reflective practice report

76
richard james maccowan_ma urban design_2010/12 reflective practice forgotten spaces 2011

Upload: richard-james-maccowan

Post on 16-Mar-2016

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Review of a design competition submission for the Reflective Practice Studio on the MA Urban Design course @ Leeds Met

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reflective Practice Report

richard james maccowan_ma urban design_2010/12

reflective practice

forgotten spaces 2011

Page 2: Reflective Practice Report
Page 3: Reflective Practice Report

i

Reflective Practice is the ‘active use of learning while doing’ which is an important facet of the designer’s toolkit. With competitions offering the chance to gain exposure within the design sector, using reflective practice techniques successfully can aid the designer a great deal. This report seeks to contextualise various reflective models whilst carrying out an in-depth review of the competition process. This will enable practitioners the chance to understand the qualities, skills and techniques that have been used by designers in the past to produce successful designs that will not only highlight their work, but also win them competitions.

summary

Page 4: Reflective Practice Report
Page 5: Reflective Practice Report

contents

i. summary01. introduction 1 02. critique of reflective practice models 403. previous experience 904. design competitions 1405. forgotten spaces competition 2206. site research and analysis 2707. concepts and designs 3908. critique of winning entries 4909 reflection of the competition process 5310. conclusions and recommendations 58 references

appendices

a. digital copies of report, entries and interim presentationb. project management

Page 6: Reflective Practice Report
Page 7: Reflective Practice Report

1. introduction

Page 8: Reflective Practice Report

introduction

“Without deep reflection one knows from daily life that one exists for other people.” Albert Enstein (undated)

1.1 overviewThis report is concerned with a personal reflection of my entry to the Forgotten Spaces design competition run by the RIBA. It includes subsequent research into success in design competitions. Competitions have long been held as a way to promote emerging talent in the design industry with many notable designers coming to prominence by this means such as Herzog + De Mueron and Bjarke Ingels. In terms of design competitions in the fields of architecture and urbanism, the UK lags behind the rest of the world when it comes to running competitions as states Ellis Woodman (2011).

1.2 report structureThis report will begin by introducing reflective practice methods. It will then delve into previous competition experience, leading into

Page 9: Reflective Practice Report

03

I don’t want to be forgotten

Figure 1.1: aerial view of ‘forgotten space’ in

Shefffield (2011)

desktop research of design competitions, followed by an overview of the competition brief.

A site analysis (based on the location in figure 1.1) and design concepts will be developed and reviewed. The winning entries will be analysed, leading to a review of the design competition process developed throughout this project.

The report will conclude with a summary of the project and recommendations following a reflection of my entry into the Forgotten Spaces competition.

Page 10: Reflective Practice Report

2. critique of reflective practice models

Page 11: Reflective Practice Report

reflective practice

Experiential learning is the process of making meaning

from direct experience.(Itin, 1999)

2.1 introductionGiven that this report is reflecting on a design competition it will be necessary to look at the theories of reflective practice and review a number of reflective practice models.

2.2 definitionsReflective Practice came to prominence in the work of Donald Schön and is described by Moon (2004, pg 35) as, ‘emphasing the use of reflection in professional or other complex activities as a means of coping with situations that are ill-structured and/or unpredictable.‘ Schön describes this in his 1983 book, The Reflective Practitioner, as “the capacity to reflect on action so as to engage in a process of continuous learning”, which, according to Schön, is “one of the defining characteristics of professional practice”. According to Bolton (2010) it involves “paying critical attention

05

Page 12: Reflective Practice Report

ConcreteExperience

ReflectiveObservation

AbstractConceptualisation

ActiveExperimentation

to the practical values and theories which inform everyday actions, by examining practice reflectively and reflexively. This leads to developmental insight”. Gourley (2000) states that reflection and self-evaluation skills are critical to learning.

2.3 experiential learningThe model used throughout this report is Kolb’s model of experiential learning. “Experiential learning is the process of making meaning from direct experience” (Itin, 1999). This model fits with my learning style in that allows me to ‘learn by doing’. By not making the same mistakes twice and improving with each subsequent task. This learning style was gained whilst studying for my undergraduate degree and then my subsequent learning for accreditation by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS).

Kolb’s model (figure 2.1) proposes four stages required to gain worthwhile knowledge:

Concrete Experience - Willingness to be actively involved in the experienceReflective Observation - Ability to reflect on the experienceAbstract Conceptulisation - form an idea from the experience via analytical skillsActive Experimentation - Use problem solving

reflective = deep thoughtpractice = repeated exercise

(Oxford English Dictionary, 2011)

Figure 2.1 : Kolb’s model of reflection (adapted from Kirk, 2011)

Page 13: Reflective Practice Report

Governingvariable

ActionStrategy Consequences

double-loop learning

single-loop learning

What

SoWhat

WhatNext

Reflection

Influencingfactors

Could I have dealth with it

better

Learning

Description of the

experience

07

and decision making skills to develop ideas.

Despite the simplicity of Kolb’s model, there are a several criticisms as highlighted by Smith (2001). It pays insufficient attention to the process of reflection. The claims made for the four different learning styles are extravagant. The model takes very little account of different cultural experiences/conditions. The idea of stages or steps does not sit well with the reality of thinking. Empirical support for the model is weak. The relationship of learning processes to knowledge is problematic. Nevertheless, the model is simple to follow and fit for my purposes.

2.4 further reflective practice models

A number of academics (such as Argyis + Schon to Rolfe) have developed other models of reflective practice over the years. These will be reviewed in the following pages.

2.5 argyis and schön (1978)This model is concerned with the identification of a perceived error or fault. A single loop is used to show the continuation of the technique (strategy or policy) after an error or fault, and double loop learning for changing the technique (strategy or policy) after an error or fault. The diagram for this model can be seen in Figure 2.2.

