PERMIT APPLICATION

for a, , , , ,

LAND TREATMENT AREA

at theOKLAHOMA REFINING COMPANY

CYRIL REFINERY

CADDO COUNTY

OKLAHOMA

SEPTEMBER 1981

^^^^"ve/ ^Rebord Documento o o o ^ /

EER1NG, !NC. 1001

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION 11.1

INTRODUCTIONPurposeHistory of OperationActivity AssignmentsEnvironmental Isipact

1 . 21.31 . 4

SECTION 22. 12.22.3

SECTION 33.13 . 23.33.43.53 . 6

ggIiQN 44 . 1

SITE DESCRIPTIONLocationProperty DescriptionRefinery Plan and Description

_PESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONRun-On ControlRun-Off ControlMonitoring WellsAccessApplication of WasteWaste Incorporation

SITE EVALUATIONTopogriphy4.1.1 Contours4.1.2 100 Year Flood PlainClimate4.24 . 2 . 1 Temperatures4 . 2 . 2 RainfallStratigraphy4.3

4.4 Soils Engineering Properties4 . 4 . 1 Test Parameters' ' " Soil Classification4. 4 . 24 . 4 . 34 . 4 . 44 . 4 . 54 . 4 . 64 . 4 . 7

Grain Sizp DistributionPermeabilityPercolation TestsAtterberg LimitsSummary of Test Results

4 . 5 Agricultural Soil Analysis4 . 5 . 1 Samples and Test Location/- c n Test Parameters

pH Values4 . 5 . 24.5.34.5.44.5.5

Soil Fertility LevelsCation Exchange Capacities

5555555666677777777888

5up^na AdministrativeRecord Document

0000/12•wa

fENSURING, INC.

1001 *•

4 . 6 Heavy Metals Analysis-Unsaturated Zone4 . 6 . 1 Test Parameters4 . 6 . 2 Soluble & Unsoluble Concentrations4 . 6 . 3 Soluble Concentrations4 . 6 . 4 Factor of Safety

4.7 Groundwater Analysis4 . 7 . 1 Monitor Wells4 . 7 . 2 Water Samples :4 . 7 . 3 test Results

4.8 Location ,and Access

SECTION 5 MONITORING- PLAN5.0 General5 . 1 Unsaturated Zone-Agricultural Soil

Analysis5 . 1 . 1 Test Parameters5 . 1 . 2 Frequency of Testing5 . 1 . 3 Facility Operation

5.2 Unsaturated Zone-Heavy Metals SoilAnalysis5 . 2 . 1 Test Parameters5 . 2 . 2 Frequency of Testing5. 2 . 3 Number of Samples Required5.2*4 Detection of Vertical Migration

5.3 Groundwater Analysis5 . 3 . 1 Monitor Wells5 . 3 . 2 Test Characteristics5 . 3 . 3 Test Parameters for Suitability5 . 3 . 4 Test Parameters for Quality5 . 3 . 5 Test Parameters for Contamination5 . 3 . 6 Frequency of Testing (First Year)5 . 3 . 7 Frequency of Testing (After

First Year)5 . 3 . 8 Water Table Elevation5 . 3 . 9 Sampling & Testing Methods

5.4 Waste Sludge Analysis5 . 4 . 1 Test Samples5 . 4 . 2 Sources of Sludge5 . 4 . 3 Test Parameters5.4. 4 Frequency of Testing5 . 4 . 5 Test Methods

5*5 Summary of Monitoring Plan

SECTION 6 CLOSURE & POST CLOSURE6 . 1 Closure6.2 Post Cloaure Monitoring6 . 3 Post Closure Maintenance

' "^>.4 Closure & Post Closure Financing

88999

1010101010

1111

11111111

11111212121212121 2131313

14141414141415151515

16161616

i?perfund AdministratSyRecord Document ^

0 0 0 0 4 ^

1NEERING.1NC.1Q01 ^

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 2 . 1Attachment 2.2Attachment 2.3Attachment 2.4Attachment 4 . 1Attachment 4.2Attachment 4.3Attachment 4,4Attachment 4.5Attachment 4 . 6Attachment 5.1Attachment 5.2

Description of Land Treatment AreaQuadrangle Map of Cyril AreaDescription of Refinery PropertyPlat of Refinery PropertyOWRB 100 Year Flood Plain LetterLocation Map of Cyril, OklahomaAgricultural Soils Analysis SummaryTotal Heavy Metals Test ResultfiE . P . Toxicity Extractions SummaryWater Sample AnalysisAPI Sludge AnalysisMonitoring Plan Summary

DRAWINGS

Drawing 1001-D-99Drawing 1001-D-102Drawing 1001-D-124

Facility Site PlanWater Monitor Wells, Plan & Detail;Topography & Dike Layout

APPENDIX

APPENDIX "A' Soil Report by Shepherd Engineering andTesting C o . . I n c . ; September. 1981

Sype^und AdministratiK@Record Document .

0 0 4 4 -

-c 1001

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 PURPOSE

Oklahoma Refining Company has been operating a land treatmentarea at their Cyril, Oklahoma Refinery for approximately tenyears* This report is being submitted to comply with interimstatus requirements of governing regulatory agencies.

1 . 2 HISTORY OF OPERATION

The facility to date has experienced a low level of operationin regard to total volume of waste received and levels ofconcentration for hazardous constituents within the soil zoneof incorporation.

1 . 3 ACTIVITY ASSIGNMENTS

Sample testing and analysis for this report has been performedby Southwest Laboratories of Oklahoma - Tulsa, Oklahoma forheavy metals soil analysis, groundwater analysis and sludgeanalysis; by Shepherd Engineering T&sting Co., Inc > - Norman,Oklahoma for soil boring, sample gathering and soils engineer-ing analysis; and by Oklahoma State University, Soil and WaterService Laboratory. Agronomy Department for agricultural soilsanalysis.

1 . 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

The environmental impact of the facility is considered to benegligible due to minimum usage, good operation procedures byORC, and its location relative to the refinery and theconaounity.

Superfund AdministrattRecord Row^nt

1001

SECTION 2

SITE DESCRIPTION

2-1 LOCATION

The ORC land treatment area is located on a tract of land inthe southwest corner of the Cyril Refinery of Oklahoma RefiningCompany. Adjacent property to the north and east *if this landtreatment area is the remainder of the refinery property. Ad~jacent property to the west is residential for H. mile. Adjacentproperty to the south and beyond the limits of the property dis-cussed above is classed as farmland or has agricultural uses.The City of Cyril is building a sewage treatment plant of pro-perty south of the refinery site in the SW^ of Section 19, T5N,R9W.

2.2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

A description of the land treatment area is included as Attach-ment 2.1 to this section* Refer Co Attachment 2.2, which is acopy of a portion of the 15* Quadrangle map for the area sur-rounding Cyril, Oklahoma* Locations of the land treatment areaand refinery property have been indicated.

2.3 REFINERY PLAN AND DESCRIPTION

Refer to drawing D-99 which shows the Facility Site Plan of therefinery. A description of the refinery property is included asAttachment 2.3 of this section. Afctachement 2.^, a plat of therefinery property, is also included for reference.

r^?

,, 4 .AA.; -, •ir,,1^.Superfund Administratj/e

Record Document

0 0 0 0 4 < J

1001

SECTION 3

DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION

3 . 1 RUN-ON CONTROL

The site for the land treatment area is flat, gently slopingland. Only a portion of the facility (approximately 3 . 7 acres)is being actively used at this time. The remainder of the de-signated area is upgradient of the active portion. Runoff fromthis clean area is diverted by ditch around the active portionto prevent run-on during rainstorms.

3 . 2 RUN-OFF CONTROL '

An earthen dike has been constructed around the active portion "^to contain all rainfall in the area(for a 100 year. 24 hour 0duration, 7.5 inch total rainfall). The dike has further di- 0vided the active land treatment area into an upper and lower Qarea. Due to the topography and existing terracing, two sep- —arate areas are required. Grading has been performed to ensurethe surface is free of abrupt irregularities, and has smoothand gentle slopes. Refer to drawing 0-124 for location of theberm.

3.3 MONITORING WELLS

Four monitoring wells have been placed adjacent to the landtreatment area. One well is placed up-gradient: and three down"gradient. Refer to drawing D-124 for their placement.

3 . 4 ACCESS

Entrance to the land treatment area can be made at the northwestcorner through a, gate that is locked at the end of each day.However, normal traffic from the refinery to the facility gainentry from the northeast.

3 . 5 APPLICATION OF WASTE

Trucks making deliveries to the land treatment area approachthe dumping area along the west side. After dri'-/ing Co theselected dump area and positioning the truck properly, the wastematerial is dumped from a steel sled or a dump truck. The steelsled is water tight to prevent leakage while transporting throughthe refinery to the facility.

Because of the small amounts of sludge and waste material generated.the steel sled is used more often than a dump truck* Therefore,£he sludge is deposited on the land treatment area in small piles»Afterwards, these small piles are spread evenly over the soilusing a road grader or a tractor with a blade attachment.

Superfund Admimstra iveRecord Document

0 0 0 0 4 7

1 .,..t- m. •.—.^! .-Trf. .B

INE^RING.INC.

3.6

A'." '«

• f•^ ;-' ^1 //\f-y <

V tf Jt

It is current practice of the refinery to not make wasteapplications when rainy conditions exist and uhen the groundis frozen during the winter season of the year.

WASTE INCORPORATION

In order to efficiently utilize the available nitrogen in thewaste material» all oiJ.y wastes are incorporated into the soilas soon as practicable after application. Waste incorporationin performed by plowing and discing the land treatment area toobtain a homogeneous mixture of soil and waste. This activityalso accomplishes aeration of the soil which ensures aerobicconditions exist in the zone of incorporation.

.\

.•-c . >-

\

•-E ^ .1 ^Record Document., - i _, .I'^T^

0 0 0 0 4 8

INHERING, INC. • IPOl •""'HI. 1 , 0 - ' r . r.l^ i , : ;• •! . - • - • .\S• f I i ' 1 ^ ' AI.'

SECTION 4

SITE EVALUATION

^ • 1 TOPOGRAPHY

'*. 1 -1 ContoursThe site is characteriacicly flat with smooth contourllnea. The slope of the *acllity, which Is lees than5Xt will easily lend it;: if to controlling erosion andsurface water runoff. Ri 'er to drawing D-124 for topo-graphy contours.

4.1.2 100 .Year,Flood PlainThe elevation of the facility places it above the 100 yearflood plain. Refer to Attachment 4.1, the August 25, 1981letter from the Oklahona Water Resources Board. The letterverifies Section 19, T5N, R9W has no areas within the 100year flood plain.

Temperature aCyril, Oklahoma is located southwest of Oklahoma City about15 miles northeasterly from Lavton. Refer to AttachmentA.2. The climate is seasonal in nature with long hot sum-mers the usual case. Cold winters are the exception withDecember, January and February being the coldest months.Usually there is little snow accumulation and consequentlyfrozen soil exists only for a short tipie and to only ashallow depth. The mean date of first fall freeze is Nov-ember 3 and of last spring freeze is April 2. This can beinterpreted as a growing season of 210 days.

The normal annual average temperature for Lawton is 62.7 Fand Apache is 61.9 P; this yields an average for Cyril of62.9 F. The daily average temperature is above 60°F forover 7 months of the year. During the summer months, max-imum temperatures above 90 F are the norm with maximumtemperatures 100 E' and above occuring quite frequently.

Rainfall

The Cyril area experiences peaks in rainfall during theearly spring and late fall. The hot and dry periods are-the months of July and August. Occasionally these dryperiods increase in severity and duration. This is typical.fot-the plains state dt-sa. ;

.The normal annual rainfalX for Lawton is 30.2 inches andjApache is 32,30 inches; this results in an average of 31.2•inches .for Cyril. /^ ' ^' ( -•A

'' ' ' ': : Superfund AdnrunistralRecord Document

c • 10011NEERING.INC

4.3 STRATIGRAPHY

The project area is underlain by fiilty clays, a gypsum layer,and aandstone scracas. The silty clay varies from 4.5 to 13.6feet in depth. Where the clay reaches a rather shallow depth,It is underlain by a gypsum formation which is approximately 10to 11 feet thick.

