfficer Factors:Officer Factors:
Age, size, genderAge, size, gender
Number of officers Number of officers
Training, experience, fitnessTraining, experience, fitness
Exhaustion, injuriesExhaustion, injuries
Prior knowledge of the subjectPrior knowledge of the subject
Distance from subjectDistance from subject
Position Position
EquipmentEquipment
![Page 8: Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski Professionalism](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062417/55180a185503468c438b456a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
2008-05-30
Reasonable Officer ResponseReasonable Officer ResponseTraining AidTraining Aid
Part II
OFFICER PERCEPTION
Cooperative Low Level Resister High Level Resister Assaultive G.B.H./Death
The Standard - Objective Reasonableness
Lawful & Professional Presence
Tactical Communication Skills
Intermediate Weapons (O.C. spray, C.E.D., baton)
Tactical Considerations
(pressure points, joint locks)Empty Hand - Soft
Empty Hand - Hard (distraction techniques, takedowns, punches, kicks)
OF
FIC
ER
RE
SP
ON
SE
Lethal Options
![Page 9: Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski Professionalism](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062417/55180a185503468c438b456a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Reasonable Officer Response(R.O.R.)
Questions and CommentsQuestions and Comments
Professionalism in Policing