regulatory review

64
REGULATORY REVIEW National Association of State Community Services Programs and the U.S. Department of Energy – Weatherization Assistance Programs 1

Upload: jean

Post on 24-Feb-2016

26 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

National Association of State Community Services Programs and the U.S. Department of Energy – Weatherization Assistance Programs. REGULATORY REVIEW. 10 CODE OF FEDERAL REGISTRATIONS 600 MAJOR SUBPARTS. Subpart A - General Subpart B - Grants to Other Than State and Local Governments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: REGULATORY REVIEW

REGULATORY REVIEW

National Association of State Community Services Programs and the U.S.

Department of Energy – Weatherization Assistance Programs

1

Page 2: REGULATORY REVIEW

10 CODE OF FEDERAL REGISTRATIONS 600 MAJOR SUBPARTS

• Subpart A - General• Subpart B - Grants to Other Than State and

Local Governments • Subpart C - Grants to State and Local

Governments• Subpart D - Cooperative Agreement• Subpart E - Audits

2

Page 3: REGULATORY REVIEW

10 CFR 600 SECTIONS

SECTION 10 CFR 600(Non-Profits)

10 CFR 600(State/Local)

General Requirements 101-104 200-205

Pre-Award Requirements 110-117 210-212

Financial Admin./Management 120-128 220-226

Property Standards 130-137 230-235

Procurement Standards 140-148 236

Reports and Records 150-153 240-242

Termination & Enforcement 160-162 243-244

After-the-Award 170-173 250-252

3

Page 4: REGULATORY REVIEW

GRANT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS

This section prescribes the forms and instructions to be used in applying for federal assistance.

Applicants are not required to submit more than the original and two copies of preapplications and applications.

For amendments to a previously submitted application only the affected pages need be submitted.

4

Page 5: REGULATORY REVIEW

Debarment and Suspension

• Recipients shall comply with the debarment and suspension common rule.

5

Page 6: REGULATORY REVIEW

SPECIAL RESTRICTIVE CONDITIONS REQUIREMENTS

Defines under what circumstances a grantee will be considered high-risk: history of unsatisfactory performance, financially unstable, management system that does not meet standards, nonconformance in prior awards, or not otherwise responsible.

Awarding agency will provide written explanation of conditions and corrective action.

6

Page 7: REGULATORY REVIEW

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS REQUIREMENTS

Financial management systems must meet the following minimum standards:

• Provide for accurate, current, and complete disclosure for all financial activities.

• Maintain records that identify the source and use of funds.

7

Page 8: REGULATORY REVIEW

Accounting system that Does not segregate funds

LIHEAP Grant

Weatherization Grant

ARRA Weatherization Grant

Grant 1Grant 2

Grant 3

8

Page 9: REGULATORY REVIEW

Accounting system that Does segregate funds

LIHEAP Grant

Weatherization Grant

ARRA Weatherization Grant

9

Page 10: REGULATORY REVIEW

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT STANDARDSREQUIREMENTS (cont.)

Financial management systems must meet the following minimum standards:

• Internal Control. Maintain effective control and accountability for all grant cash, property, and other assets.

• Budget Control. Compare actual expenditures with budgeted amounts on a periodic basis.

10

Page 11: REGULATORY REVIEW

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT STANDARDSREQUIREMENTS (cont.)

Budget Control

• Serves to link programmatic and financial activities.

• Prevents cost overruns.

• Helps staff responsible for specific activities to maintain control over expenditures.

11

Page 12: REGULATORY REVIEW

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT STANDARDSREQUIREMENTS (cont.)

Financial management systems must meet the following minimum standards:

• Allowable Cost. Determine allowable costs by OMB cost principles, program regulations, and grant agreement.

12

Page 13: REGULATORY REVIEW

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT STANDARDSREQUIREMENTS (cont.)

Financial management systems must meet the following minimum standards:

• Source Documentation. Have records supported by source documentation.

• Case Management. Have procedures to minimizing time elapsing between the transfer of funds and disbursement of funds.

13

Page 14: REGULATORY REVIEW

PAYMENT REQUIREMENTS

All methods and procedures for payment shall minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds and disbursement by the subgrantee.

The methods that can be used are:• Advances (for grantees if they meet standards)• Reimbursements (when requirements are not met or for

construction contracts.)• Working capital advances (if a subgrantee cannot meet the

criteria for advance payments.)

14

Page 15: REGULATORY REVIEW

PAYMENT REQUIREMENTS (CONT.)

