regular meeting of the measure v west side regional
TRANSCRIPT
Regular Meeting of the Measure V West Side Regional Projects Committee
LOCATION City of Dos Palos
City-County Building 1554 Golden Gate Avenue
Dos Palos, CA 93620
DATE Wednesday, February 7, 2018
TIME 2:00 P.M.
West Side Regional Projects Committee Members
City of Dos Palos Michael McGlynn, Councilman City of Gustine Pat Nagy, Councilman – Vice Chair City of Los Banos Mike Villalta, Mayor County of Merced, District 4 Lloyd Pareira, Supervisor – Chair County of Merced, District 5 Jerry O’Banion, Supervisor
Packet Page 1
AGENDA
At least 72 hours prior to each regular Measure V West Side Regional Projects Committee meeting, a complete agenda packet is available for review on the Measure V website at www.measurev-mcag.com and at the MCAG office, 369 W. 18th Street, Merced, CA 95340. All public records relating to an open session item and copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to items of business referred to on the agenda are on file at MCAG. Persons with questions concerning agenda items may call MCAG to make an inquiry regarding the nature of items described on the agenda.
TRANSLATION SERVICES
Translation Services are not provided at MCAG’s public meeting unless requested at least three (3) business days in advance. Please contact Eva Garibay at (209) 723-3153 x 108 during regularbusiness hours to request translation services.
Servicios de interpreté no son ofrecidos en las juntas públicas de MCAG al menos de que se soliciten tres (3) días de negoción en anticipación. Para solicitas estos servicios por favor contacte a Eva Garibay al (209) 723-3153 x 108 durante horas de oficina.
INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES
Representatives or individuals with disabilities should contact MCAG at (209)723-3153 at least three (3) days in advance of the meeting to request auxiliary aids or other accommodations necessary to participate in the public meeting.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Members of the public wishing to address agenda items or comment on any item not on the agenda may do so during agenda item 2 – Public Comment. Persons may also address any item on the agenda during consideration of that item. Comments are limited to three (3) minutes per person. Please state your name and city or community of residence for the record. For items not on the agenda, no action will be taken. If it requires action, the item will be referred to staff and/or placed on the next agenda.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Measure V www.measurev-mcag.com Merced County Association of Governments www.mcagov.org
Welcome to the Measure V West Side Regional Projects Committee Meeting
Packet Page 2
Regular Meeting of the Measure V West Side Regional Projects Committee
Wednesday, February 7, 2018 – 2:00pm City of Dos Palos
City-County Building, 1554 Golden Gate Avenue Dos Palos, CA 93620
AGENDA
1. Roll Call
2. Public Comment
3. Approval of Agenda Action
4. Approval of Minutes from November 9, 2017 West Side Regional Projects Committee Meeting*
Action p.
5. Revenue Update* Info Nav Bagri p.
6. Discuss Regional Projects • Project Candidate Forms*• Development of the Implementation Plan• Technical Committee• Workshop with Financial Advisor
Info Stacie Dabbs p.
7. 2018 Measure V Schedule Stacie Dabbs
8. Other program updates • Local Projects Funding Agreements• Quarterly Reporting and Citizens Oversight
Committee
Stacie Dabbs
9. Adjourn
*Attachment
Packet Page 3
4
7
8
DRAFT MINUTES MCAG Measure V West Side Regional Projects Committee November 9, 2017 1:00 PM
Guests Present:
Patrick Pittenger, Executive Director, MCAG Matt Fell, Senior Planner, MCAG Emily Haden, MCAG Counsel Kendall Flint, RGS Steve Flint, RGS Darrell Fonseca Greg Pimentel Ellen Hasness John Fulton Melanie Cowen Alex Terrazas
Item 1: Roll Call
Committee Members Present:
Pat Nagy (Vice-Chair) City of Gustine Mike Villalta City of Los Banos Mike McGlynn City of Dos Palos Lloyd Pareira (Chair) District 4 Supervisor Jerry O’Banion District 5 Supervisor
Item 2: Public Comment
There were no public comments.
Item 3: Approval of Agenda
Chairman Pareira called for a motion. Motion by Vice-Chair Nagy, seconded by Member O’Banion to approve the agenda. Motion approved.
Item 4: Approval of Minutes from August 16, 2017
Chairman Pareira called for a motion. Motion by Member O’Bannon, seconded by Vice-Chair Nagy to approve the minutes. Motion approved.
Packet Page 4
Item 5: Governing Procedures
Patrick Pittenger stated that these Governing Procedures were adopted by the MCAG Governing Board and serve to guide the actions of the advisory committees. If any member wished to comment on the procedures they are welcome to do so. No comments have been submitted.
Item 6: Revenue Update
Mr. Pittenger reported that each month’s payments are estimates. The actual “true-up” revenues have been received at the end of the quarter. Each month’s revenues have come in lower than projected, but the true-up payments received have resulted in the revenues being right on track with projections. Local monies are flowing to the jurisdictions and regional monies are going to the County Treasurer.