Below the gypsum formar.ion, additional bedrock features appearas red and brown sandstones. In all boring holes carried to adepth of 30 and 60 feec the aandst-ona stmca was not penetrated.The top surface of the sandstone formal: ion is approximately levelwith roughly an elevation of 1336 feet. The facility grade ele-vations vary froaa 1356.68 to 1344.76 feet.

In summary, the land treatment area is directly underlain byeither a sily clay/gyp&um formation or a ailty clay layer. Thesllty clay has a very low permeability and the gypsum lay r isconsidered to be impervious. The depth below grade for the siltyclay/sypsutti formation varies from 10.5 Co 23 feec. The depth be-low grade for the sHty clay at rat a, when gypaum is not present,varies froci 11.5 to 13 feet . In both cases, the clay and/or gyp-sum constitutes a geologic unit: ideally suited to retard themovement of groundwatcr to the water table.

4.4 SOILS ENGINEERING PROPERTIES

4.4.1 T^t ParametersThe soil in the unsaturated zone must have certain pro-perties and characteristics to ensure a proper breakdownof the oily wastes applied. At the sarae time the soilmust have the capability of preventing a migration ofheavy metals into the gronndwater. Soil testing of con-tinuous samples taken from fche land treatment area havebeen performed. The soils engineering parameters coveredby the testing are the following:

ooo

'0

0

0

Dry Unit WeightAtterberg LiaitsPercent passing 200 mesh sieveSoil classification per the U.S.C.SPermeability testsPercolation tests

4.4.2 Soil_ ClassificationUnder the Unified Soil Classification System, all theaamples tested above the 11.0 foot depth are in the CLgroup. The CL group is made up of inorganic clays oflow to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy claysor silty clays. The soil &£ the ORC facility is siltyclay with a depth that vsrias from 4.5 feet to 13.6 feetAt the shallower depths Cho ailty clay is underlain bya strata of gypsum which is approximately 10 to 11 feetthick.

Superfund Administer iveRecord Document

1001INHERING, INC.

4.4.3 Grain S ize_ Pis fc r iby t ionRCRA recominerids land treatment facllitieh utilize soilwhich has more than 502 of the soil passing the 200 meahsieve. This is also an indication of the clay content; ofthe soil. At the ORC facility all samples tested abovethe 1 1 foot depth have a percent passing greater than 50%.The average for 15 samples Is 88.6;.

^•^^ Permcabillty^The permeability of the eoil must be low, therefore causingpercolation through the aoil to be slow and allowing thesoil matrix to break down the waste material into insol-uble forms for retention in the upper soil layers. Theaverage penaeability of the soil at Cyril -is 88.6 X 10~6

cm/aec., a very low permeability.

4.4.5 Percolation TestsThe percolation tests requested by the ODH were performed.After drilling and completing each monitor well, a secondhold was drilled approximately 3 feet away. After thewater table elevation had stabilized in each hole, a mea-sured amount of water was added to the monitor well casingonly. As expected, the wells attempted to equalize eachother over a period of time. Even though this is not astandard test, the data is presented in the soil report.

^ •4 ,6 Atterberg Limit 8The Atterberg limics of the soil can also be an Indicationas to its suitability for serving as a barrier to the pas-sage of hazardous wastes. The liquid limit should be ap-proximately 30 with a plasticity index of around 15 . Thesoil at Cyril generally falls within these requirements.

4 .4 .7 Susanary of Test ResultsR-ifer to the soil report (Appendix A) for an Itemizedlisting of the laboratory test results discussed above.

4.5 AGRICULTURAL SOIL ANALYSIS

^•5.1 Samples & Test LocationTopsoii samples were taken at each core boring locationand analyzed by the Soil and Water Service Laboratory,Department of Agronomy, Oklahoma State University, Still-water, Oklahoma.

4.5.2 Test ParametersThe testing determined background values for the variousparameters listed below:

(N) Nitrogen(P) Phosphorous(K) Potassium(Ca) Calcium(Mg) Magnesium

Superfund Administr< iveRecord Document

( 1 1 1 r 11 "i" 1 ' i r i i " " " •"' "• ""'C J1"11 1" "" i i ' i ' i " ' i ">. 1001

3pH Values

Lime Requirement - to raise pHSS, 6.5

Cation Exchange Capacity " CEC

Refer to Attachment 4.3, Agricultural Soils AnalysisSuiamary for a listing of the teat resulsa,

4.5.3 Values of^pHThe topsoil samples are silty clays In texture and acidic.Soil pH ranges from 4.9 to 7.5 (Average aa 6.5) in the ac-tive portion of the facility. The unused area of thefacility has pH values from 5*1 CO 5.8 (Average 3a 5.5).

I.A.5 .4 Soil^ Fertility Levels C

Existing soil ferti l i ty levels for the primary elements <are as follows: nitrogen, 7 to 28 Ibs/acre (note: the220 value in CB ^4 was noc included); phosphorous, 5 to 96Ibs/acre; potassium. 153 Co 386 Iba/acre. The secondaryelements of calcium and magnesium have the respectiveranges: 2904 to 7934 Ibs/acre and 557 to 999 Ibs/acre.

^•5.5 Cation Exchange CapacitiesCation Exchange Capacities have been determined for thisclass of soil. Refer to Soil Report, Appendix A for list-ing of results*

4.6 HEAVY METALS ANALYSIS - UNSATURATED ZONE

^*6.1 Test^ Pa rame tersTesting has been performed to determine the concentrationof heavy metals in the unaaturated zone of the land treat-ment area. The following is a listing of these test para-meters:

ArsenicBariumCadmiumChromiumLeadMercurySeleniumSilverCopperNickelZinc

This testing vill serve to establish background data forthe portion of the land Ereatsient area that is being used

' " • ' ' & s veil as the uniiaed portion.

Superfund AdministrRecord Documen

<T 1001

4.6.2 S Q 1 u ble and Unsqluble ConcentrationsThe fcufcai heavy metals (soluble and unsoluble) in the soilwere determined to a depth of four (4) feet at each of thesoil boring locations. Refer to drawing D-124 for Ibcationof core borings. This testing was performed to evaluatethe extent and concentration of heavy metals migration todate.The results of this testing indicated only a negligiblevariance in the concentrations of heavy metals between theused and unused portion of the land treatment area; andalso with depth in each boring* Refe-r to Attachment 4,4 for& st results^ . . , . - . . . . , ^ iIn ai^^i011 t;? ^e heavy metals testing performed, valueswere also obtained for pH, TOG. and oil content. The TOCand oil concent results indicate that presently a very lowlevel of oil loading to the top soil exists. The values,when viewed relative to depth at each sample location, alsoindicate that no adverse waste leaching has occurred whichcould eventually contaminate the groundwater.

4.6.3 Soluble concentrationsBased on these initial results, testing was performed todetermine the soluble concentrations of heavy metals inthe upper 2 feet of the soil The testing procedure wasper 40 CFR Part 261» Appendix II-EP Toxicity Test Proce-dure. Refer to Attachment 4,5 for test results. Two (2)samples were taken from each boring at the 0-1 f t . leveland the 1-2 f t . level.

Factor of Safetyusing the maximum concentrations listed in 40 CRF Part261.24, Table I, average factors of safety have beencalculated for each level ,an4 re displayed below.

h"IT

Pactor of Safety =• (cone. limit/cone.average)O'- l 1 le^el P-2* level ~^Parameter

J£ ;

ArsenicBariumCadmiumChromiumLeadMercurySeleniumSilver

7155511171020014125

125111120831040020125

Again only a negligible variance in the teachable con-centrations of heavy metals exists between the activeportion and the unused area of the Isnd treatment fact-

Superfrnd Administrative.ir-l r *". i H'1'XAfl'l" 000053

VA" ' ^iNEERING,lNC.

1001

lity. In addition, there is a notable increase in thefactors of safety between the 0 to 1 foot level and the1 to 2 foot level. This Indicates good operational prac-

' tices have been followed by ORC in loading and maintain"ing the facility,

4 . 7 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS

4 . 7 . 1 MonitpJ WellsFour monitor wells have been installed adjacent to the

: - —land treatment area. Refer to drawings D-102 and D-124' ' ' • ' - for thsir location and details of installation. During

their installation, the water table was encountered atroughly 15 feet. At each well the casing was installedto a depth of 30 feet with well screen installed on thelower 15 feet.

4 . 7 . 2 Water SamplesSoil borings /U, S3, and ff4 were taken to a depth of 60faet, the wai-er table was encountered at roughly a depthof 15 feet. Water samples were taken for water analysis.The results are displayed in Attachment 4 . 6 . The soilborings were backfilled with. bentontte pellets to grade.

4 . 7 . 3 Test ResultsThe test results indicate very low and acceptable levelsof parameter concentrations. Again, this is indicativeof a properly operated land treatment area. The leacha-

t ^ilifcy of the hazardous constituents is extremely low and-i their liklihood of reaching the water table is quite remote.

4.8 LOCATION AND AC"SSS

The site is quite suitably located in regard to the refinery.All waste generated by the refinery can be delivered to the sitewithout leaving the refinery limits. Additional considerationsfor such items as traffic controls vehicle access, populationdensity and zoning regulations certainly require adequate review.However, sinch the material remains within the refinery limitsand the land treatment area is been operational for approximatelyten years without adverse effects to the"community, the definitelybecome secondary in nature.

Superfund AdministrativeRecord Document

INHERING, INC.

SECTION 5

MONITORING PLAN

GENERAL

The monitoring plan for the facility will monitor and recordcertain test parameters f&r the unsafcurated zone, the ground-water and the waste sludge applied to the soil.

[^•SATURATED ZONE - AGRICULTURAL SOIL A^UY&IS

5.1.1 Test ParametersThe following parameters will be monitored:

ooSoil fertility levels

W Nitrogen(p) PhosphorousW Potassium(Ca) Calcium<Mg) Magnesium

oo pH valueLime requirement - to raise pH 6 . 5Cation Exchange Capacity - CEC

5 . 1 . 2 Frequency of TestingThe soil fertility levels, pH value, lime requirementand CEC will be tested on an annual basis at OklahomaState University. Four samples will be taken from theactive portion of the land treatment area.

5.1.3 Fac ili ty Operat ion

The above information, coupled with the sludge analysis,will allow calculation of sludge application rates tomaintain proper operating conditions of the land treat-ment area. -

Care must be taken to maintain the level of pH^6.5.This gives the soil a greater ability to retain heavymetals in a form that is insoluble and unavailable forplant uptake.

For maximum utilization of the sludge as a source of plantavailable nitrogen, the rate of application will be deter-mined by the nitrogen content of the soil and the sludge- t;p be applied*

t . .

UNSATURATEB-20ME - HEAVY METALS SOIL ANALYSIS

5.2,1 Tes t _P.aranietj;rs -

' 'Due to very low levels of concentrations for certain trace'elements tested, only the following, ones will be pionitorcd;

1001 f9

', f.. -

CadmiumCliromiuraLeadSelenium

In addition, the testing will also record the TOC andoil content of the soil.

5.2,2 Frequency of TestingAnnual testing will be perrormad, using the EP ToxicityTesting Procedure, Co measure the soluble haavy metals Kconcentrations in the top 12 inches of the soil and at a -depth of approximat-ely 36 inches. ^

\05 - 2 - 3 Number of Samples RequiredThe size of the active portion of the soil farm is 3.7 acres.This, combined with the small volume of waste applied, indf^cates sampling at the rate of one per acre (^ total) will 65sufficient for heavy metals testing. 0

05.2*4 Detect ion of yerj^Ical Kij;rat ion .. p

The proposed monitoring method for detecting vertical mi-gration of hazardous waste and hazardous waste constituentsunder the active portion of the land treatment facility willbe accomplished using the EP Toxicity Test results on samplestaken from the 36 inch depth.

The low levels of heavy metal concentrations indicate thisis a sufficient depth for taonitoring vertical migration ofsoluble heavy metals.

