redistricting in california redistrictingincalifornia · redistrictingincalifornia inventory of the...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Redistricting in California
Inventory of the Collection of the California Special Masters on Reapportionment 1973Institute of Governmental Studies Library, UC Berkeley
by Dorothy Simpson and Robert H. McDonald (1975)
Forward - Eugene C. Lee
Preface - Dorothy Simpson
Special Masters on Reapportionment
Chronology of Legislative Attempts at Reapportionment
Chronology of Judicial Procedures Leading to Reapportionment
Section 1. Documents Listed in Register of Official Records
Section 2. Documents Relating to Specific Legal Cases
Section 3. Office Files and Working Collection
Section 4. Miscellaneous
Attachment 1. Register of Official Records and Written Presentations, Official Copy
[not included]
Attachment 2. List of Files Containing the Transcript of Testimony Taken at the Various
Hearings [not included]
Redistricting in California
Inventory of the Collection of the California Special Masters on Reapportionment 1973 Institute of Governmental Studies Library, UC Berkeley
by Dorothy Simpson and Robert H. McDonald (1975)
Forward - Eugene C. Lee
Preface - Dorothy Simpson
Special Masters on Reapportionment
Chronology of Legislative Attempts at Reapportionment
Chronology of Judicial Procedures Leading to Reapportionment
Section 1. Documents Listed in Register of Official Records
Section 2. Documents Relating to Specific Legal Cases
Section 3. Office Files and Working Collection
Section 4. Miscellaneous
Attachment 1. Register of Official Records and Written Presentations, Official Copy
[not included]
Attachment 2. List of Files Containing the Transcript of Testimony Taken at the Various
Hearings [not included]
-
Foreword
The drawing of district boundaries for state legislatures and congressional seats is one of the most significant events inAmerican politics. In California in the 1970's the act proved so intense that the Legislature and the Governor, chargedby the Constitution with establishing new district boundaries following each decennial census, were unable to agreeand-in the words of the Court--reached an impasse.
When the Supreme Court of California was forced to enter the picture, it appointed three Special Masters to holdpublic hearings with respect both to criteria for districting and proposed plans to implement such criteria, and torecommend to the Court plans for possible adoption together with their underlying rationale. This the Mastersproceeded to do, following their appointment in May 1973. Their report was filed with the Supreme Court on August31, 1973, and--with the slightest modifications-adopted by the Court in its decision in November 1973.
In their report, the Masters noted that "A request has been received from the University of California Institute ofGovernmental Studies in Berkeley that its facilities be used as a depository of all material lodged with the Masters,with the understanding that the materials received will be safely stored, catalogued and made available for public andscholarly use." The Masters went on to recommend that "pertinent materials that have been lodged with the Masters bereleased to the Institute," and the Supreme Court approved this recommendation.
The resulting materials, described in the following inventory, do not constitute a complete account of the tumultuoushistory of redistricting in the 1970's. Such an account will have to rely on legislative reports, newspapers andperiodicals, and other testimony not included in the Masters' records. But the Masters' papers do provide an essentialelement in this overall history. It is our hope that this collection will stimulate and aid the necessary scholarship andwriting which will inform the citizenry of the background and implications of both the legislativeexecutive impasseand the Court's resolution of it.
Eugene C. Lee
Preface
The collection of papers deposited in the Institute of Governmental Studies consists of the Register of Official Recordsand Written Presentations, together with the items and exhibits entered on it; legal documents and other informationpresented to or requested by the Masters concerning the consolidated cases and some earlier related cases and efforts atreapportionment; office files; and working papers, maps, etc. produced by the Masters in the course of their work.
In this inventory the material is divided into four sections, with brief introductions explaining the contents and theirarrangement. The "Register of Official Records and Written Presentations" is reproduced as Attachment 1 since it wasthe guide used in identifying and arranging the documents listed in Section 1. The chronologies of legislative efforts atreapportionment and judicial procedures which culminated in the acceptance of the Special Masters' plan by theSupreme Court are presented as background and to provide an indication of other official sources of informationessential to an understanding of the problem.
The work of identifying, organizing and listing the documents was accomplished by Robert H. McDonald, with theassistance of Chris Martiniak and William Goodman, formerly Research Assistants to the Chief Counsel for theSpecial Masters on Reapportionment. In spite of their best efforts they could not identify the source and/or intendedpurpose of some items. These are included in Section 4, Miscellaneous, and described as specifically as availableinformation permits.
Dorothy Simpson
ForewordThe drawing of district boundaries for state legislatures and congressional seats is one of the most significant events inAmerican politics. In California in the 1970's the act proved so intense that the Legislature and the Governor, chargedby the Constitution with establishing new district boundaries following each decennial census, were unable to agreeand-in the words of the Court--reached an impasse.
When the Supreme Court of California was forced to enter the picture, it appointed three Special Masters to holdpublic hearings with respect both to criteria for districting and proposed plans to implement such criteria, and torecommend to the Court plans for possible adoption together with their underlying rationale. This the Mastersproceeded to do, following their appointment in May 1973. Their report was filed with the Supreme Court on August31, 1973, and--with the slightest modifications-adopted by the Court in its decision in November 1973.
In their report, the Masters noted that "A request has been received from the University of California Institute ofGovernmental Studies in Berkeley that its facilities be used as a depository of all material lodged with the Masters,with the understanding that the materials received will be safely stored, catalogued and made available for public andscholarly use." The Masters went on to recommend that "pertinent materials that have been lodged with the Masters bereleased to the Institute," and the Supreme Court approved this recommendation.
The resulting materials, described in the following inventory, do not constitute a complete account of the tumultuoushistory of redistricting in the 1970's. Such an account will have to rely on legislative reports, newspapers andperiodicals, and other testimony not included in the Masters' records. But the Masters' papers do provide an essentialelement in this overall history. It is our hope that this collection will stimulate and aid the necessary scholarship andwriting which will inform the citizenry of the background and implications of both the legislativeexecutive impasseand the Court's resolution of it.
Eugene C. Lee
PrefaceThe collection of papers deposited in the Institute of Governmental Studies consists of the Register of Official Recordsand Written Presentations, together with the items and exhibits entered on it; legal documents and other informationpresented to or requested by the Masters concerning the consolidated cases and some earlier related cases and efforts atreapportionment; office files; and working papers, maps, etc. produced by the Masters in the course of their work.
In this inventory the material is divided into four sections, with brief introductions explaining the contents and theirarrangement. The "Register of Official Records and Written Presentations" is reproduced as Attachment 1 since it wasthe guide used in identifying and arranging the documents listed in Section 1. The chronologies of legislative efforts atreapportionment and judicial procedures which culminated in the acceptance of the Special Masters' plan by theSupreme Court are presented as background and to provide an indication of other official sources of informationessential to an understanding of the problem.
The work of identifying, organizing and listing the documents was accomplished by Robert H. McDonald, with theassistance of Chris Martiniak and William Goodman, formerly Research Assistants to the Chief Counsel for theSpecial Masters on Reapportionment. In spite of their best efforts they could not identify the source and/or intendedpurpose of some items. These are included in Section 4, Miscellaneous, and described as specifically as availableinformation permits.
Dorothy Simpson
-
Special Masters on Reapportionment
Martin 1. Coughlin, PresidingHarold F. CollinsAlvin E. Weinberger
Paul L. McKaskle, Chief Counsel
Chronology of Legislative Attempts at Reapportioning
This includes only those bills, resolutions or Constitutional amendments which passed at least one house. Documentsare listed in order of date of first reading.
1970 (Regular session)
January 7 AB 105, An act ... relating to reapportionment [requires county clerks to provideinformation for the use of the Legislature or legislative committees for use inreapporti onment]
January 7, read first time.March 10, passed and sent to Senate.June 19, passed and sent to Assembly.July 3, signed by Governor.
1971 (Regular session)
January 4
January 4
SB 17, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Congressional districts]January 4, read first time.November 29, passed and sent to Assembly.January 3, 1972, from Assembly without further action.
SB 18, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Senate and Assemblydistricts]
January 4, read first time.November 11, passed and sent to Assembly.November 23, passed.November 24, sent to Senate.December 2, died on file.
December 4 Regular session adjourns without passing valid legislation as required by[Legislative day Dec. 2] Constitution. Reapportionment Commission activated. (See Masters'
Chronology).
1971 (First Extra session)
December 7 AB 12, An act ... relating to reapportionment, and calling for an election, to takeeffect immediately [reapportions Assembly districts and provides Presidentialand direct primary elections shall be held on June 13, 1972]
December 7, read first time.December 18, passed and sent to Senate.
Special Masters on ReapportionmentMartin J. Coughlin, PresidingHarold F. CollinsAlvin E. Weinberger
Paul L. McKaskle, Chief Counsel
Chronology of Legislative Attempts at ReapportioningThis includes only those bills, resolutions or Constitutional amendments which passed at least one house. Documentsare listed in order of date of first reading.
1970 (Regular session)
January 7 AB 105, An act ... relating to reapportionment [requires county clerks to provideinformation for the use of the Legislature or legislative committees for use inreapportionment]
January 7, read first time.March 10, passed and sent to Senate.June 19, passed and sent to Assembly.July 3, signed by Governor.
1971 (Regular session)
January 4 SB 17, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Congressional districts]January 4, read first time.November 29, passed and sent to Assembly.January 3, 1972, from Assembly without further action.
January 4 SB 18, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Senate and Assemblydistricts]
January 4, read first time.November 11, passed and sent to Assembly.November 23, passed.November 24, sent to Senate.December 2, died on file.
December 4[Legislative day Dec. 2]
Regular session adjourns without passing valid legislation as required byConstitution. Reapportionment Commission activated. (See Masters'Chronology).
1971 (First Extra session)
December 7 AB 12, An act ... relating to reapportionment, and calling for an election, to takeeffect immediately [reapportions Assembly districts and provides Presidentialand direct primary elections shall be held on June 13, 1972]
December 7, read first time.December 18, passed and sent to Senate.
-
December 20, passed and sent to Assembly.December 30, vetoed by Governor.January 4, 1972, veto sustained.
December 7 AB 16, An act ... relating to reapportionment and calling an election, to take effectimmediately [reapportions Congressional districts]
December 7, read first time.December 18, passed and sent to Senate.December 20, passed and sent to Assembly.December 30, amendments concurred in.December 30, vetoed by Governor.January 4, 1972, veto sustained.
December 7 ACR 1, Relative to reapportionment [reapportions Assembly districts]December 7, read first time.December 18, adopted and sent to Senate.December 20, adopted and sent to Assembly.December 22, recorded by Secretary of State.