2.6 johns (1995)The Johns model of structured reflection is

based on reflective practice in the nursing profession. It is carried out with a mentor or colleague and examines “looking in” at thoughts and feelings, whist “looking out” at the situation (Figure 2.3). This is required as our natural tendency is to judge ourselves harshly (as states Moon, 2004).

2.7 rolfe et al (2001)This is a simplistic model of reflection similar to the Johns model, was also based developed for the nursing profession. It is a continuous process on three levels from ‘WHAT’ to ‘WHAT NEXT’ (Figure 2.4). The complete way of learning is to continually work through the process questioning your methods.

Figure 2.2 : Argyis + Schon’s model of reflection (adapted Joyce, 2011)

Figure 2.3 John’s reflection cycle (adapted from Meredith,

2011)

Figure 2.4: Rolfe’s model of reflection (adapted from

Rolfe’s model of relfection, 2011)

Page 14: Reflective Practice Report

2.8 conclusionsThis section highlighted a number of contrasting models of reflective practice. For my goals the use of Kolb’s model was deemed to be most suitable. A number of other models were introduced to provide a comparison. For each section of the report, where applicable, I will provide an overview of my reflective learning (based on figure 2.5) from each set of tasks whilst undertaking the designs and research into competitions.

The next two sections will deal with design competitions and my previous experience.

task feedbackdoing

reviewing

learning

planning (or trying out)

Figure 2.5: review of reflection learning

Page 15: Reflective Practice Report

3. previous experience

Page 16: Reflective Practice Report

previousexperienceThe key to reflection is learning how to take perspective on one’s own actions and experience(Amulya, 2004)

3.1 introductionDespite having a limited design background I have had experience of design competitions (below) whilst working in real estate consultancy. For confidentiality reasons the names of clients, partners and exact details of the projects have been omitted.

3.2 billundAs part of a team setup by my employers, we brought together an international team to enter an open design competition to masterplan an area of Billund (figure 3.1), Denmark, outside the town centre. Our client was a major Danish toy company, and we were supported by two internationally renowned Danish design practices.

With the combination of resources and experience in the competition process, the

Page 17: Reflective Practice Report

11

Biillund

Figure 3.1 :Aerial map of Denmark (2011)

....[developing] an internationally acclaimed desitination for learning,

meeting and playing.(Vision for competition entry, 2009)

Page 18: Reflective Practice Report

Figure 3.2 :Helsinki Docklands as seen from the air (Passing over Helsinki, 2007))

bid was successful at both stages of the competition process.

3.3 helsinkiAt the same time as the Billund project, a retained client, was considering entering a design competition for a new transport interchange and shopping destination to the east of the city centre. This was part of the larger regeneration of the docklands of Helsinki (figure 3.2).

We had known about the competition for some time, as it was an open international competition publicised at a number of international festivals. However, given that we had yet to determine that the client was wishing to enter, we did not proceed further than brief background research.

With 10 weeks until the deadline, the client decided to instruct us, along with a Swedish design practice, to design and manage the competition entry. The entry was unsuccessful due to the short timescale as a major contributing factor.

The main barrier to the best outcomes is the client who obeys

the letter of the regulations and processes without remembering the

spirit and intention.(Pirhohen and Papa, 2009)

Page 19: Reflective Practice Report

3.4 conclusionsFrom experience, it has become apparent that to be a successful project, a team needs to run in a cohesive manner. My previous employer has succeeded with design competitions in the past by employing design consultants that they know and trust to achieve the desired results. In instances such as the Helsinki competition, when the project was delivered to us at a late stage, it reduced our chances of success.

The next section will look into strategies of design competitions in more depth.

13Buildings should not exist to demonstrate

principles(Lyons, 1968)

Page 20: Reflective Practice Report

4. designcompetitions

Page 21: Reflective Practice Report

design competitions

“I think there were five open design competitions in the UK last year....

I think that’s shocking”(Chipperfield, 2011)

4.1 introduction“I think there were five open design competitions in the UK last year. There were 200 in Germany and 1,600 in France. I think that’s shocking.” stated David Chipperfield in The Architects Journal in April 2011. Searchs on the internet does not take long to see this in evidence with a variety of competitions ranging from small-scale designs to masterplans offered throughout the rest of the world.

This section serves as the fundamental part of the report identifying the importance of competitions and gives a snapshot of professionals views on the subject.

4.2 design competitionsDesign competitions are a good way of younger practices getting noticed, says

15

Page 22: Reflective Practice Report

Metropolitan Workshop principle, David Prichard (Hopkirk, 2011). Two examples of this are:

Joern Utzon (Denmark) - the designer of the Sydney Opera House (figure 4.1) in 1957. Mr Utzon, a housing designer, produced a concept completely different to the other entries. The judges stated, “Because of its very originality, it is clearly a controversial design. We are, however, absolutely convinced about its merits.” It had been noted that the design was both acoustically and structurally well designed.

Herzog and DeMeuron (Switzerland) - world-acclaimed designers who won their first design competition for the SBB SwitchTower (figure 4.2) in Basel, Switzerland in 1997. The design merges form and function, that annouced the world to the talents of this design duo.

A number of distinguished architects have commented that during this time of economic uncertainty design competitions offer a level playing field.

It is not always the winners of the competitions that are successful in these competitions, such as Metropolitan Workshop (Figure

Because of its very originality, it is clearly a controversial design.

We are, however, absolutely convinced about its merits.

(Judges of Sydney Opera House, 1957)

Figure 4.1: Sydney Opera House (Opéra de Sydney, 2007)

Figure 4.2 SBB Switch Tower, Basel (2006)

Page 23: Reflective Practice Report

4.3). In the article by Elizabeth Hopkirk in Building Design (figure 4.4), Hopkirk states that Metropolitan Workshop have landed a number of projects in Denmark after coming second behind Gehl Architects. As the major projects are awarded to the larger firm, Metropolitan Workshop have been given a number of commissions on the basis of their designs.

