red-winged blackbird aggression but not nest defense ... · !1 1! red-winged blackbird aggression...
TRANSCRIPT
Red-winged blackbird aggression but not nest defensesuccess is predicted by exposure to brood parasitism bybrown-headed cowbirdsKen Yasukawa, Josie Lindsey-Robbins, Carol S Henger, Mark E. Hauber
The brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater) is an obligate brood parasite known to useover 200 host species. The red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) is a commonlyused accepter host that incubates cowbird eggs and cares for cowbird nestlings andfledglings. This host species, however, may reduce the risk of parasitism with afrontloaded antiparasite strategy in which it attacks parasites that approach active hostnests. To test this frontloaded parasite-defense hypothesis (FPDH), we presentedtaxidermic models of a female northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis), which representsno threat to redwings, a male cowbird, which cannot lay a parasitic egg, and a femalecowbird, together with species- and sex-specific vocalization playbacks for 5 min. Weconducted these presentations at 25 active redwing nests at Newark Road Prairie in south-central Rock County, Wisconsin, USA, where 18% of redwing nests were parasitized bycowbirds in 2015. As predicted by the FPDH, the female cowbird mount elicited the mostaggressive responses and the female cardinal mount the least aggressive, as measured bynumber of times more than one male redwing responded and number of times the malehost attacked the mount, and by Principal Component analyses yielding redwingaggressive behavior and intimidation scores. Contrary to the predictions of FPDH regardingthe success of nest defense behaviors, male redwings responding at naturally parasitizednests were significantly more likely to attack the mount than males with nests that werenot parasitized. We also compared our results with those of a study using the samemethods and conducted in New York State where cowbird parasitism was rare. Wisconsinredwings were more aggressive toward the female cowbird mount than redwings in NewYork State. Red-winged blackbirds appear to frontload their antiparasite defenses and theaggressiveness, but the apparent success of those defenses depends on individual andpopulation-level experience with parasites.
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
1
Red-winged blackbird aggression but not nest defense success is predicted by 1
exposure to brood parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds 2
3
ABSTRACT 4
The brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater) is an obligate brood parasite known to use over 200 5
host species. The red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) is a commonly used acceptor host 6
that incubates cowbird eggs and cares for cowbird nestlings and fledglings. This host species, 7
however, may reduce the risk of parasitism with a frontloaded antiparasite strategy in which it 8
attacks parasites that approach active host nests. To test this frontloaded parasite-defense 9
hypothesis (FPDH), we presented taxidermic models of a female northern cardinal (Cardinalis 10
cardinalis), which represents no threat to redwings, a male cowbird, which cannot lay a parasitic 11
egg, and a female cowbird, together with species- and sex-specific vocalization playbacks for 5 12
min. We conducted these presentations at 25 active redwing nests at Newark Road Prairie in 13
south-central Rock County, Wisconsin, USA, where 18% of redwing nests were parasitized by 14
cowbirds in 2015. As predicted by the FPDH, the female cowbird mount elicited the most 15
aggressive responses and the female cardinal mount the least aggressive, as measured by number 16
of times more than one male redwing responded and number of times the male host attacked the 17
mount, and by Principal Component analyses yielding redwing aggressive behavior and 18
intimidation scores. Contrary to the predictions of FPDH regarding the success of nest defense 19
behaviors, male redwings responding at naturally parasitized nests were significantly more likely 20
to attack the mount than males with nests that were not parasitized. We also compared our results 21
with those of a study using the same methods and conducted in New York State where cowbird 22
parasitism was rare. Wisconsin redwings were more aggressive toward the female cowbird 23
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
2
mount than redwings in New York State. Red-winged blackbirds appear to frontload their 24
antiparasite defenses and the aggressiveness, but the apparent success of those defenses depends 25
on individual and population-level experience with parasites. 26
27
Authors 28
Ken Yasukawa1, Josie Lindsey-Robbins1, Carol S. Henger2,3, and Mark E. Hauber2 29
1 Beloit College, Department of Biology, Beloit, WI, USA 30
2 Department of Psychology, Hunter College, and The Graduate Center of the City University of 31
New York, NY, USA 32
3 Department of Biological Sciences, Fordham University, NY, USA 33
34
Corresponding Author 35
Ken Yasukawa, Beloit College, Department of Biology, 700 College Street, Beloit, WI 53511, 36
38
39
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
3
INTRODUCTION 40
41
About 1% of bird species are obligate brood parasites, whose reproductive strategy depends 42
exclusively on host species to build nests, incubate eggs, and care for their nestlings and 43
fledglings (Davies, 2010). The interactions of brood parasites and their hosts are a highly studied 44
model system of co-evolution because of the tractability of reciprocal adaptations between hosts 45
and parasites across different evolutionary timescales (Rothstein, 1990). In these model systems, 46
natural selection favors adaptations of the parasite that increase its ability to reproduce, including 47
the ability to locate suitable host nests, place eggs in those nests, and ensure that the host parent 48
will care for the parasitic young (Moskàt, Barta, Hauber & Honza, 2006). However, because of 49
the fitness disadvantages of parasite eggs and nestlings for the host, natural selection also favors 50
adaptations of the host that increase its ability to avoid being parasitized, including placing nests 51