December 7 ACR 2, Relative to reapportionment [reapportions legislative districts]December 7, read first time.December 18, adopted and sent to Senate.December 20, stricken from Senate file.
December 7 SB 2, An act relating to Senatorial reapportionment and calling an election to takeeffect immediately [reapportions state Senate districts, provides thatPresidential and direct primary elections shall be held on June 13, 1972]
December 7, read first time.December 18, passed and sent to Assembly.December 20, passed and sent to Senate.December 20, Senate concurs in Assembly amendment.December 30, vetoed by Governor.March 1, 1972, died on file (veto stands).
December 7 SB 5, An act ... relating to Congressional reapportionment, and calling an election,to take effect immediately [reapportions Congressional districts]
December 7, read first time.December 17, passed and to Assembly.March 1, 1972, from Assembly without further action.
December 19 SCR 2, Relative to reapportionment [reapportions Senatorial districts]December 19, read first time, adopted and sent to Assembly.December 20, adopted and sent to Senate.December 22, filed with Secretary of State.
1972 (Regular session)
January 11 SB 23, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Senatorial districts]January 11, read first time.May 2, passed and sent to Assembly.
December 20, passed and sent to Assembly.December 30, vetoed by Governor.January 4, 1972, veto sustained.
December 7 AB 16, An act ... relating to reapportionment and calling an election, to take effectimmediately [reapportions Congressional districts]
December 7, read first time.December 18, passed and sent to Senate.December 20, passed and sent to Assembly.December 30, amendments concurred in.December 30, vetoed by Governor.January 4, 1972, veto sustained.
December 7 ACR 1, Relative to reapportionment [reapportions Assembly districts]December 7, read first time.December 18, adopted and sent to Senate.December 20, adopted and sent to Assembly.December 22, recorded by Secretary of State.
December 7 ACR 2, Relative to reapportionment [reapportions legislative districts]December 7, read first time.December 18, adopted and sent to Senate.December 20, stricken from Senate file.
December 7 SB 2, An act relating to Senatorial reapportionment and calling an election to takeeffect immediately [reapportions state Senate districts, provides thatPresidential and direct primary elections shall be held on June 13, 1972]
December 7, read first time.December 18, passed and sent to Assembly.December 20, passed and sent to Senate.December 20, Senate concurs in Assembly amendment.December 30, vetoed by Governor.March 1, 1972, died on file (veto stands).
December 7 SB 5, An act ... relating to Congressional reapportionment, and calling an election,to take effect immediately [reapportions Congressional districts]
December 7, read first time.December 17, passed and to Assembly.March 1, 1972, from Assembly without further action.
December 19 SCR 2, Relative to reapportionment [reapportions Senatorial districts]December 19, read first time, adopted and sent to Assembly.December 20, adopted and sent to Senate.December 22, filed with Secretary of State.
1972 (Regular session)
January 11 SB 23, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Senatorial districts]January 11, read first time.May 2, passed and sent to Assembly.
-
December 1, from Assembly without further action.
1973 (Regular session)
January 25
February 7
AB 164, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Assembly, Senatorial andCongressional districts]
January 25, read first time.May 17, passed and sent to Senate.June 5, passed and sent to Assembly.September 10, to inactive file.
SB 195, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Assembly, Senatorial andCongressional districts]
February 7, read first time.May 23, passed and sent to Assembly.June 14, passed and sent to Senate, Senate concurs in Assemblyamendment.June 27, vetoed by Governor.January 21, 1974, died on active file pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5
Chronology of Judicial Procedures Leading toReapportionment
December 4, 1971 [Legislative date December 2] - Legislature adjourned without passing areapportionment plan as required by the Constitution. ReapportionmentCommission empowered to act pursuant to Article IV, Section 6 of the CaliforniaConstitution.
December 15, 1971 Reapportionment Commission convened. Legislature v. Reinecke (Sac.7917) filedwith Supreme Court.
December 27, 1971 Brown v. Reagan (Sac.7919) filed with Supreme Court.
January 6, 1972
January 18, 1972
May 10, 1972
March 23, 1973
Members of the U.S. House of Representatives v. Reagan (Sac.7923) filed withSupreme Court.
The Supreme Court held that the Reapportionment Commission had nojurisdiction, and that the Governor's vetoes stand. Unless the Legislature enactedvalid reapportionment statutes in time for the 1972 elections, the present statutesapportioning the Legislature would remain in effect; Congressional districts wouldbe those set forth in AB 16, 1971 First Extraordinary Session. The Court retainedjurisdiction to draft new reapportionment plans if the Legislature failed to enactvalid legislation by the close of its 1972 regular session. (Consolidated cases,Sac.7917, 7919, 7923).
The Court modified its order of January 18 to permit the Legislature to act eitherin a regular or special session as long as it did so by the end of 1972.
A Special Order of the Court outlined the procedure it would follow indeveloping new district lines. Three Special Masters were to be appointed to hold
December 1, from Assembly without further action.
1973 (Regular session)
January 25 AB 164, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Assembly, Senatorial andCongressional districts]
January 25, read first time.May 17, passed and sent to Senate.June 5, passed and sent to Assembly.September 10, to inactive file.
February 7 SB 195, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Assembly, Senatorial andCongressional districts]
February 7, read first time.May 23, passed and sent to Assembly.June 14, passed and sent to Senate, Senate concurs in Assemblyamendment.June 27, vetoed by Governor.January 21, 1974, died on active file pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5
Chronology of Judicial Procedures Leading toReapportionment
December 4, 1971 [Legislative date December 2] - Legislature adjourned without passing areapportionment plan as required by the Constitution. ReapportionmentCommission empowered to act pursuant to Article IV, Section 6 of the CaliforniaConstitution.
December 15, 1971 Reapportionment Commission convened. Legislature v. Reinecke (Sac.7917) filedwith Supreme Court.
December 27, 1971 Brown v. Reagan (Sac.7919) filed with Supreme Court.
January 6, 1972 Members of the U.S. House of Representatives v. Reagan (Sac.7923) filed withSupreme Court.
January 18, 1972 The Supreme Court held that the Reapportionment Commission had nojurisdiction, and that the Governor's vetoes stand. Unless the Legislature enactedvalid reapportionment statutes in time for the 1972 elections, the present statutesapportioning the Legislature would remain in effect; Congressional districts wouldbe those set forth in AB 16, 1971 First Extraordinary Session. The Court retainedjurisdiction to draft new reapportionment plans if the Legislature failed to enactvalid legislation by the close of its 1972 regular session. (Consolidated cases,Sac.7917, 7919, 7923).
May 10, 1972 The Court modified its order of January 18 to permit the Legislature to act eitherin a regular or special session as long as it did so by the end of 1972.
March 23, 1973 A Special Order of the Court outlined the procedure it would follow indeveloping new district lines. Three Special Masters were to be appointed to hold
-
May 1, 1973
August 31, 1973
hearings and submit recommendations by August 31, the Court to begin hearingoral arguments after thirty days (to allow time to submit briefs). The Court wouldconsider halting its proceedings should the Legislature adopt valid plans beforethe Court completed its work.
The Special Masters were appointed and the Presiding Master designated.
The Special Masters presented their report and recommendations.
November 28, 1973 The Court announced its decision to implement the recommendations of theSpecial Masters, with minor changes only.
hearings and submit recommendations by August 31, the Court to begin hearingoral arguments after thirty days (to allow time to submit briefs). The Court wouldconsider halting its proceedings should the Legislature adopt valid plans beforethe Court completed its work.
May 1, 1973 The Special Masters were appointed and the Presiding Master designated.
August 31, 1973 The Special Masters presented their report and recommendations.
November 28, 1973 The Court announced its decision to implement the recommendations of theSpecial Masters, with minor changes only.
-
> Section 1. Documents Listed in Register of OfficialRecords
This section consists of a list of the items on the Register, with related documents, arranged by number assigned on theRegister, with full titles as shown on the documents. For a reproduction of the "Register of Official Records andWritten Presentations" as prepared by the Masters' staff, see Attachment 1.
[This document is best viewed using Netscape or Internet Explorer version 4 or higher, or another browser which understands styIe sheets.]
Special Masters May 25, 1973
Description of Document
Register No. 1Notice of Hearings Before the Special Masters on Reapportionment and Rules ofHearings, n.d.Proof of Service [by mail], May 25, 1973[Proof of Service by mail], June 29, 1973
Presentor
Teela BacaWinifred L.Hepperle
Date Filed
May 25, 1973July 2, 1973
Register No.2Summary of Written Presentation Filed as a Prerequisite to an Oral Presentation ...Peace and Freedom Party, Sonoma County Central Committee, June 12, 1973
Register No.3Summary of Oral Presentation of Charles E. Bott, Mayor of the City of Stockton,June 8, 1973
Register No.4Gordon Knapp Plan
Written Presentation of Gordon Knapp (Volume I) Part One: Criteria ofReapportionment
Written Presentation of Gordon Knapp (Volume II) Part Two: Critique ofTemporary Congressional Districts; Part Three: Proposed Congressional DistrictPlan (Knapp Plan)
Exhibit A: Maps of Knapp Plan of Congressional Districts [with markings]
State of California (U.S. Geological Survey)
1970 Census Tracts, City of San Diego and Vicinity
1970 Census Tracts, [Greater Los Angeles Area]
Irvin E. Sutley, June 8, 1973Jr.
Paul F. Mordy, June 11, 1973Assistant CityAttorney
Robert W. June 25, 1973Naylor
1970 Census Tracts, San Francisco BayExhibit B: Listings of Census Units and Populations [computer printout]
Envelope of Material Sent to All County and Local Government Officials re KnappPlan
Robert W.Naylor
June 25, 1973
June 26, 1973
> Section 1. Documents Listed in Register of OfficialRecordsThis section consists of a list of the items on the Register, with related documents, arranged by number assigned on theRegister, with full titles as shown on the documents. For a reproduction of the "Register of Official Records andWritten Presentations" as prepared by the Masters' staff, see Attachment 1.
[This document is best viewed using Netscape or Internet Explorer version 4 or higher, or another browser which understands style sheets.]
Description of Document Presentor Date Filed
Register No. 1Notice of Hearings Before the Special Masters on Reapportionment and Rules ofHearings, n.d.
Special Masters May 25, 1973
Proof of Service [by mail], May 25, 1973 Teela Baca May 25, 1973[Proof of Service by mail], June 29, 1973 Winifred L.
HepperleJuly 2, 1973
Register No. 2Summary of Written Presentation Filed as a Prerequisite to an Oral Presentation ...Peace and Freedom Party, Sonoma County Central Committee, June 12, 1973
Irvin E. Sutley,Jr.
