region 14 june 2011 - in.gov€¦ · for apr 2011 to jun 2011 percent resulting in removal count...

Department of Child Services

Practice Indicator Reports

Published

For June 2011

June 2011

July 2011

Region 14

Data in the report (both historical and current) may be subject to change as it is continually being validated and updated. This may result in statistical data in previous reports to be inconsistent with statistics found in more recent reports even when the data pertain to the same time period.

This report uses data collected over a rolling three month period ending with the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use a rolling three month period ending with the historical month listed. Reports Taken – This section has data regarding the reports taken during the three month period ending with the report month.

Count – This is the total number of reports of abuse or neglect that are entered into ICWIS during the period ending with the report month.

Percent Resulting in Screen Outs – This is the percentage of reports that are screened out divided by the total reports taken during the period ending with the report month.

Assessments Substantiated – This section has data regarding the number of assessments with substantiated findings of abuse and/or neglect during the three month period ending with the report month.

Count – This is the total number of assessments with substantiated findings of abuse and/or neglect during the period ending with the report month.

Percent Resulting in Removal – This is the percentage of substantiated assessments during the period that resulted in removal of the child from the home by the end of the report month divided by the total number of substantiated assessments during the period ending with the report month.

DCS Practice Indicator Report

Initial Assessment - Use of Substitute Care

For June 2011

Report Description

July 04 2011

Prepared by:

Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

2

2,089 38.82% 311 33.76%


Initial Assessment - Use of Substitute Care

Location Reports Taken

Percent Resulting in Screen Outs

For Apr 2011 to Jun 2011

Percent Resulting in Removal

CountCount

Assessments Substantiated


Statewide 40,304 36.1% 6,007 28.9%

Region 14

For June 2011

June 2011 Statewide Percent Removal Trend

Region 14 For June 2010 to June 2011

30.8

31.3 31.5

30.4

29.629.2

30.3

30.8 30.8

30.430.6

30.3

28.9

27.5

28

28.5

29

29.5

30

30.5

31

31.5

32

06-

'10

07-

'10

08-

'10

09-

'10

10-

'10

11-

'10

12-

'10

01-

'11

02-

'11

03-

'11

04-

'11

05-

'11

06-

'11

Percent Removal

Region 14 Percent Removal

Month Reports Taken

Percent Resulting in Screen Outs


Percent Resulting in Removal

CountCount

Assessments Substantiated

For Apr 2011 to Jun 2011 32.6 33.0 32.7

30.132.2

34.338.1 37.4

39.8

34.731.6 30.0

33.8

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

06-

'10

07-

'10

08-

'10

09-

'10

10-

'10

11-

'10

12-

'10

01-

'11

02-

'11

03-

'11

04-

'11

05-

'11

06-

'11

Percent Removal

Bartholomew 510 37.5% 53 34.0%

Jackson 312 33.7% 43 25.6%

Jennings 256 39.1% 65 41.5%

Johnson 723 41.2% 118 31.4%

Shelby 288 40.6% 32 37.5%

Jun 2011 2,089 38.8% 311 33.8%

May 2011 2,133 38.4% 357 30.0%

Apr 2011 2,010 38.0% 358 31.6%

Mar 2011 2,054 35.8% 354 34.7%

Feb 2011 1,957 35.6% 332 39.8%

Jan 2011 2,023 36.7% 366 37.4%

Dec 2010 2,019 37.8% 420 38.1%

Nov 2010 2,125 38.5% 379 34.3%

Oct 2010 2,148 37.9% 360 32.2%

Sep 2010 2,031 36.9% 336 30.1%

Aug 2010 1,956 35.2% 349 32.7%

Jul 2010 1,951 32.3% 394 33.0%

Jun 2010 2,136 26.7% 405 32.6%

July 04 2011

Prepared by:


Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana


302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739 3

This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of the historical month listed. This report looks at CHINS children from CHINS cases that were open on the last day of the report month. It also collects where that child is located (in their own home or in substitute care). For the purpose of this report, a child with a non-custodial parent is considered “in home”. Total CHINS Count – This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the report month. CHINS – This section has data regarding all children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month.

In Home – This section has data regarding children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home divided by the total number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month.

Foster Care – This section has data regarding children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement divided by the total number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month.

Out of Home Placements – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement.

Relative Homes – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed with relatives. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed with relatives. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed with relatives divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

Foster Homes – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in foster homes.

Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in foster homes. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in foster homes divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

Residential – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in residential setting. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in residential setting. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in residential setting divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

Other – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in other placement settings. Example would be a court ordered unlicensed placement.

Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in other placement settings. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in other placement settings divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

Report Description

DCS Practice Indicator ReportCHINS Placements by County

For June 2011

July 01 2011

Prepared byOffice of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

Source:ICWIS Monthly Data

State of IndianaMitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director



For June 2011

CHINS Placements by County

Location Total CHINS

Foster Homes ResidentialIn Home Relative Home OtherCount % Count %Count % Count %

Region 14 719 251218 204 40 6501 40.7% 50.1% 8.0% 1.2%Statewide 13694 50504105 3514 844 1819,589 36.6% 52.7% 8.8% 1.9%

Statewide Foster Care Placement Breakdown

Region 14 Foster Care Placement Breakdown

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

06-'1

007

-'10

08-'1

009

-'10

10-'1

011

-'10

12-'1

001

-'11

02-'1

103

-'11

04-'1

105

-'11

06-'1

1

Relative Foster Home Residential Other

Foster Care

Out of Home Placements

%

30.3%30.0%

%

69.7%70.0%

Count Count Count

CHINS

0

10

20

30

40

50

6006

-'10

07-'1

008

-'10

09-'1

010

-'10

11-'1

012

-'10

01-'1

102

-'11

03-'1

104

-'11

05-'1

106

-'11

Relative Foster Home Residential Other

June 2011

Region 14 For June 2010 to June 2011Month Total

CHINSFoster Homes ResidentialIn Home Relative Home OtherCount % Count %Count % Count %

Foster Care

Out of Home Placements

% %Count Count Count

CHINS

Bartholomew 154 7032 32 20 020.8% 26.2% 57.4% 16.4% 0.0%122 79.2%Jackson 103 5226 22 1 225.2% 28.6% 67.5% 1.3% 2.6%77 74.8%Jennings 198 6361 66 7 130.8% 48.2% 46.0% 5.1% 0.7%137 69.2%Johnson 199 6066 64 8 133.2% 48.1% 45.1% 6.0% 0.8%133 66.8%Shelby 65 633 20 4 250.8% 62.5% 18.8% 12.5% 6.3%32 49.2%

Jun 2011 719 251218 204 40 630.3% 40.7% 50.1% 8.0% 1.2%501 69.7%May 2011 726 254209 211 44 828.8% 40.8% 49.1% 8.5% 1.5%517 71.2%Apr 2011 732 263208 202 50 928.4% 38.5% 50.2% 9.5% 1.7%524 71.6%Mar 2011 711 268191 207 39 626.9% 39.8% 51.5% 7.5% 1.2%520 73.1%Feb 2011 723 272198 203 42 827.4% 38.7% 51.8% 8.0% 1.5%525 72.6%Jan 2011 718 266194 206 41 1127.0% 39.3% 50.8% 7.8% 2.1%524 73.0%Dec 2010 702 255195 199 42 1127.8% 39.3% 50.3% 8.3% 2.2%507 72.2%Nov 2010 717 259181 219 46 1225.2% 40.9% 48.3% 8.6% 2.2%536 74.8%Oct 2010 689 265148 229 43 421.5% 42.3% 49.0% 7.9% 0.7%541 78.5%Sep 2010 696 272154 216 51 322.1% 39.9% 50.2% 9.4% 0.6%542 77.9%Aug 2010 687 252164 218 48 523.9% 41.7% 48.2% 9.2% 1.0%523 76.1%Jul 2010 697 254169 221 49 424.2% 41.9% 48.1% 9.3% 0.8%528 75.8%Jun 2010 693 241185 210 53 426.7% 41.3% 47.4% 10.4% 0.8%508 73.3%

July 01 2011





This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of thehistorical month listed. This report looks at CHINS children from CHINS cases that were open on the last day of the report month. It also collects where that child is located (in their own home or in substitute care). For the purpose of this report, children with non-custodial parents are considered to be in their own home. IA Count – This is the number of children that have an open Informal Adjustment case on the last day of the report month. Total CHINS Count – This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the report month. IA, In Home or Relative Care – This section has data regarding children that have an open IA case or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care.

Count- This is the number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care divided by the total number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month. Target (At or Above) % – The target for the percent of the number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care to the total number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month is 50% or higher.

Non Relative Foster Care – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care.

Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care divided by the total number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month. Target (At or below) % – The target for the percent of the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care to the total number of children that have an open IA or CHINS case on the last day of the month is 50% or higher.

Report Description

DCS Practice Indicator ReportSafely Home Families First by County

June 2011

July 04 2011

Prepared by:Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis





Region 14 719 549 297Statewide 13694 9440 6,075

Statewide Foster Care Placement Breakdown

Region 14 Foster Care Placement Breakdown

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

06-'1

007

-'10

08-'1

009

-'10

10-'1

011

-'10

12-'1

001

-'11

02-'1

103

-'11

04-'1

105

-'11

06-'1

1

In Home or Relative Foster Care Target

Non-Relative Foster Care

%

64.9%60.8%

%

35.1%39.2%

Count Count Count

IA, In Home CHINS, or Relative Care

June 2011



For June 2011

Safely Home Families First by County

Target (At or

Above) %

Target (At or

Below) %

50.0%50.0%

50.0%50.0%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

7006

-'10

07-'1

008

-'10

09-'1

010

-'10

11-'1

012

-'10

01-'1

102

-'11

03-'1

104

-'11

05-'1

106

-'11

In Home or Relative Foster Care Target

IA

1271821Count


Non-Relative Foster Care

% %Count Count Count

IA, In Home CHINS, or Relative Care

Target (At or

Above) %

Target (At or

Below) %

IA

Count

Bartholomew 154 100 9052.6% 50.0%50.0% 47.4%36Jackson 103 58 5551.3% 50.0%50.0% 48.7%10Jennings 198 129 7164.5% 50.0%50.0% 35.5%2Johnson 199 196 6974.0% 50.0%50.0% 26.0%66Shelby 65 66 1284.6% 50.0%50.0% 15.4%13

