recommended 10-year facility master plan 3.28.11
DESCRIPTION
Austin School Trustees will vote Monday, March 28, 2011 on whether to adopt this final version of the school district's facilities master plan.TRANSCRIPT
Austin independent school districtDistrict-WiDe Facility Master Plan
March 2011
EXHIBIT "B"
As a planning team we appreciate the opportunity to serve the Austin Independent School District.
DeJONG-RICHTER LLC Magellan Consulting Cuningham Group BLGY Architecture
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Facility Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................................. 10
Timeline for Facility Master Plan Implementation ......................................................................................................................... 13 Estimated Budget ...................................................................................................................................................................... 15
Area Facility Options ....................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Additional Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................................ 32
Policy Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................................ 32 Management Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................... 33 Staffing Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................................... 33 Energy Efficiency Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................... 34 Maintenance Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................ 34 Design Recommendations........................................................................................................................................................ 35 Safety and Security Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 35 Use Recommendations ................................................................................................................................................................... 36 Technology Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................... 36 Other Recommendations ......................................................................................................................................................... 37
Facility Summary Reports with Facility Master Plan Recommendations ..................................................................................... 38 Elementary Schools (Alpha) ............................................................................................................................................................ 39 Middle Schools (Alpha) ................................................................................................................................................................. 119 High Schools (Alpha) ...................................................................................................................................................................... 138 Special Schools (Alpha) ................................................................................................................................................................. 151 Support Facilities (Alpha) ............................................................................................................................................................... 154 Educational Framework ....................................................................................................................................................................... 165
Planning Guidelines ...................................................................................................................................................................... 165 Programmatic Considerations .................................................................................................................................................... 166
Enrollment Projections ................................................................................................................................................................... 169 Historical Enrollment ...................................................................................................................................................................... 169 Birth Data ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 175 Projected Enrollment .................................................................................................................................................................... 176
Page 1
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011 Capacity Analysis .......................................................................................................................................................................... 178 Utilization ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 180 Facility Condition Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................ 184
Educational Adequacy Assessment ............................................................................................................................................ 186 Building Deficiencies ...................................................................................................................................................................... 187
Facility Options .............................................................................................................................................................................. 189
Criteria .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 189 Appendices Appendix A ........................................................................................................................ FCI White Paper and Facility FCI Charts Appendix B ...................................................................................................................................................Facility Capacity Charts Appendix C ......................................................................................................................................... Visioning Workshop Summary Appendix D .................................................................................................................................... Community Dialogue #1 Results Appendix E ..................................................................................................................................... Community Dialogue #2 Results Appendix F ............................................................................................................................... Community Meeting #3 Comments Appendix G ............................................................................................................. Summary of Facility Options Discussed by FMPTF Appendix H .................................................................................................................................................................... Glossary of Terms
Page 2
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Acknowledgements We would like to extend our appreciation to the Austin Independent School District Board of Trustees for its commitment to the Facility Master Planning Process. We realize that the recommendations contained within the plan will create challenges for the community in the months and years to come. With the support of the school district and community members, the Austin Independent School District can continue its mission to provide a comprehensive educational experience that is high quality, challenging, and inspires all students to make a positive contribution to society.
Board of Trustees Mark Williams, District 5, President
Vincent M. Torres, District 4, Vice President Lori Moya, District 6, Secretary
Cheryl Bradley, District 1 Sam Guzman, District 2
Christine Brister, District 3 Robert Schneider, District 7
Annette LoVoi, At-Large Position 8 Tamala Barksdale, At-Large Position 9
Austin Independent School District
Dr. Meria Carstarphen, Superintendent of Schools Lawrence Fryer, Chief Operations Officer Paul Turner, Executive Director of Facilities
Curt Shaw, Director of Construction Management Pat Rossett, Assistant Director of Bond Planning
Joe Silva, Assistant Director of Planning Beth Wilson, Project Facilitator
Page 3
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011 Facility Master Plan Task Force We take this opportunity to acknowledge the Facility Mater Plan Task Force for its efforts in guiding the planning process. We thank the members for their dedication and commitment to this process that resulted in the development of the facility plan for Austin Independent School District. Co-Chairs: Richard Frazier
Janet Mitchell John Alawneh Larry Amaro Adolphus Anderson Evelyn Andrews Tony Arnold Frederick Bentley Sally Brackett Chris Carrillo-Spano Jacqueline Chatham Tommy Cox Joey Crumley Bill De Dufour Julie Delgado Janet Dewey Elizabeth Dickey Dan Diehl Freddie B. Dixon, Sr. Martha Dolman Jim Evans
Kelly Evans Frances Vicki Everett Rene Garganta Greg Goodman Annette Gregory Zoe Griffith Silas Griggs Janis Guerrero Kris Hafezizadeh Bergeron Harris Anne M. Heinen Heath Hignight Lawrence P. Huang Linda Johnson Bob King J. Laverne Morris-Parker Lucia Markert Carolyn Merritt Adelina Miller Paul Mitchell
Susan Moffat Chris Moore Audrea Moyers Beth Orta Mark Penniman Elizabeth Polk Jacqueline Porter Pete Price Douglas Rhodenbaugh John Rocha Michelle Rusnak Dave Sanders Curt Shaw David W. Sullivan Kathie Tovo Laura Tuma Paul Turner Texanna Turner Chad Williams
Page 4
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Introduction Facility Master Plan Vision Statement
All AISD schools will inspire high student achievement and support common community goals through
equitable, inviting facilities that integrate technology and are optimally used, accessible, sustainable, and meet highest educational adequacy standards.
The Austin Independent School District is committed to providing high quality and challenging educational experiences for all students who are enrolled in its schools. To ensure this commitment, the District developed the AISD 2010-2015 Strategic Plan. As part of Strategy #4 of that plan, key steps 4.5 and 4.7 included development of a long-range facility master plan as follows. Strategy #4 – align resources to accomplish priorities within a balanced budget
4.5 Develop and implement long-range plans for facilities, transportation, libraries and technology that align infrastructure with the district’s educational plan 4.7 Ensure efficiency and efficacy of existing facilities before investing in new facilities
This planning process, which is data driven, takes into consideration enrollments, school building capacities, educational framework, educational vision, and facility conditions for 114 school campuses and 12 support facilities in the District.
The facility master planning process is a proactive approach to explore long- and short-term academic and facility options and solutions. Among the most important components contributing to the success of the plan is the involvement and input gathered from Austin community members. The recommendations contained within will serve as the basis from which Austin Independent School District facilities will be transformed into a new generation of schools that accommodates educational needs today and in the future. The final Austin Independent School District Facility Master Plan will serve as a road map that will address facility conditions, an implementation timeframe, and project costs.
Page 5
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011 Executive Summary District Statistics AISD maintains approximately 87,000 permanent classroom seats and an additional 16,000 seats in portable/temporary buildings in 11.5 million square feet of educational facilities. The enrollment for the 2010-11 school year was approximately 86,000 students. Based on the latest demographic study, enrollment is projected to continue to increase to 98,000 by 2020.
Total Enrollment 2010-2011: 85,929
Grades Pre-K-5: 48,167 Grades 6-8: 16,577 Grades 9-12: 20,662 Separate and Special Campuses: 523
114 School Campuses 80 Elementary Schools 19 Middle Schools 12 High Schools 3 Special Schools
12 Support Facilities
Utilization By the numbers, there is an excess of 1,000 seats in addition to the capacity in portable buildings. The reality is that there are some areas experiencing population growth and others experiencing decline within the District. Combined with student migration patterns, there are significantly over- and under-utilized facilities as a result.
Facility Condition Approximately $1.1 billion in deficiencies was identified in the facility condition assessment, including a functional equity and ADA/TAS analysis, completed in 2010, and the most recent educational adequacy assessment completed the summer of 2010. These deficiencies have been categorized into the following priorities. Priority 1: Currently Critical (Immediate) Priority 2: Potentially Critical (To be corrected within one
year) Priority 3: Necessary / Not Yet Critical (1-2 Years) Priority 4: Recommended (3-5 Years) Priority 5: Does Not Meet Current Code/Standards
/Grandfathered Addressing Growth The north central and southern areas of AISD continue to experience the most enrollment growth. The following new construction programs, funded by current and previous bond programs, will help address overcrowding issues. Baldwin ES – Opened 2010 Early Childhood Center – Opens 2012 and will
relieve Linder ES New North Central ES – Currently in site selection
process New ES – Undesignated
In addition, land acquisition and funding have been approved for a new middle school site in the
Page 6
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011 southeastern part of the District, and a new high school site in the southern region of the District. The construction of the middle and high schools is anticipated to be a part of a future bond program. As enrollment is projected to increase, it is estimated that three new elementary schools and additions at seven elementary schools and one middle school would be required. Currently, the District targets a 125% utilization rate as a precipitant for potential new construction or additions. Process In April of 2010, a Facility Master Plan Task Force was created and an educational planning firm was hired by AISD in order to develop the District-wide Facility Master Plan. The Task Force, comprised of parents, community members, teachers, principals, and AISD staff was charged with the following tasks. Monitor the process to ensure equity and fairness
across the District Review and confirm recommendations and
resolve conflicting recommendations Prepare information and host community
dialogues and meetings Review and analyze data Review and analyze community input Develop and recommend an Educational
Framework to the Board of Trustees Develop facility options to improve efficiency and
address student needs Develop and recommend the district-wide Facility
Master Plan to the Board of Trustees
The Facility Master Plan Task Force held 25 meetings over the course of 10 months and hosted 11 community meetings. In addition, the Task Force Co-chairs attended ten meetings at various school campuses throughout the District. The community meetings provided invaluable input to the Task Force throughout the process. Results and comments from these meetings are available in the appendix of this report. Challenges During the process, the Task Force was faced with several challenges and complex issues associated with AISD facilities and planning for the future. The following outline is meant to provide an understanding and reflection of the real issues with which the Task Force has been struggling, and the resulting implications for facility master planning. Challenge #1: Accomplishing priorities within a shrinking budget In order for AISD to continue operating as it is today, an assessed budget shortfall between $94 and $100 million for fiscal year 2012 will have to be addressed. Can increasing facility efficiency decrease the budget shortfall, and how can this be balanced with the future of neighborhood schools, their design, size, and sustainability? Challenge #2: Student migration The number of students previously living within the Austin urban core, has declined over the past 20 years, resulting in 25% of schools housing less than 85% of their permanent student capacities. Conversely, there have
Page 7
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011 been large population increases in the outer areas of the District, resulting in 50% of schools housing more than 105% of their permanent student capacities. However, not all under- and over-utilization is a direct result of population and demographic shifts. Large numbers of students that travel outside of the boundary of their assigned school present a challenge when making future facility decisions. Should long-term planning address the number of students living within the attendance area, or should it address the number of students currently attending that school, including transfer students? What are the principles of the current transfer policies and how will they be applied in the future? Challenge #3: The role of facility planning in supporting and complementing educational program planning AISD strives to maintain academic standards, programs, and performance consistently throughout the District. From a facilities perspective, what recommendations can be made to help move the District toward increasing graduation rates and eliminating the achievement gap? Since programs are capable of changing faster than bricks and mortar, how can facilities remain flexible and be retrofitted for multi-use where practical? How can facility decisions positively impact student achievement? For example, is it more beneficial to offer duplicate programs, such as fine arts or career technology education, or is it better to provide transportation to a single program? What are the cost implications?
Challenge #4: Boundary adjustment solutions A logical solution to improve efficiencies among overcrowded and under-utilized schools is to adjust the attendance boundaries and assign more or fewer students as appropriate. In practice, it is not that simple. In some cases, under-utilization occurs when a large number of students migrate to schools outside of their geographical attendance zone. Increasing the size of the boundary of the under-utilized school will not fix the problem. In addition, if the aforementioned migrating students decided to attend their home schools, the result could be an overcrowded scenario. In other cases, there are too many overcrowded or under-enrolled schools adjacent to each other. This results in a “domino effect” of moving students from one location to the other in order to increase or decrease enrollment. In many instances, students would not be able to attend the school closest to their homes or in their neighborhoods. In fact, they may have to drive past a school closer to their home in order to attend another school to achieve balanced enrollment. Challenge #5: Balancing short- and long-term needs Significant resources will be needed to address the capital projects outlined in this facility plan. In addition to the funds needed to renovate AISD’s facility inventory, additional investment in deferred maintenance and small capital projects will continue as buildings age. At the same time, new schools will need to be constructed to accommodate growth.
Page 8
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Test_
Page 9
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Facility Recommendations
I. Portable Reduction The annual cost to operate a portable building in AISD is approximately $4.00 per square foot. The District currently has 668 portable buildings which equates to approximately 1,336 classrooms. The criteria used to identify portable reduction include:
A utilization rate (enrollment/permanent capacity) at the school location that falls below 85%.
Age and condition of the portables would be used to determine which portables to take out of service unless their current location would cause additional moving costs.
There is a potential to reduce the total number of portables in the District by 108, using the above criteria of 85% utilization. Based on a minimum annual operating cost of $4.00 per square foot, this would result in an annual savings of $663,552.
II. Funded New Construction The following new construction projects, funded by current and previous bond programs, will help address some overcrowding issues.
a. Baldwin ES – Opened 2010 b. Early Childhood Center – Opens 2012 and will
relieve Linder ES
c. New North Central ES – Currently in site selection process
d. New ES – The Facility Master Plan Task Force recommends locating the 2008 Bond Program undesignated ES to the North Central area.
e. District-wide Performing Arts Center
III. Unfunded New Construction and Capital Improvement
a. Priority 1 & 2 Needs
Priority 1 & 2 needs identified by the facility condition assessment during 2007-2010, include currently critical and potentially critical needs at each school campus and support facility. The total cost to address these needs is approximately $319,528,000 phased over eight years.
b. Functional Equity
A functional equity study was completed by the District during 2008-2010. This study identified core areas and some specialized classrooms, within specific school campuses that did not meet the current educational specification standards. The cost to resolve these issues is approximately $131,000,000, phased over eight years.
c. New Schools and Additions Land acquisition and funding has been approved for a new middle school site in the southeastern part of the District, and a new high school site in south Austin. The construction of the middle and high schools is anticipated to be a part of a future bond program.
Page 10
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
As enrollment is projected to increase, it is estimated that two additional elementary schools would be required. Currently, the District targets a 125% utilization rate as a precipitant for potential new construction or additions. The unfunded new construction recommendations include the following:
1. Three new elementary schools 2. Seven elementary school classroom additions 3. One new middle school 4. One middle school classroom addition 5. One new high school
IV. Closures/Consolidations
Although the Task Force’s recommendations include the consideration of school closures because of the severity of the District’s budget short fall, significant concerns were expressed by some members of the Task Force regarding the impact of school closures on communities, especially in those where recent gains in student performance could be jeopardized.
a. Consider consolidating/closing one middle school. b. Consider consolidating/closing eight elementary
schools.
V. Programs Recommendations
a. Relocate Alternative Learning Center (ALC) possibly in a different quadrant of the city .
b. Identify a Pre-K-8 school (begin Pre-K-5) to relieve north central overcrowding. Also, consider this model in other areas of the district.
c. Consider moving 6th grade from elementary to middle school to relieve overcrowding in
elementary schools and under-utilization in middle schools.
d. Explore Pre-K Centers to address overcrowding e. Conduct intensive planning for School for Young
Men (site TBD based on community input, feasibility, and availability of funding).
f. Conduct planning for district open-enrollment signature programs and vertical team signature programs, and their equitable geographic distribution.
g. Complete analysis of changes to district programs that generate facility needs.
h. Conduct planning for Career Tech Hubs (sites TBD based on community input, feasibility, and availability of funding).
i. Consider options for separating some elementary schools into Pre-K-3 and 4-8 grade configurations to address overcrowding.
VI. Policy
a. Seriously consider redrawing boundaries in most
critically overcrowded regions where possible. b. Initiate a District-wide boundary assessment and
possible realignment beginning January 2012 to balance enrollment and improve vertical alignment.
c. Address strict application of transfer policy as it applies to overcrowding and under-utilization.
VII. Operating Efficiency and Potential Revenue
a. Do not renew administrative leases that end in
FY’11.
Page 11
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
b. Do not renew administrative leases that end in FY’14.
c. Prepare and sell Baker Administrative Center. d. Prepare and sell Carruth Administrative Center. e. Expand District energy efficiency programs,
including coordinated facilities summer shutdowns where feasible.
f. Identify additional energy efficiencies to include in 2012 bond package.
Page 12
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Timeline for Facility Master Plan Implementation
FY ‘12 FY ‘13 FY ‘14 FY ‘15 FY ‘16 FY ‘17 FY ‘18 FY ‘19 FY ‘20 FY ‘21 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Seriously consider redrawing boundaries in most critically overcrowded regions where possible
Boundary review and redraw TBD
Boundary review and redraw TBD
Boundary review and redraw TBD
Open classroom additions at four elementary schools (requires future bond funding, $4.8M each)
Open classroom additions at two elementary schools (requires bond future funding, $4.8M each)
Open classroom addition at one middle school (requires future bond funding, $4.8M) Open classroom addition at one elementary school (requires future bond funding, $4.8M)
Consider consolidating/closing one middle school and four elementary schools
Consider consolidating/closing four elementary schools
Preliminary planning for upcoming bond proposals (every 4 yrs.)
Proposed Bond Program Election (>$500M*)
Proposed Bond Program Election (TBD*)
Proposed Bond Program Election (TBD*)
Open Linder Early Childhood Center (2008 Bond funding available, $21.6M)
Open Performing Arts Center (2008 Bond, funding available, $40M)_ __ Open North Central Elementary School (2004 Bond funding available, $28.1M)
Open new undesignated ES -recommended for North Central (2008 Bond, funding available, $28.1M)__ _ Open new undesignated ES (requires future bond funding, $24.5M)_________ Open new undesignated ES (requires future bond funding, $24.5M)
Open new undesignated ES (requires future bond funding, $24.5M)
Open new Southeast MS (requires future bond funding, $55.7M)
Open new South High School (requires future bond funding, $106.6M)
Relocate Alternative Learning Center (consider possibilities in different quadrant of the city)
Identify pre-k-8 school (begin pre-k-5) to relieve north central elementary school overcrowding. Also, consider this model in other areas of the district.
Consider options for separating some ES into Pk-3rd and 4th – 8th to address overcrowding__ _ Explore 3rd Pre-k center to address overcrowding TBD
Consider moving 6th grade from elementary to middle school to relieve overcrowding and underutilization
Consider moving 6th grade from elementary to middle school to relieve overcrowding and underutilization
Consider moving 6th grade from elementary to middle school to relieve overcrowding and underutilization
Consider moving 6th grade from elementary to middle school to relieve overcrowding and underutilization
Analyze each school to determine if limitations to transfers/choice options are needed
Review application of transfer policy for efficacy and fidelity
Note: In 2015-16 projected student enrollment > 92,000 In 2020-21 projected student enrollment > 98,000 *The Bond Program will focus on Priority 1 and 2 building systems renovations, functional equity improvements, and new schools as indicated by demographic projections and the recommendations of a Bond Advisory Committee that are approved by the Board of Trustees. The specific dates and total bond election amounts must be approved by the Board of Trustees
Page 13
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
FY ‘12 FY ‘13 FY ‘14 FY ‘15 FY ‘16 FY ‘17 FY ‘18 FY ‘19 FY ‘20 FY ‘21
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Address Priority 1 and 2 renovations and functional equity improvements (requires future bond funding)
Address Priority 1 and 2 renovations and functional equity improvements (requires future bond funding)
Address Priority 1 and 2 renovations and functional equity improvements (requires future bond funding)
Address Priority 1 and 2 renovations and functional equity improvements (requires future bond funding)
Address Priority 1 and 2 renovations and functional equity improvements (requires future bond funding)
Address Priority 1 and 2 renovations and functional equity improvements (requires future bond funding)
Address Priority 1 and 2 renovations and functional equity improvements (requires future bond funding)
Address Priority 1 and 2 renovations and functional equity improvements (requires future bond funding)
Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Do not renew administrative leases that finish in FY’11__ Explore terminating administrative leases that finish in FY’14
Do not renew administrative leases that finish in FY’14
Prepare and sell Baker Prepare and sell CAC
Expand existing district energy efficiency programs, including coordinated facilities summer shutdowns where feasible___________ Identify additional energy efficiency facility needs to include in 2012 bond package
Reduce energy usage to 95% of baseline
Reduce energy usage to 90% of baseline or lower
Reduce energy usage to 85% of baseline or lower
Reduce energy usage to 80% of baseline or lower
Reduce energy usage to 75% of baseline or lower
Reduce energy usage to 75% of baseline or lower
Reduce energy usage to 75% of baseline or lower
Reduce energy usage to 70% of baseline or lower
Reduce energy usage to 65% of baseline or lower
Programs
Intensive planning for School for Young Men (site TBD based on community input, feasibility, availability of funding)
Open School for Young Men (if feasible and funding available)
Planning for district open-enrollment signature programs, and vertical team signature programs and their equitable geographic distribution_____________ Complete analysis of changes to district programs that generate facilities needs
Planning for Career Tech Hubs (locations and funding sources TBD)
Open Career Tech Hubs (1 north, 1 south)
Note: In 2015-16 projected student enrollment > 92,000 In 2020-21 projected student enrollment > 98,000 *The Bond Program will focus on Priority 1 and 2 building systems renovations, functional equity improvements, and new schools as indicated by demographic projections and the recommendations of a Bond Advisory Committee that are approved by the Board of Trustees. The specific dates and total bond election amounts must be approved by the Board of Trustees.
Page 14
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Estimated Budget The following tables provide an estimated budget, including estimated costs or savings by year, for the facility recommendations. The estimated costs or savings are based on AISD budgeted operating costs and recently completed facility evaluations.
FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTAL
I. Operational Cost SavingsPortable Reductions (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (6,000,000)$
Total Cost / (Savings) (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (6,000,000)$
II. Funded New ConstructionEarly Childhood Center -$ 21,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 21,600,000$
New North Central ES -$ -$ 28,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 28,100,000$
Performing Arts Center -$ -$ 40,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 40,000,000$
New ES (North Central) -$ -$ -$ 28,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 28,100,000$
Total Cost / (Savings) -$ 21,600,000$ 68,100,000$ 28,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 117,800,000$
III. Un-Funded New Construction and Capital ImprovementsPriority 1 & 2 Needs -$ -$ 39,941,000$ 39,941,000$ 39,941,000$ 39,941,000$ 39,941,000$ 39,941,000$ 39,941,000$ 39,941,000$ 319,528,000$
Functional Equity -$ -$ 16,350,000$ 16,350,000$ 16,350,000$ 16,350,000$ 16,350,000$ 16,350,000$ 16,350,000$ 16,350,000$ 130,800,000$
New Schools
New ES -$ -$ -$ 24,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,500,000$
New ES -$ -$ -$ 24,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,500,000$
New ES -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,500,000$
New MS -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 55,700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 55,700,000$
New HS -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 106,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ 106,600,000$
Additions
4 ES Classroom Additions -$ 19,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 19,200,000$
2 ES Classroom Additions -$ -$ 9,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,600,000$
1 ES Classroom Addition -$ -$ -$ 4,800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,800,000$
1 MS Classroom Addition -$ -$ -$ 4,800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,800,000$
Total Cost / (Savings) -$ -$ 75,491,000$ 114,891,000$ 90,391,000$ 111,991,000$ 162,891,000$ 56,291,000$ 56,291,000$ 56,291,000$ 724,528,000$
Page 15
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Area Facility Options
The following pages describe, outline, and summarize facility options by area in the District. The District has been divided into the 10 following with a map provided on the following page.
Area 1: Northwest – Anderson HS, Murchison MS, Davis ES, Doss ES, Hill ES, Summitt ES
Area 2: North Central – Lanier HS, Burnet MS, Dobie MS, Barrington ES, Cook ES, Graham ES, Hart ES, McBee ES, Pillow ES, Walnut Creek ES, Wooldridge ES, Wooten ES, Read Pre-K Center
Area 3: Central West – McCallum HS, Lamar MS, Brentwood ES, Brown ES, Bryker Woods ES, Casis ES, Gullet ES, Highland Park ES, Lee ES, Mathews ES, Pease ES, Reilly ES, Ridgetop ES
Area 4: Northeast – LASA HS, LBJ HS, Reagan HS, Garcia MS, Pearce MS, Webb MS, Andrews ES, Blanton ES, Harris ES, Jordan ES, Maplewood ES, Overton ES, Pecan Springs ES, Pickle ES, Winn ES
Area 5: Central East – Eastside Memorial HS, Kealing MS, Martin MS, Allan ES, Allison ES, Blackshear ES, Brooke ES, Campbell ES, Govalle ES, Metz ES, Norman ES, Oak Springs ES, Ortega ES, Sanchez ES, Sims ES, Zavala ES, Garza Independence HS, Alternative Learning Center (ALC)
Area 6: Central – Austin HS, Travis HS, Fulmore MS, O.Henry MS, Barton Hills ES, Becker ES, Dawson ES, Linder ES, Travis Heights ES, Zilker ES
Area 7: Southwest – Bowie HS, Bailey MS, Gorzycki MS, Small MS, Baldwin ES, Baranoff ES, Clayton ES, Kiker ES, Mills ES, Oak Hill ES, Patton ES
Area 8: South – Crockett HS, Bedichek MS, Covington MS, Boone ES, Cunningham ES, Galindo ES, Joslin ES, St. Elmo ES, Sunset Valley ES, The Ann Richards School for Young Women Leaders
Area 9: Southeast – Mendez MS, Blazier ES, Houston ES, Langford ES, Palm ES, Perez ES, Rodriguez ES, Widen ES
Area 10: Far South – Akins HS, Paredes MS, Casey ES, Cowan ES, Kocurek ES, Menchaca ES, Odom ES, Pleasant Hill ES, Williams ES
Page 16
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 17
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
AREA 1 – NORTHWEST Anderson High School Murchison Middle School Davis, Doss, Hill and Summitt elementary
schools Area Issues
Based on the number of students living in the area for the 2010-11 school year:
The area has a slight deficiency in the number of seats available at the elementary and middle school levels.
The number of students migrating into the area is higher than the number of students migrating out of the area at all levels.
Space Utilization
Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: One elementary school, Doss, is severely
overcrowded (above 125% of permanent capacity)
Two elementary schools, Hill and Summitt, are overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity)
One elementary school, Davis, is in the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)
The middle school, Murchison, is overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity)
The high school, Anderson, is in the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)
Educational Enhancement Academic Ratings:
Future Growth Moderate population growth is projected in this
area in the next five years. Facility Condition On average, the facilities have an FCI (Facility
Condition Index) slightly above the District FCI (22.8%).
Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan Construct an eight-classroom addition at one
elementary school. Construct an eight-classroom addition at one
middle school. Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
improvements. Community Impact Consult with the community regarding boundary
adjustments. Cost Savings NA
Exemplary Doss ES Hill ES Summitt ES
Recognized Davis ES Murchison MS Anderson HS
Elementary School Capacity 2,633 Elementary Migration IN - 478Elementary School Population 2,731 Elementary Migration OUT - 166Excess / (Deficient) Seats (98) Net Migration - 312
Middle School Capacity 1,113 Middle School Migration IN - 220Middle School Population 1,171 Middle School Migration OUT - 110Excess / (Deficient) Seats (58) Net Mirgation - 110
High School Capacity 2,017 High School Migration IN - 391High School Population 1,962 High School Migration OUT - 257Excess / (Deficient) Seats 55 Net Migration - 134
Acceptable None
Page 18
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
AREA 2 – NORTH CENTRAL Lanier High School Burnet and Dobie middle schools Barrington, Cook, Graham, Hart, McBee,
Pillow, Walnut Creek, Wooldridge, Wooten elementary schools and Read Pre-K Center
Area Issues Based on the number of students living in the area for the 2010-11 school year:
The area has a severe deficiency in the number of seats available at the elementary school levels.
The number of students migrating out of the area is higher than the number of students migrating in, especially at the elementary and high school levels.
Space Utilization Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: Nine elementary schools, Barrington, Cook,
Graham, Hart, McBee, Read, Walnut Creek, Wooldridge and Wooten, are severely overcrowded (above 125% of permanent capacity)
One elementary school, Pillow, is overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity)
One middle school, Burnet, is in the target range of percent of permanent capacity(between 85% and 105%), while one middle school, Dobie, is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity)
The high school, Lanier, is in the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)
Educational Enhancement Academic Ratings:
Future Growth Highest population growth in district is
projected in this area in the next five years Facility Condition On average, the facilities have an FCI slightly
less than the District FCI (22.8%), with two
Recognized Cook ES Hart ES McBee ES Wooten ES Dobie MS
Exemplary Graham ES Pillow ES
Acceptable Barrington ES Walnut Creek ES Wooldridge ES Burnet MS Lanier HS
Elementary School Capacity 5,568 Elementary Migration IN - 641Elementary School Population 8,370 Elementary Migration OUT - 1,587Excess / (Deficient) Seats (2,802) Net Migration (946)
Middle School Capacity 1,941 Middle School Migration IN - 123Middle School Population 1,889 Middle School Migration OUT - 333Excess / (Deficient) Seats 52 Net Migration (210)
High School Capacity 1,627 High School Migration IN - 121High School Population 1,981 High School Migration OUT - 557Excess / (Deficient) Seats (354) Net Migration (436)
Page 19
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
elementary schools and one middle school requiring more extensive renovations.
Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan Construct two additional elementary schools. Construct eight-classroom additions at two
elementary schools. Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
improvements. Community Impact
Consult with the community regarding middle school redesign.
Consult with the community regarding boundary adjustments.
Cost Savings NA
AREA 3 – CENTRAL WEST McCallum High School Lamar Middle School Brentwood, Brown, Bryker Woods, Casis,
Gullett, Highland Park, Lee, Mathews, Reilly and Ridgetop elementary schools
Pease Elementary School* Area Issues
Based on the number of students living in the area for the 2010-11 school year:
The area has available seats at all school levels.
The number of students migrating into the area is higher than the number of students migrating out of the area at all levels.
Attendance zone population under 300 students at three elementary schools, Matthews, Pease, and Ridgetop.
There are three elementary schools, Bryker Woods, Pease and Ridgetop that have a permanent capacity of less than 300 seats.
Permanent capacity for the middle and high schools are within target ranges.
The Fine Arts Academy at McCallum HS results in a higher “in” migration at the high school level.
Elementary School Capacity 4,336 Elementary Migration IN - 1,197Elementary School Population 4,025 Elementary Migration OUT - 565Excess / (Deficient) Seats 311 Net Migration - 632
Middle School Capacity 1,008 Middle School Migration IN - 223Middle School Population 583 Middle School Migration OUT - 191Excess / (Deficient) Seats 425 Net Migration - 32
High School Capacity 1,596 High School Migration IN - 795High School Population 1,316 High School Migration OUT - 296Excess / (Deficient) Seats 280 Net Migration - 499
Page 20
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Space Utilization Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area:
Two elementary schools, Bryker Woods and Gullett, are severely overcrowded (above 125% of permanent capacity).
One elementary school, Casis, is overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity)
Three elementary schools, Brown, Highland Park and Ridgetop, are over capacity (between 105% and 115% of permanent capacity)
Four elementary schools, Lee, Mathews Pease, and Reilly, are within the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)
One elementary school, Brentwood, is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity)
The middle school, Lamar, is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity)
The high school, McCallum, is overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity)
Educational Enhancement Academic Ratings:
Future Growth Moderate population growth is projected in
this area in the next five years. Facility Condition
On average, the facilities have an FCI slightly higher than the District FCI (22.8%), with two elementary schools requiring more extensive renovations.
Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
improvements. Consolidate/close one elementary school.
Community Impact Consult with community regarding the use of
closed/consolidated elementary school. Consult with community if boundary
adjustments are needed. Cost Savings
Cost savings for closure of one elementary school is $700,000 in M&O savings.
Capital cost avoidance –$8.1M if one elementary school was closed / consolidated.
*Pease Elementary School does not have an attendance boundary and receives transfer students from all parts of the District, therefore its capacity, enrollment, and in-migration counts are not included in the area summaries.
Exemplary Casis ES Gullett ES Highland Park ES Lee ES Matthews ES Pease ES Ridgetop ES
Recognized Brentwood ES Bryker Woods ES Reilly ES
Acceptable Brown ES Lamar MS McCallum HS
Page 21
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
AREA 4 – NORTHEAST LASA, LBJ and Reagan high schools Garcia, Pearce and Webb middle schools, Andrews, Blanton, Harris, Jordan, Maplewood,
Overton, Pecan Springs, Pickle and Winn elementary schools
Area Issues Based on the number of students living in the area for the 2010-11 school year: The area has available seats at the middle and
high school levels, but is deficient at the elementary school level.
The number of students migrating out of the area is higher than the number of students migrating into the area at all levels, especially at the middle and high school levels.
The magnet program, LASA, located at LBJ High School attracts students from outside the LBJ attendance area.
Space Utilization Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: Three elementary schools, Andrews, Harris
and Jordan, are severely overcrowded (above 125% of permanent capacity).
Four elementary schools, Maplewood, Overton, Pecan Springs, and Pickle are overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity).
Two elementary schools, Blanton and Winn, are within the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%).
All three middle schools, are under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).
One high school, Reagan, is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity), while LBJ and LASA are within the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)
Educational Enhancement New Programs for 2011-12: Early College Prep at one middle school Early College High School / Early College
Start at two high schools Academic Ratings:
Exemplary Blanton ES LASA HS
Recognized Andrews ES Harris ES Jordan ES Overton ES Pickle ES Winn ES
Acceptable Maplewood ES Pecan Springs ES Garcia MS Pearce MS Webb MS LBJ HS Reagan HS
Elementary School Capacity 4,918 Elementary Migration IN - 741Elementary School Population 5,743 Elementary Migration OUT - 907Excess / (Deficient) Seats (825) Net Migration - (166)
Middle School Capacity 3,097 Middle School Migration IN - 93Middle School Population 2,272 Middle School Migration OUT - 665Excess / (Deficient) Seats 825 Net Mirgation - (572)
High School Capacity 3,430 High School Migration IN - 247High School Population 2,635 High School Migration OUT - 1,018Excess / (Deficient) Seats 795 Net Migration - (771)
Page 22
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Future Growth Significant population growth is projected in
this area in the next five years. Facility Condition On average, the facilities have an FCI (Facility
Condition Index) lower than the District FCI (22.8%), with two elementary schools requiring more extensive renovations
Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan Construct one elementary school. Construct an eight classroom addition at one
elementary school. Close /consolidate one middle school. Adjust boundaries between elementary
schools. Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
improvements. Community Impact Consult with community regarding plans for
closure/consolidation of one middle school and its repurposing.
Cost Savings Cost savings for closure of one middle school is
$1.8M in M&O savings. Capital cost avoidance –$7.4M if one middle
school was closed / consolidated.
AREA 5 – CENTRAL EAST Eastside Memorial High School at the Johnston
Campus - Global Tech. , Green Tech., and International high schools
Kealing and Martin middle schools Allan, Allison, Blackshear, Brooke, Campbell,
Govalle, Metz, Norman, Oak Springs, Ortega, Sanchez, Sims and Zavala elementary schools
Garza Independence High School* and the Alternative Learning Center (ALC)
Area Issues Based on the number of students living in the area for the 2010-11 school year:
The area has available seats at all school levels. The number of students migrating out of the area is
higher than the number of students migrating into the area at the elementary and high schools levels. The magnet program at Kealing MS results in a higher “in” migration at the middle school level.
Attendance zone populations are under 300 students at three elementary schools, Blackshear, Oak Springs and Ortega.
Permanent capacity for all schools is within target ranges.
International High School provides programs for limited English speaking high school students who qualify.
Elementary School Capacity 6,639 Elementary Migration IN - 665Elementary School Population 5,173 Elementary Migration OUT - 810Excess / (Deficient) Seats 1,466 Net Migration - (145)
Middle School Capacity 2,136 Middle School Migration IN - 881Middle School Population 1,597 Middle School Migration OUT - 493Excess / (Deficient) Seats 539 Net Migration - 388
High School Capacity 1,548 High School Migration IN - 125High School Population 1,249 High School Migration OUT - 955Excess / (Deficient) Seats 299 Net Migration - (830)Page 23
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Space Utilization Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: One elementary school, Allison, is over
capacity (between 105% and 115% of permanent capacity)
Three elementary schools, Brooke, Metz and Sanchez, are within the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)
Nine elementary schools, Allan, Blackshear, Campbell, Govalle, Norman, Oak Springs, Ortega, Sims and Zavala are under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity)
One middle school, Kealing, is within the target range of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%), while Martin is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).
The high school, Eastside Memorial, is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).
Educational Enhancement Academic Ratings:
Future Growth No significant population growth is projected
in this area in the next five years. Facility Condition
On average, the facilities have an FCI above the District FCI (22.8%), with three elementary schools and one secondary schools requiring more extensive renovations.
There are significant structural issues at the Alternative Learning Center (ALC).
Facility Master Plan Task Force for 10-Year Plan Consolidate / close four elementary schools. Construct one replacement elementary
school. Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
improvements. Community Impact Consult with community to discuss use /
repurposing of elementary schools to be closed and the relocation of ALC.
Cost Savings M & O savings ($5.1M) could be realized if
four elementary schools were closed / consolidated.
Capital cost avoidance - $25.2M if four elementary schools were closed / consolidated; however, it would cost $28M to construct a replacement elementary school.
*Garza Independence High School and the Alternative Learning Center do not have attendance boundaries and receive transfer students from all parts of the District, therefore their capacity, enrollment, and in-migration counts are not included in the area summaries.
Exemplary Metz ES Oak Springs ES Ortega ES Sims ES
Recognized Brooke ES Norman ES Sanchez ES Zavala ES
Acceptable Allan ES Allison ES Blackshear ES Campbell ES Govalle ES Kealing MS Martin MS Eastside Global HS Garza Independence HS
Unacceptable Eastside Green HS
Page 24
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
AREA 6 – CENTRAL Austin and Travis high schools Fulmore and O. Henry middle schools Barton Hills, Becker, Dawson, Linder, Travis
Heights and Zilker elementary schools
Area Issues Based on the number of students living in the area for the 2010-11 school year:
The area has available seats at all school levels. The number of students migrating into the area is
higher than the number of students migrating out of the area at the elementary and middle school levels. There are slightly more students migrating out of the area at the high school level.
Attendance zone populations are under 300 students at three elementary schools, Barton Hills, Becker and Dawson.
One elementary school, Barton Hills, has a permanent capacity of less than 300 seats.
Space Utilization Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: Two elementary schools, Barton Hills and
Linder, are severely overcrowded (above 125% of permanent capacity)
Two elementary schools, Travis Heights and Zilker, are over capacity (between 105% and 115% of permanent capacity).
Two elementary school, Becker and Dawson, are under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity)
One middle school, O.Henry, is overcrowded (above 125% of permanent capacity), while Fulmore is within the target range of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%).
One high school, Austin, is overcrowded (above 125% of permanent capacity), while Travis is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).
Educational Enhancement
Academic Ratings:
Exemplary Barton Hills ES Becker ES Dawson ES Zilker ES
Recognized Linder ES Travis Heights ES Austin HS
Acceptable Fulmore MS O.Henry MS Travis HS
Elementary School Capacity 2,768 Elementary Migration IN - 729Elementary School Population 2,547 Elementary Migration OUT - 433Excess / (Deficient) Seats 221 Net Migration - 296
Middle School Capacity 2,023 Middle School Migration IN - 780Middle School Population 1,654 Middle School Migration OUT - 321Excess / (Deficient) Seats 369 Net Migration - 459
High School Capacity 4,067 High School Migration IN - 936High School Population 3,860 High School Migration OUT - 1,126Excess / (Deficient) Seats 207 Net Migration - (187)
Page 25
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Future Growth Moderate population growth is projected in
this area, specifically within the Linder and Travis Heights attendance zones.
Facility Condition With the exception of one elementary with a
high FCI, on average, the facilities have an FCI above the the district average (22.8), with three elementary schools and one middle school requiring more extensive renovations.
Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan Consolidate/close two elementary schools. Address priorities 1& 2 and functional equity
improvements. Community Impact
Consult with the community regarding the use closed/consolidated elementary school(s).
Cost Savings • M&O savings for two elementary schools -
$2.2M. • Capital cost avoidance for three elementary
schools- $17.5M.
AREA 7 – SOUTHWEST Bowie High School Bailey, Gorzycki and Small middle schools Baldwin, Baranoff, Clayton, Kiker, Mills, Oak Hill and
Patton elementary schools Area Issues
Based on the number of students living in the area for the 2010-11 school year: The area has available seats at the middle school
level, and is slightly deficient at the elementary and high schools levels.
The number of students migrating into the area is higher than the number of students migrating out of the area at all levels.
Space Utilization
Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: Three elementary schools, Kiker, Mills and Patton,
are overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity)
One elementary school, Baranoff, is over capacity (between 105% and 115% of permanent capacity).
Elementary School Capacity 5,392 Elementary Migration IN - 633Elementary School Population 5,727 Elementary Migration OUT - 545Excess / (Deficient) Seats (335) Net Migration - 88
Middle School Capacity 3,738 Middle School Migration IN - 487Middle School Population 2,844 Middle School Migration OUT - 358Excess / (Deficient) Seats 894 Net Migration - 129
High School Capacity 2,535 High School Migration IN - 505High School Population 2,606 High School Migration OUT - 231Excess / (Deficient) Seats (71) Net Migration - 274
Page 26
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Two elementary schools, Clayton and Oak Hill, are within the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)
One elementary school, Baldwin, is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity)
One middle school, Bailey, is within the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%).
Two middle schools, Gorzycki and Small are under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity)
One high school, Bowie, is over capacity (between 105% and 115% of permanent capacity).
Educational Enhancement Academic Ratings:
Future Growth Moderate population growth is projected in
this area at the elementary and middle school levels.
Facility Condition On average, the facilities have an FCI well
below the District FCI (22.8%). Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan Construct an eight-classroom addition at one
elementary school. Adjust boundaries among elementary
schools. Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
improvements. Community Impact Consult with community regarding boundary
adjustments. Cost Savings NA
Recognized Bailey MS Bowie HS Gorzycki MS Small MS
No Rating Baldwin ES
Exemplary Baranoff ES Clayton ES Kiker ES Mills ES Oak Hill ES Patton ES
Acceptable None
Page 27
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
AREA 8 - SOUTH Crockett High School, Bedichek and Covington middle schools, Boone, Cunningham, Galindo, Joslin, St. Elmo
and Sunset Valley elementary schools The Ann Richards School for Young Women
Leaders* Area Issues
Based on the number of students living in the area for the 2010-11 school year:
• The area has available seats at the elementary and high school levels, and is slightly deficient at the middle schools level.
The number of students migrating out of the area is higher than the number of students migrating into the area, especially at the middle and high school levels.
Space Utilization
Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: Two elementary schools, Galindo and Joslin,
are within the target range of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%).
Four elementary schools, Boone, Cunningham, St. Elmo and Sunset Valley, are
under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).
One middle school, Bedichek, is over capacity (between 105% and 115% of permanent capacity) while Covington is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity.
The high school, Crockett, is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).
Educational Enhancements
Academic Ratings:
Future Growth Moderate population growth projected in
the area. Facility Condition On average, the facilities have an FCI above
the District FCI (22.8%) with four elementary schools and one middle school requiring more extensive renovations.
Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan Consolidate/close one elementary school. Adjust boundaries between high schools
(Akins and Crockett). Address Priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
improvements.
Exemplary Joslin ES Sunset Valley ES The Ann Richard School for Young Women Leaders
Recognized Boone ES Galindo ES St. Elmo ES
Acceptable Cunningham ES Bedichek MS Covington MS Crockett HS
Elementary School Capacity 3,436 Elementary Migration IN - 566Elementary School Population 2,921 Elementary Migration OUT - 656Excess / (Deficient) Seats 515 Net Migration - (90)
Middle School Capacity 2,066 Middle School Migration IN - 281Middle School Population 2,124 Middle School Migration OUT - 508Excess / (Deficient) Seats (58) Net Migration - (227)
High School Capacity 2,163 High School Migration IN - 285High School Population 1,883 High School Migration OUT - 510Excess / (Deficient) Seats 280 Net Migration - (225)
Page 28
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Community Impact Consult with the community regarding
closure and repurposing of elementary school.
Cost Savings Cost savings for closure of elementary school
is $1.26M in M&O savings. Capital cost avoidance –$8.4M.
*The Ann Richards School does not have an attendance boundary and receives transfer students from all parts of the District, therefore its capacity, population, and in-migration counts are not included in the area summaries.
AREA 9 – SOUTHEAST
Mendez Middle School, Blazier, Houston, Langford, Palm, Perez,
Rodriguez and Widen elementary schools Area Issues
Based on the number of students living in the area for the 2010-11 school year:
The area is severely deficient in the number of seats at the elementary level, and is slightly deficient at the middle school level.
The number of students migrating out of the area is higher than the number of students migrating into the area.
Space Utilization
Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: Four elementary schools, Blazier, Houston, Perez
and Rodriguez, are severely overcrowded (over 125% of permanent capacity).
Two elementary schools, Langford and Widen, are overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity).
One elementary school, Palm, is within the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%).
The middle school, Mendez, is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).
There is no high school in this area.
Elementary School Capacity 4,637 Elementary Migration IN - 503Elementary School Population 6,109 Elementary Migration OUT - 865Excess / (Deficient) Seats (1,472) Net Migration - (362)
Middle School Capacity 1,215 Middle School Migration IN - 27Middle School Population 1,266 Middle School Migration OUT - 396Excess / (Deficient) Seats (51) Net Migration - (369)
Page 29
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Education Enhancement Academic Ratings:
Future Growth Moderate population growth is projected in
this area. Facility Condition On average, the facilities have an FCI that is
below the District FCI (22.8%), with one elementary school requiring more extensive renovations.
Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan Evaluate reduction of portables at middle
school. Construct eight-classroom additions at two
elementary schools. Adjust boundaries among area elementary
schools to reduce overcrowding. Adjust boundaries among area middle
schools. Address priority 1& 2 and functional equity
improvements Community Impact Consult with the community regarding
elementary and middle school boundary adjustments.
Cost Savings NA
AREA 10 – FAR SOUTH Akins High School Paredes Middle School Casey, Cowan, Kocurek, Menchaca, Odom,
Pleasant Hill and Williams elementary schools Area Issues
Based on the number of students living in the area for the 2010-11 school year:
The area is deficient is the number of seats at the elementary and high school levels.