The perceived standing of the designer is also important. Sutherland Hussey Architects won a design competition in Germany a number of years ago. Despite winning, David Chipperfield Architects convinced the client that their design was the best option for construction. This is despite finishing fifth in the competition! Sutherland Hussey have since admitted that Chipperfields design was the ‘better option’ (Hopkirk, 2011).

4.3 competition experiencesVarious factors need to be taken into account to be successful in winning design competitions. I have already found a number of these from carrying out preliminary research. To find out this information, desktop research could have been carried out to obtain a better understanding of this.

However, the approach that I took differed.

17

Figure 4.3: A place in the heart of Oslo by Metropolitan Workshop (undated)

Figure 4.4: Newspaper clipping from Building Design focusing on Metropolitan Workshop (Hopkirk, 2011)

Page 24: Reflective Practice Report

Using the LinkedIn community (www.linkedin.com) I posted a number of questions on the following group discussion boards, Design Council, Archello, Landscape Urbanism, Urban Design Network, The Academy of Urbanism, and the World Architecture Community.

These 3 questions were posed to promote discussion:

1. What benefits do you get from entering design competitions?2. How successful have you been?3. What is the key to being successful?

This was done to produce a sample of answers and not as an extensive piece of field research. Fifteen responses were obtained over a week-long period.

4.4 analysis of respondentsIn figure 4.5, the word map shows the most important words used by the respondents to question 1. This identifies the key words as, new, design, explore, work, types.

Figure 4.5: Word cloud of key words of survey respondents (larger word more common response

Page 25: Reflective Practice Report

19

66% 33%The responses to question 2 are represented in the pie chart in figure 4.6 showing that the majority of respondents, 66%, have been unsuccessful in competitions. One-third of the respondents had been successful, with only 1 having been successful on more than one occasion.

Figure 4.6: Results of success in competitions, Question 2.

Page 26: Reflective Practice Report

To answer question 3, the respondents gave a range of answers that are highlighted below: “I think we have been successful because we have

entered competitions that were outside of our usual market and that we have put together teams that included other experts with experience we don't have. This means we bring fresh insight, without the baggage from that sector, but also ensure the technical expertise is present to enable delivery.”

“I think this is like a high competition sport, you must train to get a good condition, you must perfect techniques, you must learn from your experience and from others experience... you must endure, you must work in team.”

“Setting myself aside from the rest I assume as most winners appear to have done.”

“Mostly people will say thinking outside the box, but I am not to convinced about that.”

“The knack seems to be twofold: a) the ability to push the envelope just enough and b) the ability to capture the zeitgeist. I think if you look at recent winners (not the Fosters, Hadids, Gehrys, Eisenmanns) you will, I think, get the sense of this. There are, however, a number of other ways by which an architect might be successful in competition.”

Hepworth Wakefield by David Chipperfield Architects (Hepworth Wakefield, undated)

Page 27: Reflective Practice Report

21

4.5 ConclusionsThe importance of competitions in design has never been so pertinent given the current economic conditions states Chipperfield (2011). It offers designers the chance to showcase their work to a wider audience, and is especially good for up-and-coming designers. The results from the survey show that many designers view competitions as a way of experimenting on new design techniques whilst looking for new business. Creativity is the key and for the graphic style and design to stand out from the crowd. The table on the right (figure 4.7) shows my experiences from this carrying out this research.

The next section will introduce the Forgotten Spaces competition

task feedbackdoing researching design competi-

tions

reviewing Success is multi-facted with key components being experimentation, passion, and teamwork

learning developing an understanding of what I can use for the next competition and make me stand out from the crowd

planning (or trying out) developing a framework to ensure that I can be successful in my next entry

Figure 4.7: Personal relection of competitions

Page 28: Reflective Practice Report

5. forgotten spaces competition

Page 29: Reflective Practice Report

forgotten spaces

“....could be small or large - a grassy verge, a wasteland,

an unused car park, a derelict building, underpass or flyover.”

5.1 introductionI have been interested in design competitions and what it takes to win them since starting the MA in Urban Design. Having been involved in research aspects in the past (detailed in Section 3), being able to visually communicate my ideas was extremely appealing. I identified a number of competitions that could be suitable for my needs and that would fit within the university timescale.

5.2 motivationsThere are a number of reasons why I chose to enter a design competition given my non-design background. These are:

Design experience - to give me a chance to work on something that I may not get through regular courseworkPortfolio - to enhance my design portfolio and

23

Page 30: Reflective Practice Report

show potential employers that I am willing to put in extra effort.Give me a break - I have been interested in using time away from one thing to generate ideas such as the ‘The Breakout Principle’ by Benson and Proctor (2003), By expanding my design skills this will hopefully be evident.Publicity - all the competition entries will be on the Architect’ Journal and RIBA website. My designs will be ‘showcased’ to a larger online audience.

5.3 competition briefThe Forgotten Spaces Competition 2011 is an open design competition set up by the RIBA. It has been running a similar competition for forgotten spaces in London for a number of years. As stated in the entry brief it is, “Open to entrants across the country, this design competition asks architects, artists, engineers and landscape designers to nominate an existing site in the Sheffield area and propose an idea for its improvement.”

The competition started in January, with a 12 week design process, ending on the 12th May 2011, to produce two A1 boards, one for the site analysis and one for the design concepts. The project management workflow can be seen in Appendix B.

Page 31: Reflective Practice Report

25

A ‘forgotten space’ could be small or large - a grassy verge, a wasteland, an unused car park, a derelict building,

underpass or flyover. The proposal could be simple or complex, a commercial or public facility, a piece of public

art or a new building, the main requirement is that it responds to the area and serves a function for the local

community.”