Item 7: Draft Project Evaluation/Selection Criteria
Kendall Flint directed the committee to page 13 of the agenda packet, which lists potential criteria by which projects may be prioritized. Based on today’s discussion these criteria will be incorporated into a future projects summary report, so along with funding sources these criteria will be used to determine which projects go forward. It was suggested that the list be reduced. At yesterday’s meeting, the Eastside Committee decided on the following criteria:
• Funding• Safety• Connectivity• Reduce congestion/emissions (Increased mobility as a subset)• Readiness, and• Economic development (Goods movement as a subset)
It was asked yesterday if West Side and East Side must have the same criteria. So while that’s not required, the recommendations of both groups will go to the Governing Board for approval and the process might be smoother if both groups had the same criteria.
Ms. Flint said that following this meeting, staff will be sending out a form for projects evaluation that will be concise and will include projected revenue over time. Staff will fill out the form that lists the criteria and the funding sources, such as federal grants, SB 1 funds, and Measure V funds. When this committee reconvenes in February 2018 the committee will be able to compare each project to the others. Not all projects will meet all criteria. Once East Side and West Side committees finish their deliberations in the spring 2018, their recommendations will go to the Governing Board in the form of a draft Implementation Plan.
In response to a question regarding bus shelters, Mr. Pittenger indicated Measure V monies could be used for bus facilities, as well as ride share parking lots.
Packet Page 5
Item 8: Draft Regional Projects List
Each jurisdiction will have until the middle of January 2018 to complete the project evaluation forms that detail candidate project information and how they meet the criteria. Staff will prepare a draft form and distribute it to all member agencies staff to review. Once all agencies’ information is received, staff will compile and disseminate for review in February. Project prioritization and selection will take place in May/June 2018 as part of the development of the draft Implementation Plan. In response to a question, staff indicated that since both groups are using the same criteria, it facilitates using the same evaluation form.
As a related matter, Mr. Pittenger advised that the MCAG Board retreat on November 17 will include KNN financial advisors for a discussion on funding options. Staff will provide more information on the topic at the February Committee meeting. In response to a question about limiting how much Measure V funds could be applied to any one project, the question was considered by the TRB, which advised that such a limit was not a good idea.
Item 9: Meeting Schedule
The Committee decided that its next meeting will be Wednesday, February 7, 2:00 PM at Dos Palos City Hall.
Item 10: Next Steps
Closing Comments: Mr. Pittenger provided information about the Self-Help Counties conference in San Francisco, which included a session on sales tax forecasting and the status of SB 1 monies.
Meeting adjourned at 1:52 PM
Packet Page 6
Category of Funding
Yearly
Estimated
Allocation
Monthly
Estimated
Allocation
Eight month
Estimated
Allocation
Allocation
Percentage
First Six Months
(April-September) October November Total
Budget vs.
Actual
Variance over
(under)
Overall Total 15,000,000$ 1,250,000$ 10,000,000$ 100% 8,440,716$ 920,900$ 920,900$ 10,282,516$ 282,516$
Funding Directly to Local Jurisdictions
Atwater-General Transportation 80% 498,000$ 41,500$ 332,000$ 3.66% 276,565$ 31,857$ 31,857$ 340,279$ 8,278$
Atwater Alt Modes 20% 124,500$ 10,375$ 83,000$ 3.66% 69,141$ 7,964$ 7,964$ 85,070$ 2,070$
Atwater Total 622,501$ 51,875$ 415,000$ 3.66% 345,707$ 39,821$ 39,821$ 425,348$ 10,348$
Dos Palos-General Transportation 80% 197,522$ 16,460$ 131,681$ 0.75% 104,414$ 14,482$ 14,482$ 133,379$ 1,698$
Dos Palos Alt Modes-20% 49,380$ 4,115$ 32,920$ 0.75% 26,104$ 3,621$ 3,621$ 33,345$ 424$
Dos Palos Total 246,902$ 20,575$ 164,602$ 0.75% 130,518$ 18,103$ 18,103$ 166,724$ 2,122$
Gustine-General Transportation-80% 198,101$ 16,508$ 132,067$ 0.76% 104,746$ 14,516$ 14,516$ 133,778$ 1,710$
Gustine Alt Modes-20% 49,525$ 4,127$ 33,017$ 0.76% 26,186$ 3,629$ 3,629$ 33,444$ 428$
Gustine Total 247,626$ 20,635$ 165,084$ 0.76% 130,932$ 18,145$ 18,145$ 167,222$ 2,138$
Livingston-General Transportation-80% 292,210$ 24,351$ 194,807$ 1.67% 158,663$ 19,957$ 19,957$ 198,578$ 3,771$
Livingston Alt Modes-20% 73,052$ 6,088$ 48,702$ 1.67% 39,666$ 4,989$ 4,989$ 49,644$ 943$
Livingston Total 365,262$ 30,439$ 243,508$ 1.67% 198,329$ 24,947$ 24,947$ 248,222$ 4,714$