The number of students migrating out of the area is higher than the number of students migrating into the area, especially at the middle and high school levels.
Space Utilization Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: Three elementary schools, Cowan, Odom and
Pleasant Hill, are overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity).
Two elementary schools, Menchaca and Williams, are over capacity (between 105% and 115% permanent capacity). Two elementary schools, Casey and
Kocurek, are within the target range of
Recognized Houston ES Palm ES Perez ES
Acceptable Blazier ES Langford ES Rodriguez ES Mendez MS Widen ES
Elementary School Capacity 4,286 Elementary Migration IN - 773Elementary School Population 4,819 Elementary Migration OUT - 873Excess / (Deficient) Seats (533) Net Migration - (100)
Middle School Capacity 1,156 Middle School Migration IN - 69Middle School Population 1,165 Middle School Migration OUT - 291Excess / (Deficient) Seats (9) Net Migration - (222)
High School Capacity 2,394 High School Migration IN - 176High School Population 3,092 High School Migration OUT - 596Excess / (Deficient) Seats (698) Net Migration - (420)
Exemplary None
Page 30
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%).
The middle school, Paredes, is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).
The high school, Akins, is over capacity (between 105% and 115% of permanent capacity).
Educational Enhancement
Academic Ratings:
Future Growth No significant population growth is projected in
the area for the elementary and middle school levels; however, continued moderate growth is projected at the high school level.
Facility Condition On average, the facilities have an FCI below
the District FCI (22.8%), with two elementary schools requiring more extensive renovations.
Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan Priority 1& 2 and functional equity
improvements. Adjust boundaries between high schools
(Akins and Crockett to reduce overcrowding).
Community Impact Consult with community regarding high
school boundary adjustments and possible elementary boundary adjustments.
Cost Savings NA
Exemplary Cowan ES
Recognized Akins HS Paredes MS
Acceptable Casey ES Kocurek ES Menchaca ES Odom ES Pleasant Hill ES Williams ES
Page 31
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011 Additional Recommendations The Facilities Master Plan Task Force recommends the following District-wide initiatives and policy recommendations. Some recommendations may require additional planning and research from other AISD departments and outside entities. The Task Force does not want to lose sight of these very important ideas and recognizes that the Facility Master Plan is a dynamic document and should be updated periodically to incorporate building improvements, updates in community demographics, and changes in educational programming.
I. Policy Recommendations
1. Consider school closures only after all other alternatives and options, both programmatic and facilities use, have been thoroughly examined and discussed with the affected communities.
2. Create a community engagement process, led
by the Superintendent and the Senior Leadership Team, to work directly with the local community as part of the implementation planning process.
3. Establish a standing committee of parents,
teachers, district staff, and other stakeholders (e.g., City, Chamber of Commerce, realtors) to track and maintain the Facility Master Plan over time.
4. Conduct campus assessments for future bond
work in consultation with each school's Campus Advisory Council to ensure accurate, first-hand knowledge of campus conditions and priorities. For continuity, each campus will maintain a Facilities Improvement Plan documenting prior campus evaluations, including a Principal's Log, in which the principal or his/her designee will record relevant discussions regarding how the campus facilities are functioning and note any concerns for future administrators and CACs.
5. When new schools or consolidations are being
considered, first evaluate existing District sites (both presently undeveloped or in use) and determine if any are candidates for new construction, renovation, or re-construction. This may assist the District in locating schools in better locations than can be achieved with the purchase of new land.
6. Continue to identify ways to improve
collaborative planning with the City of Austin. The Austin ISD, City of Austin, and Travis County have adopted a joint resolution that specifically commits these entities to collaborative planning efforts including the AISD Facility Master Plan and the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
7. Initiate a District-wide boundary assessment and
possible realignment beginning January 2012 to
Page 32
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
balance enrollment and improve vertical alignment.
8. District Departments/staff should be moved into
available spaces at under-utilized schools so that the District may sell valuable property, avoid leasing buildings and allow for all schools to remain open.
9. Aggressively pursue joint-use opportunities for
existing underutilized campuses, as well as new facilities; potential partners include the City of Austin, Central Health/CommUnityCare, and arts organizations and other nonprofit organizations.
10. Closed schools should be reused by the District or
another governmental entity for office/ administrative use, or by another educational user, and then returned to use as AISD instructional space when student population growth makes it prudent.
11. Review current District transfer policies and
implementation, in particular using campus’ “permanent capacity”, as opposed to “functional capacity” when evaluating available space.
12. Analyze current “out migration” trends from
campus/zones to understand the underlying issues, AND then address those issues in order to support the return of students to their neighborhood schools.
13. Conduct a complete review of the day-to-day
application of the district's transfer policy, regardless of overcrowding or underutilization. Include the impact that “out migration” can have on under-utilized schools as much as “in migration can impact overcrowded schools.
14. Support the neighborhood school model.
II. Management Recommendations
15. Institute a well-defined system for handling
maintenance requests that is communicated in writing to all staff at the start of each school year including:
how and to whom to report a maintenance issue, and how to receive the estimated time for a response, how to track a maintenance request
electronically in real time, who to contact if the contractor or
maintenance person fails to arrive, what to do if work is poorly completed or is
incomplete, and who is responsible for signing off on
completed work. III. Staffing Recommendations
16. Develop a plan to supervise custodians centrally
to allow more flexibility in the use of resources, reduce overtime costs through flexible
Page 33
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
scheduling, improved supervision and quality control, and improved facility scheduling and energy management.
17. Consolidate maintenance functions, including field maintenance for athletic fields, under the Maintenance Department to provide more efficient and flexible use of available resources.
IV. Energy Efficiency Recommendations
18. Implement a centrally supervised summer
custodial program to achieve cost reductions by returning some custodians on each campus, through attrition, to a 10-month employment year.
19. Continue the current District focus on energy
usage reduction through more efficient equipment, technology applications to manage the operation of buildings more effectively, and engagement of campus and facility occupants to assist working toward the goal of reduced usage.
20. Continue efforts toward a coordinated shutdown
of facilities in the summer months as is feasible. 21. As soon as feasible, fund energy coordinator
position to implement and monitor energy savings initiatives at campuses. Savings generated from funding this position would more than offset the cost.
22. Implement an educational campaign to raise or lower thermostats in schools four degrees. (Estimates based on examples project savings of between 5% and 20%.)
23. Continue to upgrade and improve data and
systems to measure utility usage by campus.
V. Maintenance Recommendations
24. Institute bond counsel-approved strategies to designate funds for building system renovations in future bond programs to protect the District’s capital investments.
25. Include furniture and equipment replacement
schedule in the next bond program scope of work; invest in high quality equipment that will not require frequent maintenance or replacement.
26. Institute industry-standard performance measures
for bond programs, per the 2009 MGT Efficiency Study, to maintain and publish the following types of data: cost per foot of construction projects compared to peer districts and regional and national averages, final estimate compared to final bid, change-order rate, completion schedules, consultant ratings.
Page 34
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011 VI. Design Recommendations
27. Engage in public/private partnerships in the siting,
engineering, and design of “healthy” schools and neighborhood environments that support increased outdoor physical activities for children and their families.
28. Explore flexible design for future school facilities to
accommodate population fluctuations. Some strategies include implementing consistent building designs with modular components that may expand or contract with student population changes, or using a Mobile Technology unit that allows specialized equipment to be shared by two or more campuses for a portion of a year.
29. Create flexible learning spaces, where students
can work in groups utilizing the wireless network with portable devices.
30. Design large-scale facilities to provide suitable
space for multiple uses such as conferences, meetings, and professional development (ideally in conjunction with other local governmental partners to share costs and maintenance).
31. Design, construct and operate high-performance
schools and other facilities that are sensitive to natural resource use, conserve energy and water, reduce pollution and waste, promote and attract active transportation by healthy outdoor design that includes, but is not limited to, bicycle
racks for students within a two-mile radius of a campus and outdoor space designed for multi-purpose neighborhood and community use.
32. The site selection process for high-performance
schools and other faculties should include a matrix that rewards the availability of mass transportation options that include, but are not limited to, Capital Metro buses, commuter rail, and metro rail to reduce transportation costs and the carbon footprint of a facility.
33. To avoid the costs of building and maintaining
additional high schools, pursue options such as 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. schedules that offer challenging curriculums, distance learning, and advanced placement courses. Online courses could also be more widely implemented and available to all students.
VII. Safety and Security Recommendations
34. Make safe walkable routes a priority when constructing or repurposing school facilities.
35. Assess nighttime security and add security
cameras and lighting in high need areas. 36. Work with appropriate entities to encourage
construction of fences and barriers at railroad crossings.
Page 35
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
37. Ensure the installation of adequate public address and alarm systems in all schools, including all portables.
38. Address campus traffic issues as identified by the
campus. VIII. Use Recommendations
39. Increase building rental rates to increase cost-recovery for community use of schools.
40. Appropriately consolidate students in underutilized
campuses to make available as much classroom space as possible, and issue Requests for Proposals to identify educational groups or childcare providers interested in leasing excess space and assuming or sharing maintenance and operation costs.
41. Implement an aggressive marketing campaign to
rent the Burger Activity and Delco Activity centers to interested parties for conferences, athletic events, and other activities.
IX. Technology Recommendations
42. Design “Twenty-first Century Classrooms,” media
rich classrooms with projectors, audio system, document cameras, and interactive tools.
43. Expand the staff use of online meeting software
(live video/audio/screen sharing) to facilitate
communication and allow people in different spaces to be in the same space virtually. “Green” meetings reduce employee travel time and have a smaller carbon footprint.
44. Institute cloud computing with anytime/anywhere
access that works with all computer types and devices.
45. Use Web 2.0 tools to communicate, collaborate,
and create. 46. Use tools such as video “chat” to expand beyond
the classroom (i.e., virtual field trips, interactions with other students from across town, or across the globe).
47. Create a single web entry point (portal) with single
sign-on for all student and teacher resources in one place.
48. Increase use of online assessment tools to receive
results more quickly and reduce paper usage, i.e., dashboards.
49. Improve access to meaningful student data to
guide instructional decisions. 50. Create online courses for students and teacher
professional development which would be conducted entirely online and blended with face- to-face and online contact.
Page 36
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
51. Increase use of mobile computing (including personal devices such as smart phones) and mobile devices (netbooks). Fewer desktop computers (use less energy, smaller foot print,), less need for dedicated traditional computer lab.
X. Other Recommendations
52. Assess administrative fees for general, sibling, or
tracking school transfers, with no fee for students qualified for free and reduced lunch, and with provisions for hardship waivers.
53. Consider the feasibility of sharing administrative staff or resources and services among small campuses.
54. Determine cost effectiveness of duplicating
special programs in different areas of the District versus providing transportation to a single program.
Page 37
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011 Facility Summary Data Reports with Facility Master Plan Recommendations
The following pages include a summary of each facility with the information listed below, in alphabetical order by school type (ES, MS, HS). Support facilities are included subsequent to the school summaries.
School ID number, name, and address Grades served Permanent and portable/temporary square
footage Number of classrooms Permanent Capacity 2010-11 Enrollment 2010-11 Attendance Zone Population
2015-16 Projected Attendance Zone Population 2010-11 In Migration 2010-11 Out Migration Site size and number of parking spaces Individual building data Facility condition data Deficiency costs by building system and priority Facility master plan recommendations
Page 38
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
142
Allan ES
142 Allan Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 53%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 354 319
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 031
2010-11 In Migration 057
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 364 309
Utilization (by enrollment) 56% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 297 0 297
Gross Area 112,608 112,608
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 379
Permanent Capacity 673
Number of Classrooms 42 0 42
Parking Spaces 72
Gross Site Area (Acres) 19.5
Site Data
School Data
Mechanical 1 1957 1,092 27.6%
Building B 1 1958 10,577 35.3%
Building A 1 1957 100,939 30.3%
Perm Buildings 112,608Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
30.3%
Austin, Texas 78702 1957 AA No
4900 Gonzales Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical $85,828 $1,489,567 $287,683 $21,979 - $1,885,057
Specialties - - $369,686 $80,329 - $450,015
Interior - - $457,357 $323,054 - $780,411
Plumbing $802,337 - $1,423,834 $11,768 - $2,237,939
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $87,750 $494,081 - - $581,831
Fire & Life Safety $141,494 $98,779 $2,617 - - $242,889
Site - - $156,255 $85,341 - $241,597
Other $225,024 - $136,426 - $1,074,557 $1,436,007
Mechanical - $9,454 $520,512 - - $529,965
Exterior - $3,333 $2,797,431 $36,448 - $2,837,212
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $1,254,683 $1,688,882 $6,645,881 $558,919 $1,074,557 $11,222,922
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,943,565*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 39
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
101
Allison ES
101 Allison Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 120%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 585 -99
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 079
2010-11 In Migration 031
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 590 -104
Utilization (by enrollment) 112% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 113 14 127
Gross Area 61,426 7,680 69,106
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 543
Permanent Capacity 486
Number of Classrooms 30 9 39
Parking Spaces 61
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.7
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1955 61,426 21.6%
Perm Buildings 61,426Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
20.4%
Austin, Texas 78741 1955 AA No
515 Vargas Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $230,499 $412,417 $11,881 - $654,797
Specialties - - $37,014 $73,394 - $110,407
Interior - $133,897 $256,139 $115,111 - $505,146
Plumbing - - $251,501 $9,629 - $261,130
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $91,138 $447,192 - - $538,330
Fire & Life Safety $106,267 $72,572 $2,617 - - $181,456
Site - $2,222 $67,896 - - $70,119
Other $67,350 - $176,405 - $10,288 $254,043
Mechanical - $823,369 $742,003 - - $1,565,371
Exterior - $435 $49,328 - - $49,763
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - $7,992 - - $7,992
Total $173,617 $1,354,132 $2,450,503 $210,014 $10,288 $4,198,553
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,527,749*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 40
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
102
Andrews ES
102 Andrews Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 142%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 692 -206
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 075
2010-11 In Migration 061
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 764 -278
Utilization (by enrollment) 147% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 81 17 99
Gross Area 58,376 12,288 70,664
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 717
Permanent Capacity 486
Number of Classrooms 31 16 47
Parking Spaces 39
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.7
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1986 4,422 8.1%
Building A 1 1962 53,954 38.8%
Perm Buildings 58,376Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
32.1%
Austin, Texas 78723 1962 RC No
6801 Northeast Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $260,909 $362,040 $35,208 - $658,157
Specialties - - $343,330 $83,069 - $426,399
Interior - $128,866 $530,543 $44,545 - $703,954
Plumbing $239,166 - $327,938 $5,350 - $572,454
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $102,282 $476,976 - - $579,258
Fire & Life Safety $109,536 $73,733 - - - $183,268
Site - $54,271 $150,146 - - $204,417
Other $225,239 - $255,049 - $1,517,264 $1,997,552
Mechanical - $1,372,878 $1,042,888 $22,487 - $2,438,253
Exterior - $619,584 $13,720 - - $633,304
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $20,585 - - - $20,585
Total $573,941 $2,633,109 $3,502,631 $190,659 $1,517,264 $8,417,604
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,207,050*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 41
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
187
Baldwin ES
187 Baldwin Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 83%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 557 112
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 081
2010-11 In Migration 036
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 642 27
Utilization (by enrollment) 76% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 171 0 171
Gross Area 86,751 86,751
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 508
Permanent Capacity 669
Number of Classrooms 38 0 38
Parking Spaces
Gross Site Area (Acres) .0
Site Data
School Data
Building A 2 2010 86,751
Perm Buildings 86,751Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
0.0%
, Texas 0 No
Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - - - - $0
Specialties - - - - - $0
Interior - - - - - $0
Plumbing - - - - - $0
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - - - - - $0
Fire & Life Safety - - - - - $0
Site - - - - - $0
Other - - - - - $0
Mechanical - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $000*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 42
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
182
Baranoff ES
182 Baranoff Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 112%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 891 -97
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 093
2010-11 In Migration 081
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 874 -80
Utilization (by enrollment) 110% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 91 7 98
Gross Area 80,088 6,144 86,232
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 876
Permanent Capacity 794
Number of Classrooms 44 8 52
Parking Spaces 84
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.6
Site Data
School Data
Classroom 1 2008 10,996 5.8%
Building A 1 1999 69,092 13.2%
Perm Buildings 80,088Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
11.0%
Austin, Texas 78748 1999 EX No
12009 Buckingham Gate Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $95,977 $24,556 - $120,533
Specialties - - $117,320 $225,980 - $343,300
Interior $926 $42,710 $270,307 $9,202 - $323,145
Plumbing - $24,586 $27,074 $18,259 - $69,920
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $278,827 $631,528 - - $910,355
Fire & Life Safety $126,088 $72,942 $2,617 - - $201,648
Site - - $9,548 - - $9,548
Other $70,859 - $89,370 - $121,554 $281,783
Mechanical - $57,841 $43,918 - - $101,759
Exterior - - $5,556 - - $5,556
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $4,702 $521,184 - - $525,885
Total $197,873 $531,250 $1,814,399 $277,997 $121,554 $2,943,072
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $729,123*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 43
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
149
Barrington ES
149 Barrington Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 146%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 955 -301
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 086
2010-11 In Migration 084
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,098 -444
Utilization (by enrollment) 152% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 79 22 101
Gross Area 78,971 21,504 100,475
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 996
Permanent Capacity 655
Number of Classrooms 41 24 65
Parking Spaces 68
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.1
Site Data
School Data
Building D 1 2010 12,794 0.0%
Building C 1 2010 100
Building B 1 1999 15,285 4.9%
Building A 1 1969 50,792 39.6%
Perm Buildings 78,971Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
21.2%
Austin, Texas 78753 1969 AA No
400 Cooper Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical $22,712 $95,267 $180,328 $32,952 - $331,258
Specialties - - $183,446 $127,022 - $310,468
Interior - $11,761 $447,963 $46,058 - $505,782
Plumbing - - $354,720 $50,558 - $405,278
Conveyances - $198,566 - - - $198,566
Technology - $55,147 $523,988 - - $579,135
Fire & Life Safety $143,452 $84,850 - - - $228,302
Site - $7,043 $71,576 $54,752 - $133,371
Other $104,890 - $205,872 - $2,708,483 $3,019,245
Mechanical $58,895 $16,736 $3,233,378 - - $3,309,009
Exterior - - $19,209 - - $19,209
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $7,091 - - - $7,091
Total $329,948 $476,461 $5,220,479 $311,342 $2,708,483 $9,046,714
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $806,409*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 44
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
103
Barton Hills ES
103 Barton Hills Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 81%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 203 48
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 021
2010-11 In Migration 172
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 199 52
Utilization (by enrollment) 154% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 99 28 127
Gross Area 38,291 10,752 49,043
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 386
Permanent Capacity 251
Number of Classrooms 14 13 27
Parking Spaces 43
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.9
Site Data
School Data
Band 1 2007 3,205 0.5%
Building B 1 1964 2,985 20.7%
Building A 1 1964 32,101 33.1%
Perm Buildings 38,291Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
29.8%
Austin, Texas 78704 1964 EX No
2108 Barton Hills Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical $24,143 $55,790 $367,319 $9,030 - $456,282
Specialties - - $136,751 $28,851 - $165,602
Interior - - $347,145 $9,067 - $356,211
Plumbing $144,398 - $155,949 $17,190 - $317,537
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $41,851 $188,065 - - $229,916
Fire & Life Safety $85,700 $65,351 - - - $151,052
Site - $4,606 $90,727 - - $95,333
Other $750,812 - $1,082,848 - $2,391 $1,836,051
Mechanical - $19,430 $167,197 - - $186,627
Exterior - - $82,715 $383,049 - $465,764
Structural $15,245 - $769 - - $16,014
Roofing $1,970 - $17,708 - - $19,678
Total $1,022,269 $236,671 $2,637,192 $447,186 $2,391 $4,345,708
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,258,939*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 45
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
104
Becker ES
104 Becker Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 43%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 226 298
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 086
2010-11 In Migration 069
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 256 268
Utilization (by enrollment) 40% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 287 15 302
Gross Area 59,670 3,072 62,742
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 208
Permanent Capacity 524
Number of Classrooms 33 3 36
Parking Spaces 0
Gross Site Area (Acres) 3.7
Site Data
School Data
Building D 1 1936 1,099 23.9%
Building C 1 1936 1,237 21.4%
Mechanical 1 1939 499 26.9%
Building A 1 1936 56,835 39.2%
Perm Buildings 59,670Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
38.1%
Austin, Texas 78704 1936 EX Yes
906 Milton St. West Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $174,132 $299,288 $7,366 - $480,786
Specialties - - $77,271 $99,315 - $176,585
Interior - $44,583 $185,934 $80,564 - $311,082
Plumbing $29,802 - $1,547,453 $16,046 - $1,593,301
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $47,064 $354,610 - - $401,674
Fire & Life Safety $94,218 $62,525 - - - $156,743
Site - $4,927 $342,183 $2,225 - $349,335
Other $89,415 - $170,111 - $118,363 $377,889
Mechanical $901,466 $1,168,099 $599,661 - - $2,669,227
Exterior - - $8,103 $19,303 - $27,407
Structural - $7,792 - - - $7,792
Roofing - $608,432 $37,370 $28,130 - $673,931
Total $1,114,902 $2,117,554 $3,621,985 $252,949 $118,363 $7,225,752
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,232,456*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 46
EXHIBIT "B"
105 Blackshear Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 70,726 70,726
Area (GSF) per student 290 0 290
Number of Classrooms 37 0 37
Permanent Capacity 598
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 244
Utilization (by enrollment) 41% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 288 310
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 48%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 275 323
2010-11 In Migration 021
2010-11 Out Migration 058
Gross Site Area (Acres) 5.3
Parking Spaces 52
Site Data
School Data
Perm Buildings 70,726Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building A 1 1903 70,726 34.3%
Building Data
35.0%
1712 East 11th St. Yr. Open Rating HistoricAustin, Texas 78702 1903 AA Yes
Facility Condition - System by Priority
Priority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $170,707 $95,689 - $266,396
Roofing - $1,423 $632,834 - - $634,256
Structural $4,394 - - - - $4,394
Exterior - $3,785 $452,580 $575,423 - $1,031,789
Interior $4,532 - $387,531 $3,206 - $395,269
Mechanical - $1,842,538 $922,533 - - $2,765,071
Electrical - $187,699 $578,074 $25,070 - $790,843
Plumbing - - $324,886 $10,698 - $335,584
Fire & Life Safety $101,399 $65,038 $2,617 - - $169,055
Technology - $77,782 $332,300 - - $410,082
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $55,364 $86,450 - $141,814
Other $77,822 - $343,085 - $58,019 $478,927
Total $188,148 $2,178,265 $4,202,512 $796,536 $58,019 $7,423,480
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,366,412*
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
105
Blackshear ES
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 47
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
106
Blanton ES
106 Blanton Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 99%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 630 6
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 157
2010-11 In Migration 078
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 799 -163
Utilization (by enrollment) 93% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 122 18 140
Gross Area 71,817 10,752 82,569
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 591
Permanent Capacity 636
Number of Classrooms 40 10 50
Parking Spaces 75
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.0
Site Data
School Data
Greenhouse 1 2004 317 35.8%
Building C 1 2000 11,424 6.9%
Building B 1 1964 3,546 26.8%
Building A 1 1964 56,530 22.1%
Perm Buildings 71,817Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
19.6%
Austin, Texas 78723 1964 EX No
5408 Westminster Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $145,055 $802,902 $7,524 - $955,481
Specialties - - $123,565 $145,047 - $268,613
Interior - $106,775 $200,675 $46,975 - $354,425
Plumbing $326,183 - $193,561 $31,163 - $550,906
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Technology - $53,729 $536,877 - - $590,606
Fire & Life Safety $124,149 $89,652 $2,617 - - $216,419
Site - - $288,274 - - $288,274
Other $192,446 - $84,158 - $59,146 $335,750
Mechanical - $587,738 $614,997 - - $1,202,735
Exterior - - $2,793 - - $2,793
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $642,778 $1,082,233 $2,850,419 $230,709 $59,146 $4,865,285
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,725,011*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 48
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
185
Blazier ES
185 Blazier Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 150%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 896 -298
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 168
2010-11 In Migration 049
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 993 -395
Utilization (by enrollment) 130% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 107 14 121
Gross Area 82,897 10,752 93,649
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 775
Permanent Capacity 598
Number of Classrooms 38 10 48
Parking Spaces 95
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.4
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 2008 82,897 4.6%
Perm Buildings 82,897Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
5.1%
Austin, Texas 78747 2008 AA No
8601 Vertex Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $23,877 $48,516 - $72,393
Specialties - - $31,404 $87,917 - $119,321
Interior - $64,065 $88,567 $12,027 - $164,658
Plumbing - - $138,990 $17,118 - $156,108
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $69,732 $592,476 - - $662,208
Fire & Life Safety $125,254 $44,081 - - - $169,335
Site - - $508 $40,134 - $40,642
Other - - - - - $0
Mechanical $11,527 - - - - $11,527
Exterior - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - $21,733 - - $21,733
Total $136,781 $177,879 $897,555 $205,711 $0 $1,417,926
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $314,660*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 49
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
170
Boone ES
170 Boone Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 64%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 478 274
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 106
2010-11 In Migration 130
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 468 284
Utilization (by enrollment) 67% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 147 0 147
Gross Area 73,690 73,690
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 501
Permanent Capacity 752
Number of Classrooms 42 0 42
Parking Spaces 82
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.5
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1998 10,017 7.9%
Building A 1 1986 63,673 18.5%
Perm Buildings 73,690Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
17.5%
Austin, Texas 78749 1986 RC No
8101 Croftwood Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $38,018 $34,099 - $72,117
Specialties - - $104,863 $130,565 - $235,429
Interior - - $186,467 $50,972 - $237,439
Plumbing $109,823 - $214,827 $7,492 - $332,142
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $54,170 $629,580 - - $683,750
Fire & Life Safety $105,015 $71,301 - - - $176,316
Site - - - $125,012 - $125,012
Other $273,625 - $246,609 - $318,391 $838,626
Mechanical $1,502 - $1,424,842 - - $1,426,344
Exterior - $9,899 - - - $9,899
Structural - - $9,058 - - $9,058
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $489,966 $135,370 $2,854,265 $348,141 $318,391 $4,146,133
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $625,336*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 50
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
107
Brentwood ES
107 Brentwood Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 78%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 456 129
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 110
2010-11 In Migration 149
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 450 135
Utilization (by enrollment) 85% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 127 6 133
Gross Area 62,891 3,072 65,963
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 495
Permanent Capacity 585
Number of Classrooms 33 3 36
Parking Spaces 68
Gross Site Area (Acres) 16.7
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1951 572
Building A 1 1951 62,319 23.7%
Perm Buildings 62,891Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
23.2%
Austin, Texas 78757 1951 RC No
6700 Arroyo Seco Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $203,390 $179,931 $27,524 - $410,846
Specialties - - $108,798 $106,218 - $215,016
Interior - $868 $682,430 $45,770 - $729,067
Plumbing - - $572,536 $10,701 - $583,236
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $47,732 $448,626 - - $496,358
Fire & Life Safety $99,872 $69,505 - - - $169,376
Site $12,102 - $60,185 - - $72,287
Other $141,131 - $399,050 - $1,625,875 $2,166,056
Mechanical $33,509 $372,314 $787,027 - - $1,192,849
Exterior - - $134,776 - - $134,776
Structural - - $7,945 - - $7,945
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $286,613 $693,809 $3,381,304 $190,212 $1,625,875 $6,177,813
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $980,422*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 51
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
108
Brooke ES
108 Brooke Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 103%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 441 -11
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 081
2010-11 In Migration 075
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 471 -41
Utilization (by enrollment) 102% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 119 9 128
Gross Area 52,282 3,858 56,140
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 439
Permanent Capacity 430
Number of Classrooms 27 5 32
Parking Spaces 43
Gross Site Area (Acres) 5.9
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1954 52,282 25.6%
Perm Buildings 52,282Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
24.9%
Austin, Texas 78702 1954 RC No
3100 East 4th St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $447,716 $142,618 $1,900 - $592,234
Specialties - - $42,894 $69,049 - $111,943
Interior - $42,710 $129,374 $149,501 - $321,585
Plumbing $291,538 - $311,932 $27,954 - $631,425
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Technology - $49,308 $406,816 - - $456,124
Fire & Life Safety $90,134 $66,443 - - - $156,577
Site - - $35,849 - - $35,849
Other $84,861 - $220,391 - $37,886 $343,138
Mechanical - - $1,327,384 - - $1,327,384
Exterior - - $89,580 $13,732 - $103,312
Structural - - $1,461 - - $1,461
Roofing - $23,223 - - - $23,223
Total $466,533 $728,683 $2,708,300 $262,136 $37,886 $4,203,538
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,195,217*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 52
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
109
Brown ES
109 Brown Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 112%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 525 -58
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 096
2010-11 In Migration 074
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 546 -79
Utilization (by enrollment) 111% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 104 18 122
Gross Area 53,853 9,216 63,069
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 519
Permanent Capacity 468
Number of Classrooms 29 12 41
Parking Spaces 58
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.1
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1957 53,853 32.0%
Perm Buildings 53,853Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
28.1%
Austin, Texas 78752 1957 AA No
505 W. Anderson Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $200,491 $97,915 $32,990 - $331,396
Specialties - - $78,323 $57,290 - $135,613
Interior - $106,775 $47,418 $499,529 - $653,722
Plumbing $433,368 - $712,305 $5,350 - $1,151,024
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $48,342 $393,777 - - $442,119
Fire & Life Safety $106,953 $62,707 - - - $169,660
Site - - $25,359 $40,134 - $65,492
Other $85,828 - $84,704 - $2,665,997 $2,836,529
Mechanical - $734,839 $387,333 - - $1,122,172
Exterior - - $61,590 - - $61,590
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing $954,050 - $20,585 - - $974,635
Total $1,580,199 $1,153,153 $1,909,309 $635,293 $2,665,997 $7,943,951
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,733,352*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 53
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
110
Bryker Woods ES
110 Bryker Woods Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 115%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 312 -40
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 047
2010-11 In Migration 094
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 333 -61
Utilization (by enrollment) 149% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 93 23 116
Gross Area 37,517 9,216 46,733
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 404
Permanent Capacity 272
Number of Classrooms 16 12 28
Parking Spaces 33
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.3
Site Data
School Data
Multi-Use 1 1949 1,202
Multi-Use 1 1949 451 14.8%
Building B 1 1999 4,874 10.9%
Building A 1 1939 30,990 42.3%
Perm Buildings 37,517Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
33.4%
Austin, Texas 78703 1939 RC No
3309 Kerbey Lane Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical $5,774 $258,851 $193,752 $8,554 - $466,931
Specialties - - $72,714 $71,979 - $144,693
Interior - $85,420 $186,592 $86,382 - $358,394
Plumbing - - $595,420 $117,216 - $712,636
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $41,472 $228,241 - - $269,714
Fire & Life Safety $76,664 $56,369 - - - $133,033
Site $11,503 $2,135 - $64,475 - $78,114
Other $95,470 - $320,072 - $44,654 $460,196
Mechanical - $671,437 $737,812 - - $1,409,249
Exterior - $3,842 $594,025 - - $597,867
Structural - - $585 - - $585
Roofing - - $49,869 - - $49,869
Total $189,411 $1,119,527 $2,979,081 $348,606 $44,654 $4,681,279
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,308,938*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 54
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
111
Campbell ES
111 Campbell Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 70%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 367 157
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 063
2010-11 In Migration 056
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 379 145
Utilization (by enrollment) 69% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 172 4 176
Gross Area 61,793 1,536 63,329
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 360
Permanent Capacity 524
Number of Classrooms 33 2 35
Parking Spaces 71
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.7
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1992 61,793 20.6%
Perm Buildings 61,793Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
20.8%
Austin, Texas 78722 1992 AA No
2613 Rogers Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $79,714 $22,047 $21,308 - $123,068
Specialties - - $93,514 $102,707 - $196,221
Interior - $21,355 $141,699 $44,826 - $207,880
Plumbing - $5,673 $104,666 $8,562 - $118,900
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $51,473 $480,195 - - $531,667
Fire & Life Safety $102,685 $61,978 $2,617 - - $167,280
Site $2,209 - $194,564 $19,758 - $216,531
Other $206,699 - $376,708 - $377,355 $960,762
Mechanical - $159,506 $1,609,266 - - $1,768,771
Exterior - - $1,436 - - $1,436
Structural - - $3,992 - - $3,992
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $311,592 $379,698 $3,030,703 $197,160 $377,355 $4,296,509
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $691,291*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 55
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
173
Casey ES
173 Casey Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 107%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 763 -52
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 171
2010-11 In Migration 083
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 768 -57
Utilization (by enrollment) 94% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 122 2 124
Gross Area 81,506 1,536 83,042
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 669
Permanent Capacity 711
Number of Classrooms 44 2 46
Parking Spaces 90
Gross Site Area (Acres) 17.9
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1998 81,506 17.1%
Perm Buildings 81,506Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
16.7%
Austin, Texas 78748 1998 AA No
9400 Texas Oaks Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $55,790 $69,561 $20,517 - $145,867
Specialties - - $94,992 $168,573 - $263,566
Interior - $21,355 $103,475 $259,333 - $384,163
Plumbing - - $60,629 $9,631 - $70,260
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $61,817 $571,009 - - $632,826
Fire & Life Safety $118,356 $70,205 $2,617 - - $191,179
Site - - $11,274 - - $11,274
Other $214,476 - $191,954 - $78,748 $485,178
Mechanical - $9,454 $175,204 - - $184,658
Exterior - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - $1,823,016 - $1,823,016
Total $332,832 $218,621 $1,280,715 $2,281,070 $78,748 $4,191,986
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $551,453*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 56
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
112
Casis ES
112 Casis Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 109%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 731 -62
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 016
2010-11 In Migration 110
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 764 -95
Utilization (by enrollment) 123% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 94 17 111
Gross Area 77,911 13,824 91,735
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 825
Permanent Capacity 669
Number of Classrooms 38 16 54
Parking Spaces 74
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.2
Site Data
School Data
Storage 1 1977 201
Building A 1 1951 77,710 17.8%
Perm Buildings 77,911Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
17.4%
Austin, Texas 78703 1951 EX No
2710 Exposition Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical $1,398 $139,476 $502,223 $285,421 - $928,518
Specialties - - $280,357 $117,401 - $397,758
Interior - $158,014 $91,098 $192,609 - $441,722
Plumbing - - $883,640 $7,492 - $891,131
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $37,504 $553,409 - - $590,913
Fire & Life Safety $52,902 $47,234 - - - $100,136
Site - - $110,394 $128,950 - $239,343
Other $221,207 - $237,731 - $60,579 $519,518
Mechanical $1,143 $225,633 $311,862 - - $538,638
Exterior - - $125,554 - - $125,554
Structural $3,372 - - - - $3,372
Roofing - $24,163 - - - $24,163
Total $280,022 $632,024 $3,096,268 $731,873 $60,579 $4,800,767
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $912,046*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 57
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
184
Clayton ES
184 Clayton Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 100%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 837 -1
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 048
2010-11 In Migration 087
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 905 -69
Utilization (by enrollment) 104% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 115 7 122
Gross Area 99,921 6,144 106,065
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 867
Permanent Capacity 836
Number of Classrooms 47 8 55
Parking Spaces 80
Gross Site Area (Acres) 16.8
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 2006 99,921 6.0%
Perm Buildings 99,921Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
5.9%
Austin, Texas 78739 2006 EX No
7525 La Crosse Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $55,790 $15,442 $18,970 - $90,203
Specialties - - $144,232 $154,373 - $298,605
Interior - - $110,324 $11,953 - $122,276
Plumbing - - $40,274 $30,096 - $70,370
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Technology - $66,669 $727,735 - - $794,404
Fire & Life Safety $136,427 $66,371 - - - $202,798
Site - - $104,860 - - $104,860
Other - - - - - $0
Mechanical - $94,332 - - - $94,332
Exterior - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $136,427 $382,446 $1,142,866 $215,392 $0 $1,877,130
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $518,872*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 58
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
161
Cook ES
161 Cook Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 223%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,252 -691
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 379
2010-11 In Migration 036
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,388 -827
Utilization (by enrollment) 161% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 75 20 95
Gross Area 67,344 18,432 85,776
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 901
Permanent Capacity 561
Number of Classrooms 35 23 58
Parking Spaces 102
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.7
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1998 9,101 7.2%
Building A 1 1974 58,243 37.0%
Perm Buildings 67,344Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
27.5%
Austin, Texas 78758 1974 RC No
1511 Cripple Creek Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical $612 $112,040 $498,713 $41,308 - $652,673
Specialties - - $170,614 $60,771 - $231,385
Interior - $24,947 $292,679 $56,423 - $374,049
Plumbing $483,798 $7,984 $672,803 $17,116 - $1,181,702
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $52,591 $514,759 - - $567,349
Fire & Life Safety $139,760 $77,796 - - - $217,556
Site $5,447 $368,828 $71,282 $99,999 - $545,557
Other $104,525 - $171,689 - $3,529,726 $3,805,940
Mechanical $113,579 $2,346,429 $305,774 - - $2,765,782
Exterior - $5,057 $13,275 - - $18,332
Structural - $27,464 $124,896 - - $152,360
Roofing - $23,862 - - - $23,862
Total $847,723 $3,046,998 $2,836,484 $275,616 $3,529,726 $10,536,548
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,894,721*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 59
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
183
Cowan ES
183 Cowan Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 106%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 707 -38
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 121
2010-11 In Migration 196
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 704 -35
Utilization (by enrollment) 117% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 90 12 101
Gross Area 70,234 9,216 79,450
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 783
Permanent Capacity 669
Number of Classrooms 37 12 49
Parking Spaces 84
Gross Site Area (Acres) 22.5
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1999 70,234 8.1%
Perm Buildings 70,234Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
9.1%
Austin, Texas 78748 1999 EX No
2817 Kentish Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $5,580 $32,214 $45,189 - $82,983
Specialties - - $129,283 $76,537 - $205,820
Interior - $21,355 $195,024 $48,518 - $264,897
Plumbing - - $136,947 $23,607 - $160,554
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $53,321 $543,971 - - $597,292
Fire & Life Safety $122,086 $71,547 - - - $193,633
Site - $4,606 $18,655 $75,046 - $98,307
Other $318,918 - $50,165 - $287,289 $656,372
Mechanical - $76,432 - - - $76,432
Exterior - - - $770 - $770
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - $57,513 - - $57,513
Total $441,004 $282,482 $1,163,772 $269,668 $287,289 $2,444,215
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $723,486*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 60
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
113
Cunningham ES
113 Cunningham Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 78%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 573 159
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 174
2010-11 In Migration 116
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 560 172
Utilization (by enrollment) 70% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 140 42 182
Gross Area 71,600 21,504 93,104
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 512
Permanent Capacity 732
Number of Classrooms 41 21 62
Parking Spaces 62
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.8
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1990 9,722 33.0%
Building A 1 1963 61,878 43.2%
Perm Buildings 71,600Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
34.3%
Austin, Texas 78745 1963 AA No
2200 Berkeley Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $1,233,513 $39,131 - $1,272,644
Specialties - - $111,536 $92,651 - $204,187
Interior - $2,068 $210,570 $46,250 - $258,889
Plumbing - $1,894 $2,411,481 $24,603 - $2,437,977
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $53,939 $547,184 - - $601,123
Fire & Life Safety $118,092 $70,131 - - - $188,222
Site - - $779,622 $272,621 - $1,052,243
Other $56,081 - $392,715 - $3,523,663 $3,972,459
Mechanical - $74,272 $2,949,674 - - $3,023,946
Exterior $483 - $26,308 - - $26,791
Structural - $1,685 - - - $1,685
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $174,656 $203,988 $8,662,602 $475,256 $3,523,663 $13,040,166
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $378,644*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 61
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
179
Davis ES
179 Davis Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 91%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 666 66
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 035
2010-11 In Migration 047
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 702 30
Utilization (by enrollment) 93% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 106 7 112
Gross Area 72,149 4,608 76,757
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 683
Permanent Capacity 732
Number of Classrooms 41 6 47
Parking Spaces 104
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.2
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1999 9,981 4.9%
Building A 1 1993 62,168 28.5%
Perm Buildings 72,149Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
23.3%
Austin, Texas 78727 1993 RC No
5214 Duval Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $44,631 $182,421 $45,586 - $272,638
Specialties - - $169,804 $82,961 - $252,764
Interior $1,219 $21,355 $1,112,754 $53,085 - $1,188,414
Plumbing - - $133,339 $20,398 - $153,737
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $53,631 $545,092 - - $598,723
Fire & Life Safety $107,138 $67,067 $2,617 - - $176,823
Site - - $1,852 $40,134 - $41,985
Other $267,589 - $529,587 - $172,691 $969,866
Mechanical - $9,454 $1,785,526 - - $1,794,980
Exterior - - - - - $0
Structural - - $3,372 - - $3,372
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $375,946 $245,779 $4,466,364 $242,164 $172,691 $5,502,944
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $621,725*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 62
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
154
Doss ES
154 Doss Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 134%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 728 -185
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 024
2010-11 In Migration 071
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 747 -204
Utilization (by enrollment) 141% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 78 16 94
Gross Area 60,228 12,288 72,516
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 768
Permanent Capacity 543
Number of Classrooms 30 16 46
Parking Spaces 73
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.7
Site Data
School Data
Bldg B 1 2009 4,646 0.6%
Building A 1 1970 55,582 34.4%
Perm Buildings 60,228Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
26.2%
Austin, Texas 78731 1970 EX No
7005 Northledge Dr Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $16,736 $858,105 $30,101 - $904,942
Specialties - - $108,677 $126,691 - $235,368
Interior - - $401,625 $50,410 - $452,035
Plumbing - - $188,173 $15,048 - $203,221
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $49,792 $441,586 - - $491,378
Fire & Life Safety $109,107 $67,795 - - - $176,901
Site - $4,606 $68,518 $40,134 - $113,258
Other $168,386 - $49,256 - $585,467 $803,109
Mechanical - $1,559,129 $716,716 - - $2,275,844
Exterior - - $731 - - $731
Structural - $5,493 $68,609 - - $74,102
Roofing - - $464,424 - - $464,424
Total $277,493 $1,753,192 $3,366,419 $262,383 $585,467 $6,244,954
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,030,684*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 63
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
114
Dawson ES
114 Dawson Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 55%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 276 229
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 059
2010-11 In Migration 113
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 282 223
Utilization (by enrollment) 66% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 167 16 183
Gross Area 55,301 5,394 60,695
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 331
Permanent Capacity 505
Number of Classrooms 32 3 35
Parking Spaces 56
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.7
Site Data
School Data
Building C 1 1991 9,965 10.7%
Building B 1 1986 299 3.5%
Building A 1 1954 45,037 28.2%
Perm Buildings 55,301Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
27.2%
Austin, Texas 78704 1954 EX No
3001 South 1st Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $535,848 $131,343 $15,763 - $682,954
Specialties - - $342,862 $91,722 - $434,584
Interior $27,673 $85,420 $121,022 $10,149 - $244,264
Plumbing - - $321,199 $6,420 - $327,619
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $46,000 $474,418 - - $520,418
Fire & Life Safety $82,474 $63,151 - - - $145,625
Site - $236,494 $42,588 - - $279,082
Other $714,876 - $417,782 - $1,374,936 $2,507,593
Mechanical - $820,238 $195,656 - - $1,015,894
Exterior - - $58,409 - - $58,409
Structural - - $27,004 - - $27,004
Roofing - $1,297 $32,523 - - $33,821
Total $825,023 $1,788,448 $2,164,807 $124,053 $1,374,936 $6,277,266
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,613,471*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 64
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
176
Galindo ES
176 Galindo Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 97%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 689 22