June 2011 719 549 29764.9% 50.0%50.0% 35.1%127May 2011 726 547 30664.1% 50.0%50.0% 35.9%127April 2011 732 524 32261.9% 50.0%50.0% 38.1%114March 2011 711 520 31362.4% 50.0%50.0% 37.6%122February 2011 723 516 32261.6% 50.0%50.0% 38.4%115January 2011 718 504 31861.3% 50.0%50.0% 38.7%104December 2010 702 495 30861.6% 50.0%50.0% 38.4%101November 2010 717 500 31761.2% 50.0%50.0% 38.8%100October 2010 689 486 31260.9% 50.0%50.0% 39.1%109September 2010 696 461 32658.6% 50.0%50.0% 41.4%91August 2010 687 479 30561.1% 50.0%50.0% 38.9%97July 2010 697 498 30761.9% 50.0%50.0% 38.1%108June 2010 693 509 29863.1% 50.0%50.0% 36.9%114

July 05 2011





This report uses data collected over at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. For the purpose of this report, children with their non-custodial parents are considered to be in their own home. Total Out of Home Placements – This is the total number of CHINS children that are in out of home placement on the last day of the report month. Placed in Same County – This is the total number of CHINS children that are placed in the same county as the county of their case. Percent Locally Placed – This is the percentage of CHINS children that are placed in the same county as the county of their case divided by the total number of CHINS children which are in out of home placement on the last day of the report month.

DCS Practice Indicator ReportLocally Placed CHINS

For June 2011

Report Description

July 01 2011





8

Locally Placed CHINSDCS Practice Indicator Report

For June 2011

501 353 70.5%

Location Total Out of Home

Placements

Placed in Same County

Percent Locally Placed

Statewide 9,589 6,833 71.3%Region 14

June 2011


73.4

72.972.6 72.5 72.4

71.7 71.8

71.0

71.571.1 71.1 71.3 71.3

69.5

70

70.5

71

71.5

72

72.5

73

73.5

74

Jun '1

0Ju

l '10

Aug '10

Sep '1

0Oct

'10Nov '

10Dec

'10

Jan '1

1Feb

'11

Mar '1

1Apr '1

1May

'11

Jun '1

1

Statewide Percent Placed Locally

Region 14 Percent Placed Locally

72.271.8

72.5 72.373.0

72.2

69.6

68.567.8 67.9

68.3

69.870.5

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74Ju

n '10

Jul '1

0Aug '

10Sep

'10

Oct '10

Nov '10

Dec '1

0Ja

n '11

Feb '1

1Mar

'11

Apr '11

May '1

1Ju

n '11

Month Total Out of Home

Placements

Placed in Same County

Percent Locally Placed

122 76 62.3%Bartholomew77 60 77.9%Jackson137 104 75.9%Jennings133 90 67.7%Johnson32 23 71.9%Shelby

501 353 70.5%Jun 2011517 361 69.8%May 2011524 358 68.3%Apr 2011520 353 67.9%Mar 2011525 356 67.8%Feb 2011524 359 68.5%Jan 2011507 353 69.6%Dec 2010536 387 72.2%Nov 2010541 395 73.0%Oct 2010542 392 72.3%Sep 2010523 379 72.5%Aug 2010528 379 71.8%Jul 2010508 367 72.2%Jun 2010

July 01 2011





This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. Average Number of Placements Per Child – This is the total number of out of home placements for each CHINS child in out of home placement on the last day of the report month. This includes all placements during the current removal episode. If a child had at least one placement end in the first 8 days from removal, then that child's number of placements was reduced by one. This number is divided by the total number CHINS children who are in out of home placement on the last day of the report month.

DCS Practice Indicator ReportAverage Number of Placements

For June 2011

Report Description

July 01 2011





Location Average Number of Placements Per

Child


For June 2010 to June 2011

Average Number of Placements

Statewide Average Number of Placements

2.44

2.46

2.48

2.5

2.52

2.54

2.56

06-'10

07-'10

08-'10

09-'10

10-'10

11-'10

12-'10

01-'11

02-'11

03-'11

04-'11

05-'11

06-'11

Average Placements

June 2011

Region 14 For June 2010 to June 2011 Region 14 Average Number of Placements

2.3Statewide 2.5Region 14

Month Average Number of Placements Per

Child

2

2.05

2.1

2.15

2.2

2.25

2.3

2.35

2.4

06-'10

07-'10

08-'10

09-'10

10-'10

11-'10

12-'10

01-'11

02-'11

03-'11

04-'11

05-'11

06-'11

Average Placements

3.1Bartholomew2.5Jackson1.8Jennings2.3Johnson1.8Shelby

2.3June 20112.3May 20112.3April 20112.3March 20112.3February 20112.3January 20112.2December 20102.2November 20102.2October 20102.2September 20102.2August 20102.2July 20102.1June 2010