in inaccessible locations (Hauber, 2001; Hoover & Robinson, 2007) or in dense cover (Clotfelter, 52
1998; Hauber & Russo, 2000), abandoning parasitized nests (Graham, 1988; Yasukawa & 53
Werner, 2007), recognizing and ejecting, puncturing, or burying parasite eggs (Graham, 1988; 54
Valera, Hoi & Schleicher, 1997; Lahti, 2006), or directing parental care to their own offspring 55
instead of the foreign chick (Lichtenstein 2001; Peer, Rothstein, Kuehn & Fleischer, 2005). 56
These host adaptations exert selective pressures on the parasites to become better at exploiting 57
their hosts, and the parasite counter-adaptations in turn favor hosts that are even better at 58
avoiding parasitism. This process is described as co-evolutionary arms race in which an 59
adaptation in one species selects for a counter-adaptation in the other (Dawkins & Krebs, 1979). 60
The brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater; hereafter “cowbird”) is a generalist obligate 61
brood parasite in that it uses over 200 hosts species to rear its offspring (Friedmann, 1971). To 62
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
4
reproduce successfully, a cowbird must 1) find a suitable host nest, 2) determine that the host is 63
actively laying, 3) evade behavioral host defenses, 4) rapidly lay its egg, 5) remove a host egg, 6) 64
escape undetected. 65
The red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus; hereafter “redwing”) is a commonly 66
used host species that accepts and incubates cowbird eggs, and cares for cowbird nestlings and 67
fledglings (Rothstein, 1975a) despite the fitness cost of parasitism (Røskaft, Orians & Beletsky, 68
1990; Clotfelter & Yasukawa, 1999; Hoover, Yasukawa & Hauber, 2006). Because they are so 69
common, redwings may be the host species that produces the greatest number of cowbird 70
fledglings across this parasite’s range (Lowther, 1993). Many authors have asked why redwings 71
do not eject cowbird eggs to prevent the recoverable costs of parasitism (Rothstein, 1975a; 72
Røskaft, Orians & Beletsky, 1990; Clotfelter & Yasukawa, 1999; Henger & Hauber, 2014), and 73
several hypotheses have been proposed to explain this failure to eject cowbird eggs. Specifically, 74
the evolutionary lag hypothesis proposes that redwings have not had enough time to evolve 75
ejection behavior (Ward, Lindholm & Smith, 1996), whereas the evolutionary equilibrium 76
hypothesis suggests that the cost of ejection is too great or the benefit too small to make ejection 77
adaptive (Rohwer, Spaw & Røskaft, 1989; Lorenzana & Sealy, 1999). Alternatively, mechanical 78
or perceptual constraints may prevent egg or chick ejection even if it were evolutionarily 79
advantageous (Rohwer & Spaw, 1988). 80
Rothstein (1970) noted that the most effective antiparasite defense is to avoid being 81
parasitized in the first place, thus one strategy to reduce the cost of cowbird parasitism is for 82
redwings to frontload nest defense against cowbirds (Welbergen & Davies, 2009; Kilner & 83
Langmore, 2011; Feeney, Welbergen & Langmore, 2012; Feeney & Langmore, 2015). One 84
potentially frontloaded defense is to begin incubating eggs prior to clutch completion to limit 85
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
5
cowbird access to the nest (Uyehara & Narins, 1995; Clotfelter & Yasukawa, 1999). Redwings 86
also have a variety of antipredator behaviors (Yasukawa, Whittenberger & Nielsen, 1992; 87
Beletsky 1996), which could be also used to prevent parasite access to the vicinity of their nests 88
(Henger & Hauber, 2014). Alarm calling, mobbing, and physically attacking cowbird intruders, 89
as if nest predators, have all been observed at redwing nests during experiments in which 90
taxidermic mounts of female cowbirds were presented (reviewed by Henger & Hauber 2014). 91
These defenses appear to prevent the cowbird from approaching the nest, laying its egg, and 92
removing a redwing egg. 93
We presented taxidermic mounts of female and male cowbirds as well as a female 94
northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis; hereafter "cardinal") to test the hypothesis that 95
redwings frontload their antiparasite defenses by aggressively preventing female cowbirds from 96
approaching and parasitizing their nests (Feeney, Welbergen & Langmore, 2012; Henger & 97
Hauber, 2014). We used a female cardinal as an experimental control because cardinals co-occur 98
with redwings, are approximately the same size as cowbirds, and are neither brood parasites nor 99
nest predators (Halkin & Linville, 1999). 100
101
Comparison 1 102
The frontloaded parasite-defense hypothesis (FPDH) predicts that the female cowbird mount will 103
elicit the most aggressive host responses because it represents the greatest threat to the fitness of 104
the host, whereas hosts will be least aggressive toward the female cardinal mount because it 105
represents the lowest threat to host fitness (Henger & Hauber, 2014). Responses to the male 106
cowbird should be intermediate because male cowbirds cannot lay parasitic eggs, but they do 107
attract and defend females, and may assist the female in searching for host nests (Strausberger, 108
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
6
1998). 109
110
Comparison 2 111
As with antipredator behavior (Knight & Temple, 1986; Curio, 1993; Martin, 2014), 112
aggressiveness toward a brood parasite may be affected by past experience with brood parasites 113
or parasitism (Robertson & Norman, 1976, 1977). We compared the range and extent of 114
aggressive behaviors exhibited by redwings locally at nests that had been naturally parasitized by 115
cowbirds with those that had not been parasitized to determine whether experience with cowbird 116
parasites influences redwing antiparasite defense. The FPDH predicts a negative relationship 117
between nest defense intensity and parasitism itself, as more aggressive defenders should be 118
more successful at preventing parasitism. 119
120
Comparison 3 121
The intensity of antiparasite defense is also thought to be a positive function of the incidence of 122
population-level risk of parasitism (Rothstein, 1975b; Robertson & Norman, 1976) or the 123
historical duration of parasite-host sympatry (Robertson & Norman, 1977; Freeman, Gori & 124
