relativity, what is wrong?

23
Time is up 13.05.2005 Relativity, what is wrong? Hartwig Thim Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria

Upload: iman

Post on 23-Jan-2016

46 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Relativity, what is wrong?. Hartwig Thim Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria. Overview. · Principle of relativity (Galilei-Transformation) · Measurement of speed of light (or microwaves) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

Relativity, what is wrong?

Hartwig Thim

Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria

Page 2: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

OverviewPrinciple of relativity (Galilei-Transformation)

Measurement of speed of light (or microwaves)

Medium for propagation = „Ether“ (fundamental frame of reference - Maxwell, Lorentz, Larmor, Ives, Marinov and many others)

Ether: Measurement of Michelson/Morley using interferometry 1881 wrong interpretation: W. Voigt (Göttingen) warns already in 1886

Einstein 1905: there is no ether, therefore light propagation is isotropic with respect to any inertial coordinate system: c = 299.792 km/s

Lorentz -Transformations (space and time are connected to each other)

Consequences: time dilation, length contraction, twin (clock) paradoxon, Cosmic Microwave Background, GPS, relativistic Doppler shift, etc.

Page 3: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

Principle of relativity: two trains leave a railway station

Sun

EAST station WEST Earth (railway station) moves from west to east (at 462 m/s)

If all previous accelerations would be recorded a fundamental frame of reference could be defined!

Page 4: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

z S y P x v x = v.t

A point P (f. e.: a train) moves at v in x- direction.

In its own coordinate system S‘ the point does not move.

Page 5: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

Galilei – Transformationen

The point P (the train) moves at v in x- direction

In its coordinate system S’ the train does not move

Seen from the coordinate system S’ the system S moves at -v in the opposite (-x) direction (mechanical principle of relativity)

In both coordinate systems clocks tick at same rate (t = t‘)

z z’ v t x’ S S’ y y’ P v x x’ x

vtxx ' yy ' zz ' tt '

Page 6: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

Measurement of velocity v• Using light or radio waves (sound is too slow))

• Is there a medium for propagation of em. waves? Before Einstein (1905) everybody agreed: there is a stationary medium, the so-called „Ether“, in which light propagates isotropically at c = 299.792 km/s.

• Does the ether follow the earth‘s motion?

• Michelson und Morley built in 1982 an interferometer in order to detect an „etherwind“ on earth

Page 7: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

Michelson – Morley - Interferometer

mirror etherwind semi-transparent mirror mirror observer

2Δt = L/(c-v)+L/(c+v)=2Lc/(c²-v²)

Page 8: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

Michelson – Morley - Interferometer

tc

tv

Longitudinal:

2Δt = L/(c-v)+L/(c+v)=2Lc/(c²-v²)

Transversal: v²Δt² + L² = c² Δt² —>

²²/22 vcLt

J. P. Wesley (2005): phase velocities must be considered! The square root is wrong! Etherwind cannot be detected IN PRINCIPLE by this method even if one exists!

Woldemar Voigt (1887): Both beams travel at equal times!

NULL – RESULT is observed!

Page 9: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

Michelson – Morley Null result is a classical Doppler effect

J. P. Wesley:

L y x L tc

tv

w a v e i n r e s t f r a m e : )sin( rkt

p h a s e v e l o c i t y : 2/ kkc

G a l i l e i - t r a n s f o r m : tvrr

'

w a v e i n m o v i n g f r a m e :

]')sin[()]'(sin[(' rktvktvrkt

c l a s s i c a l D o p p l e r s h i f t : vk

' p h a s e v e l o c i t y i n m o v i n g f r a m e :

2222 11/''

c

vcc

vk

k

kvk

k

kkkc

l o n g i t u d i n a l :

c

vcc 1' , o u t a n d b a c k :

2

21'

c

vcc

t r a n s v e r s a l :

2

2

2221

/1

cos11'

c

vc

c

cvvcc

c

vcc

c

vccc

Two-way phase velocity is isotropic! An ether cannot be detected by this method!