July 01 2011





This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of the historimonth listed. For the purpose of this report, children with a non-custodial parent are considered to be in their own home. Count of Sibling Cases – This is the number of open cases as of the end of the report month which have more than one child in out of home placement at thend of the report month. Cases With All Children Placed Together – This is the number of cases with more than one child in out of home placement where all of the children are placed in the same resource with the same resource ID. Percent Placed Together of Sibling Cases– This is the percentage of the number of cases where all of the children in out of home placement are placed together divided by the number of open cases with more than one child in out of home placement as of the end of the report month. Average Number of Children per Case – This number takes the number of children in out of home placement from cases with more than one child in out of home placement and divides it by the number of cases with more than one child in out of home placement as of the end of the report month.

DCS Practice Indicator ReportSibling Placement Report

For June 2011

Report Description

July 01 2011





12

June 2011


Location Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Average Number of Children per

Case

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

133 96 2.6772.2%Statewide 2378 1728 2.7172.7%Region 14

71.4 71.4 71.3 71.471.0

70.6 70.6 70.7

71.671.9 71.9 72.0

72.7

69.5

70

70.5

71

71.5

72

72.5

73

06-'10

07-'10

08-'10

09-'10

10-'10

11-'10

12-'10

01-'11

02-'11

03-'11

04-'11

05-'11

06-'11

Percent Together

Statewide Percent Together

Region 14 Percent Together


June 2011

Sibling Placement Report

74.5

76.8

74.8

71.4

73.772.4

75.5

73.675.0

72.1

69.8

71.372.2

66

68

70

72

74

76

78

06-'10

07-'10

08-'10

09-'10

10-'10

11-'10

12-'10

01-'11

02-'11

03-'11

04-'11

05-'11

06-'11

Percent Together

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Average Number of Children per

Case

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Bartholomew 36 26 2.3972.2%Jackson 22 17 2.6877.3%Jennings 37 30 2.8181.1%Johnson 31 20 2.9064.5%Shelby 7 3 2.2942.9%

June 2011 133 96 2.6772.2%May 2011 136 97 2.6871.3%April 2011 139 97 2.6769.8%March 2011 136 98 2.6972.1%February 2011 140 105 2.6675.0%January 2011 140 103 2.6673.6%December 2010 139 105 2.6075.5%November 2010 152 110 2.5672.4%October 2010 152 112 2.5773.7%September 2010 154 110 2.5971.4%August 2010 147 110 2.5674.8%July 2010 151 116 2.5076.8%June 2010 141 105 2.5374.5%

July 01 2011





This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of the historical month listed. This report looks at CHINS children that were in out of home placement at the end of the month. It measures the number of days since the child was last removed from its home. One Year - 0 to 365 Days– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 0 and 365 days since the child’sremoval.

Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 0 and 365 days since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 0 and 365 days since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

One Year - 366 to 730 Days– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 366 and 730 days since the clast removal.

Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 366 and 730 days since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 366 and 730 days since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

One Year - 731 to 1095 Days– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 731 to 1095 days since the child’s last removal.

Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 731 to 1095 days since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 731 to 1095 days since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

One Year - 1096 Days+– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement 1096 days or more since the child’s last removal.

Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement 1096 days or more since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement 1096 days or more since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

Length Per Child – This column shows data for length of time of CHINS children who were in out of home placement at the end of the report month have been in out of home placement since the child’s last removal from their home.

Average- This column calculates the average or “mean” length of time in out of home placement since the last removal per child in out of home placement at the end of the report month. Median- This column calculates the median length of time in out of home placement since the last removal per child in out of home placement at the end of the report month.

Report Description

DCS Practice Indicator ReportLength of Stay in Out of Home Placement

Children in Out of Home Placement by Length of Time Since Latest RemovalFor June 2011

July 01 2011





14

257 130 51 6351.3% 25.9% 10.2% 12.6% 512.4

DCS Practice Indicator ReportLength of Stay in Out of Home Placement

Children in Out of Home Placement by Length of Time Since Latest Removal

Location One Year0 to 365 Days

Two Years366 to 730 Days

Three Years731 to 1095 Days

Three + Years1096 Days+

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

For June 2011

Average Median

Length Per Child

June 2011


Statewide Median Length

Region 14 Median Length

4,339 2,397 1,208 1,64445.3% 25.0% 12.6% 17.1% 639.6Statewide 414.4Region 14 350.6

363371

377 375381

388399 398

402 402408 413 414

330340350360370380390400410420

06-'10

07-'10

08-'10

09-'10

10-'10

11-'10

12-'10

01-'11

02-'11

03-'11

04-'11

05-'11

06-'11

Median

298 290 280260 275

296319 332 324 335 329 340 351

050

100

150200250300

350400

06-'10

07-'10

08-'10

09-'10

10-'10

11-'10

12-'10

01-'11

02-'11

03-'11

04-'11

05-'11

06-'11

Median

Month One Year0 to 365 Days

Two Years366 to 730 Days

Three Years731 to 1095 Days

Three + Years1096 Days+

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Average Median

Length Per Child

46 27 21 2837.7% 22.1% 17.2% 23.0% 724.5Bartholomew 557.540 23 5 951.9% 29.9% 6.5% 11.7% 465.1Jackson 358.781 30 15 1159.1% 21.9% 10.9% 8.0% 402.4Jennings 260.468 43 9 1351.1% 32.3% 6.8% 9.8% 499.1Johnson 352.622 7 1 268.8% 21.9% 3.1% 6.3% 343.7Shelby 176.0