Rohwer, 1990). However, the FDPH hypothesis specifically predicts that more aggressive 125
responses should yield lower parasitism rates. Accordingly, Freeman, Gori & Rohwer (1990) 126
compared results of 16 studies of cowbird parasitism of redwings and found higher rates of 127
parasitism in locations where cowbirds and redwings have a long history of parasitism than in 128
locations where the two species have only recently come into contact. Robertson & Norman 129
(1977) found that hosts with the longer history of sympatry with cowbirds were more aggressive 130
than hosts that became sympatric more recently. In a test of this directional selection hypothesis, 131
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
7
but contrary to the expectations of FDPH, Robertson & Norman (1977) found a positive 132
correlation across species between aggression toward model cowbirds and rate of parasitism. 133
However, many of these previous studies used different methodologies to assess nest defense by 134
redwings. Here we compared data collected using the same experimental methods regarding the 135
antiparasite aggression of redwings between our Wisconsin study area where parasitism is 136
common (since 1984: 15% of 1942 redwing nests were parasitized by cowbirds, and 18% in 137
2015) and that of redwings in New York State where parasitism is rare (0% in Ithaca, NY 138
between 1997 and 2002, and 8.3% in 2010 for the sites combined from Henger & Hauber, 2014). 139
140
MATERIALS & METHODS 141
142
Study species and location 143
We studied the antiparasitic behavior of redwings defending active nests at Newark Road Prairie 144
in Rock County, Wisconsin, USA (42o32'N, 89o08'W) from April to July 2015. Newark Road 145
Prairie is a 13-ha wet-mesic remnant prairie and sedge meadow habitat that supports about 35 146
redwing territories (Yasukawa, 1989). All male redwings were banded with USGS numbered 147
aluminum bands and unique color combinations of plastic wraparound bands for individual 148
identification (United States Geological Survey permit # 20438). Most females were not banded. 149
We used the behavior of female and male redwings to locate active redwing nests and monitored 150
their contents throughout the study. We compared results from Newark Road Prairie with those 151
gathered at locations in New York and Ithaca, New York, USA by Henger & Hauber (2014). 152
153
Presentation of mounts 154
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
8
We replicated the methods of Henger & Hauber (2014) using their taxidermic mounts (courtesy 155
of Bill Strausberger) and vocalization playback files to perform presentations at redwing nests 156
with eggs. All presentations occurred between 06:00 and 09:00 CDT. We obtained approval for 157
all activities from the Beloit College Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol 158
Number 13-001). 159
In each presentation all three models (female cardinal, male cowbird, female cowbird) 160
were used in a random, balanced order. We pushed a metal rod into the ground 1–3 meters from 161
the nest and clamped a dowel, to which the model was attached, to the rod at a height of ~1.5 m. 162
The model was always positioned facing the nest. The playbacks were composed of 10 163
repetitions of 10 s of vocalization followed by 20 s of silence for a total of 5 min to represent a 164
typical singing schedule. A 3rd generation iPod Touch (Apple Inc., Cupertino, California, USA) 165
was connected to an Ecoxgear ECOXBT speaker (Grace Digital Audio, Peterborough, Ontario, 166
Canada) via an auxiliary cable and played back at normal volume. We used one mount per 167
species/sex, and we acknowledge this methodological limitation explicitly. Two exemplars of 168
each species- and sex-specific vocalization were used for the male cowbird, female cowbird, and 169
female cardinal to avoid pseudoreplication concerns (Henger & Hauber, 2014). 170
Successive presentations at each nest were separated by 30–45 min to allow redwings to 171
return to normal behavior (Honza et al., 2006). Although we presented the three mounts at 50 172
nests, because we used up to four nests on a single male's territory, we restricted our analysis to 173
the first set of mount presentations to each of 25 males to avoid pseudoreplication. By limiting 174
analysis to presentations of all three mounts at one nest per male, we also minimized the chances 175
of using a female more than once even though most females were not banded for individual 176
identification. Banded females were never used more than once. 177
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
9
178
Response variables 179
We recorded the same variables as Henger & Hauber (2014: Supplementary Materials S Table 2) 180
on check sheets using zero-one scan sampling every 15 s for 5 min (20 total scan periods in each 181
presentation). To estimate responses to the three mounts, we chose response variables based on 182
the Principal Components analysis of Henger & Hauber (2014: Supplementary Materials S 183
Tables 3-5). We tested the response variables: 1) number of presentations in which > 1 male 184
responded, 2) number of presentations in which > 1 female responded, 3) number of 15-s periods 185
in which the male flew over the mount, 4) number of periods in which the male attacked the 186
mount (in contrast to Henger & Hauber (2014), we combined hovers, dives, and strikes because 187
they were highly correlated), 5) number of periods in which the male was < 3 m from the mount, 188
6) number of periods in which the male was perched and looking at the mount, 7) number of 189
periods in which the male gave "check" vocalizations, 8) number of periods in which the male 190
gave "whistle" vocalizations, 9) number of times the female struck the mount, and 10) number of 191
periods in which the female perched and looked at the mount. 192
Daily nest checks allowed us to determine whether each nest used in our mount 193
presentations was naturally parasitized by cowbirds. This information was used in a comparison 194
of attacks of the female cowbird mount at parasitized and nonparasitized nests to determine 195
whether recent experience with parasites or parasitism affected host behavior. 196