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 091
2010-11 In Migration 103
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 705 6
Utilization (by enrollment) 99% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 121 11 132
Gross Area 85,482 7,680 93,162
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 704
Permanent Capacity 711
Number of Classrooms 44 10 54
Parking Spaces 98
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.8
Site Data
School Data
Mechanical 1 2001 900 91.0%
Building A 1 1989 84,582 10.0%
Perm Buildings 85,482Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
11.4%
Austin, Texas 78704 1989 RC No
3800 S. 2nd St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical $551 $62,382 $47,347 $1,821 - $112,101
Specialties - - $182,951 $148,333 - $331,284
Interior - $87,858 $147,364 $46,940 - $282,163
Plumbing - - $70,598 $40,861 - $111,459
Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924
Technology - $69,224 $647,749 - - $716,973
Fire & Life Safety $136,237 $76,517 - - - $212,754
Site - $4,218 $5,085 - - $9,303
Other $353,824 - $409,644 - $162,944 $926,412
Mechanical $227,913 $23,049 $210,340 - - $461,302
Exterior - - $3,160 - - $3,160
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $718,525 $472,173 $1,724,238 $237,955 $162,944 $3,315,834
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,190,697*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 65
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
116
Govalle ES
116 Govalle Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 76%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 452 146
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 104
2010-11 In Migration 052
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 509 89
Utilization (by enrollment) 69% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 187 0 187
Gross Area 77,638 77,638
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 415
Permanent Capacity 598
Number of Classrooms 37 0 37
Parking Spaces 71
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.4
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1940 501 172.8%
Building A 1 1940 77,137 30.5%
Perm Buildings 77,638Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
30.9%
Austin, Texas 78702 1940 AA No
3601 Govalle Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $235,885 $82,607 $26,336 - $344,828
Specialties - - $164,526 $547,821 - $712,346
Interior - $11,544 $114,440 $804,011 - $929,995
Plumbing - $17,901 $1,297,172 $8,562 - $1,323,634
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $67,933 $536,415 - - $604,348
Fire & Life Safety $116,822 $67,936 - - - $184,758
Site - $4,606 $43,809 - - $48,415
Other $223,311 - $380,254 - $3,711,107 $4,314,671
Mechanical - $711,013 $424,842 - - $1,135,855
Exterior - $17,361 $1,182,064 - - $1,199,425
Structural - $5,349 $10,309 - - $15,658
Roofing - - $33,366 - - $33,366
Total $340,133 $1,139,527 $4,269,803 $1,386,730 $3,711,107 $10,847,299
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,479,660*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 66
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
159
Graham ES
159 Graham Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 138%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 825 -227
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 114
2010-11 In Migration 049
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 850 -252
Utilization (by enrollment) 127% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 93 14 107
Gross Area 70,589 10,752 81,341
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 761
Permanent Capacity 598
Number of Classrooms 38 11 49
Parking Spaces 77
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.9
Site Data
School Data
Building C 1 2008 11,232 4.7%
Building B 1 1993 14,411 14.5%
Building A 1 1972 44,946 45.0%
Perm Buildings 70,589Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
30.4%
Austin, Texas 78753 1972 EX No
11211 Tom Adams Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $262,635 $15,208 - $277,843
Specialties - $2,119 $83,054 $99,068 - $184,241
Interior - $46,368 $177,156 $252,277 - $475,801
Plumbing $337,809 $771 $252,984 $9,631 - $601,195
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $53,595 $561,452 - - $615,048
Fire & Life Safety $127,799 $73,588 $2,617 - - $204,004
Site $1,180 $91,328 $230,407 $86,383 - $409,299
Other $309,592 - $279,998 - $145,540 $735,129
Mechanical - $3,656,276 $245,364 - - $3,901,639
Exterior - $1,716 $3,157 - - $4,874
Structural - $16,429 $76,531 $296 - $93,256
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $776,380 $3,942,191 $2,175,356 $462,863 $145,540 $7,502,330
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,718,571*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 67
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
117
Gullett ES
117 Gullett Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 78%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 325 93
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 030
2010-11 In Migration 247
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 342 76
Utilization (by enrollment) 129% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 74 21 95
Gross Area 39,827 11,525 51,352
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 541
Permanent Capacity 418
Number of Classrooms 24 14 38
Parking Spaces 30
Gross Site Area (Acres) 17.9
Site Data
School Data
Mechanical 1 1972 179 11.7%
Building A 1 1956 39,648 35.0%
Perm Buildings 39,827Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
29.2%
Austin, Texas 78757 1956 EX No
6310 Treadwell Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $61,370 $687,901 $35,407 - $784,678
Specialties - - $107,868 $120,820 - $228,688
Interior - $42,710 $102,541 $45,619 - $190,871
Plumbing - - $795,120 $36,511 - $831,631
Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924
Technology - $46,009 $370,822 - - $416,831
Fire & Life Safety $88,849 $66,871 - - - $155,719
Site - $10,933 $96,959 $40,134 - $148,025
Other $207,430 - $86,329 - $5,578,522 $5,872,281
Mechanical - $93,054 $1,012,442 - - $1,105,495
Exterior - $917 $51,820 - - $52,737
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $7,113 $92,238 - - $99,351
Total $296,279 $477,899 $3,404,040 $278,491 $5,578,522 $10,035,231
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $774,178*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 68
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
118
Harris ES
118 Harris Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 139%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 755 -213
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 106
2010-11 In Migration 052
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 789 -247
Utilization (by enrollment) 140% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 74 20 94
Gross Area 56,066 15,360 71,426
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 758
Permanent Capacity 542
Number of Classrooms 34 16 50
Parking Spaces 33
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.3
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1998 14,112 11.3%
Building A 1 1955 41,954 32.2%
Perm Buildings 56,066Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
21.5%
Austin, Texas 78723 1955 RC No
1711 Wheless Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $5,580 $511,741 $44,635 - $561,955
Specialties - - $169,909 $93,228 - $263,136
Interior - - $110,532 $8,601 - $119,133
Plumbing - - $562,894 $29,950 - $592,844
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $47,049 $509,762 - - $556,811
Fire & Life Safety $97,111 $80,372 - - - $177,483
Site - - - $174,752 - $174,752
Other $55,187 - $120,231 - $26,321 $201,740
Mechanical - $93,054 $1,258,887 - - $1,351,940
Exterior - $2,099 $333,669 - - $335,768
Structural - $2,401 - - - $2,401
Roofing $16,363 $232,231 $16,363 - - $264,958
Total $168,662 $462,786 $3,593,988 $351,166 $26,321 $4,602,922
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $631,447*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 69
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
163
Hart ES
163 Hart Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 125%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 888 -177
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 088
2010-11 In Migration 101
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 982 -271
Utilization (by enrollment) 126% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 90 15 106
Gross Area 81,042 13,824 94,866
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 898
Permanent Capacity 711
Number of Classrooms 44 18 62
Parking Spaces 62
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.7
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 2010 11,175 4.0%
Building A 1 1998 69,867 12.6%
Perm Buildings 81,042Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
10.3%
Austin, Texas 78753 1998 RC No
8301 Furness Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $126,867 $541,461 $50,734 - $719,063
Specialties - - $125,968 $188,811 - $314,779
Interior $16,366 $27,849 $54,049 $41,169 - $139,433
Plumbing - - $53,823 $20,398 - $74,221
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $67,824 $659,673 - - $727,497
Fire & Life Safety $143,408 $84,854 - - - $228,262
Site $85,478 - $37,799 $29,425 - $152,702
Other $191,807 - $230,451 - $150,402 $572,660
Mechanical - $60,697 $1,143 - - $61,840
Exterior $2,221 $388 $202 - - $2,811
Structural $824 $3,296 $1,169 - - $5,289
Roofing - $7,887 - - - $7,887
Total $440,103 $429,303 $1,705,738 $330,538 $150,402 $3,056,083
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $869,405*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 70
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
119
Highland Park ES
119 Highland Park Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 102%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 599 -14
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 054
2010-11 In Migration 116
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 648 -63
Utilization (by enrollment) 113% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 88 14 102
Gross Area 58,550 9,216 67,766
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 662
Permanent Capacity 585
Number of Classrooms 33 12 45
Parking Spaces 60
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.3
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1952 58,550 34.0%
Perm Buildings 58,550Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
31.1%
Austin, Texas 78731 1952 EX No
4900 Fairview Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $259,407 $334,090 $36,116 - $629,613
Specialties - - $148,392 $82,273 - $230,665
Interior - $42,710 $127,305 $59,113 - $229,128
Plumbing - - $1,037,576 $3,209 - $1,040,785
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $50,681 $518,880 - - $569,560
Fire & Life Safety $106,474 $66,857 - - - $173,331
Site - - $230,132 $40,134 - $270,265
Other $102,408 - $145,599 - $2,357,371 $2,605,378
Mechanical $169,708 $108,099 $2,038,859 - - $2,316,666
Exterior - - $25,788 - - $25,788
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $21,733 $511,227 - - $532,959
Total $378,590 $549,487 $5,117,848 $220,844 $2,357,371 $8,624,139
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $928,077*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 71
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
155
Hill ES
155 Hill Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 114%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 714 -87
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 050
2010-11 In Migration 072
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 734 -107
Utilization (by enrollment) 117% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 95 13 108
Gross Area 69,626 9,216 78,842
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 732
Permanent Capacity 627
Number of Classrooms 35 11 46
Parking Spaces 74
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.9
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1990 7,616 17.3%
Building A 1 1970 62,010 32.1%
Perm Buildings 69,626Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
26.8%
Austin, Texas 78759 1970 EX No
8601 Tallwood Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $336,308 $69,270 - $405,578
Specialties - - $53,658 $75,750 - $129,408
Interior - $106,775 $102,128 $47,029 - $255,933
Plumbing $86,955 - $719,307 $10,698 - $816,960
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $53,374 $544,165 - - $597,539
Fire & Life Safety $122,357 $83,228 - - - $205,584
Site - - $8,269 $40,134 - $48,403
Other $159,986 - $195,096 - $2,849,188 $3,204,270
Mechanical - $519,366 $811,683 $152,292 - $1,483,341
Exterior - - $292 - - $292
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - $1,982,976 - - $1,982,976
Total $369,298 $762,743 $4,753,883 $395,173 $2,849,188 $9,130,285
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,132,041*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 72
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
162
Houston ES
162 Houston Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 130%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 897 -205
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 102
2010-11 In Migration 128
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 872 -180
Utilization (by enrollment) 133% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 89 17 105
Gross Area 81,360 15,360 96,720
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 917
Permanent Capacity 692
Number of Classrooms 43 19 62
Parking Spaces 93
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.8
Site Data
School Data
Building D 1 2006 11,380 10.8%
Building C 1 1991 5,303 25.9%
Building B 1 1991 8,863 32.5%
Building A 1 1976 55,814 54.5%
Perm Buildings 81,360Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
36.5%
Austin, Texas 78744 1976 RC No
5409 Ponciana Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $301,828 $224,073 $61,942 - $587,843
Specialties - - $205,773 $90,990 - $296,763
Interior - $54,696 $540,337 $62,669 - $657,703
Plumbing - - $680,338 $49,351 - $729,689
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Technology - $63,918 $692,577 - - $756,494
Fire & Life Safety $147,480 $80,500 - - - $227,980
Site - $5,847 $9,453 $40,134 - $55,433
Other $163,516 - $390,742 - $513,050 $1,067,308
Mechanical $36,988 $4,449,934 $1,127,316 - - $5,614,238
Exterior - - $3,658 $8,855 - $12,514
Structural - - $8,788 - - $8,788
Roofing - - $899,896 - - $899,896
Total $347,984 $5,056,005 $4,782,952 $313,940 $513,050 $11,013,932
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $5,403,989*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 73
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
178
Jordan ES
178 Jordan Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 108%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 706 -52
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 075
2010-11 In Migration 200
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 707 -53
Utilization (by enrollment) 127% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 89 15 104
Gross Area 74,460 12,288 86,748
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 833
Permanent Capacity 655
Number of Classrooms 41 16 57
Parking Spaces 114
Gross Site Area (Acres) 11.5
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 2008 12,205 4.8%
Building A 1 1992 62,255 27.2%
Perm Buildings 74,460Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
22.0%
Austin, Texas 78724 1992 RC No
6711 Johnny Morris Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $156,212 $406,010 $49,071 - $611,292
Specialties - - $144,437 $130,980 - $275,417
Interior - $21,355 $249,307 $55,637 - $326,299
Plumbing - $79,525 $161,718 $30,096 - $271,339
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Technology - $54,550 $646,026 - - $700,576
Fire & Life Safety $118,309 $76,247 - - - $194,556
Site - $5,980 $153,950 $40,134 - $200,064
Other $209,863 - $437,570 - $366,415 $1,013,847
Mechanical $16,073 $33,156 $2,260,379 - - $2,309,608
Exterior - - $32,022 - - $32,022
Structural - - $6,370 - - $6,370
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $344,244 $526,308 $4,497,788 $305,917 $366,415 $6,040,673
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $870,552*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 74
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
120
Joslin ES
120 Joslin Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 88%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 329 45
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 056
2010-11 In Migration 089
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 345 29
Utilization (by enrollment) 97% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 123 21 145
Gross Area 44,826 7,680 52,506
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 363
Permanent Capacity 374
Number of Classrooms 24 9 33
Parking Spaces 56
Gross Site Area (Acres) 5.1
Site Data
School Data
Building C 1 1986 3,250 5.0%
Building B 1 1957 10,642 41.4%
Building A 1 1954 30,934 55.6%
Perm Buildings 44,826Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
40.6%
Austin, Texas 78745 1954 EX No
4500 Manchaca Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $47,787 $376,979 $5,227 - $429,993
Specialties - - $94,829 $84,871 - $179,700
Interior - - $41,905 $212,692 - $254,597
Plumbing $261,201 - $467,302 $14,976 - $743,479
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Technology - $47,435 $358,949 - - $406,384
Fire & Life Safety $88,812 $59,839 $2,617 - - $151,268
Site - $165,935 $4,802 - - $170,737
Other $15,415 - $142,381 - $1,761,730 $1,919,525
Mechanical - $627,110 $884,215 $171,550 - $1,682,876
Exterior - - $1,232,954 - - $1,232,954
Structural - $4,719 $1,537 - - $6,256
Roofing - $606,704 $219,611 - - $826,316
Total $365,427 $1,658,814 $3,828,081 $489,316 $1,761,730 $8,103,367
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,024,241*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 75
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
180
Kiker ES
180 Kiker Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 117%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 883 -131
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 080
2010-11 In Migration 129
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 852 -100
Utilization (by enrollment) 124% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 82 16 98
Gross Area 76,332 15,360 91,692
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 933
Permanent Capacity 752
Number of Classrooms 42 13 55
Parking Spaces 90
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.4
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 2007 12,783 4.5%
Building A 1 1992 63,549 21.1%
Perm Buildings 76,332Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
16.4%
Austin, Texas 78739 1992 EX No
5913 La Crosse Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $9,906 $29,467 - $39,374
Specialties - - $215,347 $61,320 - $276,667
Interior - $128,130 $344,258 $41,886 - $514,274
Plumbing - - $216,461 $11,770 - $228,231
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $54,681 $646,497 - - $701,179
Fire & Life Safety $126,090 $78,994 - - - $205,083
Site - - $10,547 $87,037 - $97,584
Other $276,715 - $577,848 - $270,058 $1,124,621
Mechanical - - $1,460,014 - - $1,460,014
Exterior $62,649 - $590 - - $63,239
Structural - $3,302 - - - $3,302
Roofing - $20,585 - - - $20,585
Total $465,453 $285,692 $3,481,469 $231,480 $270,058 $4,734,153
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $751,145*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 76
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
172
Kocurek ES
172 Kocurek Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 102%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 687 -14
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 131
2010-11 In Migration 106
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 698 -25
Utilization (by enrollment) 98% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 119 2 121
Gross Area 78,528 1,536 80,064
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 660
Permanent Capacity 673
Number of Classrooms 42 2 44
Parking Spaces 70
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.3
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1998 10,499 8.3%
Building A 1 1986 68,029 28.6%
Perm Buildings 78,528Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
25.5%
Austin, Texas 78748 1986 AA No
9800 Curlew Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $160,129 $85,511 $20,237 - $265,877
Specialties - - $175,608 $130,463 - $306,071
Interior - - $121,380 $45,109 - $166,489
Plumbing - - $170,382 $36,585 - $206,967
Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924
Technology - $67,872 $659,846 - - $727,718
Fire & Life Safety $112,894 $69,086 - - - $181,980
Site - $20,597 $118,823 $73,933 - $213,354
Other $163,863 - $320,146 - $84,409 $568,417
Mechanical - $264,419 $3,033,863 - - $3,298,282
Exterior - $258 $21,688 $7,965 - $29,911
Structural - - $3,472 $23,558 - $27,030
Roofing - $7,927 - - - $7,927
Total $276,757 $739,213 $4,710,718 $337,850 $84,409 $6,148,946
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,015,969*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 77
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
168
Langford ES
168 Langford Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 129%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 895 -203
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 103
2010-11 In Migration 054
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 946 -254
Utilization (by enrollment) 121% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 94 20 114
Gross Area 78,250 16,896 95,146
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 834
Permanent Capacity 692
Number of Classrooms 43 21 64
Parking Spaces 83
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.7
Site Data
School Data
Building C 1 2010 11,831 3.8%
Building B 1 1996 8,753 16.9%
Building A 1 1980 57,666 51.7%
Perm Buildings 78,250Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
33.6%
Austin, Texas 78744 1980 AA No
2206 Blue Meadow Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $274,183 $345,120 $52,952 - $672,255
Specialties - - $158,946 $120,358 - $279,303
Interior - $24,894 $437,101 $47,124 - $509,120
Plumbing $220,334 - $466,878 $30,024 - $717,236
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $55,232 $651,423 - - $706,655
Fire & Life Safety $148,475 $81,228 - - - $229,703
Site - $45,535 $75,331 $42,669 - $163,535
Other $151,320 - $239,586 - $600,073 $990,979
Mechanical $23,055 $5,212,923 $470,507 - - $5,706,485
Exterior - $79,485 $202 - - $79,688
Structural - - $2,170 - - $2,170
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $543,183 $5,823,122 $2,847,265 $293,128 $600,073 $10,106,772
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $6,366,305*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 78
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
121
Lee ES
121 Lee Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 74%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 308 110
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 025
2010-11 In Migration 109
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 325 93
Utilization (by enrollment) 102% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 108 2 110
Gross Area 46,265 768 47,033
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 428
Permanent Capacity 418
Number of Classrooms 24 1 25
Parking Spaces 35
Gross Site Area (Acres) 4.8
Site Data
School Data
Building D 1 1939 1,310 24.2%
Library 1 1998 5,679 8.4%
Mechanical 1 1939 460 13.7%
Building A 1 1939 38,816 44.8%
Perm Buildings 46,265Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
41.1%
Austin, Texas 78705 1939 EX No
3308 Hampton Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $145,055 $437,498 $24,197 - $606,750
Specialties - $227,364 $67,925 $101,699 - $396,988
Interior - $3,267 $289,684 $48,675 - $341,626
Plumbing - $38,607 $988,639 $25,675 - $1,052,921
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $47,901 $407,694 - - $455,595
Fire & Life Safety $73,630 $55,635 - - - $129,265
Site - $6,267 $78,354 - - $84,621
Other $353,154 - $292,571 - $36,675 $682,400
Mechanical - $792,855 $977,327 - - $1,770,182
Exterior - $137,099 $17,506 - - $154,605
Structural - $32,808 - - - $32,808
Roofing - $78,378 $7,013 - - $85,391
Total $426,784 $1,565,236 $3,564,212 $200,247 $36,675 $5,793,153
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,992,020*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 79
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
160
Linder ES
160 Linder Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 176%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 956 -414
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 132
2010-11 In Migration 062
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,031 -489
Utilization (by enrollment) 164% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 78 19 97
Gross Area 69,250 16,896 86,146
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 892
Permanent Capacity 542
Number of Classrooms 34 22 56
Parking Spaces 86
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.1
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1972 69,250 23.7%
Perm Buildings 69,250Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
19.9%
Austin, Texas 78741 1972 RC No
2800 Metcalfe Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $87,923 $75,235 $27,921 - $191,079
Specialties - - $245,387 $141,453 - $386,840
Interior - $85,420 $188,004 $156,894 - $430,318
Plumbing - - $282,747 $7,489 - $290,237
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $53,083 $517,073 - - $570,155
Fire & Life Safety $138,680 $77,410 - - - $216,090
Site - - $194,636 $40,134 - $234,770
Other $32,036 - $142,186 - $5,824,800 $5,999,023
Mechanical - $1,183,106 $1,370,191 - - $2,553,297
Exterior - - $397 - - $397
Structural - - $48,399 - - $48,399
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $170,717 $1,486,942 $3,064,256 $373,892 $5,824,800 $10,920,607
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,657,659*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 80
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
122
Maplewood ES
122 Maplewood Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 84%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 300 55
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 069
2010-11 In Migration 129
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 383 -28
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 112 23 134
Gross Area 45,390 9,216 54,606
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 406
Permanent Capacity 355
Number of Classrooms 20 12 32
Parking Spaces 42
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.4
Site Data
School Data
Storage 1 1952 572 6.0%
Building A 1 1951 44,818 41.9%
Perm Buildings 45,390Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
37.4%
Austin, Texas 78722 1951 AA No
3808 Maplewood Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $145,055 $285,463 $9,109 - $439,626
Specialties - - $137,772 $67,809 - $205,581
Interior - $1,159 $296,359 $36,200 - $333,719
Plumbing $1,432,387 - $355,682 $6,422 - $1,794,492
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $43,627 $285,586 - - $329,213
Fire & Life Safety $76,274 $61,452 - - - $137,727
Site - $8,593 $528,568 - - $537,161
Other $121,573 - $203,563 - $2,005,569 $2,330,705
Mechanical - - $1,761,164 - - $1,761,164
Exterior - - $98,285 - - $98,285
Structural - - $2,844 - - $2,844
Roofing - $107,641 - - - $107,641
Total $1,630,235 $367,527 $3,955,287 $119,540 $2,005,569 $8,078,158
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,997,762*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 81
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
123
Mathews ES
123 Mathews Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 72%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 284 113
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 031
2010-11 In Migration 106
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 297 100
Utilization (by enrollment) 102% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 104 11 115
Gross Area 42,112 4,606 46,718
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 405
Permanent Capacity 397
Number of Classrooms 23 6 29
Parking Spaces 0
Gross Site Area (Acres) 2.3
Site Data
School Data
Building D 1 1996 100 3.6%
Building C 1 1965 48
Building B 1 1948 391
Building A 1 1916 41,573 34.8%
Perm Buildings 42,112Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
31.2%
Austin, Texas 78703 1916 EX Yes
906 West Lynn St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $199,892 $141,617 $25,227 - $366,737
Specialties - - $122,219 $91,283 - $213,502
Interior - $109,029 $95,427 $34,351 - $238,808
Plumbing - $4,991 $946,615 $6,420 - $958,026
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $52,122 $337,778 - - $389,900
Fire & Life Safety $55,849 $54,246 - - - $110,095
Site - - $69,246 - - $69,246
Other $41,079 - $125,550 - $2,282,922 $2,449,551
Mechanical $6,971 $979,213 $687,427 $15,202 - $1,688,813
Exterior - - $12,088 $113,496 - $125,584
Structural - $8,430 - - - $8,430
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $103,898 $1,407,923 $2,537,969 $285,980 $2,282,922 $6,618,692
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,511,822*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 82
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
165
McBee ES
165 McBee Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 178%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,031 -451
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 301
2010-11 In Migration 030
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,083 -503
Utilization (by enrollment) 132% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 91 12 103
Gross Area 69,717 9,216 78,933
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 765
Permanent Capacity 580
Number of Classrooms 36 12 48
Parking Spaces 90
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.9
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1999 69,717 7.8%
Perm Buildings 69,717Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
7.9%
Austin, Texas 78758 1999 RC No
1001 West Braker Lane Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $81,656 $30,695 $45,032 - $157,383
Specialties - - $168,777 $62,784 - $231,561
Interior - $89,744 $84,538 $124,936 - $299,218
Plumbing - - $37,720 $9,631 - $47,351
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $49,166 $577,456 - - $626,622
Fire & Life Safety $117,796 $75,825 - - - $193,621
Site $58,760 $1,308 $1,112 - - $61,180
Other $60,968 - $99,797 - $57,384 $218,148
Mechanical - $21,645 $29,969 - - $51,614
Exterior - - $1,716 - - $1,716
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - $4,268 - - $4,268
Total $237,524 $319,343 $1,036,048 $242,383 $57,384 $1,892,682
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $556,867*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 83
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
147
Menchaca ES
147 Menchaca Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 113%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 685 -79
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 117
2010-11 In Migration 113
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 629 -23
Utilization (by enrollment) 113% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 87 16 103
Gross Area 59,978 10,752 70,730
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 686
Permanent Capacity 606
Number of Classrooms 34 12 46
Parking Spaces 83
Gross Site Area (Acres) 19.8
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1975 59,978 43.5%
Perm Buildings 59,978Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
36.9%
Austin, Texas 78748 1975 AA No
12120 Manchaca Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $88,453 $40,491 $50,379 - $179,322
Specialties - - $102,211 $90,546 - $192,757
Interior - $128,130 $257,782 $462,745 - $848,657
Plumbing - - $560,898 $16,048 - $576,946
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $125,045 $455,240 - - $580,285
Fire & Life Safety $102,512 $41,970 - - - $144,482
Site - $42,176 $111,016 $73,933 - $227,126
Other $134,935 - $224,219 - $82,611 $441,764
Mechanical - $3,855,561 $730,614 - - $4,586,174
Exterior - - $4,712 - - $4,712
Structural - - $877 - - $877
Roofing - $32,373 $28,907 - - $61,280
Total $237,446 $4,313,709 $2,516,965 $693,652 $82,611 $7,844,383
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,551,155*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 84
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
124
Metz ES
124 Metz Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 88%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 477 65
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 064
2010-11 In Migration 088
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 509 33
Utilization (by enrollment) 92% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 124 6 130
Gross Area 61,905 3,072 64,977
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 498
Permanent Capacity 542
Number of Classrooms 34 4 38
Parking Spaces 45
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.4
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1993 61,905 32.3%
Perm Buildings 61,905Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
30.6%
Austin, Texas 78702 1993 EX No
84 Robert T. Martinez, Jr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $211,049 $23,656 $21,704 - $256,409
Specialties - - $144,856 $154,598 - $299,454
Interior - $42,710 $68,165 $52,813 - $163,688
Plumbing - - $108,586 $8,559 - $117,145
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $52,126 $513,620 - - $565,747
Fire & Life Safety $84,706 $64,395 $2,617 - - $151,718
Site $1,481 $654 $14,812 $2,225 - $19,172
Other $159,506 - $475,748 - $213,073 $848,327
Mechanical - $138,412 $1,871,641 - - $2,010,054
Exterior - $2,221 - - - $2,221
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $1,686,580 $373 - - $1,686,953
Total $245,693 $2,198,147 $3,224,075 $239,898 $213,073 $6,120,886
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,443,840*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 85
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
181
Mills ES
181 Mills Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 105%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 831 -37
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 031
2010-11 In Migration 134
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 821 -27
Utilization (by enrollment) 117% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 88 13 101
Gross Area 81,368 12,288 93,656
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 928
Permanent Capacity 794
Number of Classrooms 44 16 60
Parking Spaces 104
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.7
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1998 81,368 13.7%
Perm Buildings 81,368Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
12.7%
Austin, Texas 78749 1998 EX No
6201 Davis Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical $454 $129,501 $20,194 $26,219 - $176,368
Specialties - - $136,728 $216,156 - $352,884
Interior - $85,420 $238,434 $12,904 - $336,758
Plumbing - - $99,786 $6,422 - $106,208
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $65,331 $691,892 - - $757,223
Fire & Life Safety $140,775 $78,130 - - - $218,905
Site - - $4,271 $140,421 - $144,692
Other $113,354 - $300,224 - $163,005 $576,583
Mechanical - $30,001 $735,357 $202,621 - $967,978
Exterior - - $12,051 - - $12,051
Structural - - $2,701 - - $2,701
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $254,583 $438,024 $2,241,637 $604,743 $163,005 $3,701,993
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $692,608*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 86
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
150
Norman ES
150 Norman Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 77%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 376 110
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 073
2010-11 In Migration 024
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 348 138
Utilization (by enrollment) 68% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 176 5 180
Gross Area 58,519 1,536 60,055
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 333
Permanent Capacity 486
Number of Classrooms 30 2 32
Parking Spaces 74
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.2
Site Data
School Data
Classroom 1 2007 13,827 4.7%
Building A 1 1970 44,692 41.8%
Perm Buildings 58,519Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
32.6%
Austin, Texas 78721 1970 RC No
4001 Tannehill Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $209,477 $378,944 $31,881 - $620,302
Specialties - - $47,268 $51,613 - $98,881
Interior - - $499,495 $43,010 - $542,505
Plumbing $240,330 - $339,444 $8,562 - $588,335
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $46,535 $386,706 - - $433,241
Fire & Life Safety $87,986 $60,327 - - - $148,313
Site - - $87,439 $114,067 - $201,506
Other $163,681 - $125,797 - $1,961,658 $2,251,136
Mechanical - $1,300,661 $1,169,687 - - $2,470,348
Exterior - - - - - $0
Structural - $1,873 - - - $1,873
Roofing - - $453,578 - - $453,578
Total $491,997 $1,618,873 $3,488,359 $249,133 $1,961,658 $7,810,019
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,110,870*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 87
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
125
Oak Springs ES
125 Oak Springs Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 71%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 293 118
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 046
2010-11 In Migration 036
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 330 81
Utilization (by enrollment) 67% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 172 22 194
Gross Area 47,102 6,144 53,246
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 274
Permanent Capacity 411
Number of Classrooms 26 6 32
Parking Spaces 47
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.6
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1984 3,971 15.9%
Building A 1 1958 43,131 28.1%
Perm Buildings 47,102Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
26.0%
Austin, Texas 78702 1958 EX No
3601 Webberville Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $55,790 $361,078 $36,872 - $453,741
Specialties - - $77,847 $88,134 - $165,980
Interior - $85,420 $163,853 $75,624 - $324,898
Plumbing - $248,158 $128,899 $18,257 - $395,314
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $29,465 $311,196 - - $340,661
Fire & Life Safety $86,125 $59,691 - - - $145,816
Site - - $65,735 - - $65,735
Other $220,372 - $142,261 - $30,328 $392,960
Mechanical $129,699 $1,004,248 $497,533 - - $1,631,481
Exterior - - $160,769 - - $160,769
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $12,365 $4,355 - - $16,719
Total $436,196 $1,544,778 $1,913,526 $218,887 $30,328 $4,143,715
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,980,974*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 88
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
156
Odom ES
156 Odom Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 130%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 706 -164
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 101
2010-11 In Migration 058
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 719 -177
Utilization (by enrollment) 121% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 93 21 114
Gross Area 61,009 13,824 74,833
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 658
Permanent Capacity 542
Number of Classrooms 34 14 48
Parking Spaces 72
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.6
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1970 61,009 21.8%
Perm Buildings 61,009Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
19.2%
Austin, Texas 78745 1970 AA No
1010 Turtle Creek Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $214,246 $326,371 $23,526 - $564,142
Specialties - - $142,742 $140,859 - $283,601
Interior - $106,775 $158,316 $115,216 - $380,308
Plumbing - - $742,105 $24,603 - $766,707
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $47,014 - - - $47,014
Fire & Life Safety $117,601 $44,656 $2,617 - - $164,874
Site - $47,393 $18,972 - - $66,364
Other $197,192 - $231,175 - $75,095 $503,462
Mechanical - $89,478 $1,387,846 - - $1,477,324
Exterior - - $202 - - $202
Structural - $5,518 - - - $5,518
Roofing - - $41,171 - - $41,171
Total $314,793 $555,080 $3,051,516 $304,204 $75,095 $4,300,687
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $869,872*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 89
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
148
Oak Hill ES
148 Oak Hill Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 106%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 820 -47
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 117
2010-11 In Migration 057
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 918 -145
Utilization (by enrollment) 100% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 98 14 112
Gross Area 75,784 10,752 86,536
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 772
Permanent Capacity 773
Number of Classrooms 43 14 57
Parking Spaces 97
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.7
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1984 16,210 20.7%
Building A 1 1974 59,574 43.2%
Perm Buildings 75,784Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
33.6%
Austin, Texas 78735 1974 EX No
6101 Patton Ranch Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $11,159 $1,261,583 $50,338 - $1,323,079
Specialties - - $176,257 $85,095 - $261,352
Interior - $42,710 $1,072,603 $180,232 - $1,295,545
Plumbing $167,045 - $1,167,768 $27,814 - $1,362,627
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $54,881 $640,716 - - $695,597
Fire & Life Safety $116,414 $75,574 - - - $191,988
Site - $8,459 $125,527 $73,933 - $207,920
Other $294,450 - $261,725 - $46,822 $602,998
Mechanical - $2,369,967 $334,717 - - $2,704,684
Exterior - - $38,383 - - $38,383
Structural - - $3,335 - - $3,335
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $577,910 $2,562,750 $5,082,614 $417,412 $46,822 $8,687,508
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,140,659*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 90
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
126
Ortega ES
126 Ortega Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 71%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 266 108
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 023
2010-11 In Migration 053
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 269 105
Utilization (by enrollment) 79% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 160 10 170
Gross Area 47,302 3,072 50,374
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 296
Permanent Capacity 374
Number of Classrooms 24 1 25
Parking Spaces 36
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.4
Site Data
School Data
Administration 1 1968 2,143 4.7%
Building C 1 1959 5,146 62.8%
Building B 1 1966 20,907 33.7%
Building A 1 1959 19,106 51.8%
Perm Buildings 47,302Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
40.0%
Austin, Texas 78721 1959 EX No
1135 Garland Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $73,769 $382,619 $33,545 - $489,933
Specialties - - $111,385 $73,315 - $184,700
Interior - $21,355 $33,243 $49,806 - $104,404
Plumbing $273,510 - $513,427 $19,326 - $806,263
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $44,049 $361,196 - - $405,245
Fire & Life Safety $81,278 $57,173 - - - $138,451
Site - - $40,487 $12,624 - $53,112
Other $150,185 - $144,467 - $55,295 $349,948
Mechanical $49,160 $824,283 $951,354 - - $1,824,796
Exterior - - $1,040 - - $1,040
Structural - - $101,906 - - $101,906
Roofing - $1,515,309 $25,714 - - $1,541,023
Total $554,133 $2,585,580 $2,666,838 $188,616 $55,295 $6,050,462
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,139,712*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 91
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
189
Overton ES
189 Overton Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 154%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 948 -331
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 217
2010-11 In Migration 044
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 972 -355
Utilization (by enrollment) 108% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 136 18 155
Gross Area 91,163 12,288 103,451
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 668
Permanent Capacity 617
Number of Classrooms 39 15 54
Parking Spaces 175
Gross Site Area (Acres) 70.4
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 2007 91,163 4.2%
Perm Buildings 91,163Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
4.7%
Austin, Texas 78724 2007 RC No
7201 Colony Loop Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $55,790 $12,722 $11,169 - $79,681
Specialties - - $45,799 $96,956 - $142,756
Interior - $21,355 $95,057 $48,506 - $164,918
Plumbing - - $66,546 $14,979 - $81,525
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $52,063 $572,427 - - $624,490
Fire & Life Safety $129,148 $43,854 - - - $173,002
Site - - $5,287 $114,067 - $119,354
Other - - - - - $0
Mechanical - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - $14,805 - - $14,805
Total $129,148 $222,703 $812,642 $285,677 $0 $1,450,171
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $351,852*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 92
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
171
Palm ES
171 Palm Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 95%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 637 36
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 081
2010-11 In Migration 050
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 667 6
Utilization (by enrollment) 90% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 130 5 136
Gross Area 79,082 3,072 82,154
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 606
Permanent Capacity 673
Number of Classrooms 42 4 46
Parking Spaces 90
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.2
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 2005 10,963 7.4%
Building A 1 1987 68,119 10.9%
Perm Buildings 79,082Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
11.1%
Austin, Texas 78744 1987 RC No
7601 Dixie Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $163,064 $54,695 $45,744 - $263,504
Specialties - - $113,500 $98,369 - $211,869
Interior - $23,156 $115,259 $69,249 - $207,664
Plumbing - - $179,032 $10,701 - $189,732
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $64,029 $618,895 - - $682,925
Fire & Life Safety $117,288 $70,637 $2,617 - - $190,543
Site - $18,391 $37,763 $40,134 - $96,287
Other $209,088 - $423,487 - $156,623 $789,198
Mechanical - $9,454 $161,906 - - $171,359
Exterior $242 - $8,918 $38,694 - $47,854
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $6,899 - - - $6,899
Total $326,618 $355,630 $1,716,073 $302,890 $156,623 $2,857,834
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $682,248*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 93
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
143
Patton ES
143 Patton Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 117%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 908 -135
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 095
2010-11 In Migration 109
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 966 -193
Utilization (by enrollment) 118% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 84 12 96
Gross Area 76,687 10,752 87,439
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 914
Permanent Capacity 773
Number of Classrooms 43 13 56
Parking Spaces 109
Gross Site Area (Acres) 24.1
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1986 76,687 19.6%
Perm Buildings 76,687Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
18.1%
Austin, Texas 78744 1986 EX No
6001 Westcreek Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical $480 $95,192 $49,465 $30,576 - $175,713
Specialties - - $128,110 $93,252 - $221,363
Interior $741 $149,485 $75,569 $40,077 - $265,872
Plumbing - - $163,075 $8,562 - $171,637
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $54,860 $623,617 - - $678,477
Fire & Life Safety $131,145 $75,540 - - - $206,685
Site - $13,373 $4,610 - - $17,982
Other $148,665 - $726,882 - $309,114 $1,184,662
Mechanical $272,094 $961,395 $869,063 - - $2,102,552
Exterior - $2,114 $1,121 - - $3,234
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $553,125 $1,351,958 $2,641,513 $172,467 $309,114 $5,028,177
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,905,083*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 94
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
128
Pease ES
128 Pease Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 293
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 000
2010-11 In Migration 220
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 293
Utilization (by enrollment) 87% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 139 0 139
Gross Area 35,624 35,624
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 256
Permanent Capacity 293
Number of Classrooms 17 0 17
Parking Spaces 45
Gross Site Area (Acres) 2.8
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1998 4,870 17.0%
Building A 1 1876 30,754 82.3%
Perm Buildings 35,624Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
75.8%
Austin, Texas 78701 1876 EX Yes
1106 Rio Grande Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical $60,588 $423,750 $571,433 $1,900 - $1,057,671
Specialties $12,393 - $93,350 $59,933 - $165,676
Interior - - $661,149 $8,135 - $669,284
Plumbing - - $870,769 $20,327 - $891,096
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $72,214 $244,011 - - $316,225
Fire & Life Safety $60,070 $49,702 - $513,796 - $623,569
Site - $172,907 $664,245 $191,141 - $1,028,292
Other $213,415 - $95,838 - $51,831 $361,083
Mechanical $19,972 $1,818,797 $343,436 - - $2,182,205
Exterior - $14,064 $451,081 - - $465,145
Structural - - $35,507 - - $35,507
Roofing - $287,386 - - - $287,386
Total $366,438 $2,838,820 $4,030,819 $795,232 $51,831 $8,083,139
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,205,258*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 95
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
129
Pecan Springs ES
129 Pecan Springs Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 101%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 490 -4
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 068
2010-11 In Migration 077
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 501 -15
Utilization (by enrollment) 109% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 107 17 124
Gross Area 56,992 9,216 66,208
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 532
Permanent Capacity 486
Number of Classrooms 30 16 46
Parking Spaces 63
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.6
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1990 10,783 26.8%
Building A 1 1957 46,209 44.0%
Perm Buildings 56,992Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
37.2%
Austin, Texas 78723 1957 AA No
3100 Rogge Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $150,635 $1,333,300 $38,734 - $1,522,669
Specialties - - $147,312 $78,011 - $225,323
Interior - - $230,050 $99,850 - $329,899
Plumbing - - $698,316 $20,398 - $718,714
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $50,268 $475,845 - - $526,112
Fire & Life Safety $99,554 $63,610 - - - $163,165
Site - - $11,743 $298,033 - $309,776
Other $104,559 - $277,133 - $90,134 $471,826
Mechanical - $19,853 $1,145,461 $23,055 - $1,188,368
Exterior - - $882,228 - - $882,228
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $20,585 $20,585 $984,274 - $1,025,445
Total $204,113 $354,593 $5,221,971 $1,542,355 $90,134 $7,413,166
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $558,706*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 96
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
190
Perez ES
190 Perez Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 158%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 945 -347
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 123
2010-11 In Migration 066
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 980 -382
Utilization (by enrollment) 148% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 93 17 110
Gross Area 82,223 15,360 97,583
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 886
Permanent Capacity 598
Number of Classrooms 37 19 56
Parking Spaces 106
Gross Site Area (Acres) 28.0
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 2006 82,223 10.0%
Perm Buildings 82,223Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
9.0%
Austin, Texas 78744 2006 RC No
7500 S. Pleasant Valley Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $23,827 $58,015 $22,813 - $104,655
Specialties - - $151,024 $107,721 - $258,745
Interior - $42,710 $89,644 $11,718 - $144,072
Plumbing $431,564 - $119,257 $8,557 - $559,377
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $68,359 $587,513 - - $655,872
Fire & Life Safety $132,552 $81,267 - - - $213,819
Site - - $7,999 - - $7,999
Other - - - - - $0
Mechanical $642,083 - $3,280 - - $645,363
Exterior - - $11,450 - - $11,450
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $1,206,199 $216,162 $1,028,182 $150,809 $0 $2,601,352
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,422,361*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 97
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
164
Pickle ES
164 Pickle Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 119%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 737 -120
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 058
2010-11 In Migration 056
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 802 -185
Utilization (by enrollment) 120% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 163 8 172
Gross Area 120,862 6,144 127,006
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 740
Permanent Capacity 617
Number of Classrooms 39 8 47
Parking Spaces 132
Gross Site Area (Acres) 17.5
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 2001 120,862 5.3%
Perm Buildings 120,862Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
5.7%
Austin, Texas 78752 2001 RC No
1101 Wheatley Avenue Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $88,466 $10,218 - $98,684
Specialties - - $120,738 $77,413 - $198,152
Interior - $64,065 $92,964 $43,330 - $200,359
Plumbing - - $90,090 $23,607 - $113,697
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $78,233 $637,697 - - $715,930
Fire & Life Safety $178,166 $91,255 - - - $269,421
Site - - $31,650 $193,425 - $225,074
Other $88,926 - $160,756 - $116,853 $366,535
Mechanical - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $12,894 - - $12,894
Structural - - $3,616 - - $3,616
Roofing - - $2,429 - - $2,429
Total $267,092 $283,194 $1,241,301 $347,992 $116,853 $2,256,432
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $550,286*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 98
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
151
Pillow ES
151 Pillow Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 125%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 651 -129
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 090
2010-11 In Migration 095
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 734 -212
Utilization (by enrollment) 125% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 83 16 100
Gross Area 54,247 10,752 64,999
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 653
Permanent Capacity 523
Number of Classrooms 29 14 43
Parking Spaces 53
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.0
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1969 54,247 52.3%
Perm Buildings 54,247Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
42.9%
Austin, Texas 78757 1969 EX No
3025 Crosscreek Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $720,598 $51,488 - $772,086
Specialties - - $179,417 $126,230 - $305,647
Interior - $42,710 $293,433 $44,466 - $380,609
Plumbing - - $1,574,606 $55,933 - $1,630,539
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $49,648 $441,067 - - $490,715
Fire & Life Safety $107,100 $66,281 - - - $173,381
Site - $97,541 $62,869 $15,011 - $175,421
Other $116,352 - $178,920 - $2,716,120 $3,011,391
Mechanical - $41,700 $1,825,126 - - $1,866,825
Exterior - - $30,260 - - $30,260
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - $2,131,311 - - $2,131,311
Total $223,451 $347,521 $7,437,607 $293,128 $2,716,120 $11,017,828
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $570,972*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 99
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
130
Pleasant Hill ES
130 Pleasant Hill Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 121%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 631 -107
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 099
2010-11 In Migration 087
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 680 -156
