redistricting community meeting...brownsburg east ms 1,155 1,039 1,017 1,048 1,064 brownsburg west...
TRANSCRIPT
Redistricting Community Meeting
November 28, 2017
Tonight’s Objectives
• Explain the redistricting process
• Update you on the committee’s progress
• Share next steps
• Answer your questions
Important To Take Away• No decisions have been made. It is anticipated that decisions will be
made in January.
• The neighborhoods have been and will continue to be anonymous. No one on the committee knows which neighborhood is which. This has allowed the scenarios to be created by working with enrollment data, poverty data, and diversity data.
• There will be another Community Meeting on Thursday, January 4, 2018 at 6:30. It is believed that the Redistricting Committee will have made a decision by then in anticipation of providing a recommendation to the School Board for approval at the January 8th School Board Meeting.
Lincoln Elementary Front of Building
East Facade
Courtyard
Kindergarten & 1st Grade Wing
2nd & 3rd Grade Wing
4th & 5th Grade Wing
4th & 5th Grade Wing
Main Entry & Corridor
Media Center
Redistricting Committee• The purpose of the Redistricting Committee was to develop a plan to
recommend to the School Board that will adjust neighborhood school
placements in order to populate Lincoln Elementary.
• The call for volunteers went out in all school newsletters last spring and
the opportunity was available for any parent to be a participant. All
parents who volunteered were included on the Redistricting Committee.
After the first meeting, we did not add additional members as we believed
it was critical for all members to be in attendance at all of the meetings.
Similarities and Differences2013 Redistricting
• Needed due to imbalance of student
enrollment, no new school
• Students were moved in many
directions, primarily out of Eagle and
Reagan
• Committee of approximately 90
parents, teachers, and administrators
• All BCSC schools were rated as A
schools
• Parents recommended for committee
2017 Redistricting
• Needed due to opening of an
additional elementary school
• Students moved in one direction
• Committee of approximately 100
parents, teachers, and administrators
• All BCSC schools are currently rated
as A schools and all are also 4 Star
Schools
• Parents volunteered for committee
Take Aways from 2013
• Strategies to Keep: • Anonymous neighborhoods• Consideration for
• Poverty/SES and Diversity balancing• Apartment placement
• Strategies to Tweak: • Walking neighborhoods• Large neighborhoods• Homes not part of neighborhoods• Space available to maintain desired diversity and poverty ranges• Allow parents to volunteer to serve on the committee
Considerations from the 2013 Process• It was asked during the Redistricting of 2013 if it could be guaranteed that the neighborhoods being
redistricted would not be moved during the next redistricting. At the time, we explained that we would
do our best to avoid this. However, we could not guarantee that.
• Students who were in kindergarten for the last redistricting (which impacted school year 2014-2015),
meaning they were moved between kindergarten and first grade, will be 5th graders next year and could
be impacted by this year’s redistricting decisions. Past practice allowed students who would be
going into 5th grade and into 8th grade to remain at their school as long as transportation was
provided by parents. This Committee will provide input on continuing this practice.
• Beacon Pointe currently attends White Lick Elementary. This neighborhood is located across the street
from East Middle School. Families living in that neighborhood have been given the option since the last
redistricting to choose their middle school (West stays with feeder pattern riding a bus, East allows
students to walk). This neighborhood was told they would attend the new school and East after
this redistricting. Prior to redistricting, White Lick Elementary sent students to both East and West.
After the 2013 redistricting, White Lick was changed to a feeder school for West Middle School only.
Elementary Feeder ConfigurationAs students are redistricted for the opening of Lincoln Elementary, the
moves made will impact middle school placement as well. Students who
attend Lincoln will attend East Middle School.