• Recipients must also expend program income, rebates, refunds, and audit recoveries before requesting additional federal cash payments.

• Payments cannot be withheld unless: Recipient has failed to comply with grant award

conditions. Recipient is indebted to the United States.

• Recipients are encouraged to use minority owned banks.

15

Page 16: REGULATORY REVIEW

ALLOWABLE COST REQUIREMENTS

• The allowable costs referenced in 10 CFR 600 are detailed in separate OMB Circulars OMB Circular A-87 -Cost Principles for State and Local

Governments. OMB Circular A-122 -Cost Principles for Non-Profit

Organizations.

16

Page 17: REGULATORY REVIEW

PERIOD AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS REQUIREMENTS

• Where a funding period is specified, a grantee may charge to the award only costs resulting form obligations during the funding period.

17

Page 18: REGULATORY REVIEW

COST SHARING REQUIREMENTS

All Contributions, including cash and in-kind, shall be accepted as part of recipient’s cost sharing or matching if they:

• are verifiable through records,• are not counted for other federal programs• are necessary for completion of the project,• are allowable under the cost principles,• are not paid by other federal funds (unless approved by

statute),• are provided for in the approved budget, and • conform to other provisions of the financial management

circulars.

18

Page 19: REGULATORY REVIEW

PROGRAM INCOME REQUIREMENTS

Program income is gross income generated by a grant supported activity, or earned only as a result of the grant agreement during the grant period.

The methods for treatment of program income include:• Addition• Deduction• Cost Sharing

19

Page 20: REGULATORY REVIEW

PROGRAM INCOME REQUIREMENTS (CONT.)

Unless authorized by Federal regulations or the grant agreement, program income will be treated as gross program income. Unless authorized, program income shall be deducted from the total allowable costs.

There are no Federal requirements governing the disposition of program income earned after the end of the award period unless the regulations or agreement states differently.

20

Page 21: REGULATORY REVIEW

NON-FEDERAL AUDIT REQUIREMENTS

State and local governments and non-profit organizations will be subject to the audit requirements in OMB A-133.

21

Page 22: REGULATORY REVIEW

BUDGET AND PROJECT REVISIONS REQUIREMENTS

Recipients are permitted to rebudget within the approved direct cost budget to meet unanticipated requirements and make very limited program changes.

The applicable cost principles which require prior approval shall apply.

Prior approval is required based on specific clauses within the grant agreement and in the following instances where

• a revision would result in the need for additional funds;• Cumulative transfers would exceed 10% of the total budget if the grant is

over $100,000;• Funds allotted for training were transferred;• There is a revision in the scope of objectives;• Contracting out of any work;

22

Page 23: REGULATORY REVIEW

BUDGET AND PROJECT REVISIONS REQUIREMENTS

• There is a need to extend the period of availability of funds;

• There is a change in key persons who are central to the purpose of the project or

• Absence of Project Director or Principal Investigator for more than 3 months or 25% of time

Requests for prior approval will be in the same format as used in the application. The approval must be in writing.

23

Page 24: REGULATORY REVIEW

REAL PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS

Real property means land and structures.

Title to real property will vest with the grantee or subgrantee.

The awarding agency will provide instructions for disposition of real property when it is no longer needed.

24

Page 25: REGULATORY REVIEW

REAL PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS(CONT.)

Equipment is defined as tangible, nonexpendable personal property having a useful life of more than one year and an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more per unit.

Title to equipment acquired under a grant or subgrant will vest with the grantee or recipient unless specified.

Equipment shall be used for the program or project it was acquired. The equipment may be used for other Federally supported projects if it does not interfere with the project for which it was originally acquired.

Equipment shall not be used to provide services to non-federal outside organizations for a fee less than private companies charge.

25

Page 26: REGULATORY REVIEW

REAL PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS(CONT.)

• If replacement equipment is needed the equipment to be replaced may be used as a trade-in.

• The property management requirements include the following:• Property records must include a description, serial number, source, title,

cost, acquisition date, percent of Federal participation, location, use, condition, and ultimate disposition.

• Physical inventory must be done at least every two years.• A control system to ensure safeguards against loss, damage, or theft.• Adequate maintenance procedures.• Proper sales procedures. Items with a fair market value (F.M.V.) of

$5,000 or less that are no longer needed can be disposed of with no further obligations. Items over $5,000 F.M.V. require the awarding agency to receive its fair share.

26

Page 27: REGULATORY REVIEW

REAL PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS(CONT.)

Federally owned equipment requires a recipient to submit an annual inventory listing. When the equipment is no longer needed a subgrantee will request disposition instructions from the Federal agency.