Los Banos- General Transportation-80% 630,814$ 52,568$ 420,542$ 4.95% 352,657$ 39,536$ 39,536$ 431,730$ 11,187$
Los Banos Alt Modes-20% 157,703$ 13,142$ 105,136$ 4.95% 88,164$ 9,884$ 9,884$ 107,932$ 2,797$
Los Banos Total 788,517$ 65,710$ 525,678$ 4.95% 440,822$ 49,420$ 49,420$ 539,662$ 13,984$
Merced City-General Transporation-80% 1,248,132$ 104,011$ 832,088$ 10.93% 706,334$ 75,231$ 75,231$ 856,795$ 24,707$
Merced City-Alt Modes-20% 312,033$ 26,003$ 208,022$ 10.93% 176,583$ 18,808$ 18,808$ 214,199$ 6,177$
City of Merced Total 1,560,165$ 130,014$ 1,040,110$ 10.93% 882,917$ 94,038$ 94,038$ 1,070,994$ 30,883$
Merced County-General Transportation-80% 2,935,221$ 244,602$ 1,956,814$ 27.28% 1,672,907$ 172,781 172,781 2,018,469$ 61,655$
County Alt Modes-20% 733,805$ 61,150$ 489,204$ 27.28% 418,227$ 43,195 43,195 504,617$ 15,414$
Merced County Total 3,669,027$ 305,752$ 2,446,018$ 27.28% 2,091,134$ 215,976$ 215,976$ 2,523,086$ 77,068$
Total Funding Directly to Jurisdictions 7,500,000$ 625,000$ 5,000,000$ 50.00% 4,220,358$ 460,450$ 460,450$ 5,141,258$ 141,258$
Funding for Regional Projects -
Eastside Regional 4,050,000$ 337,500$ 2,700,000$ 27% 2,278,993$ 248,643$ 248,643$ 2,776,279$ 76,279$
Westside Regional 2,550,000$ 212,500$ 1,700,000$ 17% 1,434,922$ 156,553$ 156,553$ 1,748,028$ 48,028$
Regional Total 6,600,000$ 550,000$ 4,400,000$ 44% 3,713,915$ 405,196$ 405,196$ 4,524,307$ 124,307$
Transit 750,000$ 62,500$ 500,000$ 5% 422,036$ 46,045$ 46,045$ 514,126$ 14,126$
Administration 150,000$ 12,500$ 100,000$ 1% 84,407$ 9,209$ 9,209$ 102,825$ 2,825$
Total 15,000,000$ 1,250,000$ 10,000,000$ 100% 8,440,716$ 920,900$ 920,900$ 10,282,516$ 282,516$
- - - - -
MCAG MEASURE V: ALLOCATED REVENUES TO DATE COMPARED TO ESTIMATED AMOUNTS(FIRST EIGHT MONTHS OF COLLECTIONS: APRIL 2017 -NOVEMBER 2017)
Actual Allocation of Sales TaxEstimated Budget Allocation
1/26/2018Packet Page 7
Lead Agency Project Name Total Project Cost City of Los Banos Merced College Bike/Pedestrian Trail $1,200,000City of Los Banos Pioneer Road Widening $45,000,000City of Los Banos H Street, Badger Flat Road, Overland Avenue Widening $25,000,000City of Los Banos Mercey Springs Road, State Route 165 Widening $20,000,000City of Los Banos State Route 152 Bypass $450,000,000City of Dos Palos Center Avenue North $936,000City of Dos Palos Blossom Street East $2,488,310City of Gustine Carnation Road Improvements $2,460,000City of Gustine Hunt Road/Preston Road Improvements $5,575,000City of Gustine State Route 33/140 Roundabout $2,800,000County of Merced Henry Miller Road (from Hwy 33 to Turner Island) Road Project $5,010,000County of Merced Hutchens Road (from Indiana Road to Palm Ave) Road Project $260,000County of Merced Indiana Road (from Washington Rd to Hutchens Rd) Road Project $610,000County of Merced Ingomar Grade Road (from Badger Flat Rd to Cottonwood Dr) $510,000County of Merced Palm Avenue (from Hutchens Rd to Hwy 152) Road Project $710,000County of Merced Whitworth Road (from Netherton Rd to I-5) Road Project $2,810,000
Total $565,369,310As of 1.31.18
WEST SIDE REGIONAL CANDIDATE PROJECTS
Packet Page 8
Packet Page 9
Packet Page 10
Packet Page 11
Packet Page 12
Packet Page 13
Packet Page 14
Packet Page 15
Packet Page 16
Packet Page 17
Packet Page 18
Packet Page 19
Packet Page 20
Packet Page 21
Packet Page 22
Packet Page 23
PROJECT NAME: Center Avenue North (Area Project)
LEAD AGENCY: City of Dos Palos
PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits): Center Avenue North (Area Project) is
Center Avenue between Marguerite Street & Loraine Street, and Loraine Street between Center
Avenue and Dos Palos Avenue. Rehabilitates one of the city’s two arterials and its collector as a
complete street project. Has high traffic count, poor road quality, replaces storm drain system
to eliminate flooding/runoff, will improve seven intersections, reconstructs street, sidewalk,
curbs, gutters, into sustainable system that significantly reduces maintenance costs, links two
parks, recreation equipment & fields, nutrition site & senior center, together by improved
roadway, walk path/bike path, bus transit stop, city and county facilities. (Please attach a map of the project location)
PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE:
Phase / Component Estimated Start
Estimated Completion
Estimated Cost
Project Study Report 2018 2018 100,000
Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits 2018 2018
101,000
Design (PS & E) 2018 2018 43,000
Acquire Right-of-Way Existing Existing n/a
Construction 2018 2019 692,000
Estimated Total Cost 936,000
Packet Page 24
Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria:
FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants.