June 8, 1973
Register No. 3Summary of Oral Presentation of Charles E. Bott, Mayor of the City of Stockton,June 8, 1973
Paul F. Mordy,Assistant CityAttorney
June 11, 1973
Register No. 4Gordon Knapp Plan
Written Presentation of Gordon Knapp (Volume I) Part One: Criteria ofReapportionment
Written Presentation of Gordon Knapp (Volume II) Part Two: Critique ofTemporary Congressional Districts; Part Three: Proposed Congressional DistrictPlan (Knapp Plan)
Exhibit A: Maps of Knapp Plan of Congressional Districts [with markings]
State of California (U.S. Geological Survey)
1970 Census Tracts, City of San Diego and Vicinity
1970 Census Tracts, [Greater Los Angeles Area]
1970 Census Tracts, San Francisco Bay
Robert W.Naylor
June 25, 1973
Exhibit B: Listings of Census Units and Populations [computer printout] Robert W.Naylor
June 25, 1973
Envelope of Material Sent to All County and Local Government Officials re KnappPlan
June 26, 1973
http://www.netscape.com/http://www.microsoft.com/ie/
-
Examples of Redistricting Using Only Good Government Criteria [maps]
San Francisco Bay Area - Knapp Reapportionment Plan, Congressional Districts, June 1973 andCongressional Districts, Assembly Bill no.l6, 1971 First Extraordinary Session [maps]
Los Angeles and Vicinity - Knapp Reapportionment Plan, Congressional Districts, June 1973 andCongressional Districts, Assembly Bill no.l6, 1971 First Extraordinary session [maps]
[California] Knapp Reapportionment Plan
Congressional Districts, June 1973 and Congressional Districts, Assembly Bill no.l6, 1971, FirstExtraordinary Session [maps]
Memorandum to Special Masters, June 27, 1973
Factual Data Sheet
Letter to All County and Local Government Officials
Press Release
Resolution
Supplemental Presentation of Gordon Knapp
Second Supplemental Presentation of Gordon Knapp
Robert W.NaylorRobert W.Naylor
June 10, 1973
July 31, 1973
Related DocumentsLetter to Special Masters re Gordon Knapp--Proposed Congressional Districting, June 25, 1973Memorandum to Special Masters re "the question of seniority with regards to the congressionaldelegation" , June 29, 1973Letter to PaulL. McKaskle re Gordon Knapp--Proposed Congressional Districting, July 17, 1973Memo to Justice Coughlin re Naylor and Knapp, July 19, 1973
KNAPPCON District 01----50, 1972 ... 1970 ... 1968 General Election [computer printout markedKnapp"]
Robert W. Naylor June 25, 1973Gordon Knapp June 29 1973
Robert W. Naylor July 19, [1973]Paul E. McKaskle n.d.
Register No.5Statement of Linda G. Bond for the University of California Student Lobby, June 12, Linda G. Bond, June 12, 19731973 Co-Director
Exhibit No.1: Congressional District 36 (1972) [map]
Exhibit No.2: Congressional District 36 (1972) [map]
Exhibit No.3: Central Area Metropolitan Los Angeles [street map]
Register No.6Position Statement on Reapportionment, February 1971
Register No. 7Written Presentation of County of San Joaquin, a Political Subdivision of the Stateof California; County of Stanislaus, a Political Subdivision of the State ofCalifornia; City of Stockton, a Municipal Corporation; City of Lodi, a MunicipalCorporation, City of Tracy, a Municipal Corporation; City of Manteca, a Municipal
County ClerksAssociation ofCalifornia
[VariousCounty andCity Counsels]
June 12, 1973
June 12, 1973
Examples of Redistricting Using Only Good Government Criteria [maps]
San Francisco Bay Area - Knapp Reapportionment Plan, Congressional Districts, June 1973 andCongressional Districts, Assembly Bill no.l6, 1971 First Extraordinary Session [maps]
Los Angeles and Vicinity - Knapp Reapportionment Plan, Congressional Districts, June 1973 andCongressional Districts, Assembly Bill no.l6, 1971 First Extraordinary session [maps]
[California] Knapp Reapportionment Plan
Congressional Districts, June 1973 and Congressional Districts, Assembly Bill no.l6, 1971, FirstExtraordinary Session [maps]
Memorandum to Special Masters, June 27, 1973
Factual Data Sheet
Letter to All County and Local Government Officials
Press Release
ResolutionSupplemental Presentation of Gordon Knapp Robert W.
NaylorJune 10, 1973
Second Supplemental Presentation of Gordon Knapp Robert W.Naylor
July 31, 1973
Related DocumentsLetter to Special Masters re Gordon Knapp--Proposed Congressional Districting, June 25, 1973 Robert W. Naylor June 25, 1973Memorandum to Special Masters re "the question of seniority with regards to the congressionaldelegation", June 29, 1973
Gordon Knapp June 29 1973
Letter to Paul L. McKaskle re Gordon Knapp--Proposed Congressional Districting, July 17, 1973 Robert W. Naylor July 19, [1973]Memo to Justice Coughlin re Naylor and Knapp, July 19, 1973
KNAPPCON District 01----50, 1972 ... 1970 ... 1968 General Election [computer printout markedKnapp"]
Paul E. McKaskle n.d.
Register No. 5Statement of Linda G. Bond for the University of California Student Lobby, June 12,1973
Exhibit No.1: Congressional District 36 (1972) [map]
Exhibit No.2: Congressional District 36 (1972) [map]
Exhibit No.3: Central Area Metropolitan Los Angeles [street map]
Linda G. Bond,Co-Director
June 12, 1973
Register No. 6Position Statement on Reapportionment, February 1971 County Clerks
Association ofCalifornia
June 12, 1973
Register No. 7Written Presentation of County of San Joaquin, a Political Subdivision of the Stateof California; County of Stanislaus, a Political Subdivision of the State ofCalifornia; City of Stockton, a Municipal Corporation; City of Lodi, a MunicipalCorporation, City of Tracy, a Municipal Corporation; City of Manteca, a Municipal
[VariousCounty andCity Counsels]
June 12, 1973
-
Corporation; City of Ripon, a Municipal Corporation; and Escalon, a MunicipalCorporation [with 10 maps], June 11, 1973Specific Plan of Reapportionment Proposed by the County of San Joaquin, a [Various July 10, 1973Political Subdivision of the State of California.; County of Stanislaus, a Political County andSubdivision of the State of California; City of Stockton, a Municipal Corporation; City Counsels]City of Lodi, a Municipal Corporation; City of Tracy, a Municipal Corporation; Cityof Manteca, a Municipal Corporation; City of Ripon, a Municipal Corporation; andEscalon, a Municipal Corporation
Exhibit A: [map], July 10, 1973
Register No.8Outline of Lieutenant Governor Ed Reinecke's Testimony Scheduled Los Angeles,June 10, 1973 (SAC. 7917), June 13, 1973
Register No.9Resolution [no. 1973-79] of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos OpposingProposed Assembly Redistricting of Santa Clara County, June 4, 1973
Register No. 10Evidence and Statement by T. Jim Gibson; The Wall Street Political Association,June 18, 1973
Ronald B. June 14, 1973Frankum
Mark B. June 15, 1973DiDuca, Mayor
Loren Miller, June 18, 1973Jr., and Dion G.Morrow
Register No. 11Halliwell PlanHalliwell Testimony Before Special Masters on Reapportionment
[Maps marked as follows]
1 Statewide Assembly
2 San Francisco Bay Assembly
3 Los Angeles County Assembly
4 Southern California Assembly
5 Statewide Senate
6 San Francisco Bay Senate
7 Los Angeles County Senate
8 Southern California Senate
9 Statewide Congress
10 San Francisco Bay Congress
11 Los Angeles County Congress
12 Southern California Congress
Revised Halliwell Plan [with maps numbered I----IX
Michael J.Halliwell
Michael J.Halliwell
June 18, 1973
August 1, 1973
Corporation; City of Ripon, a Municipal Corporation; and Escalon, a MunicipalCorporation [with 10 maps], June 11, 1973Specific Plan of Reapportionment Proposed by the County of San Joaquin, aPolitical Subdivision of the State of California.; County of Stanislaus, a PoliticalSubdivision of the State of California; City of Stockton, a Municipal Corporation;City of Lodi, a Municipal Corporation; City of Tracy, a Municipal Corporation; Cityof Manteca, a Municipal Corporation; City of Ripon, a Municipal Corporation; andEscalon, a Municipal Corporation
Exhibit A: [map], July 10, 1973
[VariousCounty andCity Counsels]
July 10, 1973
Register No. 8Outline of Lieutenant Governor Ed Reinecke's Testimony Scheduled Los Angeles,June l0, 1973 (SAC. 7917), June 13, 1973
Ronald B.Frankum
June 14, 1973
Register No. 9Resolution [no. 1973-79] of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos OpposingProposed Assembly Redistricting of Santa Clara County, June 4, 1973
Mark B.DiDuca, Mayor
June 15, 1973
Register No. 10Evidence and Statement by T. Jim Gibson; The Wall Street Political Association,June 18, 1973
Loren Miller,Jr., and Dion G.Morrow
June 18, 1973
Register No. 11Halliwell PlanHalliwell Testimony Before Special Masters on Reapportionment
[Maps marked as follows]
1 Statewide Assembly
2 San Francisco Bay Assembly
3 Los Angeles County Assembly
4 Southern California Assembly
5 Statewide Senate
6 San Francisco Bay Senate
7 Los Angeles County Senate
8 Southern California Senate
9 Statewide Congress
10 San Francisco Bay Congress
11 Los Angeles County Congress
12 Southern California Congress
Michael J.Halliwell
June 18, 1973
Revised Halliwell Plan [with maps numbered I----IX Michael J.Halliwell
August 1, 1973
-
[Group of 12 maps labeled "Revised Halliwell Plan" with markings, rolled]
California, County Subdivisions--Census County Divisions and Places
Assembly Districts [collaged]
Senatorial Districts [collaged]
Congressional Districts [collaged]
Census Tract Outline Map of San Diego County
Assembly Districts
Senatorial Districts
Congressional Districts
Census Tract Outline Map of the [San Francisco] Bay Area and Vicinity
Assembly Districts
Senatorial Districts
Congressional Districts
Census Tract Outline Map of the Los Angeles Five County Area
Assembly Districts
Senatorial Districts
Congressional Districts
Related Documents
[photocopy set of the group of maps listed immediately above, unlabeled, with markings and rolled]
Explanatory Note
Plan for Nonpartisan Reapportionment [part of which corresponds to the Revised Halliwell Plan]
[Group of 4 maps]
See also Section 2. Documents Relating to Specific Legal Cases, October 1, 1973
Michael J.Halliwell
August 1, 1973
Register No. 12Letter from Claremont City Council [with enclosure], June 15, 1973
Register No. 13Statement from Los Angeles County Coordinating Council, National Women'sPolitical Caucus re Reapportionment: the Effect of Certain Proposed Criteria forReapportionment on the Political Power of Women As an Identifiable Group ofPersons in California, June 18, 1973
Register No. 14
Keith F. June 18, 1973Mulrooney,City Manager
Nina R. June 18, 1973Chomsky,Chairperson protern
[Group of 12 maps labeled "Revised Halliwell Plan" with markings, rolled]
California, County Subdivisions--Census County Divisions and Places
Assembly Districts [collaged]
Senatorial Districts [collaged]
Congressional Districts [collaged]
Census Tract Outline Map of San Diego County
Assembly Districts
Senatorial Districts
Congressional Districts
Census Tract Outline Map of the [San Francisco] Bay Area and Vicinity
Assembly Districts
Senatorial Districts
Congressional Districts
Census Tract Outline Map of the Los Angeles Five County Area
Assembly Districts
Senatorial Districts
Congressional Districts
Related Documents
[Photocopy set of the group of maps listed immediately above, unlabeled, with markings and rolled]
Explanatory Note
Plan for Nonpartisan Reapportionment [part of which corresponds to the Revised Halliwell Plan]
[Group of 4 maps]
See also Section 2. Documents Relating to Specific Legal Cases, October 1, 1973
Michael J.Halliwell
August 1, 1973
Register No. 12Letter from Claremont City Council [with enclosure], June 15, 1973 Keith F.