257 130 51 6351.3% 25.9% 10.2% 12.6% 512.4June 2011 350.6279 117 50 7154.0% 22.6% 9.7% 13.7% 513.0May 2011 340.3285 114 60 6554.4% 21.8% 11.5% 12.4% 509.0April 2011 329.0279 123 56 6253.7% 23.7% 10.8% 11.9% 515.6March 2011 335.0283 122 62 5853.9% 23.2% 11.8% 11.0% 507.2February 2011 324.4289 113 71 5155.2% 21.6% 13.5% 9.7% 506.5January 2011 332.0277 113 65 5254.6% 22.3% 12.8% 10.3% 507.4December 2010 318.6303 119 61 5356.5% 22.2% 11.4% 9.9% 483.2November 2010 296.0312 116 64 4957.7% 21.4% 11.8% 9.1% 460.9October 2010 275.5311 115 72 4457.4% 21.2% 13.3% 8.1% 449.3September 2010 260.0301 113 66 4357.6% 21.6% 12.6% 8.2% 450.3August 2010 279.6307 111 71 3958.1% 21.0% 13.4% 7.4% 450.5July 2010 290.0296 110 64 3858.3% 21.7% 12.6% 7.5% 450.2June 2010 298.0

July 01 2011





This report uses CHINS and IA case types that have case type status end date occurring during the month. It then groups these cases using the closure reasons codes into categories of closure reasons. Case with closure reason code “Case opened in error – disregard” are filtered out for the purpose of this report. This report uses the reason codes selected by the worker at the date of case closure. Adoption closure reasons will not match the number of actual finalized adoptions reported from the hearing information fields in ICWIS/MaGik. Closure Reasons are group by:

Description Category Description Category Child Reunited with Parents Reunification Case closed; AG case created Guardianship Child never Removed from own home, wardship terminated

Reunification Child placed with relatives Relative

Extended wardship terminated (on court order for age 18 to 21)

Emancipation Child Placed with Legal guardian Guardianship

Child Returned to Primary Home Reunification Child Reached Age of Majority (age 18) Emancipation Period of IA ended code used for Informal Adjustment cases only

Reunification Emancipated Court Ordered (age 18) Emancipation

Child Adoption Finalized Adoption Child Already Reunited with parent (s) when wardship terminated

Reunification

The Permanency column “Total” refers to the total case with reason codes in the Reunification, Adoption, Relative, Guardianship, and Emancipation categories. The Permanency column “Total within 24 months” refers to the total case that ended within 24 month of the case status type begin date in the Reunification, Adoption, Relative, Guardianship, and Emancipation categories.

DCS Practice Indicator ReportCHINS and IA Permanency Report

For June 2011

Report Description

July 05 2011





16

DCS Practice Indicator ReportCHINS and IA Permanency Report

For June 2011

Statewide Permanency within 24 Months

Region 14 Permanency within 24 Months

StatewideRegion 14

84.1

85.484.5

88.1

86.5

85.0

82.9

86.1

88.4

87.0

85.5

83.7

85.1

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

06-'10

07-'10

08-'10

09-'10

10-'10

11-'10

12-'10

01-'11

02-'11

03-'11

04-'11

05-'11

06-'11

563 76 12 64 4525 1 0 3 2

Location

Reunification Adoption Relative Guardianship Emanicipation76031

TotalClosed Cases Types with Permanency Outcomes

85.180.6

24 Month Rate

64725

Within 24 Months

Permanency

June 2011

Region 14 For June 2010 to June 2011Location

Reunification Adoption Relative Guardianship EmanicipationTotal

Closed Cases Types with Permanency Outcomes24 Month

RateWithin 24

Months

Permanency

90.6 93.684.4

97.588.9 91.7 93.2 97.1

77.1

92.5 93.9

77.1 80.6

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

06-'10

07-'10

08-'10

09-'10

10-'10

11-'10

12-'10

01-'11

02-'11

03-'11

04-'11

05-'11

06-'11

Bartholomew 5 1 0 0 0 6 33.32Jackson 7 0 0 2 0 9 100.09Jennings 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.00Johnson 12 0 0 1 0 13 100.013Shelby 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.01

Jun 2011 25 1 0 3 2 31 80.625May 2011 19 8 0 7 1 35 77.127Apr 2011 26 2 0 4 1 33 93.931Mar 2011 27 5 0 5 3 40 92.537Feb 2011 16 3 5 11 0 35 77.127Jan 2011 25 1 0 8 1 35 97.134Dec 2010 30 2 0 11 1 44 93.241Nov 2010 16 2 2 4 0 24 91.722Oct 2010 27 2 1 4 2 36 88.932Sep 2010 27 1 3 9 0 40 97.539Aug 2010 20 7 0 5 0 32 84.427Jul 2010 39 3 1 4 0 47 93.644Jun 2010 43 1 0 5 4 53 90.648