Banking Measure V Local 267,000, Banking Measure V Alt/Sidewalk Funds 50,000, Seeking Measure V Regional $200,000, Seeking SB 1 RMRA 201,000, Seeking Bike Path Grant 140,000, Have/Seeking Local Engineering/Environmental 43,000, Have City Storm Drain Funds 35,000. CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections
Rehabilitates arterial and its connector into complete street project. Center Avenue runs from Merced County into the City of Dos Palos, into Fresno County. It bisects the City. This project links a County Park with two City Parks, their community halls, playgrounds, ballfields. It also provides linkage to a bus transit stop and a senior center and nutrition site.
SAFETY
This project replaces a very poor-quality street with numerous potholes and deviations into a smooth traversable street. It is currently impossible to walk this area entirely on sidewalk, once completed it will make ADA wheelchair access possible from park to park, site to site.
READINESS For Construction
Once the City completes its $35,000 storm drainage replacement, the street and sidewalk portions become shovel ready. The bike path/walk way will require additional time, but it is off the street and sidewalk right of way.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement
As an arterial that bisects the City of Dos Palos, it is one of two streets in which virtually all goods are moved, the other being Blossom Street.
OTHER INFORMATION
This project is severable should bike path/walk way funding not be available. The storm drainage, sidewalk, curb, gutter, ramp, and street portions could proceed reducing project time and cost. This project is currently listed as item #7 on the potential regional projects list as of 01-08-18.
Packet Page 25
PROJECT NAME: Blossom Street East (Area Project)
LEAD AGENCY: City of Dos Palos
PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits): Blossom Street East (Area Project) is
East Blossom Street from Palm Avenue (County) to Lucerne Avenue and Lucerne Avenue from
Colony Canal to Blossom Street, Willson Avenue from Colony Canal to Blossom Street, Leonard
Avenue from Colony Canal to DPHS Football/Soccer/Baseball Stadiums, Harris Avenue from
Colony Canal to DPHS Soccer Field. Rehabilitates one of the city’s two arterials and its collectors
as a complete street project. Has high traffic count, very poor road quality, replaces storm drain
system to eliminate flooding/runoff, replaces water lines, replaces sewer lines, replaces
overhead PG&E, Telephone, and Cable lines with underground lines, replaces worst sidewalks in
the county, handicapped access ramps, in a high traffic area, services the high school, improves
school bus transit, significantly improves student crossing safety at various intersections,
reconstructs street, sidewalk, curbs, gutters, into sustainable system that significantly reduces
maintenance costs. (Please attach a map of the project location)
PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE:
Phase / Component Estimated Start
Estimated Completion
Estimated Cost
Project Study Report 2018 2019 200,000
Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits 2018 2019
201,000
Design (PS & E) 2018 2019 100,000
Acquire Right-of-Way Existing Existing Existing
Construction 2019 2020 1,380,000
Estimated Total Cost 2,488,310
Packet Page 26
Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria:
FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants.
Banking Measure V Local 1,380,000, Banking Measure V Alt/Sidewalk Funds 155,000, Seeking Measure V Regional $400,000, Seeking School District/Bus Impact 248,831, PG&E, Telephone, Cable 261,000, Have City Water 180,000, Have City Sewer Funds 173,169, and Have City Storm Drain Funds 90,000. CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections
Rehabilitates arterial and its connector into complete street project. Blossom Street runs from Merced County through Midway, through the City of Dos Palos, and back to Merced County. This project links several local communities of interest. It makes the high school and its facilities, classrooms, ballfields, bus transit, multi-use buildings accessible. Also improves walkability. SAFETY
It is currently impossible to walk this area entirely on sidewalk, or traverse in a wheelchair. This project will transform an area with possibly the worst quality streets and sidewalks, into a safe walkable, neighborhood and school area. It will also significantly improve the student access and crosswalk safety. READINESS For Construction
The City intends to begin replacing all of it water, sewer, storm drainage utilities, have overhead PG&E, telephone, and cable moved underground, and complete all engineering work to make this project shovel ready within two years. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement
As an arterial that bisects the City of Dos Palos, Blossom Street is one of two streets in which virtually all goods are moved, the other being Center Avenue. Further and perhaps more important, it is also the roadway access for nearly all local school students, teachers, administrators, busses, and visitors.