Utilization (by enrollment) 118% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 106 12 119
Gross Area 65,729 7,680 73,409
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 619
Permanent Capacity 524
Number of Classrooms 33 10 43
Parking Spaces 71
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.1
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1985 65,729 21.5%
Perm Buildings 65,729Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
19.6%
Austin, Texas 78745 1985 AA No
6405 Circle S Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $60,398 $25,744 - $86,142
Specialties - - $149,903 $57,475 - $207,378
Interior - $106,775 $74,494 $11,393 - $192,662
Plumbing - - $96,882 $6,420 - $103,302
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $52,104 $524,022 - - $576,126
Fire & Life Safety $110,106 $68,128 - - - $178,234
Site - $1,550 $82,599 - - $84,149
Other $228,868 - $162,817 - $473,908 $865,593
Mechanical - $193,219 $2,242,412 - - $2,435,632
Exterior - - $14,892 - - $14,892
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $338,974 $421,776 $3,408,419 $101,031 $473,908 $4,744,109
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $760,750*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 100
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
131
Lucy Read Pre-K
131 Lucy Read Pre-K School Grades Served PK (Pre-K)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 393
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 000
2010-11 In Migration 510
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 393
Utilization (by enrollment) 130% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 127 18 145
Gross Area 64,644 9,216 73,860
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 509
Permanent Capacity 393
Number of Classrooms 23 7 30
Parking Spaces 98
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.9
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1961 3,069 6.2%
Building A 1 1961 61,575 11.3%
Perm Buildings 64,644Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
11.0%
Austin, Texas 78757 1961 No
2608 RichCreek Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $156,212 $242,226 $34,575 - $433,012
Specialties - - $26,858 $65,901 - $92,758
Interior - - $118,391 $10,593 - $128,985
Plumbing - - $138,641 $3,211 - $141,852
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $40,408 $395,364 - - $435,772
Fire & Life Safety $119,486 $70,631 $2,617 - - $192,735
Site - - - $40,134 - $40,134
Other $71,846 - $230,214 - $9,470 $311,530
Mechanical - $576,178 $13,501 - - $589,679
Exterior - - $51,949 - - $51,949
Structural - - $1,365 - - $1,365
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $191,332 $843,430 $1,221,125 $154,414 $9,470 $2,419,771
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,034,762*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 101
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
132
Reilly ES
132 Reilly Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 112%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 357 -39
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 100
2010-11 In Migration 045
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 366 -48
Utilization (by enrollment) 93% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 141 21 161
Gross Area 41,646 6,144 47,790
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 296
Permanent Capacity 318
Number of Classrooms 20 8 28
Parking Spaces 45
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.8
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1954 41,646 32.0%
Perm Buildings 41,646Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
28.5%
Austin, Texas 78752 1954 RC No
405 Denson Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $176,548 $85,634 $41,902 - $304,084
Specialties - - $50,064 $67,475 - $117,538
Interior - $32,360 $97,077 $48,191 - $177,628
Plumbing $291,538 - $121,730 $5,350 - $418,619
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $46,630 $306,036 - - $352,667
Fire & Life Safety $66,358 $57,152 - - - $123,510
Site - $4,606 $54,280 $40,134 - $99,019
Other $39,270 - $206,426 - $11,517 $257,213
Mechanical - $309,403 $1,367,980 - - $1,677,383
Exterior - - $369,460 - - $369,460
Structural - $77,800 - - - $77,800
Roofing - $81,281 - - - $81,281
Total $397,166 $785,780 $2,658,687 $203,051 $11,517 $4,056,202
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,182,946*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 102
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
133
Ridgetop ES
133 Ridgetop Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 62%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 128 78
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 056
2010-11 In Migration 147
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 131 75
Utilization (by enrollment) 106% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 162 21 184
Gross Area 35,585 4,608 40,193
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 219
Permanent Capacity 206
Number of Classrooms 13 6 19
Parking Spaces 32
Gross Site Area (Acres) 5.0
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1939 400 8.6%
Building A 1 1939 35,185 32.0%
Perm Buildings 35,585Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
31.4%
Austin, Texas 78751 1939 EX No
5005 Caswell Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $157,434 $62,616 $3,642 - $223,693
Specialties - - $101,584 $422,259 - $523,843
Interior - $42,710 $29,297 $451,012 - $523,019
Plumbing - - $150,484 $22,463 - $172,948
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $45,420 $154,913 - - $200,332
Fire & Life Safety $71,510 $53,744 - - - $125,254
Site - $267,544 $75,461 - - $343,005
Other $93,975 - $164,484 - $22,541 $281,000
Mechanical - $598,001 $759,217 - - $1,357,218
Exterior - - $21,397 - - $21,397
Structural - - $4,502 - - $4,502
Roofing - - $3,940 - - $3,940
Total $165,485 $1,164,852 $1,527,895 $899,377 $22,541 $3,780,150
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,330,337*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 103
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
174
Rodriguez ES
174 Rodriguez Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 147%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,045 -334
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 202
2010-11 In Migration 079
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,062 -351
Utilization (by enrollment) 128% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 88 19 106
Gross Area 79,918 16,932 96,850
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 910
Permanent Capacity 711
Number of Classrooms 44 22 66
Parking Spaces 114
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.0
Site Data
School Data
Classroom 1 2006 10,004 8.3%
Building A 1 1999 69,914 7.7%
Perm Buildings 79,918Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
8.0%
Austin, Texas 78744 1999 AA No
4400 Franklin Park Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $36,759 $32,319 - $69,078
Specialties - - $163,736 $209,404 - $373,140
Interior - $132,079 $110,219 $11,709 - $254,006
Plumbing - - $86,792 $9,631 - $96,424
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $50,944 $639,948 - - $690,892
Fire & Life Safety $149,657 $81,989 - - - $231,647
Site - $7,621 $141,062 $42,669 - $191,353
Other $80,146 - $236,132 - $64,181 $380,459
Mechanical - $62,720 $21,281 - - $84,001
Exterior - - $534 - - $534
Structural - $238 - - - $238
Roofing - - $985 - - $985
Total $229,804 $335,591 $1,437,448 $305,732 $64,181 $2,372,756
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $565,395*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 104
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
127
Sanchez ES
127 Sanchez Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 101%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 584 -4
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 061
2010-11 In Migration 074
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 644 -64
Utilization (by enrollment) 101% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 134 11 144
Gross Area 78,131 6,144 84,275
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 585
Permanent Capacity 580
Number of Classrooms 36 8 44
Parking Spaces 70
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.2
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1976 78,131 28.7%
Perm Buildings 78,131Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
26.5%
Austin, Texas 78702 1976 RC No
73 San Marcos Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $254,788 $574,116 $54,024 - $882,927
Specialties - - $151,094 $110,084 - $261,178
Interior - - $628,109 $114,615 - $742,724
Plumbing - - $166,317 $21,394 - $187,711
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $60,612 $519,647 - - $580,259
Fire & Life Safety $102,706 $64,720 - - - $167,425
Site $1,177 - $71,710 $40,134 - $113,020
Other $65,580 - $174,732 - $2,934,744 $3,175,056
Mechanical - $3,146,518 $312,872 - - $3,459,390
Exterior - $387 $1,716 - - $2,103
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $169,463 $3,527,025 $2,600,313 $340,250 $2,934,744 $9,571,794
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,696,487*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 105
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
136
St. Elmo ES
136 St. Elmo Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 90%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 369 42
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 094
2010-11 In Migration 029
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 361 50
Utilization (by enrollment) 74% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 159 10 169
Gross Area 48,212 3,072 51,284
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 304
Permanent Capacity 411
Number of Classrooms 26 4 30
Parking Spaces 60
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.4
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1960 48,212 40.6%
Perm Buildings 48,212Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
41.2%
Austin, Texas 78745 1960 RC No
600 W. St. Elmo Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $156,212 $277,126 $40,873 - $474,211
Specialties - - $166,565 $71,399 - $237,964
Interior - $21,355 $168,428 $14,646 - $204,429
Plumbing - - $1,362,172 $28,881 - $1,391,053
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $48,230 $344,348 - - $392,579
Fire & Life Safety $79,866 $57,477 - - - $137,343
Site - $797 $48,045 $82,803 - $131,645
Other $436,826 - $244,366 - $1,342,548 $2,023,740
Mechanical - $354,726 $754,316 - - $1,109,042
Exterior - - $1,484,314 - - $1,484,314
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $42,906 - - - $42,906
Total $516,693 $681,703 $4,849,681 $238,602 $1,342,548 $7,629,227
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,198,396*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 106
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
139
Sims ES
139 Sims Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 97%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 343 12
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 084
2010-11 In Migration 016
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 359 -4
Utilization (by enrollment) 78% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 160 22 182
Gross Area 44,337 6,144 50,481
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 277
Permanent Capacity 355
Number of Classrooms 22 8 30
Parking Spaces 66
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.4
Site Data
School Data
Building F 1 1956 292 81.0%
Building E 1 1956 7,503 32.4%
Building D 1 1956 4,570 57.8%
Building C 1 1956 2,482 36.3%
Building B 1 1961 17,056 35.3%
Building A 1 1956 12,434 55.6%
Perm Buildings 44,337Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
39.4%
Austin, Texas 78721 1956 EX No
1203 Springdale Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $178,641 $630,997 $31,881 - $841,520
Specialties - - $194,276 $86,504 - $280,780
Interior - $85,420 $210,519 $10,727 - $306,666
Plumbing $650,388 - $840,920 $12,837 - $1,504,145
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $47,124 $339,322 - - $386,446
Fire & Life Safety $83,676 $58,028 - - - $141,704
Site - $31,481 $130,753 $129,820 - $292,054
Other $195,428 - $165,575 - $868,224 $1,229,226
Mechanical - - $1,539,650 - - $1,539,650
Exterior - $327 $28,402 $2,221 - $30,950
Structural - $7,498 - - - $7,498
Roofing - $216,011 $10,801 - - $226,812
Total $929,492 $624,530 $4,091,216 $273,990 $868,224 $6,787,451
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,554,022*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 107
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
138
Summitt ES
138 Summitt Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 85%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 623 109
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 057
2010-11 In Migration 288
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 662 70
Utilization (by enrollment) 117% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 89 13 101
Gross Area 75,902 10,752 86,654
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 854
Permanent Capacity 732
Number of Classrooms 41 14 55
Parking Spaces 107
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.5
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1989 9,966 24.2%
Building A 1 1986 65,936 28.9%
Perm Buildings 75,902Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
25.2%
Austin, Texas 78727 1986 EX No
12207 Brigadoon Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical $1,224 - $276,089 $27,883 - $305,196
Specialties - - $140,477 $103,664 - $244,141
Interior - $7,415 $302,725 $108,624 - $418,765
Plumbing $67,453 - $160,639 $18,257 - $246,348
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $54,765 $631,730 - - $686,495
Fire & Life Safety $130,660 $75,368 - - - $206,028
Site - - $131,854 - - $131,854
Other $254,903 - $538,644 - $177,876 $971,423
Mechanical $4,837 $224,061 $3,173,464 - - $3,402,362
Exterior - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $459,077 $411,250 $5,355,622 $258,428 $177,876 $6,662,254
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $870,328*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 108
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
158
Sunset Valley ES
158 Sunset Valley Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 86%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 483 78
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 135
2010-11 In Migration 099
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 543 18
Utilization (by enrollment) 80% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 147 7 154
Gross Area 66,467 3,072 69,539
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 451
Permanent Capacity 561
Number of Classrooms 35 2 37
Parking Spaces 86
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.4
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1996 9,169 11.6%
Building A 1 1971 57,298 50.9%
Perm Buildings 66,467Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
42.3%
Austin, Texas 78745 1971 EX No
3000 Jones Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical $5,012 $97,298 $389,217 $31,881 - $523,409
Specialties - - $98,494 $106,358 - $204,852
Interior - $42,710 $230,079 $81,622 - $354,411
Plumbing - - $485,597 $16,046 - $501,643
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $52,638 $514,926 - - $567,564
Fire & Life Safety $104,397 $71,096 $2,617 - - $178,109
Site - $23,148 $223,578 - - $246,726
Other $61,362 - $150,333 - $2,385,867 $2,597,562
Mechanical - $2,514,744 $1,388,745 - - $3,903,489
Exterior - - $22,439 - - $22,439
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - $2,043,970 - - $2,043,970
Total $170,770 $2,801,633 $5,549,996 $235,908 $2,385,867 $11,144,175
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,972,404*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 109
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
140
Travis Heights ES
140 Travis Heights Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 113%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 548 -62
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 117
2010-11 In Migration 109
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 605 -119
Utilization (by enrollment) 110% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 111 9 120
Gross Area 59,589 4,608 64,197
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 537
Permanent Capacity 486
Number of Classrooms 31 6 37
Parking Spaces 44
Gross Site Area (Acres) 3.2
Site Data
School Data
Building C 1 1994 14,021 20.4%
Building B 1 1985 4,992 35.5%
Building A 1 1938 40,576 39.7%
Perm Buildings 59,589Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
36.6%
Austin, Texas 78704 1938 RC No
2010 Alameda Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical $708 $201,183 $385,584 $14,099 - $601,574
Specialties - - $79,247 $85,654 - $164,901
Interior - $64,065 $158,357 $67,889 - $290,311
Plumbing $206,194 - $591,645 $14,976 - $812,815
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $56,634 $494,206 - - $550,839
Fire & Life Safety $99,299 $63,515 - - - $162,814
Site $223,178 $188,278 $2,109 $1,112 - $414,676
Other $435,073 - $626,691 - $1,545,119 $2,606,883
Mechanical - $1,907,086 $694,812 - - $2,601,898
Exterior - - $2,778 $321,483 - $324,261
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $964,451 $2,480,760 $3,035,427 $505,213 $1,545,119 $8,530,971
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,445,212*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 110
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
141
Walnut Creek ES
141 Walnut Creek Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 143%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 936 -282
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 094
2010-11 In Migration 060
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,002 -348
Utilization (by enrollment) 140% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 87 18 105
Gross Area 79,536 16,896 96,432
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 916
Permanent Capacity 655
Number of Classrooms 41 21 62
Parking Spaces 94
Gross Site Area (Acres) 11.5
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1999 34,499 5.6%
Building A 1 1961 45,037 27.3%
Perm Buildings 79,536Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
15.3%
Austin, Texas 78753 1961 AA No
401 W. Braker Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical $1,224 $216,949 $268,133 $18,535 - $504,841
Specialties - - $157,043 $118,152 - $275,195
Interior $610 $3,560 $53,758 $57,599 - $115,526
Plumbing $139,018 - $139,251 $5,350 - $283,619
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $55,279 $601,051 - - $656,330
Fire & Life Safety $149,776 $81,314 - - - $231,090
Site - $4,606 $67,837 - - $72,444
Other $83,310 - $44,022 - $10,090 $137,422
Mechanical - $654,561 $482,290 - - $1,136,851
Exterior $2,925 - $837,033 - - $839,957
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing $1,499 $141,304 - - - $142,803
Total $378,361 $1,157,572 $2,650,418 $199,636 $10,090 $4,396,078
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,535,934*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 111
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
175
Widen ES
175 Widen Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 118%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 794 -121
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 086
2010-11 In Migration 077
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 780 -107
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 97 20 117
Gross Area 74,523 15,360 89,883
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 769
Permanent Capacity 673
Number of Classrooms 42 20 62
Parking Spaces 92
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.7
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1989 10,857 7.4%
Building A 1 1986 63,666 15.5%
Perm Buildings 74,523Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
12.9%
Austin, Texas 78744 1986 AA No
5605 Nuckols Crossing Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $137,522 $136,454 $11,802 - $285,779
Specialties - - $292,213 $92,380 - $384,593
Interior - $106,775 $133,079 $87,980 - $327,835
Plumbing - $748 $134,172 $8,562 - $143,482
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $55,257 $615,502 - - $670,759
Fire & Life Safety $152,816 $80,016 $2,617 - - $235,450
Site - - $121,427 $4,049 - $125,476
Other $188,366 - $334,723 - $244,825 $767,913
Mechanical $1,766 $136,930 $601,976 - - $740,673
Exterior - $2,640 $13,732 - - $16,372
Structural $1,801 - $1,474 $2,648 - $5,923
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $344,749 $519,889 $2,387,370 $207,421 $244,825 $3,704,253
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $864,638*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 112
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
166
Williams ES
166 Williams Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 114%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 640 -79
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 133
2010-11 In Migration 130
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 621 -60
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 101 14 115
Gross Area 64,846 9,216 74,062
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 642
Permanent Capacity 561
Number of Classrooms 35 12 47
Parking Spaces 107
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.0
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1976 64,846 40.0%
Perm Buildings 64,846Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
36.9%
Austin, Texas 78748 1976 AA No
500 Mairo Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $156,212 $812,293 $46,853 - $1,015,358
Specialties $24,162 - $202,571 $162,006 - $388,740
Interior - $106,775 $464,627 $11,930 - $583,332
Plumbing - - $812,938 $60,184 - $873,122
Conveyances - $248,207 - - - $248,207
Technology - $51,800 $522,926 - - $574,726
Fire & Life Safety $114,412 $68,848 - - - $183,260
Site - - $132,390 $129,820 - $262,210
Other $68,453 - $183,741 - $2,107,462 $2,359,655
Mechanical - $3,364,894 $124,994 - - $3,489,887
Exterior - - $37,251 $223,445 - $260,696
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - $20,585 - - $20,585
Total $207,027 $3,996,735 $3,314,316 $634,239 $2,107,462 $10,259,778
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,203,762*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 113
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
157
Winn ES
157 Winn Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 93%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 485 39
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 082
2010-11 In Migration 044
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 531 -7
Utilization (by enrollment) 88% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 134 10 144
Gross Area 62,087 4,608 66,695
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 463
Permanent Capacity 524
Number of Classrooms 33 6 39
Parking Spaces 66
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.0
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1990 9,970 21.1%
Building A 1 1970 52,117 21.7%
Perm Buildings 62,087Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
22.5%
Austin, Texas 78723 1970 RC No
3500 Susquehanna Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $139,476 $136,299 $36,239 - $312,013
Specialties - - $182,446 $84,899 - $267,345
Interior - $42,710 $212,677 $189,878 - $445,265
Plumbing - - $709,008 $9,629 - $718,637
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $51,835 $479,005 - - $530,840
Fire & Life Safety $100,345 $63,878 - - - $164,223
Site $1,255 - $107,297 $40,134 - $148,686
Other $347,515 - $281,701 - $6,696,886 $7,326,101
Mechanical - $458,519 $777,108 - - $1,235,627
Exterior - - $10,312 - - $10,312
Structural - $2,248 - - - $2,248
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $449,115 $758,666 $2,895,852 $360,778 $6,696,886 $11,161,297
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,207,781*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 114
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
152
Wooldridge ES
152 Wooldridge Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 222%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,160 -636
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 342
2010-11 In Migration 061
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,255 -731
Utilization (by enrollment) 168% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 78 23 101
Gross Area 68,543 19,968 88,511
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 878
Permanent Capacity 524
Number of Classrooms 33 26 59
Parking Spaces 60
Gross Site Area (Acres) 11.6
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1998 9,738 13.4%
Building A 1 1969 58,805 32.1%
Perm Buildings 68,543Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
23.0%
Austin, Texas 78758 1969 AA No
1412 Norseman Terrace Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $9,816 $606,219 $55,369 - $671,404
Specialties - - $245,253 $66,737 - $311,991
Interior - - $111,004 $148,224 - $259,227
Plumbing $304,637 - $965,135 $10,698 - $1,280,469
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $52,683 $500,564 - - $553,247
Fire & Life Safety $141,507 $85,010 - - - $226,517
Site - $4,606 $31,668 $64,475 - $100,749
Other $234,894 - $282,741 - $3,072 $520,707
Mechanical - $1,627,867 $459,905 - - $2,087,773
Exterior - - $56,049 - - $56,049
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $681,037 $1,779,983 $3,258,538 $345,503 $3,072 $6,068,132
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,461,020*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 115
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
144
Wooten ES
144 Wooten Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 144%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 672 -205
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 093
2010-11 In Migration 125
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 737 -270
Utilization (by enrollment) 149% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 77 27 104
Gross Area 53,689 18,432 72,121
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 695
Permanent Capacity 468
Number of Classrooms 29 22 51
Parking Spaces 37
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.7
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1955 53,689 63.2%
Perm Buildings 53,689Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
51.2%
Austin, Texas 78757 1955 RC No
1406 Dale Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $1,407,108 $60,569 $11,248 - $1,478,925
Specialties - - $150,539 $132,609 - $283,148
Interior - $206,992 $235,337 $44,338 - $486,667
Plumbing $595,605 $1,211,680 $640,145 $31,163 - $2,478,594
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Technology - $48,984 $471,209 - - $520,193
Fire & Life Safety $119,270 $71,393 - - - $190,662
Site - $1,112 $629,572 $322,375 - $953,059
Other $437,749 - $518,995 - $1,429,495 $2,386,239
Mechanical - $37,918 $2,705,775 - - $2,743,693
Exterior $1,537 $5,198 $776,990 - - $783,726
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $1,154,161 $3,089,669 $6,189,133 $541,732 $1,429,495 $12,404,189
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,243,830*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 116
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
145
Zavala ES
145 Zavala Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 60%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 347 233
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 043
2010-11 In Migration 082
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 353 227
Utilization (by enrollment) 70% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 170 0 170
Gross Area 69,333 69,333
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 407
Permanent Capacity 580
Number of Classrooms 36 0 36
Parking Spaces 12
Gross Site Area (Acres) 3.4
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1937 69,333 32.5%
Perm Buildings 69,333Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
32.8%
Austin, Texas 78702 1937 RC No
310 Robert Martinez, Jr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical $5,100 $89,265 $578,418 $65,592 - $738,375
Specialties - $13,163 $163,406 $91,473 - $268,041
Interior - - $260,945 $236,385 - $497,329
Plumbing $571,041 - $1,984,992 $6,420 - $2,562,453
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $56,381 $504,384 - - $560,765
Fire & Life Safety $100,572 $64,748 $2,617 - - $167,937
Site - $1,196 $285,274 - - $286,470
Other $197,619 - $56,846 - $19,700 $274,164
Mechanical - $184,809 $1,186,825 - - $1,371,633
Exterior - - $38,935 $14,187 - $53,122
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $798 - - - $798
Total $874,332 $410,359 $5,062,642 $414,056 $19,700 $6,781,088
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,284,691*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 117
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
146
Zilker ES
146 Zilker Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 74%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 338 122
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 018
2010-11 In Migration 204
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 358 102
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 98 21 118
Gross Area 50,941 10,752 61,693
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 522
Permanent Capacity 460
Number of Classrooms 26 14 40
Parking Spaces 54
Gross Site Area (Acres) 11.8
Site Data
School Data
Vocational 1 1950 597 53.3%
Library 1 1990 5,488 24.8%
Gymnasium 1 1961 2,827 49.5%
Building A 1 1950 42,029 69.2%
Perm Buildings 50,941Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
56.4%
Austin, Texas 78704 1950 EX No
1900 Bluebonnet Lane Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $83,685 $466,878 $23,564 - $574,127
Specialties - - $182,402 $98,504 - $280,906
Interior - $22,794 $233,891 $434,142 - $690,827
Plumbing $445,897 $251,267 $1,401,699 $9,629 - $2,108,492
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $44,347 $360,804 - - $405,151
Fire & Life Safety $98,303 $63,990 $2,617 - - $164,909
Site - - $720,410 $210,344 - $930,754
Other $323,124 - $884,203 - $2,565,129 $3,772,456
Mechanical - $204,753 $2,049,476 - - $2,254,229
Exterior $28,203 - $338,242 - - $366,445
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $1,307,652 $59,313 - - $1,366,966
Total $895,527 $1,978,488 $6,699,936 $776,182 $2,565,129 $12,915,262
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,874,015*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 118
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
059
Bailey MS
059 Bailey Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 83%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 979 197
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 129
2010-11 In Migration 196
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,048 128
Utilization (by enrollment) 89% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 142 10 153
Gross Area 148,143 10,752 158,895
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,041
Permanent Capacity 1,176
Number of Classrooms 56 11 67
Parking Spaces 138
Gross Site Area (Acres) 41.3
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1993 148,143 15.1%
Perm Buildings 148,143Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
16.4%
Austin, Texas 78739 1993 RC No
4020 Lost Oasis Hollow Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $242,830 $3,406 - $246,236
Specialties - - $161,190 $142,753 - $303,943
Interior - $149,485 $94,214 $72,955 - $316,654
Plumbing - - $236,111 $24,615 $1,568 $262,294
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $197,531 $972,186 - - $1,169,717
Fire & Life Safety $233,448 $125,051 $14,217 - - $372,716
Site - $16,193 $27,289 $824,676 - $868,157
Other $470,451 - $392,173 - $173,780 $1,036,404
Mechanical $14,691 $1,769,423 $1,889,503 - - $3,673,618
Exterior - - $220,269 $192,392 - $412,661
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $718,590 $2,307,324 $4,249,984 $1,260,797 $175,348 $8,712,044
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,025,915*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 119
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
054
Bedichek MS
054 Bedichek Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 130%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,219 -278
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 248
2010-11 In Migration 100
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,340 -399
Utilization (by enrollment) 112% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 124 26 150
Gross Area 130,600 27,018 157,618
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,054
Permanent Capacity 941
Number of Classrooms 48 31 79
Parking Spaces 140
Gross Site Area (Acres) 23.3
Site Data
School Data
Building C 1 1997 9,909 5.8%
Gymnasium 1 1972 28,847 55.2%
Building A 1 1972 91,844 32.0%
Perm Buildings 130,600Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
30.6%
Austin, Texas 78745 1972 AA No
6800 Bill Hughes Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $554,802 $92,282 - $647,084
Specialties - - $90,013 $238,298 - $328,311
Interior $224 $192,195 $807,140 $331,731 - $1,331,290
Plumbing - - $417,426 $30,027 - $447,452
Conveyances $214,837 $49,641 - - - $264,479
Technology - $97,631 $886,402 - - $984,033
Fire & Life Safety $305,625 $162,630 $10,469 - - $478,724
Site - - $192,275 $824,676 - $1,016,951
Other $330,347 - $96,558 - $13,820,241 $14,247,146
Mechanical $5,200,844 $2,584,586 $1,231,358 - - $9,016,787
Exterior - - $2,951 - - $2,951
Structural - $11,113 - - - $11,113
Roofing - $849,916 - - - $849,916
Total $6,051,876 $3,947,712 $4,289,394 $1,517,014 $13,820,241 $29,626,237
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $9,999,588*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 120
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
046
Burnet MS
046 Burnet Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 113%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,170 -131
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 203
2010-11 In Migration 060
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,365 -326
Utilization (by enrollment) 96% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 138 18 157
Gross Area 137,768 18,432 156,200
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 998
Permanent Capacity 1,039
Number of Classrooms 53 22 75
Parking Spaces 50
Gross Site Area (Acres) 23.7
Site Data
School Data
Mechanical 1 1969 1,025 0.4%
Building A 1 1961 136,743 37.5%
Perm Buildings 137,768Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
34.5%
Austin, Texas 78757 1961 AA No
8401 Hathaway Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $284,750 $2,562,829 $72,232 - $2,919,811
Specialties - - $398,072 $287,254 - $685,326
Interior - $219,280 $300,419 $20,695 - $540,393
Plumbing $332,126 $3,631 $256,340 $28,960 - $621,057
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $82,434 $854,942 - - $937,377
Fire & Life Safety $217,661 $119,840 $2,617 - - $340,118
Site - $106,911 - $1,052,251 - $1,159,162
Other $146,741 - $176,985 - $1,228,083 $1,551,810
Mechanical - $6,231,657 $1,586,077 - - $7,817,734
Exterior - $127,204 $7,663 - - $134,868
Structural - $3,472 $868 - - $4,340
Roofing - - $2,095,309 - - $2,095,309
Total $696,528 $7,228,821 $8,242,121 $1,461,392 $1,228,083 $18,856,946
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $7,925,349*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 121
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
057
Covington MS
057 Covington Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 68%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 905 418
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 260
2010-11 In Migration 181
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 984 339
Utilization (by enrollment) 61% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 216 6 221
Gross Area 173,636 4,608 178,244
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 805
Permanent Capacity 1,323
Number of Classrooms 63 5 68
Parking Spaces 122
Gross Site Area (Acres) 21.3
Site Data
School Data
Vocational 1 1986 18,307 18.9%
Auditorium 1 1986 20,672 20.3%
Building A 1 1986 134,657 18.9%
Perm Buildings 173,636Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
18.7%
Austin, Texas 78749 1986 AA No
3700 Convict Hill Rd Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $297,742 $374,659 $66,064 - $738,464
Specialties - - $218,812 $314,103 - $532,914
Interior - $21,355 $126,060 $187,566 - $334,981
Plumbing - - $366,484 $31,967 - $398,450
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $97,536 $975,699 - - $1,073,235
Fire & Life Safety $247,938 $156,334 $33,669 - - $437,941
Site - $243 $220,213 $79,540 - $299,996
Other $442,312 - $330,814 - $1,960,490 $2,733,617
Mechanical $271,148 $2,997,320 $2,777,473 - - $6,045,940
Exterior - $6,006 $31,080 - - $37,086
Structural - - $1,775 - - $1,775
Roofing - $165,465 $1,050 - - $166,514
Total $961,398 $3,791,641 $5,457,787 $679,240 $1,960,490 $12,850,556
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,753,039*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 122
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
055
Dobie MS
055 Dobie Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 80%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 719 183
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 130
2010-11 In Migration 063
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 828 74
Utilization (by enrollment) 70% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 214 10 223
Gross Area 134,563 6,144 140,707
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 630
Permanent Capacity 902
Number of Classrooms 46 8 54
Parking Spaces 120
Gross Site Area (Acres) 20.2
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 2006 10,564 8.3%
Building A 1 1973 123,999 14.0%
Perm Buildings 134,563Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
15.2%
Austin, Texas 78753 1973 RC No
1200 E. Rundberg Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical $22,712 $200,845 $696,953 $26,695 - $947,204
Specialties - - $300,442 $286,623 - $587,065
Interior $42,171 $6,076 $648,770 $22,550 - $719,567
Plumbing $86,955 - $532,071 $38,660 - $657,686
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Technology - $116,153 $817,034 - - $933,187
Fire & Life Safety $205,797 $104,739 $7,852 - - $318,388
Site - - $229,980 $779,468 - $1,009,448
Other $172,266 - $209,938 - $6,327,599 $6,709,803
Mechanical $274,000 $505,060 $550,219 - - $1,329,279
Exterior $15,417 - - - - $15,417
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $819,317 $1,032,156 $3,993,260 $1,153,996 $6,327,599 $13,326,328
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,851,474*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 123
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
043
Fulmore MS
043 Fulmore Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 79%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 850 228
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 138
2010-11 In Migration 295
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 990 88
Utilization (by enrollment) 92% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 161 8 168
Gross Area 159,699 7,680 167,379
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 995
Permanent Capacity 1,078
Number of Classrooms 55 9 64
Parking Spaces 85
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.8
Site Data
School Data
Building D 1 2002 13,392 8.0%
Vocational 1 1980 18,500 56.1%
Cafeteria 1 1980 55,143 40.8%
Building A 1 1911 72,664 46.9%
Perm Buildings 159,699Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
40.6%
Austin, Texas 78704 1911 AA No
201 East Mary Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $5,580 $4,806,824 $574,802 - $5,387,205
Specialties - - $150,593 $341,284 - $491,878
Interior - $55,906 $611,384 $484,733 - $1,152,023
Plumbing $563,639 - $1,384,084 $103,215 - $2,050,938
Conveyances - $49,641 $8,858 - - $58,499
Technology - $122,392 $973,199 - - $1,095,590
Fire & Life Safety $237,738 $150,179 $35,577 - - $423,494
Site $3,001 $4,218 $435,203 $16,796 - $459,218
Other $866,429 - $694,429 - $353,775 $1,914,633
Mechanical - $7,512,668 $1,845,434 - - $9,358,102
Exterior - $2,011 $115,027 - - $117,038
Structural - $3,151 $33,724 - - $36,876
Roofing $4,239 - $30,865 - - $35,104
Total $1,675,047 $7,905,746 $11,125,201 $1,520,831 $353,775 $22,580,600
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $9,580,793*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 124
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
056
Garcia MS
056 Garcia Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 68%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 829 386
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 131
2010-11 In Migration 027
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 901 314
Utilization (by enrollment) 54% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 244 0 244
Gross Area 160,764 160,764
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 658
Permanent Capacity 1,215
Number of Classrooms 62 0 62
Parking Spaces 160
Gross Site Area (Acres) 41.3
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 2008 160,764 4.8%
Perm Buildings 160,764Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
4.7%
Austin, Texas 78724 2008 AA No
7414 Johnny Morris Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $86,118 $4,515 - $90,633
Specialties - - $39,734 $156,485 - $196,219
Interior - - $105,789 $65,660 - $171,449
Plumbing - - $116,926 $30,029 - $146,955
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $108,594 $1,089,676 - - $1,198,270
Fire & Life Safety $341,779 $83,119 $38,970 - - $463,868
Site - - - - - $0
Other - - - - - $0
Mechanical - $133,965 - - - $133,965
Exterior - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $341,779 $375,320 $1,477,213 $256,690 $0 $2,451,001
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $717,098*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 125
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
062
Gorzycki MS
062 Gorzycki Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 75%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 989 334
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 132
2010-11 In Migration 108
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,071 252
Utilization (by enrollment) 73% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 182 0 182
Gross Area 175,543 175,543
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 963
Permanent Capacity 1,323
Number of Classrooms 63 0 63
Parking Spaces 160
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.2
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 2009 175,543 4.7%
Perm Buildings 175,543Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
4.6%
Austin, Texas 78749 2009 RC No
7412 West Slaughter Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $127,097 $2,376 - $129,472
Specialties - - $33,711 $300,646 - $334,357
Interior - - $108,064 $73,924 - $181,987
Plumbing - - $157,202 $18,190 - $175,392
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $138,695 $1,099,309 - - $1,238,004
Fire & Life Safety $309,464 $87,857 $5,235 - - $402,556
Site - - - $40,134 - $40,134
Other - - - - - $0
Mechanical - $103,990 $20,852 - - $124,842
Exterior - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $309,464 $330,542 $1,551,469 $435,269 $0 $2,626,743
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $640,006*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 126
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
044
Kealing MS
044 Kealing Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 35%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 541 1,027
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 064
2010-11 In Migration 806
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 614 954
Utilization (by enrollment) 79% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 156 0 156
Gross Area 192,181 192,181
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,233
Permanent Capacity 1,568
Number of Classrooms 80 0 80
Parking Spaces 160
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.2
Site Data
School Data
Building C 1 2007 34,819 3.8%
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1986 55,783 24.8%
Building A 1 1986 101,579 20.4%
Perm Buildings 192,181Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
18.6%
Austin, Texas 78702 1986 AA No
1607 Pennsylvania Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical $67,252 $180,541 $313,476 $33,349 - $594,617
Specialties - - $179,106 $449,683 - $628,789
Interior - $30,226 $364,771 $127,864 - $522,860
Plumbing - - $503,134 $28,962 - $532,097
Conveyances $8,858 $49,641 - - - $58,499
Technology - $150,808 $1,362,779 - - $1,513,586
Fire & Life Safety $260,502 $149,268 $44,560 - - $454,330
Site - - $82,009 $322,375 - $404,383
Other $39,330 - $284,944 - $464,321 $788,595
Mechanical - $414,668 $2,119,963 - - $2,534,631
Exterior - - $129,828 - - $129,828
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $3,999,808 - - - $3,999,808
Total $375,942 $4,974,961 $5,384,570 $962,232 $464,321 $12,162,026
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $5,350,903*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 127
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
045
Lamar MS
045 Lamar Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 58%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 583 425
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 191
2010-11 In Migration 223
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 642 366
Utilization (by enrollment) 60% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 201 8 209
Gross Area 121,371 4,608 125,979
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 604
Permanent Capacity 1,008
Number of Classrooms 48 4 52
Parking Spaces 106
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.3
Site Data
School Data
Mechanical 1 2000 2,004 0.1%
Building C 1 2000 5,354 8.3%
Band 1 2000 9,032 6.0%
Building A 1 1955 104,981 20.2%
Perm Buildings 121,371Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
19.3%
Austin, Texas 78757 1955 AA No
6201 Wynona Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical $197,826 $307,218 $139,583 $47,865 - $692,493
Specialties - - $121,330 $149,732 - $271,062
Interior - $85,501 $243,886 $24,393 - $353,780
Plumbing $2,903 $557,289 $864,148 $18,193 - $1,442,532
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $116,800 $852,286 - - $969,086
Fire & Life Safety $169,084 $115,092 $17,966 - - $302,142
Site $5,195 - $29,823 $869,155 - $904,172
Other $191,867 - $230,959 - $19,344 $442,170
Mechanical $290,910 $1,247,215 $700,617 - - $2,238,742
Exterior $898 $433,743 - - - $434,641
Structural $9,432 - $39,783 - - $49,215
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $868,115 $2,862,857 $3,240,381 $1,109,337 $19,344 $8,100,034
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,730,973*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 128
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
051
Martin MS
051 Martin Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 131%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,056 -252
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 429
2010-11 In Migration 075
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,184 -380
Utilization (by enrollment) 79% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 169 17 186
Gross Area 107,983 10,752 118,735
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 639
Permanent Capacity 804
Number of Classrooms 41 11 52
Parking Spaces 94
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.9
Site Data
School Data
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1966 52,693 26.2%
Building A 1 1966 55,290 36.4%
Perm Buildings 107,983Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
28.8%
Austin, Texas 78702 1966 AA No
1601 Haskell Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $694,824 $667,931 $35,746 - $1,398,501
Specialties - - $99,298 $306,386 - $405,683
Interior - $109,213 $899,675 $43,981 - $1,052,869
Plumbing - $60,523 $832,467 $36,516 - $929,506
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Technology - $103,356 $719,130 - - $822,486
Fire & Life Safety $182,171 $101,186 $16,480 - - $299,837
Site - $775 $85,474 $86,678 - $172,927
Other $123,167 - $325,108 - $3,297,183 $3,745,458
Mechanical $224,290 $4,838,987 $340,715 - - $5,403,992
Exterior - $435 $50,001 $112,643 - $163,079
Structural - - $1,395 $8,681 - $10,075
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $529,628 $6,008,583 $4,037,673 $630,629 $3,297,183 $14,503,696
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $6,538,211*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 129
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
058
Mendez MS
058 Mendez Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 104%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,266 -51
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 396
2010-11 In Migration 027
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,373 -158
Utilization (by enrollment) 73% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 195 16 210
Gross Area 173,382 13,824 187,206
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 890
Permanent Capacity 1,215
Number of Classrooms 62 18 80
Parking Spaces 139
Gross Site Area (Acres) 20.7
Site Data
School Data
Vocational 1 1987 17,552 20.4%
Auditorium 1 1987 20,672 15.0%
Building A 1 1987 135,158 13.4%
Perm Buildings 173,382Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
15.0%
Austin, Texas 78744 1987 AA No
5106 Village Square Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $132,718 $1,017,416 $26,774 - $1,176,907
Specialties - - $153,510 $314,681 - $468,191
Interior - $60,254 $235,743 $17,936 - $313,933
Plumbing - - $154,472 $36,518 - $190,990
Conveyances - $108,141 - - - $108,141
Technology - $125,787 $1,090,662 - - $1,216,449
Fire & Life Safety $271,136 $157,700 $58,777 - - $487,613
Site - $3,144 $30,858 $482,213 - $516,215
Other $396,215 - $406,857 - $1,830,512 $2,633,585
Mechanical $412,860 $3,475,928 $10,551 - - $3,899,338
Exterior - $193 $3,653 $25,747 - $29,594
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $5,877 - - - $5,877
Total $1,080,210 $4,069,741 $3,162,498 $903,869 $1,830,512 $11,046,831
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $5,149,951*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 130
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
052
Murchison MS
052 Murchison Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 105%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,171 -58
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 110
2010-11 In Migration 220
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,301 -188
Utilization (by enrollment) 115% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 96 13 109
Gross Area 123,348 16,256 139,604
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,281
Permanent Capacity 1,113
Number of Classrooms 53 20 73
Parking Spaces 124
Gross Site Area (Acres) 26.2
Site Data
School Data
Greenhouse 1 1979 896 11.5%
Storage 1 1987 367
Building B 1 1998 16,628 6.1%
Building A 1 1967 105,457 25.8%
Perm Buildings 123,348Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
19.9%
Austin, Texas 78731 1967 RC No
3700 North Hills Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $793,680 $63,925 - $857,604
Specialties - - $340,986 $225,844 - $566,830
Interior - $170,840 $149,672 $724,559 - $1,045,070
Plumbing $86,955 - $396,795 $25,685 - $509,434
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $78,856 $882,096 - - $960,952
Fire & Life Safety $214,865 $135,922 $41,521 - - $392,308
Site - - $17,512 - - $17,512
Other $151,066 - $228,101 - $8,153,256 $8,532,423
Mechanical $32,241 $303,841 $3,101,002 - - $3,437,084
Exterior - $5,383 $337 - - $5,720
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $928,708 - - - $928,708
Total $485,127 $1,623,549 $5,951,701 $1,040,012 $8,153,256 $17,253,644
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,108,676*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 131
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
047
O. Henry MS
047 O. Henry Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 85%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 804 141
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 183
2010-11 In Migration 485
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 897 48
Utilization (by enrollment) 109% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 121 6 127
Gross Area 124,320 6,144 130,464
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,026
Permanent Capacity 945
Number of Classrooms 45 8 53
Parking Spaces 103
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.8
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1953 124,320 12.3%
Perm Buildings 124,320Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
13.3%
Austin, Texas 78703 1953 AA No
2610 West 10th St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $244,583 $266,248 $86,974 - $597,805
Specialties - - $83,741 $204,056 - $287,797
Interior - $85,420 $158,448 $37,802 - $281,670
Plumbing - - $2,047,419 $34,313 - $2,081,732
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $92,335 $808,610 - - $900,945
Fire & Life Safety $191,584 $127,909 $15,349 - - $334,841
Site - - $532,421 $5,561 - $537,983
Other $95,479 - $93,514 - $3,270,833 $3,459,826
Mechanical - $187,659 $89,395 - - $277,054
Exterior - $725 $49,612 - - $50,337
Structural - - $33,856 - - $33,856
Roofing - - $70,588 - - $70,588
Total $287,063 $788,273 $4,249,201 $368,706 $3,270,833 $8,964,076
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,075,336*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 132
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
061
Paredes MS
061 Paredes Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 101%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,165 -9
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 291
2010-11 In Migration 069
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,293 -137
Utilization (by enrollment) 80% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 160 7 166
Gross Area 148,695 6,144 154,839
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 930
Permanent Capacity 1,156
Number of Classrooms 59 8 67
Parking Spaces 108
Gross Site Area (Acres) 78.2
Site Data
School Data
Gymnasium 1 2000 34,358 5.4%
Band 1 2000 9,072 9.4%
Cafeteria 1 2000 15,854 4.6%
Building C 1 2000 4,035 29.8%
Administration 1 2000 6,002 8.6%
Building A 1 2000 79,374 10.5%
Perm Buildings 148,695Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
11.0%
Austin, Texas 78748 2000 RC No
10100 S. Mary Moore Searight Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $449,283 $71,212 - $520,495
Specialties - - $93,998 $1,064,189 - $1,158,186
Interior - $30,772 $214,463 $118,134 - $363,369
Plumbing - - $330,677 $42,936 - $373,613
Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924
Technology - $104,752 $1,036,362 - - $1,141,114
Fire & Life Safety $228,900 $150,096 $56,160 - - $435,155
Site - $99,871 $121,562 $208,564 - $429,998
Other $277,115 - $460,476 - $274,674 $1,012,265
Mechanical $133,382 $85,083 $18,278 - - $236,742
Exterior - - $6,745 - - $6,745
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $36,100 - - - $36,100
Total $639,397 $655,597 $2,788,004 $1,505,034 $274,674 $5,862,705
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,294,994*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 133
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
048
Pearce MS
048 Pearce Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 66%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 712 366
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 510
2010-11 In Migration 328
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 846 232
Utilization (by enrollment) 31% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 403 5 408
Gross Area 132,596 1,536 134,132
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 329
Permanent Capacity 1,078
Number of Classrooms 55 1 56
Parking Spaces 82
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.8
Site Data
School Data
Auditorium 1 1958 8,637 4.4%
Building A 1 1958 123,959 15.7%
Perm Buildings 132,596Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
15.0%
Austin, Texas 78723 1958 AA No
6401 N. Hampton Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $859,515 $42,854 - $902,369
Specialties - - $154,528 $176,304 - $330,832
Interior - $28,343 $236,543 $120,791 - $385,677
Plumbing - - $1,076,087 $18,193 - $1,094,279
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $122,320 $849,279 - - $971,599
Fire & Life Safety $191,660 $103,728 $17,966 - - $313,354
Site - $144,156 $120,754 $79,542 - $344,451
Other $184,723 - $38,956 - $797,883 $1,021,561
Mechanical $420,778 $582,707 $238,457 - - $1,241,941
Exterior - - $277,949 - - $277,949
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $438,273 - - - $438,273
Total $797,160 $1,469,168 $3,870,033 $437,683 $797,883 $7,371,927
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,266,328*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 134