Comparisons of redwing behavior at Newark Road Prairie (Wisconsin) and New York 197
State used the Principal Components analysis of Henger &Hauber (2014), who focused on four 198
Principal Components named "Aggressive Response," Aggressive Male Vocalizations," "Close 199
Male, Female Any Distance," and "Intimidation." We used these same four components to 200
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
10
calculate PC scores for our 25 Wisconsin presentations and 11 New York presentations (Henger 201
& Hauber, 2014). 202
203
Statistical analysis 204
We used JMP version 11.1.1 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) to perform all statistical analyses 205
except Friedman's repeated measures 2-factor analysis (via an Excel spreadsheet). All inference 206
tests of single response variables used nonparametric methods because data were not normally 207
distributed. Tests of Principal Component scores used parametric methods because the 208
assumption of normality was met. Statistical significance was accepted at α = 0.05. 209
210
RESULTS 211
212
Comparison 1 213
We presented the three mounts at 25 nests defended by different males. Analysis of single 214
response variables showed that the female cowbird mount elicited the most aggressive responses 215
of redwings and the female cardinal mount the least aggressive responses, in our presentations. 216
Specifically, as shown in Figure 1, the number of times more than one male redwing 217
responded differed significantly among mounts (Log-likelihood G2 = 7.86, P = 0.020), but the 218
responses of female redwings were not significantly different between different stimuli (G2 = 219
0.60, P = 0.74). 220
221
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
11
222
Figure 1 Presentations in which > 1 male and > 1 female red-winged blackbird responded to 223
three mounts Number of presentations with > 1 male redwing responding differed significantly 224
among mounts, but > 1 female redwing did not differ significantly (n = 25 nests for all 225
comparisons). 226
227
Figure 2 shows responses of male redwings to the three mounts. Male attacks differed 228
significantly among mounts (Friedman's repeated measures χr2 = 13.6, n = 25, P = 0.001) and all 229
pairwise comparisons were significant (Wilcoxon matched-pairs P < 0.01). The female cowbird 230
mount was most often attacked, whereas the female cardinal mount was attacked least often. 231
Male redwings perching within 3 m differed significantly among mounts (χr2 = 18.5, n = 25, P < 232
0.001) and male < 3 m for each of the two sexes of the cowbird mounts was significantly 233
different than for the cardinal mount (male cowbird Wilcoxon matched-pairs S = 57.5, n = 25, P 234
= 0.004; female cowbird S = 105.0, n = 25, P < 0.001). Male perching and looking at the mount 235
(PLM) differed significantly among mounts (χr2 = 6.00, n = 25, P = 0.049) and PLM for both 236
cowbird mounts was significantly different than for the cardinal mount (male cowbird Wilcoxon 237
02468
10
Female cardinal
Male cowbird
Female cowbird
# pr
esen
tatio
ns
Mount presented
Males Females
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
12
matched-pairs S = 227.5, n = 25, P = 0.01; female cowbird S = 301.0, n = 25, P < 0.001). Female 238
redwing PLM and attacks did not differ among mounts (Friedman's repeated measures P > 0.05). 239
240
241
Figure 2 Mean (+ SE) male red-winged blackbird responses to three mounts Male redwing 242
attacks, < 3 m, and perching and looking at the mount differed significantly among mounts (* = 243
P < 0.05; ** = P < 0.01), but fly over, check, and whistle were not significantly different. 244
Pairwise comparisons showed that the female cowbird elicited the most aggressive, and the 245
female cardinal the least aggressive responses (n = 25 nests for all comparisons). 246
247
Figure 3 shows redwing responses using the Principal Component scores of Henger & 248
Hauber (2014). Scores differed significantly among mounts for Aggressive Response, Close 249
Male, Female Any Distance, and Intimidation (repeated measures ANOVA, P < 0.001) and for 250
all pairwise comparisons (Tukey HSD, P < 0.05). The female cowbird mount elicited the highest 251
Aggressive Response scores and Close Male, Female Any Distance scores, whereas the female 252
cardinal the lowest scores. Intimidation scores were lowest (more negative) in response to the 253
048
1216
Female cardinal Male cowbird Female cowbird
# of
per
iods
Mount presented
Fly over Attack ** < 3 m **PLM * Check Whistle
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
13
female cowbird mount. The Intimidation score depends primarily on the behaviors hover, dive, 254
and no reaction so that more negative scores represent when redwings are more likely to attack 255
cowbirds than to dive or hover near them (Henger & Hauber, 2014). Aggressive Male 256
Vocalizations scores did not differ significantly among models (F2,48 = 2.13, P = 0.13). 257
258
259
Figure 3 Mean (± SE) Principal Component scores for red-winged blackbirds responding to 260
three mounts PC scores were calculated as in Henger & Hauber (2014). Scores differed 261
significantly among mounts for Aggressive Response, Close Male, Female Any Distance, and 262
Intimidation (* = P < 0.001) and for all pairwise comparisons. Scores for Aggressive Male 263
Vocalizations did not differ significantly among models (n = 25 nests for all comparisons). 264
265
Comparison 2 266
We examined the effect of direct experience with parasites by comparing attacks of the female 267
cowbird mount by males defending naturally parasitized and unparasitized nests. Parasitized 268
-0.40-0.200.000.200.400.600.801.00
Female cardinal
Male cowbird
Female cowbird
PC sc
ore
Mount presented
Aggressive response *
Aggressive male vocalizationsClose male, female any distance *Intimidation *
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
14
males were significantly more likely to attack than unparasitized males (Log-likelihood G1 = 269
3.99, P = 0.046). 270
271
Figure 4 Likelihood of attacking a female cowbird mount and red-winged blackbird 272
parasitism status Males defending naturally parasitized nests (n = 4) were significantly more 273
likely to attack a female cowbird mount than males with unparasitized nests (n= 21). 274