Page 32: Reflective Practice Report

5.4 conclusionsThis section introduced my motivations behind entering this competition and the overall brief for the competition. Entering competitions such as this, will hopefully allow me to develop my design skills whilst working within parameters set out in the competition brief.

The next section expand on the competition requirements in more detail.

Page 33: Reflective Practice Report

6. site research + analysis

Page 34: Reflective Practice Report

site research + analysis“A shared understanding of the context of the scheme is the foundation of a successful project.”(Meeda and other, 2007)

6.1 introductionI entered this design competition to provide me with further design work for my portfolio (and compliment the work I have done in the past). This section will deal with site selection and the site analysis, a requirement for the competition entry.

6.2 competition selectionAfter a Thames Estuary competition was postponed until 2012. I decided to enter the RIBA Forgotten Spaces competition to provide me with another oppurtunity with competition.

6.3 site selectionHaving decided to enter the competition, I needed to then chose a site as my “forgotten space”. I looked at four sites, and carried out inspections of each.

Page 35: Reflective Practice Report

296.4 londonSite 1: The land above the entrance to the Blackwall Tunnel (figure 6.1)The entry to the tunnel from both north and south bound is featureless and there could be the option of some interesting design concepts that would provide both uses for the public and pleasant vistas for the motorists.

Site 2: Land on Victoria Dock Road, Docklands (figure 6.2)This site is a small parcel of land in a residential area of east London facing the towards the Excel Arena. The land could provide space for the locals as either a small allotment and/or park.

6.5 sheffieldSite 3: Roundabout and civic space at Charter Square (figure 6.3)I chose this site as I had walked past it on a number of occasions whilst visiting Sheffield and felt that the dark underpasses and square could be improved upon with some interesting concepts.

Figure 6.1: northern entrance to the Blackwall

Tunnel (2011)

Page 36: Reflective Practice Report

Figure 6.3:Streetview of site at Victoria Dock Road (Google, 2011)

Page 37: Reflective Practice Report

31“Sheffield is a great place to be…you’ll

soon realise why we’re so proud of our city.

We just love it.”(Sheffield City Council, 2011)

Site 4: land off Arundel Gate (figure 6.4)The final site was proposed by the estates team at Sheffield Hallam University, one of the sponsors of the competition. The site is above a chemical laboratory and cannot be accessed from the street at present.

6.6 site choiceI chose the Sheffield competition as logistically it was easier for me to enter the Sheffield competition than London. It would also reduce my costs and the entry could be hand delivered to the RIBA offices in Leeds.

In deciding between the two Sheffield sites. My preference was Arundel Gate, but having checked the planning history, the site already had planning permission for redevelopment (this is not permitted under competition rules), thus leaving the site next to Sheffield Hallam University (figure 6.4). Nevertheless, I felt that I could use the site to mimic conditions placed upon by a client and could work with and challenge the brief.

6.7 site analysisHaving made the choice for the site, the next stage was to carry out a site analysis, through desktop and physical inspections.

Page 38: Reflective Practice Report

Figure 6.3: Charterhouse Square, Sheffield

Page 39: Reflective Practice Report

33

Figure 6.4: site off Arundel Gate, Sheffield

6.8 entry requirementsAs part of the entry requirements for the competition it was necessary to prepare an A1 site analysis board with the following requirements (taken from the competition brief):

1. The site must be vacant with no current applications for redevelopment logged at the local planning authority (entrants must check with the planning authority).

2. The site should be accessible to the public and access points should be indicated on the entry.

3. The submission should include a site plan at an appropriate scale to include road names and transport nodes (bus stops, train stations).

4. You should photograph the site from

Page 40: Reflective Practice Report

Figure 6.5: Bird’s eye view of chosen site off

Arundel Gate, Sheffield (Bing, 2011)

all accessible sides to give a clear understanding of the site as it stands and how it is currently used.

5. You should include basic site history, contextual photographs with accompanying text to explain the local area and build a case for your design proposal which will be illustrated on the second board.

6. You should define the specific need of the local area that you are responding to.

7. You should endeavor to establish who the owner of the land is, whether the plot is managed by a commercial or private owner or a local authority.

This was a simple checklist exercise, that could be accomplished using skills developed in the Site Analysis module.I visited all the site’s before deciding which to

Page 41: Reflective Practice Report

35

Key

Academic use

Government use

Leisure use

Car parking

Retail

Public House

Commercial use

Open space

Bus Stops

Node

Visual routes

Movement routes

Views

Forgotten Space

Hotel

ARUNDEL GATE

HOWARD STREET

SURREY STREET

Bus Station

SURREY LANE

PON

D STR

EET

N develop further it was not necessary to carry out a a further site visit.

6.9 site data analysisThe requirements to section 7.2 can be seen below:1. The current site has no planning

applications in place2. There is no public access to the site at

present.3. See Figure 6.6 (opposite)4. See Figure 6.75. See Figure 6.86. The purpose is to provide a more useful

space for both the public and natural environment. I was informed of the nesting habits of pied wagtails on the site by the competition organisers.

7. The landowner is Sheffield Hallam University, with the alleyway owned by Sheffield City Council. Access is required to an electricity box attached to the

Figure 6.6: Site Analysis for area surrounding site off Arundel Gate, Sheffield

Page 42: Reflective Practice Report

Figure 6.7: site location photographs from various angles

Page 43: Reflective Practice Report

Figure 6.8. (a) - Building grain in the 1880’s

Area defined by tight building patterns.