OTHER INFORMATION
This is a multi-agency project. The City anticipates assistance from the School District and various utilities such as PG&E. This project is currently listed as item #8 on the potential regional projects list as of 01-08-18.
Packet Page 27
Regional Project Candidate Information and Evaluation Form
Page 1
PROJECT NAME:
LEAD AGENCY:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits):
(Please attach a map of the project location)
PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE:
Phase / Component Estimated Start
Estimated Completion
Estimated Cost
Project Study Report
Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits
Design (PS & E)
Acquire Right-of-Way
Construction
Estimated Total Cost
Carnation Road Improvements
City of Gustine
The City proposes to rehabilitate the roadway of Carnation Ave between East Avenue and the WWTPGate. The proposed project will consist of a Roadway Reconstruction from EP to EP Approx. 24' wide.
Feb 2019 May 2019 10,000
Feb 2019 July 2019 50,000
Aug 2019 Nov 2019 2,400,000
2,460,000
Packet Page 28
Regional Project Candidate Information and Evaluation Form
Page 2
Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria:
FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants.
CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections
REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use
SAFETY
READINESS For Construction
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement
OTHER INFORMATION
The City is actively seeking funds for the proposed project improvements from a variety of fundingsources. At this time the City has not yet secured funds for this project. The project could potentially bephased to reduce the initial project costs. The City may also pursue a project partnership with theprivate funding sources to reduce funding needs.
In addition to the roadway's normal daily traffic that connects farms to the City of Gustine the road alsoused by City Staff to access the WWTP. Carnation also connects to Kniebes Road which provides aconnection to SR-140.
The condition of the existing roadway is very poor and accumulates large amounts of dust and debris inareas where the roadway is failing. This dust and debris is stirred up as vehicles travel along the roadresulting in particulate matter emissions. The proposed project once constructed will provide emissionsreductions for both PM10 and PM2.5 emissions as dust and debris emission will be reduced.
The road's current condition poses safety concerns. As the roadway fails there is the potential to causedamage to vehicles or result in collisions with roadside objects. By improving the roadway these types ofdamage and collisions will be reduced.
The project is currently in the conceptual phase and an initial estimated project cost and scope hasbeen developed for purposes of seeking funding. The City is eager to move forward with the projectonce funding can be secured.
Carnation Avenue is currently used by local farmers to access a variety of crop fields and dairies locatedadjacent to the roadway.
Packet Page 29
CAL IFORN IA
140
NO
RT
H
0 1500
SCALE IN FEET
PROJECT AREA
PROJECT AREA
TO THE CITY OF MERCED
Jan
11, 2018 - 2:42p
m
V:\C
OG
\945\03\cad
\exh
ib
its\P
ES
-R
FA
_E
xh
ib
its\p
ro
j_vicin
ity_m
ap
.d
wg
• • •
City of Gustine - Carnation Road Improvements - Project Location MapLOC
KN
IE
BE
S R
OA
D
WWTP
CARNATION ROAD
EA
ST
A
VE
NU
E
AIRPORT
Packet Page 30
Regional Project Candidate Information and Evaluation Form
Page 1
PROJECT NAME:
LEAD AGENCY:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits):
(Please attach a map of the project location)
PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE:
Phase / Component Estimated Start
Estimated Completion
Estimated Cost
Project Study Report
Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits
Design (PS & E)
Acquire Right-of-Way
Construction
Estimated Total Cost
Hunt Road/Preston Road Improvements
City of Gustine
The City proposes to rehabilitate the roadway of Hunt Road between SR-140 and Preston Ave andPreston Ave between Hunt Road and Old Santa Fe Grade. The proposed project will consist of aRoadway Reconstruction from EP to EP Approx. 24' wide.
Jan 2019 May 2019 20,000
Jan 2019 Jun 2019 55,000
July 2019 Oct 2019 5,500,000
5,575,00
Packet Page 31
Regional Project Candidate Information and Evaluation Form
Page 2
Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria:
FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants.
CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections
REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use
SAFETY
READINESS For Construction
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement
OTHER INFORMATION
The City is actively seeking funds for the proposed project improvements from a variety of fundingsources. At this time the City has not yet secured funds for this project. The project could potentially bephased to reduce the initial project costs. The City may also pursue a project partnership with theCounty or possible private funding to reduce funding needs.
In addition to the roadway's normal daily traffic that connects farms to SR-140 the road also sees alarge amount of traffic during special events when the bull fighting ring is used. This is the onlyconnection to the bull fighting facilities.
The condition of the existing roadway is very poor and accumulates large amounts of dust and debris inareas where the roadway is failing. This dust and debris is stirred up as vehicles travel along the roadresulting in particulate matter emissions. The proposed project once constructed will provide emissionsreductions for both PM10 and PM2.5 emissions as dust and debris emission will be reduced.