Additional systems will be designed and installed to monitorvertical migration of heavy metals if required by governingagencies -

5.3 GROl™WATER ANALYSIS . . „ - , .

5.3.1 Mon it_qr_ WellsFour monitor wells have been installed adjacent to theland treatment area. One is upgradlent and the other threedowngradient* Refer to drawings D-102 and D-124 for addi-tional information. Each veil has been installed to a depthof 30 feet below grade. Well screen is installed on thelower 15 feet,

5.3.2 Test: CharacteristicsGroundwater testing will be performed to determine thefollowing characteristics of the aquifer;

"suitability" as a drinking water"quality" of the groundwacer

f;' A, 1 aontaroinac^asi'-, of the- groundwater5.3.3 Test Paramctera tor Suitability

The parameters Co be tested in characterizing the suitabilityof the groundwater as a drinking water supply will be asfollova: , .

El &fN EARING, INC.

ArsenicBariumCadmiumChromiumFluorideLeadMercurynitratesSeleniumSilver

The "EPA interim primary drinking water standards"(refer to Appendix III in 40 CRF, Part 265) also re-quire additional testing for pesticides, radioactivity,turbidity, coliform bacteria. The water analysis ofsoils boring i?l and i?4 show that pesticides are notpresent. Radioactivity is not a problem for the Cyrilarea. Turbidity is applicable only to surface watersupplies. Colifonn bacteria are only present if tilefields from septic systems are encountered. For thisreason, these additional test items arc excluded fromthe monitoring plan.

Tegt Parameters for QualityThe parameters to be tested in establishing groundwaterquality will be as follows:

ChlorideIronManganesePhenolsSodiumSulfact

5.3^5 Tes t _Pa rajBee ers fo r Contain 1 nationThe parameters to ba eeated as indicators of groundwaterconeaiaination will bfl as follows:

Specific ConductancaTotal Organic Carbon'Total Organic Halogen

Frequency of Testing (First year)-To establish initial background ecmcenerattons or valuesfor the pas-amecers specified In paragrapha 5.3.3, 5-3.Aand 5.3.5, testing will be performed on a quarterly basisfor one (1) year at e*ch monitoring well.

Superfund AdministrativeRecord Document

"1

In addition, the testing in paragraph 5.3.5 requirethat four replicate measurements be made from each sam-ple for each parameter at each of the wells, upgradientand downgradient of the land treatment area. These rep-licate measurements will be utilized in calculating thearithmetic mean and variance of the parameters.

5-3.7 Frequency of Testing (After.First _Year)After the first year, all monitoring wells must besaaapled and the samples analyzed on an annual basis forthe parameters specified in paragraphs 5.3*3 and 5.3.4.

After the first year, all monitoring wells must besaaapled and the samples analyzed on a semi-annral basisfor the parameters specified in 5*3.5. (Note: therequirement for replicate measurements also apply tomeasurements taken during the second year)

5.3.8 Water Table ElevationEach time a sample is taken, the elevation of the ground-water surface will be determined and recorded.

5.3.9 Sampling & Testing MethodsThe procedures and techniques for: (1) sample collection,(2) sample preservation and shipment, (3) analytical pro-cedures and chain of custody control will comply withthose procedures set forth in:

Procedure^ Manual for Groundwater MonitonnfaAt Solid Haste Disposal Facilities FRE^O/SW^l^ .

Metjiod^s f o r Ch em i ca 1 Analys is oJWat G r ^nd WastesEPA-600/^-79-020. March 1979

5.^ WASTE SLUDGE ANALYSIS

Test SamplesOnly a small amount of waste has been generated by therefinery in the second quarter and to the present timein the third quarter of this year. For this reason, onlyone sample has been collected from the API Separator,Testing was performed Co determine the levels of concen-trations for heavy metals in the sludge from the APISeparator. This is displayed in Attachment 5.1.

Sou rce s of SJudgePresently sludge generated at the refinery has threeprimary sources with quantities as follows:

(a) Leaded Tank Bottoms(b) Other Tank Bottoms(c) API Separator Bottoms

2 tons/year4 tons/year3 tons/year

Superfund Administre iveRecord Document

00005^ --»*••"<•?' i~. ? -^-.^-J

S N E E R I N G , INC.

5.4.3 Test ParametersSamples from the sources listed in paragraph 5 . 4 . 2 will.be sampled and tested to determine the levels of concen-trations and values for the following parameters:

CadmiumChromiumLeadSeleniumpHOil contentTOCNitrogen content

Due to the low levels of solubility for certain traceelements in the soil matrix (after operation of the lardtreatment facility for approximately ten years) theheavy metals test list can be reduced to include onlythe above elements.

r^sQuen^y^of Testing5.4.4

Because of the low level of sludge production at therefinery, each sludge source will be tested on an annualbasis as they are generated. Perferably this testingwill take place during the spring and summer months ofthe year.

In the case of Leaded Tank Bottoois, the tirae betweentests could be quite lengthy, due Co tank cleaningrequirements.Test MethodsHeavy metals testing will conform to procedures for theEP Toxicity Test.

5.5 SUMMARY OF HONITORING PLAN

Refer to Attachment 5.2 for a summary of the categories to bemonitored, the test parameters, and the frequency of testing.

Superfund AdministrativeRecord Pooiment

SECTION 6

CLO^E & POST CLOSURE

4iThe life of any land treatment; area Is dependent upon theability of the soil to retain heavy metals in insoluble forms ^Chat are unavailable for plant uptake and are not teachable, jSoil samples will be obtained on an annual basis and tested "for t-he level of soluble heavy metals build"up within the ;zone of incorporation. —

All waste application will cease when the time for closure isreached. To ensure the complete degradation of ^il and hydro-carbons within the soil matrix, cultivation will continue.After a sufficient period of time the area will be seeded toobtain a grass cover.

POST CLOSURE MONITORING

The following will be monitored thraughout the post closure period;

o Groundw3ter-analysis to detect any migration of heavymetals from the soil matr ix above the water cable intothe aquifer.

o pH value - soil In the zone of saturation will betested to determine the lime requirements to maintainp H 2 6 . 5 .

POST CLOSURE MAINTENANCE

Maintenance of the land treatment area will consist of thefollowing activities:

o Inspection and repair of containment structures ~dikes, fences and signs, etc,

o Inspection and repair of monitoring equipment.

o Inspection and nsaint.snance (by mowing) of the rinalgrass cover on the land treatment area.

o Periodic addition of lime as indicated by teacing tomaintain pH at the appropriate levels to minimizesolubility of heavy mecals in the soil stratas,

IRK A PrtCT ft/*,/^—-- -CLOSURE & POST CLOSURE FINANCING-.:-W^

-At the appropriate tim&, ORC will provide the necessary cuaeevaluation and financial assurance for facility closure and poseclosure monitoring. All will be in accordance with the require-ffcmi-s of governing agencies and cheri regulations.ffiBSsaw*"1—1——•"

DESCRIPTIONof the

CYRIL LAND TREATMENT AREAof

OKLAHOMA REFINING COMPANYCYRIL. OKLAHOMA

rThe West 600 feet of the SW^ of the NW^ of Section 19. T5N, R9W,exclusive of the. following p'ortions of that Wea^t 600 feet:

Portion Sl - *-1"' "-",£he most westerly 33 feet, dedicated aacounty road right-of-way.Portion //2Portion //3 the most southerly 307 feet, more or less.

- the most northerly 250 feet. more or less.• of the property now remaining, the northwestcorner measuring 160 feet in an east-westdirection and 200 feet in a north-southdirection, raore of less.of the property now remaining, a triangularshaped parcel at the southwest cornermeasuring 150 in a north-south direction,326.5 feet in a south easterly direction.and 290 feet in an east-west direction.

The above described property containing 378,871 square feet or 8.7acres, more or less,

ssavitch

000062

DESCRIPTIONof the

CYRIL REFINERY PROPERTYof

OKLAHOMA REFINING COMPANYCYRIL, OKLAHOMA

Attachment: 2 .3

The CyrilexclusiveSt. Louis-Oklahoma.TRACT I :

TRACT 2:

TRACT 3:

TRACT 4:

The above

Refinery property consists of the following tracts of landof the right-of-way requirements for U . S . Highway 277, theSan Francisco Railway Company and the city streets of Cyril,

The S h of the SW^ of Section 13, T5N, R9W.

The NW^ of Section 1 9 . T5N, R9W; exclusive of aparcel of land measuring 250 ft, north-south and350 ft, east-west owned by the City of Cyril.

Lots 1 , 2. 3 , 4. 5. 6 , 7, 8, 9 , 20, 21. 22, 23 and24 in Block I of the City of Cyril.

Lots 1 , 2, 3. 4, 5. 6 , 7, 8. 1 9 , 20, 21. 22, 23 and24 in Block 8 of the City of Cyril.

tracts of land representing a net acreage of 220 acres.

ssavitch

000064

Attachment 4.1(1 of 5)

JAMES ft , BARNETT. Execupv O.'iM I C H A E L R MELTON. A«.«ani0<f

OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARDPO-60X&3585 • 1000 N.£. lOTM STREET . OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA 73152 • (4051271 -2555

, August 25. 3981

Mr. Tom Sarrett ;Nova Engineering,.Inc. , ^^•.504 N. Walnut Street ?Broken 'Arrow, Oa4J3U.. I

Rear Mr. BarretU -. . . '' i• • •••'•'• "•1" ' • " ' ; ' - \o

This better Is in response So your request for a determination as to whether ^the Nl^i of Section 19, Township 5N, Range 9WIM, Caddo County, contains any _areas identif ied as being prone to the 100-year flood.

iw'The latest o f f ic ia l Flood Hazard Boundary Map (FHBM) for unincorporated areas 0of Caddo County, OK, having an effective date of January 3. 1978, shews thatno portion of Section 19/T5N, R9W2M, lies w i t h i n the 100-year f loodplain.

If you have any questions or need any further f lood-map infomat ion , pleasefeel free to contac^^andy Zipser. Engineer ing Div i s ion , at (405) 271-2533.

Very truly yours,^ - - —fl

/-^tlHarold L . Springer, P . E .Chief, Engineering DivisionOKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD

«-,fiERALD £. eOMELLl.Chaifn-an£AHL WALKER. V<ce-Cha<rman'

L L MALES. StCrtMry

Superfund AdinmistrativeRecord Document

0 0 0 0 6 5..^SJKEST R-,"J.w^ ' TUCKER, Mamli^

JOM?< B JAM006. Membar 'JAMfiSH NORlCK. Mflmbef

fl.G- JOMNSOM, Mtftn&BrRALPH G. MtPHEflSON. Mtinfw

80VO STEVESON. MBmbflr ,^^ " ^^a&i.-i- ^^^1 * ^

• f'!~f .•'-' ' •« ' • - •'''•

•t Attachment 4.1-•-4t )

" '"Attachment 4.1' (3 of 5)

_____^^^^^^^^asfflisaais^^

• . / , / • i •-' t/ ;

These fflaps may nof tficfude af f Special Rood Hazard Areas ;rt the communi tyAfter 3 fp.ore deEaiterf study, t he Speoaf f food Ha;ard Areas shown on thesemaps may be modtfisrf. and oEher areas added.

ConsuEt R?F(A Sefvicitig Company or (ocaf insurance agent or broker to determina.f properrissm th'scomrriL-nitv are siigibis for Hood insurance.Mfftaf irfBitification Oa t2 , *pp iL2 . t 3 7 B

i-- COMMONiTY N;i, 40&3E<i

spfciai nooo M*?if to AA(* • ?ONE * *i o£ i f r (nc*r tos o iTE: [3*rE)

0000c^00

<^• c-oysy <&^ ^^ c0 3• 3;0. 0.— • ,*^ f^^ a-11;rf& tfl:-. —t-,3 -^e-r sy<"*-"*""&"

ofwutvr o' m'yilG *"t0 USB*» OfVE'.owtuiFiilf*) knirkw* M-fn:lnh»n

rQ»N OF C Y R l l . O K( C A D O O C O . ;M A P 1 K D E X

fi* »iooa nvfD »ou«(a*'*T ut^s10 M 0 1

0 0 0 0 6 8

ssavitch

000069

ssavitch

000070

nil

11 ,,. . :>- •

1 1 i .t " :

Hi 'i!11"'-§i '•lt'' " -

H c-!| €. -;""" l~l•"—•lll•lt•"ll-•H ^ 'Sample ^o.ffS '.. ., >-'C*"'f.i->- •"•' •

§ 1 CB^l^y^/O6-!'H 1 /397;/l t-2 f•111 A ^ - • • - • : .% ^ CB^/Wy/O'-l.S'IH /3975/1.5 t-3'

§ CB^^SO/O'1-!'§ /3983/I'-21

§ CE^^SS^O'-l'||g ^S^/l'^*

C^^F 0/ft; /'3QC"7 f{\t I*^g^ &f f3 / j yb / /U *"i

Si /^989/1 t -2 tHWg / .3707/ i <-.