Brown
Elementary
Eagle
ElementaryDelaware Trail
ElementaryWhite Lick
ElementaryCardinal
Elementary
Reagan
Elementary
Brownsburg West
Middle SchoolBrownsburg East
Middle School
Brownsburg High School
Lincoln
Elementary
ISTEP – Historical Data
• 2009 – 2010 BCSC ranked 22nd
• 2010 – 2011 BCSC ranked 16th
• 2011 – 2012 BCSC ranked 5th
• 2012 – 2013 BCSC ranked 5th
• 2013 – 2014 BCSC ranked 6th
• 2014 – 2015 BCSC ranked 3rd
• 2015 – 2016 BCSC ranked 1st
• 2016 – 2017 BCSC ranked 1st
Indiana Department of Education Ratings and Awards This post card was
mailed to homes last year.
With the ISTEP results from Spring
2017, every Brownsburg School
earned an
A for the
SIXTH STRAIGHT YEAR!
Question
• If you had to pick just one, how do you believe most parents would respond and why?
• My elementary school is the best in BCSC.
• My elementary school is great – just like all of the other elementary schools in BCSC.
Student Enrollment
School 2013-2014* 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-20172017-2018
(8/11/17)
Brown Elementary 543 655 659 655 730
Cardinal Elementary 505 631 598 563 588
Delaware Trail
Elementary480 606 622 633 643
Eagle Elementary 795 634 670 716 745
Reagan Elementary 667 614 602 630 678
White Lick Elementary 582 586 579 616 602
Brownsburg East MS 1,155 1,039 1,017 1,048 1,064
Brownsburg West MS 757 922 948 952 987
Brownsburg High
School2,299 2,321 2,389 2,484 2,530
*Indicates the year prior to redistricting
Average Class Size, Grades K - 8
Preferred
Size2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Kindergarten 18 - 22 21.1 18.8 19.4 19.6 19.6
1st 18 - 22 20.2 19.4 20 20 20.6
2nd 18 - 22 20.4 19.4 19.3 18.6 19.7
3rd 22 - 26 21.1 22 21.6 22.6 22.2
4th 22 - 26 21.9 22.3 22.1 21.8 23.2
5th 22 - 26 22.9 23.3 23.1 22.2 23.6
6th 24 - 28 28.4 26.5 27.7 27.6 27.5
7th 24 - 28 27.3 27.8 24.3 23.4 25.7
8th 24 - 28 25.3 24.5 22.3 25.2 23.8
School Size and Special Programs
Number of
ClassroomsSpecial Programs
Brown 33 Life Skills
Cardinal 30 0
Delaware Trail 30 Emotional Disability
Eagle 33 0*
Lincoln 33 0
Reagan 30 0
White Lick 30 Bridge & K/1 HA*
The classrooms used for the Life Skills, ED, and Bridge programs are not included in the
classroom counts. The * at Eagle indicates they will receive the K/1 HA program for the
18 – 19 school year. That program is currently housed at White Lick.
Home School Placements
• Currently, there are students attending schools that are not their home school. These typically fall into one of two categories:
• Students with disabilities and their siblings: Students and the siblings of students who participate in special education programming only offered at specific buildings will not be returned to their home school unless they elect to do so.
• Rosemont: This neighborhood was incorrectly marked as attending Cardinal even though there was Board action that made it a Reagan neighborhood. The families who had purchased their homes believing it was a Cardinal neighborhood were allowed to attend Cardinal. This impacted less than 20 families. These families will attend the home school as determined by this committee.
Desired School Size 5 Kindergarten Classrooms – 20 students x 5 = 100 students
5 First Grade Classrooms – 20 students x 5 = 100 students
5 Second Grade Classrooms – 20 students x 5 = 100 students
4 Third Grade Classrooms – 25 students x 4 = 100 students
4 Fourth Grade Classrooms – 25 students x 4 = 100 students
4 Fifth Grade Classrooms – 25 students x 4 = 100 students
(10 per grade level in the 2/3 and 4/5 high ability program)
This would put all of our elementary schools at roughly 640 students.
An enrollment of 640 students allows for related arts programming, lunch
room capacity, and media center capacity to operate within desired limits.