July 05 2011





This report uses data collected over at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. For the purpose of this report, a person is considered family for the child if they have the following relationships:

Father Mother Stepfather Stepmother Grandfather

Grandmother Pre-adoptive father Pre-adoptive mother Adoptive grandparent Legal Guardian

Children Out of Home Entire Month – This column shows the number of children in out of home placement at the end of the report month who also have a removal date prior to the first of the report month. Contact Information – This section of the reports shows information regarding FCM contacts (from the contact screens) during the report month. FCM with Family – This section of the report shows FCM contacts with the child’s family (as described above) during the report month.

Children – This is the total number of children that the FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family divided by the total number of children in out of home placement for the entire month (as described above).

FCM with Child – This section of the report shows FCM contacts with the child during the report month.

Children – This is the total number of children that the FCM had at least one contact with a the child during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that FCM had at least one contact with the child divided by the total number of children in out of home placement for the entire month (as described above).

FCM with Family and Child – This section of the report shows FCM contacts with the child’s family (as described above) AND the child during the report month. Contact with both had to have occurred for the child to be included in this section. The family and child do not need to present at the same contact, contact with each could have been made in two separate contacts.

Children – This is the total number of children that the FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family and at least one contact with the child during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family and at least one contact with the child during the report month divided by the total number of children in out of home placement for the entire month (as described above).

DCS Practice Indicator ReportFamily Case Manager Contacts Report

For June 2011

Report Description

July 03 2011





18


For June 2011Family Case Manager Contacts Report

Location

Children

Statewide Child Contact Rate

Region 14 Child Contact Rate

June 2011


478 192 40.2%StatewideRegion 14

94.1 93.8

90.892.8 92.6

86.7

96.1

91.3 91.4

93.894.7

93.7

96.4

80.082.084.086.088.090.092.094.096.098.0

Jun '1

0Ju

l '10

Aug '10

Sep '1

0Oct

'10Nov '

10Dec

'10

Jan '1

1Feb

'11

Mar '1

1Apr '1

1May

'11

Jun '1

1

Child Contact

Contact InformationFCM with Family

Rate Children

FCM with Child

Rate Children

FCM with Family and Child

Rate

Children out of home entire

month

185 38.7%461 96.4%9,191 3,019 32.8% 2,980 32.4%9,007 98.0%

Month

Children

Contact InformationFCM with Family

Rate Children

FCM with Child

Rate Children

FCM with Family and Child

Rate

Children out of home entire

month

98.097.8 97.8

97.1

96.6

96.9

97.4 97.597.3

98.1

97.296.9

98.0

95.5

96.0

96.5

97.0

97.5

98.0

98.5

Jun '1

0Ju

l '10

Aug '10

Sep '1

0Oct

'10Nov '

10Dec

'10

Jan '1

1Feb

'11

Mar '1

1Apr '1

1May

'11

Jun '1

1

Child Contact

120 33 27.5%Bartholomew 31 25.8%117 97.5%75 42 56.0%Jackson 40 53.3%71 94.7%129 40 31.0%Jennings 39 30.2%125 96.9%125 65 52.0%Johnson 65 52.0%124 99.2%29 12 41.4%Shelby 10 34.5%24 82.8%

478 192 40.2%Jun 2011 185 38.7%461 96.4%491 166 33.8%May 2011 163 33.2%460 93.7%492 172 35.0%Apr 2011 170 34.6%466 94.7%497 169 34.0%Mar 2011 166 33.4%466 93.8%510 175 34.3%Feb 2011 162 31.8%466 91.4%492 176 35.8%Jan 2011 170 34.6%449 91.3%491 158 32.2%Dec 2010 152 31.0%472 96.1%512 155 30.3%Nov 2010 144 28.1%444 86.7%511 143 28.0%Oct 2010 142 27.8%473 92.6%501 146 29.1%Sep 2010 143 28.5%465 92.8%502 161 32.1%Aug 2010 159 31.7%456 90.8%500 196 39.2%Jul 2010 191 38.2%469 93.8%472 170 36.0%Jun 2010 167 35.4%444 94.1%

July 03 2011





This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. For the purpose of this report, a person is considered family for the child if they have the following relationships:

• Father

• Mother

• Stepfather

• Stepmother

• Grandfather

• Grandmother

• Pre-adoptive father

• Pre-adoptive mother

• Adoptive grandparent

• Legal Guardian Children out of home with case plan goal of reunification – This column shows the number of children in out of home placement at the end of the report month who also have reunification as the most recently entered primary case plan goal. Children with visits to their family during the month – This section of the report shows data regarding children who have had a visit with the child’s family (as described above) begin during the report month.

Children – This is the total number of children that the child had at least one visit with a member of the child’s family during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that the child had at least one visit with a member of the child’s family divided by the total number of children in out of home placement at the end of the report month with case plan goal of reunification(as described above).