^ CB?6/3993/O t-l•gl /3992/£ l-2B

B - -

|g l) Oklahoaa^ " ' 2) Cation E^ "3} EquivaleiK ' - 0 •*) No limeill '"- • ;• ! -c • ;^S ;• i; > "cS -—•g'sgag? 'c-i ?^ .: s . • .S§i a0^ o -'5?§.

S 3^1 -". =i ^g§| 0 g sagSf. ^k fe ' . '•BB^ f^ '— ' 'l§^ " ^«- Oi

^ ' 0-——

pH

4.96.1

--- 7.16.2

6.47.4

7.56.4

5.35.7

5.15.8

State UniversityKchangs Capacitynt amount of purerequirement

AGRIC

N

1421

730

1525

22028

23,10

77

, Soil

CaCO,

HT T f T P A T <;riTT ^ULiJ,U IVVl-i Al; I tiS

PERTIUTYP

8946

3287

9670

588

fia00

48

9637

& Wacer Servi

in tons/acra,

ANAI.YSTS

(LBS/ACRK

496586

185469

406242

153433

485^FlQJL/0

385581

ces Labor

required

SW

E)Ca

33337934

67536327

73455 4 1 6

4770

36794914

29045069

ator

to

<

Attachment 4 .3 f ,' ... '" 'i ' , r -;'• " • ;;'-, \

ft \ ' •^- • •i \^ " •

™Y w -^- '\

' - !•

Lime Requirement /,^Mg (CaCO- Equiv) CEC <•/ ^-

999 3.0 , . - ' •959 0.9 : l\ . , •

[ ' ' • 1 ' L - ^ ' \999 * ^999 0,6 - ' .

999 . 0.2 ' : ' .999 • * - .' • •

999 *-0.2 :- ;' ,

Q 0 /, 1 ^ •GO" ^.-i

999 1.6 ,.. .

557 2.6999 1 . 4 . .:• ^ " -% *••• s., .•&,' ' • - . - , : - '

^{fw^v; S t illwacer, Oklahoma

raise soil pHS6.5 •.'''^'•3> ;' ~ • • "•^yr. . - • < ( , :- .—{u ... .-^m -^ fi>s

t-r^L^>

0 0 0 0 7 1

1<0

SOIL and WAT^R SERVICE LABORATORYAGRONOMY DEPARTMENT

OiL TEST REPORT NO. 13&2 A

ADDRESS C-.tii'.. ry ^ x r f^S *P\ 'J Ii<E;(:7ff^

OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITYCOOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVIC^STILLWATER. OKLAHOMA 74078

COUNTY CLEVELAND

DATE REC£iVED._07/_7_/flJ_ DATE RESULTS RgPQRTED ^ 7 / . 3 l / f J t ,LOCAT(ON,

ssavitch

000073

ssavitch

000074

;--^-r"-

IU0

>•

£ w

t £ &t/)

V>

'*. CC

y,

*-

^J§^0

::) iS I

LU

1"

<t-

X .J

< m ^

*- ...

0CO

l" ,

- >

c:

< t-

U

J5 <

t-

0 o: <

1 ^ ^

<

DL -'

.J 0

-J

*f 0

0 0

W

>"

or0t-<cc0C

D<^h-

01 -y

U1—

01^>

S

Sh

;U

JC

C</) <

n- n-

£st-Q0^s-0°

c

-2.

^o

^rco

y03 <

' u \\ \

\It

</

*,

'*

IMM

a'•<i

-J• 'J>U

J~JU>

-t-<^r>00X3k-

iJi-JK^1—>

/*/X>•

»—&,

».)VI

trtU

JccQ0<LU5;

<2

1}

z01-

<^J

•—<

•^h.0UJ

>-

e0£LHi

e<••;^-

^JDti

UJ

&;

UJ

l-<C3^f^S,

r.

00UJ

SUJ

0LUK.

UJ

fr-<?:0

^Ul3£IK"^g0xU

Jazt-tnLJt--J -

0V)

<Z

So

-1Z

2o—u<<1£J—(flLI

C.

UJ0aUJU)

^1-^V)

'*5

tS E

H

^M

3 at<nw<

JU

>-<J»-=;*«

(fl

Q•^it

<°-

Ul

-"^it

<s

ECt

QCDFGC;|t1^ ;

",

„4

^--.

-*J

^~

la

TI~~^~5

^al

'-iU

f-<5

^•n'

^

C-0JQ

.mw

^—

.

a: ^1

M

0•

ffl f-^

£ ^^

^LU

t^J

e"

Q- w

^£

1' 1

<IA<

0

0Z

ftt

B

^<

K 1

'ag

LS

Sw

rVa

^

d

'w/m

sS

ooy

fffM

iM

^1;iii)i

in'Z.0^<»-UJCCD

.Q

;tUt-z.•-.

s%a.-5.fffi;

^1

SrP

FaS

S1"?

^SisB.i-0:

0Ul

<n m

</l

UJ

CC:0<uN0)

Q-JLULL

B^^

l(T

ilfc^s im

tff i

^5^1

^^^^10A

l

^

tf-

^ °

5

a->-t-

01

w

•r<

z

2

-J

, -1

CL

<:

<0

S "

^

CC CD

00

-1

h-

&B

£^Z

WW

i lV

MiS

%sW

EFE

lKje

RS

L^U

le" ic

f a5b2&

(iifWifZ

Jrfc

mf—

irUJ

.K T

* •• i

^^^^^K

1

Atta

ch

me

nt

^.3

(4

o

f 1

2)

£<ia

0^

^0

«-?

0^,

g^

•Z. o

o e

MX(B

/E

<!'£

u. ^0

£

to *:

1^. \-

0

a,

§1

S"n

i re

uf £

2

^Z

^ S

.0

y-

w</l

0

&• (fl

<ulL

i 0

E

^

z

£

B 81OT

Q-

"

^

^

•

lU6

UJ >

e

^

0 E

m

S 0

(0

< £

0

in £

p

^

">

g 3^^ §^£

in u

-Z tU 0

0

o

U °

IL

^ ^°

=- 2U

. (^

fLJI^

Q^

2-0

<aUJ

d> ^

0 (~

(0 <

< 0

.

Z Q

? 5

0

,I

<

" 0 .

(0 0

§ q

"' u/

S >'

•

^s

m

'X

•z »—

:'\

,

<" s

^

•

h- 0

"

1 ^ duperfund Adm

inistrati§ ^

Record Documsnt

A u.

>- UJ

& Q

"

00

00

sS

t

inr-000c•»aui

:Urf»

t*t /•

/5

t-0u-y-*-i

^JU

SOIL TEST REPORT^ U 'J 0 . e

SOIL and WATER SERVtCE LABORATORYAGRONOMY DEPARTMENT

DATE RECEIVED 07/ >7/bl

ADDRESS __r';aft,rY c. :gTlN;.riN Lt IKECTUFt COUMY'_£^yfLLA5p^__^J_l

DATE RESULTS REPORTED 1LM/±1______LOCATION.

rATF t <pf'JnpR<.AB NO- {SAMPLE NO,

?.'S^&Aj 3980—————i——————I

soiLaePH

6 > <

ACTIOMe f .

7 . S

L8SNO

SUR

i K

,/A-N

SUB P Lb/A

<-^. . .. .

K Lh /A

4 0 f J

S O I LCa Lb/A

/r ^ 4 :;

, T E S T I NMQ Lti /A

^ t^- - r l ^ l .

D E XFe pf>'n ^'n (iprn Mn pom

11 i n

8 OD^ORGAN tCMArTER

'<SANOt

TSH.T

».

^ K T U M ECLAY

% CLASS

————————1ffl

RECOMMENDATfOlstS BY EXTENSION PERSONNEL't. ^PPtY NUTRfEl^TS fN AMOUNTS SHOWN ABOVE

IS DEFICIENT FOR THE YiELO GOAL ENDiCATED. OP THE DEFtCtENCtES fNOICATED ABOVE. __ POUNDS OF N.__ POUNDS OF P,0». __ POUNDS OF K,0AND—— TONS OF ECCE LIME are the ffFrufnum reauiremenis for &stabtishment and the maximum for ACP COST SHARING

ssavitch

000077

Hi

0

. > ^

>•

o;

e?^ s s(rt

(0 ^

/r- t'~

^<

^o

3 5

x

tU t-

<1-

X -J

<

UJ

$$t-

in °

05 l"

-

- 5

tr

5 <

h-

0 a:

<X l"

S

< -i

-J 0

-1^ 0

F0 0

(/l

>££0t-<0:

003<-'h

-o) z

OU

J

>§

cc

•U

J 0=

(fl <0-: Q

-U

l^

i^Q

<>

-

5:5

-o

OC

•Z

."o

-J o

r

OS

t/l <,

032«^uJ>^J>J>-

t-Z^00^/

3»-0s'£.£^•e-^f

se^>^~2.3J'

UC/>(/;LLJ(TGC<u.*<1

0fr-<00-J

#-t

N.

•Sf-0UJ

^gIL,

a.

m»—-J—~

(7UJQ:

UJ

\-<0s.

N,

h-s»t^0C»*,

uGLJLa

i

t-(

0s,

c

6P^

^J>JJLJJ£3

"Si3

ffv«h3<n<»<i<J

S*'

U^*<

Vl0s*-

(0

^n-

^ u.

Zu

*< h f

g^

§=

£cacE£c2£

^

^^ -

2 ^

rt —

-i. o.

>- 5

5 <

/i -;-.1«u*fc.J•<3n.a

:3

^^

w

tOQ

-^0

-U

Z0 -

t- 03

U4UJK-1 X

0

a-(/l"9

(E^

UJ U

Ja

.*

a£

LU «*(ft ftU

l

tu0

h. Z

5°

£»

< 'sssW

H&

ZQ

5i

h-^0-

*-•

1'-'

(;''•

^V-

C3C^

f^"ac'

f 1-.3

f^^5!

lfta^&

« ib

XIff^

^

OTZ0t—<:>—uCl:&{£U

Jt—2

liS^yS

SJS

^ iQ

mS

SS

^

iill'i

i@

ii jja!§

ll 0?

lly^y^w

S

y?S

Si^

(0UJa:

^

0.

it:h-

*J1

a:

0<

n"

UJ

CC >-

.-

-

iy W

fe'

U

N'

fc

.h- 2

—— '%

?'*

•JP

-(flJ

;J^O

<?-

Q1

&-

<(

.</

^

iT'i

S

<n

^U

J

UJ

tt: CO

C

(n

UL 0

-J

t-

,

k

\

ydJ0'

s

A(0:u-0(n0z30Q-ca.u.0tn0gCa

—i

UJ

^

^

g

^0:

yid r

Q-

JZ ;

0

Ctfl

a

z111t-, '--

11 ^

>

cffl

0:y)

<z r

g!!!5i v

-i u

0

Lu

2

^

^uUCu3t-<U-^a<253(lt/t"«u^iQS.t;( ^P

?

teat'vQ

&S

WSo

Ltta

ch

7

of

02(T<I01

-§U0.(J<0i-3Eyni„ E4)•C§i£f0'0s£-

0

1

> ^l

a>3

£;

®3 -S5

C(U1c

il3,"- ai

^^= UJ1 0lu; UJ?

u-iio

3-

^u- Ql. 2-3

<as 0^a

<< uS

0?

z

^o 0

A 0,

0

i"11n a:

0 0

z ii-

J 1-

r Z

E

UJ3 u

s £

^

UJ

• 0

^ "

tfN

rW

^

'•».«

'

men

12

)S.u

perfu

nd

Adm

inis

trativ

e

Record

Docum

ent

NO. 1 3^ A

f -^ SOIL. and WATER SERVICE LABORATORYv AGRONOMY DEPARTMENT

OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITYCOOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICESTILE-WATER. OKLAHOMA 74078

:,. NAME

DATE RECEIVED 07^ T^i

ADDRESS__r.UMY r. XU'M'.^H MJ tH LCTOR COUNTY CL^VJiLAMD

DATE RESULTS RPPOnTFO I/^l./U_______LOCATION,

FATEB !VQ

SENDERSSAMPLE NO

SOILREACTIOMPM B.t ,

'2 7 • <?