The road's current condition poses safety concerns. As the roadway fails there is the potential to causedamage to vehicles or result in collisions with roadside objects. By improving the roadway these types ofdamage and collisions will be reduced.
The project is currently in the conceptualphase and an initial estimated project cost and scope has beendeveloped for purposes of seeking funding. The City is eager to move forward with the project oncefunding can be secured.
In addition to the traffic generated during special events at the bull fighting ring, Hunt Road and PrestonAvenue are used daily by local farmers to access a variety of crop fields and dairies located adjacent tothe roadway.
Packet Page 32
CAL I FORN IA
140
CAL IFORN IA
33
NO
RT
H
0 1500
SCALE IN FEET
PROJECT AREA
PROJECT AREA
TO THE CITY OF MERCED
T
O
T
H
E
C
IT
Y
O
F
N
E
W
M
A
N
Jan
11, 2018 - 2:23p
m
V:\C
OG
\945\03\cad
\exh
ib
its\P
ES
-R
FA
_E
xh
ib
its\p
ro
j_vicin
ity_m
ap
.d
wg
• • •
City of Gustine - Hunt/Preston Ave Road Improvements - Project Location MapLOC
HU
NT
R
OA
D
PRESTON AVENUE
BULL
FIGHTING
RING
Packet Page 33
Regional Project Candidate Information and Evaluation Form
Page 1
PROJECT NAME:
LEAD AGENCY:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits):
(Please attach a map of the project location)
PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE:
Phase / Component Estimated Start
Estimated Completion
Estimated Cost
Project Study Report
Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits
Design (PS & E)
Acquire Right-of-Way
Construction
Estimated Total Cost
SR 33/140 Roundabout CML-5230(003)
City of Gustine
The City proposes to convert the existing T-intersection of 4th Street and 6th Avenue into a three-leggedroundabout with single approach and departure lanes. The southern leg of the roundabout will realignRailroad Avenue to directly connect to the new roundabout. The roundabout will also require transitionimprovements for roadway approaches on the other two legs. Along with the realignment of RailroadAvenue, a segment of South Avenue between Ash Avenue and 4th Street will be reconfigured to becomea Woonerf as part of the project’s adjacent improvements. The project footprint and street realignmentwill require the acquisition of additional right of way from at least two adjacent private properties.
3/18/11 5/1/18 225,000
3/18/11 10/31/18 100,000
7/5/18 11/7/18 175,000
3/1/19 7/4/19 2,300,000
2,800,000
Packet Page 34
Regional Project Candidate Information and Evaluation Form
Page 2
Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria:
FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants.
CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections
REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use
SAFETY
READINESS For Construction
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement
OTHER INFORMATION
The City has obtained CMAQ funding for this project in the amount of $2,390,000 with a total localmatch of $310,000. The City is seeking funds in the amount of $310,000 to assist with the City's portionof the project costs.
The proposed project incorporates complete streets components for all modes of travel. The proposedproject includes a multi-use path, intersection lighting improvements and crossing improvements forpedestrians and bicyclists.
The proposed project provides emissions reductions for both PM10 and PM2.5 emissions. EmissionsReduction Calculations were prepared for the CMAQ funding application. Those calculations show theconstruction of the roundabout at this location will have approximately 0.12 kg/day in reducedemissions.
The project improves safety for both vehicle traffic and non-motorized traffic. For vehicle traffic, areduction in collision severity and incidents is well documented for roundabout intersections. Forpedestrians and bicyclists, the proposed improvements will provide a separated area for non-motorizedtravel as well as improved crossing facilities reducing the potential for collisions between motorized andnon-motorized traffic. Improved lighting in the project area will increase visibility reducing collisions.
The project is currently in the final stages of the PS&E phase with an estimated phase completion ofNovember of 2018. The project has environmental clearance. The City is preparing to obtain a right ofway consultant to assist with right of way acquisitions required for the project. The City anticipates theCON phase of the project to occur in late 2018.
The proposed project will improve movement of goods through the region as the project is located onSR-33/140 and is a commonly used connection between the SR-99 and I-5 corridors.