275
Comparison 3 276
We used the Principal Component loading coefficients of Henger & Hauber (2014) to compare 277
responses of New York State and Wisconsin male redwings to the female cowbird mount. Figure 278
5 shows that males in Wisconsin responded significantly more aggressively, as measured by 279
Principal Components Aggressive Response and Intimidation, than males in New York State (t34 280
= 2.16, P = 0.038 and t34 = -2.12, P = 0.042, respectively). PC scores for Aggressive Male 281
Vocalizations and Close Male, Female Any Distance did not differ significantly between 282
locations, however (t34 = 1.29, P = 0.21 and t34 = -1.56, P = 0.13, respectively). 283
0
5
10
15
20
25
Parasitized Not parasitized
# pr
esen
tatio
ns
Parasitism status
Attack No Attack
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
15
284
Figure 4 Mean (± SE) Principal Component scores of red-winged blackbirds in New York 285
State and Wisconsin responding to a female cowbird mount. Aggressive Response and 286
Intimidation PC scores were significantly different for the two locations (* = P < 0.05), but PC 287
scores for Aggressive Male Vocalizations and Close Male, Female Any Distance did not differ 288
significantly between New York (n = 11 nests) and Wisconsin (n = 25 nests). 289
290
DISCUSSION 291
292
Comparison 1 293
Redwings responded most aggressively to the female cowbird mount, were intermediate in 294
aggression toward the male cowbird mount, and were least aggressive toward the female cardinal 295
mount. These results are similar to those of Henger & Hauber (2014), who found that the female 296
cowbird mount consistently elicited the most aggressive response from redwings, and that 297
-0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
Aggressive Response *
Aggressive Male
Vocalizations
Close Male, Female Any
Distance
Intimidation *
PC sc
ore
Principal component
New York Wisconsin
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
16
responses to male and female cowbird mounts were different in some, but not all, Principal 298
Component scores. Both sets of results support the frontloaded parasite defense hypothesis 299
(FPDH). 300
Differences in response to model presentations of cowbirds versus nonparasites have 301
been found in many previous studies (e.g., Robertson & Norman, 1976; Ortega & Cruz, 1991; 302
Prather, Ortega & Cruz, 1999; Henger & Hauber, 2014), but differences in response to male 303
versus female cowbirds are often not apparent (e.g., Robertson & Norman, 1976; Strausberger & 304
Horning, 1998; Gill, Neudorf & Sealy, 2008). In some cases, however, hosts have been shown to 305
respond differently to male and female cowbirds (e.g., Folkers, 1982; Henger & Hauber, 2014). 306
As a commonly exploited cowbird host, redwings may have evolved the ability to discriminate 307
between and respond differently to male and female cowbirds because they represent different 308
levels to threat to redwing fitness. Unlike many other studies on redwings (reviewed by Henger 309
& Hauber, 2014), our study, identical in methods to Henger & Hauber (2014), used both visual 310
(model) and acoustic (playback) sensory modalities to simulate parasitic (or control) intruders 311
near the redwing nest, perhaps allowing for better discrimination between cowbird sexes and 312
leading to more accurate assessment of the relative threat of parasitism by this host species. 313
314
Comparison 2 315
We found that naturally parasitized male redwings were more aggressive toward the female 316
cowbird mount than unparasitized males. Our results are contrary to the predictions of the FPDH, 317
implying that aggressive nest defense is not an effective antiparasite strategy. In contrast to our 318
results, in his study at the same location in Wisconsin, Clotfelter (1998) found that parasitized 319
and unparasitized redwings did not differ in their aggressiveness toward a female cowbird mount 320
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
17
and Strausberger (2001), working in Northern Illinois, found that more aggressive redwings 321
suffered lower rates of parasitism. The difference between our results and those of the prior study 322
at our Wisconsin site cannot be explained by a difference in parasitism rate; our rate of 18% is 323
very similar to the 20% parasitism during Clotfelter's study. When comparing these three sets of 324
results, it seems clear that the relationship between host antiparasite aggression and parasitism is 325
complex. Perhaps antiparasite aggression is disadvantageous in some circumstances, but 326
occasionally advantageous. Cowbirds were more likely to parasitize more vocally active 327
redwings (Clotfelter, 1998) and willow flycatchers (Empidonax traillii (Uyehara & Narins, 328
1995), as well as more aggressive older song sparrows (Melospiza melodia) (Smith & Arcese, 329
1994), but occasionally the parasites may still be successfully repelled by nest defense of the 330
aggressive hosts (Hauber, 2014) 331
Strausberger (2001) compared upland- and marsh-nesting redwings and found that 332
redwings nesting in dense aggregations in marshes were rarely parasitized and always detected 333
female cowbird mounts near their nests, whereas sparser upland redwing colonies were more 334
frequently parasitized and were less likely to detect the female cowbird mount. In contrast, 335
Freeman, Gori & Rohwer (1990) found no differences between parasitism rates of marsh and 336
upland redwing populations. Our studies all occurred in marsh and water-edge nesting 337
populations of redwings, thus it is unlikely that colony locality explains the intra- and inter-site 338
patterns in our comparisons. 339
Several authors have suggested that antiparasite aggression is only effective in dense host 340
populations (Robertson & Norman, 1977; Freeman, Gori & Rohwer, 1990; Strausberger, 2001) 341
where many pairs of eyes can watch for parasites and many hosts can be recruited to mob the 342
parasite. Model-presentation experiments showed that superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) 343
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
18
increase their antiparasite vigilance when the risk of parasitism is high (Feeney & Langmore, 344