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
028
Ann Richards School
028 Ann Richards School Grades Served 6-9 (MS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 924
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 000
2010-11 In Migration 526
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 924
Utilization (by enrollment) 57% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 247 14 261
Gross Area 130,240 7,424 137,664
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 528
Permanent Capacity 924
Number of Classrooms 44 6 50
Parking Spaces 90
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.3
Site Data
School Data
Building D 1 2010 7,000 4.9%
Band 1 1998 3,471 12.6%
Mechanical 1 1958 1,114 3.4%
Building A 1 1958 118,655 39.9%
Perm Buildings 130,240Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
34.3%
Austin, Texas 78704 1958 EX No
2206 Prather Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $195,266 $493,696 $24,159 - $713,121
Specialties - - $76,149 $233,139 - $309,289
Interior - - $212,810 $181,719 - $394,529
Plumbing $1,459,762 - $1,955,099 $13,914 - $3,428,775
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $148,770 $789,429 - - $938,199
Fire & Life Safety $201,671 $132,686 $11,600 - - $345,957
Site - $2,658 $92,455 $322,375 - $417,487
Other $82,916 - $390,377 - $126,188 $599,481
Mechanical - $1,997,171 $4,758,996 - - $6,756,167
Exterior - - $32,701 - - $32,701
Structural $7,066 $10,864 $6,455 - - $24,385
Roofing - $2,660 $1,640,134 - - $1,642,794
Total $1,751,415 $2,490,074 $10,459,899 $775,306 $126,188 $15,602,883
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,241,489*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 135
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
060
Small MS
060 Small Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 71%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 876 363
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 097
2010-11 In Migration 183
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,008 231
Utilization (by enrollment) 77% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 167 5 172
Gross Area 160,599 4,608 165,207
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 959
Permanent Capacity 1,239
Number of Classrooms 59 4 63
Parking Spaces 108
Gross Site Area (Acres) 36.5
Site Data
School Data
Building A 1 1999 160,599 7.0%
Perm Buildings 160,599Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
6.9%
Austin, Texas 78749 1999 RC No
4801 Monterey Oaks Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $173,490 $223,754 $31,131 - $428,375
Specialties - - $158,112 $272,576 - $430,688
Interior - $64,065 $142,138 $8,628 - $214,831
Plumbing - $30,214 $102,766 $41,871 - $174,851
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Technology - $100,499 $1,022,152 - - $1,122,650
Fire & Life Safety $233,877 $142,267 $8,983 - - $385,126
Site $832 - $136,337 - - $137,169
Other $93,147 - $137,739 - $162,029 $392,915
Mechanical $26,588 $431,732 $42,561 - - $500,882
Exterior - $4,284 $6,119 - - $10,403
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $354,444 $1,045,835 $1,980,661 $354,205 $162,029 $3,897,174
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,400,279*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 136
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
053
Webb MS
053 Webb Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 91%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 731 73
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 131
2010-11 In Migration 047
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 866 -62
Utilization (by enrollment) 74% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 205 16 220
Gross Area 120,987 9,216 130,203
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 591
Permanent Capacity 804
Number of Classrooms 41 11 52
Parking Spaces 93
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.6
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 2008 10,854 0.2%
Building A 1 1961 110,133 21.1%
Perm Buildings 120,987Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
19.8%
Austin, Texas 78752 1961 AA No
601 E. St. Johns Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $98,562 $1,006,111 $98,064 - $1,202,736
Specialties - - $134,682 $213,638 - $348,320
Interior - $106,775 $134,051 $258,925 - $499,751
Plumbing - - $515,120 $18,195 - $533,315
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $59,544 $656,548 - - $716,092
Fire & Life Safety $180,725 $108,863 $22,069 - - $311,657
Site - $31,426 $67,218 $824,676 - $923,320
Other $239,808 - $168,085 - $733,661 $1,141,554
Mechanical - $2,073,414 $334,031 - - $2,407,445
Exterior - - $42,118 - - $42,118
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $1,036,854 - - - $1,036,854
Total $420,533 $3,515,438 $3,080,033 $1,413,498 $733,661 $9,163,164
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,935,971*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 137
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
017
Akins HS
017 Akins High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 129%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 3,092 -698
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 596
2010-11 In Migration 176
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 3,305 -911
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 119 12 131
Gross Area 324,950 31,616 356,566
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 2,720
Permanent Capacity 2,394
Number of Classrooms 114 38 152
Parking Spaces 659
Gross Site Area (Acres) 57.7
Site Data
School Data
Classroom 1 2008 17,266 5.5%
Greenhouse 1 2004 3,079 3.3%
Cafeteria 1 2000 21,733 1.3%
Gymnasium 1 2000 48,566 2.1%
Theatre 1 2000 39,881 4.3%
Building A 1 2000 194,425 8.3%
Perm Buildings 324,950Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
6.6%
Austin, Texas 78748 2000 RC No
10701 South 1st St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $7,162 $175,205 $65,510 - $247,877
Specialties - - $243,956 $598,275 - $842,231
Interior - $42,710 $551,282 $48,002 - $641,994
Plumbing - - $267,011 $85,304 - $352,315
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Technology - $210,114 $1,966,674 - - $2,176,788
Fire & Life Safety $671,824 $277,782 $8,983 - - $958,589
Site $8,006 $1,530 - $655,397 - $664,932
Other $274,429 - $543,674 - $134,171 $952,274
Mechanical - $556,614 $59,616 - - $616,230
Exterior - - $129,395 - - $129,395
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $13,363 $20,715 - - $34,078
Total $954,259 $1,208,558 $3,966,511 $1,452,488 $134,171 $7,715,986
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,162,817*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 138
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
009
Anderson HS
009 Anderson High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 83%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,962 411
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 257
2010-11 In Migration 391
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,147 226
Utilization (by enrollment) 88% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 148 1 149
Gross Area 309,329 1,536 310,865
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 2,089
Permanent Capacity 2,373
Number of Classrooms 113 1 114
Parking Spaces 760
Gross Site Area (Acres) 38.8
Site Data
School Data
Library 1 2000 17,078 2.8%
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1973 121,018 36.1%
Building A 1 1973 171,233 24.2%
Perm Buildings 309,329Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
27.6%
Austin, Texas 78759 1973 RC No
8403 Mesa Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $717,293 $934,027 $57,350 - $1,708,671
Specialties - - $391,446 $576,918 - $968,364
Interior - $22,177 $3,519,578 $944,064 - $4,485,819
Plumbing $187,292 $41,436 $567,702 $125,657 - $922,088
Conveyances - $358,670 - - - $358,670
Technology - $312,614 $2,218,774 - - $2,531,388
Fire & Life Safety $470,913 $363,018 $29,211 - - $863,142
Site - - $134,285 $51,280 - $185,565
Other $223,608 - $501,829 - $8,421,936 $9,147,373
Mechanical - $5,357,640 $771,481 $204,396 - $6,333,517
Exterior $2,067 - $204,242 - - $206,309
Structural - - $62,479 - - $62,479
Roofing - $96,476 - - - $96,476
Total $883,879 $7,269,324 $9,335,056 $1,959,665 $8,421,936 $27,869,861
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $8,153,203*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 139
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
002
Austin HS
002 Austin High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 89%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,958 247
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 449
2010-11 In Migration 789
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,146 59
Utilization (by enrollment) 106% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 131 3 135
Gross Area 307,089 7,680 314,769
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 2,337
Permanent Capacity 2,205
Number of Classrooms 105 8 113
Parking Spaces 544
Gross Site Area (Acres) 44.3
Site Data
School Data
Theatre 1 2000 23,571 3.2%
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1975 283,518 33.1%
Perm Buildings 307,089Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
31.1%
Austin, Texas 78703 1975 RC No
1715 W. Cesar Chavez Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $20,527 $4,561,332 $39,527 - $4,621,386
Specialties - - $209,276 $615,356 - $824,632
Interior - $21,355 $4,141,426 $2,540,593 - $6,703,375
Plumbing - - $2,691,810 $35,372 - $2,727,183
Conveyances - $337,711 - - - $337,711
Technology - $290,897 $1,862,990 - - $2,153,887
Fire & Life Safety $444,850 $274,031 $32,183 - - $751,064
Site - - $557,354 $811,547 - $1,368,901
Other $383,831 - $458,131 - $8,187,414 $9,029,376
Mechanical $972,255 $6,008,873 $2,517,319 - - $9,498,447
Exterior $20,833 $539 $36,126 $112,707 - $170,205
Structural - $35,970 - - - $35,970
Roofing - $1,609,284 - - - $1,609,284
Total $1,821,769 $8,599,187 $17,067,949 $4,155,102 $8,187,414 $39,831,421
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $10,420,955*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 140
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
013
Bowie HS
013 Bowie High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 87%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 2,606 376
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 231
2010-11 In Migration 505
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,715 267
Utilization (by enrollment) 96% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 145 7 152
Gross Area 417,702 19,968 437,670
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 2,876
Permanent Capacity 2,982
Number of Classrooms 142 25 167
Parking Spaces 678
Gross Site Area (Acres) 66.0
Site Data
School Data
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1988 107,282 19.2%
Mechanical 1 1988 5,462 49.0%
Vocational 1 1988 27,588 51.6%
Greenhouse 1 1988 913 11.4%
Greenhouse 1 1988 634 16.2%
Building B 1 1988 261,135 24.8%
Administration 1 1988 14,688 16.4%
Perm Buildings 417,702Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
31.4%
Austin, Texas 78749 1988 RC No
4103 Slaughter Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $467,936 $613,437 $21,465 - $1,102,839
Specialties - $4,947 $551,033 $11,602,340 - $12,158,320
Interior - $35,042 $2,759,482 $3,235,155 - $6,029,679
Plumbing - - $1,589,269 $160,177 - $1,749,446
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Technology - $329,391 $2,529,387 - - $2,858,778
Fire & Life Safety $607,200 $366,573 $101,563 - - $1,075,335
Site - $36,278 $13,022 - - $49,300
Other $535,544 - $1,558,342 - $884,595 $2,978,481
Mechanical - $12,273,635 $4,660,249 - - $16,933,885
Exterior - $1,999 $89,863 $101,843 - $193,705
Structural - - $52,083 $25,949 - $78,032
Roofing - $4,399 - $483 - $4,882
Total $1,142,743 $13,619,484 $14,517,730 $15,147,412 $884,595 $45,311,964
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $14,762,227*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 141
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
008
Crockett HS
008 Crockett High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 87%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,883 280
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 510
2010-11 In Migration 285
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,026 137
Utilization (by enrollment) 78% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 199 6 205
Gross Area 335,087 10,752 345,839
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,686
Permanent Capacity 2,163
Number of Classrooms 103 13 116
Parking Spaces 666
Gross Site Area (Acres) 39.5
Site Data
School Data
Theatre 1 1988 12,929 50.5%
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1969 322,158 30.3%
Perm Buildings 335,087Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
31.2%
Austin, Texas 78745 1969 AA No
5601 Manchaca Road Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $139,476 $4,326,369 $112,680 - $4,578,524
Specialties - - $250,923 $1,031,862 - $1,282,785
Interior - $105,620 $2,134,141 $90,119 - $2,329,881
Plumbing $86,955 $2,145,931 $3,057,073 $146,206 - $5,436,165
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $231,149 $1,881,006 - - $2,112,155
Fire & Life Safety $480,657 $324,155 $61,394 - - $866,207
Site $4,218 $9,966 $999,378 $199,650 - $1,213,212
Other $1,057,058 - $386,480 - $186,183 $1,629,721
Mechanical $193,260 $7,594,793 $5,595,876 - - $13,383,929
Exterior - $3,931 $460,633 - - $464,564
Structural - $5,402 - - - $5,402
Roofing - - $240,940 $1,431,074 - $1,672,014
Total $1,822,148 $10,610,065 $19,394,213 $3,011,592 $186,183 $35,024,201
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $12,432,213*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 142
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
019
Eastside Memorial High Schools (EMHSJC)
019 Eastside Memorial High Schools (EMHSJC) Grades Served 9-12 (HS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 81%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,249 299
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 955
2010-11 In Migration 125
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,354 194
Utilization (by enrollment) 58% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 299 3 302
Gross Area 267,140 2,976 270,116
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 894
Permanent Capacity 1,548
Number of Classrooms 79 2 81
Parking Spaces 228
Gross Site Area (Acres) 27.6
Site Data
School Data
Green Tech 1 1998 25,816 1.6%
Mechanical 1 1998 248
Classroom 1 1986 24,940 7.6%
Theatre 1 1986 10,851 35.4%
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1960 205,285 32.6%
Perm Buildings 267,140Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
27.0%
Austin, Te 78721 0 NR No
1012 Arthur Stiles Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $4,487,048 $332,662 $162,664 - $4,982,374
Specialties $271 - $864,657 $374,364 - $1,239,291
Interior $431 $176,082 $316,120 $31,050 - $523,683
Plumbing $2,724,650 $2,483,754 $119,797 $76,745 - $5,404,947
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Technology - $122,906 $1,313,795 - - $1,436,701
Fire & Life Safety $343,950 $148,014 $38,970 - - $530,934
Site $608 - $291,746 - - $292,354
Other $386,864 - $277,245 - $213,544 $877,654
Mechanical $54,167 $1,080,074 $37,306 - - $1,171,547
Exterior - $3,456,001 $301,327 $4,120 - $3,761,448
Structural - - - $1,946 - $1,946
Roofing - $70,262 $3,372,487 - - $3,442,749
Total $3,510,942 $12,123,425 $7,266,111 $650,888 $213,544 $23,764,910
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $15,634,366*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 143
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
015
Garza Independence HS
015 Garza Independence High School Grades Served 11-12 (HS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 378
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 000
2010-11 In Migration 251
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 378
Utilization (by enrollment) 69% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 172 36 209
Gross Area 44,754 9,480 54,234
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 260
Permanent Capacity 378
Number of Classrooms 18 8 26
Parking Spaces 36
Gross Site Area (Acres) 3.1
Site Data
School Data
Building E 1 1939 248
Building D 1 1939 48
Mechanical 1 1939 493 183.5%
Building B 1 1965 11,435 11.5%
Building A 1 1939 32,530 21.1%
Perm Buildings 44,754Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
21.5%
Austin, Texas 78702 1939 AA No
1600 Chicon Street Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $223,161 $674,892 $67,527 - $965,579
Specialties - - $31,488 $235,513 - $267,002
Interior - $229,385 $160,297 $146,780 - $536,462
Plumbing - - $253,112 $26,530 - $279,642
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $60,658 $310,505 - - $371,163
Fire & Life Safety $144,862 $66,414 $10,469 - - $221,745
Site - $33,221 $33,788 $40,134 - $107,143
Other $383,919 - $17,142 - $198,632 $599,694
Mechanical - $312,874 $46,307 - - $359,181
Exterior - - $252,129 - - $252,129
Structural - - $942 - - $942
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $528,781 $925,712 $1,791,072 $516,483 $198,632 $3,960,682
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,454,494*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 144
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
014
Johnson (LBJ) HS
014 Johnson (LBJ) High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 59%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,083 759
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 239
2010-11 In Migration 167
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,155 687
Utilization (by enrollment) 102% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 155 7 162
Gross Area 291,406 13,824 305,230
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,881
Permanent Capacity 1,842
Number of Classrooms 94 17 111
Parking Spaces 598
Gross Site Area (Acres) 41.4
Site Data
School Data
Theatre 1 2006 16,140 9.9%
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1974 275,266 14.9%
Perm Buildings 291,406Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
14.4%
Austin, Texas 78724 1974 AA No
7309 Lazy Creek Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $2,383,711 $103,648 - $2,487,359
Specialties - - $307,899 $497,563 - $805,461
Interior - $128,130 $266,097 $1,143,379 - $1,537,606
Plumbing $86,955 - $443,282 $67,050 - $597,288
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $217,495 $1,656,802 - - $1,874,297
Fire & Life Safety $396,356 $226,467 $77,941 - - $700,763
Site - $51,493 $104,860 - - $156,353
Other $599,423 - $453,755 - $96,326 $1,149,504
Mechanical - $3,256,695 $1,351,455 - - $4,608,150
Exterior - - $14,049 $110,561 - $124,610
Structural - - $122,523 - - $122,523
Roofing - $2,932 $57,987 - - $60,919
Total $1,082,734 $3,932,853 $7,240,361 $1,922,200 $96,326 $14,274,474
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $5,015,587*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 145
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
004
Lanier HS
004 Lanier High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 122%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,981 -354
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 557
2010-11 In Migration 121
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,242 -615
Utilization (by enrollment) 100% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 162 12 174
Gross Area 262,640 19,978 282,618
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,624
Permanent Capacity 1,627
Number of Classrooms 83 26 109
Parking Spaces 329
Gross Site Area (Acres) 28.5
Site Data
School Data
Storage 1 2008 120
Storage 1 2008 280
Storage 1 2008 4,000 0.0%
Storage 1 2008 300
Classroom 1 2009 8,605 6.2%
Vocational 1 1966 23,968 8.5%
Greenhouse 1 1968 600 16.8%
Greenhouse 1 1968 922 17.5%
Greenhouse 1 1966 922 17.5%
Mechanical 1 1966 4,680 82.8%
Vocational 1 1988 17,918 28.8%
Gymnasium 1 1966 49,133 19.9%
Theatre 1 1988 16,226
Building A 1 1966 134,966 28.4%
Perm Buildings 262,640Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
22.1%
Austin, Texas 78758 0 AA No
1201 Payton Gin Rd Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $224,289 $2,383,270 $155,096 - $2,762,655
Specialties - $162 $109,311 $610,386 - $719,858
Interior - $25,168 $1,408,999 $146,335 - $1,580,502
Plumbing $10,801 $649,540 $649,896 $405,324 - $1,715,561
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Technology - $138,856 $1,479,163 - - $1,618,020
Fire & Life Safety $421,914 $318,665 $84,442 $53,927 - $878,948
Site $5,002 - $40 $26,921 - $31,963
Mechanical $716,056 $925,758 $3,711,162 $241,574 - $5,594,550
Exterior - - $938,853 - - $938,853
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $2,145,237 $1,569,825 - - $3,715,062
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $5,855,895*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 146
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
004
Lanier HS
Other $175,164 - $324,594 - $176,389 $676,147
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Total $1,328,937 $4,526,958 $12,659,556 $1,639,563 $176,389 $20,331,402
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 147
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
005
McCallum HS
005 McCallum High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 82%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,316 280
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 296
2010-11 In Migration 795
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,434 162
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 133 9 142
Gross Area 242,667 16,896 259,563
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,824
Permanent Capacity 1,596
Number of Classrooms 76 22 98
Parking Spaces 301
Gross Site Area (Acres) 31.1
Site Data
School Data
Building H 1 2010 3,000 5.1%
Storage 1 1978 464
Storage 1 1993 3,732 0.0%
Mechanical 1 1953 1,139
Gymnasium 1 1987 18,939 15.3%
Theatre 1 1987 28,997 10.0%
Mechanical 1 1953 2,364 11.1%
Building A 1 1953 184,032 25.1%
Perm Buildings 242,667Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
20.4%
Austin, Texas 78756 1953 AA No
5600 Sunshine Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical $26,177 $111,580 $684,807 $76,795 - $899,360
Specialties - - $358,293 $528,359 - $886,652
Interior $6,604 $248,022 $444,731 $37,302 - $736,658
Plumbing - $42,530 $521,263 $104,347 - $668,141
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Technology - $207,162 $1,471,162 - - $1,678,325
Fire & Life Safety $382,481 $257,141 $52,833 - - $692,455
Site - - - - - $0
Other $559,210 - $348,702 - $2,583,395 $3,491,307
Mechanical - $469,522 $6,859,945 $615,536 - $7,945,003
Exterior $9,259 $5,115 - - - $14,374
Structural $149,521 - $2,577 - - $152,098
Roofing $16,328 $2,323,201 $120,293 - - $2,459,823
Total $1,149,580 $3,763,557 $10,864,608 $1,362,340 $2,583,395 $19,723,479
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,913,137*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 148
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
006
Reagan HS
006 Reagan High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 98%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,552 36
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 779
2010-11 In Migration 080
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,769 -181
Utilization (by enrollment) 57% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 277 3 280
Gross Area 249,609 3,072 252,681
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 901
Permanent Capacity 1,588
Number of Classrooms 81 1 82
Parking Spaces 447
Gross Site Area (Acres) 31.8
Site Data
School Data
Vocational 1 1987 42,262 25.2%
Classroom 1 1967 42,718 10.7%
Building G 1 1965 24,939 14.4%
Mechanical 1 1965 4,549 8.7%
Vocational 1 1965 17,949 15.9%
Band 1 1965 2,982 10.0%
Gymnasium 1 1965 47,562 16.9%
Building B 1 1965 60,797 22.2%
Administration 1 1965 5,851 19.2%
Perm Buildings 249,609Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
22.2%
Austin, Texas 78752 1965 AA No
7104 Berkman Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $290,110 $3,174,736 $202,900 - $3,667,746
Specialties - - $828,516 $503,119 - $1,331,634
Interior - $42,710 $1,052,884 $65,128 - $1,160,722
Plumbing $86,955 - $760,828 $41,511 - $889,295
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Technology - $161,834 $1,431,591 - - $1,593,425
Fire & Life Safety $363,053 $207,769 $47,598 - - $618,421
Site - - $842,388 $2,292,227 - $3,134,615
Other $679,181 - $849,386 - $348,003 $1,876,570
Mechanical $79,120 $113,444 $3,936,964 $15,617 - $4,145,144
Exterior - - $16,637 - - $16,637
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Total $1,208,310 $865,508 $12,941,528 $3,120,501 $348,003 $18,483,850
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,073,817*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 149
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
007
Travis HS
007 Travis High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 102%
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,902 -40
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 677
2010-11 In Migration 147
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,087 -225
Utilization (by enrollment) 76% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 201 7 208
Gross Area 285,098 9,696 294,794
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,420
Permanent Capacity 1,862
Number of Classrooms 95 10 105
Parking Spaces 451
Gross Site Area (Acres) 34.8
Site Data
School Data
Mechanical 1 1975 1,600 32.9%
Mechanical 1 1953 2,273 34.8%
Mechanical 1 1971 492 23.1%
Vocational 1 1975 8,049 29.2%
Gymnasium 1 1953 47,962 23.1%
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1953 224,722 32.4%
Perm Buildings 285,098Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
30.3%
Austin, Texas 78704 1953 AA No
1211 E. Oltorf Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $3,731,338 $150,106 - $3,881,444
Specialties - - $149,836 $559,681 - $709,518
Interior - $32,033 $1,355,776 $436,067 - $1,823,875
Plumbing $239,148 - $1,384,521 $86,379 - $1,710,048
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Technology - $143,401 $1,700,776 - - $1,844,176
Fire & Life Safety $412,008 $358,380 $55,450 - - $825,838
Site $8,435 $358,112 $485,606 - - $852,153
Other $270,043 - $315,501 - $870,745 $1,456,288
Mechanical $119,848 $575,471 $13,203,202 - - $13,898,521
Exterior - $34,640 $1,142,699 $35,140 - $1,212,479
Structural - $4,163 $23,558 - - $27,720
Roofing - $11,618 $772,169 $636,555 - $1,420,342
Total $1,049,482 $1,617,099 $24,320,432 $1,903,928 $870,745 $29,761,687
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,666,581*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 150
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
852
Clifton Center
852 Clifton Center Grades Served Alt. Ed. (Alt. Ed.)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 209
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration
2010-11 In Migration
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 209
Utilization (by enrollment) n/a Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student #Error n/a n/a
Gross Area 39,039 1,536 40,575
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment n/a
Permanent Capacity 209
Number of Classrooms 12 1 13
Parking Spaces 71
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.8
Site Data
School Data
Building B 1 1977 3,840 2.7%
Building A 1 1977 35,199 41.0%
Perm Buildings 39,039Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
40.8%
Austin, Texas 78752 1977 NR No
1519 Coronado Hills Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - - $868,543 $5,148 - $873,691
Specialties - - $372,757 $191,515 - $564,272
Interior - $21,355 $127,350 $116,858 - $265,563
Plumbing - - $72,791 $57,050 - $129,841
Conveyances - $248,207 - - - $248,207
Technology - $59,277 $140,628 - - $199,905
Fire & Life Safety $54,766 $50,688 $8,983 - - $114,437
Site - $79,594 $88,237 $381,866 - $549,698
Other $200,538 - $91,510 - $36,615 $328,663
Mechanical - $1,301,989 $781,277 - - $2,083,266
Exterior - $8,004 $5,265 - - $13,269
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - $20,585 - - - $20,585
Total $255,304 $1,789,699 $2,557,341 $752,437 $36,615 $5,391,397
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,045,003*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 151
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
012
Ridgeview ALC
012 Ridgeview ALC Grades Served 6-12 (Alt. Ed.)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 462
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 000
2010-11 In Migration 139
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 462
Utilization (by enrollment) 29% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 657 68 725
Gross Area 88,677 9,216 97,893
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 135
Permanent Capacity 462
Number of Classrooms 22 6 28
Parking Spaces 120
Gross Site Area (Acres) 19.8
Site Data
School Data
Building C 1 1968 3,201 49.7%
Building B 1 1970 1,167 24.2%
Building A 1 1953 84,309 36.6%
Perm Buildings 88,677Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
34.4%
Austin, Texas 78702 1953 NR Yes
901 Neal Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $156,212 $1,172,948 $3,406 - $1,332,566
Specialties - - $233,156 $99,651 - $332,807
Interior - - $318,518 $315,973 - $634,491
Plumbing - - $533,477 $9,634 - $543,111
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Technology - $74,845 $378,576 - - $453,421
Fire & Life Safety $163,727 $107,266 $16,480 - - $287,473
Site - - $57,810 $40,134 - $97,944
Other $230,098 - $90,170 - $32,018 $352,286
Mechanical $200,864 $693,247 $4,635,098 - - $5,529,209
Exterior - - $132,297 $1,000,183 - $1,132,480
Structural - $21,088 $7,827 - - $28,915
Roofing - - $183,006 - - $183,006
Total $594,690 $1,052,657 $7,759,365 $1,468,980 $32,018 $10,907,709
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,647,347*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 152
EXHIBIT "B"
School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment
M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
251
Rosedale
251 Rosedale School Grades Served Alt. Ed. (Alt. Ed.)
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 314
Excess/Deficit Seats
2010-11 Out Migration 000
2010-11 In Migration 158
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 314
Utilization (by enrollment) 52% Percent of Capacity
Area (GSF) per student 228 47 275
Gross Area 37,112 7,680 44,792
Perm Temp Total
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 163
Permanent Capacity 314
Number of Classrooms 18 5 23
Parking Spaces 43
Gross Site Area (Acres) 4.9
Site Data
School Data
Building C 1 1940 658 15.8%
Building B 1 1939 460 8.8%
Building A 1 1939 35,994 33.4%
Perm Buildings 37,112Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building Data
32.5%
Austin, Texas 78756 1939 NR No
2117 W. 49th St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Electrical - $191,593 $223,515 $27,644 - $442,752
Specialties - - $55,191 $72,979 - $128,170
Interior - - $242,847 $73,485 - $316,333
Plumbing $285,697 - $176,849 $32,233 - $494,778
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Technology - $58,809 $230,056 - - $288,865
Fire & Life Safety $79,199 $50,972 - - - $130,171
Site - - $364,134 $40,134 - $404,267
Other $120,098 - $134,431 - $68,255 $322,784
Mechanical - $58,248 $1,503,258 - - $1,561,507
Exterior $7,439 $3,845 $539,718 $5,265 - $556,266
Structural - - - - - $0
Roofing - - $20,585 - - $20,585
Total $492,433 $462,750 $3,490,585 $251,739 $68,255 $4,765,762
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.
Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Facility Master Plan Recommendations
Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $955,183*
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 153
EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
252 Baker Center3908 Avenue B, Austin Texas 78751
Current Use:
Past Use:
Campus Overview Perm Temp Total
Total Building Area (GSF) 65,868 - 65,868
Site Area (Acres) 4.8
Parking Spaces 60
Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI
Building A 1 1911 63,810 16.7%
Building B 1 1952 1,600 0.0%
Building C 1 1911 458 110.2%
Administration and Professional Development Center
Elementary School
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 154
EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
951 Burger Athletic Complex3200 Jones Road, Austin Texas 78745
Current Use:
Past Use:
Campus Overview Perm Temp Total
Total Building Area (GSF) 180,614 - 180,614
Site Area (Acres) 48.1
Parking Spaces
Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI
Building A 2 1977 70 39.7%
Building B Restroom 1 1977 5,832 9.7%
Building C Concession 1 1977 4,927 0.9%
Building D Restroom 1 1977 5,839 1.4%
Building E Ticket 1 1977 142 23.4%
Building F Restroom 1 1977 5,839 2.4%
Athletic complex
N/A
Building F Restroom 1 1977 5,839 2.4%
Building G Concession 1 1977 4,927 0.9%
Building H Restroom 1 1977 5,832 1.1%
Building I Ticket 1 1977 142 23.4%
Building J Ticket 1 1977 59 0.0%
Building K Press Box 2 1977 12,255 2.2%
Building L Ticket 1 1977 59 77.8%
Building M 1 1977 31,119 0.6%
Building N 1 1977 31,266 6.6%
Building O 3 1977 2,005 0.0%
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 155
EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
941 Carruth Admin Center1111 W. 6th Street, Austin Texas 78703
Current Use:
Past Use:
Campus Overview Perm Temp Total
Total Building Area (GSF) 133,988 - 133,988
Site Area (Acres) 2.8
Parking Spaces
Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI
Building A 4 1991 61,310 15.6%
Building B 4 1991 21,687 19.3%
Building C 1 3 11,821 21.6%
Building D 3 1991 15,948 22.1%
Building 4 1991 17 216 14 4%
Central Administration
Carruth was retail space prior to conversion to AISD administration
Building 4 1991 17,216 14.4%
Building P Parking 2 1991 6,007 32.0%
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 156
EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
922 Central Warehouse3701 Woodbury Drive, Austin Texas 78704
Current Use:
Past Use:
Campus Overview Perm Temp Total
Total Building Area (GSF) 96,303 - 96,303
Site Area (Acres) 18.7
Parking Spaces
Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI
Building A 1 1983 96,303 5.1%
AISD Warehouse
N/A
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 157
EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
949 Delco Activity Center4601 Pecan Brook Drive, Austin Texas 78724
Current Use:
Past Use:
Campus Overview Perm Temp Total
Total Building Area (GSF) 60,294 - 60,294
Site Area (Acres) 44.1
Parking Spaces
Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI
Building A 3 2003 60,294 3.4%
Athletic faciltiies and Athletic administration
N/A
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 158
EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
948 House Park1301 Shoal Creek Blvd, Austin Texas 78701
Current Use:
Past Use:
Campus Overview Perm Temp Total
Total Building Area (GSF) 32,069 - 32,069
Site Area (Acres) 11.1
Parking Spaces
Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI
Building A 1 1940 3,325 0.0%
Building B 1 1986 2,106 0.0%
Building C 1 1940 213 0.0%
Building D 1 1940 294 0.0%
Building E 1 1963 358 0.0%
Building F 1 1940 96 17.9%
Athletic complex
N/A
Building F 1 1940 96 17.9%
Building G 1 2000 64 0.0%
Building H 1 1963 240 94.4%
Building I 1 1940 215 0.0%
Building J 1 1940 248 0.0%
Building K 1 1939 12,473 1.0%
Building L 1 1936 11,331 0.8%
Building M 2 1938 573 11.2%
Building N 2 1938 573 11.2%
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 159
EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
281 Nelson Field7400 Berkman Drive, Austin Texas 78752
Current Use:
Past Use:
Campus Overview Perm Temp Total
Total Building Area (GSF) 59,005 - 59,005
Site Area (Acres) 20.1
Parking Spaces
Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI
Building A 1 1963 2,880 43.1%
Building B 1 1963 374 59.6%
Building C 1 1963 796 93.5%
Building D 1 1963 320 48.2%
Building E 1 1963 320 58.7%
Building F 1 1963 374 59.2%
Athletic complex
N/A
Building F 1 1963 374 59.2%
Building G 1 1963 796 7.5%
Building H 1 1963 320 51.8%
Building I 1 1963 320 56.7%
Building J 1 1963 800 19.9%
Building K 1 1963 64 0.0%
Building L 1 1963 80 29.8%
Building M 1 1963 64 0.0%
Building N 4 1963 21,773 0.6%
Building O 1 1963 19,455 0.0%
Building P 1 1963 10,269 2.0%
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 160
EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
959 Nelson Field Bus Terminal7400 Berkman Drive, Austin Texas 78752
Current Use:
Past Use:
Campus Overview Perm Temp Total
Total Building Area (GSF) 13,093 1,536 14,629
Site Area (Acres) 6.6
Parking Spaces
Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI
Building A 1 1995 13,093 4.9%
Portable P097 1 1969 1,536 68.3%
Bus Terminal
N/A
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 161
EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
950 Noack Sports Complex5300 Crainway Drive, Austin Texas 78724
Current Use:
Past Use:
Campus Overview Perm Temp Total
Total Building Area (GSF) 3,231 - 3,231
Site Area (Acres) 11.2
Parking Spaces
Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI
Building A 1 2004 1,242 0.4%
Building B 1 2004 1,520 4.1%
Building C 1 2004 101 0.0%
Building D 1 2004 101 0.0%
Building E 1 2004 76 0.0%
Building F 1 2004 96 0.0%
Athletic complex
N/A
Building F 1 2004 96 0.0%
Building G 1 2004 96 0.0%
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 162
EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
960 Saegert Transportation3300 Jones Road, Austin Texas 78745
Current Use:
Past Use:
Campus Overview Perm Temp Total
Total Building Area (GSF) 26,916 1,536 28,452
Site Area (Acres) 10.6
Parking Spaces
Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI
Building A 1 2004 1,242 0.0%
Building B 1 2004 1,520 0.0%
Building C 1 2004 101 0.0%
Building D 1 2004 101 0.0%
Bus Terminal
N/A
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 163
EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
962 Service Center5101 E. 51st Street, Austin Texas 78723
Current Use:
Past Use:
Campus Overview Perm Temp Total
Total Building Area (GSF) 54,307 - 54,307
Site Area (Acres) 16.7
Parking Spaces
Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI
Building A 3 1991 27,435 15.3%
Building B 1 1991 11,219 7.0%
Building C 2 2000 6,602 4.8%
Building D 1 1995 848 0.0%
Building E 1 2007 8,203 0.0%
Maintenance and Administration
N/A
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 164
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Educational Framework
The following Educational Framework was used as a planning tool to aid in decision making by the Facility Master Plan Task Force. It was not a mandate, but a set of guidelines, and was intended to be flexible in order to align resources that will provide optimal learning environments for all AISD students. The guiding principle for teaching and learning, as set by the Board of Trustees, is performance-based empowerment and earned autonomy. 1. Planning Guidelines
A. Priorities for Decision Making and Optimal Learning Environments
1) Safety and Security 2) Equitable Learning Opportunities for All
Students - Ensure that all facilities offer Alternative Learning Education programs and are in full compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
3) Quality Facility Conditions a. Physical condition and safety b. Support for academic programs c. Indoor-air quality – e.g. proper ventilation, monitoring of indoor pollutants d. Natural lighting e. Environmental condition f. Green Building concepts – e.g. energy, water and materials efficiency g. Application of current and emerging technology – e.g. wireless networks h. Site acreage
i. Campus layout and organization j. Neighborhood accessibility k. Feeder pattern impact
4) School Performance - The Board may consider a campus intervention, including closure or repurposing, for schools that have not met academic criteria established by the District, state or federal accountability systems.
5) Facility Utilization a. Facility condition b. Capacity c. Enrollment d. Economic efficiency e. Intensity of use
Page 165
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
B. Facility Utilization Alternatives
1) Portable/Temporary Classrooms – The Facility Master Plan seeks to reduce the number of portable/temporary classrooms. When additional classrooms are needed and are anticipated to be needed over time, the Facility Master Plan will include plans to replace portable/temporary buildings with permanent buildings.
2) Shared Use of Facilities – The AISD Facility Master Plan will, wherever possible, provide access to school facilities for outside programs in order to create and promote successful community-school partnerships.
C. School Closure, Consolidation and Boundaries –
The AISD Facility Master Plan Task Force will consider recommending options for adjusting boundaries and the consolidation or repurposing of schools to balance enrollment with capacity, to ensure an optimal learning environment for all students, and to realize necessary economic efficiencies. The AISD Facility Master Plan Task Force will continue to consider criteria and options for schools that are not successful in providing adequate and/or equitable learning environments. 1) Transfer Policy – When possible, reduce the
number of transfers to align with the efficient use of facilities.
2. Programmatic Considerations
A. School Size 1) The following school-size targets are
guidelines based on community input that, fiscally, may be achievable only through creative design concepts, such as multiple schools sharing the same campus. It is unlikely that every large school will reduce its enrollment to match these specifications. Therefore, it is necessary to exercise flexibility with these general guideline, which should also be applied to site-specific and/or program-specific facilities. The utilization target is 85% - 105%.
Elementary Schools 300-500 students Middle Schools 600-800 students High Schools 1,500-2,000 students
2) The following school size standards have been utilized by AISD for construction of new school facilities since the 1996 Bond Program.
Elementary Schools 720-800 students Middle Schools 1,100 students High Schools 2,200-2,400 students
B. Grade Configuration – The current AISD grade
configuration for each facility will remain. Recommendations may be developed for schools in which flexibility in configuration might better meet student and neighborhood needs.
Page 166
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
C. Student Assignment – When developing facility options, student assignment would optimally be based on the following:
Elementary Schools - Neighborhood Schools / Vertical Alignment Middle Schools - Neighborhood Schools/ Vertical Alignment and Choice (depending upon which option provides the best level of consistency for students). High Schools - Vertical Alignment and Choice
D. Transportation of Choice Students –
Transportation should not be provided to students attending schools outside of their attendance area by choice, with the exception of those opting for choice due to No Child Left Behind or for those students whose applications have been approved for enrollment in a Magnet School (Open Enrollment Signature Program).
E. Fine Arts - The AISD Facility Master Plan Task
Force will seek opportunities to support increasing and enhancing the availability and quality of Fine Arts programs.
F. Vertical Team Signature Programs – The AISD
Facility Master Plan Task Force will seek opportunities to support increasing and enhancing the availability and quality of Signature Programs, which are offered in each school and/or vertical team. These programs are interest-based, and transportation is not
provided by the District [e.g. International Baccalaureate, Global Studies, Early College High School, Early College Start, etc.].
G. Magnet Schools (Open Enrollment Signature
Programs) - The AISD Facility Master Plan Task Force will seek opportunities to support increasing and enhancing the availability and quality of Magnet Schools that offer a specialized curriculum that draws students across boundaries, requires an application, and transportation is provided [e.g., LASA, Kealing, Fulmore, Ann Richards]. The Facility Master Plan Task Force will utilize community input to assist the District in developing other categories, if needed, for programs that do not fit existing definitions and criteria.
H. Athletic Programs - The AISD Facility Master Plan
Task Force will seek opportunities to support increasing and enhancing the availability and quality of athletic programs and facilities. The plan will also address the facilities that receive more frequent and intensive use.
I. Career and Technical Programs - The AISD
Facility Master Plan Task Force will seek opportunities to support increasing and enhancing the availability and quality of Career and Technical Programs [e.g., Cosmetology, Culinary Arts, etc.].
J. Pre-Kindergarten/Early Childhood Programs –
Pre-K and early childhood services should be
Page 167
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
expanded to the greatest extent that is economically feasible to serve all children of the community.
K. Student Services – The AISD Facility Master Plan
Task Force will seek opportunities to provide space for student services based on the demographic and economic needs of the student population.
L. Administrative Spaces - Administrative buildings
and spaces will be reviewed and recommendations developed as part of the comprehensive Facility Master Plan.
Page 168
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Enrollment Projections
Historical Enrollment The Austin Independent School District has experienced a significant increase in enrollment, over 7,500 students, during the past nine years. Since 2002-03, student enrollment has increased by an average of approximately 835 students, or 11% each year. The current school year, 2010-11, had a notable increase of an additional 933 students. Specifically, enrollment increased by 610 elementary, 246 middle, and 54 high school students.
The graph below illustrates the progression of enrollment changes by year.
Historical Enrollment – By Grade Level The Austin Independent School District experienced growth from 2002-03 to 2010-11 in all grade levels. Enrollment in grades Pre-K - 5 increased by a total of 7,233 students. Enrollment in grades 6 - 8 increased by a total of 88 students. Enrollment in grades 9-12 increased by a total of 199 students. The graph below and the chart on the following page indicate enrollment by grade over the past nine years.
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
AISD Historic Enrollment by Grade Level
2002-03 to 2010-11
PK-5
6-8
"9-12"
Source: AISD Office of Facilities
010,00020,00030,00040,00050,00060,00070,00080,00090,000
100,000
AISD Historic Enrollment 2002-03 to 2010-2011
Source: AISD Office of Facilities
Page 169
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Historical Enrollment – By Grade Level The following chart depicts the progression of increasing enrollment throughout the previous nine years.
Grade 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
EC & PreK 4,421 4,704 5,125 4,943 4,933 5,053 5,044 5,406 5,564
Kindergarten 6,431 6,728 6,849 7,462 7,309 7,391 7,589 7,668 7,660
1 6,405 6,512 6,898 7,055 7,493 7,297 7,498 7,543 7,644
2 6,115 6,235 6,373 6,669 6,898 7,107 7,027 7,354 7,225
3 6,104 6,013 6,174 6,278 6,571 6,617 6,856 6,796 7,102
4 5,866 5,912 5,897 6,073 6,136 6,254 6,477 6,595 6,679
5 5,592 5,754 5,676 5,823 5,870 5,847 6,028 6,195 6,293
Subtotal PK-5 40,934 41,858 42,992 44,303 45,210 45,566 46,519 47,557 48,167
6 5,582 5,390 5,517 5,379 5,511 5,506 5,519 5,568 5,740
7 5,655 5,517 5,278 5,443 5,344 5,300 5,421 5,425 5,513
8 5,252 5,507 5,423 5,258 5,337 5,278 5,229 5,338 5,324
Subtotal 6-8 16,489 16,414 16,218 16,080 16,192 16,084 16,169 16,331 16,577
9 6,764 6,371 6,512 6,332 6,313 6,371 6,366 6,252 6,127
10 5,093 5,321 4,962 5,337 5,183 5,043 5,084 5,148 5,212
11 4,427 4,389 4,694 4,423 4,576 4,588 4,569 4,644 4,724
12 4,179 4,048 4,126 4,368 4,118 4,590 4,511 4,564 4,599
Subtotal 9-12 20,463 20,129 20,294 20,460 20,190 20,592 20,530 20,608 20,662
Separate Campuses 318 239 271 339 350 329 337 311 332
Special Campuses 207 119 121 113 121 168 175 189 191
Subtotal Sep & Spec 525 358 392 452 471 497 512 500 523
Total 78,411 78,759 79,896 81,295 82,063 82,739 83,730 84,996 85,929Source: AISD Office of Facilities
Historical Enrollment
2002-03 to 2010-2011
Austin Independent School District
Page 170
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Allan E S 464 494 492 470 441 436 426 446 398 389 392 379Allison E S 480 485 480 452 467 486 484 509 500 520 520 543Andrews E S 654 652 601 609 581 586 586 615 611 630 573 717Baldwin E S 508Baranoff E S 647 698 777 759 812 782 822 771 788 849 856 876Barrington E S 660 670 655 703 693 778 746 752 821 866 929 996Barton Hills E S 402 362 330 319 343 339 354 360 360 374 375 386Becker E S 307 281 250 257 253 256 265 232 215 214 194 208Blackshear E S 449 417 378 317 357 309 326 277 272 264 239 244Blanton E S 824 701 635 668 622 619 608 563 564 547 555 591Blazier E S - - - - - - - - 445 596 720 775Boone E S 728 673 627 587 559 561 575 553 538 568 502 501Brentwood E S 503 468 436 414 405 389 367 413 433 447 476 495Brooke E S 412 374 360 291 281 337 372 352 344 410 423 439Brown E S 606 651 534 589 548 550 508 517 508 519 506 519Bryker Woods E S 394 422 403 369 371 376 397 427 395 401 398 404Campbell E S 655 646 638 550 498 428 414 400 350 378 396 360Casey E S 565 641 768 858 959 937 955 914 754 665 663 669Casis E S 725 667 626 647 681 677 700 743 780 831 818 825Clayton E S - - - - - - - 599 811 996 974 867Cook E S 1,022 719 713 791 823 903 953 811 845 892 906 901Cowan E S - 393 457 458 500 512 529 557 649 707 741 783Cunningham E S 638 581 613 634 611 581 609 544 538 536 550 512Davis E S 638 618 588 587 644 631 673 671 619 623 694 683Dawson E S 464 447 469 415 420 381 362 371 362 335 335 331Doss E S 666 667 652 659 669 623 627 645 659 677 719 768Galindo E S 749 759 730 715 771 771 790 740 744 727 717 704Govalle E S 630 562 459 480 438 440 416 391 383 419 394 415Graham E S 619 586 573 666 633 713 676 698 678 633 658 761Gullett E S 455 440 423 432 466 457 460 447 464 481 537 541Harris E S 970 931 647 587 589 612 684 716 689 694 740 758Hart E S 652 641 599 613 662 749 923 891 803 835 849 898Highland Park E S 559 536 529 506 501 493 518 530 557 601 632 662Hill E S 772 683 703 701 737 737 740 730 665 701 689 732Houston E S 915 814 839 850 863 872 897 942 923 936 949 917Jordan E S 725 763 800 696 629 624 622 690 619 743 814 833Joslin E S 401 383 394 413 400 377 346 355 350 332 326 363Kiker E S 1,058 771 720 753 836 881 993 711 697 717 904 933
Austin Independent School District Historic Enrollment 1999/ 2000 - 2010/ 2011
Historical Enrollment by School
Elementary Schools
Page 171
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Kocurek E S 741 650 623 579 588 606 682 682 654 678 644 660Langford E S 819 855 824 850 828 901 999 835 859 844 841 834Lee E S 371 367 395 359 375 374 383 411 401 406 440 428Linder E S 621 663 724 853 862 1,000 819 874 931 879 842 892Maplewood E S 370 316 331 313 324 342 348 332 346 373 428 406Mathews E S 372 326 345 391 386 409 393 432 418 417 392 405McBee E S - 558 601 638 707 777 822 650 704 758 785 765Menchaca E S 426 543 598 638 664 715 809 898 678 626 698 686Metz E S 662 632 658 602 518 542 661 668 592 553 492 498Mills E S 697 761 815 819 860 912 953 893 974 1,061 1,100 928Norman E S 512 547 504 553 571 598 578 586 397 372 326 333Oak Hill E S 812 781 762 763 814 837 837 896 926 950 1,008 772Oak Springs E S 409 412 383 363 342 289 283 284 317 313 311 274Odom E S 751 741 782 768 746 763 776 785 761 711 688 658Ortega E S 365 357 360 300 290 277 283 280 253 254 286 296Overton E S - - - - - - - - 543 647 715 668Palm E S 628 652 622 693 830 886 991 725 644 662 650 606Patton E S 832 823 833 812 829 804 785 777 745 726 763 914Pease E S 238 248 257 236 238 251 252 247 254 254 252 256Pecan Springs E S 560 592 585 602 569 584 556 545 554 497 516 532Perez E S - - - - - - - 655 742 705 805 886Pickle E S - - 613 594 593 581 638 660 685 710 729 740Pillow E S 481 440 412 405 460 473 524 529 552 563 652 653Pleasant Hill E S 561 525 504 515 532 585 624 655 587 623 632 619Read E C E S - - - - - - - 364 559 549 477 509Reilly E S 309 283 273 245 279 231 254 285 268 258 303 296Ridgetop E S 259 257 239 208 248 230 238 199 211 201 191 219Rodriguez E S 691 723 684 750 725 780 872 901 946 973 955 910St E lmo E S 431 422 439 490 494 484 437 449 421 360 353 585Sanchez E S 503 485 420 390 448 450 659 658 551 610 611 277Sims E S 299 303 332 322 365 388 408 416 417 415 319 304Summitt E S 631 622 596 639 585 629 601 576 559 701 750 854Sunset Valley E S 584 592 564 516 506 505 481 437 435 448 463 451Travis Heights E S 568 501 502 527 457 518 562 573 587 564 525 537Walnut Creek E S 969 994 877 942 983 1,052 1,078 971 955 763 900 916Widen E S 733 804 756 791 765 820 782 796 846 825 794 769Williams E S 709 651 637 606 645 624 616 620 627 694 664 642Winn E S 586 604 629 665 635 621 671 672 514 432 441 463Wooldridge E S 1,062 748 754 718 773 821 806 946 833 841 888 878Wooten E S 632 640 613 593 588 578 603 638 633 682 688 695Zavala E S 419 468 433 432 434 443 462 492 459 439 393 407Zilker E S 421 433 440 496 511 541 480 451 478 495 524 522
E lementary Total 42,442 41,915 41,617 41,791 42,430 43,424 44,729 45,626 45,947 46,885 47,897 48740
Austin Independent School District Historic Enrollment 1999/ 2000 - 2010/ 2011
Elementary Schools cont.
Page 172
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Middle Schools
SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Bailey MS 1,529 1,217 1,173 1,144 1,099 1,074 1,134 1,175 1,147 1,206 959 1,041Bedichek MS 1,136 1,004 998 889 904 908 912 1,039 1,150 1,119 1,018 1,054Burnet MS 1,126 1,065 1,063 1,008 1,084 1,045 970 1,005 988 912 969 998Covington MS 752 855 939 945 911 889 862 910 1,014 954 950 805Dobie MS 874 913 921 763 746 739 808 849 517 566 603 630Fulmore MS 764 749 872 957 992 1,054 1,037 1,029 1,045 1,036 1,007 995Garcia MS - - - - - - - - 605 649 689 658Gorzycki MS - - - - - - - - - - 835 963Kealing MS 958 1,058 978 948 1,029 1,277 1,190 1,251 1,215 1,279 1,242 1,233Lamar MS 915 855 798 779 791 701 675 671 741 780 668 604Martin MS 495 622 632 648 736 738 676 702 760 744 691 639Mendez MS 1,313 874 857 828 840 776 840 1,108 1,029 903 871 890Murchison MS 1,236 1,232 1,240 1,213 1,210 1,227 1,257 1,216 1,156 1,156 1,254 1,281O. Henry MS 681 743 866 887 885 801 747 789 881 982 1,005 1,026Paredes MS - 959 1,060 1,208 1,227 1,292 1,330 1,067 989 957 899 930Pearce MS 958 849 859 852 847 801 810 809 580 516 452 329Richards ( 6-8) MS - - - - - - - - 224 334 362 378Small MS 929 1,054 1,080 1,108 1,129 1,088 1,114 1,140 1,167 1,188 944 959Webb MS 805 777 779 789 767 748 663 658 495 522 573 591
Middle School Total 14,471 14,826 15,115 14,966 15,197 15,158 15,025 15,418 15,703 15,803 15,991 16,004
Austin Independent School District Historic Enrollment 1999/ 2000 - 2010/ 2011
Page 173
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
High Schools
SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11Akins HS - 1,076 1,544 2,053 2,219 2,257 2,389 2,359 2,507 2,663 2,710 2,720Anderson HS 1,804 1,742 1,763 1,959 1,959 1,997 2,121 2,013 2,093 2,096 2,000 2,089Austin HS 2,167 2,014 2,136 2,149 2,158 2,245 2,207 2,124 2,240 2,343 2,390 2,337Bowie HS 3,045 2,608 2,435 2,370 2,485 2,613 2,699 2,821 2,778 2,768 2,828 2,876Crockett HS 2,529 2,414 2,174 2,099 1,999 1,962 2,038 1,992 1,907 1,857 1,763 1,686E astside HS 1,826 1,479 1,359 1,008 975 1,068 775 760 691 556 679 718Garza HS 318 339 384 347 307 266 280 308 315 301 258 260International HS - - - - - - 258 264 185 202 230 176LASA HS - - - - - - - - 858 860 874 881LBJ HS 1,619 1,654 1,812 1,811 1,717 1,671 1,676 1,703 1,001 1,046 1,018 1,000Lanier HS 1,855 1,762 1,666 1,915 1,794 1,793 1,674 1,619 1,693 1,608 1,594 1,624McCallum HS 1,666 1,652 1,676 1,705 1,709 1,686 1,724 1,706 1,717 1,733 1,793 1,824Reagan HS 1,405 1,394 1,276 1,304 1,169 1,064 1,029 989 973 988 958 901Richards 9th and 10th - - - - - - - - - - 79 150Travis HS 1,709 1,691 1,665 1,718 1,638 1,672 1,590 1,532 1,634 1,509 1,434 1,420
High School Total 19,943 19,825 19,890 20,438 20,129 20,294 20,460 20,190 20,592 20,530 20,608 20,662
Separate Campuses 102 44 311 318 239 271 339 350 329 337 311 332
Special Campuses 159 145 155 207 119 121 113 121 168 175 189 191
District Total 77,117 76,755 77,088 77,720 78,114 79,268 80,666 81,705 82,739 83,730 84,996 85,929
Austin Independent School District Historic Enrollment 1999/ 2000 - 2010/ 2011
Page 174
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Birth Data
Historical birth data for the 31 zip codes comprising the District was collected. The total number of live births for this area has steadily increased from 1994 to 2008. In 1994, there were 9,175 births compared to 12,733 in 2008. A slight decline of 45 births followed in 2009. The increase in births points to continued growth at the elementary school level. Live birth data is commonly used to predict future kindergarten enrollment.