Child Visitation Report

For June 2011

Report Description

July 04 2011

Prepared by:


Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana



20


For June 2011

Child Visitation Report

Location

Children

Statewide Visitation Rate

Region 14 Visitation Rate

June 2011


286 86 30.1%

Statewide

Region 14

22.320.2

26.8 26.823.8

27.8

22.624.4

26.9 27.128.5

23.5

30.1

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0Ju

n '10

Jul '

10A

ug '1

0Sep

'10

Oct

'10

Nov

'10

Dec

'10

Jan '1

1Feb

'11

Mar

'11

Apr '

11M

ay '1

1Ju

n '11

Visit Rate

Children with visits to

their family during the month

Rate

Children out of home

with case plan goal of reunification

4,977 1,200 24.1%

Month

17.2 18.2 18.821.2

19.117.3

21.523.6

25.1

27.626.3

23.1 24.1

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

Jun '1

0Ju

l '10

Aug

'10

Sep '1

0O

ct '1

0N

ov '1

0D

ec '1

0Ja

n '11

Feb '1

1M

ar '1

1A

pr '11

May

'11

Jun '1

1

Visit Rate

Children

Chidlren with visits to their family during the

month

Rate

Children out of home with case plan goal of

reunification

Bartholomew 56 13 23.2%

Jackson 47 35 74.5%

Jennings 81 19 23.5%

Johnson 81 13 16.0%

Shelby 21 6 28.6%

Jun 2011 286 86 30.1%

May 2011 289 68 23.5%

Apr 2011 295 84 28.5%

Mar 2011 292 79 27.1%

Feb 2011 290 78 26.9%

Jan 2011 287 70 24.4%

Dec 2010 283 64 22.6%

Nov 2010 317 88 27.8%

Oct 2010 319 76 23.8%

Sep 2010 310 83 26.8%

Aug 2010 314 84 26.8%

Jul 2010 312 63 20.2%

Jun 2010 300 67 22.3%

July 04 2011

Prepared by:


Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana



This is a description of the key elements used in this report. Time Period – The time period used in this report is the 12 months prior to the month of the report. Assessments during time period – The assessment used in this report are assessment with BOTH report date AND approval date during the time period (12 months prior to the month of the report). Victim Selection – The children used in this report were identified as having at least one substantiated allegation of abuse or neglect on an assessment during the time period. First Occurrence – This looks at the victims of substantiated abuse or neglect during the first 6 months of the time period (6 to 12 months prior to the month of the report). If a child was a victim in multiple assessments with substantiated abuse or neglect, the assessment with the earliest report date is considered the first occurrence. Recurrence Time Period – The time period used to see if a child is a substantiated victim in a recurring assessment of abuse or neglect is based off the report date of the first occurrence. The recurrence period begins one day after the first occurrence report date and ends 183 after the first occurrence report date (>= 1st Occurrence +1 and <= 1st Occurrence +183). If a child has multiple recurrences, the earliest report date in the recurring time period is considered the recurring assessment. Here is a visual representation of an example. This is a report for December of a given year. The time period to review assessments would run from Jan 1st to Dec 31st. The time period for a first occurrence would be Jan 1st to Jun 30th. If a child had a first occurrence on Feb 7th, the recurrence period would run from Feb 8th to Aug 9th. If the child had a recurrence in Aug 5th, that would be considered repeat maltreatment. If the child had a recurrence Oct 10th, that would not be considered repeat maltreatment because it fell outside the recurrence period.

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Time Period (Jan 1st to Dec 31st)

1st Occurrence Time Period (Jan 1st to Jun 30th) Recurrence Period (Feb 8th to Aug 9th)

Percent of absence of repeat maltreatment – This calculations uses the terms defined above. The numerator is the number of children with a first occurrence minus the number of children with a recurrence. The denominator is the number of children with first occurrence.

(1st Occurrence – Recurrence) 1st Occurrence

For the purposes of this report, the county the child is assigned to is based off the county of first occurrence. If a child has a recurrence in a different county, the repeat will show for the county of the first occurrence.