2015). In low-density populations where vigilance and mobbing recruitment are limited, 345
however, antiparasite aggression may be a cue that parasites use to find nests (Robertson & 346
Norman, 1977; Smith, Arcese & McLean, 1984) or to assess the quality of potential hosts 347
(Smith, 1981). Further, Welbergen & Davies (2009) suggest that antipredator aggression may not 348
be adaptive in populations with a low risk of parasitism. Although antiparasite aggression thus 349
would be maladaptive in low-density or low-risk populations, the evolution of increased 350
aggressiveness is favored if host fitness is increased even slightly on average by antiparasite 351
defense (Sealy et al., 1998; see also Sih, Bell & Johnson, 2004). 352
Some studies have found that antiparasite defense was associated with nest success 353
(Clark & Robertson, 1979; Folkers & Lowther, 1985; Strausberger, 2001), but others have found 354
the opposite or no association (Seppä, 1969; Robertson & Norman, 1976, 1977; Smith, 1981; 355
Clotfelter, 1998; this study). Welbergen & Davies (2009) found that antiparasite aggression of 356
individual reed warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) was highly repeatable and therefore unlikely 357
to be influenced by previous exposure to a real parasite at their nests, but these authors also 358
found that mobbing propensity was positively associated with parasitism risk. Given this result, 359
we examined the repeatability of redwing antiparasite aggression using 19 males each tested at 360
two different nests and found that male attack was significantly correlated for successive 361
presentations at different nests of the same male (Spearman's ρ = 0.461, n = 19, P = 0.047). This 362
result is consistent with a behavioral syndrome for antiparasite aggression (e.g., Sih, Bell & 363
Johnson, 2004; Avilés, Bootella, Molina-Morales & Martínez, 2014), and is not consistent with a 364
developmental hypothesis that male redwing antipredator aggression depends on direct, past 365
individual experience with cowbirds. Sealy et al. (1998) discussed the methods used in studies of 366
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
19
host-parasite interactions, however, and suggested that the effectiveness of host defense can only 367
be determined when cowbirds come to lay their eggs. 368
369
Comparison 3 370
We found that Wisconsin redwings were more aggressive toward the female cowbird mount than 371
redwings in New York State (also see Armstrong 2002). Our Wisconsin study population (see 372
Schorger, 1937) falls within the traditional (long history) area of redwing-cowbird sympatry 373
(Freeman, Gori & Rohwer, 1990) and our 32-year parasitism rate of 15% is similar to the 374
approximately 22% parasitism for traditional upland habitats of Freeman, Gori & Rohwer 375
(1990). In contrast, parasitism is rare (in most years 0%) in the New York populations (Henger & 376
Hauber, 2014) into which cowbirds have only recently spread (Friedmann, 1929). Several studies 377
have found that hosts with a long history of sympatry with cowbirds are more aggressive toward 378
them (reviewed in Røskaft et al., 2002) and Briskie, Sealy & Hobson (1992) showed that hosts 379
attacked female cowbird mounts more aggressively in sympatric than allopatric populations. 380
Freeman, Gori & Rohwer (1990) also found that host populations only recently sympatric with 381
cowbirds have lower parasitism rates than host populations with a long history of sympatry, so 382
the mechanism that produces this geographic difference is unclear. At this point we suspect that 383
the expression of antiparasite aggression reflects evolutionary, ecological, and developmental 384
processes, rather than direct experience with parasites or parasitism per se during the breeding 385
history of individual hosts. 386
387
CONCLUSIONS 388
389
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
20
Our results support some of the predictions of the hypothesis that redwings frontload their 390
defenses to prevent cowbirds from parasitizing their nests: redwings most aggressively attack 391
female cowbirds that represent the most immediate risk of parasitism. However, aggressive nest 392
defense does not directly translate into lower rates of parasitism at our Wisconsin study site, both 393
at micro- and the macro-scale comparisons. Combating parasitism in the first place may thus be 394
sufficient in redwings and other acceptor host species, making potential advantages of egg 395
ejection too small to favor its evolution. We also attempted to examine the relationship between 396
antiparasite aggression and natural parasitism, but given the high variance in results of multiple 397
studies, we cannot conclude with confidence that our results support the developmental 398
hypothesis that experience with natural parasitism enhances the antipredator aggressiveness of 399
host redwings. Finally, Wisconsin redwings were more aggressive toward the female cowbird 400
mount than New York redwings, but because the two locations differed in parasitism rate and 401
history of interaction (among other things), we cannot determine whether ecological or 402
evolutionary processes were the primary factors affecting the aggressiveness of host responses to 403
parasites. Given the variance in results among studies, a meta-analysis of redwings’ antiparasitic 404
strategies, now including our new data, might be a productive next step of research. 405
406
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 407
408
We thank Beloit College and the Department of Biology for allowing us to conduct our research 409
at Newark Road Prairie. We thank Bill Strausberger for kindly loaning to us his mounted 410
stimulus birds. 411
412
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
21
REFERENCES 413
414
Armstrong MA. 2002. Defenses of red-winged blackbirds against brood parasites and predators: 415
the acquisition of threat recognition and the dynamics of group defense. Dissertation. 416
State University of New York, Binghamton, USA. 417
Avilés JM, Bootella EM, Molina-Morales M & Martínez JG. 2014. The multidimensionality 418
of behavioural defences against brood parasites: evidence for a behavioural syndrome in 419
magpies? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 68:1287-1298. DOI 10.1007/s00265-420