Mulrooney,City Manager
June 18, 1973
Register No. 13Statement from Los Angeles County Coordinating Council, National Women'sPolitical Caucus re Reapportionment: the Effect of Certain Proposed Criteria forReapportionment on the Political Power of Women As an Identifiable Group ofPersons in California, June 18, 1973
Nina R.Chomsky,Chairperson protem
June 18, 1973
Register No. 14
-
Resolution on Reapportionment by Los Angeles County Democratic CentralCommittee (n.d.) [with attachment] CDC Issues Program 1967 ... Presentation ofDiscussion Material by the Issues Development Committee on CaliforniaConstitutional Reform ...
Les River, Los June 18, 1973AngelesChairman
Register No. 15Resolution No. 4344 (City Council Series) a Resolution of the City of Santa Monica City Council of June 18, 1973Opposing Assembly Bill 8, March 13, 1973 Santa Monica
Register No. 16Clerk's Minutes, Sacramento Hearing, June 12, 1973 [schedule of testimony only]for reporter's transcript see nO.89.
WilliamGoodman
June 20, 1973
Register No. 17Presentation for 35th District of Orange County, June 15, 1973
Register No. 18Resolution of Orange County, June 13, 1973
Related DocumentsLetter from Orange County Division, League of California Cities, June 18, 1973
Register No. 19Memorandum of Points and Authorities of Petitioners, Angelita Garcia et aI., reCriteria for Reapportionment, June 20, 1973
Petitioners Garcia et ai. Request for Fair Reapportionment, July 10, 1973
[Attachment No.l: Envelope with 3 maps]
[Attachment NO.2: Envelope with 2 maps]
Declaration of Nancy R. Myers, August 2, 1973
[4 unidentified printouts]
[Maps numbered] Garcia Plan No. 1----3 [different from attachment NO.1 above]Related DocumentsLetter to Special Masters [with 3 maps], June 26, 1973
DEMOG 12: 19 PDT 06/09/73 [computer printout]
Chicano Community ... in Los Angeles County ...
227 Census Tracts, June 29, 1973
Register No. 20Senate Resolution No. 51 Relative to the Senate Reapportionment Plan, June 19,1973
John V. Briggs, June 20, 1973Assemblyman
Board of June 20, 1973Supervisors
Winston R. June 18, 1973Updegraff,Executive Secretary
Peter H. June 21, 1973Weiner, et al.[CaliforniaRural LegalAssistance]Stanley Wm. July 11, 1973Levy[CaliforniaRural LegalAssistance][California August 8, 1973Rural LegalAssistance]
Stanley Wm. Levy, June 26,1973Beverly Hills BarAssociation LawFoundation
Senators June 20, 1973Harmer, et ai.
Resolution on Reapportionment by Los Angeles County Democratic CentralCommittee (n.d.) [with attachment] CDC Issues Program 1967 ... Presentation ofDiscussion Material by the Issues Development Committee on CaliforniaConstitutional Reform ...
Les River, LosAngelesChairman
June 18, 1973
Register No. 15Resolution No. 4344 (City Council Series) a Resolution of the City of Santa MonicaOpposing Assembly Bill 8, March 13, 1973
City Council ofSanta Monica
June 18, 1973
Register No. 16Clerk's Minutes, Sacramento Hearing, June 12, 1973 [schedule of testimony only]for reporter's transcript see no.89.
WilliamGoodman
June 20, 1973
Register No. 17Presentation for 35th District of Orange County, June 15, 1973 John V. Briggs,
AssemblymanJune 20, 1973
Register No. 18Resolution of Orange County, June 13, 1973 Board of
SupervisorsJune 20, 1973
Related DocumentsLetter from Orange County Division, League of California Cities, June 18, 1973 Winston R.
Updegraff,Executive Secretary
June 18, 1973
Register No. 19Memorandum of Points and Authorities of Petitioners, Angelita Garcia et al., reCriteria for Reapportionment, June 20, 1973
Peter H.Weiner, et al.[CaliforniaRural LegalAssistance]
June 21, 1973
Petitioners Garcia et al. Request for Fair Reapportionment, July 10, 1973
[Attachment No.l: Envelope with 3 maps]
[Attachment No.2: Envelope with 2 maps]
Stanley Wm.Levy[CaliforniaRural LegalAssistance]
July 11, 1973
Declaration of Nancy R. Myers, August 2, 1973
[4 unidentified printouts]
[Maps numbered] Garcia Plan No. 1----3 [different from attachment No.1 above]
[CaliforniaRural LegalAssistance]
August 8, 1973
Related DocumentsLetter to Special Masters [with 3 maps], June 26, 1973
DEMOG 12: 19 PDT 06/09/73 [computer printout]
Chicano Community ... in Los Angeles County ...
227 Census Tracts, June 29, 1973
Stanley Wm. Levy,Beverly Hills BarAssociation LawFoundation
June 26, 1973
Register No. 20Senate Resolution No. 51 Relative to the Senate Reapportionment Plan, June 19,1973
SenatorsHarmer, et al.
June 20, 1973
-
Register No. 21Senate PlanDesignation of Witnesses to Appear at Hearing on Behalf of the Senate
Brief of the Senate of the State of California Recommending Adoption of anApproved Bipartisan Reapportionment Plan for the Senate
Exhibit A: Senate Bill 195 and Its Legislative History, 6 vol.
Exhibit B-1: Maps Showing New Districts Provided by the Senate Exhibit B- 2: Maps Showing SenateDistricts As They Now Exist Before Reapportionment [39 maps]
Robert S.DaggettRobert S.Daggett
June 21, 1973
June 21, 1973
Register No. 22Office of Senator John Stull, Weekly Column for the Week of May 27, ThroughJune 2, 1973 [filed at San Diego Hearing]
Register No. 23Testimony of Assemblyman Bill Bond, San Diego, June 22, 1973
Register No. 24Objection to Proposed Assembly District Line in Humboldt County [with coverletter], June 21, 1973
Gehres and June 22, 1973Si1las
Assemblyman June 22, 1973Bond
Fred 1. Moore, June 22, 1973Jr., CountyClerk
Register No. 25Presentation of Contra Costa County Democratic Central Committee, June 23, 1973
Register No. 26Statement of Assemblyman Carlos Bee (13th Districts, June 22, 1973
Register No. 27Application for Written and Oral Presentation and Oral Argument, June 22, 1973
Application for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention, December 8, 1972, (SAC7917)
Complaint for Right to Vote and Equal Representation and Memorandum of Pointsand Authorities, December 8, 1972, (SAC 7917)
Related DocumentsPetition for Writ of Mandamus, Petition for Writ of Prohibition and Memorandum of Points andAuthorities, January 14, 1972
Register No. 28
Minot W.Tripp,Admini strativeSecretary
AssemblymanBee
Eugene Rippenand Wayne F.RippenEugene Rippenand Wayne F.RippenEugene Rippenand Wayne F.Rippen
Eugene Rippen andWayne F. Rippen
June 25, 1973
June 25, 1973
June 25, 1973
June 25, 1973
Register No. 21Senate PlanDesignation of Witnesses to Appear at Hearing on Behalf of the Senate Robert S.
DaggettJune 21, 1973
Brief of the Senate of the State of California Recommending Adoption of anApproved Bipartisan Reapportionment Plan for the Senate
Exhibit A: Senate Bill 195 and Its Legislative History, 6 vol.
Exhibit B-1: Maps Showing New Districts Provided by the Senate Exhibit B-2: Maps Showing SenateDistricts As They Now Exist Before Reapportionment [39 maps]
Robert S.Daggett
June 21, 1973
Register No. 22Office of Senator John Stull, Weekly Column for the Week of May 27, ThroughJune 2, 1973 [filed at San Diego Hearing]
Gehres andSillas
June 22, 1973
Register No. 23Testimony of Assemblyman Bill Bond, San Diego, June 22, 1973 Assemblyman
BondJune 22, 1973
Register No. 24Objection to Proposed Assembly District Line in Humboldt County [with coverletter], June 21, 1973
Fred J. Moore,Jr., CountyClerk
June 22, 1973
Register No. 25Presentation of Contra Costa County Democratic Central Committee, June 23, 1973 Minot W.
Tripp,AdministrativeSecretary
June 25, 1973
Register No. 26Statement of Assemblyman Carlos Bee (13th Districts, June 22, 1973 Assemblyman
BeeJune 25, 1973
Register No. 27Application for Written and Oral Presentation and Oral Argument, June 22, 1973 Eugene Rippen
and Wayne F.Rippen
June 25, 1973
Application for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention, December 8, 1972, (SAC7917)
Eugene Rippenand Wayne F.Rippen
June 25, 1973
Complaint for Right to Vote and Equal Representation and Memorandum of Pointsand Authorities, December 8, 1972, (SAC 7917)
Eugene Rippenand Wayne F.Rippen
Related DocumentsPetition for Writ of Mandamus, Petition for Writ of Prohibition and Memorandum of Points andAuthorities, January 14, 1972
Eugene Rippen andWayne F. Rippen
Register No. 28
-
Summary of Proposed Oral Presentation, June 25, 1973
Written Presentation of the Republican State Central Committee of California, July10, 1973
PutnamLivermorePutnamLivermore
June 25, 1973
July 12, 1973
Register No. 29Testimony of Republican County Central Committee of San Francisco
Register No. 30Brief of Petitioners, Members of the United States House of Representatives(Volume I of III), June 22, 1973
Analysis of Petitioners Plan (Volume II of III), June 21,1973
Maps (Volume III of III)
Supplemental Presentation of Petitioners, Members of the United States House ofRepresentatives, July 22, 1973
Appendix (vol. I of II) [detailed analysis of the adjustments to the petitioners request]
Appendix (vol. II of II) [maps]
Related DocumentsLetter to Paul McKaskle [enclosures, copies of court decisions], June 19, 1973
Register No. 31A Proposal for the Computerized Drawing of Legislative and CongressionalBoundaries, n.d.