Factors to Consider for Redistricting
1. Impact the fewest number of families while achieving desired enrollment numbers.
2. Equalize poverty rates in each school.
3. Maintain a representation of our community of the racial diversity in each school.
4. Create new classes within the parameters previously shared.
• Kdg – 2nd Grade: 18-22 students
• 3rd – 5th Grade: 22-26 students
• 6th – 8th Grade: 26-28 students
5. When all else fails – go back to parameter #1
Balancing Poverty Rates/SES –Updated 11/8/17
School 2017 - 2018
Percentages
Brown 24.97%
Cardinal 33.39%
Delaware Trail 27.33%
Eagle 24.66%
Reagan 22.84%
White Lick 23.28%Elementary Total 25.94%
• The elementary average is
25.94%.
• The committee’s goal will be to
redistrict neighborhoods so
that all schools are closer to
the district average. Our goal
is to be +/- 3% of the district
average.
• The desired range would then
be 22.94% - 28.94%.
Balancing Racial Diversity – Updated 11/8/17• The difference between the
highest and lowest diversity
percentages at our schools
(comparing elementary
schools) is currently 18.11%.
• Our goal would be that any
movement of students would
cause the diversity rates in our
schools to move closer to the
district average.
School 2017 - 2018
Percentages
Brown 24.02%
Cardinal 15.45%
Delaware Trail 29.31%
Eagle 33.56%
Reagan 26.06%
White Lick 27.21%Elementary Total 26.18%
Neighborhood Information, part 1
• There are several homes in BCSC not located within a neighborhood. These are homes that are typically found on county roads. These “no neighborhood” areas send us approximately 280 students in K – 5.
Neighborhood Information, part 2• Some homes on county roads are right next to a neighborhood. When
homes are located on county roads near neighborhoods, we have included these homes as part of the neighborhood for the purpose of transportation.
Red = WindridgeYellow = CreekwoodEstatesPurple = No neighborhood
Neighborhood Information, part 3
• There are neighborhoods that have been deemed “walking neighborhoods”. These neighborhoods are within one mile of the assigned school. For financial reasons, to assist with transportation costs, our current plan is to not move walking areas. These walking areas include:
Brown
• Ashwood Estates
• Country Walk
Cardinal
• Bersot Crossing
• Holiday Pines
• Lincoln Point
• Thornburg
Delaware Trail
• Meadow Chase
• Hornaday Heights
Eagle
• Sugar Bush North
White Lick
• Brownswood
• Holiday Park II
• Hunters Cove
• Sugar Bush South
Neighborhood Information, part 4
• Reagan Elementary has three walking neighborhoods: Hornaday Heights, Ironwood and Creekside Commons.
• Since Lincoln is connected to Reagan, these three neighborhoods are also within walking distance of Lincoln and will be considered for redistricting.
Large Neighborhoods
• There are 14 neighborhoods in the district who have more than 70 students in grades K - 5.
• Austin Meadows Bersot Crossing*
• Branches Clermont Lakes
• Creekside Commons* Hession Fields
• Highland Springs Lake Ridge
• Silverleaf (Eagle Crossing) Summer Ridge
• Thornburg* Tallgrass(Eagle Crossing)
• Williamsburg Wynne Farms West**
Large Neighborhoods
Summer Ridge East -1 and
Summer Ridge West – 1
would be considered one
subdivision.
Enclave West – 1, 2A, 2B, 3A,
3B, and Summer Ridge West –
2A and 2B would be considered
one subdivision.
Large Neighborhood Discussion
• In August, the idea of splitting large neighborhoods was shared with the committee.
• In order to make the redistricting process as transparent as possible, the committee needed to consider whether or not splitting large neighborhoods is beneficial to meeting the goals of the redistricting process.
• After information was shared, each parent participant (including BCSC staff members who have students enrolled) provided feedback on their preference of either splitting large neighborhoods or keeping them whole.