L8S/AMO.I-N

SUR. S'JB

SOIL TEST tNDEXP Lt>/A K Ib/A Ca Lb/A Mg Lh/A Fe ppm Zn ppm Mr, ppm B ppm

INTERPRETATIONS:

PlY NUTRtENTS tN AMOUNTS SHOWN ABOVEDEFICIENT FOR THE YIELD GOAL INDICATED D

W

•as^aw ^§ §s. Q.

RECO^MENRATfONS BY EXTENSION PERSONNEL

OF THE DEFICIENCIES INDICATED ABOVE, ... POUNDS OF N, _,. POUNDS OF P,0»._. POUNDS OF K,,0AND. ... TONS OF" ECCE LtME are She minimum requirement;, for establish mf-m and the maximum tor ACP COST SHAFtiNG

o >o*^.o 3§1

§§.

^<' iUC3'-

-0L

Ci.;t'i\t1 COPY

us<

°

<? >- §

S?* '

t-ui £ -

^

(0 0)

-»

^1^

CC 7

li-

^uj ^

<t

<

^ ^

-•

2^

0

•J

:3 2

•=' >

0

-"tii ^

UJ^

IU

>-

<

i

<

UJ ^

1^

t- III °

(n ^

-

^-< ~

£:

$

h- LU

^5

<:

^

.20

o: <

=>T

ui S

0

< Q- -*

US

o-.

^ 0

?=.

0 0

w

0:3t"UJ

•*-*

^>'»

••'•-•I

/I

}~rr"LL»

l-

0 '

S^^

>—

Q-

^LU

S

Q:

^—'h-

/• (

t^^3

^

LAJ cc

i

Q

^

§—

J

0CO

>-(T?<(E0CO<:••"h-

11J 2:O

oi

?5

^t?

UJ

<:c

05 <

1 fl-

(:)-

;

t— U

J

^0

<>-s:^

- ?

§^0

^g

^0

^

^W <

2

-,: ^.-t. . •i. t^

i i* \

» ...((.>

•'. - i

20t-<-J

•d'S?s,3QLUh-0:

0Q,

0:

W1-3Ul

UJC:

UJ

1-<0M•sf^.

'S?'•0QLU^U

JCJU

JIE;LU»-•<1^

uf^<JUt-Ct/<0:C?C<aCvL(11>•»-L BK-^Cfl

OTlU

Ul

>-

UJ

^^

(/l

Q^W

"tt

Z U

J<

^- K"S

(2$

O2eD&01Ea.a5ea.C1^1

Z <

/i -i

U

d-

5

5 <

n 5vU<-C<3-Ja.CO

tZ"

^0^n

:Ci-l

y3: 03

JCLfJ T

^ °'

^0

a: 2'UJ U

JQ

-J?

£:

JJ-f

1ft <i

'e\

^6

S-2-<^

/!<

-i

.

^

••

w^J*

t

——

»».

'»

f0a'T-,-;n•f.«tf;fr-'0C'-^{-.ven

fi^S

^SE

^^•.p

iip^^

^

.——

—^-—

^—i

.---.^^.--.-..

.

<0z0>—<inS;0:U

l

z

a?8JUfJ

^•KK

.t-0:

UUJ

W

^^

ES^SBB'T'i^

s^St

'•.flKS

Sa

V)

UJ

0:

U<

D:

<UJ>

uj

Eny

<CO

-)

Q

0--i

0UJ

a;

u- 0 ^

B,i

|ciHtgra

J£ IL

ffiR^ffS

0^^1d"Q-

^Z

^

^

OT(n

203

0-J

t- ^

^^f^

^W

^^^^

mw

siM

T?^s& a^ssr^ ^1

^J^

ii)

9^

Atta

chm

en

t ^.3

(9 o

f 12)

u20:<z01

O.to

•^0u. U

°&

§^

Z o

3 ":

o e°-1xffi

-E

(!:£

"-• ?

o S

w •;

/*• c

§1

0 t"

0- 5<cri

gi zo0

U

- 'r-

<n 0

^C

c/i

a;LJ

o e

^

=> 50

0

fy(A

°- £

m

c

^

ID E

UJ

>

C>

o em

S ®w

< c21

0 -

0

-ij £--

t-

(Q

•(

<>

li

o

(J 5Z

"=

ilu

:z

U

J

^ "^

^

tu U

0 „

luU u

u.^

go

U "

••' zu- ,-i^0

UJ '

Z

1>-

Q

^ 2

0 <n

in a^

ui

0 »-

03 <

< U

20

5 S?i

<M

060 0

^3

-L

kJ

2 •'-'

§>-

1^

^ g Superfund Adm

inistra5 ^

Record Document

£ a2 "^

—

..

.

> u1

^ S\ /\ A

0a^ °

,

U I? V

(/' 0t^

(0

'' "

' '

-f <:

F*0

•'fc

^

a3rtlr-0:

Cccnwr

3«0wtiv0

>c0-^ULJ

ZJU

bUSL i£b! Hb^UKi NO- I - . SOIL and WATER SERVICE LABORATORY OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVE^ AGRONOMY DEPARTMENT COOPERATIVE EXTENSiO"'" STILLWATER, OKLAHOMA

-'- NAME_____________________________________ ADDRESS P-l^ry t. '< f f f j ^ J ^N tj f^HCTOt; COUNTY CtHV6:t-J

DATE RECEIVED ^^-l7/-!1______________» OATF RFSUl TS REPORTED _•>Z.<.IL/^-T_______LOCATiON____________

S ^ Y E : ] S £ ^ t O E R s 7 S O I L R E A C T l o ^ l t ^ B S . / A [ ___~Z_ ,, ^ SO I L TEST iNDEX _ __ ~ IbR'aft l ' T, ^ _ TE XTU RE ' "> A 8 NO SAMPLE NO. PM B l SU^0'^0 p Lb/A K Lb/A Ca Ll>/A Mf] Lt>/A F e p p m | z n p p m Mn wm Boom MA^TER ^W S^T Ct^V ^^3

•^i.;^»A 390^ ''»?' 6.^ 1 0 4 - ' ^t ' / -) ^ *U 4! 4^'* i

I__________\______________J I______________1 1 I t I [ \ I . I 1______.______INTERPRETATIONS i————————(————————i

1

It(t

————————I————————

SEC.____R_____ T_____

FIELD StZE________ACRES

CROP LAST YEAR________

LBS./A.N___ P,0,__KO__£ ' £

TONS LIME ____________

RECOMMENDATIONS BY EXTENSION PERSONNEL

\PPLY NUTRIENTS fH AMOUNTS SHOWN ABOVE QF THE DEFtClENClES INDICATED ABOVE,.._ POUNDS OF N, __ POUNDS OF P,0i, __ POUNDS OF K/0\SD£F)CtENT FOR THE YtELD GOAL INDICATED a AND-__ TONSOFECCE t.lME are Ihe minimum requiremenis for establishment and the ma'(imun-, tor ACP COST SHARING 'At >>—• rr

o n-fi]o n>-h g'

fr~' n?£/) N13C s_/ r<T3- =0 s •>

fr. " *

S cT ^^ §0 Q.Q.

-^ oJ> "•sw' o 0-0 c d.0 § Hoo • = sr •• - • '• _________________" y^- C» . . • Sig^AtureJ"-:___£:____________________________nno O R 1____________

c& CL i rNTCOS-Y

I*

""' SOIL and WATER SERVICE LABORATORY^ AGRONOMY DEPARTMENT

MAM£

DATE RECEtVED Q7/.-7/61

NO.

OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVER' hY'TCOOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVIC^ \ST.LLWATER. OKLAHOMA' 7W8 .;•

ADDRESS C^Uf i iTY F X T t ^ '•. f ' > rJ IHR SrCTtJP COUNTY C L^VKLANi) ^-

PATE RESULTS REPORTED IfJ.^L^l________LOCATION.

STATEAB W

'Ift.^ilA

SENOEP'SSAMPLE HO,

39^

SOtLRSPM

S.I

ACTION8 1

r*^

L8SNO

suft

7

{A.-M

SU9 P Lb/A

<) t

K Lb/A

.(rt ••;

sonCa LOi'A

** 0 0 4

TEST INMg L&/A

^'•r

^EXPe opr-i 2n ppm Mn fipm a &om

OROANICMATTER

tSAND

X

TSILT

%

EXTURRCLAVI CLASS

yP.WbUOS TAfH-

^

%ft£

^INTERPRETATIONS

RECOMMENDATIONS BY EXTENSION PERSONNEl.-

OF THE DEFICIENCIES INDICATED ABOVE.__ POUNDS OP N,-__ POUNDS OP PA.__ POUNDS OF K;0AND__ TONS OF ECCE LtME are the minimum require merits for establishment anci ths maximum EorACPCQ^T ShARING

^PPLY NUTRIENTS IN /.\.OL?NTS SHOWN ABOVEAS DEPtClc-NT FOR THE YiELD GOAL INDICATED D

IGfAt . CHflHGf:

£ftT3

332ni .o c-*^ §0 Q-

^?Og-3 §•^ ^•.-S -s<"»• Q)! g^

(& ,0^-0 8 2

NO.

SOIL and WATER SERVICE LABORATORYAGRONOMY DEPARTMENT

NAME

DATE RECCIVED 07 / '7/h 1

OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITYCOOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICESTiLLWATER. OKLAHOMA 74076

ADDRESS _C'tlNTY _ r. X T t •M f> N LYt^fcCn^ COUNTY . CL£1VLLAN6

.LOCATIONDATE RESULTS REPORTED .OT/.-.V/.^1.

STATSAS ftiO

dd.^A

SENDERSSAMPLE ft.0

399?

SOIL REPM

f<t!

ACTION

8i

7 . C

L8SNO

SUR

7

,/A-N

SUB P Lh/A

3 1

K LEI/A

<1 ^ I

SOIL

Ca Lti'A

E) P '•

TEST W

Mg L.h/A

^y ,'

0£X

Fr Hpnk ^n ppm Mn ppmr————

S (lorn

ORGAMCMATTER

%SAND

%

TPtLTt

EXTURECLA'I'

% CLA^S

SEC.____R.

FIELD SfZE_

CROP LAST Y E A R

LBS/A.N___s^O,.

TONS LIME

?PL'<' NUTRtENTS (^ AMOUNTS SHOWN ABOVES DEFICIENT FOR THE YIELD GOAL tNDlCAl 60 G

1/1

^fll

^ ^a. •"ftci c-o •-^ v^

RECOMMENOATtONS SY E X T E N

OF THE DF.FICSENCfES tND'CATED ABOVE.^^AND TONS OF ECCE L I M E are Ihe minimum

SIO

POlrequ

^ PERSONNE

f N O S O F N ,cements fores

POlfNOSOFF,0tabtishment and the

»•—ma

POUNDS OF K,0ximum lor ACP COST SHARING

s^^^^^^si^*sSK'£5sSh£?9^

frsi r-T IKetB^'t^Sfit SMSS^0 0 ^%^§' 1 y ^wE'dE-1^5 ^^^

?%sfp.