Train Station

(b) - 1930’s

Building grain developing into larger blocks.Train Station

(c) - 1960’s

First indication of Arundel Gate.Train Station

(d) - 1990’s

The area is similar to the present day, with the notable exceptions of the new builds off Arundel Gate.Train Station

(e) - current situation

37

Blackwells Bookshop. In addition, I was informed that the venting turrets on the site are required to vent from the chemical laboratory.

6.10 conclusionsThis section was concerned with analysis of the site. A task I have been carrying out for a number of years whilst working as a property consultant. The analysis was carried out using both desktop and site research to produce the required information for the first board (figure 7.4) for the submission to the competition. My learning for this section can be found in figure 6.9.

task feedbackdoing Carried out site visits to both London and

Sheffield. Chose site based on locality, planning, and ease of maximisation of design potential

reviewing Reviewed once into the design process that choice of site could have been better given the broad scope of the competition.

learning Analyse the site in depth to fully meet the challenges of the brief. In this case I could have used a site to have fun with designs.

planning (or trying out) As above.

Figure 6.9: Personal Reflection of site analysis and research

Figure 6.8 site history showing building grain from 1880’s to 2011.

Page 44: Reflective Practice Report

Figure 6.10: completed site survey submission board

Page 45: Reflective Practice Report

7. concepts + designs

Page 46: Reflective Practice Report

concepts + designs“Underlying some of the literature on creativity is the notion that creativity is itself a single talent.... held in varying quantities by different people.”(Lawson, 1980)

8.1 introductionIn this section, I will detail a number of options that led to the final concept. This will show the design process and will enable me to reflect on this stage of the competition process.

Page 47: Reflective Practice Report

8.2 concept 1 - art sculptureThe thought behind this concept is a large art sculpture that could provide a visual impact for both those working in the university building and passersby on Arundel Gate. The concept would call for a large globe (figure 8.1) similar to what was found in Leicester Square, London, in the middle of the 19th century. This was designed by James Wyld (figure 8.2).

41

Figure 8.1: Sketch idea of globe sculpture.

Figure 8.2: James Wyld’s Globe (2011)

Page 48: Reflective Practice Report

8.3 concept 2 - public greenhouseThis concept would allow for the growing of crops for the local community and offices and call for the construction of a small greenhouse on the site. Due to the lack of space a green wall would also increase the square footage for plants. The greenhouse would be in keeping with the Winter Gardens (figure 8.3).

Figure 8.3: Sketch idea for greenhouse

FIgure 8.4: Winter Gar-dens, Sheffield

Page 49: Reflective Practice Report

8.4 concept 3 - flexible office spaceAlternatively, the site could be built up to be used as temporary office space. The building could incorporate green walls and sustainable construction techniques. A sketch of the idea can be found in figure 8.5.

8.5 concept 4 - art sculpture + deckingA more sophisticated multi-purpose concept would combine an art sculpture with five columns representing Sheffield. With vents for the chemical lab below. In addition, the concept would provide a space for the public to use the site by way of a deck raised up to the street level and access provided. See figure 8.6 for a sketch and 3D model examples.

8.6 chosen conceptThe concept that I chose for the final submission was a combination of the initial ideas. This concept would call for a raised deck with public seating around an art sculpture of a large fork reflecting Sheffield’s steel industries. The fork would provide ventilation for the chemical lab below. The concept would call for the removal of the planting on the site, but the south-facing wall of the bookshop would have a green wall installed. This would provide a pleasant

43

Figure 8.5: Sketch of flexible office space

Page 50: Reflective Practice Report

Figure 8.6: Sketch of scuplture and decking

Figure 8.10 (left): Shuttlecocks (2007)

Figure 8.7: 3D models of scupltire and decking

Figure 8.9: Sheffield Gas Towers (2010)

Figure 8.9: Sheffield Steel (2010)

Page 51: Reflective Practice Report

45

Figure 8.11: Photomontage of final design concept

Page 52: Reflective Practice Report

Figure 8.12: Sketches of final design concept

Page 53: Reflective Practice Report

47

“Desk workers who have a view of nature

report greater job productivity....”

(Kaplan, 1993)

view for the public using the space as well as those from the university building adjacent. I was working on the principles of using plants to improve the productivity of office workers, as stated by Kaplan (1993). A number of the submitted images can be seen in figures 8.7 to 8.9. The submission board can be seen in figure 8.14.

8.7 conclusionsThis section detailed the ideas that were generated from carrying out the site analysis and from sketching some basic ideas. Having produced a number of ideas in a rough format, I presented them to a lecturer to see if they could work at the site. This enabled me to develop the proposals for the site from a number of ideas to a design that would fit within the criteria of the competition and show an appreciation for the site constraints, whilst developing my creative and graphical skills as is stated in figure 8.13.

task feedbackdoing Sketching a number

of ideasreviewing Evaluating ideas

against competition criteria and feedback from peers

learning Developing awareness of producing a concept from pen sketches

planning (or trying out) Using skills developed from concepts to produce the final design and submission

Figure 8.13: Personal reflection of design concepts

Page 54: Reflective Practice Report

Figure 8.14: FInal Submission sheet - Proposal

Page 55: Reflective Practice Report

8. critique of winning entries

Page 56: Reflective Practice Report

critique of winning entries“I have been inspired to see such a fantastic range of creative, innovative, thought-provoking and, in some cases, controversial ideas for transforming forgotten spaces in Sheffield.”(England, 2011)

9.1 introductionIn October 2011, the winning entry to the Forgotten Spaces competitions (both London and Sheffield) were announced. Having not been shortlisted, it was evident that there were a high number of creative and well-thought out designs that had been entered in the competition, both from students and design practices.

9.2 winning entriesFigure 9.1 shows ‘Frog Walk’, the winning entry to the Sheffield competition. It describes “previously dark, isolated and foreboding, is brought to life by animated creatures which accompany travelers on their journey between Ecclesall and Sharrow.”