Area Elementary Assigned ElemWalk K5Enrollment FRALPHA DiversityALPHA
Bogus #01 Happy Elementary 22 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #02 Happy Elementary 6 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #03 Happy Elementary 17 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #04 Happy Elementary 30 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #05 Happy Elementary 105 Near Average SES Less Diversity
Bogus #06 Happy Elementary 52 Higher SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #07 Happy Elementary 10 Near Average SES More Diversity
Bogus #08 Happy Elementary 12 Lower SES Less Diversity
Bogus #09 Happy Elementary 42 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #10 Happy Elementary Walk 15 Higher SES More Diversity
Bogus #11 Happy Elementary 24 Near Average SES Less Diversity
Bogus #12 Happy Elementary 13 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #13 Happy Elementary 5 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #14 Happy Elementary Walk 52 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #15 Happy Elementary 69 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #16 Happy Elementary 250 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #17 Happy Elementary 79 Higher SES More Diversity
Bogus #18 Happy Elementary Walk 47 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #19 Happy Elementary 10 Lower SES Less Diversity
Bogus #20 Happy Elementary 11 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #21 Happy Elementary 91 Lower SES More Diversity
Large Neighborhood DiscussionArea - Neighborhood
Elementary Assigned – Current Home School
ElemWalk – Is this a walking neighborhood?
K5Enrollment – Students currently enrolled in grades K - 5
FRALPHA – Poverty (Free and Reduced lunch) percentage in comparison to district average
DiversityALPHA – Diversity percentage in comparison to district average
District Averages - FRALPHA: 21.42% and DiversityALPHA: 18.45%
Area Elementary Assigned ElemWalk K5Enrollment FRALPHA DiversityALPHA
Bogus #13 Happy Elementary 5 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #02 Happy Elementary 6 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #07 Happy Elementary 10 Near Average SES More Diversity
Bogus #19 Happy Elementary 10 Lower SES Less Diversity
Bogus #20 Happy Elementary 11 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #08 Happy Elementary 12 Lower SES Less Diversity
Bogus #12 Happy Elementary 13 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #03 Happy Elementary 17 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #01 Happy Elementary 22 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #11 Happy Elementary 24 Near Average SES Less Diversity
Bogus #04 Happy Elementary 30 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #09 Happy Elementary 42 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #06 Happy Elementary 52 Higher SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #15 Happy Elementary 69 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #17 Happy Elementary 79 Higher SES More Diversity
Bogus #21 Happy Elementary 91 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #05 Happy Elementary 105 Near Average SES Less Diversity
Bogus #16 Happy Elementary 250 Higher SES Less Diversity
Large Neighborhood DiscussionWalking neighborhoods have been removed. Neighborhoods have been sorted by size. Look at the last two neighborhoods – we could move #5, but #16 is too large to move.
Happy Elementary School has a poverty percentage of 17.6% and a diversity percentage of 19%.
Happy Elementary School needs to send 100 students to the new school.
Happy Elementary School should send students who are Higher SES or Near SES. As for diversity, they could send students from any category
District Averages - FRALPHA: 21.42% and DiversityALPHA: 18.45%Higher, Less, or Lower = +/- 3% from district average
Area Elementary Assigned ElemWalk K5Enrollment FRALPHA DiversityALPHA
Bogus #02 Happy Elementary 6 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #01 Happy Elementary 22 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #06 Happy Elementary 52 Higher SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #17 Happy Elementary 79 Higher SES More Diversity
Bogus #16 Happy Elementary 250 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #13 Happy Elementary 5 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #19 Happy Elementary 10 Lower SES Less Diversity
Bogus #08 Happy Elementary 12 Lower SES Less Diversity
Bogus #12 Happy Elementary 13 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #04 Happy Elementary 30 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #21 Happy Elementary 91 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #07 Happy Elementary 10 Near Average SES More Diversity
Bogus #20 Happy Elementary 11 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #03 Happy Elementary 17 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #11 Happy Elementary 24 Near Average SES Less Diversity
Bogus #09 Happy Elementary 42 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #15 Happy Elementary 69 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #05 Happy Elementary 105 Near Average SES Less Diversity
Walking neighborhoods have been removed. Neighborhoods have been sorted FRALPHA.
Happy Elementary School needs to send 100 students to the new school.