10000-9&-Cil

£>

1*1

1S- r :L ] lN ' f COE'V

^E——NBB 3TEIE^^ B

;SL^NT: ^

; 501; Brc

An3U8JECT: ^

, Sampt£Identificc

^1 0-1H 1-S^1 2-:n 3-^^2 0-3i?2 1 . ^^2 3^

iS'3 0-3«i3 1-2i?3 2-:n 3-4

^4 0-1^4 1-2•?4 2-3i?4 3-4

i?5 0-1^5 1-2^5 2-:^5 3-4

#6 0-1i?6 1-2#6 2-2j?6 3-4

; ; ' ,,'

JOLEirERSANOttNTlpAL OR Sfc*»

58

t/a Enqi5 N. Wa3ken AyFN: To

\na1ysi

a

ation

L?i1 . 53-3

I

?ii

5ii3

i\

??t

REPORTSLARPflCKXJ

ne^InTOffl

s

APPJCT

«i

eringutw, OKBarrett

of Soil

Arse

3.3.2.5.

3.<l.

2.

7.3.3.

<!.

3.2.2-3.

3.3-4.

<!.

3.2.3.

<!.

IV ONLV TOS

^."Sory

74012

Samp'

me

4640

507

1490

I579

3000

1930

'-"'^ .-'i.,.

TMfcSAM

ferns ft

S871

es for

•

Ban

70858079

675969

84786273

77838279

68286968

50987970

^w^

Pt£ t£STE

Fie Wee(

(

i

u

,.•

,-

a.'

,,•

.,•

,,

0

^

3Ut6 E.

Haza

m

^215

984

5130

0416

9713

1500

^

AND

S Of

Atr(1

hwest L<43rd/Tulsa,

irdous Mater

ResultsCadmium

7.54.75.0

<.5

< .5< - 5<.5

4.72.42.22.3

4.32.32.32.5

2.52.4

<0.5<0.5

5.07.44.92.5

SouthvQV ^^B^

Wti Wt NECESS^

ffte PfsSfGtenif

acnm< 1 4 . 4of 4)"

aboratorOklahoma '

NUMBE

August

-ials

(ug/g)Chromium

4056.850.150.0

53.439.949.6

26359.049.068.4

42.846.363.849.8

49.252.654.343.9

40.1543950

vestjgborc

fLV INDICATIVE OF

nSiWfUStfv*'

tL 1- --

f\UGy of OkSs74145/(918)

R 1396-A20, 1981

Copper

12.511 .812 .59.9

1 2 . 110.012 .4

18.816.127.153.4

14.11 1 . 61 1 . 416 .4

16.219.112.316.1

16.519 .716.320.0

Superfund AcRecord DC

atc^^pkj(•^y ~^

^/^H^^

TH£ QUAUTfES OF..' ffiV.'.;W

2 : 1SSI

ihoma665-0680

Lead

<25<24< 25<25

< 2450

< 25

944945

<23

43<23< 23< 25

< 2 5< 24<25

49

<2599

<25<25

mmistrativ??cument

ihbma

APPAnENTfYfi--:.^--A

ou»

. - . - . „ . . - . ... -^W-arhmpnr- A A *

^ ii8i ^ \ k o f 4 )ww H^ P Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma

8716 E. 43rd/Tulsa. Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0680

CLIENT: Nova Engineering NUMBER 1396-A504 h. WalnutBroken Arrow, OK 74012 ^9° ?-ATTN: Tofn Barrett

SUBJECT: Analysis of Soil Samples for Hazardous Materials

Sample • Results (ug/g)Identification Mercury Nickel Selenium Silver Zinc

n 0-1 .15 15 5.0 6.0 21.6ffl 1-2 .14 14.2 <2 .4 3.8 24.6n 2-3 .15 25.0 7.0 4.0 17.5H 3-4 <.05 9.9 5.0 4.0 17.4

n 0-1.5 ,19 9.7 7.3 3.9 27.6^2 1.5-3 .16 10.0 7.0 6.0 27.4j?2 3-4 .15 9.9 <2.5 7.9 28.7

ff3 0-1 <.05 14.1 <2 .3 5.6 326^3 1-2 <.05 24.4 <2.4 5.9 17.6ii'3 2-3 0.10 22.2 < 2.2 < 2.2 12.5^3 3-4 .10 22.8 4.6 3.6 26.5

K 0-1 .10 17.1 6.4 5.1 22.3^4 1-2 <.05 18.5 <2 .3 2.3 24.6^4 2-3 .10 9.1 < 2.3 3.6 24,6^4 3-4 .10 14.9 8.9 6.0 23.9

i?5 0-1 .15 14.8 9.8 <2 .5 31.0^5 1-2 .14 14.3 2.9 3.8 28.7^5 2-3 .14 9.9 3.5 4.0 24.2#5 3-4 .16 29.2 9.8 <2.4 20.5

^ 0-1 .11 20.0 10.0 4.0 23.6^6 1-2 .10 9.9 9.4 <2 .5 38.4^6 2-3 .12 19.7 < 2.5 <2.5 27.6#6 3-4 .12 15.0 3.0 <2.5 28.5

Superfund AdministrativeRecord Document

' - - Southwes^^oratory^fpklatprfaRy,/^y%-^ ^^^ i '2-

tD£M

^^ ~l^^r<Ktft LETTEflS AM) S£POnrS *PPtV ONLV TO Tn£ SAMPLE IFfSTeo AND AflE NOT NECeSSAflt.V KCMCArtVE OF THE OUAirTeq OF APPAflPMn VtOiENTtCAL On SWiLAR PflOOUCTS --^.'^.^'--^r^'-Wi.

1————————————^-."Serwc/'flg ?0 Mesris of^ Petroieum tndustfy**'—^—3g?^5^%^^^g6§^^,^i

'»

i

<

wsss

• Attachmeiii: 4.4(3 of 4)

Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma8716 E. 43rd/Tufsa, Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0680

CLIENT: Nova Engineering504 N. WalnutBroken Arrow, OK 74012ATTN: Tom Barrett

NUMBER

IPage 31396-A

SUBJECT: Analysis of Soil Samples for Hazardous Materials

SarnpleIdent i f icat ion

?1 0-1^1 1-2H 2-3

3-4

?2 0-1.5S2 1.5-3i2 3-4

^3 0-153 1-2^3 2-3^3 3-4

54 0-1H 1-2ff4 2-3^4 3-4

^5 0-1^5 1-2^5 2-3^5 3-4

^6 0-1^6 1-2^6 2-3^6 3-4

PH@ 25

5.76 . 16 . 36 . 75.76 . 67.48.86 . 27.56 . 87.36 . 86 . 37 . 16 . 86 . 76 . 56 . 85 . 96 . 16 . 26 . 3

Oil

.(".g/91430474448624

8753,015

200

25,991266254

3,087

1,790172393318

29597

696434

360660561863

T . O . C(Wt %.63.40.28.28.60.56.6 16.88. 2 6.20.65.70.48.32.18.52.47.50.51.75.58.64.59

,, - - Jm.'rHstratitfeword Document

f Oklahoma

OUR LETTERS AMD RfcPOflTS AWLY ONLY TO THE SAMPLE TESTED AMD AHE NOT NECESSARILY INOlCA]TtV£ OF THE QUAUTlES OF APPARENTLY10£NrK;Ai. OR S»HLAfl PflODyCTS

Servicing the Needs of the Petroleum Industryff————————————

Attachment 4 .4(4 of 4)

Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma8716 E. 43rd/Tulsa, Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0680

ANALYTICAL NOTES TO REPORT ^1396

Soil Samples were analyzed by digesting approximately2 grams of sample in Aqua Regia. The digestions were fil-tered and diluted to 100 nnlliliters with deionized water.All analysis except Chlorides, Nitrates. Arsenic, Oil, pH,and T.O.C. were performed on this material.

Oil was determined by Methylene Chloride extraction ofa known weight of soil." The methylene chloride extractswere filtered and evaporated. The residue was weighed andreported as oil present in the samples.

Chlorides and Nitrates were determined by Sulfun'c Acid(3 %) digestion of approximately lOg of soil. This was fil-tered and diluted to 100 milliliters with deionized water foranalysis.

Arsenic was determined by a Sulfuric Acid (50 %} diges-tion of approximately Ig of soil. This was filtered anddiluted to 100 nnlliliters with deionized water for analysis.

pH of soil was determined by mixing 50 nnlliliters ofdeionized water with 5g of soil. After mixing for 5 minutesthe pH of the water was recorded.

Because of incomplete solubility of Silicon in AquaRegia, the silicon values may be lower than actual siliconpresent in the soil samples.

Record Document

000087

*

( ) ) AtCachfflenC 4 .5 LR.P. TOXTCITY EXTRACTION SWtARY

SAMPLE ID. Ar Ba Cd Cr Cu Pb Hg Mi Se Ag Zn

Results in mg/1

CB^I - O'ta 1 ' .03 < .1 <.05 .09 <05 < .5 .0008 <.05 .018 <.05 .20" I 'Co V .06 < .1 <.05 < .05 <.05 <.5 .0005 .10 .028 <.05 <.05

CB(?2 - O'to 1.5" .019 < .05 < .05 .10 <.05 <\5 .0026 <:,10 .20 < .OI :: .06"1.5' Co 3' .06 < . l < .05 <.05 < .05 < . 5 .0009 .10 .014 < .05 <.05

C B ^ S - O ' C o l * .21 .6 .15 .90 .10 <.5 .0004 .60 .128 .05 8.99" 1 ' c o 2 ' , .03 < . I <'.05 <.05 <.05 < .5 .0002 <.05 .004 <.05 < .05

CB^4 - 0' Co I * .12 < .1 .21 .60 .13 <.5 .0006 .50 .040 .05 9.86- 1' to 21 .03 < .1 <'.05 <.05 <.05 < . 5 .0004 <.05 .054 <.05 < .05

CS^5 - 0' Co I1 , .06 < .! < .05 <.05 <.05 <.5 .0004 <.05 .002 < .05 < .05- I 9 £0 2* '.06 < .1 <: .05 <.05 <.05 <.5 .0003 .20 .004 <.05 < .05

CBf?6 - O* to 3 ' , .08 <'.! ^.05 .09 . 1 0 <.5 .0014 < .05 .014 <^.05 .20- I 1 to 21 \0l5 <.05 <.05 .10 .05 < . 5 .0007 < .10 .200 < .01 .08

J

(1) Southwest Laboratories of Oklahoma , ^

•-; rrw • - ^C 2.•CT • ».-1 •CT

^1 • .1o 5 •••-^ TT3,0. •U;"^-o 5?* u»<p 0. - - •'-d ac 3.3 :3

S^ i "^ ^ 0 0 0 0 8 8

Attachment ^.5(1 ^12)

/...

Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma

CLIENT: Nova Engineering504 N. WalnutBroken Arrow, OK 74012ATTN: Tan Barrett

8716 E, 43r.j/Tulsa. Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0680

NUMBER 1420

August 31, 1981

SUBJECT: E.P. Toxicity Extractions of Soil Samples

Sample identification: H 0-1

PARAMETER

ArsenicBariumCadmiumChromiumCopperLeadMercuryNickelSeleniumSilverZinc

RESULTS (mq/n

.03< .1<.05

.09<.05< . 5

.0008<.05.018<.05

.20

Superfund AdministrRecord Docunnen

oya Lenefls wo REPORTS APPLY ONLY TO THE SAMPLE TESTED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY tNOtCAnve OF THE Qi'AiiTtf'i DF AppAflpMn vBXNTtCAL OH SUfLW PROOUCfS ' "'-•-""•-^•1.1

^Servicing ihe NeQds of the Petroleum /ndustry"^-____^____»™

- ®® BSS S .riffle n ^^chment 4 5wwllai® "^~"———---------^^ of n«

8^^s:=^^3UENT: p^f^- 680

Ant" r^eV4012tt ^"st 31, i98i j

UBJECT: E.P. Toxicity Extr-..- - • • • •^Extractions of So,? samples

• Sample Identification: n \

PARAMETER I

^ RKlmdw, ;Cadmium .06 IChromium <.l | iCopper <.05Lead < 05 IMercury <.05Nickel < .5 |selenl'um .0005 /Silver . 10zlnc .028

<.05<.05 |

^ss '"^"ecord Documenf

0000^0Southwp^t i ]

.^orat^ofoki^oma'W^-^^^^^ B^——^^^^<_____, D <RE B'or NE^^" ^ o, ,l?<*•? - •.™-*- — -*<?-.-...• - '""IVE OF rw niiA....,- -_ I

- •••"———————————•'•"—"—'——, j——| ^ Attachment 4 .5

a^a §|§IB| a ^^ (3 of 12) - 'fH^BBk B>*"BBBff B IHH^ BI ^KS^^B

wp ww ww ^vy Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma8716 E. 43rd/Tulsa. Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0680

CUENT: "ova Engineering NUMBER 1398-A504 N. Walnut c . . o inoiBroken Arrow, OK 74012 September 8, 1981ATTN: Tom Barrett : ,

SUBJECT: E.P- Toxicity Extract-ions of Soil Samples , .