014-1739-2 421
Beletsky L. 1996. The red-winged blackbird: The biology of a strongly polygynous songbird. 422
London: Academic Press. 423
Briskie JV, Sealy SG, Hobson KA. 1992. Behavioral defenses against avian brood parasitism in 424
sympatric and allopatric host populations. Evolution 46:334-340. DOI 10.2307/2409854. 425
Clark KL, Robertson RJ. 1979. Spatial and temporal multi-species nesting aggregations in 426
birds as anti-parasite and anti-predator defenses. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 427
5:359-371. DOI 10.1007/BF00292524. 428
Clotfelter ED. 1998. What cues to brown-headed cowbirds use to locate red-winged blackbird 429
host nests? Animal Behaviour 55:1181-1189. DOI 10.1006/anbe.1997.0638. 430
Clotfelter ED, Yasukawa K. 1999. Impact of brood parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds on 431
red-winged blackbird reproductive success. The Condor 101:105-114. DOI 432
10.2307/1370451. 433
Curio E. 1993. Proximate and developmental aspects of antipredator behavior. Advances in the 434
Study of Behavior 22:135-238. 435
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
22
Davies NB. 2010. Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. London: T&AD Poyser. 436
Dawkins R, Krebs JR. 1979. Arms races between and within species. Proceedings of the Royal 437
Society B: Biological Sciences 205:489-511. DOI 10.1098/rspb.1979.0081. 438
Feeney WE, Langmore NE. 2015. Superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) increase vigilance 439
near their nest with the perceived risk of brood parasitism. The Auk 132:359-345. DOI 440
10.1642/AUK-14-218.1 441
Feeney WE, Welbergen JA, Langmore NE. 2012. The frontline of avian brood parasite–host 442
coevolution. Animal Behaviour 84:3-12. DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.011. 443
Folkers KL. 1982. Host behavioral differences to cowbird parasitism. Kansas Ornithological 444
Society Bulletin 33:32-34. 445
Folkers KL, Lowther PE. 1985. Responses of nesting red-winged blackbirds and yellow 446
warblers to brown-headed cowbirds. Journal of Field Ornithology 56:175-177. 447
Freeman, S, Gori DF, Rohwer S. 1990. Red-winged blackbirds and brown-headed cowbirds: 448
some aspects of a host-parasite relationship. The Condor 92:336-340. DOI 449
10.2307/1368231. 450
Friedmann H. 1929. The cowbirds: a study in the biology of social parasitism. Springfield: 451
Charles C. Thomas. 452
Friedmann H. 1971. Further information of the host relations of the parasitic cowbirds. The Auk 453
88:239-255. DOI 10.2307/4083877. 454
Gill SA, Neudorf DL, Sealy SG. 2008. Do hosts discriminate between sexually dichromatic 455
male and female brown-headed cowbirds? Ethology 114:548-556. DOI 10.1111/j.1439-456
0310.2008.01501.x. 457
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
23
Graham DS. 1988. Responses of five host species to cowbird parasitism. The Condor 90:588-458
591. DOI 10.2307/1368347. 459
Halkin SL, Linville SU. 1999. Northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis). In: Poole A, ed. The 460
birds of North America. Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. 461
Hauber ME. 2001. Site selection and repeatability in brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater) 462
parasitism of eastern phoebe (Sayornis phoebe) nests. Canadian Journal of Zoology 463
79:1518-1523. DOI 10.1139/z01-091. 464
Hauber ME. 2014. Mafia or farmer? Coevolutionary consequences of retaliation and farming as 465
predatory strategies upon host nests by avian brood parasites. Coevolution: An Open 466
Access Journal 2:18-25. DOI 10.1080/23256214.2014.913974. 467
Hauber ME, Russo SA. 2000. Perch proximity correlates with higher rates of cowbird 468
parasitism of ground nesting song sparrows. The Wilson Bulletin 112:150-153. DOI 469
10.1676/0043-5643. 470
Henger CS, Hauber ME. 2014. Variation in antiparasitic behaviors of red-winged blackbirds in 471
response to simulated brown-headed cowbirds. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 472
126:488-499. DOI 10.1676/13-193.1. 473
Honza M, Šicha V, Procházka P, Ležalová R. 2006. Host nest defense against a color-474
dimorphic brood parasite: great reed warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) versus 475
common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus). Journal of Ornithology 147:629-637. DOI 476
10.1007/s10336-006-0088-y. 477
Hoover JP, Robinson SK. 2007. Retaliatory mafia behavior by a parasitic cowbird favors host 478
acceptance of parasitic eggs. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 479
104:4479-4483. DOI 10.1073/pnas.0609710104. 480
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
24
Hoover JP, Yasukawa K, Hauber ME. 2006. Spatially and temporally structured avian brood 481
parasitism affects the fitness benefits of hosts’ rejection strategies. Animal Behaviour 482
72:881-890. DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.02.011. 483
Kilner RM, Langmore NE. 2011. Cuckoos versus hosts in insects and birds: Adaptations, 484
counter-adaptations and outcomes. Biological Reviews 86:836-852. DOI 10.1111/j.1469-485
185X.2010.00173.x. 486
Knight RL, Temple SA. 1986. Why does intensity of avian nest defense increase during the 487
nesting cycle? The Auk 103:318-327. 488
Lahti DC. 2006. Persistence of egg recognition in the absence of brood parasitism: pattern and 489
mechanism. Evolution 60:157-168. DOI 10.1554/05-052.1 490
Lichtenstein G. 2001. Low success of shiny cowbird chicks parasitizing rufous-bellied thrushes: 491
chick-chick competition or parental discrimination? Animal Behaviour 61:401-413. DOI 492
10.1006/anbe.2000.1595. 493
Lorenzana JC, Sealy SG. 1999. A meta-analysis of the impact of parasitism by the brown-494
headed cowbird on its hosts. Studies in Avian Biology 18:241-253. 495
Lowther PE. 1993. Brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater). In: Poole A, ed. The birds of 496
North America. Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. 497
Martin CW. 2014. Naïve prey exhibit reduced antipredator behavior and survivorship. PeerJ 498
2:e665. DOI 10.7717/peerj.665. 499
Moskàt C, Barta Z, Hauber ME, Honza M. 2006. High synchrony of egg laying between 500
