reassignment committee meeting - april 30, 2012
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Student Reassignment Committee
Meeting Monday, April 30, 2012
6:00 p.m.
Scenario Review and Revision
District Reassignment Committee
Meeting
3
AGENDASTUDENT REASSIGNMENT COMMITTEE MEETING
Media Center, Nash Central High SchoolMonday, April 30, 2012 - 6:00 pm
Call to Order……………………………………………………………………Victor Ward
Roll Call………………………………………………………………………..Carina Bryant
Approval of Minutes from the March 26, 2012 Meeting Committee Operating Procedure Scenario Review and Revision………………………………Mike Miller,
OREd Report to School Board 5/21/12 Questions?
Next Meeting Scenario Review and Revision (continued)
Tuesday, May 29, 2012 6:00 pm
Communications
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools
5
TIME-LINE
Jan-Aug 2012
Committee Deliberations/
Monthly Reports to the School
Board
Aug - 2012Committee
Recommendations Presented to
the School Board
Aug – Dec 2012
Public Input/ Community Engagement
Board of Education Approval
August 2013Implementatio
n
6
PROCESS IS EVERYTHING
Board of Education
Community Feedback Committee
Committee Chairs
Public Engagement
Technical Support
OREDStaff
7
Contiguous boundaries: Attempt to maintain contiguous school boundaries without using satellite
attendance areas.
Respect neighborhoods: Avoid dividing easily recognized “neighborhoods” or identified
“developments” or “sub- divisions” unless it is necessary to meet other guidelines. Whenever possible and practical use major highways, railroads, rivers, and streams as natural boundaries.
Proximity to schools: While it is recognized that all students cannot be assigned to their closest
school, consider students proximity to other schools when creating school boundaries.
School Board Priorities
8
Modify feeder systems: In order to maximize facility use and establish reasonable numbers of students at each site,
consider the use of 6 middle school feeder systems instead of 5. This would allow smaller, more instructionally suited middle schools and less dependence on mobile classrooms.
Stay within enrollment capacities: Unless it is likely that a school enrollment will be declining, assign students to the four high
schools in a way that their enrollments are under established capacities.
Consider anticipated growth: Enrollment growth patterns should be taken into consideration, where feasible, to ensure that
anticipated growth will not adversely impact one school significantly more than the others.
Enrollment balance: In keeping with the intent of SB612, attempt to balance the percentage of academic and
economic populations at each middle and high school.
School Board Priorities
9
IPSAC – TimelineFebruary 13 – Understanding the Optimization
ProcessMarch 26 – Out of Capacity table and Scenario Data
April 30 – Scenario Review and Revision
May 29 – Scenario Review and Revision
June 25 – Final Scenario Presentation
TransparentLines of CommunicationsCommittee Meetings
Open to the publicWebsite
Information posted immediately after each meetingE-mail/ Phone Line
An e-mail address to answer questions/ receive feedback etc has been established to ensure seamless communication and to make all information readily available to the public.
A phone line has been established for those with limited or no internet access to provide feedback to the committee.
COMMUNICATIONS
11
Mike Miller, OREd
Scenario Review and Revision
Integrated Planning For School and Community
Michael Miller, Program ManagerOperations Research and Education Laboratory (OREd)Institute for Transportation Research and EducationCentennial CampusNorth Carolina State University
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools
Optimal ScenariosOptimal scenarios for each level: Elem, Mid,
HighScenario data presented at March 26 meetingOptimal with respect to Proximity + Utilization
OREd scenario reviewPlanning segment level review of optimal scenariosMultiple review criteriaAssignment changes to address geographic issues
IPSAC – Status
13
Membership forecast
School building
capacities
Optimization Algorithm
Optimal Attendance Zones
Optimal Attendance Zones
Balance index allowance
14
Optimal Attendance Zones
Scenario Review
Scenario Review/Revision Cycle
Track Edits & Update School
Data
15
Assignment Change Considerations:
Elem > Mid and Mid > High feeder pattern
ContiguityTransportation issuesNatural/man-made barriersCurrent assignmentCapacity
Scenario Review – Methodology
16
17
Scenario Review
• Identify potential issues
• Assess impact• Change
assignment
Assignment change fixes transportation issue, but may impact other criteria.
18
Scenario Review
Revision 1: 19 assignment changes (all 3 levels) made to 15 Planning Segments.
19
Reassignment Scenarios: Revision 1
CURRENT HIGH SCHOOL OPTIMAL HIGH SCHOOL
Scenario Review – High Schools
OPTIMAL HIGH SCHOOL OPTIMAL HIGH SCHOOL - REVISED
Scenario Review – High Schools
High School Attendance ZonesCurrent/Scenario - Rev. 1 Data
(See data tables in handouts.)
Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern Nash
CURRENT 1232 1204 1130 1232
PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 1145 1201 1416 1036
100
300
500
700
900
1100
1300
1500
9-12 Student Count
Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern Nash
CURRENT 1.07130434782609 1.04695652173913 0.81294964028777 1.15355805243446
PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 0.995652173913044 1.04434782608696 1.01870503597122 0.970037453183521
10%
30%
50%
70%
90%
110%
130%
Utilization
Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern Nash
CURRENT 0.667207792207792 0.690199335548173 0.835398230088496 0.513798701298701
PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 0.529257641921397 0.621149042464613 0.939265536723164 0.528957528957529
5%15%25%35%45%55%65%75%85%95%
Minority %
Statistics based on residence (2011 geocode).Does not measure impact of special programs such as IB.
Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern Nash
CURRENT 0.666460829493088 0.651086556169429 0.718038674033149 0.64117389298893
PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 0.501911350243403 0.591921841541756 0.856459868959869 0.66964745383324
5%15%25%35%45%55%65%75%85%
Free/Reduced Lunch %
Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern Nash
CURRENT 0.597285067873303 0.614014933946008 0.530638029058749 0.631374453618261
PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 0.706395348837209 0.681395348837209 0.423751686909582 0.624926857811586
5%15%25%35%45%55%65%75%
Academic Proficiency %
Statistics based on residence (2011 geocode).Does not measure impact of special programs such as IB.
High School Attendance ZonesCurrent/Scenario - Rev. 1 Data
Maximum Utilization: 104%Minimum Utilization: 97%Total Grade 9-12 students reassigned:
1356
CURRENT MIDDLE SCHOOL OPTIMAL MIDDLE SCHOOL
Scenario Review – Middle Schools
OPTIMAL MIDDLE SCHOOLOPTIMAL MIDDLE SCHOOL - REVISED
Scenario Review – Middle Schools
(See data tables in handouts.)
Middle School Attendance ZonesCurrent/Scenario - Rev. 1 Data
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash NEW MS (RM HS site)
CURRENT 729 633 433 910 1099 0
PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 661 639 445 705 695 659
100
300
500
700
900
1100
6-8 Student Count
Target Middle School capacity = 750. Parker capacity = 557.
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash NEW MS (RM HS site)
CURRENT 0.881499395405079
0.944776119402985
0.77737881508079
1.07058823529412
1.29294117647059
0
PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1
0.881333333333333
0.852 0.798922800718133
0.94 0.926666666666667
0.878666666666667
10%30%50%70%90%
110%130%
Utilization
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash NEW MS (RM HS site)
CURRENT 0.781893004115226
0.669826224328594
0.877598152424942
0.585714285714286
0.51410373066424
0
PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1
0.609682299546142
0.458528951486698
0.919101123595506
0.533333333333333
0.566906474820144
0.905918057663126
5%
25%
45%
65%
85%
Minority %
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash NEW MS (RM HS site)
CURRENT 0.728409448818898
0.679363699582754
0.7765 0.581846153846154
0.64117389298893
0
PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1
0.629619952494062
0.495801354401806
0.847861015278462
0.552074281709881
0.701692698873956
0.821299019607843
5%
25%
45%
65%
85%
Free/Reduced Lunch %
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash NEW MS (RM HS site)
CURRENT 0.511127063890883
0.541571319603356
0.551357733175915
0.685584562996595
0.631374453618261
0
PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1
0.568198944988696
0.709339774557166
0.474330357142857
0.707554225878833
0.606923076923077
0.474015748031496
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
55%
65%
75%
Academic Proficiency %
Middle School Attendance ZonesCurrent/Scenario - Rev. 1 Data
Maximum Utilization: 94%Minimum Utilization: 85%Maximum MS > HS feeder: 3 (New Rocky
Mount MS)Total Grade 6-8 students reassigned:
1618 (including 659 to New Rocky Mount MS)
CURRENT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OPTIMAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Scenario Review – Elementary Schools
OPTIMAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLOPTIMAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - REVISED
Scenario Review – Elementary Schools
(See data tables in handouts.)