DCS Practice Indicator ReportAbsence of Repeat Maltreatment

For June 2011

Report Description

July 01 2011





22

556 490 88.13%10,111 9,445 93.41%Statewide

Region 14

Statewide Absence of Repeat Maltreatment

Region 14 Absence of Repeat Maltreatment92.74

92.47

92.51

92.67 92.22

92.29

92.10

92.24

92.37

92.48

92.81

93.05

93.41

90.5091.0091.5092.0092.5093.0093.5094.0094.5095.00

06-'10

07-'10

08-'10

09-'10

10-'10

11-'10

12-'10

01-'11

02-'11

03-'11

04-'11

05-'11

06-'11

Absence of Repeat Maltreatment Standard

County Absence of Repeat

Maltreatment Percent

Victims from Jul 2010 to Jan

2011

Victims without a recurrence within 6

months

DCS Practice Indicator ReportAbsence of Repeat Maltreatment

For June 2011

June 2011

Region 14 For June 2010 to June 2011County Victims from

Jul 2010 to Jan 2011

Absence of Repeat

Maltreatment Percent

Victims without a recurrence within 6

months

91.05

91.77 90.33

91.03

90.74

90.91 89.86 88.47

87.72

89.01

88.82

88.80

88.13

84.00

86.00

88.00

90.00

92.00

94.00

96.00

06-'10

07-'10

08-'10

09-'10

10-'10

11-'10

12-'10

01-'11

02-'11

03-'11

04-'11

05-'11

06-'11

Absence of Repeat Maltreatment Standard

94.60%94.60%

National Standard

National Standard

97 90 92.78%Bartholomew 94.60%96 83 86.46%Jackson 94.60%134 117 87.31%Jennings 94.60%155 132 85.16%Johnson 94.60%74 68 91.89%Shelby 94.60%

556 490 88.13%June 2011 94.60%616 547 88.80%May 2011 94.60%626 556 88.82%April 2011 94.60%655 583 89.01%March 2011 94.60%676 593 87.72%February 2011 94.60%685 606 88.47%January 2011 94.60%690 620 89.86%December 2010 94.60%682 620 90.91%November 2010 94.60%691 627 90.74%October 2010 94.60%669 609 91.03%September 2010 94.60%641 579 90.33%August 2010 94.60%644 591 91.77%July 2010 94.60%659 600 91.05%June 2010 94.60%

July 01 2011





This is a description of the key elements used in this report. Time Period – The time period used in this report is the 12 months prior to the month of the report. Assessments during the time period – The assessment used in this report are assessment with BOTH report date AND approval date during the time period (12 months prior to the month of the report). Victim of maltreatment in Foster Care – The children used in this report were identified as having at least one substantiated allegation of abuse or neglect on an assessment during the time period where the perpetrator is a foster parent or institutional staff. Children in Foster Care during the time period – All CHINS children with an open removal episode at any time during the 12 months prior to the month of the report. Also included are Probation children (who are IV-E eligible) with an open removal episode at any time during the 12 months prior to the month of the report. Percent of absence of maltreatment – This calculations uses the terms defined above. The numerator is the number of children in foster care minus the number of victims of maltreatment in foster care. The denominator is the number of children in foster care.

(Children in Foster Care – Victims of maltreatment in Foster Care) Children in Foster Care


Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care

For June 2011

Report Description

July 05 2011

Prepared by


Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana



24

20,859 55 99.74%Statewide

Region 14 1,162 3 99.74%

Statewide Trend of Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care

99.5

7

99.5

2

99.5

2

99.5

8

99.6

1

99.6

3

99.6

4

99.6

7

99.6

9

99.7

0

99.7

1

99.7

0

99.7

4

99.2

99.3

99.4

99.5

99.6

99.7

99.8

99.9

100

06- '

1007

- '10

08- '

1009

- '10

10- '

1011

- '10

12- '

1001

- '11

02- '

1103

- '11

04- '

1105

- '11

06- '

11

Maltreatment Standard

Region 14 Trend of Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care

Location Absence of Maltreatment

Percent

For June 2011

Children in Foster Care

from Jul 2010 to Jun 2011

Substantiated Victims in Foster

Care

Region 14 for June 2010 to June 2011

Month Children in Foster Care

from Jul 2010 to Jun 2011

Substantiated Victims in Foster

Care

National Standard

99.68%

Absence of Maltreatment

Percent

National Standard

99.68%


Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care

For June 2011

100.0

0

100.0

0

100.0

0

100.0

0

100.0

0 99.9

1

99.8

2

99.8

2

99.7

3

99.7

3

99.7

3

99.7

4

99.7

4

99.5

99.55

99.6

99.65

99.7

99.75

99.8

99.85

99.9

99.95

100

06- '

1007

- '10

08- '

1009

- '10

10- '

1011

- '10

12- '

1001

- '11

02- '

1103

- '11

04- '

1105

- '11

06- '

11

Maltreatment Standard

Bartholomew 247 0 100.00% 99.68%

Jackson 204 0 100.00% 99.68%

Jennings 268 1 99.63% 99.68%

Johnson 316 2 99.37% 99.68%

Shelby 127 0 100.00% 99.68%

June 2011 1,162 3 99.74% 99.68%

May 2011 1,147 3 99.74% 99.68%

April 2011 1,126 3 99.73% 99.68%

March 2011 1,124 3 99.73% 99.68%

February 2011 1,113 3 99.73% 99.68%

January 2011 1,134 2 99.82% 99.68%

December 2010 1,100 2 99.82% 99.68%

November 2010 1,095 1 99.91% 99.68%

October 2010 1,096 0 100.00% 99.68%

September 2010 1,082 0 100.00% 99.68%

August 2010 1,072 0 100.00% 99.68%

July 2010 1,068 0 100.00% 99.68%

June 2010 1,055 0 100.00% 99.68%

July 05 2011

Prepared by


Source:

ICWIS Monthly Data

State of Indiana



region 14 june 2011 - in.gov€¦ · for apr 2011 to jun 2011 percent resulting in removal count...

Documents