J. Max Moore, June 25, 1973Chairman
Wyman, June 25, 1973Bautzer,Rothman andKuchelWyman, June 25, 1973Bautzer,Rothman andKuchelWyman, June 25, 1973Bautzer,Rothman andKuchelWyman, June 23, 1973Bautzer,Rothman andKuchelWyman, Bautzer, August 3, 1973Rothman andKuchelWyman, Bautzer, August 3, 1973Rothman andKuchel
Wyman, Bautzer, June 22, 1973Rothman andKuchel
Joseph McCord June 26, 1973
Register No. 32Resolution Pertaining to State Redistricting Plan, Resolution No. 73-379, County ofSanta Barbara, June 11, 1973
Register No. 33Written Presentation of Governor Ronald Reagan
Brief on Behalf of Ronald Reagan, Governor of the State of California, July 10,1973
Board ofSupervisors
GovernorReaganEvelle J.Younger,AttorneyGeneral
June 26, 1973
June 27, 1973
July 11, 1973
Summary of Proposed Oral Presentation, June 25, 1973 PutnamLivermore
June 25, 1973
Written Presentation of the Republican State Central Committee of California, Julyl0, 1973
PutnamLivermore
July 12, 1973
Register No. 29Testimony of Republican County Central Committee of San Francisco J. Max Moore,
ChairmanJune 25, 1973
Register No. 30Brief of Petitioners, Members of the United States House of Representatives(Volume I of III), June 22, 1973
Wyman,Bautzer,Rothman andKuchel
June 25, 1973
Analysis of Petitioners Plan (Volume II of III), June 21, 1973 Wyman,Bautzer,Rothman andKuchel
June 25, 1973
Maps (Volume III of III) Wyman,Bautzer,Rothman andKuchel
June 25, 1973
Supplemental Presentation of Petitioners, Members of the United States House ofRepresentatives, July 22, 1973
Wyman,Bautzer,Rothman andKuchel
June 23, 1973
Appendix (vol. I of II) [detailed analysis of the adjustments to the petitioners request] Wyman, Bautzer,Rothman andKuchel
August 3, 1973
Appendix (vol. II of II) [maps] Wyman, Bautzer,Rothman andKuchel
August 3, 1973
Related DocumentsLetter to Paul McKaskle [enclosures, copies of court decisions], June l9, 1973 Wyman, Bautzer,
Rothman andKuchel
June 22, 1973
Register No. 31A Proposal for the Computerized Drawing of Legislative and CongressionalBoundaries, n.d.
Joseph McCord June 26, 1973
Register No. 32Resolution Pertaining to State Redistricting Plan, Resolution No. 73-379, County ofSanta Barbara, June 11, 1973
Board ofSupervisors
June 26, 1973
Register No. 33Written Presentation of Governor Ronald Reagan Governor
ReaganJune 27, 1973
Brief on Behalf of Ronald Reagan, Governor of the State of California, July 10,1973
Evelle J.Younger,AttorneyGeneral
July 11, 1973
-
Register No. 34Hearing, San Francisco, June 6, 1973 [transcript of prehearing conference]
Register No. 35Presentation by the City of Pacifica, n.d.
RhondaJackson,Reporter
Aubrey M.Lumley, III,Mayor
June 23, 1973
June 28, 1973
Register No. 36Testimony of Mayor of Whittier, June 28, 1973
Register No. 37Statement of Daly City
Register No. 38Presentation by Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County [1 map withoriginal copy only], June 28, 1973
Register No. 39Statement for Marin County, June 28, 1973
Register No. 40State Election Districts [map]
Related DocumentsSenate Journal, June 19, 1973, pp. 3564-3565 [Xerox copy]
[Copy of map showing towns of Baldwin Park, Covina, West Covina, etc.]
Blake P. June 28, 1973Sanborn, Mayor
Victor G. June 28, 1973Kyriakis, ViceMayor
Ruben S. Ayala, June 28, 1973Supervisor,Fourth Di st.
Peter R. June 28, 1973Arrigoni,Supervisor
Dr. Nancy June 29, 1973Jewell Cross,People'sAdvocate
Jon D. Smock,Assistant Director,Judicial Council ofCalifornia,AdministrativeOffice of the Courts
Register No. 41Designation of Witnesses to Appear at Hearing on Behalf of the Legislature of theState of California, and Especially the Assembly Thereof, June 26, 1973
[Complete SB 195 Assembly Plan]SB 195 AmendmentsAssembly Districts As Proposed in SB 195 [statistical list]
George H.Murphy andHerman F.Selvin
June 28, 1973
June 28, 1973July 5, 1973
Register No. 34Hearing, San Francisco, June 6, 1973 [transcript of prehearing conference] Rhonda
Jackson,Reporter
June 23, 1973
Register No. 35Presentation by the City of Pacifica, n.d. Aubrey M.
Lumley, III,Mayor
June 28, 1973
Register No. 36Testimony of Mayor of Whittier, June 28, 1973 Blake P.
Sanborn, MayorJune 28, 1973
Register No. 37Statement of Daly City Victor G.
Kyriakis, ViceMayor
June 28, 1973
Register No. 38Presentation by Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County [1 map withoriginal copy only], June 28, 1973
Ruben S. Ayala,Supervisor,Fourth Dist.
June 28, 1973
Register No. 39Statement for Marin County, June 28, 1973 Peter R.
Arrigoni,Supervisor
June 28, 1973
Register No. 40State Election Districts [map] Dr. Nancy
Jewell Cross,People'sAdvocate
June 29, 1973
Related DocumentsSenate Journal, June l9, 1973, pp. 3564-3565 [Xerox copy] Jon D. Smock,
Assistant Director,Judicial Council ofCalifornia,AdministrativeOffice of the Courts
[Copy of map showing towns of Baldwin Park, Covina, West Covina, etc.]
Register No. 41Designation of Witnesses to Appear at Hearing on Behalf of the Legislature of theState of California, and Especially the Assembly Thereof, June 26, 1973
George H.Murphy andHerman F.Selvin
June 28, 1973
[Complete SB 195 Assembly Plan]SB 195 Amendments June 28, 1973Assembly Districts As Proposed in SB 195 [statistical list] July 5, 1973
-
Current Assembly Districts [statistical list][Current Assembly Districts [maps]AB 164 1972 ... 1970 ... 1968 General Election [computer printout][30 unnumbered maps]Letter" citing authorities in support of the bill adopted by a bipartisan maj ority of both houses of theLegislature," July 11, 1973
Register No. 42Statement of Assemblyman John Francis Foran, June 29, 1973
Register No. 43Declaration of Richard Alatorre, June 18, 1973
Declaration of Mervyn M. Dymally, June 18, 1973
Declaration of Nicholas C. Petris, June 20, 1973
Declaration of George R. Moscone, June 26, 1973
Declaration of Armando O. Rodriguez, June 26, 1973
Register No. 44Presentation by Board of Directors, Pomona Chamber of Commerce reReapportionment Criteria, June 29, 1973
Register No. 45The problem Facing California, Together with the Solution, June 29, 1973
Register No. 46Statements for the City of Pomona, June 29, 1973
Register No. 47Statement of the City of Redwood City and Supporting Declaration of Paul C.Keckley, Mayor of the City of Redwood City, June 28, 1973
Herman F. Selvin
AssemblymanForan
[Mexican-AmericanGroups][Mexican-AmericanGroups][Mexican-AmericanGroups][Mexican-AmericanGroups][Mexican-AmericanGroups]
G. GrenvilleWhyte,President
Robert K.Ballard,Attorney
Ray 1. Lepire,Mayor
David E.Schricker, CityAttorney
July 5, 1973July 5, 1973
July 13, 1973
June 29, 1973
June 29, 1973
June 29, 1973
June 29, 1973
June 29, 1973
June 29, 1973
June 29, 1973
June 29, 1973
June 29, 1973
June 29, 1973
Related DocumentsSummary of Oral Presentation, June 28, 1973
Register No. 48
David E. Schricker, June 29, 1973City Attorney
Current Assembly Districts [statistical list] July 5, 1973[Current Assembly Districts [maps] July 5, 1973AB 164 1972 ... 1970 ... 1968 General Election [computer printout][30 unnumbered maps]Letter "citing authorities in support of the bill adopted by a bipartisan majority of both houses of theLegislature," July 11, 1973
Herman F. Selvin July 13, 1973
Register No. 42Statement of Assemblyman John Francis Foran, June 29, 1973 Assemblyman
ForanJune 29, 1973
Register No. 43Declaration of Richard Alatorre, June l8, 1973 [Mexican-
AmericanGroups]
June 29, 1973
Declaration of Mervyn M. Dymally, June 18, 1973 [Mexican-AmericanGroups]
June 29, 1973
Declaration of Nicholas C. Petris, June 20, 1973 [Mexican-AmericanGroups]
June 29, 1973
Declaration of George R. Moscone, June 26, 1973 [Mexican-AmericanGroups]
June 29, 1973
Declaration of Armando O. Rodriguez, June 26, 1973 [Mexican-AmericanGroups]
June 29, 1973
Register No. 44Presentation by Board of Directors, Pomona Chamber of Commerce reReapportionment Criteria, June 29, 1973
G. GrenvilleWhyte,President
June 29, 1973
Register No. 45The problem Facing California, Together with the Solution, June 29, 1973 Robert K.
Ballard,Attorney
June 29, 1973
Register No. 46Statements for the City of Pomona, June 29, 1973 Ray J. Lepire,
MayorJune 29, 1973
Register No. 47Statement of the City of Redwood City and Supporting Declaration of Paul C.Keckley, Mayor of the City of Redwood City, June 28, 1973
David E.Schricker, CityAttorney
June 29, 1973
Related DocumentsSummary of Oral Presentation, June 28, 1973 David E. Schricker,
City AttorneyJune 29, 1973
Register No. 48
-
Statement of John 1. Berwald, June 29, 1973 John 1. Berwald June 29, 1973
Register No. 49Written Presentation for the City of Fremont
Register No. 50Statement of Senator Arlen Gregorio, 12th Senatorial District, n.d.