Happy Elementary School should send students who are Higher SES or Near SES. As for diversity, they could send students from any category
Large Neighborhood Discussion
Area Elementary Assigned ElemWalk K5Enrollment FRALPHA DiversityALPHA
Bogus #02 Happy Elementary 6 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #01 Happy Elementary 22 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #06 Happy Elementary 52 Higher SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #17 Happy Elementary 79 Higher SES More Diversity
Bogus #16 Happy Elementary 250 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #13 Happy Elementary 5 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #19 Happy Elementary 10 Lower SES Less Diversity
Bogus #08 Happy Elementary 12 Lower SES Less Diversity
Bogus #12 Happy Elementary 13 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #04 Happy Elementary 30 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #21 Happy Elementary 91 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #07 Happy Elementary 10 Near Average SES More Diversity
Bogus #20 Happy Elementary 11 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #03 Happy Elementary 17 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #11 Happy Elementary 24 Near Average SES Less Diversity
Bogus #09 Happy Elementary 42 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #15 Happy Elementary 69 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #05 Happy Elementary 105 Near Average SES Less Diversity
Large Neighborhood Discussion
Neighborhoods have been sorted FRALPHA.
Happy Elementary School needs to send 100 students to the new school.
Happy Elementary School should send students who are Higher SES or Near SES. As for diversity, they could send students from any category .
Scenario One: Bogus #1 and Bogus #17 = 101 students to be moved
Area Elementary Assigned ElemWalk K5Enrollment FRALPHA DiversityALPHA
Bogus #01 Happy Elementary 22 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #02 Happy Elementary 6 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #03 Happy Elementary 17 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #04 Happy Elementary 30 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #05 Happy Elementary 105 Near Average SES Less Diversity
Bogus #05A Happy Elementary 65 Near Average SES Less Diversity
Bogus #05B Happy Elementary 40 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #06 Happy Elementary 52 Higher SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #07 Happy Elementary 10 Near Average SES More Diversity
Bogus #08 Happy Elementary 12 Lower SES Less Diversity
Bogus #09 Happy Elementary 42 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #11 Happy Elementary 24 Near Average SES Less Diversity
Bogus #12 Happy Elementary 13 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #13 Happy Elementary 5 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #15 Happy Elementary 69 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #16 Happy Elementary 250 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #16A Happy Elementary 63 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #16B Happy Elementary 48 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #16C Happy Elementary 70 Higher SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #16D Happy Elementary 69 Near Average SES Less Diversity
Bogus #17 Happy Elementary 79 Higher SES More Diversity
Bogus #19 Happy Elementary 10 Lower SES Less Diversity
Bogus #20 Happy Elementary 11 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #21 Happy Elementary 91 Lower SES More Diversity
Large Neighborhood Discussion
The committee decides to have neighborhoods split. Neighborhoods that are larger than 70 and require more than one bus would be split.
This shows the splits and the whole neighborhood would be removed from the spreadsheet.
Happy Elementary School needs to send 100 students to the new school.
Happy Elementary School should send students who are Higher SES or Near SES. As for diversity, they could send students from any category .
Area Elementary Assigned ElemWalk K5Enrollment FRALPHA DiversityALPHA
Bogus #01 Happy Elementary 22 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #02 Happy Elementary 6 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #06 Happy Elementary 52 Higher SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #16A Happy Elementary 63 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #16C Happy Elementary 70 Higher SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #17 Happy Elementary 79 Higher SES More Diversity
Bogus #04 Happy Elementary 30 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #08 Happy Elementary 12 Lower SES Less Diversity
Bogus #12 Happy Elementary 13 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #13 Happy Elementary 5 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #19 Happy Elementary 10 Lower SES Less Diversity
Bogus #21 Happy Elementary 91 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #03 Happy Elementary 17 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #05A Happy Elementary 65 Near Average SES Less Diversity
Bogus #05B Happy Elementary 40 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #07 Happy Elementary 10 Near Average SES More Diversity
Bogus #09 Happy Elementary 42 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #11 Happy Elementary 24 Near Average SES Less Diversity
Bogus #15 Happy Elementary 69 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #16B Happy Elementary 48 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #16D Happy Elementary 69 Near Average SES Less Diversity
Bogus #20 Happy Elementary 11 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Large Neighborhood Discussion
Whole neighborhoods removed from the spreadsheet. Neighborhoods have been sorted FRALPHA.