common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) and their great reed warbler (Acrocephalus 501
arundinaceus) hosts. Ethology Ecology and Evolution 18:159-167. DOI 502
10.1080/08927014.2006.9522720. 503
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
25
Ortega, CP, Cruz A. 1991. A comparative study of cowbird parasitism in yellow-headed 504
blackbirds and red-winged blackbirds. The Auk 108:16-24. 505
Peer BD, Rothstein SI, Kuehn MJ, Fleischer RC. 2005. Host defenses against cowbird 506
(Molothrus spp.) parasitism: Implications for cowbird management. Ornithological 507
Monographs 57:84-97. DOI 10.2307/40166816. 508
Prather JW, Ortega CP, Cruz A. 1999. Aggressive responses of red-winged blackbirds 509
(Agelaius phoeniceus) toward brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) in areas of recent 510
and long-term sympatry. Bird Behavior 13:1-7. 511
Robertson RJ, Norman RF. 1976. Behavioral defenses to brood parasitism by potential hosts of 512
the brown-headed cowbird. The Condor 78:166-173. DOI 10.2307/1366851. 513
Robertson RJ, Norman RF. 1977. The function and evolution of aggressive host behavior 514
towards the brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater). Canadian Journal of Zoology 515
55:508–518. DOI 10.1139/z77-066. 516
Rohwer S, Spaw CD. 1988. Evolutionary lag versus bill-size constraints: A comparative study 517
of the acceptance of cowbird eggs by old hosts. Evolutionary Ecology 2:27-36. DOI 518
10.1007/BF02071586. 519
Rohwer S. Spaw CD, Røskaft E. 1989. Costs to northern orioles of puncture-ejecting parasitic 520
cowbird eggs from their nests. The Auk 106:734-738. 521
Røskaft E, Moksnes A, Stokke BG, Bičík V, Moskát C. 2002. Aggression to dummy cuckoos 522
by potential European cuckoo hosts. Behaviour 139:613-628. DOI 523
10.1163/15685390260136735. 524
Røsfaft E, Orians GH, Beletsky LD. 1990. Why do red-winged blackbirds accept eggs of 525
brown-headed cowbirds? Evolutionary Ecology 4:35-42. DOI 10.1007/BF02270713. 526
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
26
Rothstein SI. 1970. An experimental investigation of the defenses of the hosts of the parasitic 527
brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater). Unpublished PhD dissertation. New Haven: 528
Yale University. 529
Rothstein SI. 1975a. An experimental and teleonomic investigation of avian brood parasitism. 530
The Condor 77:250-271. DOI 10.2307/1366221. 531
Rothstein SI. 1975b. Evolutionary rates and host defenses against avian brood parasitism. 532
American Naturalist 105:71-74. 533
Rothstein SI. 1990. A model system for coevolution: Avian brood parasitism. Annual Review of 534
Ecology and Systematics 21:481-508. 535
Schorger AW. 1937. The range of the bison in Wisconsin. Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, 536
Arts and Letters 30:117-130. 537
Sealy SG, Neudorf DL, Hobson KA, Gill SA. 1998. Nest defense by potential hosts of the 538
brown-headed cowbird: Methodological approaches, benefits of defense, and 539
coevolution. In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK, eds. Parasitic birds and their hosts. New 540
York: Oxford University Press, 194-211. 541
Seppä J. 1969. The cuckoo's ability to find a nest where it can lay an egg. Ornis Fennica 46:78-542
79. 543
Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC. 2004. Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary 544
overview. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:372-378. DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.009. 545
Smith JNM. 1981. Cowbird parasitism, host fitness, and age of the host female in an island song 546
sparrow population. The Condor 83:152-161. DOI 10.2307/1367420. 547
Smith JNM, Arcese P. 1984. Brown-headed cowbirds and an island population of song 548
sparrows: a 16-year study. The Condor 96:916-934. DOI 10.2307/1369102. 549
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
27
Smith JNM, Arcese P, McLean IG. 1984. Age, experience, and enemy recognition by wild 550
song sparrows. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 14:101-106. DOI 551
10.1007/BF00291901. 552
Strausberger BM. 1998. Evident nest-searching behavior of female brown-headed cowbirds 553
while attended by males. The Wilson Bulletin 110:133-136. 554
Strausberger BM. 2001. The relationship of habitat and spatial distribution of nests with brown-555
headed cowbird parasitism of red-winged blackbirds. The Wilson Bulletin 113:129-133. 556
Strausberger BM, Horning ME. 1998. Responses of nesting song sparrows (Melospiza 557
melodia) and red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) to models of parasitic 558
cowbirds and nonthreatening towhees. Bird Behavior 12:71-78. 559
Uyehara JC, Narins, PM. 1995. Nest defense by willow flycatchers to brood-parasitic 560
intruders. The Condor 97:361-368. DOI 10.2307/1369022. 561
Valera F, Hoi H, Schleicher B. 1997. Egg burial in penduline tits, Remiz pendulinus: its role in 562
mate desertion and female polyandry. Behavioral Ecology 1:20-27. DOI 563
10.1093/beheco/8.1.20. 564
Ward D, Lindholm AK, Smith JNM. 1996. Multiple parasitism of the red-winged blackbird: 565
Further experimental evidence of evolutionary lag in a common host of the brown-headed 566
cowbird. The Auk 113:408-413. 567
Welbergen JA, Davies NB. 2009. Strategic variation in mobbing as a front line of defense 568
against brood parasitism. Current Biology 19:235-240. DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2008.12.041. 569
Yasukawa K. 1989. The costs and benefits of a vocal signal: the nest-associated 'chit' of the 570
female red-winged blackbird, Agelaius phoeniceus. Animal Behaviour 38:866-874. DOI 571
10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80118-6. 572
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts
28
Yasukawa K, Werner W. 2007. Nest abandonment as a potential anti-parasite adaptation in the 573
red-winged blackbird. Passenger Pigeon 69:481-489. 574
Yasukawa K, Whittenberger LK, Nielsen TA. 1992. Anti-predator vigilance in the red-winged 575
blackbird, Agelaius phoeniceus: do males act as sentinels? Animal Behaviour 43: 961-576
969. DOI 10.1016/S0003-3472(06)80009-6. 577
578
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1274v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Jul 2015, publ: 31 Jul 2015
PrePrin
ts