Register No. 51Written Presentation of the Monterey County Republican Central Committee, June28, 1973
Register No. 52Brief of the Assembly Minority Leadership [with exhibits attached], July 2, 1973
Register No. 53Brief of Assemblyman John E. Thurman's Recommended Delineation of theThirtieth Assembly District, June 27, 1973
Register No. 54Statement of Roger F. Winchester, June 28, 1973
Register No. 55Statement of Assemblyman Carlos Bee, July 6, 1973
Register No. 56Presentation of Pertinent Material on the Assembly Reapportionment of SanFrancisco by Mexican American Political Association, July 3, 1973
Jack A.Pimental,Mayor
SenatorGregorio
Louis C.Moore,Attorney
Halley andCornell
AssemblymanThurman
Roger F.Winchester
AssemblymanBee
EduardoSandoval,President
June 29, 1973
July 2, 1973
July 3, 1973
July 3, 1973
July 3, 1973
July 3, 1973
July 6, 1973
July 6, 1973
Register No. 57Brief of Walnut Creek, n.d.
Register No. 58[Unused]
Register No. 59Appeal to Disapprove Gerrymandering in AB 165, Especially as to the SecondSenatorial District, June 30, 1973
Register No. 60Statement of Assemblyman Bill Greene, July 6, 1973
James D. Hill, July 6, 1973Mayor
Velma Smith July 6, 1973
Assemblyman July 6, 1973
Statement of John J. Berwald, June 29, 1973 John J. Berwald June 29, 1973
Register No. 49Written Presentation for the City of Fremont Jack A.
Pimental,Mayor
June 29, 1973
Register No. 50Statement of Senator Arlen Gregorio, 12th Senatorial District, n.d. Senator
GregorioJuly 2, 1973
Register No. 51Written Presentation of the Monterey County Republican Central Committee, June28, 1973
Louis C.Moore,Attorney
July 3, 1973
Register No. 52Brief of the Assembly Minority Leadership [with exhibits attached], July 2, 1973 Halley and
CornellJuly 3, 1973
Register No. 53Brief of Assemblyman John E. Thurman's Recommended Delineation of theThirtieth Assembly District, June 27, 1973
AssemblymanThurman
July 3, 1973
Register No. 54Statement of Roger F. Winchester, June 28, 1973 Roger F.
WinchesterJuly 3, 1973
Register No. 55Statement of Assemblyman Carlos Bee, July 6, 1973 Assemblyman
BeeJuly 6, 1973
Register No. 56Presentation of Pertinent Material on the Assembly Reapportionment of SanFrancisco by Mexican American Political Association, July 3, 1973
EduardoSandoval,President
July 6, 1973
Register No. 57Brief of Walnut Creek, n.d. James D. Hill,
MayorJuly 6, 1973
Register No. 58[Unused]
Register No. 59Appeal to Disapprove Gerrymandering in AB 165, Especially as to the SecondSenatorial District, June 30, 1973
Velma Smith July 6, 1973
Register No. 60Statement of Assemblyman Bill Greene, July 6, 1973 Assemblyman July 6, 1973
-
Register No. 61Oral Argument of Senator Milton Marks with Points and Authorities in SupportThereof, n.d.
Greene
Senator Marks July 6, 1973
Ernest LaCoste July 6, 1973
Register No. 62Testimony by Assemblyman Walter M. Ingalls, July 6, 1973
Register No. 63Letters to Assemblyman Daniel Boatwright, 10th Assembly District reReapportionment, July 5, 1973
Register No. 64Application of the City of Petaluma and the City of Sonoma for Permission to FileBrief As Amicus Curiae, and Brief (SAC 7919), January 13, 1973
Register No. 65Summary of Comments, July 6, 1973Related DocumentsLetter to Justice Coughlin re Reapportionment, June 29, 1973
AssemblymanIngalls
[VariousConstituents]
William T.Bagley andArthur V.Azevedo
Ernest LaCoste
July 6, 1973
July 6, 1973
July 6, 1973
July 6, 1973
Register No. 66A Modified Plan for the Division of San Mateo County That Does Not Split AnyCities [2 maps], n.d.
Register No. 67Senator Mervyn M. Dymally PlanStatement by State Senator Mervyn M. Dymally, July 6, 1973
Supplementary Data and Documentation, June 6, 1973A Report on Reapportionment of the State Senate As Proposed in Senate Bill No.63, Dymally. Includes Computer Print-out with Tract Listings and OtherDocumentation, Prepared by the Staff of Elections and Reapportionment, DS BatchJob 01 ENR, n.d.
Register No. 68Claremont Institute PlanLetter from Institute of State and Local Government, Department of PoliticalScience, Claremont Men's College, July 10, 1973Reapportionment -- Step 1 [computer printout]
Assembly Reapportionment [maps, folded][Fresno][Greater Los Angeles Area]Sacramento County[San Diego Area]
Louis Papan, July 6, 1973Assemblyman,27th District
Senator July 6, 1973Dymally
July 6, 1973
Alan Heslop, July 11, 1973Director
Greene
Register No. 61Oral Argument of Senator Milton Marks with Points and Authorities in SupportThereof, n.d.
Senator Marks July 6, 1973
Register No. 62Testimony by Assemblyman Walter M. Ingalls, July 6, 1973 Assemblyman
IngallsJuly 6, 1973
Register No. 63Letters to Assemblyman Daniel Boatwright, 10th Assembly District reReapportionment, July 5, 1973
[VariousConstituents]
July 6, 1973
Register No. 64Application of the City of Petaluma and the City of Sonoma for Permission to FileBrief As Amicus Curiae, and Brief (SAC 7919), January 13, 1973
William T.Bagley andArthur V.Azevedo
July 6, 1973
Register No. 65Summary of Comments, July 6, 1973 Ernest LaCoste July 6, 1973Related DocumentsLetter to Justice Coughlin re Reapportionment, June 29, 1973 Ernest LaCoste July 6, 1973
Register No. 66A Modified Plan for the Division of San Mateo County That Does Not Split AnyCities [2 maps], n.d.
Louis Papan,Assemblyman,27th District
July 6, 1973
Register No. 67Senator Mervyn M. Dymally PlanStatement by State Senator Mervyn M. Dymally, July 6, 1973 Senator
DymallyJuly 6, 1973
Supplementary Data and Documentation, June 6, 1973 July 6, 1973A Report on Reapportionment of the State Senate As Proposed in Senate Bill No.63, Dymally. Includes Computer Print-out with Tract Listings and OtherDocumentation, Prepared by the Staff of Elections and Reapportionment, DS BatchJob 01 ENR, n.d.
Register No. 68Claremont Institute PlanLetter from Institute of State and Local Government, Department of PoliticalScience, Claremont Men's College, July 10, 1973
Alan Heslop,Director
July 11, 1973
Reapportionment -- Step 1 [computer printout]
Assembly Reapportionment [maps, folded] [Fresno][Greater Los Angeles Area]Sacramento County[San Diego Area]
-
San Francisco BayStockton
[Maps, rolled][California, Northern Half] [1 copy with markings][California, Southern Half] [1 copy with markings][Greater Los Angeles Area]Sacramento County[San Diego Area], San Diego Planning DepartmentSan Francisco Bay
[Computer printouts][A] DS Batch Job 01 Supct, AD. Listing, Forward and Reverse[B] DS Batch Job 02 Supct[C] DS Batch Job 02 Supct[D] DS Batch Job 02 Supct[E] [Continuation of D][F] DS Batch Job 01 Supct[G] DS Batch Job 02 Supct[H] [No identification][I] 1972 ... 1970 ... 1968 General Election[J] Claremont Institute Republican Assembly
Register No. 69Written Presentation of the City of Fremont, n.d.
Register No. 70Presentation of the Republican Central Committee of Los Angeles County, July 5,1973 [photograph of Santa Monica Bay with original copy only]
Jack A.Pimental,Mayor
AlanMacQuoid,Chairman
July 9, 1973
July 9, 1973
Register No. 71Presentation of Robert F. Barry, July 6,1973 Robert F. Barry July 9, 1973
Register No. 72Statement of Senator John Stull, July 8, 1973 Senator Stull July 10, 1973
Register No. 73Written Statement in Support of the Dymally Bill for the Reapportionment of the2nd State Senatorial District, and the 4th Assembly District by the Glenn CountyCitizens Committee on Reapportionment, n.d.
Register No. 74Testimony of Assemblyman Newton R. Russell, 62nd Assembly District, n.d.
Register No. 75Statement of Representative Paul N. McCloskey, Jr., n.d.
Register No. 76
Rose Manner et July 10, 1973al.
Assemblyman July 10, 1973Russell
Representative July 10, 1973McCloskey
San Francisco BayStockton
[Maps, rolled] [California, Northern Half] [1 copy with markings][California, Southern Half] [1 copy with markings][Greater Los Angeles Area]Sacramento County[San Diego Area], San Diego Planning DepartmentSan Francisco Bay
[Computer printouts] [A] DS Batch Job 01 Supct, A.D. Listing, Forward and Reverse[B] DS Batch Job 02 Supct[C] DS Batch Job 02 Supct[D] DS Batch Job 02 Supct[E] [Continuation of D][F] DS Batch Job 01 Supct[G] DS Batch Job 02 Supct[H] [No identification][I] 1972 ... 1970 ... 1968 General Election[J] Claremont Institute Republican Assembly
Register No. 69Written Presentation of the City of Fremont, n.d. Jack A.
Pimental,Mayor
July 9, 1973
Register No. 70Presentation of the Republican Central Committee of Los Angeles County, July 5,1973 [photograph of Santa Monica Bay with original copy only]
AlanMacQuoid,Chairman
July 9, 1973
Register No. 71Presentation of Robert F. Barry, July 6, 1973 Robert F. Barry July 9, 1973
Register No. 72Statement of Senator John Stull, July 8, 1973 Senator Stull July 10, 1973
Register No. 73Written Statement in Support of the Dymally Bill for the Reapportionment of the2nd State Senatorial District, and the 4th Assembly District by the Glenn CountyCitizens Committee on Reapportionment, n.d.
Rose Manner etal.
July 10, 1973
Register No. 74Testimony of Assemblyman Newton R. Russell, 62nd Assembly District, n.d. Assemblyman
RussellJuly 10, 1973
Register No. 75Statement of Representative Paul N. McCloskey, Jr., n.d. Representative
McCloskeyJuly 10, 1973
Register No. 76
-
Written Presentation by John W. Stark, July 8, 1973
Register No. 77Resolution No. 73-65 of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Napa, July 10,1973
Register No. 78Written Presentation of the City of Roseville, July 9, 1973
Register No. 79Letter Supporting Senate Bill 62 re Reapportionment of the Second SenatorialDistrict, n.d.