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Live Births by Yearin Zip Codes within AISD Boundaries
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services & the Dennis D. Harner and Associates Demographic Analysis & E nrollment Projections, 2010
Year Births1994 9,1751995 9,4171996 9,6501997 9,8221998 10,3291999 10,8292000 11,4262001 11,3462002 11,1602003 11,2702004 11,4922005 11,3832006 12,5392007 12,7442008 12,7332009 12,688
Austin Independent School Distr ict
Live Births1994-2009
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services & the Dennis D. Harner and Associates Demographic Analysis & E nrollment Projections, 2010
Page 175
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Projected Enrollment In 2010, AISD commissioned Dennis D. Harner and Associates to develop enrollment projections. According to this report, the total projected enrollment for AISD is expected to increase by 12,356 students, or 14.4%, from the 2010-11 school year to the 2020-21 school year. The enrollment forecasts were calculated using a “cohort survival” method. Each grade (cohort) is advanced from one year to the next based upon historical trends. Live birth data is also collected and used to compare the relationship between kindergarten and enrollment five years later. A cohort (grade) is advanced from one grade to the next based upon historical trends. The number of live births, and subsequently, the number of children, enrolled in kindergarten, has steadily increased since 2002.
Projected Enrollment – By Grade Level Projected enrollment for the 2011-12 through 2020-21 school years shows a steady increase in enrollment in all grade levels. At the elementary level, which reflects Pre-K through Grade 5, the projected enrollment shows an increase of 5,225 students from the 2010-11 school year to the 2020-21 school year. Similarly, the middle school enrollment, which reflects Grades 6 through 8, shows an increase of 3,334 students. The high school level, reflecting Grades 9 through 12, shows an increase of 4,166 students during this same timeframe. The table below shows projected enrollment by year and grade level.
Source: Dennis D. Harner & Associates Demographic Analysis and E nrollment Projections, 2010
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
Mid-Range Total Projected Enrollment
2011-12 to 2020-2021
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
AISD Projected Enrollment by Grade Level
2011-12 to 2020-21
PK-5
6-8
9-12
Page 176
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Projected Enrollment – By Grade Level The following chart depicts the progression of increasing enrollment throughout the next ten years.
Grade 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
E C & PreK 5,368 5,419 5,471 5,524 5,575 5,628 5,679 5,731 5,782 5,834
Kindergarten 7,773 7,848 7,923 7,998 8,073 8,148 8,223 8,298 8,373 8,448
1 7,757 7,832 7,907 7,982 8,057 8,132 8,207 8,282 8,357 8,432
2 7,426 7,532 7,607 7,682 7,757 7,832 7,907 7,982 8,057 8,132
3 6,988 7,176 7,282 7,357 7,432 7,507 7,582 7,657 7,732 7,807
4 6,926 6,788 6,976 7,082 7,157 7,232 7,307 7,382 7,457 7,532
5 6,423 6,676 6,538 6,726 6,832 6,907 6,982 7,057 7,132 7,207
Subtotal PK-5 48,661 49,271 49,704 50,351 50,883 51,386 51,887 52,389 52,890 53,392
6 5,952 6,073 6,326 6,188 6,376 6,482 6,557 6,632 6,707 6,782
7 5,677 5,877 5,998 6,251 6,113 6,301 6,407 6,482 6,557 6,632
8 5,471 5,617 5,817 5,938 6,191 6,053 6,241 6,347 6,422 6,497
Subtotal 6-8 17,100 17,567 18,141 18,377 18,680 18,836 19,205 19,461 19,686 19,911
9 6,497 6,621 6,767 6,967 7,088 7,341 7,203 7,391 7,497 7,572
10 4,882 5,197 5,321 5,467 5,667 5,788 6,041 5,903 6,091 6,197
11 4,623 4,382 4,697 4,821 4,967 5,167 5,288 5,541 5,403 5,591
12 4,761 4,648 4,407 4,722 4,846 4,992 5,192 5,313 5,566 5,428
Subtotal 9-12 20,763 20,848 21,192 21,977 22,568 23,288 23,724 24,148 24,557 24,788
Total 86,524 87,686 89,037 90,705 92,131 93,510 94,816 95,998 97,133 98,091
Source: Dennis D. Harner & Associates Demographic Analysis and E nrollment Projections, 2010
Austin Independent School District
Mid-Range Projected E nrollment 2010-11 to 2019-20
Page 177
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Year Constructed Pre 1925 1925 - 1944 1945 - 1964 1965 - 1984 1985 - 1994 1995 - 2004 2005 - 2010Total Square Feet 209,259 547,147 3,083,806 3,481,972 2,363,533 1,616,514 1,026,591
Building Count 5 33 90 77 65 59 33
Capacity Analysis
How many students can a building accommodate? This question often arises, and in the development of a facility master plan, can be one of the most debated issues. It is not uncommon to review an evaluation of an existing building only to find that the capacity which was once assigned to the building is considerably more than what the building can reasonably accommodate today. The main reason for this is that the programs in a public school system and the manner in which they are delivered have changed significantly since the building was originally built. More than half the square footage in AISD was built before 1985. Twenty-five years ago, computer labs were just beginning to be incorporated into schools, and severely handicapped students, previously assigned to specialized facilities, were not yet mainstreamed into public schools. In addition, state legislation has mandated smaller student/teacher ratios. In facility planning, the term design capacity is used to describe simply counting the number of classrooms in a building and multiplying by an average class size. Even though at first glance this seems only to be common sense, this methodology does not take into account the programmatic implications of school facilities.
In AISD, functional capacity is reviewed on an annual basis. Functional capacity is a more realistic analysis of what a building can accommodate and takes into account all special programs available at the school that year, in addition to any portable buildings located on site, to determine how many students can be assigned to a particular school campus each school year. For master planning purposes, an updated methodology to the former AISD permanent capacity methodology was developed and applied. The formula for long-range planning should reflect District programs, but should be kept simple and equitable since programs change from year to year while classroom square footages remain, for the most part, the same. Permanent capacity does not incorporate temporary or portable classrooms, but only permanent space. Elementary School Permanent Capacity The elementary program is usually delivered based on students being assigned to a home room and attending special programs such as art, music, and physical education in a specialized classroom. The number of special classrooms required is reflective of the total number of students enrolled and is subtracted from the total number of classrooms since the vacated home room cannot be utilized by other students.
Age of AISD Permanent Buildings
Page 178
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
A 95% efficiency factor is applied since students do not always arrive in perfect sets of 22 students. Additionally, due to reduced class size and increased support space needs for Title 1 schools, an 85% efficiency factor is applied to compute permanent capacity at these facilities. The following describes the permanent capacity methodology for elementary schools. Count permanent classrooms. Subtract special areas for music, art, etc. (3-7
classrooms based on staffing ratios). Multiply by 22 (average class size). Apply 95% efficiency factor; 85% efficiency factor
for Title 1 schools.
Secondary School Permanent Capacity Unlike elementary schools, at the secondary level students are not in self-contained environments but are traveling from one location to another each period. All classrooms are counted including the specialized spaces. Since it is difficult to schedule every teaching space every period of the day, in addition to the
movement to block scheduling, an efficiency factor of 75% is applied.
The following describes the permanent capacity methodology for secondary schools. Count permanent classrooms. Multiply by 28 (average class size). Apply 75% efficiency factor; 70% efficiency factor
for Title 1 schools.
Core Capacity Core capacity is defined as those spaces that large groups of students utilize at some point during the school day, including the cafeteria, gymnasium, and library. As part of the new methodology, consideration was given to lower permanent capacity if the cafeteria or gymnasium was less than 85% of permanent capacity, based on the number of classrooms. The chart below shows the AISD standard for core space sizes based on the current approved educational standards.
Grade Level
School Size
(# of students)
Total
Square Feet SF/Student
Total
Square Feet SF/Student
Total
Square Feet SF/Student
Elementary 880 4,200 4.77 3,000 3.41 3,500 3.98
Middle 1,100 4,500 4.10 13,400 12.18 4,800 4.36
High 2,400 9,000 3.75 20,720 8.63 8,400 3.50
Source: AISD, Office of Facilities
Cafeteria Gym LibraryCore Space Standards
Page 179
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Utilization Utilization, or efficiency, of a school facility, is calculated by dividing the enrollment of the school by its permanent capacity. The target range as determined by the Facility Master Plan Task Force for the purposes of long-range planning is 85%-105%. Schools below 85% may be able to provide relief for overcrowded schools or may be considered as potential candidates for closure or consolidation. Schools above 105% should be monitored for additional growth, and schools that exceed 125% are considered for additions or for relief through the construction of new schools. The chart below indicates that district-wide, AISD is within the 85%-105% target range; however, by grade level, the elementary schools are above the target and the middle schools are below. In other words, the District is short 3,833 seats at the elementary level, but has 4,263 too many at the middle school level. On an individual basis, there are 29 schools, or 25% of all school campuses, that fall below 85% of permanent capacity. Fifty-three schools, or 46% of all school campuses, operate at above 105%. The map to the right and the ones on the following pages illustrate the 2010-11 school year enrollment utilization.
Grade Level
2010
Enrollment
Permanent
Capacity
Utilization
Rate
Elementary 48,738 44,905 109%
Middle 16,154 20,417 79%
High 20,512 21,698 95%
Districtwide 85,404 87,020 98%
Source: AISD, Office of Facilities
Page 180
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 181
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Enrollment versus Population
The population (number of students that live within an attendance zone) is not always equal to the enrollment (number of students that attend) of a school. No Child Left Behind, transfer policies, and open enrollment signature programs are some of the reasons students migrate in and out of their assigned attendance zones. In a few cases in AISD, students migrating into a school comprise more than 40% of its enrollment. When large numbers of students travel outside of the boundary of their assigned school, to attend a different school, it presents a challenge when planning for long-term facility needs. Because the number of students migrating in and out of an attendance zone may vary year to year, it is important to also look at the attendance zone population. Population projections, which are derived from birth data, census data, and housing stock analysis are used in long-range planning efforts to identify trends in growth and decline. Population projections are more reliable than anticipating the rates of in and out migration. The following maps provide the 2010-11 population as a percent of permanent capacity by school. This provides a different picture than the enrollment utilization maps on the preceding pages. For example, a school that falls below the target utilization of 85% based on enrollment may in fact be above 85% based on population.
Page 182
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 183
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
= Facility Condition Index (FCI)
Facility Condition Analysis Facility condition is the state of repair of the building infrastructure. Facility condition takes into consideration all of the building systems from roofs and windows to electrical and mechanical systems. Although there is a cost associated with renovating every building according to current codes and standards, this does not mean that all schools need massive and immediate repairs and renovations. Rather, this provides an understanding of the effort it would take to bring all facilities up to the same standard. The facility condition information does provide the following. Comparative analysis of building conditions Approximate cost to address the facility conditions
of all buildings in the District Understanding of which buildings are in the worse
conditions and that might be slated for more immediate focus
Since 1991, the facility management industry has used an index called the Facility Condition Index (FCI) to benchmark the relative condition of a group of schools. This index simply divides the identified repair costs in a facility by the total cost to replace the facility. For example, take a 100,000 square foot building that might theoretically cost $10 million to construct new and now has $1 million in identified repairs. Dividing $1 million by $10 million results in an FCI of 10 percent. Industry standards and financial modeling dictate that FCI numbers above 65% or greater are more cost-effective to replace than to repair. This is due to efficiency gains with more modern facilities and the value of the building at the end of the analysis period.
Of course, FCI is not the only factor used to identify buildings that need renovation, replacement or even closure. Historical significance, enrollment trends, community sentiment, and the availability of capital are additional factors that are analyzed when making school facility decisions. The chart below indicates the distribution of campuses by ranges of FCI in AISD. Please note that the support facilities are included. Only one facility, Pease ES, falls into the replace category; however, two schools, Zilker ES and Wooten ES are between 50-59% and should be considered for major renovation or replacement.
Cost of Repairs
Cost of Replacement
FCI Campuses
<10% 18
10-19% 35
20-29% 30
30-39% 31
40-49% 9
50-59% 2
60-69% -
70-79% 1
80-89% -
90-100% -
>100% -
Total 126
Repair
Renovate
Replace
Page 184
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Replacement Costs Cost/Sq.ft. Replacement Cost
PreK Centers 297.47$ 4,783,318$
Elementary School 297.47$ 24,541,275$
Middle School 327.40$ 55,658,000$
High School 323.11$ 106,626,300$
Alt. Ed. School 327.40$ 6,548,000$
Admin 280.61$ 5,612,200$
Support 280.61$ 5,612,200$
Maintenance - Transportation 280.61$ 5,612,200$
Portable Building 138.93$ 213,396$
FCI: The Denominator The denominator is the bottom part of the equation and possibly the easiest with which to start. The denominator is the theoretical cost to replace the facility. It is important to recognize that this cost is based on the replacement of a building with another facility that is the same size and is fully code compliant. If, for example, you are comparing the FCI on a 3,450 square foot gymnasium building at a campus, the replacement cost is the theoretical cost to replace that same 3,450 square foot building. Since the replacement cost comparison is primarily driven by the type of facility (elementary school, middle school, high school, administration, etc.), a set of cost models have been developed that estimate the cost per square foot for new construction and are indicated in the chart to the right. The cost models take into account national industry averages from a recognized industry data source called RSMeans®, adjusted to Austin, Texas, as well as the District’s recent experience in the Austin construction market. The costs per square foot are then multiplied by the size of the school or building under consideration. This methodology is used for both permanent and portable buildings. FCI: The Numerator The numerator is the estimated cost to complete the repairs on the building in its current condition. This repair cost is generally considered to be like-for-like repairs. Within reason, the deficient conditions would be repaired or systems replaced to put the building into fully serviceable condition to meet current codes. At AISD, the District retained a firm in 2007 to assess all of the facilities in the district and develop cost estimates to make needed repairs. That effort included an assessment of all facilities using architectural and
engineering assessors to identify deficient conditions in the buildings. This survey focused, for the most part, on the condition of the existing buildings and did not initially include educational adequacy or functional equity needs. All of the identified needs were grouped into building systems, and a Uniformat® cost structure supported by RSMeans® nationally-based cost data adjusted to the Austin, Texas area, was employed to develop consistent cost estimates across all schools. These cost estimates, using the industry-standard, line- item costs, comprise the majority of the costs in the AISD facility assessment database and are included in the numerator of the FCI calculation. In addition, ADA (American with Disabilities Act)/TAS (Texas Accessibility Standards) reports were developed to address ADA issues against current guidelines during 2008-09. A functional equity study identified core areas and specialized classroom areas, within specific school campuses that did not meet AISD educational specifications. The cost to resolve these issues has been included in the deficiencies and numerator of the current FCI numbers.
Page 185
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Educational Adequacy Total
Capacity 1,476,141$
Support for Programs 8,738,417$
Technology 74,371,610$
Security and Supervision 34,273,456$
Instructional Aids 53,308,580$
Learning Environment 3,862,200$
Physical Characteristics 4,715,934$
Relationship of Spaces 4,078,391$
Subtotal 184,824,729$
Educational Adequacy Assessment As part of this master planning effort, AISD conducted an educational adequacy assessment of all schools. An educational adequacy assessment evaluates how well the campus is equipped to deliver the instructional program. During the summer of 2010, a team of assessors went to each school and collected an inventory of each space at the classroom level. This data was then compared to the District developed standards to identify when an individual space did not meet a specific level of compliance. When an item did not meet the standard, the condition was noted and a line item was added to the assessment database with a budget to correct that condition.
This applied a standards-based approach to determine the overall educational adequacy by evaluating eight overall criteria as follows.
Capacity: Ability of the facility to meet the needs of the student population.
Support for Programs: Provision of special spaces or classrooms to support the instructional program.
Technology: Presence of infrastructure, data distribution, and equipment.
Supervision & Security: Extent to which physical configurations help or hinder building operation.
Instructional Aids: Presence of necessary equipment within teaching spaces.
Physical Characteristics: Sizes and shapes of teaching spaces.
Learning Environment: Degree to which learning areas are comfortable, well-lit, odor-free, controllable and quiet.
•
Relationship of Spaces: Proximity of instructional spaces to support areas such as libraries, labs, and lecture halls.
The chart below identifies the educational adequacy deficiency costs by the eight overall criteria. Technology, instructional aids, and security and supervision make up the greatest need in terms of educational adequacy.
Page 186
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Building Deficiencies The combination of the building condition and the educational adequacy items currently represents over 41,000 line items district-wide. Deficiencies are categorized by the following priorities. Priority 1: currently critical (immediate need, i.e., fire safety systems) Priority 2: potentially critical (to be corrected within one year, i.e., major HVAC equipment, security systems) Priority 3: necessary/not yet critical (1-2 years, i.e., site lighting, sanitation sewer, educational adequacy) Priority 4: recommended (3-5 years, i.e., finishes, educational adequacy) Priority 5: does not meet current code/standards/grandfathered (i.e., functional equity, 3rd tier ADA/TAS) The chart below lists the facility type and the costs associated with correcting priorities 1 through 5. Logically, the greatest need is at the elementary schools since this makes up the largest number of schools and the most square footage in the District.
Renovation Costs by Priority, by Campus
Type Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Total
Schools
PreK Centers 191,332$ 843,430$ 1,221,125$ 154,414$ 9,470$ 2,419,771$
Elementary Schools 36,765,169$ 101,426,669$ 259,226,302$ 30,846,706$ 78,109,545$ 506,374,392$
Middle Schools 19,163,034$ 56,423,338$ 88,591,082$ 17,785,740$ 42,995,421$ 224,958,615$
High Schools 16,483,563$ 69,061,730$ 141,365,127$ 36,842,162$ 22,301,333$ 286,053,916$
Alternative Education 1,342,426$ 3,305,106$ 13,807,291$ 2,473,156$ 136,888$ 21,064,868$
Total Schools 73,945,525$ 231,060,273$ 504,210,927$ 88,102,178$ 143,552,658$ 1,040,871,561$
Other District Facilities
Support Facilities 2,135,310$ 7,374,941$ 6,094,116$ 45,901$ 291,467$ 15,941,735$
Administrative 732,481$ 2,760,465$ 9,054,486$ 363,873$ 202,910$ 13,114,216$
Maintenance and Transp. 637,830$ 880,329$ 3,343,222$ 277,590$ 199,746$ 5,338,716$
Total Other District Facil 3,505,621$ 11,015,735$ 18,491,824$ 687,363$ 694,123$ 34,394,666$
Grand Total 77,451,146$ 242,076,008$ 522,702,751$ 88,789,541$ 144,246,781$ 1,075,266,227$
Page 187
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
The chart below provides a crosstab by building system. The greatest building system deficiency, as is typically the case, is in the area of Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC). Please note that the “Other” building system category includes functional equity and ADA/TAS compliance.
A summary of building system by priority by individual school campus is available in the Facility Summary Reports with Facility Master Plan Recommendations section of this report, pages 38-164.
Districtwide Crosstab by Priority by System
Building System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site 498,041$ 3,002,131$ 20,459,959$ 15,715,200$ -$ 39,675,332$
Roofing 1,016,327$ 20,921,438$ 22,268,609$ 4,912,452$ -$ 49,118,826$
Exterior 195,604$ 5,079,548$ 20,391,721$ 3,620,156$ -$ 29,287,028$
Structure 191,655$ 392,439$ 997,978$ 63,077$ -$ 1,645,149$
Interior 126,632$ 6,550,035$ 44,089,416$ 20,438,059$ -$ 71,204,142$
HVAC 12,732,977$ 147,968,144$ 149,987,307$ 1,725,368$ -$ 312,413,796$
Plumbing 16,072,172$ 7,908,635$ 66,458,213$ 3,840,468$ 1,568$ 94,281,056$
Electrical 575,073$ 23,329,696$ 68,672,377$ 5,273,377$ -$ 97,850,523$
Technology -$ 9,936,855$ 77,335,604$ -$ -$ 87,272,458$
Fire and Safety 19,377,531$ 11,607,150$ 1,133,648$ 567,724$ -$ 32,686,053$
Conveyances 223,695$ 5,132,182$ 8,858$ -$ -$ 5,364,736$
Specialties 37,115$ 247,755$ 19,236,791$ 32,633,662$ -$ 52,155,323$
Other 26,404,324$ -$ 31,662,269$ -$ 144,245,213$ 202,311,806$
Total 77,451,146$ 242,076,008$ 522,702,751$ 88,789,541$ 144,246,781$ 1,075,266,227$
Facility Condition Assessment Priority
Page 188
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011
Facility Options Using the Educational Framework as guiding principles, the Facility Master Plan Task Force began the complicated task of developing facility options and scenarios in order to meet their charge of developing recommendations to improve facility efficiencies through objective data analysis and community input. The information and data considered included the following. Current condition of buildings (FCI) Educational adequacy of schools Current and proposed instructional programs Current and projected population growth and
decline Lease obligations, current and possible use of
buildings, and administrative facilities The following criteria were used for decision making. Educational enhancement – meet the
educational needs of all students Efficient space utilization – optimum utilization
range was between 85%-105% of permanent capacity
Cost savings – decrease M&O expenses or capital cost avoidance of correcting building deficiencies and building operating costs per student
Community Impact – impact of change versus the gains
Future growth – account for future population
growth/decreases Facility condition – facility condition index rating
Over the course of seven months, 108 options that were developed by the Task Force, consultants, and staff, were reviewed and evaluated by the Task Force. An outline of the 108 options is provided in Appendix G of this report.
Page 189
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
District-Wide Facility Master Plan
Appendix A FCI White Paper and Facility FCI Charts
Page 190
EXHIBIT "B"
White Paper:
Facility Condition Index (FCI) at Austin ISD
The assessment of school facilities and the development of long-range master plans, is Magellan
Consulting’s core business. District-wide master plans, by their very nature, recommend changes across
a district. In nearly every district in which we work, there are building condition and student capacity
challenges. Often, there exists enough capacity across the district when compared to total student
enrollment; however, that capacity is rarely in the right place. In the last five years, every large urban
district we have worked with has faced considerable loss of enrollment district-wide which eventually
necessitates reducing overall footprint and closing schools. We typically see changes in educational
programs that make the alignment of facilities a challenge, as curriculum and delivery methods are ever-
evolving. Nearly 90 percent of our country’s 21st century schools were designed and constructed in the
20th century, most in the mid 20th century, under an industrial age factory model with a long row of
classrooms down a double-loaded corridor. The condition of schools, with the exception of very
wealthy districts, is declining across the country. The recent economic climate is exacerbates this
problem as maintenance funds are decreasing. Texas the new education funding system in Texas is
placing greater emphasis on the use of Maintenance and Operations (M&O) funds. Unfortunately,
deferred maintenance does not go away with reduced funding, and the unmet need continues to build
until the cost to repair eventually exceeds the cost to replace the facility.
Commonly, communities have a widespread perception that school districts shape, hide, or manipulate
building condition data to obtain a desired result. This perception may even result in a law suit, which
creates the necessity to engage in projects that are driven by legal requirements. While years ago there
may have been school districts that were guilty of these charges, particularly in the era of racial
segregation and the court-ordered desegregation that followed, the fact is that we have not seen data
manipulation at any of the districts in which we have worked for over a decade.
School district administrators and facility staffs continually request that we simplify the data and planning
parameters. The process of engaging the community offers a broad spectrum of individuals who want to
participate. These diverse groups of individuals may speak different languages, have different educational
backgrounds, different levels of school planning experience. Some may have a deep understanding of
mathematics and can easily read charts and graphs, while others will not. The main challenge herein, is
that the amount and type of data used in the planning process is very complex. Depending upon the
issue, capacity can include a variety of factors. Capacity may include only permanent space, or it may
include both permanent and temporary space. Capacity can be adjusted for smaller class sizes, and
utilization can affect capacity when smaller class sizes are required for special needs students. In
addition, the Facility Condition Index FCI may include only current costs, or it may include a forecast of
future system replacements that are going to occur within the next three to five years. Enrollment data
is often complicated by official enrollment, staffing enrollment, average daily membership, and even the
time of year. Although there is often a desire to simplify the information presented, it is not
always possible to do so while maintaining access to the kinds of data that are presented in
the complex planning process. The variables in data mean to the outside individual that numbers
may be different from one context to another. Capacities change from year to year, buildings
deteriorate on a daily basis, and enrollment fluctuates. School planners are always working with a
moving target.
Page 191
EXHIBIT "B"
FCI Campuses
<10%
10-19%
20-29%
30-39%
40-49%
50-59%
60-69%
70-79%
80-89%
90-100%
>100%
Repair
Renovate
Replace
Since 1991, the facility management industry has used an index called the FCI to benchmark the relative
condition of a group of schools. This index simply divides the identified repair costs in a facility by the
total cost to replace the facility. For example, take a 100,000 square foot building that might
theoretically cost $10 million to construct new and now has $1 million
in identified repairs. Dividing $1 million by $10 million results in an
FCI of 10 percent. The National Association of College and University
Business Officers has suggested for college planning that an FCI of less
than 5 percent is good, an FCI between 5 and 10 percent is fair, and an
FCI greater than 10 percent is poor. In K-12 public school planning,
the gulf between 10 percent and 100 percent is just not stratified
enough. For several years, Magellan Consulting has used the chart
displayed to the right, with clients to provide a little more gradation.
We often find district-wide FCI averages in the 20 to 30 percent range.
Schools in the 30 to 60 percent range are probably the most difficult
to plan for long-term. Financial modeling has shown that over a 30-
year period, schools that fall in the 65 percent or greater range are
more cost-effective to replace than to repair. This is due to efficiency
gains with more modern facilities and the value of the building at the
end of the analysis period. Of course, FCI is not the only factor used
to identify buildings that need renovation, replacement or even
closure. Historical significance, enrollment trends, community
sentiment, and the availability of capital are additional factors that are
analyzed when making school facility decision.
The FCI calculation, while seemingly simple, yields a consistent result that can commonly be compared
across districts, as the same factors are almost always considered in deriving the numerator and the
denominator. It should also be noted that there are nuances regarding the process for calculating FCI
that must be understood.
FCI: The Denominator
The denominator is the bottom part of the equation and possibly the easiest with which to start. The
denominator is the theoretical cost to replace the facility. It is important to recognize that this cost is
based on the replacement of a building with another facility that is the same size and is fully
code compliant. If, for example, you are comparing the FCI on a 3,450 square foot gymnasium building
at a campus, the replacement cost is the theoretical cost to replace that same 3,450 square foot
building. For the purpose of FCI, it is not important whether the district actually replaces that building.
Depending on campus type and other factors that might include joint use, the district might decided to
replace the 3,450 building with a 12,000 square foot gymnasium building that would be built to the
district’s current educational specifications and cost considerably more. For the purposes of FCI, we
are trying to establish a benchmark to compare a group of facilities so the repair costs are compared to
the theoretical cost to replace that same facility.
Since the replacement cost comparison is primarily driven by the type of facility (elementary school,
middle school, high school, administration, etc.), a set of cost models have been developed that estimate
the cost per square foot for new construction. The cost models take into account national industry
averages from a recognized industry data source called RSMeans®, adjusted to Austin, Texas, as well as
Page 192
EXHIBIT "B"
the district’s recent experience in the Austin construction market. The costs per square foot are then
multiplied by the size of the school or building under consideration.
“Construction Cost” is a term that may mean different things to different people. To contractors,
construction cost generally means the amount they are paid to construct the building, and that figure
generally does not include a contingency for unforeseen conditions. To the school district facilities staff,
construction cost typically refers to the planning budget to construct the building plus a small
contingency for unforeseen conditions and may also include the cost to bring utilities to a site. To the
school board, construction cost often means the total costs spent on the project which includes the
architects’ fees and the cost to manage the overall construction program. Therefore, it is important to
be careful which costs to include in the replacement cost denominator calculation. For FCI purposes,
we include all of the costs associated with completing the project for the amount of funding that is
required in total. That includes the base construction cost (often referred to as “hard costs”); plus
inflation; plus professional fees; plus administrative costs for testing, surveys, and advertising; plus
management costs; plus contingencies; plus escalation to an estimated mid-point of construction (often
referred to as “soft costs”). These total costs are significantly more than the base construction cost
paid to the contractor. The following table shows the average costs used in determining the
replacement cost for AISD, based on the building type and the buildings’ gross square footage measured
to the outside of exterior walls.
FCI: The Numerator
The numerator is the top part of the equation and is a little more complicated. The numerator is the
estimated cost to complete the repairs on the building in its current condition. This repair cost is
generally considered to be like-for-like repairs. Within reason, the deficient conditions would be
repaired or systems replaced to put the building into fully serviceable condition to meet current codes.
This is where it gets complicated. In determining which costs to include in the repair cost, one has to
consider if the same conditions would be included in the replacement facility. Classroom additions, for
instance, would add square footage to the building. It would not be comparable to include the addition’s
new construction cost portion of the repaired facility to a facility of the same size, unless the square
footage was added to the replacement facility cost estimate. One would not include building needs that
have not yet occurred, also called “projected needs,” as that would be comparing a building’s future
ES MS HS Admin PortableSquare Feet 82,500 170,000 330,000 20,000 1,536 Cost / SqFt 185.54$ 204.20$ 201.53$ 176.65$ 85.97$
Construction Cost 15,306,924.11$ 34,714,158.47$ 66,504,421.68$ 3,532,981.28$ 132,047.22$
A/E Services 1,224,553.93$ 2,777,132.68$ 5,320,353.73$ 317,968.32$ 11,884.25$ Site/Survey 30,613.85$ 69,428.32$ 133,008.84$ 7,065.96$ 264.09$ Permits/Fees 68,881.16$ 156,213.71$ 299,269.90$ 15,898.42$ 198.07$ Testing 114,801.93$ 260,356.19$ 498,783.16$ 26,497.36$ 660.24$ Furn/Fixt/Equip (FF&E) 918,415.45$ 2,082,849.51$ 3,990,265.30$ 141,319.25$ 7,262.60$ Other 612,276.96$ 1,388,566.34$ 2,660,176.87$ 137,654.34$ 6,602.36$
Project Budget 18,276,467$ 41,448,705$ 79,406,279$ 4,179,385$ 158,919$
Program-level contg @ 10% 1,827,647 4,144,871 7,940,628 417,938 15,892 Program Management 1,005,206$ 2,279,679$ 4,367,345$ 229,866$ 8,741$ Escalation - 3 yrs. @ 5% 3,431,999$ 7,783,337$ 14,911,101$ 784,815$ 29,842$
Total Program Cost 24,541,319$ 55,656,592$ 106,625,354$ 5,612,004$ 213,393$
Cost Per Square Feet 297.47$ 327.39$ 323.11$ 280.60$ 138.93$
Page 193
EXHIBIT "B"
state to that of what would be replaced today. Generally, studies or hazardous material costs that might
be encountered even under a demolition scenario would not be included.
At AISD, the district retained a firm in 2006 to assess all of the facilities in the district and develop cost
estimates to make needed repairs. That effort included a walkthrough of all facilities using architects and
engineers to identify deficient conditions in the buildings. This survey focused, for the most part, on the
condition of the existing buildings and did not include educational adequacy or functional equity type
needs (more on that later). All of the identified needs were grouped into building systems, and a
Uniformat® cost structure supported by RSMeans® nationally-based cost data adjusted to the Austin,
Texas area was employed to develop consistent cost estimates across all schools. These cost estimates,
using the industry standard line item costs, comprise the majority of the costs in the AISD facility
assessment database and are included in the numerator of the FCI calculation. The construction cost
value of all of these deficient conditions, prior to adding soft costs for professional fees, contingency, and
escalation total approximately $444.9 million.
However, the facility condition assessment did not focus on what the assessment industry calls
“educational adequacy” items. Where a building assessment focuses on the condition of the building and
what is broken, an educational adequacy assessment focuses on how well the school supports the
instructional mission and looks objectively at what is missing. As part of this master planning effort,
AISD conducted an educational adequacy assessment of all schools. This assessment made use of the
district’s educational specifications, supplemented with information collected during a three-day
workshop that involved numerous staff, principals, and teachers. A set of standards was developed for
each school type, the buildings typically found on the campus, and for each instructional space. These
standards identified in detail the size of the teaching spaces, the number of students in each space,
physical conditions, plumbing requirements, the number of computer outlets and electrical plugs, and
the type of instructional support for each space, in addition to safety and supervision considerations.
During the summer of 2010, a team of assessors went to each school and collected an inventory of each
space at the classroom level. This data was then compared to the previously developed standards to
identify when an individual space did not meet a specific standard. When an item did not meet the
standard, the condition was noted and a line item was added to the assessment database with a budget
to correct that condition. This has resulted in the identification of approximately $184.8 million in
educational adequacy-related deficiencies.
The combination of the building condition and the educational adequacy items currently represents over
41,000 line items district-wide. Base costs must added up to provide a total that is comparable to the
replacement cost total program budgets use as the denominator of the calculation. Again, the design
and construction industry commonly refers to these costs as “soft costs.” The soft costs factoring is
done at a deficiency level, and every deficiency receives a specific cost allocation. The facilities staff of
AISD has conducted a review of recent projects to gain a better understanding of the associated costs
based on a variety of different types of repairs. The district has an established default soft costs factor
that is added to deficiencies of a standard nature. However, air conditioning and mechanical-related
deficiencies are typically done by mechanical contractors that may require additional engineering
requirements. For this reason, a separate model was established for all HVAC/mechanical repairs. For
life safety-related deficiencies, including security cameras and alarms, the costs are primarily equipment
related and do not have requirements for design and engineering so they too have their own model.
The deficiencies noted for ADA repairs were developed under a slightly different cost structure so a
different factor is applied to these items to provide consistent cost estimates at the project level.
Finally, the functional equity needs for additions and new construction on existing campuses have their
Page 194
EXHIBIT "B"
own soft cost model. The following chart shows the percentage factors that are applied to every $100
of estimated repair cost to derive the total repair cost figure used in calculating the FCI.
The total facility condition cost totals approximately $963.1 million after adding soft costs to the costs
for correcting deficient building and ADA conditions and the educational adequacy costs. During the
August work sessions, the need was approximated at $875 million, but at that time it was believed that
the need would eventually be lowered as data was reviewed. The $875 million figure really represented
the total construction cost (hard cost) required to correct current deficiencies. Indeed the comparable
cost has decreased to about $558.4 million; however, the overall total need is now about $1.1 billion,
including functional equity needs at 44 campuses (discussed in more detail below). Since the August
worksession:
1 Deficiencies have been reviewed and, in some cases, modified by AISD facilities staff (part of
ongoing AISD facility management procedures) – decreased cost.
2 Overlapping cost between ADA studies and building condition deficiencies have been addressed
– decreased cost.
3 Overlapping cost between functional equity deficiencies, ADA deficiencies, and building
condition deficiencies have been addressed – decreased cost.
4 Overlapping cost between educational adequacy deficiencies and building condition deficiencies
have been addressed – decreased cost.
5 Location factor that adjusts RSMeans® data to the Austin area has been corrected – decreased
cost.
6 Algorithm that applies the location factor to RSMeans® data has been corrected – decreased
cost.
7 Revised soft cost models have been developed and applied to accurately reflect the total cost
required to correct deficiencies in a potential capital improvement program – increased cost.
Functional equity needs are different from educational adequacy needs. Educational adequacy is an
analysis of the existing conditions to determine if they meet the district’s educational specifications and
to determine which corrections can logically be made to achieve the standards in an existing structure.
Functional equity is an analysis comparing the area allocations for areas within the school to determine if
they meet the current educational specifications based on the target number of students at the school.
This analysis has resulted in the recommendation for additions to expand libraries, gymnasiums,
cafeterias, administration spaces, and classrooms at several locations. These additions constitute new
space and are therefore not included in the calculation of the FCI. A summary of the functional equity
improvements, although not included in the FCI calculation, is included for reference below.
Default HVAC Life Safety ADA EquityCost Basis 100.00$ 100.00$ 100.00$ 100.00$ 100.00$
Construction Cost 138.46$ 138.46$ 103.46$ 196.37$ 196.37$
A/E Services 20.77$ 20.77$ 4.14$ 29.46$ 29.46$ Permits/Fees 0.62$ 0.62$ 0.47$ 0.88$ 0.88$ Testing 0.42$ 0.42$ -$ 0.59$ 0.59$ Other 23.26$ 28.11$ 1.34$ 32.99$ 32.99$
Project Budget 184$ 188$ 109$ 260$ 260$
Program-level contg @ 10% 18 19 11 26 26 Program Management 10$ 10$ 6$ 14$ 14$ Escalation - 3 yrs. @ 5% 34$ 35$ 21$ 49$ 49$
Total Program Cost 246$ 253$ 147$ 350$ 350$
Soft Cost Factor (%) 78% 83% 42% 78% 78%
Page 195
EXHIBIT "B"
Functional Equity Additions / Renovations
School Number and Name Library Gym Cafeteria Admin Classroom Total
009 Anderson HS - 7,558,381 - - 737,651 8,296,032
002 Austin HS 93,707 1,000,768 - 341,590 6,583,925 8,019,990
005 McCallum HS 1,056,715 974,456 - - - 2,031,171
007 Travis HS - 497,614 - - - 497,614
054 Bedichek MS 1,226,494 1,200,183 - 279,273 10,809,492 13,515,442
046 Burnet MS - - 1,121,709 - - 1,121,709
057 Covington MS - - - - 1,256,499 1,256,499
055 Dobie MS - 4,791,499 778,272 - 290,814 5,860,584
051 Martin MS 830,896 1,996,919 - - - 2,827,815
058 Mendez MS - - - - 1,323,155 1,323,155
052 Murchison MS 382,212 - 791,197 252,361 6,564,076 7,989,847
047 O. Henry MS - - 702,568 - 2,492,687 3,195,256
048 Pearce MS - - - - 751,499 751,499
053 Webb MS - - - 703,953 - 703,953
142 Allan ES 756,946 - - - - 756,946
102 Andrews ES 1,197,967 110,786 - - - 1,308,753
149 Barrington ES - 2,377,285 119,095 - - 2,496,380
107 Brentwood ES - 720,110 718,725 - - 1,438,834
109 Brown ES 101,554 2,561,928 - - - 2,663,482
161 Cook ES - 2,949,680 115,402 - - 3,065,082
113 Cunningham ES - 2,543,464 115,402 812,893 - 3,471,759
114 Dawson ES - 913,985 - 284,351 - 1,198,336
154 Doss ES - - - 486,074 - 486,074
116 Govalle ES 847,514 2,460,375 - 177,258 - 3,485,146
117 Gullett ES 1,154,714 482,843 1,442,527 698,414 1,307,276 5,085,774
119 Highland Park ES - 886,289 796,275 - 517,002 2,199,566
155 Hill ES - 2,404,981 135,713 - - 2,540,694
162 Houston ES - 191,106 - - - 191,106
120 Joslin ES 960,146 - 580,704 - - 1,540,850
160 Linder ES 2,901,672 2,331,124 109,863 - 109,863 5,452,522
122 Maplewood ES - - 1,315,585 - 76,858 1,392,443
123 Mathews ES - - - 47,777 2,160,329 2,208,105
150 Norman ES 516,771 - 268,195 670,256 - 1,455,222
151 Pillow ES 1,140,404 - - 979,995 - 2,120,400
130 Pleasant Hill ES - - - 33,697 249,269 282,966
136 St. Elmo ES - 809,200 - - 517,002 1,326,202
127 Sanchez ES - 2,441,910 168,026 - - 2,609,936
139 Sims ES - 717,340 - - - 717,340
158 Sunset Valley ES - 1,955,836 - 101,554 - 2,057,390
140 Travis Heights ES - - - 978,611 - 978,611
166 Williams ES - 1,695,489 - - - 1,695,489
157 Winn ES 2,880,438 2,654,250 839,205 - 124,634 6,498,528
144 Wooten ES - 406,216 - 704,415 - 1,110,631
146 Zilker ES - 2,409,598 - - - 2,409,598
Figures have been adjusted to eliminate overlap between Condition Assessment and ADA Studies
Page 196
EXHIBIT "B"
FCI Results
For AISD, the FCI calculations include the building condition assessment results, the educational
adequacy assessment results, and the type one and two ADA compliance considerations and then
compare them to the cost of replacing the same facility. These FCI figures provide a benchmark that can
be used to consistently compare AISD facilities district-wide. The planning team refers to the FCI to aid
in decision making when a school or building is subject to renovation, when a change in educational
program is contemplated, or when the school is targeted for replacement, consolidation, or closure for
efficiency reasons. It is not the principle driver, but rather a supporting consideration to guide the
district and hopefully prohibit the district from making additional investment into a building that is close
to or has reached the end of its serviceable life. The following chart is a summary of all of the district’s
facilities by FCI. The one school that falls in the 70-79 percent range is Pease Elementary, a historic
location celebrated as the longest operating public school in the state.