27

Page 28: REGULATORY REVIEW

SUPPLIES REQUIREMENTS

Title to supplies acquired under an award will vest with the recipient.

If there is a residual inventory of unused supplies exceeding $5,000 in total fair market value upon termination or completion of the award and if the supplies are not needed for any other federally sponsored programs the recipient shall compensate the awarding agency for its share.

28

Page 29: REGULATORY REVIEW

FEDERAL PROCUREMENT REGULATIONS

STANDARDS: Recipient is responsible for all procurement

contractual and administrative issues Maintain Code of Conduct All procurement transactions must provide for open

and free competition

29

Page 30: REGULATORY REVIEW

Grantees and Subgrantees must have written procurement procedures that include:

• Procedures that avoid the purchase of unnecessary or duplicative items.• Analysis of lease and purchase alternatives.• Preference for products and services that conserve natural resources

and protect the environment.• Grantees are encouraged to enter into State and local inter-

governmental agreements for purchasing common goods and services.• Grantees are encouraged to use Federal excess and surplus property.• Procedures to ensure awards are only to responsible contractors.• Records that detail the significant history of a procurement.• Grantees will have protest procedures.

30

Page 31: REGULATORY REVIEW

• All procurement transactions will be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. There must be written selection procedures. Also, the solicitation must include a clear and accurate description of the service or material being procured.

31

Page 32: REGULATORY REVIEW

Methods of Procurement

• Small purchase procedures for services and goods that will not cost more than $25,000 in the aggregate.

• Sealed bids (formal advertising).• Competitive proposals.• Non-competitive proposals may only be used when

the item is available from one source, emergency situations, the awarding agency authorizes, or competition is determined inadequate. Pre-award review may be required.

32

Page 33: REGULATORY REVIEW

Methods of Procurement

Sealed Bid Proposals:• Made early in the procurement cycle:

Allows vendors time to prepare their bids to meet the specification of the solicitation

• Solicitation information includes: What is being purchased Terms & conditions the vendors must meet Where & when sealed bids will be opened

33

Page 34: REGULATORY REVIEW

Methods of Procurement

Sealed Bid Proposals:• Awards are made to the lowest priced responsible

vendor: Capable of compliance will all bid specification Capability of performing the work Has administrative capacity

• Award becomes – a firm, fixed price contract

34

Page 35: REGULATORY REVIEW

Methods of Procurement

Sealed Bid Proposals:• Vendor’s payments:

Lump sum - paid for successful performance Unit price - paid for each deliverable unit is completed in the

contract

• Must have at least 2 responsive suppliers competing for contract

35

Page 36: REGULATORY REVIEW

Methods of Procurement

Competitive Proposal Procurements:– Proposal types:

Request for Proposal Request for Quotation Request for Information

36

Page 37: REGULATORY REVIEW

Methods of Procurement

Competitive Proposal Procurements:• Publicized method same as sealed competitive

process (invitation for bids)• All evaluation factor publicized & their importance• All vendor submittals received and evaluated• Proposals must be solicited from a number of

qualified sources• Organization must have a method for conducting

technical evaluation of all proposals & for selecting awardees

37

Page 38: REGULATORY REVIEW

Methods of Procurement

Competitive Proposal Procurements:• Award made to the most responsive firm whose proposal is most

advantageous to the program Price and other factors considered to determine most

advantageous offer

• Must have at least 2 responsive suppliers competing for contract

38

Page 39: REGULATORY REVIEW

Methods of Procurement

Non Competitive Procurements:• Non competitive procurements must be

approved by funding agency before awarding• Organization must devise & document its own

analysis process to ensure fair prices are being charged

• Non competitive contracts become negotiated contracts

• Organization determines what level of organizational leadership is required to approve this method

39

Page 40: REGULATORY REVIEW

Methods of Procurement

Non Competitive Procurements:• May be used only when it is not feasible for:

Small purchase procedures Sealed bid or competitive proposalsand one of the following conditions applies: Item only available from a single source Emergency exist that will not permit a delay resulting

from completive biding

40

Page 41: REGULATORY REVIEW

Methods of Procurement

Non Competitive Procurements: Organization authorized noncompetitive proposals After solicitation of a number of sources, competitive is

determined as inadequateCost analysis is required which verifies: Proposed cost data Projection of the data Evaluation of costs and profits

41

Page 42: REGULATORY REVIEW

• Grantees are to encourage minority firms, women’s business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms.

42

Page 43: REGULATORY REVIEW

• There must be a cost price analysis in connection with every procurement.