Register No. 80Letter from the Sutter County Citizens for Fair Reapportionment, n.d.
Register No. 81Presentation re Reapportionment of the Second Senatorial District, n.d.
Related DocumentsStatement of Lola Cade [with notation" and signers of original copies"], n.d.Letter Supporting Senate Bill 62, n.d.Letter from Institute of State and Local Government, Department of Political Science, Claremont Men'sCollege, July 10, 1973 and Summary of Claremont Plan, July 10, 1973
Register No. 82Recorder's Transcript of the Proceedings in San Diego, June 22, 1973, July 13, 1973
Exhibit 9: Map of the City of La Mesa
Register No. 83Reporter's Transcript of Public Hearing, Los Angeles, June 18, 1973 [2 vol.], July23, 1973Exhibit NO.4: Political Participation of Mexican Americans in California: a Report of the CaliforniaState Advisory Committee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights, August 1971Exhibit NO.5: Community of Venice [map]Exhibit NO.6: [Group of documents]
Senate Bill No. 195, Amended in Assembly June 5, 1973
Assembly Bill No. 164, Amended in Senate June 1,1973
John W. Stark July 10, 1973
Napa County July 10, 1973Board ofSupervisors
George A. July 11, 1973Bulj an, Mayor
Betty Slionys, July 11, 1973et al.
Mary Lee July 11,1973Krapp, et al.
Terry Lynn July 19, 1973Dodson, et al.
Betty Slionys, et al. July 11, 1973Alan Heslop, July 11, 1973Director
Phyllis Wrigley, July 20, 1973C.S.R.Bob Helland,Mayor
Frank O. July 24, 1973Nelson, C.S.R.Herman Sillas, Jr.
Louis McCammonDionMorrow
Negroes as a Percent of the Total Population in the Los Angeles Five County Area by Census Tracts --1970 [maps]Exhibit NO.7: Proposed Assembly Redistricting As It Would Affect Claremont [map], June 17, 1973 Gene BlockExhibit NO.8: Letter from Congressman Chet Holifield to Ray Rodriguez [and 7 maps], March 20, 1973 Ray Rodriguez
Register No. 84
Written Presentation by John W. Stark, July 8, 1973 John W. Stark July 10, 1973
Register No. 77Resolution No. 73-65 of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Napa, July l0,1973
Napa CountyBoard ofSupervisors
July 10, 1973
Register No. 78Written Presentation of the City of Roseville, July 9, 1973 George A.
Buljan, MayorJuly 11, 1973
Register No. 79Letter Supporting Senate Bill 62 re Reapportionment of the Second SenatorialDistrict, n.d.
Betty Slionys,et al.
July 11, 1973
Register No. 80Letter from the Sutter County Citizens for Fair Reapportionment, n.d. Mary Lee
Krapp, et al.July 11, l973
Register No. 81Presentation re Reapportionment of the Second Senatorial District, n.d. Terry Lynn
Dodson, et al.July l9, 1973
Related DocumentsStatement of Lola Cade [with notation "and signers of original copies"], n.d.Letter Supporting Senate Bill 62, n.d. Betty Slionys, et al. July 11, 1973Letter from Institute of State and Local Government, Department of Political Science, Claremont Men'sCollege, July l0, 1973 and Summary of Claremont Plan, July 10, 1973
Alan Heslop,Director
July 11, 1973
Register No. 82Recorder's Transcript of the Proceedings in San Diego, June 22, 1973, July 13, 1973 Phyllis Wrigley,
C.S.R.July 20, 1973
Exhibit 9: Map of the City of La Mesa Bob Helland,Mayor
Register No. 83Reporter's Transcript of Public Hearing, Los Angeles, June 18, 1973 [2 vol.], July23, 1973
Frank O.Nelson, C.S.R.
July 24, 1973
Exhibit No. 4: Political Participation of Mexican Americans in California: a Report of the CaliforniaState Advisory Committee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights, August 1971
Herman Sillas, Jr.
Exhibit No. 5: Community of Venice [map] Louis McCammonExhibit No. 6: [Group of documents]
Senate Bill No. 195, Amended in Assembly June 5, 1973
Assembly Bill No. 164, Amended in Senate June l,1973
Negroes as a Percent of the Total Population in the Los Angeles Five County Area by Census Tracts --1970 [maps]
Dion Morrow
Exhibit No. 7: Proposed Assembly Redistricting As It Would Affect Claremont [map], June 17, 1973 Gene BlockExhibit No. 8: Letter from Congressman Chet Holifield to Ray Rodriguez [and 7 maps], March 20, 1973 Ray Rodriguez
Register No. 84
-
Letter from Reapportionment Research Committee, Fairfax Democratic Club [with 1Lenore Wax,map and 1 computer printout], July 23, 1973 Chairman
July 26, 1973
Register No. 85Letter from Democratic Women of Orange County [with 1 map], July 26, 1973 Billie F.
McPeek,President
July 30, 1973
Register No. 86Assembly Critique of Beverly Plan and CISLOG PlanLetter, July 25, 1973
Assembly Reapportionment Committee Analysis of Beverly Modifications to SB195 [computer printout], n.d.
Assembly Reapportionment Committee of the CISLOG Plan [computer printout]
Carl D'Agostino August 1, 1973and Michael B.Berman
Register No. 87Reporter's Transcript of Hearing, San Francisco, June 28,1973 [2 vo1.]
Related DocumentsPress Release #349 re Governor's Veto of SB 195, June 28,1973
Memorandum re Hearings of June 28-29 -- Salient Issues, n.d.
Peggy K.Kirschner,C.S.R.
Office of Governor,Ronald ReaganGordon E. Baker,Consultant
August 23, 1973
Register No. 88Letter re Boundaries of "Communities of Interest" [County of Los Angeles], fromWestern Center on Law and Poverty, June 20, 1973
Stanton 1. Price August 6, 1973
Register No. 89Reporter' s Transcript of Hearing, Sacramento, June 12, 1973, August 15, 1973
Related DocumentsStatement of Mike D. Antonovich, n.d. [different from testimony], n.d.
Jack W.Moncrief,C.S.R.
Mike D.Antonovich
August 20, 1973
Register No. 90Statement of Congressman Paul N. McCloskey, Jr., in Response to SupplementalPresentation of Petitioners, 41 Members of the Congress of the United States,August 21, 1973
Register No. 91Letter to Justice Coughlin re the Division of San Mateo County, August 21, 1973
Congressman August 23, 1973McCloskey
Senator Milton August 23, 1973Marks
Register No. 92Reporter's Transcript of Hearing Held in San Francisco, June 29, 1973, n.d. Peggy K. August 23, 1973
Letter from Reapportionment Research Committee, Fairfax Democratic Club [with 1map and 1 computer printout], July 23, 1973
Lenore Wax,Chairman
July 26, 1973
Register No. 85Letter from Democratic Women of Orange County [with 1 map], July 26, 1973 Billie F.
McPeek,President
July 30, 1973
Register No. 86Assembly Critique of Beverly Plan and CISLOG PlanLetter, July 25, 1973 Carl D'Agostino
and Michael B.Berman
August 1, 1973
Assembly Reapportionment Committee Analysis of Beverly Modifications to SB195 [computer printout], n.d.
Assembly Reapportionment Committee of the CISLOG Plan [computer printout]
Register No. 87Reporter's Transcript of Hearing, San Francisco, June 28, 1973 [2 vol.] Peggy K.
Kirschner,C.S.R.
August 23, 1973
Related DocumentsPress Release #349 re Governor's Veto of SB 195, June 28, 1973 Office of Governor,
Ronald ReaganMemorandum re Hearings of June 28-29 -- Salient Issues, n.d. Gordon E. Baker,
Consultant
Register No. 88Letter re Boundaries of "Communities of Interest" [County of Los Angeles], fromWestern Center on Law and Poverty, June 20, 1973
Stanton J. Price August 6, 1973
Register No. 89Reporter's Transcript of Hearing, Sacramento, June 12, 1973, August 15, 1973 Jack W.
Moncrief,C.S.R.
August 20, 1973
Related DocumentsStatement of Mike D. Antonovich, n.d. [different from testimony], n.d. Mike D.
Antonovich
Register No. 90Statement of Congressman Paul N. McCloskey, Jr., in Response to SupplementalPresentation of Petitioners, 41 Members of the Congress of the United States,August 21, 1973
CongressmanMcCloskey
August 23, 1973
Register No. 91Letter to Justice Coughlin re the Division of San Mateo County, August 21, 1973 Senator Milton
MarksAugust 23, 1973
Register No. 92Reporter's Transcript of Hearing Held in San Francisco, June 29, 1973, n.d. Peggy K. August 23, 1973
-
Related DocumentsCensus Tract Outline Map of the Los Angeles Five County Area
Plastic OverlayChicano CommunityCongressional DistrictsSB 195, June 4, 1973Statement [different from testimony] and map, June 29, 1973
Kirschner,C.S.R.
California RuralLegal Assistance
Bill Lockyer n.d.
Register No. 93Reporter's Transcript of Hearings Held in San Francisco, July 5 and 6,1973, August Peggy K.21, 1973 Kirschner,
C.S.R.Related DocumentsSchedule, San Francisco, July 6, 1973
August 23, 1973
n.d.
Register No. 94Affidavit of Mailing ... a Copy of the Report and Recommendations of SpecialMasters on Reapportionment, August 31, 1973
Register No. 95Requests to Appear for Oral Argument Before the Supreme Court on October 30,1973 [Various Dates]
Register No. 96Communications Regarding Masters' Report [Various Dates]
Related Documents [not listed]
Letter from Automobile Club of Southern California, September 18, 1973
Telegram from City of San Diego, September 28, 1973
Teela Baca n.d.
Various [Various Dates]Correspondents
[Various Sept. 11-Correspondents] N ov. 1973
William W.Escherich,Mgr., TravelResearch andPublicationsPete Wilson,Mayor
Register No. 97Press Clippings [Various
Publications][Various Dates]
Kirschner,C.S.R.
Related DocumentsCensus Tract Outline Map of the Los Angeles Five County Area
Plastic OverlayChicano CommunityCongressional DistrictsSB 195, June 4, 1973
California RuralLegal Assistance
Statement [different from testimony] and map, June 29, 1973 Bill Lockyer n.d.
Register No. 93Reporter's Transcript of Hearings Held in San Francisco, July 5 and 6, 1973, August21, 1973
Peggy K.Kirschner,C.S.R.