Sample Identification: i?2 0-1.5((

PARAMETER RE SUITS Jmg/1) <Arsenic .019 <

Barium <-05 <Cadm-ium <.05Chromium ,10Copper <.05Lead <,50Mercury .0026Nickel < . 1Selenium .20Silver <.01Zinc .06

Superfund Administrati ?eRecord Document

000091

Southwestj-aborato-ry^of Oklahoma

^ S SSIT J S1'' ONtv Torfrle W^^^ w ttMm^ INDlCAriVE OF TNR QUAL^ . ^N^Y ^

—-——————-————————————^^T~~l Attachme^ ^.5

^"BBBi A ( 4 0 £ 1 2 / ':"^ "^W 9W mm W Southwest Laboratory of Okiahoma8716 £. 43rd/Tulsa, Oklahoma 74145/(918»665-0680

CUENT: Nova Engineering NUMBER 1422504 FL Walnut , , ^ ,981Broken Arrow, OK 74012 August J1'1901

AHN: Tom Barrett

SUBJECT: E.P. Toxicity Extractions of Soil Samples

Sample Identification: #2 1.5-3 CM

PARAMETER RESULTS (mg/1) ^

Arsenic .06 0Banum ^ -1 ^Cadmiutn '^•05 0Chromium <.05Copper <-05Lead < -5Mercury .0009Nickel ^OSelenium •014Silver <-05Zinc <-05

Superfund Admsnistrativ 3Record Document

oooor^

• . SQuthwest^boratQE^oJ O lahonia

OUR (JETTEftS AND REPORTS APPtV ONLV TO TH6 SAMPLE TESTED AND ARE NOT NRCESSARltY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLYIDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS

i

___________________^ _ Actachni^AC ^.5[ - — — — " ' - "Pi ( 5 o f 0Mi BBI I A l

!BB^ W® w® F Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma; 8716 E. 43rd/Tufsa. Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0680ti

CUENT: Nova Engineenng NUMBER 1423504 N. Walnut ^ ^ Broken Arrow, OK 74012 w

: ATTN: Tom Barretti

SUBJECT: E.P. Toxi'city Extractions of Soil Samples

^Sample Ident i f ica t ion; ff3 0-1

CPARAMETER RESUlTSJii.g/'I) C

CArsenic .11 ^Bariuni .6Cadnnum .15Chromium .90Copper - 1 0Lead < - 5Mercury .0004Nickel .60Selenium .128Silver .05Zinc 8.99

Superfund Administr itiveRecord Oocumen:

0 0 0 0 9 3

. . SouthwestLaborator^y Oklahpma^S'~— ^-^'/^ 'i^^

^^^^^--^^^^^^

in UETTEnS AND REPORTS AFfLV CWl-Y 10 THE SAyPifc rESTED ANO AflE NOr NECESSASHY INQIfcAirve OF TMg QUALITIES OF APPARENTl.YENTICAL Ofl SW^Afl PRODUCTS - " '

Attachment ^.5__^—————————————————————™ ^ ^^,

tf^B ffiM&iE§ Bi J^Sjte ' '•'%.—' 11-':• "ili : 1 ,WttSH gSHBffig Hgl •iBBBB

" ®®® ®® 1sy Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma8716 E. 43rd/Tulsa. Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0680

CUENT: Nova Engineering NUMBER 1424504 N. WalnutBroken Arrow, OK 74012 August 31, 1981ATTN: Tom Barrett - -

SUBJECT: E-^ Toxicity Extractions of Soit Saniples

c"tSample Identification: ^3 J-2- - c^

0PARAMnER RESULTS (mg/D 0

0Arsen-ic .03 0Barium ^.1Cadmium <.05Chromium <.05Copper <.05Lead < . 5Mercury .0002Nickel < .05Selenium .004Silver <.05Zinc <.05

Superfund Adm.'nistr aliveRecord Docun-ienE:

0 0 0 0 0 4

SouthwestJ^boratory of Oklahoma: ,«i*-y '"" ~^y^y ^ ^

^^yi^-^^, ^.^y.y^'^.^ ^^^^-

^S iS^SS^^ ONLV T0 " TESrEt) AN0 A"e Nor "' ^^"-•^ •NOtCAWE OF THE OU*OT5 OF AP^eWrLV |

Attachment: ^.5——^————————————————————-^——. (7 of

^SSBB ^@BB W® ^^s r Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma

, . . . 8716 E. 43rd/Tulsa. Oklahoma 74145, "(918)665-0680

CUENT: Novi Engineering NUMBER 1425504 N. Walnut

Broken Arrow, OK 74012 ^ust 31^ ^QlMTN: Tom Barrett

SUBJECT: E.P. Toxicity Extractions of Soil Samples

Sample Identification; iM 0-1 L

<PARAMETER SSyUiJinSZ!! <

(_ Arsenic .12 /Barium <^.1Cadmium .21Chromium ,60Copper . 13Lead <.5Mercury .0006Nickel .50Selenium .040Silver .05Zinc 9.86

Superfund Adm;nistra ive; Rficord Document

^ oo^ops; . , . , . Southwes^boratory^t,0klahoma

' ' ' ^-^ .^/^ ^r

^^^^.^ ^ A-^^ -< - ''- '-.t-'———t,.——————»^A————-f-..————^- -f'lrf'TU-'l ——y-T^-J'-^ J^^-.g-^J,——-^_^- », - : - —"»"»• wri >"- air

^ "O cTs"'' ONLy r0 rHE SAMP1'6 resTe0 AN0 A^ ttiQT ww^ w^^ OF E OUALlTltfi O^APPARSNUY

-"-"•——————-•""Jl-S^^W. tkQ S^ <?( V^ petroleum infi^"-"

? ^^ ACtdchment: 4.5f"""—————————————: »—l (8 of -^

^ f jM»iH M ^88^ ' " : : ;'1"1-' '"' '^—MB KSBaBHB H^ aHBHBB . • •

Syf -^W 9w w Southwest Laboratory of Okfahomc6716 E. 43rd/Tuisa. Oklahoma 74745/(918)665-06&

CUCTT: Nova Engineenng NUMBER 1426504 N. Walnut

Broken Arrow, OK 74012 ..August 31 , 1981ATTN: Torn Barrett

saJBJECT: E'P- Toxicity Extractions of Soil Samples ^ > . ".

<Sample Identification: i?4 2-2 <

<PAR jgTiR RESULTS (mg/J) <

Arsem'c .03Barium ^ .1Cadmium < .05Chromiuin ^ ,0?Copper ^.05Lead < .5Mercury - .0004Micke] <.05Selenium .054Silver <.05Zinc <.05

Super/und AdministraweRecord Document

0 0 0 0 9 < ;::.' • " Southwes^L^boratorY^ O^abQp^a

% SS^ J Ts ONLV r0 SAMPt-£ TESf60 AND ABE Nor NFCES3AR' 'WAr^e o. THE Q^W&OF App^E^y,,.I,,T.|*- .|.H -*»-««*» ' 'Servicing th^ ^i^-4" - ' "

Attachment; ^* .5——————————————————————.'"^——| (9 of ^

iK§ B»§ B€I vy ^n—-_____-^ Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma *• 8716 E. 43rd/Tulsa. Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0680

CUENT: Nova Engineering NUMBER 1427504 H. WalnutBroken Arrow, OK 74012 August 31 , 1981

; ATTN: Tom BarrettI

SUBJECT: £.P. ToxicHy Extractions of Soil Samples^^y .- - - • < - -- ' . " " ' ' •v'. _ i- - ^ r li t't l

: -»^_ • .-^-^—-i.-CTi""--"--——"1'——••'•-.-. • •,' J-" m.n" -*•"^1^^'«'J!"11'"!'^"1' i " ""•"•" '"""I'i'Sg!"?' ' '——- •"-" ••- •- _ _ ___„. . ..„.„„- rii—aM-i^

/^^ Sample Identif icat- ion: ^S 0-1

PARAMETER RESULTS (mg/1)l? Arsenic , .06

Barium ^ .5Cadm-ium <:.05Chroniium < .05Copper <.05Lead <.5Mercury .0004Nickel <,05Selenium .002Sliver <.05Zinc <.05

Superfund AdministrativeRecord Document

0 0 0 0 9 ?

, ^J Southwes^L^borator^0^0kl3honiaR' - ''' : '- 7 • • ^ . -.f ^J' -.

^T^ ^ n^C^ ONLy T0 '"' SAMPLE resTEOAN0 AR6 H°T NECfeSSAflK.V .NOfGAI OF IHE OUAtff^SOF ^P^E»ny

.—s—————————————"ServiciaQ the Needs of.ths Petroleum Indtssiirv"__________ __

Attachment ^ .5—.,——————————-V-, (ic"^y 12)igUfil ^^——M——k •HimH^ B ———^——— IHHHiHf

EBW wvw ww vr Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma'' 8716 E, 43rd/Tulsa. Oklahoma 74145/(918}665-0680

;UENT: Nova Engineering NUMBER 1428504 N. Walnut . , ., „.-,Broken Arrow. OK 74012 August 31, .,981ATTN: Tom Barrett

DBJECT: E-P- Toxicity Extractions of Soil Samples

Sample Identification: ^5 1-2 ^

0PARAMETER RESULTS (mg/1) 0

0Arsenic .06 0Barium <-.!Cadniium ^.05Chromium < .05Copper <.05Lead <.5Mercury .0003Nickel .20Selenium .004Silver <^.05Zinc <.05

Superfund Administr itiveRecord Documsn

0 0 0 0 9 ?

Southwest^»oratory^f OklahomaflV ' ^^ '"^ -^'^t^^Z^

reas AHO REPOHTS APPLV ONLY TO TH£ SAMPL£ rgsyeo AW *flE HOT NECEssARa Y uyDtCAnve OF THE QuALfriES QP AWAKENS,LO« &M1LAR PWMXICTS ^w ^•a^K wMrw&"'t-»

________________^^^t_-.. AccacAtdent ^..5t, ) (11 Ol2)oi H|| | ^&

aH? -ww Bfli^W Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma8716 E. 43rd/Tulsa. Oklahoma 7^145/(918)665-0680

;UENT: Nova Engineering NUMBER 1429; 504 N. Walnu t Auou^t 31 1981

Broken Arrow, OK 74012 Auoust J1' lyoi

; AHN: Tom Barrett

lUBJECT: E.P- Toxicity Extractions of Soil Samples!