Page 10: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

W. Voigt 1887:

Page 11: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

)(' vtxx

222 /1/)(' cv

cvxtt zzyy ','

skmccv /000.300/1 221

2222222222 ''''0 tczyxtczyx

22 /1/)(' cvvtxx

vtx / vtx '/'

)''( vtxx

vtxx ' tt ' Galilei-Transformationen

Lorentz - Transformations

Page 12: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

Lorentz-Transformations: The Consequences

• Length contraction (Ehrenfest-Paradoxon)

• Time dilation (Clock- or Twin-Paradoxon, symmetry)

• Transverse Doppler Effect

• GPS (traffic guidance)

Page 13: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

Length contraction

• Moving rods are shorter

• 1. question: a rotating disk should break (Paul Ehrenfest)

• 2. question: which rod contracts? (Car or road hole?)

²/²1' cvxx

Page 14: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

Time dilation

• Moving clocks tick slower

• Moving twin ages slower Question: Which one of the two?????

• Contradictions disappear, if

a) Δt‘ = Δt (Galilei-Tr.) are used or b) absolute frame of reference is used

²/²1'

cvtt

Page 15: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

Transverse Doppler-Shift Rotating antennas

metallische Ringleitung verbindet die Antennen

f f f’’’

Page 16: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

Mikrowellenexperiment circulator 33 GHz monopole antennas disk 1 rectangular wave guide pick-up disk 2 drive 1 attenuator sliding short mixer magic tee drive 2 diode isolator oscilloscope low pass filter (LP)

Page 17: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

Experimental result

Transverse (relativistic) Doppler-shift is not observed, although the sensitivity of the apparatus is found to be sufficient. One measures:

22

22

/1/1

'''cvcv

ffff ''' instead of

Page 18: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

Consequences

• Relativistic (transverse) Doppler shift and, hence, time dilation does not exist

• The Lorentz-Transformations are not ap-plicable, special relativity has been refuted

• A simple experiment is missing which all physicists can reproduce and understand

Page 19: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

Further falsifications • Penzias und Wilson observed already in 1964 an

absolute frame of reference, the so-called Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (our solar sys-tem moves at 360 km/s towards LEO)

• Speed of light is isotropic and equal to c only in the CMB, according to Arno Penzias. The CMB coincides with the center of all masses in our universe. That has been ignored up to date!

• The „simple“ experiment is still missing, for ex.: The measurement of the one-way velocity of light! Michelson has proposed such an experiment already in 1887!

Page 20: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

Measurement of the one-way speed of light Marinov 1975

General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 12, No. 1, pp.57 – 66, 1980

Page 21: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

GPSG r a v i t y :

Eo

RR

RoE RR

RMg

rrd

MMrdFWE

E/12

A b r a h a m , H a s e n ö h r l : 2cMW o P l a n c k : fhW

G r a v i t y : 10

210284,5

/1

ERR

R

c

g

f

f

W

W

S p e c i a l r e l a t i v i t y ( S R ) : 102

2

10819,02

c

vf

f

C o r r e c t i o n t e r m a c t u a l l y u s e d : 1010465,4 G r a v i t a t i o n a l e f f e c t s a r e m u c h l a r g e r t h a n S R e f f e c t s . C l o c k s a r e d a i l y a d j u s t e d ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Page 22: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

Mass Increase (W = mc2) absolute effect (Hasenöhrl 1904, Annalen der Physik)

A A td

mdcAdBDcAdHE

tddW 22 )()(

dmcMdvvdvMvMdvsdtdvMdsdFWd 22)(/)(

22 /1/ cvMMmdMd o

.........//1/ 24832

212222 cvMvMcMcvcMW oooo

The wave is absorbed by a body with mass M. The energy W of the body is increased by dW and its mass M by dm:

A body with mass M is irradiated by an electromagnetic wave:

Page 23: Relativity, what is wrong?

Time is up 13.05.2005

Thank you for your attention