August 23, 1973
Related DocumentsSchedule, San Francisco, July 6, 1973 n.d.
Register No. 94Affidavit of Mailing ... a Copy of the Report and Recommendations of SpecialMasters on Reapportionment, August 31, 1973
Teela Baca n.d.
Register No. 95Requests to Appear for Oral Argument Before the Supreme Court on October 30,1973 [Various Dates]
VariousCorrespondents
[Various Dates]
Register No. 96Communications Regarding Masters' Report [Various Dates] [Various
Correspondents]Sept. 11-Nov. 1973
Related Documents [not listed]Letter from Automobile Club of Southern California, September 18, 1973 William W.
Escherich,Mgr., TravelResearch andPublications
Telegram from City of San Diego, September 28, 1973 Pete Wilson,Mayor
Register No. 97Press Clippings [Various
Publications][Various Dates]
-
Section 2. Documents Relating to Specific Legal Cases
Documents are arranged by case number and by date of filing.
[This document is best viewed using Netscape or Internet Explorer version 4 or higher, or another browser which understands styIe sheets.]
Description of Document
SACRAMENTO NO. 7679/7681 [No further identification]
[Map of San Bernardino and Orange Counties, with markings],January 4, 1966
Presentor
Conrad G. Tuohey
Date Filed
SACRAMENTO NO. 7814
SACRAMENTO NO. 7815
PHIL SILVER, et aI., Petitioners,
v.RONALD REAGAN, as Governor, etc., et aI.,Respondents.
ABE VICKTER, et aI., Petitioners,
v.RONALD REAGAN, as Governor, etc., et aI.,Respondents.
THE SENATE AND THE ASSEMBLY OFTHE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Intervenors.
Letter to Chief Justice re "a [Congressional] reapportionment plan," Charles 1. Conrad,November 8, 1967 Assemblyman
Minimum Change Plan [pamphlet]
November 8, 1967
AB NO.2 (1967, 2nd Extraordinary Session)
Letter to Chief Justice re "proposal for drawing the boundary linebetween the 1st and 6th Congressional Districts" [map], November7, 1967Letter to Chief Justice Traynor re "a Congressional redistrictingplan," November 10, 1967
AB No. 3 (1967, 2nd Extraordinary Session)
Amendments Req. #27182
Amendments Req. #27266Proposed Reapportionment of California's Congressional Districts (1967) [maps]Proposed Reapportionment Plan of California's Congressional Districts (November1967) [statistics]Proposed Reapportionment Plan of California's Congressional Districts [statistical
William T. Bagley,Assemblyman
Jack R. Fenton,Assemblyman
Jack R. Fenton, AssemblymanJack R. Fenton, Assemblyman
Jack R. Fenton, Assemblyman
November 9, 1967
November 10, 1967
Section 2. Documents Relating to Specific Legal CasesDocuments are arranged by case number and by date of filing.
[This document is best viewed using Netscape or Internet Explorer version 4 or higher, or another browser which understands style sheets.]
Description of Document Presentor Date Filed
SACRAMENTO NO. 7679/7681 [No further identification]
[Map of San Bernardino and Orange Counties, with markings],January 4, 1966
Conrad G. Tuohey
SACRAMENTO NO. 7814 PHIL SILVER, et al., Petitioners,
v.
RONALD REAGAN, as Governor, etc., et al.,Respondents.
SACRAMENTO NO. 7815 ABE VICKTER, et al., Petitioners,
v.
RONALD REAGAN, as Governor, etc., et al.,Respondents.
THE SENATE AND THE ASSEMBLY OFTHE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Intervenors.
Letter to Chief Justice re "a [Congressional] reapportionment plan,"November 8, 1967
Minimum Change Plan [pamphlet]
AB No. 2 (1967, 2nd Extraordinary Session)
Charles J. Conrad,Assemblyman
November 8, 1967
Letter to Chief Justice re "proposal for drawing the boundary linebetween the 1st and 6th Congressional Districts" [map], November7, 1967
William T. Bagley,Assemblyman
November 9, 1967
Letter to Chief Justice Traynor re "a Congressional redistrictingplan," November 10, 1967
AB No. 3 (1967, 2nd Extraordinary Session)
Amendments Req. #27182
Amendments Req. #27266
Jack R. Fenton,Assemblyman
November 10, 1967
Proposed Reapportionment of California's Congressional Districts (1967) [maps] Jack R. Fenton, AssemblymanProposed Reapportionment Plan of California's Congressional Districts (November1967) [statistics]
Jack R. Fenton, Assemblyman
Proposed Reapportionment Plan of California's Congressional Districts [statistical Jack R. Fenton, Assemblyman
http://www.netscape.com/http://www.microsoft.com/ie/
-
summary]
Letter to Chief Justice re "plan to reapportion the State'sCongressional Districts," November 10, 1967
John F. McCarthy, StateSenator
November 10, 1967
Affidavit of Service by Mail
Amendments to SB NO.2 (1967, 2nd Extraordinary Session) Req. #27176
Statistical Summary
Los Angeles County [map]
Proposal for Reapportionment of Congressional Districts Including County Supervisorsthe County of San Bernardino [map], November 10, 1967Proposed Plan for Reapportionment of Congressional Districts and Joseph A. BallBrief [with supporting documentation and maps], n.d.Allocation of Census Units for Districts Proposed by the Vickter [None]Plan, n.d.
November 10, 1967
November 10, 1967
November 10, 1967
SACRAMENTO NO. 7917 THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OFCALIFORNIA, et aI., Petitioners,
v.ED REINECKE, as Lieutenant Governor ofthe State of California, et aI., Respondents.
Legislature v. Reinecke, 1971-1972 [handwritten list]Petition for a Writ of Prohibition or Mandate, December 8,1971
[None]Herman F. Selvin December 15, 1971
December 20, 1971
December 23, 1971
December 15, 1971
December 21, 1971
December 20, 1971December 21, 1971
G.E. Bishel, [Clerk of theSupreme Court]Herman F. SelvinDaniel Hays Lowenstein
Evelle 1. Younger, AttorneyGeneralRobert S. Daggett
Reply to Memorandum of Attorney General, December 16, 1971Answer of Respondent Edmund G. Brown, Jr. to Petition for a Writof Prohibition or Mandate and Memorandum of Points andAuthorities, December 21, 1971Return to Alternative Writ by Way of Answer and Points andAuthorities in Opposition to the Issuance of a Peremptory Writ, n.d.Memorandum of Senators John L. Harmer and Fred W. Marler, Jr.,on Behalf of Themselves and the Other Republican Members of theCalifornia State Senate, n.d.
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Petition for Writ of Prohibitionor Mandate, n.d.
Application for Action on Petition Without Requiring Prior Filing of Herman F. SelvinOpposition, December 14, 1971; Supporting Memorandum of Pointsand Authorities, n.d.; and Declaration of Edmund G. Brown, Jf.,December 15, 1971Points and Authorities in Opposition to the Issuance of a Restraining Evelle 1. Younger, Attorney December 15, 1971Order, December 15, 1971 GeneralAlternative Writ of Mandate, n.d. Chief Justice Wright December 17, 1971News Release #153: State Supreme Court Issues Temporary Order Administrative Office of theDirecting Reapportionment Commission Not To Do Any Districting, CourtsDecember 17, 1971Alternative Writ of Prohibition or Mandate, n.d.
summary]Letter to Chief Justice re "plan to reapportion the State'sCongressional Districts," November 10, 1967
Affidavit of Service by Mail
Amendments to SB No. 2 (1967, 2nd Extraordinary Session) Req. #27176
Statistical Summary
Los Angeles County [map]
John F. McCarthy, StateSenator
November 10, 1967
Proposal for Reapportionment of Congressional Districts Includingthe County of San Bernardino [map], November 10, 1967
County Supervisors November 10, 1967
Proposed Plan for Reapportionment of Congressional Districts andBrief [with supporting documentation and maps], n.d.
Joseph A. Ball November 10, 1967
Allocation of Census Units for Districts Proposed by the VickterPlan, n.d.
[None] November 10, 1967
SACRAMENTO NO. 7917 THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OFCALIFORNIA, et al., Petitioners,
v.
ED REINECKE, as Lieutenant Governor ofthe State of California, et al., Respondents.
Legislature v. Reinecke, 1971-1972 [handwritten list] [None]Petition for a Writ of Prohibition or Mandate, December 8, 1971
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Petition for Writ of Prohibitionor Mandate, n.d.
Herman F. Selvin December 15, 1971
Application for Action on Petition Without Requiring Prior Filing ofOpposition, December 14, 1971; Supporting Memorandum of Pointsand Authorities, n.d.; and Declaration of Edmund G. Brown, Jr.,December 15, 1971
Herman F. Selvin December 15, 1971
Points and Authorities in Opposition to the Issuance of a RestrainingOrder, December 15, 1971
Evelle J. Younger, AttorneyGeneral
December 15, 1971
Alternative Writ of Mandate, n.d. Chief Justice Wright December 17, 1971News Release #153: State Supreme Court Issues Temporary OrderDirecting Reapportionment Commission Not To Do Any Districting,December 17, 1971
Administrative Office of theCourts
Alternative Writ of Prohibition or Mandate, n.d. G.E. Bishel, [Clerk of theSupreme Court]
December 20, 1971
Reply to Memorandum of Attorney General, December 16, 1971 Herman F. Selvin December 20, 1971Answer of Respondent Edmund G. Brown, Jr. to Petition for a Writof Prohibition or Mandate and Memorandum of Points andAuthorities, December 21, 1971
Daniel Hays Lowenstein December 21, 1971
Return to Alternative Writ by Way of Answer and Points andAuthorities in Opposition to the Issuance of a Peremptory Writ, n.d.
Evelle J. Younger, AttorneyGeneral
December 21, 1971
Memorandum of Senators John L. Harmer and Fred W. Marler, Jr.,on Behalf of Themselves and the Other Republican Members of theCalifornia State Senate, n.d.
Robert S. Daggett December 23, 1971
-
Herman F. SelvinVerne H. Tindell, CityAttorneyRobert G. BeverlySupreme Court
Application of Senators John L. Harmer and Fred W. Marler, Jr., on Robert S. DaggettBehalf of Themselves and Other Republican Members of theCalifornia State Senate to Intervene as Parties or to Participate asAmici Curiae, December 22, 1971Letter to Chief Justice Wright re SAC No. 7917, December 27, 1971 Herman F. SelvinApplication for Order to File Complaint in Intervention by Way of Richards, Watson andReturn and Answer to Alternative Writ of Mandate, with Complaint; DreyfussPoints and Authorities in Support Thereof, and Order Thereon,December 27, 1971Petitioners' Reply to A