Page 57: Reflective Practice Report

51“....brought to life by animated creatures which accompany

travelers on their journey....”

Figure 9.1: Winning entry for Sheffield competition (RIBA, 2011)

Given that the competition allowed for any forgotten space across the whole of Sheffield to be developed it is difficult to compare the entries against each other. The winning submission by Chris Patterson, clearly attempts to provide a creative way of lighting a dark and dangerous spot in Sheffield near the cemetery. The entry is sustainable in that it only lights when people are walking past, thus saving energy and reducing the costs of permanent street lighting.

Page 58: Reflective Practice Report

Figure 9.2: Winning entry of London competition (RIBA, 2011)

In terms of the London winner, Alex Scott-Whitby produced an idea for the use of bell towers throughout the city. As he puts it, “A live project creating a series of low rent creative studios for a new generation of St Jerome’s nesting within the belfries of the City of London’s Church Spires. His entry can be found in figure 9.2.

The winning entries differ to my submission in that they are clear and simple in their objectives. My submission attempted to deal with a number of issues at the site, which could have confused the judges when considering my submission boards. The reflection of my submission will be dealt with in the subsequent sections.

9.3 conclusionsClearly a high standard of both creativity and technical ability is called for to win a competition such as this. The winning entry has provided a clear and simple answer to the competition brief, one that could be produced to “bring to life” as the entrant suggested the footpath where his design will be based.

Page 59: Reflective Practice Report

9. reflection of competition

process

Page 60: Reflective Practice Report

reflection of competitionThe main thing that I look back on, is the reliance of putting to-gether a successful team.

10.1 introductionIn the report at the end of each section a reflection on what has been developed at each stage of the process leading to the submission for the competition. This section will now bring this together to produce an understanding of what has been learned from the research, the competition process, and the winning submissions to develop a greater understanding for future competitions and design projects.

10.2 previous experienceWorking with a number of experienced design consultancies has enabled me to look at the way they are successful at winning design competitions. The main thing that I look back on, is the reliance of putting together a successful team. This coupled with strong leadership gives the team a direction and

Page 61: Reflective Practice Report

allows each member to focus on providing what is required of them.

This knowledge, can be useful for looking forward to my future career in the design sector. Whether I am working on projects with colleagues within the same firm, or with consultants brought in for their specialist skills, I can use my experience and knowledge to aid in the development of successful projects pitching for work, or as is the focus of this report, in design competitions.

10.3 design competition researchMoving on from my previous experience, desktop research was carried out to establish the thoughts of design professionals. What is evident is that there are few competitions in the UK.

What does become apparent is that the “open” design competitions allow for up-and-coming designers to be noticed and gain exposure that they would not otherwise be given, without spending large amounts of capital on marketing and business development. It is a ‘catch-22” in the UK that the competitions allow for exposure, but there are too few of them. This has led to a number of practices working on international competitions. Winning is not everything,

551. Enter for the Right Reason.

2. Pick the Right Project.3. Be Passionate.

4. Make sure you can do it quickly.5. Find a partner in crime.

(Roller, 2009)

Page 62: Reflective Practice Report

the exposure and willingness (to enter) may provide entrants with further commissions, as the more established practices work on the flagship schemes. This was highlighted in the article in Building Design outlining the work carried out by Metropolitan Workshop.

10.4 motivationsThe main focus of entering the competition was to provide another outlet for my creativity and use it as a learning tool for freehand sketching and digital design. The research allowed me to look at designs for small spaces, these being important for other modules within my masters degree.

It was important throughout the year to develop my skills. This competition gave me this chance, as it required greater involvement than working through textbooks. I feel that this aided my development as an urban designer. As stated in earlier sections, I used the ideas developed by Benson and Proctor (2003) to provide tasks away from the main task that allowed me to me to have my “break out” moment.

10.5 site selection/analysisHaving spent some time deciding on identifying sites, I felt that the choice became important in my designs. The key to the

competition was developing a “forgotten space”. The site that I used was under-utilised, however I had the potential to reinvigorate a neighbourhood.

I have learned from this project that it is important to choose a site in a neighbourhood that can provide a service or connection to the local inhabitants. This includes looking at what is needed for the specific area, and then providing the creative solution.

10.6 concept developmentThroughout the development of the concepts I had in mind that primarily the space needed to be usable, that it would also be necessary to create a strong visual presence, especially taking into account the university building next to the site. I worked on a number of concepts from examples I had found in Sheffield and by researching other projects.

My final concept was a mix of visual and public use (figure 10.1). This also echoed art works by Claes Oldenburg and Anthony Gormley. By re-examining my ideas, I have learned that I need to simplify my ideas, especially for a small site. My graphic style was a mix of sketches and 3D modeling. Due to the fact that I was using this competition as a way to learn new techniques, I had the

Figure 10.1: Plan view of design concept

Page 63: Reflective Practice Report

tendency, like my designs, to mix too many styles. I could have better served my project with saving the different styles for my notebook, and excluding them from the competition sheet.

10.7 winning entriesBy revisiting the winning entries to both London and Sheffield, it can be seen that a simple idea that gets the point across is more effective than trying to offer a concept that covers a range of answers. In hindsight, I should have chosen one theme, similar to how the London competition was judged via, growing, play, civic and inhabited spaces.

10.8 conclusionsThere are some critical points that have been

57

raised throughout this section that I have acknowledged as being important as part of the learning process. Firstly, a successful team needs to be in place. Competitions are a good way of learning new design techniques and gaining exposure. It is important to identify the reasons behind the entry in order to mimimise wasted time and resources. If the competition allows, ensure that the site selected is viable for the proposed designs. This could tie in with the competition choice.

The next point is on graphic styles. Use one or two styles, but don’t mix and match. There needs to be clarity in the presentation. Finally, the designs need to be refined and simplified to ensure that they are understandable. It is as much about the design as the idea that you are selling.