Sample Identification: i?6 0-1(T'0^

PARAMETER RESULTS (mg/1) C

Arsenic -08 ^Barium ^ •!•Cadmium <-05 c

Chromium -09Copper • 1 0

Lead < - 5

Mercury -OO14

Nickel <-05

Selenium •014

Silver <-05

Zinc -20

Superfund AdmidiStratn eRecord Document

0 0 0 0 3 9

Southwesy^borator^pf pklahorpa^^y^^ •^^^^^^

UR LETTEF® ANO REPORTS APPLY ONLY TO THE SAMPLE TESTED AND AR6 NOT MECESSARfLY IM01CAT1V6 OF THg QUAinieS QF APPAfiENTLV3ENTCA1. OR SIMUtR PRODUCTS - - '- '•t •'-*'

**C'A>ri.>J>iAM «J*A fdaarie f\f fha Dat^nlftUfn. lnftsie9e'u "_____________-_-_-.,-.-„-_--

• - . . . . — . . . — ... ^»> „. ^Attachment 4.5 (

—HI • ^~] " " — i:mm|iA BRJB BdB ^iir

^^ Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma8716 E. 43rd/Tulsa, Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0660

CUENT: Nova Engineering NUMBER 1397-A504 N. Walnut - , . .....Broken Arrow, OK 74012 September 8, 1981ATTN: Tom Barrett

SUBJECT: £.P. Toxici'ty Extractions of Soil Samples

Sample Identification: ^6 J-2

PARAMETER RJSULTS (mg/il)Arsenic ,015Barium ^.05Cadmium <,05Chromium .10Copper <.05Lead <,5Mercury .0007Nickel <.lSelenium .20Silver <,01Zinc .08

Superfund AdministrativeRecord Document

0 0 0 1 0 0

Southwest^^orator^ Oklahpmasv : ^^ ; ^^^ -.

^^ S^S^!^ ONLy T0 IHfe SAMPl£ r65Te0 Aw AR6 f'or ^ECES5Afl'^-v 'W1CAT,VE OP THt QUALlT.ES OF APPARENT^„ „ , , „ , - - - _ - — "C«^»;^.:-- -L

- -- 1™— x^. Attachment ^ * 6

'•BBiB ^ ( lof"MEflHBk "S^BBS ——^ffl! HBBM9

—— www vw wr Southwest Laboratory of Oktahoma8716 £. 43rd/Tulsa. Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0680

CUENT: Nova Engineering NUMBER T1381504 N. Walnut , , ,- ,-.,Broken Arrow. OK 74012 "uly 1"* 19U1

ATTN: Tom Barrect

SUBvlECT: \W.er Analysis

i?l Core Boring n'4 Core BoringPARAMETER _ 6-26-81 _ ,6-26-81

Arsenic, mg/1 <.01 ^.01Barium, mg/1 .10 <.10Cadniiuni. mg/I < ,06 <.05Carbon, Total Organic, mg/1 1200 24Chlorides, mg/1 170 154Chrcniiuni. rng/1 ^0.05 <0.05Copper, mg/1 ^ .05 <.05Halogens, Total Organic, ppm ^ 1 < 1Iron, mg/1 .72 .61Lead. mg/1 <0.5 <0.5Manganese, nig/I .36 .08Mercury, mg/1 .0005 .0003Nickel, nig/I .38 .34Kitrates, mg/1 < 0.1 0 .17pti @ 25°C Untested Untested

Selenium, mg/1 -CO.05 <0.05Silver, ing/I < 0.05 <0.05Sodium, mg/1 15 -8 24.9Specific Gravity @ 60°F 1.0084 1.006^Per^"Q'Adrl.;ni

Sulfatos. pig/I 276 294 ^^^UiTZinc,'mg/1 .07 .06

O O O KSouthwest LaboratOQK?f qkl ioma

- ' ' ^y^——

ST^S Si J 'S1' ONLY T0 rH£ SAMP1•E TEST6D Aw AftE Nor N£C65SAR!LY •NO!CAr«/6 Qf 1H& QU^UTfeS OF APPAfleNtfcY

-"-—-——••••"•'-—"-••-^-.. "ServicinsJ tha A/aaric /^ <'*" o-*—'- - • • • --

_*'_________________. •""'' ^-< Attachment 4.6— — — — ~ ~ ' ""I .. } (2 of 2)

OS I ^^i H®^ «@ ^ Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma

: . 8716 E. 43rd/Tulsa, Oklahoma 74145/(918»665-0680

CUENT: Nova Engineering NUMBER T1381504 N. Walnut paqp 2Broken Arrow, OK 74012 "'ATTN: Tonn Barrefct

SUlBJECT: Mater Analysis

Analysis or the Herbicides and Pesticides for both samples (<

Endrin None DetectedLindane None Detected <

Methoxychtor None DetectedToxaphene None Detected2,4-D None Detected2.4,5-T None Detected

Superfund Adrn;ni?trati' eRecord Docui'nfent

0 0 0 1 0 2

Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma^'~ -^f \ - . . . . ny • ^ • ^^•^^^'€.{^,

OUH tSntWS AHD REPORTS APPLY ONLY TO THE SAMPLE TESTED AND AR£ NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THfc QUALITIES OF APPARENTLYlOeNTH^U. OR SIMtLAfl PRODUCTS

^^™———————————"Servicing the Needs o([the ^efroteym industry"————————————————--— ••-" " . ^^^^^ .o^ ramG^T^w^^ iaa^^

.^bml tti- 'd'-By: Nova Kri^.ir'.o^rnif' i————;

An^'n^d Laboratory No: 8l^t0^ thru 3 l , ' hn ggg

iiat^ E^ceived: 5/Z1/8I Unto f^port^t: o/->/fh < A P I SEPfiMr^^ S5^(, 'BOTTOM"? .^ ^

dimple Identification: 6l^0? - ff\ ."^ - ^' ^l .^o^i - //3 ^ff7^ ' ^ 8l?^ "• ^5Ql^OT - ^6 8L'^u8 - //Y ^.•'.o'/ - /^i ^l?rTu^^ 8l^l/ ^ ,?i0

Tt•5t 612^0^ 8 [.^.03 Kl^u)h 61^0^ \ Ql'.'W

P", units — .„ .„ ^^ .:Appearance (See Attached)Mercury ^ Hg 0,0003 0.0003 O.OOO- 0.000^ (. 000^ 1 )Selenium as Se < 0.00.1 O.OO; 1 y.OOl 0.002 0 0 0 2Silver as Ag 0.05 < 0.0.^ < n.03 0.0fi < o 'O^RAriura as Ba 3.^ < t < 1 < ^ / ^ '!,oad as Pb < O.I < 0 . 1 < o . f • • , o.jo / 1 9 8 -Chrorrjuffl as Cr < o.05 < 0.i)S < o.o^ < 0.0^ / < o 'O^.-•.^mium as Cd < 0.03 < o . o ^ < (.t.Oi < u.r^ / < o 'o^Arsr-ni(- as As < 0,03 < 0.0. < 0.03 0.;^ / < 0.'03

Te£t 81^07 8i;'^)^ '•;(;1^^ /^T^Tj^^ 83:^1.1

pHt unUs --- y . ( > „__ ( Y ^ //Appearance (See Attached) /? . \Mercury as Hg O.oooo o.(mf)« 0.0006 (' o.ooo6^ ^ oonrt

^ Selenium as Se 0.00.' O.oot u.ooi / 0.001 ) < o 001Silver as Aff < 0.0-; < > ; . o < < o.;^ / < 0.0-^ / < o.o3Barium as Ba < 1 < i ;.', Y_ i .^ ) ;.'! '''^Lead as Fb 0 . 1 < . . . 1 < u. i f 0.;^ ^ ^^^ --^,3ehromluni as Cr < O.O' ' < t » . o ' , < n.o'. 'i < o.i-)1; ^ < o '^ ^ Cadmium as Cd < 0 .03 < 0.;-, < 0.0-^ 7 < 0^3 ) ^ ,/^3 ^?Arsenic as As < 0 . 0 ^ < ( ; . . » < ,' , ; . , ) ^ <• f^^-i / • / / / . ^s

\ y ' " '"'fl?^te; pH ffieasureaent on s ix ot' UK* tn . . . .• i ; : !?-! .- :- , ; i i , , i r c ' ; , . ' ', ( , ( . E ; • . • m ; . ' . v-^s^^-—-'^ • '-

i.

Tlie above results vere obtained l.y Ai'i lA ^; •t;i.t:tn( M.-i ip i , t 1 ' . , ! ' ' i( i! r.i., f , fA M<'thuih; for f 'ho in ic f t i Anrtjyt.ii.--; or Wfit-er ur.'JWustes and/or ASTM Standard?;, unless othervi:;^ i EiJ K'- i t .•J . |{f.';ut t ; ; • ( r -^ Jn mi I } i ^ntm;, per Itti?r unless uthervi^^ indr^^-i.

>>

^ Superfur^d AdrnfrttstratEveRecord Document ., -

? - , - 0 0 0 1 O ?L _ _________________________________________ _______________________ ______________________

Appearance

812^02 fine gritty soft :-luJge

6l2h03 hard "tar-like" sludge

8lUW like bits of coal ar-.d coal dust

8l!*ti05 yellow liquid

81^^06 brown dirt and liquid

81^07 like tar ^0

8l' !;0o black grease and liquid ' ~0

61^^09 "claylike", iignt brcvn 0

(,8ll(**10 gr&y -lay ar.d liquid API ^E'^^^^TOR, DOTTO^S^

811*1*!! li:ie brown soil

: Superfund AdministrativeRecord Documsnt

. - • • -.;,-^. . - .. • • • - ;, 0 0 0 1 0 4

ATTACHMENT 5.2SUMMARY OF MONITORING PLAN

for theCYRIL LAND TREATMENT FACILITY

TEST CATEGORY _______FIRST_YEAR__________\______AFTER FIRST YF:AR______________POST CLOSURE_________________________Frequency Samples Required Frequency { Samples Required ~Frequency | Samples Requ i red '1 , 0 [JNSATlfRATSD ZONE

AGRICULTURAL SOILANALYSIS1.! Soil Fertility

Levels Annually 4 topsoil samples Annually Same as first year Annually Same as first yea- \Nitrogen (O'-D from active fPhosphorous portion of landPotassium treacmenc areaCalciumMagnesium

1.2 pH Value pH ^IUQ\ &

!"3 Li[ne ' time. Re-Requirements quiremenc \

1.4 CEC

2.0 UNSATURATED ZONE 1HEAVY KETALS SOIL ,ANALYSIS ! '2.1 Heavy Metals Annually 8 samples from AnnuaLly Same as first year i N/A N/A ' ' f

Cadmium active portion '""Chromium of land treat- iLead ment area; 4Selenium topsoti samples '

(O'-r) and 42.2 TOC samples at 36"

_+_ depth , ^2.3 Oil Concent | S! n

: =r'- , 3•v-- • • ^~- - - _- ———_____ ________________ l ^7——————————————+——————————————————————————1————————————————*————————————————————————1———————————————\———————————————————————43

S ^S (Tr f——

. '•- ' ' '• . ^

^ Superfund Administrative ^ ? '^.. f^cord Document - 0 0 0 1 0 5 ^

TEST CATEGORY _______FIRST YEAR______ ________AFTEi< FIRST YEAR______g________POST CLOSURE______Frequency Samples Required Frequency T Samples Required . • Frequency Samples Required , .

GROUNDWATERANALYSIS3.1 Suitability Quarterly AC each well Annual ly Ac each well Annually At each well

Characteristics /H thru I'M ft I thru H Sf\ thru ^ArsenicBariumCadmiumChromiumFluorideLeadKereuryNitrates :Selenium i ; •Silvsr - '

3.2 QualityCharacteristics Quarterly AC each well Annually At each well NONE NONE

Chloride /U thru H fU thru ^IronM&nganesePhenols 'Soditicm ;

Sulfates j

3 .3 ContaminationCharacteristics Quarterly AC each well Semi- At each well NONE NONE

pH H I thru ff^ A n n u a l l y ^1 thru ^4SpecificConductanceTotal Organ- Vic Carbon ./

^ASTE SLUDGEANALYSIS ' ' ^4.1 Heavy Metals Annually One (1) repre- Annual ly Same as f irst year N/A N/A c

Cadmium (As gen- sentative sam- (As gen- ^0 ^ChroTOium erated by pie for each erated by , § c*Lead • the re- slu-lge source; the re- : (- 3. S. C SFelenium finery) l)Loaded Tank f inery) ^ 0> o S

4 . 2 pH Value ; Bottoms, 2) ' ° § §' ^ g-4.3 Oil Content Other Tank § 5' ^ §4.4 TOC Bottoms.3) API "~ ® £ ^ 3

^.S Nitrogen Separator 0 2.3 "Concent Bolt oms a:> £'•

_________________________ • ________ §

0 0 0 1 0 6