43

Page 44: REGULATORY REVIEW

• Grantees must make available proposed procurement technical specifications upon request by the awarding agency.

44

Page 45: REGULATORY REVIEW

• The bonding requirements of a recipient will be accepted if the awarding agency’s interest is adequately protected. If not, there are specific requirements described in 10 CFR 600.

45

Page 46: REGULATORY REVIEW

PERFORMANCE REPORT REQUIREMENTS

Performance reports shall not be required more frequently than quarterly or, less frequently than annually.

Periodically report progress in meeting program objectives. This must include comparison of accomplishments with planned objectives.

Quarterly and semi-annual reports will be due 30 days after the reporting period. Annual and final reports will be due 90 days after expiration date.

46

Page 47: REGULATORY REVIEW

RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS

Grantee and subgrantees must retain records for three years after submitting the final expenditure report.

Records must be maintained until completion of action on all litigation, claims, negotiation, or audit. For property and equipment the retention period starts upon disposition.

47

Page 48: REGULATORY REVIEW

CLOSE-OUT REQUIREMENTS

The Federal agency will require the following final reports:

• Standard Form 269 - Financial Status Report• Standard Form 270 - Request for Advance or Reimbursement,

if applicable• Final performance or progress report

The recipient will submit an invention disclosure, if applicable.

The recipient will submit a Federally-owned property report.

Cost and cash adjustments will be made as appropriate.

48

Page 49: REGULATORY REVIEW

THE COST PRINCIPLES ADDRESS FOUR MAJOR AREAS:

• Basic Guidelines for Costs• Cost Allocation Plan• Indirect Cost• Allowability for selected costs

49

Page 50: REGULATORY REVIEW

BASIC GUIDELINES FOR COSTS

• Costs are allowable if they are necessary and reasonable, not prohibited under state or local laws, conform to laws and regulations, given consistent treatment, comply with generally accepted accounting principles, and are not included as a cost under other federal programs.

• Allocable costs assigned must be in proportion to the benefits received, cannot be shifted to overcome deficiencies in other programs, must be supported by a cost allocation plan.

• Applicable credits are to be used to reduce expenditures applicable to a given grant.

• The total cost of a grant program is comprised of the allowable direct and allowable indirect costs less applicable credits.

50

Page 51: REGULATORY REVIEW

ALLOCATION OF COSTS

• Identify each of the shared costs that should be allocated.

• Identify each of the shared costs that will be included as part of the indirect cost pool, if applicable.

• Determine the method in which costs will be allocated so that each program is paying proportionately for the benefits from the cost.

• Prepare the cost allocation plan and submit for internal approval.

51

Page 52: REGULATORY REVIEW

STEPS IN PREPARING A COST ALLOCATION PLAN

• Identify the service and costs of each service to be allocated.

• Determine the method (unit) for allocating the costs of each service to user programs.

• Allocate costs mathematically to user programs.

52

Page 53: REGULATORY REVIEW

DIRECT COST ALLOCATION PLAN DOCUMENTATION

The following supporting information would be a part of a cost allocation plan.• List of grants, contracts and agreements.• Agency organization chart.• Job description - for each general and administrative staff person.• Work sheet for each individual showing personnel and non personnel costs,

chargeable hours and calculation of that employee's billing rate.• Summary of non-personnel general administrative costs and allocation to

each general and administrative position.• Copy of the previous audit report supporting the total general and

administrative costs use in these calculations.• Copy of the time sheet form which will be used by general and

administrative staff.• Copy of the monthly billings summary form that will be used to invoice each

program.• Space cost allocation for each property

53

Page 54: REGULATORY REVIEW

INDIRECT COSTS

• Indirect costs are shared costs, to be distributed by an indirect cost rate, that must be grouped into one or more equitable cost pools to determine appropriate rate(s).

• A formal indirect cost proposal must be submitted and approved. Once approval is granted, charges can then be distributed by means of an indirect cost rate.

• Application of indirect cost rates must be supported by formal accounting records available for auditing.

• Indirect costs (or administrative costs) are no different than direct costs in that they have to be allowable under the federal government cost principles.

54

Page 55: REGULATORY REVIEW

TYPES OF INDIRECT COST RATES

• Predetermined rate - negotiated, usually for one year and not subject to adjustment.

• Fixed rate with carry forward - adjusted in future period.

• Final rate - not subject to adjustment.• Provisional rate - temporarily subject to

adjustment.