Packet Page 35
CAL I FORN IA
140
CAL I FORN IA
33CAL I FORN IA
140
CAL I FORN IA
33
NO
RT
H
0 800
SCALE IN FEET
City of Gustine
Jan
11, 2018 - 2:34p
m
V:\C
OG
\945\03\cad
\exh
ib
its\P
ES
-R
FA
_E
xh
ib
its\p
ro
j_vicin
ity_m
ap
.d
wg
945.03
1
CONSTRUCT ROUNDABOUT ON SR-140/33 - CML-5230(003)
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
GOUVEIA ENGINEERING, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
••
PROJECT AREA
SCHMIDT PARK
EA
ST
A
VE
NU
E
NORTH AVENUE
SOUTH AVENUE
EA
ST
A
VE
NU
E
MEREDITH AVENUE
LA
UR
EL A
VE
NU
E
WE
ST
A
VE
NU
E
PARK
5
th
S
T
R
E
E
T
6
th
S
T
R
E
E
T
4
th
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
P
R
R
M
A
IN
L
IN
E
R
A
IL
R
O
A
D
A
V
E
N
U
E
4
th
S
T
R
E
E
T
PROJECT AREA
6
th
A
V
E
N
U
E
5
th
A
V
E
N
U
E
7
th
S
T
R
E
E
T
GR
OV
E A
VE
NU
E
Packet Page 36
Packet Page 37
Regional Project Candidate Information and Evaluation Form
Page 1
PROJECT NAME:
LEAD AGENCY:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits):
(Please attach a map of the project location)
PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE:
Phase / Component Estimated Start
Estimated Completion
Estimated Cost
Project Study Report
Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits
Design (PS & E)
Acquire Right-of-Way
Construction
Estimated Total Cost
Henry Miller Road (from Highway 33 to Turner Island Road) Road Project
Merced County
Henry Miller Road (from Highway 33 to Turner Island Road) is approximately 17.0 miles and is located inthe southwest part of Merced County. The project will involve roadway reconstruction, road shoulderwork and the installation of pavement striping and markings.
$0.00
$0.00
03/01/2018 04/30/2018 $10,000.00 *
$0.00
05/01/2020 11/30/2020 $5,000,000.00 *
$5,010,000.00
Packet Page 38
Regional Project Candidate Information and Evaluation Form
Page 2
Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria:
FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants.
CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections
REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use
SAFETY
READINESS For Construction
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement
OTHER INFORMATION
Additional funding sources are unknown at this time. Merced County has already budgeted their localshare of Measure V funds for use on this project.
Improving Henry Miller Road from Highway 33 to Turner Island Road improves the connectivity betweenthese roads by the utilization of a new road surface.
Emissions will be reduced through the increased use of this improved route, thus relieving trafficcongestion and associated emissions on other roadways.
The new roadway will increase safety by improving the condition of the road.
Ready for construction.
Improved movement of goods will be achieved by providing an improved route.
Packet Page 39
Packet Page 40
Regional Project Candidate Information and Evaluation Form
Page 1
PROJECT NAME:
LEAD AGENCY:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits):
(Please attach a map of the project location)
PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE:
Phase / Component Estimated Start
Estimated Completion
Estimated Cost
Project Study Report
Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits
Design (PS & E)
Acquire Right-of-Way
Construction
Estimated Total Cost
Hutchens Road (From Indiana Road to Palm Avenue) Road Project
Merced County
Hutchens Road (From Indiana Road to Palm Avenue) is approximately 1.0 mile and is located in thesouthwest part of Merced County. The project will involve roadway reconstruction, road shoulder workand the installation of pavement striping and markings.
$0.00
$0.00
03/01/2018 04/30/2018 $10,000.00 *
$0.00
06/01/2018 08/31/2018 $250,000.00 *
$260,000.00
Packet Page 41
Regional Project Candidate Information and Evaluation Form
Page 2
Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria:
FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants.
CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections
REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use
SAFETY
READINESS For Construction
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement
OTHER INFORMATION
Additional funding sources are unknown at this time. Merced County has already budgeted their localshare of Measure V funds for use on this project.
This project will serve as an improved route from Indiana Road to Palm Avenue.
Emissions will be reduced through the increased use of this improved route, thus relieving trafficcongestion and associated emissions on other roadways.
The new roadway will increase safety by improving the condition of the road.
Ready for construction.
Improved movement of goods will be achieved by providing an improved route.
Packet Page 42
Packet Page 43
Regional Project Candidate Information and Evaluation Form
Page 1
PROJECT NAME:
LEAD AGENCY:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits):
(Please attach a map of the project location)
PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE:
Phase / Component Estimated Start
Estimated Completion
Estimated Cost
Project Study Report
Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits
Design (PS & E)
Acquire Right-of-Way
Construction
Estimated Total Cost
Indiana Road (From Washington Road to Hutchens Road) Road Project
Merced County
Indiana Road (From Washington Road to Hutchens Road.) is approximately 2.30 miles and is located inthe southwest part of Merced County. The project will involve roadway reconstruction, road shoulderwork and the installation of pavement striping and markings.
$0.00
$0.00
03/01/2018 04/30/2018 $10,000.00 *
$0.00
06/01/2018 08/31/2018 $600,000.00 *
$610,000.00
Packet Page 44
Regional Project Candidate Information and Evaluation Form
Page 2
Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria:
FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants.
CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections
REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use
SAFETY
READINESS For Construction
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement
OTHER INFORMATION
Additional funding sources are unknown at this time. Merced County has already budgeted their localshare of Measure V funds for use on this project.
This project will serve as an improved route from Washington Road to Hutchens Road.
Emissions will be reduced through the increased use of this improved route, thus relieving trafficcongestion and associated emissions on other roadways.
The new roadway will increase safety by improving the condition of the road.