FCI Campuses
<10% 18
10-19% 35
20-29% 30
30-39% 31
40-49% 9
50-59% 2
60-69% -
70-79% 1
80-89% -
90-100% -
>100% -
Total 126
Repair
Renovate
Replace
Page 197
EXHIBIT "B"
AISD School/Facility FCI Summary Total minus NC
Priorities 1-5 and Some ADA
No. Campus Name
Grades
Served Age Site Priority 1 Priority 2
Total Priority
1 and 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5
Total Facility
Condition
Cost
FCI Related
Facility Cost
Total
Replacement
Cost FCI
Functional
Equity
Educational
Adequacy
Elementary Schools
142 Allan Elementary School PK-5 1957 19.5 1,254,683$ 1,688,882$ 2,943,565$ 6,645,881$ 558,919$ 1,074,557$ 11,222,922$ 10,148,366$ 33,497,560$ 30.3% 1,030,588$ 1,511,428$
101 Allison Elementary School PK-6 1955 10.7 173,617$ 1,354,132$ 1,527,749$ 2,450,503$ 210,014$ 10,288$ 4,198,553$ 4,188,265$ 20,556,998$ 20.4% -$ 907,125$
102 Andrews Elementary School PK-5 1962 7.7 573,941$ 2,633,109$ 3,207,050$ 3,502,631$ 190,659$ 1,517,264$ 8,417,604$ 6,737,774$ 21,020,456$ 32.1% 1,453,514$ 1,030,292$
187 Baldwin Elementary School PK-5 2010 0.0 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.0% -$ -$
182 Baranoff Elementary School K-5 1999 15.6 197,873$ 531,250$ 729,123$ 1,814,399$ 277,997$ 121,554$ 2,943,072$ 2,821,518$ 25,651,479$ 11.0% -$ 1,069,123$
149 Barrington Elementary School PK-6 1969 12.1 329,948$ 476,461$ 806,409$ 5,220,479$ 311,342$ 2,708,483$ 9,046,714$ 6,338,231$ 29,888,351$ 21.2% 2,688,134$ 1,146,187$
103 Barton Hills Elementary School K-6 1964 9.9 1,022,269$ 236,671$ 1,258,939$ 2,637,192$ 447,186$ 2,391$ 4,345,708$ 4,343,317$ 14,588,847$ 29.8% -$ 439,914$
104 Becker Elementary School PK-5 1936 3.7 1,114,902$ 2,117,554$ 3,232,456$ 3,621,985$ 252,949$ 118,363$ 7,225,752$ 7,107,389$ 18,663,896$ 38.1% -$ 977,746$
105 Blackshear Elementary School PK-5 1903 5.3 188,148$ 2,178,265$ 2,366,412$ 4,202,512$ 796,536$ 58,019$ 7,423,480$ 7,365,461$ 21,038,900$ 35.0% -$ 705,474$
106 Blanton Elementary School PK-5 1964 8.0 642,778$ 1,082,233$ 1,725,011$ 2,850,419$ 230,709$ 59,146$ 4,865,285$ 4,806,139$ 24,561,843$ 19.6% -$ 1,313,917$
185 Blazier Elementary School PK-5 2008 15.4 136,781$ 177,879$ 314,660$ 897,555$ 205,711$ -$ 1,417,926$ 1,417,926$ 27,857,817$ 5.1% -$ 978,883$
170 Boone Elementary School PK-5 1986 12.5 489,966$ 135,370$ 625,336$ 2,854,265$ 348,141$ 318,391$ 4,146,133$ 3,827,742$ 21,920,602$ 17.5% -$ 991,368$
107 Brentwood Elementary School PK-5 1951 16.7 286,613$ 693,809$ 980,422$ 3,381,304$ 190,212$ 1,625,875$ 6,177,813$ 4,551,938$ 19,622,049$ 23.2% 1,622,094$ 973,002$
108 Brooke Elementary School PK-5 1954 5.9 466,533$ 728,683$ 1,195,217$ 2,708,300$ 262,136$ 37,886$ 4,203,538$ 4,165,652$ 16,699,995$ 24.9% -$ 888,465$
109 Brown Elementary School PK-6 1957 10.1 1,580,199$ 1,153,153$ 2,733,352$ 1,909,309$ 635,293$ 2,665,997$ 7,943,951$ 5,277,954$ 18,761,168$ 28.1% 2,663,484$ 801,611$
110 Bryker Woods Elementary School K-6 1939 6.3 189,411$ 1,119,527$ 1,308,938$ 2,979,081$ 348,606$ 44,654$ 4,681,279$ 4,636,625$ 13,901,689$ 33.4% -$ 863,756$
111 Campbell Elementary School PK-5 1992 9.7 311,592$ 379,698$ 691,291$ 3,030,703$ 197,160$ 377,355$ 4,296,509$ 3,919,154$ 18,838,511$ 20.8% -$ 766,024$
173 Casey Elementary School PK-5 1998 17.9 332,832$ 218,621$ 551,453$ 1,280,715$ 2,281,070$ 78,748$ 4,191,986$ 4,113,238$ 24,702,547$ 16.7% -$ 930,563$
112 Casis Elementary School PK-5 1951 14.2 280,022$ 632,024$ 912,046$ 3,096,268$ 731,873$ 60,579$ 4,800,767$ 4,740,187$ 27,288,458$ 17.4% -$ 1,460,287$
184 Clayton Elementary School K-5 2006 16.8 136,427$ 382,446$ 518,872$ 1,142,866$ 215,392$ -$ 1,877,130$ 1,877,130$ 31,551,211$ 5.9% -$ 1,404,862$
161 Cook Elementary School K-5 1974 12.7 847,723$ 3,046,998$ 3,894,721$ 2,836,484$ 275,616$ 3,529,726$ 10,536,548$ 7,006,822$ 25,515,832$ 27.5% 3,472,684$ 1,093,546$
183 Cowan Elementary School PK-5 1999 22.5 441,004$ 282,482$ 723,486$ 1,163,772$ 269,668$ 287,289$ 2,444,215$ 2,156,926$ 23,634,032$ 9.1% -$ 1,007,303$
113 Cunningham Elementary School PK-5 1963 8.8 174,656$ 203,988$ 378,644$ 8,662,602$ 475,256$ 3,523,663$ 13,040,166$ 9,488,259$ 27,695,695$ 34.3% 3,471,761$ 1,336,362$
179 Davis Elementary School PK-5 1993 13.2 375,946$ 245,779$ 621,725$ 4,466,364$ 242,164$ 172,691$ 5,502,944$ 5,330,253$ 22,832,945$ 23.3% -$ 1,062,050$
114 Dawson Elementary School PK-5 1954 8.7 825,023$ 1,788,448$ 2,613,471$ 2,164,807$ 124,053$ 1,374,936$ 6,277,266$ 4,902,331$ 18,054,973$ 27.2% 1,332,942$ 812,429$
154 Doss Elementary School PK-5 1970 9.7 277,493$ 1,753,192$ 2,030,684$ 3,366,419$ 262,383$ 585,467$ 6,244,954$ 5,659,486$ 21,571,372$ 26.2% 548,668$ 867,630$
176 Galindo Elementary School PK-5 1989 10.8 718,525$ 472,173$ 1,190,697$ 1,724,238$ 237,955$ 162,944$ 3,315,834$ 3,152,890$ 27,712,949$ 11.4% -$ 1,255,082$
116 Govalle Elementary School PK-5 1940 8.4 340,133$ 1,139,527$ 1,479,660$ 4,269,803$ 1,386,730$ 3,711,107$ 10,847,299$ 7,136,192$ 23,095,017$ 30.9% 3,614,398$ 935,305$
159 Graham Elementary School PK-5 1972 9.9 776,380$ 3,942,191$ 4,718,571$ 2,175,356$ 462,863$ 145,540$ 7,502,330$ 7,356,790$ 24,196,550$ 30.4% -$ 874,097$
117 Gullett Elementary School K-5 1956 17.9 296,279$ 477,899$ 774,178$ 3,404,040$ 278,491$ 5,578,522$ 10,035,231$ 4,456,709$ 15,275,706$ 29.2% 5,538,153$ 1,100,391$
118 Harris Elementary School PK-5 1955 7.3 168,662$ 462,786$ 631,447$ 3,593,988$ 351,166$ 26,321$ 4,602,922$ 4,576,600$ 21,247,129$ 21.5% -$ 1,301,321$
163 Hart Elementary School PK-5 1998 15.7 440,103$ 429,303$ 869,405$ 1,705,738$ 330,538$ 150,402$ 3,056,083$ 2,905,681$ 28,219,837$ 10.3% -$ 1,071,119$
119 Highland Park Elementary School K-5 1952 6.3 378,590$ 549,487$ 928,077$ 5,117,848$ 220,844$ 2,357,371$ 8,624,139$ 6,266,769$ 20,158,386$ 31.1% 2,314,969$ 1,112,435$
155 Hill Elementary School PK-5 1970 8.9 369,298$ 762,743$ 1,132,041$ 4,753,883$ 395,173$ 2,849,188$ 9,130,285$ 6,281,096$ 23,453,170$ 26.8% 2,816,276$ 921,105$
162 Houston Elementary School PK-5 1976 13.8 347,984$ 5,056,005$ 5,403,989$ 4,782,952$ 313,940$ 513,050$ 11,013,932$ 10,500,882$ 28,771,349$ 36.5% 452,838$ 1,698,239$
178 Jordan Elementary School PK-5 1992 11.5 344,244$ 526,308$ 870,552$ 4,497,788$ 305,917$ 366,415$ 6,040,673$ 5,674,257$ 25,804,974$ 22.0% -$ 1,294,151$
120 Joslin Elementary School PK-5 1954 5.1 365,427$ 1,658,814$ 2,024,241$ 3,828,081$ 489,316$ 1,761,730$ 8,103,367$ 6,341,638$ 15,618,987$ 40.6% 1,726,417$ 905,386$
180 Kiker Elementary School K-5 1992 12.4 465,453$ 285,692$ 751,145$ 3,481,469$ 231,480$ 270,058$ 4,734,153$ 4,464,095$ 27,275,667$ 16.4% -$ 945,244$
172 Kocurek Elementary School PK-5 1986 12.3 276,757$ 739,213$ 1,015,969$ 4,710,718$ 337,850$ 84,409$ 6,148,946$ 6,064,538$ 23,816,680$ 25.5% -$ 1,239,761$
168 Langford Elementary School PK-5 1980 10.7 543,183$ 5,823,122$ 6,366,305$ 2,847,265$ 293,128$ 600,073$ 10,106,772$ 9,506,698$ 28,303,131$ 33.6% -$ 1,519,228$
121 Lee Elementary School K-6 1939 4.8 426,784$ 1,565,236$ 1,992,020$ 3,564,212$ 200,247$ 36,675$ 5,793,153$ 5,756,478$ 13,990,931$ 41.1% -$ 1,268,395$
160 Linder Elementary School PK-5 1972 9.1 170,717$ 1,486,942$ 1,657,659$ 3,064,256$ 373,892$ 5,824,800$ 10,920,607$ 5,095,807$ 25,625,896$ 19.9% 5,754,971$ 876,187$
131 Lucy Read Pre-K School PK 1961 9.9 191,332$ 843,430$ 1,034,762$ 1,221,125$ 154,414$ 9,470$ 2,419,771$ 2,410,301$ 21,971,173$ 11.0% -$ 715,064$
122 Maplewood Elementary School PK-6 1951 6.4 1,630,235$ 367,527$ 1,997,762$ 3,955,287$ 119,540$ 2,005,569$ 8,078,158$ 6,072,588$ 16,243,675$ 37.4% 1,958,007$ 648,571$
123 Mathews Elementary School PK-6 1916 2.3 103,898$ 1,407,923$ 1,511,822$ 2,537,969$ 285,980$ 2,282,922$ 6,618,692$ 4,335,770$ 13,897,228$ 31.2% 2,258,699$ 841,669$
165 McBee Elementary School K-5 1999 10.9 237,524$ 319,343$ 556,867$ 1,036,048$ 242,383$ 57,384$ 1,892,682$ 1,835,298$ 23,236,719$ 7.9% -$ 883,087$
Page 198
EXHIBIT "B"
AISD School/Facility FCI Summary Total minus NC
Priorities 1-5 and Some ADA
No. Campus Name
Grades
Served Age Site Priority 1 Priority 2
Total Priority
1 and 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5
Total Facility
Condition
Cost
FCI Related
Facility Cost
Total
Replacement
Cost FCI
Functional
Equity
Educational
Adequacy
147 Menchaca Elementary School PK-5 1975 19.8 237,446$ 4,313,709$ 4,551,155$ 2,516,965$ 693,652$ 82,611$ 7,844,383$ 7,761,772$ 21,040,089$ 36.9% -$ 1,093,862$
124 Metz Elementary School PK-5 1993 6.4 245,693$ 2,198,147$ 2,443,840$ 3,224,075$ 239,898$ 213,073$ 6,120,886$ 5,907,813$ 19,328,741$ 30.6% -$ 958,961$
181 Mills Elementary School PK-5 1998 10.7 254,583$ 438,024$ 692,608$ 2,241,637$ 604,743$ 163,005$ 3,701,993$ 3,538,989$ 27,859,900$ 12.7% -$ 1,316,271$
150 Norman Elementary School PK-5 1970 10.2 491,997$ 1,618,873$ 2,110,870$ 3,488,359$ 249,133$ 1,961,658$ 7,810,019$ 5,819,127$ 17,864,592$ 32.6% 1,896,243$ 880,325$
148 Oak Hill Elementary School PK-5 1974 13.7 577,910$ 2,562,750$ 3,140,659$ 5,082,614$ 417,412$ 46,822$ 8,687,508$ 8,640,685$ 25,741,908$ 33.6% -$ 1,650,197$
125 Oak Springs Elementary School PK-5 1958 8.6 436,196$ 1,544,778$ 1,980,974$ 1,913,526$ 218,887$ 30,328$ 4,143,715$ 4,113,386$ 15,839,115$ 26.0% -$ 712,476$
156 Odom Elementary School PK-5 1970 8.6 314,793$ 555,080$ 869,872$ 3,051,516$ 304,204$ 75,095$ 4,300,687$ 4,225,593$ 22,017,089$ 19.2% -$ 783,022$
126 Ortega Elementary School PK-5 1959 7.4 554,133$ 2,585,580$ 3,139,712$ 2,666,838$ 188,616$ 55,295$ 6,050,462$ 5,995,167$ 14,984,780$ 40.0% -$ 794,706$
189 Overton Elementary School PK-5 2007 70.4 129,148$ 222,703$ 351,852$ 812,642$ 285,677$ -$ 1,450,171$ 1,450,171$ 30,773,624$ 4.7% -$ 1,014,803$
171 Palm Elementary School PK-5 1987 13.2 326,618$ 355,630$ 682,248$ 1,716,073$ 302,890$ 156,623$ 2,857,834$ 2,701,211$ 24,438,393$ 11.1% -$ 1,129,509$
143 Patton Elementary School PK-5 1986 24.1 553,125$ 1,351,958$ 1,905,083$ 2,641,513$ 172,467$ 309,114$ 5,028,177$ 4,719,062$ 26,010,525$ 18.1% -$ 969,016$
128 Pease Elementary School K-6 1876 2.8 366,438$ 2,838,820$ 3,205,258$ 4,030,819$ 795,232$ 51,831$ 8,083,139$ 8,031,308$ 10,597,089$ 75.8% -$ 743,252$
129 Pecan Springs Elementary School PK-5 1957 7.6 204,113$ 354,593$ 558,706$ 5,221,971$ 1,542,355$ 90,134$ 7,413,166$ 7,323,032$ 19,694,928$ 37.2% -$ 1,346,708$
190 Perez Elementary School PK-5 2006 28.0 1,206,199$ 216,162$ 1,422,361$ 1,028,182$ 150,809$ -$ 2,601,352$ 2,601,352$ 29,028,065$ 9.0% -$ 1,027,736$
164 Pickle Elementary School PK-5 2001 17.5 267,092$ 283,194$ 550,286$ 1,241,301$ 347,992$ 116,853$ 2,256,432$ 2,139,580$ 37,780,539$ 5.7% -$ 1,225,897$
151 Pillow Elementary School PK-5 1969 10.0 223,451$ 347,521$ 570,972$ 7,437,607$ 293,128$ 2,716,120$ 11,017,828$ 8,301,708$ 19,335,286$ 42.9% 2,695,012$ 1,237,573$
130 Pleasant Hill Elementary School PK-5 1985 10.1 338,974$ 421,776$ 760,750$ 3,408,419$ 101,031$ 473,908$ 4,744,109$ 4,270,200$ 21,837,014$ 19.6% 367,071$ 767,791$
132 Reilly Elementary School PK-5 1954 10.8 397,166$ 785,780$ 1,182,946$ 2,658,687$ 203,051$ 11,517$ 4,056,202$ 4,044,685$ 14,216,116$ 28.5% -$ 623,670$
133 Ridgetop Elementary School PK-5 1939 5.0 165,485$ 1,164,852$ 1,330,337$ 1,527,895$ 899,377$ 22,541$ 3,780,150$ 3,757,609$ 11,956,232$ 31.4% -$ 492,082$
174 Rodriguez Elementary School PK-5 1999 15.0 229,804$ 335,591$ 565,395$ 1,437,448$ 305,732$ 64,181$ 2,372,756$ 2,308,575$ 28,810,020$ 8.0% -$ 1,238,887$
127 Sanchez Elementary School PK-5 1976 9.2 169,463$ 3,527,025$ 3,696,487$ 2,600,313$ 340,250$ 2,934,744$ 9,571,794$ 6,637,050$ 25,069,329$ 26.5% 2,843,511$ 1,158,542$
139 Sims Elementary School PK-5 1956 8.4 929,492$ 624,530$ 1,554,022$ 4,091,216$ 273,990$ 868,224$ 6,787,451$ 5,919,228$ 15,016,609$ 39.4% 837,082$ 928,787$
136 St. Elmo Elementary School PK-5 1960 9.4 516,693$ 681,703$ 1,198,396$ 4,849,681$ 238,602$ 1,342,548$ 7,629,227$ 6,286,679$ 15,255,478$ 41.2% 1,326,203$ 1,045,047$
138 Summitt Elementary School PK-5 1986 14.5 459,077$ 411,250$ 870,328$ 5,355,622$ 258,428$ 177,876$ 6,662,254$ 6,484,378$ 25,777,010$ 25.2% -$ 1,075,677$
158 Sunset Valley Elementary School PK-5 1971 10.4 170,770$ 2,801,633$ 2,972,404$ 5,549,996$ 235,908$ 2,385,867$ 11,144,175$ 8,758,308$ 20,685,803$ 42.3% 2,339,157$ 1,005,839$
140 Travis Heights Elementary School PK-5 1938 3.2 964,451$ 2,480,760$ 3,445,212$ 3,035,427$ 505,213$ 1,545,119$ 8,530,971$ 6,985,852$ 19,096,715$ 36.6% 1,471,609$ 991,804$
141 Walnut Creek Elementary School K-6 1961 11.5 378,361$ 1,157,572$ 1,535,934$ 2,650,418$ 199,636$ 10,090$ 4,396,078$ 4,385,988$ 28,685,677$ 15.3% -$ 1,064,371$
175 Widen Elementary School PK-5 1986 10.7 344,749$ 519,889$ 864,638$ 2,387,370$ 207,421$ 244,825$ 3,704,253$ 3,459,428$ 26,737,543$ 12.9% -$ 1,026,980$
166 Williams Elementary School PK-5 1976 14.0 207,027$ 3,996,735$ 4,203,762$ 3,314,316$ 634,239$ 2,107,462$ 10,259,778$ 8,123,194$ 22,031,262$ 36.9% 2,037,080$ 1,806,830$
157 Winn Elementary School PK-5 1970 10.0 449,115$ 758,666$ 1,207,781$ 2,895,852$ 360,778$ 6,696,886$ 11,161,297$ 4,464,411$ 19,839,796$ 22.5% 6,617,626$ 1,369,856$
152 Wooldridge Elementary School K-5 1969 11.6 681,037$ 1,779,983$ 2,461,020$ 3,258,538$ 345,503$ 3,072$ 6,068,132$ 6,065,060$ 26,329,413$ 23.0% -$ 961,821$
144 Wooten Elementary School PK-5 1955 6.7 1,154,161$ 3,089,669$ 4,243,830$ 6,189,133$ 541,732$ 1,429,495$ 12,404,189$ 10,974,694$ 21,453,872$ 51.2% 1,380,857$ 1,403,037$
145 Zavala Elementary School PK-6 1937 3.4 874,332$ 410,359$ 1,284,691$ 5,062,642$ 414,056$ 19,700$ 6,781,088$ 6,761,389$ 20,624,524$ 32.8% -$ 1,032,634$
146 Zilker Elementary School PK-6 1950 11.8 895,527$ 1,978,488$ 2,874,015$ 6,699,936$ 776,182$ 2,565,129$ 12,915,262$ 10,350,133$ 18,351,848$ 56.4% 2,409,599$ 1,023,970$
Page 199
EXHIBIT "B"
AISD School/Facility FCI Summary Total minus NC
Priorities 1-5 and Some ADA
No. Campus Name
Grades
Served Age Site Priority 1 Priority 2
Total Priority
1 and 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5
Total Facility
Condition Cost
FCI Related
Facility Cost
Total
Replacement
Cost FCI
Functional
Equity
Educational
Adequacy
Middle Schools
059 Bailey Middle School 6-8 1993 41.3 718,590$ 2,307,324$ 3,025,915$ 4,249,984$ 1,260,797$ 175,348$ 8,712,044$ 8,538,264$ 52,022,435$ 16.4% -$ 2,483,427$
054 Bedichek Middle School 6-8 1972 23.3 6,051,876$ 3,947,712$ 9,999,588$ 4,289,394$ 1,517,014$ 13,820,241$ 29,626,237$ 15,805,996$ 51,604,343$ 30.6% 13,761,948$ 2,467,186$
046 Burnet Middle School 6-8 1961 23.7 696,528$ 7,228,821$ 7,925,349$ 8,242,121$ 1,461,392$ 1,228,083$ 18,856,946$ 17,628,862$ 51,140,088$ 34.5% 1,167,871$ 2,786,054$
057 Covington Middle School 6-8 1986 21.3 961,398$ 3,791,641$ 4,753,039$ 5,457,787$ 679,240$ 1,960,490$ 12,850,556$ 10,890,066$ 58,357,322$ 18.7% 1,633,542$ 2,218,938$
055 Dobie Middle School 6-8 1973 20.2 819,317$ 1,032,156$ 1,851,474$ 3,993,260$ 1,153,996$ 6,327,599$ 13,326,328$ 6,998,729$ 46,067,662$ 15.2% 6,294,500$ 2,605,739$
043 Fulmore Middle School 6-8 1911 9.8 1,675,047$ 7,905,746$ 9,580,793$ 11,125,201$ 1,520,831$ 353,775$ 22,580,600$ 22,226,825$ 54,800,107$ 40.6% -$ 1,873,471$
056 Garcia Middle School 6-8 2008 41.3 341,779$ 375,320$ 717,098$ 1,477,213$ 256,690$ -$ 2,451,001$ 2,451,001$ 52,634,348$ 4.7% -$ 1,785,189$
062 Gorzycki Middle School 6-8 2009 14.2 309,464$ 330,542$ 640,006$ 1,551,469$ 435,269$ -$ 2,626,743$ 2,626,743$ 57,473,012$ 4.6% -$ 1,948,774$
044 Kealing Middle School 6-8 1986 13.2 375,942$ 4,974,961$ 5,350,903$ 5,384,570$ 962,232$ 464,321$ 12,162,026$ 11,697,705$ 62,920,315$ 18.6% -$ 2,797,674$
045 Lamar Middle School 6-8 1955 14.3 868,115$ 2,862,857$ 3,730,973$ 3,240,381$ 1,109,337$ 19,344$ 8,100,034$ 7,963,458$ 41,245,693$ 19.3% -$ 2,294,389$
051 Martin Middle School 6-8 1966 9.9 529,628$ 6,008,583$ 6,538,211$ 4,037,673$ 630,629$ 3,297,183$ 14,503,696$ 11,206,513$ 38,873,997$ 28.8% 3,222,769$ 1,488,156$
058 Mendez Middle School 6-8 1987 20.7 1,080,210$ 4,069,741$ 5,149,951$ 3,162,498$ 903,869$ 1,830,512$ 11,046,831$ 9,216,319$ 61,291,493$ 15.0% 1,701,214$ 2,294,128$
052 Murchison Middle School 6-8 1967 26.2 485,127$ 1,623,549$ 2,108,676$ 5,951,701$ 1,040,012$ 8,153,256$ 17,253,644$ 9,100,388$ 45,706,537$ 19.9% 7,989,851$ 1,754,965$
047 O. Henry Middle School 6-8 1953 13.8 287,063$ 788,273$ 1,075,336$ 4,249,201$ 368,706$ 3,270,833$ 8,964,076$ 5,693,243$ 42,714,090$ 13.3% 3,236,248$ 1,604,680$
061 Paredes Middle School 6-8 2000 78.2 639,397$ 655,597$ 1,294,994$ 2,788,004$ 1,505,034$ 274,674$ 5,862,705$ 5,588,032$ 50,694,496$ 11.0% -$ 3,031,743$
048 Pearce Middle School 6-8 1958 14.8 797,160$ 1,469,168$ 2,266,328$ 3,870,033$ 437,683$ 797,883$ 7,371,927$ 6,574,044$ 43,914,998$ 15.0% 770,887$ 1,421,448$
028 Ann Richards School 6-10 1958 15.3 1,751,415$ 2,490,074$ 4,241,489$ 10,459,899$ 775,306$ 126,188$ 15,602,883$ 15,476,695$ 45,071,376$ 34.3% -$ 1,975,612$
060 Small Middle School 6-8 1999 36.5 354,444$ 1,045,835$ 1,400,279$ 1,980,661$ 354,205$ 162,029$ 3,897,174$ 3,735,145$ 54,088,993$ 6.9% -$ 1,928,150$
053 Webb Middle School 6-8 1961 15.6 420,533$ 3,515,438$ 3,935,971$ 3,080,033$ 1,413,498$ 733,661$ 9,163,164$ 8,429,502$ 42,628,637$ 19.8% 703,954$ 2,101,392$
High Schools
017 Akins High School 9-12 2000 57.7 954,259$ 1,208,558$ 2,162,817$ 3,966,511$ 1,452,488$ 134,171$ 7,715,986$ 7,581,815$ 115,209,011$ 6.6% -$ 4,294,809$
009 Anderson High School 9-12 1973 38.8 883,879$ 7,269,324$ 8,153,203$ 9,335,056$ 1,959,665$ 8,421,936$ 27,869,861$ 27,743,960$ 100,442,692$ 27.6% 8,296,036$ 5,596,292$
002 Austin High School 9-12 1975 44.3 1,821,769$ 8,599,187$ 10,420,955$ 17,067,949$ 4,155,102$ 8,187,414$ 39,831,421$ 31,644,007$ 101,704,101$ 31.1% 8,019,994$ 4,786,572$
013 Bowie High School 9-12 1988 66.0 1,142,743$ 13,619,484$ 14,762,227$ 14,517,730$ 15,147,412$ 884,595$ 45,311,964$ 44,427,369$ 141,414,289$ 31.4% -$ 16,682,721$
008 Crockett High School 9-12 1969 39.5 1,822,148$ 10,610,065$ 12,432,213$ 19,394,213$ 3,011,592$ 186,183$ 35,024,201$ 34,838,018$ 111,743,044$ 31.2% -$ 3,899,330$
019 Eastside Memorial High Schools (EMHSJC) 9-12 1960 27.6 3,510,942$ 12,123,425$ 15,634,366$ 7,266,111$ 650,888$ 213,544$ 23,764,910$ 23,551,366$ 87,276,402$ 27.0% -$ 2,370,779$
015 Garza Independence High School 11-12 1939 3.1 528,781$ 925,712$ 1,454,494$ 1,791,072$ 516,483$ 198,632$ 3,960,682$ 3,762,050$ 17,523,392$ 21.5% -$ 1,160,890$
029 International High School 9-10 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.0% -$ -$
014 Johnson (LBJ) High School 9-12 1974 41.4 1,082,734$ 3,932,853$ 5,015,587$ 7,240,361$ 1,922,200$ 96,326$ 14,274,474$ 14,178,148$ 98,621,982$ 14.4% -$ 3,610,445$
004 Lanier High School 9-12 1966 28.5 1,328,937$ 4,526,958$ 5,855,895$ 12,659,556$ 1,639,563$ 176,389$ 20,331,402$ 20,155,013$ 91,315,888$ 22.1% -$ 3,798,556$
018 LASA 9-12 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.0% -$ -$
005 McCallum High School 9-12 1953 31.1 1,149,580$ 3,763,557$ 4,913,137$ 10,864,608$ 1,362,340$ 2,583,395$ 19,723,479$ 17,140,084$ 83,866,651$ 20.4% 2,352,452$ 3,347,251$
006 Reagan High School 9-12 1965 31.8 1,208,310$ 865,508$ 2,073,817$ 12,941,528$ 3,120,501$ 348,003$ 18,483,850$ 18,135,847$ 81,643,031$ 22.2% -$ 5,067,540$
007 Travis High School 9-12 1953 34.8 1,049,482$ 1,617,099$ 2,666,581$ 24,320,432$ 1,903,928$ 870,745$ 29,761,687$ 28,890,942$ 95,250,042$ 30.3% 685,951$ 3,901,369$
Other Facilities
852 Clifton Center Alt. Ed. 1977 7.8 255,304$ 1,789,699$ 2,045,003$ 2,557,341$ 752,437$ 36,615$ 5,391,397$ 5,354,782$ 13,110,071$ 40.8% -$ 1,163,512$
012 Ridgeview ALC 6-12 1953 19.8 594,690$ 1,052,657$ 1,647,347$ 7,759,365$ 1,468,980$ 32,018$ 10,907,709$ 10,875,692$ 31,629,925$ 34.4% -$ 843,199$
251 Rosedale School Alt. Ed. 1939 4.9 492,433$ 462,750$ 955,183$ 3,490,585$ 251,739$ 68,255$ 4,765,762$ 4,697,506$ 14,472,614$ 32.5% -$ 777,226$
252 Baker Center 1911 4.8 282,216$ 1,676,261$ 1,958,477$ 1,224,224$ -$ 202,910$ 3,385,610$ 3,182,700$ 18,483,157$ 17.2% -$ -$
951 Burger Athletic Complex 1977 48.1 1,189,463$ 7,099,714$ 8,289,176$ 3,529,618$ 35,546$ 42,012$ 11,896,352$ 11,854,340$ 50,681,646$ 23.4% -$ -$
941 Carruth Administration Center 1991 2.8 180,247$ 903,444$ 1,083,691$ 5,448,615$ 269,285$ -$ 6,801,590$ 6,801,590$ 37,598,528$ 18.1% -$ -$
922 Central Warehouse 1983 18.7 268,665$ 404,270$ 672,935$ 725,905$ -$ 11,195$ 1,410,034$ 1,398,840$ 27,023,496$ 5.2% -$ -$
949 Delco Activity Center 2003 44.1 259,623$ 205,193$ 464,817$ 170,579$ 10,355$ -$ 645,750$ 645,750$ 16,919,044$ 3.8% -$ -$
948 House Park 1936 11.1 137,227$ 70,034$ 207,260$ 730,632$ -$ 157,489$ 1,095,381$ 915,722$ 8,999,133$ 10.2% -$ -$
281 Nelson Field 1963 20.1 422,773$ -$ 422,773$ 1,663,288$ -$ 91,966$ 2,178,027$ 2,086,061$ 16,557,338$ 12.6% -$ -$
959 Nelson Field Bus Terminal 1995 6.6 70,197$ 81,921$ 152,119$ 58,564$ 61,039$ 24,167$ 295,889$ 271,722$ 4,105,030$ 6.6% -$ -$
950 Noack Sports Complex 2004 11.2 126,224$ -$ 126,224$ -$ -$ -$ 126,224$ 126,224$ 906,929$ 13.9% -$ -$
942 Pleasant Hill Annex 1936 2.0 270,019$ 180,761$ 450,779$ 2,381,648$ 94,588$ -$ 2,927,015$ 2,927,015$ 7,228,209$ 40.5% -$ -$
960 Saegert Transportation 1975 10.6 128,439$ 185,122$ 313,561$ 1,456,374$ 172,306$ 28,659$ 1,970,900$ 1,942,241$ 7,983,889$ 24.3% -$ -$
962 Service Center - Building & Grounds 1991 16.7 170,528$ 209,015$ 379,543$ 1,102,379$ 44,245$ 135,726$ 1,661,892$ 1,526,167$ 15,239,037$ 10.0% -$ 15,999$
Total 77,451,146$ 242,076,008$ 319,527,153$ 0 522,702,751$ 88,789,541$ 144,246,781$ 1,075,266,227$ 0 938,928,480$ 4,112,139,818$ 22.8% 130,776,864$ 184,824,729$
Page 200
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
District-Wide Facility Master Plan
Appendix B Facility Capacity Charts and Population Updates
Page 201
EXHIBIT "B"
LOC Elementary
Permanent
Capacity
2010
Enrollment
% of Perm.
Capacity
by Enroll.
2009-10
Population
% of Perm.
Capacity
by Pop.
Classroom
Count
Special
Rooms
(ES Only)
Average
Students
per
Classroom
Efficiency
Factor
Classroom
Capacity
Café Area
(SF)
4.77 SF per
student
Capacity
based on
Café Size
Café /
Classroom
Gym Area
(SF)
3.41 SF per
student
Capacity
based on
Gym Size
Gym /
Classroom
Library
Area (SF)
3.98 SF per
student
Capacity
based on
Library Size
Library /
Classroom
142 Allan 673 379 56% 357 53% 42 6 22 85% 673 5,483 4.77 1,149 171% 6,160 3.41 1,806 268% 6,704 3.98 1,685 250%
101 Allison 486 543 112% 536 110% 30 4 22 85% 486 3,513 4.77 736 151% 2,972 3.41 871 179% 3,636 3.98 914 188%
102 Andrews 486 717 147% 604 124% 31 5 22 85% 486 3,361 4.77 705 145% 3,192 3.41 936 192% 2,217 3.98 557 115%
187 Baldwin 669 508 76% 488 73% 38 6 22 95% 669 4,507 4.77 945 141% 3,183 3.41 933 140% 3,598 3.98 904 135%
182 Baranoff 794 876 110% 881 111% 44 6 22 95% 794 3,845 4.77 806 102% 2,878 3.41 844 106% 2,850 3.98 716 90%
149 Barrington 556 996 179% 909 163% 41 6 22 85% 655 2,574 4.77 540 82% 2,558 3.41 750 115% 2,642 3.98 664 101%
103 Barton Hills 251 386 154% 184 73% 14 2 22 95% 251 2,707 4.77 567 226% 2,329 3.41 683 272% 2,834 3.98 712 284%
104 Becker 524 208 40% 214 41% 33 5 22 85% 524 3,337 4.77 700 134% 3,403 3.41 998 191% 2,116 3.98 532 102%
105 Blackshear 598 244 41% 255 43% 37 5 22 85% 598 3,117 4.77 653 109% 3,054 3.41 896 150% 2,246 3.98 564 94%
106 Blanton 636 591 93% 667 105% 40 6 22 85% 636 3,052 4.77 640 101% 2,531 3.41 742 117% 2,723 3.98 684 108%
185 Blazier 598 775 130% 827 138% 38 6 22 85% 598 5,258 4.77 1,102 184% 3,203 3.41 939 157% 3,480 3.98 874 146%
170 Boone 752 501 67% 496 66% 42 6 22 95% 752 4,052 4.77 850 113% 2,887 3.41 847 113% 3,384 3.98 850 113%
107 Brentwood 585 495 85% 419 72% 33 5 22 95% 585 2,468 4.77 517 88% 2,447 3.41 718 123% 3,078 3.98 773 132%
108 Brooke 430 439 102% 449 104% 27 4 22 85% 430 2,363 4.77 495 115% 2,328 3.41 683 159% 2,743 3.98 689 160%
109 Brown 468 519 111% 480 103% 29 4 22 85% 468 3,944 4.77 827 177% 2,426 3.41 712 152% 3,139 3.98 789 169%
110 Bryker Woods 272 404 149% 283 104% 16 3 22 95% 272 2,296 4.77 481 177% 2,987 3.41 876 322% 2,307 3.98 580 213%
111 Campbell 524 360 69% 377 72% 33 5 22 85% 524 4,129 4.77 866 165% 3,030 3.41 889 170% 2,777 3.98 698 133%
173 Casey 711 669 94% 652 92% 44 6 22 85% 711 4,425 4.77 928 131% 3,055 3.41 896 126% 2,757 3.98 693 97%
112 Casis 669 825 123% 729 109% 38 6 22 95% 669 3,962 4.77 831 124% 2,588 3.41 759 113% 3,736 3.98 939 140%
184 Clayton 836 867 104% 734 88% 47 7 22 95% 836 4,282 4.77 898 107% 3,025 3.41 887 106% 3,576 3.98 898 107%
161 Cook 561 901 161% 1,173 209% 35 5 22 85% 561 3,242 4.77 680 121% 2,365 3.41 694 124% 3,375 3.98 848 151%
183 Cowan 669 783 117% 678 101% 37 5 22 95% 669 4,060 4.77 851 127% 2,985 3.41 875 131% 2,968 3.98 746 111%
113 Cunningham 627 512 82% 632 101% 35 5 22 95% 627 3,363 4.77 705 112% 2,518 3.41 738 118% 3,091 3.98 777 124%
179 Davis 731 683 93% 675 92% 41 6 22 95% 731 3,995 4.77 837 114% 3,047 3.41 894 122% 2,848 3.98 716 98%
114 Dawson 505 331 66% 279 55% 32 5 22 85% 505 2,470 4.77 518 103% 2,338 3.41 686 136% 2,121 3.98 533 106%
154 Doss 543 768 141% 679 125% 30 4 22 95% 543 4,623 4.77 969 178% 3,027 3.41 888 163% 2,925 3.98 735 135%
176 Galindo 711 704 99% 715 101% 44 6 22 85% 711 4,287 4.77 899 126% 3,041 3.41 892 125% 3,545 3.98 891 125%
116 Govalle 598 415 69% 450 75% 37 5 22 85% 598 3,570 4.77 749 125% 2,301 3.41 675 113% 2,225 3.98 559 93%
159 Graham 598 761 127% 759 127% 38 6 22 85% 598 4,280 4.77 897 150% 3,217 3.41 943 158% 3,068 3.98 771 129%
117 Gullett 418 541 129% 340 81% 24 4 22 95% 418 2,195 4.77 460 110% 2,401 3.41 704 168% 2,434 3.98 612 146%
118 Harris 542 758 140% 793 146% 34 5 22 85% 542 3,408 4.77 714 132% 2,267 3.41 665 123% 2,594 3.98 652 120%
163 Hart 711 898 126% 865 122% 44 6 22 85% 711 3,667 4.77 769 108% 3,040 3.41 892 125% 2,848 3.98 716 101%
119 Highland Park 585 662 113% 567 97% 33 5 22 95% 585 2,469 4.77 518 88% 2,514 3.41 737 126% 1,951 3.98 490 84%
155 Hill 627 732 117% 677 108% 35 5 22 95% 627 2,723 4.77 571 91% 2,456 3.41 720 115% 3,357 3.98 844 135%
162 Houston 692 915 132% 911 132% 43 6 22 85% 692 4,951 4.77 1,038 150% 3,483 3.41 1,021 148% 3,645 3.98 916 132%
178 Jordan 655 833 127% 672 103% 41 6 22 85% 655 4,159 4.77 872 133% 2,997 3.41 879 134% 2,807 3.98 705 108%
120 Joslin 374 363 97% 314 84% 24 4 22 85% 374 3,595 4.77 754 202% 2,375 3.41 696 186% 2,080 3.98 523 140%
180 Kiker 752 933 124% 866 115% 42 6 22 95% 752 3,779 4.77 792 105% 3,211 3.41 942 125% 2,782 3.98 699 93%
172 Kocurek 673 660 98% 676 100% 42 6 22 85% 673 4,292 4.77 900 134% 2,962 3.41 869 129% 3,561 3.98 895 133%
168 Langford 692 834 121% 914 132% 43 6 22 85% 692 2,881 4.77 604 87% 2,579 3.41 756 109% 2,519 3.98 633 91%
121 Lee 418 428 102% 293 70% 24 4 22 95% 418 2,059 4.77 432 103% 2,238 3.41 656 157% 2,647 3.98 665 159%
160 Linder 542 892 164% 906 167% 34 5 22 85% 542 2,738 4.77 574 106% 2,507 3.41 735 136% 2,322 3.98 584 108%
122 Maplewood 355 406 114% 302 85% 20 3 22 95% 355 2,470 4.77 518 146% 2,447 3.41 718 202% 1,941 3.98 488 137%
123 Mathews 397 405 102% 299 75% 23 4 22 95% 397 1,906 4.77 400 101% 2,377 3.41 697 176% 2,278 3.98 572 144%
165 McBee 580 765 132% 1,026 177% 36 5 22 85% 580 5,127 4.77 1,075 185% 3,045 3.41 893 154% 2,852 3.98 717 124%
147 Menchaca 606 686 113% 702 116% 34 5 22 95% 606 3,572 4.77 749 124% 2,501 3.41 734 121% 2,442 3.98 614 101%
124 Metz 542 498 92% 481 89% 34 5 22 85% 542 4,045 4.77 848 156% 3,013 3.41 884 163% 2,816 3.98 708 130%
181 Mills 794 928 117% 860 108% 44 6 22 95% 794 3,759 4.77 788 99% 3,052 3.41 895 113% 2,747 3.98 690 87%
150 Norman 486 333 68% 380 78% 30 4 22 85% 486 2,876 4.77 603 124% 2,259 3.41 662 136% 2,647 3.98 665 137%
148 Oak Hill 773 772 100% 783 101% 43 6 22 95% 773 4,567 4.77 957 124% 3,393 3.41 995 129% 3,330 3.98 837 108%
125 Oak Springs 411 274 67% 336 82% 26 4 22 85% 411 2,086 4.77 437 106% 2,985 3.41 875 213% 2,130 3.98 535 130%
156 Odom 542 658 121% 740 136% 34 5 22 85% 542 2,643 4.77 554 102% 2,421 3.41 710 131% 2,877 3.98 723 133%
126 Ortega 374 296 79% 263 70% 24 4 22 85% 374 2,734 4.77 573 153% 2,323 3.41 681 182% 1,468 3.98 369 99%
189 Overton 617 668 108% 904 146% 39 6 22 85% 617 4,148 4.77 870 141% 7,853 3.41 2,303 373% 3,560 3.98 894 145%
171 Palm 673 606 90% 687 102% 42 6 22 85% 673 4,189 4.77 878 130% 3,075 3.41 902 134% 3,757 3.98 944 140%
143 Patton 773 914 118% 894 116% 43 6 22 95% 773 4,849 4.77 1,017 131% 3,067 3.41 899 116% 3,542 3.98 890 115%
128 Pease 293 256 87% 0 0% 17 3 22 95% 293 1,307 4.77 274 94% 2,995 3.41 878 300% 1,468 3.98 369 126%
129 Pecan Springs 486 532 109% 520 107% 30 4 22 85% 486 3,220 4.77 675 139% 2,412 3.41 707 146% 2,986 3.98 750 154%
190 Perez 598 886 148% 864 144% 37 5 22 85% 598 4,158 4.77 872 146% 3,295 3.41 966 161% 3,467 3.98 871 146%
164 Pickle 617 740 120% 618 100% 39 6 22 85% 617 4,363 4.77 915 148% 9,153 3.41 2,684 435% 2,882 3.98 724 117%
151 Pillow 522 653 125% 617 118% 29 4 22 95% 522 2,761 4.77 579 111% 3,069 3.41 900 172% 2,282 3.98 573 110%
130 Pleasant Hill 524 619 118% 662 126% 33 5 22 85% 524 3,991 4.77 837 160% 3,022 3.41 886 169% 3,546 3.98 891 170%
131 Read Pre-K 393 509 129% 0 0% 23 - 18 95% 393 2,982 4.77 625 159% NA 3.41 NA NA 2,148 3.98 540 137%
132 Reilly 318 296 93% 342 108% 20 3 22 85% 318 2,287 4.77 479 151% 2,398 3.41 703 221% 1,637 3.98 411 129%
133 Ridgetop 206 219 106% 123 60% 13 2 22 85% 206 2,309 4.77 484 235% 2,336 3.41 685 333% 1,762 3.98 443 215%
Classroom Capacity
Cafeteria = 4,200 SF / 880 Students
4.77 SF per Student
Gym = 3,000 SF / 880 Students
3.41 SF per Student
Library = 3,500 SF / 880 Students
3.98 SF per Student
AISD Permanent Capacity
11/11/2010 Page 202
EXHIBIT "B"
174 Rodriguez 711 910 128% 1,044 147% 44 6 22 85% 711 3,714 4.77 779 110% 3,056 3.41 896 126% 2,818 3.98 708 100%
127 Sanchez 580 585 101% 564 97% 36 5 22 85% 580 2,959 4.77 620 107% 2,399 3.41 704 121% 3,028 3.98 761 131%
139 Sims 355 277 78% 366 103% 22 3 22 85% 355 2,599 4.77 545 153% 2,484 3.41 728 205% 2,625 3.98 660 186%
136 St. Elmo 411 304 74% 407 99% 26 4 22 85% 411 2,825 4.77 592 144% 2,259 3.41 662 161% 3,149 3.98 791 192%
138 Summitt 731 854 117% 572 78% 41 6 22 95% 731 3,683 4.77 772 106% 3,064 3.41 898 123% 4,017 3.98 1,009 138%
158 Sunset Valley 561 451 80% 494 88% 35 5 22 85% 561 2,987 4.77 626 112% 2,376 3.41 697 124% 2,952 3.98 742 132%
140 Travis Heights 486 537 110% 556 114% 31 5 22 85% 486 2,992 4.77 627 129% 2,812 3.41 825 170% 1,962 3.98 493 101%
141 Walnut Creek 655 916 140% 918 140% 41 6 22 85% 655 4,721 4.77 990 151% 2,638 3.41 773 118% 3,706 3.98 931 142%
175 Widen 673 769 114% 834 124% 42 6 22 85% 673 3,851 4.77 807 120% 3,051 3.41 895 133% 3,363 3.98 845 126%
166 Williams 561 642 114% 728 130% 35 5 22 85% 561 3,040 4.77 637 114% 2,500 3.41 733 131% 2,923 3.98 734 131%
157 Winn 524 463 88% 601 115% 33 5 22 85% 524 2,565 4.77 538 103% 2,322 3.41 681 130% 2,348 3.98 590 113%
152 Wooldridge 524 878 168% 1,096 209% 33 5 22 85% 524 4,120 4.77 864 165% 2,580 3.41 757 145% 2,319 3.98 583 111%
144 Wooten 468 695 149% 740 158% 29 4 22 85% 468 3,534 4.77 741 158% 2,534 3.41 743 159% 3,036 3.98 763 163%
145 Zavala 580 407 70% 339 58% 36 5 22 85% 580 2,618 4.77 549 95% 2,740 3.41 804 139% 2,714 3.98 682 118%
146 Zilker 460 522 114% 329 72% 26 4 22 95% 460 2,894 4.77 607 132% 2,217 3.41 650 141% 2,703 3.98 679 148%
44,905 48,738 47,366
LOC Middle
Permanent
Capacity
2010
Enrollment
% of Perm.
Capacity
by Enroll.
2009-10
Population
% of Perm.
Capacity
by Pop.
Classroom
Count
Special
Rooms
(ES Only)
Average
Students
per
Classroom
Efficiency
Factor
Classroom
Capacity
Café Area
(SF)
4.10 SF per
student
Capacity
based on
Café Size
Café /
Classroom
Gym Area
(SF)
12.18 SF
per
student
Capacity
based on
Gym Size
Gym /
Classroom
Library
Area (SF)
4.36 SF per
student
Capacity
based on
Library Size
Library /
Classroom
59 Bailey 1,176 1,041 89% 997 85% 56 0 28 75% 1,176 4,752 4.10 1,159 99% 13,668 12.18 1,122 95% 4,013 4.36 920 78%
54 Bedichek 941 1,054 112% 1,171 124% 48 0 28 70% 941 6,348 4.10 1,548 165% 11,555 12.18 949 101% 3,657 4.36 839 89%
46 Burnet 1,039 998 96% 1,163 112% 53 0 28 70% 1,039 5,765 4.10 1,406 135% 11,877 12.18 975 94% 3,243 4.36 744 72%
57 Covington 1,125 805 72% 922 82% 63 0 28 75% 1,323 4,461 4.10 1,088 82% 13,935 12.18 1,144 86% 4,044 4.36 928 70%
55 Dobie 902 630 70% 709 79% 46 0 28 70% 902 4,790 4.10 1,168 130% 11,388 12.18 935 104% 3,553 4.36 815 90%
43 Fulmore 1,078 995 92% 898 83% 55 0 28 70% 1,078 5,452 4.10 1,330 123% 13,196 12.18 1,083 101% 4,127 4.36 947 88%
56 Garcia 1,215 658 54% 801 66% 62 0 28 70% 1,215 5,220 4.10 1,273 105% 15,986 12.18 1,312 108% 4,666 4.36 1,070 88%
62 Gorzycki 1,323 963 73% 943 71% 63 0 28 75% 1,323 4,669 4.10 1,139 86% 15,396 12.18 1,264 96% 5,616 4.36 1,288 97%
44 Kealing 1,333 1,233 93% 563 42% 80 0 28 70% 1,568 4,433 4.10 1,081 69% 12,344 12.18 1,013 65% 4,499 4.36 1,032 66%
45 Lamar 1,008 604 60% 554 55% 48 0 28 75% 1,008 6,725 4.10 1,640 163% 10,575 12.18 868 86% 3,665 4.36 841 83%
51 Martin 804 639 80% 1,070 133% 41 0 28 70% 804 4,022 4.10 981 122% 11,740 12.18 964 120% 2,983 4.36 684 85%
58 Mendez 1,215 890 73% 1,224 101% 62 0 28 70% 1,215 4,501 4.10 1,098 90% 13,699 12.18 1,125 93% 4,044 4.36 928 76%
52 Murchison 1,113 1,281 115% 1,187 107% 53 0 28 75% 1,113 4,879 4.10 1,190 107% 11,857 12.18 974 87% 3,413 4.36 783 70%
47 O. Henry 945 1,026 109% 764 81% 45 0 28 75% 945 5,199 4.10 1,268 134% 10,628 12.18 873 92% 3,147 4.36 722 76%
61 Paredes 1,156 930 80% 1,123 97% 59 0 28 70% 1,156 5,953 4.10 1,452 126% 12,775 12.18 1,049 91% 2,798 4.36 642 55%
48 Pearce 1,078 329 31% 683 63% 55 0 28 70% 1,078 5,057 4.10 1,234 114% 13,147 12.18 1,079 100% 4,293 4.36 985 91%
28 Richards YWL 924 528 57% 0 0% 44 0 28 75% 924 5,272 4.10 1,286 139% 11,751 12.18 965 104% 5,046 4.36 1,157 125%
60 Small 1,239 959 77% 873 70% 59 0 28 75% 1,239 6,244 4.10 1,523 123% 13,899 12.18 1,141 92% 3,142 4.36 721 58%
53 Webb 804 591 74% 692 86% 41 0 28 70% 804 4,348 4.10 1,061 132% 12,023 12.18 987 123% 4,399 4.36 1,009 126%
20,417 16,154 16,337
LOC High
Permanent
Capacity
2010
Enrollment
% of Perm.