Page 64: Reflective Practice Report

10. conclusions + recommendations

Page 65: Reflective Practice Report

conclusions + recommendations

It is an important part of the designers toolkit to enable

them to learn from previous experience to enable personal and professional development

11.1 introductionThis report was concerned with gaining an understanding of the design competition process by using reflective practice as a method for experiential learning. The Forgotten Spaces competition was entered that formed the basis of this report.

11.2 overviewIt is an important part of the designers toolkit to enable them to learn from previous experience to enable personal and professional development. There are various methods of reflective practice. The method chosen for this report is the model developed by David Kolb.

59

Page 66: Reflective Practice Report

Where applicable in each section, reflective practice was undertaken after recording this in my notebook (figure 11.1). This has created a list of key tasks, the challenges, and how to use them in the future. What has become apparent is the fact that there are a number of key challenges and motivations for entering and ensuring success in design competitions. These can both be controlled and out of the control of the designer. At the end of the day, the client, who may have no design training has a defined role where the success of the competition will be judged not only on the entries but, also on the brief written to enable the designers to effectively produce an interpretation of them.

The word map detailed in Figure 11.2 shows the most important criteria, developed from this report, to be successful in entering design competitions.

11.3 recommendationsFollowing on from this reflective practice study of a design competition, I can make the following recommendations, personal to me, that would aid me in moving forward:

1. Develop a way of keeping track of tasks and continued learning

2. Ensure that you put together a successful

Ensure that if you need expertise in a specialist field

you obtain this, unless you can supply it yourself

Figure 11.1: design notebook, and desk!

Page 67: Reflective Practice Report

team, or that the project leader is confident in running the team to ensure that each team member is fully aware of their role

3. Ensure that if you need expertise in a specialist field you obtain this, unless you can supply it yourself

4. Choose the design competition carefully and have the resources, manpower, and knowledge within the competition timescale

5. Carry out a detailed site inspection and analysis as this will guide you towards idea generation

6. Produce a number of concepts and work through each one until deciding on the best-fit

7. Learn from the entries, both personally and the competition as whole to gain an understanding of how to develop your skills for the future

8. Enjoy the experience and have fun!

11.4 conclusionsReflective practice is becoming more important within the design professions, given its way of continuous learning and developing skills and tasks used in one situation and adapting them to another. The reason for this report is to highlight the strategies, motivations, skills, and knowledge that was gained and developed by undertaking

61

Enjoy yourself and have fun!

Figure 11.2: criteria for success in competiitions

Page 68: Reflective Practice Report

not only the design competition, but from researching learning styles, and speaking with more experienced practitioners on how they value (or de-value in some cases) design competitions.

What was hoped from the start of this project was the development of new skills. This has been a success and has led to be becoming a successful reflective practitioner. The overall reflection from this project can be found in figure 11.3.

task Design Competitons Site Analysis Design Conceptsdoing Researching design

competitionsCarried out site visits to both London and Sheffield. Chose site based on locality, planning, and ease of maximisation of design potential

Sketching a number of ideas

reviewing Success is multi-facted with key components being, experimentation, passion, and teamwork

Reviewed once into the design process that choice of site could have been bet-ter given the broad scope of the compe-tition.

Evaluating ideas against competition criteria and feedback from peers

learning Developing an understanding of what I can use for the next competition and make me stand out form the crowd

Look at the site carefully how it could fully meet the challenges of the brief. In this case I could have used a site to have fun with designs.

Developing awareness of producing a concept from pen sketches

planning (or trying out)

Developing a framework to ensure that I can be successful in my next entry

As above. Using skills developed from concepts to produce the final design and submissionFigure 11.3: Overall

personal reflection

Page 69: Reflective Practice Report

references

task Design Competitons Site Analysis Design Conceptsdoing Researching design

competitionsCarried out site visits to both London and Sheffield. Chose site based on locality, planning, and ease of maximisation of design potential

Sketching a number of ideas

reviewing Success is multi-facted with key components being, experimentation, passion, and teamwork

Reviewed once into the design process that choice of site could have been bet-ter given the broad scope of the compe-tition.

Evaluating ideas against competition criteria and feedback from peers

learning Developing an understanding of what I can use for the next competition and make me stand out form the crowd

Look at the site carefully how it could fully meet the challenges of the brief. In this case I could have used a site to have fun with designs.

Developing awareness of producing a concept from pen sketches

planning (or trying out)

Developing a framework to ensure that I can be successful in my next entry

As above. Using skills developed from concepts to produce the final design and submission

Page 70: Reflective Practice Report

referencesA place in the heart of Oslo (und.) [Online image], Available from: <http://www.metwork.co.uk/> [Accessed 10 July 2011].

Aerial map of Denmark 2011) [Online image], Available from: <http://www.bing.com/maps/> [Accessed 2 November 2011].

Aerial view of Sheffield (2011) [Online image], Available from: <http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&tab=wl> [Accessed 2 February 2011].

Amulay, J, (2004) What is Reflective Practice?, The Center for Reflective Community Practice at MIT, MIT Press, Cambridge

Benson, H, and Proctor, W, (2003) The Breakout Principle, Scribner, New York.

Bird’s eye view of Sheffield (2011) [Online image], Available from: <http://www.bing.com/maps/> [Accessed 2 February 2011].

Bird’s eye view of Dartford Tunned (2011) [Online image], Available from: <http://www.bing.com/maps/> [Accessed 2 February 2011].

Bolton, G, (2010) Reflective Practice, Writing and Professional Development, 3rd ed. SAGE, California.