Previously, there were 5 neighborhoods that were Higher SES. However, one was too large to consider. The split results in 6 Higher SES neighborhoods. Additionally, there were 7 Near Average SES neighborhoods prior to the split, now there are 10.
Area Elementary Assigned ElemWalk K5Enrollment FRALPHA DiversityALPHA
Bogus #01 Happy Elementary 22 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #02 Happy Elementary 6 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #06 Happy Elementary 52 Higher SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #16A Happy Elementary 63 Higher SES Less Diversity
Bogus #16C Happy Elementary 70 Higher SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #17 Happy Elementary 79 Higher SES More Diversity
Bogus #04 Happy Elementary 30 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #08 Happy Elementary 12 Lower SES Less Diversity
Bogus #12 Happy Elementary 13 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #13 Happy Elementary 5 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #19 Happy Elementary 10 Lower SES Less Diversity
Bogus #21 Happy Elementary 91 Lower SES More Diversity
Bogus #03 Happy Elementary 17 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #05A Happy Elementary 65 Near Average SES Less Diversity
Bogus #05B Happy Elementary 40 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #07 Happy Elementary 10 Near Average SES More Diversity
Bogus #09 Happy Elementary 42 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #11 Happy Elementary 24 Near Average SES Less Diversity
Bogus #15 Happy Elementary 69 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #16B Happy Elementary 48 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Bogus #16D Happy Elementary 69 Near Average SES Less Diversity
Bogus #20 Happy Elementary 11 Near Average SES Near Average Diversity
Large Neighborhood Discussion
Scenario Three: Bogus #1, #2, and #16a = 98 students to be moved
Neighborhoods have been sorted FRALPHA.
Happy Elementary School needs to send 100 students to the new school.
Happy Elementary School should send students who are Higher SES or Near SES. As for diversity, they could send students from any category .
Large Neighborhood DiscussionSplitting Neighborhoods
• Pros• More options for scenarios
• Cons• Neighborhood children could
attend different schools
Keeping Neighborhoods Whole
• Pros• Neighborhood children attend the
same school
• Cons• Fewer options for scenarios
If no splitting is done, one or two of our largest neighborhoods become redistrict-proof. This could be a pro or a con.
Voting Results (slide added after September meeting)
Keep Neighborhoods Whole Split Neighborhoods
Factors to Consider for Redistricting
1. Impact the fewest number of families while achieving desired enrollment numbers.
2. Equalize poverty rates in each school.
3. Maintain a representation of our community of the racial diversity in each school.
4. Create new classes within the parameters previously shared.
• Kdg – 2nd Grade: 18-22 students
• 3rd – 5th Grade: 22-26 students
• 6th – 8th Grade: 26-28 students
5. When all else fails – go back to parameter #1
Adjustments Needed
All of the numbers listed below indicate an approximate number of students
who will be relocated. **New enrollment data from November 8, 2017**
August
Numbers
November
Numbers
Desired
Size
Difference
(approx.)
Brown 730 737 +/- 600 - 130
Cardinal 588 602 +/- 560 - 30*
Delaware Trail 643 655 +/- 560 - 80*
Eagle 745 742 +/- 600 - 145
Lincoln 0 0 +/- 560 + 560**
Reagan 678 683 +/- 560 - 120
White Lick 602 610 +/- 560 - 40
Total 3,986 4,029 4,000
*= updated enrollment data causes <10 student change in original relocation number**= could impact number of students for opening of Lincoln (larger than original estimate)
Scenarios• In September, each table was asked to come up with at least two scenarios of moves that could be
made that fell within the parameters provided.
• 35 scenarios were submitted. These scenarios were collected and run through a database to determine the impact of the moves on poverty rates, diversity rates, and student enrollment.
• In October, the list was narrowed from 35 to 15. The narrowing occurred based on poverty, diversity, and student enrollment.