55

Page 56: REGULATORY REVIEW

COGNIZANT AGENCY

• Receive the grantee's indirect cost proposal.• Review it in the detail it deems necessary to reach a

conclusion.• Try to reach an agreement with the proposing agency on a

rate both will find acceptable.

56

Page 57: REGULATORY REVIEW

KEY POINTS TO REMEMBER

• Costs included as indirect costs should not also be charged directly to programs.

• All costs could be charged to programs on a direct basis, if one wanted to incur the time and expenses to do so.

• Costs must be allowable under the cost principles.• Funds spent on administrative costs are unavailable for programmatic use.• Funds spent on administrative costs, which are not charged to the

program receiving the benefit, must be paid for by other funds of the agency.

• Many funding sources limit the amount of total administrative costs (direct and indirect).

57

Page 58: REGULATORY REVIEW

CostCategory

A-87State & LocalGovernments

(ProposedRevision)

A-122Nonprofit

Organization

Allowable AllowableWith

Approval

NotAllowable

Accounting X XAdvertising - SpecificPurchases

X X X

Advisory Council X XAlcoholic Beverages X X XAudit Services X XAutomatic data processing X XBad Debts X X XBid and proposal costs(reserved)

X

Bonding Costs X X XBudgeting X XBuilding lease andmanagement

X X

Communication costs X X XCompensation for personalservices

X X X

Contingency provisions X X XContributions X X XDefense and ProsecutionRead Allowability

X X

Depreciation of use allowance X X XDisbursing services X XDonations X XEmployee morale, health andwelfare costs and credits

X X X

Entertainment costs X X X

58

Page 59: REGULATORY REVIEW

Cost

Category

A-87

State & Local Governments

(Proposed Revision)

A-122

Nonprofit Organization

Allowable

Allowable

With Approval

Not

Allowable

Equipment and other capital expenditures

X X X

Fines and penalties X X X Fringe benefits X X X General government expenses X X Goods/services for personal use

X X

Housing and personal living expenses

X X

Lobbying X X X Idle facilities and idle capacity X X X Independent research and development (reserved)

X

Insurance and indemnification X X X Interest, fund-raising, and investment management costs - read the regulations

X X X

Labor relations costs X X Legal expenses X X X Losses on other awards X X X Maintenance and repair costs X X X Materials and supplies X X X Meetings, conferences X X X Memberships, subscriptions and professional activity costs

X X X

Motor pools X X Organization costs X X Overtime, extra pay, shift and multi-shift premiums

X X A-87 A-122

59

Page 60: REGULATORY REVIEW

Cost

Category

A-87

State & Local Governments

(Proposed Revision)

A-122

Nonprofit Organization

Allowable

Allowable

With Approval

Not

Allowable

Page charges in professional journals

X X

Participant support costs X X Patent costs X X Payroll preparation X X Pension plans X X X Personnel administration X X Plant security costs X X Pre-award costs X X X Professional costs X X X Profit and losses on disposition of depreciable property or other capital assets

X X X

Proposal costs X X Publication and printing costs X X A-87 A-122 Rearrangement and alteration costs

X X X

Reconversion costs X X X Recruiting costs X X Relocation costs - subject to limitations

X X

Rental costs X X X Royalties and other costs for use of patents and copyrights

X X

Severance pay X X X Specialized service facilities X X Taxes X X X Termination costs X X Training and education costs X X X Transportation costs X X X Travel costs X X X Trustee Travel and Subsistence X X Under recovery X x 60

Page 61: REGULATORY REVIEW

Monitoring Subgrantees12 Steps To Financial Monitoring

• Step One: Review Financial Policies and Procedures

• Step Two: Review the Procurement Policies• Step Three: Review the Cost Allocation Plan• Step Four: Review the Financial Audit

Report

Page 62: REGULATORY REVIEW

Monitoring Subgrantees12 Steps To Financial Monitoring (con’t)

• Step Five: Review the Planned Production and the Actual Production

• Step Six: Review the Planned Expenditures and the Actual Expenditures

• Step Seven: Validate that the Financial Policies and Procedures are being Adhered to.

• Step Eight: Validate that the Procurement Policies are being Followed

Page 63: REGULATORY REVIEW

Monitoring Subgrantees12 Steps To Financial Monitoring (con’t)

• Step Nine: Validate that the Cost Allocation Plan is applied to all Programs

• Step Ten: Assess if Corrective Action has been taken on all Audit Findings

• Step Eleven: Test Expenditures• Step Twelve: Evaluate Cash on Hand

Page 64: REGULATORY REVIEW

THANK YOU

64