Ready for construction.
Improved movement of goods will be achieved by providing an improved route.
Packet Page 45
Packet Page 46
Regional Project Candidate Information and Evaluation Form
Page 1
PROJECT NAME:
LEAD AGENCY:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits):
(Please attach a map of the project location)
PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE:
Phase / Component Estimated Start
Estimated Completion
Estimated Cost
Project Study Report
Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits
Design (PS & E)
Acquire Right-of-Way
Construction
Estimated Total Cost
Ingomar Grade Road (From Badger Flat Road to Cottonwood Dr.) Road Project
Merced County
Ingomar Grade Road (From Badger Flat Road to Cottonwood Dr.) is approximately 2.0 miles and islocated in the southwest part of Merced County. The project will involve roadway reconstruction, roadshoulder work and the installation of pavement striping and markings.
$0.00
$0.00
03/01/2018 04/30/2018 $10,000.00 *
$0.00
01/01/2019 05/31/2019 $500,000.00 *
$510,000.00
Packet Page 47
Regional Project Candidate Information and Evaluation Form
Page 2
Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria:
FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants.
CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections
REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use
SAFETY
READINESS For Construction
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement
OTHER INFORMATION
Additional funding sources are unknown at this time. Merced County has already budgeted their localshare of Measure V funds for use on this project.
This project will serve as an improved route connecting Badger Flat Road to Cottonwood Drive.
Emissions will be reduced through the increased use of this improved route, thus relieving trafficcongestion and associated emissions on other roadways.
The new roadway will increase safety by improving the condition of the road.
Ready for construction.
Improved movement of goods will be achieved by providing an improved route.
Packet Page 48
Packet Page 49
Regional Project Candidate Information and Evaluation Form
Page 1
PROJECT NAME:
LEAD AGENCY:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits):
(Please attach a map of the project location)
PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE:
Phase / Component Estimated Start
Estimated Completion
Estimated Cost
Project Study Report
Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits
Design (PS & E)
Acquire Right-of-Way
Construction
Estimated Total Cost
Palm Avenue (From Hutchens Road to Highway 152) Road Project
Merced County
Palm Avenue (From Hutchens Road to Highway 152) is approximately 2.5 miles and is located in thesouthwest part of Merced County. The project will involve roadway reconstruction, road shoulder workand the installation of pavement striping and markings.
$0.00
$0.00
03/01/2018 04/30/2018 $10,000.00 *
$0.00
06/01/2018 08/31/2018 $700,000.00 *
$710,000.00
Packet Page 50
Regional Project Candidate Information and Evaluation Form
Page 2
Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria:
FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants.
CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections
REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use
SAFETY
READINESS For Construction
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement
OTHER INFORMATION
Additional funding sources are unknown at this time. Merced County has already budgeted their localshare of Measure V funds for use on this project.
This project will serve as an improved route connecting Highway 152 and Hutchens Road.
Emissions will be reduced through the increased use of this improved route, thus relieving trafficcongestion and associated emissions on other roadways.
The new roadway will increase safety by improving the condition of the road.
Ready for construction.
Improved movement of goods will be achieved by providing an improved route.
Packet Page 51
Packet Page 52
Regional Project Candidate Information and Evaluation Form
Page 1
PROJECT NAME:
LEAD AGENCY:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION (location, scope and limits):
(Please attach a map of the project location)
PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND ESTIMATED COST BY PHASE:
Phase / Component Estimated Start
Estimated Completion
Estimated Cost
Project Study Report
Environmental Review, Project Approvals, Permits
Design (PS & E)
Acquire Right-of-Way
Construction
Estimated Total Cost
Whitworth Road (From Netherton Road to Highway 5) Road Project
Merced County
Whitworth Road (from Netherton Road to Highway 5) is approximately 10.5 miles and is located on thesouthwest part of Merced County. The project will involve roadway reconstruction, road shoulder workand the installation of pavement striping and markings.
$0.00
$0.00
03/01/2018 04/30/2018 $10,000.00 *
$0.00
06/01/2018 08/31/2018 $2,800,000.00 *
$2,810,000.00
Packet Page 53
Regional Project Candidate Information and Evaluation Form
Page 2
Please briefly describe how the project meets the following criteria:
FUNDABILITY Committed funding; Leveraging funding from multiple agencies; Competitiveness for grants.
CONNECTIVITY Complete Streets, Regional Connections
REDUCE EMISSIONS Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled; Reduction in Single-Occupant Vehicle Use
SAFETY
READINESS For Construction
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Including Goods Movement
OTHER INFORMATION
Additional funding sources are unknown at this time.
Whitworth Road serves as a major route to connect the City of Newman with Highway 99.
Emissions will be reduced through the increased use of this improved route, thus relieving trafficcongestion and associated emissions on other roadways.
The new roadway will increase safety by improving the condition of the road.
Ready for construction.
Improved movement of goods will be achieved by providing an improved route.
Packet Page 54
Packet Page 55