reasoning

29
Reasoning http://www.toothpastefordinner.com/012408/circular- reasoning.gif

Upload: violet-miles

Post on 23-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reasoning

Reasoning

http://www.toothpastefordinner.com/012408/circular-reasoning.gif

Page 2: Reasoning

Types of Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning

deductive validity

Inductive Reasoning

inductive strength

Page 3: Reasoning

Types of Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning Syllogistic reasoning

Basic syllogism:

Premise 1: All A are B.

Premise 2: All B are C.

Conclusion: Therefore, all A are C.

Page 4: Reasoning

Types of Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning Syllogistic reasoning

Syllogism example:

All red books are astronomy books.

All astronomy books are large.

All red books are large.

Page 5: Reasoning

Types of Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning Syllogistic reasoning

Categorical syllogisms

Conditional syllogisms

Page 6: Reasoning

1. All Beagles are dogs

All dogs have fur.

Therefore:

2. Some teachers are women.

All women are human.

Therefore:

3. No elephants are carnivorous.

Some dogs are carnivorous.

Therefore:

Page 7: Reasoning

4. Some cats are grey.

Some cats like dogs.

Therefore:

5. All ghost stories are scary.

No jokes are scary.

Therefore:

6. No documentary films make money.

No nonfiction books make money.

Therefore:

Page 8: Reasoning

Types of Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning Principles of validity and truth in syllogisms

Principle 2: the validity of a syllogism is determined only by its form, not its content.

All birds are ants.

All ants have four legs.

Therefore, all birds have four legs.

Page 9: Reasoning

Types of Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning Principles of validity and truth in syllogisms

Principle 1: if two premises are true, the conclusion of a valid syllogism must be true.

All birds are animals.

All animals eat food.

Therefore, all birds eat food.

Page 10: Reasoning

Types of Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning Using Euler circles to determine validity

Page 11: Reasoning

Types of Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning Studying Syllogisms

Normative Approach

Descriptive Approach

Page 12: Reasoning

Types of Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning Studying Syllogisms

Normative Approach

Descriptive Approach

Page 13: Reasoning

Illustrations of possible meanings of “Some bers are sabs.”

Reasoning Performance Premise phrasing

Page 14: Reasoning

Illustration of possible meanings of “All daxes are wugs.”

Reasoning Performance Alternation of premise meaning

Page 15: Reasoning

Failure to consider all possibilities

Reasoning Performance

Page 16: Reasoning

Believability effects

Reasoning Performance

All of the students are tired.Some tired people are irritable.Some of the students are irritable.

All of the men are tired.Some tired people are women.Some of the men are women.

All of the students are tired.Some tired people are irritable.Some of the students are irritable.

All of the men are tired.Some tired people are women.Some of the men are women.

Page 17: Reasoning

Types of Reasoning

Deductive ReasoningConditional syllogisms

An example of a logical argument

Premise p q If “p,” then “q”

Existing condition p p is true

Conclusion qtherefore, q is true

Page 18: Reasoning

Types of Reasoning

Deductive ReasoningFormal Logic

Inference rulesModus Ponens (valid)

p q If “p,” then “q”

p p is true

¬ p therefore, q is true

Page 19: Reasoning

Types of Reasoning

Deductive ReasoningFormal Logic

Inference rulesModus Tollens (valid)

p q If “p,” then “q”

¬ q q is not true

¬ p therefore, p is not true

Page 20: Reasoning

Types of Reasoning

Deductive ReasoningFormal Logic

Fallacies Denying the antecedent (invalid)

p q If “p,” then “q”

¬ p p is not true

¬ q therefore, q is not true

Page 21: Reasoning

Types of Reasoning

Deductive ReasoningFormal Logic

Fallacies Affirming the consequent (invalid)

p q If “p,” then “q”

q q is true

p therefore, p is true

Page 22: Reasoning

Summary of Conditional Syllogisms

Type of Syllogism

2nd Premise Conclusion Valid?

Modus Ponens p q Yes

Modus Tollens Not q Not p Yes

Denying the antecedent

Not p Not q No

Affirming the consequent

q p No

Page 23: Reasoning

Wason’s selection task (or four-card task)

Types of Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning

Page 24: Reasoning

$35

Check 1

Check 4Check 2

Check 3

no initialsinitials

$20

Page 25: Reasoning

Types of Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning

Page 26: Reasoning

Types of Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning Analogical

reasoning

Examples of verbal and pictorial analogies.

Page 27: Reasoning

Example of a matrix completion problem.

Types of Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning Analogical

reasoning

Page 28: Reasoning

Types of Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning Hypothesis testing

Confirmation bias

Page 29: Reasoning

Approaches to Studying Reasoning

Fallacies in ReasoningEquivocation Illicit contrastArgument by innuendoLoaded questionFallacy of the continuumFallacy of composition