Burns, T, & Sinfield, S, (2003) Essential Study Skills. The complete guide to success @ university, Sage Publishing, London

England, E, (2011) [internet] in ‘Sheffield Telegraph’, Design winner lights the way for a brighter and safer future. Available from: < http://www.sheffieldtelegraph.co.uk/news/local/design_winner_lights_the_way_for_a_brighter_and_safer_future_1_3828735 > [Accessed 25 October 2011].

Frog Walk (2011) [Online image], Available from: <http://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/home/riba-forgotten-spaces-2011> [Accessed 15 November 2011].

Gas Holder (2011) [Online image], Available from: <http://www.flickr.com/photos/60650565@N03/5553708260/sizes/m/in/photostream/> [Accessed 30 November 2011].

Gourly, B, (2000) We can all learn to be creative in the right environment: the challenge is too prove it, The Independent, 27 June, pg.5.

Hepworth Wakefield (und.) [Online image], Available from: <http://www.iwan.com/photo_Hepworth_Wakefield_David_Chipperfield.php?plaat=03Hepworth-W-DCA-3663.jpg> [Accessed 30 November 2011].

Hopekirk, E (2011) Working Abroad: Metropolitan Workshop, Building Design, 18 April, pg. 3.(in)Spires (2011) [Online image], Available from: <http://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/home/riba-forgotten-spaces-2011> [Accessed 15 November 2011].

Itin, C, M, (1999) Reasserting the Philosophy of Experiential Education as a Vehicle for Change in the 21st Century. The Journal of Experiential Education, 22(2), pp 91-98.

Joyce, D (2011) [Online image] Argyis and Schon’s model of reflection Available from: <http://leanandkanban.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/double_loop_learning.png> [Accessed 20 February].

Kaplan, R, (1993) The Role of Nature in the Context of the Workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 26, No. 1-4, pp. 193-201.

Kirk, K (2011) [Online image] Kolb’s model of experiential learning. Available from: <http://serc.carleton. edu/images/introgeo/enviroprojects/kolb_cycle.gif> [Accessed 20 February].

Lawson, B, (1980) How Designers Think, Architectural Press, London.

Lawson, B, (2004) What designers know [internet], Taylor & Francis. Available from: Dawsonera <http://

Page 71: Reflective Practice Report

www.dawsonera.com> [accessed 15 June 2011].

Meeds, B, Parkyn, N, and Walton, D, S, (2007) Graphics for Urban Design, Thomas Telford, London

Merideth, D (2011) [Online image] John’s reflection cycle Available from: <http://bejlt.brookes.ac.uk/uploads/meredith2.jpgf> [Accessed 20 February].

Moon, J, A, (2004) A Handbook of Reflective and Experiential Learning: Theory and Practice, Routledge, London.

Opéra de Sydney (2007) [Online image], Available from: <http://www.flickr.com/photos/misterbobo/6255976863/sizes/m/in/pool-sydneyoperahouse/> [Accessed 2 November 2011].

Passing over Helsinki (2007) [Online image], Available from: <http://www.flickr.com/photos/bergie/371805006/in/photostream/> [Accessed 2 November 2011].

Pirhohen, A, and Papa, D (2009) [internet] Running the competitions the European way. Available fromL ,http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110118095356/http://www.cabe.org.uk/articles/running-competitions-the-european-way. [Accessed 15 April 2011]

Rolfe’s Model of reflection (2011) [Online image]

Available from: <http://rpmedia.ask.com/ts?u=/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/51/Steph_Rol_Model.jpg/180px-Steph_Rol_Model.jpg> [Accessed 20 February].

Roller, M, (2009), How to Win a Design Competition [internet]. Available from: <http://www.michaelroller.com/?p=793> [Accessed 3 May 2011].

SBB Switch Tower (2006) [Online image], Available from: <http://www.flickr.com/photos/conarcist/2785915550/sizes/l/in/photostream/> [Accessed 5 March 2011].

Schön, D, (1983) The Reflective Practitioner, Basic Books, New York.

Sheffield City Council (2011) [internet] Tourist Information. Available from: < http://www.sheffield.gov.uk/out--about/tourist-information > [Accessed 30 May 2011]

Sheffield Steel (2010) [Online image], Available from: <http://www.flickr.com/photos/revstan/5106468339/> [Accessed 29 November 2011].

Shuttlecocks (2007) [Online image], Available from: <http://www.flickr.com/photos/hanneorla/1439478736/sizes/z/in/photostream/> [Accessed 29 November 2011].

Smith, M, K, (2001), David A. Kolb on experiential learning’ [internet]. The encyclopedia of informal education. Available from: <http://www.infed.org/biblio/b-explrn.htm> [Accessed 13 June 2011].

Street view of Victoria Dock Road (2011) [Online image], Available from: <http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&tab=wl> [Accessed 2 November 2011].Woodman, E, (2011) Right now, no one’s a winner. Building Design, 26 August, pg. 5.

Wyld’s Great Globe (2011) [Online image], Available from: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Greatglobe_sectional.png> [Accessed 29 November 2011].

Page 72: Reflective Practice Report

appendices

Page 73: Reflective Practice Report

appendix a

Page 74: Reflective Practice Report

FORGOTTEN SPACES 2011 DUE DATE:12 MAY 2011

12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

18 25 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 12

WEEKS TO GO -->

EASTER HOLIDAYS

CHANGES FOLLOWING

REVIEW

ECO

MARCH MAYFEBRUARY

LA

ST

DA

Y F

OR

PO

ST

ING

DESIGN CONCEPTS

MEETINGS WITH CHRIS

APRIL

INTERIM REVIEW

FINAL PREPARATIONS

FINAL REVIEW

SUBMISSION

DEVELOP DESIGNS

PREPARE DRAFTS

INITIAL PLANNING

RESEARCH

appendix b

Page 75: Reflective Practice Report
Page 76: Reflective Practice Report

richard james maccowanma urban design 2010/12