Elementary School Attendance ZonesCurrent/Scenario - Rev. 1 Data
Bailey Baskerville
Benv-enue
Cedar Grove
Coop-ers
Johnson MB Hub-bard
Middle-sex
Nash-ville
Pope Red Oak/Swift Creek
Spring Hope
Willi-ford
Win-stead/Engle-wood
CUR-RENT
620 341 743 221 624 475 492 340 709 279 583 550 437 1081
PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1
620 399 640 214 514 511 477 340 686 304 706 520 575 989
100300500700900
1100
K-5 Student Count
Bailey Baskerville
Benv-enue
Cedar Grove
Coop-ers
Johnson MB Hub-bard
Middle-sex
Nash-ville
Pope Red Oak/Swift Creek
Spring Hope
Willi-ford
Win-stead/Engle-wood
CURRENT
0.933734939759036
0.798594847775176
1.11227544910
18
0.991031390134529
1.03826955074
875
0.826086956521739
0.9609375
0.813397129186603
1.03958944281
525
0.897106109324759
0.719753086419753
1.01476014760
148
0.752151462994837
0.954104148278906
PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1
0.933734939759036
0.934426229508197
0.958083832335329
0.959641255605381
0.855241264559068
0.888695652173913
0.931640625
0.813397129186603
1.00586510263
93
0.977491961414791
0.871604938271605
0.959409594095941
0.989672977624785
0.872903795233892
10%
50%
90%
Utilization
Bailey Baskerville
Benv-enue
Cedar Grove
Coop-ers
Johnson MB Hub-bard
Middle-sex
Nash-ville
Pope Red Oak/Swift Creek
Spring Hope
Willi-ford
Win-stead/Engle-wood
CURRENT
0.654838709677419
0.982404692082112
0.737550471063257
0.520361990950226
0.307692307692308
0.995789473684211
0.780487804878049
0.588235294117647
0.493653032440056
0.989247311827957
0.437392795883362
0.514545454545455
0.965675057208238
0.640148011100833
PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1
0.654838709677419
0.989974937343358
0.7234375
0.485981308411215
0.219844357976654
0.99412915851
272
0.775681341719078
0.588235294117647
0.486880466472303
0.980263157894737
0.439093484419263
0.511538461538462
0.895652173913044
0.656218402426694
10%
50%
90%
Minority %
Bailey Baskerville
Benv-enue
Cedar Grove
Coop-ers
Johnson MB Hub-bard
Middle-sex
Nash-ville
Pope Red Oak/Swift Creek
Spring Hope
Willi-ford
Win-stead/Engle-wood
CURRENT
0.709450714823175
0.936566265060241
0.684589625738674
0.728067729083666
0.467428797468355
0.909124378109453
0.703311320754717
0.702206266318538
0.520635430038511
0.907741433021807
0.456706210746685
0.650129659643436
0.922113163972286
0.593824966681475
PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1
0.709450714823175
0.936272493573265
0.659783420463032
0.711359832635983
0.387806026365348
0.900924908424909
0.704201762977473
0.702206266318538
0.492967180174146
0.917930029154519
0.467365373480023
0.654667817083693
0.895189189189189
0.619392318911035
5%
35%
65%
95%
Free/Reduced Lunch %
Bailey Baskerville
Benv-enue
Cedar Grove
Coop-ers
Johnson MB Hub-bard
Middle-sex
Nash-ville
Pope Red Oak/Swift Creek
Spring Hope
Willi-ford
Win-stead/Engle-wood
CURRENT
0.618270799347471
0.450657894736842
0.629283489096573
0.731707317073171
0.729636048526863
0.377232142857143
0.575692963752665
0.613079019073569
0.705801104972376
0.348122866894198
0.721815519765739
0.601973684210526
0.348448687350835
0.606741573033708
PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1
0.618270799347471
0.471976401179941
0.651785714285714
0.748898678414097
0.782258064516129
0.360887096774194
0.577777777777778
0.613079019073569
0.699558173784978
0.355345911949686
0.724179829890644
0.602473498233216
0.384615384615385
0.597790055248619
5%25%45%65%85%
Academic Proficiency %
Elementary School Attendance ZonesCurrent/Scenario - Rev. 1 Data
Maximum Utilization: 101%Minimum Utilization: 81%Maximum MS > HS feeder: 4 (Benvenue
ES)Total Grade K-5 students reassigned:
1045
Summary
Scenario Review ProcessPlanning Segment assignment change protocol
Scenario - Revision 119 Planning Segments reassigned from optimal
scenariosRevision 1 scenario data + mapsTotal Grade K-12 students reassigned: 4019
(including 659 to New Rocky Mount MS)
38
February 13 – (4:00-5:30)*
March 26 (6:00)
April 30 (6:00)
Tuesday, May 29 (6:00)
June 25 (4:00–5:30)*
August/ Sept - TBD
MEETING SCHEDULE
QUESTIONS