• Some modified scenarios were created at the end of the October meeting. The 15 scenarios (created in September) and 14 modified scenarios (created in October) were run again using updated numbers (11/8/17).
• In November, the Committee evaluated the scenarios again and narrowed the scenarios to 7. These 7 scenarios will be evaluated and discussed by the Committee in December and in January. Additional narrowing will be done until there is one scenario that will be the recommended scenario.
Plan: I1 Modified Desired
Enrollment
This Plan's
Enrollment
Enrollment
check
+/- 20
This Plan's
SES Prior SES SES check
This Plan's
Diversity
Prior
Diversity
Diversity
Check
Brown Elementary 600 604 25.00% 24.97% Within Range 23.34% 24.02% Widening
Cardinal Elementary 560 577 33.45% 33.39% Outside Range 15.60% 15.45% Narrowing
Delaware Trail Elementary 560 570 23.33% 27.33% Within Range 23.86% 29.31% Narrowing
Eagle Elementary 600 597 27.97% 24.66% Within Range 33.00% 33.56% Narrowing
Lincoln Elementary 560 566 19.61% NA Outside Range 31.45% NA NA
Reagan Elementary 560 561 27.45% 22.84% Within Range 26.74% 26.06% Widening
White Lick Elementary 560 554 24.55% 23.28% Within Range 29.42% 27.21% Widening
These areas would be moved: Area ID To Elementary
BES-07 Lincoln Elementary
BES-08 Lincoln Elementary
BES-10 Lincoln Elementary
CES-02 Lincoln Elementary
DTES-08 Lincoln Elementary
DTES-13 Lincoln Elementary
EES-02 Lincoln Elementary
EES-06 Lincoln Elementary
EES-13 Lincoln Elementary
RES-05 Lincoln Elementary
RES-11 Lincoln Elementary
RES-14 Lincoln Elementary
RES-15 Lincoln Elementary
xxx xxx
DTES-11 Lincoln Elementary
xxx xxx
xxx xxx
xxx xxx
xxx xxx
xxx xxx
xxx xxx
Desired SES Range: 22.94 - 28.94%
Average SES: 25.94%
Average Diversity: 26.18%
1. Cardinal’s SES will not be within the range with only moving +/- 30 students.
2. White Lick’s diversity will always show widening since only one neighborhood and one program are moving.
3. A too big with a too small is a correction that can be made.4. Pay attention to Lincoln Elementary numbers. Because
they are essentially new numbers, they are not figured in to the Diversity check. You will need to do that.
5. The xxx below RES-15 indicates that the DTES-11 is an addition. This addition is what makes this scenario a modified plan.
Other Factors to Consider• Previously Redistricted Neighborhoods: There is one neighborhood which has
been moved in more than 2/3 of the plans that were submitted for consideration in November. Investigation into this neighborhood shows that there is 1 student who was impacted by the last redistricting. The data shown about redistricting does not include this neighborhood as part of the count. A yes indicates there are neighborhoods in the plan which were redistricted for the 2014-2015 school year. Best response would be a No.
• Apartments: Currently each elementary school has 1 to 2 apartment complexes sending students to them. If a scenario causes the number of apartment complexes at Lincoln to be more than 2 or if a scenario leaves schools with 0 apartment complexes, the box will say no. If the scenario results in all schools have 1 – 2 complexes, the box will say yes. Best response would be a Yes.
Other Factors to Consider, part 2• Split Neighborhoods: This represents the number of neighborhoods
that are actually being split in this scenario. If a neighborhood is split into 3 sections and only one section is moved, it would be counted as 1. If a neighborhood is split into 3 sections and two sections are moved, it would be counted as 1. If a neighborhood is split into two sections and both sections are being moved, it would not be counted because the neighborhood is staying together even though it is being moved. The best response is a low number.
SCENARIO/PLAN REDISTRICTED APARTMENTSSPLIT
NEIGHBORHOODS
I1M NO YES 5
Questions
• Please mark your calendars for Thursday, January 4, 2018 at 6:30 pm. This will be
the next Community Meeting for Redistricting.