Capacity
by Enroll.
2009-10
Population
% of Perm.
Capacity
by Pop.
Classroom
Count
Special
Rooms
(ES Only)
Average
Students
per
Classroom
Efficiency
Factor
Classroom
Capacity
Café Area
(SF)
3.75 SF per
student
School
Capacity
based on
Café Size
Café /
Classroom
Gym Area
(SF)
8.63 SF per
student
School
Capacity
based on
Gym Size
Gym /
Classroom
Library
Area (SF)
3.50 SF per
student
School
Capacity
based on
Library Size
Library /
Classroom
17 Akins 2,394 2,720 114% 3,076 128% 114 0 28 75% 2,394 10,935 3.75 2,916 122% 21,471 8.63 2,488 104% 8,371 3.50 2,392 100%
9 Anderson 2,017 2,089 104% 1,912 95% 113 0 28 75% 2,373 8,178 3.75 2,181 92% 17,068 8.63 1,978 83% 9,864 3.50 2,818 119%
2 Austin 2,205 2,337 106% 1,964 89% 105 0 28 75% 2,205 10,074 3.75 2,686 122% 17,488 8.63 2,026 92% 5,977 3.50 1,708 77%
13 Bowie 2,535 2,876 113% 2,594 102% 142 0 28 75% 2,982 9,200 3.75 2,453 82% 22,036 8.63 2,553 86% 9,862 3.50 2,818 94%
8 Crockett 2,163 1,686 78% 1,927 89% 103 0 28 75% 2,163 8,955 3.75 2,388 110% 17,050 8.63 1,976 91% 7,671 3.50 2,192 101%
19/20/29
EMHSJC /
International 1,548 894 58% 1,310 85% 79 0 28 70% 1,548 8,952 3.75 2,387 154% 16,419 8.63 1,903 123% 6,106 3.50 1,745 113%
15 Garza 321 260 81% 0 0% 18 0 28 75% 378 1,834 3.75 489 129% 2,282 8.63 264 70% 1,223 3.50 349 92%
4 Lanier 1,627 1,624 100% 2,037 125% 83 0 28 70% 1,627 13,513 3.75 3,603 221% 23,465 8.63 2,719 167% 7,677 3.50 2,194 135%
14/18 LBJ / LASA 1,842 1,881 102% 1,110 60% 94 0 28 70% 1,842 8,026 3.75 2,140 116% 18,936 8.63 2,194 119% 8,856 3.50 2,530 137%
5 McCallum 1,596 1,824 114% 1,343 84% 76 0 28 75% 1,596 6,244 3.75 1,665 104% 15,765 8.63 1,827 114% 6,981 3.50 1,994 125%
6 Reagan 1,588 901 57% 1,597 101% 81 0 28 70% 1,588 8,600 3.75 2,293 144% 22,180 8.63 2,570 162% 6,226 3.50 1,779 112%
7 Travis 1,862 1,420 76% 1,994 107% 95 0 28 70% 1,862 9,462 3.75 2,523 136% 14,870 8.63 1,723 93% 7,017 3.50 2,005 108%
21,698 20,512 20,864
Classroom Capacity
Cafeteria = 9,000 SF / 2,400 Students
3.75 SF per Student
Gym = 20,720 SF / 2,400 Students
8.63 SF per Student
Library = 8,400 SF / 2,400 Students
3.50 SF per Student
Classroom Capacity
Cafeteria = 4,500 SF / 1,100 Students
4.10 SF per Student
Gym = 13,400 SF / 1,100 Students
12.18 SF per Student
Library = 4,800 SF / 1,100 Students
4.36 SF per Student
AISD Permanent Capacity
11/11/2010 Page 203
EXHIBIT "B"
LOC Elementary
Permanent
Capacity
2010
Enrollment
% of Perm.
Capacity
by Enroll.
2010-11
Population
% of Perm.
Capacity
by Pop.
142 Allan 673 379 56% 354 53%
101 Allison 486 543 112% 585 120%
102 Andrews 486 717 147% 692 142%
187 Baldwin 669 508 76% 557 83%
182 Baranoff 794 876 110% 891 112%
149 Barrington 556 996 179% 955 172%
103 Barton Hills 251 386 154% 203 81%
104 Becker 524 208 40% 226 43%
105 Blackshear 598 244 41% 288 48%
106 Blanton 636 591 93% 630 99%
185 Blazier 598 775 130% 896 150%
170 Boone 752 501 67% 478 64%
107 Brentwood 585 495 85% 456 78%
108 Brooke 430 439 102% 441 103%
109 Brown 468 519 111% 525 112%
110 Bryker Woods 272 404 149% 312 115%
111 Campbell 524 360 69% 367 70%
173 Casey 711 669 94% 763 107%
112 Casis 669 825 123% 731 109%
184 Clayton 836 867 104% 837 100%
161 Cook 561 901 161% 1,252 223%
183 Cowan 669 783 117% 707 106%
113 Cunningham 627 512 82% 573 91%
179 Davis 731 683 93% 666 91%
114 Dawson 505 331 66% 276 55%
154 Doss 543 768 141% 728 134%
176 Galindo 711 704 99% 689 97%
116 Govalle 598 415 69% 452 76%
159 Graham 598 761 127% 825 138%
117 Gullett 418 541 129% 325 78%
118 Harris 542 758 140% 755 139%
163 Hart 711 898 126% 888 125%
119 Highland Park 585 662 113% 599 102%
155 Hill 627 732 117% 714 114%
162 Houston 692 915 132% 897 130%
178 Jordan 655 833 127% 706 108%
120 Joslin 374 363 97% 329 88%
180 Kiker 752 933 124% 883 117%
172 Kocurek 673 660 98% 687 102%
168 Langford 692 834 121% 895 129%
121 Lee 418 428 102% 308 74%
160 Linder 542 892 164% 956 176%
122 Maplewood 355 406 114% 300 84%
123 Mathews 397 405 102% 284 72%
2010 Population Update
01/26/2011 Page 204
EXHIBIT "B"
165 McBee 580 765 132% 1,031 178%
147 Menchaca 606 686 113% 685 113%
124 Metz 542 498 92% 477 88%
181 Mills 794 928 117% 831 105%
150 Norman 486 333 68% 376 77%
148 Oak Hill 773 772 100% 820 106%
125 Oak Springs 411 274 67% 293 71%
156 Odom 542 658 121% 706 130%
126 Ortega 374 296 79% 266 71%
189 Overton 617 668 108% 948 154%
171 Palm 673 606 90% 637 95%
143 Patton 773 914 118% 908 117%
128 Pease 293 256 87% 0 0%
129 Pecan Springs 486 532 109% 490 101%
190 Perez 598 886 148% 945 158%
164 Pickle 617 740 120% 737 119%
151 Pillow 522 653 125% 651 125%
130 Pleasant Hill 524 619 118% 631 121%
131 Read Pre-K 393 509 129% 0 0%
132 Reilly 318 296 93% 357 112%
133 Ridgetop 206 219 106% 128 62%
174 Rodriguez 711 910 128% 1,045 147%
127 Sanchez 580 585 101% 584 101%
139 Sims 355 277 78% 343 97%
136 St. Elmo 411 304 74% 369 90%
138 Summitt 731 854 117% 623 85%
158 Sunset Valley 561 451 80% 483 86%
140 Travis Heights 486 537 110% 548 113%
141 Walnut Creek 655 916 140% 936 143%
175 Widen 673 769 114% 794 118%
166 Williams 561 642 114% 640 114%
157 Winn 524 463 88% 485 93%
152 Wooldridge 524 878 168% 1,160 222%
144 Wooten 468 695 149% 672 144%
145 Zavala 580 407 70% 347 60%
146 Zilker 460 522 114% 338 74%
44,905 48,738 48,165
2010 Population Update
01/26/2011 Page 205
EXHIBIT "B"
LOC Middle
Permanent
Capacity
2010
Enrollment
% of Perm.
Capacity
by Enroll.
2010-11
Population
% of Perm.
Capacity
by Pop.
59 Bailey 1,176 1,041 89% 979 83%
54 Bedichek 941 1,054 112% 1,219 130%
46 Burnet 1,039 998 96% 1,170 113%
57 Covington 1,125 805 72% 905 80%
55 Dobie 902 630 70% 719 80%
43 Fulmore 1,078 995 92% 850 79%
56 Garcia 1,215 658 54% 829 68%
62 Gorzycki 1,323 963 73% 989 75%
44 Kealing 1,333 1,233 93% 541 41%
45 Lamar 1,008 604 60% 583 58%
51 Martin 804 639 80% 1,056 131%
58 Mendez 1,215 890 73% 1,266 104%
52 Murchison 1,113 1,281 115% 1,171 105%
47 O. Henry 945 1,026 109% 804 85%
61 Paredes 1,156 930 80% 1,165 101%
48 Pearce 1,078 329 31% 712 66%
28 Richards YWL 924 528 57% 0 0%
60 Small 1,239 959 77% 876 71%
53 Webb 804 591 74% 731 91%
20,417 16,154 16,565
LOC High
Permanent
Capacity
2010
Enrollment
% of Perm.
Capacity
by Enroll.
2010-11
Population
% of Perm.
Capacity
by Pop.
17 Akins 2,394 2,720 114% 3,092 129%
9 Anderson 2,017 2,089 104% 1,962 97%
2 Austin 2,205 2,337 106% 1,958 89%
13 Bowie 2,535 2,876 113% 2,606 103%
8 Crockett 2,163 1,686 78% 1,883 87%
19/20/29
EMHSJC /
International 1,548 894 58% 1,249 81%
15 Garza 321 260 81% 0 0%
4 Lanier 1,627 1,624 100% 1,981 122%
14/18 LBJ / LASA 1,842 1,881 102% 1,083 59%
5 McCallum 1,596 1,824 114% 1,316 82%
6 Reagan 1,588 901 57% 1,552 98%
7 Travis 1,862 1,420 76% 1,902 102%
21,698 20,512 20,584
2010 Population Update
01/26/2011 Page 206
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
District-Wide Facility Master Plan
Appendix C Visioning Workshop Summary
Page 207
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISDFacility Master Plan
Visioning Workshop
May 13 & 14, 2010
Page 208
EXHIBIT "B"
Acknowledgements Cuningham Group Architecture P.A., as a consultant to DeJONG-RICHTER, prepared this document with the support and assistance of the following Facility Master Plan Vision Workshop participants: John Alawneh AISD - Technology Tony Arnold City of Austin – Parks & Recreation John Blazier Business Partner Kathrin Brewer Austin Partners in Education Bill Caritij AISD - Chief Accountability Meria Carstarphen AISD - Superintendent Nan Clayton Former AISD Board Member Ariel Cloud AISD – Asst. Superintendent Elementary Nicole Conley-Abram AISD - CFO Tommy Cowan Business Partner Paul Cruz Chief of Schools Ashton Cumberbatch Community Seton Hospital Elizabeth Dickey AISD Special Education Bill De Dufour AISD - Technology Richard Frazier AISD – Teacher / Task Force Chair Janna Griffin Asst. Supt. Office - Elementary Janis Guerrero AISD – Community Relations Bergeron Harris AISD – Asst. Supt. Middle Schools Janna Lilly AISD – Special Education Viviana Lopez AISD – Curriculum/Special Projects Eliza May Community Janet Mitchell Community – Task Force Chair Chris Moore City of Austin – Child Safety Jaqui Porter Early Childhood Geronimo Rodriguez Community – Seton Hospital Curt Shaw Director of Construction Management Karen Sperry AISD – Chief of Staff Paul Turner AISD – Executive Director of Facilities Gloria Williams AISD – Community Education Cora Wright City of Austin – Parks & Recreation Other Participants
Pat Rossett Carolyn Staskiewicz
AISD – Assistant Director Bond Services DeJONG-RICHTER
Eric Sheppard Magellan Inc Steven Kapeller BLGY Architecture Benny Hawkins BLGY Architecture Meg Parsons Cuningham Group Architecture, P.A. Tim Dufault Cuningham Group Architecture, P.A.
Page 209
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Table of Contents
Introduction
Day One A. Greatest Hopes B. Provocation I: Sir Ken Robinson C. Issues & Assets
D. Provocation II: School of One E. I See…We See… F. Facility Master Plan Vision Statement G. Provocation III: Environment Matters H. Values: AISD Strategic Plan 2010-2015 Review I. Story Time
Day Two
A. Reflections B. Provocation III: John A. Johnson C. Facility Principles
Appendices A. Day One Presentation
B. Day Two Presentation C. Final Presentation D. Photos
Page 210
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Introduction
This document is the result of a Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop held May 13th & 14th, 2010 with participants from the Austin Independent School District and the community. The purpose of this workshop was to create a Facility Master Plan Vision Statement and Facility Principles. The purpose of a Facility Master Plan is to create a clear and compelling vision of the future for AISD, aligning facilities with learning. A Facility Master Plan Vision Statement creates a filter by which future decisions can be made and Facility Principles create overarching ideas about what‟s important for all schools in AISD. The process used during the Visioning Workshop was interactive and included “Provocations” and small and whole group work. The following is a summary of our work during both days.
Page 211
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Greatest Hopes: Day one started with participants sharing their Greatest Hopes for the Facility Master Planning process. Below are some of the hopes shared by participants:
Page 212
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Provocation I: Sir Ken Robinson: Do Schools Kill Creativity? http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity.html
Reactions to the video included the following:
Learning occurs in many ways – public education focuses on academic achievement
Career/Vocational Education is not emphasized but some children want – we need to provide the right programs for all children
The system is structurally set up to fail some children – there are ethnocentric, gender, and cultural differences we need to consider
Everyone learns differently
Focus on where students can be successful through application
Plan for the future but not at the expense of today
There is a knowing/doing gap in education – establish the courage to do what we know is right – “thou shalt” …accountability
We continue to build boxes for people to teach in that look the same – we need more flexible, collaborative spaces
We need to respond to changes in the world; we need to be agile and our environment affects us
The challenge is that we have given critical responsibility to one group of adults: teachers; we need to consider the role of parents and the community to create creative thinkers. Open possibilities for kids to learn from and in whole world – engage the community
Page 213
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Issues & Assets We discussed and prioritized Issues and Assets in Austin ISD. This was a way to find out what was important to those present and what they thought were key to the success of a Facilities Master Plan. As is noted below on the sheets the key issues identified were:
Equity of facilities and resources across the district
Efficient use of resources throughout the community
Partnering
Future flexibility for teaching in the future
Competition and school choices (Middle class participates in public schools but they have other choices)
School boundaries
Page 214
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Provocation II: School of One http://schools.nyc.gov/community/innovation/SchoolofOne/default.htm
The group watched a video on the School of One, a program that started the summer of 2009, in New York City. From the above website: “The mission of School of One is to provide students with personalized, effective, and dynamic classroom instruction so that teachers have more time to focus on the quality of their instruction. To achieve this mission, School of One re-imagines the traditional classroom model. Instead of one teacher and 25-30 students in a classroom, each student participates in multiple instructional modalities, including a combination of teacher-led instruction, one-on-one tutoring, independent learning, and work with virtual tutors. To organize this type of learning, each student receives a unique daily schedule based on his or her academic strengths and needs. As a result, students within the same school or even the same classroom can receive profoundly different instruction as each student‟s schedule is tailored to the skills they need and the ways they best learn. Teachers acquire data about student achievement each day and then adapt their live instructional lessons accordingly By leveraging technology to play a more essential role in planning instruction, teachers have more time to focus on doing what they do best - delivering quality instruction and ensuring that all students learn.”
Page 215
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Activity I: I See…We See… “Vision is the art of seeing the invisible” Jonathan Swift To start the visioning process we asked participants to „imagine it‟s 10 years out, the AISD Facility Master Plan has given the district amazing learning places that reflect the community and help the district accomplish its mission. People visit because its facilities are so successful in accomplishing the goals of the District. Imagine you‟re giving someone a tour – what do you see?‟ Individually participants created I See statements:
One-on-one time with teachers
Entire staff focused and engaged with kids
Teachers focused on teaching the kids and not other issues
Schools are the pride of the community and the first choice of middle class families
Large yet flexible spaces built to fit our growing population
Repurposed spaces that are vintage yet functional for the community
All facilities are beautifully maintained and are supportive of the instructional programs
All schools are painted in bright colors – place of exciting learning
A dramatically reduced number of schools, yet a mix of small, medium, and large facilities
50 years later the space is still current (or can be)
Public and private, city and school district co-location of offices, classrooms, theaters, and meeting areas
Art facilities which involve all our students and the world class Austin arts community in a learning partnership
Shared facilities with the city Zachary Scott Theater, Long Center, AT&T, IBM, CAN. ACC – classroom days around and within the city
Students integrated within the community, downtown, capitol, tech companies, Whole Foods; “what do you do days”
Students a large part of the day as interns and apprentices
Schools have clear feeder patterns and each feeder pattern has a special focus
Engaged, enthusiastic students that want to be there. Eager to explain their love for learning.
Loud sounds from playing and team problems solving
Quiet places for reading and silent learning contemplation
Team sports, yoga, and meditation
Wall-sized white boards for drawing ideas and solutions (graffiti on buildings)
Integrated learning (curriculum) across multiple learning environments
Teachers focused on each child‟s learning style and developing and delivering in small groups to that style on a fundamental goal
Subjects based on student career goals
Teams of students involved in projects using technology
Students in a variety of “work spaces “ to complete team projects
Teachers facilitating the learning for students with technology as a major focus
Fifteen-to eighteen-hour campuses that engage all ages of the community from senior populations to immigrant populations teaching each other, weekend festivals, performing arts with the community
Partnerships with the community, government and schools to achieve educational goals
Schools that are useable by the community – computers, gymnasiums, weight room
Teachers adept at teaching with technology, smart boards that are interactive, advanced projection systems with students to share their work
Computer-directed programs that include collaboration and relationships
Furniture that is moveable and easily configured to adapt to a lesson
Wall space for student work display
Work space for problem solving – environmental issues
Students interacting with each other and the instructor in a well lit, clean, environmentally comfortable space
Recreational and athletic facilities that are available in all communities resulting from partnerships with public and private entities that support youth and adult education
Page 216
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Schools that welcome visitors and are responsive to visitors
Classrooms that are interactive include technology but also instructionally interactive – kids engaged with each other and teacher
All students have internet access at home
Staff, students and parents can readily access results and academic plans
Students have exactly the information they need in the best format
Realization of the promise of “instructional TV” to help teachers with complex, real world concepts such velocity, acceleration, gravity, history of Middle Eastern areas, areas on curves, environmental science, poetry etc…
Virtual lab for HS students to work on course credits. Teachers as side facilitators.
As I walk through the facility I see a number of distant learning centers where students and teachers participating in a collaborative learning process. These rooms have state of the art technology.
State of the art facilities on each campus and two district-wide performing art centers
Students attend neighborhood schools as best opportunity
Classroom instruction that accommodates different student learning styles and provides support and enrichment based on student learning needs
Stimulating and inviting learning environments that are fun to be in
Inviting/welcoming face to the facility
Parents working with students throughout the school
Spaces for collaboration between teachers, parents and students
Parents present, actively engaged, knowing learning goals of students
Space for community/parents to be engaged
Outside area is an extension of the learning environment
Students learning in flexible indoor and outdoor spaces
Gardens, fountains and trails instead of carpet and grass
Active learning
Classrooms that make use of indoor and outdoor settings for learning
Students moving and active in the learning process
Students actively engaged in their learning
Classrooms which comfortably hold 30 students in a variety of ways
Students working in small groups collaboratively
I see building design geared towards multi-sensory student engagement
A clean, well maintained visually appealing school for every student
Tables instead of desks
Classrooms are organized into learning centers
Apprenticeships for vocational education
Learners engaged in community activities and project learning
Government classes sponsor a bill/resolution at the capital
Spaces for volunteers from collaborative agencies
Libraries that allow students to access the world beyond their classroom
Community of instructors…local, expert, university, etc…
Space for group performances in every school
Culturally relevant artwork and displays
Technology is natural (organic part of the learning process
Facilities and technology and resources accessible for all
Classrooms where students have access to technology and its use is integrated into all areas
Students skilled at technology for gaining, sharing, linking, creating information
Multiple technology resources in every classroom
Science and math labs which allow for technology and hands on activities
I Pad technology instead of paper
Learning spaces for teachers and administrators
Adequate work space for all staff
Multi use meeting spaces
Less office space – more multi-purpose spaces
All space is special education space based on IEP (Individual Education Plan) for every child
Page 217
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Social skills training as part the degree program (such as mediation training)
Flex schedules for students in high school
Young children given the time and opportunity to learn through play
Access to all resources within a school for every student
Curriculum that is differentiated to fit individuals needs and flexible schedules to allow the best use of time
Secondary classrooms that allow for small group work (not just rows of chairs)
A flower bed at the entrance of school, there are trees that have been pruned, and doors have been painted recently and rooms are brightly painted, there are posters on the walls along with student work. The facilities reflect attention to detail
As we enter the library, there is a bank of computers and students working in small groups accessing databases from around the world. The students are engaged and the noise level is amazingly semi quiet.
Technology driven learning in every classroom in AISD facility
Language development academy, producing fluent 2nd and 3rd language proficiency
Fine arts integrated with academics integrated with social learning
Music academy generating music professionals, singers, etc.
Spaces that are student/teacher friendly
Teachers interacting with students
Community advocate centers/service for students and family members
Learning centers for 0 to 4-year olds
All students actively involved in learning
Collaboration between AISD and ACC that produces HS graduates interested in graduation with certificates in medical technology, nursing, construction, etc…
Central headquarters reduced in physical size, in more compact, effective structure
Substantial revenue generated from space use that can be reinvested into important programming
Private and corporate donation to AISD foundation in excess of $50 million
Number-one rated HS in the country in Austin due to technology or live music/jazz, band or other with an awesome facility/stages, media rooms, etc…
I See Wordle www.wordle.net
Wordle is a program that generates “word clouds” from text. The clouds give greater prominence to words that appear more frequently in the source text. The Wordle to the left was generated from all the I See statements
contributed by participants
Page 218
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
In small groups participants then shared these I See… statements and created We See… statements. Listed below are the We see… statements worked on by participants in small groups. These became the basis of the Vision Statement. We see…..
An overall environment that is both encouraging and engaging Purposeful, functional, modular facilities that serve all students needs Facilities “co-purposed” for student and community usage Teachers totally focused on education and innovation
Students in a variety of learning environments with technology support, integrated to ensure development of individual learning styles and goals, supported by community partnerships on an ongoing basis (24/7) Facilities that are inviting, welcoming, flexible enough to accommodate and support a variety of instructional arrangements and incorporates:
instructional technology
family and community access to information
teacher access to information and resources
Facilities with dedicated spaces to foster and engage parents/community Facilities that use the outdoors and indoors in ways that are environmentally responsible and
allows for learning to take place in a variety of ways Facilities that engage with the community to provide extended learning opportunities both within
the school walls and beyond Classrooms large enough to allow for flex grouping and active hands-on learning A variety of multi-use areas Facilities where technology is integrated in every space and accessible to all students and staff Spaces that allow for differentiated instruction and flexible school day
Environment: small group instruction spaces, flower beds, natural light, storage areas and no portable buildings (beautiful physical space high quality learning is norm) Special Programs: Single gender/ single-grade academies, partnerships with higher learning for career/vocational skill development, family resource centers, fine arts, language academies and early childhood centers Technology: Virtual/distance learning, IPad/electronic text-books Central Office: More compact space Revenue: Space used (for partnerships, co-locations in underutilized space) Private and corporate gifts – Austin-based celebrities
Page 219
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 220
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Facility Master Plan Vision Statement
The purpose of a vision statement is to guide the entire process, help set priorities, align resources against priorities and facilitate an efficient decision making process. The following vision statement was created by participants from the work done together:
All AISD schools inspire high student achievement and common community goals through inviting, accessible, and efficient facilities that integrate technology and sustainability. Revised Version:
All AISD schools will inspire high student achievement
and support common community goals through equitable,
inviting facilities that integrate technology and are
optimally used, accessible, sustainable, and meet highest
educational adequacy standards.
Page 221
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
14
Provocation III: Environment Matters “The only true voyage of discovery consists not of visiting new places, but seeing with new eyes.” Voltaire As a part of the process of thinking about the future of Austin schools, the group looked at learning styles, the learning environment and current examples of what other districts are doing with their facilities. Below are examples of what was discussed. The presentation is included in the May 13th presentation in the appendix of this document.
Page 222
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Values Building on the work that has already been done in the District we reviewed the Austin ISD Strategic Plan and expanded on the Values contained in the Plan: AISD Strategic Plan 2010-2015:
Mission (What We Do) In partnership with parents and our community, AISD exists to provide a comprehensive educational experience that is high quality, challenging, and inspires all students to make a positive contribution to society. Vision (Where We Want to Be) AISD will be nationally recognized as an outstanding school district, instilling a passion for life-long learning in all students. Goals (What We Want to Accomplish)
Goal 1: All students will perform at or above grade level.
Goal 2: Achievement gaps among all student groups will be eliminated.
Goal 3: All students will graduate ready for college, career, and life in a globally competitive economy.
Goal 4: All schools will meet or exceed state accouintability standards, and the district will meet federal standards and exceed state standards.
Strategies (How We Will Achieve Our Goals)
Provide a high-quality, well-rounded educational experience to all students that is rigorous, culturally relevant, healthful, and engaging.
Build strong relationships with students, families, and the community to increase trust and shared responsibility.
Ensure that every classroom has a high-quality, effective educator, supported by high-quality, effective administrators and support staff.
Align resources to accomplish priorities within a balanced budget.
Values (What We Believe In)
Focus on Children
Excellence
Integrity
Equity
Respect
Health and Safety
Page 223
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 224
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 225
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Story Time As a way to think more about how learning will happen in the future and what role the facilities play, participants were asked to work in small groups and answer the following question:
Imagine it is 2020 and AISD has met its strategic plan goals for 2015 and has addressed many of the key facility needs as defined in the Facility Master Plan of 2010. Imagine you are (a student, a community member, a teacher, a staff member) Describe your typical day in an AISD school – what does your day look like? 1. What are you doing? What is the process of learning and what are the outcomes or expectations? 2. Who are you with? How is your day organized? 3. What is your environment like? Where are you and how do you feel? 4. What makes AISD a special place to learn?
Page 226
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Day Two: Reflections While Day One was about creating a Facility Master Plan Vision Statement, Day Two of the workshop was about creating Facility Principles. Facility Principles create overarching ideas about what‟s important for all schools in AISD. To start off Day Two the group reflected on Day One and on a video assigned as homework: Dave Eggers‟ Wish: Once Upon a School. http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/dave_eggers_makes_his_ted_prize_wish_once_upon_a_school.html
Page 227
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Provocation IV: John A. Johnson From the KnowledgeWorks website: http://www.kwfdn.org/resource_library/_resources/sacc_video_guide.asp
"Schools as Centers of Community: John A. Johnson Achievement Plus Elementary School” is a video case study and discussion guide that assists local leaders and residents in creating constructive, meaningful dialogue on the importance of good school design and ways schools can become centers of their communities. KnowledgeWorks Foundation partnered with the American Architectural Foundation to create the guide and video. Video link: http://www.archfoundation.org/aaf/gsbd/Videos.SCC.htm
Page 228
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Facility Principles Starting with the Austin ISD 2010-2015 Strategic Plan Strategies, participants worked in small groups to define Facility Principles. Facility Principles are overarching ideas about what‟s important for all schools in the Austin Independent School District. For each of the Strategies groups defined what this meant for facilities. So, for example, if the Austin ISD is committed to an engaging/healthy experience for all students, this means what in terms of facilities.
Page 229
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Facility Principles The Austin Independent School District is committed to An engaging/healthy experience for all students … This means…
• All schools will have a space identified to engage parents and be responsive to student needs (learning/language/cultural/socioeconomic)
• All schools will have spaces dedicated to active learning and diverse learning styles
• All schools will be equipped to provide technology resources in classrooms and other learning areas
• Create and maintain clean and attractive grounds that encourage physical activities
• Provide safe entry and exit for cyclists, walkers, skateboarders, etc.
• Develop spaces that promote social and recreational interaction
• Common areas for active, hands-on group activities
• Coordinate and cooperate with other entities (YMCA, YWCA, Parks & Recreation) to share and/or build new facilities (pools, gyms, parks)
• All schools will have good indoor air quality, climate control, and day-lighting
• Our facilities will support high quality, rigorous, well rounded learning
Page 230
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Facility Principles The Austin Independent School District is committed to Strong relationships with students/families/community … This means…
• Community hubs for services and programs
• Flexible spaces and hours to accommodate changes in learning styles, instructional delivery supported by technological resources for students, families and communities
• Facilities to provide learning spaces that support student collaboration, teamwork and relationship building
Page 231
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Facility Principles The Austin Independent School District is committed to Supporting and engaging high quality effective staff … This means…
• AISD facility decisions promote long-term value
• AISD facilities should be equitable and adequate across the district
• AISD staff and community must have input into facility decisions to ensure adequate resources (examples: space, storage, technology, outlets)
• AISD facilities to provide high quality professional development spaces
• AISD facilities must provide an appropriate environment for staff effectiveness (example: HVAC, light, acoustics, security)
• AISD facilities must include adequate, flexible-use core facilities (library, gym, cafeteria)
• AISD staff must have appropriate access to various spaces to meet student needs of a high quality rigorous educational experience
Page 232
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Facility Principles The Austin Independent School District is committed to Aligning resources with priorities… This means…
• Leverage Austin public and private resources for more effective and efficient use of existing and new facilities by:
• Revisit efficiency study
• Align decisions with fiscal impact statement
• “CAN” concept (Community Action Network) to engage various public entities (e.g. UT, ACC, Travis County, Seton, St. David‟s, etc…) for purpose of repurposing facilities including charters and co-location
• Must at least break even or generate revenue
• Strategy for maintenance and operations to support facilities and address deferred, routine, and preventative maintenance
• Develop detailed capital plan schedule/report that includes budget/actuals/completion dates and M & O impact by project
• CAN concept must be integrated into bond planning process to address shared facilities and a more comprehensive set of services
• Develop strategic partnerships to obtain private donations /endowments in excess of $50 million
Page 233
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 234
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Appendices
Contained on the following pages are the presentations from both days.
Page 235
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 236
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 237
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 238
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 239
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 240
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 241
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 242
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 243
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 244
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 245
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 246
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 247
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 248
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 249
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 250
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 251
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 252
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 253
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 254
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 255
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 256
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 257
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 258
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 259
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 260
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 261
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 262
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 263
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 264
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 265
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 266
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 267
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 268
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 269
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 270
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 271
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 272
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 273
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 274
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 275
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 276
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 277
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 278
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 279
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 280
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 281
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 282
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 283
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 284
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 285
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 286
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 287
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Photos taken during the Workshop
Page 288
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 289
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 290
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 291
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 292
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 293
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 294
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 295
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 296
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 297
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 298
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 299
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 300
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 301
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
District-Wide Facility Master Plan
Appendices D, E, and F Appendix D: Community Dialogue #1 Results
Appendix E: Community Dialogue #2 Results
Appendix F: Community Meeting #3 Results
Due to the volume of these reports, see the following link to access this information:
http://rcpt.yousendit.com/1042147173/d50a3fb54a75365c932c5df95adbd0c4
Page 302
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
District-Wide Facility Master Plan
Appendix G Summary of Facility Options Discussed by the FMPTF
Page 303
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options
0.1Cut all bus service for magnet schools and signature programs $1,994,516
0.2Redraw boundaries for the entire district with the greatest weight on vertical alignment Unknown Unknown $0
0.4
Move International HS from Eastside HS to ALC. Relocate ALC students to Blackshear ES. Move Blachsear ES students to Zavala ES Unknown $0 $0
0.5
Repurpose Allan ES as a Pre-K thru 8 and move Allison ES attendance area middle school students from Martin MS to Allan Pre-K-8 Unknown $0 $0
0.6
Repurpose Blackshear ES to a Pre-K - 8 school, and Oak Springs ES as a Pre-K - 6th, move middle school students from these attendance zones from Kealing MS Unknown $0 $0
0.7
Repurpose Campbell ES as a Pre-K -8th school and move middle school students from Kealing MS to Campbell Pre-K-8th Unknown $0 $0
0.8
Repurpose Brentwood ES as a Pre-K-6th school, move sixth grade students in this attendance zone from Lamar MS to Brentwood PreK-6 School Unknown $0 $0
0.9Repurpose Zavala ES to a Pre-K-8th school and move middle school students from Martin MS to the new school Unknown $0 $0
0.10
Add a sixth grade class to Metz ES, Govalle ES, Ortega ES, Norman ES, and Sims ES, move sixth grade students from Martin MS and Garcia MS. Unknown $0 $0
0.11
Assuming all changes in options 0.5 through 0.10 are made, repurpose Martin MS as adminstrative center. Move remaining Martin students to Kealing MS. Remove magnet program from Kealing MS. Move 500 students to Lamar MS and 300 students to Covington MS. Move middle schol population of Cowan ES from Covington MS to Bailey MS. Unknown $0 $0
0.13Reassign portion of students from Small MS to Gorzycki MS $0 $0 $0
0.14
Purchase shopping center with adequate space for all district adminstrative functions and a movie theater for a Performing Arts Center. Sell CAC and discontinue all leases. Rent the PAC when not in use. $0
0.15Charge a fee for general transfers, reducing fee for low-income families Unknown $0 $0
0.16Move the media center and professional library services together with PDC for better utilization of resources Unknown TBD TBD
0.17 Build three new elementary schools - Undesignated $0 $0 $79,700,000
NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
DescriptionOption M&O SavingsCost Avoidance
Future Bond Impact
Page 304
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options
NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
DescriptionOption M&O SavingsCost Avoidance
Future Bond Impact
0.18Build a new middle school - Southeast (land funded from previous bond) $0 $0 $55,700,000
0.19Build a new high school - South (land funded from previous bond) $0 $0 $106,600,000
0.20 School for Young Men
0.21Global option to remove 6th grade from all elementary schools when room is available in middle schools
1.1Consolidate Reilly ES and Ridgetop ES at a new school built on the Reilly ES site $2,076,204 $7,734,391 $24,000,000
1.2 Reassign students from Brown ES to Reilly ES $0 $0 $0
2.1Move a portion of student population from Cowan ES to Boone ES ($72,607) $0 $0
2.2Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES and Boone ES $1,259,273 $8,466,116 $0
2.2AClose Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES. Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES $1,259,273 $8,466,116 $0
2.2 B
Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES. Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES and Cunningham ES. Adjust boundaries between Cowan ES and Boone ES. $1,266,595 $8,466,116 $0
2.2 C
Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES. Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES and Cunningham ES. $1,266,595 $8,466,116 $0
2.2 D
Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES. Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES and Cunningham ES. $1,276,967 $8,466,116 $0
2.3Adjust boundaries between Mills ES, Patton ES, and Boone ES ($59,185) $0 $0
2.4Adjust boundaries between Williams ES and Cunningham ES ($2,241) $0 $0
2.5 Adjust boundaries between Odom ES and St Elmo ES $0 $0 $0
3.1Close Oak Springs ES and Zavala ES and consolidate into Blackshear ES and Govalle ES $2,369,043 $10,681,507 $0
3.2Close Allan ES and move students into Govalle ES and Norman ES $1,257,574 $11,546,218 $0
3.2B
Close Allan ES and repurpose as an administrative building. Move student population to Govalle ES and Norman ES, adjust boundaries of Oak Springs ES, Zavala ES, Brooke ES and Ortega ES $1,257,574 $0 $0
3.3
Close Zavala ES and Brooke ES move students into a new elementary school. Close Allan ES and move students into Govalle ES, Norman ES, and Ortega ES $3,843,266 $23,479,180 $28,100,000
Page 305
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options
NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
DescriptionOption M&O SavingsCost Avoidance
Future Bond Impact
3.4 Adjust boundaries for Maplewood ES and Campbell ES $0 $0 $0
3.5Close Oak Springs ES and Ortega ES and consolidate students into Blackshear ES, Sims ES, and Norman ES $2,300,842 $10,308,022 $0
3.6 Close Pease ES $712,296 $7,302,501 $0
3.7Close Govalle ES and Oak Springs ES and move students to Allan ES, Zavala ES, and Blackshear ES $2,510,507 $16,136,129 $0
3.8Repurpose Blackshear ES as a Hutson-Tillotson demonstration school, training site for future teachers $0 $0 $0
3.9 A
Close Brooke ES and move students to Allan ES and Zavala ES. Adjust boundary between Allan ES and Norman ES. $1,301,382 $5,477,387 $0
3.9 B1 Close Ortega ES and move students to Govalle ES. $1,153,873 $6,082,090 $0
3.9 B2Close Oak Springs ES and move students to Blackshear ES. $1,146,969 $4,225,932 $0
3.9 C
Close Sanchez ES and move students north of Town Lake to Zavala ES and Metz ES. Adjust boundaries between Zavala ES and Linder ES. Build a new 800-student elementary south of Town Lake to receive students from Sanchez ES, Metz ES and Travis Heights ES. $1,556,924 $9,424,688
* included in Option 0.17
3.12
Close Allan ES and repurpose as a middle school for Young Men, repurpose Martin MS as a middle school for Young Women. Reassign Allan ES students to Govalle ES, Ortega ES and Norman ES $12,203 $0 $15,389,258
3.13Close Govalle ES and reassign students to Ortega ES, Oak Springs ES and Allan ES $1,363,538 $11,910,197 $0
3.14Close Blackshear ES and reassign students to Oak Springs ES and Zavala ES $984,538 $7,291,599 $0
3.16
Close Govalle ES and reassign students to Brooke ES, Ortega ES and Oak Springs ES. Close Allan ES and reassign students to Brooke ES and Norman ES. Adjust boundaries between Brooke ES and Zavala ES. $2,873,104 $23,456,415 $0
4.1A Close Dawson ES and move students to Becker ES $1,422,157 $6,110,749 $0
4.1BClose Becker ES and move student population to Dawson ES $1,422,157 $7,036,234 $0
4.2Close Becker ES, Barton Hills ES, and Zilker ES and consolidate into new elementary school $3,282,691 $24,580,169 $28,100,000
4.3Adjust boundaries between Becker ES, Dawson ES, Travis Heights ES, and Linder ES ($80,539) $0 $0
4.4AClose Barton Hills ES and Becker ES and move students into Zilker ES and Dawson ES $2,201,810 $11,930,384 $0
Page 306
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options
NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
DescriptionOption M&O SavingsCost Avoidance
Future Bond Impact
4.4BClose Barton Hills ES and Zilker ES and move students to Becker ES and Dawson ES. $2,266,637 $17,543,935 $0
4.5Close Barton Hills ES and Becker ES and move students into Zilker ES and Dawson ES $2,207,301 $11,930,384 $0
4.6Close Barton Hills ES and Joslin ES and move students into Zilker ES and Dawson ES $2,367,541 $13,360,266 $0
4.7Close Barton Hills ES and reassign students to Zilker ES and close Becker ES and reassgin students to Dawson ES $2,207,301 $11,930,384 $0
4.8Reassign a portion of Linder ES to Travis Heights ES and reassign a portion of Travis Heights ES to Becker ES $0 $0 $0
5.1Do not accept transfers into Bryker Woods ES, Casis ES, Gullett ES, and Highland Park ES $0 $0 $0
5.2Discontinue the option to offer 6th grade at Bryker Woods ES $0 $0 $0
5.3Adjust boundaries between Bryker Woods ES, Gullett ES, and Brentwood ES $0 $0 $0
5.4Build new school and adjust boundaries for Highland Park ES, Doss ES, and Hill ES $0 $0 $25,200,000
5.5 Adjust boundaries between Mathews ES and Casis ES $0 $0 $0
6.1Adjust boundaries between Norman ES, Overton ES, and Ortega ES ($1,220) $0 $0
6.3Add Pre-K center to Winn ES to provide relief for Andrews ES, Pecan Springs ES, Jordan ES and Overton ES Unknown $0 $0
7.1
Move Kealing MS magnet program to Martin MS. Move student population of Martin MS into Kealing MS with remaining neighborhood students ($186,096) $0 $0
7.2Reassign O. Henry MS/Austin HS students to Martin MS/Eastside HS $0 $0 $0
7.3 Reassign Martin MS students to Fulmore MS $0 $0 $07.4 Create new K-8 schools at Martin MS and Allan ES $0 $0 $0
8.1Close Webb MS and reassign students into Pearce MS, Dobie MS, and Lamar MS $1,865,782 $11,454,070 $0
8.2A
Close Pearce MS and reassign student population into Garcia MS, Webb MS and Lamar MS. Reassign a portion of Webb MS students to Dobie MS $1,881,140 $7,443,511 $0
8.2B
Close Pearce MS and reassign student population into Garcia and Webb MS. Reassign a portion of Webb students to Dobie. Improve vertical alignment for Webb students $1,881,140 $7,443,511 $0
8.3
Close ALC and move students to Webb MS. Reassign Webb MS students to Dobie MS, Lamar MS, and Pearce MS $1,567,984 $12,262,155 $0
Page 307
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options
NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
DescriptionOption M&O SavingsCost Avoidance
Future Bond Impact
8.4Close Webb MS and repurpose school as a School for Young Men ($98,844) $0 $0
9.1Reassign a portion of Bedichek MS population to Covington MS ($28,677) $0 $0
9.2Adjust boundary between Bedichek MS and Covington MS ($234,298) $0 $0
10.1 Adjust boundary between Reagan HS and McCallum HS $0 $0 $0
10.2
Improve programming at Reagan HS by providing cross-training and mentoring with McCallum staff. Provide nurturing environment to draw students back into Reagan HS. $0 $0 $0
10.3
Give Reagan HS students the option to attend specialized signature programs at McCallum HS with transportation provided. $0 $0
10.4 Close Eastside HS and consolidate into Reagan HS ($539,373) $0 $0
10.5Close Reagan HS and CAC, repurpose Reagan HS as administrative center $0 $0 $0
10.6Close Reagan HS and repurpose as Junior College / ACC Partner $0 $0 $0
11.1Identify surplus portables and build new elementary school in the next bond $0 $0 $0
11.2Repurpose Langford ES as a Pre-K center and adjust boundaries with adjacent schools $0 $0 $0
12.1
Close Dobie MS and repurpose as elementary school to provide relief for Hart ES, Graham ES, Walnut Creek ES and Barrington ES. Reassign Dobie MS students to Webb MS and Pearce MS ($437,477) $0 $0
12.2Discontinue 6th grade at Barrington ES and Walnut Creek ES $0 $0 $0
12.3Adjust boundaries between Wooten ES and Brentwood ES $0 $0 $0
12.4
Assign the remaining 2008 undesignated elementary school to north central Austin (in addition to 2004 Bond Program ES) $0 $0
included in 2008 bond
program
12.5Build a new elementary school in north central Austin (in addition to 2004 Bond Program ES) $0 $0 $28,100,000
12.6
Close Dobie MS and repurpose as an elementary school, reassign students to Webb MS. Adjust boundaries between Webb MS and Pearce MS. Move a portion of student population from Graham ES and Hart ES to new Dobie Elementary. Adjust boundaries between Graham ES and Walnut Creek ES and between Hart ES and Barrington ES TBD $0 $1,056,778
Page 308
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options
NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
DescriptionOption M&O SavingsCost Avoidance
Future Bond Impact
12.7
Repurpose Garcia MS as a 4 - 8 school and reassign a portion of the population (Sims ES and Norman ES attendance areas) to Pearce MS. Reassign Overton ES and Jordan ES 4 - 5 grade to new Garcia 4 - 8.
13.1Adjust boundaries between Maplewood ES and Campbell ES $0 $0 $0
13.2Build new elementary school in Mueller to relieve overcrowding at Andrews ES, Harris ES, and Blanton ES ($58,093) $0 $24,000,000
13.3 Adjust boundaries between Andrews ES and Winn ES ($84,811) $0 $0
13.4Build a Pre-K center to relieve Andrews ES, Winn ES, Blanton ES, Pecan Springs ES, and Blanton ES $0 $0 $21,600,000
14.1 Build a new school west of Clayton ES $0 $0 $25,200,000
14.2Adjust boundaries between Mills ES, Kiker ES, Cowan ES, and Boone ES ($6,120) $0 $0
14.3 Add a K-8th grade school in southwest area Unknown $0
14.4 Adjust boundaries between Clayton ES and Baldwin ES $0 $0 $014.5 Repurpose Boone ES as a PK - 8 school $0 $0 $0
15.1
Repurpose Casey ES as a Pre-K Center and adjust boundaries between Williams ES, Menchaca ES, Casey ES, Odom ES, and Pleasant Hill ES $0 $0 $0
15.2
Build Pre-K center in the Williams ES attendance zone to relieve Williams ES, Casey ES, Menchaca ES, Odom ES, and Pleasant Hill ES $0 $0 $21,600,000
16.1Create a career center and add a magnet program to Crockett HS to attract students Unknown
16.2 Adjust boundaries between Akins HS and Crockett HS $0 $0 $0
17.1Adjust boundaries between Murchison MS, Burnet MS, Dobie MS, and Webb MS ($191,587) $0 $0
17.2
Move middle school population of Lee ES, Campbell ES, and Maplewood ES attendance zones to Lamar MS. Create more room at Kealing MS to expand program and increase diversity ($73,218) $0 $0
17.3Add a fine arts focus to Lamar MS to attract students and increase enrollment Unknown $0 $0
17.4 Close either Pearce MS or Webb MS Unknown $0 $0
17.5Create a sixth grade center with students from Webb MS, Pearce MS, Dobie MS, Garcia MS. $0 $0 Unknown
Page 309
EXHIBIT "B"